Top Banner
Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, [email protected] Meeting Date: 2012-10-25 Agenda Item: 7 “Contributions” BENEFITS OF ONEM2M TECHNOLOGIES
37
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Group Name: oneM2M WG1 RequirementsSource: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR,

[email protected] Meeting Date: 2012-10-25Agenda Item: 7 “Contributions”

BENEFITS OF ONEM2M TECHNOLOGIES

Page 2: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Scope

2

• Audience: Vertical industry segment stakeholders• Purpose: Trigger feedback from [the Audience]

on oneM2M requirements• Duration: 1 hr presentation (including questions,

but not including generating feedback) • Content: – Highlights potential benefits of oneM2M

communication technology to [the Audience]– Provides avenue for feedback on requirements

• Note: current title of presentation is a placeholder only

Page 3: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Outline

• Motivators: – Audience Priorities oneM2M intends to address

• Description of oneM2M Technology– Simple description– Implicit Benefits of oneM2M standardization

effort• oneM2M Capabilities and Directed Benefits• Conclusion• Feedback Template

3

Page 4: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Current state of affairs

4

• Fragmented market• Niche products and solutions• Custom design, custom engineering• Various industry segments reproducing effort

in order to solve their own problems• Etc.

NOTE: This slide should provide a pre-frame for the rest of the discussion. Describe what oneM2M participants see in the marketplace. This then leads to motivators. [CALL FOR VOLUNTEER(S) TO COMPLETE!]

Page 5: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Motivators• [Audience] priorities oneM2M aims to address– Improved Functionality-Price-Quality (FPQ)

tradeoffs• Sourcing, developing and integrating Components• “Price” CAPEX, OPEX and Time-to-market [1]

– Enhanced Scalability – Greater Choice• Range of providers for sourcing, developing and

integrating Components– Greater Opportunities• E.g. ability to share data and other resources by

partnering with other stakeholders.

5

Editor: Francois Ennesser had comments on “Choice”. Further discussion is required.

Page 6: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

DESCRIPTION OF ONEM2M TECHNOLOGY

One sentence description of oneM2M technologyEasy-to-digest description of oneM2M technology

6

Page 7: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

One sentence description

oneM2M aims to enable improved Functionality-Price-Quality tradeoffs of future end-to-end M2M solutions, whilst providing scalability, greater choices and opportunities for [the Audience] by standardizing a set of valuable, Generic M2M-communication Capabilities that incorporate the necessary interactions with Underlying Networks.

7

Page 8: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Easy-to-digest description of oneM2M

• Figure & text showing relationship between– Applications– oneM2M Technology– Underlying Networks

• Should not imply an architecture

8

Page 9: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Underlying Networks

Example only

9

M2M App M2M App

oneM2M Capabilities

Page 10: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Summary of Benefits

1. Implicit benefits– Benefits of standardizing generic

capabilities– Benefits of incorporating interactions

with underlying networks2. Directed benefits– Benefits of valuable capabilities directly

addressing the Motivators

10

Page 11: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Benefits of Standardizing Generic Capabilities

11

Improved FPQ Tradeoffs

Enhanced Scalability

Greater Choice

Greater Opportunities

Specifications might be used as the basis for certifying #

interoperability & quality

Specifications might be used as the basis for certifying #

interoperability & quality

Interoperable Components from multiple providers Interoperable Components from multiple providers

Economies of scaleEconomies of scale

Extensive Application Development Ecosystem

Extensive Application Development Ecosystem

# Note: at the time of writing, oneM2M has not decided what role (if any) oneM2M might play in certification. It is possible that one or more other groups may certify against part or all of the oneM2M specifications.

Editor: “Certifying” may need further discussion. See email from Eanny Bae

Page 12: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Benefits of Incorporating Interactions with Underlying Networks

12

Wider range of options for the [Audience] in selecting an underlying network

Wider range of options for the [Audience] in selecting an underlying network

Application developers can ignore details of usage of underlying network (simplifying development) while benefiting from integrated efficiency, reliability & scalability of communications

Application developers can ignore details of usage of underlying network (simplifying development) while benefiting from integrated efficiency, reliability & scalability of communications

Improved FPQ Tradeoffs

Enhanced Scalability

Greater Choice

Greater Opportunities

Editor: Should “Benefiting from integrated efficient, reliability& scalability” be a separate item?

Page 13: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

ONEM2M CAPABILITIES & DIRECTED BENEFITS

oneM2M Capabilities & Their Benefits

13

Page 14: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Goal of this document

• Previous Section: – Implicit Benefits independent of the capabilities that

oneM2M chooses to support• This section:– Capabilities & their features being considered– Directed benefits of these

capabilities/features/requirements • Objective of document– oneM2M wants feedback on what it is considering,

to help prioritize its work

14

Page 15: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Sharing Capability

15

Sharing content between M2M Apps

Control via Standardized Metadata

Sharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Content Origin Metadata

Other …

Content Delivery Guidance

Notification

Communication Control

Searchable tags

Page 16: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Content-Aware Processing

16

Data-Type-Aware Procedure Language

Sharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Data-Type-Aware Description Language

Data-Type-Aware Processing

Semantics-Aware Processing Semantics-Aware

Procedure Language

Semantics-Aware Description Language

Filtering/Searching

Aggregating content

Simple Arithmetic Operations (sum, mean, max, min)

Communication Control

Editor: : I would appreciate the help of a semantics/ content-aware processing expert(s) /advocate(s) to improve this page and provide notes. Any volunteers?

Page 17: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Security Framework and Access Control

17

oneM2M-to-oneM2M class

App-to-oneM2M classSharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Security Framework Classes

Authentication Framework

Passphrase

High-Entropy Key

Certificate

Static root of trust

Dynamic root of trust

App-to-App class

IdentityStatic Identity

Dynamic Identity

Access Control

Communication Control

Editor: Does this go into too much detail?

Editor: Do we need to go into further detail on access control?I think not.

Page 18: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Remote Device Management

18

Communication Control

Sharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Reporting Data from Devices

Controlling Data on Devices

Log Reports

Fault Reports

Performance Reports

Reporting Configuration Settings

Updating ConfigurationsManaging Software & Firmware

Adding new Software (E.g. Applications)Software/Firmware updates

Removing Software

Maintenance Reporting

Provisioning

Editor: : I would appreciate the help of a remote device management expert(s) /advocate(s) to improve this page and provide notes. Any volunteers?

Page 19: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Communication Control

19

Interface to M2M-specific features of the underlying network

Communication Control

Sharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Network selection & scheduling

Content Delivery Guidance

Delivery confirmation /Progress reporting

Robustness in presence of lossy links

Communication Scalability Features

Page 20: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Directed Benefits

20

Communication Control Sharing

Security Framework and Access ControlRemote Device Management

Content-Aware Processing

Improved FPQ Tradeoffs

Enhanced Scalability

Greater Choice

Greater Opportunities

Ability to share data & assets with partners

Ability to share data & assets with partners

Reduced traffic

volume

Reduced traffic

volume

More value extracted from

underlying network

More value extracted from

underlying network

Improved end-product

quality

Improved end-product

quality

Better power consumptionBetter power consumption

Reduced field agent call-outs

Reduced field agent call-outs

Page 21: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Conclusion

• Summary– Why? FPQ tradeoff, scalability, choice, quality– How? Standardizing valuable generic M2M

capabilities integrated with underlying networks– Outline: Potential capabilities and features

• What do we want from you?– Feedback on these potential capabilities &

features in order to help oneM2M prioritize its work

21

Page 22: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

FEEDBACK TEMPLATEProvide as mechanism for feedback to oneM2M

22

Page 23: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Feedback on MotivatorsMotivator Priority

(0=Low, 10 = Critical)Comments

(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

Improved Functionality, Price, Quality Tradeoffs

Enhanced Scalability

Greater Choice

Greater Opportunity

23

Page 24: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Feedback on Sharing (1)

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

Field-Backend Sharing

Field-Field Sharing

Backend-Backend Sharing

Sharing with multiple Apps

Sharing with partners

Notification

24

Page 25: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Feedback on Sharing (2)Feature Priority

(0=Low, 10 = Critical)Comments

(E.g. clarification audience requirements)<Hints provided in angle brackets – feel

free to delete hints2014 2015+

Content Origin

Content Delivery Guidance

<Note: Discussed further under “Communication Control”>

Searchable tags

Vertical-specific metadata

<what data types would be helpful to support>

Proprietary metadata <what data types would be helpful to support>

Using metadata <How would you like to use metadata?>

Metadata-aware processing

<What metadata-aware processing would you value. See examples below>

25

Page 26: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Feedback on Content-Aware Processing

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

26

Page 27: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Feedback on Content-Aware Processing

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

27

Page 28: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Feedback on Security Framework and Access Control

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

28

Page 29: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Feedback on Remote Energy Management

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

29

Page 30: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Feedback on Communication Control

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

30

Page 31: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

APPENDICES

TerminologyReferences

31

Page 32: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

TerminologyName Description

M2M Application (App) TBD

App-to-App

Capability TBD

Component Hardware, software and services comprising an M2M solution

Content Data produced or consumed by Applications

Content-Aware Aware of the data model and/or semantics of Content

Generic Common to two or more applications or vertical segments

Underlying networks Access networks, core networks, busses and other technology assisting in data transport

32

Page 34: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

OLD SLIDES – DELETE BEFORE PUBLICATION

Saved here in case they are useful in future.

34

Page 35: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Figure by Farooq Bari, AT&T

35

Page 36: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Figure by Tim Carey, ALU

36

Page 37: Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR, phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com.

Summary of CapabilitiesCapability Features Sharing Sharing of content between M2M Applications.

Support for sharing with partners. Content is opaque. Standardized metadata provides control.

Possible processing of visible data includes: filtering; aggregating; simple arithmetic ops (average, sum, etc.)

Content-Aware Processing

Sharing Capability features plus processing with varying degree of “understanding” of Content data elements: e.g. data type, data value and/or semantics.

Security Framework & Access Control

Provisioning, access control, authentication and security mechanisms for protecting oneM2M capabilities. Support for enabling App-to-App security.

Remote Device Management

Provisioning. Remote reporting from Device (e.g. for maintenance) and remote configuring (e.g. settings, software and firmware management).

Communication Efficiency & Reliability

Selecting and establishing connectivity on an underlying network. Scheduling communication. Delivery confirmation/progress reporting. Robustness in the presence of lossy links. Broadcast/multicast support.

37

NOTE: Initial text to explain partitioning of features.