«*-. Historical Evaluation & Research Organization in 5 O < Report Number 129 COMBAT HISTORY ANALYSIS STUDY EFFORT (CHASE) DATA ENHANCEMENT STUDY (CDES) Vol III: Task 2 and 3 Final Report 31 January 1986 Prepared for the US Army Concepts Analysis Agency Bethesda, Maryland Contract No. MDA903-85-C-0232 This document has been approved for public release and sale; its di-t, ibution is unlimited. 5 6 i „ i t" l r 12 30 127. 8316 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD - SUITE 400 - FAIRFAX, VA 22031 (703) 5604427
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
■«*-.
Historical Evaluation & Research Organization
in
5 O <
Report Number 129
COMBAT HISTORY ANALYSIS STUDY EFFORT (CHASE)
DATA ENHANCEMENT STUDY (CDES)
Vol III: Task 2 and 3
Final Report 31 January 1986
Prepared for the
US Army Concepts Analysis Agency
Bethesda, Maryland
Contract No. MDA903-85-C-0232
This document has been approved for public release and sale; its di-t, ibution is unlimited.
5 6
i
„ i t" l
r 12 30 127.
8316 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD - SUITE 400 - FAIRFAX, VA 22031 (703) 5604427
MNTPyKTFTFn SKCURITV CLMSIFICATION OP THIS PAGE (Whm Dtf Bnfnd)
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING FORM
i. SnSJPf NUMBER f. OOVT ACCESSION NO.
Report Number 129 *. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER
4. TITLE fand SubUrraj
COMBAT HISTORY ANALYSIS STUDY EFFORT (CHASE) DATA ENHANCEMENT STUDY (CDES) //TT"
S. TYRE OF REPORT * PERIOD COVERED
Final, 06 Jun 1985 - 31 Jan 1986
«. PCRPORMINO ORO. REPORT NUMBER
7. AUTHORft)
Brian R. Bader, John R. Brlnkerhoff» Trevor N. Dupuy, C. C. Johnson, Charles R. Smith
•. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERft)
MDA903-C-85-0252
•• PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Data Memory Systems, Inc.. HERO Division 8316 Arlington Blvd., Suite 400 Fairfax. VA 22031
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASK AREA * WORK UNIT NUMBERS
M. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Army Concepts Analysis Agency 8120 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, MD 20814-2797
U. MONITORING AGENCY NAME • kOOnE»S(ll dllUiml horn Centnlilnt Ollle»)
IS. REPORT DATE
31 Jan 1986 IS. NUMBER OP PAGES
764 II. SECURITY CLASS, (et thlm npoit)
UNCLASSIFIED
IS*. OECLASSIFICATION/OOWNORADING SCHEDULE
1«. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ot (hi« Report)
Unlimited
17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (et the abmtrmet mtfnd In Bloc* 30, II dlttermt fton Report)
IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
See also AD-B086 797L, AD-B087 718L, AD-B087 719L, AD-B087 720L, AD-B087 721L. and AD-B087 722L.
It. KEY WORDS (Continue en tevetee aid« II neeeeemy and Identity by block number)
Military history, engagement data bases, personnel strength data, casualty data, assessment of victory In engagements, engagement duration data, attacker and defender width of front data, defender posture data, strength and casualty data quality estimation, strength and attrition histories.
a& ABSTPACT rCaoOaua aa r»« i at* H nmteeeety end Identity by block number)
This final report contains enhanced data and corrections of omissions. Inconsistencies, and ambiguities for a 1984 study performed by HERO for USACAA entitled "ANALYSIS OF FACTORS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED OUTCOMES OF BATTLES AND WARS: A DATA BASE OF BATTLES AND ENGAGEMENTS" (Contract No. MDA903-82C-0363). It has been performed in order to make the data base contained in the 1984 study applicable for use in U.S. Army studies and analyses, concept formulations, and wargaming. It contains enhanced and
DD, FORM JAN7S 1473 COITION OF t MOV 65 IS OBSOLETE UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Dale Bnlered)
HICI4SSTFIFD MCUWTY CtAMtriCATION Of TMU gAOggfcjg Drnta tetfM)
20. corrected data from the original data base, newly developed data, and responses to specific questions and problems formulated by USACAA In Its transcription of the data base to computerized format. Volume I contains Introductory materials. Volumes II-V, the main body of the report, contain the results of nine tasks developed by USACAA.
UNCLASSIFIED SCCURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfI«i»n Dmlm Bntmnd)
Report Nurober 129
COMBAT HISTORY ANALYSIS STUDY EFFORT (CHASE)
DATA ENHANCEMENT STUDY (CDES) Vol. Ill: Task 2 and Task 3
Final Report
Brian Bader John R. Brinkerhoff
Trevor N. Dupuy C.C. Johnson
Charles R. Smith
31 January 1986
Prepared for
US Army Concepts Analysis Agency
Bethesda, Maryland
Contract No. MDA903-85-C-0252
Data Memory Systems, Inc. 8316 Arlington Blvd.
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
Task 2r-Clarification of the Total Engaged Personnel Strength Data ' <T^ty\
1
Task 2 Footnotes
Task 3?-Clarification of the Basis for Assigning Victory
1
105
119
V ^ r#
i'W.'
B: - Di ;:•;•;■.., ,; '
Avail :■' 1 ■ '* :
•; J-.'; -'Ji'
Dlst j Spucial
L
Task 2; Clarification of the Total Engaged Personnel Strength
Data
'y The purpose »f thl-a task.is to identify the type of personnel
strength given for an engagement. Three categories of personnel
strength are provided: Start Strength, Average Daily Strength,
and Total Engaged Strength. -" ^-9 ^- ^'1
1. Start Strength. The sura, at the start of an engagement,
of all personnel subject to enemy fire. An "x" under column
heading ^ on the following tables identifies the strength as
start strength.
2. Average Daily Strength. The average daily number of
personnel subject to enemy fire. An "x" under column heading 2
on the following tables identifies the strength as average daily
strength. The derivations of the average daily strength computa-
tions are provided in footnotes appended to the Task 2 tables.
3. Total Engaged Strength. The total number of personnel
subject to enemy fire during the entire duration of the engage-
ment. An "x" under column heading ^ on the following tables
identifies the strength as total engaged strength.
New strength and casualty data, generated as a result of
the work done on General Problem Reports 2 and 3, and improved
data found in research for other parts of this study are
also presented in the Task 2 tables. Where appropriate, users of
the data base should substitute the revised strength or casualty
data presented here for that in Table 3 of the original data
base. An asterisk after an engagement number indicates that
revised data is given for the engagement, either "enhanced" data.
such as reinforcements, which does not change the original data,
or entirely new data.
For two engagements, Arcis-sur-Aube, #142, and Monastir,
#251, the duration in days has been changed. The revised values
are presented in the footnotes appended to the Task 2 tables.
These two engagements are the only ones for which duration in
days has been changed. Users of the data base should make the
appropriate changes in Table 1 in the original data base and in
the percent per day casualty rates and KPDA values for these two
engagements and any others in which strength or casualty data has A
been changed. Explanations of the column headings for the Task 2
tables are as follow:
Strength is the value reported for personnel strength
in the original data base, or a revised value, if research
performed for this study has resulted in a change in the original
figure. The type of strength is indicated by an "x" under the
appropriate column heading marked "l," "2," or "S," as described
above.
Initial, Strength is the sum, at the start of an engage-
ment, of all personnel subject to enemy fire. This value is
provided if data is available. For engagements in which the
start strength is presented under Strength, it is the same value.
Reinforcements'/Replacements (Reinf ./Repl.) are the
total number of personnel received as such during the course of
an engagement. In pre-twentieth century engagements, this number
frequently represents units which were not subject to enemy fire
at the start of the engagement, but which reinforced their side
during the course of the battle. This value is provided if data
is available.
Casualties are the total number of battle casualties
sustained by a force during an engagement. For a more comprehen-
sive definition of this term, see page 11 in Volume II of the
original data base. The number presented here is the figure
reported in the original data base, or a revised value if
research performed for this study has resulted in a change in the
original data.
Final Strength is the total strength of a force at the
end of an engagement. This value is provided if data is available.
Sources for new data presented in these tables and
derivations of average daily strength computations are given in
the footnotes appended to the Task 2 tables.
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Nieuport, #1
A:
D:
Strength 1
1c
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf ,/Repl. Casualties
final Strength
11,500
11,300
11,500
11,300
0
0
4,000
1,000
7,500
10,300
White Mountain, #2
A;
p: 40,000
21,000
X
X
40,000
21,000
0
0
400
5,000
39,6001
16,000 1
Wimpfen, «3*
A:
D:
20,000
20,000
X
X
20,000
20,000
0
0
0,000
5,800
15,0001
14,200
Dessau Bridge, #4
lA:
p: 8,500
16,000
[x"
1 X
8,500
16,000
1 ** 0
1 3,000
| 1,000
5,5001
15,000
Luti
%
:er. #5
IÄ:
D:
17,000
20,000
X
X
17,000
20,000
0
0
2,000
7,000
15,0001
13,000
Breitenfeld I, #6
A:
D:
32,000
37,850
13,600
6,100
18,400
31,750
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
The Lech, #7
[57
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
33,000
27,000
33,000
27,000
0
0
1,000
3,000
32,000
24,000
Alte Veste, «8
lA:
D:
46,000
60,000
X
X
46,000
60,000
0
0
4,000
2,000
42,000
58,000
Luet zzen, #9*
A:
D:
18,596
21,770
X
X
10,996
16,770 5,000
4,000
5,000
14,996
16,770
Noerdlingen I, #10
A:
D:
25,000
35,000
X
X
25,000
35,000
0
0
12,000
2,000
13,000
33,000
Wittstock, #11
A:
D:
22,000
30,000
22,000
30,000
" 7,000'
18,000
15,000
12,000
Breitenfeld II, #12
A:
D:
25,000
30,000
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Rocroi, #13
Initial Final
AT
Strength 1
x
2 3 Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties Strength
23,000 23,000 0 | 4,000 19,000
D: 26,000 X 26,000 1 0 14,000 12,000
Tuttlingen, #14
A: 22,000 X 22,000 0 1,000 21,000
D: 18,000 X 18,000 0 7,000 11,000
Frieburg, #15
A: 19,000 X 19,000 0 8,000 11,000
D: 16,000 X 16,000 0 4,000 12,000
JanV :au, #16
A: 15,000 X 15,000 0 0,500 6,500 1
p: 15,000 X 15,000 0 2,000 13,000
Mergentheim, #17
A:
p:
10,000
11,000
[x
X
10,000
11,000
0
0
■700
3,500
$,300
7,500
\11( »rheim (Noei rdling« »n II), #18
A:
D:
18,000
16,000
X
X
18,000
16,000
0
0
7,500
6,000
10,500 1
10,000 |
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Lens, #19
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
14,000
18,000
14,000
18,000
0
0
4,000
10,000
10,000
8,000
Edgehill, «20*
A:
D:
14,300
14,870
X
X
14,300
14,870
0
0
2,000
2,500
11,800
12,370
Marston Moor, #21
A:
D:
27,000
17,500
X
X
■27,000
17,500
0
0
1,500
6,000
25,500
11,500
Tippermuir, #22
A;
D:
6,800
3,000
X
X
■ 6,800"
3,000
0
0
3,000
1
3,800
2,999
Kil« »yth. #23
A:
D:
4,900
6,800
X
X
4,900
6,800
0
0
6
6,000
4,094
800
Newbury II, #24
A:
D:
22,000
10,000
X
X
22,000
10,000
0
0
500
500
21,500
9,500
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Naseby, «25
A;
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
| Final Strength
9,000
13,000
9,000
13,000
1 0
0
| 6,000
1,000
| 3,000
| 12,000
Pre: ston, #26*
|A:
D:
9,000
21,000
[x
X
9,000
21,000
0
1 0 1 300
1 5,000 1
[ 8,700
16,000
Dunl jar, #27
JA: D:
| 11,000
| 22,000
[x
X
11,000
22,000
1 0
1 0 | 30
13,000
1 10,970
9,000
Wore :ester, #28
|A:
D:
28,000
16,000
x
x
28,000
16,000
0
0
1,000
9,000
27,0001
7,000
St. Antoine, #2 .9
lA;
D:
12,000
6,000
X
X
12,000
6,000'
0
0
4,000
2,000
S7W1 4,000
The Dunes, #30
A:
D:
15,000
12,000
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
! r rhe Raabf «31
A?
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 |3 Initial
|Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties "Tfhar Strength
60,000
30,000
60,000
30,000
1 0
0
| 8,000
2,000
52,000
28,000
\ Hex ina, «32
A;
D:
76,000
107,000
X
X
76,000
107,000
0
0
2,000
10,000
74,000
97,000
Chocim II, #33
A:
p: 50,000
80,000
X
X
1 50,000
| 80,000
0
0
1,000
30,000
4$,0001
50,000
Sinsheim, «34
5,000
Senef, «35
At
p: 50,000
70,000
X
X
50,000
70,000
0
0
' " *T0;w
14,000
40,000 1
56,000
Enzheim, «36
A:
p: 22,000
31,700
X
X
22,0001 01 3,500
31,700' 0 2,500
( 1
18,500
29,200
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Turckheiro, #37
A:
p:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
33,000
30,000
33,000
30,000
0
0
1,100
3,400
31,900
26,600
Fehrbellin, #38
A:
D:
6,m 6,400
X
X
6,"000
6,400
0
0
500
2,500
5,5001
3,900
Sedgemoor, #39
JA:
p:
4,000
3,000
X
X
4,000
3,000
0
0
1,500
300
2,5001
2,700
Killiecrankie, #40*
IA:
p: 2,800
3,400
X
X
2,800
3,400
0
0
| 600
| 1,900
2,2001
1,500
Wale :ourt, #41
|A:
D:
24,000
35,000
X
X
24,000
35,000
0
0
2,000
130
22, wr 34,870
Flei irus, #42
IA:
D:
50,000
38,000
X
X
50,000
38,000
' " "" 0"
0
0,000
19,000
44,0001
19,000
10
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
The Boyne, #43
n Initial Final
A:
Strength 1
X
2 3 Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties Strength
35,000 35,000 0 | 2,000 33,000
D: 23,000 X 23,000 0 | 1,500 21,500
Aughrim, #44
A: 18,000 X 18,000 0 2,708 15,300
D: 25,000 X 25,000 0 4,400 20,600
i Steenkerke, #45
A: 63,000 X 63,000 0 8,000 55,000
D: 57,000 X 57,000 0 7,000 50,000
Neerwinden (Landen) , #46
80,000
50,000
Marsaglia, #47
A:
D;
40,000
36,000
Zenta, #48
9,000
14,000
71,000
36,000
40,000
36,000
0
0
. 3,000
11,000
3^,000
25,000
A:
p: 50,000
100,000
X
X
50,000
100,000
0
0
500
30,000
49,500
70,000
11
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Poltava, #49
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
21,500
80,000
21,500
80,000
0
0
9,600
1,300
11,900
78,700
Bier iheim, #50
|A:
D:
52,000
56,000
X
X
52,00(3
56,000
0
0
12,883
34,190
39,117
21,810
Ramillies, #51
IA:
D:
; 62,000
60,000
IT
X
1 62,000
60,000
1 0
0
| 3,020
| 19,000
| 56,500
41,000
Oude snarde, #52
IA:
p: 80,000
85,000
X
X
80,000
85,000
0
0
4,000
15,000
76,000
70,000
Malplaquet, #53
A:
D:
110,000
80,000
"110 ;W0
80,000
Peterwardein, #54
A:
D:
63,000
60,000
X
X
63,000
60,000
0
0
4,500
6,000
58,500
54,000!
12
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Mollwitz, «55
Strength 1
X
X
A:
D:
18,100
22,000
3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
18,100
22,000
0
0
4,551
4,850
13,549
17,150
Chotusitz, #56
6,332
4,819
22,668
19,681 24,500
Dettingen, #57
35,000
26,000
Fontenoy, #58
Hohenfriedberg, #59
lA:
D:
50,000
60,000
X
X
50,000
60,000
0
0
22,000
6,000
38,000
54,000
lA:
D:
50,000
66,000 X
50,^00
66,000
1 0
0
1 4,737
13,176
i 45,2S3
52,824
Sohl :, «60
|A:
p; 22,562
41,000
X
X
22,562
41,000
0
0
3,876
7,444
18,6861
33,556
13
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Kesselsdorf, #61
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl, Casualties
Final i Strength \
31,000
31,200
31,000
31,200
0
0
5,000
6,630
26,000
24,570
Prestonpans, #62
Culloden, #63
IA:
DI
5,400
9,000
X
X
5,400
9,000
0
0
1,558
309
3,8421
8,691
Lobositz, #64
IA:
D:
29,000
34,500
X
X
2Md0
34,500
0
0
2,406
2,873
\—i67m\ 31,627
Prac |ue, #65
IA:
D:
65,000
62,000
X
X
65,000
62,000
0
0
14,300
13,400
50,7001
48,600
Pias isey, #66
|A:
D:
50,050
2,975
X
X
50,000
2,975
0
0
500
63
4M5dl
2,912
14
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Kolin, #67
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
32,000
44,000
32,000
44,000
0
0
13,768
9,000
18,232
35,000
Hastenbeck, #68
Rossbach, #69
42,000
22,000
Leuthen, #70
Crefeld, #71
Zorndorf, #72
10,150
548
11,589
22,000
8,200
A: 36,000 X " 36,000 0
D: 43,300 X 43,300 0
12,797
18,500
31,850
21,452
21,411
43,000
30,200
41,800
23,203
24,800
15
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Hochkirch, #73
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
80,000
31,000
80,000
31,000
0
0
7,587
9,097
72,413
21,903
Bergen, #74
Minden, #75
A:
D:
45,000
60,000
X
X
■■■ 45,-0iJ0
60,000
1»
0
i,762
7,086
42,238
52,914
Kunersdorf, #76
A:
D:
50,900
59,500
X
X
50,900
59,500
0
0
19,100
15,500
31,800
44,000
Plains of Abraham (Quebec), #77
A:
D:
4,500
4,800
X
X
4,500
4,800
0
0
1,500
650
3,000
4,150
Max« sn. #78* --
A:
D:
38,000
13,500
X
X -
" '_ Iff ,W0"
13,500
0
0
1,000
1,000
rr,w0 12,500
16
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Warburg, #79
Llegnitz, #80
!A:| j j
30, 000 !x| | I ! !
30 000 j ÖT 6 000 | 2* ,000
!D:| 1 1
30, 000 i i i i
!x| I I I 1 1
30 000 1 01 3 600 26 400
Torgau, #8] »
!A: | i i
50, 000 r....... r- X i i i
1 1 1 50, 000 1
j 01
1 16 670 33. 330
i i |D:| 1 1
53, 400 1 1 1
ix| 1 1 1 1 1
53. 400 1 1
1
01 1
15, 697 37, 703
Bunker Hill, #82
IA:! 2,650!x! I I I III ID:! 3,200|x| I II III
1 2,650
j 3,200
I 01 1
1 01 1
1,Ö54| 1
479! 1
1,5961 1
2,7211 i
Quebec, #83
IA:| 1,10(51x1 | • I 1 ID:| l,800|x| | II III
1 1,100 1 1 I 1,800 1 !
ÖI 1
0! 1
' 4861 " 1
181 i
" 6141
1,7821 i
White Plains, #84 -■■
|A:| 13,000|x| | II 1 1 I ID:! 13,000|x| 1 1 ! Ill
j 13,000|
1 13,000
0! 1
0! i
313!
150 1 i
12,6871 1
12,850! i
17
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Trenton,#85
2 3 initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
final 1 Strength
2,420
1,520
0
0
12
996
2,408
524
Princeton, #86*
A:
D:
4,800
1,200
X
X
1,25«
800
3,550
400
44
215
■■4,756 1
985
Freeman's Farm, #87*
3,300
7,000
1,100
0
556
316
3,844
6,684
Germantown, #88
A:
p: 11,200
9,000
X
X
11,200
9,000
0
0
1,0*0
551
10,110
8,449
Berois Heights, #89
lA:
D:
5,000
11,000
[x"
X
5,000
11,000
0
0
600
130
4,4001
10,870
Monmouth Court House, #90*-
[A:
D:
13,000
11,000
X
X
2,000
5,000
11,000
6,000
358
362
12,642
10,638
18
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Camden, #91
II III llnitial 1 I IStrength |1 1213[Strength |1 II MM 1
Reinf. 1
/Repl.ICasu 1
alties Final
Strength
|A:| i 1 |D:| 1 1,
2,1001x1 1 1 2,1001 II II 1
3,0501x1 I I 3,0501 III! 1
01 1
01 1
32ii
1,050
1,776
2,000
Cowpens #92
IA:| 1 1 |D:| 1 1
1,1001x1 I I 1,100 1 II 1
1,0251x1 I I 1,025 Mil
0
0
929
72
171
953
Guilford Court House, #93
Hobkirk's Hill, #9^
Eutaw Springs, #95
A:
D:
2, ^00 |x ITT
2,000!x
Valmy, #96
19
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Jemappes, #97
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final 1 Strength
40,000
13,000
40,000
13,000
0
0
3,000
2,500
37,000
10,500
Neerwinden, #98
A:
D:
45,000
43,000
X
X
45,000
43,000
0
0
4,000
3,000
4T7000I
40,000
Hondschoote, #99
|A:
D:
42,000
13,000
X
X
42,000
13,000
0
0
3,000
3,000
39,000
10,000
Wattignies, #100
44,000
23,000
Fleurus, #101*
T75W
3,000
4,000
7,000
Lodi, »102*
|A:
D:
17,000
10,000 X
39,500
20,000
42,000
66,000
20
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Castiglione, #103*
A:
p:
Strength 1
X
2 3
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
i
Final 1 Strength 1
30,000
25,000
21,000
25,000
9,000
0
1,500
3,000
28,500
| 22,000
Neresheim, #104
|A:
p: 40,000
45,000
X
X
40,000
45,000
0
0
3,000
3,000
37,0001
42,000
Wuer zburg, #10J >*
JA:
D:
44,000
30,000 X
X .?
30,000
?
0
1,500
3,000
42,5001
27,000
Arcc )la, #106
|A:
D:
17,300
12,700
X
X
17 300
12,700
0
0
4,500
7,000
.12,800 1
5,700
Rive )li, #107
1 A«
D:
28,000
20,500
X
X
28,000
?
0
?
14,000
5,000
1 14,0001
15,500
A:
D:
25,000
21,000
24,700
16,000
21
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Stockach I, #109
A:
p:
Strength I
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final | Strength 1
38,000
50,000
38,000
50,000
0
0
4,500
6,000
33,500
44,000]
Mount Tabor, #110*
lA:
D:
35,000
4,500
X
X
35,000
2,000
0
2,500
6,500
60
28,5001
4,440
Zurich I, #111
JA; D:
40,000
25,000
X
X
40,000
25,000
0
0
3,400
1,600
36,6001
23,400
NOVJ L, #112
|A:
p: 50,000
35,000
X
X
50,000
35,000
0
0
9,000
11,000
41,000
24,000
Zurich III, #113
A:
p: 35,000
23,000
X
X
35,000
23,000
0
0
4,000
8,000
31,0001
15,000 1
Moeskirch, #114
22
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Marengo, #115*
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
2 3
X
Initial Strength Reinf,/Repl. Casualties
Final | Strength |
31,000
29,000
31,000
9,000
0
20,000
11,000
7,000
20,000
22,000
Hohenlinden, »116*
Austerlitz, »117*
JA: D:
05,400
73,200
fx
X 65,200
1 0 8,000
i7,500
7,000
57,9001
66,200
Jene », #118*
IA:
D:
96,000
53,000
X
X
46,000
38,000
50,000
15,000
4,000
30,000
92,0001
23,000
Auerstadt, #119*
IA:
D: 1
63,500
27,000
X
X
47,900
20,800
15,600
6,200
20,000
4,000
43,5001
23,000
Eyl« tu, #120* --
IA:
D:
78,000
80,000
X
X
48,900
71,000
29,100
9,000
18,500
28,000
59,5001
52,000
23
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
'riedland, #121*
Strength 1
X
2 3
X
Initial Strength Reinf ./Repl. Casualties
Final 1 Strength 1
A;
D:
80,000
60,000
17,000
60,000
63,000
0
8', 000
25,000
72,000
35,000
Vimeiro, »122
|A:
D:
13,6150
19,600
X
X
13,85«
19,600
0
0
1,000
750
11,2501
18,850
Corunna, #123
1 20,600
14,800
0
0
1,600
1,000
iM00|
13,800
Eckmuehl, #124*
A:
D:
74,000
66,000 X
74,000
36,000
0
30,000
12,000
6,000
62,000
60,000
Aspern-Essling, #125*
A:
D:
99,000
66,000
X
X
99,000
23,000
0
43,000
23,000
21,000
76,000 1
45,000
The Raab, #126
lA:
D:
35,000
37,000
X
X
35,000
37,000
0
0
4,000
6,211
31,0001
30,789
24
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Wagram, #127
A:
p:
Strength r 1 2 3
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final j Strength |
140,000
140,000
?
?
?
?
34,000
45,000
106,000
95,000
Talavera, #128
Bussaco, #129
JA: D:
65,900
51,910
X
X _
65,900
51,910
0
0
4,500
1,300
61,400
50,610
Fuentes de Onoro, #130
|A:
p: 48,260
37,360
X
X
48,260
37,360
0
0
2,7001
1,800
Albuera, #131
45,560
35,560
lA:
p: 23,000
30,000
X
X
23,000
30,000
0
0
6,000
7,50n
TTOT
22,500
Salamanca, #132
lA:
p: 46,000
42,000
X
X
46,000
42,000
0
0
6,000
13,000
40,000
29,000
25
Vittoria, «133
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf,/Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
79,062
68,024
79,062
68,024
0
0
5,148
7,000
73,914
61,024
Borodino, #134
A:
D:
'120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000 40,000
Luetzen, #135*
Bautzen, #136*
Dresden, #137*
92,000
80,000
A:
D:
93,000
120,000
X
X
93,000
45,000
0
75,000
18,000
22,000
75,000
98,000
A:
D:
199,000
97,000 X
X 115fī0
97,000
84,000
0
25,000
20,000
174,000
77,000
A:
D:
170,000
120,000
X
X
158,000
70,000
12,000
50,000
4Md0
10,000
130,000
110,000
[.ei] jzig, #138* --
A:
D:
36M00
196,200
X
X 177,500
165,000
18,700
65,000
60,000
300,000
136,200
26
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Hanau, «139*
1
357
D:
Strength 1
X
2 3
7
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
60,000
40,000
30,000
40,000
| 30,000
1 0 | 5,000
| 15,000
55,000
25,000
La I lothiere, #] L40*
JA: D:
110,000
40,000 X
X 70,000
40,000
32,000
0
6,000
6,000
104,0001
34,000
Laor i, #141*
|A:
p: 47,600
85,000 X
X 37,600
85,000
10,000
0
6,000
4,000
41,6001
81,000
Arcis-sur-Aube, #142*
lA:
D:
80,000
30,000
X
X
20,000
18,000
60,000
12,000
3,000
5,000
77,000
25,000
Quatre Bras, #144*
A:
D:
26,741
33,765
X
X
22,241
29,265
27
TASK2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Waterloo, #145«
I I Strength
ITi SFT^Ix I I
D:| 137,5471 i i
_i i_
m n 2I3 Initial T TTrüT Strength IReinf./Repl.I Casualties I Strength I
43,625! 25,000|
22,500! 115,047!
The Thames, #146
!A:!
ID:! 3,500|x
l,80oix i
i i i i
i i
! !
3,500
1,800
"01
0
"5^ 37*711 t i
1,132| 668!
Chippewa, #147
Lundy's Lane, #148»
!A:| 2,0öö! ! |x ! ! ! ! 1 ID:) 3,000! ! |x ! ! ! ! !
7öö
1,700
1 l,3öö!. 1
! 1,300! 1
■55Ö
878
! 1,1401 !
2,122! 1
New Orleans, #149
!A:! 6,0001xi ! ! 1 III ID:! 3,200|x! I ! I ! ! !
6,000
3,200
i 0! 1
I oi I
2 ,600
71
! 3,400! 1
3,129! i
Boyaca, #150 •
!A:t 3,ÖÖO|x| ! II ill ID:! 3,000|x| I 1 I 1 III!
3,öüü
3,000
Ui !
0! 1
bb
,800
^,9341
1,200 1
28
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Carabobo, #151
XT
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
6,400
5,180
6,400
5,180
0
0
200
2,908
6,200
2,272
Bombona, #152
A:
D:
1,800
2,200
X
X
1,800
2,200
0
0
531
250
1,^9
1,950
Pichincha, #153
A:
D:
2,500
2,400
X
X
2,500
2,400
0
0 1
5^0
340
1,510
2,060
Juni n. #154
A:
D:
2,000
2,000
X
X
2,000
2,000
0
0
145
464
1,855
1,536
Ayacucho, #155
San Jacinto, #156
A:
D:
743
1,600
X
X
743
1,600
0
0
39
1,600
704
0
29
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Palo Alto, «157
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl.
6,000
Resaca de la Palma, #158
Ä7
D:
Buena Vista, #159
Cerro Gordo, #160
Contreras, #161
Casualties
rTF
400
Final Strength
2,240
5,600
1,700
5,600
X
X
1,700
5,600
0
0
122
600
1,578
5,000
A;
D:
14,000
4,759
X
X
14,000
4,759
0
0
2,000
746
12,000
4,013
A:
D:
0,500
12,000
X
X
8,500
12,000
0
0
431
4,000
6,069
8,000
A:
D:
4,500
4,000
X
X
4,500
4,000
0
0
60
1,513
4,440
2,487
Churubusco, #162
8,497
10,500
996
3,124
7,501
7,376
30
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Molino del Rey, #163
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
—zrW 9,300
3,100
12,000
3,100
12,000
0
0
792
2,700
Chapultepee, #164
A:
D:
7,180
15,000
X
X
7,180
15,000
0
0
863
1,800
6,317
13,200
The Alma, #165
|A:
D:
1 6$,000
36,400 X
05,000
36,400
1 0
0
1 2,562
5,709
| 62,438
30,691
Ink« jrman, #166* k
IÄ:
p: 42,000
16,000
X
X
42,000
8,500
0
7,500
15,187
4,105
26,813
11,895
Magenta, #167
A:
D:
| 48,090
| 61,618
X
X
48,090
61,618
0
1 0 4,530
10,236
43,560
| 51,382
oil ferino, #16E ]
A:
D:
143,000
130,000
X
X
143,000
130,000
0
0
17,400
21,800
125,600
108,200
31
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Sadowa (Koeniggraetz), #169*
A:
p:
Strength 1
X
2 3
7
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final 1 Strength
220,000
215,000
105,000
215,000
115,000
0
9,200
44,300
210,800
170,700
Custozza II, #170
A:
D:
90,000
75,000 X
X ?
75,000
?
0
8,100
5,600
81,9001
69,400
First Bull Run (First Manassas), #171*
lA:
D:
35,000
32,500
X
X
35,000
30,500
0
2,000
2,896
1,982
32,104
30,518
Wilson's Creek, #172
lA:
p: 5,400
10,175
X
X
5,400
10,175
0
0
1,23S
1,095
4,165
9,080
Belmont, #173*
A:
p: 3,144
5,000
X
X
3,144
2,500
0
2,500
607
642
2,5^
4,358
Mill Springs, #174
lA:
D;
4,000
4,000
X
X
4,000
4,000
0
0
533
262
3,467
3,738
32
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Fort Donelson, #175
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf,/Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
21,000
27,000
21,000
27,000
0
0
2,000
2,609
19,000
24,391
Pea Ridge, «176
A:
D:
16,202
10,500
X
X
16,202
10,500
0
0
1,300 14,902
1,384 9,116
Kernstown, #177
A:
D:
3,087
7,000
X
X
3,087
7,000
0
0
718
590
2,369
6,410
Shiloh, #178*
A: 40,355
D: 66,812
X
X
40,355
41,330
0
25,482
10,699
13,047
29,656
53,765
Front Royal, #179
A:
D:
16,000
1,063
X
X
16,000
1,063
0
0
35
904
15,965
159
First Winchester, #180
33
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Cross Keys, #181
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
10,500
5,000
10,500
5,000
0
0
684
288
Mi* 4,712
Port Republic, #182*
x
Seven Pines (Fair Oaks) #183*
A: 41,816 X 7,580 34,236 6,100 1 35,7161
p; 41,797 X 8,253 33,544 5,000 | 36,797
Mechanicsville, #184
[A: 16,808 X 16,808 0 1,484 15,3241
p: 15,631 X 15,631 0 361 15,270
Gaines's Mill, #185*
|A;
p: 5.7,018
34,214
X
X
21,752
25^214
35,266
9,000
8,751
6,837
48,267
27,377
Gier »dale-Frays« jr's FJ irm, #186*
|A:
p: 86,748
83,345
X
X
" 'lT,"00r
24,635
75,-?46
58,710 4,443
82,507
78,902
34
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Malvern Hill, #187*
A;
D:
Strength
82,507
78,902
Initial Strength
82,507
78,902
Reinf./Repl. Casualties
5,355
3,214
Final Strength
77,152
75,688
Cedar Mountain, #188
Second Bull Run (Second Manassas), #189*
TA:
D: 48,527
X
X
35,083
20,000
40,613
28,527
14,462
9,474
61,234
39,053
Soul :h Mountain , #190
lA:
D:
28,480
17,852
X
X
iÖ,480
17,852
0
0
1,813
2,685
26;6"6'7 1
15,167
Antietam (Sharpsburg) , #191*
90,000
Corinth, #192*
A:
D:
22,000
21,147
X
X
22,000
21,147
0
0
4,233
2,520'
17,767
18,627
35
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Perryville, #193
A:
D:
Strength 1
7
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl, Casualties
Final Strength |
36,^40
16,000
3M40
16,000
0
0
4,211
3,396
3J,7id
12,604
Fredericksburg, #194
A:
D:
106,007
72,497
X
X
106,007
72,497
0 1 12,653
0 4,656
93,354 1
67,841
Murfreesboro (Stones River), #195
A:
p; 34,73i
41,400
X
X
34,732
41,400
0
0
11,735
12,906
22,993
28,494
Chancellorsville, #196*
x lA:
D:
113,000
60,892 X
Champion's Hill, #197
x A:
D:
29,3V3
20,000
Brandy Station, #198*
10,500
10,000
11,100
9,500
36
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Gettysburg, #199*
A:
p:
Strength 1 2 3
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final i Strength
^5,054
83,289
28,800
23,600
46,254
59,689
28,063
23,049
46,991
60,240
Chickamauga, #200
A:
D:
66,326
58,222
X
X
66,326
58,222
0
0
10,454
16,170
47,8721
42,052
Chattanooga, #201
A:
D:
61,000
40,000
X
X
i— 61,000
40,000
0
0
| 5,024
6,667
55,176
33,333
' rhe Wilderness, #202* k
A:
D:
101,895
61,025
X
X
74,000
31,000
27,895
30,025
17,666
7,750
84,229
53,275
i »pel :sylvania, * 1203*
A:
D:
90,000
50,000
X
X
20,000
14»000
70,000
36,000
18,399
10,000
71,6011
40,000
I lew Market, #26 14*
A:
D:
5,000
5,150
X
X
5,000
5,150
0
0
577
831
4,4231
4,319
37
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Cold Harbor, #205*
A?
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
107,907
59,000
107,907
59,000
0
0
11,000
1,500
96,707
57,500
Kenesaw Mountain, #206
A:
D:
16,225
17,733
X
X
lä,225
17,733
0
0
M51
442
14,174
17,291
Peachtree Creek, #207
A:
D:
18,832
20,139
18,832
20,139
Atlanta, #208
Petersburg, #209*
47,657
36,099
2,746
1,600
TTTW
4,752
16,086
18,539
55,647
36,747
A:
D:
63,797
41,499
16,100
5;400
Globe Tavern, #210*
A: 20,289 X 11,832
D: 14,787 X ?
38
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Opequon Creek (Third Winchester), #211
Final Strength
Initial Strength
37,711
17,103
Reinf./Repl. Casualties
TTTTf
3,921 13,182
Cedar Creek, #212
A:
D:
10,410
30,829
X
X
18,410
30,829
0
0
2,910
5,665
15,500
25,164
Franklin, #213
A:
D:
26,897
27,939
X
X
iM97
27,939
0
0
0,252
2,326
20,645
25,613
Nashville, #214
A:
p: 49,773
23,207
X
X
49,773
23,207
0
0
3,061
5,350
46,712
17,857
Bentonville, #215*
A:
D:
27,000
60,000
X
X
27,000
17',990
0
42,010
2,606
1,646
24,354
58,354
Dinwiddie Court House & White Oak Road, #216*
A:
D:
45,247
20,030
X
X
13,000
3,500
32,247
16,530
2,781
1,800
42,466
18,230
39
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Five Forks, #217' k
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
30,000
10,000
30,000
10,000
0
0
634
6,000
29,366
4,000
Sein m, #218
A:
D:
13,500
7,000
X
X
13,500
7,000
0
0
40Ö
4,000
13,100
3,000
Sayler's Creek, #219*
Weissenburg, #220
Froeschwiller (Woerth) , #221
32,000
41',tt00
10,700
20,300
A:
D:
30,000
21,000
X
X
30,000
21,000
0
0
1,180
7,000
28,820
14,000
A:
D:
51,000
6,000
X
X
51,000
6,000
0
0
1,600
2,100
49,400
3,900
71,300
20,700
Spichern, #222*
A:
D:
42,000
28,000
X
X
16,000
13,400
26,000
14,600
4,900
3,100
37,100
24,900
40
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Mars la Tour, «223*
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
2 3
7
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
63,000
113,000
id,odd
113,000
34,000
0
16,000
14,000
47,000
99,000
Gravelotte-St. Privat, #224
A:
D:
187,300
113,000
X
X
187,000
113,000
0
0
20,200
12,800
166,800
100,200
Sed« m, #225
A:
D:
200,000
120,000
X
X
200,000
120,000
0
0
9,000
38,000
191,000
82,000
Couliniers, #226
A:
D:
60,000
20,000
X
X
60,000
20,000
0
0
1,800
1,800
58,200
18,200
Orl« »ans, #227
A:
D:
86,000
116,000
X
X
86,000
116^00
0
0
6,300
28,000
79,700
88,000
LeM« ans, #228
A:
D:
72,000
88,000
X
X
72,000
88,000
0
0
4,000
26,000
68,000
62,000
41
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Belfort, «229
A:
p:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final | Strength {
110,000
40,000
110,000
40,000
0
0 2,000
102,000
38,0001
Isandhlwana, #230
|A:
D:
j 20,000
1,800
fx"
X
20,000
1,800
1 0
[ 0
| 3,000
1 1#445
| 17,000
1 355
Ulm idi. #231
|A:
D:
20,000
5,317
X
X
20,000
5,317
0
0
1,500
100
18,500
5,217
Majuba Hill, #232
A: 1,200 X 1,200 0 6 1,194
D: 350 X 350 0 284 66
Tel el-Kebir, #233
A:
D:
17,401
20,000
X
X
17,401
20V000 0
46$
2,500 17,500
Omdurman, #234
55,000
25,800
24,300
25,318
42
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Adowa, #235
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf ./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
A:
D:
120,000
20,251
120,000
20,251
0
0
17,000
9,678
103,000
10,573
Modder River, #236
A:
D:
8,000
3,500
X
X
8,000
3,500
0
0
468
150
7,532
3,350
Magersfontein, #237
|A:
p:
15,000
9,000
X
X
15,000
9,000
0
0
9481
236
14,052
8,764
Colenso, #238
lA:
D:
13,411
5,500
X
X
13,411
5,500
0
0
| 1'126
50
12,285
5,450
Spion Kop, #239
|A:
D:
24,000
5,000
X
X
-~J47000
5V000
0
0
1,734
335
22,2661
4,665
Paardeberg, #240
T777T
350 D:
■01
0
13,730
3,650
43
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
San Juan and El Caney, #241
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 initial Strength Reinf ./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
15,065
1,592
16,065
1,592
0
0
1,572
850
13,493
742
The Yalu, «242
A:
D:
56,000
18,000
X
X
56,000
18,000
0
0
1,110
2,500
54,900
15,500
Teli issu, »243
A:
D:
36,000
38,000
X
X
36,000
?
0
?
1,200
3,800
34,800
34,200
Liac )yang, #244
A:
D:
135,000
150,000 -
X
X
?
?
?
?
17,500
16,500
117,500
133,500
The Sha-Ho, #245
A:
D:
210,000
145,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
46,000
17,000
164,000
128,000
Sane Jepu, #246
A:
D:
58,000
40,000
X
X
58,000
40,000
0
0
13,000
9,400
45,000
30,600
44
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
iuk« ien, #247
AT
D:
Strength 1 2 3
X
X
Initial Strength Reinf ./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
314,000
310,000 ? ?
41,000
96,500
273,000
213,500
Kumanovo, #248*
A:
D:
103,000
110,000 X
X 61,800
110,000
41,200
0
5,000
10,000
$0,000
100,000
Lule* Burgas, #249*
2M00I—n&Ti 30,000 80,000
A:
D:
140,000
110,000
"757
Prelip, #250*
A:
D:
50,000
20,000 X
X 25,000
20,000
25,000
0
3,000
6,000
47,000
14,000
Monastir, #251*
A:
D:
120,000
90,000
X
X
120,000
90,000
0
0
5,000
20,000
115,000
70,000
Adrianople, #252
A:
D:
152,000
75,000
X
X
152,000
75,000
0
0
9,300
15,000
142,700
60,000
45
TASK 2l STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Warsaw, #253
A:
D;
Strength 1 2 3
X
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
160,000
200,000 ? ?
50,000
150,000
110,000
50,000
The Nieman, #254*
A:
D:
80,000
108,500
X
X
?
?
?
?
20,000
50,000
60,000
58,500
Guadalajara-Brihuega, #255
A:
D:
52,000
100,000
X
X
52,000
100,000
0
0
6,460
6,660
45,540
93,340
Char »gkufeng/Sh« ichaof« »ng, #256
A:
D:
1,410
1,460
X
X
?
?
?
?
178
350
1,232
1,110
Hill 52/Shachaofeng, #257
A: 4,000 X ? ? 400 3,600
D: 3,010 X ? ? 41 2,969
Changkufeng/Hill 52, #258
A:
D:
20,000
8,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
4,000
1,100
16,000
6,900
46
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Nomonhau: Opening Engagement, #259
A:
D:
Strength 1 2 3
X
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
1,300
1,228
?
?
?
?
278
250
1,022
978
Nomonhan: Soviet Counteroffensive, #260
A:
D;
57,000
30,000
X
X
57,000
30,000
0
0
10,000
11,500
47,000
18,500
Suomussalmi, #261*
A:
p: 9,000
29,954
X
X
4,000
11,954
5,000
18,000
2,670
19,600
6,330 1
10,354
Alsace-Lorraine I, #262
A:
p: 457,000
345,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
65,430
32,880
391,570
312,120
Alsace-Lorraine II, #263
A;
D:
350,000
400,000
11,
21,780
The Ardennes, #264
339,000
378,220
A:
p: 360,000
400,000
X
X
?
?
-?
?
17,196
12,720
342,804
387,280
47
■
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
The Sambre, #265
AT
p:
Strength 1 2 3
X
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
440,000
254,000
?
?
?
?
21,018
8,000
1 418,982'
246,000
Mons 1, 1266
|A:
D:
260,000
70,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
6,210
1,638
253,7901
68,362
Le Cateau, «267*
TÄ7 D:
1 250,000
| 40,000
1 X
X
r" f i ?
i ?
?
1 0,970
7,800
241,030
32,200
Guis je, #268
|A:
p: 260,000
200,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
12,000
8,000
248,000
192,000
The Heights of Nancy« #269*
|A:
p: 350,000
276,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
75,000
52,000
275,0001
224,000
The Ourcq I, #270
A:
D:
100,000
45,000
X
X
IdMM
45,000
0
0
5,600
2,500 42,500
48
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
The Ourcq, II, «271
A:
D:
Strength 1 2 3
X
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
407000
39,000
Final Strength
198,000
157,000
?
?
?
?
158,000
118,000
The Petit Morin, #272
A;
D:
227,000
82,000
182,000
63,000
The Two Morins, #273
3,500
TTTSM
9,500
The Marshes of St. Gond, #274
A:
D:
101,000
141,000
Vitry le Francois, #275
A:
D:
113,000
170,000
The Gap of Revigny, #276
A:
D:
142,000
180,000
25,000
29,000
76,000
112,000
26,000
27,000
87,000
143,000
113,000
151,000
49
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
The Aisne, #277
AT
D:
Strength 1 2 3
"x
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
343,000
290,000 ?
?
?
50,000
30,000
293,000
260,000
Sta] Lluponen, #: '78
A:
D:
50,000
40,000
X
X
50,000
?
0
?
3,000
2,000
46,500
38,000
Guml »innen, #275 )
A:
D:
120,000
150,000
X
X
120,000
150,000
0
0
20,000
20,000
100,000
130,000
Tanr lenberg, #28 0
A;
D:
107,000
160,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
13,212
120,000
173,788
40,000
Masurian Lakes, #281
A: 288,600 X 288,600 0 40,000 248,600
D: 273,000 X 273,000 0 125,000 148,000
Krasnik, #282
A: 350,000 X ? ? 50,000 300,000
D: 260,000 X ? ? 50,000 210,000
50
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Komarov, #283
A:
D:
Strength 1 2 3
X
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
300,000
260,000 ?
40,000
90,000
260,000
170,000
The Gnila Lipa, , #284
A:
D:
240,000
480,000
X
X
?
?
76,000
35,000
164,000
445,000
Rava t Russka, #< !85
A:
D:
900,000
936,000
X
X
?
?
180,000
82,000
720,000
854,000
Lod: !, #286
A;
D:
260,000
400,000
X
X
?
?
60,000
95,000
200,000
305,000
The Jadar, #281 t
A:
D:
200,000
200,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
34,000
18,000
166,000
182,000
The Kolubra, #288
A:
D:
200,000
300,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
45,000
92,000
155,000
208,000
51
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Eastern Champagne, #289*
A?
D:
Strength 1
"x
X
2 3 initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
163,182
85,220
163,182
85,220 ?
42,820
23,050
?
?
Neuve Chapelle, #290*
A:
D:
87,000
40,000
X
X
?
20,000
?
20,000
12,892
12,000
74,108
28,000
Ypres II, #291*
A:
D:
150,000
190,000
X
X
t
? ?
35,000
70,000
115,000
120,000
Festubert, #292*
A:
D:
90,365
30,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
16,648
5,000
73,71?
25,000
Loot », #293
A:
D:
298,437
75,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
61,713
19,836
236,724
55,164
The Winter Battle (Nasuria) , #294
A:
D:
650,000
300,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
135,000
210,000
515,000
90,000
52
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Gorllce-Tarnow (Opening Phase Only), #295
Initial I \ I Final I Strength !Reinf./Repl.I Casualties!Strength I
I I i i 36,0001 180,0001
1 TTT !Strength II1213
A: |
D:| i i
i i i 216,000|x
I I I 219,000|x! ! I II
216,000
219,0001
01 I I I
oi i53,65Mi es^ei I I I
First Isonzo, #296
A: | 200,000
D:| 100,000
lx| I I Ix! I I
TT I
?l
?l I
?l
iM1»?
9,958
185,0531
90,042
Second Isonzo, #297
TiHT I I ID:| I I
2üü,000| I Ixj |
128,5001
T] 41,8661 150,134! II I
?! 46,6401 81,8601 !x| LI
TT I
?l
Third Isonzo, #298
T7T" I
x! ?
Vt ZTTGGSr 288,$$21 I
?! 31,4741 125,5261 I I
Fourth Isonzo, #299
IA: 311,0001 | Ix
ID:! 136,0001 I Ix
First Dardanelles Landing, #300»
ATT 32,000! I |x|
D:i i i i i ■ lit
IO.OOO; ; |xj i i
TT TT I
?
5,400! 26,6001
3,900) 6,100)
53
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
1 Suvla Bay, #301*
A:
Strength 1
|x
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl, Casualties
1 Final Strength
25,000 25,000 0 | 9,000 1 16,000
D: 15,800 X 1,800 14,000 750 15,050
1 ' 1 <ut-el-Amara, #302
A: 11,000 X 11,000 0 1,230 9,770
D: 11,300 X 11,300 0 5,300 6,000
< ;tesiphonf #303
A:1 13,756|x li,l56 0 4,593 9,1631
D: 20,400 X ? ? 6,188 14,212{
I 'irs it Somme, #3 04
A: 600,000 X 1 600,000 ?| 670,000 ?|
D: 300,0001 X 300,000 ? 500,000 ?
Somme, Fourth Army Attack, #305
x 290,000
95,000
Somme, Ovillers, #306
0 57,450
8,000
232,550
87,000
A:
D:
11,300
2,800
X
X
11,300
2,800
0
0
5,121
281
6,1791
2,519
54
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Somme, Bazentin Ridge, #307
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final | Strength
■■■u,m'\
?
45,000
15,000
45,000
15,000
0
?
9,000
4,000
Sonune, Flers-Courcelette, #308
A:
D:
190,000
90,000
X
X
190,000
90,000
0
0
3,500
3,000
186,500
87,000
Caucasus Winter Offensive, #309
A:
D:
103,000
61,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
8,000
25,000
95,000
36,000
Lak< i Narotch, i 1310
|A:
D:
350,000
180,000
X
X
?
? ?
100,000
20,000
250,000
160,000
1916 Brusilov Offensive, #311
A:
D:
600,000
500,000
X
X
600,Add
500,000
?
?
495,000
260,000
?
?
Fifth Isonzo, #312
A:
D:
300,000
160,000
296,200
158,015
55
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Asiago, #313
Initial Strength
Final Strength
A:
D:
Strength
2I370M
118,000
12 3
x
x
213,000
118,000
Reinf./Repl. Casualties
74,887
Trentino Counteroffensive, #314
x
A:
D: 172,000
Sixth Isonzo (Gorizia), #315
A:
D:
308,000
168,000
"x
X
308,000
168,000
1 ?
?
51,232
41,835
?
?
Arie is, #316
A:
D:
276,000
120,000
X
X
276,000
120,000
?
o
03,375
75,000 ?
Aisne II, #317
A:
D:
1,000,000
480,000
118,000
40,000
882,
440,
Messines, #318
A:
D:
180,000
100,000
X
X
180,000
100,000
?
?
17,000
32,500
?
?
56
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Ypres III, «319
Initial Strength
Final Strength
A:
D:
Strength
380,000
200,000
380,000
200,000
Reinf./Repl. Casualties
3dM2i
270,710
Cambrai I, #320
A:
D;
90,000
75,000
X
X
90,000
75,000
?
?
15,000
25,000
?
?
Cambrai II, #321
A:
D:
130,000
90,000
X
X
130,000
90,000
?
?
28,000
29,000
?
?
Tenth Isonzo, #322
AT
D:
280,000
165,000
X
X
280,000 ?
165,000 ?
157,000
75,700 ?
Eleventh Isonzo, #323
A:
D:
518,000
252,000
X
X
518,000
252,000
?
?
166,000
85,000
?
?
Caporetto (Twelfth Isonzo), #324
A:
D:
602,000
574,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
20,000
305,000
582,000
269,000
57
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Crossing of the Tigris, #325
A:
D:
Strength
46,000
10,500
initTaT" Strength Reinf./Repl.
7 Casualties
2,750
4,300
""FTnar" Strength
Gaza I, «326
A:
D: 26,000 26,000
T7M0
2,450
Gaza II, «327
|A:
D:
25,000
20,000
X
X
25,000
20,000
Gaza III, «328
Junction Station, «329
x A:
D:
85,000
15,500
Second Somme, Phase I (Somme-Personne}, «330
43,250
6,200
23,550
A:
D; 34,400
X
X
?
?
?
? 2,950
69,3041
31,450
A:
p: 800,000
400,000
X
X
800,000
400,000
?
?
70,000
120,000
?
?
58
IASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Second Somme, Phase II (Somme-Montdidier), #331
"nn" I I I llnitial r~ '^ | I Final IStrength 11 |2l3IStrength IReinf./Repl.ICasualtiesiStrength j • i
ATI 700,000 IxTl"! 700,0001" I
D:| 600,0001x1 600,000 !
?l 133,0001
1l»0,000|
Lys, #332
\TPt 500,0001 ! |x| i I
T1 175,000! 32b, ÜÜU I I
?| 152,0001 247,000 ID:! 400,000! t i
t i i
i i i i
xl I
?! i i
Yvonne and Odette Positions, Sector Toulon, Verdun, #333
TSTT ! ! ID:!
3,072|xj i j i i
6501x1 < < i )
3,072! I
650! I
TIT
721
3,00l|
578! i
i
Chemin des Dames, #334*
!A:! ! ! !D:i 11
75,000!x
250,000 !x! T~] 250,000!
75,000
T1 118,000
?| 128,0001 „I !
?! I
?!
Cantigny, #335
!A: 8,679!x| ! I 8,6791 01 3ÖÖ! 1 8,379 ! ! 1 1 1 1 i
i 1 1 ID:! 7251x1 1 ! 725! 01 3861 339 ! 1 III! 1 I I
Belleau Wood, #336
59
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Hill 142, #337
1
A:
D:
Strength 1 2 3
I
X
[Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
1 Final 1 Strength
2,913
2,458
1 ?
?
i ?
?
383
471
1 2,530
1,987
\ *esi t Wood I, «: 338
. ■
1 A;
D:
1 lr740
1»121
X
X
! 1,740
1,121
1 0
0
i 361
54
1 1»379|
| 1,067
I JOUl reaches I, i 1339
A:
D:
2,153
1,352
X
X
i,733
1,352
0
0
343
186
2,3901
1,166
h till 192, «340 •
AT]
D:
3,T0tf |
3,955
X
X
3,6fl8
3,955
01
0
340
87
172681
3,868
West Wood II, #341
North Wood I, The Hunting Lodge, #342
T77T7 A:
D:
1,747
1,952
"xT
x
60
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Bouresches II, #343
i i r i i i l"~)
I IStrength |1!2|3!
I i i
2,6291x1 I
Initial Strength
JT^J
2,629
] } Final i Casualties I Strength I
I
I ID: I II. ! ! I.
Reinf./Repl. B
0
TJffl J75??l
107 2,522
North Wood II, #344
i,697ixi i i—r^m T 1ST I
0}
rm—175^ 181 1,410 I
IA:| I I ID: | l_J.
l,428|x I 1,4281
North Wood III, #345
t I ID: I 11
1,^61x1 I I I I
1,5651x1 I
North Wood IV (Final Assault), #346
in ID:
4,4531 I Ix! i I I I
1,5461 I |x| • i i
I ?!
Vaux, #347
lATT 12,812|x! I I 12,812! II till I |D:| 10,3581 I |x| ?|
! • * I I I
I ?!
3361 -rcrm I
1,074| 9,284
La Roche Wood East, #348
i»,515lx IA:| I I ID: | l—I.
5,182|x
] 57515
5,1821
-öT I
0!
94
568
4,4211 I
4,614|
61
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
La Roche Wood West, «349
A:
D:
Strength 1
7
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
FlnaT 1 Strength 1
4,508
5,177
4,508
5,177
0
0
223
506
4,285
4,671
Noyon-Montdidier, «350
A:
D:
275,000
300,000
X
X
?
?
?
?
80,000
35,466
195,000 1
264,534
Champagne-Marne, «351
IA:
D:
400,000
450,000
X
X
7
?
?
?
Id0,odd
40,000
300,0001
410,000
Aisne-Marne I, «352
TW7WB A:
D: 450,000 X
750,000
? ?
■"■ 55,000
50,000 400,000
Missy aux Bois Ravine, «353
IA: 5,004 X 5,004 0 393 4,611
|D: 3,013 X 3,013 0 1,853 1,160
Breuil, «354
A; 5,039 X 5,039 0 448 4759T
D: 2,663 X 2,663 0 1,243 1,420
62
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
St. Amand Farm, #355
AT
D:
Strength 1
X
2 3 [Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
1 Final Strength
0 400
1,150
400
0
0
120
i 400
Beai irepaire Fai rm, #31 )6
IA:
ID:
4,480
565
X
X
4,480
565
1 0
1 0
125
| 181
4,3551
384
Cray fancon Fernw i-Chauc lun, #357
JA:
D:
10,345
2,420
X
X
10,345
2,420
0
0
895
1,610
9,4501
810
Chai idun, «358
IA:
D:
1,611
800
X
X
1,611
800
0
0 500
msri 300
Aisr ie-Marne II, #359
lÄT]
p: 725,000]
400,000
X
X
71
?
?|
?
"" T9-5,"000
170,000
530,0001
230,000
Berzy le Sec, #360
|A:
D:
4,000
350
X
X
4,000
350
0
0
210
116
3,7901
234
63
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Buzancy Ridge, #361
I ! I ! Initial I 1 1 Plnal I II!2i3{Strength IReinf./Repl. [Casualties[Strength I U_l_l I I i „ —j ! 1 ! I I I I
I Strength
ATI—sTjroiirri—5Tiwi 554| I
D:| 5511x1 I I II ■ i
i i
2761 278
Picardy, 1918, Phase I, #362
TT 10,000|
30,000 j
|A:| 225,000|x II I ID:! 170,000|x II I
i
i i i i
TT I
?l ?l
?l
Picardy, 1918, Phase II, #363
TSTT
ID: I
3öö,ööö|x| I I I I I I
200,0001x1 I I i
TT I
?l i i
TT i
35.ÖÖÖ! I
80,0001
'71 I
?l
St. Mihiel, #364
IA:| 400,000' ' i i
ID:| 100,0001 * i i i
xl I
xl I
?l i i
71 7,ööö| 3$3,ööö| I
?| 20,000| 80,0001 _l I I
Lahayville-Bois de Lamarche, #365
13,2081 IA:
D:
13,208|x
2,090|x
1551 13,0231
Meuse-Argonne, Phase I, #366
3öö,ÖOÖ!x| I
190,000 |x
71 I
?l
A:
D:
64
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Blanc Mont I, #367
Initial I p—-_~-^ -r-—- j Strength IReinf./Repl.I Casualties I Strength I
I I I I
T T {Strength II I I
TT\ 26,0001"" ! I
13,0001 I
D:|
3
x
I
I ?l
Tf I
?l 4,000 I
9,0001
Medeah Farm, #368
IA: 1,9211x1 I 1 1,921| 01 2471 1,674| 1 1 1 1 1 } 1 1 1 ID: 1551x1 I I 1551 01 831 72| 1 III! 1 1 1 1
Essen Hook, #369
nrrr i i ID: I i i
l,42ü!x| I I 1,4201 I
216
irr im—TTTOTI
I
Mil 2161x1 I I
I I I I II I
120 I
96
Blanc Mont Ridge, #370
in I ID:
7,8ÖÖfx! | I 7,8öö!
6701 i
I 01
I
im—77^1 I I
4501 220 i i
670|x| I I
i i
I I I I
Sommepy Wood, #371
IA: I ID: i i
9,230|x! I I I I I I
4581x1 I I i i i i
.■i i I
"9T5^rr 458
TJT
oi
1491 I
2411
I7m\ I
2171
Blanc Mont II, #372
AT] 18,ÖÖÖix
D:| 10,000|x | | 10,000)
18,ÖÖÖ| in r^fffTi—rsTnri I I I
0 500; 9,500)
65
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Meuse-Argonne, Phase II, #373
r "rrr I1!2!3
5ööföööi7rr i i i
300f000|x| I I I I
llnltlal I 1 1 Final I Strength IReinf./Repl.{Casualties I Strength I
500 ^ool 71—Trpm1 iir ID:
Strength
I 300,000! I
7|- I I
?l 75,0681
?! I
?!
Exermont-Montrefagne, §37^*
TTsP 3,053
IA:! I I ID:! II
5,3361x1 I I i i i
3,2i*5lxi i i I II I
5,3361 I
3,245!
01
0}
352! i
1921
Mayache Ravine, #375
1,899
TTT I
0! I
TTFT I
ill! I
1,7851
La Neuville le Cotnte Ferme, #376
5,3651x1 I I IA: I ID: 1,9401x1 | |
i i i i 1,940
TTT I
0! I
■
61
Trff?5 1,879
Ferme des Granges-Fleville, #377
IA:! I I ID: | II
5,46l!x i
2,587!
Tpmr !
?! I
?! i i
"2721 !
250!
T&9
2,337
Hill 212, #378
66
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Bois de Boyon-Nontrefagne, #379
Initial Strength
TTTTff
2,925
Reinf./Repl.
y
0
Casualties
m 126
FinaT' Strength
Hill 242, «380
A:
D:
2,950
2,563
X
X
Meuse-Argonne, Phase III, 4381
Remilly-Aillicourt, #382
1,210
296
15"
30
Hill 252-Pont Naugis, #383
The Piave, #384
2,799
2,950
2,563
0
0
109
250
2,841
2,313
A:
D:
600,000
380,140
X
X
600,000
380,140
?
?
30,426
29,491
?
?
A:
D: 69,079
266
A:
D:
1,989
1,655
X
X
1,989
1,655
0
0
110
182
1,879
1,473
690,000
714,921
67
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Megiddo, «385*
Final Strength
—177777
11,250
Initial Strength
51,178
18,250
Reinf./Repl. Casualties
-J7JTS
7,000
Alam Haifa, «386
A:
D:
124,000
120,000
X
X
124,000
120,000
0
0
2,940
1,750
121,060
118,250
El Alamein II, «387
A:
D:
220,476
105,223
X
X
220,476
105,223
9
9
■■■■IsVSfifl
15,995
200,916
89,228
Operation "Lightfoot," «388
220,476 A:
D: 105,223 105,223 0
6,140
3,695 101,528
Alamein Bridgehead Expansion, «389
A:
D:
214,336
101,528
X
X
214,^6
101,528
0
0
3,000
4,500
211,336
97,028
Ope i -ation "Supe »rcharc je," «390
A:
D:
211,000
97,000
X
X
211,000
97,000
0
0
4,420
7,800
206,580
89,200
68
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Chouigui Pass, #391*
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
IIS 188
465
188 0
27
21
438
167
El Guettar, «392
IA:
D:
10,300
22,019
[x X
10,300
22,019 0
| 450
203
9,050
21,816
Sed: jenane-Bizei :ta, #: )93
|A;
p: 24,098
5,000
X
X
24,098
5,000
?
?
1,120
605 ?
Amphitheater, «394
IA;
Dt
12,917
4,250
X
X
12,917
4,250
0
0
1,154
100
11,7631
4,150
Port of Salerno, «395
IA:
p: 12,917
4,250
X
X
12,91?
4,250
0
?
-37530"
120
11,3871
?
Sele-Calore Corridor, «396
A:
D:
12,447
8,390
X
X
12,447
8,390
0
0
251
60
12,196
8,330
69
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Battipaglia I, «397
Final Strength
initial Strength
14,730
11,230
Reinf./Repl. Casualties
TTTIT
1,639
y
9,591
Vietri I, #398*
A:
D:
15,000
12,917
X
X
15,000
12,917
?
514
900
1,164
?
12,267
Tobacco Factory, #399
A:
D:
14,733
12,691
X
X
14,733
12,691 0 317
?
12,374
Battipaglia II, #400
D:
14,730
6,995
X
X
14,730
6,995
0
?
300
110
14,430
?
Ebo] Li, #401
A:
D:
15,576
6,702
X
X
15,570
6,702
?
?
3H
120
?
?
Vietri II, #402*
A:
D:
13,300
18,912
X
X
' 13,300
18,912
?
337
400
255
?
18,994
70
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Grazzanise, #403
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
14,557
8,068
14,557
8,068 ?
370
80
7
?
Caiazzo, #404
A: 18,210 X 18,210 ? - 14« *
D: 6,435 X 6,435 ? 52 ?
Capua, «405
A: 16,857 X 16,857 0 420 16,437
D: 8,000 X 8,000 0 94 7,906
Castel Volturno, #406
A;
D:
17,765
8,158
X
X
17,765
8,158
?
?
500
40
7
?
Monte Acero, #407
A;
D:
21,265
6,435
X
X
21,265
6,435 ?
133
130 ?
Triflisco, #408
A:
D:
18,476
7,250
X
X
18,476
7,250
?
?
267
76
?
?
71
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Dragonl #409
I"—] 1 I I llnitial i 1 1 Final I {Strength 1112|3{Strength IReinf./Repl.{Casualties{Strength { { { { { { I { { .{
i I I I i { D: 5,152{x{ { { 5,1521
! { { ! I ?{ 103 ?{
{
Canal I, «410
{A: { {D: i i
I4,600|x
8,138|x{ { { { {
14l600{ !
8,138{
?{ {
?{
125 { !
45 { !
?{ {
?{
Monte Grande (Volturno), #411
AT
D:
1 16,400! { { { 7,239!
{ ?{
"5ÜÜT 16,4öö{x!
7,239{x{ 66 ?{
Canal II, #412
17,5001
8,128!
TT {
?{
15ÜT !
138!
A:
D:
i7,5öö!xl I
8,128!x{ i i i i
Francolise, #413
Santa Maria Oliveto, #414
{A: 16,87Ö!xf ' ' i i i i i i ■ i i
|D:l 6,321|x| | j i i i
16,870! {
6,321]
TTST
185)
72
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Monte Camino I, #415
AT
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
19,513
6,750
19,513
6,750
i
7
240
33 7
Mont :e Lungo, #4 tl( •
A:
D:
16,600
6,566
X
X
16,600
6,566
?
?
361
25
7
7
Pozzilli, «417
A:
D:
17,404
6,566
X
X
17,404
6,566
7
7
155
25
7
7
Monte Camino II, #418
A:
p: 7,942
5,200
X
X
7,942
5,200
7
7
34
310 7
Monte Rotondo, #419
A;
D:
167350
7,942
Calabritto, «420
A:
D:
1^,765
7,588
X
X
17,765
7,588
?
7
250
20
7
?
73
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Monte Camino III, #421
AT
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
E'inal Strength
20,744
3,288
20,744
3,288 ?
550
141
?
?
Monte Maggiore, #422
A: 5,551 X 5,551 ? 80 ?
D: 3,288 X 3,288 ? 20 ?
Aprilia I, #423
A: 19,350 X 19,350 * " 1,158 ?
D: 6,750 X 6,750 ? 130 ?
The Factory, #424
mTm
D;
15,317
17,976
X
X
15,317
17,976
0
0
366
62
14,951
17,914
Campoleone, #425
A;
D:
17,766
15,098
X
X
17,766
15,098
?
?
742
221
■ ■ ?
?
:ami joleone Cour iteratt :ack, «426
A:
D:
26,029
9,834
X
X
26,029
9,834
?
?
1,318
1,450
?
?
74
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Carroceto, #427
XT
DJ
Strength 1
7
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
26,49«
4,515
26,490
4,515
?
?
341
369
?
?
Moletta River Defense, 1428
A:
D:
7,418
5,000
X
X
7,418
5,000
?
7
167
107
?
?
Apri ilia II, «4; 19
A:
D:
27,518
17,730
X
X
27,518
17,730 0
270
311
27,248
17,419
Factory Counterattack, #430
A:
D:
13,400
7,077
X
X
13,4*6
7,077
?
?
"m: 206
?
?
Bow] Ling Alley, #431
A:
D:
41,974
20,496
X
X
41,974
20,496
?
?
2,238
1,018
?
?
Moletta River II, #432
A:
D:
21,478
9,761
X
X
21,478
9,761
?
?
1,451
1,693
?
?
75
TASK_2 :_STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Fioccia, «433
A?
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
15,637
19,613
15,637
19,613
?
7
265
403
?
?
Santa Maria Infante, #434
A:
D:
lö,->öi
9,250
X
X
18,702
9,250
?
7
531
1,035
7
7
San Martino, «4 135
A;
D:
17,970
8,141
X
X
I7,i7d
8,141
7
7
1,^74
720
?
7
Castellonorato, #436
XT
D:
16,458
7,500
X
X
16,458
7,500
?
7
537
442 7
J 5pic mo. #437
A:
D:
18,308
8,215
X
X
18,308
6,653
7
7 730
?
?
I 'orn lia, #438
A:
D:
23,190
7,627
X
X
23,190
7,627
7
7
405
721
7
?
76
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Monte Grande (Rome), «439
rr D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
13,095
4,563
13,095
4,563
?
?
203
332
7
? i
3 :tri l-Fondi, «44 10
A:
D:
17,91i
6,653
X
X
17,912
6,653
?
?
257
380
7
?
1 fen racina, «441 L
A:
D:
18,030
6,653
X
X
Id,030
6,653
?
?
id7
380
7
?
^ lole ttta Offensi V€ »r «442
A:
D:
17,345
12,569
x
X
17,345
12,569 ?
234
468
7
?
Anzio-Albano Road, «443
A:
D:
17,313
11,343
X
X
17,313
11,343 ?
194
107
"7
?
Anzio Breakout, «444
A:
D:
22,374
12,815
X
X
22,374
12,815
?
?
710
1,355
?
?
77
TASK 2; STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Cisterna, «445
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
19,971
11,928
19,971
11,928
?
?
1,524
1,617
?
?
Sezi se, #446
A:
D:
17,925
6,957
X
X
17,925
6,957
?
?
162
227
?
?
Vel] Letri, #447
A:
D:
20,683
12,327
X
X
20,683
12,327
0
0
767
1,319
19,916
11,008
Camj joleone Stat :ion, i N48
A:
D:
15,047
10,593
X
X
""••"rsvflrr 10,593
? 517
580 7
Vill .a Crocetta, 1 »449
A:
D:
18,000
13,715
X
X
18,000
13,715
?
?
263
598
■■ ?
?
Arde »a, #450
A:
D:
15,557
7,659
X
X
15,557
7,659
?
?
245
374
?
?
78
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Fosso di Campoleone, #451
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
29,711
15,801
29,711
15,801
7
?
1,304
1,379
7
?
Lanuvio, #452
A:
D:
17,300
6,108
X
X
17,300
6,108
?
?
825
698
?
?
Lariano, #453
A:
D:
22,641
13,012
X
X
, 22,641
13,012
?
?
329
1,178
■ ■ ■ ■
?
?
Via Anziate, #454
Valmontone, #455
A:
D:
26,607
10,111
710
568
Tarto-Tiber, #456
A:
D:
38,011
10,855
X
X
<M
38,011
10,855
?
?
572
850
?
?
79
TA^K 2s STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
II Giogio Pass, #457
A:
D;
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
15,721
3,700
15,721
3,700
0
?
560
560
15,161
?
St. Lo, #458
A:
D:
18,228
7,500
X
X
- i8;ii8
7,500
?
? 2,350 ?
Operation "Goodwood," #459
Operation "Cobra," #460
T,-OT
5,
Mortain, #461*
A:
D:
25,497
27,673
X 25,497
13,690
?
13,983
4,800
2,673
Chartres, #462
A:
D:
76,213
57,500
X
X
76,213
57,500
?
?
4,011
5,000
?
?
?
25,000
80
Melun, #463
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
I llnitlal I 1 1 Final 2l3iStrength IReinf./Repl.I Casualties I Strength
A:
D:
Strength |1
Tr753?|x
6,000|x I I
6,0001
I
I oi
■^i—rrrm 362; 5,638
Seine River, «464
40,6191 I
15,0001
IT I
?i
"2p"
906
A:
D:
40,6191x1
15,000 |x I I ! I { i I I
I
Moselle-Metz, #465
!A: I
! 59,631lx! 1 I ■ II 59,6311 ?l 1,64?|
j t
ID: i i
1 41,5001x1 I I 1 1 ! 1
41,5001 i
?l 1
1,7001 ?
Met2 '., #466 •
IA: i
6ö,7^4|x| 1 i i i i
6ö,794| öl j
3591 1 60,435
ID: 1 1
39,580|x| I j 1 I 1 1
39,5801 1
01 1
210! • i
39,370
Arracourt, #467
IA: 10,0001 | xi i i i
?! •
?l •
7791 ^1 !
ID: 3,894|x| I 1 I 1
3,8941 1
i
?l 1
1191 i
?l i i
Westwall, #468« 10'
35,8741^-7^1
23,5181 ^jlf
81
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Schmidt, #469*
A:
D:
Strength 1 2
X i0,453
20,250
3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
final" ""I Strength
X
?
?
3,903
?
3,683
3,000
l
17,250
Seille-Nied, »470
A: 99,583 X 99,583 ? 4,265 ?
D: 23,588 X 23,588 ? 4,880 ?
Foret de Chateau Salins, #471
x 43,587
11,185
?
?
720
446
?
?
Morhange, #472
A: 25,881 X 1 25,881 [ f 1 1,606 i
D: 7,555 X 7,555 1 ? 197 ?
Morhange-Faulquemont, , #473
[A: 92,393 X ■ "firrer ? 3,223 ?
p: 28,382 X 28,382 ? 2,665 ?
Bourgaltroff, #474
A:
D:
107348
6,519
185
141
82
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Sarre-St. Avoid, #475*
ÄT
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
3,279
4,942
Final Strength
88,941
32,396
88,941
32,396
7
?
1
?
Baerendorf I, #476
A: 7,935 X " 7,93-5 ? 58 ?
D: 5,366 X 5,366 ? 224 ?
Baerendorf II, #477
"x
Burbach-Durstel, #478
15,871
6,999
|A:
D:
16,232
6,713
x
X
■"56
233
15,815
6,766
6,713 ?
110
616 ?
Durstel-Faerbersviller, #479
A:
D:
90,078
30,712
X
X
90,078
30,712
?
?
482
811
?
?
Sarre-Union, #480
A:
D:
19,773
6,044
X
X
19,773
6,044
?
?
234
129
1
?|
?
83
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Sarre-Singling, #481
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
09,977
31,501
89,977
31,501
7
?
835
1,774
?
?
Singling-Bining, #482
A:
D:
15,224
5,044
X
X
15,224
5,044
0
0
155
121
15,069
4,923
Sauer River, #483
?
?
?
?
268
134
9,732
8,500
St. Vith, #484*
A:
D:
87,000
19,996
X
X
?
?
?
?
4,306
1,731
82,694
18,265
Bastogne, #485*
A:
D:
36,678
4,849
X
X
?
?
?
? 1,151
1 " 33,578
3,698
Sedc in-Meuse Ri\ 'er, #4 186
A:
D:
48,000
60,000
X
X
48,000
60,000
?
?
800
5,000
?
?
84
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Jitra, «487
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 initial Strength Reinf ,/Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
7,000
12,000
7,000
12,000
■ ■ " ~0
0
■■ "m
1,200
6,400
10,800
Rovr JO, «488
A:
D:
132,000
150,000
X
X
132,000
150,000
?
?
3,960
88,000
?
?
The Defense of Moscow, «489
A:
D:
1,100,000
1,372,000
1,100,
1,372,
253,000
885,000
Soviet Counteroffensive at Moscow, «490*
A:
D:
1,060,300
880,000
X
X
1,060,300
880,000
?
?
139,000
85,300
?
?
The Pogoreloye Gorodische Offensive, «491*
37,300 A:
D:
54,180
12,035
Leningrad (Operation "Spark"), «492
A:
D:
120,000
30,000
X
X
120,000
30,000 ?
28,000
4,150
?
?
85
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase I, #493
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
62,000
45,000
62,000
45,000
' ?
? i
1,364
5,680
t
?
Operation "Citadel," Southern Sector, #494
A:
D:
140,000
75,000
X
X
140,000
75,000
0
0
3,180
4,900
136,820
70,100
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase II, #495
A:
D:
60,000
149,000
"56,500
123,200
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase III, #496
A:
D:
56"/000
129,000
X
X ? ?
2,9(30
30,200
?
?
Prokhorovka, #497
A:
D:
78,000
82,300
78,000
82,300
5,700
5,100
Kursk Counteroffensive (Southern Sector), #498
D:
980r600
280,000
X
X
980,600
280,000
?
?
117,700
39,500
~7
?
86
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Belgorod, #499
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
X
2
70,000
15,000
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
70,000
15,000
?
? 2,405
?
?
Melitopol, «500
A:
D:
524,724
210,000
X
X
524,724
210,000
?
?
79,000
36,500
?
?
Kon iun-Schevch< »nkovs» iiy, #501
A:
D:
254,950
84,500
X
X
254,$50
84,500
?
?
63,500
68,000
?
?
Nikopol Bridgehead, #502
A:
D:
25,100
8,230
X
X
25,100
8,230 0
«10
480
24,490
7,750 I
Sevi istopol, #5C J3
A:
D:
397,607
72,000
X
X 72,000
?
0
35,500
48,500
i
23,500
The Berezina River, Byelorussian Offensive, #504
A:
D:
16,100
8,500
X
X
■i6,i00
8,500
?
?
670
4,795
?
?
87
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
The Lvov-Sandomierz Offensive, #505
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
2 3
X
Initial Strength Reinf,/Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
1,200,000
900,000
1,200,000
?
?
?
37,400
198,000 702,000
Brody, Phase I, #506
A:
D:
39,000
3,300
X
X
39,000
3,300
0
0
980
720
30,020
2,580
Brody, Phase II, #507
A:
D:
38,500
12,900
X
X
30,500
12,900
0
0
" *1,7"5T
490
36,750
12,410
Assault Crossing of the Vistula River, Phase I, #508
A:
D:
12,700
5,100
Vistula River Operation, Pulawy, Phase II, #509
A:
D:
17,550
6,400
X
X
ii;55ii
6,400
?
?
5,040
785 ?
Yassy-Kishinev, #510
A:
D:
1,250,000
800,000
X
X
1,250,000
800,000
?
?
135,000
690,000
?
?
88
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Vistula-Oder, i »511
F D:
Strength 1
X
X
|2 |3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final" " Strength
2,200,000
560,000
2,200,000
560,000
?
?
46,900 i
147,400
?
| ?
East : Prussia, i ̂ 512
A:
D:
1,220,000
780,000
X
X
1,220,000
780,000
?
?
112,000
126,000
?
?
Ciec :hanow, Phaf le 1, i »513
A: Id,odd
3,100
X
X
—r0rf0"y
3,100
?
?
685
145
?
?
Ciechanow, Phase II, #514
A:
D:
12,115
3,900
X
X
12,115 ?
3,900 ?
850
230
?
?
Seelow Heights, «515*
~~ 1M00 A:
D:
Mutankiang, «516
A: 147,000
75,000
X
X
147,000
75,000
?
?
10,000
36,000
?
?
89
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Tarawa-Betio, #517*
A:
D:
Strength 1
X
2 3
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Pinal Strength
9,000
4,836
5,000
4,836
4,000
0 4,836
5,^6
0
Iwo Jima, Into the Main Defenses, #518
|A:
p:
33,915
18,300
X
X
33,915
18,300
?
?
6,845
15,615
?
?
Iwo Jima, Suribachi, #519
A:
D:
?,200
1,600
X
X
3,200
1,600
?
0
510
1,231
?
369
Iwo Jima, Final Phase, #520
A:
D:
32,000
2,685
X
X
»,000
2,685 0
3,605
2,685
i
0
Advance from the Beach, #521
At
D:
22,888
1,400
X
X
22,888
1,400
?
?
158
628
?
?
Advance through the Outposts, #522
A:
D:
18,398
2,900
X
X
18,3*8
2,900
?
?
266
2,120
?
?
90
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Tomb Hill-Ouki, #523
A:
D:
Strength 1
x
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength - , ,.. ?
7
18,111
4,731
16,111
4,731
7
7
4M
1,278
Skyline Ridge-Rocky Crags, #524
A:
D:
16,291
2,600
X
X
16,291
2,600
7
7
740
1,661
KocJ li Ridge-On« iga I, #525
A:
D:
14,594
5,000
X
X
14,594
5,000
7
7
269
1,324
Kocl li Ridge-One tga II, , #526
D:
15,986
4,500
X
X
15,986
4,500
7
7
182
814
Kochi Ridge-Onaga III, #527
Japanese Counterattack, 4-5 May, #528
A:
D:
6,850
15,350
X
X
6,850
15,350
7
7
3,704
339
?
?
91
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Kochi Ridge IV, #529
r7
D:
Strength 1
x"
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final | Strength |
15,109
5,140
15,109
5,140
7
?
114
1,464
7
?
Shuri Envelopment, Phase I, #530
lA:
D: 3,338
X
X
16,043
3,338
i
?
in 478 7
Japanese Counterattack, 24/24 May, #531
JA: D:
4,000
15,777
[x"
X
4,000
15,777
0
0
, 1,269
241
2,7311
15,536
Shuri Envelopment, Phase II, #532
A:
D:
15,840
3,000
X
X
15,840
3,000
?
?
124
434
?
?
Shuri Envelopment, Phase III, #533
A:
D:
15,205
2,600
X
X
15,205
2,600
?
?
182
2,564
?
?
Hill 95-1, #534
|A:
D:
16,091
3,500
X
X
16,091
3,500
?
?
193
1,222
?
?
92
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Hill 95-11, #535
A:
p:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl, Casualties
Final 1 Strength
10,002
2,500
16,0612
2,500
?
?
248
1,470
?
?
Yaeju-Dake, #536
|A:
p: 5,237
2,500
X
X
5,237
2,500
?
?
48
2,401
?|
?
Hills 153 and 115, #537
A:
p: 15,808
2,000
X
X
15,800
2,000
?
?
31?
1,971
?|
?
Advance from the Beachhead, #538
lA:
D:
19,082
2,000
X
X
19,082
2,000 ?
282
1,588
?|
?
Advance to the Shuri Line Outposts, #539
lA:
D:
18,388
2,900
X
X
18,388
2,900
?
?
555
2,470 ?
Kakazu and Tombstone Ridges, #540
|A:
p: 21,247
3,000
x 1
X
i 21,247
3,000
?
?
1,079
2,468
?
?
93
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Nishibaru Ridge - Tanabaru Escarpment, #541
Initial Strength
17,163
3,000
Reinf./Repl, Casualties
879
2,860
Final Strength
Maeda Escarpment, #542
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank I, #543
502
4,038
..
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank II, #544
? 20,973
4,757
"~5F0
4,328
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank III, #545
A:
D:
Advance to the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #546
A:
D:
?
?
?
?
?
?
94
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Initial Attack on the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #547
A:
'D:
Strength 1
X
X
2 3 InTtfal"" Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
18,660
4,250
10,660
4,250
?
? 1,006
?
?
Capture of the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #548
lA:
D:
19,047
3,250
X
X
19,047
3,250
?
?
576
3,220 ?
Jen] in, #549
|A:
p: 10,900
6,160
X
X
10,900
6,160
0
0
225
200
10,675
5,960
Jerusalem, #550
Kabatiya, #551
A:
D:
375
350
Tilfit-Zababida, #552
A:
D:
2M6i 13,600 X
X ?
13,600
?
0
1,750
1,500
25,932
12,100
12,425
9,550
lA:
D:
5,350
5,450
X
X
5,350
5,450
0
0
250
250
5,100
5,200
95
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Nablus, »553
Bir Lahfan, #555
Abu Ageila-Um Katef, #556
A:
D:
19,280
18,450
19,280
18,450
El Arish, #557
Jebel Libni, #558
A:
D:
10,800
3,000
10,800
3,000
Initial Final
A:
Strength 1
X
2 3 Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties Strength
10,700 10,700 0 37S 1MJ5
D: 8,640 X ? ? 350 8,290
Rafah, #554
A: 19,520 X 19,520 0 700 18,820
D: 19,500 X 19,500 0 2,700 16,800
0
0
3007 18,9801
9001 17,550
70
450
10,730
2,550
96
k ■ r\m n mn ^■« mrm.. — ■. — n.m'*nMinmv» m^mi—urn, am.te'm (■/vM:r-jin„ML^i.-B.fc-7wk. rt M rLh: I^MI\Mfr..*.*^ n wr..wrLwrLk r±ikr^Lnjä:AMTM-^jiKu."VitTikTi» ?\irn-k TkRimjt nVAi.JpjV KV
■
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Gaza Strip, #559
Initial Final Strength 1 2 3 Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties Strength
A: " l2r100 X ■■~T2"fT5"0 0 55 12,095
D: 17f450 X 17,450 0 626 16,824
Bir Hassna-Bir Thamada, #560
A: 8,700 X ? ? 60 8,640
D: 3,000 X ? ? 550 2,450
Mitla Pass, #561
Bir Hamma-Bir Gifgafa, #562
A: 10,200 X ? ? ... ...„.
T0V125
D: 13,500 X ? ? 550 12,950
Nakhl, #563
18,780 A: 18,780 X 0 60 18,720
D: 18,450 X 18,450 0 625 17,825
Bir Gifgafa, #564
A:
D;
97
™JI»I^**>^ Hj^n'.W4. w™.^«.^^^
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Tel Fahar-Banias, #565
A:
D:
Strength 1
It
X
2 3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
Final Strength
5,375
8,160
5,375
8,160
0
0
300
850
5,070
7,310
Rawiyeh, #566
A:
D:
5,350
4,350
X
X
5,350
4,350
0
0
150
300
5,200
4,050
Zaov ira-Kala, #! 567
A:
D:
5,850
8,560
X
X
5,850
8,560
0
0
TU
500
5,620
8,060
Kerama, #568*
A:
D:
11,940
16,168
11,940
16,168
201
497
Suez Canal Assault-North, #569
A:
D:
29,490
4,455
?
4,455
Suez Canal Assault-South, #570
11,739
15,671
29,090
4,180
98
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Second Army Buildup, #571
A:
D:
Strength 1 2 3
X
X
Initial Strength Reinf./Repl.
?
?
Casualties
Öd"0
450
Final Strength
03,110
13,550
63,910
14,000
?
?
Third Army Buildup, #572
A:
D:
45,160
10,980
X
X
?
?
?
?
750
400
44,410
10,580
Kantara Firdan, #573
A: 25,850 X 25,850 0 700 25,150
D: 67,440 X 67,440 0 700 66,740
Sgyi Jtian Offensive-North, #574
A: 81,160 X 01,160 0 1,12T 79,460
D: 43,400 X 43,400 0 380 43,020
Egyptian Offensive-South, #575
A: 57,960 X 57,960 0 1,350 56,610
D: 28,600 X 28,600 0 260 28,340
Jev« jrsoir (Chinese Farm I), #576
A: 22,790 X ? ? 100 22,690
D: 30,970 X ? ? 500 30,470
99
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Deversoir (Chinese Farm II)f #577
Initial Strength
Tr,T0^ ?
Reinf./Repl. Casualties
5W
2,400
"Final Strength
1 TTTSSV
34,440
Deversoir West, #578
A:
D:
19,600
18,180
300
800
19,300
17,380
Ismailia, #579
Jebel Geneifa, #580
Shallufa I, #581
300"| rf,"9"00"
1,650 33,983
A; 16,200 X 16,200 0 150 16V050
D: 25,600 X 25,600 0 1,100 24,500
Adabiya #582
A; 10,900 X 10,900 0 75 10,825
D: 14,620 X 14,620 0 400 14,220
100
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Shallufa II, #583
A:
Strength 1
X
2 —
3 Initial Strength Reinf./Repl. Casualties
150
Final Strength
11,550 —TT;m il/TS? 0
D: 22,570 X 22,570 0 1,100 21,470
Sues :, «584
A: 14,681 X 14,681 0 340 14,341
D: 22,570 X 22,570 0 1,100 21,470
Kuneitra, #585
A:
D:
17,750
3,630
X
X
?
?
?
?
350
200
17,400
3,430
Ahme idiyeh, #58( 5
A;
D: 5,745
X
X
" i
?
?
? 250 5,495
Raf: id, #587
A:
D:
19,525
4,958
X
X
19,525
4,958
0
0
350
250
19,175
4,708
Yehi 'dia-El Al, #588
A:
D:
r ^r,"W4"
6,300
X
X
T
?
?
? 150
"' ■2r,T84
6,150
101
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Nafekh, «589
J' Initial Strength iReinf./Repl.ICasualties
250
fTnaT" Strength
—rrjm 6,696
Tel Paris, «590
Hushniyah, «591
A;
D:
12,733
14,683
X
X
?
?
?
?
450
1,125
■■"■12,2'Ö1
13,558
Mour it Herraonit, , «592
A:
D:
3l,6"50
5,395
X
X
?
?
?
?
1,200
400
30,4'50
4,995
Mt. Hermon I, #593
2,642
1,483
Tel Shams, «594
A:
D:
16,100
19,400
102
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Tel Shear# «595
Strength 1 2 3
"x
X
InitTal Strength Reinf./Repl.
?
?
Casualties Final
Strength
A:
D: 21,500 ?
■" ■"SffiB
900
14,420
20,600
Tel el Hara, «596
A:
D:
12,500
14,300
X
X
12,500
14,300
0
0
450
50
iT,T50
14,250
Kfar Shams-Tel Antar, #597
A: 11,000 X 11,000 0 100 10,900
D: 12,000 X 12,000 0 200 11,800
Nabc i, #598
A; 11,500 X """ TTPSW d "~K(r " ■"iT,"TO
D: 11,000 X 11,000 0 100 10,900
Arab Counteroffensive, #599
XT' ~3T,T50' x
Di 16,100 x
35,200
15,940
Mount Hermon II, #600
A:
D!
5,700
4,750
'5, TU 7 4,7501
X
0
TST
200
TTOTI
4,550
103
TASK 2: STRENGTH CLARIFICATION
Mount Hermon III, #601
Initial Strength
flTOT
4,750
Reinf./Repl.
&
0
Casualties
"TOT
250
"TfnaT" Strength
TTTJOT
4,500
Aj --r-r-i | |
D:
ffn r I ri i '^r
D:
A:
D:
A: ' '~~ ~"~ '" - —- ~
D:
104
Task 2 Footnotes
Wlmpfen. #3
The defender's strength and casualties are from Bodart, p. 50.
Luetzen, #9
The defender's initial strength is from Sweden, Generalstaben, Vol. VI.
Edgehill. »20
Strength and casualty data is from Young and Adair, pp. 136, 142.
Preston. #26
The attacker's casualties in the Battle of Preston are nowhere specified, not even in the original sources. HERO estimates approximately 100 KIA based upon the brief discussion in Woolrych, p. 178, and adds to this figure 200 WIA, the normal ratio of WlA to KIA at this period being 2:1. Total attacker battle casualties certainly could not have been less than 300, and may have been as high as 600.
Killiecrankie. #40
Casualty data is from Kinross, p. 181, and Smurthwaite, p. 194.
Maxen. #78
All data is from Bodart, p. 237, except defender casualties, which a»"e from Malleson, Ambushes, p. 293.
Torgau. #81
All data is from Duffy, p.''235.
Princeton. #86
The strength of the attacker's force initially engaged was approximately 1,250, composed of 350 men of Mercer's command (Boatner, American Revolution, p. 891) and 900 men of Cadwalader's militia (Dupuy and Dupuy, Compact History of the
105
Revolutionary War, p. 180). The initial strength of the defender
was 800 men (ibid.. p. 179).
Freeman's Farm, #87
The strength of the attacker's force which was initially engaged was 3»300 men, from the right and center columns. See Boatner, American Revolution, p. 971.
Monmouth Court House. #90
The strengths of the attacker's and defender's forces initially engaged were 2,000 and 5,000 men respectively. See Boatner, American Revolution, p. 721.
Fleurus. #101
The defender's strength is from Dupuy and Dupuy, Encyclopedia, p. 681.
Lodi, #102
The attacker's initial strength was approximately 6,100 men (3,600 infantry and 2,500 cavalry). See Chandler, Napoleon, pp. 78, 81.
Castiglione. #103
The attacker's initial strength is from Chandler, Dictionary, p. 83.
Wuerzburg, #105
The defender's casualties are from Bodart, p. 312.
Mount Tabor. #110
The defender's reinforcements are from Chandler, Dictionary, p. 431. "
Marengo,^#115
Two French divisions by themselves opposed the attacking Austrians at the beginning of the battle according to Chandler, Napoleon. The strength of the two divisions was nearly 9,000 men
(ibid., p. yL02). This is the estimated initial strength of the
106
defender.
Hohenlinden. #116
Strength clarification for the defender is from Dodge, Napoleon, 11:96.
Austerlitz, »117
The strength of the defender's reinforcements is from Atlas to Accompany Napoleon, map M2. The 8,000 men of Davout's corps are considered reinforcements.
Jena. »118
The attacker's and defender's initial strengths are from Chandler, Napoleon, pp. 479-480.
Auerstadt. #119
Two divisions (Orange's and Wartensleben's) are considered reinforcements for the attacker. Von Lettow-Vorbeck gives Wartensleben's strength as 7,800. Orange's division was organized similarly and is estimated to have had the same strength. Total attacker reinforcements are therefore estimated to be 15,600. Maude, p. 172, gives the strength of Morand's division as 6,200. This figure is considered the defender's reinforcement.
Eylau. #120
A map on p. 539 of Chandler, Napoleon gives the combined strength of Ney's and Davout's corps as 29,100. This <s considered the attacker's reinforcement. Lestocq's command of 9,000 men is considered the defender's reinforcement.
Friedland. #121
The attacker's initial strength of 17,000 men (9,000 infantry and 8,000 cavalry under Lannes) is from Chandler, Napoleon, p. 573.
Eckmuehl. #124
The defender's initial strength was 36,000 men, according to Chandler, Napoleon, p. 689.
107
Aspern-Essllng. #125
The defender's initial strength was 23,000 men, according to Chandler, Napoleon, p. 702.
Luetzen. #135
The defender's initial strength was 1*5,000 men under Ney, according to Esposito and Elting, map 129.
Bautzen. #136
The attacker's reinforcements were 84,000 men under Ney, accord- ing to Esposito and Elting, map 131a. The attacker's initial strength was 115,000.
Dresden. #137
Attacker and defender initial and total strengths are from Esposito and Elting, maps 135 and 136.
Leipzig. #138
The initial attacker strength was approximately 200,000 men (Esposito and Elting, map 141) rising to a total strength of 365,000 (Chandler, Napoleon, p. 1,120). The initial defender strength was 177,500 men, with 18,700 as reinforcement (ibid.. p. 924).
Hanau, #139
The attacker's initial strength is from Esposito and Elting, map 144.
La_Rothiere. #140
The attacker's initial strength was 78,000 men, 53,000 under Bluecher and 25,000 under Wrede (Chandler, Napoleon, p. 960).
Laon. #141
The attacker's reinforcements were 10,000 men under Marraont (Chandler, Napoleon, p. 989).
Arcis-sur-Aube. #142
Attacker and defender initial strengths are from Chandler, Napoleon, p. 1118. Note that this engagement's correct duration
108
should be two days (20-21 March 1814).
The attacker's reinforcements were approximately 18,000 men of the French Imperial Guard. See Dodge, Napoleon, IV:573.
Quatre Bras, #144
The defender's initial strength was approximately 8,000 men according to Chandler, Napoleon, p. 1048.
Waterloo, »145
The defender's initial strength is from Esposito and Elting, map 166 (68,000 men under Wellington).
Lundy's Lane. #148
The attacker's reinforcements are estimated to be approximately two-thirds of the total US force, i.e., two brigades or 1,300 men. See Esposito, West Point Atlas, I, map 11. The defender's initial strength was some 1,700 men according to Jacobs and Tucker, pp. 137-138.
Inkerman, #166
The defender's initial strength was 8,500 men according to Young and Calvert, p. 20.
Sadowa_(Koeniggraetz). #169
The attacker's reinforcements consisted of 115,000 men of the Prussian Second Army. See Dupuy, Genius, p. 81.
First Bull Run (First Manassas). #171
The defender's reinforcements were 2,000 men under Kirby Smith, according to Esposito, West Point Atlas, I, map 22.
Belmont. #173
The defender's initial strength was 2,500 men. Total strength committed was 5,000. See Johnson and Buel, 1:356. (Johnson and Buel is hereafter cited as B&L.)
109
i -r i turn k«* t «Mf iMi v / tf* J WJafV;^n I W\/-tAi tA i knr^KJ MU k
Shiloh. #178
Defender reinforcements totalled 25,482 men from Buell's command and Lew Wallace's division. See Johnson and McLaughlin, p. 49.
Port Republic. »182
The attacker's start strength is from Henderson, p. 288. This was 1,200 men of Winder's brigade.
Seven Pines (Fair Oaks), #183
See B&L, 11:219, for a breakdown of forces involved in this engagement. The attacker's start strength is for D.H. Hill's division, and the defender's start strength is for Couch's and Casey's troops.
Gaines's Mill. #185
The attacker's start strength is from Livermore, Numbers and Losses, p. 84. This is the strength of A.P. Hill's and Longstreet's troops. The defender's reinforcements are from Slocum's division (Henderson, p. 359).
Glendale-Frayser's._Farm, #186
The defender's total engaged strength is from Livermore, Numbers and Losses, p. 84. The attacker's and defender's casualties are calculated for this engagement by adding the casualties incurred on 29 and 30 June, as presented in Boatner, Civil War, pp. 722, 915-916. The attacker's initial strength represents that of Magruder's troops, as presented in Freeman, 1:549. The defender's initial strength is that of Sumner's corps and W.F. Smith's division as shown in War of the Rebellion, vol. XI, Part III, p. 238, and estimated at 93% effectives, i.e., 0.93 x 26,489 (Livermore's formula in Numbers and Losses).
Malvern Hill. #187
Strength data for both sides is calculated by subtracting the losses of 29-30 June fronrthe strengths given for 29-31 July in Livermore, Numbers and Losses, p. 85. Casualty data for both sides is from Boatner, Civil War, p. 507.
Second BullRun (Second Manassas). #189
The attacker's initial strength is that of Sigel's troops, not including Reynold's division, and Heintzelman's troops, a total of 35,083 men according to Livermore, Numbers and Losses, p. 88.
110
Jackson's command of 20,000 men is taken as the defender's initial strength. See Boatner, Civil War, p. 104.
Antietam (Sharpsburg). #191
The defender's reinforcements represent A.P. Hill's division, 3,000 men according to Henderson, p. 538.
Corinth. #192
Strength and casualties and NAMA and NAMD for both sides are reversed in the original report. The attacker's strength and casualties should be 22,000 and 4,233, and the defender's figures are 21,14? and 2,520. The Confederates attacked, and Union forces were defending. ^A ^ v/^'D^r*, = 4 a* = ß??*^*-»■»"^
Chancellorsville. #196
The attacker's total strength is from Dupuy and Dupuy, Encyclo- pedia, pp. 884-885. The attacker's reinforcements represent Averell's cavalry division (Bigelow, p. 473). Boatner, Civil War, p. 140, is the source for the defender's strength.
Brandy Station. #198
The attacker's reinforcements, representing two infantry bri- gades, are from Livermore, Story, III, Book 11:348.
Gettysburg, #199
The attacker's and defender's initial strengths are from Liver- more, Story. Ill, Book 11:429.
The_Wilderness. #202
The initial strengths of the attacker and defender are from Esposito, Atlas to Accompany Steele. map 122b.
Spotsylvania. #203
The opening action of this engagement involved Warren's V Corps and one cavalry division for the attacker and Anderson's I Corps and two cavalry divisions for the defender. The strength of Warren's troops (16,250 men) is from Livermore, Numbers and Losses, p. 112. The attacker's cavalry is estimated at slightly less than one-third of 12,424, the US cavalry corps strength (B&L, IV:153). The strength of Anderson's corps is from B&L, IV: iBltlO.OOO men). The defender's cavalry is estimated to be one-
Ill
half of the total Confederate cavalry strength of 8,000 (Ibid,, p. 153).
New Market. #204
The attacker's strength is from Boatner, Civil War, p. 588.
Cold Harbor. #205
The defender's casualties are from Boatner, Civil War, p. 163.
Petersburg. #209
Initial strengths of the attacker and defender are from Boatner, Civil War, p. 6411.
Globe Tavern. #210
The attacker's initial strength represents that of Warren's V Corps (11,832 men according to Livermore, Numbers and Losses, p. 119).
Bentonville, #215
The defender's initial strength represents that of the XIV and XX corps (17,990 men according to Livermore, Numbers and Losses, p. 134).
Dinwiddie_Court House & White Oak Road. #216
The attacker's initial strength is from Boatner, Civil War, p. 282. The defender's initial strength is estimatecTTE approxi- mately one-half of Johnson's division of 6,813 (Livermore, Numbers and Losses, p. 188). These troops moved to meet the union advance on 29 March. The defender's casualties are esti- mated. They lost 800 men at White Oak Road according to Freeman, 111:665. Freeman also reports that Johnson's division of four brigades lost a total of 1,050 men. Two of Johnson's brigades were at White Oak Road and two at Dinwiddie Court House. Esti- mated losses at Dinwiddie Court House are 500 for Johnson plus an additional 500 for other units. Therefore the total defender losses are estimated to be 1,800; 800 at White Oak Road and 1,000 at Dinwiddie Court House.
Five Forks.#217
The defender's casualties are from Knox, p. 297.
112
Sayler's Creek. »219
The defender's strength is estimated to be 21,000 men. Boatner, Civil War, p. 721, reports that the total Confederate casualties TTI TRe engagement probably represented one-third of the force that left Amelia and Jetersville. Therefore the total Confederate strength is estimated to be 21,000.
Spichern, »222
The attacker's and defender's initial strengths are from Rousset, 1:119.
Mars la Tour. #223
The attacker's initial strength is from Rousset, 1:151.
Kumanovo. »248
The attacker's start strength is estimated to be three-fifths of the attacker's total strength. Three Serbian divisions were present for the battle on the first day, and elements of two more plus one entire division arrived on the second day. See Barby, pp. 57-58, 84. The defender's casualties are from Boucabelle, p. 106. Note, however, that the defenders lost many more men in their retreat from the battlefield.
Lule' Burgas. »249
The attacker's initial strength is from Ford, pp. 56-58.
Prelip. »250
The attacker's total strength is estimated to be 50.000 for three divisions. Half of this force (one of two columns) is estimated to be the attacker's initial strength. See Boucabelle, pp. 112- 113. The defender's strength is estimated to be 20,000 men (ibid., pp. 112-114). -The defender's casualties are from BütnSäFelle, p. 115.
Monastir. »251
The defender's strength is from Barby, p. 123. Note that this engagement's correct dates and duration should be 16-18 Nov 1912 and 3 days respectively.
113
The Nleman. #254
The attacker's casualties are estimated. Sikorski, p. 315, re- Sorts total Polish casualties for September 1Q20 as 29,397. ince the Battle of the Nieman was the major conflict during that
month, Polish casualties are estimated to be 20,000.
Suomussalmi. #261
The attacker's reinforcements are estimated at 5,000 men (five new battalions) as described in Elting, p. 28. The defender's reinforcements of 18,000 men represent one division (ibid., p. 28).
La_Cateau, #267
The attacker's casualties, "estimated on the best returns available," are from Great Britain, Le Gateau, p. 31.
The Heights of Nancy. #269
The correct strength for the defender is 276,000. The original number is a typographical error.
Eastern Champagne. #289
The attacker's and defender's initial strengths and the attacker's casualties are presented in France, Ministere de la guerre, Les armees francaises, 11:^25, 481. Germany, Per Weltkrieg, VII; 53. gives Mbjioo as the total casualties sufferecT By CTl defenders from December 1914 to March 1915 in Champagne. French casualties from mid-February to mid-March 1915 were approximately half of the French total for the same time period (December 1914 to March 1915). Therefore, German casualties between mid-February and mid-March 1915 are estimated to be one- half, or 23,050, of 46,100.
Neuve Chapelle. #290
The defender's reinforcements are from Edmonds and Wynne, p. 88.
Ypres II. #291
Total defender strength committed in the Ypres battle is from King, p. 150. This is the strength of the German Fourth Army, but it comports with an estimated German strength for 10 divi- sions and 5 brigades at an average strength of 13,615 men per division. Edmonds and Wynne, pp. 377-378, give the order of battle of the German forces at Ypres. The average divisional
114
strength is calculated from the 20 April 1915 strengths of two German divisions which participated in the offensive, presented in Schwarte, p. 266. Total defender strength committed in the Ypres battle is calculated from the British order of battle in Edmonds and Wynne, pp. 370-371*.. The British committed 8 infan- try divisions (estimated at 18,179 men per division, Becke, p. 126) and 3 cavalry divisions. Two French divisions also partici- pated in the first days of the battle.
Festubert, #292
The defender's strength is estimated for two divisions at the beginning of the battle and the limited number of reserves sent to the front as described in Edmonds, 1915, pp. 1*9, 80-82. Edmonds, 1915, p. 76, gives German casualties.
First Dardanelles Landing, #300
Strength data originally given for both sides has been changed. The attacker's strength was 32,000 men total ashore on 25 April 1915, 29,000 British and ANZACs, according to Moorehead, p. 159, and 3,000 French, according to King, p. 181. Turkish strength was 5,000 against the ANZACs according to Aspinall-Oglander, 1:255. According to Moorehead, p. 149, 2,000 Turks are estimated to have opposed the British landing. Three thousand Turks are estimated to have opposed the French. The ANZACs incurred 2,000 casualties, according to Aspinall-Oglander, 1:198, and the British lost 3,000 according to Churchill, The World Crisis, 11:333. French casualties are estimated to have been approxi- mately one-half of the 778 casualties they incurred on 25-26 April. Total estimated attacker casualties are 5,400. Moorehead, p. 149, writes that the Turks lost 1,000 against the British. Aspinall-Oglander, 1:199, writes that 2,000 Turks were lost against the ANZACs. Approximately one-half of the 1,730 Turkish casualties incurred fighting the French on 25-26 April are estimated to have occurred on 25 April. Total defender casualties are therefore estimated to be 3,900.
Suvla Bay. #301
Turkish casualties are estimated from data presented in Aspinall- Oglander, 11:283, 302. One Turkish unit of the force initially opposed to the British landing at Suvla Bay suffered 30$ casual- ties according to Major Willmer, the commander of the force. The Turkish 12th Division incurred 143 casualties on 10 August. Total Turkish casualties are thus estimated by adding one-third of the original Turkish force (600 of 1,800 men) and 150 for the 12th Division on 10 August.
115
Chemln des Dames. »331*
The attacker's start strength Is 250,000 men. The defender's start strength is 75,000 men. The defender's casualties are 128,000. All data is estimated.
Exermont-Montrefagne, fST1*
The correct defender's strength and casualties are 3.245 and 192 respectively. The original numbers were typographical errors.
Megiddo. »385
The attacker's casualties are from MacMunn and Falls, Part II, p. 509. The defender's casualties are estimated to be 7,000 minimum (ibid.. p. 488).
Chouigui Pass. #391
Attacker and defender casualties have been estimated to be three men for each destroyed or damaged tank. US forces had no sup- porting arms, and German forces had only a small group of infan- try and engineers in this engagement. No data for German casual- ties was found in any source. The account of Lieutenant Freeland A. Daubin, Jr., a US tank commander who participated in the action, is quoted in most of the sources consulted for this engagement. Daubin's tank was destroyed and all four crew mem- bers were casualties. He notes that a US tank company commander was killed.
Vietri I. #398 ,
The defender's reinforcements are from British 46th Division.
Vietri II. #402
The defender's reinforcements are from ibid.
Mortain, #461
The defender's start strength is 13f690 representing the strength of the US 30th Infantry Division. See HERO, Historical Survey, p. 13. The defender's reinforcements represent the estimated strength of Combat Command B, 3d Armored Division, the 12th Infantry Regiment, and miscellaneous combat units. Shulman, p. 148, writes that the German 2d Panzer Division commander told him in an interview in 1946 that his division was back at its orig- inal line of departure by 9 August having incurred 800 casual- ties. The 2d Panzer Division's total casualties are estimated to
116
be 1,600 for the entire Mortain battle. The two other German divisions participating are assumed to have sustained a similar number of casualties, giving a total of 4,800 casualties for the Germans. Bluraenson, The Duel for France, p. 247, writes that German casualties were nigher tnan rnose sustained by US forces, but does not give a figure for the Germans.
Westwall, #468
Strengths for both sides were calculated by adding the daily strengths and dividing by six, the duration in days of the engagement. All data is from HERO, Field Fortifications, p. 41. The data is based on operational records and some estimation.
Schmidt. #469
The attacker's reinforcements are from Clark, p. 40. The attacker's strength is calculated by adding the attacker's daily strengths and dividing by twelve, the duration in days of the engagement. See HERO, Historical Survey, p. 36. MacDonald, Siegfried Line, p. 374, estimates ihe number of German casualties in the main phase of the battle to be 3,000.
Sarre-St. Avoid. #475
The correct casualties for the defender are 3,279. The original number is a typographical error.
St.Jfith, #484
All data is presented in The Seventh Armored Division, p. 103. US casualties are given only for the 7th Armored Division and attached units (1,037). Casualties for supporting US troops are estimated by using the same proportion of 7th Armored Division casualties to the armored division's strength and multiplying that ratio by the supporting troop's strength.
Bastogne, #485
Two pieces of data for attacker and defender casualties were found in the sources consulted for this battle. Cole, The Ardennes, p. 303, writes that 175 officers and men of Task force Cherry, one-quarter of its strength, were the casualties incurred by this force on 19 December. One-quarter of the strengths of the other two heavily engaged US forces and the 212 casualties incurred by the 506th Airborne Infantry Regiment on 19 December (ibid., p. 455) were added to give an estimated total of 1,151 US casualties. German casualties at the Neville action were estimated by Task Force Desobry personnel to be the equiva- lent of a battalion of German infantry, according to Phillips, p.
117
4 n M r. A ru k. rv_M n K »_wn *;■;•■ k: n. t r. ur.h.r
125. An additional 2,000 casualties at Lullange/Allerborn and Longwilly are estimated to have been incurred, giving a total of 3,000 German casualties. The strength of an airborne infantry regiment was added to the defender's strength, as one unit of this type was engaged in combat.
Soviet Counteroffenslve at Moscow. ff490
The correct casualties for the defender are 85,300. The original number Is a typographical error.
The Pogoreloye Gorodishche Offensive. #^91
All data is presented in HERO, Historial Scenarios, p. 73.
Seelow Heights. #515
Strengths for both sides were calculated by adding the daily strengths and dividing by two, the duration in days of the engagement. All data is from HERO, Field Fortifications, p. 47.
Tarawa-Betlo. #517
The attacker's initial strength was 5,000 men, part of the 2d Marine Division.
Kerama. #568
The attacker's casualties are from Col. Israel Gefen, an Israeli Defense Forces veteran and HERO consultant. He based this data on an article in Maarachot, No. 292, and on Interviews with Israeli participants.
118
Task 3; Clarification of the Basis for Assigning Victory
The purpose of ^ttrit* task.Is to Identify the basis used to
determine victory or success in an engagement.-^ As described on
pages 12 and 13 of Volume II of the original data base, 3 two
criteria^ej^ eraj?lpxe^to_determine victory in an engagement.J
"^ l) Qecisive (or "Clear-cut") Resolution of Combat ' .is a
qualitative assessment of the outcome of combat in favor of one
side or the other. (The term "clear-cut," i.e., obvioiis, is
preferable to "decisive" since the latter term has ext^a-battle-
field or strategic connotations). The resolution of combat
recorded in Table 7 of the data base is^a-^chematic representa-
tion of what happened to bgJth^sTSes as a result of the engage-
ment. It does—Rot necessarily represent whether or not the
resolution of combat was decisive, nor was it intended to do so. S
If t^ie basis for determining victory in an engagement is clear-
cut resoluvn <s? combat, "RESO" is entered under the column
heading CRITERION in the Task 3 tables.
&**') 2} fission Accomplishment .is the criterion used to
determine victory, when there was judged to be no clear-cut
resolution of combat, but one of the sides is Judged to be more
successful than the other in accomplishing its mission. Mission
accomplishment is shown as a numerical score on a scale of 1 to
10, representing the success each side achieved in fulfillment of
its mission. An explanation of the derivation of the mission
accomplishment scores is given on pages 14-15 of Volume II of the
original data base. If the basis for determining victory in an
engagement is mission accomplishment, "ACH" is entered under the
column heading CRITERION in the Task 3 tables.
119
Explanations of the column headings for the Task 3 tables
are as follow.
WINA is the heading under which the victor or side
which achieved success is designated. The entry "1" indicates
that the attacker was victorious or successful, the entry "-1"
indicates that the defender was victorious or successful, and the
entry "0" indicates that the engagement was a drawn battle. A
drawn battle is scored only when (i) there is judged to be no
clear-cut resolution of combat and (ii) neither side is judged to
have been more or less successful than the other side in accom-
plishing its mission. The review of the basis for assignment of
victory performed for this study disclosed some typographical
errors in the original data base and has led to some revisions in
analytical assessments affecting success. This has resulted in
changes in assigned victory or success for a number of engage-
ments. A review of the 95 engagements recorded for General
Problem Report 2 has also resulted in changes in several engage-
ments. All changes in WINA and ACHA and ACHD in Table 5 of the
original data base which are presented on the following tables
are marked by an asterisk. Users of the data base should regard
the entries shown in the Task 3 tables as the correct ones.
Where appropriate, changes should be made under "Success" in
Table 3 of the first 247 engagements of the data base, as well as
under "Victor" and "Success" for all engagements in Tables 5 and
7.
ACHA and ACHD are the mission accomplishment scores of
the attacker and defender. The review of the basis for assignment
of victory has disclosed some typographical errors in the
120
R *;/v*-tÄ:n_jE JUI p!.MJn.JM?LMJV.^n_k:n.MA^"ILi RJ
original data base and led to some revisions in mission
accomplishment scores. Users of the data base should regard the
mission accomplishment scores given in the Task 3 tables as the
correct ones. Where appropriate, changes should be made in Table
5 of the original data base.
CRITERION is the heading under which the basis for
determining victory or success is shown, as described above.
121
.•»i-i-v.n wwwv«wim «winrww ■«■«*« im A iHHHM«i.'«-i«i«k.*^MB«kA'<i.,r4.,<"iUf»jnUnur<.T*J
Nieuport, #1
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
\-wm—ntcH*—ntCHP ; CHTTCTIOTI I I i i
i i i i I -1 • 3 ! 8 ! RESO I
White Mountain, #2 1—— 1 r —p. I 1 1 1 i 8 1 2 ! RESO 1 1 j 1 1
Wimpfen, #3
RESO
Dessau Bridge, #4*
! 1 i i
-1 i
i
1 3 9 RESO
r, #5
1 i
! i
7 3 RESO | i
i i
Breitenfeld I, #6
122*
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
The Lech, #7 •
«8
r 1 1 1 1.
*
1" i
1.
r i i.
Tmnr • i
i • • J.
Trcmr
9
-'-
Trcmr
3
J.
CRITERION I
i RESO
Alte Veste,
-i ' i
1 4 1 1
8 1
RESO 1 i
Luetzen, #9 "
i
""r i i
i t
9 i i i
1 5
1 i i
RESO I 1
Noerdlingen I, #10
Wittstock, #11 *
Breitenfeld II, #12 *
12 i
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Rocroi, #13*
nmr innrc—! retro i CHITLHION I i i i
RESO
Tuttlingen, #14*
I 1 RESO
Freiburg, #15*
RESO
Jankau, #16
Mergentheim, #17*
Allerheim (Noerdlingen II), #18*
124f
Lens, «19*
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Edgehill, «20
RESO
Mars ton Moor, «21*
Tippermuir, «22
! -1
Kilsyth, «23*
Newbury II, «24*
!125
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Naseby, #25*
iTmra—nrcirc—nrctro—i cmrronoii i i i i i -X | 4 * 9 I RESO
i I I I
Preston, #26 r i i 1 " 1 1
r
i -! • •
9 1 3 1 RESO 1 1
Dunbar, #27
"1 i i
i 9 | i
4 1 1
RESO i i
Worcester, #28*
St. Antoine, #29
The Dunes, #30
126!
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
The Raab, «31*
#32
i*
|- 1 1.
I" i
1.
"TOR ffcmr
4
"1'ACHÜ
i 1 9 1
j
i
cRiTmcnr
RESO
Vienna,
-1
-'
1 " '1
-!
J. 9
i
1 3 1
i
i J.
RESO 1 •
J
Chociro II, #33
'"T | i " 1 1 I
1 8 1
i
3 i i
1 RESO i
i
Slnsheim, #34
1 1 1
i i
i
9 | i
4 1 1
RESO |
1
Senef, #35
1 i i
i r ^ ' i
5 ACH ;
i
Enzheim, #36*
r • i
L 0
f
!
r"" ——■
1 6 1 1
ACH |
i
127'
J BauaaKJiu «u nv « - R u tm Hicjtu KU m A nuwu ^ w. n J KJ .fki *
■ i
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Turckheim, #37
i WINA ! KCTTC
Fehrbellln, «38*
Sedgemoor, #39*
1 —r ] i
1 1 ! 9 i 4 1 RESO !. -i. —S- -J-
1 1
■
-1 i —«J.
2 1 7 1 RESO
Killiecrankie, #40»
1 ""T — 1 1 1 1 1
8 1 1 1 1
2 RESO 1 i
Walcourt, #41*
#42*
-1 i * i
—r i
1 i i
7 i — j
RESO ;
i
Fleurus,
1 i 9 i
3 1 1 I RESO | i i
ui
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
The Boyne, #43* 1 '* imnr j ACHJT ■ffcmr -r cRiTEHimri 1
1
•
5
i
i i i i 9 RESO !
r i
. i, j.
Aughrim, #44
i "i i 9
1 1 4
• i RESO j
i-
-1- .J. . i. I
Steenkerke, #45*
I | "i | i -i i
i 3 ! 7 RESO |
i. J '. 1
Neerwinden (Landen), #46* 1
1 1
,1 1
I 1 1 8 1
3 RESO |
Marsaglia, #47*
1 ! 9
i
2 RESO ;
Zenta, #48*
i i » i i
2 | RESO j
12 1
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Poltava, #49^ i-wm—mm—nrcmj—i CHITEHION i i i i i i
i " -i 8 RESO
I
Blenheim, #50*
! T , ..p 1 1 9 1 3 1 RESO i 1 1
Ramlllles, #51*
RESO
Oudenarde, #52*
Malplaquet, #53
Peterwardein, #54*
130/
-
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Mollwitz, #55»
l-TTCTTC—Hm—I'ACHD' ! CHiTI-KlüN i I _J I I I
! -1 I I I
RESO
Chotusitz, #56 1 T i i |
i -1 1 I
5 1 8 1 RESO i i
Dettingen, #57*
RESO
Fontenoy, #58
Hohenfriedberg, #59*
#60
1 ! 1 1 9 1
3 i
RESO | i
Sohr,
1 1 1 i 1 9
i
4 i RESO 1
131
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Kesslesdorf, #61 I wiNr Tfcmr 1 ACHD CTTTCTTOT i
_l I
RESO
Prestonpans, #62
Culloden, #63
Lobositz, «64
Prague, #65*
r 1 i
t" i
1 L
r • •
•
i 1 I
9 r
i i
3 1 RESO "I
1
-i ——T""
I
1 i I
3 i 9 1 j
^1 RESO
i 8 7 RESO i i
i 9 4 ■ i
i
1 i i
RESO
Plassey, #66
-i !-- 2 9 RESO 1 1 1
13!
•
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Kolin, #67*
i wiNA nrorc I rem» i CHITIIHIüN \ I I I I. I
I 5 j 8 I -1 I I
RESO
I
Hastenbeck, #68*
I
Rossbach, #69*
ACH
r ' 1 1 1 i -i 3 | 9 RESO <
i 1
Leuthen, #70
i i • i
i 10 3 RESO
i
Crefeld, #71*
Zorniorf, #72
1 | |
1 1 1
7 5 1 i i
ACH 1 i
133(
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Hochkirch, #73*
r i- i
1 1.
r i i.
•
•
mnr i
, 1. 9
1 T .J.
i I
A-cmr
4
-'-
CHITER1ÖH
i RESO
Bergen, #74»
-i I 1 !
3 I ! 6
i
1 . 1.
ACH
Minden, #75
i 9 I 2 i
i J.
RESO
Kunersdorf, #76
-1 RESO
Plains of Abraham (Quebec) , #77*
#78*
-1 1 3 9
T- i i I
1
i
RESO j
1
Maxen,
1 ■ « 2
I
1 l
1 RESO
i
13 i
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Warburg, #79
lima—nrorc i ACHD I CHITEHION I
r RESO
Liegnitz, #80*
1
i-1 —r
-i i
2 • 1 1
8 i
1 RESO — 1
1
Torgau, #81
j 1 8 1 i i i i
4 i
1 1
RESO 1 i i
Bunker Hill, #82*
i 1 !
7 5 i
RESO ;
i
Quebec, #83*
i-i 1 4 j 7
1 i i
1 i i
RESO I
White Plains, #84
( 135
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Trenton, #85
TTm—I ACHÄ | ACHD—i CHlTl-HiüN I I I I. I
I I 1 I 9
i i
i 2 i .
RESO I
Princeton, #86
1 1 i i 1
1 1 1 8 • 2 1 RESO 1
1 1 -J- -J« „J
Freeman's Farm, #87*
1 |
1 o 5 5 | ACH i i
1 1
Germantown, #88
Bemis Heights, #89
Monmouth Court House, #90*
ACH
1316
-
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Camden, #91
Um—{ ACHA i ACHÜ iTHmHlüN { I I I I III !
1 17 13 I RESO I I I I I
Cowpens, #92*
I -1 RESO
Guilford Court House, #93* 1 1
-~-r- 1 i 1 1 1 1
i
i 6 i
i i i
5 ACH ! 1
Hobkirk's Hill, #94
RESO
Eutaw Springs, #95*
-1 i
1 i
. , i
4 5 RESO |
Valmy, #96*
-1 1 1
1 3 4
i
ACH | I
13'
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Jemappes, #97
|-¥nra—nrm—{'ACHD i cRiTtiRioN \ I I I I I I 1 j 6 | 4 | RESO \ I I I I I
Neerwinden, #98
-1 I RESO
Hondschoote, #99 •-r
i i i i i
RESO
Wattignies, #100
RESO
Fleurus, #101
Lodi, #102*
138
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Castiglione, #103
|-¥m—I ACHA—i'ACHl) { CHITLRION { I I I I I j—— | | | | 1 I 8 | 3 | RESO I I I i
Neresheim, #104 * 1
j ACH I 1
Wuerzburg, #105
i i
1 1 1 1
7 ' 1
i i t i
4 i
i i
1
RESO | 1
Arcola, #106
| 1 8 3 RESO ;
Rivoli, #107
i- 3 i
1 i i
9 ! ' 1
1 l 1
RESO j
Pyramids, #108*
139
J M - n _ * .u * u * u m. \
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Stockach I, «109
iTmra—nrcrra—i AüHü I cmrEWTon i i i i i
i i I -1 I 5 16
i RESO
Mount Tabor, #110
1 1 -1 -1 1
r i 8
1 1 RESO
1 -J- '.. -J«
Zurich I, #111
#112*
i
i L
r i • •
-i —r-
i
1 1
4 !
6 1 1 1
ACH 1 1 J
Novi,
i i i i i i
7 1 3 i i
1 i i i
RESO 1 i i i i
Zurich III, #113
RESO
Moeskirch, #114
.40
■
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Marengo, #115
inmrx—nnTÄ—i ACHD—i CHITLHIüN I I i i i i I -1 I 2 | 7 i RESO I I I I I
Hohenlinden, #116
! -1 RESO
Austerlitz, #117
#118
1 1 i !__
r i i
-i 2 1 1 i
10 i RESO i J
Jena,
i i 9 i i 2
I
i
RESO i
Auerstadt, #119
!"" —i— —T— | I i
i I
-i 2 i
1 i i
10 I
1 i I
RESO I 1
Eylau, #120* r , 1 1 1 ! i
0 6 i i
6 i I i i_
ACH 1 !
] 41
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Friedland, «121 nmra—nrcirc—;'ACHD—i cHiTbiHiüN i i i i i_ i i I i
I 3 I I
RESO
Vimeiro, #122
-1 RESO
Corunna, #123
Eckmuehl, #124
Aspern-Essling, #125*
RESO
The Raab, #126
1142
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Wagram, #127
{ WINA" IRCHA' ACHÜ i CHITLHIÜN I
RESO
I
Talavera, #128 *
i r ! 6 I
.1 -1^ I -1 ACH
Bussaco, #129
Fuentes de Onoro, #130*
ACH
Albuera, #131
-1 ACH
Salamanca, #132 1 - T—
1
1 1 7 3 RESO
I1 43
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Vittoria, #133 \irm—nm—nrciro—mnnmmni i i i i i | i ii lei i i i
i i 3 ! RESO
Borodino, #134
r ~r —,... i
i
L i i 7 1 1
6 i
RESO
Luetzen, #135*
Bautzen, #136
Dresden, #137
Leipzig, #138
j —r 1 i
1 -1 1
i 4 6 RESO 1 1
JL44
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Hanau, #139
i-¥m—rrm—i ■ ACHD—{ CHTTCTIOT i i i
RESO
La Rothiere, #140
I 1
1 i i 1 8 ! 1
7 1 1
,. 1. RESO
Laon, #141
i
1 -1
■ - - '
i
! 4 i
7 1 1 RESO
Arcis-sur-Aube, #142
1 7 i
i
1 4
1 | ACH | 1 . 1
Ligny, #143
1 7 i
1 i i
4 1
; RESO • 1 i
Quatre Bras, #144*
ACH
I 45
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Waterloo, #145
I I -1
I ACHA } ACHü i cHrmnon i i i i i
8 RESO I
The Thames, #146
r RESO
Chlppewa, #147
Lundy's Lame, #148 l~ "' !" 1 1 1
-1 3 4 i i ACH |
New Orleans, #149
Boyaca, #150*
JL46
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Carabobo, #151*
nmns—nnm i i i i i i
! ACHl) I CTTTCTTOTI I I | RESO
Bombona, #152'
ACH
Pichincha, #153*
#154*
1 1 1
-1
—p. i i i
"1 3 8
i
| RESO 1 1
Junin,
1 9 3 i
| RESO i i
" ■ i i i i
1
Ayacucho, #155*
San Jaclnto, #156*
Al
-
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Palo Alto, #157
\irm—PACHA i ACHD—i CRTTOTTOT I
r RESO
Resaca de la Palma, #158
| PESO
Buena Vista, #159
r ■ r 1 1 i -i 2 i 6 1 RESO 1 i • i 1
Cerro Gordo, #160
PESO
Contreras, #161
PESO
Churubusco, #162
/148
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Molino del Rey, #163
imrc—nnm
Chapultepec, #164
i RESO I I I
The Alma, #165
Inkerman, #166 *
1 1 -1 3
"T • i
i
5 1
RESO
1
Magenta, #167
I 1 i
1 5 3
1 • i
, i
1 RESO 1
i i
Solferino, #168
(149
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Sadowa (Koeniggraetz), #169
i-¥m—rwnrc—TTOTJ—i CCTTCTTCT I I .1 i i i
i i ' I 7 i i
I 5 i
RESO
Custozza II, #170
V -1
1 1 3 I 6 | RESO
First Bull Run (First Manassas), #171*
I "I | RESO
Wilson's Creek, #172
I I
#173
-1 5 6 ' 'I '
1 1 1 RESO 1
Belmont,
i
I1 i
i 6 1 •
1 ACH |
f i
Mill Springs, #174
| !
1-1 1
j-4 18 i
RESO 1 i i
{l50
m
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Fort Donelson, #175*
I-BTTM—nrnra—i'ACHD' { CHITILHION I I I I I I j I I i 1-1 14 | 7 | RESO | i i i i i
Pea Ridge, #176*
! -1 RESO
Kernstown, #177*
#178
-1 1 1
.1 4 1
1 7
i
1 i
RESO 1 1 i i
Shiloh.
-1 1 1 i
4 6 ACH i
i
Front Royal, #179
First Winchester, #180
(151
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Cross Keys, #181
Port Republic, #182
RESO
Seven Pines (Fair Oaks), #183*
i -1 ; ACH
MechanicsviHe, #184*
! -1 ACH
Gaines's Mill, #185*
Glendale-Frayser's Farm, #186
i ACH
fl52
r«A r ^M i %^ IA 11
I
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Malvern Hill, «187
ircmr i I
RESO
Cedar Mountain, #188
Second Bull Run (Second Manassas), #189
-1 T
South Mountain, #190
Antietam (Sharpsburg), #191*
-1 ACH
Corinth, #192*
1153
■
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Perryvllie, #193 \-mU—I AliHA | ACHÜ—{ CHITLHIÜN
I I t ACH I
Fredericksburg, #194
I -1 1 | RESO
Murfreesboro (Stones River), #195*
I j "T" i
0 1 1
l_
5 i • i i
5 1 1
ACH i 1
Chancellorsville, #196
Champion's Hill, #197
Brandy Station, #198
1154
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Gettysburg, #199
i-tmra—mm—i' ACHU—i • CHITEKION I I I I I I I I I I I I -1 I 4 I 6 I RESO *
I I I { {
Chlckamauga, #200
RESO
Chattanooga, #201
| RESO
The Wilderness, #202
Spotsylvania, #203*
New Market, #204
• ,-■
i RESO
'155
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Cold Harbor, »205*
{ W1NA I ACHA I
-1
Tcrnj—rmmioN i i i
! i 7 | RESO | I I
Kenesaw Mountain, #206
-1 T 1
| RESO I
Peachtree Creek, #^07
-1 RESO
Atlanta, #208
1 r ^ 1 1 -1 1
1 1
3 i •
6 RESO 1 1
Petersburg, #209
Globe Tavern, #210
ACH
fl56
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Opequon Creek (Third Winchester), #211
i W1NA i AUHA } ACHD I
RESO !
Cedar Creek, #212
I -1 I 3 I 7 | RESO
Franklin, #213
I -1 I 3 RESO
Nashville, #214
i
1 1 1 8 1 2 i i
| RESO i i
Bentonvilie, #215
Dinwiddie Court House & White Oak Road, #216
157
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Five Forks, #217
{ wiNA ! mm—i xm i CRTTCTTDH \ I i i i i
• 1 1 8 S 3 j RESO •
I I I I I
Selma, #218
8 RESO
Sayler's Creek, #219
Weissenburg, #220
Froeschwiller (Woerth), #221
Spichern, #222*
(158
I
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Mars la Tour, #223 i-rmra—nnnra—nrorc i CTTTCTTCTI I i i i i
1 • 8 < 4 l RESO I I I I
Gravelotte-St. Privat, #224
1 ~r ~T~ ~l 1 1 1
1 8 . 3 I •
RESO 1 1
Sedan, #225
Coulmiers, #226
Orleans, #227
Le Mans, #228
(l59
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Beifort, «229 limra—TTTCHX—i'ACHD—{' CHITEHIÜN i I I I I I
j -1 | 3 ; 8 j RESO | I I I I I
Isandhlwana, #230
r -r —r- i 1
1 L
i 1 9 1 3 1 RESO 1
Ulundl, «231 r I i i
-i • 3 1 i i
8 RESO i
Majuba Hill, «232
Tel el-Kebir, «233
Omdurmah, «234
(160
Adowa, #235
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Modder River, #236
r T" ~T~ -r-
i i ! 1
5 1 1
4 i KESO
Magersfontein, #237 1
-1 1
3 1 1 1
8 1 1,
■
RESO \ 1
Colenso, #238
-1 1 2 1 1
1 1 1
L 8 RESO \
Spion Kop, #239
Paardeberg, #240*
(w:
/
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
San Juan and El Caney, #241
|-T7m—I Xm \ ACHU I CHlTbHiüN I I I
i I I 1 | 6 | 4 { RESO I I ! I
The Yalu, «242
1 1 1
—r -1 8
—r i 2 1 RESO
l_ -L —L _L Telissu, «243
r 1 1
j 1 9 2
i ■ RESO
1 1 1
• ^.,'-.
Liaoyang, «244
RESO
The Sha-Ho, «245
Sandepu, «246 *
162
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Mukden, «247*
imra—rrorc—nroro i CRITLHION I .1 j i i
1 : 7 | 4 | RESO I I I
Kumanovo, #248 I'
RESO
Lule* Burgas, #249
• i
■ RESO
Prellp, #250
Monastir, #251*
Adrianople, #252
!163
l'
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Warsaw, «253
iimra—nrcira—i xm \ cgrmnroi i i i i, i i
i i i i i
I 3 i i
I I RESO
I
The Nieman, #254 I I
1 T -r 1 ] 9 1 4 i RESO
huega, #255
-1 1 4 . 1
1 1 1
7 ! i RESO
Changkufeng-Shachaofeng, #256*
Hill 52-Shachaofeng, #257
ACH
Changkufeng/Hill 52, #258
'164
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Nomonhan: Opening Engagement, #259
am—I ACHA KCHTT CHiTKHiüN
ACH
Nomonhan: Soviet Counteroffensive, #260 I 1 I i i 7 I
RESO
Suomussalml, #261
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
9 1 i i
1 | RESO
Alsace-Lorraine i# #262
Alsace-Lorraine II, #263
The Ardennes, #264*
{165
!
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
The Sambre, #265
! WiNA '!'AUHA—} XCTO I CRITILIUOH I I I I I I } I I I I | 1 | 6 | 4 { RESO ;
I _l I I I
Mons, «266*
! 5 RESO
Le Gateau, #267
I 1 ! 4 | RESO
Guise, #268*
The Heights of Nancy, #269
RESO
The Ourcq I, #270*
fl66
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
The Ourcq II, #271*
inmni—nccm—nrrop i CHITLHIüN I I i i i i ii i i i 10 16 |6 1 ACH | I I I I I
The Petit Morin, #272
I 1 I 3 RESO
The Two Morins, #273*
1 1 1 1 t
1 5 1
1 4 i i
1 i
RESO
The Marshes of St. Gondf #274
Vitry le Francois, #275
The Gap of Revigny, #276
167
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
The Aisne, #277
nmrc—i äCKä—i ACHU I cumHiow i I I I I ! ! -1 ! 5 ] 7 ] ACH i
I I I i i
Stalluponen, #278 I
Gumbinnen, #279 I
"T" —T" -r- -1 i 3 1 6 i RESO
1 1 0 1
1 5 I 5 i
1 1 ACH
Tannenberg, #280 r
i 8 RESO
Masurian Lakes, #281
8
i i
I RESO
Krasnik, #282
1 1 ■-■■>— 1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1 1
8 6 i i i
RESO i
IRQ
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Komarov, #283
I VINA ! ACHA—| ACHD—{ CHiTLHIÜN { I I I I I
i fi 1 3 j RESO :
I
8
I I
The Gnlla Lipa, «284
I -1 I
RESO
Rava Russka, #285
1 1 1
-1 ! 1 3
i
8 1
RESO
Lodz, #286*
r 1 i
1 1 1 1
8 1 i
i i
5 1 i i
i
ACH 1 t i
i
The Jadar, #287
j i
-1 J. 3 1 i i
9 j RESO
The Kolubra, #288* i'"■"■*' i
I i i i
RESO
169
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Eastern Champagne, #289
i wiNA i ACHA—nrcmj—i cHrrmoN i I I I I -II 4 I 6 I ACH
I I I I .1
Neuve Chapelle, #290 i r I I
-1 ACH
Ypres II, #291 l' 1 1 r 1
i -1 1 5 1 6 1 ACH 1
'
Festubert, #292 1 1 1 1
,
1 .! 1 4 1 1
6 1 1
ACH •
J
Loos, «293
1
i
1 1 5
I i
_._ i „ 6 i ACH
1 1 i
The Winter Battle (Masuria), #294 1 I"" _
■"I i 1 1 1 8 1 2 I RESO ! 1 1 _l i i
i
170
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Gorlice-Tarnow (Opening Phase Only), #295
| WiNA I ACHA I ACHD—I CHlTblHiuN I I I I I I I I j I I i 1 I 8 | 3 | RESO |
I I L I I
First Isonzo, #296
1 -1 RESO
Second Isonzo, #297 I "" 1 1 -1 3 i 6 1 RESO 1 | i
i
Third Isonzo, #298
-1 RESO
Fourth Isonzo, #299
First Dardanelles Landing, #300 !-
r* ■ ■ ' 1 i
0 ! 5
5 • 1
1 ACH j
i
• 171
■
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Suvla Bay, #301 i-m*—nrcira—I'ACHD—{CHITEHIüN \ I I I I I
-1 ACH
Kut-el-Amara, 1302
RESO
Ctesiphon, #303*
-1 RESO
First Sonme, #304
1 "~Tr ; I -1 4 • 5 RESO i ! -i 1
Somme, Fourth Army Attack, #305
Somme, Ovillers, #306
1 ■T —i— —T— 1 1 -1 ! 3 7 l
1 RESO | 1 i i
i
(172
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Sonune, Bazentin Ridge, #307
i ACHA imnr I
! ACHÜ CHlTblHiüN { I
ACH
Somine, Flers-Courcelette, #308 T
ACH
Caucasus Winter Offensive, #309
1 1 • 1 8
T I 3 | RESO
1 1
'._ _l- l 1 i
Lake Narotch, #310
1916 Brusilov Offensive, #311
Fifth Isonzo, #312
i 173
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Asiago, «313*
i-mra—nrcmt—i ACHü I efttgRTCT i i i i i ill i
1 16 I 5 | RESO | I
1 6 i I I
Trentlno Counteroffensive, #314 i 1 r
RESO
Sixth Isonzo (Gorizia), «315
| RESO
Arras, «316
Aisne II, «317
Messines, «318
(174
. I
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Ypres III, #319 nmra—IACHA
i
-i
Cambrai I, #320
1 -"T T" "T" 1 1 1
1 7 I L
5 I I
RESO
Cambrai II, #321
1 1 1 1
1 7 1 3 1 i
RESO
Tenth Isonzo, #322 *
1 1 1 I 1 1 1
5 * ACH 1 1
Eleventh Isonzo, #123
ACH
Caporetto (Twelfth Isonzo), #324 -,
i
! RESO i i
(l75
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
..
Crossing of the Tigris, #325
TTTK1—I ACHA—TACmJ—i' CHITLHIÜN { I I I
RESO
Gaza I, «326
-1 "! 1 I 8 1 RESO I I
Gaza II, #327*
-1 • RESO
Gaza III, #328*
Junction Station, #329
Second Somme, Phase I (Sonune-Peronne) , #330
'176
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Second Sorome, Phase II (Sonune-Montdidier), #331 |-irm—rmra—TäCHü—r CHITEKION I I i i i i i i i i I 10 i 5 |5 | ACH | I L I l_ I
Lys, #332
RESO
Yvonne and Odette Positions, #333*
1 1 1 1
1 1 6
1 1 4 1
ACH 1 1 1
Chemin des Dames, #334
-1 RESO
Cantigny, #335
Belleau Wood, #336
im
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Hill 142, «337
imnr "mm—nrcmj—ICHITLHION I i i i
RESO
West Wood I, «338
! -i RESO
Bouresches I, «339*
Hill 192, «340 i ■ • i j
1 -I 3 7 i t
i
RESO
West Wood II, «341
North Wood I, The Hunting Lodge, «342
1 i 7 6 ACH |
. ■ ■ (178
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Bouresches II, #343 ■wm—nrcHÄ—; AUHü I CHITKHIüN i
-i
i RESO
North Wood II, #344
-1 RESO
North Wood III, #345
North Wood IV (Final Assault), #346
#347*
1 1
1 1 1
i
7 3 i
i
RESO
Vaux,
1 7 3 i
1 i i
RESO !
La Roche Wood East, #348*
1 1 1
1 1 1
7 !
3 RESO
( 179
—
>■*■•:; ■'■■■^
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
La Roche Wood West, #349* HTM—nrnrc—I ACHU ! CHITEHIüN
I i | RESO
Noyon-Montdidier, #350
1 1 -1 1
4 1 —L
6 T"
1 1
RESO 1
Cheunpagne-Marne, #351
Aisne-Marne I, #352*
Missy aux Rois Ravine, #353
#354
1 7 i 3 —nr-
i i i
1. RESO j
Breuil,
1 7 i 3 i
i
1
1 RESO I
i
1 180
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
St. Amand Farm, #355
I WiNA { ACHA—i tm ! CHmHlüN i I I I I I II I i I | 1 I 8 | 2 | RESO | I L } i {
Beaurepaire Farm, #356 1
1 ] 8
#357
1 2 i | RESO
-Chaudun,
; i 1
1 8 1
i
2 1 | RESO i i
Chaudun, #358
Aisne-Marne II, #359
Berzy le Sec, #360
8 RESO
181
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Buzancy Ridge, #361
WiNA { m\k \ ACH1)—{ CHmHlüN } J I I I
8 I RESO
I
Picardy, 1918, Phase I, #362 I 1
I I RESO I
Picardy, 1918, Phase II, #363
i
i RESO
St. Mlhiel, #364
Lahayville-Bois de Lamarche, #365
Meuse-Argonne, Phase I, #366
(l82
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Blanc Mont I, »367
I U1NA I ACHA—rXCHTJ—i CHITLHIÜN | I I I I I II i I I | 1 I 6 I 5 | ACH i I I i i t
Medeah Farm, #368
8 RESO
Essen Hook, #369 I""
RESO
Blanc Mont Ridge, #370 1 1
1 r ! 7 3 RESO
1
_L i
Sommepy Wood, #371
r i i —T
I i i
i i
! 8 ! 2 1 RESO i
1 1
Blanc Mont II, #372* I T7
ACH
( 183
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Meuse-Argonne, Phase II, #373 i uiNA i ACHA—nrcmj—i CHITLHIüN i I I I 1^ I
I i i ACH
I
Exermont-Montrefagne, #374 I 1 I 0 is I
ACH
Mayache Ravine, #375
! o ACH
La Neuville le Comte Ferme, #376
Ferme des Granges-Fleville, #377
Hill 212, #378
ACH
184
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Bois de Boyon-Montrefagne, #379*
| WINA I ACHA—{'ACHÜ | CHlTtlHIÜN } I I I I i I I I I I | 1 | 6 | 5 | ACH i I I I I I
Hill 272, «380
RESO
Meuse-Argonne, Phase III. #381 T
RESO
Remllly-Aillicourt, «382
Hill 252-Pont Maugis, «383
The Piave, «384
(l85
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Megiddo, «385
{ W1NA I ACHA 1 ACHÜ { CHlTblKiüN { I I I
1 i RESO I
Alam Haifa, «386
1 T" "T"" ; -i 1 5 ! 7 1 RESO i 1 1
El Alamein II, «387*
Operation "Lightfoot," «388
Alamein Bridgehead Expansion, «389
Operation "Supercharge," «390
186
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Chouigui Pass, «391*
W1NA i AIM 1 ACHÜ 1 CHi'l'LHiON
-1 8 RESO
El Guettar, «.)92 I ~r T- ~l
-1 i 5 7 1 RESO
Sedjenane-Bizerte, #393
RESO
Amphitheater, «394
Port of Salerno, «395
r i 1 i i
i l 6 4 i • RESO 1 .1
Sele-Calore Corridor,«396 *
187
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Battipaglia I, #397 i-TO*—nrcira—nrcflu—i1 CHITLHIüN I i i i. II i i
3 i 7 I RESO I -1
Vietri I, #398
1 1 -1 I
1 1 3 i
■ ■ r • i 7
1 i RESO I i i
Tobacco Factory, #399
r i i
-i 4 7 RESO j
Battipaglia II, #400
Eboli, #401 1 " ""I 1
i ^ 6 ! 5 j ACH
Vietri II, #402
! 188
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Grazzanlse, #403
Tim—I ACHl)—i CHITÜHION I I ! I
RESO
Caiazzo, #404 1
1 J
! 6 ! 3 1
—1- RESO
""I 1 1
Capua, #405
-1 2 i i
8 1
1 1
RESO 1 1 J
Castel Volturno, #406
Monte Acero, #407
Triflisco, #408
189
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Dragoni, #409*
|-Wm—I'RCHR1
I I I I -1 i i .
TTCCmJ—I'CHiTLRION I I
! 16 I ACH i {
Canal I, #410*
ACH
Monte Grande (Volturno), #411
1 ^ i i
1 1 6 5 ACH | 1 1
Canal II, #412
Francolise, #413
-1 RESO
Santa Maria Ollveto, #414
( I 190
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Monte Camino I, #415 ______ \inM—nrcira—i ACHD—rcinrrETmni i
.1 i
RESO
Monte Lungo, #416
-1 ACH
Pozzilli, #417
Monte Camino II, #418 r ! ! i i 7
i i i
, ■ 2 •
i
RESO
Monte Rotondo, #419
Calabritto, #420
-1 ACH
/ '• 191
■
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Monte Camino III, #421
TOTC—rVM i ACHD—{ CHlTblHiuN I I I l_ I
I RESO
Monte Magglore, #422 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 17 ! 3 1 RESO I
Aprilia I, #423
The Factory, #424
Campoleone, #425
Campoleone Counterattack, #426
ACH
I 192
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Carroceto, #427 \-ma—nrcrrc—nnnro—i CRITLHIüN I i
i -i
Moletta River Defense, #428
1 5 ACH
Aprilia II, #429
Factory Counterattack, #430
Bowling Alley, #431
Moletta River II, #432
1193
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Fioccia, #433
{ ffimr
-1
i Am i ACHU i cRTTnmju i i i i i i i i | 13 18 I RESO I
.1 I i I
Santa Maria Infante, #434
RESO
San Martino, #435* 1 1
"^i
1 1 1 6 5 ACH 1 1 1
Castellonorato, #436
r i
i • i
i 8 3 1 1
RESO |
1
Spigno, #43"?
i i
i i
6
j rj
4 i
RESO I i
Formia, #438
i i 6 1 1
i 3 1
RESO |
L94
' /
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Monte Grande (Rome) , #439 ITmra—! ACHA I ACHD—1' CHlTfclHlüN i
RESO
Itri-Pondi, #440 r
1 8 RESO
Terracina, #441 —i—
i 1 1 6 3 j RESO j
i
Moletta Offensive, #442
Anzio-Albano Road, #443
ACH
Anzio Breakout, #444
RESO
195
■
■
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Cisterna, «445
|~TTm—i ACHA 1 ACHÜ i CHmHiTnT I i I I
i i 7 3
Sezze, #446
i i 6 1 !
-1. 4
RESO
RESO
Velletri, #447
-1 RESO
Campoleone Station, #440*
Villa Crocetta, #449
#450
i i
-1 i
1 3 8 1 i
1 RESO
1 i i i i
Ardea,
1 1 1 i i
L 1 6 i i
1 1 i i
4 ! i i •
- •-
ACH
f- 96
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Fosso di Campoleone, MSI inmra—mm.—nrcnu—i cHmmoN i i
i -i i
RESO
Lanuvlo, #452
-1 RESO
Lariano, #453
Via Anziate, #454* 1 i ■ i ■
i 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1
5 i i i i
5 ACH I
Valmontone, #455
RESO
Tarto-Tiber, #451
1197
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
II Giogio Pass, #457
inmrx—nrcira—i ACHU I CHITILHIüN I i i i i i III! I I 1 I 6 I 3 I RESO i I I I I I
St. Lo, «458
RESO
Operation "Goodwood," #459
I "I RESO
Operation "Cobra," #460
Mortain, #461
Chartres, #462
198
'
!
i
>
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Melun, «463
\irru—nrcmi—i ACHD I CRITLHIüN I I i i i
i I 6 | 4 I RESO |
Seine River, #464 *
i 8 RESO
Moselle-Metz, #465
Metz, #466
Arracourt. #467
0 i 5 5 1
ACH !
1 1-1 1
j 3 I 7 1
| RESO ; i i 1 . , , . '
Westwall, #468
! 1 i -
1199
I
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Schmidt, «469 inmnt—nnnra—i ACHü I CTTTCTTOTI I i i i i
! i i -1 | 3 | 8 | RESO
I
Seille-Nied, «470*
RESO
Foret de Chateau-Salins, «471*
! —T"
I 1 1 I 1
1 I 6 i i i
5 | ACH i i
Morhange, «472
RESO
Morhange-Faulquemont, «473
Bourgaltroff, «474
!200
/ I
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Sarre-St. Avoid, #475
\irm—nrcirc—i ACHD—i cinramn» i i _; i i . i
i ! 7 I
I | RESO I
Baerodorf I, #476 I""
RESO
Baerendorf II, #477
Burbach-Durstel, #478
Durste 1-FaerbersviHer, #479
Sarre-Union, #480
box
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Sarre-Singling, #481
iimra—nrnrc—I ACHD—i CHITLHIüN I i i
i i i 1 ! 8 I 5 I RESO i I
Singling-Bining, #482*
Sauer River, #483
1
1 o 1
1 5 i 5 "T"
1 AGH i
1 1 1 -J_ -J- J
183 -T" 1 i i
! 1 1 1
1 5 1
1 4 1 RESO
St. Vith, «484
Bastogne, #485*
Sedan-Meuse River, #486
(202
. I
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Jitra, #487 i-tfm—nrcira—rronr i i i
8 I
I. I 'I
RESO
Rovno, #488 r ~T~ '•■r "T- 1 i i 1 8 i 3 1 RESO I i 1 i .r 1 ^ 1
The Defense of Moscow, #489
Soviet Counteroffenslve at Moscow, #490
RESO
The Pogoreloye Gorodische Offensive, #491
Leningrad (Operation "Spark"), #492
f 203
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase I, #493* \inU—! ACHA "I ACHD
i
I ACH
Operation "Citadel," Southern Sector, #494
I RESO
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase II, #495 *"T
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase III, #496
-1 RESO
Prokhorovka, #497*
ACH
Kursk Counteroffensive (Southern Sector), #498*
204
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Belgorod, #499 | W1NA lAWTS—! ■ ACHD—i-CHi'ltRlÜN
I. I i I
Melitopol, #500
RESO
Korsun-Schevchenkovskiy, #501
Nikopol Bridgehead, #502
Sevastopol, #503
The Berezina River, Byelorussian Offensive, #504
1205
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
The Lvov-Sandoraierz Offensive, #505
i-wm—mm
8
TTCHTJ—rcmrmmffi
I RESO
Brody, Phase I, #506 *
i r -i ACH
Brody, Phase 11, #507 *
Assault Crossing of the Vistula River, Phase I, #508*
Vistula River Operation, Pulawy, Phase II, #509*
Yassy-Kishinev, #510*
206
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Vistula-Oder, #511
rwiNÄ1
1 i 1
#512-*
"T 1. 1 i •
Tcmr TCKir 1
1 CRITERIOTT
1 9
-!-
4 1 J.
RESO
East Prussia, i
1 1 1 1 I
7 1
\ 1
, 1. 3 1
J. RESO
Ciechanow, Phase I, #513
Ciechanow, Phase II, #514
Seelow Heights, #515 i i
I 1 I 6 RESO
Mutankiang, #516
1201
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Tarawa-Betio, «517 ! ACHA { ACHD CHlTbHlON i I
RESO
Iwo Jima, Into the Main Defenses, #518
1 T "T~ 1 *~l 1 1
1 1 I
7 • i
1 . 5 i RESO
1 I 1
Iwo Jima, Suribachi, #519
l~ 1 I 1 1
1 1 1
1 7 4 RESO I
1
Iwo Jima, Final Phase, #520
RESO
Advance from the Beach, #521*
RESO
Advance through the Outposts, #522*
I ' 208
BASIS FQR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Tomb Hill-Ouki, #523* \irm—i ACHA i ACHb ! I I
I
1 CTTTgRTOT { .1 I
I ! ACH
Skyline Ridge-Rocky Crags, #524* i 1 n I
1 8 i
RESO
Kochi Ridge-Onaga I, #525
Kochi Ridge-Onaga II, #526*
Kochi Ridge-Onaga III, #527*
Japanese Counterattack, 4-5 May, #528*
f209
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Kochl Ridge IV, #529* l-Wnra—I ACHA | ACHU | CHiTmUN i I I I I I |,| I I I 1 18 |5 | RESO I I I
Shuri Envelopment, Phase I, #530* i 1 r-
RESO
Japanese Counterattack, 24/25 May, #531* i 1 f" T
-1 ACH
Shuri Envelopment, Phase II, #532*
f — | —r i -v i 6
i i
! 7 1 1,
i
i i
ACH
Shuri Envelopment, Phase III, #533*
ACH
Hill 95-1, #534*
i -
I 7 i i
ACH
210
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Hill 95-11, #535*
um—I'ACHA
8
I ACHD
I 5
mTklllON
RESO
Yaeju-Dake, «536*
RESO
Hills 153 and 115, #537*
Advance from the Beachhead, #538
Advance to the Shuri Line Outposts, #539*
Kakazu and Tombstone Ridges, #540*
I 1-1 4 ' 7
1211
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Nishibaru Ridge-Tanabaru Escarpment, #541
iimra—rrcm—i ACHU I cirrrgffTOfi i i i i i i ! I ! I ' i | 1 I 6 1 4 | RESO |
I I I
Maeda Escarpment, #542
ACH
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank I, #543*
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank II, #544*
1 ■■ t" i 1
1 0 ! •
5 i i
— 1. 5 ACH i
i i
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank III, #545*
RESO
Advance to the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #546*
1212
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Initial Attack on the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #547 *
\ircu—nrcms—i ACHü I CHITLHION
Capture of the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #548
#549
1 i 1
7 r i 2
i
1 1
RESO | i
Jenin, i i
1 1 1
* i
i 7 4
i
RESO I 1
Jerusalem, #550
Kabatiya, #551
Tilfit-Zababida, #552
1213
Nablus, «553
Rafah, «554
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
RESO
Bir Lahfan, #555
I 1
*-r i i i t i
I RESO
Abu Ageila-Um Katef, «556*
El Arish, «557
Jebel Libni, #558*
!214
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Gaza Strip, #559 I WiNA I ACHA—1 ACHÜ { CHITLHIÜN I I I I I I II I i | | 1 I 8 14 | RESO | i i i i i
Bir Hassna-Bir Thamada, #560* r
RESO
I -
Mitla Pass, #561 i
! -1 i 3 1 i
i i
8 1 j RESO i
1 i i
Bir Hamma-Bir Gifgafa, »562*
i
I 1 I
7 1 i i i
4 i RESO
Nakhl, #563
I 1 i
1 9 4 'I
! RESO i
'" i i
1 1
Bir Gifgafa, #564
I !215
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Tel Fahar-Banias, #565
\iim—nrcira—ncnnj—mnrEiritffl i i
"i i i i
RESO
Rawlyeh, «566
1 —r T" T" 1 1
1 i 1
8 1 1
2 1 RESO
Zaoura-Kala, #567 1 ' — i i i 1 1 1
i 7 1 1
2 RESO 1 1
Kerama, #568*
! I 1 1 o 1
• 6 6 i
i i
ACH 1 1
Suez Canal Assault-North, #569
Suez Canal Assault-South, #570
(216
'
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Second Army Buildup, #571
iimra—nrcms i ACHD—i cmnrEyiDW i i i i RESO
Third Army Buildup, #572
1 RESO
Kantara-Firdan, #573
r • 1 "■ 1 ■ i 1
i
i -i • 4 1
i
7 1 1
RESO i i i
Egyptian Offensive-North, #574 *
Egyptian Offensive-South, #575*
Deversoir (Chinese Farm I), #576
(217
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Deversolr (Chinese Farm II), #577
I TTCHTJ—rmrmoN {
RESO
Deversolr West, #578
Ismailia, #579
1
i1 i 8 1 5 IT
1 RESO -1
1
1 1 -1 1
l i i
4 1 5.
8 1 1 1
RESO " 1
1 i
Jebel Geneifa, #580*
Shallufa I, #581*
Adabiya, #582*
i
RESO
(218
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Shallufa II, »583*
ra—nrcmc—{ ACHD—rcmtinrow i
i i
r 1
!-
■wm 'in rcmr «a» *
TTCHIT ;
CRITERIÜIT
1 i i 7 2 i RESO 1 .,'.
•
Suez, #584* r i 1 • i i -i i
i 3 ! 6 i RESO
Kuneltra, «585
ACH
Ahmadiyeh, #586
Rafid, #587
Yehudiah-El Al, #588
'219
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Nafekh, «589 W1NA I ACHA I ACHU—i" CHlTEKlü^T!
.1 I I I I
RESO
Tel Paris, «590
Hushniyah, «591
1 T —T —r- |
1 i i 7 1 3 i RESO 1 L
i
—1- _L «-.L _l
i 1 1 *~l i 1
1 7 •
i • i
3 i RESO 1 1
Mount Hermonit, «592
Mount Hermon I, «593
!-l ! 3 ! 8
1
| RESO I
Tel Shams, «594*
I 1 TT I RESO
(220
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Tel Shaar, «595 urn—i ACHA TTCHTT CHITEHION i
RESO I
Tel el Kara, «596 1 "*T- r -T"
i-1 1 1
1 i i
9 1 1 RESO
Kfar Shams-Tel Antar, #597 i ' ' ' i
! 1
i i i
1 8
i i
2 RESO
1 1 1
Naba, «598
■i
! -1 i
i 2 i 8
1 RESO i
i
Arab Counteroffensive, «599
Mount Hermon II, «600
221
BASIS FOR ASSIGNING VICTORY
Mount Hermon III, »601 |-Tmrc—I'ACHA ! ACHD—i ÜHITLHIÜN I I I I
1|7 j 3 | RESO I I I I
1 ' ' ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
] ! 1 1 1
1 i 1
! 1
1 ——-i | I i i 1 !
(222
Related Documents
