PT1 Developing trust Women develop meaningfulrelationships with other womenin the group and withhealth-care providers285363
PT2 Learning by doing Women acquire practical366 andcommunication skills367 thatequip them for their new roles366
PT3 Feeling supported Women feel supported by theirpartner health professionalspeer supporters or groupmembers to help them feelcomfortable reduce their anxietyand help them cope withchallenges283285364368
PT4 Accessing information Women are able to accessinformation not before or afterbut when they need it369
PT6 Feeling normal Women come to realise thattheir experience is notuncommon and that otherwomen come through it364369
Women come to realise that thenarratives of the idealmother316371 birth372 and babyare social constructions
PT8 Making time for self Women discover that it islegitimate to make time forthemselves320371 within ababy-centric situation373
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
TABLE 53 Mechanisms and underpinning theory for generic group and one-to-one approaches
Mechanism
Underpinningtheory (whenidentified) Group approaches One-to-one approaches
Appraisal support(functionalsupport)
Social exchangetheory374375
Positive even where facilitatorappears unsupportive other groupmembers may compensate
Positive individuals may developrapport and trust with theirnominated contact
Negative individuals may feelinhibited within a group setting
Negative individuals may perceivenominated contact as judgementalor unsympathetic
Emotional support(functionalsupport)
Social exchangetheory374375
Positive even where facilitatorappears unsupportive other groupmembers may compensate
Positive individuals may developrapport and trust with and feelable to confide in their nominatedcontact
Negative individuals may feelinhibited within a group setting
Negative individuals may not beappropriately matched withnominated contact
Informationalsupport (functionalsupport)
Social exchangetheory374375
Positive facilitator may validateinformation quality on behalf of thegroup
Positive health professionalpeersupporter may validate informationquality and provide tailoredinformation
Positive other group members mayask a question of relevance to amore reticent member
Positive individuals may feelcomfortable in asking sensitivequestions
Positive reticent individuals maygrow in confidence to askquestions
Negative health professionalpeersupporter may provideinappropriate unhelpful or factuallyincorrect information
Negative group members mayprovide unfiltered informationleading to incorrect decision orincomplete picture
Negative individuals may leavepersonalised concerns unexpressed
Negative individualspartners mayfeel uncomfortable in askingsensitive questions
Instrumentalsupport (functionalsupport)
Social exchangetheory374375
Positive women may share ideasfor sources of practical aid
Positive facilitator may share ideasfor sources of practical aid
Negative individual women mayexperience increased frustration ifsources are not forthcoming
Negative facilitator may not havefull understanding of practicalrealities
Support-seekingstrategies
Attachmenttheory355
Positive group members accesswidest range of suggestedstrategies
Positive health professionalpeersupporter may be able to tailorsuggested strategies
Negative others in group may havea limited repertoire of strategies toshare
Negative health professionalpeersupporter may have limitedrepertoire of strategies to share
Interpersonalrelationships
Interpersonaltheory354
Positive other group members mayact as buffer or sounding board forrelationship difficulties
Positive health professionalpeersupporter may become confidantfor relationship difficulties
Negative group may have limitedtime to address specific individualrelationship difficulties
Negative individual may feelinhibited from sharing relationshipdifficulties with health professionalpeer supporter
Negative individuals may feelinhibited from sharing relationshipdifficulties with others
RESULTS OF REALIST SYNTHESIS WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
188
TABLE 53 Mechanisms and underpinning theory for generic group and one-to-one approaches (continued )
Mechanism
Underpinningtheory (whenidentified) Group approaches One-to-one approaches
Normalisation Normalisingthroughconnectiontheory376
Positive other group members mayaffirm validity of individualrsquos feelingor experience
Positive health professionalpeersupporter may validate individualrsquosfeeling or experience based onprevious caseload or professionalknowledge
Positive facilitator may validateindividualrsquos feeling or experiencebased on previous caseload orprofessional knowledge
Negative health professionalpeersupporter may communicatefrequently experiencedphenomenon as routine andappear to minimise individualrsquospersonalised experience
Negative others in group may nothave experienced same feeling orevent Individual may feel strangeor isolated
Negative health professionalpeersupporter may perpetuateunrealistic expectations
Negative others in group mayperpetuate or amplify unrealisticexpectations
Coping Coping theory359 Positive individual is exposed todifferent models of coping and canselect resources appropriately
Positive health professionalpeersupporter may identify mostappropriate coping resources tomatch to individual
Negative individual may comparethemselves unfavourably to othergroup members
Negative health professionalpeersupporter may privilege their ownpreferred strategies
Self-efficacy Self-efficacytheory377
Positive group members may helpto normalise rationalisations fortheir symptoms
Positive care provider may help tonormalise rationalisations for theirsymptoms
Negative group members mayaffirm belief that PND isunpreventableuntreatable
Negative care provider may affirmbelief that PND is unpreventableuntreatable
Continuity of care Not identified Positive group facilitation andmembership may be relativelystable
Positive individual receivescoherent and cohesive care from asole provider
Negative group facilitation andmembership may be inconsistent
Negative individual may becomeoverly dependent upon soleprovider
Modellingbehaviours
Social learningtheory360
Positive other group members maybe appropriate and realistic rolemodels
Positive individuals may rehearseappropriate behaviours in a safeenvironment
Negative group may promoteunhelpful norms thatcounterbalance positive behaviours
Negative individual may notperceive health professionalpeersupporter as appropriate or realisticrole model
Preparing forparenting
Not identified Positive facilitator and other groupmembers may contribute to realisticexpectations
Positive health professionalpeersupporter may help to activelymanage expectations
continued
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
189
The social cognitive theory of depression proposes that lsquowomen for whom motherhood is a highly valuedrole may be particularly vulnerable to depression if events or difficulties threaten this rolersquo378 Interventionsthat address this theory therefore seek to equip the woman with self-efficacy so that she is better able tomanage such events or difficulties or has multiple strategies by which she might attempt to address themIncreased self-efficacy may be seen in the management of her own symptoms or more generally in beingable to cope with the practical aspects of motherhood that might otherwise be viewed as difficult orproblematic A further aspect to this theory is the modification of the womanrsquos understanding of themotherhood role so that she is less likely to fall victim to unrealistic expectations of either herself orof others
The social support theory of depression is underpinned by social exchange theory Social support has beenfound to facilitate the adaptation to and transition to motherhood and facilitates the flow of emotionalconcern instrumental aid information and appraisal between people including partners and mothersInterventions that address this theory therefore seek to reduce the psychological stress of the transition tomotherhood379 Strategies include the building up of social support networks prior to the birth and beingbetter able to mobilise such support when needed Group-based interventions may serve to extend socialsupport again in preparation for the birth or as a resource to be accessed after childbirth Social exchangetheory requires a structure through which an interactive process might occur and preventive strategies mayhelp in both the identification of and mobilisation of such structures for interaction378
The idea of the locus of control that is lsquowhether a person perceives what happens to her as being withinher own control or in the hands of external forcesrsquo380 is believed to be an important aspect ofpsychological functioning Clearly this is closely linked with self-efficacy as discussed above Howeversome commentators caution380 that in a childbirth context this may not necessarily translate into greaterinvolvement in decision-making as for some women such involvement may actually increase feelings ofanxiety Interventions that engage with the idea of locus of control provide a woman with an opportunityto discuss all aspects of the motherhood experience fully with staff The woman receives the right amountof information that they personally require Receiving the right amount of information both lsquopreloadedrsquo(ie prior to the birth) and subsequently lsquoon demandrsquo reduces their anxiety about aspects of themotherhood experience and increases their satisfaction with aspects of the birth experience Againthe mechanism of modifying expectations to make them more realistic is present in such interventions
TABLE 53 Mechanisms and underpinning theory for generic group and one-to-one approaches (continued )
Mechanism
Underpinningtheory (whenidentified) Group approaches One-to-one approaches
Negative facilitator and othergroup members may focus onlabour rather than parenthood
Negative health professionalpeersupporter may base advice solelyon their own experience
Negative health professionalpeersupporter may focus on labourrather than parenthood
Targetingdepressivesymptoms
Vulnerability-stress theory358
Positive even though not everyindividual experiences everysymptom there is an increasedlikelihood that at least one memberexperiences a symptom
Positive health professionalpeersupporter may be able to tailorsupportadvice to specific needs ofindividual
Targeting anxietysymptoms
Vulnerability-stress theory358
Positive not every individualexperiences every symptom butthere is an increased likelihood thatat least one member experiences asymptom
Positive health professionalpeersupporter may be able to tailorsupportadvice to specific needs ofindividual
RESULTS OF REALIST SYNTHESIS WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
190
The empowerment model of prevention of depression is based on the assumption that women are likelyto experience negative partner support and therefore need information and coping resources by which tohandle this Interventions that address this theory therefore seek to provide information to help womento identify particular strategies that may be helpful to them Community resources are identified fromwhich women may draw as appropriate Empowerment approaches often allow an individualised focus foran intervention so that support can focus on areas of particular need for each woman
The attachment theory of depression proposes that postpartum depression develops when a motherrsquosattachment needs are not being satisfied by her partner whom she feels is irresponsive or inaccessible toher381 Although attachment theory originally focused on the importance developing a strong emotionalbond between an infant and their mother more recently this has been extended to include adultrelationships such as the partner and the mother or mother-in-law Attachment provides a useful resourceduring times of uncertainty such as characterise the anxiety-filled birth and postnatal periods Attachmenttheory attempts to explain why some women seek to be close to their partner or significant othersbut fear being rejected by them and why others seek to avoid closeness Interventions that address theattachment theory seek to develop attachment typically with the partner so that social support may bereadily accessed as and when required They seek to develop mechanisms by which need for support maybe communicated and recognised
This discussion demonstrates that these theories are not distinct but frequently operate in close proximityCollectively they explain many intervention components for individual-based and group-centredapproaches Other interventions derive their imperative not from an explicit theoretical basis but frompolitical or social drivers such as the agendas of the UK government264 or of the World HealthOrganization148 For a fuller discussion of principal theories underpinning strategies for treatment and byimplication prevention see the useful summary by Beck381
Development of a programme theory
A key issue in developing a programme theory with regard to two different modes of delivery that isgroup-based (one-to-many) and individual-based (one-to-one) approaches relates to whether they offercompeting alternatives to meet the same needs or they seek to address different sets of needs The tables ofcomponents (see Appendix 7) assist in identification of important mechanisms that are common to bothapproaches those that can substitute for each other or those that are unique to one of the two approaches
Group-based interventionsIn the case of the group under a lsquoresource-based modelrsquo (ie the idea that a group is identifyingsharing and subsequently using its collective emotional and experiential resources) members of a groupmay provide aspects of information experience or support beyond the resources of a singlefacilitator302312313321 However this relies on the existence of mechanisms for releasing the resources foruse by the whole group There is evidence of facilitators being aware of resources or experience within agroup that the individuals themselves felt unable or unwilling to share293 Consequently the facilitators feltpowerless to offer such experiences without the approval of the individual themselves Use of group-basedmechanisms places additional requirements for group coherence382 the development of trust with a largernumber of individuals and the existence of ground rules that minimise the chance of harmfulgroup behaviours
Continuity of careContinuity of care may be present through the ongoing participation of one or more group co-ordinatorsThe CenteringPregnancy programme identifies lsquostability of group leadershiprsquo as an lsquoessential elementrsquo ofthe approach383 Continuity is also sought within team midwifery-based support approaches224 but thatdoes not necessarily translate into the personalised and tailored care required for the building ofconfidence trust and satisfaction with care If a facilitator does not function well with or relate well
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
191
personally to several or indeed all of the group then this may potentially cause more harm than aproblematic one-to-one approach However this may be partially compensated for through a form ofsubstitution by good relationships within the group
Individual-centred interventionsWith regard to individual interventions it is perhaps unhelpful to focus on the lsquoindividualrsquo part as theintervention (in contrast to the acknowledged effect of the lsquogrouprsquo) The individual approach offerspotential benefits that may or may not be realised For example under a resource-based model aparticular supporter whether professional or lay may not have experience to draw upon and mobilise forthe benefit of the individual Continuity of care a claimed advantage of individual-based interventionsmay not be realised if staff changes or team processes interfere with this This may explain why Denniset al384 found a non-significant effect for continuity of care in their systematic review There may not bea rapport between supporter and woman If an individual relationship is not built up then trust andrelationships are impaired Other benefits such as sharing of confidential personalised information arenot realised Dennis et al384 refer to this in the specific context of revealing PND to a health professionalHowever this may be equally important in prevention when seeking to broach the subject of potentialsymptoms or causative factors385 It is helpful to highlight the personalised targeted nature of theindividual-based approaches not the fact of the individual relationship per se
Considerations shared by group-based and individual-centred interventionsThe analysis has revealed the shared importance of three preparatory stages in the intervention Principallythese concern (1) recruitment whether of health professionals or of lay supporters (2) training againirrespective of whether professionals or lay supporters and (3) the process of targeting or matching theneeds of those requiring support to those delivering support In addition mechanisms for sustainabilitywithin a programme also surface as being important considerations
RecruitmentRecruitment is a key intervention in relation to lay support Lay supporters are typically volunteers and areoften motivated by a desire to help or to give something back301
TrainingClinical staff must make a considerable investment of time to supplement their clinical expertise withfacilitation counselling or support skills Midwives to create a favourable impression within aCenteringPregnancy intervention have to be sufficiently skilled knowledgeable and warm to providesuggestions for group discussion and to allow unstructured discussion all of which were appreciated by groupmembers277 The intervention by Morrell287 compared training for health visitors in assessment and two differentmethods of psychological support Deficiencies in delivery of care sometimes imply a need for further training
For lay supporters the potential training burden is substantial For example it may include experientialtraining such as role-playing and supervision information on peer support strategies and topic-specificinformation about PND and medications as well as organisations or further sources to which they couldrefer386 Dennis386 describes the use of a 121-page training manual
MatchingBehavioural interventions require creation of a rapport between service provider and recipients of careThose delivering group interventions must be viewed as accessible and welcoming by members of thegroup Indeed effective facilitation requires that the facilitator progressively suppresses his or her own roleso that the group becomes functional with minimum and judicious input In the individual telephonecounselling intervention participants were matched with peer volunteers lsquoif the mother desiredrsquo205
However this so-called matching was based on residency and ethnicity and was performed by theco-ordinator The Newpin Intervention saw young befrienders being matched with younger parents206387
However demographic lsquomatchingrsquo may not be sufficient and numerous other variables could beconsidered when seeking to establish compatibility
RESULTS OF REALIST SYNTHESIS WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
192
Support to providersA further ongoing requirement for both approaches is supervision of or at least support to thosedelivering support (whether professionals or lay supporters) This is particularly the case for formalpsychological approaches such as IPT which often require supervision as a component of interventiondelivery The availability of such support may have a subsequent effect on retention of the facilitatorssupporters the sustainability of the overall programme and indeed on further recruitment
Another consideration for both group and individual approaches that is not determined exclusively by typeof intervention delivery relates to the convenience of the intervention sessions Delivery of sessions at homeor over the telephone and integration with routine health-care visits may help to increase the acceptabilityand feasibility of intervention delivery as well as adherence327388 Hybrid models may seek to optimise thepattern of home visits and regular visits to a health-care provider Opportunities for improved co-ordinationare offered by using such visits to give advice on nutrition child health child development programmespositive parenting programmes vaccination programmes routine childbirth education sessions andcommunity health programmes389 Group interventions can seek to achieve improved acceptability andfeasibility by being offered in conjunction with individual health-care appointments as in theCenteringPregnancy model
Components of the interventionsSeveral features recurred frequently in the qualitative syntheses of interventions and of personal and socialstrategies as either actual or suggested components for the intervention irrespective of the chosenmethod of delivery In some cases the feature is implicit within suggestions of what might have helpedFor example the value of family support or of instrumental support translates into a requirement forintervention content that both affirms the validity of help-seeking and provides practical strategiesfor eliciting such support A useful intervention when time and resources permit includes the following
l make provision for continuity of carel legitimise help-seeking without framing this as an inability to copel offer strategies for identifying supportl equip women to delegate tasks without surrendering mother rolel offer strategies for eliciting emotional spiritual and instrumental supportl identify coping strategies to allow self-helpl help women to access information as and when requiredl feel able to share feelings and experiences without experiencing premature closurel facilitate normalisation of feelingsl create realistic expectations about the birthl create realistic expectations about motherhood rolesl create realistic expectations about health professional support and roles and health servicesl challenge social norms of the ideal birth the ideal baby or the ideal motherl anticipate baby-centric focus of family and health professionalsl identify strategies for acknowledging and meeting motherrsquos own needsl prepare women for emotional labilityl anticipate fatigue pain and slow recovery from labourl help women adjust their routines to motherhoodl widen focus beyond delivery and birthl gain strengthjoy from babyl develop attachment with infantl acquire practical skills (breastfeeding changing nappies bottle feeding bathing)l understand appropriate use of medication alternative medicine and counselling servicesl acknowledge and build upon cultural variationl adjust to cultural barriers regarding communication or provision of support
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
193
SustainabilityA further key consideration relates to the sustainability of the intervention or programme Unlike otherself-management or peer support programmes primarily within the domain of chronic diseases pregnancyis a time-limited condition with definable antenatal and postnatal periods Sustainability cannot be offeredby continuity of group membership Sustainability may be offered by structural components for examplea common venue or ongoing facilitators or by process elements such as training manuals and programmesor a standard curriculum There is some evidence within the reviewed studies of a cohort approach whichseeks to engage a group of mothers to be at a common point and then take them together through theantenatal birth and postnatal period Certainly group membership seems less of an issue under a cohortmodel than with an escalator model in which mothers can enter or exit at any point in the programmeHowever the cohort model is in turn predicated upon having sufficient critical mass of women atapproximately the same point in their pregnancy for the group to be viable Here considerations of optimalgroup size need to be considered against what is feasible and practicable
Recruitment of the next generation of peer supporters could in theory be achieved from within eachcohort although timing is an issue as a recent mother adjusting to such a significant life event does notcorrespond to the typical model of one likely to volunteer Therefore some mechanism for medium-termfollow-up may be needed to keep in touch with potential future peer supporters
Construction of pathways or chains from lsquoifndashthenrsquo statements
The subsequent stage to production of lsquoifndashthenrsquo statements is to seek to integrate these into causalpathways or chains
Mechanisms for improving appropriateness of strategiesFigures 57 and 58 present schema demonstrating the way in which lsquoifndashthenrsquo statements might illuminateparticular paths or dependencies290
These representations illustrate that a key point in the delivery of interventions whether group orindividual based is the establishment of a relationship with a care provider whether professional or a layhelper Matching of care provider to women whether individually or collectively becomes a key factor inthe success of such interventions Building up such a relationship allows the establishment of trust whichthen allows open and frank information exchange285 When such communication is present it leads inturn to a better understanding of the needs of the expectant mother The establishing of relationshipsexplains at least in part why continuity of care283 figures prominently in discussions of the requirementsfor good-quality antenatal care
Trust
Confidingin care
provider
Identificationof personalised
strategiesby provider
Continuityof care
Relationshipwith careprovider
FIGURE 57 The ways in which lsquoif-thenrsquo statements might illuminate pathways for individual approachesData source McNeil et al 2013290
RESULTS OF REALIST SYNTHESIS WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
194
In group-based interventions the requirement for a successful relationship is further compoundedRelationships need to be built up between mother and care provider and between mother and othersin the group283289 However this element of lsquoriskrsquo to the functioning of the group may potentially becompensated for by the likelihood that support for the group may compensate for inadequacies in thefacilitation and also that the group has more resources in terms of experience to share and a lsquolike mindrsquo390
to offer in support of each individual mother When support is being provided by care provider andor bywomen in a group this may take away some of the pressure on the relationship with fathers or significantothers (such as in-laws)
That women need to build up relationships in order for the intervention to work is seen in the experiencethat groups may initially struggle285 Subsequently they typically weather initial periods of individual anxiety
On adverse effectsSome women do not welcome the group approach and so in quantitative terms are lost to trials prior torandomisation Similarly most of the qualitative studies recruited women who had agreed to participate ina group-based approach This represents an important area of potential methodological bias Likewiseparticipation tends to be described in very forgiving terms for example in the number of women attendingone or more sessions Theoretically this means that the women are likely to be being delivered a suboptimallsquodosersquo of care In practical terms there is the possibility that health provider resources are not used effectivelyor women may be unable to access groups because available slots are occupied by non-attenders In additionthere was some evidence that discomfort experienced by partners over the nature of discussions may havecaused them to disengage with a subsequent perception of lack of support from the viewpoint of the womenthemselves283 A further complication relates to the potential inclusion of fathers Fathers may experiencedifficulty in contributing to the group277 either because of their own shyness or because women felt that menwere uncomfortable with intimate discussions283 Alternatively women may feel reticent in bringing uptopics when in a mixed group that includes fathers If women themselves fail to maintain an adequateattendance level and thus experience a consequent lack of group support they may perceive an inability toimplement strategies that they have learned286
Communication with a care provider andor with a group should not be viewed simply in positive termsGroups or care providers may albeit unwittingly create expectations that become difficult or impossiblefor an individual mother to fulfil371 A failure to meet either perceived or actual norms may contributeto a feeling of inadequacy Social comparison may also be unfavourable if others in the group are handlingchallenging situations with more ease even if this reflects individual proficiency rather than the benchmarklevel for the group as a whole There was some evidence that established group members would takesignificant steps to avoid upsetting other group members by creating expectations (eg in their supportrelationships material circumstances or the pregnancy experience) that they might be unable subsequentlyto fulfil293
Diversityof group
Relationshipwith careprovider
Trust
Sharing ofpersonalstrategies
(provider andgroup)
Self-identificationof personalised
strategies
Relationshipwith group
FIGURE 58 The ways in which lsquoif-thenrsquo statements might illuminate pathways for group approaches
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
195
Although much is made of the benefits of bringing together women who are facing the commonchallenges associated with pregnancy labour and childbirth it should be recognised that this is notwithout risk Given the recognised susceptibility of these women to emotional feelings it can be seen tobe potentially volatile to bring together women when the response of another might well attenuatethe emotional effect A further consideration within a group context is that a lack of privacy during theintervention may result in a mother feeling that her individual care has been sacrificed to the requirementsof the group The very structured CenteringPregnancy protocol also poses specific logistic problems ifwomen perceive that the format of the sessions is not ideal with a 2-hour session being too long289 orthere being too long a period of time between first and second group meetings277
A shared concern for both individual- and group-based approaches relates to the fact that any type ofservice provision raises expectations from the service If these expectations are subsequently unrealisedthen this can be an additional source of frustration to women who already feel unsupported Improvedaccess to a caregiver through a targeted intervention may subsequently raise expectations that might notbe met either in individual follow-up care from the provider or by front-desk support staff in theirinteractions with mothers283 Qualitative research revealed specific logistic concerns related to the fact thatthe choreographed and structured nature of group sessions may induce a feeling of being rushed by ahealth professional during the intervention Specifically within a military setting CenteringPregnancy wasseen to neglect consideration of the associated workload and resource constraints So although theCenteringPregnancy Intervention appears to be generally well received constraint of available resourcescould have a disproportionate that is non-symmetrical effect if service providers are seen to be scrimpingand saving on costs of care Women may therefore feel that their care is not perceived as a priority
Other considerations relate to specific facilitation difficulties in which a health professional is perceived asbeing too controlling or not suitably facilitative in engaging with the wishes of the group A tensionbetween encouraging women to bring their family in some cases when this facilitates their access andattendance but acknowledging the disruption this may pose in other instances can lead to the perceptionthat the service is not family centred and that older children are not welcome
Testing of the programme theory and integrating quantitativeand qualitative findings
Having identified hypothesised components for successful inclusion in an intervention or programmeenabled us to re-examine their presence or absence in the featured interventions Although this approachis necessarily limited by the quality of reporting of each intervention this effect was minimised by using allavailable published reports of each intervention not solely the primary trial report It was assumed thatthe emphasis of the reporting would largely reflect the corresponding emphasis of particular featureswithin an intervention That is if a feature is mentioned it is more likely to be considered important to aninterventionrsquos mechanisms of action whereas if a feature is unclear or omitted particularly given word limitconstraints it is correspondingly unlikely to be considered a key feature although not necessarily absentA further limitation relates to the limited ability of an approach based on reporting to establish whethera feature was deliberately planned in the conception of an intervention or was implemented fortuitously oropportunistically Nevertheless its presence would indicate that it is feasible both as a feature of theexisting intervention and as part of any planned enhancement
RESULTS OF REALIST SYNTHESIS WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
196
Finally consideration of desired qualitative features alone is not sufficient for exploration of the candidateinterventions At some point these features must be correlated with data on the effectiveness of eachintervention Table 54 makes an initial link between the presence or absence of reported features and anoverall assessment of effectiveness However it is important to recognise that this simply represents acorrelation and cannot be considered evidence of a cause and effect relationship
Response from the service user group to optimal characteristicsidentified from the qualitativerealist reviews
Consultation with the PPI group revealed that many characteristics listed resonated with group membersrsquoown experience and feelings One informant commented that they felt that lsquothe list was meaningful andshows good insight into the pregnancy experience and early motherhoodrsquo while another stated that lsquoitcaptures the main concernsrsquo and a third agreed that it was meaningful They did identify that the wordingof the list would need careful attention if it is to be translated into use with women themselves asopposed to health professionals
Modifications to the listOne informant endorsed the need to equip woman to delegate tasks without surrendering the motherrole She made an implicit connection with challenging the concept of the lsquoideal motherrsquo in stressing towomen that lsquohelp with mothering could be necessary and to avoid making this shameful or neglectfulrsquoMembers of the PPI group offered specific observations on the timing of some of the suggested strategiesPractical skills (such as breastfeeding changing nappies bottle feeding bathing) were considered lsquoveryimportant skills that need to be acknowledged before the birthrsquo It was felt that these should beemphasised because as also revealed by the literature reviews lsquotoo much focus is on the birthrsquo It was alsoimportant that womenrsquos own needs be acknowledged before the birth
I would add also to tell mothers to look after themselves before and after the birth by doing one thinga day they enjoy five minutes of filing nails eating something they really enjoy and simple everydaypleasures which are achievable
PPI group member
Finally information on PND needs to be available from the start for example at antenatal classes
Additions to the listIn addition members of the PPI group volunteered observations that triangulated with findings identifiedelsewhere in the review processes In particular the involvement of and role of partners was essentialwith a need to educate partners regarding symptoms and a requirement to lsquokeep them involved and tohelp them understand what is going onrsquo Comments resonated with the strategies offered by IPT namelylsquoto avoid potential possible relationship difficultiesbreakdown which obviously wouldnrsquot be helpful to thewomen with PNDrsquo The importance of attachment extends beyond the mother and baby requiring thatpartners enjoy lsquosome level of involvement to encourage the later bonding process with baby ndash or it couldbecome very much just the womanrsquos experiencersquo
Other findings from the review reflected by participant responses included the importance of the need tolegitimise help-seeking without framing this as an inability to cope given that women may lsquofear theirchildren may be taken away from them if they open up as to how they are feelingrsquo The key role ofcontinuity of care was affirmed particularly in the context of the caregiver being able to identify changesin the woman and therefore offer personalised strategies for eliciting emotional spiritual and instrumental(ie practical) support
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
197
TABLE 54 Matrix indicating presence or absence of reported features with overall assessment of effectiveness
Element from qualitativefindings Two-step CenteringPregnancy
Midwife-ledbrief counselling
Midwife-managed care
Mid-routineprimary care
Continuity of care ndash ndash
Legitimise help-seeking ndash ndash ndash ndash
Identify support ndash ndash ndash
Delegate without surrender ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Strategies for elicitingsupport
ndash ndash
Coping strategies ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Access information asrequired
ndash ndash
Able to share feelingswithout experiencingpremature closure
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Normalisation of feelings ndash ndash ndash ndash
Realistic expectations aboutbirth
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Realistic expectations aboutmotherhood roles
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Realistic expectations ofprofessionals and healthservices
ndash ndash ndash
Challenge lsquoidealrsquo ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Anticipate baby-centricfocus
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Acknowledge motherrsquosown needs
ndash ndash ndash ndash
Acknowledge emotionallability
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Anticipate fatigue painand recovery from labour
ndash ndash ndash ndash
Adjust routines ndash ndash ndash ndash
Focus beyond delivery andbirth
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Gain strengthjoy frombaby
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Develop attachment withinfant
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Acquire practical skills ndash ndash ndash ndash
Use of medicationalternative medicine andcounselling
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Cultural variation ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
Cultural barriers regardingcommunication or support
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
RESULTS OF REALIST SYNTHESIS WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
198
PoNDER Home based IPT phone IPT Rose IPT-brief Telephone support Newpin Thinking Healthy
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash ndash
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
199
Other important features felt to help avoid PND included
l being informed about and prepared for the risks of reccurrence with subsequent pregnanciesl having a supportive GPl not being put under pressure to breast feed if a woman feels uncomfortable doing sol providing access to other new mums for example groups
An observation not identified in the literature related to lsquohelp with identifying babyrsquos criesrsquo A womandescribed how she lsquofelt anxious and found it hard to trust and to connect with [her] babyrsquo She suggestedthat help in interpreting babyrsquos cries might be based on the work of an Australian musician who haslsquoobserved babiesrsquo cries and discovered how we can interpret them before they become fully fledgedit is called Dunstanrsquos baby language391
Additional nuances emerging from the consultationOne informant while recognising that the strategies listed were important highlighted practical difficultiesin implementing the strategies For example triggering asking for help may prove problematic becauselsquowhat a woman experiences is ldquonormalrdquo for her and therefore she might not know that she is depressedand therefore not ask for helprsquo Similarly equipping a woman with strategies for identifying support is alsodependent on a woman herself recognising that she needs support
Delegation of tasks will not always be possible if a woman has no one to help her or if a partner is of nohelp and only increases her anxiety Individual ability to lsquomanage everything themselvesrsquo varies fromwoman to woman and this needs to be recognised by health-care providers Other comments alsohighlighted the individualised nature of response to help advice and support
Anything that is said to an anxious or depressed woman can have a negative effect but also a positiveeffect Her ability to cope must not be doubted I think professionals need to be very aware
Summary of findings from realist synthesis review
When planning a group-based intervention an intervention is
l more likely to succeed if a facilitator has been trained in group leadership and facilitationl more likely to succeed if a facilitator has personal resources that they can bring to the groupl more likely to succeed if a facilitator creates a rapport with the groupl more likely to succeed if the group creates a favourable group dynamicl less likely to succeed if the facilitator is seen as controlling or not responding to the wishes of
the group
When planning a one-to-one peer-based intervention an intervention is more likely to succeed
l if a peer has been matched on other than simple demographic variablesl when peers are recruited based on extroversion and good communication skills
When planning a one-to-one professional mediated intervention an intervention is more likely tosucceed if
l a relationship of trust is built up between the woman and the care providerl the health-care provider has significant personal resources on which to draw
A face-to-face intervention is more likely to be successful if a health-care provider responds to visual verbaland non-verbal cues that reflect how a woman is feeling
RESULTS OF REALIST SYNTHESIS WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
200
An intervention delivered at a distance is more likely to be successful if a supporter makes more contactshas more conversations and leaves messages
Training interventions for health professionals or peer supporters are more likely to be successful if they
l include problem-solving strategies such as role playl include demonstrations of practical skills that can subsequently be modelled with individuals and
groups of womenl are relevant to the community as they equip health professionals or peer supporters with appropriate
skills to deal with the range of people who receive services within a multicultural society
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
201
Chapter 9 Assessment of cost-effectiveness
Systematic review of existing cost-effectiveness models
Identification of cost-effectiveness studiesA comprehensive search was undertaken to identify systematically cost-effectiveness literature comparingthe costs of different interventions to prevent PND The search used a combination of thesaurus andfree-text terms The search comprised four facets combined together Facet 1 comprised terms for thepopulation (pregnant and postnatal women) Facet 2 comprised terms for prevention Facet 3 comprisedterms for known risk factors of PND Facet 4 was generic terms for interventions To retrievecost-effectiveness literature the four facets of the searches were combined with an economic evaluationssearch filters The searches were performed by an information specialist (AC) in November and December2012 The search strategy is reported in Appendix 1 The economic evaluations filter for MEDLINE isprovided in Appendix 1 Search strategy used for cost-effectiveness studies with economic evaluations filterfor MEDLINE The list of electronic bibliographic databases searched for cost-effectiveness literature ispresented in Appendix 1 Electronic databases searched for the cost-effectiveness literature All citationswere imported into Reference Manager version 12 and duplicates deleted The Preferred Reporting Itemsfor Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart for the studies included in the healtheconomics review is presented in Figure 59
Potentially relevant papersscreened and identified
for retrieval(n = 2420)
Studies excluded at title andabstract sift (n = 2401)
Studies excluded at full paper sift
(n = 4)
Studies excluded abstract only (n = 5)
Total studies screened (n = 19)
Total full papers screened (n = 14)
Additional papers (n = 3)
Total included full papers (n = 13)nine economic evaluations
alongside trials three decisionmodel and one cost study
FIGURE 59 The PRISMA flow chart of studies included in the health economics review
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
203
Study selection criteria and procedures for the health economics reviewPapers were eligible for inclusion if they included costs or health-related quality-of-life measurements ofPND that could be used in an economic decision model As only a limited number of studies addressingprevention only were found the inclusion criteria were kept broad to include papers evaluating screeningfor and treatment of PND as well as prevention of PND in order to minimise the risk of potentially usefuldata being excluded When multiple papers of the same studies were published the most detailed or mostrecent (as appropriate) were selected as recorded in Table 55
There were 2420 papers were identified in the search The reasons for exclusion at the full paper stageare shown in Table 55 There were two studies for which multiple papers for the same study werefound4557392393 and in both cases the more detailed paper was selected45392 An additional paper that waspublished after the search was completed was identified by a member of the project team who was anauthor on the paper and the paper was included396 It was not identified in a systematic way and otherpapers that were published after the search was conducted will have been missed A second paper wasidentified by a member of the project team during the search for quantitative studies and was included inthis health economic review56 This paper had been excluded at the title and abstract stage on the basis ofthe paper title A further paper was identified during the economic modelling process397 It had beenexcluded at the title and abstract stage as PND or associated terms were not included in the title orabstract Of the 13 papers identified61174199264392ndash394398ndash400 nine described an economic evaluation thatwas conducted alongside a trial5361174199264299392393400 three papers described an economic decisionmodel4556394 and one paper described a cost study398
Overview of papers included in the health economics reviewAlthough all included papers described an economic evaluation of a PND intervention they wereheterogeneous in many aspects including the population intervention comparator and outcomesevaluated The nine economic evaluations5361174199264299392393400 and the one cost study398 are described inTable 56 and the three economic decision models4556392 are described in Table 57
Population considered in the health economics reviewThe population under consideration differed between studies Two of the studies evaluating treatmentinterventions included only women diagnosed with PND392399 The other two studies that evaluatiedthe incremental cost of PND included women regarded as having PND400 and women at risk of PND51
In the Dagher et al400 study women were regarded as having PND if they scored 13 or more on the EPDSat 5 weeks postpartum The Petrou et al174 study included high-risk women identified antenatally at26ndash28 weeksrsquo gestation using the Cooper predictive index401 including both psychological and social riskfactors Women were diagnosed with PND using the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic andStatistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Third Edition Revised diagnoses at 8 weeks 18 weeks 12 monthsand 18 months postpartum The population in the screening papers4556 was all postnatal women Forthe papers broadly evaluating the prevention of PND the population differed with some studies includingall postnatal women61199264397 and three studies evaluating women who had been identified as atincreased risk of developing PND61174396
TABLE 55 Reasons for exclusion of full papers in the health economics review
First author year reference number Reason for exclusion
Stevenson 2010392 Two papers on same study392393 the more detailed paper was selected392
Paulden 200957 Two papers on same study4557 the more detailed paper was selected45
Buist 2002394 Non-economic evaluation neither costs nor health-related quality of lifereported
Darcy 2011395 Non-economic evaluation neither costs nor relevant health-related quality oflife reported
ASSESSMENT OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
204
TABLE
56Economic
evaluationsan
dtheco
ststudyincluded
inthehea
ltheconomicsreview
Study(first
authorye
ar
reference
number)
Country
Interven
tion
Population
Sample
size
Outcomes
mea
sured
Maineconomic
outcomereported
Quality-of-life
mea
sure
Timehorizo
nResult
App
leby20
0339
8En
glan
dHealth
visitors
giving
cogn
itivendashbe
haviou
ral
coun
selling
Allpo
stna
tal
wom
en97
health
visitors
Num
berof
health
visitorcontacts
per
depressedwom
anprean
dpo
sttraining
cost
ofhe
alth
visitor
timeprean
dpo
sttraining
Cha
ngein
health
visitorcosts
ndash6mon
ths
Ano
n-sign
ificant
decrease
inmean
costsoccurred
overall
Boath
2003
399
Englan
dPN
Dtreatm
entin
aspecialised
PBDU
compa
redwith
routineprim
arycare
Wom
enwith
PND
60wom
en(30in
theinterven
tion
and30
inthe
controlg
roup
)
Meancostsfor
wom
enusingPB
DU
androutineprim
ary
carenu
mbe
rof
wom
ende
pressed
at6mon
ths
Increm
entalcost
persuccessfully
treatedwom
an
ndash6mon
ths
Amovefrom
routine
prim
arycare
toPB
DU
wou
ldincuran
additio
nalcostof
pound194
5pe
rsuccessfullytreated
wom
en
Dag
her20
1240
0USA
ndashEm
ployed
postna
talw
omen
31de
pressed
607
non-de
pressed
Totalh
ealth
-care
resourcesused
at11
weeks
Differen
cein
health-care
resourcesused
SF-12
11weeks
Themeantotalcost
forhe
alth-care
resourcesused
was
US$
681high
erin
the
depressedgrou
pthan
intheno
n-de
pressed
grou
p
Duk
hovny
2013
396
Can
ada
Volun
teer
teleph
one-ba
sedpe
ersupp
ortcompa
red
with
usua
lcarefor
thepreven
tion
ofPN
D
High-riskwom
en(screene
dpo
stna
tally)
610wom
en(296
intheinterven
tion
and31
4in
the
controlg
roup
)
Cases
ofPN
Daverted
at12
weeks
(EPD
S)
health-service
use
cost
ofinterven
tion
volunteerop
portun
itycosthired
housew
orkchild
care
andpa
rtne
rtim
eof
work
ICER
(per
case
ofPN
Daverted)
ndash12
weeks
AnICER
ofCA$1
000
9pe
rcase
ofPN
Davoide
d continued
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
205
TABLE
56Economic
evaluationsan
dtheco
ststudyincluded
inthehea
ltheconomicsreview
(continued
)
Study(first
authorye
ar
reference
number)
Country
Interven
tion
Population
Sample
size
Outcomes
mea
sured
Maineconomic
outcomereported
Quality-of-life
mea
sure
Timehorizo
nResult
Gold
2007
397
Australia
Prim
arycare
and
commun
ity-based
interven
tions
toprom
otethehe
alth
ofne
wmothe
rs
Allpo
stna
tal
wom
enin
stud
yareas
16interven
tion
areaseigh
tin
the
interven
tionan
deigh
tin
the
controlg
roup
Costof
the
interven
tionan
dhe
alth-careresource
use
Costpe
rwom
anof
theinterven
tion
andcost
perarea
SF-36(but
value
notrepo
rted
inpa
per)
24mon
ths
Average
cost
per
wom
anof
AU$1
29in
rurala
reas
and
AU$1
72in
urba
nareasNosign
ificant
differen
cesin
health-careresource
usewhe
ninterven
tionareas
compa
redwith
controla
reas
MacArthu
r20
0326
4En
glan
dDesigne
dto
enab
lemidwife
rycare
incommun
itysettings
tobe
tailoredto
wom
enrsquosindividu
alne
edswith
afocus
ontheiden
tification
andman
agem
ent
ofph
ysical
and
psycho
logicalh
ealth
rather
than
onroutineob
servations
Allpo
stna
tal
wom
enin
the
selected
GP
clusters
1042
(485
inthe
controlg
roup
and55
7in
the
interven
tion
grou
p)
Num
beran
ddu
ratio
nof
health-service
use
EPDSscores
Totalh
ealth
-care
resourcesused
Costpe
rcase
ofprob
able
depression
avoide
d
ndash12
mon
ths
Anincrem
entalcost
ofpound7
00pe
rcase
ofprob
able
depression
preven
ted
Morrell
2000
199
Englan
dAdd
ition
alpo
stna
tal
care
bytraine
dcommun
itypo
stna
tal
supp
ortworkers
Postna
talw
omen
623(311
inthe
interven
tiongrou
pan
d31
2in
the
controlg
roup
)
Num
berof
contacts
with
health
services
SF-36
Duk
efunctio
nalsocial
supp
ortscalescores
EPDSscoresothe
rmeasuresof
health
outcom
es
Cha
ngein
health
servicecosts
SF-36
6weekan
d6mon
ths
Nosign
ificant
differen
cesin
NHS
resource
use(excep
tforthesupp
ort
workerservice)
ASSESSMENT OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
206
Study(first
authorye
ar
reference
number)
Country
Interven
tion
Population
Sample
size
Outcomes
mea
sured
Maineconomic
outcomereported
Quality-of-life
mea
sure
Timehorizo
nResult
Morrell
2009
61En
glan
dHealth
visitor
psycho
logically
inform
edtraining
interven
tion
At-riskwom
en(screene
dpo
stna
tally)an
dallp
ostnatal
wom
en
At-riskwom
en41
8allw
omen
2659
Costof
health
visitor
training
he
alth
servicecontacts
for
interven
tions
and
controlEPDSscores
Increm
entalcosts
andQALY
sSF-6D
6an
d12
mon
ths
Psycho
logical
approa
ches
dominated
control
grou
pndashlower
mean
cost
andhigh
ermean
QALY
gain
Petrou
20
0617
4En
glan
dAdd
ition
alhe
alth
visitorvisits
At-riskwom
en(screene
dan
tena
tally)
151(74in
interven
tiongrou
pan
d77
incontrol
grou
p)
Num
berof
contacts
with
health
services
leng
thof
PND
Increm
entalcost
permon
thof
PND
avoide
d
ndash18
mon
ths
Increm
entalcostpe
rmon
thof
PND
avoide
dof
pound4310
Petrou
20
0253
Englan
dndash
High-riskwom
en20
6Num
berof
contacts
with
health
services
Increm
entalcostof
treatin
gPN
Dndash
18mon
ths
Meancost
per
wom
enwith
PND
pound241
9meancost
perwom
enwith
out
PNDpound2
027
KeyICER
increm
entalcost-effectiven
essratio
PB
DUpsychiatric
parent
andba
byda
yun
itQALY
qu
ality-adjustedlife-year
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
207
TABLE
57Economic
decisionmodelsincluded
inthehea
ltheconomicsreview
Study(first
authorye
ar
reference
number)
Country
Interven
tion
Population
Costsused
Quality-of-life
mea
sure
Outcomemea
sure
Model
time
horizo
nResults
Hew
itt20
0945
Englan
dScreen
ingforPN
D(EPD
San
dBD
I)Allpo
stna
tal
wom
enCostof
screen
ing
cost
oftreatin
gPN
D
Mod
eratePN
DICER
increm
ental
costsan
dincrem
entalQ
ALY
s
1year
EPDS(cut-offscoreof
6)ICER
pound4110
3pe
rQALY
Th
eICER
for
othe
rstrategies
rang
edfrom
pound2319
5to
pound814
623
Steven
son
2010
392
Englan
dGroup
CBT
for
wom
enwith
PND
Wom
enwith
PND
Costof
grou
pCBT
SF-6D(m
appe
dfrom
EPDS)
Meancost
per
QALY
1year
Meancost
perQALY
ofpound4
646
2(pound36
062
PSA)
Cam
pbell20
0856
New
Zealan
dScreen
ingforPN
D(three-que
stion
questio
nnaire)
Allpo
stna
tal
wom
enCostof
screen
ing
cost
oftreatin
gPN
D
Revickia
ndWoo
dge
neral
depression
values
ICER
increm
ental
costsincrem
ental
QALY
sincrem
ental
PNDcasesde
tected
increm
entalP
ND
casesresolved
1year
ICER
NZ$
3461
per
QALY
NZ$
287pe
rad
ditio
nalcaseof
PNDde
tected
NZ$
400pe
rad
ditio
nal
case
ofPN
Dresolved
KeyICER
increm
entalcost-effectiven
essratio
PSAprob
abilisticsensitivity
analysisQALY
qu
ality-adjustedlife-year
ASSESSMENT OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
208
The methods used to identify higher-risk women also varied between studies The Dukhovny et al396 andMorrell et al61 studies both used the EPDS but at different cut-off points (score greater than 9 and scoregreater than 11 respectively) and at different time points (24ndash48 hours after hospital discharge and at6 weeks postnatally respectively) Both the 2002 and the 2006 Petrou et al papers53174 identified womenantenatally at 26ndash28 weeksrsquo gestation using the Cooper predictive index401
Interventions in the health economics reviewOf the 13 included papers
l Six were broadly concerned with the prevention of PND61174199264396397
l Four evaluated different strategies for treating PND53392399400 and of these four two were concernedwith the additional cost of treating PND53400
l Two evaluated screening for PND4556
l One focused on the impact on health visitorsrsquo time before and after they were given training incognitivendashbehavioural counselling398
The health impact of the intervention on PND was measured in 10 of the studies455661174199264392ndash394399 themeasure used differed between studies and included the number of cases of or duration of PND and theEPDS scores The Appleby et al398 study did not report the impact of the intervention on PND as it wasfocused on the impact on health visitors and their time spent per depressed woman The Petrou et al53
study and the Dagher et al400 study did not contain an intervention as they were focused on theincremental cost of treating PND in a high-risk population and among employed women respectively
Health-related quality-of-life data in the health economics reviewSeven of the papers used a measure of health-related quality of life455661199392397400 Five of these papersused a generic measure61199392397400 whereas the other two used a patient-generated utility value4556
Of those that used a generic measure two used the SF-6D61392 two used the SF-36199397 and one usedthe SF-12400 The SF-36 and SF-12 cannot be used in their basic form to estimate quality-adjusted life-year(QALY) values but can be converted into the SF-6D which provides values that can be used to estimateQALY values for use in an economic decision model Only the mean and SD were reported for the SF-12PCS and MCS at 5 postnatal weeks400
The remaining two papers45401 used patient-generated utility values from a study by Revicki and Wood402
in which patients diagnosed with depression valued hypothetical depression-related states using a standardgamble approach From this study402 Hewitt et al45 used the value given for moderate depression andapplied this to women suffering with PND in their decision model In contrast Campbell et al56 usedvalues for severe symptoms mild or moderate symptoms subthreshold symptoms drug and psychologicaltreatment response and response without drug-associated disutility for different health states within theirmodel There are several issues with using the utility values from the Campbell et al56 study First thehealth state valued was a general depression health state and not a specific PND health state Secondthe sample size reported of 70 patients was relatively small and made up of patients suffering withdepression and not specifically PND Third the health-state values were estimated using a patientpopulation although the preferred approach is to use a general population sample to value health states403
The PoNDER trial61 collected SF-6D data using the UK tariff at a baseline of 6 weeks and then at 6 12and 18 months postnatally and these scores were used in the economic evaluation to calculate QALYsThe PoNDER trial61 also collected data on the EPDS at the same time points The paired data on thechange in SF-6D and EPDS scores were used by Stevenson et al392 to map change in EPDS to change inSF-6D which was then used in the decision model392
Comparison between the QALY estimates used in the three papers is not possible because of the way theywere calculated and presented Hewitt et al45 and Campbell et al56 used utility values from the Revicki andWood study402 Hewitt et al45 used values of 063 for women with PND and 086 for women without PND
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
209
and Campbell et al56 used values of 030 for severe symptoms 063 for mild or moderate symptoms 080 forsubthreshold symptoms and response with drug and psychological treatment and 086 for response withoutdrug-associated disutility Whereas Morrell et al61 presented the mean difference in QALY values at 6 monthsfor women in the control and intervention groups Stevenson et al392 presented the mean QALY gain
Costs and health-care resources reported in the health economics reviewAll included studies reported health-service use for interventions evaluating the prevention or treatment ofPND The nine economic evaluations alongside trials and the one cost study all reported costs associatedwith the resource use reported during the trials or study whereas the decision models used estimates fromthe literature and expert opinion Costs were inflated using the hospital and community health servicesindex for studies based in England404 Canadian costs were inflated using the Canadian ConsumerPrice Index health and personal care index405 US costs were inflated using the medical care Consumer PriceIndex406 Australian costs were inflated using the Australian Total Health Price Index407 and the New Zealandcosts were inflated using the average of the US and English indexes The costs used in the economicevaluations identified in the literature review are presented in Table 58
In their economic decision model Hewitt et al45 included costs for screening using the EPDS and BDIbased on 5 minutes of health visitorsrsquo time plus the licence fee for the BDI screening tool The costs oftreatment of PND were based on NICE clinical guidelines for the treatment of PND and were costed usingrelevant NHS reference costs The cost for an undiagnosed woman with depression was estimated as oneadditional GP visit Stevenson et al392 included costs for an intervention group CBT which were based onresource use reported in a RCT and from expert opinion408 Campbell et al56 included the cost of screeningand the cost of treatment based on unit costs of health staff and prescriptions Screening was assumed totake 5 minutes using the EPDS and 3 minutes using the brief three PHQ questions49 A further 30-minuteappointment with a GP was assumed for all women who screened positive Half of the women who wereseverely depressed and did not respond to treatment were assumed to have 1 day of inpatient care inhospital and a further GP appointment Treatment costs were adjusted for non-compliance with 10of the total treatment costs applied to these women
For their economic evaluations alongside trials Petrou et al53 estimated the health-care resources usedfrom delivery to 18 months by the population of high-risk women and differentiated between those whodeveloped PND and those who did not Women diagnosed with PND had higher overall resource usea reported difference of pound392 which inflated at 20123 prices increased to pound601404 Part of the Petrouet al53 2002 sample included women who were taking part in the Petrou et al174 2006 RCT The report of2006 trial174 described resource use for the intervention group additional health visitor visits and thecontrol group routine primary care and not for women who developed PND and those that did notMother and infant costs were included in both studies
A broader perspective was taken in the Dukhovny et al396 study which included both health-care andnon-health-care costs For the intervention the public health cost and the opportunity cost of thevolunteersrsquo time was included Costs for the intervention group and the usual-care group were reportedat 12 weeks These included health-care costs as well as costs for hired housework hired child care andfamilyfriend and partner time off work Mother and infant costs were included
The 2009 Morrell et al61 paper collected health-care resource use for women in their trial Total resourceuse estimates were split into control and intervention groups over periods of 6 and 12 months Theprimary analysis was carried out using the 6-month data which included the costs incurred by the motherA further analysis on the 12-month data was also carried out which included the costs incurred by themother and also the baby The total resource use was further split into an analysis of at-risk women andan analysis of all women and additionally split between the two intervention approaches of CBA and PCAThe study also collected data on the additional training that would be required for health visitors to beable to provide the psychologically informed intervention sessions and estimated that the additionaltraining would increase the health visitorsrsquo cost per hour of client time by pound2 from pound77 to pound79
ASSESSMENT OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
210
TABLE 58 Costs used in economic evaluations included in the health economics review
First authoryear referencenumber
Resource userecorded in study
Category ofcost Cost Base year
Inflated cost(201213) Perspective
Appleby 2003398 Health visitor timepre-training
Per woman pound81 1998 pound135 Health-care system(NHS) perspective ndash
health visitor timePer depressedwoman
pound116 pound193
Per treatedwoman
pound107 pound178
Health visitor timepost-training
Per woman pound79 pound132
Per depressedwoman
pound108 pound180
Per treatedwoman
pound109 pound182
Boath 2003399 Mean cost PBDUpatient
PBDU cost pound991 19923 pound1905 Health-care system(NHS) and widersocietal costsperspective ndash
health-care resourceuse Mother andinfant costs included
GP and healthvisitor
pound203 pound390
Secondary care pound0 pound0
Cost to client pound302 pound581
Medication pound44 pound85
Total pound1540 pound2960
Total excludingcost to client
pound1238 pound2380
Mean cost perroutine primarycare patient
PBDU cost pound0 19923 pound0
GP and healthvisitor
pound266 pound511
Secondary care pound309 pound594
Cost to client pound25 pound48
Medication pound32 pound62
Total pound632 pound1215
Total excludingcost to client
pound607 pound1167
Dagher 2012400 Mean cost perwoman with PND
Emergencydepartmentvisits
US$84 2001 US$131 Health-care systemperspective(USA) ndash health-careresource useUnclear if infantcosts included
Inpatienthospital stays
US$607 US$949
Outpatientsurgeries
US$93 US$145
Physicianrsquosofficeurgentcare centrevisits
US$124 US$194
Mental healthcounselling
US$138 US$216
Total US$1046 US$1636
pound984a
continued
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
211
TABLE 58 Costs used in economic evaluations included in the health economics review (continued )
First authoryear referencenumber
Resource userecorded in study
Category ofcost Cost Base year
Inflated cost(201213) Perspective
Mean cost perwoman withoutPND
Emergencydepartmentvisits
US$13 2001 US$20
Inpatienthospital stays
US$80 US$125
Outpatientsurgeries
US$138 US$216
MD officeurgent carecentre visits
US$12 US$189
Mental healthcounselling
US$13 US$20
Total US$365 US$571
pound343a
Dukhovny2013396
Telephone-basedpeer support group
Public healthcosts
CA$667 2011 CA$674 Health-care systemand wider societalcosts perspective(Canada) ndashhealth-care resourceuse and wider costsincluded Motherand infant costsincluded
Volunteeropportunitycosts
CA$126 CA$127
Hiredhousework
CA$234 CA$236
Hired child care CA$194 CA$196
Familyfriendand partnertime of work
CA$2374 CA$2398
Health-careutilisation total
CA$901 CA$910
Nursing visits CA$252 CA$255
Provider visits CA$371 CA$375
Mental healthvisits
CA$43 CA$43
Inpatientadmissions total
CA$227 CA$229
Mother CA$42 CA$42
Infant CA$185 CA$187
Ambulance CA$8 CA$8
Total CA$4497 CA$4543
pound2474a
ASSESSMENT OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
212
TABLE 58 Costs used in economic evaluations included in the health economics review (continued )
First authoryear referencenumber
Resource userecorded in study
Category ofcost Cost Base year
Inflated cost(201213) Perspective
Routine primarycare
Public healthcosts
NA 2011 NA
Volunteeropportunitycosts
NA NA
Hiredhousework
CA$180 CA$182
Hired child care CA$137 CA$138
Familyfriendand partnertime of work
CA$1983 CA$2003
Health-careutilisation total
CA$1080 CA$1091
Nursing visits CA$256 CA$259
Provider visits CA$373 CA$377
Mental healthvisits
CA$57 CA$58
Inpatientadmissions total
CA$389 CA$393
Mother CA$73 CA$74
Infant CA$316 CA$319
Ambulance CA$6 CA$6
Total CA$3380 CA$3415
pound1860a
Gold 2007397 Cost of theintervention
Rural cost perwoman
AU$172 2002 pound127a Cost of theintervention andhealth-care resourceuse (Australia)Urban cost per
womanAU$129 pound95a
Rural cost perarea
AU$272490 pound200959a
Urban cost perarea
AU$313900 pound231499a
MacArthur2003264
Control group Total costs pound542 1998 pound902 Health-care system(NHS) perspective ndash
health-care resourceuse Infant costs notincluded
Postnatal carecost
pound126 pound209
Intervention group Total costs pound470 pound783
Postnatal carecosts
pound190 pound317
continued
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
213
TABLE 58 Costs used in economic evaluations included in the health economics review (continued )
First authoryear referencenumber
Resource userecorded in study
Category ofcost Cost Base year
Inflated cost(201213) Perspective
Morrell 2000199 Cost ofinterventionadditional supportworker visits
ndash pound160 1996 pound279 Health-care system(NHS) perspective ndash
cost of theintervention andhealth-care resourceuse Mother andinfant costs included
Total resourcesintervention(6 months)
ndash pound815 pound1420
Total resourcescontrol (6 months)
ndash pound639 pound1113
Morrell 200961 Total resourcesused all women(6 months)
Control pound272 20034 pound350 Health-care system(NHS) perspective ndash
health-care resourceuse Mother andinfant costs included
CBA pound253 pound326
PCA pound250 pound322
Total resourcesused at-riskwomen(12 months)
Control pound374 pound481
CBA pound329 pound423
PCA pound353 pound454
Petrou 2006174 Cost of additionalhealth visitor visits
ndash pound121 2000 pound185 Health-care system(NHS) perspective ndash
health-care resourceuse Mother andinfant costs included
Petrou 200253 Total resourcesused women withPND
ndash pound2419 2000 pound3710 Health-care system(NHS) perspective ndash
health-care resourceuse Mother andinfant costs includedTotal resources
used womenwithout PND
ndash pound2027 pound3109
Hewitt 200945 Cost ofintervention
EPDS (5 minuteshealth visitortime)
pound8 20067 pound9 Health-care system(NHS) perspective ndash
cost of screeningand treatment
BDI (5 minuteshealth visitortime andlicense fee)
pound9 pound10
Cost of treatmentof PND
Structuredpsychologicaltherapy
pound447 pound517
Supportive care pound414 pound479
Stevenson2010392
Group CBT Onesession per weekfor 8 weeks2-hour longgroups of four tosix women
ndash pound1500 20078 pound1687 Health-care system(NHS) perspective ndash
cost of interventiontreatment
ASSESSMENT OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
214
TABLE 58 Costs used in economic evaluations included in the health economics review (continued )
First authoryear referencenumber
Resource userecorded in study
Category ofcost Cost Base year
Inflated cost(201213) Perspective
Campbell200856
Psychologicaltherapy (IPT- orCBT-basedintervention)eight sessions(50 minutes each)provided by aclinical psychologist
ndash NZ$268 20067 NZ$318 Health-care systemperspective (NewZealand) ndash cost ofscreening andtreatment
pound166a
Social supportthree groupsessions (fivewomen) and threetelephone contactsby a qualifiedcounsellor(30 minutes each)
ndash NZ$59 NZ$70
pound37a
Combinationtherapy16 sessions(50 minutes each)of psychologicaltherapy by aclinical psychologistand 12 weeksrsquoantidepressanttherapy
ndash NZ$561 NZ$666
pound347a
Key GBP Great British pounds PBDU psychiatric parent and baby day unit NA not applicablea Costs converted using XE Currency Convertor (wwwxecom) exchange rates correct as of 11 March 2014 1 AU$= 055
GBP 1 USD= 06 GBP 1 CAD= 0545 GBP and 1 NZ$= 052 GBP
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
215
The Morrell et al199 paper reported the cost of the intervention under study (additional care by trainedcommunity postnatal support workers) and the total health-care resources used by the intervention andcontrol groups Total health-care resource use was reported at 6 weeks and 6 months Mother and infantcosts were included
MacArthur et al264 collected total health-care resources used for the intervention and control groups inthree matrices (presented in Table 59) A subset of the total health-care resources referred to as postnatalcare costs was also presented These costs included the standard community services offered to postnatalwomen including midwife home visits GP home visits and the postnatal check For all matrices total costswere lower in the intervention group than in the control group while postnatal care costs were higher inthe intervention group than in the control group for matrices A and B and lower for matrix C Costs formatrix A were estimated based on crude data from midwivesrsquo diaries and GPsrsquo records A further analysiswas conducted that included replacement data from womenrsquos health diaries when estimates frommidwives were unavailable (matrix B) Using this approach the total costs for the control group decreasedfrom pound542 to pound479 whereas the cost of postnatal care increased slightly from pound126 to pound134 A thirdanalysis using the womenrsquos health diaries to estimate the frequency of midwivesrsquo and GP appointmentswas undertaken (matrix C) Using this approach the total costs decreased compared with matrix A to pound509and the costs of postnatal care also increased compared with both matrices A and B to pound161 The totalcost for the intervention group also fell from pound470 to pound457 and the costs for postnatal care decreasedfrom pound190 to pound152 (see Table 66) As the intervention was not intended to impact on health visitorshealth visitor costs were not included in the total resource use Costs incurred by the babies were alsonot included
Boath et al399 reported the median and mean of total cost for women receiving treatment in a specialisedpsychiatric parent and baby day unit and for women receiving routine primary care Costs to the motherand baby were included in the analysis
TABLE 59 Costs by matrices A B and C derived from trial of midwifery redesigned postnatal care
Matrix Category of cost
Mean of cluster means
Control (pound) Intervention (pound)
Matrix A Total costs 542 470
Postnatal care costs 126 190
Matrix B Total costs 479 469
Postnatal care costs 134 190
Matrix C Total costs 509 457
Postnatal care costs 161 152
Data source MacArthur et al264
ASSESSMENT OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS
NIHR Journals Library wwwjournalslibrarynihracuk
216
Appleby et al398 concentrated on what the impact of additional training would be in terms of the amountof time health visitors spent with the women under their care The amount of time spent with eachwoman depressed woman and treated woman before and after the training on cognitivendashbehaviouralcounselling was recorded and costed using the 1998 Unit Costs of Health and Social Care409 Furtherdetails on the definition of depressed or treated women were not provided
The Dagher et al400 study estimated the extra health-care resources used by women with PND comparedwith those used by women without PND Health-care use was estimated using self-reported data from thewomen themselves The data on health-care use were then costed using 2001 unit prices of servicesprovided by the Blue Cross Shield of Minnesota The incremental cost for women with PND comparedwith women without PND was US$1065 Converted to British pounds using exchange rates correct as ofMarch 2014 this is equivalent to a difference of pound641 It is not clear whether or not this included thehealth-care costs of the infant as well as the mother
Gold et al397 evaluated the economic side of the PRISM (Program of Resources Information and Supportfor Mothers) trial The PRISM trial evaluated primary care and community-based strategies to improve thephysical and mental health of new mothers Costs were collected in relation to the intervention andhealth-care resource use in the intervention and control areas No significant differences were foundin health-care resource use between the areas The cost of the intervention was estimated in Australiandollars at AU$272490 in rural communities and AU$313900 in urban areas Inflated from 2002 prices to201213 prices using the Australian Total Health Price Index407 and converted to British pounds usingexchanges rates correct as of July 2014 which resulted in costs of pound200959 and pound231499 respectivelyThe average cost per woman was AU$17240 for rural areas and AU$12870 for urban areas whichresulted in a cost of pound127 and pound95 respectively when inflated and converted
The differences in the population intervention and objective for each study make a comparison of thedifferent costs across the papers difficult However as a number of papers report costs of treatmenta speculative comparison could be made Boath et al399 at 6 months reported the highest cost for thoseundergoing treatment in the parent and baby day unit at pound2380 and a lower cost for those undergoingroutine primary care at pound1167 Stevenson et al392 estimated the cost of treating PND with groupCBT-based intervention as pound1687 but did not include any additional GP appointments or secondary carethat a woman with PND may have received Hewitt et al45 estimated the total cost of standard care forwomen with PND as pound996 This is lower than the best comparator for the cost of routine primary carereported by Boath et al399 Petrou et al53 found a difference of pound601 in health-care resources used betweenhigh-risk women with PND and high-risk women without PND This is the lowest of all the estimates of thePND treatment studies possibly because the control group comprised high-risk women rather than a universalpopulation of all women and therefore it estimated the additional cost of treating PND in a high-riskpopulation The difference between the resource use of women with PND and the resource use of non-high-riskwomen may have been greater Based on these figures pound1000 would be a reasonable estimate for the cost ofroutine care for women with PND
In the studies not based in England with costs converted to British pounds Dagher et al400 estimated theincremental cost as pound641 This is similar to that found in the Petrou et al53 study but lower than otherEngland-based estimates This could be because of differences in the health-care systems of the twocountries It could also be as a result of the way health-care resource use was recorded Dagher et al400
relied on self-reported estimates of health-care use from the women in the study and used a recall periodof up to 3 months whereas Boath et al399 used womenrsquos case notes Stevenson et al392 used costestimates from a RCT and Hewitt et al45 costed out treatment guidelines
DOI 103310hta20370 HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2016 VOL 20 NO 37
copy Queenrsquos Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016 This work was produced by Morrell et al under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State forHealth This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to NIHR Journals Library National Institute for Health Research Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Alpha House University of Southampton SciencePark Southampton SO16 7NS UK
217