HFH_evaluation report_1

Period: 21 March - 18 April 2014Date of presentation : 14 April 2014Date of deposition : 18 April 2014Places: Toliary and AntananarivoName of the Appraiser: Rakoto Yvon NamelankafatraRecipient of Evaluation: Habitat For Humanity Madagascar

[2]

List of the abbreviations and acronyms

DAO : Offer Appeal File (Dossier d’Appel d’Offre)

FKT : Fokontany

HFH : Habitat For Humanity

KOICA : Korean International Cooperation Agency

OMD : Objectives Millennium of Development

NGO : Non governemental Organization

TOR : Terms Of reference

List tables

Tableau 1 Situation of the house construction.....................................................15Tableau 2 Realization on the cover of the lanes in Paving stones........................17Tableau 3 Realization in Water Points construction and renovation.....................18Tableau 4 Internal factors affecting the results of the project..............................21Tableau 5 External factors affecting the results of the project.............................21Tableau 6 The result of project............................................................................24

List graphsFigure 1 Flipchart showing the progression of work of the house........................14Figure 2Situation of the houses construction.......................................................15Figure 3 "Trano vondro", manufacturated out vegetable matter, it is property of Mr. Rafaralahy there.............................................................................................16Figure 4 A Mason who charged to rebuilt an house destroyed by Cyclone "Haruna"...............................................................................................................16Figure 5 It's here that Mr. Rafaralahy will settle in the next months....................16Figure 6 This house is rebuilt with precaution and attention after its collapse at the passage of the Cyclone Haruna.....................................................................16Figure 7 An house HFH/KOICA in the course completion in Ankilahila..................17Figure 8 An house HFH/KOIKA which has been just finished in Ankilahila............17Figure 9 Realization of the cover of the lanes in Paving stones...........................17Figure 10 Water Point renovated in Tsimenatse I West........................................18Figure 11 New construction of Water point in Tanambao Motombe.....................18Figure 12 Water point renavated in Mahavatse I East..........................................18Figure 13 New construction of Water point in High Ankiambe.............................18Figure 14 An inhabitant of Tsianengea Shantytown raises the question which the Maintenance of infrastructures for them means. Photograph: HFH Antananarivo20Figure 15 Trainers explain to the participants the importance of the Maintenance of the infrastructures and Hygiene. Photograph:: HFH Antananarivo...................20

[3]

Contents

List of the abbreviations and acronyms.................................................................2List tables...............................................................................................................2List graphs..............................................................................................................2Contents................................................................................................................. 3Executive Summary...............................................................................................6

I. Summary......................................................................................................6II. Purpose of the Evaluation.............................................................................6III. The public of the evaluation......................................................................6IV. Uses in the future......................................................................................7I. Results of the evaluation..............................................................................7

Methodology and Sampling....................................................................................8I. Sampling on ground......................................................................................8II. Methodology.................................................................................................8

1. Analysis of the various project documents................................................82. Formal surveys and guidelines..................................................................83. Free and informal interviews.....................................................................94. Focus group...............................................................................................95. Observation...............................................................................................96. Refining and the stepping of the meditative information..........................97. Limits of the external evaluation...............................................................9

Methodology and sampling..................................................................................10III. Sampling on ground.................................................................................10IV. Methodology............................................................................................10

8. Analysis of the various documents project..............................................109. Formal surveys and guidelines................................................................1010. The free and not formal interviews.......................................................1111. The focus group....................................................................................1112. The Observation...................................................................................1113. The refining and the stepping of the meditative information...............1114. Limits of the external evaluation..........................................................11

Assessment of execution......................................................................................12I. How was the project it prepared?...............................................................12

[4]

II. Organization and Human resources............................................................12III. The realization of the project...................................................................15

i. Construction and or rehabilitation of 89 Houses......................................15ii. Construction of the lanes in Paving stones..............................................17iii. Construction and rehabilitation of the Water Points................................18iv. Training in Maintenance of infrastructures and Hygiene......................20v. Distribution of the Mosquito nets.............................................................20

IV. Factors affecting the project results........................................................21i. Internal factors affecting the project.......................................................21ii. External factors affecting the project......................................................21iii. The relevance of the project....................................................................22iv. The efficiency of the project.................................................................22v. Impacts of the project..............................................................................23vi. The efficiency of the project....................................................................23vii. The durability of the project.................................................................23viii. Marketing images of HFH and the Donors............................................23

Conclusion............................................................................................................24Main recommendations........................................................................................25The lessons to be learned....................................................................................26Best practice to be duplicated in the future.........................................................26

Appendix 1 Matrix of evaluation........................................................................27Appendix 2 Sampling........................................................................................28Appendix 3 Methodology...................................................................................29

Definition of the evaluation criteria................................................................29Design of a matrix of evaluation....................................................................29Methods of data acquisition...........................................................................29Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)...................................................................29Existing Reports/ documents.........................................................................29Interviews......................................................................................................30Observations on the ground...........................................................................30Case studies...................................................................................................30Questions about the quality of the data.........................................................30Improvement of the quality of sampling........................................................30To guarantee the consistency of the gathering of the data...........................30Checking of the precise details: use of several data sources.........................31

[5]

Analysis, interpretation and synthesis of the data.........................................31Appendix – 4 Questionnaire – 1 Technical Staff HFH Antananarivo...................32

Appendix 5 – Card-indexes Balance-sheet of execution.................................35Appendix 6 - Balance-sheet of execution – A - FKT Tsianengea......................36Appendix 7 - Balance-sheet of execution – B- FKT Tsimenatse.......................37Appendix 8 - Balance-sheet of execution – A - FKT Mahavatse.......................38Appendix 9 Questionnaire – Impact – Beneficiaries- Focus Group (Group of 8 A 12 People).........................................................................................................39Appendix 10 - Questionnaire HFH Toliary..........................................................41Appendix 11 Questionnaire municipal Authority of Toliary I (Mayor or PDS and DSAS)................................................................................................................ 43Appendix 12 Lists interviewed people...............................................................44Appendix 13 – visited Sites...............................................................................45Appendix 14 - Quoted work...............................................................................45Appendix 16 - DECLARATION OF THE RESPECT OF THE ETHICS........................45

[6]

Executive Summary

I. Summary

The present document handles the final external evaluation of the project "Community Mobilization, Infrastructure, Hygiene and Health in the slums of Toliara." Part 3.

The plan was to carry out this project for the year between January 2013 and December 2013, but for several reasons which we will further develop, its launch was delayed by 8 months and it is on track to be complete by the end of April 2014.

The main content of the project is as follows:

- Construction and / or rehabilitation of 89 houses ;- Distribution of 267 mosquito nets;- Construction and / or rehabilitation of 12 Water Points ;- Rehabilitation of streets in Pavers with a total length of 2000 meters.

Besides, other actions were planned such as the training of beneficiaries in Maintenance and hygiene.

The NGO Habitat For Humanity is the Agency of Execution – This project is financed by KOICA as high as 248 095 293 Korean

The evaluation mission is headed by Yvon Rakoto Namelankafatra with the assistance of two Consultants - Investigators: Ramaharoarivo Tahinjanahary Hariliva and Tsangandahy Aina.

II. Purpose of the Evaluation

According to the TOR, the objective of the evaluation is of:

- to appreciate in a way independent the results of the project, while sticking more to the impact of the actions carried out compared to the had aims;

- To learn the principal lessons from the intervention and to make practical recommendations.

III. The public of the evaluation

The public of the evaluation is constituted by HFHM, KOICA, the Urban district of Toliary, the Presidents of Fokontany where the actions were rationally chosen there, the resident families in the sites of the project, the direct beneficiaries, the inhabitants of the urban city of Toliary, NGO and Associations which have work which have work in development of the human value.

[7]

IV. Uses in the future

The results, assets identified, weaknesses, lessons learned, and the various impacts should be used for ideas and as benchmarks in similar projects.

I. Results of the evaluation

At the time of completion of the evaluation, the result is:

The project "Community Mobilization, Infrastructures, Hygiene and Health in the slums of Toliary " reached the majority of its objectives with some difficulties.

Of the 89 houses to be built or rehabilitated:- 86 are actually finished and occupied in 22 Fokontany;- 2 are in the course of being finished;- 1 to completely reconstruct in Anketa Bas.

The completion rate for the houses is therefore 95.50 %.

- Concerning the 2000m of alleys to be paved: - 89.74%, or almost 1794,9 m, are finished and practicable

Concerning the12 Water Points: - 6 old public Water Points were renovated and continued to supply of

drinking water (in Fokontany: Ambalanombikamoa, Mahavatse I West, Tsimenatse I West, Tsimenatse I East and Mahavatse II West)

- 6 new public fountains were built but are unoperational because they are not connected to JIRAMA sources (Fokontany: Tanambao Motombe, Ankiambe Haute, Mahavatse I East, Mahavatse I West, Ambalanombikamoa, Mahavatse Tanambao).

Regarding health, namely prevention of and the fight against Malaria, 267 mosquito nets were distributed to all the beneficiaries of houses (3 mosquito nets per beneficiary).

Finally, the project beneficiaries from Tsianengea and Tsimenatse Fokontany have benefited from training on the Maintenance and hygiene

[8]

Methodology and Sampling

I. Sampling on ground

Population (Ideal Universe): human resource employed by Habitat For Humanity NGO (Antananarivo and Toliary), leaders and technicians for the companies involved in the project (Head of company, Heads of building site and Masons), the beneficiaries of the project, Authorities of the Urban District of Toliara I, and the decentralized Communities (Mayor of the CUT, Presidents of the FKT).

Subpopulation (operational Universe)

N° Subpopulations Criteria of selection Variable Size

1Technical persons in charge for the ONG Habitat For Humanity

Having a direct responsibility with the execution for the project with Toliara and a knowledge of the history of the project

Place of employmentAntananarivo

Toliary

2

072 Enterprise manager Contribution on execution of the

projectgeographical locality

013 Final recipients of the

projectrecipients associations members geographical locality 14

4 Indirect recipientsTo reside in neighbouring FKT while profiting the advantages rising from the built infrastructures

Function and responsibility: In the Commune In the FKT

08

5 Communal and FKT Authorities

To be decision makers in the Commune or in the FKT

Function and responsibility: In the Commune orIn the FKT

01 Commune

03 FKT

6 Workmen Effective participation in work of the project

-Function and responsibility -professional Classification

06

II. Methodology

As announced in our technical offer, the methodology adopted contains several techniques of investigation.

1. Analysis of the various project documents

These documents are provided by HFH: They include the initial project document, the previous evaluation reports, the organizational structure of the Executive, the Schedule, and the databases for tracking.

2. Formal surveys and guidelines

Questionnaires were prepared for the purpose of obtaining precise technical information required by the evaluation. (See questionnaire in Appendix).

[9]

3. Free and informal interviews

They allowed us to obtain useful information, while their importance was unforeseen during the elaboration of the methodology – Interviews of this type were recorded to get faithful transcriptions of the narratives given and declarations made by the interviewees, often in local dialects.

4. Focus group

They are organized to obtain several joint and divergent answers for some questions - The focus group were used to collect the information with the direct or indirect beneficiaries and HFH Staff of Toliary.

5. Observation

The technical observation enabled us to see, in person, the state of the sites. Photographs were taken in order to analyze them. The observation is necessary because it will enable us to confirm, cancel, or to correct certain assertions or accounts of the interviewed people. It’s the most effective instrument to describe the results accurately.

6. Refining and the stepping of the meditative information

Information proven to be unfounded will not be taken into account and more rhetorical accounts will be compared with other sources.

Thus, analyses and interpretation will be based on reliable data.

7. Limits of the external evaluation

The limits of the external evaluation are imposed by available time and the geographical distance of the sites involved. Also, interviewees who withhold information will limit the scope of the evaluation.

[10]

Methodology and sampling

III. Sampling on ground

Population (ideal Universe): human resource employed by Habitat For Humanity NGO (Antananarivo and Toliary), leaders and Responsible technical for the companies having carried out the implementation for the project (Head of company, Heads of building site and Masons), the recipients of the project, Authorities of the Urban District of Toliara I and the decentralized Communities (Mayor of the CUT, Presidents of the FKT).



1Technical persons in charge for the ONG Habitat For Humanity

Having a direct responsibility with the execution for the project with Toliara and a knowledge of the history of the project

Place of employmentAntananarivo

Toliary

2

072 Enterprises manager Contribution on execution of the

projectgeographical locality

013 Final recipients of the

projectrecipients associations members geographical locality 14

4 Indirect recipientsTo be resident neighbouring FKT while profiting the advantages rising from the built infrastructures

Function and responsibility: In the Commune In the FKT

08

5 Communal and FKT Authorities

To be maker decision in the Commune or in the FKT

Function and responsibility: In the Commune orIn the FKT

01 Commune

03 FKT

6 Workmen Effective participation in work of the project

-Function and responsibility -professional Classification

06

IV. Methodology

As announced in our technical offer, the methodology adopted contains several methods and techniques of investigation.

8. Analysis of the various documents project

These documents are provided by HFH: It’s the initial project document, the previous evaluation reports, the organizational structure of the Executive, the Schedule, the databases for tracking.

9. Formal surveys and guidelines

Questionnaires pre-established were used to obtain the technical information requiring precision in the evaluation. (Cf. Questionnaire in Appendix).

[11]

10. The free and not formal interviews

They allowed us to obtain useful information, while their importance was unforeseen during the elaboration of the methodology - This type of interview (Maintenance) was always followed by sound recordings, to transcribe faithfully narratives and declarations of people interviewed, often expressed in dialects local.

11. The focus group

They are organized to obtain several joint and divergent answers for some questions - The focus group were used to collect the information with the direct or indirect beneficiaries and HFH Staff of Toliary.

12. The Observation

The observation technical enabled us to see in visu the inventory of fixtures. Photographs were taken in order to analyze them. The observation is necessary, it will enable us to confirm, cancel or to correct certain assertions or accounts of the interviewed people. It’s the most effective instrument to describe the inventories of fixtures accurately.

13. The refining and the stepping of the meditative information

Proven information as non founded will not be taken into account and those which are the subject of a rhetoric, will be compared with other sources.

Thus, it’s at the base of the reliable data that the analyses and interpretations of the facts are based.

14. Limits of the external evaluation

The limits of the external evaluation are in the time required to make it count held by the geographical distance where are the Sites of the Project - The possibility of withholding of information on behalf of certain interviewed people.

[12]

Assessment of execution

The project "Community Mobilization, Infrastructures, Hygiene and Health in the Slums of Toliary " - HFH-KOICA, was launched in a particularly difficult context: political and economic crisis, passage of the Haruna Cyclone in Toliara of an intensity not seen for 35 years, and internal management problems of HFHM. The project required HFHM to restructure itself by improving the connection between HFH Toliary and HFH Antananarivo, while scrupulously sticking to procedures.

I. How was the project it prepared?

Being already in the third phase of the project, experiments and improvements of the preceding phases were taken into account.

The City of Toliary is rationally chosen, just like Fokontany selected (Tsianengea, Mahavatse, and Tsimenatse). It’s the biggest Province of Madagascar, but also the worst if we consider all the indicators of development (health, education, housing).

The project continues to focus its efforts on the pressing needs of the City and the Fokontany. These needs are for infrastructure essential to the inhabitants: houses, roads and alleys, drinking water, and measures against malaria. The actual start of the project was preceded by organizational restructuring, in particular by the removal of certain functions and the creation of media outlet.

Adequate preparations were made for the project.

II. Organization and Human resources

1. Organizational structure

The project adopts an functional organization (structure) of pyramidal form. There are between 10 and 13 levels. Each of these member is subordinate to one directly above with a slightly broader function, but a related goal. The project serves several Cities and Regions at the same time: Toliary, Fianarantsoa, Antsirabe, Tamatave, Fianarantsoa, Moramanga.

The advantages of the organization come from its simplicity, executive efficiency, and stability. It is particularly suited to small companies or companies of average size.

The weakness of the functional structure is that it is heavy and slow, especially when applied to big projects to be realized in various localities, such as is the case of HFHM at present.

The matrix structure or the organization by geographical territory seem more adapted to the actions of HFHM.

[13]

[14]

2. Human resources

HFHM employs highly qualified technicians, recruited on the basis of scientific criteria. It is a compact, plain, and interdependent team that carries out a professional life in harmony; generally, it is composed of Christians.

Devoted to work in Toliary each week begins with a prayer meeting and a briefing. Devotion and enthusiasm decrease in the consultants when the end of their contract approaches.

However, the number of employees of HFHM are insufficient – It is the weak point of the project. In Toliary, and certainly in other Cities, the demand for Houses averages requests per week. But the staff of HFHM is decreasing – construction specialists are unable to make their periodic follow-ups on site. Also, other employees are required to help peers complete their tasks, even if they really have no competence in the domain. The effect is not always positive.

The insufficiency of the staff is partially responsible for the slowness and for the low quality of certain parts of the project.

3. The planning

The HFHM plans the actions to be made during the period when the project is executed, by means of a Chronogram (Graph of Henry GANTT or linear graphic representation). This technical kind of sequencing of the works would not raise of the problem then that it is about works of which we know in advance its dimension as alleys in Pavements or others infrastructures same Water Point. But when it is about the Construction of the House the applicants of which come according to the effects of the very effective Mass communications to Toliary (By Radio, Seminars), we don’t know, in advance how many Houses go we to build, which type and Where? How much mason are we going to mobilize? And who will be in charge (be loaded) of the control of the construction of each of these Houses? In this genre of very complicated problem, especially when the staff(size) of the technical Staff is not enough, the use of a Software of planning and the Monitoring and Evaluation of project is imperative.

[15]

4. The Monitoring and Evaluation System (ME)

The ME System shows itself under two (2) forms: the periodic sending of a report(of Monitoring, following the progressof the works on Construction sites and the descents on ground. In Toliary, the Specialist under construction manages a data base of all the Work in progress by types; he updates this data base following the progress on ground.To avoid the risks of forgetting the responsible in ME shows on Flipchart posted in the wall the progress the realizations of Houses by Beneficiaries. (See photo below)Photographs are taken and preserved in the base of the data. These photographs show the state of Work progress. In Antananarivo the post of Monitoring and Evaluation is not occupied yet and remains vacant.Strengthenings of capacity regarding Monitoring and Evaluation assisted on Computer, would be advantageous for the project.

Figure 1 Flipchart showing the progression of work of the house

[16]

III. The realization of the project

The Assessment of the execution after the organisational reorganization and management can be recapitulated as follows :

i. Construction and or rehabilitation of 89 Houses

The houses are built in several scattered FKT: Amborogony, Tsimenatse, Ankatsaka, Tseanengea, Anketraka, Tanambao Motombe, Ampasiko, Befanamy (Ankilahila), Betania, Mitsinjo, Antaravoy, Mangambe, Andakoro, Anketa, Andaboly, Tsianaloka, Mahavatse, Besakoa, Camp Caser, Ampasikibo (Ambaiboho), Ambohitsabo and Toliara Center.

Situation Numbers envisaged Numbers real Difference % percentageBuilt and/or rehabilitated houses 89 85 4 95,50Houses in phase of completion 0 3 3,27Unfinished house 1 1,12

Tableau 1 Situation of the house construction

Built/Rehabilited houses Houses in phase

of completion Unfinished house

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Situation of house construction/rehabilitation

Numbers envisagedReal number

Figure 2Situation of the houses construction

1 House with Ambalanombikamoa Tsimenatsa II is almost completed, it remains with its recipient to make the tilings. 2 other Houses being in the FKT Ankilahila and in Andaboly are also in phase of completion – It remains with their owners to make the pavements and paintings.

1 another house in Anketa - Bas, is to be rebuilt after its collapse at the time of the passage of the Haruna Cyclone in February 2013;

[17]

Generally, all those which saw their house finished are content and satisfied. It is family project or a dream which has been just carried out. Satisfactions depend on several parameters: when the house is well and by a good mason, within the time envisaged – the recipients are also satisfied when they directed them even the operations of constructions with materials which are appropriate them. The recipients who have financial means are included in this category.

Among these people, let us quote the case of Raharivelo Clin, For a long time, He had a dream to build a House behind its place of work in Ampasikibo. He exerts an independent trade. For a long time, He bought Building materials gradually. One day, He attended a campaign of HFH and introduced its file; HFH decides to finance Construction partly. Construction lasted only 20 days, it’s time record.

There is part of the recipients who are not satisfied of the quality of the work of the Masons, a few months only after the completion of the house, of the cracks appear on the walls.

Figure 3 "Trano vondro", manufacturated out vegetable matter, it is property of Mr. Rafaralahy there

Figure 4 A Mason who charged to rebuilt an house destroyed by Cyclone "Haruna"

Figure 5 It's here that Mr. Rafaralahy will settle in the next months

Figure 6 This house is rebuilt with precaution and attention after its collapse at the passage of the Cyclone Haruna

[18]

Figure 7 An house HFH/KOICA in the course completion in Ankilahila

Figure 8 An house HFH/KOIKA which has been just finished in Ankilahila

ii. Construction of the lanes in Paving stonesFokontany Envisaged Realized Rate of

realization in%Tsimenatse II Ambalanombikamoa 259 237,7 91,78Ambalanombikamoa 156 156 100,00Tsimenatsa I East 446 346 84.30Ankatsaka 714,4 714,4 100,00Tsimenatsa I West 82 67,6 82,44Mahavatse 342 273,23 78,89Total 1999,4 1794,93 89,77

Tableau 2 Realization on the cover of the lanes in Paving stones

Tsimenatse II Ambalanombikamoa

Ambalanombikamoa

Tsimenatsa I East

Ankatsaka

Tsimenatsa I West

Mahavatse

Total

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 140016001800 2000

Construction of the lanes in paving stones in meter

RealizedEnvisaged

Figure 9 Realization of the cover of the lanes in Paving stones

[19]

iii. Construction and rehabilitation of the Water Points

FKT New Water Points Water Points renovated

Mahavatse Tanambao 1 0Ambalanombikamoa 1 1Mahavatse I West 1 1Mahavatse I East 1 0Tsimenatse I West 0 2Tsimenatse I East 0 1High Ankiambe 1 0Tanambao Motombe 1 0Mahavatse II West 0 1Total 6 6

Tableau 3 Realization in Water Points construction and renovation

Figure 10 Water Point renovated in Tsimenatse I West

Figure 11 New construction of Water point in Tanambao Motombe

Figure 12 Water point renavated in Mahavatse I East

Figure 13 New construction of Water point in High Ankiambe

[20]

Mahavatse Tanambao

Ambalanombikamoa

Mahavatse I West

Mahavatse I East

Tsimenatse I West

Tsimenatse I East

High Ankiambe

Tanambao Motombe

Mahavatse II West

Total

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Construction and rehabilitation of the Water Points

Water Points renovatedNew Water Points

Figure 7 Realization in Water Points construction

The drinking water supply is a crucial problem of the slum dwellers of Toliary.The project plans to build 6 Borders of new public fountains and to rehabilitate (discharge) 6 others already operational, that is a total of twelve (1). For lack of connecting with the sources) of JIRAMA, three (3) news Water Points are not able of serving the users. The heart of the problem of the inhabitants are not solved yet.

[21]

iv. Training in Maintenance of infrastructures and Hygiene

It is the corollary of the previous actions, in particular the construction of Houses, Water Points and alleys in pavements. The theme of training concerns the Maintenance of infrastructures and Hygiene - The training took place 04 Mars in Toliary - the beneficiaries association members of Tsianengea and Tsimenatse participated in this training

Figure 14 An inhabitant of Tsianengea Shantytown raises the question which the Maintenance of infrastructures for them means. Photograph: HFH Antananarivo

Figure 15 Trainers explain to the participants the importance of the Maintenance of the infrastructures and Hygiene. Photograph:: HFH Antananarivo

v. Distribution of the Mosquito nets

It is the shutter health of the project, its characteristic resides on the free distribution of the Mosquito nets at the recipients of the Houses. It is a contribution to the fight and prevention against Malaria. Each recipient has right of 3 Mosquito nets. 267 Mosquito nets were distributed.

[22]

[23]

IV. Factors affecting the project results

Several factors can affect the results of a project.

They can be inherent to this one, in this case: we call it internal factors, if they are outer of the project, we call them external factors. These factors can act differently on the results, sometimes positive, sometimes negative.

i. Internal factors affecting the project

Internal factors affecting the project positively Internal factors affecting the project negativelyThe reorganization brought to the organization in October 2013

Insufficient manpower

The devotion of the employees to work

Insufficient materials and equipment

The competence of the Technical StaffInsufficient of work permanent control The technical skill of some Masons

The cohesion of the group Insufficient implication of the partners: the Urban District and the JIRAMA Company

Free distribution of various tools, equipment and materials to the Masons, Bible…

Insufficiency of the degree of appropriation of the works carried out at the recipientsThe relationship between the Recipient and Mason HFH. This last often refuses the order and council of the future owner.A Mason assumes at the same time 2 to 3 Houses: the consequence is reflected on output quality

Tableau 4 Internal factors affecting the results of the project

ii. External factors affecting the project

External factors affecting the project positively

External factors affecting the project negatively

The support brought by certain Presidents FKT to persuade the inhabitants to collaborate with the project

The political and economic crisis

The Haruna Cyclone and its effects The behavior and dealing of the inhabitants who live in the sites which are not integrated in the project

Tableau 5 External factors affecting the results of the project

[24]

iii. The relevance of the project

The project is relevant: it is an initiative which answers OMD. So, it is an answer to the social needs for the Toliary City: needs regarding housing, Hygiene and regarding Health.

93.7 %1 of Houses to Toliary are made either wooden, or in sheet steels, vegetable materials which they call "Trano Vondro" - to welcome approximately 6 people (the domestic size to Toliary is 5,3).

Besides, regarding main source of water to drink 59.1 % of Toliary people use the river and 37.5 % make recourses to wells without pump not covered.

iv. The efficiency of the project

The efficiency of the project varies according to shutters:

The constructions of alleys in Pavements and the distribution of Mosquito nets to the beneficiaries of Houses, showed the efficiency of the project.

Before project, according to the testimony of an inhabitant, the residents of the district have to bring with them a bottle filled with water to wash their shoes or sandals at the exit. of the alleys which were dirty and muddy. The situation is other at present. The Malaria is the second disease which causes most death in Madagascar. Until the contrary proof, mosquito nets stay the most effective way of prevention is the least expensive.

On the other hand, until 6 Water Points recently constructed are connected with the sources of the JIRAMA, the shutter: Water Points construction and rehabilitation is not effective. The situation Before and After project, regarding water supply in Fokontany Beneficiaries stays the same.

The Water points old rehabilitated remain insufficient in number and the problem in supply of drinking water persists: the inhabitants deposits their cans to reserve a place at 4:30 am of the Morning, the distance separating their places to residence of Water Point vary between 300 in 600 meters; It’s open at 5:30 am or at 6 am in the morning; the flow is very low in Toliara, from Noon till 2 pm, there is a systematic cut of water supply at the present time there.

The construction of Houses is partially effective: a House it hard is reassuring, not vulnerable on fires or on any risks of the disasters as Cyclones or floods. The beneficiaries are reported the change of their social status. Several people put down their files and ask every day the HFH Toliary, following in the daytime by the raising sensitizations.

1 Source : INSTAT/DSM/EPM 2004

[25]

However, the absence of uniformity in the forms and the quality of built Houses following the coat of category socio - professional where belonged their owners; the problems bound to the technical skill of Masons used, the quality of Building materials delivered by the Suppliers, hinder the construction of Houses such as they were initially designed, return the often ineffective project.

v. Impacts of the project

From the social, cultural and public health views, We can admit that the project has positive impacts.

The economic impact is not still measurable, because the project has just been finished; so, the beneficiaries are still for the period of repayment in an economic in state of recession. It's the same for the environmental impact of the project, it is necessary that one time ago or events to appreciate the positive or negative impacts of the works built on the environment.

vi. The efficiency of the project

Référerant on the size of the Staff allocated directly to the project, Staff of HFH Toliary and Antananarivo confused (18 individuals) using equipments and often insufficient materials- allowing them however to execute difficult tasks and complex works, with a satisfactory result of execution, we can admit that the project is efficient.

vii. The durability of the project

The durability of the project in the future is certain, taking into account the nature of outputs: houses hard, alleys in Pavements the life expectancy of which can pass beyond two (2) centuries, Shelters of Water Point built in bricks covered cement.

Nevertheless, the effectiveness of this durability will depend widely in the application of a culture of Infrastructures Maintenance of the beneficiaries and the users of the public works.

The durability of the experiences of the project will also depend on contribution of the Urban district and Communities decentralized in Maintenance of the public Works.

viii. Marketing images of HFH and the Donors

The HFHM is known in Toliary as Christians NGO - The population of Toliary knows it has through campaign diffused by the local radio and of the seminaries. It is in the environment of construction of House that it’s more known.

The Donor of fund, KOICA, is better known at the beneficiary's than in the Population.

[26]

The informations on this organization are diffused by HFH Toliary during the meeting of sensitivity.

So, on the main facade of the constructed Houses are written on a plate their company names and initials.

[27]

Conclusion

In conclusion, the project "Community Mobilization, Infrastructures, Hygiene and Health " reached the majority of the objectives with some difficulties.

The other actions planned all was produced as distribution of the Mosquito nets, for the recipients of the Houses; distribution of materials, small tools, equipment, clothing, helmets of protection and Bibles for the masons,

- 95.50% of Houses to be built are realized, that is 85/89 ;

- 89,77 % of alleys to be covered with Pavements are made, that is 1824,93 meters on 1999,4 meters;

- 100 % of shelters of Water Points are rehabilitated and/or built among which 50 % of them are capable serving the users.

- 267 Mosquito nets are distributed to all the beneficiaries of Houses, completely built or in the course of finish.

The beneficiaries of the infrastructures of Tsianengea and Tsimenatse FKT received training on the Maintenance of infrastructures and Hygiene.

The reasons by which the objectives didn’t reach are often ascribable to the partners of HFH, like JIRAMA Company and the Urban District of Toliary.

The other causes come from the slowness of the procedure, the insufficiency of Human resources and the maladjustment of the organization to dimension and the compexity of the project.

Also, the refusal of certain inhabitants to move their clotures delay the beginnings of work

N° The result of project 01 The project achieved all its goals02 The project reached the majority of its objectives without difficulties03 The project reached the majority of its objectives with some difficulties 04 The project did not reach the majority of its objectives, but has some positive effects05 The project did not reach the majority of its objectives and does not have any positive effect06 The project did not reach any of its objectives, but has some positive effects07 The project did not reach any of its objectives and does not have any positive effectTableau 6 The result of project

[28]

[29]

Main recommendations

- Strengthen collaborations with the local authorities and companies), NGO by the formal agreements (written documents signed by the partners) planning their respective roles and responsibilities, following their fields of expertise, if the project requires it.

- Work more in the relative actions in Drinking water supply- To intensify and reinforce covering.

- Try to introduce into the strategies HFH the Marketing of service (The speed and the quality of the services

- Adopt an organization answering better the geographical dimension and the extent of the project, by adopting either the matrix structure, or the organization by geographical territory.

- Increase the number of the technical staff, to be better adapted to the exponential increase of their tasks and responsibilities.

- Endow the project team of the sufficient material equipments and necessary for their daily tasks: rolling stocks, materials (equipments) of reproduction of documents, computing software…

- Systematize the strengthening of capacity or the development of skill of the employees of HFH (Training) following the technological evolution and the needs for HFHM.

- Include in appendix to DAO the characteristics and technical specificities of the Work to be built with which will be signed their technical obligations and responsibilities.

- As soon as possible, establish and apply rational and scientific criteria to the choice of the quality of building materials to be used (quality of raw materials, composition, hardness, degree of drying of wood.).

- Establish and outsource a system of PERMANENT CONTROL to any companies or Masons who execute works within the framework of the project HFH.

- Try to recruit Landscape painters and Architects among the technical Staff of the project.

- Verify and check systematically the quality and the reliability of building materials coming from Suppliers;

[30]

- Involve the beneficiaries in any purchase of building materials susceptible to engage their financial responsibility.

- Relieve any procedures or mechanism susceptible to engender slowness or delays in the execution of a project, without compromising the good management.

The lessons to be learned

- Before any launch, estimate the political and social viability of the project.

- Give more responsibilities to the other actors or the partners of the project (Urban district of Toliary, JIRAMA…);

- An unsolved problem in time, as the delay of an activity for example, can entail a chain of delays susceptible to succeed up to the not achievement of one or several objectives

- The Organization and the resources (human, material and technological) remain key factors of success).

Best practice to be duplicated in the future

- The free distribution of tools, small materials and equipments, Bible and clothing-work for the Masons;

- Development of the cohesion of spirit of the team by the session of the prayer, the working briefing every beginning of the week, the sense of mutual aid and the Sharing…

[31]

Appendix 1 Matrix of evaluation

Criteria of evaluation

Question-keys specific Under-questions

Méthodes/Outils of data-gathering

Indicateurs/Normes of success

Methods to analyze the data

The attack of the objectives

Which are forced having marked out its implementation, the learned lessons and the good practices? Which are the effects and impacts awaited and not awaited in relation to the use of the resources which were allocated to him?

Are the products of the results stated in the document of project –they reached?

Collections of information on the realization of the project (Reports/ratios periodic); semi-directing interviews of all the persons in charge for the project; Technique of observation

Nbr carried out / Nbr Envisaged X 100

A number of mosquito nets

distributed

Numbers exempted Participants of training in Maintenance and hygiene

Regrouping of information in data base, refining of information and interpretation of the significance of these data bases

Effectiveness How the objectives and/or the results they are reached

RelevanceLe projet répond-il au besoin régional ?

The project meets it the local context, or needs regional?

Reference: Millenium of Development, PCD of Toliary I,

Statistical reports/ratios of the Regional Management of the Statistics of Toliary (dwellings, Water, Health...

EfficiencyLe projet est il efficient

Is the use of the resources (human, material and financial) it efficient?

Analyze volume of the activities carried out and the level of the use of funds

Comparison between the rate of realization and the rate of withdrawal

Impacts

Quels sont les impacts du projet ?

Which is its impact on the recipients from the point of view social, economic, public health, cultural

Investigations into ground near the persons in charge respectifs/Collecte for the official data

Nbr réalisé/Nbr Envisaged X 100 - a Number of mosquito nets distributed - a Number of the exempted Participants of training in Maintenance and hygiene

[32]

Appendix 2 Sampling

Population (ideal Universe) Staff technical employed by Habitat For Humanity Madagascar, technical leaders and Responsible for the companies having carried out the implementation of the project, the recipients of the project, the Urban District Authorities of Toliara I.



1Staff technical employed by HFHM

Having a direct responsibility with the execution for the project with Toliara

Knowledge of the project history

Place of employment 4 people

2 Managers of undertaking Execution of the project Role and function within the company

To determine

3 Final recipients of the project

Member of associations of the recipients - resident in the 3 Fokontany -to be chosen since the launching of the project

- Sexes - Ages - Profession 36 (12 By

Fokontany)

4 Indirect recipients

To be resident of Fokontany neighbouring while profiting the advantages rising from the built infrastructures

To determine

5 Communal authorities

To be maker decision - Having a responsibility in the social affairs and the implementation for the Communal Plan for Development -

Function and responsibility within the Commune

2 to 3

[33]

Appendix 3 Methodology

In some lines, the methodological steps that we intend to carry on are developed hereafter:

Definition of the evaluation criteria

The evaluations criteria are as follows:

a) The reaching of the objectives and the results at the end of April 2014; b) The relevance c) The effectiveness d) The efficiency e) The impact

Design of a matrix of evaluation

The Matrix of evaluation will make it possible to tally, first of all the mission of evaluation in general, according to the terms' of references, then, to synthesize in the form of table, all the question-keys in connections with the above mentioned criteria of evaluation, as well as the short specific questions, the methods / tools for data-gathering, the indicators and standards of successes, finally the methods to analyze the data.

Methods of data acquisition

The various answers to the question-keys of the criteria of evaluation, in particular of the reaching of the objectives/results, relevance, effectiveness, impact and durability, will be obtained starting from the various methods of data acquisition, which will rationally be chosen, according to their natures and their sources.

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

It is fundamental insofar as it provides us the indicators of performance to measure the progress, particularly the current results facing the expected results

Existing Reports/ documents

Practically, the majority of information which the criteria of evaluation require, are drawn from the secondary data sources (external or internal): the monograph of area (demographic information , socio-economic, etc), a preliminary photograph draft of the sites; the document of project, agreements of partnership (if, necessary), schedules of conditions on which the Project superintendent must conform to it, periodic reports of Monitoring and Evaluation, evaluation reports to internal semi-course, etc

[34]

Interviews

Also called, primary sources data, it is only by the means of the talks, individual or of groups of 6 to 8 people, directing or semi-directing, as we will obtain information answering the specific questions stated in the Terms of references.

The talks are preceded by the sampling of the people to be interviewed (Personal technique of the Project, the recipients of the project, the targets, the local authorities...), the elaboration of the questionnaires (short of all the tools for evaluation).

The people to be interviewed could be also, the Advisor-keys and the Panels of Expert, if the mission of Evaluation requires it.

Observations on the ground

The descent on ground, by the exploitation of the technique of Observation, is the singularity of any informed and conscientious Appraiser of its trade. It will help him to describe as accurately as possible the inventory of fixtures, or to give a photograph of the project to a given moment.

Case studies

The studies of the cases of the similar projects carried out in other areas or other countries, could be useful during the evaluation of the relevance of the project. The Appraiser must also resort to this method with the purpose of consolidating the good experiments and the lessons drawn from the other projects.

Questions about the quality of the data

Our strategy consists in improving reliability and the validity of the data bases. To this end, the Appraiser will carry out the:

Improvement of the quality of sampling

The sample must, be thus selected on the basis of of a reasoning or an aim directly related to the purposes of the evaluation and is supposed to guarantee a precision in the interpretation of the conclusions and the utility of the results of the evaluation.

To guarantee the consistency of the gathering of the data

By assisting the Appraiser, the data-processing Operator already received a training about the protocols of observation; in order to make sure that they record all their observations in the same way.

The meaning of key words used in the questionnaires and the time-tables of the talks, will be checked particularly if they were translated, in order to make sure that the people who are polled understand well what is required of them.

[35]

Checking of the precise details: use of several data sources

It is a matter of proceeding:

- the use of a mixture of methods to collect information rather than to stick with only one source or only one element.

- the cross checking for example the element of a source (such as the Maintenance of group) with another element on the experiments of the people living in rural environment (being able to be a documentary element coming from relationship or of talks with credible advisor-keys and quite informed on the situation).

- the calling of experts to examine and validate the facts.

Analysis, interpretation and synthesis of the data

According to the duration and the complexity of the mission of Evaluation, the Appraiser can work out a Plan of analysis.

It is the phase which precedes the drafting of the evaluation report.

It should be reminded that the analysis of the data is a systematic process for which it is a question of organizing and of classifying the information collected in the form of tables, to summarize them and compare the results with those of the other adequate information in order to extract some deductions being able to answer the questions of the evaluation and its purposes.

It makes it possible to the analyst to decipher the facts resulting from a whole of testimonies thanks to a coding and a systematic gathering of the collected data, while taking care to ensure itself of their precision, by carrying out any statistical analysis necessary and while transposing these data on formats or units of analysis related to each question about the evaluation.

The analysis of the data seeks to identify models in the facts, either by isolating some significant deductions (analyzes), or by combining sources of information to reach a greater comprehension (synthesis). So the mixture of the methods of evaluation requires a separate analysis of each element and a synthesis of all the sources in order to examine the diagrams, the convergence or complexity

[36]

Appendix – 4 Questionnaire – 1 Technical Staff HFH Antananarivo

Names of the responsible to be interviewed: Functions and roles in the project: Place...................................................... Date and hour:..........................................

1. When and how the project was identified?

2. To your knowledge was the project in question the purpose of a Preparation (enquiry about the social, economic, public health, demographic....) YES NO

In the affirmative, ask the references of the documents

3. To your knowledge, did the project have the purpose of a precondition of a prior evaluation (technical Analysis of feasibility, analyzes of financial feasibility)? YES NOT In the affirmative, to ask the references of the documents

4. were the recommendations put forth in the evaluation report of 2012 followed up by positive and concrete acts?

Yes, all were followed up partially without

(in case that the response given is partially or without, ask the reasons - Why?)

5. To make the information on the time-table of execution filled out by bringing explanations the gaps Goes back to beginning envisaged (jj/mm/aaaa)

real Date of beginning:Différence ;Reasons of the difference: Envisaged date of completion envisaged real Date of completion Différence Reason of the difference:

6. Make the information on the financing of the project filled outOrganization 1....................Amount t of the contribution financial Organization 2....................Amount t of the contribution financialOrganization 3....................Amount t of the contribution financial Organization 4....................Amount t of the contribution financial

Total costs of the project Envisaged realDifference

Reasons of the difference:

[37]

7. Do the Commune and the recipients contribute to the financing of the project? YES NOT If Yes, give the percentages of their respective participation:communeRecipients......................................................................

8. Briefly describe the organization of the project and ONG HFH as a whole?

10.How many workers are mobilized by HFH in Toliary in the execution of project?

11. Is the size of the team of Project, according to you: Normal Insufficient in excess

12. Please appreciate the motivation of the Technical staff of the project as a whole? Extremely motivate Fairly motivate Not motivate

13. Please appreciate the competence of the Technical staff of the Project as a whole? Highly qualified Fairly qualified Inefficient

14.Does the document of preliminary draft comprise a planning of the activities?Yes Not Ask an unspecified related document (operational Planning, Chronogram, Plan of annual work) / _ /

15.Is the organisational structure of the project equipped with a service (function or department) dealing only of the Monitoring and Evaluation?Yes No

16.If Yes, are the Monitoring and Evaluation are systematized (Procedure, standard form of report, periodic descent, etc.) Yes No

17 Were the difficulties encountered, the problems of execution or the delays of executions on ground reported accurately to the Head of project or to the Person in charge for Monitoring and Evaluation?Yes No..................More or less Explain

18 Is – were the reported difficulties encountered, the problems of execution or the delays of executions examined, taken into account and solved after an adequate decision? Always No Seldom If the answer is " no " or " seldom ", describe briefly the reasons of the non application of a corrective decision? /

19. Quote, according to you the Assets of the project, in terms of its management or its execution:

-

[38]

---

20. Quote, according to you the Weaknesses of the project (according to your own experiment), in terms of its management or its execution: ---- 21. Quote, according to your experiments, the influential internal factors positively or negatively the results of the project. A) A Factors internal (but unforeseeable) influencing the results positively

-B) Internal factors influencing the results negatively

---

22. Quote, according to your experiments, the influential external factors positively or negatively the results of the project. A) ,External factors (but unforeseeable) influencing the results positively

--

--B) External factors influencing the results negatively

---

23. Which data-processing software do you use in the Monitoring, Project management and Evaluation?

24. Did the Project envisage a strategy of perennisation or durability? Yes No

If in the affirmative, would you specify which?

[39]

Appendix 5 – Card-indexes Balance-sheet of execution

Recapitulation

LOCALITES Construction and/or rehabilitation of the

houses

Distribution of the mosquito nets in 89

Houses

Construction of the lanes in Paving stones

Construction of Water Ponits

Training of the recipients

Fokontany Tsianengea

Envisaged

Realized Envisaged

Realized Envisaged Realized Envisaged Realized Envisaged

Realized

Fokontany TsimenatseFokontany TsimenatseTotalRate of realization

REMARKS AND OBSERVATIONS

[40]

Appendix 6 - Balance-sheet of execution – A - FKT Tsianengea

N° Contents Observation

01Construction and/or rehabilitation of houses

Number

02 Distribution of mosquito net Number

03 Construction of the lanes in Paving stones

Length (m)

04Construction of Water Points Number

05Formation des bénéficiaires

Number

[41]

Appendix 7 - Balance-sheet of execution – B- FKT Tsimenatse



Number



Length (m)



Number

[42]

Appendix 8 - Balance-sheet of execution – A - FKT Mahavatse



Number



Length (m)



Number

[43]

Appendix 9 Questionnaire – Impact – Beneficiaries- Focus Group (Group of 8 A 12 People)

Locality and date:............................................................... Hour: …………………

A - Questions to be asked to the final beneficiaries 1. Did you take part or contribute to the identification or the implementation

of the project? If so, which was your role? 2. Which trade do you practise? 3. How many people are there in your family (size of household)? 4. Preparatory project, describe the living conditions where your family has

lived: - The number of rooms? Did you live with a problem of promiscuity?

(Establish the ratio: the amount of household/number of rooms) - are you tenant of a house? If so, how much did you pay monthly? - Or were you lodged by your close or friends? Or a homeless? Do you

built yourself your house? Water accessibility? Availability of health facilities?

- Were the children provided education ? - Does malaria prevail in the district before? Are there other tropical

diseases which prevailed there? If yes, which? - Do you have Savings preparatory project? Roughly, how much per

month? - How much per month do you ge, roughly as income?

5. After Project, was the problem of promiscuity solved? explain, how many do you live in the same roof now? (Establish the current ratio: Cut of household per rooms)

6. Is drinking water accessibility now solved? 7. Quid with the schooling of the children? 8. Did you receive Mosquito nets? Do you use it? 9. was the problem of malaria in the district clearly improved (Statistical

epidemiologic to be checked, if possible, at the closest CSB where the recipients frequented in case of epidemic of malaria)

10. Do you currently have Savings or are they improved? 11. How much per month do you receive roughly as income? (analyze the

difference Before and After project)

[44]

12. Give your opinions on the and impact and the effect of the project? (Compared to your former way of life)

13. Did you profit from a training on Maintenance of the work, the dwelling and hygiene?

14. How do you find the training? Did you already put it into practice? 15. Do you know how the organization which finances this project is? 16. How is the ONG which carries out this project called? 17. How to recognize them? Describe their respective logos

B - Specific questions, indirect recipients of the project (non members of associations of the recipients) 18.Which feeling do you express the works built (Lanes in Paving stones, water

Points, discharge culverts of worn water) within the project HFH, in which you enjoy and get advantages and interests, as well as the direct recipients in the Fokontany?

19.Is there no frustration, rivalry or litigation between you the direct recipients and the indirect recipients who enjoy the advantages through the project in the everyday life?

20.If in the affirmative, how to solve them? Would not you attempt to organize yourself one day, to take similar initiatives in order to solve the problems of home, of water supply, traffic, hygiene and public health? a) 4 Highlight in a few words the difference of the advantages and interests

between you and the associations of the final recipients. 21.Do you know what the organization which finances this project in Fokontany

Tsianengea, Tsimenatse and Mahavatse is? 22.How is the ONG which carries out this project called? 23.How to recognize them? Describe their respective logos?

Put the questions 22, 23 and 24 to a sample of the inhabitants of the Fokontany neighbouring, randomly taken and with multivariable: (sex, age, social and economic category). Record the good and the bad answers.

[45]

Appendix 10 - Questionnaire HFH Toliary

1. How does your Communication with the local Partners of HFH appear?

a) With the local Authorities and politicians of the region

Good Average Bad Sometimes good sometimes bad

Explain?

b) With the firms

Good average bad sometimes good sometimes bad

Explain?

c) With the Final recipients (members of the associations of the recipients)

Good average bad sometimes good sometimes bad

Explain?

2. Briefly describe your role, function, attributions and extent of your responsibilities in the execution for the project?--

3. Do the titular firms designed to execute some tasks respect their engagements to HFH?

Yes No......................... Rarely Explain?

4. Are there cases in which the execution of one or more activities are late or in update?

[46]

Yes Rarement Frequently Explain, which are the reasons?

5. Were the recorded lost time of executions made up?

Yes No How?

6-. Who controls the completion of the work? - -

7. How many works are finished officially?

a) Temporarily Fkt Tsianengea: - House: - Water Points - Lanes in Paving stones: -- Mosquito nets distributed

Fkt Tsimenatse - House: - Water Points - Lanes in Paving stones: -- Mosquito nets distributed

Fkt Mahavatse - House: - Water Points - Lanes in Paving stones: -- Mosquito nets distributedb) Definitively Fkt Tsianengea: House: - Water Points - Lanes in Paving stones: -- Mosquito nets distributed

Fkt Tsimenatse House: - Water Points - Lanes in Paving stones: -- Mosquito nets distributed

Fkt Mahavatse - House: - Water Points - Lanes in Paving stones: -- Mosquito nets distributed

[47]

8.What are the assets of the project, which should be maintained or to develop more? According to your experiments on ground -

- 9. Which are the weaknesses and difficulties encountered during the execution of the project? (Relational, administrative, financial, material, competence of RH employed...) - -

[48]

Appendix 11 Questionnaire municipal Authority of Toliary I (Mayor or PDS and DSAS)

1.Does the CUT lay a Communal Plan of Development?

Yes No

If Yes, is it operational?

2.How do you see the initiative of HFH in the Shantytowns of the 3 Fokontany of Toliary?

------

Does the CUT have a budget allocated for the Maintenance of public works?

Yes No

If Yes, till how much does it rise? Till how much does the annual budget of the CUT approved by the Town council rise?

3.Does the CUT lay out a strategy having for purpose to develop and maintain the works, services and goods left by the Projects initiated by various ONG after their completion?

[49]

Appendix 12 Lists interviewed people

-Haja Mamiharijaona Ramerison, Program Manager, Hfh Antananarivo - AZOELISOLOMIHANTA Volatiana Livanirina, Resources Development and

communication Manager, HFH Antananarivo - Ravotovelson Mamisoa Hubert, Consulting in Covering, HFF Toliary - Ramamonjisoa Cerice Gaustin, Consulting in Covering, HFH Toliary - Razafindrambola Adrien, Consulting Specialist Construction - Rasoanantenaina Simonette, Socio-Organizing, Hfh Toliary -Tinanomendranahary Luciana Danella, Socio-Organizing, Hfh Toliary - Rambeloson Thierry, Consulting Cs, Hfh Toliary - Mampionotsihoaly Patric, Consultant Hao, Hfh Toliary - Dr. Fiacre Hatimo, Mayor of the Urban District Toliara - Perfect, Assistant Emampo - Fokontany Head, Tsianengea - Robin, Member of the Committee of Fokontany Tsianengea - Zo Chef of building site, Fenitra Firm, - Faly, Head of Building site, Fenitra Firm, - Niry, Manager of the Fenitra firm, - Manjato, Mason, Undertaken Fanilo - Rado, Head of Building site, Fanilo Firm - Solonjatovo José Ralaro, Mason Hfh, Ampasikibo - Ambahiboho - Léandre Fidison, Operation, Ampasikibo - Ambahiboho - Mrs. Lazaikely Patrice, Profit House, Ampasikibo – Ambahiboho - Christian, President of Fokontany – Ankatsaka - Dino, Mason – Ankilahila Befanamy - Justin, Mason - Ankilahila Befanamy; - Celine Sitony, Recipient; - Lala Jean Baptiste, Recipient - Basile, Recipient; - Rakoromamonjisoa Barijaona, Recipient - Christel Role, Recipient - Novasoa Berthine, Recipient - Leky, Recipient - Mouslah Hazam, Recipient - Arthur, Member of the Committee of Fokontany - Ramilasoa, Head of Village, recipient - Etitatse, Assistant Fokontany, Recipient - Raharivelo Clim, Ampasikibo, Recipient - Farez, Andrimasom-pokonolona, nonprofit - Christelle, Ankatsaka, nonprofit

[50]

Appendix 13 – visited Sites

- Hfh Antananarivo - Hfh Toliary – Roadway system - Toliary Town hall - Mahavatse Tanambao - Ambalanombikamoa - Mahavatse I West - Mahavatse I Is - Tsimenatse I West - Tsimenatse I Is - High Ankiambe - Tanambao Motombe - Mahavatse II West - Ankilahila - Ambahiboho - Andaboly

Appendix 14 - Quoted work Ministry of Economy, Finances and Budget - Secretary general. PERIODIC ENQUIRY INTO THE HOUSEHOLD 2004. Report of the anquiry Socio-demographic, health and economic, Antananarivo: Instat, January 2006.

Appendix 16 - DECLARATION OF THE RESPECT OF THE ETHICS

I, undersigned, Rakoto Yvon Namelankafatra - Consultant in Evaluation, declares that the Retrospective appraisal and external Project " Community Mobilization, Infrastructures, Hygiene and Health in the Shantytowns of Toliary ", is carried out in the respect of the Ethics of the Evaluation.

In this respect, the Evaluation is made with independence, impartiality, honesty, integrity, responsibility, confidentiality and transparency; any conflict of interest enters the interviewed people was avoided.

The team had not saved her efforts so that the reports and the presentations of evaluation are precise, complete and reliable.

Antananarivo, April 14 2014

Rakoto Yvon Namelankafatra

[51]

HFH_evaluation report_1

Documents