Health Care Costs: The Health Care Costs: The Role of Technology Role of Technology Alliance for Health Reform 20 th Anniversary Series May 29, 2012 Joseph R. Antos, Ph.D. Joseph R. Antos, Ph.D. Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and Retirement Policy and Retirement Policy American Enterprise Institute American Enterprise Institute
10
Embed
Health Care Costs: The Role of Technology Alliance for Health Reform 20 th Anniversary Series
Health Care Costs: The Role of Technology Alliance for Health Reform 20 th Anniversary Series May 29, 2012 Joseph R. Antos, Ph.D. Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and Retirement Policy American Enterprise Institute. The power source for proton beam therapy. $140 million +. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Health Care Costs: The Health Care Costs: The Role of TechnologyRole of Technology Alliance for Health Reform20th Anniversary SeriesMay 29, 2012
Joseph R. Antos, Ph.D.Joseph R. Antos, Ph.D.Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health CareWilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and Retirement Policyand Retirement PolicyAmerican Enterprise InstituteAmerican Enterprise Institute
2
3
4
$140 million +
The power source for proton beam therapy
5
“Traditional” Technology
Standard Technology circa
2000
Current Technology
X-Ray Machine$175,000
CT Scanner$1 million
CT Functional Imaging w/PET
$2.3 millionOpen Surgery Instrument Set
$10,000
Laparoscopic Surgery Set
$15,000
Surgery Robot~$2 million
Cardiac Balloon Catheter
$500
Stent$2,300
Treated Stent$5,000
Scalpel$20
Electrocautery $12,000
Harmonic (ultrasonic) Scalpel$30,000
High cost of advancing technology High cost of advancing technology
Source: Keith Kasper, “The Cost of Hospital Care,” National Health Policy Forum, October 8, 2010
AEI
16th century: “couching” a clouded lens with a thick needle
1960s: inpatient operation, with patient’s head held in place for 2 weeks with sand bags◦ “Intracapsular cataract extraction”
Today: outpatient procedure completed in an afternoon◦ “Phacoemulsification”
Better technology, more successful results Greater demand, more spending
6
AEI7
Cost Effectiveness of Treatment1
Deaths Prevented
% of Mortality Decline
A. Effective/Low Cost 83,285 52.3%B. Effective/Higher Cost
45,225 28.4%
C. Less Cost Effective
30,830 19.3%
Total 159,340 100.0%
Aspirin vs. AngioplastyDecline in Death from Coronary Disease,