Top Banner
Anita Rajasekhar, MD, MS University of Florida Health Anne Rose, PharmD University of Wisconsin Health High Dose vs Low Dose: Duration of Therapy Debate Presenters:
51

High Dose vs Low Dose

Jan 24, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: High Dose vs Low Dose

Anita Rajasekhar, MD, MS

University of Florida Health

Anne Rose, PharmD

University of Wisconsin Health

High Dose vs Low Dose: Duration of Therapy Debate

Presenters:

Page 2: High Dose vs Low Dose

Disclosures

Anita Rajasekhar• Grants, Research or Clinical Trials: (institution receives support)

• Sanofi, Baxalta, Biomarin, Dimensions Therapeutics, Genetech, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Bio Products laboratory, LTD, and Kedrion

Anne Rose• Grants, Research or Clinical Trials: Pfizer

Page 3: High Dose vs Low Dose

Learning Objectives

By the end of this presentation the audience will be able to:

1. Recognize factors associated with increased risk of recurrent VTE2. Discuss appropriate duration of anticoagulation for VTE depending

on risk/benefit analysis3. Summarize evidence (or lack thereof!) on extended anticoagulation

in VTE associated with various clinical scenarios

Page 4: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 1: First Unprovoked VTE• 65 year-old man is diagnosed with a left femoral vein DVT. He has had

no recent travel, acute illness, hospitalization, surgery, trauma• PMHx: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, BMI 27• Labs including CBC and CMP are normal• Medications: ACE-I, statin• He was assessed to be at low risk of bleeding on anticoagulation. • He was on apixaban 10mg twice daily x 1 week followed by 5mg twice

daily thereafter• He returns to clinic at 3 months to discuss duration of anticoagulation• He is willing to continue long-term anticoagulation if needed

Page 5: High Dose vs Low Dose

Questions to ask?

Why did he develop a DVT?

How should he be treated in the acute phase?

If long term anticoagulation is indicated, what should he be treated with?

How long should he be treated?

Page 6: High Dose vs Low Dose

WHY did he develop recurrent thrombosis?

Recent surgery/hosp <3 mosEstrogen, pregnancy/puerperiumIV cathetersLong travel

Acute inflammatory diseasesActive malignancy/systemic therapy

50% of VTE

Page 7: High Dose vs Low Dose

HOW to treat: VTE Treatment Phases and Anticoagulant Options

DOACUFHLMWHFondaparinux

DOACVKA LMWH

DOACVKA LMWH Low dose DOAC ASA

0-7 days Up to 3-6 months Beyond 3-6 months

(Primary Treatment) (Secondary prevention)

Page 8: High Dose vs Low Dose

Minimum of 3 months anticoagulation3 months no different than longer duration

Recurrence risk increases whenever anticoagulation stoppedHighest in 1st month after stopping anticoagulation

Boutitie BMJ 2011

Cum

mul

ativ

e

Page 9: High Dose vs Low Dose

HOW LONG should he be treated?

Baglin et al. Lancet. 2003 Aug 16;362(9383):523-6.Deip et al. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program (2020) 2020 (1): 634–641.

30% at 5 years

Page 10: High Dose vs Low Dose

3 months vs. Indefinite Anticoagulation?

Drug optionsVKA

DOACs (standard or low dose)

ASA

Recurrence RiskUnprovoked

Prognostic scoresMale

Bleeding RiskPatient characteristics

Stability of INR

ModifiersPatient

preferences/valuesCost

AdherenceLifestyle

Bauer Hematology 2010

Page 11: High Dose vs Low Dose

Weighing bleeding and thrombotic risk on anticoagulation

Kearon 2020 Blood. 2020;135(5):317-325

Case fatality rate of recurrent VTE- 4%Case fatality rate of major bleeding on AC- 12%

Page 12: High Dose vs Low Dose

Scenario Recommendation1st UNPROVOKED proximal VTE

• Low/moderate risk bleeding

• High risk bleeding

EXTENDED over 3mos (GRADE 2B)

3 MOS over extended (GRADE 1B)

Kearon CHEST ACCP 2021Ortel Blood Advances 2020Streiff JTT ACF Guidance 2016

Page 13: High Dose vs Low Dose

VTE Extension Trial Design

DOAC

Placebo, ASA, VKA (INR 2-3)

R

>3 month anticoagulation

Primary Endpoints: Bleeding or Recurrent VTE

New Acute DVT

Page 14: High Dose vs Low Dose

DOAC VTE Extension Trial Characteristics

Page 15: High Dose vs Low Dose

DOAC VTE Extension Trials: Results

Page 16: High Dose vs Low Dose

Low Dose vs High Dose DOAC: RENOVE Trial

• Unprovoked VTE or VTE due to persistent risk factor

Primary Endpoints: Recurrent VTESecondary Endpoints: Bleeding, Mortality

NCT03285438, study completion 11/2022

Page 17: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 1: Revisited

• Male with unprovoked LE DVT high recurrence risk• Renal function normal, no antiplatelet low bleeding risk• On DOAC without AE• No drug interactions with DOAC• Patient willing to continue anticoagulation

Continue long-term DOAC; consider low dose

Page 18: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 2: The Tale of Mr. Morton

• 60-year-old male presents to the ED with acute onset left sided chest pain (5/10)

• PMH: NIDDM2; HTN; s/p right ankle fracture surgery 3 weeks ago

• Cardiac workup: negative• CT: right sided subsegmental PE w/o signs of right heart strain• Enoxaparin 120 mg x 1 given in the ED; Discharged on apixaban• Patient following up in clinic 3 months later to discuss length of

therapy

Page 19: High Dose vs Low Dose

Questions to ask?

Was the VTE provoked by a transient risk factor?

What is the patient’s bleeding risk?

What is the patient’s preference?

How significant was the event?

Page 20: High Dose vs Low Dose

Provoked VTE: What Caused It?

Major Transient Risk Factor Minor Transient Risk Factor

Surgery (anesthesia > 30 mins)

Acute illness:• Hospitalization and confined to bed (for at

least 3 days)

Cesarean section

Surgery (anesthesia < 30 mins)

Acute illness:• Hospitalization < 3 days• Confined to bed (no hospitalization) for at least 3 days

Estrogen therapy (oral contraception or HRT)

Pregnancy or puerperium

Leg injury with reduced mobility for at least 3 days

Ortel TL. Blood Advances. 2020; 4(19):4693-4738Stevens SM. Chest. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.056

Page 21: High Dose vs Low Dose

Provoked VTE: How Long To Treat?

CHEST (2021) ASH (2020) NICE (2020) ESC (2019) AC Forum (2016)

3 months• From major

transient risk factor

Considerations: All patients should be assessed for extended therapy

3-6 months• From transient risk

factor

3 months• Provoking factor

that is no longer present

3 months • From major

transient/reversible risk factor

3 months • From surgical risk

factor

At least 3 months:• Medical illness• Travel related

Other considerations: • How significant was the thrombotic event?• Is the transient/provoking risk factor still present?• What is the bleeding risk for the patient? • Is low dose anticoagulation an option? Stevens SM. Chest. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.056

Ortel TL. Blood Advances. 2020; 4(19): 4693-4738NICE (2020) Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk.guidance/ng158Konstantinides SV. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(4): 543-603Streiff MB. J Thromb and Thrombolysis. 2016; 41: 32-67

Page 22: High Dose vs Low Dose

HOW LONG should he be treated?

Baglin et al. Lancet. 2003 Aug 16;362(9383):523-6.Deip et al. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program (2020) 2020 (1): 634–641.

30% at 5 years

Page 23: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 2 revisited. Mr. Morton

• Transient risk factor: surgery

• Bleeding risk: low

• VTE event: subsegmental PE

• Patient preference: wishes to stop anticoagulation

• Length of therapy: 3 months

Page 24: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 3: Antiphospholipid Syndrome• A 32-year-old woman with h/o late 2nd trimester

miscarriage 5 years ago now presents with an unprovoked lobar PE

• Medications: none• Labs: CBC and CMP normal• She is started on LMWH bridge to VKA• She is found to meet criteria for APLS (triple aPL

positive)• She returns after 3 months to discuss duration of AC• She is interested in a DOAC if long term AC is needed. • INRs well controlled (time in therapeutic range 75%)

Page 25: High Dose vs Low Dose

Questions to ask?

Why did she have a thrombotic event?

How should she be treated in the acute phase?

If long term anticoagulation is indicated, what should she be

treated with?

How long should she be treated?

Page 26: High Dose vs Low Dose

Why did she develop unprovoked PE?

• Antiphospholipid Syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by clinical and laboratory criteria

• Recurrence risk off anticoagulation-conflicting data• VTE ~30% annual risk vs no significant increased risk

• Triple positive higher thrombosis risk than single aPL• VTE ~ 5% annual risk or 37% at 10 years

Garcia et al Blood. 2013;122(5):817-824Pengo et al Blood. 2011;118(17):4714-4718Galli er al Blood 2007; 118(17): 4714-4718

Page 27: High Dose vs Low Dose

HOW LONG should she be treated?

• RR depends on aPL profile and additional thrombotic RF

• Indefinite anticoagulation is accepted

• Exception: clearly provoked thrombosis in setting of APLA

Baglin et al. Lancet. 2003 Aug 16;362(9383):523-6.Deip et al. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program (2020) 2020 (1): 634–641.

30% at 5 years

Page 28: High Dose vs Low Dose

DOACs In APLS

• Low-risk (VTE, not triple positive)- rivaroxaban lower peak thrombin generation vs VKA, no clinical events (RAPS)

• High-risk (triple positive or ATE)- increased risk of thrombosis with rivaroxaban vs. VKA (TRAPS and Spanish study)

• Systematic Review- 11% annualized recurrent thrombosis risk on DOAC• Ongoing trials

• ASTRO-APS: Extended apixaban 5mg BID vs VKA (INR 2-3), excludes ATE

• RISAPS: Rivaroxaban 15m BID vs VKA (INR 3-4), only CVA patients

Skeith Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):439-449Cohen et al. Lancet Haematol. 2016 Sep; 3(9): e426–e436

Ordi-Ros et al Ann Intern Med. 2019;171:685-694Pengo et al J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:531–535

Cohen et al Lupus 2020, Vol. 29(12) 1571–1593 ATE= arterial thromboembolism

Page 29: High Dose vs Low Dose

Avoid low dose-DOAC

In low risk APLS treated initially with DOACS without untoward effects discuss risks/benefits of continued DOAC

WHAT are the options for initial & long-term anticoagulation?

Tektonidou Ann Rheum Dis 2019;0:1–9Cohen Lupus 2020, Vol. 29(12) 1571–1593Zuily J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:2126–2137Skeith Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):439-449

Page 30: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 3: Revisited

• APLS patient with VTE • Triple aPL positive• No prior arterial thrombosis• High time in therapeutic range (TTR) on warfarin• Low risk bleeding• Patient willing to continue anticoagulation

Continue long-term VKA

Page 31: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 4.

• 28-year-old female presents to the ED with LLE swelling and pain in foot. She is unable to bear weight on her foot.

• PMH: factor V Leiden (heterozygous), depression, generalized anxiety• Additional information: patient on oral contraception x 3 years• Doppler US: extensive DVT from left popliteal vein to common femoral vein• IR: thrombectomy• Patient started on rivaroxaban• Follow up with PCP 2 weeks after hospital discharge

Page 32: High Dose vs Low Dose

Questions to ask?

Was the VTE provoked by a transient risk factor?

What is the patient’s bleeding risk?

What is the patient’s preference?

How significant was the event?

Page 33: High Dose vs Low Dose

Oral Contraception and VTE

• Oral contraceptives are associated with increased risk for VTE

• Can be up to five-fold increase • Trend for lower risks with

levonorgestrel and lower ethinyl estradiol doses

• Length of therapy considerations• Provoked from minor transient risk

factor• Is the patient going to continue

OCP?Lidegaard Ø. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2890van Hylckama Vlieg A. BMJ. 2009;339:b2921.Dragoman MV. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018 141(3): 287-294D inger J. Contraception. 2014; 89:253-263

Page 34: High Dose vs Low Dose

VTE Prediction Tools

• Prediction models for recurrent VTE:• HERDOO2• DASH• Vienna

• Exception to consider:• In high-risk VTE patients (triple-

positive antiphospholipid antibody), benefits from anticoagulation may outweigh high bleeding risk

Bleeding Risk

High Risk (>3%/year) Low Risk

• Provoked by major transient factor

• Women with unprovoked or provoked from minor transient risk factor AND HERDOO2 = 0 or 1

• Men• Women with

unprovoked or provoked from minor transient risk factor AND HERDOO2 >2

• Potent thrombophilia• Recurrent

unprovoked VTE• VTE and malignancy

Rodger MA. Blood Adv. 2018; 2(21): 3081–3087

Stop Anticoag Continue

Anticoag

Page 35: High Dose vs Low Dose

What About Inherited Thrombophilia

• N = 474 prospective cohort (all comers)• Followed for VTE recurrence after 1st VTE• Overall HR = 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8–2.0)

• FVL= HR 1.2• P20210= HR 0.7• Hyperhomocysteinemia= HR 0.9• High FVIII, IX, XI= HR 0.6-1.1• Protein C/S/AT def= HR 1.8• 2 abnl= HR 1.6

• The VTE recurrence risk is modest, but if no other risk factors, does not require extended duration anticoagulation Christiansen SC. JAMA. 2005; 293:2352-2361

Page 36: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 4 revisited

• Transient risk factor: oral contraceptives

• Bleeding risk: low

• VTE: extensive DVT

• Patient preference: wishes to stop anticoagulation

• Length of therapy: • At least 3 months• Consider 6 months• Consider low dose

-6

Page 37: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 5: Malignancy

• A 52-year-old male with stage 4 lung cancer on palliative chemotherapy presents with acute PE

• Labs reveal mild anemia (Hb 10.5 g/dL) but otherwise normal. • His bleeding risk is judged to be moderate• He is started apixaban 10mg BID for 1 week followed by 5mg BID• He returns for 3-month follow-up visit and would like to discuss

duration of anticoagulation• He is agreeable to staying on anticoagulation, if needed

Page 38: High Dose vs Low Dose

Questions to ask?

Why did he have a thrombotic event?

How should he be treated in the acute phase?

If long term anticoagulation is indicated, what should he be treated

with?

How long should he be treated?

Page 39: High Dose vs Low Dose

WHY Did Patient Develop Thrombosis?

• Malignancy is the most common persistent VTE risk factor

• Cumulative incidence recurrence up 20% at 12mos

• VTE risk influenced by cancer type, stage, treatment, and patient-related factors

• Challenges to anticoagulation include thrombocytopenia, drug interactions, liver/renal disease from metastasis or therapy adverse effects, malabsorption, poor PO intake

Page 40: High Dose vs Low Dose

HOW to treat in cancer patient:VTE Treatment Phases and Anticoagulant Options

DOAC (Apix, Riva) LMWH

UFHFondaparinux

DOACLMWH

VKA

DOACLMWH

VKA (INR 2-3)Low dose DOAC Nothing

0-7 days Up to 3-6 months Beyond 3-6 months

Lyman et al. Blood Advances 2021; 5(4): 927-974; Key et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(5):496-520; Farge et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(10):e566-e581; https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx#supportive

Page 41: High Dose vs Low Dose

SELECT-D

HOKUSAI VTE-CANCER

ADAM-VTE

Edoxaban vs. Dalteparin

Rivaroxaban vs. Dalteparin

Apixaban vs Dalteparin

DOAC vs. LMWH For Short-term Treatment of CAT

CARRAVAGIO Apixaban vs Dalteparin

Lower recurrent VTENo diff Major Bleeding or CRNMB

Lower Recurrent VTEHigher Major Bleeding

Lower Recurrent VTENo diff Major Bleeding

Higher CRNMB

No diff in recurrent VTENo diff in Major Bleeding or CRNMB

Raskob et al. N Engl J Med 2017; Young JCO 2018;36:2017-2023; McBane JTH 2020;18(2):411-42; Agnelli NEJM 2020; 382; 1599-1607

Page 42: High Dose vs Low Dose

2 Decision Points After Short-term Treatment

1. Continue beyond 6 months?

• How do we risk stratify?

2. Which anticoagulant to use?

• LMWH vs DOAC vs VKA?

Page 43: High Dose vs Low Dose

Anticoagulation Extension Trials in Cancer Patients

Study Population Intervention Comparator Bleeding outcome

VTE outcome

DALTECAN 2015

Active cancer and acute prox DVT or PE

Dalteparin month 7-12

Dalteparin month 1-6

Less MB month 7-12

Less VTE month 7-12*

TiCAT 2017 Active cancer and acute proxDVT or PE

Tinzaparin month 7-12

Tinzaparin month 1-6

No difference Less VTE month 7-12*

API-CAT NCT 03692065

Cancer patents after initial 6 months of AC

Apixaban 2.5mg BID

Apixaban 5mg BID

Pending 2022 Pending 2022

* VTE recurrence secondary outcome

Hull et al. The American Journal of Medicine (2006) 119, 1062-1072Francis et al. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 1028–35.

Jara-Palomares et al. Thrombosis Research 157 (2017) 90–96

Page 44: High Dose vs Low Dose

Bottom Line in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis • No study definitive on 3-6 months vs. longer

• Decision to extend beyond 6 months multifactorial

• Metastatic disease, active disease with ongoing systemic therapycontinue

• Remission, cure, no ongoing therapy, catheter remove stop

• Drug of choice for long-term anticoagulation unknown

Lyman et al. Blood Advances 2021; 5(4): 927-974Key et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(5):496-520

Farge et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(10):e566-e581https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx#supportive

Page 45: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 5 revisited

• Metastatic malignancy and ongoing therapy high risk recurrence• Bleeding risk judged to be moderate• On preferred AC with DOAC without AE• Not GI/GU tumor• No drug interactions with DOAC• Patient willing to continue anticoagulation

Continue long-term DOAC; for now, full dose

Page 46: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 6. What’s Happening? • 68-year-old male diagnosed with unprovoked right lower lobe PE

• Discharged on LMWH bridge to warfarin for long term anticoagulation therapy (due to DOAC $$)

• PMH: HTN, HLP, IDDM2; CKD (Scr 1.8; CrCl ~40 mL/min)

• Additional info: GIB – 2 months after starting warfarin (INR 2.3); reversed with PCC, hospitalized for 4 days

• Colonoscopy and upper endoscopy performed• Gastric ulcer with bleeding; treatment with epi and clips

• 2-week PCP follow up after hospitalization• Discussion of resumption and length of anticoagulation

Page 47: High Dose vs Low Dose

Questions to ask?

Was the VTE provoked by a transient risk factor?

What is the patient’s bleeding risk?

What is the patient’s preference?

How significant was the event?

Page 48: High Dose vs Low Dose

Weighing bleeding and thrombotic risk

Kearon C. Blood. 2020;135(5):317-325

Case fatality rate of recurrent VTE- 4%Case fatality rate of major bleeding on AC- 12%

Page 49: High Dose vs Low Dose

Case 6 revisted. How Long To Treat?

• Transient risk factor: none identified

• Bleeding risk: high

• VTE: PE

• Patient preference: unsure, looking to PCP to decide

• Length of therapy: • At least 3 months• Consider stopping based on high bleeding risk• Consider low dose

Page 50: High Dose vs Low Dose

Ensure patient is up-to-date on age-appropriate cancer screening

Discuss risks/benefits of extended therapy with all patients

Recommend extended therapy for patients who:

Are male or high-risk

female

Have active cancer/undergoing systemic therapy

Have high risk thrombophilia

(e.g APLS)

Have low risk of AC-related

bleeding

Determine the cause: major or minor transient risk factor

Discuss risks/benefits of extended therapy with all patien

Recommend 3-month therapy for patients who:

Provoked with major risk factor

Have a high risk of AC-related

bleeding

Are low risk female

Have low risk of AC-related bleeding

Consider significance of the event or if risk factor still present for longer therapy or continued

prophylaxis Reassessment regularly risk:benefit of

continued anticoagulationReassessment regularly risk:benefit of

continued anticoagulation

Treat a VTE event at least 3 months

PROVOKEDUNPROVOKED

Consider using clinical prediction rules in equivocal cases

Page 51: High Dose vs Low Dose

My Hero, Zero

• Take Home Points:• Risk for recurrent VTE and bleed will

never be 0%

• Regular reassessment of risk:benefit

• Special thanks to School House Rocks