grscmpaper-12647247310401-phpapp01

8/8/2019 grscmpaper-12647247310401-phpapp01

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/grscmpaper-12647247310401-phpapp01 1/12

To: Reader

From: Justine Forrest

Re: Research Paper

Date: April 3, 2009

I attach here my research paper on the topic of Green Supply Chain Management.

Green Supply Chain Management particularly interests me because my grandmother works at

Alcon Laboratories in the Supply Chain Management division, and this research gives me a

chance to explore what concerns her daily work life. Also, the “green movement” is a topic and a

trend on the forefront of everyone’s thoughts. The convergence of these two topics that may

seem lacking any similar attributes makes me curious to see how “Going Green” may benefit

Supply Chain Management. Ever growing concern about the environment can lead consumers to

judge companies based on how they affect the environment, making Green Supply Chain

Management essential to businesses, and by making the Supply Chain Green, a company take

steps to minimize environmental impacts of its operations.

I hope this paper interests you as much as I have enjoyed researching Green Supply Chain

Management.

Attachments:Abstract

Research Paper with Appendices

References Page

Forrest 1



Abstract

This paper explores the concept of Green Supply Chain Management (GrSCM). I first explain

what Supply Chain Management (SCM) and Green means, and then explain how these twoconcepts work together and produce the business concept Green Supply Chain Management.

GrSCM may become a goal of SCM and can be looked at in three different sectors: organization,

process, and technology. To know the results your greening produces, you must first gather data

assessing your current environmental impact, select environmental performance indicators

relative to your company’s goals, and then check how well your company achieves its goals.

Forrest 2



Green Supply Chain Management

Introduction

I write this paper to convey to businesses that they should “green” their Supply Chain. This topic

interests me because my grandmother works in Supply Chain Management of Alcon

Laboratories, and this paper gives me an excuse to research what big picture decisions she must

manage every day. I never thought her job might consist of thinking about the environmental

impact her company makes in daily operations. I chose this topic because I believe the world’s

focus on environmentalism increasingly impacts operations of businesses in every department

and every sector of the economy, whether it is to minimize paper use or make a completely

recyclable product.

This paper will first define my parameters, introducing Supply Chain Management and

Environmentalism. Next, I will consolidate the two topics into Green Supply Chain Management

and focus on how companies can Go Green with its Supply Chain, relaying the antecedents, the

concept, and the outcomes. Finally, I will apply my concept to Alcon Laboratories and relate

how well the company performed when it applied the concept to itself.

Supply Chain Management

Supply Chain Management (SCM) is an essential part of every business. The supply chain of a

company is its network consisting of all the companies’ suppliers, itself, and its customers.Without a successful SCM system, no matter how small a company might seem, a business

cannot successfully operate.

Different definitions of SCM exist. The definition given in “Evolution of Supply Chain

Management” by Gunjan Soni and Rambadu Kodali:

“The systematic strategic coordination of the traditional business functions and

the tactics across these business functions within a particular company and across

businesses within the supply chain, for the purposes of improving the long-term

performance of the individual companies and the supply chain as a whole” (2008, p. 1).

Bozarth Handfield defines SCM as the “active management of supply chain activities and

relationships in order to maximize customer value and achieve a sustainable competitive

advantage” (Soni, 2008, p. 19). Though different definitions exist, they generally center around

the same principles: efficiency and sustainability.

Forrest 3



The supply chain encompasses every aspect of a business’s operations. It begins with raw

materials, continues through production phases, creating finished goods, through distribution,

and finally to the end consumer (Boone, 2009, p. 434). Appendix A shows SCM’s importance

by graphically organizing how it encompasses the daily operations of a business. As you can see,

SCM includes every portion relevant to a company’s operations. General benefits a successful

SCM presents a company are:

• Less uncertainty, errors, delays and losses along the supply chain

• Lower costs by improving efficiency and production

• Low stock size

• Better information sharing and highlighting (Soni, 2008, p. 1-2)

These contributions give a company another asset: competitive advantage. If a Company A’s

SCM operates more efficiently than another Company B’s SCM, then Company A can produce

its product at a lower cost and sell at a lower price.

Supply Chain Management is constantly seeking ways to improve itself, to become more

efficient and gain the competitive advantage. I believe a company without a SCM system will

flounder at best.

The Green Movement

The Green Movement is a trendy spin on Environmentalism. Most commonly today, anything

that reduces harmful impacts on the environment finds itself labeled “Green.” Environmentalismis a social movement that advocates sustainable management of resources and the protection and

restoration of our natural environment. As the world focuses on “Going Green” companies are

looked upon to reduce their environmental impact, or footprints. Much legislation passes to

increase our planets sustainability.

Environmentalism in Businesses Today

Businesses must begin thinking green today to retain future competitiveness. “There is now a

widespread acknowledgement among business leaders that green will be a core requirement for

doing business in the future (Smith, 2007, p.52).” Businesses must adapt to customer

preferences. As people in the world become more concerned with environmentalism, businesses

must conform to get ahead.

The Convergence of SCM and Environmentalism

Environmentalism and Supply Chain Management hold the same high-level objectives. Two

principles associated with both concepts are efficiency and sustainability. These two concepts

Forrest 4



complement each other with their goals. A company beginning a Green Supply Chain

Management system must look at both the goals of environmentalism and SCM in order to

determine and institute initiatives.

Green Supply Chain Management

Increased public concern with environmental impacts gives reason enough to contemplate going

green in the supply chain. The public contains a company’s customers. If customers see a

company not trying to implement green standards, they might switch their buying elsewhere.

This section outlines the antecedents of my concept, the concept, how to apply the concept, and

the outcomes when applied. See Appendix B for the conceptual model.

Antecedents of GrSCM: What comes first?

The main antecedents of Green Supply Chain Management are the current existence of a Supply

Chain Management System, environmental knowledge, and what environmentalism means to

your company. A company cannot develop its SCM system into a Green SCM system without an

existing SCM system. You cannot know where to begin your environmental transition without

knowing the goals of environmentalism and what extent your company tolerates resource use to

achieve those goals. Both of these must exist to have a Green Supply Chain Management

System.

Two other antecedents to GrSCM are governmental and top-management support of an

environmentalist attitude. Due to the long-term time, effort, and resource commitment of

GrSCM, and the way in which it can cause conflicting agendas, top-level management

commitment must exist (Srikanta, 2009, p.22). A company beginning or continuing a GrSCM

system needs top-level management support, throughout the process, otherwise the GrSCM

system will not survive.

As the world begins focusing on environmentalism, government regulations become a key

motivation for companies Voluntary environmental initiatives (VEIs) are one way a government

may choose to support environmentalism. A company can choose to adhere to a VEI’s

requirements, thought the requirements are not mandatory. (Christmann, 2002, p.121).

Government support for environmentalism warrants companies’ close consideration of GrSCM.

Concept: Green Supply Chain Management

Green Supply Chain Management (GrSCM) makes sense, and I will tell you why. Samir

Srivastava, who performed a literature review of available documents pertaining to GrSCM,

defines GrSCM as:

“Integrating environmental thinking into supply-chain management, including

product design, material sourcing and selection, manufacturing processes,

Forrest 5



delivery of the final product to the consumers as well as end-of-life management

of the product after its useful life” (2007, p. 2-3)

This broad definition complements the already broad responsibility of Supply Chain

Management and even adds another responsibility to a company: the product’s recyclability, also

known as reverse logistics. Appendix C is Srivastava’s model of the responsibilities of GrSCM.As you can see, there are many different issues a company can look at when first beginning the

greening process.

Big Picture View

Companies need a good plan because starting a GrSCM system requires work. You must

determine the bigger picture of your company’s SCM goals. “Greening becomes another goal—

at times aligned and at times in conflict—with the more traditional supply chain goals of

building efficiency, continuous improvement, and profitability (Tohamy, 2009, p.10). Before

beginning any initiative, determine how it fits in the bigger picture of the green supply chainstrategy (Tohamy, 2009, p.11). An initiative implemented without regard to the bigger picture

detrimentally affects a company’s other supply chain operations. Changing products by making

them recyclable may cause problems with other company goals, like profitability. Sometimes an

initiative is too expensive to be realistic for a company.

Current Impact and Performance Standards

To know the results your greening produces, you must first gather data assessing your current

environmental impact, select environmental performance indicators (EPIs) relative to your

company’s goals, and then check how well your company achieves its goals.

Many countries already have directives that a company can or must comply. Without compliance

a company cannot participate in that country’s market. VEIs are another way governments help

companies self-regulate. VEIs become a great mechanism companies may use to balance their

interests with the broader public interest (Christmann, 2002, p. 122). VEIs enable companies to

initiate a GrSCM in its current SCM system by giving companies defined criteria for operation.

Implement Initiatives

Greening some supply chain processes may require more work than others. Some easy first ideas

for greening your company’s supply chain are:

• “Reduce energy consumption through plant redesign and machine preventative

maintenance.

• Measure and minimize [your] transportation carbon footprint in the distribution network.

• Work with [your] suppliers to minimize excess packaging…

Forrest 6



• Incorporate product reuse and recycling into [your] product development initiatives

(Tohamy, 2009, p.10).”

Measuring and minimizing transportation is probably one of the most apparent first steps a

company can implement. Reducing transportation costs makes less impact on the environment

from transportation vehicles along with saving gasoline, which reduces cost and the draining of our fossil fuel resources. Managing transportation better not only realizes goals of SCM, but also

those of environmentalism.

Measure Environmental Impact of New Initiatives

Many different initiatives a company can take to become green exist. The company must be

careful that the initiatives it takes do not negatively affect other performances of the company.

As long as the company takes steps guarding against negative impacts on performance in other

sectors, good outcomes will follow.

Outcomes of Implementing GrSCM

Many different outcomes may arise from implementing a Green Supply Chain Management

system. A company may find difficulty spelling out exactly every little minute detail that occurs.

As long as a careful watch is kept on the costs versus the perceived benefits, GrSCM will

produce positive outcomes such as:

• More efficient resource use

• Increased sustainability

• Customer satisfaction

• Competitive advantage

• Cost advantage

Green Supply Chain Management lends itself as a concept and a goal. You either begin

environmentally friendly Supply Chain Management system, or you do not. You can achieve it

fully or partially. Using fewer resources, while still effectively maintaining product integrity,

enables more efficient resource use. Companies can achieve increased sustainability for

themselves as well as the environment. Exhausting fewer resources, reducing harmful

ingredients, and choosing cost effective uses of those resources improve sustainability.

Businesses cater to customers. When customers are concerned with the environment, so should

the company selling to those customers. This lends to customer satisfaction. Through GrSCM

companies may gain a competitive advantage and a cost advantage. More efficient resource use,

increased sustainability, and customer satisfaction all lead to these two things. As long as a

company keeps an eye on the big picture, the outcomes will be positive.

Responsibility to Green your SCM?

Forrest 7



The environment today constitutes as a global problem. Many experts are worried about our

futures and our responsibilities to the future. Christmann and Taylor suggest multinational

companies (MNCs) have a responsibility to help “MNCs have financial, technical, and

organizational capabilities (2002, p. 122).” These capabilities enable resource transference

towards actions combating environmental issues (2002, p. 122). Research and Development

resources used determining useful ways to green the supply chain potentially helps the local area

as well as the world. If a company holds the means, it should make itself more efficient and

sustainable, even if it means helping the rest of the world.

Businesses have a social responsibility. Kurtz says social responsibility “includes contributing

resources to the community, preserving the natural environment (2009, p. 24).” Businesses have

a dual responsibility; it must be profitable, while also helping the community. This social

responsibility concept gives companies reason to begin GrSCM initiatives.

Application of GrSCM to Company

I chose to examine Green Supply Chain Management and how well Alcon Laboratories did

applying this concept to their business organization and procedures. Alcon Laboratories

develops, manufactures, and distributes eye care products within its Surgical, Pharmaceutical,

and Consumer Vision Care divisions. I’m sure you have seen their products on the shelves of

Wal-Mart and other stores. At Alcon, their Green Supply Chain Management system is known as

ASCEM, or Alcon Supply Chain Environmental Management. Alcon applied GrSCM several

ways. I derived the following information form Alcon’s ASCEM pamphlet.

How Alcon Applies GrSCM Concept

Alcon Supply Chain Environmental Management encompasses several key factors. Its mission

assures “regulatory compliance by extending the commitment towards Corporate Environmental

Responsibility (ASCEM Pamphlet),” and focuses particularly on product stewardship and data

management, supplier conformance, and supply chain environmental sustainability. Currently

issues ASCEM pursue include:

• EU’s REACH Regulations (Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization Chemical

substances)

• EU’s Battery Directive

• EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive

• EU’s Packaging Essential Requirements

• And several others.

Forrest 8



These initiatives accomplish several objectives. The EU’s REACH Regulations apply to

manufacturers and importers with substances over one ton a year. REACH ensures that

potentially harmful substances used are controlled. The EU’s Battery Directive prohibits the placing batteries and accumulators that contain mercury or cadmium above a certain point. These

two initiatives create a barrier for harmful materials to flood the world.

Another initiative, the Packaging Waste Directive and Essential Requirements, minimizes the

creation of packaging waste materials along with promoting energy recovery, re-use and

recycling packaging. Compliance with this EU Directive includes:

• Packaging using the minimum weight/volume allowing for its functionality, safety,

hygiene, and customer satisfaction.

• Concentration of lead, mercury and other materials under a specified amount

• Packaging must either meet one of the following recovery methods: Energy Recovery,

Recycling, or Composing

The Packaging Waste Directive and Essential Requirements complements one initiative I previously stated as a concept of GrSCM. Alcon goes up and above minimal compliance. They

look at other countries and comply with their directives as well as looking at buyer specificinitiatives like Wal-Mart’s Score Card.

How Did Alcon Do?

Obviously Alcon Laboratories believes that a Green Supply Chain Management system benefits

the company as well as the supply chain, otherwise they wouldn’t be so heavily involved inregulation compliance and other directive compliances. Alcon knows the current environmental

impact of their products. Governments and top-level management have chosen performance

standards, such as the level of mercury and cadmium in batteries. Alcon has implementedinitiatives, like the EU’s REACH directive. They measure new initiatives environmental impacts.

Alcon performs each step of my concept and performs it well.

Conclusion- Go GreenSCM!

Environmentalism and Supply Chain Management work together well. Supply Chain

Management constantly tries to improve itself, and going green accomplishes that aim.

Environmentalism and Supply Chain Management both contain ambition for long term

performance. Both also aim to achieve sustainability. With a world focusing on ways to better

itself, now and long-term, I believe that Environmentalism and Supply Chain Management gohand-in-hand, creating a need for a Green Supply Chain Management system in every company.

Initiatives well planned and thought out with the proper management support can greatly impact

the sustainability of a company, a goal every company holds. I advise to start out small and

increase initiatives as the ability becomes efficient because every company differs. Every little

step counts.

Forrest 9



Appendices

Appendix A:

(Soni, 2008, p. 3)

Appendix B: Conceptual

Model

Forrest 10

Antecedents

Existence of Supply Chain

Management SystemKnowledge of “Green” and

what it means to your

companyTop-level Management

commitment.

Government Support

Concept

Know Big Picture

Determine current

environemental impactChoose performance

standards

Implement Initiatives

Measure environmentalimpact of new initiatives

Outcomes

Better use of resources

Increased Sustainability

Customer Satisfaction

Competitive Advantage

Cost Advantage



Appendix C:

(Srivastava, 2007, p. 57)

Forrest 11



Works Cited

Alcon Supply Chain Environmental Management (ASCEM) pamphlet

Christmann, P., Taylor, G. (2002) “Globalization and the environment: Strategies for

international voluntary environmental initiatives.” Academy of Management

Executive. Vol. 16 (Issue 3), p121-135, 15p.

Kurtz, D.L. (2009). Contemporary Business. United States: South-Western Cengage

Learning.

Smith, J. W. (2007). “Green is Not an Attitude.” Marketing Management. Vol. 16

(Issue 5), p52, 1p.

Soni, G., Kodali, R. (2008). “Evolution of Supply Chain Management: Developments

in Academia and Industry.” ICFAI Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol.5 (Issue 4), p7-40, 34p.

Srikanta, R. (2009). “Antecedents and Drivers for Green Supply Chain Management

Implementation in the Manufacturing Environment.” ICFAI Journal of Supply

Chain Management. Vol. 6 (Issue 1), p20-35, 16p

Srivastava, S. K. (2007). “Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art

Literature Review.” International Journal of Management Reviews. Vol. 9

(Issue 1), p53-80, 28p.

Tohamy, N. (2009). “Green Journey Needs a Roadmap.” Supply Chain Management

Review. Vol. 13 (Issue 1), p10-11, 2p.

Forrest 12

grscmpaper-12647247310401-phpapp01

Documents