Top Banner
Hawthorne Experiments b Elton Mayo P.ROHITH KRISHNASAI 161433 Pgdmtopics.blogsp ot.in
15

Hawthorne experiments

Jan 09, 2017

Download

Education

VJIMPGDM
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Hawthorne experiments

Hawthorne Experiments by Elton Mayo

P.ROHITH KRISHNASAI161433

Pgdmtopics.blogspot.in

Page 2: Hawthorne experiments

Who is Elton Mayo?

Industrial Researcher Psychologist and Sociologist

12/26/1880 – 9/7/1949

Active Australian Psychologist

Page 3: Hawthorne experiments

Mayo's Contribution….

Human Relations Movement

The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization (1933)

Training Within Industry Supervisor Training

Page 4: Hawthorne experiments

Hawthorne Experiments…?

Page 5: Hawthorne experiments

The experiments conducted in four parts Illumination StudiesRelay Assembly Test

Experiments Mass Interview Program Bank Wiring Observation Group

Page 6: Hawthorne experiments

Illumination Studies 1924-1927 Funded by General Electric

Conducted by The National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences with engineers from MIT

Measured Light Intensity vs. Worker Output

Result : Higher worker productivity and satisfaction at all light levels

Conclusions: Light intensity has no conclusive effect on output

Concept of “Hawthorne Effect” was created

Page 7: Hawthorne experiments
Page 8: Hawthorne experiments
Page 9: Hawthorne experiments

Relay Assembly Test Experiments 1927-1929

Manipulated factors of production to measure effect on output:

Pay Incentives

Length of Work Day & Work Week

Use of Rest Periods

Company Sponsored Meals

Results: Higher output and greater employee satisfaction

Conclusions: Positive effects – workers’ output will increase as a response to attention

Strong social bonds were created within the test group. Workers are influenced by need for recognition, security and sense of belonging

Page 10: Hawthorne experiments

Relay Assembly Room #2Relay Assembly Room #2

• 1928-1929• Measured effect on output with compensation rates

• Special observation room• 1st Session- Relay Assemblers changed from departmental

incentive to small group incentive• 2nd Session - Adjusted back to large group incentive

Page 11: Hawthorne experiments
Page 12: Hawthorne experiments

Mica Splitting Test Group 1928-1931 Measured output with changes to work conditions only:

Special Observation Room Length of Work Day Use of Rest Periods Workers stayed on established Piece-rate compensation

Result: Productivity increased by 15% over standard output base

Conclusions: Productivity is affected by non-pay considerations Social dynamics are a basis of worker performance

Page 13: Hawthorne experiments

Plant Interview Program

1925-1927 – Objective Questions Work Conditions Work Relationships Yes/No Answers

1928-1932 – Conversational / Non-directive Attentive Sympathetic Listening Concern for personal needs Increased in time from 30-90 minutes

Page 14: Hawthorne experiments

Bank Wiring Observation Group

• 1931-1932• Limited changes to work conditions

• Segregated work area• No Management Visits• Supervision would remain the same• Observer would record data only – no interaction with

workers Result:

• No appreciable changes in output

Page 15: Hawthorne experiments

THANK YOU..!