Top Banner
Guanabara Bay QMRA Rachel Sklar Anna Gitter Alexandre Chabrelie
23
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Guanabara bay qmra final

Guanabara Bay QMRA

Rachel SklarAnna Gitter

Alexandre Chabrelie

Page 2: Guanabara bay qmra final

Problem● Sailing Competitions scheduled in heavily polluted body of water

● Guanabara Bay o Trash/sewage from Favelas along riverso 35 rivers, 9 million inhabitants (5.5 t/day garbage), 6,000

industries (150 t/day industrial effluents)o Pollution gradient + tidal → pollution variability

⇒ Bottles, dead fishes, sewages & garbages

● Authorities received $1 billion over last 2 decades to depollute

● 32t dead fish removed, garbages vs. “eco-boats” & eco-barriers, 35% average in 2013 (some spikes: 7% treated sewages)

Page 3: Guanabara bay qmra final

“Removing 80% of the pollutants? It’s not going to happen”

“From the point of view of the Olympics, the point of view of water

quality, what I’ve said about the 80% does not at all affect the courses”

for the sailing events, Correa said. “There’s no big risk for sailors

having troubles with illnesses and such things.”

Andre Correa, Rio State Environmental Secretary

Page 4: Guanabara bay qmra final
Page 5: Guanabara bay qmra final

What is the risk of contracting Highly Credible Gastroenteric Disease to sailors during one hour of an olympic race?

QMRA Question

Rachel Sarah Sklar
make sure wecan we justify why we chose 1 hour only? During presentation in words.
Page 6: Guanabara bay qmra final

Hazard ID

Olympic Games - Sport mapSource: www.rio2016.com

Canoe slalom

Marathon swimming

SailingRowing,

Canoe sprint

Diving

● Many potential pathogens concerned - F/T coliforms, E. coli, Enterococci, giardia, cryptosporidium

● Fecal Coliforms serve as an Indicator Bacteriapresence of sewage and other waste

● Concern for athletes contracting a HCGI→ (1) vomiting;→ (2) diarrhea with a fever or disabling enough for remaining at home;→ (3) stomachache or nausea accompanied by a fever.

Page 7: Guanabara bay qmra final

Paranhos et al. 1998

Page 8: Guanabara bay qmra final

Exposure Assessment● Incidental ingestion

o Assumptions recreational contact routes: inhalation and entrapment of mists in the nose and mouth with swallowing;

secondary contact of water (Geosyntec 2008; Sunger 2012) Duration of sailing events: one hour (worst-case scenario assumption)

Distribution Lognormal

Mean 5

Standard Deviation 5

Fixed IntakeMedian (50th Percentile)100th Percentile

4 mL/hr7.52 mL/hr34 mL/hr

Table 1: Canoeist Ingestion Rates (mL/hr) (Geosyntec 2008)

Page 9: Guanabara bay qmra final
Page 10: Guanabara bay qmra final
Page 11: Guanabara bay qmra final

Environmental Samples

Guanabara Bay

(Carreira 2015 unpublished)

FC:Ecoli Ratio

Bathing Waters,Israel

(Fattal et al.,1987)

Dose Response

Bathing waters in NY, LA, and MA

(Cabelli et al.,1982)

Page 12: Guanabara bay qmra final

Dose Response● Exponential DR Model fit to data from Cabelli et al. 1982

Kcalculated=0.001254263

Rachel Sarah Sklar
not sure if this is the best graph to show for this slide. . . . does it make sense to show proportion of swimmers with hgci as a function of dose? or should i graph a diff parameter?
gitt200
I think this should suffice. Other studies posted their dose response as e.coli concentration v. risk of infection. Could we change the axes titles as E.coli (cfu/100mL) for the X and risk of HCGI infection for the Y?
Rachel Sarah Sklar
well our data is in ecoli density/100 mL and then yeah I can change Risk to Risk of HCGI. should i leave in the blue risk curve?
Page 13: Guanabara bay qmra final

Risk Characterization

● Crystal Ball method

● Risk of HCGI risk for sailors during one hour of an olympic sailing race: 6.24999E-06

● Very Low!

Page 14: Guanabara bay qmra final

Risk

Page 15: Guanabara bay qmra final

Sensitivity Analysis

● most sensitive variable according to the quantitative model was for ingestion volume

Page 16: Guanabara bay qmra final

Modelling Limitations

● sensitivity analysis: greatest uncertainty is ingestion rate ???

● FC:E.Coli Ratio for a different environment, Israel vs. Brazil

● Dose-Response curve derived from epi studies in N. America bathing waters

Rachel Sarah Sklar
any specific uncertainty in the ingestion?
Page 17: Guanabara bay qmra final

Risk Management

Page 18: Guanabara bay qmra final

Risk Mitigation● Current:

o New Sewage Treatment Plantso Floating Garbage Barrierso Trash Collecting Vessels called Ecoboats

● Potentialo Education & economic incentives to bring trash and other

waste to a centralized disposal location o Limit unnecessary recreation by athletes in the watero Consider relocating event to a less polluted area of the bay or

out of Brazil

Page 19: Guanabara bay qmra final

“It can get really disgusting, with dog carcasses in some places and the water turning brown from sewage contamination”

Thomas Low-Beer, 24, a Brazilian sailor

Guanabara Bay was exaggerated, contending that recent tests had shown that fecal contamination in the Olympic regatta area was within “satisfactory” standards in Brazil.

Carlos Portinho, Rio’s top environmental advisor

Page 20: Guanabara bay qmra final

Future Work● Hazard ID: look at presence of geographically specific pathogens

● Exposure Assessment: sailing specific ingestion rates via observation

● Dose-Response: o indicator to pathogen ratio specific to geographic regiono dose-response curve derived from epi studies in geographically similar

area

● Risk Management:o risk would be significantly lower in another bay in Brazil? o model risk reduction: cost o survey athletes to gauge risk perception

Page 21: Guanabara bay qmra final

Risk Management● Relocation Scenario: loss of revenue for

Brazil/local communities

● Cleanup Scenario:o investment in prevention and cleanup (infrastructure)o Local leaders, CBO, Brazilian Govt, Olympic

Committeeo incentive schemes that involve benefits for local

people

Page 22: Guanabara bay qmra final
Page 23: Guanabara bay qmra final

SourcesAquece Rio-International Sailing Regatta 2015. (n.d.). Retrieved June 11, 2015, from http://www.aquecerio.com/sailing2015/en/documents/NoticeOfRace.pdf Cabelli, V. J., Dufour, A. P., McCabe, L. J., & Levin, M. A. (1982). SWIMMING-ASSOCIATED GASTROENTERITIS AND WATER QUALITY1. American journal of epidemiology, 115(4), 606-616.Francy, D. S., Myers, D. N., & Metzker, K. D. (1993). Escherichia coli and fecal-coliform bacteria as indicators of recreational water quality. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.Geosyntec. (2008). Dry and wet weather risk assessment of human health impacts of disinfection v. no disinfection of the Chicago Area Waterways System (CWS). Retrieved June 8, 2015, from https://www.mwrd.org/pv_obj_cache/pv_obj_id_6AC3502D8F86067ABE801480B078B7E5B7182001/filename/GEOSYNTEC_RISKASSESS_Final.pdf Kjerfve, B., Ribeiro, C. H., Dias, G. T., Filippo, A. M., & Quaresma, V. D. S. (1997). Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Continental Shelf Research, 17(13), 1609-1643.Paranhos, R., Pereira, A. P., & Mayr, L. M. (1998). Diel variability of water quality in a tropical polluted bay. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 50(2), 131-141.Kirkpatrick, N. (2015, March 19). 2016 Rio Olympics: Sailing with Sewage. The Washington Post. Retrieved June 10, 2015, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/03/19/the-bay-in-rio-where-2016-olympic-sailors-will-compete-is-a-disgusting-cesspool/ Sunger, N. 2013. Quantitative Health Risk Assessment of Recreational Water Users in Philadelphia. (Doctoral Dissertation). Accessed from Google Scholar.Texas Commission for Environmental Quality. (2007). Texas Water Quality Standards: Criteria for Recreation. Available from: www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/waterquality/tmdl/82lakehouston/82-bactstand-oct2007.pdf.