Hadronic Work Plan 2009. 2 Outline list of high priority deliverables and tentative assignments list of other main tasks and assignments milestones and.

Hadronic Work Plan 2009

2

Outline

• list of high priority deliverables and tentative assignments

• list of other main tasks and assignments

• milestones and responsibles for 2009

• milestones for 2010-2012

3

High-priority Deliverables

• study and repair of problems which disrupt smooth simulated calorimeter energy response

• identify reasons for differences in shower shape lengths and widths between Geant4 simulation and test beam data from ATLAS, CMS

• complete validation suite for all energy regions

• regular validation of hadronic models against thin target and full-setup data

4

Smooth Energy Response (1)

• main tasks:

– study of distribution-matching between cascade and string models

• V. Uzhinsky

• M. Kossov

• G. Folger

• A. Ribon

• V. Ivantchenko

• D. Wright

– review of internal cross sections in string and cascade models

• A. Heikkinen (Bertini)

• V. Grichine (string models)

5

Smooth Energy Response (2)

• potential additional tasks (could evolve with time):

– develop/test re-interaction of particles from string models (Binary cascade)

• G. Folger

• V. Uzhinsky

– theoretical or parameterized method for smoothly turning off the Bertini cascade in the range 5 – 15 GeV

• D. Wright

• S. Banerjee

6

Smooth Energy Response (3)

• required resources:

– expertise in QGS, FTF, Bertini, Binary models

– 2.5 FTE-years:• Required

– 1.0 distribution matching– 0.5 cross section review

• Potential additional– 0.5 re-interaction of particles– 0.5 Bertini high energy cut-off

7

Shower Composition and Shape (1)

• main tasks:

– study and improve pion production, especially pi0

• A. Ribon

• S. Banerjee

• D. Elvira

• J. Yarba

• D. Wright

– improve diffraction in proton-nucleus collisions (both in QGS and FTF)

• V. Uzhinsky

8

Shower Composition and Shape (2) • potential additional tasks:

– study neutron and charged particle capture (affects lateral shape)

• G. Folger

• T. Koi

– develop alternative to replace LEP/Gheisha neutron transport model

• G. Folger

• T. Koi

• D. Wright

– study and improve precompound and nuclear physics, especially for protons below 200 MeV

• J-M. Quesada

• A. Howard

• V. Ivantchenko

• T. Koi (GEM)

9

Shower Composition and Shape (3)

• required resources:

– expertise in low energy neutron propagation, precompound/evaporation models and nuclear physics

– 2.25 FTE-years:

• 0.50 pion production study

• 0.50 proton diffraction (especially QGS)

• 0.25 neutron/charged particle capture study

• 0.75 development of improved neutron capture and transport model

• 0.25 precompound/evaporation, nuclear physics study

10

Completion of Hadronic Validation Suites (1)

• main tasks:

– complete medium energy suite with metrics and automation• J. Yarba

• S. Banerjee

• D. Elvira

– high energy validation suite• G. Folger

• M. Kossov

• help from FNAL ?

– heavy ion validation and suite development• T. Koi

• P. Cirrone, F. Romano, G. Cuttone

– stopping particle• ?

11

Completion of Hadronic Validation Suites (2)

• required resources:

– 2.00 FTE-years:

• 0.50 medium energy suite completion (automation)

• 0.75 development of high energy suite

• 0.25 development of stopping particle suite

• 0.50 development of heavy ion validation suite

12

Benchmarks

• main tasks:

– IAEA spallation benchmarks

• V. Ivantchenko

• A. Ivantchenko

• help from J-M. Quesada, D. Wright

– Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop

• G. Folger, D. Wright, T. Koi, V. Ivantchenko, A. Ivantchenko

– Cross-code comparisons with FLUKA for ion-ion

• F. Romano, G. Cuttone, P. Cirrone

13

Regular Hadronic Validation (1)

• main tasks:

– run all validation suites for each release

• V. Ivantchenko

• A. Ivantchenko

• J. Yarba

• T. Koi

• F. Romano

• P. Cirrone

• G. Folger

14

Regular Hadronic Validation (2)

• required resources (continuing):

– 0.75 FTE:

• 0.15 test30, test35, test45 validations

• 0.15 medium energy validation

• 0.15 high energy validation

• 0.15 stopping particle validation

• 0.15 heavy ion validation

15

Other Main Hadronic Tasks (1)

• New models – nucleus-nucleus collision models

• V. Uzhinsky (FTF)

• M. Kossov (CHIPS)

• V. Grichine (Glauber and elastic scattering implementation)

• P. Truscott (complete Glauber databases, complete DPMJET-3 interface

– full release of QMD, improvements and testing• T. Koi

– alternative to high precision neutron model, based on ENDL• T. Koi

– improve and validate charge exchange process• V. Ivantchenko, F. Jones

– INCL/ABLA upgrades (INCL5, new interfaces)

• P. Kaitaniemi, A. Heikkinen, A. Boudard

16

Other Main Hadronic Tasks (2)

• New models – RPG

• S. Banerjee, J. Yarba, D. Elvira, D. Wright

– CHIPS refactoring and new applications• M. Kossov

• help from FNAL?

17

Other Main Hadronic Tasks (3)

• Testing– complete system tests

• D. Wright

• G. Folger

– unit tests• each person who is responsible for a model should develop tests (if not

already completed)

– energy/momentum developer tests• D. Wright

• Documentation– model descriptions and validity ranges

• D. Wright and all model developers/maintainers

Hadronic Milestones and Responsibles for 2009

18

19

Hadronics Milestones 2009 (1)

• Feb

– complete IAEA spallation benchmarks (V.I, A.I., J-M. Q.)

• Mar– complete latest validation against changes in Bertini cascade (J.Y.,

S.B., V.I., A.R.)

– INCL/ABLA physics list completed, validated (P.K.)

• May

– complete study of cascade turn-off in Bertini (D.W., S.B., J.Y., D.E., A.R.)

• Jun– medium energy validation suite completed (J.Y., S.B., D.E.)

– run automated validation for next release (J.Y., S.B., D.E.)

– carbon ion projectiles allowed in INCL (P.K.)

20

Hadronics Milestones 2009 (2)

• Aug

– ion-ion validation suite completed (T.K., P.C., F.R., G.C.)

– GEM model fixed and validated (T.K.)

– hadronic code clean-up (V.I., D.W.)

– study and implementation of code speed-up (Z**1/3, etc.) (V.I.)

– review of natural isotope class (V.I., T.K.)

• Sep– implementation of developer tests for energy/momentum

conservation in all hadronic models (D.W.)

– upgrade of CHIPS C++ code quality (M.K., FNAL)

– extension of CHIPs to nucleus-nucleus (M.K.)

– validation of G4QMD (T.K.)

– binary cascade internal cross section review completed (V.G.)

21

Hadronics Milestones 2009 (3)

• Oct

– completion of QGS model revision (V.U.)

– complete Glauber databases for DPMJET II.5, extend to AT, AP > 56 (P.T.)

– validation of ion-ion models against LNS-Catania data (up to 80 MeV/N (Catania group)

• Nov– Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop benchmarks completed

(G.F., V.I., A.R., D.W.)

– ENDL-based model for high precision neutrons implemented

– validate Glauber-type interactions for HE nucleus-nucleus (T.K.)

– INCL5 features ported to translated code (P.K., A.H., A.B.)

22

Hadronics Milestones 2009 (4)

• Dec

– high energy validation suite completed (G.F., V.I., A.R.)

– precompound model improvements completed (J-M.Q., A.H.)

– QGS internal cross section review completed (V.G.)

– INCL5 features ported to translated code (P.K., A.H., A.B.)

– complete validation against FLUKA ion-ion interactions for thin target up to 500 MeV/N (Catania group)

Hadronic Milestones for 2010-2012

23

24

Hadronics Milestones 2010-2012 (1)

• Jun 2010

– SATIF benchmarks completed

– testing and validation of Propagate interface in Binary cascade

– Bertini cascade turn-off implemented **

– regular benchmarking against MCNPX

• Dec 2010– distribution matching study complete **

– pion production study complete **

– neutron/charged particle stopping study complete

– proton diffraction implemented (QGS + FTF) **

• Jun 2011– stopping particle validation suite complete

– RPG model complete

25

Hadronics Milestones 2010-2012 (2)

• Dec 2011

– implementation of distribution matching algorithms **

– improved approximate neutron propagation and capture process

– Hadron Shower Simulation Workshop benchmarks

• Jun 2012– IAEA benchmarks

– development freeze for documentation month

• Dec 2012– very high energy (> TeV ) string model additions

– low energy ( < 50 MeV/n) nucleus-nucleus models

– SATIF benchmarks