-
CSRD BOARD REPORT
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION #1
Chair and Directors
Dan PassmoreSenior Planner
File No:
Date:
BL 850-8BL 851-7June 18, 2015
Electoral Area 'B' Official Community Plan Amendment
(HansfordLand Corporation) Bylaw No. 850-8Electoral Area IBI Zoning
Amendment (Hansford Land Corporation)Bylaw No. 851-7
THAT:"Electoral Area 'B' Offjciai Community Plan Amendment
(Hansforcf LandCorporation) Bylaw No, 850-8" be read a first time
this 16th day of July,2015;
AND THAT:the Board utilize the complex consultation process for
Bylaw No. 850-8,and, in accordance with Section 879 of the Local
Government Act, it bereferred to the following agencies and First
Nations:
Area 'B' Advisory Planning Commission; Interior Health
Authority; Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure;
IVlinistry of Environment; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural
Resource Operations; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural
Resource Operations -
Water Rights Branch; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural
Resource Operations,
Archaeology Branch; CSRD Operations Management; CSRD Financial
Services; City of Revelstoke; Transport Canada/ Nav Canada; School
District #83; and, All relevant First Nations Bands and
Councils.
AND FURTHER THAT:pursuant to Section 882 of the Local Government
Act, the Board hasconsidered this "Electoral Area 'B' Official
Community Plan Amendment(Hansford Land Corporation) Bylaw No.
850-8" in conjunction with theColumbia Shuswap Regional District's
Financial Plan and its WasteManagement Plan.
Page 1 of 14
11.1
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16,2015
RECOMMENDATION #2: THAT:"Electoral Area 'B' Zoning Amendment
(Hansford Land Corporation)Bylaw No. 851-7" be read a first time
this 16th day of July, 2015;
AN D THAT:the Board utilize the complex consultation process for
Bylaw No. 851-7,and it be referred to the following agencies and
First Nations:
Area 'B' Advisory Planning Commission; Interior Health
Authority; Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; Ministry
of Environment; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource
Operations; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource
Operations -
Water Rights Branch; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural
Resource Operations,
Archaeology Branch; CSRD Operations Management; CSRD Financial
Services; City of Revdstoke; Transport Canada/ Nav Canada; School
District #83; and, All relevant First Nations Bands and
Councils.
APPROVED for BoardMeeting Date: July 16th,
Consideration:2015 A_^zCharles Hamilton,
l/-l-~
CAO
ft.fr- J ..
SHORT SUMMARY:
This OCP/rezoning amendment application is for a property that
formerly was used for residentialpurposes and is located in the
Airport Bench area in rural Revelstoke, near the City of Revelstoke
inElectoral Area (B). The proposal is to redesignate the subject
property from RR2 - Rural Residential2 to RC - Resort Commercial
and to rezone from RR2 - Rural Residential - 2 to RC2 -
ResortCommercial - 2 with some specific provisions for the
site.
The proposal is to build a 5 bedroom backcountry lodge and a
helipad to house a heli-skiingoperation.
VOTING: Unweighted Corporate
LGA Part 26(Unweighted)
Weighted Corporate D Stakeholder D(Weighted)
BACKGROUND;
APPLICANT: Hansford Land Corporation
Page 2 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16,2015
AGENT:
ELECTORAL AREA:
CIVIC ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SIZE OF PROPERTY:
Barry Janyk
'B' (Airport Bench)
1944 Leidloff Road
Lot A, Sec. 14, Tp. 23, Rge. 2, W6M, Plan 5575, Except Plans
5614,10031, and 10533
2.319 ha.
SURROUNDING LANDUSE PATTERN:
NORTHSOUTHEASTWEST
Rural ResidentialRural ResidentialRural ResidentialRural
Residential
CURRENT USE:
PROPOSED USE:
OCP DESIGNATION:
PROPOSED OCP:
ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
POLICY:
Single Family Dwelling
5 unit backcountry lodge and helipad
RR2 - Rural Residential - 2
RC - Resort Commercial
RR2 - Rural Residential - 2
RC2 - Resort Commercial - 2
Electoral Area 'B' Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 850
1.5 General Implementation1.5.3 The CSRD will require
development approval information pursuant to Section 920.1 of the
Local
Government Act. Procedures and policies for requiring
development approval information will berequired to be established
by bylaw and would apply to:
applications for amendments to an adopted Zoning Bylaw,
applications for a Development Permit, and
applications for temporary use permits.
The Development Approval Information Bylaw will apply to all
lands within the OCP Bylaw area.The Development Approval
information Bylaw will give the CSRD authority to require an
applicantto provide information on the impact of the activity or
development that is the subject of theapplication. The Development
Approval Information Bylaw will also specify the matters for
whichadditional on-site and off-sife information will be required,
including, but not limited to such issuesas:
Page 3 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16, 2015
an assessment of drinking water source and sewage disposal as
required by the localauthorities;
transportation patterns including traffic flow;
the impact and assessment on local infrastructure;
assessment of capacity of public facilities including schools
and parks;
the impact on or need for additional community services;
the impact and assessment of the natural environment of the area
affected;
assessment of slope conditions;
an assessment of the wildfire urban interface; and,
an assessment of how the development addresses on-site issues
such as emergencyuse, accessibility and water conservation.
The Development Approval Information Bylaw will also set out
procedures regarding requests forreconsideration of development
approval information requirements.
2.1 Growth PatternsSouth Revelstoke
The South Revelstoke area is the area east of the Arrow Lakes
reservoir and south of theRevelstoke municipal boundary. At present
the South Revelstoke area has a rural character that ishighly
valued by the residents. The area contains a mixture of lot sizes
from small half acre parcelsto large agricultural acreages. There
is abundant forested upland area framing the valley andproviding
context for the proposed ski resort. The developed area is also
bordered by large areas ofthe river ecosystem that supports
recreational activities and open space when the Arrow
Lakesreservoir elevation is low.
The settled area contains a mixture of housing types and sizes
but the majority of development issingle family residential. There
are some properties that are within the Agricultural Land Reserve
butthere is little active farming taking place.
Residents in this area expressed a desire to retain the
environmental quality and the rural residentialcharacter. Residents
also noted that while their objective was to retain a country
living atmosphere,they recognized that their close proximity to the
ski resort could significantly alter their lifestyle.
In reviewing the South Revelstoke area it is evident that the
lands closest to the resort (UpperBench) have the greatest
potential to be impacted by resort development. The Upper
Bench,adjacent to the core of the RMR development, but not part of
the resort land holdings, has not beenintegrated into the City of
Revelstoke land use planning process. The relationship between the
resortand the privately held lands in the rural residential area is
complex and raises numerous planningand servicing issues. While it
is recognized that the resort wishes to initially concentrate
onlaunching its own development initiatives, there must also be a
time for planning partnershipsinvolving the Upper Bench landowners,
the City of Revelstoke, the CSRD and Revelstoke MountainResort. The
municipality does not have any responsibility for servicing lands
in the Regional District,however, it is likely that any future
servicing in this general area will be led by the municipality
asthey sen/ice lands in the municipality. In the process of
planning for servicing to this general area, itwould be appropriate
for an active dialogue between the Regional District and the City
ofRevelstoke. With an estimated 150 parcels and an approximate
population of 300 persons, SouthRevelstoke will be dwarfed by the
16,000 bed units proposed for the Revelstoke Mountain Resort
Page 4 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16, 2015
community, Specific policies related to the ultimate development
of the South Revelstoke area arearticulated in Section 4.4.
The Revelstoke Airport is located in Revelstoke, immediately
north of the South Revelstokeneighbourhood. The airport is owned by
the CSRD. Numerous flight path options are available asapproaches
to the airport and these need to be considered in future planning
exercises both in termsof the safety of the approach (e.g.
structure height) and the impacts of the airport on neighbours
4.4 Community Specific PoliciesSouth Revelstoke
4.4.8 As shown on Figure 4.2, South Revelstoke contains an Upper
Bench area that adjoins theplanned core of Revelstoke Mountain
Resort. The Upper Bench will be impacted by future activityin the
resort core and will not sustain its present rural character.
Recognizing the nature of futuredevelopment pressures, the CSRD
supports the following strategy for the Upper Bench.
a. As Revelstoke Mountain Resort develops, the future land uses
considered for the Upper Benchshould be urban and resort
development;
b. development to higher resort densities should be consistent
with the overall direction of the ResortMaster Plan, and will
require neighbourhood planning and design guidelines to
achieveconsistency and use compatibility;
c. development to higher density cannot be accomplished without
improved servicing. The terms ofservicing, phasing, timing and
partnerships shall be considered as part of a detailed
planningprocess; and
d. when there is a clear strategy to integrate development on
the Upper Bench with the overallRevelstoke Mountain Resort Master
Plan, these lands may be more appropriatelyadministered as
properties within the City of Revelstoke and the CSRD could support
aPhase 3 boundary extension process that considers the private
lands on the Upper Bench andhow they should be serviced.
4.4.10 Residential properties in the south Revelstoke area that
are not in the ALR will be designated forRural Residential 2 use
with a minimum parcel size of 2 ha from the City of Revelstoke to
MontanaCreek. Residential properties south of Montana Creek are
designated as Small Holdings andintended for large lot rural
residential and agricultural use. Properties in the South
Revelstokearea, including those south of Montana Creek, which are
excluded from or subdivided within theALR, may be considered for
redesignation to Rural Residential 2
4.4.11 Parcels in all areas south of Revelstoke will be
independently serviced with water and sewer.Minimum parcel sizes 2
ha can only be achieved where provincial water and sewer
servicingstandards can be met.
Commercial5.2 ObjectivesThe objectives for commercial
development in the plan area are as follows:
5.2.1 To provide for commercial activities servicing the needs
of local communities and the travelingpublic;
5.2,2 To minimize land use incompatibility between commercial
activities and surrounding land uses byrequiring setbacks,
screening and landscaping of new commercial developments;
Page 5 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16, 2015
5.2.3 To ensure that the scale of all commercial developments
harmonizes with the naturalsurroundings of the plan area;
5.2.4 To encourage home occupations that do not harm the rural
residential character of communities;
5.2.5 To protect the character and integrity of quiet rural
residential areas;
5.2.6 To recognize unique recreation and resort opportunities
subject to detailed project reviews; and
5.2.7 To support the City of Revelstoke as the commercial centre
of Area 'B'.
5.3 General Commercial Policies
5.3.1 Commercial land use designations are shown on Schedules B
and D
5.3.2 The minimum parcel size shall be 1 hectare serviced by an
approved water system andapproved sewer system subject to relevant
regulations and approvals. The CSRD willconsider small parcel sizes
where community water and sewer system requirements havebeen
met.
5.3.3 Higher order and larger scale commercial uses are
encouraged to locate in the City ofRevel stoke.
5.3.4 The CSRD will consider regulating commercial signage
through the zoning bylaw.
Resort Commercial Uses
5.3.10 Resort Commercial uses may be considered throughout the
plan area and should meet thefollowing criteria:
a. accessible to adequate transportation routes;
b, capable of being serviced with municipal, private or public
utilities;
c. capable of being sufficiently buffered from adjacent
non-compatible land uses to ensure thequality of life (e.g.
character and integrity of quiet rural residential area) of those
and adjacentoccupiers;
d. accessible to community services, recreation and open
space;
e. cognizant of, and addressing special site features such as
mature vegetation, landscaping,topography, adjacent development,
environmental sensitive habitat and wildlife corridors, andview
sheds; and
f. all parking requirements, as specified in the zoning bylaw
shall be provided on site.
g. may include primary and accessory residential uses in
conjunction with the ResortCommercial use.
New Resort Commercial Developments should consult and implement
strategies from the BestPractices Guide for Resort Developments in
British Columbia, September 2005, Province ofBritish Columbia,
Section 5.4 of the OCP designates a Commercial Development
Permit Area (CDPA) for the purposeof establishing objectives for
the form and character of commercial development. A
CommercialDevelopment Permit will therefore need to be issued prior
to any new construction of, addition to oralteration of buildings
or structures on the subject property.
Page 6 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16, 2015
Electoral Area 'B' Zoning Bylaw No. 850
The subject properties are currently zoned RR2 - Rural
Residential. The RR2 zone is summarizedas follows:
Principal uses: agriculture day care
horticulture
single family dwelling standalone residential campsite
Secondary Uses: accessory use
bed and breakfast home occupation residential campsite secondary
dwelling unit
The minimum parcel size created by subdivision is 2.0 ha.
Proposed Zone: RC2 - Resort Commercial 2
The RC2 zone is summarized as follows:
Principal Uses: backcountry lodge lodge single family dwelling
tourist cabin
Secondary Uses: accessory use
secondary dwelling unit
Page? of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16,2015
Regulations:
COLUMN 1MATTER REGULATED
(a) Minimum parcel size created bysubdivision
(b) Minimum parcel width created bysubdivision
(c) Maximum parcel coverage(d) Maximum number of single
family
dweiiings per parcel (subject to Section3.7ofthis6y/aw)
(e) Maximum number of secondary dwellingunits per parcel
(subject to Section 3.15of this Bylaw}
(f) Maximum gross floor area of secondarydweHing unit
(g) Maximum number of tourist cabins(h) Minimum number of
sleeping units(i) Maximum number of sleeping units per
parcel(]) Maximum number of guests per parcel(k) Maximum height
for:
K principal buildings and structures accesso/y buildings
(1) Minimum setback from: front parcel boundary
interior side parcel boundary
N exterior side parcel boundary
rear parcel boundary
COLUMN 2REGULATION
4 ha
30m
20%
one
one
shall not exceed 100 m2 or 60% ofthe gross floor area of the
singlefamily
6 per ha4
15
30
11.5mK 10m
- 10m
10m
10m
N 10m
Screening
(4) All outside commercial storage, including the storage of
garbage, shall be completelycontained within a landscape screen of
not less than 2 m in height.
Proposed Zoning Amendment
Staff are proposing that a special regulation be used for this
proposed development to restrict thepermitted uses on the subject
property to those that the applicant is proposing. Staff is
proposing toamend the RC2 zone to include a new special regulation
for the subject property only, as follows:
Special Reg u lation
(5) This subsection, applies to Lot A, Section 14, Township 23,
Range 2, West of the 6thMeridian, Kootenay District, Plan 5575,
Except Plans 5614, 10031, and 10533, as shown
Page 8 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16,2015
on the map below. In the event of any discrepancy between the
legal description of thelands and the map, the map governs.
a) Notwithstanding Section 5.14 (1) and (2), the only permitted
uses on the subjectproperty, as shown hatched on the map below, are
a 5 unit lodge, with accessory usesof a spa and sauna; helipad and
restaurant which is for guest use only.
b) Notwithstanding Section 5,14 (3) (i), the Minimum setback
from front parcel boundaryfor the lodge building only on the
subject property, as shown hatched on the mapbeiow, is 1.5 m.
c) Notwithstanding Part 4, Table 1, parking for 7 cars and a
loading space is required onthe subject property, as shown hatched
on the map below.
5540NWi UK ROAD
I plan NEP19490
^/
Plan1
95612
Rem. N 1/2
LS1
S38.^
i?oA PlanNEP19135
m.LS2 p? \^PQ
FINANCIAL:
This application is not the result of a bylaw enforcement
action. There would be no financialimplications to the Regional
District.
Page 9 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16, 2015
KEY ISSUES/CONCEPTS:
Sewage DisposalThe applicant has provided a Record of Sewerage
System for the property that has been filed withthe Interior Health
Authority (IHA). This document indicates that sewage disposal for
thedevelopment of a 6 bedroom Bed and Breakfast development is
accommodated by a Type 2 septicsystem. Staff have reviewed the 1HA
filing and have expressed some concerns over some of thecontent to
the applicant and to the IHA.
Water SupplyWater for the proposed development will be provided
by an onsite groundwater well that will be incompliance with the
Drinking Water Protection Act.
GeotechnicalThe owner has engaged Interior Testing Services, who
has provided a report, dated May 1, 2015which provides a
geotechnical investigation of the site, although this firm was not
involved with theconstruction of the new lodge facility. The report
examines site slope conditions in respect of the newlodge building
and a proposed helicopter landing site, in particular foundations
for the proposedhelipad. The report provides recommendations
regarding the suitability of the site to support theintended
development.
A further report, dated June 3, 2015 has been received
specifying the design characteristics for aretaining wall to be
installed to support the proposed helipad.
AccessPrimary driveway access to this property is from Leidloff
Road, a Cul-de-Sac off Mclnnes Road.Materials submitted with the
application advise that guests proposing to stay at the lodge would
not bedriving to the lodge, but rather they would all be picked up
at the airport and shuttled to the site. Asurvey plan of the lodge
building shows a proposed parking area just off Leidloff Road as
well as agravel driveway down into the site. The plan does not
illustrate the number of parking spaces provided.
Electoral Area 'B' Zoning Bylaw No. 851, in Part 4 requires
off-sfreet parking and loading spaces.Unfortunately, Table 1 does
not specify a parking requirement for a lodge, so staff have
included a sitespecific requirement for 7 parking spaces and a
loading space for the lodge facility.
Development PermitSection 5.4 of the OCP designates a Commercial
Development Permit Area (CDPA) for the purpose ofestablishing
objectives for the form and character of commercial development. A
CommercialDevelopment Permit (DP) must therefore be issued prior to
any new construction of, addition to oralteration of buildings or
structures on the subject property. The owner has already
constructed a newlodge building on the property without having
first obtained a DP. The current OCP designation on thesite is RR2
which does not require a Development Permit.
Accessory Structures and UsesThere are some existing accessory
buildings on the property that are proposed to be used for
guestservices such as a spa and sauna.
RARA watercourse flows through the subject property, known as
Turtle Creek. The watercourse has carveda significant gully through
the property. The owner engaged Jeremy Ayotte, RPBio, as a
QualifiedEnvironmental Professional (QEP) to perform a Riparian
Area Assessment Report (RAAR) because
Page 10 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16, 2015
proposed helipad development on the property is within 30.0 m of
the watercourse. The RAAR wasfiled with the Provincial Riparian
Area Assessment Report Notification System (RAARNS) on April
10,2015. The RAAR indicates that development is situated 22,0 m
from the natural boundary of thewatercourse and that the Streamside
Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA) is 10.0 m.
Proposed Helicopter Flight OperationsThe applicant has provided
a letter which describes proposed flight operations from the
helipad on thesite. The information provided includes the
following:
Helicopter will be a Eight single-engine machine; Helicopters
will follow an east/west flight path which will mean that the
helicopters will not
directly overfly neighbouring properties; A thick forest belt to
the north side of the property will effectively buffer neighbouring
properties
in that direction; Some landscaping is proposed on the east side
of the property to help buffer neighbouring
properties in that direction; Flights will only occur in the
winter months (December to April); Flights will only operate 5 days
per week; Takeoffs are anticipated at 9:00 am with the helicopters
returning at around 3:00 pm; and, 2 to 4 flight movements are
anticipated per operational day.
Front Setback - IVIoTAs previously mentioned the owner has
already constructed the lodge on the site. The owner had asurvey
certificate prepared which indicated that a structural column
supporting a deck on the front ofthe lodge building was situated
1.5 m from the front property line. The proposed site specific zone
forthe property will include a reduction in the front setback from
the required 10.0 m for the RC2 zone, tothe actual 1.5 m.
The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MoT) has a
4.5 m (1476') setback requirement fromall Highway Rights-of-Way.
The Provincial setback area, is established in Provincial
PublicUndertakings Regulation No. 513/2004 under Section 12. The
applicant has initiated an application(2015-02036) to obtain a
waiver to the Provincial Setback requirement from the Ministry
ofTransportation and Infrastructure (MoT).
LodgeElectoral Area 'B' Zoning Bylaw No. 851 has defined a Lodge
use as follows:
"LODGE is a building which complies with the definition of a
"hotel" except that a lodge does notinclude a restaurant and areas
used for public retail and public entertainment purposes;."
The applicant has advised that the proposed lodge building will
contain a restaurant. The applicant hasadvised that operationally
they will only be providing food service to guests. The site
specific rezoninghas therefore included this use, with the
stipulation that it be restricted for use by guests only.
Page 11 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16, 2015
IMPLEMENTATION:
Consultation Process
CSRD Policy No. P-18 regarding Consultation Processes-Bylaws,
recommends that a complexconsultation process be followed when
considering combined OCP/Rezoning proposals. If the Boardendorses
staffs recommendation, the applicant will be required to hold a
public meeting. Neighbouringproperty owners will first become aware
of the application for OCP and zoning amendments when theapplicant
informs them of the public meeting and a notice of development sign
is posted on the subjectproperty in accordance with Development
Services Procedures Bylaw No. 4001 , adopted by the Boardat the
June 18, 2015 regular meeting.
Referral Process
The following list of referral agencies is recommended:
Area 'B' Advisory Planning Commission; Interior Health
Authority; Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; Ministry
of Environment; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource
Operations; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource
Operations - Water Rights Branch; Ministry of Forests, Lands and
Natural Resource Operations, Archaeology Branch; CSRD Operations
Management; CSRD Financial Services; City of Revelstoke; Transport
Canada/ Nav Canada; School District #83; and, All relevant First
Nations Bands and Councils.
SUMMARY:
The applicant has applied to redesignate the subject property
from RR2 - Rural Residential 2 to RC- Resort Commercial and to
rezone from RR2 Rural Residential 2 to RC2 Resort Commercial 2
withsome specific provisions for the site. The proposal is to build
a 5 bedroom lodge including arestaurant for guests only and
accessory spa and sauna, and a helipad to house a
heli-skiingoperation. Staff are recommending that the Board
consider the bylaws for first reading, and endorsestaff's
recommendation for the applicant to follow the complex consultation
process and hold a publicmeeting regarding their proposal, Staff
are also recommending that the Board consider directing staffto
refer the proposed bylaws to referral agencies
LIST NAME OF REPORTS / DOCUMENTS:
1. Maps: Location, Orthophotos, OCP, Zoning
2. Site Survey Plans, Site Plan, Building Plans
Attached to BoardReport:0
Attached to BoardReport:0
Available fromStaff: D
Available fromStaff: a
Page 12 of 14
-
Board Report BL 850-8, BL 851-7 July 16, 2015
3. Electoral Area 'B' Official Community PlanAmendment (Hansford
Land Corporation)Bylaw No. 850-8
4. Electoral Area 'B' Zoning Amendment(Hansford Land
Corporation) Bylaw No. 851-7
5. RAAR
6. Geotechnical Reports
Attached to BoardReport:0
Attached to BoardReport:0
Attached to BoardReport:a
Attached to BoardReport:D
Available fromStaff: a
Available fromStaff: D
Available fromStaff: 0
Available fromStaff: 0
DESIRED OUTCOME:
That the Board endorse staff recommendations.
BOARD'S OPTIONS:
1.
3.
4.
Endorse recommendations. Bylaw No. 850-8 and Bylaw No. 851-7
will be given firstreading, the applicant wii! be required to
follow the complex consultation process and theBylaws will be sent
out to the referral agencies.
Decline first readings, Bylaw No. 850-8 and Bylaw No. 851-7 will
be defeated. The fodgebuilding already constructed on the site
could only be used as a single family dwelling anda DVP would be
required to address setback regulations.
Defer.
Any other action deemed appropriate by the Board,
COMMUNICATIONS:
If the bylaws are given first readings they will be forwarded to
the referral agencies. Agencycomments will be provided with a
future Board report. If the Board endorses staff's
recommendationfor the complex consuitation process, the applicant
will be required to hold a public meetingregarding the proposal.
Information regarding the public meeting will be provided with a
future Boardreport.
REVIEWED BY: Date Signed Off(MO/DD/YR) Approval Signature of
Reviewing Manager or Team Leader
Development Services
Development Services of 1^//.rOperations Management
Finance ^ ^1 fb .^Of'S^O
Page 13 of 14
-
Location (1:10,000)
Subject Properties Map - Legal 1:5,000
^
-
Current OCP4t. ^ .^r "^ ^.-.
^ ,: f_ . ^ -^u ;
*' ^. '.^ :*: ^ J?* K '^ ^* ^
\^- '*J
-
3 ,
)E RD ..
-
Current Zoning
Proposed Zoning Amendment
3 4
&719h
-
*Pit n MEP)SHBC
3?i
y
sc
IRan 10011
Rem Lot A
Plan 5575
Sec 'i4 Tp 23 R 2 W6M
I
4Finn 5SI+
~~ - ^/ -' ',
\ ^
'-f.i f*IS^1m=i
^E f^ LT^-TJ -
Jl /;5 -"~-^1= ^ J ;l-A:-i". ! n "^1
-^ ^^ ",...,.
^..-...^
1non 10031
\\
1
^^\
'"'
-
3y
sc
AWEIS194M
(
'^^.,.
I/Cross Section 3
Rem Lot A '
Plan 5575
Sec 14 Tp 23 R 2 W6M
I. __,._.____;Cross Section 2t
Cross Section 1 .
'Pl un 561 *
sPlan 10031
n
in
3
Ul
1fun 10031
fc -^ .
_^f-~''
^
\
y"ss ^-...VT: ^ '^'""'^ \ ;.,;f^' '"S- ^'? e'ui ".//''' '
D - U V-~--U^^S^PPI
T^S^I
=j . ~:L L^1L.
> ^@
ngi^M
^^3
p
h_^::~' r---^j
^
H^