Top Banner
GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons M. Kavaya & G. Koch NASA/LaRC D. Emmitt & S. Wood SWA Lidar Working Group Meeting Sedona, AZ 27-29 January 2004
39

GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

nathaniel-brock

GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons. M. Kavaya & G. Koch NASA/LaRC D. Emmitt & S. Wood SWA Lidar Working Group Meeting Sedona, AZ 27-29 January 2004. Outline. NASA/LaRC’s Lidar Intercomparison Facility VALIDAR GWOLF VALIDAR intercomparisons Hard target experiments Cloud returns - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

M. Kavaya & G. KochNASA/LaRC

D. Emmitt & S. WoodSWA

Lidar Working Group MeetingSedona, AZ

27-29 January 2004

Page 2: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Outline

• NASA/LaRC’s Lidar Intercomparison Facility

• VALIDAR

• GWOLF– VALIDAR intercomparisons– Hard target experiments– Cloud returns– Vertical motion

Page 3: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Lidar Intercomparison Facility (LIF)at

NASA Langley Research Center

Page 4: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Lidar Intercomparison Facility

Features:

• Inside NASA grounds • Paved parking lot for up to 4 lidar systems• Row of surveyed marks on parking lot with 32-foot spacing• Row of 4 target lights on tall structure with 32-foot spacing• Surveyed positions of lidars and targets allows for parallel alignment among the lidars• Target lights at 677-m range, and 6° elevation angle• Target lights atop poles allowing atmospheric data collection while aimed at lights• Utilities available including telephone, intercom, internet, and electrical power

Page 5: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

VALIDAR & GWOLF at the Lidar Intercomparison Facility

LocationOf Target LightsBldg 1297R-B-Y-G

Page 6: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

View Of Lidars From The Target Lights’ Location

LocationOf LidarsBldg 1159

Page 7: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Lidar Intercomparison Facility

Possible Enhancements: • Lidar aim compensation for differing beam departure heights• Calibrated flat targets mounted on flat structure or at ground level for horizontal path• Calibrated velocity moving targets (> ? m/s)• Detectors near the target lights to confirm lidar aiming• Ancillary in situ and/or lidar sensors

Page 8: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Validar

Objectives:• Demonstrate advanced 2-m lidar components in a complete lidarsystem.• High-energy lasers, receiver optics, detectors, and electronics are being developed at LaRC from a variety of funding sources. Validarserves as a testbed for this development.• Make field measurements as required for validation.• FY ’04 Specifications are

- laser pulse energy = 100 mJ (78 mJ)- pulse repetition rate = 5 Hz (10 Hz)- pulse width = 150 ns- wavelength = 2053.5 nm

Page 9: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Lidar Specifications FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 (water cooled) (cond. cooled) (cond. cooled)

pulse energy 30 mJ 83 mJ (65 mJ) 100 mJ (78 mJ)

pulse rep. freq. 5 Hz 5 Hz (10 Hz) 5 Hz (10 Hz)

wavelength 2050.8 nm 2050.8 nm 2053.5 nm

pulse length 180 ns 150 ns 150 ns

spectrum single freq. single freq. single freq.

Page 10: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

VALIDAR Trailer

LidarSystem

DataAnalysis

&VisitorsRooms

Validation Lidar Facility

Page 11: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Validation Lidar (VALIDAR) Facility: • Well-instrumented 48 ft long Trailer

Hemispherical Scanner with 20 cm effective apertureElaborate Video System consisting of 2 sets of cameras,

monitors, and recorders Weather StationGPS Receiver

• Powerful state-of-the-art Coherent Doppler Lidar50-150 mJ, 5-10 Hz, Diode-pumped Transmitters10 cm COTS and 25 cm SPARCLE Telescopes

• Real-time data processor and display

Validation Lidar Facility

Page 12: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

GWOLF(Groundbased Wind Observing Lidar

Facility)• Funded by IPO as part of NPOESS

development of cal/val program for space based wind observing systems such as QuikScat, WindSat, CMV, WVMV and future DWLs

• Currently the TODWL system mounted in a trailer; plan to replace TODWL scanner with a roof mounted hemispherical scanner.

Page 13: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 14: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 15: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Validar/GWOLF Comparisons

• Performed at LaRC’s LIF

• Horizontal and vertical stares

• 200m resolution for Validar

• 1 minute averaging

Page 16: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 17: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 18: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 19: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

GWOLF hard target and threading

• Performed at LaRC’s LIF

• Using corrugated metal enclosed elevator shaft at 677 meters from lidar as hard target

• 100 meter range gates

• 5 peak threading

Page 20: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 21: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 22: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 23: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 24: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 25: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 26: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 27: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Cloud returns

• Performed at LaRC’s LIF

• Objective is to understand how to process and interpret GWOLF returns from cloud boundaries (large ~ 15 -20 dB backscatter gradients)

Page 28: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 29: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 30: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 31: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Vertical velocity from VADs

• Performed at LaRC’s LIF

• Question is “ How accurate and reliable is the estimate of the vertical velocity using the offset in the sine fit of a partial VAD”

• Interweaved a 25 second vertical stare into a 7 point partial VAD.

Page 32: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 33: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Summary

• The LaRC’s Lidar Intercomparison Facility enables long term, iterative evaluation of specific lidar performance issues.– Cloud boundary returns, hard target (ground

surrogate) returns, instrument stability and low SNR signal processing investigations

• Plan is to bring direct detection systems to LaRC for detailed investigations of both individual as well as hybrid wind sensing issues.

Page 34: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Clouds

• Backscatter values based upon backscatter data at wavelengths other than 2 microns

• Modeled to 2 microns (rather wavelength independent)

• Cirrus (0 to -37 C): 7.0 E-5 m-1sr-1

• Warm, opaque: 1.8 E-5 m-1sr-1

Page 35: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Per hard target calibration

Per current theory

TODWL 03

Page 36: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Cirrus at 5800 m agl

Page 37: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons

Lidar Design

telescopeλ/4

dual-balancedInGaAsphotodiodes

50/50 Coupler

Atmospheric Return

Outgoing pulse

Local Oscillatoracousto-opticmodulator

isolator

isolatorisolator

resonancedetector

Q-switch

Ho:Tm:YLFPZT

λ/2

λ/2

λ/2

λ/2

telescopeλ/4

dual-balancedInGaAsphotodiodes

50/50 Coupler

Atmospheric Return

Outgoing pulse

Local Oscillator

Atmospheric Return

Outgoing pulse

Local Oscillatoracousto-opticmodulator

isolator

isolatorisolator

resonancedetector

Q-switch

Ho:Tm:YLFPZT

λ/2

λ/2

λ/2

λ/2

Page 38: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons
Page 39: GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons