I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DECEMBER 2007 I HELICOPTER-BORNE MAGNETIC AND VLF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY NTS MAP SHEET 42A102 DATA ACQUISITION REPORT LAKE ASHLEY PROJECT Presented to: CANADIAN ROYALTIES INC. 2772, chemin Sullivan Sullivan (Quebec) JOY 2NO Presented by: GEOPHYSICS GPR INTERNATIONAL INC. 100-2545 Delorimier Street Longueuil (Quebec) J4K 3P7 M-07428
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DECEMBER 2007
I
HELICOPTER-BORNE MAGNETIC AND VLF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
NTS MAP SHEET 42A102
DATA ACQUISITION REPORT LAKE ASHLEY PROJECT
Presented to:
CANADIAN ROYALTIES INC. 2772, chemin Sullivan
Sullivan (Quebec) JOY 2NO
Presented by:
GEOPHYSICS GPR INTERNATIONAL INC. 100-2545 Delorimier Street
TABLE 5 Drawing titles and numbers ............................................................................... 13
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Equipment calibration and tests
APPENDIX B Miniature map samples
APPENDIX C Maps
Drawing number: 07-12-700-00 to 07-12-705-00
APPENDIX D Digital data on CD-ROM
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1
1. INTRODUCTION
During November 2007, Geophysics GPR International Inc. flew a helicopterborne magnetic and EM-VLF geophysical survey for Canadian Royalties Inc. The survey was composed of one single block with a minimum coverage of 150 linekm, located near Matachewan, (Ontario) on the NTS sheet 42A102. A total of 141 line-km was flown from November 23rd to 24th 2007. The linear coverage difference is due too the fact that some tie-lines were not flown.
The Helimager™ system is a towed bird system configured with two caesium vapour magnetometers at the end of the lateral arm and one on top of the horizontal boom. The system also includes two DGPS systems, one mounted into the helicopter and onto the bird. Finally, a EM-VLF system was attached to the bird.
This report is intended to be read in association with the printed maps provided in Appendix C.
Data processing and quality control was carried out by Josianne Morel, Eng Jr and Olivier Letourneau, Phys. The report was written by Isabelle D'Amours, Eng. M.A.Sc. and Olivier Letourneau, Phys.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
2
2. SURVEY S
2.1 Survey Area
The survey area is located near Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada Figure 1. The survey consists of one single block on the NTS map sheet 42A102.
-81' -80' SO' -80' 4() , -80'30' -80'20' -80'10' -80'
-81' -80'SO' -80'40' -80' 30' -80'20'
CANADIAN ROYALTIES INC,
GENERAL LOCATION MAP
-80' 10' -80'
-f-5000 0 5000 10000 15000 IIjjOIi
(me~)
NAD83 / UTM zone 17N
Figure 1 - General survey area
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
3
2.2 Survey block parameters
The direction of the flight lines is (0°-180°). The direction of the tie-lines is (90°-270°), with respect to UTM coordinates.
The coordinates given in Tables 1 represent the outline of the zones to be flown. All coordinates are given in UTM zone 17N (NAD83).
One block was scheduled for surveying for a total of 150 linear kilometers, based on 50 meters line spacing and 500 meters tie-line spacing.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
4
2.3 Survey geodetic parameters
48°
The DPGS data were acquired as longitude and latitude format in WGS84 coordinates system. The coordinates were re-projected as NAD83 Zone 18 North using Geosoft's Oasis Montaj software. Table 2 below presents the geodetic parameters that were used for data processing.
Datum: NAD83
Ellipsoid: GRS-80
Projection: UTM
Zone: 17N
Central meridian: _810
False Easling: 500000
False Northing: 0
Scale factor: 0.9996
Table 2 - Geodetic parameters
LOCATION PLAN
t 81°
[ I
1 1
NTS 42A02
NTS 41P15
Figure 2 - Survey area and map sheets location for Lake Ashley Project
1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
5
3. LOGISTICS
3.1 Survey helicopter
• Type Bell 206-L Jet Ranger • Call sign: C-GMHY • Operated by: Canadian Helicopters ltd, based in Radisson, Quebec
3.2 Survey personnel
The survey crew consisted of the following personnel (Table 3):
Operator Guillaume Perron, tech. Nicolas McCrae, tech.
Data QC and Processing Josianne Morel, Eng. Jr. Olivier Letourneau, Phys.
The helicopter's installation was carried out at the base of Canadian Helicopters ltd located in Radisson, Quebec. The HelimagerTM system was assembleo and a test flight was carried out
3.4 Operating base & fuel cache
The crew was based in the city of Kirkland Lake, Ontario. Kirkland Lake's airport was used for take-off and landing operations with the bird attached.
3.5 Flight dates
The crew was already mobilized on November 23rd. Flying production was
carried out from November 23rd to 24th. The crew demobilized on November 24th. No day was lost due to bad weather condition.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
6
4. DATA ACQUISITION
4.1 Planned survey parameters
Table 4 below shows the planned survey parameters for the project.
Parameters Specifications
Ma~. SamplinQ Interval 2.5 m (0.1s)
VLF. SamplinQ Interval 2.5 m (0.1s)
Flight-line Spacing 50m
FIiQht-line Direction 0°_180°
Control-line Spacing 500 m
Control-line Direction 90°-270° . Aircraft MTC 60m +/- 6m
Ma~. Sensor MTC 30m +/- 6m
Ground speed 80 km/h +/- 20 km/h * Mean Terrain Clearance
Table 4 - Planned survey parameters
4.2 Quality control
During data acquisition, quality control was carried out on data on a daily basis by GPR's data processor to ensure that quality remained within specifications. At the end of the planned survey, data were reviewed by GPR's team leader and re-flight lines were identified. Profiles were checked after each production day to ensure correct flight path recovery and instrument noise was verified using Geosoft Oasis Montaj Software.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
7
5. SURVEY EQUIPMENT
5.1 The HELIMAGERTM Gradiometer system
The HELIMAGERTM system consists of a tri-axial magnetic gradiometer, developed by Geophysics GPR International Inc. The gradiometer was installed on a stable helicopter-borne vector platform capable of accepting a range of different sensors I instruments, particularly useful for the mapping and exploration of mountainous regions. The platform allows the arrangement of the sensors in three orthogonal directions. A photograph of the platform is presented below (Figure 3).
Advantages of measuring the lateral gradients include the production of bidirectional total magnetic field gridding using measured transversal magnetic gradient. It may also be used for the gridding of the Laplace Enhanced Vertical Gradient, as we" as allowing Laplace Enhanced Total Field gridding that are both free of a" diurnal variations, if data quality permits it, which is the case for this project.
Figure 3 - HelimagerTM in flight with a Bell 206-L
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
8
5.2 Helicopter-borne magnetometers
Three {3} Geometries G-823A (optically pumped caesium vapour) total magnetic field sensors with a sampling interval of 0.1 second were mounted on the gradiometer, below a 30 meters cable under the helicopter. Two (2) of the sensors were installed at the end of the horizontal boom (6m spacing) and one above the vertical boom (1.5m spacing). The magnetometers send directly the measured magnetic field intensity as nanoTesla (nT) units to the data acquisition system via a RS-232 port.
5.3 Base-station magnetometer
A Geometries G-856 Ax (proton precession) total magnetic field sensor, with a sampling interval of 4 seconds was used to record the diurnal variation of the magnetic field at the base-station's location. The base-station was set up at a location away from power lines and main roads to avoid interference from traffic. It was located a few kilometers from the helipad in a nearby forest.
5.4 DGPS positioning
A Crescent R120 DGPS receiver that offers many differential correction options for various environments and worldwide coverage was used for inflight navigation, with a sampling interval of 0.1 second. The antenna was mounted directly on the bird, and allowed an accurate positioning of the bird.
The DGPS system provides an accurate positioning as well as the height above the WGS-84 ellipsoid. A LED-type track bar (from AG-NAV Inc.) was used by the pilot for efficient line tracking in any lighting conditions. A second DGPS comprising the same elements was mounted on the helicopter.
5.5 Radar altimeter
A FreeFUght TRA3000 radar altimeter, combined with a TRI40 Indicator unit mounted on the helicopter provides the pilot with highly accurate altitudeabove-ground-Ievel (AGL) information.
5.6 Helicopter Data Acquisition and Recording System
The Helicopter data acquisition and recording system is composed of proprietary hardware developed by Geophysics GPR International Inc. and an industry standard navigation I recording software package (Hypack Max 6.2). Data were recorded on hard disk and backed up after each flight
(~ ... ~.A'\-. \V';/ "-._/
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
9
5.7 Field computer workstation
A dedicated laptop computer was used on-site for the purpose of displaying geophysical data for quality control, calculating and displaying the navigation, producing preliminary magnetic and VLF total field maps, and backing up digital data.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
10
6. DATA PROCESSING
6.1 Magnetic data
1) Data checking, editing, reformatting and flight path recovery
Data recorded on the helicopter were transferred after each flight to the processing computer for verification and quality control. Raw GPS data (longitude, latitude and height) were recorded in the WGS-84 geodetic system. These coordinates were transformed into the NAD83 datum, UTM projection, Zone 17 North by the navigation software and compared in real-time to the theoretical coordinates of the flight paths to provide a correction to the pilot.
The DGPS data were recorded at 10Hz (0.1 s interval), the same rate as magnetic data and exported for flight path recovery and quality control.
Raw line data was transformed into Oasis Montaj .XYZ format by a proprietary software program. Data coordinates were re-projected in NAD83 datum, UTM projection Zone 17 North using Oasis Montaj.
2) Diurnal corrections
The magnetic data recorded at the base-station were synchronized, using the GPS time and merged with the helicopter-borne data. Subsequently, the diurnal corrections obtained by subtracting the mean value of the base-station readings were applied to the data after low-pass filtering.
3) Lag corrections
A lag correction of 0.85 second was applied to the final processed magnetic data based on a lag test executed on survey location. The results of this test can be found in Appendix A. The LevCorr processing module in Oasis Montaj was used to carry out this operation.
4) Heading corrections
A heading correction was not applied to the magnetic data since the original data was of sufficient quality. The results of the heading calibration can be found in Appendix A.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
11
5) Tie-line levelling
Classical tie-line levelling was partially performed on the horizontal gradients data due to the missing Tie-lines. The LevTieLine processing module in Oasis Montaj was used to carry out these operations.
6) Enhanced total magnetic field
The total magnetic field was enhanced using the measured horizontal gradients based on Laplace's law for potential field and a Hilbert transform property.
7) Enhanced vertical gradient
The vertical gradient was enhanced using the measured horizontal gradients based on Laplace's law for potential field and an Hilbert transform property.
Figure 4 presents a summary of the processing sequence used to obtain the final magnetic grid.
I Raw mag I 1-----------,
I HemUng ","eet,,, .\ I if required I , 1 no
De-spiking and lag 1 ____ - _____ 1
+ application r
Tie line levelling " USing multiple statistical passes
Base-station
J (trends, splines) Gridding
correction Corrections applied and '- yes to both ties and ~ calculation ~tiS~ct~ lines to reduce of vertical ... intersection gradient
differences to 0 -'- ~
,-----'------, ~ , I I Micro-levelling I I IGRF correction if I I required I , 1
I I -----______ 1
Figure 4 - Standard magnetic data processing flow
Final gridding
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
12
6.2 Digital Terrain Model (DTM) data processing
The Digital Terrain Model was obtained by subtracting the radar altimeter readings from the DGPS height. The radar altimeter was corrected for an estimated lag of 2 second.
A standard combination of a Butterworth high-pass filter followed by a directional cosine filter was used to obtain the residual error grid, which was imported in the Oasis Montaj database, filtered and subtracted from the original to obtain the de-corrugated DTM data.
6.3 Presentation
The Enhanced Total Magnetic (ETF) Field, Enhanced Vertical Gradient (EVG), Digital Terrain Model (DTM), Very Low Frequency (VLF) Total Field and VLF Quadrature were gridded using the Minimum Curvature algorithm of Oasis Montaj using a cell size of 10.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
13
7. FINAL PRODUCTS
7.1 Paper products
A standard set of geophysical maps was produced at a scale of 1: 20 000. The flight path is presented on a separate map. The claims boundaries and numbers are displayed on this map. The name and direction of the lines are indicated at the beginning and end of each line.
The maps were drawn in the UTM projection Zone 17 North, NAD83 datum. Coordinate units are in meters, unless indicated otherwise.
The final paper products consist of six (6) maps at a scale 1 :20 000 as follows:
1) Flight path recovery and property limits map 2) Colour contour map of the Enhanced Total Magnetic Intensity 3) Colour contour map of the Enhanced Vertical Gradient 4) Colour contour map of the Digital Terrain Model 5) Colour contour map of the VLF Total Field 6) Colour contour map of the VLF Quadrature
The digital data are included on a CD-ROM along with the printed maps.
Table 5 below lists each map type and its associated drawing number.
Drawing title Drawing number
FliQht path Recovery and Prope~limits 07-12-700-00
Enhanced Total Field, (nTJ 07-12-701-00
Enhanced Vertical Gradient (nT/m) 07-12-702-00
VLF Total Field (Pllm) 07-12-703-00
VLF Quadrature (01m) 07-12-704-00
Digital Terrain Model, (m) 07-12-705-00
Table 5 - Drawing titles and numbers
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
14
7.2 Digital products
Below is a list of the products delivered on CD-ROM (More in Appendix C).
There are two (2) main directories:
Data
Contains for Mag. and VLF.:
Report
• Databases
• Grids • Projection information files
• Maps • Files used in the Maplnfo
software to distinguish a Geosoft map file from a Maplnfo file
• Geo referenced image map
Contains:
• Copy of the report • Report on the lag test for mag.
(Oasis MontajTM .GDB and ASCII.XYZ) (MontajTM .GRD binary grid format) (Maplnfo and other .GI) (Oasis MontajTM .MAP)
• Daily flight log • Description of the database's
Channel
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
15
8. CONCLUSION
A helicopter-borne magnetic and EM-VLF survey was flown for Canadian Royalties Inc. The survey was composed of one single (1) block near the city of Kirkland Lake, Ontario. A total linear distance of 141 km was flown from November 23rd to 24th
, 2007.
The total magnetic intensity. 3-Dimensional Magnetic Gradients. VLF total field and quadrature horizontal components were measured by the helicopter-borne system. DGPS positioning data were collected.
The final paper products consist of maps at a scale of 1 :20 000. A total of six (6) maps was produced. The digital products consist of final databases, maps, metadata files and final grid files. Digital data are included on the CD-ROM and the content is described in Appendix C.
It is hoped that the information presented in this report and on the accompanying maps will be useful both in planning subsequent exploration efforts and interpretation of related exploration data.
This report was written by Isabelle o 'Amours. Eng., M.A.Sc. and Olivier Letourneau, Phys., and was approved by Rejean Paul, Eng., Geoph.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
REFERENCES
Mouge P. and Chalifoux E., 2005, Stable heli-borne vector platform for performing geophysical measurements. Patent No.: US 6,845,936 B1.
Nabighian, M.N., 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential-field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: fundamental relations, Geophysics. Vol. 49.780-786.
McNeill, J.D. Labson, V.F.,1992, Geological Mapping Using VLF radio Fields in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, ed. Misac Nabighian, vol. 2., Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION
1. I, the undersigned, Isabelle D'Amours, residing at 6875 rue Corelli, Brossard, Quebec graduated with a B. Eng. in geological Engineering from Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal in 1996 and I obtained a M.A.Sc. in Applied geophysics in 1998 also from Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal and I have worked in airborne geophysics since the year 2000.
2. I am a member of the Ordre des ingenieurs du Quebec (number 118513) and of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
3. I have no direct or indirect interests in the mining claims owned by Canadian Royalties Inc., nor in the securities of this company and have no interest in receiving such interest.
4. My company, 1.0. Geophysics Inc., is hired by GPR Geophysics Inc. for consulting and training purposes.
Signed in Longueuil, on the Ie tl\ (rtf r: t <,; /Jdt L / Jcc '-1
Respectfully submitted,
Isabelle D'Amours, Eng. M.A.Sc. (# 1185
I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A
Equipment Calibration and Tests
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
AEROMAGNETIC SYSTEM CALIBRATION (HEADING TEST)
Project #: M07428 ,
Aircraft: Company: Magnetometer: Data Acquisition system:
Scale: 1: 20000 Drawing by A. Beaudoin, tech . Checked by I. D'Amours, Eng.
Date: December 2007 Drawing no.: 07-12-701-00
Processed by O. Letourneau, Phys. Approved by R. Paul, Eng.
~ GEOPHYSICS GPR INTERNATIONAL INC.
513000
0 0 0 N N
""C") ~lO ".
0 0 0
N C")
'"
0 - 0 ~o "'0 "N
C")
'"
0 0 0 OJ ,-C")
'"
Coo "0
0 to ,-C") L[)
513000
250 0 1IiiiiII __
-80'49' 514000
+
0 ~
+ 514000
-80 '49'
Scale 1 :20000 250 500 750
metres NAaJJ / ltrMzone 17N
-80'48' 515000
U1 W N N 0 0'" O~
'"
U1 w N
0 0 0
U1 w .. NOO 0 ' 0'" 0 0
U1 w <D 0 0 0
"-+' 00 U1 ' w"'! ~
()) 0 0 0
515000 -80'48'
1000 1250
0.683
0.270
0.205
0.165
0.135
0.115
0.100
0.090 0.080
0.070
0.060
0.050
0.045
0.035
0.030
0.D25
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.000
-0.010
-0.015
-0.025
-0.030
-0.035
-0.045
-0.050
-0.060
-0.070
-0.075
-0.085
-0.095
-0 .110
-0.120
-0.140
-0.160
-0.180
-0 .215
-0.416
VLF Total Field (ppm)
LEGEND
INTERVAL CONTOUR 0,005 ppm INTERVAL CONTOUR 0.025 ppm INTERVAL CONTOUR 0.1 ppm LAKE OR RIVER
81°
SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS -Line spacing: 50 m -Mean terrain clearance : 30 m -Line direction: N-S -Tie line direction: E-W -Survey date: November 23rd to 24th, 2007 -Line kilometres: 141 km
GEODETIC SPECIFICATIONS -Map projection: UTM -Datum: NAD-83 -UTM zone: 17 north -Central meridian: 81 ° west
AIRCRAFT -Bell 206L, callsign: C-GMHY -Aircraft elevation (MTC): 60 m (nominal) -Average aircraft speed: 22.3 m/s -GPS receiver: Crescent R120 DGPS -GPS sample rate: 0.1 s
AIRBORNE VLF SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS -Model : TOTEM-2A MULTI-CHANNEL -The VLF transmission antenna used was the NAA (24.0 kHz) , in Cutler Maine
-Accurate frequency selection: from 15kHz to 24 kHz: selectable for each channel in 100Hz steps
-Sensitivity range: from 130 ,uVI m to 100 mVlm at 20 kHz: 3dB down at 14kHz and 25 kHz
-VLF signal bandpass: -3 Db at ± 80 Hz: < 4 % variation at ± 50 Hz