Guyana 2013 PSAR January 2014 This Guyana Private Sector Assessment Report (GY-PSAR) presents an overall assessment of private sector development (PSD) and recommendations for facilitating and accelerating private investment and growth. This report includes a summary of the main characteristics and issues as it relates to private sector development, selection of priorities, a section on monitoring and evaluation of PSD initiatives, and finally a section with recommendations for interventions and also for filling in data gaps. The report includes one annex with the Guyana Donor Matrix (GY- DMX). I want to thank the support, comments and suggestions of Mark Wenner, Tara Lisa Persaud, Sylvia Dohnert, Musheer Kamau and Sophie Makonnen. I want to thank all the people that were interviewed in Georgetown that provided data, analysis and anecdotes and experiences that have been incorporated into this report. 2013 Carlos Elias Ph.D.
93
Embed
Guyana 2013 PSAR€¦ · Guyana Private Sector Assessment Report Table of Contents 1) ... and organized in Guyana, in part due to the country’s large needs, and in part due to a
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Guyana 2013 PSAR
January 2014 This Guyana Private Sector Assessment Report (GY-PSAR) presents an
overall assessment of private sector development (PSD) and recommendations for facilitating and accelerating private investment and growth. This report includes a summary of the main characteristics and
issues as it relates to private sector development, selection of priorities, a section on monitoring and evaluation of PSD initiatives, and finally a
section with recommendations for interventions and also for filling in data gaps. The report includes one annex with the Guyana Donor Matrix (GY-DMX).
I want to thank the support, comments and suggestions of Mark Wenner,
Tara Lisa Persaud, Sylvia Dohnert, Musheer Kamau and Sophie Makonnen. I want to thank all the people that were interviewed in Georgetown that
provided data, analysis and anecdotes and experiences that have been incorporated into this report.
a) Goal of PSD in the country and current programs............................................................... 4
b) Overview of the economy .................................................................................................... 6 i. The domestic economy..................................................................................................... 6
ii. The international economy ............................................................................................. 10
iii. The productive structure ............................................................................................. 13
iv. The institutions ........................................................................................................... 16
c) State of the private sector................................................................................................... 17
d) Large and fast growing sectors in the economy................................................................. 20 e) Issues for private sector development ................................................................................ 22
i. Business supportive institutions structure ...................................................................... 22
ii. Donors and other international entities .......................................................................... 33
iii. Access to finance ........................................................................................................ 38
iv. Corporate taxation ...................................................................................................... 42
v. Business environment .................................................................................................... 44
vi. Technology and innovation ........................................................................................ 48
vii. Trade and FDI policies ............................................................................................... 48
viii. Labor regulation.......................................................................................................... 50
ix. Infrastructure, communications and energy ............................................................... 51
xi. Gender......................................................................................................................... 53
3) Chapter II: Selecting and prioritizing issues.......................................................................... 54
a) Opportunities for selective interventions to improve the business climate in Guyana ...... 55
b) Additional recommendations to accelerate private sector growth and development in Guyana....................................................................................................................................... 60
c) Action plan ......................................................................................................................... 62 4) Follow-up, monitoring and evaluation .................................................................................. 62
5) Chapter III: Conclusions and recommendations.................................................................... 63
Annex 1: Sources of information used in this report .................................................................... 65
Annex 3: Brief description of the National Competitiveness Strategy and the Low Carbon
Development Strategy................................................................................................................... 81
Guyana PSAR
3
1) Introduction
According to the PSAR guidelines the PSAR is: “a report meant to provide a comprehensive framework to identify market failures concerning the development of the private sector and
prioritize them in terms of their need for an urgent solution. These outcomes are the result of a process that involves the use of descriptive and analytical tools to assess the state of the private sector and the economy as a whole, as well as consulting with firms in strategic sectors of the
economy to prioritize issues. The PSAR can be decomposed in two big parts: first, it compiles and analyzes information from different sources in order to provide a snapshot of the state of the
private sector in the country, and second, it brings the information to relevant stakeholders – such as firms in the economy – to establish priorities on all the identified issues affecting further growth in the private sector.”1
According to the DMX guidelines the DMX is: “is a dynamic tool designed to improve
coordination among government, stakeholders and the donor community of PSD programs and projects in CARIFORUM countries. The DMX will identify PSD programs and projects,
including, among other, business climate reforms, macroeconomic support to governments, direct support to the private sector, and women in business initiatives and related gender mainstreaming efforts. As such it is a tool that will be used to identify, assess, and monitor PSD
programs and projects in individual CARIFORUM countries as well as sub regional programs and projects. The DMX is also meant to be used for the development of strategic partnerships,
to identify gaps and omissions, and to maximize the impact of projects through improved donor coordination.”2
The DMX guidelines note that: “The DMX and PSAR complement each other, with the DMX
providing information about past and present programs and projects in each country; and the PSAR identifying priority areas for Private Sector Development (PSD) interventions at the country or sub-regional level. The contrast between what is currently being supported by the
donor community identified in the DMX, and what should be supported identified in the PSAR, is an important input for the definition of PSD programs and projects, and for improved
coordination between government, stakeholders and the donor community.”
It is expected that donors, working together, would use this report to improve coordination and identification of larger, more comprehensive private sector projects and programs to accelerate growth across the region. Improved coordination would lead to increasing the development
impact of private sector development projects and programs while reducing transaction costs. These activities fall within larger donor coordination efforts to improve the quality and
effectiveness of development cooperation as reflected in the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness of 2005, the follow-up Accra Agenda for Action of 2008 and the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation recently agreed on by donors in November
2011.
1 Guide for Private Sector Assessment Report (PSAR) in the Caribbean Countries. Version 1.2. InterAmerican
Development Bank, 2011. 2 Donor Matrix Guidelines. Draft February 2012. InterAmerican Development Bank, 2012.
Guyana PSAR
4
The analysis presented in this report rests on two sources of information: primary data collected during a trip to Georgetown in October 2013 that served to identify actors and PSD programs as
well as the main bottlenecks for investment and growth; and secondary data and information available from multiple sources that are referenced throughout the document. An important
contribution from this report, in addition to fulfilling the purpose of the GY-PSAR, is to identify data and information gaps. The PSAR is a long document that provides large amounts of information and priorities, but it does not facilitate its use by decision makers. For this reason
the PSAR highlights are summarized in the Executive Summary document that complements this report.
Importantly, significant analysis and actions have been taken to facilitate the expansion of the
private sector of Guyana. From this perspective, Guyana leads the region in the preparation of development plans that would improve competitiveness and that provide a clear framework within which government supports the expansion of economic activity in the country. In 2006
government published a National Competitiveness Strategy (NCS) which would guide efforts to expand economic activity and diversify the economy. Since then this ambitious strategy has
been partially implemented and has delivered some important results. Complementing this formal effort to improve competitiveness in the country, government has also published the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) that provides clear direction for the country’s future
generation and use of energy, and for the preservation of Guyana’s environmental assets. These two strategies necessarily frame the analysis presented in this PSAR and are described in this
report.
The rest of this report presents a summary of the main characteristics and issues of the economy of Guyana as it relates to private sector development, the selection of priorities including those identified by the business community, a section on monitoring and evaluation of PSD initiatives,
and finally a section with recommendations for interventions and also for filling in data gaps. The report includes one annex with the GY-DMX.
2) Chapter I: Identifying market failures
This section presents the economic background for this report and concludes that the largest
challenge for the development of the private sector is to strengthen property rights of the two sectors that are the engines of growth of the economy: mining and agriculture. The section includes an overview of the private sector, which can be characterized by many micro, small and
medium sized companies active in primary, secondary and mostly tertiary economic activities.
a) Goal of PSD in the country and current programs
The PSAR emphasizes private sector constraints for growth in agriculture and mining, the engines of the economy; and focuses on business environment gaps, such as access to credit and the gap between supply and demand of skills in the market. Additional important issues
presented in this report include the large migration of trained Guyanese nationals, in health and education in particular, and the impact of availability of labor market skills on private sector
expansion. This report may be used to identify priority actions that may be funded either by Compete Caribbean, the IDB or other donors. Importantly, the donor community is very active
Guyana PSAR
5
and organized in Guyana, in part due to the country’s large needs, and in part due to a history of debt reduction and forgiveness that required extensive donor coordination and negotiations with
government. The Donor Matrix (DMX) included as an annex to this report maps out programs and projects designed primarily to strengthen private sector activities.
This PSAR highlights the special characteristics of economic growth in Guyana. Guyana’s
growth has been characterized as an enigma because of stable and long periods of constant growth, decline, or stagnation. Other countries in the region reflect growth volatility as a consequence of dependence on commodity exports, or on the swings of the tourism industry that
reflects the business cycles of industrialized countries, or related to macroeconomic mismanagement mostly linked to poorly designed and implemented fiscal and monetary policies.
Guyana shares these characteristics with countries in the region, but it that does not exhibit growth volatility, and instead shows long periods of strong and sustained growth, decline or stagnation. This is a serious problem as sustained economic stagnation and decline are highly
correlated with poverty, the development of institutions such as democracy and political stability, gender issues, environmental degradation and crime and violence.
Because the economy is small, Guyana’s growth performance is highly sensitive to single events
related to politics, large investments, exogenous shocks, or policy initiatives. In the context of a very small economy, a single positive or negative event is felt throughout the economy and
determines growth, decline or stagnation. The successful period from 1990 to 1997 indicates that positive events related to the privatization program offered relevant opportunities for investment that in turn resulted in sustained and high growth. Similarly, the political disruptions
of 1998 to 2001 introduced uncertainty throughout the economy, and as such, resulted in the prolonged stagnation period that ended in 2007. Since then, Guyana is again experiencing sustained and large economic growth, mostly linked to the extraordinary performance of
international prices of gold and other minerals, but also positive external environment for rice exports—large increases in prices of Guyana’s commodities result in significant investment by
small producers.
The private sector plays an important role in this process. Some actors in the private sector play a central role in economic performance, mining and agriculture, while others are limited to adapt
to the good or bad economic context, manufacturing and services. The leading private sector actors that determine overall economic performance, the leading sectors of the economy mining and agriculture, react to incentives provided by international prices and trade conditions. When
prices and conditions are good—which was the case in the last few years as international prices of gold and more generally other minerals, but also of agricultural commodities were good—then
the private sector invested and accelerated production for export markets, and the benefits of these activities spilled over to the rest of the economy resulting in increased aggregate demand. Manufacturing and ehe service sector, which directly reacts to aggregate demand, acted as an
economic buffer that expands or contracts based on how well the economy is doing.
Government plays a central role in this process as well. Directly through the impact of government spending on aggregate demand, especially by the impact of public investment. Past
successful efforts to reduce Guyana’s very large public sector debt have had an impact on economic performance. Guyana’s experience in debt restructuring and forgiveness includes
Guyana PSAR
6
Paris Club renegotiations, HIPC, enhanced HIPC, and the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative, of which the IDB share the largest burden, set the stage for a more stable macroeconomic
environment. Importantly, these actions from the international community and the government of Guyana also resulted in important reforms that, among other, increase social spending and
improve competitiveness. Recent actions and announcements from government indicate that it is committed to large investments in the near term—such as, among other, building a new Marriott hotel in Georgetown on which government already spent US$18 million, expanding the Cheddi
Jagan International Airport, and building the Amaila Falls Hydroelectric Power Plant. These investments add to the government program of the Public Sector Investment Program, with
heavy emphasis on education, health and transport, that directly fund economic activities and result in large and positive multipliers with impact on growth and employment. Importantly, government is also primarily responsible for maintaining a positive macroeconomic environment
measured by domestic and real price stability. Low inflation and maintaining a real exchange rate in equilibrium provide the appropriate incentive framework for economic expansion and
investment.
These positive factors and resulting good performance hide structural weaknesses of the Guyanese economy. These weaknesses are related to the small size of the economy, and its dependence on external factors mainly related to the demand for the few minerals and
agricultural products exported by Guyana. High concentration of exports on few raw commodities result in exposure to changes in international prices, as the prices come down, the
economy inevitably shrinks.
For this reason, it is widely acknowledge by all, government, private sector, and international donors, the need for deepening reforms that would result in the diversification of the economy, and in adding more value to Guyana’s exports. But this is not easy to do, as the experience from
many countries show. It takes time to set in motion processes that would modernize the economy. This PSAR is designed to identify priority short-term initiatives that would, over time,
modernize the economy. Successful continuation of the current good economic performance of Guyana may depend on carefully nurturing those sectors that explain success: agriculture and mining. Over time, and as a consequence of continuing the process to improve the business
climate, the economy would modernize and diversify.
b) Overview of the economy
i. The domestic economy
By 2013 Guyana had experienced over five years of positive growth resulting in nominal GDP
growth to an expected US$3,865 per capita in 2013 from US$2,507 in 2008—a 54% increase. Several factors played a role in the good performance of the country. Among the most relevant is the unusually high international prices of Guyana’s exports, especially gold. Figure 1 shows
on the vertical axis on the left annual terms of trade changes since 2008—the red line.3 For all the years since 2008 the terms of trade of Guyana have been positive, and in particular from
2008 to 2009 they experienced a 17% increase. The increase is related to overall changes in
3 Terms of trade measure the price of exports to the price of imports in the country. The terms of trade increase
when the prices of the country’s exports are increas ing, reflecting better conditions for the country and a generally
increase in welfare.
Guyana PSAR
7
prices of exports and imports, but in this case it was mostly related to large increases in the price of gold. Guyana benefited from a global trend in which, as a response to the international
financial global crisis, investors bought gold to preserve value of assets, away from financial assets and into real assets. Gold experienced an unprecedented period of price increases, from
US$871 in 2008, to US$972 in 2009, US$1,224 in 2010, US$1,569 in 2011 and US$1,669 in 2012.4 By October 2013 the price of gold is about US$1,311 per ounce, lower than in previous years but still high by historical standards. Although data available does not allow for the
estimation of the impact of investing in gold on overall economic performance, the Figure shows a high positive correlation between terms of trade and per capita GDP real growth, which is
presented in the blue line.
Figure 1: Guyana recent economic performance
Source: IMF Public Information Notice, No. 12/136, November 29, 2012
Improved terms of trade explains only part of the recent success of the Guyanese economy. In
addition, government over the last several years has been able to improve fiscal and monetary policies—see Table 1. These policies have provided stability to the economy, facilitating
investment and subsequent growth. More stable fiscal management and especially control of spending have stabilized total public sector debt, which was a recurrent problem of Guyana that required in the past several rounds of debt rescheduling and forgiveness by private, bilateral and
multilateral creditors. Overall public sector debt remains high at about 60% of GDP, but it is stable and in particular it is notable the reduction of domestic debt. Reducing public sector debt
from domestic sources opens space to the private sector for borrowing, but it also increases the exposure of Guyana to foreign currency. This is, however, an acceptable risk given the composition of external debt which is on concessional terms with long maturity periods. More
4 Annual average price of gold in US$. Source World Bank DataBank, Global Economic Monitor Commodities.
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013In
dex
of
term
s o
f tr
ad
e (2
00
7 =
10
0)
Rea
l GD
P p
er c
ap
ita
(%)
Real GDP per capita Terms of trade
Guyana PSAR
8
conservative fiscal policy, coordinated with monetary and exchange rate policy, has resulted in single digit inflation, as the table shows. Although high by regional standards, inflation is low
and does provide a stable price framework for private sector investment. Perhaps more importantly, the Bank of Guyana has been able to accumulate significant reserves, which stand at
over 3 months of imports.
Table 1: Main macroeconomic indicators of Guyana
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Inflation (p.a. %) 8.1 3 3.7 5 3 5.6
Public sector debt (% of GDP) 61.6 64.8 65.3 65.2 60.3 59.9
Gross Official Reserves (months of imports) 2.7 5.1 5.3 4.3 3.7 3.5
Source: IMF Public Information Notice, No. 12/136, November 29, 2012
The overall favorable conditions for the country are reflected in increased investments, which are
financed by national and foreign savings. Both the public and private sectors are investing heavily since 2010. The public sector is partially financing its investments with higher savings,
while private sector investments are being financed, as expected, by foreign savings. The large size of the balance of payments current account, foreign savings, are being fully funded by the capital account and as noted in the previous paragraph, the Bank of Guyana is accumulating
reserves to meet at a minimum 3 months of imports and government debt remains stationary at about 60% of GDP, both indicating that investments are not being funded by external debt—an
issue that created problems for Guyana in the past. Of high relevance to the analysis presented in the PSAR is to note the jump in private investment. According to anecdotal evidence, given the limited information about private sector issues in general, these investments are geared towards
the gold and rice sectors and to real estate—more about this issue in the following Section (iii).
Table 2: Guyana Savings and Investment Balance (% of GDP)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Investment 19.0 16.5 16.8 22.7 20.4 25.4
of which private 8.4 4.0 5.7 9.5 8.7 12.8
of which public 10.7 12.5 11.1 13.2 11.7 12.6
National savings 5.8 7.4 6.8 9.1 6.3 7.8
of which private 1.4 0.2 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.5
of which public 4.5 7.2 6.3 7.9 5.7 7.3
Foreign savings 13.2 9.1 9.9 13.6 14.0 17.6
Source: IMF Public Information Notice, No. 12/136, November 29, 2012
Guyana PSAR
9
Complementing the previous macroeconomic analysis, the PSAR presents a brief overview of fiscal accounts, and monetary and financial indicators—the external accounts are presented in
the following section (ii).
Table 3 shows the results from the central government since 2008 to the second quarter of 2011—the latest data provided by the Guyana Bureau of Statistics website. Important highlights
from the recent fiscal performance of the central government include: (i) government is not borrowing from the domestic financial sector, which as previously presented resulted in a large reduction of public domestic debt but more importantly does not crowd out private sector
borrowing; (ii) there is an upward trend related to government revenues, mostly related to better tax management for VAT collections; (iii) government savings are growing significantly, and it
is important to note the during the first two quarters of 2011 savings were almost four times higher than for the whole year in 2008; (iv) Guyana still depends heavily from external grants, although it appears that over time this source of funding is becoming less relevant; and
(v) Guyana’s public investment program relies heavily on project loans funded by external donors. As it relates to fiscal management, donors identify Guyana’s budget processes as one of
the strongest in the Caribbean—in fact according to many the country has the best budget preparation process in the Caribbean. In general, budgets are properly prepared and substantiated, and although execution and monitoring can be improved, budget preparation
provides a model for the region.5
Table 3: Guyana Central Government Finances (Guyana Dollars, million)
2011*= only the first two quarters of 2011. Importantly the figures for the overall fiscal result changed significantly
due to large spending commitments on salaries for the fourth quarter of the year.
Source: Guyana Bureau of Statistics, Table 7.5 Central Government Finances (Summary)
Table 4 shows selected interest rates for the financial sector of Guyana. Of relevance to this report is to note that real lending rates are in the 5-7% rate range, about the average for the
region. The interest rate nominal spread is stationary at slightly over 9%, which is also about average for the region. According to the Bank of Guyana, Guyana’s 6 commercial banks appear to be well capitalized and function properly, with the non-performing portfolio at about 5%.6
Credit to the private sector has been growing steadily for the past 10 years: 10% in 2011 and 20% in 2012. However, in spite of low lending interest rates and credit growth the banking
Guyana’s trade and investment in frame by several international agreements, such as, among
other, CARICOM, CARICOM-Colombia, CARICOM-Costa Rica, CARICOM-Cuba, CARICOM-Dominican Republic, CARICOM-Venezuela, Argentina, Brazil, China, Turkey and Venezuela. In addition, preferential trade agreements with the E.U. Cariforum, E.U. Economic
6 Bank of Guyana. The six commercial banks include: Republic Bank (Guyana) Limited, Guyana Bank of Trade and
Industry, Bank of Nova Scotia, Demerara Bank Limited, Citizens Bank of Guyana, and Bank of Baroda.
Guyana PSAR
11
Partnership Agreement, U.S. Caribbean Trade Partnership, and CARIBCAN; complemented by bilateral investment agreements with China, Cuba, Germany, the U.K. and Kuwait. Importantly
for private sector expansion is Guyana’s membership of CARICOM, with headquarters in Georgetown. The relevance of the EU-ACP trade preferences agreed in Lome and Cotonou have
diminished, although it remains important for the sugar sector that still falls under the Sugar Protocol. Within this general context, this section presents Guyana’s trade and external performance.
Table 5 presents the balance of payments for 2011 and 2012. As previously noted, the large current account balance is fully funded by the capital account, and in this case related to large
transfers from the private sector in medium and long-term capital. Such as in other countries in the region, the current account is driven by large imports, which are related to domestic demand for goods and services. The small and underdeveloped manufacturing sector, but also the limited
amount of primary goods produced in the country, result in limited domestic supply of tradable goods. In many cases these goods are intermediate inputs for the mining and agriculture sectors,
Guyana PSAR
12
the leading sectors of the economy—an issue that will be expanded in this section. Importantly, Guyana’s large number of nationals living abroad sends back home very large, and steady,
transfers. In fact, these transfers are larger than any individual export of the country, and account for 30% of total exports. Without these transfers, the current account and the overall
external condition of the country would be unsustainable, and represent a source of risk for the future if these remittances were to drop. The current stability of the exchange rate, although with some signs of appreciation as presented in Figure 2 that according to the authorities of the Bank
of Guyana is a reflection of fundamentals in the economy, and the investments financed by private capital inflows, result in continuous accumulation of reserves by the Bank of Guyana.
Figure 2: Guyana Real Effective Exchange Rate (Index 2010=100)
Source: Global Economic Monitor, World Bank DataBank
Table 6: Guyana imports by end-use (US$ million)
Total
Consumer
goods
Fuel &
lubricants
Other
intermediate
Capital
goods Miscellaneous
2008 1,323.6 326.3 424.3 311.0 254.8 7.3
2009 1,179.4 335.9 296.7 279.1 259.2 8.6
2010 1,419.1 376.8 395.5 347.3 291.0 8.5
2011 1,770.5 417.3 573.0 376.2 396.1 8.0
2012 1,977.7 465.9 619.0 424.3 459.8 8.7
Source: Bank of Guyana
Table 6 presents Guyana’s imports by end-use. Total imports in 2012 are equivalent to about 77% of GDP, one of the highest ratios in the region. Although we do not have data that
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Guyana PSAR
13
identifies intermediate and capital imports by sector, anecdotal and production information, which would be presented in the next section, indicates that large increases in international prices
of Guyana’s exports provided incentives for investments. These investments are reflected in the large increases in intermediate and capital imports from 2011 to 2012. The table also shows
large increases in consumer goods imports, which are directly related to economic growth and its impact on aggregate demand. Finally, an issue that increases production costs in the economy is the dependence for electricity generation on fossil fuels, as noted in the large level of imports.
Guyana’s PetroCaribe deal to some extent lowers the negative impact of this fact, and as it will be shown in the next section, provided incentives for investments in the rice sector consequence
of the oil for rice agreement with PetroCaribe.
Table 7 presents Guyana’s exports since 2008, and helps explain the economic success of the country. As previously noted, gold prices have reached historical levels as a consequence of the international financial crisis. For many countries that produce gold, this favorable environment
triggered very large investments—many gold mines were reopened as the new prices made previously discarded projects profitable, and new investments were planned and executed
throughout the world. For Guyana, these investments resulted in large increases in gold production and exports. Gold exports grew over 250% from 2008 to 2012. The only other export that exhibits spectacular growth is rice, which grew 66% over the same period,
responding to the deal between Guyana and Venezuela to pay back some of the PetroCaribe debt with rice . The largest exports of the country are gold, rice, bauxite, and sugar. The first two
result from fully private sector efforts related to small producers, an issue that will be highlighted in the next section. The rapid growth of exports in these two sectors provides evidence of the potential for private sector expansion when conditions are appropriate, and also provides
evidence of future investments in these two sectors if external conditions remain favorable, and domestic conditions continue improving.
Table 7: Guyana main exports (domestic, US$ million)
Total Bauxite Sugar Rice Shrimp Timber Molasses Rum Gold Other
Guyana’s largest economic sector, such as other countries in the region, is services. About 2/3 of
value added GDP are produced for the delivery of the vast array of services necessary for the functioning of the economy. The largest service sector is retail, which has also experienced the
highest real growth from 2008 to 2012—see Table 8. Transportation and Storage and Construction are the second and third largest service sectors in the economy. This is consistent with the fact that the country is very small and does not provide incentives for the production of
Guyana PSAR
14
goods for domestic consumption, and as the economy expands, aggregate demand expansion is satisfied by increasing imports which are delivered to the economy through retail and
transportation services. Construction growth, although modest when measured from 2008 to 2012, appears to be accelerating in 2013 related to investments of profits from the mining sector.
Financial services, although a small share of total value added in the economy, has experienced significant growth confirming that the sector is expanding as the economy grows—another indicator is the expansion of credit to the private sector, presented in the previous section of this
report (2.b.i). ICT business process outsourcing is expanding in Guyana. Over the last several years Guyana has been hosting call centers that take advantage of low labor costs in the context
of educated labor force with English as their first language.
Table 8: Guyana Gross Domestic Product composition by sector (%)
Sector composition (% of GDP, using G$ 2006) Real
growth
2008-12 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
GDP AT BASIC PRICES 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.2%
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND
FISHING 21.4% 20.9% 20.5% 20.0% 19.8% 10.3%
Sugar 4.7% 4.7% 4.2% 4.3% 3.8% -3.6%
Rice 2.5% 2.7% 2.6% 2.7% 2.7% 27.7%
Other Crops 5.0% 4.9% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 15.6%
Livestock 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.6% 2.9% 25.2%
Fishing 3.3% 2.9% 3.0% 2.7% 2.9% 6.1%
Forestry 3.1% 3.1% 3.3% 2.8% 2.6% -0.5%
MINING AND QUARRYING 11.2% 10.5% 9.5% 10.8% 11.8% 25.6%
Bauxite 2.6% 1.7% 1.5% 1.9% 2.1% -5.2%
Gold 6.1% 6.8% 6.7% 7.5% 8.6% 67.8%
Other 2.5% 2.0% 1.4% 1.4% 1.1% -46.1%
MANUFACTURING 6.9% 7.0% 6.7% 6.8% 6.6% 14.4%
Sugar 1.2% 1.2% 1.1% 1.1% 1.0% -3.6%
Rice 1.6% 1.7% 1.6% 1.7% 1.7% 28.1%
Other Manufacturing 4.1% 4.1% 4.0% 4.0% 3.9% 14.5%
SERVICES 63.3% 64.1% 65.9% 65.3% 65.1% 22.6%
Electricity and Water 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 13.0%
Construction 9.9% 9.7% 10.2% 10.0% 8.5% 1.7%
Wholesale and Retail Trade 12.7% 13.5% 14.3% 14.2% 14.4% 35.8%
Transportation and Storage 7.8% 7.5% 7.7% 8.3% 9.4% 43.8%
Information and Communication 6.9% 7.0% 7.1% 6.9% 6.8% 17.3%
Financial and Insurance Activities 3.6% 3.8% 4.1% 4.3% 4.7% 56.0%
Public Administration 8.9% 8.6% 8.3% 7.9% 7.6% 2.0%
Education 4.5% 4.6% 4.6% 4.6% 4.5% 19.6%
Health and Social Services 1.7% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 38.4%
Real Estate Activities 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 10.5%
Guyana PSAR
15
Other Service Activities 4.2% 4.4% 4.5% 4.3% 4.3% 21.1%
Source: Bank of Guyana
Compared to other countries in the region, agriculture represents a large share of total production. Guyana’s good conditions for growing rice and sugar cane, added to historical
development patterns that resulted in the specialization in growing sugar cane, are an asset and have proven in recent years to be a feasible option for continuing expansion. Importantly, rice
exports have been growing to countries in the region, and opportunities for adding value exist. For sugar, the prospects depend largely on adding value, such as making rum, one of the highlights of Guyana’s industry. Although data on employment is scarce, anecdotal evidence
suggests that large number of people are fully dedicated to the sector. The impact of good performance is therefore high as it would result in increased exports, and also would impact a
large portion of the population that in general tend to be rural and poorer than urban dwellers. As Table 8 shows, rice has experienced a 25% increase in production from 2008 to 2012.
The mining sector has also experienced high growth rates since 2008. This is the highlight of the
performance of the economy: the extraordinary success of gold miners. As Table 8 notes, from 2008 to 2012 the sector expanded by almost 68%. The responsiveness, technical, financial and managerial, of miners to high prices of gold has been outstanding. The results are presented in
Figure 3 that show how fast and strongly the sector was able to invest heavily on the extraction of gold in the country.
Figure 3: Guyana's extraordinary performance of the gold sector: production and exports
(prices in blue, left axis on both charts)
Source: Bank of Guyana, Global Economic Monitor, World Bank DataBank
These trends continue in 2013. According to the Bank of Guyana, during the first quarter of
2013 rice production increased 68.8%, gold 30.8%, and diamonds 47.9%. During the same period sugar production decreased 14.9% and bauxite production decreased 23.9%.7
7 Bank of Guyana, Quarterly Report and Bulletin, 2013 Q1 Vol. 7 No. 1.
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Gold exports (US$ million)
Gold price Gold exports
15,000
17,000
19,000
21,000
23,000
25,000
27,000
29,000
31,000
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Gold production (G$)
Gold price Gold production
Guyana PSAR
16
iv. The institutions
The Cooperative Republic of Guyana is a presidential republic. The president is elected every five years—the President is the head of the political party that wins the Parliamentary election.
President Donald Ramotar was elected in November 2011 as the head of the PPP/C party with 48.6% of votes—next elections will be held before December 2016. The Parliament is
composed by 65 seats—32 held by the ruling PPP, 26 by the PNU, and 7 by the Alliance for Change.
Of relevance to the analysis of private sector in Guyana is to note that, such as for most
Caribbean democracies, there is a vibrant political debate that is widely followed by the press. The current administration is facing strong opposition in Parliament, where it does not have an absolute majority, which creates significant delays about important national issues such as the
budget and related public investments.
A recent issue may be used to illustrate this point and its impact on private sector activities. Guyana’s Parliament has not passed anti money laundering and countering the financing of
terrorism legislation. Lack of Parliamentary action on this issue would trigger the inclusion of Guyana in the list of countries, assembled by the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force, that do not have appropriate legislation to prevent money laundering. Guyana has missed two deadlines
in 2013, and if legislation is not passed before the end of November then the country may suffer the consequences of increased transaction costs related to international flow of funds.8 By early
2014 these measures have not passed, and the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force issued a statement in November 2013 noting that: “Jurisdictions with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies that have not made sufficient progress in addressing the deficiencies or have not complied with
their Action Plan developed with the CFATF to address these deficiencies. The CFATF calls on its members to consider implementing counter measures to protect their financial systems from
the ongoing money laundering and terrorist financing risks emanating from each jurisdiction … Guyana must therefore pass the relevant legislation and implement all the outstanding issues within its Action Plan including 1) fully criminalising money laundering and terrorist financing
offences, 2) addressing all the requirements on beneficial ownership, 3) strengthening the requirements for suspicious transaction reporting, international co-operation, and the freezing
and confiscation of terrorist assets, and 4) fully implementing the UN conventions. Members are therefore called upon to consider implementing counter measures to protect their financial systems from the ongoing money laundering and terrorist financing risks emanating from
Guyana.”9 The business community, specially representatives of the banking sector but also most private sector institutions, fully support passing legislation and argue that lack of action would
significantly limit foreign investment and increase banking costs. Similarly, other decisions that require Parliamentary approval for budget decisions are also held back by significant political friction.
8 The potential impact of being blacklisted include, among other: potential capital flight; financial isolation from the
region; increased costs; reputational risk; and loss of confidence. 9 http://www.fatf-gafi.org/countries/d-i/guyana/documents/cfatf-ps-nov2013.html
Guyana PSAR
17
c) State of the private sector
Guyana’s investment - production cycles are different from other countries in the region because its outcome is mostly determined by decisions made by domestic producers, although new
prospection investments in the mining sector by multinational corporations also have an impact. In Guyana the mining and agricultural sectors are characterized by large numbers of small private producers. Gold, exporting about 50% of total exports, is extracted by a large number of
mining businesses that employ between 30-500 people and are fully owned by Guyanese nationals. The situation is similar for agriculture, where rice and sugar cane production is
completely in the hands of small farmers. Compared to other large mining exporters, such as Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana does not have large national or multinational corporations investing in this sector.10 Guyana’s growth cycles are therefore determined by
domestic investment decisions.11
When mining and agriculture are expanding, it is because farmers and miners increase their investment and as a consequence increase production. The transmission mechanism from wealth
generated in these sectors to the rest of the economy may be summarized as follows: adequate incentives for mining and agriculture result in increased investments; which lead to increased production and exports; the investments have a multiplier effect beyond mining and agriculture,
which is amplified by the exported earnings spent or invested in the country. Importantly, aggregated demand increases as a consequence of these large resources circulating in the
economy, including those linked to the public sector in the form of higher revenues and spending. The limited industrial capacity of the country forces the import of a significant amount of goods consumed in the country. However the domestic service sector, most notably
construction and banking, directly benefits from the expansion of aggregate demand. For instance, current large investments in real estate are being funded by investments related to
owners of mining companies that seek investment opportunities for their profits.
Compared to other countries in the region, the economic structure of Guyana is also very different as there are strong linkages between the engines of growth, mining and agriculture, and
other domestic economic sectors. With the exception of large machinery and related maintenance parts required for extraction of gold, which is imported, most of goods and services are directly bought in the domestic market—tradable and non-tradable goods. These forward
and backward linkages enhance the multiplying effect of investments and spending generated by the mining and agriculture sectors, therefore the largest share of the wealth created stays in
Guyana.12
10
With the exception of the bauxite and alumina mining companies that have historically been owned by
multinational corporations . Currently the largest investments in bauxite extraction and alumina production are
owned by Rusal and Bosai, a Rusian and Chinese companies respectively. Exports of bauxite and alumina are about
10% of total exports. 11
This is an exceptional issue that characterizes Guyana. In addition to domestic investment, FDI would bring
financial resources and cutting edge technology that would increase productivity and ensure sustainable practices,
especially in gold mining. 12
For example, in Suriname the mining sector behaves as an enclave in which the extraction of minerals have weak
links to the rest of the economy. Only a few low-value added services, such as food and transportation, are bought
by multinational corporations. Technical expertise and most goods are brought into the country.
Guyana PSAR
18
In spite of the impact on growth and development of the mining and agriculture private sector in Guyana, the private sector is fragile and the incentive framework is such that companies tend to
underinvest. Because of underinvestment, companies do not modernize and practices in mining and agriculture have not changed much over time. Mining practices use obsolete extractive
technologies and in many cases miners are responsible for significant environmental damage including water pollution with high negative impact on downstream indigenous populations. Agricultural practices use labor intensive practices and farmers have not invested in mechanizing
agricultural processes. Because the economy is small, future growth prospects would continue to depend on these primary sectors. As a small country Guyana’s industry and service sector
cannot grow by focusing on satisfying domestic aggregate demand, and building the capacity to export requires specialization and investment and the existence of additional factors such as energy and skills, which take time to build up. Therefore the focus of the PSAR is in identifying
the incentives that limit the modernization of the mining and agricultural sectors, and also the growth of secondary and tertiary sectors.
The PSAR notes that underinvestment in modernizing the mining and agriculture sectors is the
result of the investment framework that does not adequate protect property rights. Investments, in technology and know-how, are not rare commodities and can be imported into the country. Similarly, agricultural investments to mechanize processes are also available in the market and
may be imported into Guyana. Moreover, both sectors matured years ago and by now should be experiencing a process of consolidation and growth, as more successful companies would buy
smaller ones in a process that have been experienced in many developing countries in Latin America. The miners and farmers interviewed during the PSAR referred to technology that would significantly increase productivity of their businesses and therefore profits, but also
showed little appetite for it. Why? The main culprit for this outcome is a generalized framework of insecure property rights that severely limits investment.
In mining small and medium scale operations have to renew land leases every year. In part this
is done by government to collect revenues because the renewal process involves paying fees to government for prospection and exploitation, as well as placing an environmental bond. It should be noted that once a plot has been granted, there is the expectation that it would be
granted again to the mining company. But because of the need to renew leases every year, miners are constrained in their investments as they cannot plan ahead for the long-term due to the
impossibility of accessing long-term financing. Gold extraction is a risky business, and the risk is amplified by the type of lease that does not provide enough legal protection to be used as collateral by banks. As a result banks do not lend to small and medium scale mining companies:
these businesses are funded by family savings and inter-company loans, and by suppliers credit that sell large equipment, such as MACORP that sells Caterpillar in Guyana.13
However, Government offers, through GoInvest, fiscal incentives to large scale mining
operations. These incentives include importation of equipment free of duties and tax holidays—small and medium size miners can only import excavators duty free. Government also facilitates
the concession of large swaths of land for prospecting and then exploitation, and these deals are offered long term. There is a large asymmetry in the investment framework for small and
13
Lending and leasing terms are not good. These machines are expensive, usually in the US$150-500 thousand
range. The maturity of the loans never exceeds 3 years, and interest rates are high, in many cases in excess of 15%.
Guyana PSAR
19
medium size miners compared to large operations. Contradictory, 100% of gold production in Guyana is the result of investments by small and medium sized miners, which would benefit
from a leveled playing field.
The incentive framework that results from insecure property rights is replicated in the agricultural sector. The sector is dominated by a large number of individual farmers leasing
small plots. For the vast majority of farmers, their plots range from 10 to 20 acres. Government has been responsible for granting these leases to individual farmers, for between 25 to 49 years. In many cases these leases are held by people that do not farm anymore but sub lease land to
active farmers—the common payment is 3 bags (each bag about 100 pounds) of rice per acre, on an average yield of 30 bags per acre, or about 10% per year. In general, small holdings do not
provide economies of scale that would grant investing in mechanizing agricultural practices. For those farmers that sub lease land, and therefore have larger plots for which mechanization is an option, the practice of subleasing land set incentives against investment. This is the case because
this practice is considered illegal. Therefore successful farmers cannot gradually consolidate plots into larger ones, and have strong incentives against investment in machinery. The limits
imposed by the land tenure system on the development of the rice sector of Guyana are severe, and condemn the sector to remain stagnant and poor without opportunity to succeed and compete.
Therefore the investment prospects of the two sectors that lead economic activity in the economy face large negative incentives related to insecure property rights. Management of public land has large negative impact on the investment in the rice and gold sectors. At low levels of property
right protection, the case of Guyana, miners and farmers would invest significantly lower levels that would be considered ideal, and as property rights increase, then investment increases rapidly. It is important to note that insecure property rights limit bank funding, and without it,
miners or farmers cannot invest in the long-run. In many cases it is not the risk aversion of the miner or farmer the constraint to invest, it is the risk aversion of the banker. As property rights
are strengthened, then bankers feel more comfortable with the risk/benefit analysis of loans, and may use collateral as an effective tool to reduce risk. Longer-term investment horizons would result in more attention paid to environmental issues, such as deforestation and water
contamination, real issues for the mining sector, but also to agriculture that uses pesticides and fertilizers. Longer-term horizons would also result in using modern technologies for gold
extraction, moving away from dredging and pumping, alluvial mining, and the negative impact that this practice has on the environment. Farmers and miners investing in more advanced technologies would be able to increase productivity, with significant benefits to them and more
generally the country.
The status quo of property rights in the country is mainly the result of historical reasons in which land has been owned by government with limited access by the private sector—this is an issue
common to other countries in the region. Modernizing land-tenure and property rights more generally would require significant changes in legislation and current practices, a process that
would probably take time to mature. This report suggests that intermediate steps may be taken to facilitate the expansion of investments in agriculture and mining by improving property rights in these sectors, especially by strengthening and lengthening current land leases to make them more
secure to the eyes of the banking sector. As noted in this report, the banking sector offers limited
Guyana PSAR
20
funding to agriculture and mining because of the perception of high-risk of these operations, and in general do not consider land as acceptable collateral.
In general, detailed information about the composition of the private sector is limited.
Significant data exists and is held by institutions that represent the private sector. They have lists of companies, description of management structures and in some cases more detailed
information about issues of relevance—a complete description is provided in this report in the following sections. For example the Small Business Bureau collects information about their members, including size of business, number of employees and sector. The Guyana Chamber of
Commerce and Industry executes surveys asking their members their opinion about relevant issues in the economy—called the Attitudinal Survey. However, the information is not
consolidates and is fragmented. There is no information that would permit for a more detailed description of the private sector in the economy. The analysis of private sector issues would benefit from investing in filling in the following information and data gaps:
A mapping of private sector activities by sector
A mapping of financial sector products available to the private sector—such as banking
services on factoring, secured transactions, discount of letters, long-term lending terms and options, stock exchange bond issue conditions, credit ratings of people and companies
A mapping of trade-related information relevant to companies in selected sectors for selected market—such as phytosanitary and other food safety concerns, standards and
certification, trading mechanisms and timing, costs
A complete description and analysis of labor markets
A complete description and analysis of the tax system
A complete description and analysis of registries, real estate and movable property
A complete mapping of licensing requirements by sector
A complete mapping of bottlenecks for private sector development
d) Large and fast growing sectors in the economy
As previously noted during the first quarter of 2013 rice and gold production continue to lead economic activity in Guyana. As noted ICT and call centers are growing businesses with potential expansion and high value added—Qualfon specializes in back office support and has
offices in the U.S., Philippines, Mexico, Costa Rica and China, in addition to Georgetown Guyana. Qualfon employs over 1,700 people in Guyana, and is investing in building a new 800-seat call center in Providence, which may include building a call center campus with an Arts and
Culture Center, an accredited university, and a medical service facility, and potential expansion to up to 5,000 seats. According to Qualfon management, operating costs in Guyana are 10%
lower than in the Philippines, and 30% lower than in Costa Rica. To identify other sectors that may also be growing fast, this report uses the information collected by the Bank of Guyana on the loans provided to private sector individuals and firms. This information excludes informal
activities, which are reported to be high in Guyana, and activities that do not have access to the banking sector—such as gold. In spite of its limitations, Table 9 presents a detailed list of
sectors and subsectors that provide some relevant information about growth and potential for the future.
Guyana PSAR
21
Table 9 shows that the largest demand for credit from commercial banks in 2012 was for the service sector, followed by manufacturing, agriculture and mining. The largest sub sector,
measured by credit, is distribution followed by construction and rice paddy. Measured by credit growth, the largest sub sectors were education, molasses, and electricity although these three
borrow very little and these results are probably biased by a few large transactions. Beyond these three, the fastest growing credit was for forestry, paddy, sugar cane, construction and health. It is important to note that for agriculture the amounts lent are very small, for example
rice paddy in 2012 was about US$25 million, most of which go to fun relatively large milling and related rice operations. Most farmers do not have access to commercial bank lending, and
have to rely on family funds, or on other sources.
Table 9: Guyana commercial banks' loans and advances to the domestic private sector, by
Entertaining and catering 1,873.90 1,959.00 2,914.60 2,891.80 3,383.40 81%
Distribution 14,605.70 13,849.30 17,287.40 21,556.20 26,398.60 81%
Education 24.7 23.6 218.7 472.1 850.5 3343%
Health 266.2 337.2 490 663.1 1,043.90 292%
Professional services 684 781.6 1,015.10 1,207.90 1,287.10 88%
Other services 3,968.60 5,595.20 3,641.80 5,108.10 7,624.70 92%
Source: Bank of Guyana
The information available for the analysis of private sector activities does not allow for a more
detailed identification of expanding businesses. This is an issue that may merit collecting specific information about these pre selected sub sectors to understand their real potential for
expansion and the barriers that may be slowing down the process.
e) Issues for private sector development
This section presents detailed analysis of PDS bottlenecks clustered around the following issues: business supportive institutions structure, donors and other international entities, access to finance, corporate taxation, business environment, technology and innovation, trade and FDI
policies, labor regulation, infrastructure communications and energy, environment, gender, and other. A recurrent problem for the analysis of private sector development initiatives in Guyana is lack of reliable information, therefore in all cases the report provides as much factual
information as possible including complete references. When subjective assessments have been made those are also clearly identified in the report, usually with recommendations for investing
in primary data collection and analysis.
As much as possible the analysis is presented comparing Guyana to the following countries: Puerto Rico, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, Suriname and Haiti. The selection of these
countries follows the presentation of the World Bank Ease of Doing Business Report for Guyana 2013.
i. Business supportive institutions structure
Guyana has many public and private institutions that directly or indirectly focus on the expansion of private sector activities. The country, compared to other countries in the region, has a well-
developed framework for growth and development that has been presented to the general public and that over time has been implemented. The framework is provided by the National
Competitiveness Strategy and the Low Carbon Development Strategy. These two strategies guide government policy as it relates to private sector growth, and are summarized in this section. Three public institutions are also analyzed and presented in this report, GoInvest, the
investment promotion agency of Guyana, the Competitiveness Unit that was designed to implement the National Competitiveness Strategy, and the Small Business Bureau which
Guyana PSAR
23
supports the development of small businesses. In addition to these public institutions, this report also describes private sector institutions that represent the private sector in Guyana: the Private
Sector Commission, the Consultative Association of Guyana Industries, the Georgetown Chamber of Commerce, the Guyana Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Guyana
Manufacturing and Services, the Tourism Association, the Guyana Gold and Diamond Association, the Guyana Rice Development Board, and the Guyana Tourism Authority.
The list of participants and issues is very large and does not necessarily correspond to the size of the economy. To some extent there is “over representation” as too many actors play too many
roles, in many cases overlapping as the companies and their representatives are members of several institutions. Fragmentation and overcrowding are a problem as the private sector cannot
speak with one voice, and diverging agendas do not help move forward important reforms. This is an issue that would be presented as a recommendation for stronger coordination between private sector actors in Guyana, later in this report.
National Competitiveness Strategy (NCS) and the NCS Unit. Launched in 2006 after significant consultations, this strategy is an ambitious attempt to improve competitiveness—a description of the NCS is included as an annex to this PSAR.14 The strategy includes 245 actions
designed to improve competitiveness, are measurable, and increase rankings of the country, especially in the World Bank Ease of Doing Business surveys. The NCS actions are divided into
core policies, sector policies, strategic sub sector policies, and overarching enablers. Core policies focus on improving the business climate, and include competition and consumer protection, infrastructure, human resources and access to finance. Sector policies focused on
actions that would facilitate the expansion of economic activities in the sugar, rice, and non-traditional agricultural products, and tourism. Strategic sub sectors were identified as those that could help diversify the economy into promising businesses in its infancy or yet to develop, in
fruits and vegetables, aquaculture and forestry. Finally, overarching enablers focused on how to implement the NCS and on the public-private arrangements that would be necessary for taking
concrete actions with support from all relevant actors.
It is common for many countries, and actors within countries, to prepare comprehensive strategies. It is not common to follow through on them. Guyana is an exception as the NCS was
used by government to develop an implementation plan, which was supported by an IDB loan, the Support for Competitiveness Program that facilitated the creation of the National Competitiveness Strategy Unit empowered to implement the strategy. The NCS also received
significant support from other donor funded projects, such as the Agricultural Support Services Program, the Agricultural Diversification Program, and the Guyana Trade and Investment
Support.15 Because of these efforts, the NCS by 2013 can show concrete results: 57 out of the 245 actions proposed in the plan have been completed, 83 are at late stages of completion, and
14
Guyana National Competitiveness Strategy. Enhancing National Competitiveness. A National Competitiveness
Strategy for Guyana. Government of Guyana in Partnership with the Private Sector. 15
IDB US$26.65 million loan Support for Competitiveness Program approved in 2006; IDB US$22.5 million loan
Agricultural Support Services Program approved in 2004; DFID £1.3 million grant Guyana Agricultural
Diversification Program; USAID two phases of grant funding for the Guyana Trade and Investment (US$7.6 and
US$7.3 million).
Guyana PSAR
24
72 are at early stages of implementation.16 Some of the most relevant actions completed include: the Secretariat of the Competition Commission was created to serve as a consumer protection
agency that would implement the 2011 Consumer Protection Bill; implementation of the Value Added Tax (VAT) and Excise Regime; lowering the Corporate Income Tax from 45% to 40%
for commercial companies and from 35% to 30% for non-commercial companies, still high by regional standards but improving; the Commercial Court is functioning providing services for dispute resolution; using real estate for collateral lending from commercial banks and more
generally facilitating the development of land and property markets; and passing legislation and the establishment of a Credit Bureau, CreditInfo, that started functioning in September 2013.
In spite of the partial success of the implementation of the NCS, much remains to be done. As
noted the NCS Unit, which has been leading the implementation of the strategy, was funded by an IDB loan. This project is at late stages of execution and resources have been almost exhausted. Moving forward, the work done by the NCS Unit should be continued. Importantly,
the impact of actions taken on the expansion of economic activity is difficult to assess due to lack of data and baselines. This is an issue that should be considered in moving forward with
additional support to the NCS Unit.
Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS).17 Approved in 2010, this document commits Guyana to implement a sustainable, low carbon, development strategy that specifically protects
forests, water and more generally biodiversity—a description of the LCDS is included as an annex to this PSAR. The strategy, and the current agreement for its implementation with Norway, recognizes the opportunity cost of exploiting Guyana’s large rain forest and related
assets. The implementation of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) commits Norway to pay Guyana annual installments based on performance criteria linked to preserving its rain forest. The initial package is worth US$250 million for five years, starting in 2009, which would
be paid out of a World Bank administered trust fund named Guyana REDD-Plus Investment Fund (GRID).
The LCDS notes that Guyana’s pristine forests are its most valuable asset, about 16 million
hectares. These forests have valuable timber, minerals, and may be transformed into agricultural land, which the LCDS estimates may bring an annual economic value of US$580 million to the
country. The cost of these actions, however, is large as the services provided by the forests are high in bio diversity, water, and carbon sequestration. The LCDS notes that these environmental services provided to the world, now for free, could be as high as US$40 billion per year.
Therefore, the cost to the world of not counting with Guyana’s environmental services is very large, but the direct opportunity cost to Guyanese people is also large. The challenge is to
internalize the opportunity cost of the environmental services provided by Guyana’s forests to the world. The government of Norway through the REDD+ funding mechanism is an attempt to do that.
16
National Competitiveness Strategy. Monitoring and Evaluation Review: 2006-2012. May 31st
2102. National
Competitiveness Strategy Unit. 17
A low-carbon development strategy. Transforming Guyana’s economy while combating climate change. Office
of the President, Republic of Guyana. May 2010.
Guyana PSAR
25
The resources received from the trust fund would be invested in seven priority projects/issues: (i) the Amaila Falls hydroelectric project; (ii) accelerating Amerindian land titling; (iii) funding
the Amerindian Development Fund; (iv) expanding fiber optic infrastructure; (v) provide micro finance; (vi) establishing a Centre for Bio-Diversity and Low Carbon Development; and
(vii) monitoring, reporting and verification systems for the LCDS.
There is no formal connection between the NCS and the LCDS, however, they somewhat complement each other—see the annex for a description of both. The current priorities of the LCDS have significant impact on competitiveness, and therefore on private sector growth,
especially in recognizing the need for more energy at lower cost (priority i); property rights (priority ii); modernizing infrastructure (priority iv); and expanding credit (priority v).
Moreover, as it relates to agriculture and mining, the implementation of the LCDS would have an impact on these two sectors that are generally characterized by lack of sustainable practices: fertilizers and pesticides over use in agriculture, and deforestation and water/soil pollution for
mining. These are important issues that would need to be addressed in the near term as Guyana continues to simultaneously implement the NCS and the LCDS.
GoInvest. The Guyana Office for Investment is a public institution that promotes private sector
investment. Modeled after similar institutions throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, GoInvest channels interest in investing in Guyana by providing information, sponsoring trade
shows, and facilitating the processes for investors. GoInvest has prioritized the following sectors:
Agriculture & Agro-Processing- Includes seafood & aquaculture, processing (fruit juice
Light Manufacturing- Textiles & Garments, Pharmaceuticals, Building & Construction, Packaging
Services- Financial, Medical, Environmental, Transportation, Retail/ Commercial, Housing, Fashion, Music & other Entertainment, Machining
Energy- Includes Petroleum & Gas Exploration, Solar Power, Hydro Power, Bio-fuels, Bio-diesel, Wind Power, Cogeneration from Rice Husk/ Bagasse & Biomass Power
Information & Communication Technology- Includes Business Process Outsourcing
(BPO), Call Centres (inbound/outbound), Software Development, Medical & Legal Transcription
Mining - some mining projects, laboratories and machinery
Guyana PSAR
26
GoInvest facilitates investment in these priority sectors by providing significant incentives for investing in Guyana. General incentives include:18
Exemption from Customs Duty on most plant machinery and equipment, raw materials
used in manufacturing
Exemption from Customs Duty and zero VAT on raw materials and packaging for
manufactures that export 50% or more of their products
Unlimited carryover of losses from previous years
Accelerated depreciation of plant and machinery for approved activities
Full and unrestricted repatriation of capital, profits and dividends
Benefits of double taxation treaties with the U.K., Canada, Kuwait and CARICOM
Exception from Customs Duty and zero VAT on items approved under an Investment Agreement between the government and the business
Removal of taxes on equipment used for generating electricity from non-traditional or
renewable sources for both household and commercial purposes
Exemption from Excise Tax on items approved under an Investment Agreement between
the government and the business
Zero rate VAT on exports
Tax holidays
Figure 4: GoInvest distribution of projects by sector, 2013
18
GoInvest has a contract template used for all sectors. We did not have access to this template, and the information
provided in this list comes from the press as reported in the FIEL inception report.
Guyana PSAR
27
Source: GoInvest presentation to the Cross Border Agriculture Investments in the Caribbean meeting
Although detailed information about the results of this institution are somewhat limited, there are
some indicators that point towards success. Figure 4 shows the distribution of projects facilitated by GoInvest by sector. The largest sectors that have attracted investments in the country are
agro-processing, services, wood products, and light manufacturing. Figure 5 shows that the majority of investments were related to small projects. A highlight of the work of GoInvest is the investment by Interamericana Trading Corporation (ITC), a Barbados corporation with multi
sector investments throughout the region, that in February 2010 signed a Memorandum of Understanding for investing in the Large Scale Integrated Farm Project in the Rupununi
Savannahs. ITC created Santa Fe Inc. as a Guyanese affiliate, and was granted fiscal concessions for investments in growing rice, soya beans and cow peas, in addition to cattle, sheep and goats. Longer term plans call for additional investments in aquaculture, fruits and
grains—maize and sorghum. Santa Fe employs about 60 people, that farm 1,000 acres of rice using zero tillage technology, and has invested in mills and silos.
Some people interviewed noted that, in spite of the template approved by Parliament detailing
the incentives for investing in Guyana, GoInvest and government discretionary approach to identifying investments puts domestic businesses at a disadvantage. In addition, it was noted that
GoInvest does not make decisions or provide licenses, it coordinates the actions of other government units and facilitates processes. Some criticize GoInvest for being slow, or for not being able to deliver needed licenses—importantly GoInvest is a facilitator, and helps firms that
want to invest in Guyana get required permits and licenses. Some of these criticisms should be addressed as this institution continues to expand.
Guyana PSAR
28
Figure 5: GoInvest distribution of projects by size, 2013
Source: GoInvest presentation to the Cross Border Agriculture Investments in the Caribbean meeting
Small Business Bureau (SBB). The Small Business Act, passed in 2004, resulted in the
creation of the Small Business Bureau and the Small Business Council. The SBB offers support for the development of small businesses, and offers services such as training, export workshops, formal registration, and trade shows. Through the SBB, small businesses can grow and become
successful commercial institutions. Priority areas, in the context of the Low Carbon Micro and Small Enterprise Development Project (LCMSEDF), include farming, processing, aquaculture,
eco-tourism, business process outsourcing and bio-ethanol. The SBB is a young institution, it only started operations on June 1st 2010.
Importantly the SBB collects information about businesses. In efforts to collect information and facilitate the formalization process of small businesses, the SBB keeps a database. The database
includes, as of October 2013, 6,756 businesses of which about 2,500 have been validated as active businesses—a number of businesses are not active because they have closed or were
improperly registered in the SBB. According to data collected, small businesses consider the following as their largest constraints:19
Access to affordable finance, specifically relating to monies for working capital,
equipment purchase and expansion to existing business premises—this is a recurrent
19
Data provided by the SBB.
Guyana PSAR
29
issue for formal firms in Guyana, one that triggers focusing on access to finance by expanding the financial options including factoring, leasing and secured transactions
Inability to source packaging materials, especially for the manufacturing sector in the form of bottles, seals and corks
High transportation costs for farmers to transport goods from other regions to region four
A general lack of understanding of managing cash flows, and preparing basic financial
analysis
The database offers good information that should be expanded. Currently, about 73% of registered businesses employ less than 5 people, 22.3% between 5 and 15, and 4.7% more than
15. Most firms only sell their goods and services to the domestic market, only 15% report selling to the Caribbean, and only 3.8% selling beyond the Caribbean. Inputs are mostly bought from domestic suppliers, although 24% report buying directly from non-domestic suppliers.
Table 10 provides the distribution of firms by sector in the SBB database.
Table 10: Small Business Bureau firms by sector, 2013
No. Priority Sectors Total
1 Agriculture 702
2 Agro-processing 160
3 Apiculture 21
4 Aquaculture 16
5 Handicraft 375
6 Internet Services 66
7 Mining 1
8 Poultry 47
9 Tourism 33
10 Transportation Services 220
Other Services
1 Auto repairs 15
2 Auto Supplies 13
3 Beauty Salons 33
5 Beverage Distributors 14
4 Book Store 7
6 Car wash 9
7 Catering Service 7
8 Clothing 27
15 Clothing and accessories 39
9 Confectionaries 37
10 Construction Materials 5
11 Cosmetolgy 36
12 Education 7
Guyana PSAR
30
16 Foams manufacturing 9
17 Food Snackette 57
18 Furniture Stores 26
19 Furniture Rentals 3
21 Grocery Shop 68
22 Home Décor 6
23 Stationery 13
24 Jewellery 19
25 Lumber Yard 9
26 Management Consultancy 5
27 Money Trasfers 1
28 Pharmacetical 19
29 Photo Studios/ Services 14
30 Refridgeration Services 9
31 Restaurants/cafes 39
32 Sewing & Tailoring 18
33 Shipping Service 2
34 Variety Stores 123
35 Wholesale & Retail Trading 170
Source: Small Business Bureau
Private Sector Commission (PSC). Established in 1992, it is the senior institution that
represents the private sector in Guyana, and plays a central role as representative of private sector interests to government, unions and civil society. The priority areas for support of private
sector growth include: promote projects with high value added; facilitate exports and investment; collect and share information about the private sector; improve governance and security; facilitate the development of alliances, domestic and international, for the expansion of private
sector activities; and build up skills and retain them in the country.
Important actions sponsored by the Private Sector Commission include: collaboration with the Council for Technical and Vocational Education and the Board of Industrial Training, submitting
proposals to the University of Guyana to restructure curriculum so that students would have the skills demanded by private sector; supported the agenda of the NCS, in particular those activities that would improve transportation, ports, creating a single window automated processing system,
improving the business climate and increasing the supply of energy at lower costs than now. Proposals to government presented by the PSC in 2013 that succeeded include: lowering
property tax rates to zero for individuals owning less than G$40 million and the personal income tax rate was reduced to 30%.
The PSC announced to pursued three projects that they consider priorities for 2013: (i) the
creation of a development bank, and preliminary discussions with the World Bank IFC, the European Investment Bank and Venture Capital companies indicate initial interest in this new financial institution; (ii) the creation of an international trade arm of the PSC, that would give the
Guyana PSAR
31
private sector a better position to represent their interests in international trade negotiations and agreements; and (iii) the establishment of a CARICOM private sector group, that would
represent the interests of the private sector at the highest level of CARICOM negotiations.
Georgetown Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI). Established in 1890 it is the oldest private sector organization in Guyana, and its membership includes businesses from all
sectors and sizes. The GCCI has an active program that includes the presentation of the “Agenda for Action: Top 20 Barriers to Guyana’s Competitiveness.” The agenda includes:
Ensuring political and economic stability
Enacting local government reform and administering elections—noting that Guyana has not held local government elections in 17 years
Improving the tax system—noting high rates
Encouraging investments and the use of alternative sources of energy
Transforming the University of Guyana and expanding training and educational opportunities—to meet the needs of the private sector
Implementing comprehensive security sector reform—as a proposal to lower crime
Establishing a development bank
Ensuring more transparency and accountability in the management of the public and private sectors
Enacting urgent commencement of the public procurement commission (PPC) and the inclusion of private sector concessions to the mandate of the PPC
Resolving Guyana’s skills challenge—noting the mismatch between skills supplied and demanded in the market
Providing a balanced, efficiently managed regulatory protocol and framework
Establishing a culture of market innovation, research and development
Accelerating the process of information and communication technology liberalization to make Guyana competitive—opening up the market for communications
Building modern infrastructure
Making Guyana a magnet for foreign direct investment
Building a globally competitive manufacturing sector
Enacting modern intellectual property laws
Accelerating the implementation of the NCS
Strengthening the commercial court
Strengthening foreign economic diplomacy
The GCCI uses extensively survey tools to identify the needs of their members and their opinion
with respect to issues of relevance to the private sector. In 2012 they executed a survey, a needs assessment, to collect information about their membership. The main finding of the survey is that 77.1% of the members point to tax reform as the most important policy issue. Trade
relationships of members are extensive and include trading processed manufactured food goods, machinery, agriculture chemicals and products, tires, spare parts, hardware materials, clothing
among many more. As previously noted, the small size of the economy does not allow for the creation and growth of a domestic manufacturing sector. The survey also reveals significant trade in services, with Guyanese companies buying the following services: accounting and audit,
Guyana PSAR
32
tax and other related services, multimedia, insurance, risk management and other consultancy, ocean freight, shipping and logistics, and security. An important finding is related to skills
needed, but scarce, in the market. According to the survey businesses find it difficult to find skills related to: customer service, human resources, sales, and accounting and finance. Most
businesses use web-based applications, however the main tool for marketing is word of mouth.
The GCCI also collects information about their members attitudes toward relevant current issues in the country—the attitudinal survey. The 2013, only the second survey executed, finds that in general GCCI members are optimistic about future prospects, over 91% of respondents noted
that their companies made profits in 2012, and 87% rated business activities as strong. The major obstacles for doing business are keeping good employees (42%), high tax rates (31%), and
high cost and unreliable supply of energy (22%). Government efforts to support business is rated well, with over 60% of respondents characterizing it as moderately to very supportive. However, corruption is also perceived as a problem. Politics are a concern, as 83% of respondents noted
their lack of satisfaction with the performance of Parliament. The most important public investments, according to respondents of the survey, are the Amaila Falls hydroelectric power
plant, the Lethem road, interior roads construction and improvements, building a recycling plant, and maritime ports upgrades.
Consultative Association of Guyana Industries (CAGI). Established in 1962, the CAGI
represents the interests of employers in labor disputes with unions. It is a member of the Private Sector Commission, and takes the lead on labor policy and industrial relations. Members represent most sectors in the economy, including shipping, transport, trade, mining,
manufacturing, forestry, construction, insurance and banking among other. A recent issue that required the support from CAGI was changing legislation to establish a 40-hour work week replacing a 48-hour work week, a reduction of 8 hours per week. This issue created opposition
from private sector representatives as they would have to pay a 50% over regular salary, as regular over time, to workers that work on Saturday. This issue was not resolved and the current
40-hour week is enforced in Guyana.
Guyana Manufacturing and Services Association (GMSA). Established in 1963, groups manufacturing and services economic groups, including textiles, pharmaceuticals, construction
materials, financial, health, environmental, transportation, trade, entertainment, and education among other. The largest group measured by sales is beverages, that is actively searching for opportunities to penetrate regional markets.
The GMSA has identified issues and interventions that would facilitate the expansion of the
manufacturing sector in Guyana:
Cost of energy and unreliable supply
High trade transaction costs, related to customs delays for import and export transactions.
The GMSA proposes accelerating the implementation of the Single Window Automated Processing System
Promotion of private sector investments and public private partnerships in maritime and air infrastructure, transportation logistics and warehousing
Creating a development bank
Guyana PSAR
33
Comprehensive review of existing mechanisms to facilitate investments in manufacturing
Increasing the range and quantity of fiscal and financial incentives
Enforce laws that prohibit trade of smuggled goods
Application of mandatory incentives/disincentives to ensure compliance with Quality Assurance and Reliability Standards
Implementation of a continuous Labor Market Intelligence Survey to gauge occupational skill demand and supply. Development of competency based entrepreneurial skills
training in the education system. Introduction of a National Training Levy and establishing a skills bureau
Facilitate the transformation from sole traders to partnerships with local and foreign
partners
Expand the use of ICT to the manufacturing sector
Providing financial assistance to micro, small and medium enterprises
Facilitating closer collaboration for research and development
Guyana Gold and Diamond Miners Association. This association represents the interests of small miners that are responsible for 100% of gold extraction in Guyana. They directly employ about 15,000 people, and many more indirectly through service providers in air, water and land
transportation, security, food, equipment and maintenance. Their largest challenge is access to capital, an issue already presented in the previous section of this report.
Guyana Rice Development Board (GRDB). Established in 1995, the GRDB promotes the
development of the rice industry, facilitates research, and engages in promotional activities. The GRDB estimates that about 10,000 families are dedicated to the production of rice, with about 105 privately owned rice millers. Counting direct and indirect services related to the rice
industry, the GRDB estimates that about 100,000 people, or 14% of the population, is involved in growing and trading rice in Guyana. Such as with mining, the most relevant issue for the
expansion and modernization of the industry is access to finance, an issue already presented in the previous section of this report.
In addition to the private and public institutions presented in this section, there are other that represent other productive sectors of the economy, but that are small or represent small sectors.
Among those the most important small sectors is tourism. Guyana Tourism Authority (GTA). Created in 2002 as a statutory body, the GTA promotes the development of the tourism industry
in Guyana. The main responsibilities of the GTA include: monitoring and regulating the supply of tourism services, collecting data, providing specialized training, design and implement marketing strategies, and improving transportation services. Tourism and Hospitality
Association of Guyana (THAG). This is the association of hoteliers, resort owners, travel agents, restaurant owners, jewelry and craft shops owners, and transportation services. THAG
organizes owners of hotels, restaurants, and transportation services to provide tourism packages to visitors to Guyana.
ii. Donors and other international entities
Because of the past events that required significant efforts from the donor community and private
sector to provide debt rescheduling and forgiveness to Guyana, the international community is
Guyana PSAR
34
well organized in support of government. In particular, the effort related to HIPC and enhanced HIPC that triggered the creation of poverty reduction strategies that channeled support from the
international community to the country along well-defined issues and projects, resulted in a cohesive approach by donors. As previously mentioned in this report, these efforts also resulted
in good planning capacity by government, that as noted has the best budget process in the region. Government takes the lead in organizing the donor community and assigning them areas of support.
In this general context, the following paragraphs describe the work programs of the largest
international donors working in Guyana.
InterAmerican Development Bank (IDB). The IDB is the largest donor in the country, with an active program of loans, technical cooperation, studies, and technical advice to government. As
previously noted in this report, the IDB was instrumental in supporting government efforts to implement the NCS, and also in the establishment of Guyana’s credit bureau, CreditInfo. These
two actions may be the largest contribution by any donor, in recent years, to facilitate the expansion of private sector activities and to diversify the economy.
As noted, government defines the parameters of the relationship with the IDB and suggest areas in which the Bank may support government. These parameters are formalized in the IDB
Country Strategy with Guyana. The last strategy was prepared for the period 2012-2016, and focuses IDB activities on the following priority areas: sustainable energy, natural resources
management, private sector development, and public sector management. The expected lending program to Guyana is US$82.4 million for the 2012-2016 period, that may increase to US$103.2 million if the country lends less on concessional terms. This is a very small amount of resources
compared to the needs of the country, however, according to the authorities and IDB representatives the value added of interventions is mostly related to the transformational
characteristics, not so much about the amounts disbursed—such as the presented examples of the implementation of the NCS or the establishment of a credit bureau.
The IDB work program to support private sector development follows on previous government efforts to increase competitiveness and innovation. According to the IDB the outcomes of
actions that they would fund would: improve the business climate by providing incentives for reducing the informal sector, increase access to credit by developing a framework for secured
transactions, and retain skilled labor; improve the regulatory capacity to enforce standards; and facilitate the adoption of modern production technologies and promote exports and diversification.
Caribbean Development Bank (CDB). The CDB is funding the construction of community
roads and improving the west coast Demerara road. The loans would fund the rehabilitation and maintenance of 240 roads across a number of communities, and improve 30.7 kilometers of
highway – Vreed-en-Hoop to Hydronie section of the road and to finance school road safety education program. These are very large loans, for Guyana and for the CDB, with US$16.4 million and US$32.2 million respectively.
Guyana PSAR
35
The European Union. The E.U. provides significant grant funding in the context the Guyana Country Strategy Paper 2008-2013 and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper 2011-2015
(PRSP), and the appropriations of the E.U. 10th EDF NIP, which add to €55.4 million. The E.U. objectives in Guyana may be summarized as: (i) addressing economic and environmental
vulnerabilities; and (ii) promoting social cohesion and combating poverty. The country strategy identifies two priority areas: contributing to Guyana’s sector policy on coastal management, and macroeconomic support for the implementation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy.
The PRSP formally recognizes the importance of growth for poverty reduction. The policies that
would promote growth include: maintaining a sound macroeconomic framework; providing a business friendly environment for private sector growth; continued modernization of the
traditional sectors; emergence and growth in new sectors; and ICT-cross cutting policy to support growth and development.
World Bank. The work program of the World Bank in Guyana includes two loans designed to
improve teacher education, and to strengthen the University of Guyana science and technology. These operations focus on improving tertiary education. The UG Science and Technology Support, US$11.4 million, is designed to improve education quality, rehabilitate infrastructure,
and improve management.20 Important activities to execute within this operation include: updating science curricula and funding research in science areas that impact the implementation
of the LCDS. The project was approved in 2011 and become effective in December 2012. There are no preliminary results to date.
The project appraisal document provides significant description and analysis of the main issues that the University of Guyana faces, and focuses on the four faculties of science and technology.
Of interest to private sector expansion is to improve the local capacity to assess climate change impact on the country’s main economic infrastructure. The University of Guyana has identifies a
need to improve the following areas: GIS and remote sensing, climate change modeling, hydrology, ground water management, alternative energy, agriculture resource management, forestry, natural resources management, food and nutrition, and biodiversity inventory. This is
an initiative that merits follow up and additional support, if needed, from the donor community.
USAID. The work program is designed to address issues in health, economic growth, and democracy and governance. The focus of activities on to facilitate growth are in four sectors:
wood products, aquaculture, agribusiness and ecotourism. USAID recently funded two projects with an impact on private sector expansion.
The Guyana Trade and Investment I&II was a designed to maximize Guyana’s competitive advantages and increase non-traditional, value-added exports in Wood Products, Aquaculture,
Agribusiness, and Tourism. According to Carana, the consulting company hired to execute this project: “GTIS II was a four-year, $7.3 million program designed to maximize Guyana’s
competitive advantages and increase non-traditional, value-added exports in four primary sub-sectors: Wood Products, Aquaculture, Agribusiness, and Tourism. The project implemented a market-led approach to strengthen targeted sub-sectors and worked with foreign investors,
strategic buyers, and anchor firms in Guyana to invest in new capacity, technology, and standards.
The GTIS project’s market-led approach became the preeminent development model for Guyana.
With the exception of forestry, the GTIS project built new promising sectors with the capability of diversifying Guyana’s economy from the bottom up. The direct results of GTIS work included
$2.8 million in new investments, $9.78 million in additional sales, and more than 170 new or enhanced jobs, based on environmentally sound value chain development strategies. GTIS placed particular emphasis on leveraging additional funding from the donor community and
leveraged a total of $1.85 million in donor contributions. In the ecotourism subsector where advertising is of vital importance to promote a new destination, GTIS leveraged over $6.5
million in articles, advertisements, and television shows on the country’s heretofore little known attractions.
These results are best seen on the ground where skepticism and pessimism have been replaced
with vision and progress, where leading rice farmers in the country have promoted and invested in aquaculture, ecotourism lodges are booked two to three years in advance, multinational forestry companies have made substantial investments in Guyana, and Israeli agriculture experts
have introduced cutting-edge farm management techniques.”21
Skills and Knowledge for Youth Employment (SKYE) Project is funded within President Obama Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) partnership. It is design to provide young people
with market skills so that they may enter and stay in the workforce. According to the U.S. Embassy in Georgetown, “The work readiness training transfers a set of basic employability skills, knowledge, and behaviors essential to the success of young people as entry-level workers
or entrepreneurs. These skill sets were identified as priorities by Guyana’s employment sector. The curriculum, adapted to the Guyana employment context, is designed to provide young
Guyanese with the foundational skills and knowledge necessary to become healthy, productive employees and community members. This training is one of several program elements to assist youth to gain the self-confidence necessary to find and sustain employment.”22 The program
targets at-risk youth between the ages of 15 and 24, mostly males school dropouts that have been identified through the juvenile justice system. In total the program would train about 1,500 in
reigon 4, 6, 9 and 10.
The Skills and Knowledge for Youth Employment (SKYE) project in seeks to strengthen youth’s access to justice and equip youth with market-driven skills and attitudes to improve their ability to transition to the workforce. SKYE will target a total of approximately 600 youth beneficiaries
who do not have the necessary education, skills and behaviors for integration into the workforce; many will be school dropouts and/or involved in the juvenile justice system. SKYE will also
provide capacity building support to local partner organizations, as well as relevant government ministries and the court system. SKYE will work in four regions, which were selected for their high populations of vulnerable youth, high crime areas, and high rates of unemployment.
UNDP. UNDP supports Guyana with grant funding to strengthening the institutional capacity of government in the following areas: to increase access to energy services, electricity or cleaner
fuels in rural areas; increase individual and institutional capacity for planning Sustainable Land Management (SLM) at the national and regional level; protect biodiversity through the
implementation of valuation methodologies, payment of environmental services; strengthen capacity to collect, analyze and disseminate key economic and social data, and to support completion of Millennium Development Goal and Poverty Reduction Strategy; strengthen
capacity within the Ministry of Finance to plan, manage and implement, aid effectively according to the 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.
These projects play an important role is trying to fix one of the main problems for the analysis of
private sector development in the country: lack of reliable information. This project follows on two other UNDP funded initiatives: the DISSC (Development of Institutional Social Statistics Capacities) Project which developed tools (PETRs), training materials, and advisory support
services to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of statistics and M&E Systems; and the MDGs Support Project, which is expected to track progress of the MDGs.
The project would facilitate the analysis of interventions and their impact on key social and
economic targets, mostly performed by the Economic Policy Analysis Unit in the Ministry of Finance.
Canadian International Development Agency.23 CIDA does not have a country-to-country
program, but the country benefits from the Caribbean Regional Program. Through the regional program, CIDA has approved grants for social entrepreneurship, basic education, and economic capacity development. According to CIDA, the C$2.6 million grant Economic Capacity
Development, executed by Natural Resources Canada “This project builds on achievements accomplished in a previous project called Environmental Management and Capacity
Development. It is community- and private-sector-oriented. It aims to support the poorest segments of Guyana's population, namely the rural poor and hinterland populations. The goal of the project is to promote private-sector-led economic growth that provides sustainable
livelihoods and reduces poverty. Improvements to the health, skills, and economic opportunities of miners and the men, women and families in selected communities living near mining
operations are also targeted through this project.”24
The resources are distributed among the program has already achieved results: the construction of a plant nursery for the communities of Mahdia and Isseneru provides services that enhance agricultural practices and address gender issues. Produce is sold to miners that work in adjacent
areas, therefore ensuring a steady and reliable source of income.
Department For International Development (DFID, U.K.). DFID £1.3 million grant was provided in the context of the Guyana Agriculture Diversification Program, and is designed to
expand aquaculture, tilapia, and no-traditional agriculture exports, such as sweet peppers, hot peppers and butternut squash. The program, implemented by the consulting firm Carana, would
23
CIDA is now the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development (DFATD). 24
create about 1,000 new jobs. This program follows on USAID funded Guyana Trade and Investment.
iii. Access to finance
This is an issue that was frequently mentioned during interviews as having significant impact of private sector expansion. The common criticism from private sector leaders is that the banking sector is too liquid and does not provide enough lending to new businesses, therefore limiting
investment and growth. The bankers response to this criticism is that they assess risk and use collateral, exclusively real estate, to make decisions on lending to all businesses, and that the
result of this process is the portfolio of loans to the private sector that is growing faster than the economy. Therefore, lending is expanding but is not satisfying all the demand for loans. Structural barriers, such as availability of registries for movable property and legal frameworks
for use of financial instruments and limited property right for miners and farmers, impose restrictions on lending to some clients, which are those that need funding but cannot get it from
the banking system. This issue has resulted, as previously noted in this report, for suggesting the need for a development bank that would fill in the gap—we will return to this issue at the end of this section. This section presents an analysis of commercial banks’ assets and addresses some
of the main issues related to access to finance in Guyana.
Table 11 shows that by May 2013 commercial banks held 33% more excess reserves than required by regulations of the Bank of Guyana—currently at 12%. Over time, as the economy
expands and the banking sector grows, excess reserves have also increased, from 15% in 2011 to 22% in 2012. This issue was frequently mentioned by private sector representatives noting that, in their opinion, the banks were too conservative in their lending practices. This issue, however,
is more complicated and requires a better overview of portfolio of assets of banks.
Table 12 provides the distribution of bank assets among the major portfolio classes. In general,
over the last three years about 1/3 of the portfolio of the banking sector is in loans to the private sector; about 1/5 is allocated to government debt; and the balance distributed among assets related to foreign transactions, assets held in the Bank of Guyana, and other. The decision of
how to allocated assets among these asset classes is based on assessing risk in the context of maximizing returns to shareholders. The table shows the outcome of this process, noting that
over time credit to the private sector has steadily increase: 22% from December 2011 to May 2013. For the same period, overall asset of the banking sector increased 18%. According to the bankers interviewed, the traditional characteristics of the banks and their clients limit the
Guyana PSAR
39
expansion of credit to the private sector. In particular, they note that large and consolidated businesses, especially in the service sector but also some in manufacturing, are the preferred
clients as they have had long-term relationships with them. A long-standing problem in Guyana, partly resulting from its small size, is the high concentration of loans on few businesses—by the
end of the first quarter of 2013 the exposure to the top 20 borrowers is about 15.9% compared to total loan portfolio.25 New businesses, however, find it difficult to borrow in part because of the current structure of the banking system, but also because in many cases they lack appropriate
collateral. Currently, the regulatory system is biased towards using only real estate as collateral, and in general the banking system has limited supply of financial products such as leasing,
factoring and used of movable property as collateral—secured transactions. In addition to these issues, the most promising sectors of the economy, mining and agriculture, have insecure property rights over land, making it very difficult for traditional commercial banks to lend to
these sectors—this issue will be expanded in the next section of this report.
Table 12: Guyana Assets of commercial banks
Total assets
Foreign
sector
Public
sector
Non-bank
financial
institutions
loans
Private
sector
loans &
advances
&
securities
Bank of
Guyana Other
2011
(December)
GY$
million 328,165 53,126 77,508 31 94,238 41,055 62,206
% 100.0% 16.2% 23.6% 0.0% 28.7% 12.5% 19.0%
2012
(December)
GY$
million 378,123 64,086 72,971 359 112,969 48,899 78,836
% 100.0% 16.9% 19.3% 0.1% 29.9% 12.9% 20.8%
2013 (May)
GY$
million 385,934 55,663 84,169 682 115,167 55,689 74,563
% 100.0% 14.4% 21.8% 0.2% 29.8% 14.4% 19.3%
Source: Bank of Guyana
Therefore, it is correct the observation that the banking system is excessively liquid and that banking practices may be too conservative. Moreover, the banking system may not be providing
services to small and medium enterprises, which desperately need funding but that are also high risk for the banking sector, and in many cases lack appropriate collateral. From the bankers’
perspective, it is also true that their mandate is to maximize returns to shareholders, and to assess risk as best they can given poor information available to assess loan applications.26 They note that a solid and well capitalized banking sector is an asset, and that they provide adequate
services to the majority of established business in the country, which are responsible for most of production and employment.
25
Bank of Guyana. Quarterly Report. March 2013. 26
Guyana has recently started the process to rate businesses and individuals. The newly created credit rating
agency, CreditInfo Guyana, will provide information that would facilitate risk assessment of loan applications. As
of now, the agency is in its infancy, it was launched in September 2013, and it is expected that in the coming 18
months some businesses and individuals would be rated, and that banks would start using that information for
approving loans.
Guyana PSAR
40
In essence, both sides on this issue are correct, but the problem remains as many small and medium size businesses lack appropriate access to finance. This report identifies this issue as
one of the most important limiting factors for the expansion of private sector activities, and the main recommendations of the report are focused on how to maintain the strength of the sector,
and at the same time expand services to more clients, especially in mining and agriculture.
Importantly, the Executive Opinion Survey of the World Economic Forum notes that private sector representatives do not identify access to finance as one of the most problematic factors for doing business—only 5.4% of respondents note that this is the most important issue, with 8 other
factors taking precedence. Table 13 shows that Guyana’s financial market performs well, especially on ease to access to loans (ranking 45 out of 148 countries), and access to venture
capital (ranking 38 out of 148 countries). Other financial indicators presented in the table note the soundness of banks and low cost of financing among other. It should be noted, however, that these results are biased towards those businesses that do have access to finance, which as
previously noted face a completely different environment compared to small and upcoming ventures.
Table 13: Guyana WEF GCI ranking on financial market development
Source: 2013-2014 Global Competitiveness Report, Guyana Country Profile
The World Bank Ease of Doing Business Report presents a less rosy view of access to credit in
Guyana, and ranks the country 167 out of 185 countries and the worse compared to comparator countries—see Figure 6. Unlike the WEF GCI report that is based on executing a survey asking respondents their opinion about how difficult it is to get credit, the Ease of Doing Business bases
its rankings on four sets of measurable indicators: strength of legal rights, depth of credit information, public registry coverage, and private bureau coverage. Guyana ranks poorly in all these areas.
Guyana PSAR
41
Figure 6: Guyana ease of getting credit
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
Of relevance to this report is to compare Guyana’s legal rights, for borrowers and lenders, to other countries in the region. Figure 7 shows that Guyana underperform the region in legal
rights as it relates to collateral and bankruptcy and their impact on access to credit. Importantly, in Guyana movable property cannot be used as collateral for bank transactions and there are no
registries for movable property.
Guyana PSAR
42
Figure 7: Guyana legal rights strength for borrowers and lenders27
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
iv. Corporate taxation
Tax rates are too high and limit investment and expansion of private sector activities, and probably are responsible for high level of informality, discretionary granting of fiscal incentives,
and the general perception of corruption in the country. According to the Executive Opinion Survey, the two most problematic factors for doing business in Guyana are corruption (19.7% of
27
According to the WB Ease of Doing Business methodology: “The data on the legal rights of borrowers and
lenders are gathered through a questionnaire administered to financial lawyers and verified through analysis of
laws and regulations as well as public sources of information on collateral and bankruptcy laws. Questionnaire
responses are verified through several rounds of follow-up communication with respondents as well as by contacting
third parties and consulting public sources. The questionnaire data are confirmed through teleconference calls or
on-site visits in all economies.” http://www.doingbusiness.org/methodology/getting -credit
respondents) and tax rates (11.7% of respondents).28 Compared to comparator countries, Guyana’s taxes are only lower than in Haiti and Jamaica—see Figure 8. The indicators used to
determine Guyana’s ranking in ease of paying taxes include the number of payments per year (35), the number of hours per year that are required to fill in tax forms (263 hours), and the tax
rate as a percentage of profits (36.1%).
Figure 8: Guyana ease of paying taxes
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
Guyana may improve in almost all categories that are used by the Ease of Doing Business report
to gauge Guyana’s performance in ease of paying taxes—see Figure 9.
28
2013-2014 Global Competitiveness Report, Guyana Country Profile
Guyana PSAR
44
Figure 9: Guyana comparison of tax and administrative burden
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
v. Business environment
Overall results from the WEF GCI Report show that Guyana’s efforts to improve the business environment are paying off and may be measured by improvements in the ranking over the years.
The last GCI rank has Guyana ranked 102 out of 148 countries, an improvement from 109 in the previous years. Much work remains to be done, however. Figure 10 shows the results from the last Executive Opinion Survey that identifies the most problematic factors for doing business as:
corruption, tax rates, inefficient government bureaucracy, inadequate supply of infrastructure and crime and theft.
Guyana PSAR
45
Figure 10: Guyana most problematic factors for doing business
Source: 2013-2014 Global Competitiveness Report, Guyana Country Profile
In this section this report focuses on the institutions that facilitate private sector development and growth. Figure 11 shows that Guyana has strong institutions in burden of government
regulation, efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations, transparency of government policy making, and ethical behavior of firms—among more. The country could improve performance in the following: reliability of police services, favoritism of decisions of
government officials, irregular payments and bribes, and in strengthening auditing and reporting standards. In all of these indicators the country ranks poorly.
Guyana PSAR
46
Figure 11: Guyana's institutions for private sector growth
Source: 2013-2014 Global Competitiveness Report, Guyana Country Profile
Overall, Guyana ranks below the regional average in ease of doing business, but better than comparator countries Dominican Republic, Suriname and Haiti—see Figure 12. Areas in which
Guyana lags include: getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, paying taxes, and resolving insolvency. The country does comparatively well in dealing with construction permits, protecting investors, trading across borders, and enforcing contracts—see Figure 13.
Guyana PSAR
47
Figure 12: Guyana ease of doing business
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
Figure 13: Guyana business environment
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
Guyana PSAR
48
vi. Technology and innovation
As previously noted in this report Guyana is at the early stages of becoming a hub for the provision business process outsourcing (BPO) services. Qualfon, the first company that is
providing these services in Guyana, employs over 1,700 people in the country and has plans for large expansion in the near term. Guyana offers an educated labor force that speaks English as a
first language at competitive prices, factors quoted by investors when deciding where to invest.
Successful expansion of BPO services would require complementary investments in ICT and more generally in research and development. According to the WEF GCI Guyana needs to
invest in mobile broadband technology—see Figure 14. More generally, the country needs to take advantage of the opportunity offered by BPO services.
Figure 14: Guyana technological readiness—the first column denotes the score, and the
second the ranking
Source: 2013-2014 Global Competitiveness Report, Guyana Country Profile
This report suggest that an assessment of the specific needs of BPO and complementary services
is performed. This assessment would identify infrastructure and knowhow gaps that should be filled to take full advantage of investments in BPO. The experience from other countries indicates that a concerted effort to facilitate the expansion of the service sector requires the
participation of public and private actors. From this perspective, a program similar to the WB that is focusing on science issues at the University of Guyana may be developed with an
emphasis on ICT.
vii. Trade and FDI policies
As previously noted in this report Guyana welcomes foreign direct investment, and prospective projects are channeled to GoInvest. Importantly, Guyana offers significant fiscal incentives for prospective businesses—the list of these incentives was presented in a previous section in this
report.
In this section this report focuses on how easy is it to trade in Guyana. Figure 15 notes that Guyana’s trade environment is positive when compared to other countries in the region, only the
Dominican Republic has better performance than Guyana.
Guyana PSAR
49
Figure 15: Guyana ease of trading across borders
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
An important indicator is the cost to export per container—see Figure 16. Over time the cost per container has remained constant at about US$730, comparing favorably with the region average.
According to the WB Ease of Doing Business, it takes 7 documents and 19 days to export. Importing costs a bit more, US$745 per container, and takes more effort and time: 8 documents and 22 days. Although Guyana compares well with other countries in the region, this is an area
that could be improved, especially given the opportunities for exporting agricultural goods to the region.
Guyana PSAR
50
Figure 16: Guyana cost to export (US$ per container)
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
viii. Labor regulation
Guyana has ratified all 8 fundamental conventions of the ILO—freedom of association (C087 and C098), forced labor (C029 and C105), discrimination (C100 and C111) and child labor
(C138 and C182).29 This provides a good framework for setting the incentive framework for labor markets. According to people interviewed, the legal framework for labor markets is good in the country, with acceptable flexibility for hiring and firing. The work week was recently cut
to 40 hours, an issue that created some friction between unions and private sector representatives. This issue, however, is not high in the agenda for reforms. The country also enforces a minimum
wage of GY$202 per hour. Sub-contracting is common practice and used to bypass regulations on full time employment. Unionization, such as in all countries in the region, is falling and stands at about 30%. As usual in the Caribbean, labor issues are subject to significant tripartite
negotiations.
Figure 17 confirms this assessment. According to the WEF GCI, Guyana ranks well in most indicators of market efficiency. In particular hiring and firing practices and flexibility of wage
determination. A puzzling result presented in the GCI report is that the capacity to retain talent is very good, which is inconsistent with anecdotal evidence that shows large numbers of
Guyanese migrating abroad, especially teachers and nurses. This issue merits additional analysis as it may be that for selected skills there are good conditions that provide incentives to stay in the
country, and that for other sets of skills, there are less incentives and those are the ones that migrate. This would indicate an interesting segmentation in the labor market, with some skill-set
earning high returns on education, and another very low returns on education.
Figure 17: Guyana labor market indicators of efficiency—the first column denotes the
score, and the second the ranking
Source: 2013-2014 Global Competitiveness Report, Guyana Country Profile
ix. Infrastructure, communications and energy
The most relevant issue for Guyana is the supply and cost of electricity. Figure 18 shows that
the country ranks poorly in quality of ports, airports, and electricity. Of these, most of the representatives of the private sector identified high cost and unreliable supply of electricity as the most important factor that slows down the expansion of private sector activities, especially for
manufacturing. According to people interviewed, most medium and large manufacturing industries use electricity generated by diesel generators, which are reliable but very expensive to
run.
Guyana PSAR
52
Figure 18: Guyana WEF CGI indicators of infrastructure—the first column denotes the
score, and the second the ranking
Source: 2013-2014 Global Competitiveness Report, Guyana Country Profile
Figure 19 shows that Guyana is the worst performer compared to comparator countries, ranking
148 out of 185 countries in the Ease of Doing Business report. For a business to get electricity in Guyana, it needs to follow 7 procedures, wait 109 days and spend the equivalent of 542% of per capita income. Cost of electricity is among the highest in the world, with costs of that average
US$ 39 cents per kwh.30 31 As previously noted in this report, supply of electricity is a priority for the expansion of the private sector, and has been prioritized by government that is pursuing
building the Amaila Falls hydroelectric power plant.
Source: 2013 Ease of Doing Business, Guyana Country Profile
x. Environment
Arguably the largest asset of the country is its endowment in natural resources. Guyana is a small country sparsely populated that has recognized the importance of maintaining its natural
endowments and has found a viable alternative to ensure its preservation. The Low Carbon Development Strategy and the funding that has been agreed with the government of Norway provides an example to other countries that also share the characteristic of Guyana. The LCSD
and related Norway support has already been presented in this report.
xi. Gender
Such as with the environment, gender issues and how to address them are important for government and civil society in Guyana. The Constitution explicitly provides for equal rights to
men and women in all spheres of political, economic and social life. Moreover, it incorporates provisions of the “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women” and the “Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence against Women.” Political representation of women in Parliament is mandated by law establishing that 33% of candidates on the slates of political parties must be women. According
to the U.S. 2010 Human Rights Report written by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Libor of the U.S. State Department,
Guyana PSAR
54
A recent issue with impact on gender equality is the support for the work of the Women and Gender Equality Commission that promotes women’s rights and gender equality in Guyana. The
third report prepared by the Commission and presented to Parliament in August 2013 recommends, among more, designing sensitization programs to be implemented for trafficking in
persons and sexual offences, creation of a policy on sexual harassment in the workplace and a review of the building code to include provision for access to persons with disabilities.
Data on gender issues is not easy to find for Guyana. The World Bank Enterprise Survey of 2010 notes that women are underrepresented in top management, however, compared to Latin
America and lower middle income countries, women participate more in ownership of firms—see Figure 20. The E.U. 2008-2013 country strategy quotes female to male labor participation at
35% and 42% in 1990 and 2002 respectively, but additional information on participation of women in the labor force is not available.
Figure 20: Guyana women in management and ownership
Source: World Bank Enterprise Survey 2010
3) Chapter II: Selecting and prioritizing issues
This section presents the priority PSD issues which have been identified throughout this report, and a proposal for a PSD plan to be implemented in the short-term that would complement
several PSD processes that are currently in preparation and in execution in Guyana.
a) Opportunities for selective interventions to improve the business climate in Guyana
Identified constraint Suggested goal Proposed outcome Specific actions Comments/background
Insecure property rights
Insecure property rights
for miners and farmers
Land property registered and
used as collateral for bank
lending to mining and
agriculture companies or
individuals
Increased investment by
miners and farmers in
modernizing productive
practices and increasing
productivity. Significant
increase in production and exports
Lower impact of productive
practices on the environment,
especially in the mining sector
and in the hinterland
Compilation of studies
prepared in the last 10 years
with emphasis on mining and
agriculture. With that
information: prepare an action
plan that would result in
providing secured and long-
term property rights and
modern registration of property for farmers and miners
This is not a full-blown reform
of property rights in the
country. This is a focused
effort on strengthening the
property rights of farmers and miners
Design a program that would
ensure sustainable practices for
small producers, especially
addressing issues of
deforestation and water/soil
pollution
The cumbersome system of
assigning property rights in
Guyana has been extensively
analyzed over the years and it
has been summarized in many
reports. For this reason it is
not necessary to add more
studies to identify the
problems.
This effort would require a
change in the framework for
how property is treated and
valued in Guyana. Now
government has a monopoly
over land, resulting in an
inefficient system of land
distribution that is
characterized by poor
transparency and discretion.
However, this system has been
in place for many years, and to
replace it would require
political support, always difficult in Guyana.
From this perspective, it is best
to follow a phased approach
that would emphasize initially
a solution, partial?, to property
rights over land by miners and farmers
Limited access to Expansion of credit to the Increase of the lending Survey banks to find extent of
financial services provision for
It is important to note the
growing frustration of private
Guyana PSAR
56
Identified constraint Suggested goal Proposed outcome Specific actions Comments/background
finance
Access to finance is
limited to large and
established businesses
and individuals.
Young, small and
medium size businesses
find it difficult to access
finance services from
the banking sector for
working capital. All
firms, young and
established, cannot
access long-term
financing for capital
investments on good
terms.
In addition, lending
almost always requires
real estate collateral
that in many cases
greatly exceeds the
amount of loans
provided. The banking
system does not use
modern financial
services such as leasing,
factoring and secured
transactions
private sector
Introduction of lending
instruments that are not
collateralized by real estate,
using leasing, factoring and secured transactions
Introduction of long-term
instruments for funding capital
investments of small, medium and large enterprises
portfolio of banks
Suggested measurable outcomes:
Total credit to the private sector (% of GDP
Total share of credit to small
and medium enterprises of
total credit to the private sector
(% of total credit, number of
firms)
Quality of the portfolio (non-
performing portfolio as a % of total portfolio)
Nominal and real, passive and
active, interest rates
Maturity of the portfolio, by
type of lending instrument, in
months
leasing, factoring and secured
transactions (# of banks
offering the service, # of
clients and types of clients
(small, medium and large enterprises) using the service
Review of bank regulations to
allow for the expansion of financial services
Develop leasing and factoring
services to be provided by the
banking sector
Creation of registries for
movable property required for
the provision of secured
transactions services. Initial
focus on agriculture and commerce
Training for bankers on how to
design and implement
appropriate programs to create
and expand leasing, factoring
and secure transactions services
Leverage the newly created
CreditInfo, Guyana’s first
credit bureau, and facilitate its
expansion and use by the banking sector
Prepare a proposal to facilitate
the financing of businesses in
Guyana by Guyanese nationals
sector leaders with the banking
system “lack of response” to
their financial needs—an issue
widely recognized as the WB
Ease of Doing Business ranks
Guyana 167 out of 185
countries in 2013. According
to private sector leaders, banks
have excess liquidity that
could be put to more
productive uses. However,
from the bankers’ perspective,
they argue that their lending
policies maximize returns to
shareholders and balance risk
and return, given the structure
of the economy and financial
regulations, including a 12%
reserve requirement.
Many private sector leaders are
supporting the creation of a
“development bank” that
would fill in the lending gaps
that exist in the market. The
creation of a development
bank in Guyana would, as in
many small countries in Latin
America, create incentives for
rent seeking, and would add to
the contingent liabilities of government.
It is therefore important to
highlight that the solution to
the shortcomings in the
provision of financial services
should be addressed by
strengthening the banking
Guyana PSAR
57
Identified constraint Suggested goal Proposed outcome Specific actions Comments/background
that live abroad. Such as in
other countries in the region,
the large number of Guyanese
living abroad may be
interested in funding
opportunities in Guyana.
These experiences may inform
the creation of a similar program for Guyana
Design a program of
guarantees to be used for the
expansion of credit to the
private sector with emphasis
on small and medium sized
enterprises
sector, and by facilitating its
expansion
Limited access to
finance—micro and small credit
Limited access to
finance by individual
entrepreneurs that need
micro or small loans to
grow
Expansion of credit to the
private sector by increasing
access to finance to individual
entrepreneurs, with a focus on
rice producers and traders in
urban areas
Increase of credit to the private
sector’s segment of individual
entrepreneurs
Suggested measurable outcomes:
Micro credit to the private
sector (number of loans,
amount)
Terms of the micro loans (size,
maturity, grace periods, interest rates)
Prioritized sectors: rice and
commerce
Map out the business of micro
credit institutions such as
IPED. Analyze and review
their best practices, identify
assets and liabilities of their
approach
Facilitate the expansion of
current institutions that provide
micro credit—cooperatives
and other institutions such as
IPED that specialize in the
provision of micro and small
loans
There is an active non-banking
system in Guyana that
provides small loans to farmers
and traders. These institutions
have several years working in
Guyana and have accumulated
significant experience in the
market, and have brand
recognition and a stable client
base. The expansion of their
markets would have a large
impact on access to finance to
micro and small loans
High tax rates and
link to the informal sector
The WEF GCI 2013-
Increased investment by the
private sector as a consequence of lower tax rates
Identified constraint Suggested goal Proposed outcome Specific actions Comments/background
produce about 7,600MW,
many of which are related to
small to medium sized
hydroelectric power plants.
A review of the better projects
would make a contribution as
it would divert attention from
the highly contentious Amaila
Falls project, and may result in
the selection of several small
ones which could be executed
in the near-term
National
competitiveness unit
work is winding down
Continue improving Guyana’s
competitiveness Productivity increases
Consolidate the national
competitiveness unit into a
permanent institution.
GoInvest could incorporated
the assets of this executing
unit, strengthening the
executive capacity of GoInvest
The National Competitiveness
Strategy, prepared by the
National Competiveness Unit,
considers improvements to
infrastructure (roads, air and
sea/river). The unit was
financed by an IDB loan,
which is in the final stages of
execution. The work of this
unit should be continued and
maybe
b) Additional recommendations to accelerate private sector growth and development in
Guyana
Strengthen the policy framework for the development of the rice and gold sectors in
Guyana. These two sectors lead economic activity in the country, however, as previously noted, insecure property rights have a negative impact on investment and growth. The problems that
these sectors face go beyond property rights, and their importance merit the design of policies that are designed to facilitate their expansion and development.
For agriculture former President Jagdeo has formulated a proposal for the development of agriculture within CARICOM. Known as the Jagdeo initiative, that would prioritize agricultural
production and set the stage for future agribusiness developments that would result in significant regional and extra regional trade. By 2015 the initiative proposes to: “make substantial
contributions to economic development, social and environmental sustainability; have a transparent regulatory framework at national and regional levels, that promotes, attracts and facilitates capital and investments; have significantly transformed its processes and products
and stimulates innovation and entrepreneurship; and enable the region to achieve an acceptable and stable level of food security.” Moreover, the initiative identifies ten constraints that limit
the growth of the sector: limited financing, outdated and inefficient health and safety standards; inadequate research and development; fragmented and disorganized private sector; inefficient land and water management systems; deficient and uncoordinated risk management systems;
inadequate transportation; weak and non-integrated information systems; weak market linkages; and lack of skilled workers.
This approach is particularly appropriate for Guyana, one of the largest countries in the region
with a strong agricultural sector. It could be the foundation for the development of a long-term policy that solely focus on the sector, with emphasis on the role of the private sector and on reducing the barriers that slow its growth and development.
Similarly, a mining development policy framework that introduces appropriate incentives for the
expansion of the mining sector in Guyana would set the stage for new and higher investments in the sector. Issues of relevance include leveling the playing field for domestic miners. The issues
related to property rights, as noted in the previous section, are the priority but are not the only ones. The mining sector is a high risk business that requires significant initial investment. In general, the sector would benefit from policies that facilitate these initial investments with the
following facilities, among other: tax deductions allowed for failed investments, appropriate depreciation schedules for equipment. Additional factors that would be included in a policy
framework for the mining sector include: skills development, social and environmental issues, and modernization of extraction practices.
Leveled playing field for investments. The issues presented about the mining and agricultural
sectors also affect other sectors in the economy. Current practices to facilitate private sector development are appropriate and should be encourage. However, strengthening the capacity of GoInvest by ensuring that incentives apply evenly to all participants, regardless of sector, size or
nationality, would provide equal ground for all market participants. In particular GoInvest
Guyana PSAR
61
template for investments should be used as a benchmark for the expansion of private sector activities in the country. The use of public private partnerships could be expanded—more on
this issue in the next recommendation. In essence, clear, common and transparent investment incentives should apply to all.
Reassess PPP policy and the role of the private sector. Currently government has committed
to the development of large projects that are considered priorities for the country: the Marriott Hotel in Georgetown, expanding the Cheddi Jegan International Airport, building a specialty hospital and building the hydroelectric power plant at Amaila Falls. These projects fit for public
private participation, and in some cases government has started negotiations with relevant private sector partnert—for the Marriott Hotel. These projects offer the opportunity to develop a
framework for public private partnerships in Guyana. Such as in other countries in the region, the infrastructure gap in Guyana is wide and cannot be filled with public investment. Other countries in Latin America, most notably Peru, are using PPP to bring in the private sector and
fund large infrastructure projects.
The Peruvian authorities recognize the infrastructure gap and the fact that the public sector does not have the resources to fill it on its own—the investment gap in Peru is estimated at US$88
billion for the period 2012-2021.32 For this reason, government announced its intention of working with the private sector using Public Private Partnerships. The Peruvian authorities put
up for bid these infrastructure projects-in airports, ports, urban transportation metro lines, energy transmission lines, mining developments, telecommunications, agricultural irrigation among others. The procurement process for infrastructure projects requires a bidding process with well-
defined rules. Interested companies buy bidding documents, and then present proposals. The process generally involves four steps: a project is announced and bidding documents are sold to any company that wants to participate; interested companies present their proposals in three sets
of documents: technical and financial qualifications (called envelope 1), their technical proposal (called envelope 2), and their economic proposal (called envelope 3).
Because government has recognized that they cannot fully fund these investments, all infrastructure projects are Public Private Partnerships (PPP). For some investment projects
government would make a financial contribution; for the rest, the majority, government would grant a 20-40 year concession to the winner of the bid without making any financial contribution.
In general, projects with low rates of financial return would be enhanced by a financial contribution from government to provide incentives for private companies to participate in the bidding process—for example rural electrification projects tend to have low financial rates of
return. Projects with high returns are expected to be fully funded by the private sector company selected during the bidding process, and the company makes money from the concession
contract. Guyana may benefit from a similar approach, which would bring in needed investments in
infrastructure without adding fiscal pressure to the budget. Guyana has the experience of the PPP for the construction and operation of the Berbice Bridge. The bridge is managed by the
Berbice Bridge Company Inc. (BBCI), on a version of a PPP with significant government participation in financing this project. Government may also build on this experience.
32
Asociación para el Fomento de la Infraestructura Nacional (Afin).
Guyana PSAR
62
c) Action plan
The PSAR methodology calls for the preparation of an action plan for the implementation of the main recommendations. This is appropriate for many countries in the region that do not have a
well-structured institutional framework to support an agenda for reforms for private sector growth and development. This is not the case for Guyana. As noted, Guyana’s NCS and LCDS, and the institutions that implement them and monitor its results, are the ones that should continue
taking the lead. Ideally, the NCS Unit should take the recommendations presented in this report and if appropriate include them in their work program.
4) Follow-up, monitoring and evaluation
The PSAR/DMX includes the definition and creation of databases for future monitoring and
evaluation of results of both instruments. These instruments are powerful tools for the selection of priority interventions to support PSD, as well as for the coordination of ongoing and future programs and projects. Importantly, the suggestions presented in this report would be
incorporated into the work program of the NCS Unit, if considered appropriate. In this context, Table 14 suggests indicators that may be used to monitor the actions presented in this report. It is important to note that the NCS Unit already has a system that monitors implementation of
initiatives—as noted the NCS has 245 specific actions. Therefore the intention of this table is to complement the methodology and monitoring process already in place, not to replace it.
Guyana PSAR
63
Table 14: PSAR monitoring indicators
Purpose of the PSAR Indicator Output Outcome
Overall characteristics of the
economy in relation to PSD
General macroeconomic indicators, such as total and
private sector real growth, inflation, total and private
sector employment, private sector exports as a
percentage of total exports
X
Competitiveness indicators as presented in the World
Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Index and
the World Bank Ease of Doing Business Reports
X
Collect primary data on businesses that provide goods
and services to multinational corporations in the
energy sector—sales, exports, number of employees
X
Identification of PSD priorities Short selection of PSD priority areas that merit
support from the donor community X
Increased focus on PSD support
from the donor community Average size and number of programs and projects X
Identify duplication and overlapping
initiatives to improve efficient
private sector support by the donor
community
Number and amount of programs and projects that
duplicate or overlap initiatives X
Number and amount of programs and projects that
have been merged/consolidated X
Number and amount of new multi-donor efforts in
areas in which duplication or overlapping had been
identified
X
Identify omissions and gaps in
donor supported programs that need
to be filled to accelerate private
sector development
Number and amount of new programs and projects
that have been identified as omissions and gaps in the
DMX report
X
Number and amount of new multi-donor efforts in
areas identified as omissions and gaps in the DMX
report
X
5) Chapter III: Conclusions and recommendations
This Guyana Private Sector Assessment Report (GY-PSAR) presented an overall assessment of private sector development (PSD) and recommendations for facilitating and accelerating private
investment and growth. It is important to clarify that important PSD initiatives are currently supported by government and stakeholders in Guyana. The objective of this report is to respectfully contribute to the process to accelerate growth and development, not to compete or
upstage any existing PSD effort. Guyana’s National Competitive Strategy provides an excellent framework for private sector expansion and growth, which is complemented by government’s
Low Carbon Development Strategy. These two combine to offer the most comprehensive framework for development in the region. Moreover, the NCS Unit has played a central role in the implementation of the NCS and complementary activities. For these reasons, the proposals
presented in this document should result in complementary actions to those already in place, and
Guyana PSAR
64
hopefully this report would provide sufficient support for the continuation of the NCS Unit work in Guyana.
Recommendations in addition to those already presented in this report are all related to filling in
data gaps identified during the preparation of this report.
Data and information gaps:
A mapping of private sector activities by sector
• A mapping of financial sector products available to the private sector—such as banking services on factoring, secured transactions, discount of letters, long-term lending terms and
options, stock exchange bond issue conditions, credit ratings of people and companies
• A complete description and analysis of labor markets
• A complete description and analysis of the tax system
• A complete description and analysis of registries, real estate and movable property
• A complete mapping of licensing requirements by sector
Guyana PSAR
65
Annex 1: Sources of information used in this report
The following are the main sources of information used for this report. Data was collected from the Guyana Bureau of Statistics, the Bank of Guyana, and the World Bank DataBank Databases.
Additional documents from many private sector organizations were also used, especially those from the Consultative Association of Guyana Industries, GoInvest, the Guyana Competitiveness
Unit, Guyana Invest Magazine, Georgetown Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Guyana Manufacturing and Services Association, IPED, the Ministry of Trade, the Private Sector Commission, the Small Business Bureau, and THAG.
Government of Guyana. 2006. Enhancing National Competitiveness: A National Competitiveness Strategy for Guyana. Government of Guyana in partnership with the Private Sector. Georgetown.
Government of Guyana. 2010. A low-carbon development strategy. Transforming Guyana’s
economy while combating climate change.
Delegation of the European Commission. 2008. Country Strategy Paper and National Indicative Programme for the period 2008-2013.
Fundacion de Investigaciones Economicas Latinoamericanas. 2013. Productive development
policies for Guyana: the land of many waters. Inception report and work plan.
InterAmerican Development Bank. 2012. IDB Country Strategy with the Cooperative Republic of Guyana 2012-2016. InterAmerican Development Bank, Washington D.C.
International Finance Corporation. 2010. Guyana Country Profile 2010: Enterprise Surveys.
International Finance Corporation. 2013. Economy profile: Guyana. Doing Business 2013.
Smarter regulations for small and medium-size enterprises.
International Monetary Fund. 2011. Guyana: 201 Article IV Consultation—Staff Report, supplement, public information notice on the Executive Board Discussion and Statement by the
Executive Director for Guyana. IMF Country Report No. 11/152.
Nathan Associates. 2007. Guyana Economic Performance Assessment. Publication produced by Nathan Associates Inc. for review by the United States Agency for International Development.
World Economic Forum. 2013. The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014: Full Data Edition is published by the World Economic Forum within the framework of the Global
Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network. World Economic Forum, Geneva.
World Trade Organization. 2009. Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat Guyana Revision.
Guyana PSAR
66
Annex 2: Guyana Donor Matrix Report (GY-DMX)
Description of local stakeholders
Guyana has many public and private institutions that directly or indirectly focus on the expansion of private sector activities. The country, compared to other countries in the region, has a well-
developed framework for growth and development that has been presented to the general public and that over time has been implemented. The framework is provided by the National Competitiveness Strategy and the Low Carbon Development Strategy. These two strategies
guide government policy as it relates to private sector growth, and are summarized in this section. Three public institutions are also analyzed and presented in this report, GoInvest, the
investment promotion agency of Guyana, the Competitiveness Unit that was designed to implement the National Competitiveness Strategy, and the Small Business Bureau which supports the development of small businesses. To these public institutions, this report presents
the most relevant private sector institutions that represent the private sector in Guyana: the Private Sector Commission, the Consultative Association of Guyana Industries, the Georgetown
Chamber of Commerce, the Guyana Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Guyana Manufacturing and Services, the Tourism Association, the Guyana Gold and Diamond Association, the Guyana Rice Development Board, and the Guyana Tourism Authority.
The list of participants and issues is very large and does not necessarily correspond to the size of the economy. To some extent there is “over representation” as too many actors play too many roles, in many cases overlapping as the companies and their representatives are members of
several institutions. Fragmentation and overcrowding are a problem as the private sector cannot speak with one voice, and diverging agendas do not help move forward important reforms. This is an issue that would be presented as a recommendation for stronger coordination between
private sector actors in Guyana, later in this report.
National Competitiveness Strategy (NCS) and the NCS Unit. Launched in 2006 after significant consultations, this strategy is an ambitious attempt to increase competitiveness.33 The
strategy includes 245 actions that are designed to improve competitiveness, are measurable, and increase rankings of the country, especially in the World Bank Ease of Doing Business surveys.
The NCS actions are divided into core policies, sector policies, strategic sub sector policies, and overarching enablers. Core policies focus on improving the business climate, and include competition and consumer protection, infrastructure, human resources and access to finance.
Sector policies focused on actions that would facilitate the expansion of economic activities in the sugar, rice, and non-traditional agricultural products, and tourism. Strategic sub sectors were
identified as those that could help diversify the economy into promising businesses in its infancy or yet to develop, in fruits and vegetables, aquaculture and forestry. Finally, overarching enablers focused on how to implement the NCS and on the public-private arrangements that
would be necessary for taking concrete actions with support from all relevant actors.
33
Guyana National Competitiveness Strategy. Enhancing National Competitiveness. A National Competitiveness
Strategy for Guyana. Government of Guyana in Partnership with the Private Sector.
Guyana PSAR
67
It is common for many countries, and actors within countries, to prepare comprehensive strategies. It is not common to follow through on them. Guyana is an exception as the NCS was
used by government to develop an implementation plan, which was supported by an IDB loan, the Support for Competitiveness Program that facilitated the creation of the National
Competitiveness Strategy Unit empowered to implement the strategy. The NCS also received significant support from other donor funded projects, such as the Agricultural Support Services Program, the Agricultural Diversification Program, and the Guyana Trade and Investment
Support.34 Because of these efforts, the NCS by 2013 can show concrete results: 57 out of the 245 actions proposed in the plan have been completed, 83 are at late stages of completion, and
72 are at early stages of implementation.35 Some of the most relevant actions completed include: the Secretariat of the Competition Commission was created to serve as a consumer protection agency that would implement the 2011 Consumer Protection Bill; implementation of the Value
Added Tax (VAT) and Excise Regime; lowering the Corporate Income Tax from 45% to 40% for commercial companies and from 35% to 30% for non-commercial companies, still high by
regional standards but improving; the Commercial Court is functioning providing services for dispute resolution; using real estate for collateral lending from commercial banks and more generally facilitating the development of land and property markets; and passing legislation and
the establishment of a Credit Bureau, CreditInfo, that started functioning in September 2013.
In spite of the partial success of the implementation of the NCS, much remains to be done. As noted the NCS Unit, which has been leading the implementation of the strategy, was funded by
an IDB loan. This project is at late stages of execution and resources have been almost exhausted. Moving forward, the work done by the NCS Unit should be continued.
Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS).36 Approved in 2010, this document is a statement of Guyana’s approach to sustainable development, in particular to the protection of
forests and a commitment to a low carbon development. The strategy, and the current agreement for its implementation with Norway, in essence leverages Guyana’s large rain forest assets and
recognizes, and values, the opportunity cost of deforestation. The implementation of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) commits Norway to pay Guyana annual installments based on performance criteria linked to preserving its rain forest. The initial package is worth
US$250 million for five years, starting in 2009, which would be paid out of a World Bank administered trust fund named Guyana REDD-Plus Investment Fund (GRID).
The resources received from the trust fund are being invested in seven priority projects/issues:
(i) the Amaila Falls hydroelectric project; (ii) accelerating Amerindian land titling; (iii) funding the Amerindian Development Fund; (iv) expanding fiber optic infrastructure; (v) provide micro
finance; (vi) establishing a Centre for Bio-Diversity and Low Carbon Development; and (vii) monitoring, reporting and verification systems for the LCDS.
34
IDB US$26.65 million loan Support for Competitiveness Program approved in 2006; IDB US$22.5 million loan
Agricultural Support Services Program approved in 2004; DFID £1.3 million grant Guyana Agricultural
Diversification Program; USAID two phases of grant funding for the Guyana Trade and Investment (US$7.6 and
US$7.3 million). 35
National Competitiveness Strategy. Monitoring and Evaluation Review: 2006-2012. May 31st
2102. National
Competitiveness Strategy Unit. 36
A low-carbon development strategy. Transforming Guyana’s economy while combating climate change. Office
of the President, Republic of Guyana. May 2010.
Guyana PSAR
68
There is no formal connection between the NCS and the LCDS, however, they complement each other. The current priorities of the LCDS have significant impact on competitiveness, and
therefore on private sector growth, especially in recognizing the need for more energy at lower cost (priority i); property rights (priority ii); modernizing infrastructure (priority iv); and
expanding credit (priority v).
GoInvest. The Guyana Office for Investment is a public institution that promotes private sector investment. Modeled after similar institutions throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, GoInvest channels interest in investing in Guyana by providing information, sponsoring trade
shows, and facilitating the processes for investors. GoInvest has prioritized the following sectors:
Agriculture & Agro-Processing- Includes seafood & aquaculture, processing (fruit juice
Housing, Fashion, Music & other Entertainment, Machining
Energy- Includes Petroleum & Gas Exploration, Solar Power, Hydro Power, Bio-fuels, Bio-diesel, Wind Power, Cogeneration from Rice Husk/ Bagasse & Biomass Power
Information & Communication Technology- Includes Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), Call Centres (inbound/outbound), Software Development, Medical & Legal
Transcription
Mining - some mining projects, laboratories and machinery
GoInvest facilitates investment in these priority sectors by providing significant incentives for
investing in Guyana. General incentives include:37
Exemption from Customs Duty on most plant machinery and equipment, raw materials used in manufacturing
Exemption from Customs Duty and zero VAT on raw materials and packaging for manufactures that export 50% or more of their products
Unlimited carryover of losses from previous years
Accelerated depreciation of plant and machinery for approved activities
Full and unrestricted repatriation of capital, profits and dividends
Benefits of double taxation treaties with the U.K., Canada, Kuwait and CARICOM
37
GoInvest has a contract template used for all sectors. We did not have access to this template, and the information
provided in this list comes from the press as reported in the FIEL inception report.
Guyana PSAR
69
Exception from Customs Duty and zero VAT on items approved under an Investment
Agreement between the government and the business
Removal of taxes on equipment used for generating electricity from non-traditional or renewable sources for both household and commercial purposes
Exemption from Excise Tax on items approved under an Investment Agreement between the government and the business
Zero rate VAT on exports
Tax holidays
Figure 22: GoInvest distribution of projects by sector, 2013
Source: GoInvest presentation to the Cross Border Agriculture Investments in the Caribbean
meeting
Although detailed information about the results of this institution are somewhat limited, there are some indicators that point towards success. Figure 5 shows the distribution of projects facilitated
by GoInvest by sector. The largest sectors that have attracted investments in the country are agro-processing, services, wood products, and light manufacturing. Figure 6 shows that the majority of investments were related to small projects. A highlight of the work of GoInvest is
the investment by Interamericana Trading Corporation (ITC), a Barbados corporation with multi sector investments throughout the region, that in February 2010 signed a Memorandum of
Understanding for investing in the Large Scale Integrated Farm Project in the Rupununi Savannahs. ITC created Santa Fe Inc. as a Guyanese affiliate, and was granted fiscal concessions for investments in growing rice, soya beans and cow peas, in addition to cattle,
sheep and goats. Longer term plans call for additional investments in aquaculture, fruits and
Guyana PSAR
70
grains—maize and sorghum. Santa Fe employs about 60 people, that farm 1,000 acres of rice using zero tillage technology, and has invested in mills and silos.
Some people interviewed noted that, in spite of the template approved by Parliament detailing
the incentives for investing in Guyana, GoInvest and government discretionary approach to identifying investments puts domestic businesses at a disadvantage. In addition, it was noted that
GoInvest does not make decisions or provide licenses, it coordinates the actions of other government units and facilitates processes. Some criticize GoInvest for being slow, or for not being able to deliver needed licenses. Some of these criticisms should be addressed as this
institution continues to expand.
Figure 23: GoInvest distribution of projects by size, 2013
Source: GoInvest presentation to the Cross Border Agriculture Investments in the Caribbean meeting
Small Business Bureau (SBB). The Small Business Act, passed in 2004, resulted in the
creation of the Small Business Bureau and the Small Business Council. The SBB offers support for the development of small businesses, and offers services such as training, export workshops, formal registration, and trade shows. Through the SBB, small businesses can grow and become
successful commercial institutions. Priority areas, in the context of the Low Carbon Micro and Small Enterprise Development Project (LCMSEDF), include farming, processing, aquaculture,
eco-tourism, business process outsourcing and bio-ethanol. The SBB is a young institution, it only started operations on June 1st 2010.
Guyana PSAR
71
Importantly the SBB collects information about businesses. In efforts to collect information and facilitate the formalization process of small businesses, the SBB keeps a database. The database
includes, as of October 2013, 6,756 businesses of which about 2,500 have been validated as active businesses—a number of businesses are not active because they have closed or were
improperly registered in the SBB. According to data collected, small businesses consider the following as their largest constraints:38
Access to affordable finance, specifically relating to monies for working capital,
equipment purchase and expansion to existing business premises
Inability to source packaging materials, especially for the manufacturing sector in the
form of bottles, seals and corks
High transportation costs for farmers to transport goods from other regions to region four
A general lack of understanding of managing cash flows, and preparing basic financial
analysis
The database offers good information that should be expanded. Currently, about 73% of
registered businesses employ less than 5 people, 22.3% between 5 and 15, and 4.7% more than 15. Most firms only sell their goods and services to the domestic market, only 15% report selling to the Caribbean, and only 3.8% selling beyond the Caribbean. Inputs are mostly bought
from domestic suppliers, although 24% report buying directly from non-domestic suppliers. Table 10 provides the distribution of firms by sector in the SBB database.
Table 15: Small Business Bureau firms by sector, 2013
No. Priority Sectors Total
1 Agriculture 702
2 Agro-processing 160
3 Apiculture 21
4 Aquaculture 16
5 Handicraft 375
6 Internet Services 66
7 Mining 1
8 Poultry 47
9 Tourism 33
10 Transportation Services 220
Other Services
1 Auto repairs 15
2 Auto Supplies 13
3 Beauty Salons 33
5 Beverage Distributors 14
4 Book Store 7
6 Car wash 9
38
Data provided by the SBB.
Guyana PSAR
72
7 Catering Service 7
8 Clothing 27
15 Clothing and accessories 39
9 Confectionaries 37
10 Construction Materials 5
11 Cosmetolgy 36
12 Education 7
16 Foams manufacturing 9
17 Food Snackette 57
18 Furniture Stores 26
19 Furniture Rentals 3
21 Grocery Shop 68
22 Home Décor 6
23 Stationery 13
24 Jewellery 19
25 Lumber Yard 9
26 Management Consultancy 5
27 Money Trasfers 1
28 Pharmacetical 19
29 Photo Studios/ Services 14
30 Refridgeration Services 9
31 Restaurants/cafes 39
32 Sewing & Tailoring 18
33 Shipping Service 2
34 Variety Stores 123
35 Wholesale & Retail Trading 170
Source: Small Business Bureau
Private Sector Commission (PSC). Established in 1992, it is the senior institution that represents the private sector in Guyana, and plays a central role as representative of private
sector interests to government, unions and civil society. The priority areas for support of private sector growth include: promote projects with high value added; facilitate exports and investment;
collect and share information about the private sector; improve governance and security; facilitate the development of alliances, domestic and international, for the expansion of private sector activities; and build up skills and retain them in the country.
Important actions sponsored by the Private Sector Commission include: collaboration with the Council for Technical and Vocational Education and the Board of Industrial Training, submitting proposals to the University of Guyana to restructure curriculum so that students would have the
skills demanded by private sector; supported the agenda of the NCS, in particular those activities that would improve transportation, ports, creating a single window automated processing system,
improving the business climate and increasing the supply of energy at lower costs than now.
Guyana PSAR
73
Proposals to government presented by the PSC in 2013 that succeeded include: lowering property tax rates to zero for individuals owning less than G$40 million and the personal income
tax rate was reduced to 30%.
The PSC announced to pursued three projects that they consider priorities for 2013: (i) the creation of a development bank, and preliminary discussions with the World Bank IFC, the
European Investment Bank and Venture Capital companies indicate initial interest in this new financial institution; (ii) the creation of an international trade arm of the PSC, that would give the private sector a better position to represent their interests in international trade negotiations and
agreements; and (iii) the establishment of a CARICOM private sector group, that would represent the interests of the private sector at the highest level of CARICOM negotiations.
Georgetown Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI). Established in 1890 it is the
oldest private sector organization in Guyana, and its membership includes businesses from all sectors and sizes. The GCCI has an active program that includes the presentation of the “Agenda
for Action: Top 20 Barriers to Guyana’s Competitiveness.” The agenda includes:
Ensuring political and economic stability
Enacting local government reform and administering elections—noting that Guyana has
not held local government elections in 17 years
Improving the tax system—noting high rates
Encouraging investments and the use of alternative sources of energy
Transforming the University of Guyana and expanding training and educational
opportunities—to meet the needs of the private sector
Implementing comprehensive security sector reform—as a proposal to lower crime
Establishing a development bank
Ensuring more transparency and accountability in the management of the public and
private sectors
Enacting urgent commencement of the public procurement commission (PPC) and the
inclusion of private sector concessions to the mandate of the PPC
Resolving Guyana’s skills challenge—noting the mismatch between skills supplied and
demanded in the market
Providing a balanced, efficiently managed regulatory protocol and framework
Establishing a culture of market innovation, research and development
Accelerating the process of information and communication technology liberalization to
make Guyana competitive—opening up the market for communications
Building modern infrastructure
Making Guyana a magnet for foreign direct investment
Building a globally competitive manufacturing sector
Enacting modern intellectual property laws
Accelerating the implementation of the NCS
Strengthening the commercial court
Strengthening foreign economic diplomacy
Guyana PSAR
74
The GCCI uses extensively survey tools to identify the needs of their members and their opinion with respect to issues of relevance to the private sector. In 2012 they executed a survey, a needs
assessment, to collect information about their membership. The main finding of the survey is that 77.1% of the members point to tax reform as the most important policy issue. Trade
relationships of members are extensive and include trading processed manufactured food goods, machinery, agriculture chemicals and products, tires, spare parts, hardware materials, clothing among many more. As previously noted, the small size of the economy does not allow for the
creation and growth of a domestic manufacturing sector. The survey also reveals significant trade in services, with Guyanese companies buying the following services: accounting and audit,
tax and other related services, multimedia, insurance, risk management and other consultancy, ocean freight, shipping and logistics, and security. An important finding is related to skills needed, but scarce, in the market. According to the survey businesses find it difficult to find
skills related to: customer service, human resources, sales, and accounting and finance. Most businesses use web-based applications, however the main tool for marketing is word of mouth.
The GCCI also collects information about their members attitudes toward relevant current issues
in the country—the attitudinal survey. The 2013, only the second survey executed, finds that in general GCCI members are optimistic about future prospects, over 91% of respondents noted that their companies made profits in 2012, and 87% rated business activities as strong. The
major obstacles for doing business are keeping good employees (42%), high tax rates (31%), and high cost and unreliable supply of energy (22%). Government efforts to support business is rated
well, with over 60% of respondents characterizing it as moderately to very supportive. However, corruption is also perceived as a problem. Politics are a concern, as 83% of respondents noted their lack of satisfaction with the performance of Parliament. The most important public
investments, according to respondents of the survey, are the Amaila Falls hydroelectric power plant, the Lethem road, interior roads construction and improvements, building a recycling plant,
and maritime ports upgrades.
Consultative Association of Guyana Industries (CAGI). Established in 1962, the CAGI represents the interests of employers in labor disputes with unions. It is a member of the Private Sector Commission, and takes the lead on labor policy and industrial relations. Members
represent most sectors in the economy, including shipping, transport, trade, mining, manufacturing, forestry, construction, insurance and banking among other. A recent issue that
required the support from CAGI was changing legislation that established a 40-hour work week, replacing a 48-hour work week. This issue created opposition from private sector representatives as they would have to pay a 50% over regular salary, as regular over time, to workers that work
on Saturday. This issue was not resolved and the current 40-hour week is enforced in Guyana.
Guyana Manufacturing and Services Association (GMSA). Established in 1963, groups manufacturing and services economic groups, including textiles, pharmaceuticals, construction
materials, financial, health, environmental, transportation, trade, entertainment, and education among other. The largest group measured by sales is beverages, that is actively searching for
opportunities to penetrate regional markets.
The GMSA has identified issues and interventions that would facilitate the expansion of the manufacturing sector in Guyana:
Guyana PSAR
75
Cost of energy and unreliable supply
High trade transaction costs, related to customs delays for import and export transactions. The GMSA proposes accelerating the implementation of the Single Window Automated Processing System
Promotion of private sector investments and public private partnerships in maritime and air infrastructure, transportation logistics and warehousing
Creating a development bank
Comprehensive review of existing mechanisms to facilitate investments in manufacturing
Increasing the range and quantity of fiscal and financial incentives
Enforce laws that prohibit trade of smuggled goods
Application of mandatory incentives/disincentives to ensure compliance with Quality
Assurance and Reliability Standards
Implementation of a continuous Labor Market Intelligence Survey to gauge occupational
skill demand and supply. Development of competency based entrepreneurial skills training in the education system. Introduction of a National Training Levy and establishing a skills bureau
Facilitate the transformation from sole traders to partnerships with local and foreign partners
Expand the use of ICT to the manufacturing sector
Providing financial assistance to micro, small and medium enterprises
Facilitating closer collaboration for research and development
Guyana Gold and Diamond Miners Association. This association represents the interests of small miners that are responsible for 100% of gold extraction in Guyana. They directly employ
about 15,000 people, and many more indirectly through service providers in air, water and land transportation, security, food, equipment and maintenance. Their largest challenge is access to
capital, an issue already presented in the previous section of this report.
Guyana Rice Development Board (GRDB). Established in 1995, the GRDB promotes the development of the rice industry, facilitates research, and engages in promotional activities. The GRDB estimates that about 10,000 families are dedicated to the production of rice, with about
105 privately owned rice millers. Counting direct and indirect services related to the rice industry, the GRDB estimates that about 100,000 people, or 14% of the population, is involved
in growing and trading rice in Guyana. Such as with mining, the most relevant issue for the expansion and modernization of the industry is access to finance, an issue already presented in the previous section of this report.
In addition to the private and public institutions presented in this section, there are other that
represent other productive sectors of the economy, but that are small or represent small sectors. Among those the most important small sectors is tourism. Guyana Tourism Authority (GTA).
Created in 2002 as a statutory body, the GTA promotes the development of the tourism industry in Guyana. The main responsibilities of the GTA include: monitoring and regulating the supply of tourism services, collecting data, providing specialized training, design and implement
marketing strategies, and improving transportation services. Tourism and Hospitality
Association of Guyana (THAG). This is the association of hoteliers, resort owners, travel
agents, restaurant owners, jewelry and craft shops owners, and transportation services. THAG
Guyana PSAR
76
organizes owners of hotels, restaurants, and transportation services to provide tourism packages to visitors to Guyana.
Description of the donor community
Because of the past events that required significant efforts from the donor community and private sector to provide debt rescheduling and forgiveness to Guyana, the international community is well organized in support of government. In particular, the effort related to HIPC and enhanced
HIPC that triggered the creation of poverty reduction strategies that channeled support from the international community to the country along well-defined issues and projects, resulted in a
cohesive approach by donors. As previously mentioned in this report, these efforts also resulted in good planning capacity by government, that as noted has the best budget process in the region. Government takes the lead in organizing the donor community and assigning them areas of
support.
In this general context, the following paragraphs describe the work programs of the largest international donors working in Guyana.
InterAmerican Development Bank (IDB). The IDB is the largest donor in the country, with an
active program of loans, technical cooperation, studies, and technical advice to government. As previously noted in this report, the IDB was instrumental in supporting government efforts to implement the NCS, and also in the establishment of Guyana’s credit bureau, CreditInfo. These
two actions may be the largest contribution by any donor, in recent years, to facilitate the expansion of private sector activities and to diversify the economy.
As noted, government defines the parameters of the relationship with the IDB and suggest areas
in which the Bank may support government. These parameters are formalized in the IDB Country Strategy with Guyana. The last strategy was prepared for the period 2012-2016, and focuses IDB activities on the following priority areas: sustainable energy, natural resources
management, private sector development, and public sector management. The expected lending program to Guyana is US$82.4 million for the 2012-2016 period, that may increase to US$103.2
million if the country lends less on concessional terms. This is a very small amount of resources compared to the needs of the country, however, according to the authorities and IDB representatives the value added of interventions is mostly related to the transformational
characteristics, not so much about the amounts disbursed—such as the presented examples of the implementation of the NCS or the establishment of a credit bureau.
The IDB work program to support private sector development follows on previous government
efforts to increase competitiveness and innovation. According to the IDB the outcomes of actions that they would fund would: improve the business climate by providing incentives for
reducing the informal sector, increase access to credit by developing a framework for secured transactions, and retain skilled labor; improve the regulatory capacity to enforce standards; and facilitate the adoption of modern production technologies and promote exports and
diversification.
Guyana PSAR
77
Caribbean Development Bank (CDB). The CDB is funding the construction of community roads and improving the west coast Demerara road. The loans would fund the rehabilitation and
maintenance of 240 roads across a number of communities, and improve 30.7 kilometers of highway – Vreed-en-Hoop to Hydronie section of the road and to finance school road safety
education program. These are very large loans, for Guyana and for the CDB, with US$16.4 million and US$32.2 million respectively.
The European Union. The E.U. provides significant grant funding in the context the Guyana Country Strategy Paper 2008-2013 and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper 2011-2015
(PRSP), and the appropriations of the E.U. 10th EDF NIP, which add to €55.4 million. The E.U. objectives in Guyana may be summarized as: (i) addressing economic and environmental
vulnerabilities; and (ii) promoting social cohesion and combating poverty. The country strategy identifies two priority areas: contributing to Guyana’s sector policy on coastal management, and macroeconomic support for the implementation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy.
The PRSP formally recognizes the importance of growth for poverty reduction. The policies that would promote growth include: maintaining a sound macroeconomic framework; providing a business friendly environment for private sector growth; continued modernization of the
traditional sectors; emergence and growth in new sectors; and ICT-cross cutting policy to support growth and development.
World Bank. The work program of the World Bank in Guyana includes two loans designed to
improve teacher education, and to strengthen the University of Guyana science and technology. These operations focus on improving tertiary education. The UG Science and Technology Support, US$11.4 million, is designed to improve education quality, rehabilitate infrastructure,
and improve management.39 Important activities to execute within this operation include: updating science curricula and funding research in science areas that impact the implementation
of the LCDS. The project was approved in 2011 and become effective in December 2012. There are no preliminary results to date.
The project appraisal document provides significant description and analysis of the main issues that the University of Guyana faces, and focuses on the four faculties of science and technology.
Of interest to private sector expansion is to improve the local capacity to assess climate change impact on the country’s main economic infrastructure. The University of Guyana has identifies a
need to improve the following areas: GIS and remote sensing, climate change modeling, hydrology, ground water management, alternative energy, agriculture resource management, forestry, natural resources management, food and nutrition, and biodiversity inventory. This is
an initiative that merits follow up and additional support, if needed, from the donor community.
USAID. The work program is designed to address issues in health, economic growth, and democracy and governance. The focus of activities on to facilitate growth are in four sectors:
wood products, aquaculture, agribusiness and ecotourism. USAID recently funded two projects with an impact on private sector expansion.
The Guyana Trade and Investment I&II was a designed to maximize Guyana’s competitive advantages and increase non-traditional, value-added exports in Wood Products, Aquaculture,
Agribusiness, and Tourism. According to Carana, the consulting company hired to execute this project: “GTIS II was a four-year, $7.3 million program designed to maximize Guyana’s
competitive advantages and increase non-traditional, value-added exports in four primary sub-sectors: Wood Products, Aquaculture, Agribusiness, and Tourism. The project implemented a market-led approach to strengthen targeted sub-sectors and worked with foreign investors,
strategic buyers, and anchor firms in Guyana to invest in new capacity, technology, and standards.
The GTIS project’s market-led approach became the preeminent development model for Guyana.
With the exception of forestry, the GTIS project built new promising sectors with the capability of diversifying Guyana’s economy from the bottom up. The direct results of GTIS work included $2.8 million in new investments, $9.78 million in additional sales, and more than 170 new or
enhanced jobs, based on environmentally sound value chain development strategies. GTIS placed particular emphasis on leveraging additional funding from the donor community and
leveraged a total of $1.85 million in donor contributions. In the ecotourism subsector where advertising is of vital importance to promote a new destination, GTIS leveraged over $6.5 million in articles, advertisements, and television shows on the country’s heretofore little known
attractions.
These results are best seen on the ground where skepticism and pessimism have been replaced with vision and progress, where leading rice farmers in the country have promoted and invested
in aquaculture, ecotourism lodges are booked two to three years in advance, multinational forestry companies have made substantial investments in Guyana, and Israeli agriculture experts have introduced cutting-edge farm management techniques.”40
Skills and Knowledge for Youth Employment (SKYE) Project is funded within President Obama Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) partnership. It is design to provide young people with market skills so that they may enter and stay in the workforce. According to the U.S.
Embassy in Georgetown, “The work readiness training transfers a set of basic employability skills, knowledge, and behaviors essential to the success of young people as entry-level workers
or entrepreneurs. These skill sets were identified as priorities by Guyana’s employment sector. The curriculum, adapted to the Guyana employment context, is designed to provide young Guyanese with the foundational skills and knowledge necessary to become healthy, productive
employees and community members. This training is one of several program elements to assist youth to gain the self-confidence necessary to find and sustain employment.”41 The program
targets at-risk youth between the ages of 15 and 24, mostly males school dropouts that have been identified through the juvenile justice system. In total the program would train about 1,500 in reigon 4, 6, 9 and 10.
The Skills and Knowledge for Youth Employment (SKYE) project in seeks to strengthen youth’s
access to justice and equip youth with market-driven skills and attitudes to improve their ability to transition to the workforce. SKYE will target a total of approximately 600 youth beneficiaries
who do not have the necessary education, skills and behaviors for integration into the workforce; many will be school dropouts and/or involved in the juvenile justice system. SKYE will also
provide capacity building support to local partner organizations, as well as relevant government ministries and the court system. SKYE will work in four regions, which were selected for their
high populations of vulnerable youth, high crime areas, and high rates of unemployment.
UNDP. UNDP supports Guyana with grant funding to strengthening the institutional capacity of government in the following areas: to increase access to energy services, electricity or cleaner fuels in rural areas; increase individual and institutional capacity for planning Sustainable Land
Management (SLM) at the national and regional level; protect biodiversity through the implementation of valuation methodologies, payment of environmental services; strengthen
capacity to collect, analyze and disseminate key economic and social data, and to support completion of MDGRs, PRSRs, and the new PRSP; strengthen capacity within the Ministry of Finance to plan, manage and implement, aid effectively according to the 2005 Paris Declaration
on Aid Effectiveness.
These projects play an important role is trying to fix one of the main problems for the analysis of private sector development in the country: lack of reliable information. This project follows on
two other UNDP funded initiatives: the DISSC (Development of Institutional Social Statistics Capacities) Project which developed tools (PETRs), training materials, and advisory support
services to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of statistics and M&E Systems; and the MDGs Support Project, which is expected to track progress of the MDGs.
The project would facilitate the analysis of interventions and their impact on key social and economic targets, mostly performed by the Economic Policy Analysis Unit in the Ministry of
Finance.
CIDA. CIDA does not have a country-to-country program, but the country benefits from the Caribbean Regional Program. Through the regional program, CIDA has approved grants for
social entrepreneurship, basic education, and economic capacity development. According to CIDA, the C$2.6 million grant Economic Capacity Development “This project builds on achievements accomplished in a previous project called Environmental Management and
Capacity Development. It is community- and private-sector-oriented. It aims to support the poorest segments of Guyana's population, namely the rural poor and hinterland populations.
The goal of the project is to promote private-sector-led economic growth that provides sustainable livelihoods and reduces poverty. Improvements to the health, skills, and economic opportunities of miners and the men, women and families in selected communities living near
mining operations are also targeted through this project.”42
The resources are distributed among the program has already achieved results: the construction of a plant nursery for the communities of Mahdia and Isseneru provides services that enhance
agricultural practices and address gender issues. Produce is sold to miners that work in adjacent areas, therefore ensuring a steady and reliable source of income.
DFID. DFID £1.3 million grant was provided in the context of the Guyana Agriculture Diversification Program, and is designed to expand aquaculture, tilapia, and no-traditional
agriculture exports, such as sweet peppers, hot peppers and butternut squash. The program, implemented by the consulting firm Carana, would create about 1,000 new jobs. This program
follows on USAID funded Guyana Trade and Investment.
Recommendations to improve PSD-related information systems and monitoring and evaluation of results
Poor follow up of projects. In general projects are not designed considering
sustainability of funded actions. Larger and more focused projects would address this problem.
Monitoring and evaluation of projects need to be strengthened. Larger and more
focused projects would benefit from the establishment of monitoring and evaluation systems. Such systems are generally characterized by the definition of baselines of
relevant indicators, the definition of targets over time, and the use of evaluations for the modification during project execution and the definition of follow up projects.
List of projects by donor—attached in MS Excel and MS Access formats.
Guyana PSAR
81
Annex 3: Brief description of the National Competitiveness Strategy and the Low Carbon Development Strategy.
Description of the National Competitiveness Strategy (NCS)
Launched in 2006 after significant consultations, this strategy is an ambitious attempt to improve competitiveness.43 The strategy includes 245 actions designed to improve competitiveness, are
measurable, and increase rankings of the country, especially in the World Bank Ease of Doing Business surveys. The NCS actions are divided into core policies, sector policies, strategic sub
sector policies, and overarching enablers. Core policies focus on improving the business climate, and include competition and consumer protection, infrastructure, human resources and access to finance. Sector policies focused on actions that would facilitate the expansion of economic
activities in the sugar, rice, and non-traditional agricultural products, and tourism. Strategic sub sectors were identified as those that could help diversify the economy into promising businesses
in its infancy or yet to develop, in fruits and vegetables, aquaculture and forestry. Finally, overarching enablers focused on how to implement the NCS and on the public-private arrangements that would be necessary for taking concrete actions with support from all relevant
actors.
The NCS was designed to achieve the following objectives: to attain the highest rates of economic growth; to eliminate poverty, to achieve geographical unity; to attain an equitable
geographical distribution of economic activity; and to diversify the economy. The strategy identified constraints to development in the following factors:
Politics and race, noting the divisive nature of politics—an issue that has continued to
play a central role in the implementation of the strategy since 2006. The NCS clearly notes that the division of politics along ethnic background limits reaching “a meeting of the minds” and on the contrary it results in “confrontation of every sort and form has
been the norm.” The NCS calls for overcoming the historical political pattern, and that a number of decisions are made based on objective discussions and consultations
between the two largest political parties. Such as in 2006, by 2013 this issue continues to significantly influence the capacity of stakeholders to come together in support of a program designed to increase competitiveness
Guyana’s infrastructure is poor, especially its road connectivity between the coastal region and the interior—the NCS notes that by 2006 only 19% of the total road network
of the country were primary roads, and 21% were feeder roads linking coastal agricultural areas to the primary road network. Because of these facts, production costs
increase, it is not easy to exploit natural resources, communication between the coast and the interior results in a de facto division of the country in two, it is not easy to invest in the interior, and low population density in the interior may bolster territorial claims
by neighboring countries
43
Guyana National Competitiveness Strategy. Enhancing National Competitiveness. A National Competitiveness
Strategy for Guyana. Government of Guyana in Partnership with the Private Sector. The NCS may be found in
Public utilities provide limited and expensive coverage. Electricity rates are high, and
the service is poor characterized by frequent outages that forces private firms to buy diesel generators. Communications coverage is also limited limiting the capacity of the country to modernize
The education system has deteriorated, and does not provide skills demanded in the market, and in many cases highly educated professional migrate abroad because of
better paying jobs offered in neighboring countries. Education in science and technology, including technical and vocational training, and business and administration is not good. According to the NCS shortage of qualified human capital is the most
severe constraint to social and economic development
The country heavily depends on the production and export of few unprocessed
commodities in mining and agriculture—gold, bauxite, rice and sugar
Current institutions are obsolete and do not facilitate development—policy making, land
registration and distribution, judicial system
The country does not attract investment on a regular basis. In part this is the result of
the complex political environment and the policies that promote investment, which tend to be unclear
In this context, the NCS proposed a strategic approach built on a multi-pronged approach:
The strategy has been informed by two basic considerations. First, that we could
considerably assist in removing the scourge of racism from our land, if we developed and put into practice inclusive systems of governance in which all would feel that they have a
stake, in which all would know that they are involved, and in which there were established both procedures and penalties to ensure transparency and accountability. Second, that a considerable degree of harmony would prevail in our country if we were
able to formulate and implement social and economic policies which would lead not only to significant economic growth, but also to the widest distribution of the benefits of such
growth among the population, no matter in what district they are located, and to what racial group they belong.
Accordingly, the first prong of the strategy has been crafted to ensure that the practices
that are followed by all future governments of Guyana are as inclusionary, participatory, accountable and transparent as possible. This imperative applies to the regional and
local governments, as well as to the central administration.
The strategy’s second prong, which is inextricably linked to the first because the one
cannot succeed in the attainment of ethnic harmony without the existence of the other, lies in the domain of macro-economic policy and economic management, and is multi-faceted. It includes (i) reforming the tax system (by eliminating some taxes, reducing
others, introducing a more effective and equitable tax, and simplifying taxation procedures). Through this, it is intended to increase the quantum of investment in
Guyana, and to provide incentives for investors both to engage in new ventures and to operate in economically depressed areas; (ii) formulating an investment strategy and code both to encourage financiers to invest in the country, and to spell out clearly the
terms and conditions under which they would be required to operate; (iii) establishing a one-stop investment agency to expedite and facilitate the actual investment process in
Guyana; (iv) enhancing the efficiency both of the country’s revenue collection agencies
Guyana PSAR
83
and of those institutions that are charged with procurement, with other forms of expenditure, and with their monitoring; and (v) designing systems that would focus
particularly on trade promotion, and on mobilising our economy to export more. In this regard, one aspect of the strategy is the establishment of two Export Promotion Zones.
It cannot be over-emphasized that this macro-economic strategy, while containing vital elements for the propulsion of the growth of the economy, is designed to achieve such
growth while, at the same time, maintaining low inflation rates, and external viability. The promotion of financial stability remains the primary objective of monetary policy.
We attach the highest importance to the third element of the Strategy, which is the
establishment of a road network throughout the length and breadth of Guyana over the next ten years. We have put forward a transport infrastructural strategy which, if
followed, will result (i) in the rehabilitation and modernisation of the coastal roads, and the placement of bridges across the Supenaam, the Essequibo, the Demerara and the Berbice rivers; (ii) in the construction of an up-to-date north-south road from
Georgetown to the Takutu; (iii) in the building of a series of roads connecting both the coastal road and the north-south highway with all the regions and villages in this
country; and (iv) in the establishment of a number of strategic highways linking Guyana with the rest of the Americas, through Brazil, Venezuela and Surinam. Although this road network will contribute to the attainment of all of the NDS’s objectives, it will
particularly assist in the penetration of our interior, in the opening up of new lands for a wide variety of economic activities, and in the facilitation of eco-tourism. Above all, it
will contribute immensely to the social and physical unification of Guyana.
Essential components of this third element of the Strategy are the construction of two
deep water harbours in the Berbice and Demerara rivers, the improvement and extension of Timehri and Ogle Airports, and the rehabilitation of many of the country’s interior airstrips.
The fourth element in the Strategy is devoted to the role which Information Technology can play in the modernisation of Guyana. Considerable importance is attached to this
aspect of our development, for we see the new approaches in IT as affording our country the opportunity to circumvent the beaten paths of development, and to leap-frog, so to
speak, into the 21st century. The formulators of the NDS see Information Technology as one of the important means of improving our capacity to govern our country and to manage our economy, to increase our competitiveness, to attract investors, to market our
products and diversify our production, to enhance the efficiency of our social services and, most important, to acquire knowledge and develop our human capital.
Because our telecommunications system has been identified as one of the main obstacles to the development of this sector, the first strand in this element of the strategy is the rationalisation and liberalisation of the telecommunications sector.
Other strands in the IT strategy include (i) the reform of the Public Utilities Commission (ii) the full computerisaton of the Public Service, beginning with the ministries,
departments, and institutions that are responsible for finance, education and health; (iii) the utilisation of IT in the process of education, and in the provision of health services at
all levels; (iv) the establishment of Internet linkages between the University of Guyana and institutions of learning in other parts of the world; (v) the forging of linkages with expatriate Guyanese in order to utilise them as part of the Guyanese work force, even
though they may be resident abroad; (vi) the provision of fiscal incentives to encourage
Guyana PSAR
84
the establishment of computer-based services; (vii) the fixing of deadlines for the full computerisation of various sectors of the economy; and (viii) the setting up of public
centres to provide access to computers and the Internet for those not fortunate enough to possess the necessary equipment.
The fifth prong is focussed primarily on the enhancement of our social services and, through this process, on the eradication of poverty, and the improvement of our
productivity. Over the next decade or so, the Strategy envisions the expenditure of significant proportions of our financial resources to provide universal access to educational and health facilities at all levels, and in all places. In addition to increasing
the number of physical structures throughout the country, from which these services will be offered, particular attention will be paid to ensuring that the necessary teaching
materials, medical equipment and medicinal supplies are available. The imperative of having in place adequate cadres of trained teachers and qualified health workers has also been provided for in this prong of the Strategy. In particular, the difficulty of
persuading a significant number of trained public servants to work in the hinterland has been acknowledged, and incentives are provided in the Strategy to encourage them to do
so.
The need for the provision of adequate shelter for Guyana’s population in general, but especially for those in the lower-income bracket, looms large in the Strategy. Not only
are specific fiscal incentives provided to the private sector and to the commercial banks to encourage them to engage either in the financing or in the actual construction of
houses for the poor, and for those who now exist in depressed areas, but the distribution of land, free of charge, to the very needy, is also prescribed.
Strategies have also been evolved in our poverty eradication drive, for the provision of
micro-credit to small and medium scale entrepreneurs in the agricultural, manufacturing, and service sectors.
This description of what may be termed the social element in this NDS is not exhaustive. What are presented here are the barest bones of a more comprehensive attack on those
social factors which contribute to the debilitation of our society.
However, the main means of alleviating poverty lies, in the final analysis, in the
nurturing of an enabling environment which would lead to the creation either of jobs or of job opportunities. This thrust is subsumed by the strategies set forth in the section devoted to tax reform and economic management, by our strategy to enhance the quality
of our institutions, and by our proposals for land reform, for example.
One last point in regard to the measures presented for the alleviation of poverty: many of
the prescriptions are location specific in the sense that particular geographical areas are identified either for the provision of incentives, for example, or for the construction of
housing schemes, rural roads, or schools and health centres.
As has been discussed in an earlier section of this chapter, one of the major constraints
to our development is to be found in the inadequacy, irrelevance, and obsolescence of many of our government institutions. Accordingly, the sixth plank in the overall Strategy has been the reform of our public sector institutions. Each of these has been examined in
the various sectoral chapters, and specific strategies have been put forward for their improvement. This approach has been followed not only in the social, but also in the
production sectors.
Guyana PSAR
85
A special element of the Strategy, the seventh prong, is directed to such factors as the
role of the family in the process of social and economic development, and to the importance of gender considerations in all our social and economic activities. These cross-cutting, but integral, aspects of our socio-economic development are examined with
the main objective of ensuring that they are taken into account in the formulation and implementation of policies, no matter what particular subject or sector is being catered
for. Specific procedures and policies are put forward for improving the quality of the lives of both the Guyanese family (infants, youths, parents and the elderly) and the women in our society. Perhaps the most important strand in the strategy, however, is our
recognition that matters of gender must not be considered as mere appendages to other aspects of development. On the contrary, they must be "main-streamed" and must
influence all our decisions.
Eighth, it has been emphasized that the conservation of Guyana’s environment should be the prime consideration in the Strategy. The imperative of conserving our ecosystems and
our other natural resources pervades our document and is repeatedly stressed. The chief problem that is envisaged in this area is the reconciliation of economic development with
the necessity of conserving the environment. Accordingly, prescriptions are made for the environmental monitoring and control of all of our social and economic endeavours. The importance of sustainably utilising all our resources is, also, carefully delineated.
Ninth, there is a prong of the strategy that relates particularly to Amerindians. It recognises that theirs is a specially disadvantaged group and, accordingly, it makes
detailed prescriptions for their development. These include the demarcation and distribution of land; the preservation of their culture; the improvement of the quality of
their training and education at all levels; the improvement of their health facilities; and the general social and economic development of the areas which they inhabit. The Strategy pays particular attention to the facilitation of the participation of Amerindians
in the main-stream of Guyanese society while, at one and the same time, ensuring the sanctity of their culture and traditional ways of life.
And finally, a strategy has been devised to implement the NDS. Apart from financing its implementation from government revenues, and from the normal multilateral and
bilateral sources of financing, great dependence is placed on the involvement of private sector financiers even in the construction and repair of road, bridge, and port infrastructure. Specifically, it is strategised that we would enter into a build, operate and
transfer ownership (BOT) and build, operate, own (BOO) arrangements with potential investors. In return for their services and finances, these investors will either be allowed
to charge tolls, or be recompensed for their expenditure by being given the opportunity to utilise our natural resources, or by being paid in cash over a specific period, or through combinations of all these methods.
The obtaining of critical masses of personnel effectively to negotiate with potential investors; to design, build and monitor the construction of the infrastructure that it is
planned to establish; to formulate developmental policies and strategies and to oversee their implementation; to increase productivity in the agricultural sector; to enhance our manufacturing capacity and capability; and to ensure that our forests are sustainably
developed, and that our mineral wealth is exploited for our benefit will be extremely difficult, especially during the early years of the NDS when, although a massive amount
of training and education is projected, the trained persons will not yet be available for
Guyana PSAR
86
the various tasks. Therefore, a strategy has been put forward which would rely (a) on the provision of technical assistance by international and bi-lateral agencies, (b) on the
remigration of expatriate Guyanese, (c) on the utilisation of the skills and knowledge of non –resident Guyanese; and (d) on the hiring of personnel, from whatever source, if
their expertise is considered essential to our progress. A strategy for general migration, as our economy grows and develops, is also put forward.
It is common for many countries, and actors within countries, to prepare comprehensive strategies. It is not common to follow through on them. Guyana is an exception as the NCS was
used by government to develop an implementation plan, which was supported by an IDB loan, the Support for Competitiveness Program that facilitated the creation of the National
Competitiveness Strategy Unit empowered to implement the strategy. In 2007 the IDB loan, for US$27 million hybrid project with funds to be disbursed for policy decisions by government complemented by a traditional investment loan, was designed to support the implementation of
the NCS within the Ministry of Tourism, Trade and Commerce. The Program’s specific objectives were to help strengthen the institutions for public-private dialogue on competitiveness
and to help improve the business environment for private investment and export development. The NCS also received significant support from other donor funded projects, such as the Agricultural Support Services Program, the Agricultural Diversification Program, and the
Guyana Trade and Investment Support.44
By 2007 the National Competitiveness Center had re-evaluated the NCS and identified 8 priority areas to improve competitiveness: improving access to finance, especially for small and medium
size enterprises; promoting exports; reducing red tape for international trade; establish a program of guarantees for small businesses; reform the tax system; streamlining business registration; liberalizing the telecommunications sector; and improving corporate governance.
Because of these efforts, the NCS by 2013 can show concrete results: 57 out of the 245 actions proposed in the plan have been completed, 83 are at late stages of completion, and 72 are at early stages of implementation.45 Some of the most relevant actions completed include: the Secretariat
of the Competition Commission was created to serve as a consumer protection agency that would implement the 2011 Consumer Protection Bill; implementation of the Value Added Tax (VAT)
and Excise Regime; lowering the Corporate Income Tax from 45% to 40% for commercial companies and from 35% to 30% for non-commercial companies, still high by regional standards but improving; the Commercial Court is functioning providing services for dispute resolution;
using real estate for collateral lending from commercial banks and more generally facilitating the development of land and property markets; and passing legislation and the establishment of a
Credit Bureau, CreditInfo, that started functioning in September 2013.
44
IDB US$26.65 million loan Support for Competitiveness Program approved in 2006; IDB US$22.5 million loan
Agricultural Support Services Program approved in 2004; DFID £1.3 million grant Guyana Agricultural
Diversification Program; USAID two phases of grant funding for the Guyana Trade and Investment (US$7.6 and
US$7.3 million). 45
National Competitiveness Strategy. Monitoring and Evaluation Review: 2006-2012. May 31st
2102. National
Competitiveness Strategy Unit.
Guyana PSAR
87
The evaluation prepared for the period 2006-2012 of the implementation of the NCS summarizes its findings as follows:
• While the international composite indicators suggest that there is room for improvement
in certain areas, many of the ongoing reforms within the areas of Trade Transactions, Competition Policy, Corporate Governance and Ease of Doing Business are certain to influence
future assessments of Guyana’s business and competitiveness indices by addressing many of these concerns.
• The national indicators of NCS impact reflect generally positive results – with the
majority of indicators moving in the right direction. Of particular achievement are the indicators of macroeconomic stability, and those reflecting an increased role for private investment and expanded trade. Those in need of attention relate to the cost of importing and
exporting, and the availability of domestic credit to the private sector.
• NCS implementation itself also shows steady progress, with an upturn in progress since 2009. Overall, out of the total of 245 NCS actions, 57 (or 23%) have been completed; 83 actions
(or 35%) are in the late stages of completion; 72 actions (or 29%) are in progress but at early stages of completion; 30 actions (or 12%) have progressed little since 2006; whilst only 3 actions (1%) are deemed no longer to be relevant, or else have been superseded by other
activities. This means that 58% of the NCS is either complete or in the late stages of progress, and 87% of the NCS has been completed or is in some stage of progression.
• The greatest rate of sectoral implementation is among the ‘Core Policies’, which include
‘Incentive Policies’ and ‘Supply Side Policies’: 29% of these actions have been completed, 30% are in progress at late stages, 25% in progress at early stages; only 5% of actions have progressed little. The results for ‘Sector Policies’ (which include traditional economic sectors
such as Sugar, Rice, Forestry, Mining and Tourism) are similarly good.
• There has been more limited progress in the ‘Strategic Sub-Sector Policies’, which include the new sectors Guyana is attempting to diversify into, such as aquaculture, agro-
processing, contract manufacturing and non-traditional fruits and vegetables. It is not surprising that progress is slower in such areas since re-orienting the economy and developing new competitive advantages is a longer-term process. Of the Strategic Sub-Sector actions, 13%
are complete, 49% are in progress in late stages, 15% are in progress at early stages; while 21% of actions have progressed little.
• There have been many positive developments in policy areas intrinsic to economic
competiveness, though not captured by the original NCS actions. The NCS structure has nonetheless adapted itself to these developments, and many of them have been handled through
the NCS process. These policy areas are: ICT, corporate governance, trade transactions, and energy.
• There have been many other positive competitiveness- related developments emanating from Guyana’s newer national strategy, the Low Carbon Development Strategy - especially in
the areas of energy, ICT, forestry and infrastructure.
Guyana PSAR
88
And recommended:
• The NCS should be updated for 2012 onwards and it’s institutional and policy focus should be consolidated and integrated into Guyana’s newer (and currently more project- based)
national strategy, the LCDS. An alternative NCS structure would see the NCSU being re-located to the Office of the President (OP), where it can work collaboratively within a more
comprehensive and economy-wide LCDS structure in order to coordinate institutional reforms which will support the emerging energy, environmental and industrial sectors.
• The updated NCS process must more consciously and strategically aim to create
‘clusters’ in certain selected sectors in order to create employment through up- and down- stream linkages. Such an effort can help to facilitate complementary growth dynamics in selected agro-processing and manufacturing sectors. The Kenyan cut flower industry (see Annex
2) provides an example of what such a productive cluster would look like.
• NCS stakeholders must seek ways of mainstreaming the focus and aims of the NCS into ongoing policy-making circles – so that the NCS (or its equivalent) is retained as a prime driver
of public-private dialogue. Particular attention must be given to the National Competitiveness Council (NCC) structure and the Cabinet sub-committee on Trade and Investment.
• Once stakeholders have evaluated the findings of this report, the next exercise that needs to be carried out is the development of a new list of actions central to the competitiveness of
Guyana’s new economic position. This list needs to be based on those actions identified by public and private sector as being those cross-sectoral reforms most crucial for supporting
Guyana’s development path from 2012 for the next 5 years. This list should then be prioritized, costed and scheduled.
• The Government Of Guyana must give particular attention to how progress made within the externally- funded projects which have supported the NCS – such as the Support for
Competitiveness Programme (SCP), the Agricultural Support Services Programme (ASSP), the Agricultural Diversification Programme (ADP), and Guyana Trade and Investment Support
(GTIS) etc. – can be consolidated so that the activities piloted within those projects can grow and be sustained. For example, where Feasibility Studies have been conducted, it is essential to follow-up swiftly on the findings of those reports. The NCSU remains the prime agency for
coordinating this process.
• In the short term, stakeholders must concentrate on implementing the 29% of NCS actions which are only in the early stages of progress and the 12% of actions which are still
considered by stakeholders to be essential to the Guyanese economy and yet have progressed little. These are detailed in Section 6 of the report.
• Stakeholders must further build on the public-private linkages which have been so
successful during the early stages of NCS activity. Particular examples are in the areas of Infrastructure and Information and Communication Technology (ICT).
Guyana PSAR
89
• Stakeholders must consider how better use can be made of cross-agency dialogue in order to reach the most strategic and efficient development outcomes.
• There must be better data collection and dissemination, if stakeholders are to be able to
monitor Guyana’s progress effectively. For example, there is a current lack of publicly available data on non-traditional production and exports – a key indicator of Guyana’s diversification
success; and on disaggregated labour market information. Information in this latter area could inform the public and private sector of Guyana’s specific training and development needs.
An indication of measurable progress of the implementation of the NCS is provided by the WEF
GCI and the WB Doing Business Index. The following reflects how Guyana has performed as measured by these two publications, as presented in the 2006-2012 evaluation of the implementation of the NCS:
In the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI), Guyana’s ranking has remained fairly constant
between 2007 and 2011, falling just one place from 108 to 109. Breaking down the 12 pillars, it is possible to see where progress has been made, and where it has lagged.
In the ‘Institutions’ pillar, Property Rights (up from 113 in 2007 to 110 in 2011) and the Ethical
Behaviour of Firms (100 to 91) registered moderate improvements; while the Strength of Auditing and Reporting Standards (98 to 79), Efficiency of Legal Framework (121 to 93), and Efficacy of Corporate Boards (98 to 56) registered vast improvements.
In the ‘Infrastructure’ pillar the Quality of Overall Infrastructure (from 100 in 2007 to 84 in 2011), the Quality of Roads (78 to 76), the Quality of port Infrastructure (110 to 101), and the Quality of Air Transport Infrastructure (115 to 100) and Telephone Lines (73 to 67) all showed
steady improvements; while there is room for improvement in the Available Seat Kilometres (118 to 135) and Quality of Electricity Supply (114 to 115) indicators.
In the ‘Macroeconomic Stability’ pillar, Government surplus/deficit (from 128 in 2007 to 62 in
2011) and Inflation (89 to 68) registered vast improvements; while there is room for improvement in the National Savings Rate (120 to 131) and Interest Rate Spread (114 to 124).
In the ‘Higher Education and Training’ pillar, the Quality of the Educational System (from 82 in 2007 to 56 in 2011) and the Local Availability of Research and Training Services (124 to 93)
both registered improvements.
In the ‘Goods Market Efficiency’ pillar, the Intensity of Local Competition (from 104 in 2007 to 79 in 2011), the Extent of Market Dominance (111 to 95), the Burden of Customs Procedures
(128 to 107), the Effectiveness of Anti-monopoly Policy (110 to 97), and the Extent and Effect of Taxation (122 to 79) all registered significant improvements; while there is room for improvement in the Total Tax Rate indicator (59 to 68), the Number of Procedures Required to
Start a Business (from 44 in 2008 to 78 in 2011), the Time Required to Start a Business (from 92 in 2007 to 98 in 2011), and the Trade-weighted Tariff Rate indicator (98 to 99).
Guyana PSAR
90
In the ‘Financial Market Sophistication’ pillar, there is room improvement in the Ease of Access to Loans (remaining at 104 between 2007 and 2011) and the Restriction on Capital Flows (from
56 in 2007 to 71 in 2010).
In the ‘Technological Readiness’ pillar, there is room for improvement in the Laws Relating to ICT, which moved from 121 in 2007 to 123 in 2010. This is expected to be improved through the
E-Transactions and Telecommunications reform which are currently being worked through Parliament (see Section 5a-XXII).
Finally, in the ‘Market Size’ pillar, there is room for improvement in the Foreign Market Size
indicator, which moved from 118 to 132.
In the Doing Business Index (DBI), Guyana has made good progress, rising from a ranking of 133 in 2006, to 113 in 2011.
Breaking down the index by composite indicator, we can see that the Starting a Business ranking fell from 78 in 2007 to 87 in 2012; in spite of the fact that the Time (in days) to Start a Business
fell from 46 to 26 days, and the Cost (as % of income per capita) of Starting a Business fell dramatically from 104.1% of income per capita, to 14.6%.
The Dealing with Licenses/construction Permits ranking rose dramatically from 74 in 2007 to 28
in 2012, largely because the Cost (% of income per capita) fell from 355.7% to 17.5%. However, highlighting the inconsistency of the DBI, the Time (in days) for dealing with licences
increased from 133 days to 195 days.
The Registering a Property ranking fell from 52 in 2007 to 104 in 2011, largely because of the increase in the numbers of days it takes to register – this increased from 34 in 2007 to 75 in 2011. Nonetheless, current and ongoing reforms to the Deeds Registry are attempting to deal
with this issue, and the next ranking should register an improvement.
The Getting Credit ranking should be the most concerning, as it shows that Guyana has not improved significantly from a low baseline ranking – falling from 159 in 2007 to 166 in 2011.
The Protecting Investors ranking has dramatically improved from 151 in 2007 to 79 in 2011; in
spite of the fact that none of the indicators (the Extent of Disclosure, the Extent of Director Liability, the Ease of Shareholder Suits Index, and the Strength of Investor Protection) appear to have moved over the same period.
The Paying Taxes ranking has improved somewhat between 2007 and 2001, rising from 121 to 115 – largely as a result of the fall in the number of hours per year taken to pay taxes, from 288 hours to 263 hours, and a fall in the tax rate as a percentage of profits – from 39% to 36%.
The Trading across Borders ranking represented an area of improvement - and many of the
current reforms within the Trade Transactions Action Plan (see Section 5b-I) will further address some of these issues. The ranking rose from 155 in 2007 to 82 in 2011, in spite of the
Guyana PSAR
91
increase in the cost of importing and exporting a container – which increased from US$530 to US$745 for importing and from US$530 to US$730 for exporting.
The Enforcing Contracts ranking rose from 122 in 2007 to 73 in 2011, even though the cost (as a
% of the claim), the number of days to enforce, and the number of procedures all remained fairly constant over the same period.
Finally, the Closing a Business ranking registered little improvement between 2007 and 2011,
falling from 131 to 138. This is an area that has only started to have been given attention within the NCS structure since around 2011, but improvement is expected to be forthcoming.
In spite of the partial success of the implementation of the NCS, much remains to be done. As
noted the NCS Unit, which has been leading the implementation of the strategy, was funded by an IDB loan. This project is at late stages of execution and resources have been almost exhausted. Moving forward, the work done by the NCS Unit should be continued. Importantly,
the impact of actions taken on the expansion of economic activity is difficult to assess due to lack of data and baselines. This is an issue that should be considered in moving forward with
additional support to the NCS Unit.
Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS).46 Approved in 2010, this document commits Guyana to implement a sustainable, low carbon, development strategy that specifically protects forests, water and more generally biodiversity—a description of the LCDS is included as an
annex to this PSAR. The strategy, and the current agreement for its implementation with Norway, recognizes the opportunity cost of exploiting Guyana’s large rain forest and related
assets. The implementation of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) commits Norway to pay Guyana annual installments based on performance criteria linked to preserving its rain forest. The initial package is worth US$250 million for five years, starting in 2009, which would
be paid out of a World Bank administered trust fund Guyana REDD-Plus Investment Fund (GRID).47
The LCDS notes that Guyana’s pristine forests are its most valuable asset, about 16 million
hectares. These forests have valuable timber, minerals, and may be transformed into agricultural land, which the LCDS estimates may bring an annual economic value of US$580 million to the country. The cost of these actions, however, is large as the services provided by the forests are
high in bio diversity, water, and carbon sequestration. The LCDS notes that these environmental services provided to the world, now for free, could be as high as US$40 billion per year.
Therefore, the cost to the world of not counting with Guyana’s environmental services is very large, but the direct opportunity cost to Guyanese people is also large. The challenge is to internalize the opportunity cost of the environmental services provided by Guyana’s forests to
the world. The government of Norway through the REDD+ funding mechanism is an attempt to do that.
46
A low-carbon development strategy. Transforming Guyana’s economy while combating climate change. Office
of the President, Republic of Guyana. May 2010. 47
REDD+ stands for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation, a mechanism agreed by the parties to
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
Guyana PSAR
92
The key agreement between Norway and Guyana is related to limiting deforestation. The challenge for Guyana is to promote sustainable gold extraction, which has increased significantly
as prices of gold had skyrocketed, limiting the level of deforestation. It is difficult to monitor the deforestation rate, an issue that causes some friction between supporters of the LDCS,
stakeholders and miners. Verifying the rate of deforestation has brought significant problems between Guyana and Norway, in part due to the difficulties related to objectively measure deforestation. For this reason since 2013 the memorandum of understanding between the parties
does not include verification of deforestation, and instead it calls for independent assessments—it is unclear the extent to which these assessments would bind the disbursement of funds in the
future.
According to the LCDS:
REDD+ payments can enable Guyana’s economy to be realigned onto a low-carbon development trajectory. Guyana can generate economic growth at or in excess of projected Latin
American growth rates over the coming decade, while simultaneously eliminating approximately 30 percent of non-forestry emissions through the use of clean energy. To achieve this, Guyana must:
• Invest in strategic low carbon economic infrastructure, such as: a hydro-electricity plant at
Amaila Falls; improved access to arable, non-forested land; and improved fibre optic bandwidth to facilitate the development of low-carbon business activities.
• Nurture investment in high-potential low-carbon sectors, such as fruits and vegetables,
aquaculture, business process outsourcing and ecotourism.
• Reform existing forest-dependent sectors, including forestry and mining, where necessary, so that these sectors can operate at the standards necessary to sustainably protect Guyana’s forest.
• Expand access to services and new economic opportunity for Amerindian communities through
improved social services (including health and education), low-carbon energy sources, clean water and employment which does do not threaten the forest.
• Improve services to the broader Guyana citizenry, including improv ing and expanding job prospects, promoting private sector entrepreneurship, and improving social services with a
particular focus on health and education.
Guyana received funds from its agreement with Norway over the LCDS. The money transferred to Guyana was between US$30 to 42 million in 2010, and US$30 to 64 million in 2011, with
additional funding in 2012 and 2013. As of March 2013 the trust fund accrued more than US$100 million, with total disbursements of about US$10 million—for institutional strengthening of the Office of the President and the Guyana Forestry Commission.
The resources received from the trust fund would be invested in seven priority projects/issues: (i) the Amaila Falls hydroelectric project; (ii) accelerating Amerindian land titling; (iii) funding the Amerindian Development Fund; (iv) expanding fiber optic infrastructure; (v) provide micro
Guyana PSAR
93
finance; (vi) establishing a Centre for Bio-Diversity and Low Carbon Development; and (vii) monitoring, reporting and verification systems for the LCDS. As noted, investment in this
projects is still pending.
Connection between the NCS and the LCDS
There is no formal connection between the NCS and the LCDS, however, they somewhat complement each other—see the annex for a description of both. The current priorities of the LCDS have significant impact on competitiveness, and therefore on private sector growth,
especially in recognizing the need for more energy at lower cost (priority i); property rights (priority ii); modernizing infrastructure (priority iv); and expanding credit (priority v).
The LCDS would provide a framework for the continued implementation of the NCS. According to the 2006-2012 evaluation of the NCS, this would be the intention of the authorities as they continue to define policies for the country. In some cases this is already happening. For
example, rural electrification projects would play a central role in both the expansion of coverage, private sector investment, and lowering the demand for fossil fuels. More generally, the Energy Strategy Group is working on the identification of key projects with significant
impact on energy: the Amaila Falls hydroelectric generation project, the Skeldon co-generation plant, the Lethem Power Company, the wind power energy strategy and the Turtuba
hydroelectric generation project.
The NCS and LCDS also overlap on sectoral issues, such as forestry. In 2011 government created the Guyana Forestry Commission, in the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. The GFC consulted on areas regarding REDD and the GFC's submission to the
World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility and its Readiness Preparation Proposal for 27 communities. The GFC has also been receiving support and institutional strengthening for other
REDD/LCDS- related actions, such as: emissions trading; Gap analysis; License Verification; National Forest Inventory; Lesser Used Species; and Recovery and Utilization. The GFC plays a central role in the development of business opportunities on the forestry and tourism sectors.
Tourism is also a sector in which the NCS and LCDS intersect. An idea for a project, inspired
by efforts of the Trinidad and Tobago government, would promote investments from Guyanese nationals living abroad. These investments would promote sustainable tourism to the country,
within the mandates of the LCDS. Additional efforts are also under consideration, such as a “Visit Guyana” and “Clean Up Guyana” campaigns, which would simultaneously have positive impact on the environment and generate business opportunities in tourism.