Hitra Procedure Kz01 Cg Pro 53 0113 a02

8/17/2019 Hitra Procedure Kz01 Cg Pro 53 0113 a02

1/41

KhazzanProject

Security Classification:

Contract No. CO-BPXO-12-0376Project nternal

Khazzan Commissioning

Hazard Identification and Task Risk Assessment

(HITRA) Procedure (CPF)


2/41

!"a##an Project Co$$issionin% &a#ar' 'entification an' (as) *is) +ssess$ent ,CP

Revision Histor

Amendment

!ate

Revision

"um#er

Amender

Initia$sAmendment

2/022016 +01 *(

Re$ated !ocuments

!ocument "um#er !ocument "ame !escri%tion of Content

Petrofac ol'en *ules of

Safety

!01-C-P*O-3-0107!"a##an Co$$issionin%

Control of 4or)

Co$$issionin% s5ecific Co4 5rocess inclu'in% Pt4 an'

+ut"orisations

!01-S+-PN-3-000 $er%ency *es5onse 8

Crisis 9ana%e$ent Plan

!01-C-P*O-3-0111 ner%y solation

Proce'ure

!"a##an Project Co$$issionin% ner%y solation 5roce'ure


3/41


CS Confine' S5ace ntry

PO BP lo


4/41


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................

1.1. P=*POS......................................................................................................................................

1.2. SCOP...........................................................................................................................................

2.0. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES............................................................................

2.1. SN PON( O +CCO=N(+B(@.........................................................................................

2.2. S( +=(&O*(@..........................................................................................................................

2.3. +*+ +=(&O*(@.........................................................................................................................

2./. +*+ +=(&O*(@ SN+(....................................................................................................

2.. P*O*9N +=(&O*(@..........................................................................................................

2.6. *SPONSB(S O &(*+ +C(+(O*S..........................................................................

2.6.1. &(*+ > 1 +C(+(O* ,(@PC+@ P+ 10

2.6.2. &(*+ > 2 +C(+(O* ,(@PC+@ ++ O* *P*SN(+(> *O9

(& &S S( (+9 10

3.0. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND TASK RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................................

3.1. (+S! *S! +SSSS9N( >S............................................................................................

3.2. &(*+ P*OCSS S(PS............................................................................................................

3.3. > 1 &(*+ P*OCSS..........................................................................................................

3 / > 2 &(*+ P*OCSS


5/41


APPENDI% D RISK ASSESSMENT MATRI%......................................................................

APPENDI% E APPROVAL MATRI%..................................................................................

APPENDI% F TASK RISK ASSESSMENT TABLE #TRAT$.....................................................

APPENDI% G LEVEL 1 RISK ASSESSMENT PRO FORMA...................................................

APPENDI% H HITRA FORM...........................................................................................


6/41


1.0. INTRODUCTION

&a#ar' 'entification an' (as) *is) +ssess$ent ,&(*+ is use' 'urin% t"e 5lannin% an' e?ecution sta%esof Co$$issionin% Control of 4or) ,Co4 to i'entify "a#ar's associate' ;it" 5erfor$in% tas)s. t 5rescri


7/41



8/41


2.0. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

2.1.S-/+ P)- ) A)&--5!"a##an CP &(*+ Sin%le Point of +ccounta


9/41


2.3.A'+ A&6)'-5

("e +rea +ut"ority ,++ role is central to t"e site Co4 5rocess for t"e $ana%e$ent an' control of Co4

tas)s. ++s are accounta


10/41


("e P+ can


11/41


• nsure t"at all $e$


12/41


o Bloc)in% of esca5e routes

o (a)in% a fire 5u$5 or e$er%ency %enerator offline

Note, safety critical performance shall be considered with respect to the hazards present in a

Commissioning, pre hydrocarbon environment.

• Online connections to 5rocess eHui5$ent tan)s or 5i5elines inclu'in% "ot ta55in%.

• Planne' 'eiation fro$ an e?istin% 5olicy 5roce'ure or 5ractice.

9ore e?a$5les of actiities an' ;"et"er t"ey ;arrant eel 1 or eel 2 assess$ent are inclu'e' in t"e

(*+( +55en'i? .

3.2.HITRA P')+** S+(*

• Identif the site and %rocess hazards t"at coul' result in "ar$ suc" as injury illness 'a$a%e to t"e

eniron$ent 5lant or 5rocess

• Identif riskL 'eter$ine t"e cre'i


13/41


("is a55roac" s"all also


14/41


3.4.L+8+ 2 HITRA P')+**

+ eel 2 &(*+ is a structure' e?a$ination of all "a#ar's associate' ;it" a tas) to 'eise a set of control

$easures t"at re'uce t"e leel of ris) sufficiently to allo; a tas) to 5rocee' safely. f t"e ris) cannot


15/41


",T:1 ("rou%" Co$$issionin% t"e aentilatin% an' +ir Con'itionin% ,&>+C inta)es

o lare "ea'er

o $er%ency S"ut o;n >ales ,S>s

o sca5e routes fire 5u$5s lar%e inentories ,5i5elines essels or tan)s


16/41


or e?a$5le i$5act leel an' 5ro


17/41


Consi'eration s"oul'


18/41


Residua$ Risk Check

+. f t"e resi'ual ris) is not at a leel to allo; t"e tas) to


19/41


• eel e$5o;ere' ,an' o


20/41


Before selection for trainin% eel 2 &(*+ acilitators s"oul'


21/41


".0. TASK RISK ASSESSMENT TABLE #TRAT$

(*+( lists ty5ical Co$$issionin% actiities 5rescri


22/41


APPENDI% A ENERGY SOURCE PROMPTS

:nergsources

!escri%tion ? guidance

Biolo%ical

@io$ogica$ - inclu'in% ;il'life an' iruses or


23/41


:nergsources

!escri%tion ? guidance

Noise

"oise - + for$ of 5ressure ener%y.

Consi'eration s"oul'


24/41


APPENDI% B HAZARD IDENTIFICATION PROMPTS

C+/)'5 T5(+ ) 6'7 E>7(+*9ec"anical (ra55in% ,crus"in% 5ressin% 'ra;in% in

an' s"earin% injuries

(;o $oin% 5arts or one $oin%

5art an' a fi?e' surface

Coneyor


25/41


C+/)'5 T5(+ ) 6'7 E>7(+*

&y'ro-


26/41


C+/)'5 T5(+ ) 6'7 E>7(+*

$ec"anical failure C"ain slin%

Scaffol' oerloa'

Structure oerloa' es5ecially

e?tre$e ;eat"er

ire e?5losion

Co$


27/41


C+/)'5 T5(+ ) 6'7 E>7(+*

Poisonin% (o?ins

+ll "ar$ful aerosols

Pollute' ;ater

Conta$inate' foo' an' 'rin)

&a#ar's


28/41

!"a##an Project Co$$issionin% &a#ar' 'entification an' (as) *is) +ssess$ent

APPENDI% C IMPACT ASSESSMENT TABLE

S+8+'-5 H+6 ; S+5 E8-')7+

A

(evels A-)maintain the

visibility ofrisks with thepotential forcatastrophicimpact even if theirprobability ofoccurrence ise*tremely low.

!he upperlevel of thisframework isde+ned by themost severelevel of impactever seen inindustry.

)omparable to the most catastrophichealthsafety incidents ever seen in industry.

!he potential for or more fatalities $or onset

of life threatening health eects% shall alwaysbe classi+ed at this level.

• /uture impact, e.g., unintended release, with widespread damage to any

environment and which remains in an 0unsatisfactory0 state for a period 1 2

years.

• /uture impact with e*tensive damage to a sensitive environment and which

remains in an 0unsatisfactory0 state for a period 1 2 years.

• /uture impact with widespread damage to a sensitive environment and

which can only be restored to a 0satisfactory0agreed state in a period of more

than and up to 2 years.

B

)atastrophic healthsafety incident causing verywidespread fatalities within or outside a facility.

!he potential for 2 or more fatalities $or onsetof life threatening health eects% shall alwaysbe classi+ed at this level.

• /uture impact with e*tensive damage to a non-sensitive environment and

which remains in an 0unsatisfactory0 state for a period 1 2 years.


can only be restored to a 0satisfactory0agreed state in a period of more than

and up to 2 years.

• /uture impact with widespread damage to a non-sensitive environment andwhich can only be restored to a 0satisfactory0agreed state in a period of more


• /uture impact with widespread damage to a sensitive environment and

which can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of around year.

C

)atastrophic healthsafety incident causingwidespread fatalities within or outside a facility.

!he potential for or more fatalities $or onsetof life threatening health eects% shall alwaysbe classi+ed at this level.


which can only be restored to a 0satisfactory0agreed state in a period of more


• /uture impact with widespread damage to a non-sensitive environment and



can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of around year.• /uture impact with widespread damage to a sensitive environment and

which can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of months.

Every employee associate with this project has the ultimate responsibility for Health, Safety, Security & Environmental performance. This will be achieved through a positive HSSE culture at all the levels and by implementing a robust HSSE Management system. etrofac and its Sub!"ontractor management will continually strivetowards reducing HSSE ris#s to $s %ow $s easonably ractical '$%$( in all its operations to achieve the roject HSSE goals.

K'*C+*PR,*-.*. Page /6 of 0 Rev1 A/

Project nternal


29/41


S+8+'-5 H+6 ; S+5 E8-')7+

D

#ery ma3or healthsafety incident

!he potential for 4 or more fatalities $or onset of life threateninghealth eects% shall always be classi+ed at this level.

4 or more in3uries or health eects, either permanent orrequiring hospital treatment for more than 56 hours.



• /uture impact with locali7ed damage to a sensitive environment and which

can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of around year.

• /uture impact with widespread damage to a non-sensitive environment and



can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of months.

E

8a3or healthsafety incident

or 5 fatalities, acute or chronic, actual or alleged.

or more in3uries or health eects, either permanent orrequiring hospital treatment for more than 56 hours.

• /uture impact with locali7ed damage to a non-sensitive environment and




• /uture impact with locali7ed damage to a sensitive environment and which

can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of months.


can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of days or weeks.

F

9igh impact healthsafety incident

:ermanent partial disability$ies%

&everal non-permanent in3uries or health impacts.

;ays Away /rom


30/41


S+8+'-5 H+6 ; S+5 E8-')7+

/irst aid

&ingle or multiple over-e*posures causing noticeable irritation butno actual health eects

and which can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of days or

weeks.

K'*C+*PR,*-.*. Page . of 0 Rev1 A/

Project nternal


31/41


S+8+'-5 N)?=- B&*-+** I7(F-- I7(

$equipment damage, business valuelost%

A:ublic or investor outrage on a global scale.

!hreat of global loss of license to operate.1=5 billion

B

(oss of license to operate a ma3or asset in a ma3or market > ?&, @?, Russia.

Intervention from ma3or 'overnment > ?&, ?, @?, Russia.

:ublic or investor outrage in ma3or western markets > ?&, @?.

;amage to relationships with key stakeholders of bene+t to the 'roup.

=2 billion - =5 billion

C

(oss of license to operate other material asset, or severe enforcement action against a ma3or asset in a ma3ormarket.

Intervention from other ma3or 'overnment.

:ublic or investor outrage in other material market where we have presence or aspiration.

= billion - =2 billion

D

&evere enforcement action against a material asset in a non-ma3or market, or against other assets in a ma3ormarket.

Interventions from non-ma3or 'overnments.

:ublic or investor outrage in a non-ma3or market, or localised or limited Binterest-groupC outrage in a ma3ormarket.

:rolonged adverse national or international media attention.


32/41


APPENDI% D RISK ASSESSMENT MATRI%

/ . 0 - 3 5 6

Im%act8eve$

A similarevent has

not yetoccurred inour industryand wouldonly be aremote

possibility.

A similarevent has

not yetoccurred inour industry.

Similarevent hasoccurred

somewherein our

industry.

Similarevent hasoccurred

somewhere within theBP Group.

A similarevent has

occurred, oris likely to

occur, within thelifetime of10 similar

facilities.

ikely tooccur onceor twice inthe facilitylifetime.

!vent likelyto occurseveral

times in thefacility

lifetime.

"ommonoccurrence

#at leastannually$ atthe facility.

A 6 7 / . 0 -

Area

@ 5 6 7 / . 0

C 3 5 6 7 / .

! - 3 5 6 7 /

: 0 - 3 5 6 7 Area

I

F . 0 - 3 5 6 7 Area

III

+ / . 0 - 3 5 6 7Area

II

Area


33/41


APPENDI% E APPROVAL MATRI%

Residua$ risk =inimum $eve$ of a%%rova$

Area Not allo;e'

Area I Not foreseen 'urin% co$$issionin% 5"ase

Area III Project irector

Area II Co$$issionin% 9ana%er e5uty Co$$issionin% 9ana%er

Area I Site +ut"ority


34/41


APPENDI% F TASK RISK ASSESSMENT TABLE #TRAT$

("e follo;in% ta


35/41


Risk area I

e%en': C4 ,Col' 4or)&4 ,&ot 4or) &4SP ,&ot 4or) S5ar) Potential 9SS ,9aterial Safety ata S"eet

Task Permit to


36/41


Risk area II and III

e%en': C4 ,Col' 4or) &4 ,&ot 4or) &4SP ,&ot 4or) S5ar) Potential 9SS ,9aterial Safety ata S"eet O5s ,o5erations *+ ,*is) +ssess$ent

TaskPermit to #ased onthe residua$ risk in

the a%%rova$ ta#$e)

Brea)in% contain$ent

,as 5er isolation 5roce'ureC4 CC

solation 5lan c"e$ical

'ata s"eet

eel 1 or eel 2 ,tas)

'e5en'entP+ ++ S+ ++

Brea)in% contain$ent

,'oes not $eet ener%y isolation

5roce'ure

C4 CC

Proce'ure

non-confor$ant

isolations a55roal

c"e$ical 'ata s"eet

eel 2 P+ ++ S+ S+

(as)s in CS: essels ;it" 5ositie

isolation(as) 'e5en'ent CS CC

**P c"e$ical 'ata

s"eeteel 2 P+ ++ Site +ut"ority

(as)s in CS: essels in reenfiel's ,not

connecte' to syste$

(as) 'e5en'ent CS **P eel 2P+ ++ &S

s5ecialist

Site +ut"ority

=se of $ec"anical 'eice ,sto55le5lu%

for secon'ary isolation $et"o'C4 CC

solation 5lan isolation

'eice 5roce'ure

c"e$ical 'ata s"eet

eel 2P+ ++ Site

+ut"oritySite +ut"ority

iel' instru$ent ;or) ,isolation of a safety

critical 'eice ;"en t"e 'eice is in use

for its inten'e' 5ur5ose not

Co$$issionin% fault fin'in%

C4 or &4 s5ar)

5otential

,tas) 'e5en'ent

CC

By5assin"i


37/41


Risk area II and III


TaskPermit to #ased onthe residua$ risk in

the a%%rova$ ta#$e)

solation of 5rotectie 'eice ,;"en leel

of 5rotection is re'uce' e.%. sin%le relief

ale

C4

,tas) 'e5en'entCC

By5assin"i


38/41


Risk area I (e;c$uding CB)


TaskPermit to


39/41


APPENDI% G LEVEL 1 RISK ASSESSMENT PRO FORMA

L+8+ 1 R-*9 A**+**7+

D+@ P+')'7-/ A&6)'-5@

T*9;+*'-(-)

H:'; T*9*, (')+** ; )'9*-+("e "a#ar's 'irectly relate' to 5erfor$in% t"e tas) ste5s usin% t"e tools an' eHui5$ent at t"is jo


40/41


APPENDI% H HITRA FORM

NS(++(ON : P*9( No :if not )no;n no; co$5letelater

+( : 'ate of assess$ent &(*+ * No :

P+*(9N(S@S(9OC+(ON: *S! +SSSS9N( (+9 ,Na$e of acilitator first

*S! +SSSS9N( (@P:NO*9+ &(*+

SO*+ O*+ N+9 POS(ON

(+S! SC*P(ON:4"o 4"at 4"y &o; an' 4"en. +s t"e tas) +N( NO*9+(ON :

,e.%. $er%ency Proision *eHuire' Co$5etency reHuire$ents (ools 8 Hui5$ent a''itional PP P8s ra;in%s P(4Proce'ures Certificates ot"er *is) +ssess$ents

CON*9 ++*P&(*+ +PP*O>: ** +PP*O>+ 9+(*X

N+9 ,P*N(:

SN+(=* :si%n after ;or)s"eets are co$5lete an' t"e ++acce5ts t"e (*+

POS(ON :

+( :

(+S! SC*P(ON S=99+*@ : &(*+ * No :

ie t"e co$5lete' for$ to t"e Per$it to 4or) Coor'inator

K'*C+*PR,*-.*. Page 0 of 0 Rev1 A/

Project nternal


41/41


2 &u#*Task "o

/2 &u#*Task Activit ? !escri%tion

.2 Hazard!escri%tion

02 Hazard Im%actcategorsafet> hea$th>environment and#usiness

-2 :;isting Contro$=easures*eHuire' for 1 an' 2

32 Initia$ Risk

im%act> %ro#a#i$itand rating

528ist A$$ Risk Reduction=easures Re9uired

72 Residua$ Risk

im%act> %ro#a#i$it andrating

2A%%rover

2 Actionsc$osed

& H : @ I P R I P R

K'*C+*PR,*-.*. Page 0 of 0 Rev1 A/

Project nternal

Hitra Procedure Kz01 Cg Pro 53 0113 a02

Documents