WiamsDvid W., Esq Law Oces of DavWWlams 7NMan Street, Sute Sant AnaCA 976-UJuExecute Oce Imigaion Revw Board ofmigtion Appeals ce ohe Cek 5 /07 Leesburg Pik. Ste 2000 FalCh1chVin030 H/ICOce oChef Consel - SD 88FroS, Room 3San D ego, CA 9-883ame: CISERO-SANCHZILAO A 79-793 Date of ths otice: /33 Eclsed s a copy of he Board's decson ad oden he aboe-eenced case. ncose Pl Mb: Adkins-Blanch, Chares KGantEdward RGuendesbegeJon Snceely, Dc Dona Caeek Dcket For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished Cite as: Hiliario Cisneros-Sanchez, A079 791 113 (BIA Nov. 13, 2013)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
h esndent aeals o th Iigraion Judge's uly 8, 2012, decson ying he sonnt's mtion to on he Deament o Hold Sci (DS) oses theapea Th aea will b sustane, d the ecod ll be anded
h sndet e t tiely alcaons li by ay 2, 202, te eadlieset by h iaon udge on Octob 1, 201 In a dcsion daed ay 9, 202, egration Judge eemd he aplcations abdn d ganted voay dee o eesonen On Jne 8, 2012, e esndent led a motion o eoen, wc incuded a swostatent m e esondnts cons, David Wilis. In at steent, Wllis
aeed tha his eloye tie om actice in Fbay 202, esultig in Wilams ig ove the emoye's caslad. . Wllas then aited ha due to ainisativechges, e aled to oely calen h ay 2, 202, lig adln. By od daed uly 1,2012, the Iigation uge dee t otion, ig hat e esondt ad e t coywith Maer of Lozada I&N Dec. 63 7 BIA 1).
he US o o Aeas the it cui, i whose juiscion ths case es, hasheld that sict coliance wih atter ofozada supra is not eue when the inectivenesso conse w lain on ts ce Tamang v Holder 59 F.3d 1083, 100 i 200);Casto-Perez v INS, 212 F3d 518 526 ( Ci 2000) ncvness was la on ts cewhee pettions e consel seesnte o etione hat is alcation had been e
and petitone lae ld a dclaaton colying wth Lozada Lov
Ashcro 341 F.3 93,93 ( 203) (inctivness was ai on its ce whee counsel mis-canedte mal hen, ette ae t ape at e he, d ecats wee e ttcomplied ih the st two ogs o Lozaa); RojsGarcia scro 339 F.3d 14 8225( 003) neectiveness was plain on is ace wee e cousl g to e he biebecause he was ansiiong to a ew ob an tang ove a me colleages caseload, anddeclaaons wee satsng s og o ozada ).
ee, Wlis hs aded a he al to ely e t alcaons was du tohis o, not the espondent's seueny, we nd ha neciveness o consel s pan nthe c he ecod See in v hcro 37 F.3 0, 02 (th Ci 200) (hding that the
court "mus coser th neryng merts of the case o coe to a tetatve cocuson a owheher [a petoers] ca f roery resee wou be vabe nowthstng theaege neectve assstance of counse)
ORE he aea s sustane
RHR OE he gratio uges ecsos of uy 8 2012 ay 92012 ae vaate an the roceengs e reoee
FRHER ORER he recor s remae to he graton uge r her oceengs cosse w the regong oo fr the enry of a new ecson
ITED SATES DEPAENT OF JUSICEEXECTI OFICE OR IMIGTION REVIEW
IMIGTIN CORT401 WEST A STREET, SUITE #80
S DIEGO CA 9211
LAW OFFICE OF JES G. ROCHEILLIS DAID ESQ1702 N AI ST. STE #21STA A, CA 9276
Date: Jul 19 212
Fil A079-791113
In he Matter of:CISERSSCEZ HILIIO
_ Attached is a copy of the writte cisio f the mmgratio JugeThis ecsio is fial ess a appea s tak t the Ba Imigrato Appeas The nclse cpis f OM EOIR 6,Notc o Apa, a FOM EOIR 27 Notc of Enty as Attore orRprstatve prpery xecute, ust be file ith th Boar ofImmigratio Apeas o o bforeh appea must be accopae by pof of pai fee {$100).
Eclose s a copy of th ora cison
Enclose is a transcrpt of the tstimny of co.
You ae grante until to sbit a bift ths ffc i supprt f you appea
Oppsi cons s gate utbef i opposition to the appa
to subt a
Ecos is a copy of the orr/ecisio of the Imgrati Jge.
Al paprs file wth th Cort shall be accoa by prooff svic up opposg cousel.
lNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEXCUTV FCE O MGRATIO RVW
UT STTS TN COUT
401 est Sreet, Suie 80San igo, Califria 92101
ie --113 ate u 1, 212
I e Mae f
Hia Cine Sanhez
Repndent
BHAL SNENT:
Davd W Wii, qure
APPCTION Mtn t Repen
)) IN MOVAL PROCEEDINGS
N BHAF OF ARTMENT OFHEAN SECUTY
Ted Y Yamada, quire
DECSON AND OER OF THE IMMGRATON JUDGE
he Cu aee ith the ppt ed b the Gveent The epndet ha t prpe·
e a aim f ineetive aitne f une purat t Matter f Loz da, 19 I&N De 67
BI 19, and ha nt hn that he i exempt m ding
repndent are en remnded in Cur, hen t me t appeal, e have n da t eith the Bad f Imgatn Appea f e e even e a ate, the Bard ma ipdi eir appeal a nt having been time ed The appeal ma e died a uniethut an pir mmniatn m the Bard t e repndent n nat, here at the MateCaendar heng hed n Otbe 19, 2, he repndent a ena ied e rt,b a d in ting, f the deadine r ing ad the nequene f faing t prpe dtme e S Rerd f Mate Caena Pre-Tra ppearane and Order rm r Otber 1,1, igned b b the epnden and the epndent e Meve, he Cu gave therepndent me th nth t eet the g deane d he repndent ha faed t hthat e i n penal repnibe the iure t meet the ing reqiement n thi ae CR § 133 ; s als "ein ad Oer f the mgratn dge date Ma , 1
1 A tanrpt f e peeding avaiabe pn der f e Bd f migratnAppeal Ateave, evie f the gt Ad Red f the peeing avaiabe t theBd f Imatin Appea ad t the pate b appintment h the C