Top Banner
GSM_P&O__01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning Objective Frequency Planning Neighbor Cell Planning BSIC Planning Reference GSM Cellular Network Design and Optimization GSM Frequency Planning GSM Frequency Hopping Principles
56

GSM Frequency Planning

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Justice Baloyi

GSM Frequency Planning, Neighbor Cell Planning and BSIC Planning
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • GSM_P&O__01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    Objective

    Frequency Planning

    Neighbor Cell Planning

    BSIC Planning

    Reference

    GSM Cellular Network Design and Optimization

    GSM Frequency Planning

    GSM Frequency Hopping Principles

  • i

    Contents

    Chapter 1 Frequency Planning .................................................................................................................... 1

    1.1 Cellular Structure Formation Rule ....................................................................................................... 1

    1.2 Interference Model............................................................................................................................... 3

    1.3 Frequency Multiplexing Technology and Interference Analysis ......................................................... 8

    1.4 Packet Frequency Multiplexing Technology ....................................................................................... 8

    1.4.1 4 x 3 Multiplexing Technology .................................................................................................. 8

    1.4.2 3 x 3 Multiplexing Technology ................................................................................................ 14

    1.4.3 1 x 3 Multiplexing Technology ................................................................................................ 16

    1.4.4 2 x 6 Multiplexing Technology ................................................................................................ 17

    1.4.5 MRP Multiple Frequency Multiplexing MRP ......................................................................... 18

    1.4.6 Concentric Cell Technology .................................................................................................... 25

    1.5 Cell Splitting ...................................................................................................................................... 30

    1.6 Several Common Immunity Technology to Interference ................................................................... 31

    1.6.1 Discontinuous Transmission (DTX) ........................................................................................ 32

    1.6.2 Frequency Hopping (FH) ......................................................................................................... 32

    1.6.3 Dynamic Power Control (DPC) ............................................................................................... 37

    1.6.4 1 x 3 Multiplexing + Radio Frequency FH + DTX + DPC ..................................................... 37

    1.7 Conclusion on Principles of Frequency Assignment in Engineering ................................................. 38

    Chapter 2 Neighboring Cell Planning ....................................................................................................... 41

    Chapter 3 BSIC Planning ........................................................................................................................... 49

  • 1

    Chapter 1 Frequency Planning

    Key points

    Frequency multiplexing and interference model analysis based on ideal cellular

    structure

    Several common immunity technologies to interference

    1.1 Cellular Structure Formation Rule

    In ideal situation, a base unit (base station area) of cellular structure is a

    regular hexagon (handoff border). A certain number of regular hexagons

    constitute a radio cluster. A full mobile network coverage is composed of two

    adjacent radio clusters.

    The radio cluster, a base unit of Frequency Multiplexing (FR), allocates all of

    the available channels in a radio cluster to every base station area or sectoral

    cell. Two same radio clusters are able to be adjacent to each other and ensure

    mapping relationship between each base station areas or sectoral cells. The

    channel group assigned to every base station area or sectoral cell is fixed.

    Therefore mapping base station areas or sectoral cells in any adjacent radio

    clusters are all co-frequency areas. This forms a comprehensive co-frequency

    multiplexing pattern.

    The radio cluster must meet the following conditions:

    1) The radio clusters are able to be adjacent to each other.

    2) The distance between any two co-frequency multiplexing area centers in

    the adjacent radio clusters should be equal.

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    2

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G R

    60o

    i

    j

    D

    Figure 1.1-1 Constitution of a radio cluster

    As shown in the above figure, i and j are two parameters. Given the two

    parameters different values (cannot be 0 at one time), any area can be

    reached from a certain area. Based on triangular relationship shown in the

    above figure, the distance D between two co-frequency multiplexing areas

    is:

    22 jijiD

    The number of base stations N included in the radio cluster based on the

    above distribution is:

    22 jijiN

    Given the distance between the centers of two adjacent base station areas is

    1, and semi diameter of base station area is R, then:

    3/1R

    Define RDq / as co-frequency multiplexing distance protection

    coefficient or called as co-channel interference attenuation factor:

    NR

    Dq 3

    (

    1

    -

    1

    ) (

    1

    -

    2

    ) (

    1

    -

    3

    ) (

    1

    -

    4

    )

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    3

    1.2 Interference Model

    1. Co-frequency interference protection ratio B

    Under the condition wherein wanted signals from the Tx end of a receiver

    meet the defined quality, the parameter indicates the minimum ratio of

    wanted RF signals to unwanted RF signals. Usually, the value of this

    parameter is represented as dB.

    2. Estimation on carrier-to-interference ratio in an N-multiplexing radio

    cluster

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C G

    A

    B

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    D

    E

    F

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    Figure 1.2-1 Interfering resource

    Regarding wave propagation characteristic, it could be described with the

    preceding general model:

    DiffkkkHdkHkdkkPL effeff 765loglog4log3log21

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    4

    Since it is the ideal cellular system that has been observed and studied, both

    emission power of each cell and antenna antenna apparent height are the

    same, and there is no diffraction loss. Therefore the carrier-to-interference

    ratio can be calculated as follow:

    M

    k

    dkk

    dkk

    M

    k

    PL

    PL

    M

    k

    PL

    PL

    M

    k

    PLP

    PLP

    M

    kk

    kHeff

    Heff

    k

    kkt

    t

    I

    C

    I

    C

    1

    10/log)log42(

    10/log)log42(

    1

    10/

    10/

    1

    10/

    10/

    1

    10/)(

    10/)(

    1

    10

    10

    10

    10

    10

    10

    10

    10

    Indicate effHkkk log42'2

    , d as cell semi diameter R, kd as

    propagation distance D from each interfering resource to this cell.

    As shown in figure 1-2, there are 6 the most intense interfering resources

    around each cell, and 6 (or 12) the secondary most intense interfering

    resources.

    10/'210/'2

    10'2

    12

    1

    10/2log'26

    1

    10/log'2

    10/log'2

    )2(126

    1010

    10

    kk

    lk

    k

    Dk

    k

    Dk

    Rk

    DD

    R

    I

    C

    Indicate '2k/10 ( This is so-called propagation path loss slope

    determined by the actual terrain environment.)

    2

    126)2(126

    q

    DD

    R

    I

    C

    Logarithm, it is:

    )2

    126log(10log'2)(

    qkdB

    I

    C

    (

    1

    -

    6

    )

    (

    1

    -

    5

    )

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    5

    No loss generality, indicate 40'2 k , 4 .

    So

    dB5.06log10)2

    126log(10

    4

    .

    We can see that contribution to interference made by the secondary most

    intense interfering resource in the second circle is much less than that of the

    most intense interfering resource in the first circle, which can be negligible.

    Now we have established an interference model under ideal cellular

    environment. We will use this model to study its interference when various

    common multiplexing methods are introduced later.

    3. Co-frequency interference possibility )/( BICP

    Actually, because of non-ideal site location and rise-and-fall characteristic topography,

    when mobile station is on the move, received signals are influenced by Rayleigh fast

    fading and Gauss slow fading. No matter it is signal or interference, before it reaches

    mobile station, its field strength instantaneous value and median value are all random

    variables. Even though mobile station stays still, as a result of various existed

    interference including movement of surrounding moving objects, its field strength

    instantaneous value and median value are still random variables.

    We can see that the value of receiver Rx end IC / is not static but a random variable.

    Only if BIC / , there is no interference. Co-frequency interference appears with

    certain possibility.

    According to CCIR740-2 report, in 1979 France comes up with the idea that

    when multipath fading complies with Rayleigh distribution and shadow

    fading complies with Gauss distribution, co-frequency interference

    possibility is :

    du

    uBICP

    uBIC 10/)2(

    2

    101

    }exp{1)/(

    In the formula, u is integration variable, is standard deviation of

    signal and interference, IC

    .

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    6

    BICZ p

    100

    10-1

    10-2

    10-3

    10-4

    20 40 60

    dB

    = 12

    = 0 = 6 = 8

    Figure 1.2-2 Co-frequency interference possibility

    Co-frequency interference possibility in the typical circumstance is shown

    as above.

    Without losing its generality, indicate = 6, interference possibility

    )/( BICP =0.1,

    dBZ p 12 concluded from the chart, GSM

    network requires co-frequency interference protection ratio B be less than 9

    dB, generally B = 12dB in engineering. Therefore, in ideal interference

    model carrier-to-interference ratio must be more than: 9(12) + 12 = 21 dB

    (24dB).

    William C.Y. Lee believes that indicating 6 dB margin is enough, so it is

    concluded that in ideal interference model carrier-to-interference ratio must

    be more than 9(12)+6=15dB (18dB).

    4. Near End- Far End interference

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    7

    A

    B

    C

    D

    d2

    d1

    2

    1 d2

    d1

    Figure 1.2-3 Near end- Far end interference

    1 Cell 1

    2 Cell 2

    According to interference model, indicate mobile station B relative to

    mobile station A

    dBd

    dkdB

    I

    C9log'2)(

    2

    1

    , then

    69.11

    2 d

    d

    . If

    frequency used by mobile station B is adjacent to that of mobile station A,

    when

    69.11

    2 d

    d

    , adjacent frequency interference protection ratio does not

    match the condition, which causes call drop. The same circumstance also

    appears in adjacent cells.

    Lets check another extreme circumstance: given that Tx power of two

    antennas in a cell is 34 dBm, the level received on spot D is -85 dBm, base

    Comment [m1]:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    8

    station sensitivity is -110 dBm If uplink and downlink power are balanced,

    then transmission power of mobile station D is -110+(34-(-85))=9dBm.

    Now, when the very near mobile station C powers on, if it is working with

    the maximum transmission power 30 dBm (1 W), given that the path loss

    when the signal reaches cell 2 is same to that reaching mobile D, then

    interference signal received by cell 2BTS is : 30-(34-(-85)= -89 > -110 + 9.

    Therefore, call drop occurs.

    1.3 Frequency Multiplexing Technology and Interference Analysis

    Frequency multiplexing is a kind of technology commonly used in a GSM

    network. It applies the same frequency to cover different areas. In addition,

    it keeps certain distance between these areas using the same frequency, and

    the distance is called co-frequency multiplexing distance.

    If directional antenna is used, it is recommended to adopt 4 x 3 multiplexing

    method. In certain areas with heavier traffic, other multiplexing methods can

    be adopted according to machine capability, such as 3 x 3 and 2 x 6. No

    matter which method it is adopted, its basic principle is that it should meet

    the requirements of interference protection ratio after considering different

    propagation conditions, different multiplexing methods, and multiple

    interference factors. They are shown as follows:

    Co-frequency protection ratio C/I 9 dB

    Adjacent frequency interference protection ratio C/I -9 dB

    400 kHz adjacent frequency interference protection ratio C/I -41 dB

    1.4 Packet Frequency Multiplexing Technology

    1.4.1 4 x 3 Multiplexing Technology

    There are a variety of frequency multiplexing structures used by GSM, such

    as 4 x 3, 3 x 3, and 2 x 6. Usually, all multiplexing methods are to classify

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    9

    limited frequencies into a certain number of groups. In sequence these

    groups form a cluster of frequency assigned to adjacent cell (shown in the

    following figure). According to advices of GSM system criteria, 4 x 3 is

    commonly used in various GSM systems. 4 x 3 multiplexing method is to

    divide frequencies into 12 groups assigned to 4 stations in turn. That means

    3 frequency groups can be used in each station. As result of long

    multiplexing distance in this frequency multiplexing method, it can reliably

    meet the specifications of co-frequency protection ratio and adjacent

    frequency interference protection ratio required by GSM system. Therefore,

    it makes GSM network operate in fine quality and good security.

    A3

    D2B1

    D1

    D3

    C1B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D2B1

    D1

    D3

    C1B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B3B2

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    A1

    A2A3

    D2B1

    D1

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A1

    A3

    D2B1

    D1

    D3

    C1B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    Figure 1.4-1 43 multiplexing

    Indicating the value of cellular hexagon side length as 1, from the above

    figure and the preceding interference models, it can be concluded as:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    10

    dBdBI

    C18

    )2.7(28

    2log10)(

    52.352.3

    52.3

    Subtracting the margin of 6dB suggested by William C.Y. Lee, the value is

    exactly 12 dB.

    Discussion on 4 x 3 frequency packet and multiplexing model applied in

    engineering:

    As the name implies, 4 x 3 multiplexing divides usable frequencies into 4 x

    3 = 12 groups, and respectively marks them as A1, B1, C1, D1, A2, B2, C2,

    D2, A3, B3, C3, and D3. Take the following table as an example:

    A1 B1 C1 D1 A2 B2 C2 D2 A3 B3 C3 D3

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

    25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

    Indicate A1, A2, and A3 as a large group, and assign it to 3 sectors in a base

    station. Indicate B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, C3, D1, D2, and D3 as a large group,

    and assign it to 3 sectors in an adjacent base station. Obviously, there are 6

    frequency multiplexing methods as follows.

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    11

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3 B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    1

    A1

    A2

    A3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A3 B1

    B2

    B3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    2

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3 C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A3 C1

    C2

    C3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    4

    A1

    A2

    A3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3 D1

    D2

    D3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    5

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3 D1

    D2

    D3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    6

    (1~6) Method (1-6)

    If following the above frequency sequence packet method, there will be no

    problems about co-frequency occurred in adjacent base stations. However,

    adjacent frequency in end-on cells still exists: (see the positions indicated by

    red arrowheads in the above figure)

    Method 1: D1---A2; Method 2: D2---A3; Method 3: D1---A2;

    Method 4: D2---A3; Method 5: D3---A1; Method 6: D3---A1.

    Therefore, lets switch to another frequency packet method. See it in the

    following table:

    Comment [m2]:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    12

    A1 B1 C1 D1 A2 B2 C2 D2 A3 B3 C3 D3

    1 2 4 3 5 8 7 6 9 11 10 12

    13 14 16 15 17 20 19 18 21 23 22 24

    25 26 28 27 29 32 31 30 33 35 34 36

    The same 6 multiplexing methods:

    No end-on adjacent frequency in Methods 1 and 4; Method 2: C1---A2;

    Method 3: B2---A3;

    Method 5: C1---A2, B2---A3, D3---A1; Method 6: D3---A1.

    (1~6) Method (1-6)

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    1

    A1

    A2

    A3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A3 B1

    B2

    B3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    2

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3 C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A3 C1

    C2

    C3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    4

    A1

    A2

    A3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3 D1

    D2

    D3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    5

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    D1

    D2

    D3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3 D1

    D2

    D3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    6

    Comment [m3]:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    13

    Therefore, we recommend the above frequency packet multiplexing

    methods 1 and 4. Base station of each system may not be right on the grid,

    hence it can be all right if we adopt the preceding packet method classified

    by frequency sequence. However, adjacent frequency problem occurred in

    adjacent cells should be avoided.

    We can see from the above example table that the largest station type is of

    7.2M bandwidth. It can be concluded that this multiplexing method cannot

    satisfy the requirement of network capacity expansion in the areas with

    heavy traffic, as a result of its low frequency utilization rate. In some large

    and medium cities with high population density, after many times

    expansion, station distance is less than 1 km, coverage semi diameter is no

    more than several hundred meters and some sites even cover 300 m.

    Therefore, it is not realistic to increase network capacity by adopting

    large-scaled cell splitting technology. There are two methods to solve the

    problem of ever-increasing network capacity demand. One is to develop

    GSM900/1800 two-frequency network, and the other is to adopt the closer

    frequency multiplexing technology.

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    14

    1.4.2 3 x 3 Multiplexing Technology

    A3

    C2B1

    C1

    C3

    B3B2

    A1

    A2

    A3

    C2B1

    C1

    C3

    B3B2

    A1

    A2A3

    C2B1

    C1

    C3

    B3B2

    A1

    A2

    A3 C1

    A1

    A2

    A3

    C2B1

    C1

    C3

    B3B2

    A1

    A2

    A3 C1

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B3B2

    A1

    A2

    Figure 1.4-2 3 3 multiplexing

    Indicating the value of cellular hexagon side length as 1, from the above

    figure and the preceding interference models, it can be concluded as:

    dBdBI

    C3.13

    )57.5(2)7(2

    2log10)(

    44

    4

    Discussion on 3 x 3 frequency packet and multiplexing model applied in

    engineering:

    3 x 3 multiplexing generally adopts baseband frequency-hopping, or it

    adopts without frequency-hopping. However, it does not perform well. 3 x 3

    multiplexing divides usable frequencies into 9 groups, and respectively

    marks them as A1, B1, C1, A2, B2, C2, A3, B3, and C3, as follows:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    15

    A1 B1 C1 A2 B2 C2 A3 B3 C3

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

    19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

    28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

    There are the following two multiplexing methods:

    Method 1: Adjacent frequency in no-end-on cell; Method 2: C1---A2,

    C2---A3, C3---A1.

    Obviously, multiplexing method 1 is better.

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3 A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    C1

    C2

    C3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3 A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    B1

    B2

    B3

    C1

    C2

    C3

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    16

    1.4.3 1 x 3 Multiplexing Technology

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    Figure 1.4-3 1 x 3 multiplexing

    Indicating the value of cellular hexagon side length as 1, from Figure 1-7

    and the preceding interference models, it can be concluded as:

    dBdBI

    C43.9

    )36.4(25

    2log10)(

    44

    4

    Discussion on 1 x 3 frequency packet and multiplexing model applied in

    engineering:

    1 x 3 is one of the closest methods in frequency multiplexing. It is generally

    adopted in synthesizer hopping system. Meanwhile DTX, power control,

    antenna diversity and other immunity technologies to interference are used

    to make up for interference degradation caused by shortened multiplexing

    distance. All non_bcch frequencies are divided into three groups: A1, A2,

    and A3. Each of them is MA of three sectors in each base station, as shown

    below:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    17

    A1 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34

    A2 2 5 8 11 14 17 20 23 26 29 32 35

    A3 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36

    When frequency-hopping load (number of cell frequency/MA length) is less

    than 50%, MAIO of 3 cells in the same base station should not be adjacent

    frequency. In addition, MAIO of cells in the same direction in each station

    and HSN of 3 cells in the same base station should be the same, and HSN in

    adjacent base stations should be different. Base station distance with the

    same HSN should be as far as possible, all of which should be guaranteed.

    1.4.4 2 x 6 Multiplexing Technology

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A4

    A5

    A6

    B1

    B2

    B3

    B4

    B5

    B6

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A4

    A5

    A6

    B1

    B2

    B3

    B4

    B5

    B6

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A4

    A5

    A6

    B1

    B2

    B3

    B4

    B5

    B6

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A4

    A5

    A6

    B1

    B2

    B3

    B4

    B5

    B6

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A4

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A4

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A4

    A5

    A6

    B1

    B2

    B3

    B4

    B5

    B6

    A1

    A2

    A1

    A2A6

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A4

    A5

    A6

    B1

    B2

    B3

    B4

    B5

    B6

    Figure 1.4-4 2 x 6 multiplexing

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    18

    Obviously, 2 x 6 multiplexing model is not symmetrical model. Therefore,

    the multiplexing distance of cells A1 and A4 are different from that of other

    cells.

    Indicating the value of cellular hexagon side length as 1, from Figure 1-8

    and the preceding interference models, carrier-to-interference ratio of cells

    A1 and A4 can be concluded as:

    dBdBI

    C86.16

    )64.2(

    1log10)(

    4

    4

    Carrier-to-interference ratio of other cells can be concluded as:

    dBdBI

    C04.12

    )2(

    1log10)(

    4

    4

    1.4.5 MRP Multiple Frequency Multiplexing MRP

    The Multiple Multiplexing Pattern (MRP) technology divides the full band

    of frequency into BCCH frequency band and a certain number of TCH

    frequency bands, and these frequency bands are mutually orthogonal. In

    addition, each band of load frequency is an independent layer. Frequencies

    in different layers adopt different multiplexing method and frequency

    multiplexing is closer and closer by layers.

    This method divides the full band of frequency into two mutually

    orthogonal bands, that is, BCCH frequency band and TCH frequency band,

    planning with different multiplexing methods respectively. One of methods

    to improve system capacity is to use closer multiplexing method. BCCH

    channel plays a decisive role in the process of mobile station access and

    switching. Therefore, in order to ensure the quality of BCCH channel, the

    following benefits can be enjoyed, if using the frequency orthogonal to TCH

    frequency band:

    BCCH can use 4 x 3 or higher multiplexing coefficient to ensure the

    quality of BCCH channel, while TCH uses relatively close

    multiplexing method.

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    19

    Separation among each layer of BCCH and TCH frequency band

    reduces planning workload. Therefore, planning by layer is available.

    In addition to that, a section of frequency may be kept for micro cell.

    BSIC decoding has nothing to do with voice channel load. BCCH

    frequency band and TCH frequency band are mutually orthogonal.

    Therefore, the increase in TCH channel load has little influence on

    BCCH channel. In addition, it does not have an impact on BSIC

    decoding, and thereby improving switching performance.

    Simplify the configuration of adjacent cell list. Some documents

    indicate that long adjacent cell list will reduce switching performance,

    while this method can simplify adjacent cell list, and thereby

    improving switching performance.

    BCCH independently uses a segment of frequency (12 frequency

    points in 4 x 3 method), and thus length of adjacent cell list

    (composed of BCCH frequency points) can be greatly reduced.

    Give full play to immunity technologies to interference, such as

    power control and DTX. BCCH cannot use dynamic power control

    and DTX and it has been transmitting signal in the highest

    transmission power. Therefore, BCCH and TCH will influence the

    effect of these anti-interference technologies by using the same

    frequency band.

    Each layer in BCCH and TCH is comparatively independent, which

    helps maintenance and expansion by layer. Increasing or deleting sites or

    TRX in cells will not have an impact on existed BCCH frequency planning

    and thus facilitating network maintenance.

    MRP segmenting with 6 MHz frequency band

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12

    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

    21 22 23 24 25 26

    27 28 29 30TCH3(4)

    BCCH(12)

    TCH1(8)

    TCH2(6)

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    20

    Carrier No.

    MRP is one of the hotspots in frequency planning technology development

    in recent years. Some documents indicate that by using MRP simultaneously

    integrated with frequency-hopping, DTX, power control and other immunity

    technologies to interference can reduce average frequency multiplexing

    coefficient to around 7.5, without influencing network quality.

    Example:

    TRX 2 3 4

    20% 30% 50%

    MRP 12/8 12/8/6 12/8/6/4

    12+8/2=10 (12+8+6/3=8.7 (12+8+6+4)/4=7.5

    TRX TRX quantity of the cell

    Proportion of the cell

    MRP MRP segments

    Average frequency multiplexing coefficient

    Frequency-hopping diversity gain

    Large, medium, small

    Comment [m4]:

    Comment [m5]:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    21

    In the above table, the number of cells with 2TRX is 20%, that with 3TRX

    is 30%, and that with 4TRX is 50%. Given that these cells are distributed

    equally, thus average frequency multiplexing coefficient must be less than

    actual multiplexing coefficient. Take the cells with 3TRX as an example.

    Since the number of cells with 3TRX or above is actually 80%, and they are

    distributed equally, thus the actual multiplexing coefficient on the third layer

    is 6/0.8=7.5.

    Extended MRP is the development of MRP concept. After being segmented,

    each layer can include frequencies of each layer thereafter: Layer TCH0

    includes frequency points in each layer from TCH1 to TCHn, layer TCH1

    includes frequency points in each layer from TCH2 to TCHn, and so forth.

    First, assign frequency points in Layer TCHn, then frequency points in

    Layer TCHn-1, and so forth. However, this will have an impact on the

    structure of MRP planning.

    Extended MRP segmenting with 6 MHz frequency band

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12

    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

    21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

    27 28 29 30TCH3(4)

    BCCH(12)

    TCH1(8)

    TCH2(6)

    Carrier No.

    Example:

    Take frequency bandwidth of 7.2 MHz as an example. Classify 36 pairs of

    carrier frequencies into four groups according to 12/9/8/7 by using MRP, as

    follows:

    Comment [m6]:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    22

    TCH1 TCH2 TCH3

    60 61 62 63 64 65

    66 67 68 69 70 71

    72 73 74 75 76 77

    78 79 80

    81 82 83 84 85

    86 87 88

    89 90 91 92

    93 94 95

    Channel Type

    Channel No.

    Logic Channel

    TCH1 TCH1 Traffic Channel

    TCH2 TCH2 Traffic Channel

    TCH3 TCH3 Traffic Channel

    Channel BCCH adopts 4 x 3 multiplexing (Figure 1.4-5A), traffic channel

    TCH1 adopts 4 x 3 multiplexing (Figure 1.4-5B), traffic channels of TCH2

    and TCH3 adopt 2 x 3 multiplexing (Figure 1.4-5A and Figure 1.4-5B),

    classify them into four groups.

    Comment [m7]:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    23

    60

    64

    68

    62

    66

    7063

    67

    7161

    65

    69

    72

    75

    78

    73

    76

    7972

    75

    787477

    80

    12-carrier frequencies of BCCH adopt 4 x

    3 multiplexing method

    (A)

    9-carrier frequencies of TCH1 adopt 3 x 3

    multiplexing method

    (B)

    Figure 1.4-5

    89

    91

    93

    9092

    94 9092

    9489

    91

    93

    8183

    85

    8284

    8682

    84

    8183

    85

    86

    8-carrier frequencies of TCH2 adopt 2 x 3

    multiplexing method

    (A)

    7-carrier frequencies of TCH3 adopt 2 x 3

    multiplexing method

    (B)

    Figure 1.4-6

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    24

    60728189

    64 75 8391

    85 93 6878

    62738290

    66 76 8492

    70808594

    63 7282 90

    67 75 92 84

    71 8678 94

    65 77 8391

    61748189

    85936980

    Figure 1.4-7 Configuration diagram of MRP carrier frequency with a frequency bandwidth of 7.2

    MHz

    Comparison about system capacities between packet multiplexing and MRP

    technology

    According to the preceding various analysis and introduction on

    multiplexing technologies, now lets make a comparison on capacity

    increasing among these four multiplexing methods (4 x 3 multiplexing

    method).

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    25

    43 3/2/2 3/3/2 1440 1

    33 3/3/3 1788 124

    13 4/4/4 2640 183

    MRP1296

    **

    3/3/3 1788 124

    6MHZ

    26 2/2/2/2/2/2 2160 15

    43 4/4/4 2628 1

    33 5/5/5 3384 129

    13 6/6/6 4272 163

    MRP1296

    **

    6/6/6 4272 163

    9.6MHZ

    26 3/3/3/4/4/4 4416 168

    Note: GOS = 0.02, 0.025 Erl/User

    ** () herein indicates multiplexing method of each carrier frequency

    Multiplexing Method

    Based Station Configuration

    Average Capacity per Site

    Capacity Ratio

    1.4.6 Concentric Cell Technology

    (1) Basic principle

    Comment [m8]:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    26

    So-called concentric cell is to divide a common cell into two areas: external

    layer and internal layer, or called as overlay and underlay. The scale of

    overlay covers traditional cellular, while that of underlay covers mainly

    around base stations. The differences between overlay and underlay are not

    only on coverage scale, but also on frequency multiplexing coefficient.

    Overlay generally adopts traditional 4 x 3 multiplexing method, while

    underlay adopts closer multiplexing method, such as 3 x 3, 2 x 3 or 1 x 3.

    Therefore, all carrier channels are classified into two groups. One is for

    overlay and the other is for underlay. The reason why this structure is called

    concentric cell is that overlay and underlay share co-location, a set of

    antenna system and the same BCCH channel. However, public control

    channel must belong to external channel group, which means call

    establishment must operate on external channel. Diagram of concentric cell

    structure is shown as follows:

    f5

    f2

    f3

    f6

    f9

    f12

    f10

    f11

    f1

    f7

    f4

    f8

    /

    /

    Figure 1.4-8 Diagram of concentric cell structure

    / Overlay

    Comment [m9]:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    27

    / Underlay

    According to different methods to realize concentric cell, they are common

    concentric cell and intelligent underlay overlay (IUO). The difference

    between these two concentric cells is mainly about underlay transmission

    power and handoff algorithm between underlay and overlay.

    Generally overlay transmission power of common concentric cell is lower

    than overlay power, and thereby reducing coverage scale, increasing

    distance ratio and satisfying co-frequency interference requirement. Handoff

    between underlay and overlay in common concentric cell is based on power

    and distance.

    Transmission power in underlay of IUO (frequency adopts closer

    multiplexing method, therefore, this layer is usually called as super layer) is

    the same as that in overlay (usually called as regular layer), as a result of

    handoff algorithm. Handoff algorithm of IUO is switched based on C/I. The

    simple description of its realization process is as follows:

    A call is established at the regular layer. Then, the BSC continuously

    monitors the downlink super group channel C/I ratio of the call. When a

    certain super channel C/I ratio reaches the available threshold (good C/I

    threshold defined in IUO), the channel for the call is switched to the super

    channel. At the same time, the BSC continues to monitor the channel C/I

    ratio. When the C/I ratio reaches a bad threshold (bad C/I threshold defined

    in IUO), the channel is switched back to the regular channel. Therefore, to

    use IUO, the system must have the following functions:

    A. Estimation on downlink co-frequency C/I ratio

    B. Handoff algorithm concerning IUO

    Handoff in cell from regular layer to super layer (measured C/I greater

    than good C/I threshold)

    Handoff in cell from super layer to regular layer (measured C/I less than

    bad C/I threshold)

    (2) Capacity

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    28

    Since underlay adopts closer multiplexing method, each cell can be assigned

    to more TRX, and thereby improving frequency utilization rate and

    increasing network capacity. However, it should pay attention to the fact that

    coverage semi diameter of underlay in concentric cell is less than common

    cell and its traffic absorption is confined by call operation distribution and

    coverage scale. The following table shows distribution on different call

    operations. Under different coverage scales, make a comparison on capacity

    between concentric cell and traditional 4 x 3 method. Indicate Si as underlay

    coverage, Sout as outlay coverage area, the measure of capacity as Erlang:

    Si / Sout

    3TRX 2TRXout+2TRXin 4TRX 3TRXout+2TRXin

    0.3 14.04 10.57 21.04 20.05

    0.7 14.04 20.55 21.04 28.25

    0.9 14.04 21.04 21.04 28.25

    0.3 14.04 15.09 21.04 21.92

    0.7 14.04 21.04 21.04 28.25

    Coverage Ratio

    Uniform distribution of traffic

    Linear distribution of traffic

    What needs to explain is that coverage ratio is concerned with frequency

    multiplexing type. The closer frequency multiplexing type is, the more

    intense co-frequency interference is and the less underlay coverage ratio is.

    In addition to that it is concerned with configuration of handoff parameter

    and surrounding environment. Therefore, coverage semi diameter is not

    configured at will. It needs giving comprehensive consideration upon the

    quality of network, which is hardly more than 50%.

    Comment [m10]:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    29

    From the preceding analysis, the concentric cell technology improves the

    capacity a little or even reduces the capacity when traffic is well distributed.

    The denser the traffic around a cell, the more obvious the effect is. Above all,

    capability increasing is limited. For a common concentric cell, the Tx power

    of its internal layer is low, which is hard to absorb the traffic indoor.

    Therefore, the frequency efficiency is low and the actual capacity is

    increased by about 10% to 30%. For IUO, the Tx power of its internal layer

    remains unchanged, which can absorb the traffic indoor and the handoff

    based quality for capacity absorbing is flexible. Therefore, the actual

    capacity is increased by 20% to 40% (relatively high).

    (3) Features and application

    A. Common concentric cell

    The features of common concentric cell are as follows:

    No need to change network structure.

    Need to increase some special handoff algorithm, but generally the

    realization is simple.

    No specific requirements on mobile phone.

    A limitation on capacity increase, generally it is 10-30%. It is concerned

    with call operation distribution. Because of small power, underlay is hard to

    absorb indoor traffic.

    It is applicable in the situation that call traffic is highly concentrated around

    base station and distributed outdoor.

    Notice in application

    Make a good network planning. On one hand, it should be applied in areas

    of high call operation concentration, on the other hand, making a good

    planning about coverage area of underlay. The area cannot impact quality

    because of interference caused by close multiplexing, and it should absorb

    enough call operation. If it is a bad planning, it will not only hardly increase

    capacity, but also reduce network quality.

    It would be better to integrated with technologies about reducing

    interference, such as power control and DTX.

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    30

    B. IUO

    IUO mainly has the following features:

    As a kind of concentric cell, IUO can utilize existing site, have little

    modification on network and no specific requirements on mobile phone.

    System function needs to increase measure and estimation on C/I and

    special handoff algorithm.

    Capacity has an augment of 20% - 40%, and it has nothing to do with call

    operation distribution and call traffic absorbed by super layer. In addition to

    that it can ensure quality on the basis o f increasing capacity.

    Super layer can adopt closer multiplexing method. When the frequency is

    enough wide, it can keep a segment of frequency for micro cellular.

    It is applicable for the areas where high density of call operation is and

    concentrated around base stations.

    Notice in IUO application:

    Make a good planning. Cell should be planned based on call operation

    distribution and notice to reduce interference.

    When cell channel is being assigned, reasonable configuration between

    super layer frequency and regular layer frequency should be noticed.

    In order to reduce interference, power control and DTX technology should

    be integrated in application.

    It would be better to adopt handoff based on C/I in regular layer.

    1.5 Cell Splitting

    In the beginning period of GSM network establishment, since there are not

    too many users, channels are surplus. With ever-increasing users, blockage

    occurs in the channels that were assigned to each base station. At this time

    new channels can be added and assigned to the original base stations. If

    users are constantly increasing, while the usable channels are exhausted,

    then only cell splitting, increase in base stations and co-channel

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    31

    multiplexing can meet demand of users. Usually, the semi diameter of

    newly-splitted cell is only half of that of original cell.

    Semi diameter of new cell=semi diameter of old cell/2 (1-5-1)

    based on formula (1-4-1), the following formula works:

    Coverage area of new cell=coverage area of old cell/4 (1-5-2)

    Given that the highest traffic load of each new cell and old cell are the same,

    then principally speaking, it is concluded as:

    New traffic/unit area= 4 old traffic/unit area (1-5-3)

    Therefore, the relation between cell splitting and increase on user capacity

    can be represented as follows:

    Tn = 4n T (1-5-4)

    In the formula: Tn- network capacity after n times cell splitting

    T0- network capacity prior to cell splitting

    Formula (1-5-4) is applicable for cellular grid that is splitted to 4 less cells

    at a ratio of 1:4. Simply speaking, after one time splitting, the number of

    users can be increased to 4 times of the original one and the actual capacity

    is less than that of its four times.

    1.6 Several Common Immunity Technology to Interference

    GSM system itself has many immunity technologies to interference, such as

    frequency hopping, power control, discontinuous transmission based on

    voice activity detection and so on. If effectively applicable, it will improve

    C/I, thereby it can form a closer frequency multiplexing method, in addition

    to increase on frequency multiplexing coefficient and frequency utilization

    rate. Herein, we will introduce these technologies one by one and analyze

    their gain through absolute mathematics model and artificial model.

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    32

    1.6.1 Discontinuous Transmission (DTX)

    TRAU BTS

    BTS MS

    480 ms

    Comfort noise frame

    Voice frame

    During the period of voice activation, discontinuous transmission encodes

    voice at 13 kbit/s. During silence period, it encodes comfort noise at 500

    bit/s.

    During silence period, discontinuous transmission has little contribution to

    interference. It can be regarded that its power is zero (none activation). If

    DTX activity factor is p

    , then its gain is

    pI

    C

    pI

    CdBIC log10log10log10)(/

    1.6.2 Frequency Hopping (FH)

    Frequency hopping is one kind of spread spectrum communication. It is

    applied in cell mobile communication system to improve system

    anti-multipath fading capability. In addition to that it can curb co-frequency

    interference on communication quality. Therefore, it is highly applicable.

    Especially, nowadays when spectrum resource is more and more insufficient,

    Comment [m11]:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    33

    frequency hopping becomes one of the most effective methods to improve

    spectrum utilization rate.

    In GSM, data of each logic frame is sent in a way of decentralized and

    interleaved in 8 TDMA frames, while all of these data has been encoded in

    convolution. If a part of these 8 blocks of burst is interfered or damaged, it

    can recover the data that has been sent through convolution encoder.

    However, if too many blocks are damaged, it is hard to recover the original

    data. By frequency hopping, it is unlikely to make burst in one channel in

    heavy fading area too long (it easily occurs in a still or moving-at-low-speed

    mobile station that works on a fixed carrier), or to be interfered by a certain

    strong co-frequency signal. Thus it is possible to get good transmission

    effect by using channel coding and encoding. It is the simple principle to

    improve communication quality by adopting frequency hopping technology.

    Frequency hopping sequence used by GSM system is a kind of Poisson false

    random variable sequence. It can provide 64 frequency hopping sequence at

    most. Length is same to hyperframe (lasting 3 hours 28 min 53 sec 760ms)

    to ensure, as soon as possible, that each sequence is orthogonal to each other,

    so that ensure the effect of frequency hopping. Frequency hopping sequence

    in GSM is mainly described by two parameters: HSN (Hopping-frequency

    Sequence Number) and MAIO (Mobile Assignment Index Offset). Usually,

    different HSN is assigned to different cell and different value of MAIO is

    assigned to different channel of cells.

    It is noticed that every channel in a same cell adopts a same HSN and only

    value of MAIO offset is different, which ensures that every channel in a

    same cell will not occupy same frequency points at a same time. In different

    cells, as a result of different HSN, it adopts different categories of frequency

    hopping sequence. Then it makes frequency hopping sequence in every cell

    is not relevant as far as possible, so that interfering resource signals are

    assigned to many channels to ensure coding and encoding effect. When

    HSN=0, MAI is dup loop from low to high, it is called as Cyclic Hopping.

    Since frequency hopping gain in this method is very low, usually it is not

    adopted in GSM

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    34

    GSM supports baseband frequency hopping and RF frequency hopping (or

    called as Synthesized Frequency Hopping). Baseband frequency hopping

    means that many transmitters work on their own fixed frequency points,

    while on baseband signals from different channels switched to different

    transmitters are sent according to frequency sequence. Baseband frequency

    hopping can be easily realized, however, frequency hopping points are few

    as a result of the limited TRX number. Frequency hopping artificial system

    established by ZTE is mainly to support RF frequency hopping. Baseband

    frequency hopping is only regarded as an exception of RF frequency

    hopping (that is, the number of frequency points equals to the number of

    TRXs). The advantage brought by frequency hopping is mainly about the

    effect of Frequency Diversity and Interference Diversity. Frequency

    diversity actually improves network coverage scale, and Interference

    diversity increases network capacity

    The number of available frequency hopping in baseband frequency hopping

    is equal to the number of TRX. Therefore, it can only bring frequency

    diversity gain, not interference diversity gain. However, now GSM

    operators are more concerned about capacity problem. Coverage is not a

    problem in most of cities. RF frequency hopping is a very effective method

    to solve capacity problem.

    RF frequency hopping is a trend of application in network planning.

    Frequency diversity gain

    Frequency diversity means its immunity ability to Rayleigh fading. Since

    Rayleigh fading on different carriers is certain irrelevance (the more

    frequency differential is, the less irrelevance is), then burst distributed on

    different carriers will not influenced by the same Rayleigh fading. It means

    a lot to the still and moving-at-low-speed mobile station. It is said that it can

    provide a gain value of 6.5dB. However, MS moving at high speed and two

    successive burst in a same channel are different on timing position, which

    means they are irrelevant to Rayleigh change. They are seldom influenced

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    35

    by the fading at a time when frequency diversity provided by low-speed

    frequency hopping is very little.

    Under the condition that MS moves at high speed, frequency points

    assigned in cells have little impact on frequency hopping performance.

    While under the condition of no frequency hopping, there are about

    frequency diversity gain of 1 dB to 2dB. When MS moves at low speed

    (TU3), because of frequency diversity effect, the number of assignment

    frequency points has significant influence on system performance.

    Frequency points increased by a time will obtain about gain value of

    0.2~1dB, load rate can be increased by 10% or so.

    (1) Interference diversity gain

    Interference diversity means that it curbs capability of interfering signals in

    other co-frequency multiplexing cell, that is, to provide frequency hopping

    and interfering differential on the transmission path in order to improve

    interference under the harshest conditions. It makes all users evenly enjoy

    good communication quality, which is very important for the mobile

    communication system with lots of users, especially critical to increase

    communication traffic through augmenting frequency multiplexing rate.

    Usually interference diversity effect should be provided, and the number of

    frequency hopping points should not be less than 3.

    MA},...,,,{ 321 nffff ,

    TRX m (mn)

    Regarding the above figure, given that mobile station is in air with fk at time

    t. At that time, the possibility of interfering cell fk being activated is

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    36

    nmCCp mnmn //

    11

    m

    n

    I

    C

    pI

    CdBIC log10log10log10)(/

    Gain

    (3) Frequency hopping planning and capacity analysis

    If co-frequency point is 10 MHz, frequency hopping planning and capacity

    analysis without adopting frequency hopping are as follows:

    The multiplexing method of BCCH is 4X3, and the multiplexing method of

    traffic channel is 3X3. 10 MHz has 50 frequency points. It leaves 37

    frequency points after losing 1 protection frequency point and 12 BCCH

    frequency points. Thus, each cell can be assigned 4 traffic frequency points

    ((37-1)/9), and only one frequency point is left. Then its most assignment

    should be 5+5+5. Each cell can provide 37 channels

    (1BCCH+2SDCCH+37TCH).

    When RF frequency hopping technology is adopted, traffic channel can

    adopt 1X3 multiplexing. When load is 50%, each cell can provide 6 service

    logic frequency points. The reason why it is called logic frequency point is

    that they all adopt the same 12 frequency hopping collection ((37-1)/3).

    Only HSN is different from MAIO, then one frequency point is left, and the

    most assignment becomes 7+7+7. It can provide 53 service traffic channels

    (1BCCH+2SDCCH+53TCH) with increase on capacity by 43%. At this

    time more than 90% of areas can have C/I with a value of 9dB. When DTX

    and ZTE distinctive fast power control algorithm are adopted at the same

    time, system capacity can be improved much better. If intelligence traffic

    control technology is adopted, GSM can acquire soft capacity, and gain

    more system capacity by sacrificing certain voice quality in hot traffic areas.

    Comment [m12]:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    37

    1.6.3 Dynamic Power Control (DPC)

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    A2

    Seen from the above figure, in dynamic power control interfering only when

    mobile station is at the border of a cell, BTS can work with the most

    transmission power.

    Obviously, the position of interfering mobile station is a possibility. The

    circumstance is even more obvious in frequency hopping.

    Indicate DPC factor as p:

    pI

    C

    pI

    CdBIC log10log10log10)(/

    Gain

    1.6.4 1 x 3 Multiplexing + Radio Frequency FH + DTX + DPC

    Lets observe and study 13multiplexing interference in specific and

    check the contribution made by immunity technologies to interference to

    reduce interference and increase system capacity.

    Differentials on interfering degradation between 1 x 3 and 4 x 3

    multiplexing methods:

    CIR 43- CIR 13 =18 - 9.43 8.57 dB

    Comment [m13]:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    38

    Interference diversity gain made by 1 x 3 frequency hopping with 50% of

    frequency carrier:

    10log10(2/1) = 3dB

    Indicate the length of frequency hopping is 12 frequency points, then

    frequency diversity gain is about 2 dB.

    Indicate DTX activation factor is 0.5, then its gain is:

    -10log10(0.5) = 3dB

    Indicate DPC factor is 0.9, then its gain is:

    -10log10(0.9) =0.5dB

    The total gain is:

    3+2+3+0.5=8.5Db

    From the above analysis we can see that utilizing immunity technologies to

    interference basically can recover interference degradation made by

    intensified multiplexing methods.

    1.7 Conclusion on Principles of Frequency Assignment in Engineering

    Adjacent frequencies cannot be identical in the same base station.

    Directly adjacent base station should avoid co-frequency (even

    though the direction of their antenna central lobes are different, side

    lobe and back lobe can also bring much interference.):

    End-on cells cannot be co-frequency and should avoid adjacent

    frequency, especially for BCCH and SDCCH carrier frequency

    (usually they are 1st and 2nd carrier frequencies of the cell). When

    frequency hopping is adopted, the starting hopping points of adjacent

    base stations can be the same, while the algorithm of frequency

    hopping cannot be the same.

    When in common frequency hopping (that is synthesizer frequency

    hopping), frequency hopping algorithm (HSN) of each cell in the

    same station are all identical. However, starting frequency hopping

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    39

    points (MAIO) cannot be adjacent frequency. Note: whatever adopts

    CCB combiner cannot support frequency hopping.

    Design of BSIC should also be noticed. BSIC = 8 x NCC + BCC,

    BCC is available from 0-7, thus the near co-frequency and adjacent

    frequency cell should not be the same as far as possible.

    Co-frequency (especially BCCH carrier frequency) and the same

    BSIC in short distance should be avoided as far as possible.

    There are high mountains between base stations, which is not

    regarded as adjacent station. If there are large scale of water between

    base stations, which should be regarded as adjacent station.

    Prior to frequency hopping, and no limitation on the using scale of

    BCCH carrier, BCCH can be staggered as far as possible. A certain

    segment of frequency band should be saved for 4X3 multiplexing

    when in frequency hopping. If frequency is enough, BCCH can adopt

    5 x 3 or even 6 x 3 multiplexing models to reduce interference among

    BCCH.

    In large or medium scale cities, different close frequency

    multiplexing methods are adopted according to different functions

    supported by equipments, such as MRP, 1 x 3, and 1 x 1 frequency

    hopping. Meanwhile saving part of frequency points in advance for

    micro cellular to establish layered network. Its frequency

    multiplexing coefficient is small.

    In large or medium scale cities, different frequency multiplexing

    methods are adopted according to different functions supported by

    equipments. Whether it is needed to establish layered network or not,

    it is based actual conditions. Its frequency multiplexing coefficient is

    a little bit more than that of large or medium scale cities.

    In towns and villages, frequency resource are abundant, then regular

    4 x 3 frequency multiplexing method can be adopted.

    For stations build on high mountains for the geographic reason,

    independent frequency points can be assigned.

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    40

    The above are about some principles in frequency planning, while doing

    frequency planning needs another important principle, that is, it should be in

    accordance with the local actual circumstance. Morphology and base station

    of each system are different, so are transmission of radio signal, which

    requires us to learn more about the local actual circumstance before we

    make frequency planning. We should not be confined in the common

    frequency multiplexing methods, for frequency assignment methods is in

    accordance with the local actual circumstance. Frequency planning should

    satisfy the local situation as far as possible. If possible, we may use some

    specific planning tools integrated with e-map to do field-strength prediction.

    First, observe that whether the coverage area of each cell is reasonable.

    Then make coverage modification or frequency planning revise for those

    areas which are not satisfied with the interference requirements (generally

    we set the co-frequency interference as 12dB or so and leave 3Db margin

    while in prediction). After base station is in operation, it is to judge whether

    coverage frequency planning is proper or not by line test and some statistic

    data. For the areas with heavy interference, it is to solve the problems by

    modifying coverage, revising frequency planning and other methods.

    We make frequency planning in a way of geographic slicing, while we

    should keep a certain number of frequency points (frequency is enough) or

    make frequency band division at slicing border. The choice of border should

    avoid hot areas or networking complex areas as far as possible.

    Usually, planning should start from the densest area in base station. For

    example, first from urban bustling areas, then to suburban base station with

    less carrier assignment (usually choose O1/ or S1/1/1 as border). Notice that

    there are rivers or l4arger lakes in the urban areas. Interference made by

    strong transmission of water surface should be avoided.

    As a result of irregularity of actual base station distribution, it is hard to

    ensure that the frequency in the same layer carrier can be planned fully

    following 4 x 3 or 3 x 3 and other common models. It needs flexible

    modification according to actual circumstance.

  • 41

    Chapter 2 Neighboring Cell Planning

    Knowledge point

    Know about the principles and methods in neighboring cell planning.

    Analyze cases of improper neighboring cell planning.

    Neighboring cell planning determines consecutive coverage of a GSM

    network and network performance indexes. The principles of neighboring

    cell planning are as follows:

    (1) Frequencies of the primary cell and neighboring cells must be

    different.

    (2) The number of neighboring cells must be less than or equal to 32, and

    the OMCR can be configured for a maximum of 32 neighboring cells.

    To acquire a better neighboring cell planning, the QoS and load of the

    system must be taken into consideration. Actually, more neighboring cells,

    more system load will bring because of handover. However, moderate

    number of neighboring cells reduces call drops because of handover.

    When you plan neighboring cells, take the following aspects into

    consideration.

    If there are a large number of neighboring cells, handover occurs frequently

    and thus leads to signaling overload.

    If there are fewer neighboring cells, call drop may occur because of

    handover failure, or QoS is affected severely.

    Generally, in planning neighboring cells, it is determined that cells are

    distributed based on cellular structure. Therefore, pay attention to the

    following points:

    When you configure neighboring cells for microcells in urban areas,

    two-layer adjacency is required, as shown below:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    42

    A3

    D2 B1

    D1

    D3

    C1 B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D2 B1

    D1

    D3

    C1 B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D2 B1

    D1

    D3

    C1 B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2 A3

    D2 B1

    D1

    D3

    C1 B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    Figure 2-1

    When you configure neighboring cells in remote areas such as suburban

    areas or the countries, one-layer adjacency is required. This is because in

    these areas, network is sparsely distributed and each cell is with wide

    coverage. In this case, a long distance is between the first layer and the

    second layer. For details, see the following figure:

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here. Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    43

    A3

    D2 B1

    D1

    D3

    C1 B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D2 B1

    D1

    D3

    C1 B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    A3

    D2 B1

    D1

    D3

    C1 B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2 A3

    D2 B1

    D1

    D3

    C1 B3

    C2

    B2

    C3

    A1

    A2

    Figure 2-2

    In a dual frequency network, cooperation and setting principles between the

    two-layer network should be considered in configuring neighboring cells.

    Therefore, the network adjacency should be configured according to

    different principles of network sharing.

    Generally, it is considered that cells are arranged in order based on cellular

    shape. But actually, cells are hardly arranged in order because site selection

    is affected by various factors. In this case, configuration should be

    performed based on data that is obtained by simulating networking planning.

    In addition, if the transmit power of a BTS is very large, the covered edge

    zone takes a great proportion. In this case, the adjacency cannot be obtained

    based on the geographic position; instead, it must be obtained by on-site

    measurement, or configure more adjacencies, as shown below:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    44

    A

    B

    C

    Figure 2-3 Neighboring cell configuration

    From the figure, we can see that a cell phone walks along the curve line in

    the covered edge zone. Theoretically, the cell phone selects service area A

    first, then service area B, and last service area C. But actually, signals of

    BTS B cannot size the control position in the curve line because of certain

    complex factors in the radio propagation environment. In this case, if cells

    of BTS C are not configured as the neighboring cells of sector 1 of BTS A,

    the cell phone is always in sector 1 of BTS A, until call drop occurs or the

    cell is selected again. To solve this problem, configure sectors 1 and 2 of

    BTS A and sector 1 of BTS C as neighboring cells (sense frequency points).

    However, you cannot configure all cells as neighboring cells. If all cells are

    configured as neighboring cells, unexpected problems may occur, such as

    cell reselection and handover.

    The following lists improper neighboring cell planning.

    One-way neighboring cell

    Many neighboring cells

    Few neighboring cells

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here. Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    45

    The following lists problems that may occur because of improper

    neighboring cell planning.

    Call drop

    Handover failure

    Frequent handover

    Isolated cells

    Abnormal inter-cell handover

    Unbalanced traffic

    Decreased handover precision

    Cases

    Case 1

    1. Fault Symptom

    A BTS in the urban area is configured as S333, and the single frequency

    GSM900 network is used at local with 1*3 RF frequency hopping mode.

    The cutin failure rate in a sector of this BTS is constantly high. That is, cutin

    failure rate for this cell from source cell A is about 80%, but indexes such as

    call drop rate and failure rate of the voice channel allocation are normal.

    2. Fault Analysis

    The fault is not caused by hardware fault and interference. This is because

    though the cutin failure rate is high, TCH allocation does not fail, which

    indicates that MS can occupy TCH channels allocated by BSC. In addition,

    severe interference does not exist because no call drop occurs on MS and

    voice communication is with good quality. After analysis, it can be

    determined that source cell A is far away from this cell with high cutin

    failure rate and thus handover requests should be fewer. Therefore, the fault

    may be caused by island effect.

    3. Fault Locating

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    46

    The fault is caused by island effect after checking hardware, transmission

    stability, and interference and no fault occurs. Check neighboring cells of

    source cell A to check whether cells with the same frequency and same color

    codes as cell C exist. It is found that such a cell exists. Locate the fault

    further. It is found that a very big square is set up between cell B and cell A,

    which makes radio propagation conditions between cell A and cell B better.

    MS senses signals, and these signals are ones of cell B, but BSC determines

    send Handover Command to cell C. At the same time, the level of cell C

    may be very low, which makes handover failure. This is handover failure

    caused by island effect.

    4. Troubleshooting

    Modify the frequency point of cell C and add isolation cell B into the

    neighboring cell table of cell A. Then, the fault is rectified.

    5. Conclusion

    In troubleshooting network faults, pay attention to environment change. For

    example, whether radio signal propagation is affected, or whether radio

    signals can be propagated better. If these factors are changed, engineering

    parameters (such as antenna height, downtilt angle, and directional angle)

    and cell parameters need to be adjusted (for example, add, delete, or modify

    neighboring cells or frequency). Frequency resources of a GSM network are

    limited. Therefore, with expansion of the network scale, island effect is

    more likely to be generated, especially on handover. In addition, if

    co-channel interference is severe, handover success ratio is severely

    affected.

    Case 2

    1. Fault Symptom

    A user at border areas of a province complains that he/she cannot disengage

    the roaming signals from another province once receiving these signals, but

    the roaming problem does not exist at home. These two provinces are not

    neighboring cells.

    2. Fault Analysis

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here. Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    47

    Perform the drive test at local. It is found the following network results:

    Figure 2-4

    The user usually is located in point P, which is in cell A. Cell A and cell B

    are neighboring cells and are home networks for the user. Cell C and cell D

    are neighboring cells and are networks for roaming area. In addition, cell A

    is not the neighboring cell for cell C and cell D.

    Cell D has the same BCCH frequency point as neighboring cell B that is

    defined by cell A; therefore, the mobile phone at point P may re-select cell

    D and then re-select cell C through cell D. The neighboring cell table of cell

    C and cell D does not define the frequency point of cell A. Therefore, the

    user resides in the networking of the roaming area. If the user powers off the

    mobile phone and then powers it on in cell C, the mobile phone searches

    cell C and frequency points of the neighboring cells that are defined by cell

    C. This is because the mobile phone keeps the frequency point of the cell

    where it is located when being powered off. This leads to the roaming

    problem.

    3. Troubleshooting

    Comment [m14]:

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    48

    Define neighboring cells between two provinces. If neighboring cells cannot

    be configured, modify the frequency point of cell B to rectify the fault.

  • 49

    Chapter 3 BSIC Planning

    Knowledge point

    Know about the definition, value range, and planning principles of BSIC.

    1. Definition

    In a GSM system, each BTS is allocated with a local color code, which is

    called base station identity code (BSIC). In a physical position, if the mobile

    phone receives BCCH carrier frequencies of two cells concurrently, and

    these two cells are with the same channel ID, the mobile phone

    differentiates these two cells by BSIC. In network planning, to decrease

    co-channel interference, BCCH carrier frequencies of neighboring cells are

    assured with different frequencies. However, in the cellular

    telecommunication system, it is possible that BCCH carrier frequencies are

    multiplex. For these cells with the same BCCH carrier frequency, make sure

    that they have different BSICs, as shown below:

    Figure 3-1 BSIC selection

    In the figure, BCCH carrier frequencies of cells A, B, C, D, E, and F are

    with the same absolute channel ID, and other cells use different channel ID

    as the BCCH carrier frequency. Generally, cells A, B, C, D, E, and F are

    requested to have different BSICs. When the BSIC resources are insufficient,

    consider whether neighboring cells of these cells adopt different BSICs.

    Here, take cell E as an example, if BSIC IDs are insufficient, preferentially

    consider that cells D and E, B and E, and F and E use different BSICs

    respectively, but cells A and E, and C and E use the same BSIC respectively.

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    50

    The BSIC consists of the network color code (NCC) and base transceiver

    color code (BCC), as shown in figure 3-2. The BSIC is transmitted over the

    synchronization channel (SCH) of each cell. It mainly provides the

    following functions:

    Figure 3-2 BSIC composition

    When the mobile phone receives codes from SCH, it is determined

    that the mobile phone is synchronized with the cell. To correctly

    translate the information of the downstream common signaling

    channel, the mobile phone needs to know training sequence code

    (TSC) used by the common signaling channel. According to GSM

    specifications, TSC has eight fixed formats, which are presented from

    ID 0 to ID 7. The TSC SN used by the common signaling channel of

    each cell is determined by BCC of the cell. Therefore, one of

    functions of BSIC is to notify the mobile phone of the TSC that is

    used by the common signaling channel of the cell.

    BSIC takes part in random access channel (RACH) translation, so it

    can be used to prevent RACH that is transmitted to neighboring cells

    by the mobile phone from being incorrectly translated as the access

    channel of the cell by the BTS.

    When the mobile phone is in use, it must measure the levels of BCCH

    carrier frequencies of neighboring cells and then report the results to

    the BTS according to specifications of the relevant neighboring cell

    table on BCCH. At same time, for each frequency point in the

    measurement report, the mobile phone must point out BSIC of the

    measured carrier frequency. In specified conditions, that is, two or

    BCC

    BSIC

    NCC

  • Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here. Error! Use the Home tab to apply 1 to the text that you want to appear here.

    51

    more cells contained in neighboring cells of a cell adopt the same

    BCCH carrier frequency; the BTS differentiates these cells based on

    BSIC. This prevents incorrect handover or even handover failure.

    When the mobile phone is in use, it must measure signals of

    neighboring cells and report the results to the network. In each report,

    contents of only six neighboring cells are included. Therefore, take

    control for that the mobile phone reports situations of only cells

    having handover relationships with the current cell. In BSIC, the

    higher three bits (representing NCC), are used for control. In this case,

    carrier frequencies can control the mobile phone to report situations

    of only neighboring cells in the allowed range of NCC through the

    broadcast parameter "allowed NCC".

    2. Format

    Format of BSIC: NCC-BCC.

    Value range of NCC: 0-7.

    Value range of BCC: 0-7.

    3. Setting and Effect

    In many cases, different GSMPLMNs adopt the same frequency, but their

    network planning is independent. To ensure that neighboring BTSs that are

    with the same frequency point have different BSICs, neighboring

    GSMPLMNs adopt different NCCs.

    However, situations in China are special. Actually, the GSM network of

    China Telecom is an integer and independence GSM network. Though

    China Telecom subordinates a majority of local mobile offices, these offices

    belong to the same carrier frequency, China Telecom. However, China is a

    vast land and it is hard to manage the GSM network in a united manner.

    Therefore, the entire GSM network is divided and managed by local mobile

    offices (or their equal agencies) of cities and provinces. These local mobile

    offices plan their networks independently. To ensure that BTSs with the

    same BCCH frequency that are used by border areas of cities and provinces

    have different BSICs, NCCs of cities and provinces are coordinated by

    China Telecom in a united manner.

  • GSM_P&O_ _01_200904 GSM Frequency Planning

    52

    BCC is a component part of BSIC, which is used to identify different BTSs

    that are with the same BCCH carrier frequency in the same GSMPLMN.

    And the BCC value should meet the requirements described above as much

    as possible. In addition, according to GSM specifications, the TSC of the

    BCCH carrier frequency in a cell need to be the same as the BCC of the cell.

    Usually, vendors assure this consistency.

    4. Precautions

    Make sure that neighboring cells that are with the same BCCH carrier

    frequency have different BSICs. Especially, when two or more cells

    contained in neighboring cells of a cell adopt the same BCCH carrier

    frequency, these two cells must have different BSICs. Pay attention to

    configurations of cells in the border areas of cities and provinces. Otherwise,

    inter-cell handover failure may occur.