Group 3 Presentation

1

ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STUDIO: AIR

SEMESTER 1 / 2014EMILY LUCCHESI 585234

NEHA NAGARKAR 539362ANDREEA ONOFREIASA 588039

2

INFLUENCESA STARTING POINT FOR DEVELOPMENT

(LEFT) REVERSE ENGINEERED ‘KLUPA 1000CM’ BENCH

(BOTTOM) STRIPS PRECEDENT ‘KLUPA 1000CM’

ENERGY SYSTEM - Hydroelectricity; Water Vortex.

MATERIAL SYSTEM - Strips & Folding, Klupa 1000cm.

COMPUTATIONAL PRECEDENTS - Seroussi Pavilion, Reverse Engineered Klupa 1000cm.

3

(BOTTOM - LEFT) CASE STUDY 1: SEROUSSI PAVILION

(BOTTOM - RIGHT) ENERGY GENERATION TECHNIQUE - HYDROELECTRICITY: WATER VORTEX

(BACK) WATER CURRENT DIAGRAM

4

EXTRUSIONS OF FORM

POLY-ARC BETWEEN EDGE POINTS

LOFT FUNCTIONS ADDING/EXTENDING FORM MESH/VORONOI

EDGE POINTS LISTS SHIFTED BETWEEN SUPERIMPOSED TOWERSLINES FIT BETWEEN SHIFTED LIST

LINES FIT BETWEEN EDGE POINTS/ LOFT OPTIONS

METABALL/KALIEDOSCOPE ORIENTATION

MATRIX

A

B

C

D

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

DEVELOPING AN ALGORITHM

5

MESH/VORONOI

FIG 1 (LEFT). ELECTROMAGNETIC SPIN FORCE ADDED TO DEFINITION

FIG 2 (BOTTOM). SUPERIMPOSED DEFINITION LOFTED BETWEEN EDGE POINTS

Developing the Klupa bench further and discovering design, proved a difficult task as we were limited to the cylindrical shape that the bench would form. This shape was ideal for our water vortices approach however became problematic when designing something to occupy the site.

Because of the size of the site we found that this was a very small scaled approach to cover the entirety of the site (in which we intended to do). As a consequence we looked back at our previous matrix for the Seroussi Pavilion and incorporated the technique of their computational approach using Spin Forces. This resulted in a more successful design to further develop, which not only occupies a larger area but mimics the movement of water flowing through vortices supporting the original concept.

DEVELOPING AN ALGORITHM

6

CHOSEN ITERATIONS

Curved Formation; Allows for maximum performance of Water Vortex generation.

Ability for Interaction; Between the site, design and audience.

Interesting Characteristic; The optimal use of Computational Design techniques that results in a complexity of form that is aesthetically intriguing.

Expression of Water; This acts as the concept of the overall design to conjoin the relationship between the technology system and the design.

SELECTION CRITERIA

7

CHOSEN ITERATIONS

ADDITITONAL TO CRITERIA

As a concept began to form additional requirements for the design increased the criteria for choosing an iteration.

Use of Space; Maximal use of the site allows for more generation systems to be placed creating more energy.

8

GENERATING A CONCEPTDEVELOPMENT OF ITERATIONS TO FULFILL A GOAL

Function; Interactive maze that generates enegry sustainably.

Form; Organic and Curvilinear in order to mimic the movement of water.

Considerations;

Circulation of Water,

Circulation of Public,

Placement of Energy Sytems,

Bringing water to Energy Systems,

Materiality,

Structure.

9

10

PROTOTYPES: STRUCTURETRANSPARENCY

11

TECTONICS

12

PROTOTYPES: WATER FLOWGRAVITATIONAL

2 degree angle

5 degree angle

8 degree angle

13

14

PIPING

Slow/Low Pressure

15

Fast/High Pressure

16

GUIDING WATER ONTO THE SITE

This Page(TOP) Ends Curved Inward

Next Page(TOP) Spread Apart

(BOTTOM) Elongated

17

18

HITTING FORMS (TOP) Curved (BOTTOM) Squared

Left(TOP) Piping Walls, Perspective View

(BOTTOM) Piping Walls, Top View

Right(TOP) Waflle Wall, Perspective

(MIDDLE) Waffle Wall , Front View(BOTTOM) Voronoi Wall, Front View

19

PROTOTYPES: DIGITALWALL CONSTRCUTION

Left(TOP) Piping Walls, Perspective View

(BOTTOM) Piping Walls, Top View

Right(TOP) Waflle Wall, Perspective

(MIDDLE) Waffle Wall , Front View(BOTTOM) Voronoi Wall, Front View