GS 1321 ISSUANCE 3 COMPREHENSIVE MONITORING REPORT

GS 1321 ISSUANCE 3

COMPREHENSIVE MONITORING REPORT MonitoringPeriod:April1st,2015toMarch31st,2016

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page1

TableofContents

FOREWORD.............................................................................................................................3 Con7nuousMonitoring.................................................................................................................4

SUMMARYPROJECTDESCRIPTION..........................................................................................7 ProjectPartners............................................................................................................................7 KeyDevelopmentMilestones.......................................................................................................7 ProjectTechnologies....................................................................................................................8 Baseline&ProjectScenariosDefinedinthePDD.........................................................................8 Manufacturing&Distribu7on......................................................................................................9

FORWARDACTIONSREQUESTS..............................................................................................11 FAR1:RecordKeeping,hh-wt....................................................................................................11 FAR2:enduserfiltercleaningandcareeduca7on....................................................................11

PROJECTRECORDKEEPING&DATABASES..............................................................................13 SALESRECORDS&CARBONRIGHTSWAIVERS...........................................................................13

MONITORINGPLANDESCRIPTION..........................................................................................16 SUMMARYOFMONITORINGREQUIRED&conducted...............................................................16 SAMPLINGMETHOD...................................................................................................................17 DATAcollec7on,analysisandQAQC..........................................................................................18 SURVEYEQUIPMENTCALIBRATION............................................................................................19 ProceduresforMinimizingNon-SamplingErrors&InternalQAQC...........................................20 OutlierRemoval..........................................................................................................................20

KEYFIXED(EX-ANTE)DATA&PARAMETERS...........................................................................21 DATA/PARAMETERSDERIVEDFROMIPCCdefaults...................................................................21 DATA/PARAMETERSDERIVEDFROMBASELINEMONITORING..................................................22

KEYMONITORED(EX-POST)DATA&PARAMETERS................................................................24 EFFICIENTSTOVETECHNOLOGIES..............................................................................................24 WATERTREATEMENTTECHNOLOGIES.......................................................................................26

HOUSEHOLDDEMOGRAPHICS:ALLMONITORING..................................................................29

KPTMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-DUALEFFICIENTSTOVES......................................................30 OverviewofSurveysConducted.................................................................................................30 ProjectFuelConsump7onandSavings.......................................................................................31

MS/USMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-DUALEFFICIENTSTOVES..................................................33 OverviewofSurveysConducted.................................................................................................33 Usagerate&personmeals.........................................................................................................34

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page2

FrequencyofUse........................................................................................................................35 BaselineFuel&Stoveprac7ces..................................................................................................36 Hea7ngPrac7ces........................................................................................................................37 SustainableDevelopmentIndicators..........................................................................................37 CustomerSatisfaction.............................................................................................................39

WCFTMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-WT&HH-DUALWATERFILTERS........................................40 OverviewofSurveysConducted.................................................................................................40 waterConsump7onandboiling.................................................................................................41

MS/USMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-WT&HH-DUALWATERFILTERS......................................43 OverviewofSurveysConducted.................................................................................................43 Usagerate&usersperfilter.......................................................................................................43 baselinestove&fueltype..........................................................................................................45 SustainableDevelopmentIndicators..........................................................................................46 CustomerSatisfaction.............................................................................................................48

WATERQUALITYMONITORING..............................................................................................49

PROJECTLEAKAGEASSESSMENT............................................................................................50 LeakageSource1........................................................................................................................50 LeakageSource2........................................................................................................................50 LeakageSource3........................................................................................................................50 LeakageSource4........................................................................................................................53 LeakageSource5........................................................................................................................53

EMISSIONSREDUCTIONSEQUATIONS&CALCULATIONS........................................................54 EmissionReduc7ons...................................................................................................................56

SUMMARYSALES&DISTRIBUTIONUSEDFORERCALCULATIONS...........................................58

TOTALCALCULATEDERS:MONITORINGPERIOD3..................................................................59

LISTOFSUPPORTINGDOCUMENTSPROVIDEDWITHTHISREPORT.........................................60

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page3

FOREWORD

ThisComprehensiveMonitoringReportdocumentstheimplementationactivity,monitoring,andemissionsreductionsofGS1321StoveCapitalGuatemalaImprovedStoveandWaterPurificationProject(“theProject”)duringtheIssuance3MonitoringPeriodofApril1st,2015toMarch31,2016,includingallsalesofEcofiltrowaterfiltersandEkoEstufaefficientcookstovestoruralhouseholdsinGuatemalafromtheProject’sinceptionthroughtheendofthecurrentmonitoringperiod.ItisdesignedtodeliveralloftherelevantdataanddescriptionsrequiredforcompletereviewandverificationoftheProjectandincludesthefollowingreportsintheirentirety:

• KitchenPerformanceTestReport

• WaterConsumptionFieldTestReport

• WaterQualityTestReport

• NRBLeakageReport

• MonitoringandUsageReport

Ratherthanproducingseparatereportsforeachofthemajorareasofmonitoringandthensummarizingthosereportsinthisdocument,thePPhaselectedtoincludefullreportcontentforallmonitoredparametersinonedocument,therebyreducingunnecessaryduplicationofinformationacrossvariousreportsanddecreasingthelikelihoodoferrorscausedbyreportingdatathatissubjecttochangeduringtheauditprocessandwhichmustbetrackedandeditedacrossmultipledocumentsthrougheachsuccessiveroundofreview.

Similarly,thecollectionandanalysisofdatafromfieldmonitoringhasbeensimplifiedbycombiningrawandanalyzeddataintoaselectfewMicrosoftExcelspreadsheets.Ratherthanpresentingseparatespreadsheetsforeachoftheabovementionedreports(manyofwhichusedatafromtheothersincalculatingkeyparameters)allrequireddataforreviewandverificationhasbeenincludedin2keyspreadsheets:

• ERCalculationsSpreadsheet

• MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataSpreadsheet

AswiththeintentoftheComprehensiveMonitoringReport,thisreductionofsourcedocumentssimplifiesthereviewprocessandreducespossibleerrorsbydrawingallrawdataintooneplaceandpullingallanalysisdirectlyfromrawdatasourcesratherthanmanuallytransferringkeydatapointsfromonespreadsheettoanotherwhentheoutputsfromoneanalysisareneededtocompleteanother.

Whereindividualreferencedocumentsorspreadsheetsfromoutsidesourcesorfrompriorissuanceperiodsarerequiredtosupportoutcomespresentedinthisissuance,thosedocumentsarepresentedintheiroriginalform,typicallyasdistinctdocumentsprovidedalongwiththisreportandtheabovekeycurrentissuancespreadsheets.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page4

CONTINUOUSMONITORING

BeginningwithIssuance3,TheParadigmProjectimplementedanewmonitoringprocesscalledContinuousMonitoring.InFebruaryof2015,Paradigmcreatedaconcepttomonitorhouseholdactivitieswithineachofitsprogramscontinuouslythroughouttheyearratherthaninaconcentratedperiodofweekseachyear.AlthoughtheGoldStandard(“GS”)Methodology-TechnologiesandPracticestoDisplaceDecentralizedThermalEnergyConsumption(“TPDDTEC”)-11/04/2011doesnotspecifythemodeofcollectingmonitoringdata(annual,periodicorcontinuous),forthesakeofclarity,ParadigmrequestedanopinionfromGSonthecontinuousmonitoringconceptandreceivedclarificationthatitwasindeedallowedbythemethodologyinanemaildated11Feb2015andsubsequentlyinanfacetofacemeetingbetweenVikashTalyanandNeilBellefeuilleonFriday,June5thinMinneapolis,Minnesota.ContinuousMonitoringfollowstheTPDDTECmethodologyexactly,butseekstomonitorhouseholdsoverthecourseofanentireyear,capturingdatathatismorerepresentativeofactualusagepatternsratherthanrelyingonrespondentstorecallactivitiesthatmayhavehappenedfarinthepast.

ContinuousMonitoringoffersthefollowingbenefits:

• Greaterdepthofconsumerinsight.

• Improveddataaccuracyandconsistency.

• Reduceddisruptionofongoingfieldactivities.

• Reducedriskviareal-timerefinementofactivitiesderivedthroughcontinuousfieldinput.

Specifically,ContinuousMonitoringoffersimproveddataaccuracyandconsistencyovertraditional,short-termmonitoringbyreplacingquestionsthatpreviouslyreliedontherespondent’smemoryofpasteventswithactualobservationandcollectionofthatdatainrealtime.Forinstance,theTPDDTECmethodologyseekstoascertainthenumberofpeopleeachhouseholdcooksforthroughaMonitoringSurvey.GShashistoricallyrequiredthattheProjectProponentincludequestionswithinthemonitoringsurveytodeterminewhetherthenumberofmealscookedorthenumberofpeoplecookedforfluctuatesbetweentheharvest,rainyanddryseasons.Thislogicclearlyassumesmonitoringthatisconductedinaconcentratedperiodoftimeannually(forinstancewithina4-weekperiodthatmayfallinanyoneseason,butisunlikelytoextendoverseveralseasons)asitrequiresthesurveyortoasktherespondenttorecallwhetherthosenumbershavefluctuatedhistorically.Withinthismodeofworking,surveyoutcomesrelyontherespondent’srecollectionofthenumberofpeoplecookedforinseasonsandattimesthatcouldbe6ormoremonthsremoved.Self-reporteddatarelyingontheaccuracyofhumanmemoryisdubiousatbestandthusParadigmsoughtamoreaccuratewaytomonitoritsprograms.

ContinuousMonitoringreducesthepossibilityoferrorbyeliminatingsuchquestionsinfavorofmonitoringhouseholdsacrossallseasonsandallconditions,collectingdatainrealtimethataccuratelyreflectstheactivitiesofthehouseholdinthoseseasons.Assuch,someofthetraditionalseasonally-comparativedatapointsareeliminatedinfavorofdatathathasbeencollectedandaveragedoverthecompleterangeofseasons,circumstancesandhouseholdsrepresentedintheproject.Wheresuchchangeshavebeenimplemented,thedataisnotedasbeingContinuousMonitoringdatathatincorporatesseasonality.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page5

Additionally,surveyssuchasKPTsandWCFTswhicharerequiredtobeconductedbienniallyareincorporatedintotheflowofthecontinuous,annualmonitoringprogram.Doingsoprovidesseveralbenefits:

1. ItincreasesthefrequencyandthereforeaccuracyofthedatabyincorporatingrecentchangesintokeyparametersandcalculationsusedtodetermineVERvolumes.

2. Itdoublesthesamplingframebyachievingtheminimumrequiredsampleannuallyinsteadofbiennially.Hereagain,webelievethisincreasesaccuracyandrobustnessofthedata.

Thetablesbelowsummarizerequiredandtargetedsurveyoutputperprojectscenario:

ProjectScenario1:hh-wt AnnMinReq AnnTarget

WaterConsump7onFieldTest(WCFT) 30(biennially) 30WaterQualityTest(WQT) 90/10rule 20FilterMonitoring&UsageSurvey(MS/US) 100:30/techage 1001

ProjectScenario2:hh-dual AnnMinReq AnnTarget

KitchenPerformanceTest(KPT) 30(biennially) 30StoveMonitoring&UsageSurvey(MS/US) 100:30/techage 1002WaterConsump7onFieldTest(WCFT) 30(biennially) 30WaterQualityTest(WQT) 90/10rule 203FilterMonitoring&UsageSurvey(MS/US) 100:30/techage 100

Ineverycasethroughoutmonitoring,aspresentedinthisdocument,thePPassumedaminimum1000technologiesinthefieldandthuselectedtomonitoratthehighestminimumsamplesizerequirementsoutlinedbythemethodology.

AsContinuousMonitoringwasinitiatedinMonitoringPeriod3,thePPwasnotabletocoverafull12monthsofprojectactivity.However,monitoringtookplaceoverbothdryandwetseasons,aswellasduringharvestandnon-harvestseasons.Whileseasonalrepresentationwasnotfullybalancedwith9%ofsurveysbeingdoneduringharvestand16%duringrainyseason,asreportedbysurveyrespondentsinanswertothequestions,“Isit

1Waterfiltersolderthan2yearsofageareremovedfromcredi7ng,thusannualsamplingminimumis100unitswithatleast30ofeachage.2Currentlytheprojecthasstovesranginginagefrom1to3yearsofage,thustheminimumusagesurveynumberis100(90x3+10).Inthefuturethisnumberwillgrowwiththeagerangeofstovesinthefield.3WaterQualitytestresultsarecombinedacrossProjectScenario1and2aswhileusagemayvarybyProjectScenario,productperformanceisconsistent.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page6

currentlytheharvestseason?”and“Isitcurrentlytherainyordryseason?”,1%orfewerofrespondentsreportedthatthenumberofpeopleservedchangesforthembyseasonwhenaskedthequestion,“Doesthenumberofpeopleyouservedailychangeintheharvest/rainy/dryseason?”.Thusthedatapresentedwithinisfullyrepresentativeoftheprojectscenariothroughoutallofthevaryingseasonsusersexperience.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page7

SUMMARYPROJECTDESCRIPTION

TheProjectpromotestheuseofimprovedstovesandwatertreatmenttechnologies,andinturngeneratescarboncreditsinthevoluntarymarketbasedonthegreenhousegasemissionsreduc7onsofthesetechnologies.TheProjectworksthroughlocalorganiza7ons,NGOsanddistributorstoprovidehealthyandefficientcookingtechnologiesandgreateraccesstosafedrinkingwater.Therevenuesfromcarbonfinanceareinvestedintosubsidies,socialmarke7ng,andthedevelopmentofrobustdistribu7onchannelstofurthersupportthegrowthandimpactoftheProject.

PROJECTPARTNERS

• TheParadigmProject(Paradigm)isaninterna7onalsocialenterprisespecializinginthedevelopmentofcleancookstovesprojectsthatleveragecarbonfinanceforscaleandsustainablesupplychaindevelopment.TheParadigmProjecthaspartneredwithStoveCapitalLLCtofinancethedevelopmentofacarbonprograminGuatemalaandtofacilitateprocessesfortrackingandmonitoringoftheproject.

• SocorroMaya(SM)isanon-profitGuatemalanorganiza7onwiththegoalofservingthehumanitarianneedsofthepoor.SocorroMayafocusesonhelpingthe“livingMaya”withtheirgreatestneedsforhealthandwell-being,includingreplacingopencookingfireswithhighlyefficientcookingstovesandintroducingwatertreatmenttechnologiesthatsignificantlyreducewaterbornedisease.SocorroMayadistributestheEkoEstufaandEcofiltrotoGuatemalancommuni7esandprovidestrainingandfollow-uptoensuretechnologiesareusedcorrectly.SocorroMayadistributesprimarilyunderProjectScenario2,whereineveryhouseholdreceivesbothanefficientstoveandawaterfilteraspartofapackage,butwilloccasionallysellfilterswithoutanaccompanyingstoveunderProjectScenario1.

• Ecofiltro(EF)isaGuatemalanbusinesscreatedtomanufactureandmarketthelocallydesignedEcofiltrowaterpurifica7ondevice.Ecofiltrobelievesthatbusinessprac7cesandsustainablemarketscaneffec7velyaddressthelackofaccesstocleandrinkingwaterinGuatemala.EcofiltromanufacturesanddistributestheEcofiltrotechnologyunderProjectScenario1whereinhouseholdsreceiveonlyawaterfilter.EcoFiltroconductsbothbulksalestonon-profitandotherorganiza7onsworkingintargetcommuni7es,anddirectsalestohouseholdsandprovidestrainingandfollow-upthroughbothchannels.

KEYDEVELOPMENTMILESTONES

• LocalStakeholderConsulta7on: September4th,2012

• Passport&LSCReportSubmission: October10th,2012

• OfficialRegistryLis7ng: November13th,2012

• ProjectStartDateasDescribedinPDD: January1st,2013

• ProjectRegistra7on: June28th,2013

• Ini7alCredi7ngPeriod: January1st,2013toDecember31st,2019

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page8

TheProjectwasdevelopedundertheGSMethodology-TechnologiesandPracCcestoDisplaceDecentralizedThermalEnergyConsumpCon-11/04/2011,andincludesa7-yearcredi7ngperiodwithanop7ontorenew.

PROJECTTECHNOLOGIES

TheProjectdisseminatescleancookingandsafewatertreatmenttechnologiesthroughoutGuatemala.TheProjectDesignDocument(“PDD”)includesdescrip7onsofthetwotechnologiesincludedintheprojectac7vity,eachofwhichissummarizedbelow.

EkoestufaCleanCookstoveTheEkoEstufawasdesignedbyengineersatCEMEXwiththesupportoflocalpartnerSocorroMayaandinterna7onalimprovedstovedesignexpert,PeterScorfromBurnDesignLab.Thestoveisalargeplancha-stylestovemadeupofcinderblocksandbothtradi7onalandcellularlightweightconcrete.Thethermalefficiencyofthestoveis15.4%andthestovehasapoweroutputof8.95kW.ThestoveislocallyappropriateforallGuatemalancookingneeds,providingbeneficiariesamplespacetocooktor7llasandlargemeals.Thestovehasanes7matedlife7meof10years.

EcofiltroWaterFilterTheEcofiltroismanufacturedlocallybyEcofiltroS.A.Thefilterpurifiesthroughagravity-fedceramicfiltra7onelement.Theceramicelementhasaporoussurfacesizeof0.6to0.3micronsandislinedwithcolloidalsilvertoremovepar7clesanddisinfectthefilteredwater.Thefilterhasaflowrateof1-2litersperhour,amaximumcapacityof20liters,andmeetsdrinkingwaterstandardssetbytheWorldHealthOrganiza7onandCoguanorofGuatemala.Theceramicelementhasalifespanof2to3years.

BASELINE&PROJECTSCENARIOSDEFINEDINTHEPDD

ThePDDstatesthatthebaselinescenarioincludes“householdbiomassusers”astakeholdergroupthatconsistsofusersofunimprovedstovesoropenfiresfueledwithbiomassandusedfordomes7cpurposes.

PROJECTSCENARIO1(hh-wt):WaterTreatmentOnlyProjectScenario1includesallfilterdistribu7onsthatarenotdisseminatedalongwithanimprovedstovetechnology.Thisprojectscenarioconsistsofhouseholdwatertreatmenttechnologiesthatdisplacetheuseofbiomassforwaterpurifica7on.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page9

PROJECTSCENARIO2(dh-dual):ImprovedCookstove&WaterTreatmentProjectScenario2consistsofthedualimplementa7onofhouseholdimprovedwoodstovesandwatertreatmenttechnologies,whichreplacebiomassforwaterpurifica7onandallowfortheefficientuseofbiomassforcooking.

Theemissionreduc7onsequa7onandtargetpopula7onforwatertreatmenttechnologiesinbothProjectScenariosareiden7cal.Thus,despitebeingmonitoredindividually,watertreatmentmonitoringdataandanalysisispresentedtogetherwithinthisdocumentforthesakeofconsistencyandcomparison.

PROJECTSCENARIO3(hh-Ics):ImprovedCookstoveOnlyProjectScenario3consistsofhouseholdsusingprojectimprovedcookstovetechnologiesthatallowfortheefficientuseofbiomassforcooking,butnotusingwatertreatmenttechnologies.Currently,ProjectScenario3isnotbeingimplementedandisthereforenotnotedinaddi7onalsec7onsofthisMonitoringReport.

Belowisadescrip7onofimplemen7ngpartnerrolesrelatedtotheProjectScenariosabove.

Organizacon Role

SocorroMayaPrimarilydistributestechnologiesunderProjectScenario2,occasionallyunderProjectScenario1.Managesthemanufacturingof,andisthesoledistributorof,EkoEstufas.SourcesfiltersfromEcofiltro.

EcofiltroDistributesexclusivelyunderProjectScenario1.ManufacturesanddistributestheEcofiltrodirectlyandthroughNGP/CBOpartners.

PartnerNGO/CBOsPurchasefiltersfromEcofiltroinbulkanddistributethemtoend-usersrepresenta7veofthetargetpopula7onunderProjectScenario1.

MANUFACTURING&DISTRIBUTION

AllproducttechnologiesimplementedthroughtheProjectaremanufacturedlocally.Variousdistribu7onchannelsareusedinordertomakeproductsaccessibletothetargetpopula7on.AstheProjectgrows,theprojectpartnersplantoinvestrevenuesgeneratedbycarbonfinancetohelpfurtherexpandmanufacturinganddistribu7onandtherebyincreasetheimpactoftheProject.

SocorroMayaisbothastovemanufactureranddistributorofstovesandwaterfilters.SMdistributesimprovedstovesandwatertreatmenttechnologiesdirectlytoconsumers,otenworkingwithlocalbankstoprovideloansandpaymentplanswhichallowhouseholdstopayforthetechnologiesover7me.SocorroMayabegandistribu7onintheDepartmentsofAltaVerapaz,BajaVerapaz,andSanMarcos,asthesedepartmentshavethemostneedanddemand,butwillexpandtootherregionsasresourcesallow.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page10

Ecofiltroisbothafiltermanufactureranddistributor.Ecofiltrodistributesfiltersdirectlytoendconsumers,throughschoolprograms,andthroughlocalNGOs/CBOswhoprovidefilterstothetargetpopula7onfreeofchargeoratasubsidizedrates.WorkingwithschoolsandNGOs/CBOsenablesEcofiltrotoexpandtheirreachandtargetend-userswhootherwisemaynotbeabletoaffordthetechnology.Whenworkingdirectlywithendusers,Ecofiltrootenoffersfinancingtomakethefiltermoreaccessibleforlow-incomefamilies.Ecofiltroiscurrentlydistribu7ngfilterstoalldepartmentsofGuatemala.Onlydirectfiltersalestoruralcommuni7esorbulksalestoNGOs/CBOsworkinginruralcommuni7eswherethetargetpopula7onfortheProjectislocatedareincludedinthesalesrecord.Filterssoldtofor-profitcompaniesforresaletourbanmarketsorforpopula7onsnotrepresenta7veoftheProjecttargetpopula7onareexcludedfromtheProjectsalesdatabase.

Withinitsschoolprogram,Ecofiltrosellsanddonatesfilterstoschoolsinruralandperi-urbanareaswheretheboilingofwaterisacommonprac7ce.Ecofiltroiden7fiesschoolsincommuni7escomprisedofstudentsfromthesamegeographiesandBOPsocio-economicgroupsasthehouseholdstargetedfordirectstoveandfilterdistribu7ontoofferadonatedfilterforeveryclassroomandschoolkitchen.Thesefiltersprovidecleanwaterforstudents,teachersandadministratorsandreplacetheboilingofwaterand/ortheconsump7onofuncleanwater.Tobepartoftheprogram,schooldirectorsandteachersmustagreetotakeresponsibilityforthecareandusageofthefilters.Ecofiltroalsoasksthattheteachersinvolvethestudentsinacleanwatereduca7onprogrambeforethedayofdeliverytocommunicatetheimportanceofcleandrinkingwatersostudentsunderstandtheimportanceofEcofiltrosintheirschools.Then,withthehelpofthedirectoroftheschools,onthedayofthedona7on,alloftheparentsofthestudentsaregatheredtogetherinordertoexplaintheimportanceofcleanwaterintheschoolsandathomeandEcofiltroofferseachhouseholdtheabilitytopar7cipateinEcofiltro’s“WaterforLife”program,wheretheycanpurchasefiltersthroughalow-interestmonthlypaymentplan.Onaverage,foreveryfilterplacedinaclassroom,Ecofiltroreaches10ruralfamilieswhopurchasethefiltersfortheirhomes.Salesto,anduseoffilterswithin,schoolsarenotincludedforcredi7nginthisissuance.Thesalesprocessdescrip7onissimplyincludedforreference.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page11

FORWARDACTIONSREQUESTS

ThefollowingForwardAc7onRequestsaredocumentedintheERMCVSFinalVerifica7onReportdatedSeptember28th,2015.

FAR1:RECORDKEEPING,HH-WT

Issued:Verifica7onIssuance2

By:DOE

Descripcon:Duringthenextverifica7onprocesstheDOEshallreviewtheimplementa7onandfullopera7onthemeasuresproposedbyPP.Forthenextverifica7onthePPshallprovide:

1. AregisterofCRWsfromallNGOs/CBOsregisteredintheTSRandDCD/10/11/12/.PPshalldemonstratethatthefinalusersdataregistra7onshallbeproperlyrequested.

2. AnevidenceoftrainingofOpera7onManualopera7onstoEcofiltro’sstaff.

3. Thecross-checkingrevisionofapor7onoffilterssalesnolessthanthe50%oftotalssales.

4. TheDOEshallvisitasampleofruralschoolstoverifytheEcofiltroSchoolprograms.

Comment:ThePPhasimplementedthefollowingac7vi7estocompletecollec7onofhistoricCRWsandtofurtherstrengthentherecordingprocedures:

1. AllNGOswhopreviouslypurchasedfilterswerecontactedtorequestaCRWsignatureforallsalestodateandtoexplaintheimportanceofenduserregistra7ons.Arecordofsuchcallsandmee7ngsisincludedwiththereferencedocumentsprovidedwiththisreport.However,it’simportanttonotethatsigneddocumentsfromNGOssta7ngthattheyunderstandthecarbonrightsareonlyasecondarymeasuretoassureunderstandingthroughoutthesupplychain.Theprimarymodeofexecu7ngCRWcomplianceisthoughcompleteCarbonReleaseWaiversprintedprominentlyontheboxofthefilterproduct.

2. EcofiltroheldtrainingsessionsforemployeescoveringthedetailsoftheOpera7onsManualinQ1of2016.Alistofemployeesarendingtrainingsessionsisincludedwiththereferencedocumentsprovidedwiththisreport.

3. Thefull-7meM&EstaffhasbeenworkingcloselywithEFstafftocross-checkallhistoricalsalesandregistra7onrecordsfoundintheTSRandDCD.Specifically,ashouseholdsaremonitored,serialnumbersandend-userdetailsarecheckedagainstthedatabaseandcorrec7onsmadeasnecessary.

4. Theruralschoolsprogramandtheindividualschoolswithinthem,althoughanimportantmarke7ngtool,arenotincludedforcredi7nginthisissuance.TheyaremerelyamechanismthroughwhichthePPpromotesstovestoindividualend-userfamilies.

FAR2:ENDUSERFILTERCLEANINGANDCAREEDUCATION.

Issued:Verifica7onIssuance2

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page12

By:GoldStandard

Descripcon:Duringthenextverifica7onprocess,theDOEshouldcheckthehygieneprogramimplementedbythePPandevaluatetheeffec7venessofprogramonthewaterquality.Inpar7cular,theDOEshouldconfirm:

1. Thedevelopmentoftheeduca7onalflyertobedistributedwithallwaterfiltersoutliningthehealthandsafetybenefitsof:

a. Washinghandsbeforetakingwaterfromthespigot

b. Keepingthespigotcoveredwithaclean,plas7cbag

c. Avoidingtheuseofragsorotherbacteria-formingmaterialsasacoverorcleaningdeviceforthespigot.

2. Thedistribu7onofziplock-stylebagswitheachfilter.

3. Thetrainingprogramforthesalespeopletoeducateusersonthebenefitsofwashinghandsandusingtheprovidedbagtocoverthespigot.

Comment:Ecofiltroimplementedaneduca7onalcampaignbeginninginNovemberof2015toinformendusersofthebenefitsofproperhygiene,careandcleaningoftheirfilter.Aziplock-stylebagandaneduca7onalflyerinthelocallanguagehavebeenincludedwitheverynewfiltersalesincemid-2015.Asampleoftheeduca7onalflyerandphotosoftheimplementa7onofbagsintargethouseholdsareincludedwiththereferencedocumentsprovidedwiththisreport.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page13

PROJECTRECORDKEEPING&DATABASES

SALESRECORDS&CARBONRIGHTSWAIVERS

Carefularen7onhasbeenpaidtotheaccuracyofallrecordswithinbothProjectScenarios.ThePPworkscloselywiththelocalpartnerstoassurethatalldataiscompleteandconserva7ve.Threetypesofrecordsarekeptindifferingformatsforeachprojectscenario:

4. TotalSalesRecord(TSR):Adetailedrecordofindividualand/orbulksales.

5. DetailedCustomerDatabase(DCD):Asecondaryrecordofresaleordistribu7ontransac7onsimplementedwhentheTSRrecordlacksend-userdata.

6. CarbonRightsWaiver(CRW):AnindividualreleaseofrightstoanyVERsderivedfromtheuseoftechnologiessoldwithintheprogram.Implementedasadocumentrequiringsignature,oraprominentproductlabelwhentheformerisnotpossible.

Organizacon SummaryRecordKeepingRoles

TheParadigmProjectManagementofpartnerorganiza7onsdatacollec7onandanalysis.Reviewsandcleansalldatasets.Storesandmaintainsdatabaserecordsprovidedbyprojectpartnerselectronically.CalculatesEmissionReduc7onsandwritesallreportsforcarboncredi7ngpurposes.

SocorroMayaCollec7onandentryofend-userdataandrecordsviasalesreceiptsandCRWs.Responsibleforcollec7on,upda7ngandstorageofhardcopiesofsalesreceiptsandCRWsalongwiththetranscribingofdataintoexcelspreadsheets.

Ecofiltro

Collec7onandentryofbulksalesrecordsusedtopopulateTSRviasalesinvoices.Collec7onandcompila7onofDeliveryNotesandend-userdatacollectedbypartnerresellersusedtopopulateDCD.Responsibleforcollec7onandstorageofhardcopiesofSalesInvoicesandDeliveryNotesaswellandtranscrip7onofdataintoexcelspreadsheets.

PROJECTSCENARIO1:HH-WT(FiltersOnly)

TheTSRforfilterssoldunderProjectScenario1(hh-wt)iscompiledfromsalesinvoicesandlatercomplimentedbyaDetailedCustomerDatabase(DCD)compiledfromregistra7onscompletedbyresalepartners.TheTSRforfiltersalesunderProjectScenario1includesthenumberoftechnologyunitssold,dateofsale,andcontactinforma7onforthewholesalepurchaser.Fortransparencyandeaseofrepor7ng,salestosubsidiariesandcloselyheldorganiza7onssuchasEcofiltroS.A.andEcofiltroOne,aretreatedasanyothersaleandrecordedwithintheTSR.Allinternalsalestosubsidiaryorganiza7onsareissuedinvoicesandreconciledthroughEcofiltro’saccoun7ngsystemwhichcomplieswithGuatemalanregula7onsandisauditedannually.AllsalesoffilterstoSocorroMayaarerecordedintheTSR,butremovedfromcredi7ngunderProjectScenario1asthesefiltersarecreditedunderProjectScenario2.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page14

Likemanystoveandwaterprojectsaroundtheworld,Ecofiltro’sprimarymodeofdistribu7onisthroughbulksalestodistributorswhothenselltoendusers.Asaresult,Ecofiltro’sabilitytocollectend-userinforma7onisseverelylimited.WhiletheTSRreflectsacompleterecordofsalesvolumeseligibleforcredi7ngwithinthecurrentmonitoringperiod,itdoesnotaccuratelyreflectthespecificdateinwhichtheindividualtechnologiesweredistributedtoendusers,northedetailedend-userinforma7onrequiredformonitoringongoinguse.TheProjectScenario1TSRisthereforecomplementedbyaDetailedCustomerDatabase(DCD),whichseekstocollectindividualproductserialnumbers,end-userinforma7onandspecificdateofdelivery/saletoendusersfromdistribu7onpartners.AlthoughEcofiltrosolicitsend-userinforma7onfromallresellers,includingallNGOs/CBOs,mostpartnersdonothavesufficient7me(orwillingness)toregisterend-userdetails.Inmostinstances,thecollec7onofsuchdataisaddi7onaltotheresellersotherdu7esandisotenletneglected.Evenwhenfinancialcompensa7ontotheresellerisoffered,datacollec7onissporyatbest.

TheTPDDTECrequiresthatthePPcollectend-userinforma7onthatshallbe“nolessthan107mestherequiredsurveyandfield-testsamplesize”.Inanefforttoexceedthisrequirement,thePPseekstocollectenduserinforma7onfromasmanyendusersaspossible,targe7ngaminimumof10%oftotalsales.TheDCDisacompila7onofalldirectsalesandend-userinforma7onsuccessfullyretrievedfromdistributorsandpartnerNGOs/CBOs,andcontainswellover5000entries,farexceedingtheGoldStandardminimumof1000(107mestheminimumsamplesize).

Inanefforttomakealltransac7onsfullytransparentandaccurate,EcofiltroalsotracksthedateofdeliveryforbulksalesthroughtheuseofaDeliveryNote,whichcorrespondstothesalesinvoiceandindicatesthedatethefiltersweredeliveredtoendusers.Individualregistra7onsintheDCDandDeliveryNotesareusedtoconductalaganalysistodeterminethe7medifferen7albetweenthedateofsaleandthereceiptofthefiltersbyendusers.Thelaganalysisofferinganaccuratewaytomeasuretheaveragenumberofdayseachtechnologyisactuallyinuseforeachcredi7ngperiod.

ForcarbonrightswaiverswithinProjectScenario1,thePP,inlinewithguidancefromtheGSduringIssuance2,optedtoapplycarbonrightswaivers7ckerstotheproductsinordertoconsistentlyandclearlycommunicatethecarbonprogramtoallpar7cipants.ThePPhasusedsimilars7ckersinotherGSprojectsandbelievesthes7ckersaretheclearestandsurestwaytocommunicatecarbonrightsacrosstheen7resupplychain.S7ckersenableeveryonewhohascontactwiththeproducttohaveaccesstoinforma7onregardingcarbonrights,ensuringownershipofcarbonrightsistransparenttoallendusers.EcofiltroalsoexplainstheCRWandguaranteetowholesalepurchasers(includinginforminglarge-scaleNGOpurchasersinwri7ng)atthe7meofpurchasetoensurethattheyunderstandthatallbenefitsofemissionreduc7onsassociatedwithprojecttechnologiesbelongtotheProject.

PROJECTSCENARIO2:HH-DUAL(Stoves&Filters)

SocorroMayadistributesallEkoEstufatechnologieswithanEcofiltroaspartofapackageprovideddirectlytoendusers.AsSocorroMayadoesnotsellinbulktowholesalers,theirTotalSalesRecordandDetailedCustomerDatabaseareoneinthesamesalesrecord(labeledasaTSR).

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page15

TheTSRforstovesandfilterssoldunderProjectScenario2iscompiledfromsalesinvoicesexecuteddirectlywithend-users,andincludesacompleterecordofeachindividualstoveandfiltersold.Thedatabaseincludesthedateofinstalla7on,end-user’snameandcontactinforma7on(whenpossible),productserialnumbers,andthegeographicloca7on(communityanddepartment)ofthehousehold.Dataisrecordedonpaperformsinthefieldthentranscribedintoanexcelcustomerdatabase.SocorroMaya’scomprehensiverecordkeepingensuresthatallsalesareaccountedfor,andallowsforfollowupwithbeneficiariestoensuretechnologiesareworkingproperly.

SocorroMayaclearlycommunicatesthetransferofcarbonrightsandtheneedtodismantletradi7onalstovesbothverballyatthepointofsale,andinwri7ngoneachsalescontractsignedbytheend-user.Carbonrightswaiversaresignedbyallend-usersatthepointofsale.Acomponentofwarrantyregistra7oninformstheconsumerthatthewarrantyisinvalidiftheycon7nuetou7lizetheirbaselinestove.

TheTSRsand/orDCDsforbothProjectScenariosareincludedintheiren7retywithintheExcelspreadsheet,ERCalcula7onsGS1321Iss3[DATE].

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page16

MONITORINGPLANDESCRIPTION

AllsurveysrequiredbytheTPDDTECMethodologywereconductedsimultaneouslyinrandomlyselectedcommunitiesinordertosimplifytheprocessandreducethecostsassociatedwithmonitoring.

SUMMARYOFMONITORINGREQUIRED&CONDUCTED

TheTPDDTECMethodologymaintainsthefollowingsamplesizerequirementsforex-postmonitoring:

• UsageSurvey-minimumtotalsamplesizeof100perprojectscenario,withatleast30samplesofeachtechnologyage.

• MonitoringSurvey-minimumsamplesizeof100perprojectscenarioforagroupsize>1000.MaybeconductedintandemwithUSSurvey.

• BiennialKPTTest-minsamplesizeof30,if90/10confidence/precisionnotmet,applyupperbound.

• BiennialWCFTTest-minsamplesizeof30,if90/10confidence/precisionnotmet,applyupperbound.

• WaterQualityTest-Follow90/10confidence/precisionruletodeterminesamplesize.

ThePPconductedUsageSurveys,MonitoringSurveys,WaterConsumptionFieldTests,KitchenPerformanceTestsandWaterQualityTestsasrequiredbythemethodology.AsKitchenPerformanceandWaterConsumptionFieldTestdataisrequiredtobemonitoredbiennially,thePPconductsthesesurveysataratethatallowsforcollectionofdataoverthe2-yearoperatingspan.However,giventhatContinuousMonitoringbeganmid-cycleforWCFTdatarequirements,thePPdoubledthenumberofWCFTsurveyscompletedinthemostrecent12monthsinordertoreachtherequiredminimumsurveysduetobepresentedinthismonitoringperiod.

Thetablesbelowsummarizethemonitoringconductedandu7lizedforIssuance3:

Type&NumberofSurveysConducted hh-wt hh-dual TOTAL

WaterConsump7onFieldTest(WCFT) 33 56 89

WaterQualityTest(WQT) 58 58

FilterMonitoring&UsageSurvey(MS/US) 118 144 262

StoveMonitoring&UsageSurvey(MS/US) N/A 144 144

KitchenPerformanceTest(KPT) N/A 72 72

Type&NumberofSurveysUsed hh-wt hh-dual TOTAL

WaterConsump7onFieldTest(WCFT) 33 55 88

WaterQualityTest(WQT) 58 58

FilterMonitoring&UsageSurvey(MS/US) 118 139 257

StoveMonitoring&UsageSurvey(MS/US) N/A 139 139

KitchenPerformanceTest(KPT) N/A 66 66

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page17

SAMPLINGMETHOD

ThePPelectedtouseasimplerandomsamplingapproachforallmonitoringconductedduringthismonitoringperiod.Adetaileddescrip7onofthesamplingplanusedforallsurveysandtestsisbelow:

1. TheTotalSalesRecord(TRS)and/orDetailedCustomerDatabase(DCD)fortheen7reprojectperiod(from2013tothedateatthestartofmonitoring)isusedtodeterminethetotalsalesforeachtechnology.Ineachcase,salesexceeded1000,andthussamplingrequirementsdefaultedtothelargestminimumsizesforeachsurveyasrequiredbythemethodology.

2. Forstoves,theTotalSalesRecordwasusedandstovesyoungerthan6monthsatthe7meofmonitoringwereexcludedfromconsidera7on.

3. Forfilters,theDetailedCustomerDatabasewasusedandfiltersyoungerthan6monthsandolderthan24monthsatthe7meofmonitoringwereexcludedfromconsidera7on.

4. RelevanthouseholdandtechnologydatafromtheTSRandDCD(respec7vely)wascopiedintoanewXcelsheet(SamplingDatabase)inordertoworkwiththedatawithoutdisturbingtheformaldatabase.

5. ResearchRandomizer(hrps://www.randomizer.org/)wasthenusedtogeneratealistofrandomnumbersmatchingthenumberofregistra7onsineachdatabase.Asamplescreenshotofinputsfor10,000entriesisincludedbelowforreference.

6. Anewcolumn“A”isinsertedintheSamplingDatabaseandtherandomizedlistofnumbersgeneratedbyResearchRandomizerispastedintothisnewcolumnA.

7. AllofthedataintheSamplingDatabaseisthensortednumericallybycolumnA(from1to10,000intheexampleabove).Thishastheeffectofrandomizingtheoriginaldata.

8. Thedataisthenreducedtoamoremanageablesize(WorkingDatabase)byselec7ngthefirst1000entriesfromthenewlyrandomizedlist.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page18

9. Those1000entriesarethensortedbydateofsaleandthedataisreviewedtoconfirmthatitincludesatleast60registra7ons(doubletherequirednumber)foreachageoftheapplicabletechnology.

10. IftheWorkingDatabasedoesnotincludeatleast60unitsofeachtechnologyage,thenext1000entries(1001to2000)arepulledfromtheSamplingDatabaseandaddedtotheWorkingDatabase.

11. Step7and8arerepeatedasnecessary,increasingthenumberofhouseholdsselectedfromtheSamplingDatabaseun7ltheWorkingDatabaseincludesatleast60ofeachageofthemonitoredtechnology.

12. TheWorkingDatabaseisthencolorcodedbytechnologyage.AndthedataissortedbyDepartmentwiththedatafromeachDepartmentbeingplacedonauniquetab.

13. OneachDepartmenttab,thedataisthensortedbyCommunity.Thisprovidesareasonablegeographicplanningtoolformonitoring,randomlyclusteringhouseholdsbyloca7ontoallowformonitoringmul7plehouseholdssimultaneouslyasKPTsandWCFTsrequire4daysinasingleloca7ontocompletethetests.

14. Star7ngwiththefirsttab,theM&Eteamthenworktheirwaydowntherandomizedlistscontac7nghouseholdstorequestadateformonitoring,clusteringvisitdatesand7mesgeographicallyastheygo.Iftheteamcannotsuccessfullyreachahouseholdonthelistorthehouseholdrefusestopar7cipate,theyskiptothenextpersononthelist.

15. TheM&Eteamtracksthenumberofeachtechnologyagebeingmonitoredsothatanyshorxallsresul7ngtowardtheendofthemonitoringperiodcanbeadjustedasneededbyselec7ngmoretechnologiesofacertainagefromtherandomWorkingDatabaselists.

16. TheM&ETeamtravelstoaloca7onandstayslocallyfor4consecu7vedaysallowingforKPTandWCFTteststobecompleted.Atthesameloca7on,theteammaycompletevaryingnumbersoftestsbasedonavailable7meanddifficult.Forinstance,theteammayconduct10KPTsorWCFTsoverthecourseoftheweekwhilealsoconduc7ng20MS/USand5WQTs,dependingonhouseholdavailability.

17. WQTsamplesarecollectedfromthelast5to7homesmonitoredineachareaonthefinaldayofmonitoring(usuallyaThursday)andtransportedbacktoGuatemalaCityfortes7nginalab.

DATACOLLECTION,ANALYSISANDQAQC

TheParadigmProjectoverseesallmonitoringoftheprojectandcoordinatesac7vi7esbetweenthelocalM&ETeam,distribu7onpartnersandcommuni7es.InSeptemberof2015twofull-7meMonitoring&Evalua7on(M&E)associates,EddyMelendezandGabrielGerezwerehiredtoconductCon7nuousMonitoringofefficientstovesandwatertreatmenttechnologies.BothemployeeswereformerlyemployedbyCO2Management,alocalenvironmentalconsultancyfirmspecializinginenvironmentalimpactrepor7ng,carbonfootprintanalysis,andcarbonmonitoring,thatwascontractedtoconductallmonitoringfortheProjectinthelastmonitoringperiod.ThesetwonewhiresgreatlyimprovedthespeedandefficiencywithwhichthePPwasabletoimplementthenewmonitoringframeworkasbothweredeeplyexperiencedinalloftherequiredmonitoringac7vi7es,havingcompletedallproject,andsomebaseline,monitoringac7vi7esinthepriormonitoringperiod.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page19

Surveysu7lizedinthepreviousmonitoringperiodwererefinedbythelocalM&EteamandthePPinlinewiththeirexperiencewithsimilarprojects.ThesurveyswerethenpilotedandfurtherrefinedbythePPandthelocalM&Eteamtoassurefunc7onalityandeaseofuseinthefield.Wherepossible,US,MS,KPTs,WCFTsandWQTswereconductedintandemonthesamehouseholdsforconsistencyandvalida7onofdata.

ThelocalM&Eteamcompleted100%ofsurveysconducted.Noaddi7onalenumeratorswereusedtocollectdataforthismonitoringperiod.Dataentrywascompletedandsynchedtothecloudreal-7meusingODKdigitaldatacollec7onsotwareonAndroidphones.Ifcellularservicewasunavailableinthefield,datawasstoredlocallyonthephoneandsynchedattheendofeachdayviawifi.Incomingrawdatawasexportedtothe“MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTData”spreadsheetforreviewandanalysis.ThePPreviewedthedataandconductedcompletenesscheckstoensurethathouseholdresponseswereinternallyconsistent.ThePPthenworkedwiththeM&ETeamtocleanthedatabyclarifyingandcorrec7ngdataentrymistakesasappropriate.

CO2ManagementwascontractedtocompleteaQA/QCcheckonthedataandprocessestoconfirmthevalidityoftheM&Eapproachandoutcomes.Belowisadescrip7onofen77espar7cipa7nginmonitoringandtheirrespec7veresponsibili7es.

Organizacon Responsibilices

TheParadigmProjectManagementoflocalM&Eteam,developmentofsurveys,training,dataanalysis,QAQCandrepor7ng.Reportwri7ng,EmissionReduc7onCalcula7on,GSandDOEcommunica7ons.

LocalM&ETeamRefinementofsurveysforlocalcontext,conduc7ngallmonitoring,enteringrawdatafromsurveysviaODK.WorkswithlocalprojectpartnerstoschedulehouseholdvisitsandmanageM&Eprocess.

SocorroMaya&Ecofiltro Logis7calsupporttolocalM&Eteam.

CO2Management QAQCanalysisofmonitoringplanandsystems.

SURVEYEQUIPMENTCALIBRATION

ForKPTsurveysrequiringsensi7veequipmentsuchasscalesandmoisturemeters,suchequipmentischeckedannuallyforaccuracyandcalibratedasneeded.Specifically,thecalibra7onproceduresforthisequipmentare:

CalibrationProcedureforScales:

1. Setallfieldscalestomeasurecommonunits(kg).

2. Weighabagforcalibra7ononananaly7calscale.Notetheweight.

3. Selectanamountofwoodtobeusedforcalibra7onandweighitonthesameanaly7calscale(seeimage#1).Notethecombinedweight. Image1

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page20

4. Placethewoodinthebagandweighitoneachofthefieldscales(seeimage#2).Notetheweight.

5. Ifthecombinedweightdiffersbymorethan+/-1g,re-calibratethetestedscaleaspermanufacturer’sinstruc7ons.

CalibrationProcedureforMoistureMeters:

1. Selecttwopiecesorwood,eachhavingadis7ncttexture.

2. Witharulerandpen,mark3pointsoneachwherethemoisturemeasurementswillbemade(seeImage3).

3. Usingfieldmoisturemeters,measurethemoisturecontentateachmarkedloca7on,recordingthereadingsfromeachmeter.

4. Comparethereadingsforconsistency.Ifthemoisturereadingfromanymeterdiffersfromtheaveragereadingforthatloca7onbymorethan+/-1STDEV,re-calibratethemeterpermanufacturer’sinstruc7ons.

PROCEDURESFORMINIMIZINGNON-SAMPLINGERRORS&INTERNALQAQC

ThefollowinginternalQAQCcheckswereutilizedbythePPtoassurequalityandconsistencyofdata:

• Surveyquestionswerecoded,multiplechoiceand/orlist-generatedwherepossibletofacilitatedataentryandminimizeenumeratorerror.

• AqualitycheckonalldatawasconductedweeklybythePPtoensureaccuracyofentriesandthenfollowed-upbyaskypecallwiththelocalM&ETeamtoensureaccuracy.

• Basicanalysiswasconductedtocheckforanyabnormalitiesinthedata.

OUTLIERREMOVAL

Duringthedetaileddatareview,thePPremovedsurveysasoutliersifoneormoreofthefollowingoccurred:

• Householdsrefusedtoparticipateinthesurveyorwerenotabletoprovideaccessorresponsesforoneormoredaysinamulti-daytest.

• Surveywasincomplete/missingdataforasignificantnumberofquestions.

• Informationwasinconsistentordidnotmakesense(negativedatavalues,forexample).

• Datavalue(s)wasoutsideoftwostandarddeviationsaboveorbelowthemean.

Image2

Image3

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page21

• Householdsreportedusingthestoveorfilterforcommercialorinstitutionaluses,assuchhouseholdswouldskewkeydatapointssuchasperson-meals.

KEYFIXED(EX-ANTE)DATA&PARAMETERS

DATA/PARAMETERSDERIVEDFROMIPCCDEFAULTS

Data/parameter EFb,wood,CO2Unit kgCO2/TJDescription TheCO2emissionfactorarisingfromuseoffuelsinbaselinescenarioSourceofdata 2006IPCCguidelinesfornationalgreenhousegasinventoriesValue(s)applied 112,000Choiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures

Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Data/parameter EFb,wood,CH4Unit kgCH4/TJDescription TheCH4emissionfactorarisingfromuseoffuelsinbaselinescenarioSourceofdata 2006IPCCguidelinesfornationalgreenhousegasinventoriesValue(s)applied 300Choiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures

Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Data/parameter EFb,wood,N2OUnit kgN2O/TJDescription TheN2OemissionfactorarisingfromuseoffuelsinbaselinescenarioSourceofdata 2006IPCCguidelinesfornationalgreenhousegasinventoriesValue(s)applied 4Choiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures

Purposeofdata Additionalcomments

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page22

Data/parameter NCVb,woodUnit TJ/tonneDescription NetcalorificvalueforfuelusedinthebaselinescenarioSourceofdata 2006IPCCguidelinesfornationalgreenhousegasinventoriesValue(s)applied 0.0156/GgChoiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures

Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Data/parameter NCVp,woodUnit TJ/tonneDescription NetcalorificvalueforfuelusedintheprojectscenarioSourceofdata 2006IPCCguidelinesfornationalgreenhousegasinventoriesValue(s)applied 0.0156/GgChoiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures

Purposeofdata Additionalcomments DATA/PARAMETERSDERIVEDFROMBASELINEMONITORING

Data/parameter Wb,yUnit tonne/liter

Description Quantityoffuelintonnesrequiredtotreat1literofwaterusingtechnologiesrepresentativeofbaselinescenarioduringprojectyeary,asperBWBT.

Sourceofdata BWBTFieldReportGS1321Iss2dated9/3/2015Value(s)applied 0.00072Choiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures


DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page23

Data/parameter Wp,yUnit tonne/liter

DescriptionQuantityoffuelrequiredtotreat1literofwaterusingunimprovedstovetechnologiesduringprojectyeary,asperBWBT.

Sourceofdata BWBTFieldReportGS1321Iss2dated9/3/2015Value(s)applied 0.00072Choiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures

Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Data/parameter CjUnit Percentage

Description Portionofusersofprojectsafewatersupplywhowerealreadyinbaselineusinganon-boilingsafewatersupply.

Sourceofdata MS_USFilter(hh-wt,hh-dual)ReportGS1321Iss2dated9/3/2015Value(s)applied hh-wt:9.32 hh-dual:9.17Choiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures

Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Data/parameter fNRB,y,ics-nbUnit PercentageDescription Non-renewabilitystatusofwoodybiomassfuelinscenarioiduringyeary

SourceofdataNRBAssessment.FixedinPDDbybaselinestudyforagivencreditingperiod,updatedifnecessaryasspecifiedinMethodologysectionIII.1.

Value(s)applied 95.74Choiceofdataormeasurementmethodsandprocedures


DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page24

KEYMONITORED(EX-POST)DATA&PARAMETERS

EFFICIENTSTOVETECHNOLOGIES

Data/parameter Np,y,ics-nbUnit technology-daysDescription Cumulativenumberofdaysoftechnologyuseforprojectscenariopagainst

baselinescenariob,inyeary.Measured/calculated/default CalculatedSourceofdata ERCalculationsGS1321Iss3Value(s) 1,421,355Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) Technology-days=sumof(recordedsaledateofeachtechnology–closingdate

ofthemonitoringperiod),indays.QA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata Additionalcomments ThePPhasrevisedtheunitsofmeasurefromprojecttechnologiescreditedas

specifiedintheparameterboxinthePDDtotechnology-days(asspecifiedintheequationsinthePDDandmethodology)inordertobeinlinewithdefinitionoftheparameterintheERequation.

Data/parameter P,p,b,y,ics-nbUnit tonnes/technology-dayDescription Specificfuelsavingsforanindividualtechnologyintheprojectscenarioagainst

anindividualtechnologyinbaselinescenarioinyeary.Measured/calculated/default CalculatedSourceofdata MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3.Value(s) 0.02051Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) PersonMeals(MS/KPT)*Fuelsavingspermeal(KPT).QA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page25

Additionalcomments ThePPhasrevisedtheunitsofmeasurefromkg/household-dayasspecifiedintheparameterboxinthePDDtotonnes/technology-day(asspecifiedintheequationsinthePDDandmethodology)inordertobeinlinewithdefinitionoftheparameterintheERequation.ThisparameterwasnotincludedintheparametersectionofthemethodologyandthePDD,butwasincludedintheERequationsofboth.ThusthePPhasincludedtheparameterinthemonitoringreport,inlinewiththeinformationnotedinthePDDunderP,b,yandP,p,y.P,p,b,y,ics-nbisequivalenttothedifferenceinthespecificfuelconsumptionforanindividualtechnologyinbaselinescenariob(P,b,y)andthespecificfuelconsumptionforanindividualtechnologyinprojectscenariop(P,p,y),SinceasbydefinitionP,p,b,yisthedifferencebetweenP,p,yandP,b,ythePPhasadoptedthesimilarparameterdescriptionsforP,p,b,yasthoseusedforP,p,yandP,b,yinthePDD.

Data/parameter Up,y,ics-nbUnit PercentageDescription Cumulative,weightedusagerateinprojectscenario,fortechnologyduringyear

yMeasured/calculated/default CalculatedSourceofdata MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3.UsageSurvey.Value(s) 97.29Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) Sumof(Binaryreportedusagefrequencybytechnologyage*%oftotalsalesby

technologyage)QA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Theusagerateaccountsfornon-usageoftheEkoEstufaaswellascontinueduse

ofbaselinestoves,andusagefrequencyweightedbysalesperageofstove.Data/parameter LEp,y,ics-nbUnit tCO2e/yrDescription LeakageinprojectscenariofortechnologyinyearyMeasured/calculated/default MeasuredSourceofdata MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3.Value(s) 0.00Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) BiennialSurveyandDeskReviewQA/QCprocedures

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page26

Purposeofdata Additionalcomments AllleakagesourcesnotedinthePDDweredeterminedtobenegligibleWATERTREATEMENTTECHNOLOGIES

Data/parameter Np,y,wtUnit person-daysDescription Cumulativenumberofperson-daysofwaterconsumedinprojectscenariop

throughyeary.Measured/calculated/default CalculatedSourceofdata ERCalculationsGS1321Iss3Value(s) hh-wt:54,981,357 hh-dual:6,952,387Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) Person-days=sumof((recordedsaledateofeachtechnology–closingdateof

themonitoringperiod–lagadjustmentfactor),indays*numberofpersonsutilizingthefilterperHH).

QA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata Additionalcomments AdjustedtoaccountforhouseholdswhouseLPGandotherappropriateHWT

technologies.Data/parameter Up,y,wtUnit PercentageDescription Cumulative,weightedusagerateinprojectscenario,fortechnologyduringyear

yMeasured/calculated/default CalculatedSourceofdata MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3Value(s) hh-wt:96.17 hh-dual:99.26Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) Sumof(percentofrespondentsthatmeetallcriteriainthe“Guidelinesfor

carryingoutusagesurveyforprojectsimplementinghouseholdwaterfiltrationtechnologies”,bytechnologyage*%oftotalsalesbytechnologyage*%oftechnologiespassingWaterQualityTestbytechnologyage)

QA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Theusagerateaccountsfornon-usageoftheEcofiltro.Filtersover2yearsof

ageareconsideredpastperformingagerangeandthusareremovedfromcrediting.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page27

Data/parameter Qp,yUnit Litersperpersonperday(L/p/d)Description Quantityofrawwatertreatedwithwatertreatmenttechnologyandusedfor

hygienicpurposesintheprojectscenariopandsuppliedbyprojecttechnologyperpersonperday

Measured/calculated/default CalculatedSourceofdata MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3Value(s) hh-wt:3.46 hh-dual:3.10Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) Averagehygienicwaterconsumptionperdayperhh—averagenon-hygienic

waterconsumptionperdayperhh/averagepersonsconsumingtreatedwaterperdayperhh

QA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Data/parameter Qp,cleanboil,yUnit Litersperpersonperday(L/p/d)Description Quantityoftreatedwaterstillboiledinprojectscenarioafterinstallationof

projecttechnology,perpersonperdayMeasured/calculated/default CalculatedSourceofdata MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3Value(s) hh-wt:0.00 hh-dual:0.00Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) AveragelitersboiledforpurificationafterfilteringperHH/averagepersons

consumingtreatedwaterperdayperhhQA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata Additionalcomments Data/parameter LEp,i,yUnit tCO2e/yrDescription Leakageinprojectscenario2fortechnologyiinyearyMeasured/calculated/default MeasuredSourceofdata MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page28

Value(s) 0.00Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency Calc.method(ifapplicable) BiennialSurveyandDeskReviewQA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata Additionalcomments AllleakagesourcesnotedinthePDDweredeterminedtobenegligibleData/parameter WaterQuality(WQT)Unit PercentageDescription PerformanceofthetreatmenttechnologyMeasured/calculated/default MeasuredSourceofdata MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3.Value(s) hh-wt:96.55 hh-dual:100Monitoringequipment Measuring/recordingfrequency QuarterlyCalc.method(ifapplicable) NumberofpassingfiltersdividedbytotalnumberoffilterstestedQA/QCprocedures Purposeofdata Additionalcomments 3rdpartylabtestswereconductedonrandomlyselectedfilterunits.OneWQT

percentagewasmeasuredacrossbothprojectscenariosastheproductisidenticalinbothscenariosandtheperformancecharacteristicsoftheproductshouldthusbeassumedtobeidenticalacrossbothprojectscenarios.Anydropinproductperformanceinproductsfoundinonescenariocanreasonablybeassumedtoapplytobothscenariossincetheuseoftheproduct,thetraining,thewarrantyandallotheraspectsareidentical.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page29

HOUSEHOLDDEMOGRAPHICS:ALLMONITORING

ContinuousmonitoringallowsthePPtoconductallrequiredsurveys—KPT,WCFT,MS/USandWQTtests—inlargenumberofcommonhouseholds.WhilemoreMS/USsurveysweredonethanothersurveytypes,allsurveystypeswereconductedinallcommunitiessurveyed.ThebelowdemographicsrepresenttheaveragedemographiccharacteristicsofthemonitoredhouseholdsbyProjectScenario(ratherthanbysurveytype)acrossallsurveysperformed.BecauseERsforGS-1321arecalculatedonaperson-mealbasis,householdsizedoesnotaffectERvolumesdirectlyandchangesinhouseholdsizerela7vetothebaselineareaccountedforthroughperson-mealvaluesashouseholdsizechanges.Householddemographicsshownbelowarereportedforinforma7onalpurposesonly.

AVERAGEHHSIZE

HHSize hh-wt hh-dual

AveragePersonsTotal 5.20 5.17

Gender hh-wt hh-dual

Female 111 131Male 7 8Total 118 139

RESPONDANTGENDER

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page30

KPTMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-DUALEFFICIENTSTOVES

OVERVIEWOFSURVEYSCONDUCTED

72projectKPTsurveyswereconductedin-personbythelocalM&ETeamacross3Departmentsrepresentingmorethan96%ofefficientstovesalestodate.6outlierswereidentifiedandremovedfromtherawdataduringanalysisaseachofthesehouseholdsrespondedasinstitutionalorcommercialcooks.TheresultsforthemainquantitativeparametersdeterminedintheKPTsareusedinEmissionsReductions(ER)calculationsfortheIssuance3MonitoringPeriod.

KPTSURVEYSCONDUCTEDANDOUTLIERSREMOVED

SurveysConducted OutliersRemoved SurveysUsed

72 6 66

KPTHOUSEHOLDSBYDEPARTMENT

Department N % Department N %AltaVerapaz 26 39% Peten 0 0%BajaVerapaz 28 42% Quetzaltenango 0 0%Chimaltenango 0 0% Quiche 0 0%Chiquimula 0 0% Retalhuleu 0 0%ElProgreso 0 0% Sacatepequez 0 0%Escuintla 0 0% SanMarcos 12 18%Guatemala 0 0% SantaRosa 0 0%

Huehuetenango 0 0% Solola 0 0%Izabal 0 0% Suchitepequez 0 0%Jalapa 0 0% Totonicapan 0 0%Jutiapa 0 0% Zacapa 0 0%

WithintheCon7nuousMonitoringframework,afullMS/USisconductedwithineveryKPThousehold.MS/USsurveysarealsoconductedonhouseholdsthatdonotpar7cipateinKPTsasthesamplingrequirementforMS/USsurveysismuchhigherthanforKPTs.IncludinganMS/USsurveyineveryKPThouseholdallowsthePPtoreplacemanyoftheredundantqualita7veques7onsnormallyincludedwiththeKPTwiththemorecomprehensiveMS/USsurveyques7ons.Thishastwobenefits:

1. Everyhouseholdsurveyedreceivesthemostcomprehensivemonitoringavailable,producingmorerobustandcompletedata.

2. MS/USresultsbetweenKPTandnon-KPThouseholdscanbecomparedandanalyzedtoiden7fytrendsoranomalies.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page31

PROJECTFUELCONSUMPTIONANDSAVINGS

Oneachdayofthetest,KPThouseholdswereaskedhowmanypeopleateateachmeal,theageandgenderofthoseea7ng,typeoffoodthatwasprepared,andstove(s)used.Enumeratorsmeasuredthequan7tyoffuelconsumedbytakingdailymeasurementsinkilograms(kg)ofthefuelsupply.TheKPTisasubsumedKPTandmeasureswoodconsumedfromallstovespresentandinuseinthehomeduringthetestperiod.Thetablesbelowpresenttheaveragefuelconsump7onperday,averagepersonmealsperday,andaveragefuelperpersonmealperdayforboththebaseline,project,andthecalculatedsavingsbetweenthetwo.

AVERAGEDAILYMOISTUREADJUSTEDFUELCONSUMPTION&SAVINGSPERHH(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

HHConsumpcon Avg.(kg) SDEV 90%CI Precision 90/10? N

Baseline 19.77 4.35 1.24 6.30% Yes 35Project 5.93 2.28 0.47 7.91% Yes 66Savings 13.84

AVERAGEPERSON-MEALSPERDAY,MEALADJUSTED(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

Parameter Avg.(kg) SDEV 90%CI Precision 90/30? N

PersonMeals 14.65 5.75 1.18 8.06% Yes 66

AVERAGEDAILYPER-PERSON-MEALFUELCONSUMPTION&SAVINGS(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

PMConsumpcon Avg.(kg) SDEV 90%CI Precision 90/10? N

Baseline 1.35 0.77 0.22 11.30% No 35Project 0.45 0.22 0.04 9.89% Yes 66Savings 0.90

AVERAGEDAILYPER-PERSON-MEALFUELCONSUMPTION&SAVINGS

Parameter Value Definition

FuelSavings(t) 0.0014Specificfuelsavingsforanindividualtechnologyofprojectpagainstanindividualtechnologyofbaselinebinyeary,intonnes/meal/day,asderivedfromthestatisticalanalysisofthedatacollectedfromthefieldtests.

TheprojectfieldKPTdataconfirmsfuelsavingsof0.0014tonnesoffuelwood/personmeal/day.Consistentwiththepreviousmonitoringperiods,thePPelectedtoquan7fyfuelsavingsonaper-personmealbasisduetothe

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page32

Guatemalancontextofcookinganen7remealonasinglestove.Fuelconsump7onsavingswerecalculatedbycomparingbaselinefuelconsump7ontoprojectfuelconsump7on.Mealscookedperdayincludedtwosnackmealsweightedat0.25ofaregularmeal.TodeterminethefuelsavingsperhouseholdperdaythePPmul7pliedthefuelsavingspermealvaluebythenumberofpersonmealscookedperdayreportedintheKPT.PersonMealdataisalsocollectedintheMS/USreport,evenforhouseholdspar7cipa7ngintheKPT.Conduc7ngMS/USonKPThouseholdsallowscomparisonofoutcomesbasedonself-reporteduseover7me(MS/US)andself-reporteduseimmediatelyfollowingamonitoredcookingtest.Notsurprisingly,MS/USreportedperson-mealstrendedslightlyhigher(17.10)thanKPTreportedperson-meals(14.65).Forthesakeofconserva7sm,thePPhaselectedtou7lizetheKPTperson-mealfigureforallERcalcula7ons.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page33

MS/USMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-DUALEFFICIENTSTOVES


144projectMonitoring&Usagesurveyswereconductedacross3Departmentsrepresentingmorethan96%ofProjectScenario2salestodate.Ifthestatedhouseholdusagewas“none”,theMS/USwashalted,butthesurveywasutilizedinthecalculationofthefinalusageparameter.5outlierswereidentifiedandremovedfromtherawdataduringanalysisasrespondentscommunicatedthettheycookedcommerciallyorinstitutionally.ProjectScenario2MS/USmonitoringcoversbothefficientstovesandwaterfilters,however,forthesakeofconsistencyandcomparison,allMS/USdatarelatedtowaterfiltersfromProjectScenario2ispresentedwithinthisreportinsec7on“MS/USMONITORING:HH-WT&HH-DUALWATERFILTERS”.Thisallowsfordirectcomparisonoffilterusebetweenhouseholdsthatreceiveonlyandfilterandthosethatreceivebothafilterandastove.Onlyparametersrelatedtoefficientstovesarepresentedinthissec7on.

Aspermethodologicalallowance,allMSandUSSurveyswereconductedonthesamesamplepopula7onandin-personbythelocalM&ETeam.ThisincludesonlyhouseholdswithdualtechnologiesdistributedbySocorroMayaintandemwitheachotherwithinProjectScenario2(hh-dual).ThedatacollectedthroughMS/USmonitoringprovidestheaveragevalueofperson-mealspreparedperhouseholdperdayusedforERcalcula7onsaswellascri7calinforma7ononyear-toyeartrendsinendusercharacteris7cssuchastoveuse,cookingprac7ces,baselinestove/fueltype,leakageandsustainabledevelopmentIndicators,alongwithdemographicinforma7on.Themainmonitoredparametersresultsarereviewedbelow.

MS/USHOUSEHOLDSBYCOMMUNITY



StoveMSUSSurveysConducted&OutliersRemoved

SurveysConducted OutliersRemoved SurveysUsed

144 5 139

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page34

USAGERATE&PERSONMEALS

TheGSmethodologyrequiresthat“ausageparameterbeestablishedtoaccountfordropoffratesasprojecttechnologiesageandarereplaced”.Thesurveyusedacombinationofself-reportedusagequestionsandenumeratorassessmentoftheimprovedstovetodetermineboththebinaryusageparameter(Yes/No)andthefrequencyofuse.Forenumeratorassessment,theenumeratorcommentedonwhetherthestoveshowedsignsofbeinginrecentuse:signsofpartiallyburnedwood/ashandlackofspiderwebsinthefirechamber,stovewarmorinuse.Thefrequencyofimprovedstoveusewasestimatedbyaskingrespondentshowmanydaysperweektheyusethestove,andwhichstovesweretypicallyusedtocookeachmealoftheday.Thisfinalsetofquestionsallowedforclarityonstovetypesinuseandthespecificfrequencyofuseoftheprojecttechnology.

PertheGSmethodologyTPDDTEC,asingleusageparameterthatisweightedbasedondropoffratesthatarerepresenta7veoftheagedistribu7onforprojecttechnologiesinthetotalsalesrecordisusedtocalculateERs.Thetotalusagerateisdeterminedbydividingthehouseholdsthatmeetallusagecriteriabythetotalnumberofhouseholdssurveyed,andtakesintoaccountcon7nueduseofbaselinestovesforcertaincookingprac7ces.

TOTALCUMULATIVEWEIGHTEDUSAGERATE(Up,i,y)


Up,i,y 97.29%Cumulativeusageratefortechnologiesinprojectscenariop,fortechnologyi,inyeary,basedoncumulativefrequencyofuserateweightedbytechnologyage.

SALES-WEIGHTEDUSAGEBYAGE

TechnologyAge AccveUnits %ofSales %InUse WeightedUsage

Age0-1 2,098 53% 100% 52.87%Age1-2 1,698 43% 100% 42.79%Age2-3 172 4% 100% 4.33%Total 3,968 100% 100% 100%

Con7nuousMonitoringallowsforadirectcomparisonofmeasuredvs.reportedresponsestokeyparameterssuchasperson-meals.WithintheMS/USrespondentsareaskedhowmanypeople,onaverage,theycookforonatypicaldayandthenaskedwhichstovetheyusetocookeachmealduringtheday,givingthePPdataonboththenumberofmealscookedandtheuseoftheimprovedstovepermeal.ThustheMS/USallowsthePPtodetermineanaveragenumberofpeopleservedateachmeal.AlthoughtheKPTalsoreliesonself-reporteddata,suchdataisrecordedbytherespondentonameal-by-mealbasisfora24-hourperiod.Inaddi7on,breakfast,lunch,anddinnerareweightedequally,butsnacksandteasareweightedasaquarterofameal,aslesscookingisconductedtopreparethesemeals.KPTdataisthereforemuchmorespecificandaccurate,recordingtheexactnumberofpeopleservedateachindividualmealoverthecourseof3days.Notsurprisingly,theMS/US

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page35

person-mealdataisslightlyhigherthantheperson-mealdataderivedfromtheKPT.Forthesakeofconserva7sm,thePPhaselectedtousetheKPTperson-mealfigureforallERcalcula7ons.

COMPARISONOFPERSONMEALSFROMKPTANDMS/US


KPTPersonMeals 14.65Averagenumberofpeopleperhouseholdperdayservedacrossallmealsandadjustedwithsnacksandteaas0.25ofameal,asdeterminedbyKPTanalysis.

MS/USPersonMeals

17.10 Averagenumberofpeopleperhouseholdperdayservedacrossallmeals,asdeterminedbyMS/USanalysis.

FREQUENCYOFUSE

Householdswereaskedtoreportthefrequencywithwhichtheyusetheirstove(indays)andtoclarifywhichstove(s)weretypicallyusedtocookwhichmealsinordertocalculateanaccuratefrequencymeasurement.Theresultsoffrequencyofusequestionsareshownbelow.

WEEKLYFREQUENCYOFUSE

Frequency:Weekly N %Everyday 131 94.24%4to6daysperweek 6 4.32%2to3daysperweek 2 1.44%1dayperweek 0 0%Never 0 0%Total 139 100%

MEALFREQUENCYOFUSE

MealUse EkoEstufa Other %Breakfast 130 9 93.53%MorningTea 118 5 95.93%Lunch 138 1 99.28%AternoonTea 117 1 99.15%Dinner 137 2 98.56%TotalMeals/Use 640 18 97.29%

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page36

BASELINEFUEL&STOVEPRACTICES

Tocalculateaccurateemissionreduc7onsandunderstandleakagefromfuelswitchingand/orhea7ngprac7ces,thesurveyaskedhouseholdrespondentsaboutbaselinefuelandstovetypeaswellashea7ngprac7ces.

Theoverwhelmingmajorityofhouseholdsusedonlywoodfuelinthebaseline.AsmallminorityofusersswitchedfromLPGtofirewoodastheirprimaryfuelsourceaterreceivingtheEkoEstufa.Specifically,inreviewingthedatafromMonitoringPeriod3,11surveyrespondentsreportedLPGastheirprimarybaselinestove.Ofthose11,8reportthattheys7llhavetheirLPGstoveand4reports7llusingit.ThePPwouldsubmitthatthereportedownershipofthestovemaybeamoreaccurateindicatorofactualusageashistoricallyrespondentshavetendedtoanswertheques7onofuseofanoldstovewithwhattheybelievethesurveyormaywanttohear.Addi7onalques7onsintheMS/USaskingaboutstovesandfuelsusedtocookspecificmealssupportthisposi7onshowingthatabout5%ofrespondentsreportedcookingatleastonemealperdayonLPG.Incomparison,the8respondentsthatreporteds7llowninganLPGstovewouldequatetojustover5%ofthesurveyedsample.Takingthisintoaccount,thePPwouldsuggestthatfuelswitchingintheprojectscenario(vsthefuelmixingthatisconsistentwiththebaselineaverageofabout8%)wouldthenberepresentedbythe3homes(2%)whoreportedusingLPGastheirprimaryfuelinthebaseline,butwhonolongerownorusetheLPGstoveandinsteadhaveswitchedfullytotheprojectwoodstove.At2%fuelswitching,thePPwouldsuggestthatleakagefromfuelswitchingisnegligible.BeforereceivingtheEkoEstufa,thevastmajorityofthepopula7onreportedusingabiomassstoveofsometype.Theseincludeopenfiresandplancha-stylestoveslikethosemeasuredintheaddi7onalKPTtestsconductedforIssuance2,whichperformedonparwith,orbelowthelevelofa3-stonefireandthushavebeenclassifiedbythePPasunimprovedstoveswithinthebaselineforthepurposesofcalcula7ngERreduc7ons.

BASELINEFUELTYPE

BaselineFuelType N %Wood 128 92%Charcoal 1 1%Gas 10 7%Other 0 0%Total 139 100%

BASELINESTOVETYPE

BaselineStoveType N %OpenFire 102 73%Plancha 18 13%Charcoal 6 4%Gas 11 8%

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page37

Other 2 1%Total 139 100%

HEATINGPRACTICES

Forleakageassociatedwithhea7ng,respondentswereasked(a)whethertheyusetheirstovetoheattheirhomeand(b)howtheyfuelthestoveforhea7ngpurposes(i.e.dotheyspecificallylightafireinthestoveforhea7ngorsimplyallowcookingfueltoburnout).Whileabouthalfofallusersindicatethattheyusethestoveforhea7ng,themajorityalsoindicatethattheytendtouseonlythefuelburningforcookingpurposesandthattheyusethesameamountorlessfuelforhea7ngrela7vetotheiroldstove.Furthermore,KPTsaresubsumed,andincludeanychangesinincreaseduseofthenewstoveforhea7ngpurposes.Thusitcanbeconcludedthattherearenegligiblechangesintheamountoffuelusedforhea7ngatertheintroduc7onoftheEkoEstufa.

BASELINESTOVETYPE

HomeHeacng N %Yes 70 50%No 69 50%Total 139 100%Ifyes,nofueladded? 60 86%Ifyes,fueladded? 10 14%Total 67 100%

SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENTINDICATORS

AirQuality&HealthEffects

Self-reportedincidenceofairqualityandhealthindicatorsshowoverwhelminglypositivechangesinthehouseholdincomparisontothebaseline.Ineachcase,respondentswerefirstaskediftheynoticedanydifferenceintheindicatorbeingmonitored.Iftheyresponded“yes”,thentheywereaskedtoquantifythedegreeofperceiveddifferencefromthebaseline.

DEGREEOFPERCIEVEDCHANGEINAMOUNTOFSMOKEINKITCHEN(FORTHOSEINDICATIINGACHANGE)

ChangeinSmoke? N %Yes 129 93%No 10 7%Total 139 100%MuchLess 124 96%Less 5 4%

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page38

Nodifference 0 0%More 0 0%MuchMore 0 0%Don’tKnow 0 0%Total 129 100%

DEGREEOFCHANGEINAMOUNTOFEYEIRRITATION(FORTHOSEINDICATIINGACHANGE)

ChangeinEyeIrritacon N %Yes 133 96%No 6 4%Total 139 100%MuchLess 119 89%Less 14 11%Nodifference 0 0%More 0 0%MuchMore 0 0%Don’tKnow 0 0%Total 133 100%

DEGREEOFCHANGEINFREQUENCYOFCOUGHING(FORTHOSEINDICATIINGACHANGE)

ChangeinCoughing N %Yes 116 83%No 23 17%Total 139 100%MuchLess 108 93%Less 8 7%Nodifference 0 0%More 0 0%MuchMore 0 0%Don’tKnow 0 0%Total 116 100%

LivelihoodofThePoor&AccesstoEnergyServices

Fuelsourcinganditsimpactonlivelihoodandaccesstoenergywererecordedbyaskingrespondentstoindicatehowtheysourcedfuelpriortotheintroduc7onoftheEkoEstufaefficientstove.AsProjectScenario2combinesthestoveandfilter,makingimpossibleforrespondentstodelineatebetweenstoveandfiltersavings,thefollowingdataincludesoutcomesforthecombina7onofproducts,notjuststoves.Dataindicateslirlechangein

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page39

modeofsourcingfuelwithextremelylowvariancebetweenbaselineandprojectbehaviors.Financialand7mesavingsmeasuredasapercentageofmoneyor7mespentinthebaseline,wassignificant.

FUELSOURCING

FuelSource Baseline % Project % Varience%

Buy 82 59% 82 59% 0.00%

Collect 42 30% 46 33% 2.88%

Both,MostlyBuy 12 9% 8 6% -2.88%

Both,MostlyCollect 3 2% 3 2% 0.00%

Total 139 100% 139 100% 0.00%

FUELSAVINGSINTIMEANDMONEY

Savings/Week Baseline Project Savings %

Money(Q) 61.52 29.95 31.58 51%

Time(H) 11.09 2.55 8.55 77%

FUELSAVINGSCOMPARISON

Savings/Week Week Month Annual

Money(USD,FX=$0.13) $4.13 $16.51 $198.12

Time(H) 8.55 34.19 410.27

CustomerSatisfaction

2keycustomersa7sfac7onindicatorsaremonitored:Agrosssa7sfac7onscalewhereinrespondentsareaskedtoratetheirhappinesswiththestoveonascaleof1to100%,andaNetPromoterScorewhichmeasuresthenumberofpeoplestronglypredisposedtorecommendingtheproducttoafriend.Bothindicateveryhighdegreesofusersa7sfac7on.

UserSatisfaction NetPromoterScore

97.99% 9.8

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page40

WCFTMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-WT&HH-DUALWATERFILTERS


WCFTmonitoringofthewaterfiltercomponentofProjectScenarios1andScenario2wasconductedseparately,butresultsarepresentedtogetherforthesakeofeasycomparisonsincebothProjectScenariosusethesamewaterfiltertechnology,havethesametargetpopula7on,usethesamewaterEmissionReduc7onequa7on,andu7lizeiden7calwater-relatedsurveyques7ons.Thisallowsforeasieranalysisofreportedfilterusebetweenhouseholdsthatreceiveonlyafilterandthosethatreceivebothafilterandastove.

ForWCFTMonitoring,33surveyswereconductedunderProjectScenario1and56surveyswereconductedunderProjectScenario2.Allsurveyswereconductedin-personbythelocalM&ETeam.NooutlierswereidentifiedandnorecordswereremovedfromeitherProjectScenariorawdataduringanalysis.TheresultsforthemainquantitativeparametersdeterminedintheWCFTsareusedinEmissionsReductions(ER)calculationsfortheIssuance3MonitoringPeriod.Thepurposeofthismonitoringistoinvestigateandreportonthefollowing:

• Filteredwaterconsumptionforhygienicpurposes(Qp,y)• Continuedboilingoffilteredwater(Qp,cleanboil)• Seasonalvariationinwatertreatmentandconsumption(incorporatedintoContinuousMonitoring)• Baselinetreatmentmechanisms

WCFTHOUSEHOLDSBYDEPARTMENT

Department HH-DUAL % HH-WT %

AltaVerapaz 10 38% 27 49%BajaVerapaz 7 21% 28 51%Chimaltenango 7 21% 0 0%Solola 9 27% 0 0%Total 33 100% 55 100%

WithintheCon7nuousMonitoringframework,afullMS/USisconductedwithineveryWCFThousehold.MS/USsurveysarealsoconductedonhouseholdsthatdonotpar7cipateinWCFTsasthesamplingrequirementforMS/USsurveysismuchhigherthanforWCFTs.IncludinganMS/USsurveyineveryWCFThouseholdallowsthePPtoreplacemanyoftheredundantqualita7veques7onsnormallyincludedwiththeWCFTwiththemorecomprehensiveMS/USsurveyques7ons.Thishastwobenefits:

1. Everyhouseholdsurveyedreceivesthemostcomprehensivemonitoringavailable,producingmorerobustandcompletedata.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page41

2. MS/USresultsbetweenWCFTandnon-WCFThouseholdscanbecomparedandanalyzedtoiden7fytrendsoranomalies.

WATERCONSUMPTIONANDBOILING

Oneachdayofthetest,WCFThouseholdswereaskedtoquan7fythenumberofpeopleusingtreatedwaterovertheprevious24hoursandtolistthevarioususesfortreatedwater.Eachrespondentwasthenaskedpourtheamountofwateru7lizedovertheprevious24hoursfordrinking,washinghandsandwashingfruitsandvegetablesintoameasuringcontainertoascertaintheamountoftreatedwaterusedforhygienicpurposes,andthentopourtheamountofwateru7lizedovertheprevious24hoursforcooking,washingdishesandbathingintoameasuringcontainertoascertaintheamountoftreatedwaterusedfornon-hygienicpurposes.Finally,respondentswereaskedwhether(otherthanforthepurposesofcookingalreadyquan7fied)theyhadboiledanytreatedwaterovertheprevious24hours,andifso,forwhatpurposes.

Enumeratorsmeasuredthetotalquan7tyofwaterconsumedbymeasuringtheamountofwaterinliters(L)inthehouseholdpriortothe24-houruseperiodandthenmeasuringtheamountofwaterremainingaterthatperiod.Enumeratorsmeasuredvarioususesofwaterbytakingdailymeasurementsofeachspecificuse.Thetablesbelowpresenttheaveragehygienicwaterconsump7onperpersonperday(L)andtheaveragequan7tyoftreatedwaterthatiss7llboiledforbothProjectScenarios.

QUANTITYOFSAFEWATERCONSUMED&BOILED,PERPERSON,PERDAY(L)(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

Parameter HH-WT HH-DUAL Definition

Qp,y 3.10 3.46Quantityofsafewatersuppliedbyprojecttechnology(inLiters)andconsumedforhygienicpurposesintheprojectscenariopperpersonperday.

Qp,cleanboil 0.00 0.00 Quantityoftreatedwatersuppliedbyprojecttechnology(inLiters)andstillboiledintheprojectscenariopperpersonperday

Qp,ySTATISTICALANALYSIS(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

Qp,y Avg.(L) SDEV 90%CI Precision 90/10? N

hh-wt 3.46 1.01 0.30 8.64% Yes 33hh-dual 3.10 0.85 0.19 6.18% Yes 55

Qp,cleanboilSTATISTICALANALYSIS(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

Qp,cleanboil Avg.(L) SDEV 90%CI Precision 90/10? N

hh-wt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Yes 33hh-dual 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Yes 55

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page42

Qp,cleanboilmeasuredzeroforbothProjectScenarios.WhileinpreviousissuancesQp,cleanboilwasmeasureable,itwasextremelysmall.InthisissuancethePPsoughttoclarifywhetherrespondentspreviouslyunderstoodtheques7onregardingQp,cleanboilclearly.Inreviewingprevioussurveysitbecameclearthatsomerespondentsconsideredthecookingofsouporteaashavingboiledtreatedwater.Howeverallcookingac7vityisalreadycapturedinnon-hygienicuseswhichincludecooking,andthereforeQp,cleanboilwas,inessence,doublecoun7ngsomewateruse.Forthisissuance,thePPrefinedtheWCFTques7ononboilingtoread,“Otherthanforcookingsoupsorhotbeverageslikecoffeeortea,didyouboilanyofthewateryoufilteredinthelast24hoursinordertopurifyit?”.Iftherespondentanswered“yes”,theywerethenaskedwhytheychosetoboilthewaterandtolistthepurposesforwhichthewaterwasboiled.Thisrefinedlineofques7oningclarifiedtheissueforrespondentsandresultedinamoreaccurateoutcomefortheparameter.

Abreakdownofwaterconsump7onbyProjectScenario,dayanduseispresentedbelow:

HH-WTCONSUMPTIONBYDAYANDTYPE(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

HH-WT Day1 Day2 Day3 AVG

TOTWaterConsumed/HH 17.10 20.20 22.59 19.96TOTNon-HygienicUse/HH 3.00 2.35 1.50 2.28Avg#ofUsers/HH 5.55 5.63 5.37 5.49

HH-DUALCONSUMPTIONBYDAYANDTYPE(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

HH-DUAL Day1 Day2 Day3 AVG

TOTWaterConsumed/HH 14.57 16.66 18.50 16.58TOTNon-HygienicUse/HH 1.68 1.78 1.92 1.79Avg#ofUsers/HH 5.05 5.05 5.14 5.07

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page43

MS/USMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-WT&HH-DUALWATERFILTERS


AswithWCFTs,MS/USmonitoringisconductedforbothProjectScenario1&2separately.However,asthedemographicsforbothgroupsaresimilar,allMS/USdatarelatedtobothprojectscenariosispresentedsidebysidebelowforthesakeofeasycomparison.

ForMS/USMonitoring,118surveyswereconductedunderProjectScenario1and144surveyswereconductedunderProjectScenario2.Aspermethodologicalallowance,allMSandUSSurveyswereconductedonthesamesamplepopula7onandin-personbythelocalM&ETeam.NooutlierswereidentifiedandnorecordswereremovedfromtheProjectScenario1rawdataduringanalysis.5outlierswereidentifiedandremovedfromtheProjectScenario2rawdataduringanalysisasrespondentscommunicatedthattheycookedcommerciallyorinstitutionallyandthusboththeircookingandwaterconsumptioncouldbeoverstatedandskewresults.TheresultsforthekeyquantitativeandqualitativeparametersdeterminedintheMS/USSurveysareusedinEmissionsReductions(ER)calculationsfortheIssuance3MonitoringPeriodandpresentedbelow.Thepurposeofthismonitoringistoinvestigateandreportonthefollowing:

• Cumulativesales-weightedusagerate(Up,i,y)• Numberofpersonsconsumingtreatedwaterperhousehold• Seasonalvariationinwatertreatmentandconsumption(incorporatedintoContinuousMonitoring)• Baselinetreatmentmethods&technologies• Sustainabledevelopmentindicators

MS/USHOUSEHOLDSBYDEPARTMENT

Department HH-WT % HH-DUAL %

AltaVerapaz 10 8% 67 48%BajaVerapaz 8 7% 52 37%Chimaltenango 7 6% 0 0%Escuintla 75 64% 0 0%SanMarcos 0 0% 20 14%Solola 18 15% 0 0%Total 118 100% 139 100%

USAGERATE&USERSPERFILTER

TheGSmethodologyrequiresthat“ausageparameterbeestablishedtoaccountfordropoffratesasprojecttechnologiesageandarereplaced”.Thesurveyusedacombinationofquestionstodeterminetheweightedusageparameterbasedonseveralfactors.Forenumeratorassessment,theenumeratorcommentedonwhetherthefilterwasfilledorwet,inworkingconditionandwhethertherespondentwasusingitproperly.To

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page44

determinebinaryandrateofusage,theenumeratorrequestedacupofwatertodrinkandobservedwhethertherespondentusedthefiltertoprovideit.Theenumeratorthenaskedhowoftentherespondentusedthefilter(pre-determinedlistofoptions)andiftherewaseveratimewhentherespondentdidnotusethefilter.

PertheGSmethodologyTPDDTEC,asingleusageparameterthatisweightedbasedondropoffratesthatarerepresenta7veoftheagedistribu7onforprojecttechnologiesinthetotalsalesrecordisusedtocalculateERs.AlthoughthePPhasstrongevidenceoffiltersworkingeffec7velyinthefieldaslongas4years,forthesakeofconserva7smthePPhaselectedtoincludeonlyfilters2yearsofageorlessforcredi7ngpurposesandthusonlytwoagegroupsoffiltersareconsideredinthesurveys.Asfiltersreach25monthsofagetheyareautoma7callyexcludedfromcredi7ng.Thetotalusagerateisdeterminedbydividingthehouseholdsthatmeetallusagecriteriabythetotalnumberofhouseholdssurveyed,andtakesintoaccountcon7nueduseofbaselinestovesforcertaincookingprac7ces.

ACTIVEFILTERUNITSBYAGE

ProjectScenario Age0-1 % Age1-2 %

hh-wt 26,811 58% 19,241 42%hh-dual 1,231 47% 1,397 53%

KEYUSAGEPARAMETERSUSEDINTHECALCULATIONOFERS(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

Parameter HH-WT HH-DUAL Definition

Up,y 96.17% 99.26%Cumulativeusageratefortechnologiesinprojectscenariop,fortechnologyi,duringyeary,basedoncumulativeinstallationrateanddropoffrate.

Personsperfilter

5.20 5.18 Numberofpersonsconsumingwatersuppliedbyprojectscenariopertechnologyperday.

LPGUserswhoBoil

6.06% 1.00% PortionofusersofprojectsafewatersupplywhowereboilingwaterusingLPG

PERSONSPERFILTER(CONTINUOUSMONITORINGSEASONALITY-INCORPORATEDDATA)

Personsperfilter Avg.(L) SDEV 90%CI Precision 90/10? N

hh-wt 5.20 2.19 0.33 6.42% Yes 118hh-dual 5.18 2.20 0.31 5.98% Yes 139TheusageratesofbothProjectScenariosrepresentthepercentageofhouseholdsmee7ngallusagecriteriathatalignwiththeGSruleupdate,“Guidelinesforcarryingoutusagesurveysforprojectsimplemen7nghousehold

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page45

waterfiltra7ontechnologies”.ThefixedCjparameterfrombaselineandpreviousissuancemonitoringindicatesthat9.32%ofthepopula7oninhh-wtand9.17%ofthepopula7oninhh-dualwerealreadyusinganon-boilingsafewatersupply.ThePPhasthusappliedaCjadjustmentfactortoeachProjectScenarioaccordingly.USAGECRITERIAFROMGSRULEUPDATE,“GUIDELINESFORCARRYINGOUTUSAGESURVEYSFORPROJECTSIMPLEMENTINGHOUSEHOLDWATERFILTRATIONTECHNOLOGIES”

Topic HH-WT HH-DUAL Question(s)

BinaryUsage 100% 99.17% Isthereeveratimewhentherespondentdoesnotusethefilter?(answerstransposedtoreflectpositivevs.negative)

Watertreated?

100% 100% Requestaglassofwaterandnotethesourcefromwhichthewateristaken.Isthewatersourcedfromthefilter?

CorrectUse? 100% 99.17% Observewhethertherespondentisusingthefiltercorrectly.Isthefilterbeingusedcorrectly?

FilterHasWater/Wet?

100% 100% Checktheinteriorofthefilter.Doesithavewateroristheceramicfilterwet?

FilterisFunctional?

98.36% 99.17% Isthefilterfunctioningproperly?Istheceramicbrokenorcracked?Arethespigotandbucketworkingasintended?

FrequencyofUse?

99.12% 98.33% Isfrequencyofusegreaterthan50%ofusabledays?

BASELINESTOVE&FUELTYPE

TheMS/USalsosoughttoconfirmbaselinestoveandfuelusedforboilingwaterforthepurposeofERcalcula7ons.Themajorityofhouseholdsusedonlywoodfuelinthebaselineastheirmainfuelforboilingwater.

BASELINEFUELUSEDFORBOILING

BaselineFuelforBoiling HH-WT % HH-DUAL %Wood 31 94% 99 99%Coal 0 0% 0 0%Gas 2 6% 1 1%Biogas 0 0% 0 0%Other 0 0% 0 0%TOTAL 31 100% 100 100%

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page46

UserswhoboiledwithLPG 2 6% 1 1%Ofthosehouseholdswhoboiledwaterinthebaseline,onlyasmallminorityusedgas(LPG)tocompletethetask.The%ofLPGuserswhotreatedwaterbyboilinginthebaselinehavebeendeductedfromERcalcula7onsbyadjus7ngtheparameterNp,yasapplicable.BASELINESTOVEUSEDFORBOILING

BaselineStoveforBoiling HH-WT % HH-DUAL %OpenFire 17 52% 82 82%Plancha 9 27% 14 14%UnimprovedCharcoal 2 6% 3 3%Gas 2 6% 1 1%Other 3 9% 0 0%TOTAL 33 100% 100 100%Similarly,beforereceivingthefilter,thevastmajorityofthepopula7onusedawoodburningstove(eitheropenfireorplancha-stylestove)toboilwater.SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENTINDICATORS

WaterQuality&Quantity

Self-reportedindicatorsofwaterqualityandquantityshowpositivechangesincomparisontothebaseline.Respondentswereaskedaboutthetasteoftreatedwater,iftheyfeltliketheyhadmoreorlessaccesstocleanwaterandwhethertheynoticedareductioninstomachillnesseswiththeEcofiltrovsthebaseline.

PERCIEVEDTASTEOFWATERINCOMPARISONTOBASELINE

TasteofWater HH-WT % HH-DUAL %Bererthanbefore 110 93% 136 98%Sameasbefore 8 7% 3 2%Worsethanbefore 0 0% 0 0%Total 118 100% 139 100%

PERCIEVEDACCESSTOWATERINCOMPARISONTOBASELINE

AccesstoWater HH-WT % HH-DUAL %

Bererthanbefore 118 100% 136 98%Sameasbefore 0 0% 3 2%Worsethanbefore 0 0% 0 0%Don’tknow 0 0% 0 0%

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page47

Total 118 100% 139 100%

PERCIEVEDCHANGESINFREQUENCYOFSTOMACHILLNESSES

IncidenceofStomachIllness HH-WT % HH-DUAL %MuchLess 89 75% 94 68%Less 5 4% 11 8%Nodifference 24 20% 32 23%More 0 0% 0 0%MuchMore 0 0% 0 0%Don’tKnow 0 0% 2 1%Total 118 100% 139 100%

LivelihoodofThePoor

Fuelsourcinganditsimpactonlivelihoodwererecordedbyaskingrespondentstoindicatehowtheysourcedfuelpriortotheintroduc7onoftheEcofiltro.Unliketherestofthissec7onofthedocument,thefollowingdataisreportedonlyforHH-WTfilters.HH-DUALfilterisinextricablylinkedtothestoveintermsoffueland7mesavings,andthusthatdatacanbefoundinthesec7on“MS/USMONITORINGRESULTS:HH-DUALEFFICIENTSTOVES”.Dataindicatesextremelylowvariancebetweenbaselineandprojectbehaviors.

FUELSOURCING

FuelSource Baseline % Project % Varience%

Buy 90 76% 88 75% -1.69%

Collect 21 18% 24 20% 2.54%

Both,MostlyBuy 6 5% 5 4% -0.85%

Both,MostlyCollect 1 1% 1 1% 0.00%

Total 118 100% 118 100% 0.00%

FUELSAVINGSINTIMEANDMONEY

Savings/Week Baseline Project Savings %

Money(Q) 30.03 17.08 12.95 43%

Time(H) 6.58 4.85 1.73 26%

FUELSAVINGSCOMPARISON

Savings/Week Week Month Annual

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page48

Money(USD,FX=$0.13) $1.69 $6.77 $81.25

Time(H) 1.73 6.93 83.17

CustomerSatisfaction

2keycustomersa7sfac7onindicatorsaremonitored:Agrosssa7sfac7onscalewhereinrespondentsareaskedtoratetheirhappinesswiththetechnologyonascaleof1to100%,andaNetPromoterScorewhichmeasuresthenumberofpeoplestronglypredisposedtorecommendingtheproducttoafriend.Bothindicateveryhighdegreesofusersa7sfac7on.

USERSATISFACTION

Sacsfaccon NetPromoterScore

HH-WT 99.92% 10.0

HH-DUAL 98.88% 10.0

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page49

WATERQUALITYMONITORING

ThePPconductedmicrobiologicalPresence/Absence(P/A)teststodeterminetheeffec7venessoftheprojecttechnologiesastheyage.Ecofiltro’smanufacturer’sspecifica7onsstatethatthefilterhasaminimumlifespanof2years,andhasbeenshowntolastformorethan4yearswhenusedandmaintainedcorrectly.Forthesakeofconserva7sm,thePPhaselectedtoincludeonlyfilters2yearsofageoryoungerforcredi7ng,andthustes7ng.

Thelast5to7householdsmonitoredineachregionfromtherandomlyselectedmonitoringlistwereusedforwaterqualitytes7ng,assuringtheselec7onofhouseholdswasunbiasedandrepresenta7veofthepopula7on.

Surveyorscollected100mlsamplesofwaterdirectlyfromthefilterusingasterilizedbeakerandlatexgloves.Thesampleswerethensealedandplacedinaprotec7veboxfortransporttolaboratoriesfortes7ng.Independent,3rdpartylaboratorieswereselectedtoconducttes7ngbasedongeographicproximitytothefieldsamplecollec7onpointtominimizepossiblecontamina7onduringtravelandtoassurethatallsamplesweredeliveredwithin8hoursofsampling.

WHOandGuatemalanstandardsconsidersafedrinkingwaterascontaininglessthan1ColonyFormingUnit(CFU)ofE.Coli/100mlofwater.Thelabsusedfortes7ngconductedacontrolledanalysisofwatersamplestomeasureforthelevelsofEcoliinthewatersamples.AsperGuatemalanandWorldHealthOrganiza7onStandards,andasconsistentwiththemethodologyandPDD,anyfiltersamplesexceeding1CFUofEcoliper100mlwereconsideredtohavefailedthetest.

WQTHOUSEHOLDSBYDEPARTMENT



WQTLABTESTINGPASSRESULTS

PassingFilter% HH-DUAL HH-WT

Age0-1 100% 100%

Age1-2 100% 96.43%

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page50

PROJECTLEAKAGEASSESSMENT

Belowistheleakageassessmentforeachpoten7alsourceofleakageasdefinedintheGSTPDDTECmethodologyandPDD:

LEAKAGESOURCE1

Thedisplacedbaselinetechnologiesarereusedoutsidetheprojectboundaryinplaceofloweremi�ngtechnologyorinamannersugges7ngmoreusagethanwouldhaveoccurredintheabsenceoftheproject.

Assessment:Noleakage.

Jus7fica7on:Thereisnoevidencethattheprojectincreasestheuseofhigheremi�ngtechnologiesoutsidetheprojectboundarywhereloweremi�ngtechnologiesareinplace(i.e.3stonesfires).Woodfuelsremainavaluableanddecliningresourceandthistrendisnotreversedbytheprojectac7vity.ThebaselinetechnologyusedinGuatemalaisthreestonecookstoves,whicharethesametypeoftechnologythatisusedoutsidetheprojectboundary(Guatemala)i.e.Honduras,ElSalvador,etc.Giventhattheleakageassessmentdoesnotexpectanincreaseinfuelconsump7onbythenon-projecthouseholds/usersarributabletotheprojectac7vity,calcula7onsdonotneedtobeadjustedtoaccountforthisleakage.

LEAKAGESOURCE2

Thenon-renewablebiomassorfossilfuelssavedundertheprojectac7vityareusedbynon-projectuserswhopreviouslyusedloweremi�ngenergysources.


Jus7fica7on:Thereisnoevidencethattheprojectincreasestheuseofhigheremissionfuelsoutsidetheprojectboundarywhereloweremi�ngenergysourceswereformerlyused.Woodfuelsremainavaluableanddecliningresourceandthistrendisnotreversedbytheprojectac7vity.Giventhattheleakageassessmentdoesnotexpectanincreaseinfuelconsump7onbythenon-projecthouseholds/usersarributabletotheprojectac7vity,calcula7onsdonotneedtobeadjustedtoaccountforthisleakage.

LEAKAGESOURCE3

TheprojectsignificantlyimpactstheNRBfrac7onwithinanareawhereotherCDMorVERprojectac7vi7esaccountforNRBfrac7onintheirbaselinescenario.


Jus7fica7on:TheProjectProponenthasdeterminedthattotalnumberofpeoplereachedbyallac7vi7esofGS1321islessthan1.4%ofthetotalGuatemalanpopula7on,andthusitseffectsonthena7onalNRBvaluearecurrentlynegligible.

Inaddi7ontoGS1321,therearecurrentlytworegisteredefficientstoveprojectsinGuatemalathataccountforNRBintheirbaseline:

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page51

- GS1377UtsilNaj—Casasaludableparatodos,locatedinSacatepaquez,Guatemala,isaGoldStandardprojectac7vityregisteredunderaLa7nAmericanPoA.

- CDM8480Distribu7onofOnilStoves,Guatemala,aCDMPoAwithprojectac7vi7esmanagedbyHelpsInterna7onalcountry-wideinGuatemala.

Despiteeachhavingbeenregisteredforseveralyears,neithertheUtsilNaj,northeOnilprojecthaverequestedissuance,sugges7ngthatneitherhasbeensuccessfulimplemen7ngmeaningfulnumbersofstoves.TheUtsilNajprojectwasini7allyprojectedasasmallscaleprojectthatwouldproducefewerthan10,000tonnesofVERsperyear,andthusevenatfull-scaleimplementa7on,wouldhaveanegligibleimpactonNRB.TheOnilPDDprojectsthesaleofupto50,000stovesperyearfromabaseof4,500inthefirstyearoftheproject(2008).RichardGrinnell,formerPresidentofHelpsInterna7onal,es7matesthattheorganiza7onhasdistributedapproximately10,000stovesperyearsince2009,buthasnotbeenabletoexceedthatlevelofannualsalestodate.Conserva7vees7matesoftechnologydistribu7onthroughthesetwoprojectsareplacedat15,000perannum.AddingGS1321salesfiguresfor2014tothisbaseamount,totalannualstovedistribu7onvolumesarees7matedtobebelow20,000unitsperyear.Annualwaterfiltervolumesarees7matedat30,000peryear.

ThirdpartybaselineanalysiscompletedforGS1321placedannualNRBat15,006,365tonnesperyearinGuatemala.Withapopula7onofapproximately15,000,000,thisequatesroughlytoonetonneperpersonperyear,or5.66tonnesperhouseholdperyear.Guatemala’sannualgrowthrateises7matedtobe2.5%bythePopula7onReferenceBureau4.Thatgrowthrateequatesto66,000addi7onalhouseholdsperyear,andacorrespondingincreaseofapproximately375,000tonnesinannualNRB.Conserva7velyassuminga70%reduc7oninfuelusepertechnology-household,projectinterven7onswouldneedtoachieveadistribu7onrateof94,000unitsperyeartooffsetthecurrentannualrateofincreaseinNRB.

Usingasimplerpointofcomparison,totalannualtechnologydistribu7onfromGS1321andotherprojectscurrentlyimpactsonly1.4%ofthepopula7on,approximately1.1%belowtheannualgrowthrate,renderingtheeffectsonNRBnegligibleinthattheymerelyslowtheincreaseinannualNRBratherthanreducingit.

Givenallofthesefactors,theProjectProponenthasdeterminedthatGS1321doesnotsignificantlyaffectthena7onalNRBvalueandisunlikelytowithinitsprojectedcredi7ngperiod.

Seedetailedvaluesusedforcalcula7ngNRBleakageassessmentsonthefollowingpage.

4hrp://www.prb.org/Publica7ons/Datasheets/2011/world-popula7on-data-sheet/guatemala.aspx

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page52

NRBLeakageAnalysis Value Unit Source

CurrentNRBinGuatemala 15,006,365 t/year 3rdpartybaselineanalysis

Popula7onofGuatemala 15,073,375 personshrp://www.ine.gob.gt/sistema/uploads/2014/02/26/5eTCcFlHErnaNVeUmm3iabXHaKgXtw0C.pdf

AverageHHSize 5.69 persons Annex6GS1321Iss1HHWCFTMSUSReport

Popula7onofGuatemala(households)

2,649,099 HHs Calculated

ApproximateNRBalloca7on/HH 5.66 t/year Calculated

AnnualPopula7onGrowthRate 2.50% % hrp://www.prb.org/Publica7ons/Datasheets/2011/world-popula7on-data-sheet/guatemala.aspx

AnnualHHGrowthRateEquivalent(HHs)

66,227 HHs Calculated

AnnualNRBContribu7onfromPop.Growth

375,159 t/year Calculated

HouseholdsReceivingTechnologies(GS1321)

30,000 units/year ISS2TotalSalesRecordAverage

HouseholdsReceivingTechnologies(other)

15,000 units/year Conserva7velyEs7mated

AverageFuelSavings/Technology 70% % ISS3ERCalcula7onsroundedup

AnnualNRBReduc7onfromTechnologyDist.

178,438 t/year Calculated

%ofpopula7onrepresentedbycurrentsales

1.70% % Calculated

AnnualDistribu7onRequiredtoOffsetNRBGrowthRate

94,611 units/year Calculated

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page53

LEAKAGESOURCE4

Theprojectpopula7oncompensatesforlossofthespacehea7ngeffectofinefficienttechnologybyadop7ngsomeotherformofhea7ngorbyretainingsomeuseofinefficienttechnology.


Jus7fica7on:MS/USmonitoringdeterminedthatmorethan80%ofstoveusersusetheEkoEstufatoheattheirhome.However,theoverwhelmingmajorityofthesehouseholdsindicatedthattheyachievehea7ngbyle�ngthefirefromcookingdieout(i.e.theydonotspecificallylightafireinthestoveforthispurpose),alsoindica7ngthattheyusethesameoralesseramountoffuelforhea7ngrela7vetotheamounttheyusedontheiroldstove.Further,thelargemajorityofusershaveremovedtheiroldstovetechnologyfromthehomeinconsidera7onofwarrantyrequirementsthats7pulatethatthewarrantyisonlyvalidiftheoldtechnologyisremovedfromthehome.Thusitcanbeconcludedthattherearenegligiblechangesintheamountoffuelusedforhea7ngatertheintroduc7onoftheEkoEstufa.

LEAKAGESOURCE5

Byvirtueofpromo7onandmarke7ngofanewtechnologywithhighefficiency,theprojects7mulatessubs7tu7onwithinhouseholdswhocommonlyusedatechnologywithrela7velyloweremissions,incaseswheresuchatrendisnoteligibleasanevolvingbaseline.


Jus7fica7on:MS/USmonitoringshowsthatasmallpercentage(<5%)ofusershaveswitchedfromusingfuelsandtechnologiesconsideredhigherefficiencyinthebaselinetoonlyusingfirewoodaterreceivingtheEkoEstufa.TheoverwhelmingmajorityofrespondentsreportedusingfuelwoodonastovewithlowerefficiencythantheEkoEstufainthebaseline.SincethepercentageofrespondentsusingtechnologieswithloweremissionsthantheEkoEstufainthebaseline(LPGandbiogasstoves)issosmall(<5%),leakagefromfuelswitchingisconsiderednegligible.

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page54

EMISSIONSREDUCTIONSEQUATIONS&CALCULATIONS

IMPROVEDCOOKSTOVES

ERy=(Np,y,ics*Up,I,y*Pp,b,y,ics*NCVb,fuel*((fNRB,b,y*EFwood,CO2+EFwood,nonCO2)–ΣLEp,y)5

Where:

Parameter Value Unit Defini7on

fnrb,y,ics-nb 96% Percentage Non-renewablefrac7onofthewoodybiomassharvestedintheprojectcollec7onareainyeary

Pp,b,y,ics-nb 0.02051 tons/technology-day

Specificfuelsavingsforanindividualtechnologyofprojectscenario2againstanindividualtechnologyofbaselinescenarioinyeary,intons/technology-day,asderivedfromthesta7s7calanalysisofthedatacollectedfromthefieldtests

Up,y,ics-nb 97.29% Percentage Usagerateinprojectscenariop,fortechnologyics-nb,duringyeary

NCVwood 0.0156 TJ/ton Netcalorificvalueofwood(TJ/Gg)

EFb,wood,CO2 112,000 kgCO2/TJ IPCCdefaultvalueforwoodfuelCO2emissionfactor

EFb,wood,CH4 300 kgCH4/TJ CH4emissionforwoodfuel

EFb,wood,N2O 4 kgN2O/TJ N2Oemissionfactorforwoodfuel

GWPCO2 1 kgCO2/kgCO2 Globalwarmingpoten7alofCO2

GWPCH4 21 kgCO2/kgCH4 Globalwarmingpoten7alofCH4

GWPN2O 310 kgCO2/kgN2O Globalwarmingpoten7alofN20

Npy,ics-nb 1,421,355 technology-daysCumula7venumberofprojecttechnology-daysincludedintheprojectdatabaseforprojectscenariopfortechnologyics-nbagainstbaselinescenariobinyeary

LEp,y,ics-nb 0 tCO2e/yr Leakageforprojectscenariop,technologyics-nb,inyeary(tCO2e/yr)

WATERFILTERS

5NotetoconvertEFEFfuel,nonCO2toCO2equivalentsthefollowingformulaisused:Ffuel,nonCO2=(EFwood,CH4*GWPCH4)+(EFwood,N2O*GWPN2O)

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page55

ProjectScenarioFuelConsump7onCalcula7on:

ThePPeliminatedQp,rawboil,yfromtheequa7onaspertheguidanceinGSJune2012TACupdatewhichallowsthePPtoapplyacapof6l/p/dfortheamountofwatertreatedbythewatertreatmenttechnologyfordrinkingwater,handwashingandfoodwashinginsteadofmonitoringtherawwaterboiledintheprojectsitua7on.

Bb,y,wt=(1-Cj)*Np,y,wt*Wb,y*(Qp,y+Qp,rawboil,y)(1)

Where:

HH-WT


Cj 9.32% percentageExpressedasapercentage,thisisthepor7onofusersoftheprojecttechnologyjwhointhebaselinewerealreadyconsumingsafewaterwithoutboilingit

Np,y,wt 54,981,357 persons/day/technologyNumberofpersonconsumingwatersuppliedbyprojectscenariopertechnologyperday

Wb,y,unimproved 0.00072 tonswood/literExis7ngbiomassstoveperformanceinbaselineforwatertreatmentunitIinyearyinclusterc

Qp,y 3.46 Litres/person/dayQuan7tyofsafewaterinlitersconsumedintheprojectscenariopandsuppliedbyprojecttechnologyperpersonperday.

Qp,rawboil,y NA liters/person/day Quan7tyofrawwaters7llboiledintheprojectscenario

HH-DUAL


Cj 9.17% percentageExpressedasapercentage,thisisthepor7onofusersoftheprojecttechnologyjwhointhebaselinewerealreadyconsumingsafewaterwithoutboilingit

Np,y,wt 6,952,387 persons/day/technologyNumberofpersonconsumingwatersuppliedbyprojectscenariopertechnologyperday

Wb,y,unimproved 0.00072 tonswood/literExis7ngbiomassstoveperformanceinbaselineforwatertreatmentunitIinyearyinclusterc

Qp,y 3.10 Litres/person/dayQuan7tyofsafewaterinlitersconsumedintheprojectscenariopandsuppliedbyprojecttechnologyperpersonperday.

Qp,rawboil,y NA liters/person/day Quan7tyofrawwaters7llboiledintheprojectscenario

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page56

EMISSIONREDUCTIONS

BEb,y,wt=Bb,y,wt*((fNRB,b,y,wt*EFb,fuel,CO2)+EFb,fuel,nonCO2)*NCVbfuel(3)6

PEp,y,wt=Bp,y,wt*((fNRB,p,y,wt*EFp,fuel,CO2)+EFp,fuel,nonCO2)*NCVp,fuel(4)7

Where:

DEFAULTVALUES


fnrb,b,y,wt 95.74% Percentage Non-renewablefrac7onofthewoodybiomassharvestedintheprojectcollec7onareainyeary

NCVwood 0.0156 TJ/ton Netcalorificvalueofwood(TJ/Gg)

EFb,wood,CO2 112,000 kgCO2/TJ IPCCdefaultvalueforwoodfuelCO2emissionfactor

EFb,wood,CH4 300 kgCH4/TJ CH4emissionforwoodfuel

EFb,wood,N2O 4 kgN2O/TJ N2Oemissionfactorforwoodfuel

EFp,wood,CO2 112,000 kgCO2/TJ IPCCdefaultvalueforwoodfuelCO2emissionfactor

EFp,wood,CH4 300 kgCH4/TJ CH4emissionforwoodfuel

EFp,wood,N2O 4 kgN2O/TJ N2Oemissionfactorforwoodfuel

GWPCO2 1 kgCO2/kgCO2 Globalwarmingpoten7alofCO2

GWPCH4 21 kgCO2/kgCH4 Globalwarmingpoten7alofCH4

GWPN2O 310 kgCO2/kgN2O Globalwarmingpoten7alofN20

6NotetoconvertEFEFb,fuel,nonCO2toCO2equivalentsthefollowingformulaisused:EFb,fuel,nonCO2=(EFb,wood,CH4*GWPCH4)+(EFb,wood,N2O*GWPN2O)7NotetoconvertEFEFp,fuel,nonCO2toCO2equivalentsthefollowingformulaisused:EFp,fuel,nonCO2=(EFp,wood,CH4*GWPCH4)+(EFp,wood,N2O*GWPN2O)

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page57

HH-WT


Bb,y,wt 124,203.99 TonnesQuan7tyoffuelconsumedinbaselinescenariobduringyearyintonnes

Bp,y,wt 0.00 TonnesQuan7tyoffuelconsumedinprojectscenariobduringyearyintonnes

HH-DUAL


Bb,y,wt 14,094.75 TonnesQuan7tyoffuelconsumedinbaselinescenariobduringyearyintonnes

Bp,y,wt 0.00 TonnesQuan7tyoffuelconsumedinprojectscenariobduringyearyintonnes

OverallWaterFilterGHGreduc7onsarecalculatedasfollows:

ERy,hh-wt=(ΣBEb,y,wt–ΣPEp,y,wt)*Up,y,wt-ΣLEp,y,wt(5)

Where:

BEb,y,wtandPEp,y,wtarecalculatedfromtheparametersaboveand:

HH-WT


Up,y,wt 96.17% Percentage Usagerateinprojectscenariop,fortechnologywt,duringyeary

LEp,y,wt 0 tCO2e/yr Leakageforprojectscenariop,technologywt,inyeary

HH-DUAL


Up,y,wt 99.26% Percentage Usagerateinprojectscenariop,fortechnologywt,duringyeary

LEp,y,wt 0 tCO2e/yr Leakageforprojectscenariop,technologywt,inyeary

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page58

SUMMARYSALES&DISTRIBUTIONUSEDFORERCALCULATIONS

ThetotalsalesonwhichERCalculationsarebasedforeachtechnologyarepresentedbelowbyDepartment.Cumulativesalesincludeallsalesofstovesfromtheinceptionoftheprogramtodateaswellasallfilters2yearsofageandyounger.ERCalculationsstartwiththesegrosssalesfiguresandapplythemyriadofparametersderivedfrommonitoringandpresentedaboveinordertoarriveatafinalVERvolumeforissuance.

Thetablebelowindicatescumula7vesalesbydepartmentandProjectScenario.

DEPARTMENT HH-DUAL HH-WT DEPARTMENT HH-DUAL HH-WT

AltaVerapaz 1,211 505 ElProgresso 0 0BajaVerapaz 1,203 4,008 Quetzaltenango 0 2,270Chimaltenango 0 4,341 Quiche 0 3,975Chiquimula 0 1,349 Retalhuleu 0 288Escuintla 8 7,660 Sacatepequez 20 2,744Guatemala 111 4,458 SanMarcos 1,405 1,944Huehuetenango 3 1,820 SantaRosa 0 938Izabal 2 510 Solola 5 2,912Jalapa 0 349 Suchitepequez 0 878Jutiapa 0 696 Totonicapan 0 1,251Peten 0 393 Zacapa 0 698TOTAL 3,968 43,987

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page59

TOTALCALCULATEDERs:MONITORINGPERIOD3

XcelDocumentERCalculaConsGS1321Iss3[DATE]containsallEmissionsReduc7ons(ER)calcula7onsforeachofthetechnologiesdescribedinthisreport.TherearetwotabsforeachProjectScenario:

1. “ProjectScenario”EREqs.

a. Providescalcula7onoftheERsbasedequa7onslistedaboveandprojectmonitoringconductedtodateanddefaultvalues(aslistedintheParameterboxesinthisreport).

b. FollowsERequa7onsaslistedintheTPDDTECMethodology.

2. “ProjectScenario”Calcs.

a. Technologydaysaccruedduringthismonitoringperiodarecalculatedusingtotalsalesdatabase.

b. Stockturnoverrateorinventorylagdaysareaccountedfor(whereapplicable)bythecalcula7onofaninventorylagdate(salesdate+inventorylagdays)whichisusedtodeterminethetechnologyyearsaccruedduringthisMP.TheanalysisusedtodeterminethenumberofinventorylagdaysappliedtoeachtechnologyiscontainedwithintheCalcstab.

ThetablesbelowshowtotalCO2eemissionsreduc7onsachievedbytheProjectduringtheMonitoringPeriodbyproducttypeandbyprojectscenario,eachwithVintagebreakdowns.

CumulativeERsbyProjectScenario&Vintage 2015 2016

hh-dual 76,685 tCO2e 56,726 18,959

hh-wt 213,857 tCO2e 160,478 53,379

Total 289,542 tCO2e 217,205 72,338

EmissionreductionsorGHGremovalsbysinks(tCO2e)

HH-WT HH-DUAL

Actualvaluesachievedduringthismonitoringperiod 217,205 72,338

ValuesestimatedinexantecalculationofregisteredPDD 1,839,095 210,444

DOCREV16/08/16.1

Page60

LISTOFSUPPORTINGDOCUMENTSPROVIDEDWITHTHISREPORT

• ERCalcula7onsGS1321Iss3[DATE].xlsx

• MS_US_WCFT_KPT_WQTDataGS1321Iss3[DATE].xlsx

• ReferenceDocs[Folder]

o GuatemalaPDDV5_2013-09-20.pdf

o GS1321_3-WeekReview_IIMP_RoundII_23092015.pdf

o Paradigm_GS1321_FVR28Sep1015_signed.pdf

o Ecofiltro_Opera7ons_Manual_V3_20150518.pdf

o SocorroMaya_Opera7ons_Manual20150518.pdf

o SalesData[Folder]

o FARDocumenta7on[Folder]

o MeterCalibra7on[Folder]

o WQTLabReports[Folder]

o Con7nuousGSMonitoringConcept.docx

o Con7nuousMonitoringApproval.pdf

o Annex5GS1321Iss1KPTDatav3.xlsx

o Eko-StoveManual.pdf

o MonitoringReportGS1321Iss220150928FIN

o NRBLeakageAnalysisGS1321Iss3_20160429.xlsx

o PhotosofHHTraining[Folder]

GS 1321 ISSUANCE 3 COMPREHENSIVE MONITORING REPORT

Documents