Top Banner
Home Networking Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002 18 September 2002
17

Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Home NetworkingHome Networking

prepared for

FCCTechnical Advisory Committee

18 September 200218 September 2002

Page 2: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Broadband Way(Yesterday vs. Tomorrow)

• 1 cable modem/3 mo• 568 user network• 2400 Bps connectivity• $18,000 per unit• Data only• Luxury feature

• 1 cable modem/0.1 sec

• 100 million users• 100,000,000 bps• Less than $10 per unit• Video, data, voice• Key element of life

1988 2010

In North America, installing a cable modem every 8 seconds and a DSL modem every

16 seconds

Page 3: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Home NetworkingThree Dimensions

Applicatio

ns

IndustryEfforts

Network Technologie

s

Page 4: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Network Technologies• Connections

– Wired vs. wireless• Power line, phone line, dedicated line, wireless

– Synchronous, asynchronous

• Carry IP and MPEG• Some do it “better” than others

– Faster throughput, Lower latency– Native QoS– More reliable– Easier to install– RF / electrical integrity– Wireless spectrum issues

Technology– IEEE 802.3– IEEE 802.11– HomePlug™– HomeRF™– HomePNA™– Bluetooth™– IEEE 1394– UWB – Etc.

Applications and the Marketplace will shake this out

Applications

IndustryEfforts

Network Technologi

es

Page 5: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Technology Survey

Other considerations: Native QoS ? Security ?

peak distanceBW (Mbps) limit (m)

IEEE 1394a 400 5UWB 100 - 500 10IEEE 802.11a 54 50HomeRF™ 2.0 20 50HomePlug™ 1.0 14 300IEEE 802.11b 11 100HomePNA™ 2.0 10 30010Base-T 10 100Bluetooth™ 1 10

Page 6: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

What kind of home networking technology and equipment is installed in your home?

10Base-T (95.4%)

802.11b (0.9%)

HPNA (0.5%)

HomePlug (0.4%)

Home RF (0.3%)

Other (1.0%)

Not sure (1.5%)

Home NetworkTechnology in the Field

(n=778)

© Parks Associates 2001

Page 7: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Length of Time Networked

How long have your computers been networked?

5+ years (10%)

3 - 5 years (10%)

2 - 3 years (19%)

1 - 2 years (26%)

0.5 - 1 years (18%)

< 0.5 year (17%)

(n=778)

© Parks Associates 2001

Focus on PCs for now, not Multimedia (yet)

Over 60% in just the last 2 years

Page 8: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Applications

• Video Streaming (500 kbps – 5 Mbps)• Telemetry (up to 300 kbps)• Web Surfing/E-mail (up to 200 kbps)• Streaming (up to 200 kbps)• Fast-twitch games (up to 128 kbps)• Voice (up to 128 kbps)• Meter reading (bps)• Toggling a light switch (bps)

New stuff every day, and higher bandwidth

Applications– web– email– calendar– games– audio– video– voice– home

automation– home security

Applications

IndustryEfforts

Network Technologi

es

Page 9: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Bandwidth Needs• Yesterday

– low bandwidth• E.g., designed for 56 kbps dialup

– Symmetric: email (no attachments)– Asymmetric: web browsing

• Today– High bandwidth, moving toward symmetry– but mainly store and forward

• digital images• Peer-to-peer

• Tomorrow– Real-time streaming (controlled latency and jitter)– Prioritized

Page 10: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Gross Traffic is Nearly Symmetric• Average up/downstream data flow symmetry

is 1.4– Data flow has been fairly stable since September

2001

Symmetry

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

May-01 Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01

Symmetry

• Average individual user symmetry (independent of volume) is 4:1• 30% of users have more upstream than downstream use• Symmetry tends to increase as use increases Data flow symmetry is skewed by big users

Page 11: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

More on Symmetry and Traffic• Traffic breakdown of a major ISP

– Backbone traffic = 26 Gbps– 17 Gbps into homes, 9 Gbps out of homes

• Symmetry = 1 : 1.8– 34% peer-to-peer– 27% web– 18% net news

– 21% other

– 50% of sub’s use only 5% of the bandwidth– Other 50% of sub’s use 95% of the

bandwidthNationwide footprint – August 2002

Page 12: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Industry Efforts

• Ad Hoc Network– Consumer runs the home network

• Finds their own services

• Managed Network– Network– Services– Network + Services

Efforts– Zeroconf– UPnP™– OSGi™– CableHome™– ITU SG 9– CEA R7.3

(VHN)– HAVi– BlueTooth™– Jini™

Differing Semantics, Consumer Choice

Applications

IndustryEfforts

Network Technologi

es

Page 13: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Group Details• ZeroConf

– no centralized configuration, management, or administration

• UPnP™– IP and A/V services, on the home network

• OSGi™– offering services over any IP network

• CableHome™– IP and A/V, home network and access network services

• BlueTooth™– IP home network services using BlueTooth wireless

• VHN– CEA standards committee R7.4. Adopted UPnP + extensions

• HAVi– audio/video home network services using IEEE1394

• Jini™– Requires adopting JAVA as the implementation language

Page 14: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Compare/contrast

• ITU Study Group 9– ITU J.191 (Draft)

• Managed networking • Basic Residential Gateway (centralized data

store)– DHCP, DNS, NAT, Firewall, etc.

• IETF Zero Configuration Working Group– ad hoc networking – No centralized servers or data stores

Page 15: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Access Network+

service provider+

Internet

X.10

analog

10B-T

ITU J.191 Network - enabling services

DHCP, DNS, NAT, Firewall, etc. configured by service provider

1394

Power line

Phone line

Page 16: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

10B-T

ZeroConf Network - enabling IP networks

1394

Power line

Phone line

Internet

Simple Ethernet switch configured by user

Page 17: Home Networking prepared for FCC Technical Advisory Committee 18 September 2002.

Home Networking Summary

• Choice aboundsApplications

IndustryEfforts

Network Technologi

es

Industry Efforts– Zeroconf– UPnP™– OSGi™– CableHome™– ITU SG 9– CEA R7.3

(VHN)– HAVi– BlueTooth™– Jini™– Etc.

Technology– IEEE 802.3– IEEE 802.11– HomePlug™– HomeRF™– HomePNA™– Bluetooth™– IEEE 1394– UWB– Etc.

But what is easy to do and adds value ?

Applications– web– email– calendar– gaming– audio– video– voice– home

automation– home security– Etc.