Top Banner
Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009 Spitzer LVL Luminosity- and Mass-Metallicity Relations for Star-Forming Dwarf Galaxies in the Local Volume “Galaxy Metabolism”, Sydney - 23 June 2009 Henry Lee (Gemini Observatory) Liese van Zee (Indiana University) Evan Skillman (University of Minnesota) Janice Lee (Carnegie Observatories) Rob Kennicutt (Cambridge University) and the LVL Team 1
30

HL Galaxy Metabolism

Jun 24, 2015

Download

Education

Henry Lee

Contributed talk at "Galaxy Metabolism" meeting in Sydney, Australia (2009). I'm disappointed there is no "science" category on Slideshare.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Spitzer LVL Luminosity- and Mass-Metallicity Relationsfor Star-Forming Dwarf Galaxies in the Local Volume

“Galaxy Metabolism”, Sydney - 23 June 2009

• Henry Lee (Gemini Observatory)

• Liese van Zee (Indiana University)

• Evan Skillman (University of Minnesota)

• Janice Lee (Carnegie Observatories)

• Rob Kennicutt (Cambridge University)

• and the LVL Team

1

Page 2: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Pre-lunch themes

“Ingestion, digestion, excretion”

2

Page 3: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Pre-lunch themes

“Ingestion, digestion, excretion”

2

Page 4: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Pre-lunch themes

“Ingestion, digestion, excretion”

• e.g., Heavens, Noeske, Hopkins :★ SFR density maximum at z ~ 1★ SFH of galaxies are mass-dependent (“downsizing”)

2

Page 5: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Pre-lunch themes

“Ingestion, digestion, excretion”

• e.g., Heavens, Noeske, Hopkins :★ SFR density maximum at z ~ 1★ SFH of galaxies are mass-dependent (“downsizing”)

“A Nurturing Environment”

• Cole : “free-range, organic, pesticide-free (galaxies)...”

• e.g., Cooper :★ Some scatter in high-mass M-Z (SDSS T04) correlated with

local environment

2

Page 6: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Why low-mass galaxies are important

• Most abundant galaxy-type : “building blocks” ?• Representative of conditions present in early universe ?• Detailed SFHs from CMDs and resolved stellar populations• Ongoing assembly in MW, M31 : stellar-streams, new dwarfs ...• Galactic archaeology : oldest, lowest-Z stars• ISM metallicity evolution tied to dust evolution• Possible candidate-hosts to distant gamma ray bursts

• e.g., Bland-Hawthorn, Karlsson, Cole, Guhathakurta, Zucker, Yeh, Lopez-Sanchez, Levesque, Muller, ...

3

Page 7: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Why low-mass galaxies are important

• Nearest dwarfs show great diversity in properties & SFH• Despite low-M, dwarfs sufficiently robust to form stars steadily

• Evolution a combination of low-SF + metals-loss ?• Can environment hasten the evolution of low-M galaxies?

3

Page 8: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Why low-mass galaxies are important

• Nearest dwarfs show great diversity in properties & SFH• Despite low-M, dwarfs sufficiently robust to form stars steadily

• Evolution a combination of low-SF + metals-loss ?• Can environment hasten the evolution of low-M galaxies?

Detailed studies of nearby dwarf galaxies help tie down a picture of galaxy evolution at low-M and at low-z.

3

Page 9: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

“Personal diets (& lunch with friends)”

• Processes associated with galaxy assembly

✴ Conversion of gas into stars ? Galactic winds ?✴ At given epoch, SFH & gas flows affect mass and metallicity

✴ Luminosity-metallicity (L-Z) commonly used as proxy for mass-metallicity (M-Z) ...

✴ L-Z stronger correlation than vs. Mdyn, vs MHI

4

Page 10: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

L-Z for Nearby Dwarf Galaxies

• Gas-rich galaxies : ✴ Lequeux et al. 1979✴ Skillman et al. 1989✴ Zaritsky et al. 1994✴ Richer & McCall 1995✴ Garnett 2002✴ HL et al. 2003✴ van Zee et al. 2006✴ HL et al. 2006

H. Lee et al. 2006 (N=27)

5

Page 11: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

L-Z & M-Z Relations

• Collections of galaxies at z > 1 :✴ e.g., Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2003;

Savaglio et al. 2005; Erb et al. 2006; Maiolino et al. 2008; Rodrigues et al. 2008; Hayashi et al. 2008; Perez-Montero et al. 2008; Lamareille et al. 2008; note also Monday’s talks ...

• Recent models :✴ e.g., Brooks et al. 2007; Cid

Fernandes et al. 2007; Davé & Oppenheimer 2007; De Rossi et al 2007; Köppen et al. 2007; Ellison et al. 2008; Erb 2008; Baldry et al. 2008; Bertone et al. 2008; Bovil & Ricotti 2008; Vale Asari et al. 2009; ...

Mannucci & Maiolino 2008

6

Page 12: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Why 3.6, 4.5 µm

• Near-infrared : 1-5 µm✴ tracer of underlying stellar mass✴ minimize extinction by dust✴ minimize how light from recent SF affects L, Mstar/L✴ contributions by PAHs or hot dust not significant

(e.g., Jackson et al. 2006)

7

Page 13: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Why 3.6, 4.5 µm

Galliano et al. 2005

7

Page 14: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Why 3.6, 4.5 µm

Galliano et al. 2005

7

Page 15: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Why 3.6, 4.5 µm

1 µm 10 µm

stars

PAHs

VSGs BGs

7

Page 16: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Why 3.6, 4.5 µm

1 µm 10 µm

stars

PAHs

VSGs BGs

3.6+

4.5µm

7

Page 17: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Local Volume Legacy Survey : D < 11 Mpc (z < 0.003)

J. Lee et

8

Page 18: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Local Volume Legacy Survey : D < 11 Mpc (z < 0.003)

UGC 5829 (DDO 84); Dale et al. 2009

8

Page 19: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Local Volume Legacy Survey : D < 11 Mpc (z < 0.003)

UGC 8320 (DDO 168)Halpha3.6 µm24 µm

Dale et al. 2009

8

Page 20: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

The numbers, before plots

• B, J, H, K, [3.6], [4.5] luminosities : Dale et al. 2009✴ Stellar masses, using Bell & de Jong 2001✴ Different “combinations” for Mstar vary by ~0.2 dex

• ~50 dwarf irregular galaxies with reliable metallicities✴ [O III] 4363 measurements✴ Temperatures and direct measures of (O/H)

• M-Z, with M = Mstar commonly seen in models

9

Page 21: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

The numbers, before plots

• B, J, H, K, [3.6], [4.5] luminosities : Dale et al. 2009✴ Stellar masses, using Bell & de Jong 2001✴ Different “combinations” for Mstar vary by ~0.2 dex

• ~50 dwarf irregular galaxies with reliable metallicities✴ [O III] 4363 measurements✴ Temperatures and direct measures of (O/H)

• M-Z, with M = Mstar commonly seen in models

• Dekel & Silk (1986); Dekel & Woo (2003):✴ Z ∝ Ln, where n = 0.3 to 0.4✴ log Z ~ m log L, where m = 0.12 to 0.16

9

Page 22: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

L-Z relation, B

HL et al., in prep.

solar

10

Page 23: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

λ a b R σ

B -0.149 5.67 -0.80 0.15

J -0.147 5.44 -0.81 0.14

H -0.156 5.21 -0.77 0.16

K -0.152 5.24 -0.75 0.17

[3.6] -0.135 5.53 -0.85 0.14

[4.5] -0.132 5.36 -0.84 0.14

12+log(O/H) = a M! + b

11

Page 24: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Observed M-Z : Mstar < 1010 Msun

HL et al., in prep.

12

Page 25: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Observed M-Z : Mstar < 1010 Msun

HL et al., in prep.

Z ∝ Ln ∝ Mstarn, n = 0.3-0.4

12

Page 26: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Metals loss (1)

Tremonti et al. 2004 Simple model for chemical evolution:

ZO = yO ln (1 + Mstar/Mgas)

yeff = ZO / ln (1 + Mstar/Mgas)

13

Page 27: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Metals loss (1)

Tremonti et al. 2004HL et al, in prep.

13

Page 28: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Metals loss (1)

Tremonti et al. 2004HL et al, in prep.

50% loss

90% loss

13

Page 29: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

mass-dependent SF efficiencycf. Baldry et al. 2008

Z = -y ln(μ) = -y ln(Mgas/Mb)

ε ≡ Mstar/Mb = 1 - Mgas/Mb

= 1 - exp(-Z/y)

ε = M/(M+M0) * (ε0-ε1)+ ε1

ε1 ~ 0.01-0.1ε0 ~ 0.8log(M0/Msun) ~ 109.6

Grazing (2)

14

Page 30: HL Galaxy Metabolism

Galaxy Ontogeny : 23 Jun 2009

Consumibles• Spitzer Local Volume Legacy Survey :

✴ providing uniformity in galaxy L (and SF measures)✴ high-quality (O/H) from measured temperatures

• L-Z with N=50 : B, J, H, K, [3.6], [4.5] :✴ slope decreases a little with increasing wavelength✴ dispersion not significantly different from optical to NIR

• M-Z with Mstar derived at each wavelength✴ M-Z from B to [4.5] are indistinguishable✴ extending SDSS M-Z down to ~106.5 Mstar

• Mass-dependent SFE (“grazing”) & modest winds can account for L-Z, M-Z for dwarfs (Mstar < 1010 Msun)

15