Harrisonburg City Public Schools FY2016 School Board Approved Operational and School Nutrition Budgets April 14 th , 2015 Presented by Scott Kizner, Ph.D. Investing in the Future of Harrisonburg City Harrisonburg City Schools…A place where learning has no limits and together we work for the success of all.
37
Embed
Harrisonburg City Public Schools FY2016 School Board Approved Operational and School Nutrition Budgets April 14 th, 2015 Presented by Scott Kizner, Ph.D.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Harrisonburg City Public Schools
FY2016 School Board Approved Operational and School Nutrition Budgets
April 14th, 2015
Presented by Scott Kizner, Ph.D.
Investing in the Future of Harrisonburg City
Harrisonburg City Schools…A place where learning has no limits and together we work for the success of all.
LEARNING We believe learning is the heart and soul of what we do and that all students will learn.
EQUITY We believe each and every student has gifts and talents that will be recognized, valued, nurtured, and celebrated.
EXCELLENCE We believe in setting high expectations for students and adults in attitude, behavior, progress, and achievement.
TOGETHER We believe in meaningful collaboration with each other, parents, students, and the community.
FORWARD We believe in continuous improvement through innovation, taking risks, solving problems, and a sense of humor.
Our Budget is Aligned with Our Mission and Core Beliefs
2
3
Budget Goals Goal 1
• Promote outstanding achievement, high standards and expectations for learning
Goal 2• Promote the best practices to recruit, retain and engage our
workforceGoal 3
• Promote the involvement and enhance the professional development for all staff
Goal 4• Promote student personal growth so that each can become a
responsible contributing citizenGoal 5
• Promote community support and involvement in the schoolsGoal 6
• Promote organizational efficiency and protection of assets
4
• Equity and excellence drives our daily decisions
• Budget is flexible to meet unanticipated or new priority needs
• High expectations for learning and investing in personnel are essential for continuous improvement
• Not everything can be funded and not everything can be funded at current levels
• New needs require us to “abandon” some past priorities
• Our enrollment continues to increase (2-4%)
• Diverse needs of our students are a driving budget focus
Key Points
5
• Greatest AMO gains are expected for English Language Learners (ELL), Economically Disadvantaged and Students with Disabilities
• Harrisonburg City Public Schools ELL and Economically Disadvantaged student population is significantly higher than the state average• ELL State Average = 10.07%; ELL HCPS average = 34.16%• F/R Lunch State Average = 40.04%; F/R Lunch HCPS average = 71.12%
• College and Career Readiness is an expectation for ALL students
• The “Whole Child” is our focus
Key Points
Free/Reduced Lunch Program Participation(includes Pre-K)
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
58.38%62.62% 65.43%
68.45% 68.99% 71.66% 71.12%
6
7
• Teachers and staff receiving state and national awards
• On-time graduation has improved to above the state requirement
• Harrisonburg High School listed as one of the best high schools for advanced placement instruction and results
• Harrisonburg High School ranked 26 out of the best high schools in Virginia according to Niche Rankings
• Winner of the Wells Fargo Scholastic Cup four years in a row
• Expansion of STEM instruction and fine arts academies
Accomplishments
8
• Expansion of college and university partnerships
• Continuation of Blue Ridge Scholars Degree program
• Expansion of dual language programs
• Career experience program implemented at HHS
• Expansion of CTE HS courses including Teach for Tomorrow
• Parent and community learning workshops
• Expansion and upgrades of instructional technology• So many more….
Accomplishments
9
• Growth and facility limitations• Accelerated AMO requirements• “Newcomer” eligible students have increased significantly• Prepare students for k school readiness• Meeting the social and emotional needs of our students• Older students entering our schools with no or very few credits• Attracting and retaining exceptional staff to meet the diverse needs
of our students• Health insurance and VRS increases• Funding revenue uncertainties• New mandates and laws
Total K-12 5,371 5,568 5,774 5,993 6,106 6,248 877
Demographics Research Group - University of Virginia - www.coopercenter.org/demographics - 434.982.5698
112002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 20160
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Short Term Trends ProjectionMedium Term Trends ProjectionLong Term Trends ProjectionEnrollment
Class Size Reduction Requirements
Qualifying School Percentage of Students
Approved for Free Lunch
Required Grades K-3 Schoolwide Ratio
Required Maximum Individual Class Size
30% but less than 45% 19 to 1 24
45% but less than 55% 18 to 1 23
55% but less than 65% 17 to 1 22
65% but less than 70% 16 to 1 21
70% but less than 75% 15 to 1 20
75% or more 14 to 1 19
Source: Item 132 C. 10. d. of Chapter 874, 2010 Acts of Assembly.
12
13
• Expansion Middle School AVID programs• Expansion of elementary dual immersion programs• Middle School dual language program• Expansion of instructional technology programs• Expansion of digital reading program at Spotswood • Community partnerships for after school programming• Development of a comprehensive high school apprenticeship,
internship, and mentoring program• Creating additional leadership experiences for staff• University and Foundation support for professional
development
New Opportunities for 2015-2016
14
• Budgeted ADM for FY16 is 5,400. • VA DOE currently funding on 9/30/14 adjusted
ADM of 5,255 (current budget built on 5115 ADM) • Assumes 2% salary increases for all employees and
an additional 1% increase for instructional assistants $767,520
• Additional payroll taxes and VRS contributions associated with proposed salary increase $154,407
• State revenues are based on the General Assembly Amendments to the Governor’s budget on 2/26/15
• Revenues reflect a $2,161,540 increase in State revenues based on increased ADM
Budget Notes
15
• Assumes 12% health insurance increase of $690,689. • Assumes health design changes to employer
contributions for health insurance premiums: $77,000• Salary/benefit adjustment of $240,000 to cover costs
for employees who have been hired to meet student growth and enrollment needs
• Assumes a .44% reduction in VRS contributions for professional staff members totaling ($22,004)
• Original new non-personnel requests totaled $2,374,575
• Assumes an addition of $1,090,812 in non-personal funds
Budget Notes
16
• Original new personnel requests totaled $2,227,860 for 41 new FTE and extended contracts
• Assumes an increase of 12 new positions ($693,369) and reduction of 5 current staff ($165,261) for a net total of 7 new positions totaling $528,108.
Budget Notes
17
Health Insurance Plan ChangesOption 3-Hired on or After July 1, 2015
Total Cost% Cost for Employer Cost for Employee Employer Cost
Employee Only $511.97 90% $51.20 $460.77Employee & One Minor $749.35 68% $237.37 $511.98Employee & Children $1,068.77 65% $374.07 $694.70Empoyee & Spouse $1,122.37 62% $426.50 $695.87
Family $1,578.04 56% $694.34 $883.70
Option 1-Hired on or After July 1, 2012
Total Cost% Cost for Employer Cost for Employee Employer Cost
Employee Only $511.97 100% $0.00 $511.97Employee & One Minor $749.35 68% $237.37 $511.97Employee & Children $1,068.77 48% $556.80 $511.97Empoyee & Spouse $1,122.37 46% $610.40 $511.97
Family $1,578.04 32% $1,066.06 $511.97
Option 2-Hired prior to July 1, 2012
Total Cost% Cost for Employer Cost for Employee Employer Cost
Employee Only $511.97 70% $153.59 $358.38Employee & One Minor $749.35 70% $224.81 $524.55Employee & Children $1,068.77 70% $320.63 $748.14Empoyee & Spouse $1,122.37 70% $336.71 $785.66
Family $1,578.04 70% $473.41 $1,104.63
18
• Assumes an additional $1,166,992 in the City appropriation.
• Assumes an additional $198,000 in local recovered costs from E-Rate reimbursement.
• The budget development process compares expenditures and revenues to the approved 2014-2015 budget, which does not include supplemental appropriations.
Budget Notes
19
• Health insurance increase 690,689• Health insurance plan adjustment 77,000• Salary/benefit adjustments 240,000• 2% salary increase 747,735• Additional 1% salary increase for TA’s 19,785• Increased VRS and FICA 154,407• New positions (12) 693,369• Personnel reductions/savings (5 positions) (165,261)• Less employer contribution to VRS (22,004)• Non-personnel requests 1,090,812
Includes GF, lottery profits, miscellaneous NGF, and state appropriated federal stimulus fundsSource: http://www.doe.virginia.gov/school_finance/budget/calc_tools/index.shtml
30
Inflation-Adjusted State Per Pupil K-12 Funding Indicates Even Larger Declines in State Aid(2007 $ -- All State Appropriated Funds)