Habitat selection models Habitat selection models to account for seasonal to account for seasonal persistence in radio persistence in radio telemetry data telemetry data Megan C. Dailey* Megan C. Dailey* Alix I. Gitelman Alix I. Gitelman Fred L. Ramsey Fred L. Ramsey Steve Starcevich Steve Starcevich * Department of Statistics, Colorado State * Department of Statistics, Colorado State University University Department of Statistics, Oregon State Department of Statistics, Oregon State University University Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife † ‡ † † ‡
35
Embed
Habitat selection models to account for seasonal persistence in radio telemetry data Megan C. Dailey* Alix I. Gitelman Fred L. Ramsey Steve Starcevich.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Habitat selection models to Habitat selection models to account for seasonal persistence account for seasonal persistence
in radio telemetry datain radio telemetry data
Megan C. Dailey*Megan C. Dailey*Alix I. GitelmanAlix I. GitelmanFred L. RamseyFred L. RamseySteve StarcevichSteve Starcevich
* Department of Statistics, Colorado State University* Department of Statistics, Colorado State UniversityDepartment of Statistics, Oregon State UniversityDepartment of Statistics, Oregon State University
Oregon Department of Fish and WildlifeOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
†
‡
†
†
‡
Westslope Cutthroat TroutWestslope Cutthroat Trout Year long radio-telemetry study (Year long radio-telemetry study (Steve Starcevich)Steve Starcevich)
• 2 headwater streams of the John Day River in eastern 2 headwater streams of the John Day River in eastern OregonOregon
• 26 trout were tracked ~ weekly from stream side26 trout were tracked ~ weekly from stream side Roberts CreekRoberts Creek F = 17F = 17 Rail CreekRail Creek F = 9F = 9
Habitat associationHabitat association Habitat inventory of entire creek once per seasonHabitat inventory of entire creek once per season
• Channel unit typeChannel unit type• Structural association of poolsStructural association of pools• Total area of each habitat typeTotal area of each habitat type
For this analysis: For this analysis: • H = 3 habitat classesH = 3 habitat classes
1.1. In-stream-large-wood pool (ILW)In-stream-large-wood pool (ILW)
2.2. Other pool (OP)Other pool (OP)
3.3. Fast water (FW)Fast water (FW)
• Habitat availability = total area of habitat in creekHabitat availability = total area of habitat in creek
Goals of habitat analysisGoals of habitat analysis IncorporateIncorporate
– multiple seasonsmultiple seasons– multiple streamsmultiple streams– Other covariatesOther covariates
Investigate “Use vs. Availability”Investigate “Use vs. Availability”
Radio telemetry dataRadio telemetry data Sequences of observed habitat useSequences of observed habitat use
SUMMERWINTER SPRING
FISH 2
FISH 1
Habitat 1 Habitat 3Habitat 2 missing
2,2,1,3,3,3,3,3,1,1,3,3,1,1,3,3,3,0winter,2 sfX
2,2,3,3,3,3,1,3,3,1,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3winter,1 sfX
Independent Multinomial Selections Independent Multinomial Selections Model (IMS)Model (IMS)
One parameter extension of the IMS model to One parameter extension of the IMS model to relax assumption of independent sightingsrelax assumption of independent sightings
H-state Markov chain H-state Markov chain (H = # of habitat types)(H = # of habitat types)
ihf = indicator for initial sighting habitat= number of stays in habitat h ;ihhv
Bayesian extensions
I.I. Reformulation of the original non-seasonal Reformulation of the original non-seasonal persistence model into Bayesian framework:persistence model into Bayesian framework:
Estimated persistence parameters:Estimated persistence parameters:Rail CreekRail Creek
s
ss
s
),( sh
),( shs
),( hs
Estimated habitat selection probabilities:Estimated habitat selection probabilities:Roberts CreekRoberts Creek
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Seasonal Persistence
HSP
In-Stream-Large-Wood
( ) WINTER
( ) SPRING
( ) SUMMER
Other Pools
( ) WINTER
( ) SPRING
( ) SUMMER
Fast Water
( ) WINTER
( ) SPRING
( ) SUMMER
),( shs
),( hs
Non-seasonal Persistence
SPR/AR
0 10 20 30 40 50
In-Stream-Large-Wood
( ) WINTER
( ) SPRING
( ) SUMMER
Other Pools
( ) WINTER
( ) SPRING
( ) SUMMER
Fast Water
WINTER
SPRING
SUMMER
Seasonal Persistence
SPR/AR
0 10 20 30 40 50
In-Stream-Large-Wood
( ) WINTER
( ) SPRING
( ) SUMMER
Other Pools
( ) WINTER
( ) SPRING
( ) SUMMER
Fast Water
WINTER
SPRING
SUMMER
Selection Probability Ratio/Area Ratio:Selection Probability Ratio/Area Ratio:Rail CreekRail Creek
s
ss
s
),( sh ),( shs
BIC comparisonBIC comparison
MODELMODEL PersistencePersistence HSPHSP BIC RobertsBIC Roberts BIC RailBIC Rail
II NS NS 742.6 482.2482.2
IIII NS seasonal 751.2 479.4479.4
IIIIII seasonal NS 711.6 ** 467.8 **467.8 **
IVIV seasonal seasonal 717.0 469.2469.2
),( sh ),( shs ),( hs
BIC = -2*log(likelihood) + p*log(n)
),( h
ConclusionsConclusions Relaxes assumption of independent sightingsRelaxes assumption of independent sightings
Biological meaningfulness of the persistence parameterBiological meaningfulness of the persistence parameter
Provides a single model for the estimation of seasonal Provides a single model for the estimation of seasonal persistence parameters and other estimates of interest persistence parameters and other estimates of interest (HSP, (SPR/Arat)), along with their respective uncertainty (HSP, (SPR/Arat)), along with their respective uncertainty intervalsintervals
Allows for seasonal comparisons and the incorporation of Allows for seasonal comparisons and the incorporation of multiple study areas (streams)multiple study areas (streams)
Allows for use of other covariates by changing the Allows for use of other covariates by changing the parameterization of the multinomial logitparameterization of the multinomial logit
Affiliations and fundingAffiliations and funding
FUNDING/DISCLAIMERThe work reported here was developed under the STAR Research Assistance Agreement CR-829095
awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado State University. This
presentation has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed here are solely those of the
authors and STARMAP, the Program they represent. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial
services mentioned in this presentation.
Megan’s research is also partially supported by the PRIMES National Science Foundation Grant DGE-