Safe and Sustainable Road Transport Planning Solutions HDS Australia Civil Engineers and Project Managers Adelaide Melbourne Hong Kong The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association REGIONAL ROAD ACTION PLANS AND 2015 SLRP ROADS DATABASE UPDATE Final Report HDS Australia Pty Ltd 277 Magill Road Trinity Gardens SA 5068 telephone +61 8 8333 3760 facsimile +61 8 8333 3079 email [email protected]www.hdsaustralia.com.au April 2015
61
Embed
HDS Australia Civil Engineer s and Project Manage rs Final Report.pdf · HDS Australia Civil Engineer s and Project Manage rs x x g The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Safe and Sustainable Road Transport Planning Solutions
HDS Australia Civil Engineers and Project Managers
Ad
ela
ide
Me
lbo
urn
e H
on
g K
on
g
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association
REGIONAL ROAD ACTION PLANS AND 2015 SLRP ROADS DATABASE UPDATE
APPENDICES A. Regional Road Action Plans – Endorsed by RTS Committee 6 March 2015 B. Detailed Submissions – Berri Barmera Council C. Detailed Submissions – Coorong District Council D. Detailed Submissions – Mid Murray Council E. Detailed Submissions – Rural City of Murray Bridge F. Detailed Submissions – Renmark Paringa Council G. Detailed Submissions – Southern Mallee District Council H. 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update – Endorsed by RTS Committee 6 March 2015 REFERENCE (downloadable from the M&MLGA website “Reports” page) 1. M&MLGA 2030 Regional Transport Plan – Final Report, HDS Australia, March 2014 2. Murray and Mallee Regional Transport Review 2010, Parsons Brinckerhoff, March 2011
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd
LG802\006 April 2015
Regional Road Action Plans and 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update Final Report
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background In June 2013, HDS Australia was engaged by the Murray and Mallee Local Government Association (M&MLGA) to prepare its 2030 Regional Transport Plan (Reference 1). The 2030 Regional Transport Plan is a strategic level assessment of transport needs and priorities within the Region for the period from 2013 to 2030. Upon its release in March 2014, it officially replaced an earlier Regional Transport Strategy (RTS) which had been operating since 2002. The final report for the 2030 Regional Transport Plan recognised that the 2030 Regional Transport Plan is a “living” document which will need regular review and updating as subsequent regional planning and development initiatives influence future transport priorities. In particular, Section 9 of the report outlined a methodology for review and update of the 2030 Regional Transport Plan, along with preparation and submission of annual Special Local Roads Program (SLRP) or other funding applications. A flow chart depicting the methodology was presented in Section 9.2 of the report, and is repeated below:
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd
LG802\006 April 2015
Regional Road Action Plans and 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update Final Report
2
1.2 Project Brief In August 2014, HDS Australia was engaged by the M&MLGA to assist member councils undertake Steps 2 and 3 of the above “Methodology for Review and Update of the 2030 Regional Transport Plan”. The project comprised two separate, but linked components, namely: 1. Phase 1 – Provision of assistance to the M&MLGA and individual member councils with
development of Regional Road Action Plans, in accordance with the methodology contained in Section 10 of the 2030 Regional Transport Plan. The purpose of these Action Plans was to develop an overall funding priority list, and associated strategy for seeking additional funds when available, to enable all regionally significant freight, tourism and community access routes, as defined by the maps in Appendix A of the 2030 Regional Transport Plan Final Report, to operate at their “fit for purpose” standard.
2. Phase 2 – Provision of assistance to the M&MLGA to undertake an independent review
and prioritisation of road upgrade proposals submitted by member councils for consideration under SLRP annual funding arrangements. This process, identified in Section 9 of the 2030 Regional Transport Plan Final Report, continued to utilise the two step assessment process first employed for the 2006 Regional Transport Strategy update, thereby ensuring continuity with earlier assessments. However, for 2015, all road proposals submitted for consideration were required to have been listed under Regional Road Action Plan 1. This provided an essential link to the 2030 Regional Transport Plan, by ensuring that all SLRP road upgrade proposals were for regionally significant roads with major deficiencies.
The project was undertaken by a specialist team of road transport planning and traffic engineers from HDS Australia led by John Olson, Managing Director and Principal Engineer, assisted by Tim Viner Smith for Phase 1 and Kyle Yang for Phase 2, both Senior Traffic Engineers. The M&MLGA RTS Committee acted as a Reference Group for the project, with Peter Campbell and subsequently Peter Bond, Chief Executive Officer of the M&MLGA, as the Client Representatives.
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd
LG802\006 April 2015
Regional Road Action Plans and 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update Final Report
3
2.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND OVERVIEW OF OUTCOMES
2.1 Phase 1 Tasks Listed below are the activities undertaken in Phase 1, which included one task that was optional, based on individual council requirements. 1. An initial workshop was conducted in Karoonda on 12 September 2014, covering the
methodology for determining major and minor deficiencies on the regional road network. It was based upon comparing sample deficiencies with standards contained in the most recent version of the Local Government Association of SA (LGA) SLRP Fit for Purpose Standards Spreadsheet.
2. All RTS Committee representatives were followed up after the workshop to ascertain their
level of understanding and commitment to the development of Regional Road Action Plans, including the availability of resources and the timeframe needed to achieve an outcome if tackled in-house.
3. Where RTS Committee representatives indicated that they did not have available in-
house resources (which was seven of the eight members councils), HDS Australia assisted those councils to assess all regional routes in their area for major and minor deficiencies. One council, namely DC Loxton Waikerie, elected to undertake this task in-house. This task was carried out over the period October to December 2014.
4. Results from the road deficiency assessments were prioritised into Council Action Plans
1, 2 and 3 (with those roads showing no or insignificant deficiencies listed separately as Fit for Purpose).
5. Consolidated Regional Road Action Plans for the M&MLGA were then developed by HDS
Australia, listing all regionally significant roads and highlighting the level of deficiencies identified. Individual councils also provided an estimated upgrade cost for all road segments listed under Action Plan 1, based upon cost estimates included in their five year capital works program.
6. A Phase 1 completion meeting of the RTS Committee was held in Karoonda on 11
December 2014 to review draft Regional Road Action Plans, discuss the significance of the individual lists, seek endorsement from the RTS Committee of the draft plans as presented, and identify the next steps associated with Phase 2 of the project.
2.2 Phase 1 Outcomes
Training notes for all attendees under Task 1, plus an initial report to the client under Task 2, were the principal outcomes of the first two tasks. Individual road deficiency assessment sheets, including site specific observations by our field assessor, were supplied to the seven councils who used HDS Australia’s services for the road deficiency assessments (Task 3). All eight councils received Council Action Plans as part of Task 4. Under Task 5, draft Regional Road Action Plans were published for review and endorsement by the RTS Committee, before final versions of the Regional Road Action Plans were supplied to the client representative (for ultimate approval at a subsequent M&MLGA general meeting). Appendix A of this report contains a copy of the endorsed Regional Road Action Plans.
2.3 Phase 2 Tasks The independent assessment and prioritisation of road upgrade proposals submitted as part of the 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update involved the following steps:
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd
LG802\006 April 2015
Regional Road Action Plans and 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update Final Report
4
1. 27 road upgrade proposals were received from six of the eight councils within the
M&MLGA. Copies of these upgrade proposals are contained in Appendices B to G of this report. The proposals were independently reviewed by HDS Australia, which included the following activities:
a. A check that each road segment proposed for upgrading was regionally significant,
as shown on the Regional Transport Route maps forming part of the 2030 Regional Transport Plan;
b. A check that each road segment was identified as a deficient road segment within Regional Road Action Plan 1;
c. Provision of telephone and/or emailed comments on the overall quality of each
submission and evidence provided in support of benefits claimed for each road upgrade proposal;
d. Calculation of "Stage 1” and “Stage 2” assessment scores, in accordance with the
M&MLGA RTS methodology previously used in the 2006 and 2010 reviews; and
e. Ranking of all proposals by combined assessment, similar to the reported outcome under Section 5.3 of PB’s March 2011 report (Reference 2).
2. A Phase 2 completion meeting of the RTS Committee was held in Murray Bridge on
6 March 2015, at which: a. The final version of Regional Road Action Plans (released on 26 February 2015)
were endorsed; and
b. The prioritised list of 2015 SLRP Roads Database upgrade proposals was discussed and formal endorsement obtained from the RTS Committee for the overall list and for a set of identified 2015-16 priorities.
2.4 Phase 2 Outcomes
Individual verbal feedback by telephone was provided to each M&MLGA member council as their submissions were reviewed. Additional face-to-face feedback was provided to RTS Committee representatives at the Phase 2 completion meeting. A verbal report of HDS Australia’s findings, incorporating all assessment spreadsheets, was presented at the Phase 2 completion meeting. This final report of our findings, incorporating key outcomes from both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project, plus the final agreed M&MLGA priority lists, is the project’s final deliverable. Appendix H of this report contains a copy of the endorsed 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update.
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd
LG802\006 April 2015
Regional Road Action Plans and 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update Final Report
5
3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
3.1 Phase 1 – Regional Road Action Plans All member councils received detailed feedback by telephone and email in relation to their individual road deficiency assessments as part of Phase 1 of the project. It is not intended to replicate those detailed findings in this final report. However, in the lead up to the meeting held on 6 March 2015 at which the Regional Road Action Plans were formally endorsed by the RTS Committee, the following key facts and recommendations were emailed to committee members on 26 February 2015 for consideration prior to the meeting. Extracts from my email are included below: “ Some key facts (in relation to regional roads in the M&MLGA region) have now become
apparent from carrying out this project: 1. The total length of regionally significant roads of all functional types (freight,
tourism and community access) is 1,346km. A further 808km of locally important roads have also been assessed and included under the fifth (for information only) section of the Regional Action Plans document. The total length of locally important roads will further increase should the District Council of Loxton Waikerie and Southern Mallee District Council undertake deficiency assessments of their locally important roads (which was only an optional task in the current project). This places strategic oversight of at least 2,154km (it will be more) of the M&MLGA local road network under the collective responsibility of the RTS Committee, through implementation of the 2030 Regional Transport Plan.
2. 476km of regionally significant roads are listed under Regional Action Plan 1, with
identified major deficiencies expected to cost in the order of $32 million to bring these roads up to a fit-for-purpose standard. The eight M&MLGA councils have committed to this level of expenditure over the next five years, assuming that grant funding is available to assist. Therein lies a major hurdle. Forecast SLRP funding, if last year’s reduced level is maintained, will see about $1.5 million per year (i.e. $7.5 million over five years) allocated to the region. On a one part council to two parts SLRP grant basis, this will only enable a maximum of $12 million out of the forecast $32 million of capital works to be funded under the SLRP program over the next five years. Clearly this level of funding is grossly inadequate and other sources for grants, or a higher contribution from individual councils, will be required. Or a lot of projects will miss out!
3. 199km of regionally significant roads are listed under Regional Action Plan 2.
These roads have identified major deficiencies which should be rectified in order to achieve a fit-for-purpose standard, but no funds have been committed by councils in the next five years. This unfunded liability can be estimated at about $13 million if compared on a pro-rata basis to costs in Regional Action Plan 1. Hence, the total spend required to bring all regionally significant roads in the M&MLGA region up to a fit-for-purpose standard over the next five years is $45 million!
4. On a percentage basis, 50% of regionally significant roads in the M&MLGA region
have been assessed as having at least one major deficiency in their fit-for-purpose standard (i.e. they fall into Regional Action Plan 1 or 2). A further 38% display minor deficiencies which require on-going monitoring and potentially higher than normal routine maintenance to ensure the road operates safely and effectively (i.e. they fall into Regional Action Plan 3). Only 12% of regionally significant roads have been assessed as being fully compliant with their fit-for-purpose standard.
In due course, I’m sure the RTS Committee, and ultimately the M&MLGA as a whole, will be able to use the above information as part of a strategic level opportunity to pursue additional sources of funds for the M&MLGA region. However, on a more immediate basis, all RTS Committee members should appreciate that, as per Note 2, there is a
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd
LG802\006 April 2015
Regional Road Action Plans and 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update Final Report
6
significant shortfall in the ability of SLRP grant funds to support all road projects in Regional Action Plan 1. While not every one of the road projects from Regional Action Plan 1 have been submitted for prioritisation and inclusion in the 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update, those that have been submitted are seeking well in excess of the likely $7.5 million in SLRP grants available over the next five years. Total capital works cost for the projects which have been submitted is a little under $20 million. Thus, there will be as many losers as winners in the prioritisation process, especially if the M&MLGA policy of seeking two-thirds the project cost as a grant is maintained. I therefore recommend that: a. The RTS Committee give serious consideration to switching to a 50/50 grant
application model, allowing a few more projects to be funded over the next five years, but at a slightly higher cost to the councils who receive a grant; and
b. The M&MLGA join with other regional LGAs (particularly SELGA and S&HLGA who
are also well advanced with their updated regional transport planning and road deficiency assessments) to lobby the LGA, state and federal governments for a better share of the (getting smaller) road grant “pie” on the basis of the comprehensive master planning process now in use to ensure that funds spent on regionally significant roads achieve maximum economic and social benefit for the region. ”
3.2 Phase 2 – 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update
Once again, all member councils received detailed feedback by telephone and email in relation to their individual road upgrade proposals as part of Phase 2 of the project. It is not intended to replicate those detailed findings in this final report. However, in the lead up to the meeting held on 6 March 2015 at which the 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update was discussed and then formally endorsed by the RTS Committee, the following key conclusions were emailed to committee members for consideration prior to the meeting. Extracts from my email are included below: “ This assessment and associated prioritisation of the submissions is based upon Stage 1
of the agreed methodology set out in the 2030 Regional Transport Plan, which in turn is consistent with the previous Stage 1 assessment methodology used in the 2007 and 2011 updates. Note that the Stage 1 assessment, resulting in a score out of 100, is identical to the annual SLRP Application assessment scoring system used by the Local Government Transport Advisory Panel (LGTAP) on a state wide basis. While the Stage 1 assessment process provides a broad indication of likely final priorities, Stage 2 of the assessment process allows for some adjustment to the final agreed order. Since the basis of the Stage 2 assessment is nowhere near as well defined as the Stage 1 assessment, it requires further discussion and agreement by the RTS Committee. This will form an important part of my presentation at Friday’s meeting. In the meantime, though, some key conclusions can be drawn from the Stage 1 assessment, namely: 1. Over $5 million in SLRP grants are being sought in the 15 submissions which
councils have indicated they are ready to undertake (or at least commence) in 2015-16. Apart from the Rural City of Murray Bridge, which has sought funding on a 50/50 council contribution basis, all other submissions have been made on the M&MLGA traditional basis of 2/3 grant 1/3 council contribution. With a likely M&MLGA SLRP grant allocation of around $1.5 million for 2015-16, the majority of submissions received will not get SLRP grant funding in 2015-16. The quality of the proposals (see next note) might allow for a special argument to be put to LGTAP that the M&MLGA share of the state SLRP funds should be increased (e.g. to say $2 million), but this is highly unlikely as SLRP funds are very tight all round.
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd
LG802\006 April 2015
Regional Road Action Plans and 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update Final Report
7
2. Based upon my past experience, and assuming there are sufficient SLRP funds to
go around (which there aren’t), the following is my assessment of the likelihood of projects being funded –
a. For roads with “Freight” as the primary purpose, those scoring 60 and above
under the Stage 1 (i.e. LGTAP SLRP) assessment have a high to very high rating. 10 submissions (6 ready to undertake in 2015-16) fall into this category, with 2 others missing out by only 1 point.
b. For roads with “Tourism” or “Community Access” as the primary purpose,
those scoring 55 and above under the Stage 1 assessment have a high to very high rating. 10 submissions (4 ready to undertake in 2015-16) fall into this category.
3. If we were to base our final prioritisation of submissions for 2015-16 using only the
10 submissions ranked high to very high under the Stage 1 assessment, we will still currently have $4.3 million in SLRP grants required. However, 4 of the 10 submissions have been flagged as multiple year expenditure (1 from Southern Mallee District Council and 3 from Renmark Paringa Council). I will ask the representatives from these two councils to clarify their council’s committed expenditure for 2015-16, so that we can adjust the total grant being sought for 2015-16. However, we will still be well over any likely allocation. We should also discuss at the meeting on Friday whether, given the high quality of so many proposals, all councils (not just the Rural City of Murray Bridge) should commit to a 50/50 council contribution basis.
Please give some thought to the above comments in preparation for Friday’s meeting. ”
At the RTS Committee meeting held on 6 March 2015, several of the matters highlighted above were discussed and decisions made which are reflected in both the minutes of that meeting and in the final version of the 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update. In particular, the following items were noted at the meeting (as extracted from the meeting minutes): “ It was raised by Greg Hill, then confirmed by Matt James, that Cypress Terrace (ranked 2
on the 2015/16 draft priority list) has received federal government grant funding under the Heavy Vehicle Safety and Productivity Programme (HVSPP) which is an excellent outcome that means Cypress Terrace can be withdrawn from needing SLRP funding. This also applies to the remaining three sections of the Murray Bridge OD Route / Freight Bypass as they are scheduled to come up for funding in future years – now not required under SLRP. A note will be placed on the 2015 SLRP Database Update confirming funding from an alternative source. It was also identified that the junction of Battams Road and Sturt Highway, through to the Accolade Wines Entrance, received grant funding under HVSPP. This project can therefore also come off the draft priority list. The Rural City of Murray Bridge (Matt James) confirmed that they were happy to retain their SLRP application as 50/50 grant funds vs council funding for Schenscher Road (5 Ways Intersection), on the basis that they had been separately successful with funding from HVSPP for Cypress Terrace and had budgeted for 50/50 grant funding on all applications. Renmark Paringa Council (Geoff Meaney prior to meeting) confirmed they were happy with a 50/50 funding application for Murtho Road. Mid Murray Council (Greg Hill) offered to move from 2/3 grant 1/3 council funds to 50/50 for Murraylands Road, especially if it meant that the first segment of Purnong Road had a better chance of success, but this offer was subject to confirming with his council that the
The Murray and Mallee Local Government Association HDS Australia Pty Ltd
LG802\006 April 2015
Regional Road Action Plans and 2015 SLRP Roads Database Update Final Report
8
change was acceptable. The SLRP grant sought for Murraylands Road was therefore reduced from $ 487,200 to $ 365,400, but this will need to be confirmed – Action Greg Hill. Post Meeting Note – Greg subsequently advised that, in the absence of a M&MLGA wide decision to change to a 50/50 grant funding basis, Mid Murray Council did not wish to change. The grant application for Murraylands Road therefore reverted to $ 487,200. ”
Also advised at the meeting, but not separately noted in the minutes, was that Southern Mallee District Council (Matthew Sherman) wished to stage their Geranium South Road upgrade proposal over three years, while Coorong District Council (David Mosel) wished to stage their Tauragat Well Road final upgrade proposal over two years. The SLRP grant sought for 2015-16 was adjusted accordingly for both projects.
3.3 Phase 2A – SLRP 2015-16 Funding Applications Final Priority List While not specifically part of the original project brief, HDS Australia provided assistance to the M&MLGA CEO in early April by coordinating and consolidating final applications and overall regional priority recommendations for the 2015-16 round of SLRP funding applications. The final list of recommended priorities, as submitted by M&MLGA for 2015-16, was:
Priority Road Name Segment (Primary Purpose) SLRP Grant Sought R1 Murraylands Road 4km from Sturt Highway to 8.2km north
Thiele and Patterson Roads (Freight) $ 400,000 R3 Geranium South Road Unsealed Section (Freight) – 3 stages $ 422,000 R4 Tauragat Well Road End of sealed section to Council boundary
West Terrace (Karoonda) Full length - Roads to Recovery submission 2014/15 F/C 0.3 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.0
Sub-Total 34.3
District Council of Loxton Waikerie
Airfield Road Crase Road to Aerodrome Entrance C 1.0 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Armstrong Avenue Bookpurnong Terrace to Access Lane (School) C 0.1 Minor Minor Minor Major 1 0.0
Badcoe Road Robertson Avenue to Trenerry Avenue F/C 0.3 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Badcoe Road Trenerry Avenue to Mackey Road C (F) 1.8 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.1
Civic Avenue Crush Terrace to McCutcheon Street F 0.6 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Crase Road Taplan Road to Airfield Road C 2.0 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.1
East Terrace (East) Bookpurnong Terrace to Beverly Street C (T) 0.4 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
East Terrace (West) Beverly Street to Bookpurnong Terrace C (T) 0.4 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Edward Street Martha Street to East Terrace C 0.1 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Gratwick Road Bookpurnong Terrace to School Entrance F/C 0.2 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Gratwick Road School Entrance to Trenerry Avenue F 0.1 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Holder Top Road Sturt Highway to Sir Donald Anderson Drive C 0.9 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Kokoda Terrace (East) Bookpurnong Tce to Robertson Avenue F/C 0.9 Major Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Kokoda Terrace (West) Robertson Avenue to Bookpurnong Tce F/C 0.9 Major Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Luther Road Bookpurnong Terrace to School Entrance C 0.6 Major Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Maggea Road Sturt Highway to Stott Highway F 46.5 Major Compliant Minor Major 1 1.6
Martha Street Bookpurnong Terrace to Edward Street C 0.2 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
McCoy Street Strangman Road to White Street C 0.3 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
McCutcheon St Ian Oliver Drive to Civic Avenue F 0.1 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
McIntosh Street Bookpurnong Terrace to Hospital Entrance C 0.3 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Murbko Road Sturt Highway to Enduro Road F/T 16.0 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.6
Murbko Road Enduro Road to Council Boundary T (F) 2.4 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.1
Pyap Street Bookpurnong Terrace to Drabsch Street C 0.2 Major Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Robertson Avenue Kokoda Terrace to Siding Entrance F 0.8 Major Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Sir Donald Anderson Drive Holder Top Road to Aerodrome Entrance C 0.3 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Starcevich Road Gratwick Road to Kokoda Terrace F 1.0 Minor Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Strangman Road Sturt Highway to Lawrie Terrace C 1.3 Major Compliant Minor Major 1 0.0
Taplan Road Badcoe Road to Crase Road C (F) 5.1 Major Compliant Minor Minor 1 0.1
Ziegler Road Ramco Road to Sturt Highway F 6.0 Major Compliant Minor Minor 1 0.2
Sub-Total 90.8
Mid Murray Council
Bower Boundary Road Thiele Highway to new section F 23.1 Compliant Major Major Major 1 0.2
Carman Road Hunter Highway to Gierke Road F 4.9 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.7
Milendella Road Randell Road to Wachtel Road F (T) 2.1 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.4
Milendella Road Wachtel Road to Angus Valley Highway F (T) 10.1 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 1.0
Murraylands Road Angas Valley Highway to Black Hill Road T (C/F) 5.0 Compliant Compliant Minor Major 1 0.8
Murraylands Road Black Hill Road to Sunnydale Road T (C/F) 7.5 Compliant Compliant Major Major 1 1.2
Murraylands Road Punyelroo Road to Stott Highway T (C/F) 5.5 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.8
Murraylands Road Stott Highway to Swan Reach Pump Station T (C/F) 7.4 Compliant Compliant Minor Major 1 1.1
Murraylands Road Sturt Highway to Grid 8.2km North of Sturt Highway F/T (C) 8.2 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.8
Purnong Road Long Gully Road to 100 km/h sign T/C (F) 2.9 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.1
Purnong Road 100 km/h sign to Murraylands Road T/C (F) 6.6 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.3
Purnong Road Murraylands Road to Mallee Road T/C (F) 4.5 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.6
Sub-Total 87.8
Rural City of Murray Bridge
Boundary Road Orland Road to Bowhill Road F 15.5 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.2
Bowhill Road Boundary Road to Council Boundary F 16.3 Compliant Compliant Minor Major 1 0.1
Brinkley Road Hindmarsh Road to the end of freight section F/C 0.5 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.5
Cypress Terrace Full length F/C 1.3 Compliant Major Compliant Minor 1 0.8
Ferries MacDonald Road Old Princes Highway to Princes Highway F/T/C 2.4 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.2
Hindmarsh Road Brinkley Road to Swanport Road F/C 2.1 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 1.8
Jarvis Avenue Swanport Road to Lohmann Street C 0.2 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.2
Koehler Road Full length T/C (F) 1.8 Major Major Major Major 1 0.1
Lohmann Street Jarvis Avenue to Long Island Road C 0.4 Compliant Minor Compliant Major 1 0.1
Mary Terrace Swanport Road to East Terrace F/T/C 0.5 Compliant Major Compliant Major 1 0.1
Maurice Road Brinkley Road to Adelaide Road F/C 2.1 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 1.2
Maurice Road Adelaide Road to Cypress Terrace F/C 1.4 Compliant Compliant Major Major 1 1.0
Monarto Road Full length C 12.1 Compliant Compliant Minor Major 1 0.3
Mypolonga Road Dean Jaensch Road to Woolshed Road F/C (T) 2.8 Compliant Minor Compliant Major 1 0.2
Page 1 of 9
Murray and Mallee LGA 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORT PLAN
ROAD DEFICIENCY ACTION PLAN 1
(For RTS Committee Endorsement - as at 26 FEB 15)
HDS Australia Pty Ltd
Old Princes Highway East Terrace to Ferries MacDonald Road C 7.7 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.1
Pallamana / Schenscher Road I'section Full length F/C (T) 0.5 Compliant Minor Major Major 1 0.8
Pallamana Road Full length F (T) 7.7 Compliant Minor Compliant Major 1 0.3
Schenscher Road Full length F/C (T) 4.3 Compliant Minor Compliant Major 1 0.2
Sixth Street (Murray Bridge) Bridge Street to South Terrace C 0.1 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.1
Usher Road Brinkley Road to Koehler Road T/C (F) 2.5 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.1
Wagenknecht Road Full length F (T) 4.9 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.1
Sub-Total 87.1
Renmark Paringa Council
Airport Road Gregory Road to End (Airport Terminal) C 1.6 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.1
Government Road Full length F 9.1 Compliant Minor Major Minor 1 0.6
Lindsay Point Road Sturt Highway to Old Sturt Highway F (T) 1.2 Compliant Minor Compliant Major 1 0.1
Murtho Road Sturt Highway to Beherendt Road T/C (F) 11.1 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.4
Murtho Road Beherendt Road to Wilkinson Road T (F) 4.2 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.2
Murtho Road Wilkinson Road to Customs House T 15.4 Compliant Minor Major Compliant 1 0.6
Sub-Total 42.6
Southern Mallee District Council
Geranium South Road Unsealed section F/T 10.6 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 1.9
Hawthorne Road Full length C 8.1 Compliant Minor Minor Major 1 0.1
Lovers Lane Full length F 1.1 Compliant Major Compliant Major 1 0.2
Tauragat Well Road Full length F/T 4.5 Compliant Compliant Compliant Major 1 0.9
Sub-Total 24.3
TOTAL 476 31.7
NOTE - Road deficiency assessments were carried out over the period from October to December 2014. Some of the road segments showing one or more
major deficiencies, and included above as part of Action Plan 1, have been funded for upgrade works in the 2014/15 financial year. While works on these road
segments remain incomplete as at February 2015, many of these segments will effectively become either fully compliant, or will have only minor deficiencies
remaining, at the end of the 2014/15 construction season. They will therefore move out of Action Plan 1 at the next review of the Regional Action Plans, and
no further funding will be required. On the other hand, a few segments currently being upgraded are part of staged works, so they will remain on Action Plan
1, but with a reduced cost estimate, when the Regional Action Plans are next revised.
Page 2 of 9
Murray and Mallee LGA 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORT PLAN
Appendix C Detailed Submissions Coorong District Council
SLRP-03
ECM 584209 Page 1 of 10
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PANEL
STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2015-16
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES att ached and also available at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap )
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA The Murray and Mallee LGA
Council Name Coorong District Council
Road Name Coonalpyn-Geranium Road
(Tauragat Well Road) – Stage 6
Timeframe 2015-16
2015-16 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) $1,300,000 $2,640,000
Length of Road (Km) 7km 26km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
95% N/A
Amount Sought ($) $433,00 $1,760,000
Council Contribution ($) $867,000 $880,000
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Previous Works Stages 1 and 2 These stages of the project involved the construction of approximately 6 km of Tauragat Well Road between the 10 km and 16 km markers, all of which has now been completed. Stage 3 Funded in 2012/13, this stage involved construction of a further 3 km of roadway to the 19 km marker. This has been completed (refer Appendix B, Map 1).
SLRP-03
ECM 584209 Page 1 of 8
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PANEL
STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2015-16
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES att ached and also available at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap )
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA The Murray and Mallee LGA
Council Name Coorong District Council
Road Name Granites Road
Timeframe 2015-16
2015-16 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) $250,000 $ 250,000
Length of Road (Km) 0.5km 0.5km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
90% N/A
Amount Sought ($) $165,000 $165,000
Council Contribution ($) $85,000 $85,000
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
The Coorong District Council intends to profile a 500m section of Granites Road. Along this section they will then lay deep lift asphalt to improve strength and durability for heavy vehicles to access the Viterra Grain depot.
2(b). PROJECT SUITABILITY CHECKLIST FOR LGTAP CONS IDERATION
1. If not covered in section 2(a) on the previous page, please outline justification and objectives of the project, includ ing a description of the functions of the road and any existing problems .
SLRP-03
ECM 584209 Page 1 of 8
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PANEL
STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2015-16
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES att ached and also available at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap )
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA The Murray and Mallee LGA
Council Name Coorong District Council
Road Name Seven Mile Road
Timeframe 2015-16
2015-16 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) $240,000 $240,000
Length of Road (Km) 2km 2km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
90% N/A
Amount Sought ($) $159,000 $159,000
Council Contribution ($) $81,000 $81,000
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
The main aim of this project is to improve the strength and durability of the pavement on Seven Mile Road. Council intends to upgrade a 2km section of Seven Mile Road by improving the sub-base material and laying new base material. This section of road will then be sealed with a 7m wide spray seal on the 9m wide formation.
2(b). PROJECT SUITABILITY CHECKLIST FOR LGTAP CONS IDERATION
1. If not covered in section 2(a) on the previous page, please outline justification and objectives of the project, includ ing a description of the functions of the road and any existing problems .
SLRP-03
ECM 584209 Page 1 of 8
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PANEL
STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2015-16
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES att ached and also available at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap )
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA The Murray and Mallee LGA
Council Name Coorong District Council
Road Name Yarindale Road
Timeframe 2015-16
2015-16 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) $240,000 $240,000
Length of Road (Km) 2km 2km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
90% N/A
Amount Sought ($) $159,000 $159,000
Council Contribution ($) $81,000 $81,000
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
The main aim of this project is to improve the strength and durability of the pavement on Yarindale Road. Council intends to upgrade a 2km section of Yarindale Road by improving the sub-base material and laying new base material. This section of road will then be sealed with a 7m wide spray seal on the 9m wide formation.
2(b). PROJECT SUITABILITY CHECKLIST FOR LGTAP CONS IDERATION
1. If not covered in section 2(a) on the previous page, please outline justification and objectives of the project, includ ing a description of the functions of the road and any existing problems .
Appendix D Detailed Submissions Mid Murray Council
SLRP-03
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PANEL STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2015-16
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA The Murray and Mallee LGA
Council Name Mid Murray Council
Road Name Purnong Road-Long Gully Road to 100 km/h sign
Timeframe 2015-16
2015-16
Application Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) $114,600 $114,600
Length of Road (Km) 0.8km 0.8km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
95% 95%
Amount Sought ($) $76,400 $76,400
Council Contribution ($) $38,200 $38,200
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Purnong Road is identified as a regionally significant community access route and tourist route in the Murray and Mallee 2030 Regional Transport Plan. It is also identified as a locally important freight route.
The road starts in Mannum and heads north and then east for approximately 30km to Purnong. The road acts as a collector road for the communities in the area such as Purnong and Walkers Flat who are heading to Mannum. Purnong Road is also heavily utilised by tourists wishing to access the river and the many shack communities along the Murray. Purnong Road is also a locally important freight route due to the volume of freight it carries. It is a B Double gazetted route. There is potential in the future for an initial section of Purnong Road to become part of a fright bypass around the Mannum town centre (as shown in the. 2030 Regional Transport Plan)
Stage 1 of this project is to upgrade 0.8kms of Purnong Road, 2 . 3 k m s n o r t h from the junction with Long Gully Road. It is intended to improve the pavement and widen the road by 1m. There will also be some minor
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PANEL STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2016-17
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA The Murray and Mallee LGA
Council Name Mid Murray Council
Road Name Purnong Road-100 km/h sign to Murraylands Road
Timeframe 2016-17
2016-17
Application Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) $315,040 $315,040
Length of Road (Km) 2.2km 2.2km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
95% 95%
Amount Sought ($) $210,026 $210,026
Council Contribution ($) $105,013 $105,013
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Purnong Road is identified as a regionally significant community access route and tourist route in the Murray and Mallee 2030 Regional Transport Plan. It is also identified as a locally important freight route.
The road starts in Mannum and heads north and then east for approximately 30km to Purnong. The road acts as a collector road for the communities in the area such as Purnong and Walkers Flat who are heading to Mannum. Purnong Road is also heavily utilised by tourists wishing to access the river and the many shack communities along the Murray. Purnong Road is also a locally important freight route due to the volume of freight it carries. It is a B Double gazetted route. There is potential in the future for an initial section of Purnong Road to become part of a fright bypass around the Mannum town centre (as shown in the. 2030 Regional Transport Plan)
Stage 2 of this project is to upgrade 2.2kms of Purnong Road, 5 k m s n o r t h from the junction with Long Gully Road. It is intended to improve the pavement and widen the road by 1m. There will also be some minor
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PANEL STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2017-18
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA The Murray and Mallee LGA
Council Name Mid Murray Council
Road Name Purnong Road-Murraylands Road to Mallee Road
Timeframe 2017-18
2017-18
Application Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) $554,880 $554,880
Length of Road (Km) 3.4km 3.4km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
95% 95%
Amount Sought ($) $369,920 $369,920
Council Contribution ($) $184,960 $184,960
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Purnong Road is identified as a regionally significant community access route and tourist route in the Murray and Mallee 2030 Regional Transport Plan. It is also identified as a locally important freight route.
The road starts in Mannum and heads north and then east for approximately 30km to Purnong. The road acts as a collector road for the communities in the area such as Purnong and Walkers Flat who are heading to Mannum. Purnong Road is also heavily utilised by tourists wishing to access the river and the many shack communities along the Murray. Purnong Road is also a locally important freight route due to the volume of freight it carries. It is a B Double gazetted route. There is potential in the future for an initial section of Purnong Road to become part of a fright bypass around the Mannum town centre (as shown in the. 2030 Regional Transport Plan)
Stage 3 of this project is to upgrade 3.4kms of Purnong Road, 1 . 2 k m s e a s t from the junction with Murray Lands Road. It is intended to improve the pavement and widen the road by 1m. There will also be some minor
Stage 2, consists of 2.1 km’s reconstruction of existing pavement by remove the old bitumen seal and ripping and relaying the existing base; with the inclusion of 200mm of crush road base material to provide additional pavement strength. There is a small segment of road realignment to be considered so that new road is away from silo entrances and neighbouring houses. Entrance from Randell Road and the silo’s to be widened and asphalt sealed to increase performance in bitumen seal.
Stage 1 Wachtel Rd to near The Pines Rd (8km) Completed Stage 2 Randell Rd to Wachtel Rd (2.1km) 16/17 Financial Year Stage 3 near The Pines Rd Angas Valley Rd(2.1km)17/18 Financial Year See Map 1 for segment locations. The proposal overall is to widen the road pavement to 7.2m wide by
shoulder widening 8kms of road pavement and reconstruct 4.2km of road
Stage 1, consists of 8 km’s of shoulder widening and resurfacing. Currently the existing seal pavement varies from 6.2 to 6.4 in width where the sealed pavement would be widened to 7.2m to cater to suit B-double traffic. Works will also include the installation of new safety barrier on the Milendella Bridge, as the existing railing is inadequate. The proposal is to shoulder widen and reconstruct 12.2km of sealed carriageway along Milendella Road. The works will be programmed over a 3 year period; with completion of works in the 2018/19 financial year.
Stage 1 Wachtel Rd to near The Pines Rd (8km) 15/16 Financial Year Stage 2 Randell Rd to Wachtel Rd (2.1km) 16/17 Financial Year Stage 3 near The Pines Rd Angas Valley Rd(2.1km)17/18 Financial Year See Map 1 for segment locations.
Appendix F Detailed Submissions Renmark Paringa Council
SLRP-03
ECM 584209 Page 1 of 9
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PA NEL
STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2014-15
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA M&MLGA
Council Name Renmark Paringa
Road Name Government Road
Timeframe 2015-2018
2014-15 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) $600,000
Length of Road (Km) 9.1 klm
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
77% N/A
Amount Sought ($) $400,000
Council Contribution ($) $200,000
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Resealing works as identified in Councils Sealed Road Asset Management Plan. Approximately 40,000 M2 is scheduled to be resealed within the next 5 years. Widening 2.6 klm of shoulders to 2.4 mts and sealing x 1 mts, is also being considered (dependent on funding) Existing shoulders vary in width but average around 1.5 metres
2(b). PROJECT SUITABILITY CHECKLIST FOR LGTAP CONSIDERATION
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA M&MLGA
Council Name Renmark Paringa
Road Name Murtho Road Paringa
Sturt Highway to Beherendt Road
Timeframe 2015-2018
2014-15 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) 400,000
Length of Road (Km) 12klm 9 km to seal
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
50%
Amount Sought ($) $200,000
Council Contribution ($) $200,000
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Resealing works as identified in Councils Sealed Road Asset Management Plan. Approximately 9.5km is scheduled to be resealed within the next 5 years. As identified in SRAMP. This section of Murtho Road is a locally important Freight Route, as identified in the M&MLGA 2030 RTP.
2(b). PROJECT SUITABILITY CHECKLIST FOR LGTAP CONSIDERATION
1. If not covered in section 2(a) on the previous page, please outline justification and objectives of the project, including a description of the functions of the road and any existing problems.
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA M&MLGA
Council Name Renmark Paringa
Road Name Murtho Road Paringa
Beherendt Road to Wilkinson Road
Timeframe 2015-2018
2014-15 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) 120,000
Length of Road (Km) 3.5lkm 2 km to seal
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
20%
Amount Sought ($) $100,000
Council Contribution ($) $20,000
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Resealing works as identified in Councils Sealed Road Asset Management Plan. Approximately 14000 M2 is scheduled to be resealed within the next 5 years. As identified in SRAMP.
2(b). PROJECT SUITABILITY CHECKLIST FOR LGTAP CONSIDERATION
1. If not covered in section 2(a) on the previous page, please outline justification and objectives of the project, including a description of the functions of the road and any existing problems.
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA M&MLGA
Council Name Renmark Paringa
Road Name Murtho Road Paringa
Wilkinson Road to Customs House
Timeframe 2015-2018
2014-15 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) 400,000
Length of Road (Km) 15 klm 10.5 km to seal
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
50%
Amount Sought ($) $200,000
Council Contribution ($) $200,000
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Resealing works as identified in Councils Sealed Road Asset Management Plan. Approximately 73,000 M2 is scheduled to be resealed within the next 5 years. As identified in SRAMP.
2(b). PROJECT SUITABILITY CHECKLIST FOR LGTAP CONSIDERATION
1. If not covered in section 2(a) on the previous page, please outline justification and objectives of the project, including a description of the functions of the road and any existing problems.
Appendix G Detailed Submissions Southern Mallee District Council
SLRP-03
ECM 584209 Page 1 of 13
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT ADVISORY PANEL
STANDARD FUNDING APPLICATION
SPECIAL LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM 2014-15
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA Murray and Mallee Region
Council Name Southern Mallee District Council
Road Name Geranium South Road
Timeframe 3 years
2014-15 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) 1,900,000
Length of Road (Km) 10.6 km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
N/A
Amount Sought ($)
Council Contribution ($)
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Reconstruction and sealing 10.6 Kilometres of Geranium South Road from the end of the existing seal 5km south of Geranium to the intersection of Pfeiffer and Tauragetwell Roads.
This will compliment construction currently being undertaken by Coorong
District Council to form a sealed road connecting Geranium to Coonalpyn The proposed construction will consist of new pavement incorporating a
crushed rock base coarse and a two coat bitumen spray seal to a width of 8 meters with 1 metre unsealed shoulder
Upgrading of the intersection of Geranium South Road with Pfeiffer and
Tauraget Well Road will also form part of the works
(Please complete this form using the GUIDELINES attached and also available
at www.lga.sa.gov.au/goto/lgtap)
1. PROJECT SUMMARY (please complete all details in this box)
Regional LGA Murray and Mallee Region
Council Name Southern Mallee District Council
Road Name Tauraget Well Road
Timeframe 1 year
2014-15 Application
Project Total
Estimated Cost ($) 875,000
Length of Road (Km) 4.5 km
% Gap Closed (Refer to Section 4 of Guidelines)
N/A
Amount Sought ($)
Council Contribution ($)
2(a). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN
Reconstruction and sealing 4.5 Kilometres of Tauraget Well Road from the intersection of Pfeiffer and Geranium South Roads to the Council boundary. This will compliment construction currently being undertaken by Coorong District Council to form a sealed road connecting Geranium to Coonalpyn
The proposed construction will consist of new pavement incorporating a
crushed rock base coarse and a two coat bitumen spray seal to a width of 8 meters with 1 metre unsealed shoulder
MMC Purnong Road Long Gully Road to 100 km/h sign Community Access 69 12 R6 C1 $76,400
BBC Battams Road Old Sturt Highway to Accolade Wines Entrance Freight 61 23 HVSPP
CDC Granites Road Webb Street to northern Viterra entrance Freight 60 24 R7 F5 $165,000
BBC Katapapko Crescent Plush Road to Grid Tourism 53 26 R8 T2 $65,000
$2,249,100
Sort in Descending Order using Data / Sort by Column "H", then by Column "F"
Note - The following recommended "2015 Regional Priorities", sorted both by "Primary Purpose" and "Overall", are based upon all road segments submitted for consideration with "2015-16+" council priority (being a subset of
road segments listed in the 2015 Roads Database), sub-grouped by the likelihood of funding within their individual purpose categories, then re-grouped for an overall ranking.
Council Name: Berri Barmera Council Berri Barmera Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council
Primary Purpose:Freight Tourism Freight Freight Community Access Community Access Freight Tourism Tourism Tourism Tourism Community Access Community Access Community Access Freight Freight
Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Southern Mallee District
Council
Southern Mallee District
Council
Cypress Terrace Hindmarsh Road Maurice Road Maurice Road Pallamana Road Government Road Murtho Road Murtho Road Murtho Road Geranium South Road Tauraget Well Road
Council Name: Berri Barmera Council Berri Barmera Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council
Primary Purpose:Freight Tourism Freight Freight Community Access Community Access Freight Tourism Tourism Tourism Tourism Community Access Community Access Community Access Freight Freight
Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Southern Mallee District
Council
Southern Mallee District
Council
Cypress Terrace Hindmarsh Road Maurice Road Maurice Road Schenscher Road Government Road Murtho Road Murtho Road Murtho Road Geranium South Road Tauraget Well Road
ANALYSIS OF WEIGHTED BENEFIT (WB) AND WEIGHTED BENEFIT/COST SCORE (WBC) - REVISED ASSESSMENT
Council Name: Berri Barmera Council Berri Barmera Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Coorong District Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council Mid Murray Council
Primary Purpose:Freight Tourism Freight Freight Community Access Community Access Freight Tourism Tourism Tourism Tourism Community Access Community Access Community Access Freight Freight
(Based on Guidelines developed through the Roads Infrastructure Database Project, for application for Special Local Roads Funding)
Benefit Influencing Factor
1. Continuing project.
2. Tourism / community access weighting
adjustment.
3. Cross-regional linkage route.
4. Significance of road to the region.
Modified: 10/6/15
M&MLGA SLRP DATABASE 2015 - STAGE 2 ASSESSMENT
ANALYSIS OF WEIGHTED BENEFIT (WB) AND WEIGHTED BENEFIT/COST SCORE (WBC) - REVISED ASSESSMENT
Council Name:
Road Name:
Segment:
Primary Purpose:
Specific Criteria Maximum Score
5
5
5
5
10
STAGE 2 SCORE 30
COMBINED STAGE 1 AND 2 ASSESSMENT 130
PRIORITY RANKING BY COMBINED ASSESSMENT
5. Project cost & economic analysis.
(Based on Guidelines developed through the Roads Infrastructure Database Project, for application for Special Local Roads Funding)
Benefit Influencing Factor
1. Continuing project.
2. Tourism / community access weighting
adjustment.
3. Cross-regional linkage route.
4. Significance of road to the region.
Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Rural City of Murray Bridge Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Renmark Paringa Council Southern Mallee District
Council
Southern Mallee District
Council
Cypress Terrace Hindmarsh Road Maurice Road Maurice Road Schenscher Road Government Road Murtho Road Murtho Road Murtho Road Geranium South Road Tauraget Well Road