Hierakonpolis Online - HK6 - Elite Cemetery

HierakonpolisCity of the Hawk

About HierakonpolisHierakonpolis MapMeet the Team

Renee FriedmanLearn More about Renee FriedmanPublications of Renee Friedman

Hagg Sidain Abdel Razzik SaidGrazia Di PietroXavier DrouxFred HardtkeJoel PaulsonMasahiro BabaPeter Robinson (webmaster)

Nekhen NewsBibliographyBecome a Friend

UK, Europe & Worldwide FriendsUS Friends

Contact Us

Main Menu

HomeTake a TourExplore the Predynastic SettlementExplore the Predynastic Cemeteries

HK43 ­ Workers' CemeteryHK6 ­ Elite Cemetery

Discovering Tomb 72 ­ Press ReleaseTomb 72Rendering Time at HK6

Explore the FortExplore the Nubian CemeteriesExplore Dynastic tombsExplore Rock ArtHistory of Exploration

Search

Search...Search...

Donate Here

Please consider supporting our efforts at Hierakonpolis.

Amount: GBP

You are here: Home Explore the Predynastic Cemeteries HK6 ­ Elite Cemetery

Site HK6

HK6: the Elite Predynastic and Early Dynastic cemetery

Excavations at HK6 began in 1979 and are still in progress as are our interpretations of what we haveunearthed here. One of the most exciting areas of the site of Hierakonpolis, discoveries made here arecontinually rewriting the history books. Discoveries include the largest tombs of the early Naqada IIperiod, the earliest above ground funerary architecture, the first funerary temples, the most extensiveand varied animal burials known from any early site, remarkable figurines in flint, early ceramicmasks, limestone statuary and the first falcons…the list goes on. Here we present a brief discussion ofwhere we are so far (December 2012 ­ plan at June 2013. For information about Tomb 72 discoveredin March 2014 click here) and what are current thoughts are about certain aspects. The cemetery is awork in progress and with each year we learn more, sometimes our finding overturn earlier ideas,while presenting different questions to investigate. It is sometimes easy to get confused, so we alsoinclude here an updated check list of the nearly 60 tombs discovered to date.

The first excavations (of a scientific nature) at HK6 were undertaken from 1979 to 1985 by MichaelHoffman who demonstrated the special status of this cemetery with the discovery of massive brick­lined (and one rock­cut) tombs of the Naqada III period (Tomb 1, 2 10, 11), the largest tombs inUpper Egypt outside of Abydos. Despite extensive plundering they still containing some of fine andexotic materials showing that even after power had shifted north to Abydos and then to Memphis,Hierakonpolis was still a very rich and important place.

Applying techniques of settlement excavation in the cemetery, Hoffman also revealed the remnants ofthe unique wooden architecture that once surrounded these tombs, a type unknown at any other site,which we now they they inherited from their ancestors.

He was also the first to uncover the burials of animals (Tombs 7, 12) which at the time he was unableto date. Graves of the early Naqada II period were also discovered, many also containing animals inconjunction with human occupants (Tombs 3, 5, 6, 9). Large tombs, they were undoubtedly originallyquite rich, but they were not any larger than elite tombs at other sites of the Naqada II period, andcontained nothing that set Hierakonpolis ahead of the pack to correspond with the sophisticated natureof the settlement. This was eventually to change.

From 1997 to 2000, Barbara Adams resumed the excavations, working in the central part of thecemetery in search of evidence to determine whether the perceived gap in burial activity in theNaqada IIC­D period was real (so far it does appear to be). She uncovered several more graves of boththe Naqada II and III period, but her most significant discovery was Tomb 23 (although she wasunable to complete the excavations). Measuring 5.5m long by 3m wide, it is the largest known tombof the Naqada IIB period, which in addition to its size, was, at the time of its discovery, the earliest inEgypt to exhibit above ground funerary architecture. This involved an enclosure wall all made ofwooden posts surrounding a pillared superstructure above the tomb, on the east side of which was aspecial columned area we call an offering chapel, based on the deposits of fine objects found in it.These objects include animal figures knapped from flint (an ibex and the head of a Barbary sheep), anivory cylinder, which is possibly a mace handle, and more disturbingly a human vertebra with cutmarks indicative of decapitation.

It is also from the chapel that fragments of Egypt’s first near life size human stone (induratelimestone) statue were recovered. The statue’s size and shape are based on the well­carved nose andtwo ears, while the rest of it is represented by over 600 small fragments that have proved difficult tomend. The overwhelming majority of the fragments have worked surfaces suggesting the statue hadbeen intentionally defaced with glancing blows and its core hauled away for reuse. As a result it isimpossible to determine who this statue represented, and we can only speculate on whether it wasstanding or seated.

Further exploration of the adjacent areas in 2006­2007 revealed another large tomb (Tomb 26) withclear evidence of wooden superstructure (as well as a scorpion statuette and an imported wine jar), butmore remarkable were the structures, below which there were no tombs, which took the form of multi­columned, or pillared, halls.

These pillared halls not only provide the first examples of an architectural style (the hypostyle hall)only previously hypothesized for the Predynastic, but also give ample evidence for the existence ofdeveloped mortuary temples and rituals from a very early time. These wooden buildings apparentlystretched back for generations, as at least three building phases were detected as earlier structureswere replaced over time by even grander structures. A radiocarbon date on the bark from one of thewooden pillars of a later phase hall (Structure E8) of 3790­3640BC (4930+/­50BP) proves theirantiquity. Their original appearance is harder to determine, but fragments of plaster with red andgreen pigment, and some with figural designs, indicate that these structures were both colourful andimpressive.

Of the eight structures known, the best preserved is Structure 07; 15m long and 10.5 meters wide, 24wooden columns originally filled its interior. Although much denuded, a variety of objects were foundwithin the postholes apparently as foundation deposits. These include seashells from the Red Sea,ivory objects, a cow horn, and a bundle of cloth containing malachite. Further objects were foundconcentrated in the corners. In the northeast, were masses of ostrich eggshells attesting to the originalpresence of at least six rare and valuable whole eggs, some of which were incised with a huntingscene. In the southeast corner were objects of different types, including a unique ivory wand carvedwith a procession of hippopotami along the top, a tiny steatite hippo figurine and a falcon figurinemasterfully carved from brittle malachite. This is Egypt’s earliest falcon image; falcons onlybecoming common just before the First Dynasty, especially as markers of royal names. Whether thisfalcon already carried royal connotations is unknown, but given the elite context and the strongassociation of the local falcon god Horus with early kingship, it seems highly likely.

From the corners we also collected a large number of elegant hollow­base arrowheads, some of largesize anticipating the gigantism of the votive mace heads and palettes of the Main Deposit. The skillinvolved leaves little doubt that the same craftsmen created the flint ibex also discovered in Structure07. More flint animals were found in the corners of other structures, always in association witharrowheads and other hunting gear, and suggest ritual activities symbolic of control. Members of arelatively rare class of artifact (only about 65 examples are now known), these flint figurines from theHK6 cemetery, now represents the largest single assemblage of flint animals with known provenancefrom anywhere in Egypt.

(For more details and pictures see Early Kings:http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/hierakonpolis/field07/6.html)

This precinct of pillared hall, located in the center of the cemetery, was no doubt used for themortuary cults of those buried here and provide us a view of an elaborate mortuary landscape on ascale hitherto unexpected for this time. But their discovery left us with a problem as the theconfiguration of pillars around Tomb 23 looked suspiciously like a reused or borrowed pillared hall.

Further, when we realized that several posts of pillared hall E8 had been removed to bury the Africanelephant found in Tomb 24 and presumed to be part of the Tomb 23 entourage, a scenario of“borrowing” became even more likely. (for more information on Tomb 24 follow along athttp://www.archaeology.org/interactive/hierakonpolis/field/elephant1.html)

Thus it became critical to determine whether other elite tombs of the period were endowed witharchitectural features, and in hopes of discovering this we returned to the area first investigated byBarbara Adams in 1999 to take another look at Tomb 16, another large elite tomb of the earlypredynastic, Naqada 1C­IIA period, around which remnants of wooden posts had been observed.

Although a brick­lined tomb of the Naqada IIIA2 period had later been inserted into Tomb 16 in whatappears to have been an act of respectful renovation rather than usurpation, it was still possible to getthe measure of the original tomb. Roughly 4.3 x 2.6 m and about 1.45 m deep, it is amongst thelargest known from the Naqada IC­IIA period. Despite plundering and reuse, it was still a very richtomb containing a huge amount of pottery. More than 115 vessels have been recorded from it,including one incised with the earliest known emblem of Bat, showing her close association withpower from the beginning.

Two of the best preserved of the ceramic masks known exclusively from this cemetery also probablyoriginate from this tomb. Curved to fit over the human head and attached by means of a string passedthrough holes behind the ears, they are Egypt’s earliest funerary masks. They stand at the beginning ofa tradition whose origin has long been a matter of conjecture. So if any tomb was going to havesuperstructure, Tomb 16 was going to be the one and it did not disappoint.

Investigations from 2009­2011 revealed a number of wooden posts suggesting a substantialsuperstructure was raised above it, while six postholes along the north side marked a small offeringchapel. And like Tomb 23, surrounding it all was a wood­post fence, but in the case of Tomb 16 itinterconnected with a wider complex of enclosures containing a range of smaller tombs. Togetherthese elements form a complex that we tentative reconstruct as imitating the owners earthly residencewith household members holding their place in death as they did in life. Although all of the satellitetombs have been heavily plundered, enough remains of their contents to suggest that there was

nothing arbitrary about their layout or their occupants: the inner rung flanking Tomb 16 was reservedfor human burials, while the graves of animals and possibly their keepers form an outer perimeter,attesting to an extensive menagerie of animals both domestic and wild.

The fine artifacts in all of the human tombs indicate high status owners, presumably family andcourtier, amongst which apparently especially favoured was a male achondroplastic dwarf buried insubsidiary Tomb 47, who stood just under 4 feet (120cm) tall.

Dwarfs were highly prized in the court of the First Dynasty kings where they were honoured withburial amongst the retainers around the royal tombs and commemorated with high quality stelae,showing that they were valued as personal attendants as they would continue to be in the OldKingdom. But there are several indications that the Tomb 47 dwarf was already highly valuedcompanion in the predynastic period. Foremost among them is the location of his grave, which isbeneath the floor of the pillared chapel. Burial here would seem to be an incredible privilege,associating him intimately with the owner of Tomb 16 in death, as he no doubt was in life.

Further recognition is also suggested by his possible portrait in flint.Although found in surface levels to the northwest, this remarkable piece maywell represent the dwarf with his bowed legs and short arms.

But perhaps the best indication of the special status of the dwarf is his age. Atapproximately 40 years of age, he is the oldest person in the tomb complex. Of the 39 individualsfound within the 14 tombs directly flanking Tomb 16, no one is younger than 8 years of age and noone is older than 35 years; over two­thirds of them were juveniles under 15 years of age and youngwomen. The sample is still limited, but this is far from normal mortality and strongly suggests thatfew, if any, of them died of natural causes. They may in fact have been specifically chosen for thehonour of accompanying their lord.

If this is true for the humans, it is certainly true for the majority of animals amongst which differentlevels of care and value are evident. Near identical radiocarbon dates from two of these animalsindicate that both met their end at the same time: at some point between 3660 and 3640 BC. Theseanimals, buried whole, include an African elephant, an aurochs (wild cattle), a pregnant hartebeest, ayoung hippopotamus, a crocodile, two baboons, 15 domestic cattle, two large goats, and 28 dogs– 52animals in all (so far).

Perhaps not surprisingly the most prized appears to be the ten­year­old male African elephant (Tomb33) and the aurochs (Tomb 19), both requiring extraordinary efforts to acquire as probably neitherwere locally available at the time. Both were found alone in large, fenced tombs, wrapped in vastamounts of linen and matting. Whether they were endowed with additional grave goods remainsunclear, but both were given a substantial final meal, as a great deal of it was still present inside them.In addition to half­digested items of settlement debris, detailed analysis of the botanical content of theelephant’s final meal indicate that he dined on river plants, acacia twigs and emmer wheat, both chaffand grains, suggesting he was well maintained.

Although neither the elephant nor the aurochs show explicit evidence of long­term captivity, that theanimals were sustained alive for some time is indicated by the hartebeest who exhibited deformationof her dentition similar to that seen on wild animals kept in prolonged captivity in zoos today. Inaddition, she was also 3 months pregnant, and the articulating leg bones of the fetus were found inplace within the womb tissue. Thus it is likely that breeding herds of what was becoming anincreasingly rare breed, and is in fact now extinct, were being maintained.

Likewise kept in breeding troops were the baboons, which are not native to the Nile Valley. Healedfractures on the forearms are common to almost all of them, indicating they were subjected toprobably disciplinary violence, but then nursed back to health over the course of a minimum of 4 to 6weeks, which is the time takes for the bone to knit, after that we cannot tell how long they survived.For more about the baboons from the cemetery see:http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/hierakonpolis/animals.html

Acquired closer to home, was a 4 month old hippo. Although the hippo’s tomb was badly disturbed,almost the entire skeleton was recovered. Amongst the bones, a healed fracture on the lower back legindicates that this young hippo was probably tied to a tree and held in captivity for several weeksbefore its death, breaking its own leg as it strained to be free. Also from the river, came a crocodile(Tomb 45), the size of its head indicating it was originally about 2 m long.

Dogs are by far the best represented species and were found interred in seven different graves. Mostof them were fairly large, high quality animals, but mongrel types were also present. Interspersedaround the complex, they probably served as hunters, herders or controller of the other animals,

especially the wild animals, which can be considered statements on the power of their owner. But thedogs probably also herded the domestic animals, which appear to be expressions of his ostentation andexcess.

The sacrifice of valuable assets is visible in the burial one old bull in a large tomb of his own (Tomb43), as well as the neighbouring tomb with a cow and calf (Tomb 36), but these are nothing comparedto Tomb 49, a long, trench like tomb 13.5m (45 feet) long, which contained 12 cattle, buried wholeand unbutchered, all under 3 years of age, and thus prime food.

It is not entirely clear to whom these 12 cattle belonged. From the location of Tomb 49, they could bepart of the Tomb 16 complex or just as easily part of another complex to the south, since we can nowconfirm that several such complexes were constructed across the cemetery.

During the 2012 season a set of tombs (Tomb 50­60) due east of Tomb 16 was investigated and theseappear to belong to a different complex, probably just a little later in date, perhaps only a generation.

So far we have examined 10 graves in this new complex which reveal a reassuring range ofsimilarities but also an intriguing range of differences, showing that the rules were far from fixed. Theinhabitants thus far include a leopard, another aurochs, another crocodile, an ostrich, six morebaboons, eight large sheep, as well as 14 humans, one of which was another dwarf! Find out more inNekhen News vol. 24, available to Friends of Nekhen.

But why bury all of these animals? This is not an easy question to answer. Within the various

complexes, the different levels of effort taken in the burial of the animals suggest that their meaningneed not be the same. In generally, it seems that the wide variety of taxa interred around the perimeterof the Tomb 16 complex symbolically provided protection against the natural chaos they represented.The burial of domestic animals may also have insured an eternal food supply and companionship aswell as being an ostentatious display of the wealth. But the burial of the large wild animals wasprobably more than anything else a display of power. The ownership of these exotic animals wouldhave been strong visual statement of their owner’s power and wealth. The creation and maintenanceof royal menageries is known to have been a means of legitimizing New Kingdom pharaohs and mayalso have served this purpose at this early time. Yet the power exhibited here was not simply theauthority to control or kill these creatures, but also to become them, taking their formidable naturalattributes for one’s own. In this way, these graves reflect the physical reality behind the animal­basediconographies of power that dominate in the early periods of Egyptian history, as seen for example onthe Narmer palette and other documents, where royal power is manifest in several animal guises. Theevidence from Hierakonpolis now suggests this royal symbolism was not metaphorical, but can betraced back to actual physical mastery over some of the most powerful creatures of their world.

To read about the discoveries from Tomb 73, click here.

To follow along on our voyage of discovery at HK6, see the Nekhen News. Just about every issue hassomething to say about this amazing cemetery.

For more on the animals see:

http://www.naturalsciences.be/active/expeditions/egypt/index_html

For more pictures of the site and its finds see older (but not always out of date) reports atarchaeology.org see

Elite cemetery Intro: http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/hierakonpolis/cemetery.html

Weird animals: http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/hierakonpolis/animals.html

Early Kings: http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/hierakonpolis/field07/6.html

Tomb 23 : http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/hierakonpolis/

To follow along as we excavate the elephant in HK24 see

Elephant: http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/hierakonpolis/field/elephant1.html

For further information see Basic Bibliography where the most significant publications are listed.

Latest News

Did You get your Nekhen News?

The latest edition of Nekhen News, volume 26, was posted out in November 2014. Did you receiveyours? If it hasn't yet arrived, please contact us via our Friends' addresses (follow the links on our'Contact Us' page for how to contact us).Or why not become a Friend of Nekhen and help support our expedition discovering the history ofPredynastic Hierakonpolis. You can make a donation by clicking on the Paypal link or going to our'Become a Friend' page and following the appropriate link

New tomb discovered at Hierakonpolis

Read all about the discovery in 2014 of a nearly intact tomb from the predynastic period at the site ofKom el Ahmar, ancient Hierakonpolis, which contained some astonishing and unique finds from thetomb.For a Press Release about the tomb's discovery near Edfu, Egypt, by the international team from theBritish Museum, click here.

We have moved!

For our Friends in America:

If you wish to contact the American Friends of the British Museum to help support the work atHierakonpolis, you should note that they have moved to:American Friends of the British Museum275 Madison Avenue Suite 401New York, NY 10016Phone: 212­812­4362

For more information about becoming a supporter of our work at Hierakonpolis & Nekhen, pleasevisit our US Friends page.For those who live outside the United States, please visit our UK, Europe & Worldwide page.

Become a Friend of Nekhen. You can help make a difference and support the work of the Expedition.

| Text, images, media, code, and design elements in Hierakponpolis­online Copyright |

Copyright: Hierakonpolis Expedition © 2012­2015. All Rights Reserved.