Hong Kong People’s Hong Kong People’s Participation in Participation in Gambling Activities Gambling Activities (2005) (2005) Prepared for Home Affairs Prepared for Home Affairs Bureau Bureau by by Social Sciences Research Social Sciences Research Centre Centre The University of Hong The University of Hong
61
Embed
Hong Kong People ’ s Participation in Gambling Activities (2005) Prepared for Home Affairs Bureau by Social Sciences Research Centre The University of.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Hong Kong People’s Hong Kong People’s Participation in Participation in
Prepared for Home Affairs BureauPrepared for Home Affairs Bureau
byby
Social Sciences Research CentreSocial Sciences Research Centre
The University of Hong KongThe University of Hong Kong
The SurveyThe Survey
Population SurveyPopulation Survey Survey Period: March to April 2005Survey Period: March to April 2005 Survey Coverage: Persons aged 15-64 in Survey Coverage: Persons aged 15-64 in all domestic households in Hong Kong all domestic households in Hong Kong (excluding domestic helpers)(excluding domestic helpers)
Margin of Error of Key Statistics: +/-Margin of Error of Key Statistics: +/-2.1% at 95% confidence level2.1% at 95% confidence level
The SurveyThe Survey
Youth SurveyYouth Survey Survey Period: April to May 2005Survey Period: April to May 2005 Survey Coverage: 48 classes from Survey Coverage: 48 classes from 14 secondary schools, 23 classes 14 secondary schools, 23 classes from VTC from VTC
Who invited/persuaded to Who invited/persuaded to participate in first gamblingparticipate in first gambling
8.0%
6.0%
6.9%
7.0%
12.0%
16.9%
43.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Others
Siblings
Other relatives
Colleagues
Parents or grandparents
I invited others
Friends or schoolmates
Base: n=1720
Reasons for participating in Reasons for participating in first gamblingfirst gambling
5.3%
7.4%
8.4%
9.6%
15.7%
25.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Trying my luck
Killing time
Hoping to win
Entertaining otherpeople
Curiosity
Just for fun
Base: n=1865
Income spent on bettingIncome spent on betting
7.2%
64.6%
11.3%
11.6%
5.3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0%
<5%
5%
10%
Over 10%
Po
rtio
n o
f in
com
e
Base: n=1543
Awareness of the preventive and Awareness of the preventive and remedial measures to address remedial measures to address gambling related problemsgambling related problems
40.6%59.4% Yes
No
Base: N=2093
Type of measuresType of measures
9.2%
10.7%
10.9%
41.2%
88.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Competition and activities
Counseling and treatment services forproblem and pathological gamblers
Website
Posters and banners
TV commercials and docu-drama
Base: n=850
Problem & Pathological gamblingProblem & Pathological gambling
2.2% of respondents indicated that they had 2.2% of respondents indicated that they had experienced five or more of the problems experienced five or more of the problems covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as “probable pathological gamblers”“probable pathological gamblers”
3.1% of respondents indicated that they had 3.1% of respondents indicated that they had experienced three or four of the problems experienced three or four of the problems covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as “probable problem gamblers”“probable problem gamblers”
Most of the identified “probable pathological Most of the identified “probable pathological gamblers” said they experienced the DSM-IV gamblers” said they experienced the DSM-IV problems when betting on problems when betting on Horse Racing, Football Horse Racing, Football Betting, Casino (Macau) and Social GamblingBetting, Casino (Macau) and Social Gambling
Note: DSM-IV is a clinical tool, not a screening tool
Problem & Pathological Problem & Pathological gamblinggambling
1.1% of respondents could be classified as 1.1% of respondents could be classified as pathological gamblers by Dr Leung’s screenpathological gamblers by Dr Leung’s screen
3.2% of respondents could be classified as 3.2% of respondents could be classified as problem gamblers by Dr Leung’s screenproblem gamblers by Dr Leung’s screen
Overall comparison with 2001 – Overall comparison with 2001 – Population SurveyPopulation Survey
2005 2001
Samples size 2 093 respondents aged 15-64
2 004 respondents aged 15-64
Participation in gambling activities (last year)
81.1% 78.0%
The three most popular forms of gambling in HK
Mark Six (68.6%)Social gambling (47.4%)
Horse racing (25.2%)
Mark Six (64.2%)Social gambling (45.9%)
Horse racing (30.4%)
Participation in legal gambling 80.4% 77.8%
Participation in illegal gambling 2.1% 4.2%
Pathological gamblers 2.2% 1.8%
Problem gamblers 3.1% 4.0%
Participation in gambling Participation in gambling activities (last year) compared activities (last year) compared
with 2001with 2001
12.1%
1.30%
30.4%
45.9%
64.2%
15.8%
16.3%
25.2%
47.4%
68.6%
1.60%
0.40%
1.00%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Casino (Macau)
Football betting withlocal book makers
Football betting withoffshore book makers
Football betting withHKJC
Horse racing withHKJC
Social Gambling
Mark Six
2005(N=2093)
2001(N=2004)
Participation in gambling Participation in gambling activities (last year) compared activities (last year) compared
with 2001with 2001
4.2%
78.0%
2.1%
80.4%
77.8%
81.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Illegal
Legal
Overall
2005(N=2093)
2001(N=2004)
Amount spent on gambling Amount spent on gambling activities activities (per month)(per month)
Problem & Pathological gamblingProblem & Pathological gambling(Students aged 12-19 of secondary (Students aged 12-19 of secondary
schools only)schools only) 1.3% of respondents indicated that they had 1.3% of respondents indicated that they had
experienced five or more of the problems experienced five or more of the problems covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as “probable pathological gamblers”as “probable pathological gamblers”
1.3% of respondents indicated that they had 1.3% of respondents indicated that they had experienced three or four of the problems experienced three or four of the problems covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified covered by the DSM-IV and can be classified as “probable problem gamblers”as “probable problem gamblers”
Most of the identified “probable pathological Most of the identified “probable pathological gamblers” said they experienced the DSM-IV gamblers” said they experienced the DSM-IV problems when betting on problems when betting on Mark Six, Football Mark Six, Football Betting, Social Gambling and cussecBetting, Social Gambling and cussec
Note: DSM-IV is a clinical tool, not a screening tool
1.3% of respondents could be classified as 1.3% of respondents could be classified as pathological gamblers by Dr Leung’s screenpathological gamblers by Dr Leung’s screen
0.8% of respondents could be classified as 0.8% of respondents could be classified as problem gamblers by Dr Leung’s screenproblem gamblers by Dr Leung’s screen
Awareness of preventive and Awareness of preventive and remedial measures to address remedial measures to address gambling related problemsgambling related problems
41.9%58.1% Yes
No
Base: n=2019
Type of measuresType of measures
15.2%
20.5%
20.9%
55.9%
73.9%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Competition and activities
Website
Counseling and treatment services forproblem and pathological gamblers
Posters and banners
TV commercials and docu-drama
Base: n=790
Family’s reactions to Family’s reactions to participation in gambling participation in gambling
activitiesactivities
4.9%
9.8%
9.9%
11.9%
12.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
They support me
They persuade me to gamble less
They don't know that I gamble
They give me advices on gambling
They feel calm
Base: n=679 (who had participated in any gambling activities within last year)
Comparison with 2001– Youth Comparison with 2001– Youth SurveySurvey
2005 2001
Survey coverageSecondary schools and VTC
classesSecondary schools
Samples size1 939 students (1496 for secondary schools) aged between 12-19
2 000 respondents aged between 13-18
Participation in gambling (last year)
32.3% (34.0% for secondary schools
only)53.8%
The three most popular forms of gambling
Social gambling :22.9% (24.5% for secondary schools
only)Mark Six :13.8%
(15.0% for secondary schools only)
Football betting with HKJC :7.0% ( 6.8% for secondary schools only)
Social gambling (49.2%)Mark Six (19.4%)
Horse racing (9.2%)
Pathological gamblers1.5%
(1.3% for secondary schools only)2.6%
Problem gamblers1.1%
(1.3% for secondary schools only)4.5%
Participation in gambling Participation in gambling activities as compared with 2001 activities as compared with 2001
– Mark Six – Mark Six (secondary schools only)(secondary schools only)
(ii) Family members of pathological gamblers(ii) Family members of pathological gamblers
(iii) Social gamblers(iii) Social gamblers
(iv) Youth (aged 18-24)(iv) Youth (aged 18-24)
(v) Students (aged 18 or below)(v) Students (aged 18 or below)
Pathological gamblersPathological gamblers Reasons and causes of pathological Reasons and causes of pathological gambling:gambling:
Winning brings good emotionsWinning brings good emotions Believing that they have control over the Believing that they have control over the situation and other peoplesituation and other people
Greed Greed Hoping to get ahead Hoping to get ahead Not satisfied with current life or jobNot satisfied with current life or job
Chasing lossesChasing losses Becoming a habitBecoming a habit ExcitementExcitement
Pathological gamblersPathological gamblers Behaviours and consequencesBehaviours and consequences
““Gambling marathon” Gambling marathon” Not going to work/not going homeNot going to work/not going home
Lying/cheatingLying/cheating Anxiousness, loneliness, headache, loss of Anxiousness, loneliness, headache, loss of appetite, unstable emotions, insomnia, etc. appetite, unstable emotions, insomnia, etc.
Loss of relationships and jobsLoss of relationships and jobs Financial hardships Financial hardships $ from family members, $ from family members, relatives, friends, loan sharks, banks, etc.relatives, friends, loan sharks, banks, etc.
Family members of pathological Family members of pathological gamblersgamblers Perceived reasons and causes of Perceived reasons and causes of pathological gambling:pathological gambling:
HKJC’s or casinos’ adsHKJC’s or casinos’ ads Media and friends’ influenceMedia and friends’ influence Gamblers’ character – e.g. no personal goal, no direction in Gamblers’ character – e.g. no personal goal, no direction in life, easily influenced by other people, low self-esteem, etc.life, easily influenced by other people, low self-esteem, etc.
Gamblers’ values – e.g. $ is very importantGamblers’ values – e.g. $ is very important
Gamblers’ first gambling experienceGamblers’ first gambling experience
Gamblers’ family background Gamblers’ family background
Family members of pathological Family members of pathological gamblersgamblers Consequences caused by the Consequences caused by the pathological family memberpathological family member
Loan sharks approaching home Loan sharks approaching home Financial hardships of the family – e.g. no $ to Financial hardships of the family – e.g. no $ to pay for daily expensespay for daily expenses
Loss of trust – keep on breaking promisesLoss of trust – keep on breaking promises Loneliness, embarrassment (when neighbors/relatives discovered Loneliness, embarrassment (when neighbors/relatives discovered the issue), unstable emotions, helplessness, hopelessness, etc.the issue), unstable emotions, helplessness, hopelessness, etc.
Loss of relationships Loss of relationships
Social gamblersSocial gamblers Reasons for participation in gambling:Reasons for participation in gambling:
The process brings good emotions – happy, The process brings good emotions – happy, exciting, etc.exciting, etc.
Releasing pressureReleasing pressure A kind of entertainment & social activityA kind of entertainment & social activity
Checking their skills on a game Checking their skills on a game
Wanting to know if good predictions madeWanting to know if good predictions made
Attractive pool size & special tipsAttractive pool size & special tips
Special ads and variety of playing methodsSpecial ads and variety of playing methods
Social gamblersSocial gamblers Difference with pathological gamblersDifference with pathological gamblers
Gambling won’t lead to prosperity Gambling won’t lead to prosperity
Better self control – gambling on an affordable Better self control – gambling on an affordable amount, set $ limit, etc.amount, set $ limit, etc.
Can’t afford the great loss in $ and the Can’t afford the great loss in $ and the consequences caused by problem gamblingconsequences caused by problem gambling
No chasing losses No chasing losses
YouthYouth Reasons for participation in gambling:Reasons for participation in gambling:
Family and cultural influence – parents thinks Family and cultural influence – parents thinks it’s normalit’s normal
Social function/entertainmentSocial function/entertainment Exciting and funExciting and fun Attractive pool size Attractive pool size Other perceived reasons (not personal reasons): winning in first gambling, Other perceived reasons (not personal reasons): winning in first gambling, attractive ads, chasing losses, wanting to win $ to improve standards of attractive ads, chasing losses, wanting to win $ to improve standards of living, etc.living, etc.
StudentsStudents Reasons for participation in gambling:Reasons for participation in gambling:
Parents’ and friends’ influence – think gambling Parents’ and friends’ influence – think gambling is normal for the Chinese cultureis normal for the Chinese culture
Gambling is funGambling is fun A kind of entertainment & social activity – A kind of entertainment & social activity – improve relationships and communicationimprove relationships and communication
WinningWinning Losing – chasing lossesLosing – chasing losses Special tips and oddsSpecial tips and odds