Top Banner
Oral imaging in oral implantology H. Reychler
32

Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Mar 12, 2016

Download

Documents

Luc Vrielinck

Oral imaging in oral H. Reychler Medical imaging -without X-rays -with X-rays -principles -radioprotection -digitalisation -tomography -orthopantomogram -CT scan -Denta scan -ConeBeamCT -3D and related devices Principles of X-rays –Preop planning –Immediate postop control –Not accurate for measurements –Information on healing !! X-rays
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Oral imaging in oral

implantology

H. Reychler

Page 2: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Medical imaging

- without X-rays

- with X-rays

- principles

- radioprotection

- digitalisation

- tomography

- orthopantomogram

- CT scan

- Denta scan

- ConeBeamCT

- 3D and related devices

Page 3: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Principles of X-rays

-To visualise, after or during radiation, hard tissues

- no accessible to clinical exam

- no accessible otherwise

- some geometrical rules and constraints

- during radiation

- position of the patient

- enlargement of the images

- immobility of the patient

- some limits

- projection

- superimposition

- morphological details without informations on physiopathology

Ballinger PW. Merrill's Atlas of Radiographic Positions and Radiologic Procedures. St Louis, Mosby, 1986 - Goaz

PW & White SC. Oral Radiology : Principles and Interpretation. St Louis, Mosby, 1987 - Langland OE et al.

Textbook of Dental Radiology. Springfield, Ill, Thomas, 1984 - Mailland M. Techniques de radiologie dentaire.

Paris, Masson, 1987 - Manson-Hing LR. Fundamentals of Dental Radiography. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1985

- Pasler FA. Zahnärztliche Radiologie. Stuttgart, Thieme, 1987

Page 4: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

- Retroalveolar– Preop planning

– Immediate postop control

– Not accurate for measurements

– Information on healing !!

X-rays

Page 5: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

– Quality of bone

Classification of Lekholm & Zarb (1985).

Implants survival rates depend on bone quality :

Class I : almost exclusively compact homogenous bone

Class II : thick compact bone around dense trabecular spongious bone

Class III : thin cortical bone around dense trabecular spongious bone

Class IV : thin cortical bone around dense spongious bone

Symphyseal bone

of edentulous patient

Symphyseal +

mandibular bone

Maxillary bone

Limits of X-rays

Page 6: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

- Do not replace clinical exam :

• Bone/interdental space on the alveolar crest

Limits of X-rays

Page 7: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

- Do not replace clinical exam :

• Alveolar crest thickness

Limits of X-rays

Page 8: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Height :

- screwed prosthesis : 5 mm

- sealed prosthesis : 7,5 mm

- Bona : 12, 5 mm

- Bar : 18,5 mm

Limits of X-rays

- Do not replace clinical exam :– Vertical intermaxillary space/dimension

Page 9: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

- Do not replace clinical exam :

• Classification of Cawood

et Howell

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:

232-6

Limits of X-rays

Page 10: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Radioprotection

- « As Low As Reasonably Achievable » principle

- To choose the most performant technique to visualise what you want,

with the lowest radiation dosis

- Mean dosis due to dental X-rays = 0.37 mSv/year/ Belgian patient

- = « only » 10 % of total radiation dosis (3.5 mSv/year)

- « Optimisation principle » means X-rays only acceptable if not any

other diagnostic tool is possible and taking into account radiation dosis

>< image quality

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/136en.htm - http://www.fanc.fgov.be -

Page 11: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Radioprotection

Page 12: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Digitalisation

- To modify an analogic signal/image to a digital one

- 2 different techniques :

- direct = sensors : CCD (photoelectric effect) ou CMOS (semiconductive agents)

- indirect = phosphor plates : PSPP + laser scanning

- Advantages :

- speed

- radiation dosis lowering

- computerisation

- « user-friendly » with patient, with colleagues ..

- Disadvantages :

- cost

- some hard- and software aspects

Alcaraz M et al, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2009 - Wakoh M et al, Bull Tokyo Dent Coll, 2001

Page 13: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

CCD

CMOS

PSPP

X-rays

Scanner

Laser

= DIRECT

= INDIRECT

Page 14: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Tomography

- Principle : image of predetermined « slice » through object

- Homothetic geometrical figures due to movements…

- Complex and speedy movements of sensor and X-rays emission source

- Thickness of the slice !

- Many slices ! (MSCT)

Bourjat P et al. Tomodensitométrie cervico-faciale. Paris, Masson, 1988 - Hendee WR. The Physical Principles

of Computed Tomography. Boston, Little, Brown, 1983 -

Page 15: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Orthopantomogram

- Tomography adapted to the form and shape

of dental arches and adjacent tissues

- Enlargement and deformations

- Indicated as overview, must be completed

by other techniques (retroalveolar, TeleX-ray …)

Chomenko AG. Atlas of Maxillofacial Pantomographic Interpretation. Chicago, Quintessence, 1985 - Jung T.

Panorama-Röntgenographie. Heidelberg, Hüthig, 1984 - Langland OE et al. Principles and Practice of

Panoramic Radiology. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1982

Page 16: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Orthopantomogram

- some devices allow for 3D imaging but

only for limited areas

Page 17: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

CT scan

- Digitalisation

- Millimetric slice thickness

- High radiation dosis (MSCT!)

- « Windows » (hard and soft tissues)

- « 3D » diagnosis may be difficult

Page 18: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology
Page 19: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Denta scan

- CT scan applied to dental arches and

adjacent tissues

- Images are reconstructed !

- Same limits as CT scan ones

Page 20: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology
Page 21: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology
Page 22: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

– Anatomical pitfalls

Page 23: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology
Page 24: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Cone Beam CT

- CT scan principle, but

- radiation dosis is limited (10 to 30 lower than CT scan, but = 2 OPG!)

- radiation time is short : 20 to 30 seconds !

- volumetric tomography (FOV 4x4, 8x8 or 15x15 cm)

- conic beam, no slices as for MSCT

- Not any diagnostic information on soft tissues

- Patient is seated or standing

- 2D images are reconstructed in a 3D data set using algorithm

- Images may be combined to laser optical clinical view

- Images of high resolution : voxel size in mm3

- Images may be integrated in 3D images analysis software

- Most evidence-based technique

- USA : 35 % of CBCT are indicated for implantology, Am Assoc Oral &

Maxillofac Radiol recommends it for planning dental implants

De Vos W et al, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009 – Horner K et al, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2009

Page 25: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Cone Beam CT

- Not recommended as a routine imaging technique for all implant cases

- Accuracy of measurements : error of 3 to 8 % (0,5 on 10 mm)!

- Accuracy of measurements : error of max 4 °

- But if many in-vitro studies, very few in-vivo …..

- Quality of bone : corelated to implant stability !

- Reliability of implant placement > flapless surgery (98,4 % fit of surgical

template)

- Allows for surgical navigation, surgical guide, 3D imaging

- volumetric evaluation

- 3D planning (implant axis…)

- augmentation surgery before implanting

Nickenig H-J et al, J Cranimaxillofac Surg, 2007 - Naitoh M et al, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009 – Rugani

P et al, Int J Comput Dent, 2009 - Song Y et al, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009 -

…/…

Page 26: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Cone Beam CT

- Anatomical pitfalls :

- maxillary sinus

- mandibular canal (bifid in 65 % of patients !)

- retromolar canal (in 25 % of patients !)

- mental foramina

- mandibular incisive canal

- nasal floor

- nasopalatine canal

- cortical perforations

- (TMJ)

Dreiseidler T et al, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009 - Leitlinie der DGZMK, DZZ, 2009 -

Page 27: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

3D Imaging

- Do not confuse 2D images of 3D structures and real 3D images and models

- Seems tricky…but errors :

- human / application / imaging / technical / registration errors

- Reliability of implant placement > flapless surgery (98,4 % fit of surgical

template)

- In real time = navigation (tracking system) : very reliable but necessitates

hard- and software : 1,5 mm / 4°

- But is essential in implantology

- to avoid some anatomical pitfalls

- to accurately plan implantation, taking care of

- constraints and occlusal aims

- constraints and esthetic aims

- anatomical aspects (bone principally)

Parel S et al, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004 – Nickenig H-J et al, J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2007 – Chen X et al,

Int J Med Robot, 2008 – Xiaojun C et al, Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2009 – Widmann G et al, Oral

Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009 -

Page 28: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

– Bony volume

– Bony structure

– Insertion axis

– Implants diameter

– Anatomical pitfalls (zygoma !)

– Accuracy of images

– Transfer to peroperative :

• 3D model

• 3D splint

• References ??

– …/…

3D Imaging

Page 29: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

3D Imaging

Page 30: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

- On models

Surgical guides

Page 31: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Surgical guides

– Computerized

Nickenig H-J et al, J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2007 – Ersoy AE et al, J Periodontol, 2008 -

Page 32: Herve Reychler Oral imaging in Implantology

Surgical guides

– Computerized

- flapless surgery

- accuracy : 1,5 mm / 5°

Jabero M et al, Implant Dent, 2006 - Nickenig H-J et al, J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2007 – Ersoy AE et al, J

Periodontol, 2008 -