Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012. 1 A Participatory Action Research Study to Develop GNH Pedagogy, MA and PhD degree programs in Holistic Education, Baseline round report. The Americas Association for the Care of Children Naropa University Deborah Young Assistant Researcher Irina Karic and The Royal University of Bhutan Research Team June 2012
218
Embed
Gross National Happiness Participatory Action Research Study Baseline Report 2012
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
1
A Participatory Action Research Study to Develop GNH Pedagogy, MA and PhD degree programs in
Holistic Education, Baseline round report.
The Americas Association for the Care of Children
Naropa University
Deborah Young
Assistant Researcher Irina Karic
and
The Royal University of Bhutan Research Team
June 2012
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
2
A Participatory Action Research Study to Develop GNH Pedagogy, MA and PhD degree programs in
Holistic Education
Prepared by;
Dr. Deborah Young (Primary Investigator) Irina Karic (Research Associate) Brittny Madden (Research Assistant) Paro College of Education (PCE) Core Research Team: Jambay Lhamo (In-country Research Team Leader, RTL) PCE is the hub college of this research study. Hari Maya Ugyen Tshomo Karma Wangchuk Karma Nidup Tashi Dema PCE Assistant Research Team Data collection Writing Team Kezang Amina Gurung Nima Dechen Tshomo LN Chetri Lhaden Research Team members at RUB Colleges College of Natural Resources (CNR): Yonten Dorji (RTL) Sigye Dema Dr. D.B. Gurung Tshering Dorji Tshering Gyeltshen L.M. Mishra (Non-RTM) Samtse College of Education (SCE): Uygen Pem (RTL) Bojoy Hangmo Subba Pema Chopel Kezang Choden Institute of Language and Cultural Studies (ILCS): Tashi Dendup (RTL) Tenzin Jamtsho Chencho Tshering Dechen Choney Tshering Dema Jygme Namgyel Polytechnic (JNP): Shabir Rai (RTL) Namgay Dorji Sonam Keba Sherubtse College: Sangay Dorji (RTL) Sumjay Tshering Sangay Tsecho Pema Choden Dr. Rama Kanta Barman Jamyang Choda Rashmi College Science and Technology (CST): Kelzang Dorji (RTL) Basant Pradham Dechen Lhamo Pema Choezom Yowaraj Chhetri Sonam Peden Geddue College of Business Studies (GCBS): Dawala (RTL) Richen Dorji Akansha Shukla Ashutosh Shukla Dawa Pran Karma Yedzer
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
3
National Institute of Traditional Medicine (NITM): Dechen Choden (RTL) Tendril Wangdi Sherab Dorji Pema Zangmo Royal Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS): Kinga Pem (RTL) Nidup Dorji Manikala Laygoi Sangay Phuntso Passang Lhamo
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
4
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 11 Development of Gross National Happiness (GNH) in Education ............................................ 11
Study Method: Participatory Action Research Gap Analysis Study ............................................................... 11 Identified Gaps ...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 Gap Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Priority Recommendations: Short, Intermediate and Long Term .................................................................. 19 Short-‐Term Recommendations: .................................................................................................................................... 19 Intermediate Recommendations ................................................................................................................................... 20 Long Term Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................... 21
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 29 Historical Context and Background ................................................................................................. 29 The Project ................................................................................................................................................ 29 Aims of the study: .................................................................................................................................................. 30 Central Research Questions ............................................................................................................................................. 30
The Significance of the Project ......................................................................................................................... 32 Relationship of Research to Existing Literature ....................................................................................... 32 New Knowledge Expected to Result from Research ............................................................................... 32 Classroom culture: ................................................................................................................................................. 33
Sampling and Data Collection .................................................................................................. 37 Sampling .................................................................................................................................................... 37 Data collection methods ....................................................................................................................... 46 Jumpstart ................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Pretest ......................................................................................................................................................................... 50 Onsite data collection ........................................................................................................................................... 50 Collection process .................................................................................................................................................. 52
Data analysis methods .......................................................................................................................... 52 Intro: What is data analysis? ............................................................................................................................. 52 Parts of data analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 53
Findings ........................................................................................................................................... 59 Quality of Education .............................................................................................................................. 60 Experiential Learning ........................................................................................................................................... 61 Relevant education for future/life .................................................................................................................. 62 Purpose of education ............................................................................................................................................ 64 Student centered learning .................................................................................................................................. 64 Feedback needed .................................................................................................................................................... 65 Body language ......................................................................................................................................................... 66 Teacher directed and centered learning ...................................................................................................... 66 Syllabus driven ........................................................................................................................................................ 67 Large class size ........................................................................................................................................................ 68 Content oriented ..................................................................................................................................................... 68 Professional development .................................................................................................................................. 69 Experienced teachers ........................................................................................................................................... 69 Pedagogy is lacking ............................................................................................................................................... 69 Lecture: teacher directed .................................................................................................................................... 70 Holistic: physical health, social, emotional, spiritual .............................................................................. 71 Food Quality ............................................................................................................................................................. 71 Opportunities for students ................................................................................................................................. 71 Creativity ................................................................................................................................................................... 72 English language ..................................................................................................................................................... 72
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
5
Slow – boring ........................................................................................................................................................... 73 Number of teachers ............................................................................................................................................... 73 Joyful learning ......................................................................................................................................................... 74 Audibility ................................................................................................................................................................... 74 Book centered .......................................................................................................................................................... 74 Age of lecturer ......................................................................................................................................................... 75 Personal development ......................................................................................................................................... 75 Qualified teachers .................................................................................................................................................. 75 Expatriates have very little buy in to GNH .................................................................................................. 76 Teacher preparedness ......................................................................................................................................... 76 Academic pressure ................................................................................................................................................ 76 Curriculum revision .............................................................................................................................................. 77
Teaching Strategies ................................................................................................................................ 77 Interactive Strategies ........................................................................................................................................... 78 Variety ......................................................................................................................................................................... 79 More group discussions ...................................................................................................................................... 80 Visual aid: media, TV, doc, music, poetry, and art. ................................................................................... 81 Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning (VAK) ..................................................................................... 81 Scaffolding knowledge ......................................................................................................................................... 82 Fun and Games ........................................................................................................................................................ 82 Humour ...................................................................................................................................................................... 82 Individual attention .............................................................................................................................................. 83 PowerPoint enhancement .................................................................................................................................. 83 Engage students in their learning ................................................................................................................... 83 Learning theory (shy, temperaments) .......................................................................................................... 83 Story telling ............................................................................................................................................................... 83 Hands-‐on activities ................................................................................................................................................ 83 Creating intentional classroom culture ........................................................................................................ 84 Experiences, practical implementation needed ........................................................................................ 84 Hand-‐outs (ineffective) ....................................................................................................................................... 84 Language: power, mindful speech, word selection ................................................................................. 85 Brainstorming .......................................................................................................................................................... 85 Field study sites ...................................................................................................................................................... 85 Repetition: call and response, drills ............................................................................................................... 85 Strategic questioning ............................................................................................................................................ 86 Service learning ...................................................................................................................................................... 86 Independent learning ........................................................................................................................................... 86
GNH Definition ......................................................................................................................................... 86 Vague ........................................................................................................................................................................... 87 Theory / Implementation concrete ................................................................................................................ 88 Curriculum ................................................................................................................................................................ 89 Alignment with Buddhist philosophy ........................................................................................................... 91 Fulfillment of desires, materialistic ............................................................................................................... 92 Interdependence .................................................................................................................................................... 93 Awareness, being awake ..................................................................................................................................... 93 Individual / collective .......................................................................................................................................... 93 Rhetorical jargon, negative attitude .............................................................................................................. 94 GNH standards and indicators ......................................................................................................................... 94 Too restrictive ......................................................................................................................................................... 95 Fulfillment of needs .............................................................................................................................................. 95 GNH tools for assessment ................................................................................................................................... 95 Sustainability ........................................................................................................................................................... 95 Relationships, social gatherings ...................................................................................................................... 96 Rubrics / Affective domain ................................................................................................................................ 96
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
6
Critical Pedagogy/ Banking ................................................................................................................. 96 Lecture style ............................................................................................................................................................. 97 Relevant examples ................................................................................................................................................. 99 Critical Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 100 Yes / No style of questions .............................................................................................................................. 100 Probing questions ............................................................................................................................................... 101 Co-‐creation of knowledge ................................................................................................................................ 101 Training and workshops .................................................................................................................................. 102 Strategic questions, action syllabus transformation ........................................................................... 102
Mindfulness ........................................................................................................................................... 102 Mind training, mind control ........................................................................................................................... 103 Benefits .................................................................................................................................................................... 103 Integration into classroom .............................................................................................................................. 105 Misconception, vague ........................................................................................................................................ 108 Frequency ............................................................................................................................................................... 110 Personal, hands-‐ on practice .......................................................................................................................... 110 Time constraint .................................................................................................................................................... 110 Religious context / secular .............................................................................................................................. 111
Relationships ........................................................................................................................................ 120 Student teacher relationship .......................................................................................................................... 121 (Un) Friendly teachers ...................................................................................................................................... 122 Care ........................................................................................................................................................................... 123 Equality for students and lecturers ............................................................................................................. 123 Personal experiences shared ......................................................................................................................... 123 Shared positive emotions ................................................................................................................................ 124 Encouragement .................................................................................................................................................... 124 Respect .................................................................................................................................................................... 124 Greetings ................................................................................................................................................................. 124 Trust: lacking, support ...................................................................................................................................... 125 Socialization among staff and lecturers .................................................................................................... 125 Helping each other .............................................................................................................................................. 125 Need to cultivate positive peer pressure .................................................................................................. 125 Communication skills of teachers ................................................................................................................ 125
Cultural Preservation ......................................................................................................................... 126 National Dress ...................................................................................................................................................... 126 Language ................................................................................................................................................................. 127 Module and course development ................................................................................................................. 127 More Dzongkha in class .................................................................................................................................... 128
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
7
Use of folklore, story telling ............................................................................................................................ 128 Extracurricular activities ................................................................................................................................. 129
Motivation .............................................................................................................................................. 129 Professional development opportunities ................................................................................................. 129 Attitude .................................................................................................................................................................... 130 Confident / Empowered ................................................................................................................................... 131 Inspiration needed ............................................................................................................................................. 131 Career ladder (top down, nepotism) .......................................................................................................... 132 Assessment / exams .......................................................................................................................................... 132 Encouragement .................................................................................................................................................... 132 Coaching Groups .................................................................................................................................................. 133 Love of learning ................................................................................................................................................... 134 Recognition ............................................................................................................................................................ 134 Support from administration (resource distribution) ........................................................................ 134 Willingness to learn ........................................................................................................................................... 134 Attitude and ethics of lecturers – find plagiarism ................................................................................. 134 Disinterest .............................................................................................................................................................. 134 Fear ........................................................................................................................................................................... 135 No choice in attending college ....................................................................................................................... 135 Perception of work ............................................................................................................................................. 135 Praise ........................................................................................................................................................................ 135
Modernization ...................................................................................................................................... 138 Stress ........................................................................................................................................................................ 139 Contradictions to Buddhism, Buddhist culture, and GNH ................................................................. 139 Success is wealth ................................................................................................................................................. 140 Urban and rural differences, resources ..................................................................................................... 141 Technology ............................................................................................................................................................. 141 Transition to autonomy .................................................................................................................................... 141 Rural to urban opportunities ......................................................................................................................... 142 Happiness of fulfillment of desires .............................................................................................................. 143 Media literacy ....................................................................................................................................................... 143 Corruption .............................................................................................................................................................. 143
Environmental Preservation ........................................................................................................... 143 Volunteer ................................................................................................................................................................ 143 Waste Management ............................................................................................................................................ 144 Green school .......................................................................................................................................................... 145 Experiential Learning ........................................................................................................................................ 146 Needs to be embedded into all modules ................................................................................................... 146 Health Connection .............................................................................................................................................. 146
Community Partnerships .................................................................................................................. 147 Community vitality ............................................................................................................................................. 147 Parent Partnerships ........................................................................................................................................... 147
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
8
Volunteering: helping the community from the students ................................................................. 149 Elderly ...................................................................................................................................................................... 149 Guest speakers ..................................................................................................................................................... 150
Resources ............................................................................................................................................... 150 Limited ..................................................................................................................................................................... 150 Internet .................................................................................................................................................................... 150 Capacity building still needed ........................................................................................................................ 150 Equitable distribution ....................................................................................................................................... 151 Internet courses for students, more skills learning ............................................................................. 151 Soft copies, books ................................................................................................................................................ 152
Structure ................................................................................................................................................. 152 Class size ................................................................................................................................................................. 152 Class duration, too short .................................................................................................................................. 153 Accommodation ................................................................................................................................................... 153 Classroom: seating arrangement, indoors, outdoors .......................................................................... 154 Facility shortage .................................................................................................................................................. 154 Number of modules ............................................................................................................................................ 154 Location of college (remote – Sherubtse) ................................................................................................. 154 Artificial lighting .................................................................................................................................................. 155 Sacred spaces ........................................................................................................................................................ 155 Schedule of classes ............................................................................................................................................. 155
Democracy ............................................................................................................................................. 155 Freedom of expression ..................................................................................................................................... 155 Freedom with responsibility .......................................................................................................................... 155 Gender ...................................................................................................................................................................... 156 Good governance ................................................................................................................................................. 157 Shared decision making ................................................................................................................................... 157 The collective good ............................................................................................................................................. 157 Decentralization .................................................................................................................................................. 157
Management, leadership ................................................................................................................... 158 Transparency needed ........................................................................................................................................ 158 Attitude .................................................................................................................................................................... 158 Change ...................................................................................................................................................................... 158 Planning .................................................................................................................................................................. 158 Regional difference ............................................................................................................................................. 159 Teacher – student marks ................................................................................................................................. 159 Time, not sufficient to lead with quality ................................................................................................... 160
Counseling .............................................................................................................................................. 160 Support for emotional state ............................................................................................................................ 160 Alcohol abuse is concern .................................................................................................................................. 161 Perceptions of substance abuse .................................................................................................................... 161 Stress – faculty support .................................................................................................................................... 161
Time ......................................................................................................................................................... 161 Time management .............................................................................................................................................. 161 Too much to study at one time ...................................................................................................................... 161 Efficiency ................................................................................................................................................................. 161 Too many duties .................................................................................................................................................. 162 Workload too heavy ........................................................................................................................................... 162 Too much to prepare at one time ................................................................................................................. 162
Learning Centre .................................................................................................................................... 162 Extra-‐Curricular Activities ............................................................................................................... 163 Recreational activities ....................................................................................................................................... 163 Sports – recreational and professional / girls to be expanded ....................................................... 163 Music ......................................................................................................................................................................... 164
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 165 Quality of Education ........................................................................................................................... 165 Teaching Strategies ............................................................................................................................. 170 Interactive learning ............................................................................................................................................ 172 Service learning ................................................................................................................................................... 172
Critical Pedagogy ................................................................................................................................. 173 Mindfulness ........................................................................................................................................... 176 Assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 178 Relationships ........................................................................................................................................ 181 Cultural preservation ......................................................................................................................... 183 Motivation .............................................................................................................................................. 183 Responsibility and Self Discipline .................................................................................................. 184 Environmental preservation ........................................................................................................... 186 Community partnership .................................................................................................................... 189 Democracy ............................................................................................................................................. 191 Management and Leadership .......................................................................................................... 192 Learning Center .................................................................................................................................... 193
References ................................................................................................................................... 202 Appendix A (Operations Manual) ........................................................................................ 206 Appendix B (Glossary) ............................................................................................................. 269 Appendix C (Jumpstart Notes: Day 1 and Day 10) .......................................................... 281 Appendix D (Cycle I Interventions) .................................................................................... 292 Appendix E (The Research Writing Manual for PCE Research Team and The Coaching Manual Draft) .......................................................................................................... 298 Appendix F (Schedule of Research Implementation) ................................................... 305
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
10
Abstract
The purpose of this three-year participatory action research (PAR) gap analysis study is to develop
guidelines for all lecturers at the Royal University of Bhutan (RUB) to use in the transformation of
current teaching practices into holistic, Gross National Happiness (GNH) classroom practices and
pedagogies. In addition, the study will be used to develop a MA and PhD program in Holistic
Education at RUB aiding in the attainment of the ultimate goal of a holistic GNH based educational
paradigm for Bhutan.
At the onset of the study, topic guide questions, as part of the Operations Manual (OPM), and a
glossary were developed during a two-week Jumpstart workshop, which began with the examination
of the foundations of critical pedagogy, contemplative education, and the planning and design of the
PAR study.
Thereafter, the Research Team (62 RUB faculty and one consultant from Colorado, US, the Primary
Investigator) traveled to all 10 RUB colleges for data collection. Qualitative data collection methods
included focus group discussions (FG), key informant interviews (KI), class observations (OBS),
meeting notes and research diaries.
This Report details the Baseline Study including the collection and analysis of baseline data, the
identification of gaps between the current and targeted GNH classroom practices and pedagogies and
the development of recommendations to address these identified gaps through Interventions.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
11
Executive Summary
Development of Gross National Happiness (GNH) in Education
In April of 2012, Prime Minister Jigmi Y. Thinley issued a directive to the UN Council that
Gross National Happiness (GNH) was to be implemented by a government taskforce that would
develop and propose recommendations generated by leaders in Bhutan. The Royal University of
Bhutan (RUB), as the leader in higher education in Bhutan and currently the only institution that
prepares teachers for the public school system, has been given the responsibility to transform current
lecturer teaching practices so that they align with the GNH framework.
This participatory action research gap analysis study is an attempt to inform RUB’s lecturers
and administrators on (a) how to develop GNH classroom practices and pedagogies; and (b) to
provide recommendations for the development of an action plan to transform current teaching
practices to holistic educational practices more aligned with the GNH framework; and (c) to develop a
MA and PhD degree program for those interested in pursuing graduate degrees in education. The
information from this research will inform the operationalization and implementation of RUB’s
institutional programs necessary for the attainment of the ultimate goal, holistic GNH based
educational paradigm for Bhutan.
Study Method: Participatory Action Research Gap Analysis Study
Participatory action research (PAR) is a systematic cyclical method of planning and design,
observation and data collection, actions/interventions, monitoring and evaluation, and critical
reflection and analysis (individual, among research team members, as well as through plenary
sessions) prior to the design and implementation of the next cycle. It is a collaborative method of
testing new ideas, implementing action for change, and learning from the consequences of change.
The ongoing process of the gap analysis in this study involves the identification of gaps
between current classroom practices and pedagogies and those that would foster holistic GNH
education. The purpose of the interventions of the PAR study is to address these identified gaps from
the baseline data.
This PAR study is a lecturer-led process throughout, fully utilizing the local knowledge and
skills of the key stake-holders at RUB (lecturers, students, administrators, and staff) and thereby
encouraging and cultivating local initiative and self-reliance. Participation by the RUB stake-holders
in every part of the study ensures the inclusion of diverse and heterogeneous local knowledge, skills
and resources in the investigation and development and of RUB’s classroom practices and pedagogy.
These contributions also increase the flexibility of the initiative, increase the responsiveness to local
conditions and reduce the chances of mistakes; indeed they often make the difference between the
success or failure of an intervention.
Although a PAR study is more time-consuming than traditional research methods and
development approaches, it leads to changes that are sustained over the long term. PAR is
collaborative: the research team members responsible for the intervention cycles are the ones making
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
12
the changes to their classroom practices and pedagogies. The lecturers of RUB are the researchers
who initiate, implement, and drive the research. They are directly involved in the identification and
analysis of the problems that affect them and in the design of their potential solutions. Because they
have a direct interest in the success of the solutions, they are likely to remain motivated to sustain the
changes in the long run. Furthermore, within the PAR research method itself, principals and values of
GNH such as accountability, responsibility, community vitality, critical thinking and social or civic
action, equanimity, honesty and respect, humility, interdependence, mindfulness and sustainability are
broadly promoted.
At the onset of the study, the two-week Jumpstart workshop began with the examination of
the foundations of critical pedagogy, contemplative education, and the planning and design of the
PAR study. The participants engaged in experiential activities designed to strengthen their
development of the participatory tools and skills necessary for the implementation of the PAR study
and the integration of critical pedagogy and contemplative education in the classroom. The topic
guide questions as part of the Operations Manual (OPM) and a glossary were developed during the
Jumpstart workshop (See Appendix A for the OPM, Appendix B for the glossary and Appendix C for
sample Jumpstart notes). The OPM was used as a manual to guide and organize the study. The OPM
went through 14 different revisions. The revisions were made in response to the learning of the
research team members. The learning included discernment of research skills and terminology,
adjustments in the topic guide questions that led the data collection, and the in depth rigorous analysis
that was required of the data sets.
After the Jumpstart workshop had concluded, the 62 lecturers who formed the research teams
returned to their respective college. The Paro College of Education (PCE) research team, using the
OPM as a guide, practiced for one week (as a “pre-test”) developing their note taking, interview and
analysis skills that were introduced during the jumpstart workshop. The OPM and topic guide
questions significantly changed during the pretest week.
Thereafter, select members of the PCE research team consisting of 2 RUB faculty along with
the primary investigator (PI) and associate research assistant traveled to all other RUB colleges for
data collection. When the traveling PCE research team arrived at the designated college, the research
team from that college joined together to collect data over a two to six day period, depending on the
size of the college. The remainder of the PCE research team continued to collect data at PCE during
the spring semester. Qualitative data collection methods included focus group discussions (FG), key
informant interviews (KI), class observations (OBS), meeting notes, and research diaries.
In May of 2012, the baseline data collection was completed, findings and extensive
discussions on the meaning and analysis of the data were held, six Cycle I interventions were
developed and implemented, the results of the Cycle I interventions were discussed and analyzed and
the research team members then developed the framework for Cycle II interventions to begin in the
Fall of 2012. In addition, drafts of Cycle III and IV interventions were also drafted.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
13
Participatory processes require investments of time and specific resources. Expert facilitation
and clear objectives are needed to avoid chaotic meetings and a general loss of direction for the
initiative. There were times when the necessary resources were not available or the relevant activities
were not foreseen in the original plan of the GNH PAR study. In this case, creativity and managerial
initiative were necessary.
The GNH PAR study required a continued commitment and actual results took a while to
appear. This process can tax the patience of administrators, managers, staff and lecturers alike and
may discourage people from undertaking the lengthy participatory processes. Time and resource
investments were and are still required to reach a good level of communication between the lecturers
and the RUB administration, also involved in the study. Some compromises were and may still need
to be made. For example, the research team leader will, in all likelihood, need greatly reduced
teaching loads to enable him/her to devote the necessary time for effective research study monitoring
and evaluation processes. These processes are of great importance to ensure quality and motivation
among lecturers at the Paro College of Education (PCE), the hub of the GNH PAR study. In addition,
research team members will need time to meet together regularly in order to increase their research
skills and knowledge, to generate innovative interventions that impact, and to implement the
interventions with consistency and intention to reduce the identified gaps in the baseline study.
Participation requires time, effort, additional resources, and sociopolitical sensitivity.
However, the rewards, in terms of the sustainability of project interventions, local empowerment and
promotion of GNH processes, more than compensate for the potential costs and potential frustrations
encountered.
Identified Gaps
The initial phase of the GNH PAR study began in February 2012 with the objective of
identifying gaps between current classroom practices and pedagogies and those that would foster
holistic GNH education. The outcome of this baseline research identified the following major gaps:
1. There is no consistent definition of what constitutes a holistic GNH classroom practice and
pedagogy among lecturers, administrators, and students within and among RUB colleges.
2. Current classroom practices align more with the traditional Euro-Indian methods of
education, which are teacher narrated, lecture based, and teacher directed. This is in
contrast to a holistic education classroom based upon participatory teaching strategies,
which are learner directed and include mindfulness practices and critical pedagogy.
3. There is little consistency of what constitutes mindfulness practice for the classroom and
how mindfulness practice inculcates holistic educational paradigms. The research team
holds the assumption that mindfulness development is part of a GNH holistic education.
4. The current assessment practices are primarily based upon competitive forms of exams and
quizzes rather than authentic assessment models, which align significantly more with a
GNH holistic education model.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
14
5. Lecturers within and among colleges teach and learn in isolation rather than as a
professional community of learners. The civic vitality and holistic foundation of RUB is
dependent upon the development of an intentional and collaborative community of lecturers
at the college level.
6. There is a balance missing between lecturers’ concerns for their own semester plans and that
of the entire student journey. GNH education requires attention to the whole RUB four-year
journey and the development of the students’ human potential rather than focusing on each
module isolated from other modules and merely training students to become qualified for a
specific job.
7. The modules and semester plans are merely content based rather than including content, GNH
principles and values, and mindfulness or the development of awakening/awareness infused
together and taught holistically.
8. Cultural preservation is typically limited to national language, dress, song, and dance. A
GNH holistic educational paradigm would infuse the Bhutanese culture within the content
areas and individual module semester plans.
9. Environmental awareness and preservation efforts are based primarily upon a one-time
activity rather than as a paradigm for students and lecturers to teach through i.e. permeating
within the content areas, individual module semester plans, and the whole student journey.
10. Self-initiated motivation of the lecturers to develop change and move towards a GNH
classroom practice and pedagogy is low.
Recommendations
Assumptions Derived from the Collected Data
Education can reflect the values and beliefs of society and individuals if done with attention,
intention and the right attitude. These three ingredients are critical and need to be at the forefront of
any attempt to bring about educational change. A GNH education offers opportunity for everyone to
achieve their full potential and develop moral, well-rounded individuals. Although school attendance
contributes to an individual education, the whole educational journey of an individual happens
collectively in school and at home and throughout society.
The lecturers are invariably at the forefront of any plans to implement educational change.
The baseline data analysis of current classroom practice and pedagogy suggests that lecturers deliver
information and content by depositing a body of knowledge and skills to their students. In contrast,
lecturers in a holistic GNH classroom will develop and use a wider set of professional qualities that
recognize the social and cultural lives of their students. Students bring with them important ideas,
experiences, interests and concerns that should provide the raw material for learning. The holistic
classroom works with the notion of student-centeredness. The baseline data suggests that currently in
RUB classrooms we find students sitting uneasily with the dominant notion that lecturers are there to
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
15
guide students through a series of tasks and assessments. Although GNH knowledge, skills and
qualities are harder to test and measure, they should not be overlooked.
Education should be much more than preparation for national tests or a passing grade.
Holistic education develops (a) a range of collaborative skills such as teamwork and communication
skills; (b) qualities found in GNH values and principles such as resilience, self-discipline, and
empathy; (c) knowledge in literacy and numeracy; (d) the conscious of the learner and teacher; and (e)
abilities that young people will need for the future. College classrooms should be arranged to make
learning more relevant and engaging for young people, with students at the center of their own
learning, providing a mix of experiential, service, and theoretical learning. Therefore learning must
take place beyond the classroom setting engaging the student and lecturer in the wider community.
GNH holistic education highlights the importance of empowering young people to do good
within their communities and to learn how they can change society for the better. If RUB’s education
system can prepare young people in this way, the benefits to society, civic health, sustainable living,
and the psychological and over all well-being of the individual and their communities will be
considerable. By enhancing young people’s sense of agency and teaching them self-awareness and
compassion, the lecturers at RUB can help them to understand and tackle the problems they face in
today’s world. Young people today face many challenges: increasingly segmented communities,
disintegration of the extended family, a capitalistic world economy, and global climate change. By
teaching young people the value of compassion, collaboration, and informed action moving toward
social justice, the lecturers at RUB can encourage them to look both inward and outward to develop
relationships with people in the local, national and global community. An RUB education can support
the growth and development of a strong productive workforce steeped in dignity and integrity, a
generation that understands the importance of community life, and an education system based on
GNH values and principles that develop well-rounded, capable individuals cultivating the harmonious
and happy Bhutan one can envision.
Gap Recommendations
1. Identified Gap: There is no consistent definition of what a holistic GNH classroom practice and
pedagogy is among lecturers, administrators, and students within and between RUB colleges.
Recommendation: To develop a working definition of holistic GNH education, classroom practices,
and pedagogies for administrators, lecturers, and students to use as a guide developing a GNH
classroom. This will culminate in a GNH definition for RUB to use for years to come. A working
definition was developed during the Cycle I intervention. (See Appendix D for Cycle I interventions
report). The working definition states:
A GNH classroom embodies an intentional culture promoting holistic development and righteous attitude. The co-creation of knowledge, a love of learning and curiosity through the democratization of the student-teacher relationship is at the foundation of our classrooms. Lecturers and students use a contemplative critical pedagogy upholding collective responsibility and mindful action for learning, and for the protection of nature and culture.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
16
2. Identified Gap: Current classroom practices align more with the traditional Euro-Indian methods of
education which are teacher narrated, lecture based, and teacher directed. This is in contrast to a
holistic education classroom based upon participatory teaching strategies, which are learner directed
and include mindfulness practices and critical pedagogy.
Recommendation: To develop teaching strategies and pedagogies that align more with a holistic
GNH education system. This includes teaching strategies and pedagogies that are based upon
participatory teaching strategies, learner directed classrooms, mindfulness practice in the classrooms,
and the foundations of critical pedagogy infused in lecturer teaching. A teaching strategy handbook
with 52 participatory teaching strategies, workshops on participatory teaching strategies for lecturers,
and professional development learning communities called coaching groups are three of key
interventions to address this gap.
3. Identified Gap: There is little consistency of what constitutes mindfulness practice for the
classroom and how mindfulness practice inculcates holistic educational paradigms. The research team
holds the assumption that mindfulness development is part of a GNH holistic education.
Recommendation: To develop a mindfulness manual that will support the lecturer to make use of
mindfulness practices in the classroom. To bring training to lecturers into each of the colleges that
supports the inculcation of mindfulness into the pedagogy of the classroom.
4. Identified Gap: The current assessment practices are primarily based upon competitive forms of
exams and quizzes rather than authentic assessment models which align more with a GNH holistic
education model.
Recommendation: To develop a variety of authentic assessment tools based upon the coaching
group’s, i.e., the professional development learning community’s data during the fall 2012 semester at
PCE. These coaching groups are focused on identifying and developing authentic tools to observe and
assess how students learn. Over the next three years RUB should shift the assessment of students from
a weight of 60% to 100% of the total student evaluation based upon exams and quizzes to a weight of
no more than 10% of the student total evaluation based upon exams and quizzes. It is recommended
that the winter session 2012 is dedicated to increase the knowledge and skills of authentic assessment
to the research team members at PCE and SCE as well as any other research team member interested
from the other eight RUB colleges. During the workshop an action plan for shifting assessment tools
will be developed and during the spring 2013 semester a shift in assessment should start at PCE and
SCE.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
17
5. Identified Gap: Lecturers within and among colleges teach in isolation rather than as a community
of learners. The civic vitality and holistic foundation of RUB is dependent upon the development of
an intentional and collaborative community of lecturers at the college level.
Recommendation: Lecturers within and among colleges set up a disciplined systematic
collaboration among lecturers by developing a lecturer community of learners as role models for their
students. This initiative is being addressed through college specific professional development
initiatives (a) coaching group(s); (b) lecturer retreats for the cultivation of a mindful learning
institution; (c) and an annual summit for lecturers to participate in Bhutan’s cultural uniqueness and
general professional development workshops. It is recommended that coaching groups for
professional development are started at PCE during the Fall 2012 semester and continue throughout
the research. Additional colleges are training by PCE lecturers on coaching groups during future
intervention cycles. (See Appendix E for the first draft of a coaching manual for lecturers).
6. Identified Gap: There is a balance missing between lecturers’ concerns for their own semester
plans and that of the entire student journey. GNH education requires attention to the whole and the
development of the students’ human potential rather than merely training students to become qualified
for a specific job.
Recommendation: The development of an overall structure and plan for each student entering a
RUB college, articulating how the student journey will support the growth and development of (a) the
skills and knowledge needed to be a person who studies, a serious and mindful student; (b) a strong
productive contributor to Bhutan steeped in dignity and integrity; (c) one who understands the
importance of community life; and (d) an educational journey based upon GNH values and principles
that will support the development of a well-rounded, capable individual cultivating the harmonious
and happiness of Bhutan. To do this it is recommended that a module or part of a first year module
includes skills such as goal setting, identifying learning styles, personal strength identification, and
other skills necessary for developing good student patterns of behavior. In addition, upon entering a
RUB college each student should develops a plan for the student journey that outlines (a) student
learning objectives and outcomes that align with RUB overall mission goals, degree sought, and GNH
values and principles; and (b) the assessment plan to measure how the student met RUB overall
mission goals, degree sought, and GNH values and principles. Individual semester plans should
include participatory teaching strategies, strategic questions, and assessment tolls that are associated
with each daily class that informs the student journey.
In addition, the research team recommends and has developed a four year tiered plan to
emphasize the four pillars of GNH. For the first year all students in groups of 10-12 students in their
second semester will take a one-week cultural experiential journey and engage in a cultural historical
experience in Bhutan. For instance a group of student may live with a nomadic or semi-nomadic
family helping and serving the family in their daily lives and work. This supports the pillar of
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
18
preservation and promotion of cultural and spiritual heritage providing students an authentic learning
experience about the value of nature-based communities and their contributions to the overall society.
In the second year second semester, a groups of students will go to the back-country or wilderness
areas of Bhutan learning the flora and fauna, how to leave no trace behind, and falling in love with
nature. This second year supports the conservation of the environment. The third year is a one-week
mindfulness retreat for students and lecturers in a local monastery nurturing the development of GNH
principles and values in support of a sustainable society. The final year students engage in local
leadership projects practicing good governance in real world projects applying their new knowledge
and skills with lecturers and community partnerships as their mentors and teachers.
7. Identified Gap: The modules and semester plans are merely content based rather than including
and integrating content, GNH principles and values, and mindfulness or the development of
awakening/awareness infused together and taught holistically.
Recommendation: Module development and semester plans will need to clearly address student
learning outcomes and assessments that align with GNH values and principles and content subject
outcomes so that both lecturers and students are aware of the expectations and work needed to
successfully complete the degree program. The research team recommends the knowledge and skills
of lecturer’s in the areas of critical pedagogy and contemplative education should be further
developed through hands on workshops and semester plan development. .
8. Identified Gap: Cultural preservation is typically limited to national language, dress, song, and
dance. A GNH holistic educational paradigm would infuse the values of the Bhutanese culture within
the content areas and individual module semester plans.
Recommendation: The cultural aspects of Bhutan needed to be embedded into curriculum rather
than be outside of the subject content held in co-curricular activities. Teams at each college should be
developed to help infuse cultural history into the subject content. In addition, the recommendation for
the first year students to visit and live with a nomadic or semi-nomadic family can be part of this
development. The students will learn the life style of the nature-based populations of Bhutan.
Currently the nomadic and semi-nomadic populations are decreasing as young people go away from
the family to attend school. Through the baseline data collection process the research team members
heard lecturers and students talk about the nomadic and semi-nomadic populations as a “lesser-than”
population; a population not knowing as much as those who are more integrated in the modern and
becoming dominate culture. Having students become aware of an ancient Bhutanese cultural way of
life through genuine first hand experiences can positively affect attitudes about the subject matter that
is being taught. Learning by experience is intrinsically motivating, is better remembered, and the
skills learned are retained longer than in a classroom setting.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
19
9. Identified Gap: Environmental awareness and conservation efforts are based primarily upon a one-
time activity rather than as a paradigm for students and lecturers and infused within the content areas,
individual module semester plans, and the whole student journey.
Recommendation: To bring environmental practices as a daily practice to college campuses and
classroom practices RUB will need to include environmental awareness and practices into module
development, student learning outcomes, and assessments. Environmental practices such as
recycling, reducing, and reusing; leaving no trace behind; school campus gardens, regulations such as
no plastic bottled water on campus, the reduction of processed packaged food, reuse of text books and
classroom readings, environmental groups participating in current environmental issues of Bhutan as
part of the learning center expanding homework and curriculum collaboration, the expansion of
experiential learning in the outdoors, and alternative power sources for the college to function on are
recommended. Training to infuse environmental knowledge and awareness into module development
for lecturers is necessary as well as the increase of lecturer environmental knowledge and awareness.
International working groups such as National Outdoor Leadership School can help facilitate the
training for lectures and train RUB personal to guide students and lecturers in the wilderness of
Bhutan as part of the overall RUB journey.
10: Identified Gap: Self-initiated motivation of the lecturers to develop change and move towards a
GNH classroom practice and pedagogy is low.
Recommendation: The recognition of lecturer contribution to the college, student learning, and
Bhutan needs to be heightened and systematically developed. This involves website exposure of
lecturers, publishing and research opportunities, financial incentives, and weekly announcements on
individual college campuses –visual and auditory.
Priority Recommendations: Short, Intermediate and Long Term
Addressing the themes and patterns that were identified during the baseline study and keeping
in mind that RUB desires to develop a program unique for students and lecturers infused with GNH,
the following ideas have been developed as the key recommendations.
Short-Term Recommendations:
1. To implement interventions in the fall 2012 and spring 2013 semester with all lecturers at Paro
Teachers College. Bring in lecturers at Samtse Teachers College for some of the lecturer
development and training.
a. The assumption that there will be a minimum of one lecturer assigned as the research team
leader, currently Jambay Lhamo (RTL), a minimum of six additional research team members, and
the Dean of Research coordinating interventions with the primary investigator, collecting data on
an on-going basis, and attending to the interventions on a weekly basis. (Total of 8 core research
team members). The RTL will need release time to be able to give the necessary time to the
research and interventions to ensure quality change and sustainability.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
20
b. The RTL will need to be available between 24-26 hours a week to coordinate and lead the
research alongside collecting, analyzing, and developing further interventions.
c. The interventions include:
i. The development of professional learning communities - coaching groups - with all
lecturers focused on student learning, teaching strategies, and assessment tools.
ii. Semester plan transformation to include 10-15 participatory teaching strategies per
semester and a strategic questions for each class session focused on the content.
iii. Development of a Mindfulness Manual that all lecturers at all colleges can use as a
guide to infuse mindfulness practice into their daily classroom practices
iv. Development of a Teaching Strategy Handbook that includes at least 52 participatory
teaching strategies
v. Continued development of the Coaching Group Manual for professional
development.
vi. Survey data collection on Mindfulness practice at PCE and SCE
vii. Service-learning pilot at PCE with GNH Seed Schools in Paro (Agreement between
RUB and REC).
viii. Continued data collection through direct classroom observations, focus group
discussions, key informant interviews, and meeting notes throughout the semester
monitoring and evaluating the interventions listed above.
2. To work closely with research teams from other colleges during the winter and summer sessions of
January-February 2013 and July 2013 to increase lecturer capacity for research and to prepare for
educational interventions during the fall semester 2013.
a. The winter January – February 2013 session will focus on authentic assessment and
professional learning communities or coaching groups.
b. Research team leaders throughout the colleges will need to have release time to attend
workshops for success implementation.
Intermediate Recommendations
1. Change the weight of assessment tools inculcating each module with authentic assessment tools to
make up a minimum of 70% of the grade. This leaves no more than 30% of any grade based upon
texts or quizzes. Eventually moving the test and quiz percentage to 10% by the fall semester 2014.
2. Implement Service-learning as a teaching strategy and assessment tool in all 10 colleges. (Based
upon the results from the Fall 2012 pilot at PCE).
3. Continue to strengthen coaching groups as on-going professional development for all lecturers
throughout the 10 RUB colleges,
4. Design and implement a four-pillar student journey. Fall 2013 implement at Paro Teachers
College, Fall 2014 implement in all 10 colleges. The four-pillar journey is to include:
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
21
a. First year second semester one-week stay with nomadic or semi-nomadic families learning
about their way of life and contribution to Bhutanese culture.
i. Each student stays for seven nights with a nomadic or semi-nomadic family learning
the daily patterns of behavior of the nomadic way of life, contributing through
service to the family, and learning about the nature based populations that have
inhabited Bhutan for centuries. (or an equivalent cultural week-long experience such
as with weaving cooperatives)
ii. Students are expected to infuse their learning into their writing and reflections
throughout the fall semester modules. Lecturers are expected to incorporate lessons
from the cultural experience into their subject content.
b. Second year second semester one-week environmental learning retreat. Students in the
second year second semester will trek, river run, backpack, or mountaineer in the back
country of Bhutan for seven overnights to learn how to:
i. Fall in love with the Bhutanese natural environment
ii. Identify flora and fauna
iii.Leave no trace behind ethics
iv. Learn the interdependence of their daily life’s actions and the ecosystem, which is
impacted
v. Balance development and the sacred space the natural environment provides for the
people to sustain
vi. Environmental sustainability – taking a look at the impact of development such as
the eco-tourism industry, hydro electric dams, commercial agriculture, and the
construction of tourist lodges on the environment and how to balance between
environmental harmony and development.
c. Third year second semester one-week mindfulness retreat.
i. Students in the third year travel together to a near-by monastery for a one-week
mindfulness retreat. Each day students engage in mindfulness practice, learn about the
benefits of mindful living as a student, as a citizen, and as a human being.
d. Fourth year students spend one week in leadership roles in their local communities.
i. Each student is placed in a group and take on a leadership role in the local
community. This is a creative process whereby the students are contributing to the
sustainability, innovations, and human relationships necessary to uphold a harmonious
Bhutanese culture. Examples include ideas such as the development of recycling
centers, local community radio programs, story hours for young children in the local
town, local library development, cultural visual and performing arts centres, lecture
series for the public, family weekend events based in the community.
Long Term Recommendations
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
22
1. In-coming lecturers at RUB will be mandated to take a foundational course in
contemplative critical pedagogy (If not already taken in their prior formal schooling) in their
first year of teaching;
Development of a first year student module that includes foundations of contemplative critical
pedagogy and the skills necessary to be a successful student;
2. Increase the capacity of lecturers at RUB in research knowledge, skills, and opportunity.
3. Increase the capacity of lecturers in professional learning communities – coaching groups-
utilizing the immense intelligence the lecturers bring to the college;
4. Transform the examination based system of qualifications for college entrance
5. Develop a MA and PhD degree program in Holistic GNH Education providing a teacher
education program that aligns with GNH education for teachers within Bhutan as well as
teachers from the international educational community; and
6. To develop a unique quality driven undergraduate student journey at RUB that students could
not access in other colleges around the world. This would mean that the unique elements of
Bhutan’s natural environment; spiritual essentials; cultural patterns of behavior; and the
harmonious interdependence between culture, development, modernization, and nature are
studied and lived for four years throughout all subject areas.
The GNH PAR study was grounded in an approach on dialogue, mutuality, reciprocity, and
respect for each other’s ideas, and openness to a dialectical challenge use the challenges that emerge
through the PAR process as central to knowledge creation. This participatory approach acknowledges
the ways in which our own life experiences have shaped the ideas that we share in this study, the
vignettes give insight into critical moments, which have influenced the researcher and the findings.
The process called for collective action for education change moving toward a sustainable model of
education infused with GNH values and principles.
“The human being is essentially a holistic being who lives in integrated totalities. When the
human being is forced to lead a fragmented life, he/she shrinks, is frustrated, diminished….”
(Skolimowski, 1994, p. 91). The GNH PAR study has brought the argument forward that in order to
change we have to change the way we think and the way we view that what we want to change. The
nature of our mind is the nature of our knowledge and therefore the nature of our reality. The way we
see the world impacts the way we act in it. This is the basis for our recommendations to develop and
create a GNH classroom practice and pedagogy. The way we want people to act in the world should
be the basis of the educational paradigm. Given this assumption, this study has attempted to gather
rooted values and principles of the lecturers, students, and administrators at RUB. Analyze them and
make recommendations for change to support the development of a GNH classroom practice and
pedagogy.
Throughout the colleges, lecturers, students, administrators have stated that Bhutan has not
been colonized. However if we critically examine the education system we see that the main
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
23
language spoken is English, the system is set up as a Euro-Indian school system, there exists a lot of
competition within the system, and the fragmentation which comes from this system is different than
the Buddhist philosophy of interconnectedness and mutual reciprocity. (See Appendix F, Schedule of
Research Implementation).
Conclusion
Prime Minster Lyonpo Jigme Thinley of Bhutan states, “Gross National Happiness is based
on the belief that the purpose of development and the role of the state is to create conditions within
which people can pursue and find what they aspire to most in life – happiness. It is a holistic
development paradigm to make human society resilient. It motivates an individual and society to
consciously balance material wants with spiritual growth wherein the needs of the body and those of
the mind are addressed in equal measure within a stable and sustainable environment” (April, 2012,
speech at the UN, NY).
The leaders of Bhutan clearly understand how schools and colleges impact society. A critical
understanding and engagement with the quality of society and its relationship to the reproduction
within schools and colleges is essential. This GNH PAR study has begun this path of critical
understanding and engagement by identifying the gaps between what currently happens in RUB
classrooms and what types of changes are needed to in order to support an intentional GNH culture. A
central element of a GNH holistic classroom is to become acquainted with life’s mysteries of learning,
to engage in the world of creativity and imagination, and to learn to serve self and others in the search
of meaning and purpose. Embracing the GNH principle of interdependence, holistic education seeks
to bring interconnectedness into the classroom supporting and teaching with the GNH values of
compassion and loving kindness. Holistic education seeks to provide opportunities so that students
can practice to be kinder to others, more loving and compassionate, and to grow up with more
universal responsibility. To teach for GNH is "…to teach so that the young may be awakened to the
joy of working for transformation in the smallest places, so that they may become healers and change
their worlds” (Greene, 1998, p. xlv).
Zen master, poet, and peace and human rights activist, Thich Nhat Hanh, (1998) spoke about
a man and a horse galloping quickly down the road when someone along the side of the road shouts
“Where are you going?” and the man on the horse replies, “I don’t know! Ask the horse!” Perhaps
the story can offer symbolism to RUB during the GNH PAR research journey. The story representing
the habitual patterns or habitual routines which RUB lecturers and management govern and the
journey is to awaken the rider. The GNH PAR study is an attempt to awaken the community at RUB
through inquiry, analysis, discussion, and action. The three-year time frame of the GNH PAR study
can be symbolically thought of as rites of passage with three steps. Van Gennep (1920) names these
three steps sequentially as separation, threshold experience, and incorporation. Separation is to move
away from the familiar landscape of the social territory we created and take part in the day to day
while delving into the unfamiliar. This step correlates to the data collection and the deep listening,
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
24
contemplating, and awakening required of the research teams. The threshold experience is the time to
jump into the unknown. This time can be, and often is, a chaotic and transformative period. This step
refers to the intervention cycles, introducing new ways for lecturers to be and hold their classrooms.
Incorporation is a time of healing, shifting, and making whole again. This step refers to the last part
of the GNH PAR study where the final guideline document on GNH pedagogy and classroom
practices is completed, as well as the modules for the MA and PhD programs for a GNH holistic
education. The GNH PAR study was, and is, an opportunity for RUB to take a plunge, entering the
world of not knowing. In any growth this step is essential to break from the “factory bells” of routine.
A topic guide for investigation emerged for the GNH PAR study developed from the above
concepts. The research team began the investigation by asking students, lecturers, and administrators
throughout RUB, questions such as: What would a classroom and an education system really look like
that is steeped in GNH? What gifts, knowledge, and skills would you want the students to leave RUB
with? When people find out that a person has graduated from RUB, what is the first thought that you
would want to come to them? What does a RUB education mean? (Topic guide is part of the
Operations Manual Appendix A).
The GNH PAR study was grounded in an approach based on dialogue, mutuality, reciprocity,
respect for each other’s ideas, and openness to a dialectical challenge utilizing obstacles central to
knowledge creation. This participatory approach acknowledged ways in which our own life
experiences have shaped the ideas that we share in this study, as well as the vignettes that give insight
into critical moments that influenced the researcher and the findings.
PAR, the study’s methodology, is based on human inquiry, exploring and making sense of
human action, personal experience, and thought. This GNH PAR process was a way of building
knowledge through action on that understanding. One of the fundamental assumptions of the GNH
PAR study is the worth of everyone’s contribution and voice. Furthermore, a critique of one’s own
thinking and perceptions of the world is fundamental during the analysis process. Developing an
approach of inner inquiry to research stirs up the “taken-for-grantedness” of our everyday life and
routine. Attitudes that are common sense may no longer make sense; the research team began to see
below the surface level assumptions that often distract current classroom practices and
pedagogies. One such assumption heard throughout many of the colleges by all three of the
respondent categories was that Bhutan had not been colonized. During the focus group discussions
and interviews, lecturers and students dove deeper into the conversation and asked critical questions
such as: Why is English the language used in schools? Where and when did this start? How did the
Bhutanese formal school system start? How did the heavy influence from India on Bhutan’s education
system affect India’s school system and is this influence something to maintain and follow or to
transform into an intentional way of learning and teaching in Bhutan?
Concepts from Holistic educators, such as Krishnamurti, Pestazolli, Montessori, Thoreau,
Frobel, Friere, Thich Nhat Hanh, Dewey, Shinichi Hisamatsu, Toshihiko Izutsu and Illich; were
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
25
investigated and discussed, helping to articulate many of the patterns and themes that arose from the
data sets. When the research team critically examined the RUB education system, the research team
found that the dominant language is English, education system is set up as a Euro-Indian school
system, and the rigidness and fragmentation identified within RUB came from this system rather than
the Buddhist philosophy of interconnectedness and mutual reciprocity. “The human being is
essentially a holistic being who lives in integrated totalities. When the human being is forced to lead
a fragmented life, he/she shrinks, is frustrated, diminished….” (Skolimowski, 1994, p. 91).
The charge of this study is to develop a classroom practice and pedagogy for lecturers that
align with GNH values and principles. A RUB education is not worth a great deal if it teaches young
people how to make a living but not how to make a life. Therefore, the research team has tried to
develop interventions so that “the organization of human communities and the establishment of
freedom and peace are not only intellectual achievements but spiritual and moral achievements as
well, demanding a cherishing of the wholeness of the human personality”. (Illich, 1971).
During the baseline data collection round, it became clear to the research team that the
banking method of education was the most common method of pedagogy used in the classrooms
throughout RUB. A GNH holistic education pedagogy and classroom practice would require the
classroom pedagogy and practice to shift from a banking model, one where the lecturers are talking in
front of the class and the words are being deposited into the student to a more generative and/or
transformative model. The generative is a more hands-on approach to learning. The communication
between lecturer and student flows in several directions and thus many more questions arise and elicit
responses to the learning. Since the lecturer and learners learn more closely together, they generate or
co-create knowledge. It is still limited because the real work is outside the classroom window, out in
the world. The transformative model is where the learner and lecturer get out into the real world and
participate in existing issues and activities within the community, thus gaining a realistic picture and
experience to use as part of the learning process. In the transformative model the lecturer is a partner
in the learning process. This last pedagogical approach has education situated in solidifying the
values of solidarity, social responsibility and vitality, creativity, and self-discipline within the service
of the common good; critical spirit through contemplative self-reflection and informed action are
central.
The research team believes creating a positive classroom environment is one of the most effective
ways to improve behavior and learning for academics and for the psychological, social, and emotional
well-being of the students. From the data, the research team deduced that four essential qualities
should exist in the classroom:
• Students need to feel included and appreciated by peers and lecturers.
• Students are respected for their different abilities, cultures (family histories), gender, interests
and dreams.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
26
• Students are actively involved in their own learning.
• Students have positive expectations that have been articulated from the lecturers that they will
succeed. The lecturers are there to support their success as a learner.
For this to happen, agreements between lecturers and students need to be made at the onset of each
semester. Lecturers and students agree to attentively and actively listen to each other. Lecturers and
students agree to: (a) there will be no insults, (b) there is mutual respect between lecturers and
students, and (c) all students have the right to pass with honors and dignity.
These agreements require the development of collaborative skills where students help each
other with work on tasks, homework, and classroom learning. Throughout the semester students are
guided by the lecturers to learn how to set and monitor their goals. During the study the research
team found few students who were able to articulate any semester long goals other than to pass their
classes. Students are given support from lecturers to monitor and assess the progress of student goals
during class time. At the end of the semester there is a celebration of achievements in class.
With a generative and/or transformative learning system, self-responsible behavior is
embedded in the structure as lecturers use best teaching practice methods based upon brain-
compatible learning, multiple intelligences, cooperative learning and social development research.
The lecturers and administrators at RUB also work together in supportive groups, referred to as
coaching groups, so they too enjoy the participatory democratic process and creative collegiality.
Creating and developing an intentional school culture where the college environment provides
a sense of belonging, support, connection to others and to ideas and values that make young lives
meaningful and significant, is part of a GNH pedagogy. This is essential for a GNH holistic education.
Each classroom should be a complete community. A GNH holistic classroom has a shared vision,
realistic goals for achievement and development, and offers a caring way for students and lecturers to
be and learn together (Dewey, 1916; Shor, 1992).
RUB needs to shift from a deficit-focused system based upon the Euro-India educational
system. This means challenging those in the college to be strength-focused on students’ development
within their interests, ways of learning, gifts and humanity. Holistic GNH education recognizes that
the body, mind and brain operate in a dynamic unity (Pert, 1997; Wolfe, 2001). This means that no
longer can the body-mind-brain unity be ignored as a path to academic achievement for that of filling
students’ brains with concepts and information is not enough.
The research team has yet to find a piece of authentic research that proves filling students’
brains with concepts and information is how the human brain learns best. The research read by the
research team shows over and over again that cognitive information becomes meaningful and lifelong
when united with application and experience (Benard, 2004, Dewey, 1998). Not only has research
shown this, the data from significant numbers of students, lecturers and administrators at RUB, have
stated this.
The research team recommends that GNH classroom practices include cooperative learning
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
27
methods, active group inquiry, problem posing, and participatory action research as methods for
learning. Perhaps more importantly than anything else for school reform is lecturers’ onsite
professional development. With their peers, lecturers learn in on-going professional learning
communities referred to as coaching groups. The coaching groups share information and skills about
cognitive theory, assessment of student learning, collaborative group structures, students’
developmental needs and how to create supportive socially competent classroom environments. Social
competence includes flexibility, empathy and compassion, self-efficacy, self-awareness, caring,
communication skills, and other GNH principle and values (Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1995).
The research team believes it is the daily culture of the school is the primary factor that
supports students’ holistic development and academic learning. It is not the curriculum as curriculum
changes over time. RUB colleges’ classrooms as well as the other spaces on campus must establish a
caring strength-focused culture that nurtures resilience in all students and lecturers.
Caring relationships convey compassion, understanding and respect (Friere, 2004; Shor,
1992). They are grounded in active listening and establish basic trust. Positive high expectations
communicate the guidance, structure, challenge, and moreover a belief in the student’s ability.
Classroom learning should provide opportunities, inside and outside the physical classroom, for
meaningful participation, social competence, leadership, critical thinking and problem solving skills,
and contribution to the community (Capra, 1997, 2004). In this way, the students and lecturers can
support humanity’s basic needs for love and belonging, for respect, for involvement, power and
purpose. A sense of purpose includes the ability to set goals, educational aspirations, optimism in their
local and global community, meaning, and spiritual connectedness (Bruner, 1996; Miller, 1990).
RUB must be ambitious to fulfill its desire to become holistic and infuse GNH values and
principles. This ambition must be fulfilled systematically engaging the lectures, administrators, and
students to work together as a learning community; dedicated to the changes necessary to
intentionally develop a caring, supportive, participatory and positive learning environment. This
report is an attempt to develop the interventions that will help lead to the development of GNH
classroom practices and pedagogies, as well as MA and PhD graduate degree programs offered from
RUB. If successful, RUB will be unique in the world by offering a program that supports the overall
GNH national framework. The programs will serve to contribute to the attainment of Millennium
Development Goals by providing concrete teaching and learning practices for educational
transformation.
Currently RUB places the onus for failure to achieve academic credentials on the individual
rather than the system. There are mandates to teach certain subjects and have established standards
based on texts applicable to the subject. If RUB wants to be a GNH college, GNH pedagogy and
curriculum that facilitates and meets the GNH standards and indicators must be developed and
funded. Currently, rewards for those who perform well on high-stakes tests tend to be unequal.
Curriculum standards presuppose students’ possession of cultural capital, an acquisition that entails
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
28
being reared in that genre. Education cannot forgo either authority or tradition, however authority
must be earned rather than assumed and the transmission of tradition needs to be critical and
experiential rather than blindly followed. Using student knowledge as the object of rigorous study can
bring a closer relationship between student, teacher and subject matter.
A GNH college goes beyond a career conduit. It will take some convincing and hard work to
understand holistic education is the best way for students to become compassionate, productive, and
contributing and responsible citizens. The forefront of a GNH holistic education is to offer a genuine
education enabling social change and widening students’ possibilities in life. Instruction should
include more than knowledge to be credentialed. Instruction should support the “intellectual exertion
and the development of a poetic and divine life” (Thoreau, 1849). Without the notion and idealism of
developing the impossible, there is little chance for transformation toward GNH education. For a
GNH holistic education to become fulfilled, this GNH PAR analysis and intervention is essential and
timely.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
29
Introduction
Historical Context and Background In the 1972, the 4th King of Bhutan, His Majesty Jigme Singye Wangchuck, developed an
approach to modernization, the objective of which he called “Gross National Happiness” (GNH). This
framework, based upon the premise that the happiness of the people should be a guiding principle in
the development of this formerly closed society, acknowledges that the spiritual and emotional
development of the people is as important to the country as the promotion and development of
material accumulation and modern comfort. The pursuit of GNH currently guides all economic and
social policies in Bhutan.
In 2009, the 5th King of Bhutan, Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, asked the government
and the people to address the need to reform the educational system. His goal was to transform the
current British-Indian based school structure into a more holistic educational system in line with the
principles of GNH. Holistic education, based upon the premise that each person finds identity,
meaning, and purpose in life through connections to the community, the natural world, and
humanitarian values such as compassion, interdependence, and trust aligns well with basic Bhutanese
principles.
The Project
The Royal University of Bhutan (RUB) has undertaken a participatory action research study
(PAR). The research team includes 62 lecturers from RUB and a primary investigator from Colorado,
US. This study seeks to identify the most deeply rooted values among the lecturers at RUB and the
disparity between these values and current educational practices. The GNH PART study aims to
identify foundational elements of a holistic education system dedicated to GNH, the gaps in current
classroom practice of RUB, as well as develop ways to bridge the identified gaps and thereby create a
holistic GNH educational classroom practice and pedagogy. The results of the investigation will
inform and guide the transformation of the Colleges of RUB, and will also inform the entire
Bhutanese public school system; RUB is responsible for training the teachers of Bhutan. From the
ideas and opinions of the stakeholders at RUB (including lecturers, students, and administrators)
elements, functions, flows, and characteristics, of a GNH holistic education system will be defined.
The nature of the PAR processes include the change that takes place with the researchers as
well as within their classroom practice. The lecturers, teachers and staff involved in the research as
respondents, also develop and organize a GNH educational culture within the PAR process. The study
will focus on populations of lecturers and staff at RUB; in-service teachers/ staff (those already
teaching and directing at schools); and pre-service teachers (those students attending college to
become a teacher). Some of the challenges include: utilizing the recommendations from the study as
support for institutional change for those organizations and agencies with decision making power,
capacity building, and developing nationwide training for teachers/staff/lecturers.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
30
Currently identified by the office of the Vice Chancellor, it is the responsibility of lecturers
and staff to embody and transmit the values and principles of GNH in their classroom and college
communities. It is the charge of the Ministry of Education, in collaboration with the RUB colleges, to
assess and monitor the content and methods of the education curriculum and classroom practices.
Presently, the decision-making lies in the OVC and is mandated through various procedures and
programs that include training and workshops to help carry those mandated programs to fruition.
Aims of the study:
Central Research Questions
1. How do the lecturers of RUB want to see GNH principles and values developed in
their schooling system?
2. What are the perceptions on whose role it is to set and monitor the content and
methods of the education curriculum?
3. What are the perceptions of decision-making roles relative to the education system
and what are the pedagogies to use?
4. What aspects of the Western modern world are important to include, and how can
these be balanced with traditional culture and values as well as GNH? Benefit/risk
analysis. Both directions…. Transmission, adaptation.
5. What are the perceptions of whose role it is to transmit these values?
6. How long does something have to be in place to be considered
traditional/modern?
7. How widespread does something have to be in place to be considered
traditional/modern?
8. What principles and values of GNH do the University faculty want to see
developed in the school system? How do they want to receive their professional
development in terms of GNH pedagogy?
9. What does the faculty see as their role in defining, monitoring, mediating and
integrating values and cultural elements, in the education system?
10. What skills and knowledge are necessary to develop in students in order to
support the principles and values of GNH? How will these be developed in the
students?
11. What is the best way to structure an educational system to support the principles
of GNH?
12. What are the differences between mission/monastic schools and holistic GNH
education?
13. What are the differences or gaps in values and pedagogies that are currently being
transmitted or modeled between the colleges?
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
31
i. How do any of these college-related values link with, or appear to,
influence GNH?
ii. What criteria and evidence exists to support the increase of GNH
principles as outlined in the GNH framework as needed in schools?
iii. How can a system of assessment be developed to ensure the education
system does not get stuck in a fixed model system that already exists?
14. What pedagogical instruction is necessary for the RUB Teachers College to
ensure that pre-service teachers are appropriately prepared? How can this
instruction be delivered?
15. What will be the criteria or indicators that show lecturers ‘are appropriately
prepared’? How will they be assessed and hold accountable?
a. Change in classroom strategies, which include several from the Cycle 1 and
Cycle 2 interventions
i. The sharing of information from lecturers/staff who have been involved
in the PAR study to those lecturers/staff who were not involved so the
research team can observe the intervention practices in classes beyond
those lecturers/staff who have participated in the study.
16. What will be the criteria or indicators that show students are learning content and
GNH values and principles? How will lecturers be accountable for assessment
using the indicators?
a. How will the learning and assessment of student learning include GNH values
and principles?
b. How will lecturers develop systems of assessment that align with GNH and be
held accountably to use them?
17. How can RUB build systematic capacity rather than just train lecturers.
18. What will the lecturers need to do to go beyond their training and develop an
attitude of holistic education? (Communities of practice, policy change, include
career paths, systems of support supervision, etc.)
19. Are there classrooms are currently practicing pedagogy that aligns with GNH
holistic education: where, who, and what, are the circumstances and contributing
factors.
i. Why here and not other places?
ii. Who is involved?
iii. Is this being supported – monitored, assessed?
20. What kinds of college classrooms already show examples of some aspects of
positive/desirable forms of pedagogy?
a. What are the factors that support such changes?
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
32
b. What challenges are they meeting?
c. What shows that they ‘are working or not’ in terms of GNH desired educational
designs?
The Significance of the Project
Although the vast majority of the population currently has access to the Bhutanese public
education system, there still exists an emphasis on an Anglo-Indian curriculum focusing on individual
achievement, competitiveness, and technical mastery of numeracy and literacy. To cultivate GNH, it
is essential that an attitude shift takes place among the lecturers, administration and students of RUB.
In addition, the development of several genres of education as foundational pillar needs to be
embedded in the daily classroom practice and curriculum of RUB. The foundational educational
paradigms that are outlined in the GNH framework include holistic education based on critical
pedagogy, contemplative or mindfulness practices, and values education.
This study will contribute to the development of the first nationwide college educational
system based upon holistic education principles. While there are currently individual schools that
take a holistic approach, to date, no country has attempted to use holistic education as the underlying
paradigm for the nation’s entire college education system. The small nation of Bhutan is attempting
to create something the world has never seen before. This study can provide a unique example to
inform other parts of the world about holistic education and can provide a model for the development
of graduate programs in holistic education at RUB for pre-service, in-service teachers and
administrators around the world.
Relationship of Research to Existing Literature
This study seeks to gather data that will inform the research team on how to bridge the
existing gap between theory of, and actual classroom practice and pedagogy, thereby advancing a
holistic based education. The study will expand the existing research and literature of holistic
education pedagogy.
New Knowledge Expected to Result from Research
Innovative pedagogy and classroom practices supporting holistic education are the expected
outcomes of this study. The existing RUB colleges will be examined to find out what extent holistic
GNH pedagogy already exists and what pedagogy is not supportive of GNH. Collaborations with
those lecturers, staff, and students, who are teaching and learning in ways that support GNH will be
assessed and invited to participate in bringing more GNH pedagogy to their college community and
classrooms. From this GNH PAR study innovative new pedagogy can be developed. Observations by
the research team of those lecturers, staff and community members already engaged in GNH
pedagogy are documented and monitored. During Cycle II interventions, the research team is
working with lecturers at PCE to develop and share classroom practices and pedagogies more aligned
with GNH and to identify how they impact student learning. In this collaborative professional
development learning community (i.e. coaching groups, lecturers and staff) can shift the existing
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
33
attitude from a more additional top-down Euro-Indian classroom and education paradigm to an
expanded GNH classroom paradigm.
At this time, the research team has infused innovative practices into the second and third
intervention cycles and developed recommended interventions for the second and third phases of the
research based upon the baseline data. Data is to be continually collected as to the effectiveness of
student learning and teaching of the lecturers during the fall 2012 semester as part of the Cycle II
intervention. As a participatory action research study, the second and third cycles phase of data
collection looks at processes and outcomes as the holistic education practices are being rolled out.
Training is developed and given to current lecturers/staff as support in order to implement new
practices developed from the findings of the baseline data. Data collected on what is working, as well
as what is not working, and the contributing factors to each, are identified and used to help further
develop the training for current lecturer/staff. At the end of the Cycle II intervention round Phase I
and II recommendations will be adjusted to reinforce the continued development of a GNH classroom
practice and pedagogy. At the end of the study in 2014, the research team will write a comprehensive
summary and an official guideline of GNH pedagogy and classroom practices. Lastly, RUB will use
the findings and recommendations to develop modules contributing to a MA and PhD degree program
in holistic education.
Classroom culture:
Classroom culture influences the way learning is valued, the way students look upon
themselves and others, and lays the foundation of lifelong habits of thought and action. VanBalkom &
Sherman (2010) elucidate the current situation regarding teacher preparation in the two colleges of
Education in Bhutan, suggesting that there is a general disconnect between theory and practice (p. 47).
The study notes that the colleges in Bhutan primarily use the lecture method as the predominant
teaching pedagogy, even with content about the use of different teaching methods. Our baseline data
strongly echoed VanBalkom & Sherman’s (2010) study. The GNH PAR study asserts that students
believe lecturers should practice what they teach and recommends that teachers model different
teaching strategies for pre-service teachers. MacInerney & MacInerney (1994) examine how students
learn best, and report concrete demonstrations of key concepts facilitate effective learning (p. 568).
The baseline data confirmed MacInerney & MacInerney’s (1994) findings. Students from all colleges
state that concrete, experiential experiences are how they learn best. VanBalkom & Sherman (2010)
conclude: “Bhutanese schools will only improve if there is a shift to a culture of engagement in
classrooms” and that the college lecturers’ and school teachers’ pedagogy play a vital role in creating
such an intentional culture. The GNH PAR study baseline data substantiates this conclusion
throughout RUB colleges. A shift in attitude among lecturers, administrators, and students to develop
approaches more aligned within GNH values and principles than the current Euro-Indian form of
education currently prevailing in classrooms, is necessary to fulfill the expectations of a GNH
educational culture and pedagogy.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
34
There are a variety of approaches to increase the effectiveness of lecturer pedagogy
supporting the GNH framework. Critical pedagogy and contemplative, or mindfulness education, are
two paradigms steeped in GNH values and principles. Critical pedagogy emerged as an alternative to
hegemonic educational practices, questioning the imbalance of power and marginalization perpetuated
by the status quo. Bourdieu explains: “The educational market is strictly dominated by the linguistic
products of the dominant class and tends to sanction the pre-existing differences in [symbolic,
material, and cultural] capital” (1982, p. 62). Externally imposed conceptions of education function to
maintain the social status quo of the external entity, in which some populations benefit, while others
do not. GNH calls for a holistic education whereby all learners benefit. Ayers (2001) states:
“Education is about opening doors, opening minds, opening possibilities. School is too often about
sorting and punishing, grading and raking and certifying. Education is unconditional—it asks nothing
in return. School routinely demands obedience and conformity as a precondition to attendance.” (p.
xxiii). A critical pedagogical foundation of education shifts classroom “focus to the active process of
learning [this shift] has never denied that texts, materials, lessons, tests, and classrooms are important;
they are just not the substance of curriculum or the purpose of education” (Slattery, 2006, p. 62).
Critical pedagogy is a way to develop consciousness. Freire argued for “…education as the
practice of freedom - as opposed to education as the practice of domination” (1998, p. 75). He urged
educators to base educational activities on issues that were immediately related to the learners’ lives.
Dialectical discourse leads to conscientization, or “the emergence of consciousness and critical
intervention in reality” (Freire, 1998, p.75). The classroom transforms to a place where learners
become active participants in the world, rather than passive objects acted upon by circumstance.
Education becomes a dynamic process of reflective, empowerment for both lecturers and student.
Freire elaborates: “Teaching in schools and universities is not a preparation for a future life; it must
be, as Dewey (1998) wrote in Experience and Education, an experience of life itself” (p. xvi).
Education is an awakening to and exploration of one’s own life (Friere, 1998), and the concentric
circles of context in which we live.” (Ayers, 2001). Pedagogical classroom practice is used as a means
of challenging hegemonic systems, embodying “liberation [as] a praxis; the action and reflection of
men and women upon their world in order to transform it.” (Freire, 1998, p. 73).
The process of conscientization does not guarantee awareness. Greene (1998) warns that we
cannot assume everyone will be moved to open his or her heart and mind through the process of
conscientization. Teachers must model “…moving beyond self-interest to a consideration of
responsibility as members, as citizens, or (sometimes in the extreme) as contemporary… resistance
fighters.” (Greene, 1998, p. xxviii). Support is needed from the management in order for classrooms
to transform. Collective critical awareness is limited when it “…does not extend to needed structural
transformation" (Gottlieb & La Belle, 1990, p. 11), nor does it necessarily improve living conditions.
Despite these uncertainties, to teach for GNH is "…to teach so that the young may be awakened to the
joy of working for transformation in the smallest places, so that they may become healers and change
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
35
their worlds." (Greene, 1998, p. xlv).
Contemplative, or mindfulness education, is this: how we know is as important as what we
know. Mindful education allies with rational empirical schooling. Traditional schooling methods
have focused on rational empirical knowing involving observation, calculation, analysis, evaluation,
measurement and explanation. Another way of knowing, through mindfulness practices, has been
utilized throughout time, culture, and in many disciplines, to pursue knowledge and wisdom. Mindful
education, or contemplative education, is absent in many of the classrooms and pedagogies
throughout Bhutan and the world. This gap impacts student performance, the development of
character, civic vitality, and conscience. The mindful mind is opened through various approaches
designed to quiet the chatter in one’s mind and cultivate a deeper awareness. Mindfulness is a quality
of human consciousness described as an accepting awareness of, and enhanced attention to, lived
experience. Being mindful increases engagement with the present moment and allows for a clearer
understanding of how thoughts and emotions can impact our health and quality of life. Using
mindfulness practice in the classroom enables the student to gain a way of knowing that supports and
complements rational and empirical ways of knowing.
The data from the baselines GNH PAR study shows that one of the largest contributing
factors blocking mindfulness practice in the classroom is the result of lecturers feeling that it is a
religious practice and should be kept out of the classroom. Hart (2004) states: “Opening the
contemplative mind in schools is not a religious issue but a practical epistemic question. It is about
how we know, not about what knowledge we are giving others. Inviting the contemplative simply
include the natural human capacity for knowing through silence, looking inward, pondering deeply,
beholding, witnessing the contents of our consciousness and so forth.” This way of opening and
allowing deeper understanding parallels critical pedagogy. Critical pedagogy uses praxis, a process of
naming, critical self-reflection, and informed action, to co-create knowledge with students and
lecturers. The critical self-reflection is best achieved when using contemplative practices.
A GNH classroom requires the classroom practice and pedagogy to include GNH values and
principles such as life tools of social life, emotional regulation, civility, and compassion. The
responsibility of RUB is to develop classroom practices and pedagogies to support GNH principles
and values as well as to encourage development of lecturers’ conscience through a deeper
understanding and application in their specific content area. The deeper understanding infers a higher
order understanding, creativity, problem solving and self-reflection that will ultimately transform the
lecturer and the student through the process of learning together.
Schonert-Reichl & Lawlor (2010) report children who participated in mindfulness practices,
as compared to those who did not, showed significant increases in optimism and socially competent
behaviors. In addition, there are an abundance of research studies showing the positive impact
mindfulness practices have on learning, health, reduction of stress, self-awareness, civility and
happiness. Research also shows students significantly:
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
36
• Became more optimistic and thought more positively
• Learned to make themselves happy
• Were more accepting of others perspectives
• Tried to help others more often
• Thought mindfulness practices positively influenced their social and emotional development
• Declined appreciably in aggressive behaviors
• Were significantly more attentive and emotionally regulated.
Atkinson, 1996). Not only has it been shown that mindfulness practices positively impacts students,
research has also shown that teachers’ own presence and ability of teaching is cultivated. (Miller,
1994; Solloway, 2000). Throughout the baseline data round, the GNH PAR research team frequently
heard from lecturers that learning is not merely a matter of time on task but the quality of attention
brought to the task. In the discussion section of this report there will be several ideas of mindfulness
practice that can be infused into GNH classroom practice and pedagogy.
Preservation of culture is one of the four pillars of GNH. Some of the traditional Bhutanese
values include the extended family system, which historically functioned as the school where the elder
family members educated and prepared children for adult life. Families have functioned as a medium
of moral, civic, and intellectual education in non-literate societies. The integration of oral learning
transmission, experiential learning, and values education, are teaching tools necessary to use uphold
cultural preservation and GNH (Dorji Penjore, 2005). Values were acquired through direct
participation in the socio-cultural daily rituals of Bhutanese life. Bhutanese culture has been preserved
by each generation orally passing its history to the next. Maintaining and adapting these oral-learning
traditions is essential in bridging the gap between theory and practice in classroom that aligns with
GNH.
Values education is one of the most important objectives in the teaching of children. Dasho
Karma Ura (2009) states that it is imperative that the education system of Bhutan incorporate values
in its methodology. He notes that values education – also known as character education, civic
education, and moral education – has been overshadowed by an emphasis on individualism in western
education systems, with a de-emphasis on social responsibility, community consciousness, and
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
37
altruism (p. 10-11). He furthers notes: “…peaceful, human relations and helpfulness towards each
other are central factors in creating a contented society” a central objective in the GNH framework.
Dasho Karma Ura points out in his review of current textbooks and pedagogy that values-based
education is lacking. A school system based on GNH would include values education in textbooks,
teacher preparation, classroom management and structure.
Happiness is at the center of GNH. McDonald’s (2005) work in Bhutan describes the
connection between development of values and happiness, which “…provides the intellectual
foundation for almost every system of sustainable social co-ordination.” (p. 25).
…this universal wisdom has however, been successively lost in the process of modernization to
be replaced by a less grounded understanding…First the abandonment of happiness as the
ultimate end to be sought…the denial of any need for an intentional morality….
(McDonald, p. 27)
Sampling and Data Collection
Sampling
The sampling used in most of the colleges was a mix of random sampling incorporating
probability and stratified random sampling, purposive, and convenience sampling. Attention was paid
to gender, year or level of study for students, years of teaching for lecturers, age, and the location of
students from Bhutan.
The GNH PAR study utilized probability sampling, as the research generalized from the
sample populations of RUB to the whole population of RUB. The estimates for selection were based
on the demographics of the total RUB population. This form of respondent selection was less biased
as it did not depend on personal judgment. A random selection process has independence because the
selection of one person does not have an effect on the selection of other individuals.
During the pretest round held in Paro, March 5 - 11, 2012, the stratified random sampling
method was used. Stratified random sampling assured greater statistical precision with less variance
because groups were more likely to be homogenous within a stratum than across the whole
population. In an attempt to ensure the sample was representative of the population, students at Paro
Teachers College were stratified into subgroups based on gender and their level of study: first, second,
third and fourth year. Then, respondents were sampled randomly within each stratum in an effort to
provide equal opportunities for different key subgroups of the student population. However, due to
research leader changes and organizational issues among the research team, one month into the data
collection the nature of randomization shifted. The research team members had very little prior
experience in research and sampling procedures. It was difficult for team members to follow the
randomization selection process and match with the schedule of the students and the lecturers. At the
beginning, the lecturers seemed to be fully occupied during the day, which led to timing challenges.
Lecturers were unable to show up at a specific time. They needed a more spontaneous schedule.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
38
Therefore, a convenience sampling and scheduling procedure replaced the original randomized
selection process.
The key aspect of the convenience method, as its name indicates, was based upon the
participants’ availability. This method was inexpensive and straightforward, and although it is widely
used in qualitative research (for it represents actual characteristic of the population), it may be linked
to limited credibility because of the ease of data gathering and a possible systematic bias. The latter
implies the sample may not be an accurate representative of the entire population, which may result in
obtaining irrelevant, skewed results and low external validity of the research. The research team made
every attempt to line up the sampling population with the total population. When the research team
used convenience sampling, research team members selected the individuals based on gender balance
and year of study to obtain more balanced opinions in their target population. The lecturers were
selected based upon gender, years of teaching, and the department in which they taught. Inclusion of
the administrators and support staff into the research study required use of the purposive sampling
method. Administrators were chosen deliberately, mainly based upon the position they held and who
was at the college during the data collection period. Purposive sampling can be a useful non-
probability type of sampling method in situations where sampling for proportionality is not the main
concern. The strategy is typically used when a particular subset of the population is targeted, such was
the population of the administrators of each college. Primary criticism of a purposive sample is the
likelihood to overweight subgroups in a population that are more readily accessible and therefore
rejecting those who do not suit the method. Homogenous sampling of the purposive sampling
technique was used to address specific questions characteristic of the group being studied. The
research team selected the directors at each college to interview, as well as academic deans. The
director was not available for an interview from one college.
It is important to note that although PCE research team members, who spoke the
respondents’ local language(s), were always present, wording questions and language barriers while
conducting focus group discussions and key informant interviews in English may have presented
some error or bias in the respondents’ ability to answer and/or understand the language. English is an
official language and used in the colleges, however it is rarely a first language of the respondents.
In this study, 630 adults, 17 years and older, were sampled, which represents 9.3% of the
entire RUB population, including students, lecturers, and administrators. The total sample included:
● 366 students, or 6.1% of the entire student population,
● 203 lecturers, including the research team members, or 42% of the entire lecturer population,
● 28 administrators, which represents 10.44% of the administration population;
● 33 respondents who were involved and/or who participated in the writing of field notes,
meeting notes, and research team diaries. Those sets are labeled as “notes.”
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
39
The research team members were required to keep a research diary to document their personal
growth throughout the research and their journal entries were utilized to provide an additional
perspective from RUB’s lecturers on their self-reflective journey through PAR. Out of
approximately 70 data sets between meeting notes, field notes, and research diaries collected, 27
sets we used in our analysis. The results of this study report come from an analysis of 218
collected data sets.
After the pretest round held in Paro, March 5-11, 2012, four members of the PCE research
team visited CNR, in Lobesa, on March 11-14, 2012. Of the total population of 321, of which 58 are
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
40
female and 263 male, there are 249 students enrolled in either diploma, or degree programs, of which
37 are female and 212 are male between 21 or 42 years of age. At present, CNR employs 30 lecturers,
6 female and 24 male, whose age ranges between 21 and 54 years old. In addition, there are 42
administrators, including support staff, of which 15 are female and 27 are male and the age range is
from 27 to 53-years-old. To document current classroom practices, individual scope, and
stakeholders’ needs. Together, CNR and PCE RT members:
● Gathered thirteen sets of data, which included a total of 34 respondents: 8 female and 26
male.
● Three classroom observations that were selected at random, all male lecturers.
● Five focus group discussions, which included lecturers, teachers and students, and
● Four key informant interviews with administrators, teachers, lecturers, and students.
● One additional data set was derived from notes and it involved 1 male respondent.
Further sampling using the probability method, for field data gathering in local schools in Lobesa,
was facilitated in consultation with CNR RT members.
In Trongsa, the team visited ILCS on March 15-17, 2012. Total population at ILCS numbers 561
of which 255 are female and 306 are male. The Student population totals 501, including 241 female
and 260 male students between 21 and 26-years-old. There are 26 lecturers, 4 female and 22 male,
whose ages range between 24 and 48 years old. In addition, there are 34 administrators including
support staff, of which 10 are female and 24 are male and their ages range from 21 to 55-years-old.
Together, ILCS and PCE RT members:
● Gathered nineteen sets of data that included a total of 53 respondents, 19 female and 34 male.
● Five classroom observations randomly selected with all male lecturers,
● Four focus group discussions, which included lecturers and students, and
● Six key informant interviews with 3 male administrators, lecturers, and students.
● Four additional data sets were collected from the notes included 6 respondents.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
41
To ensure other PCE data collection team members received concrete hands-on data
collection experience, in addition to having to uphold their pre-established teaching duties at PCE,
two research team members returned to Paro, and two different PCE research team members
embarked on a new data collection journey. This team visited GCBS in Gaeddu, on March 18-20,
2012. Total population at GCBS numbers 1148 of which 476 are female and 672 are male. The
student population totals 1066, including 460 are female and 606 are male between 18 and 35-years-
old. Currently, there are 72 lecturers appointed at GCBS, 12 female and 60 male, whose ages range
between 23 and 66-years-old. Additionally, there are 10 administrators including support staff, of
which 4 are female and 6 are male, and their ages range from 24 to 49-years-old. Together, GCBS and
PCE RT members:
● Gathered twenty two sets of data that included a total of 54 respondents, 16 female and 38
male.
● Seven classroom observations, randomly selected, including all male lecturers,
● Eight focus group discussions which included 6 male lecturers, 28 students, of which 12 were
female and 16 male, and
● Five key informant interviews with 1 male administrator, 1 male lecturer, and 4 students, 2
female and 2 male.
● Two additional sets derived from the notes of meeting notes included 7 respondents.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
42
After visiting GCBS, PCE team collected data at CST located in Rinchending, Phuntsoling,
between March 21 and 23, 2012. Total population at CST numbers 568 of which 143 are female and
425 are male. The student population totals 521, of which 132 are female and 389 male, between 18
and 29 years of age. CST employs 34 administrators and 43 lecturers, of which 9 are female and 34
male, whose ages range between 25 and 55-years-old. To note, during research, 4 lecturers, including
1 female and 3 male, were on leave. Together, CST and PCE RT members:
● Gathered twenty-two sets of data that involved 60 respondents, 22 female and 38 male.
● Seven classroom observations with both, female and male lecturers, and
● Seven focus groups with lecturers and students, and 5 key informant interviews with
lecturers, students, and administrators.
Between March 24 and 29, 2012, PCE RT visited SCE, in Samtse. Total population at SCE
numbers 981 of which 439 are female and 542 are male. Currently, SCE has student population that
totals 899 full-time students, including 411 female and 488 male students, whose ages range from 17
to 34-years-old. There are 156 students pursuing PgDE, 68 female and 88 male, whose ages range
from 20 to 34-years-old. Students enrolled in B.Ed. compose a total of 743 students, 343 female and
400 male students, between 17 and 32-years-old. Total number of faculty members at SCE is 54
lecturers, 15 female and 39 male, between 23 and 58 years old. Administrative staff includes library,
instructors, technical, and administrative staff of 28 members, 13 female and 15 male, between 21 and
54-years-old. Together, SCE and PCE RT members:
● Gathered twenty-six data sets that engaged 86 respondents, 38 female ad 48 male.
● Seven class observations with both, female and male lecturers,
● Nine focus groups with students, lecturers, and administrators, and
● Seven key informant interviews with students and lecturers.
● An additional three sets gathered from notes involved 3 respondents.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
43
While at SCE, teams gathered an additional 12 data sets using the probability method in local primary
and secondary schools.
At this time in the semester, PCE RT was experiencing challenges with research data
collection team’s itinerary and coordination between colleges. Shortly thereafter, one of the two PCE
RT leaders resigned from the team leader position and the traveling members of the PCE research
team returned to Paro on March 31, 2012.
PCE research team’s subsequent visit to Sherubtse College, in Kanglung, on April 04-09,
2012, produced 27 data sets, thereby involving 62 respondents in the study. Total population at
Sherubtse numbers 1291 of which 496 are female and 795 are male. The student population totals
1101, of which 456 female and 645 male, between 19 and 22 years of age. Faculty at Sherubtse
includes 114 lecturers, 26 female and 88 male lecturers, whose ages range from 25 to 55-years-old.
There are 72 administrators, of which 14 are female and 62 are male, from 25 to 44-years-old.
Together, Sherubtse and PCE RT members:
● Gathered thirty six data sets, involved 102 respondents, 33 female and 69 male.
● Seventeen class observations with female and male lecturers,
● Seven focus groups with lecturers and students, and
● Four key informant interviews with lecturers, students, and administrators.
● An additional eight sets included 8 respondents.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
44
On April 10-11, 2012, PCE team resumed their data collection at JNP, in Dewathang. Total
population at JNP numbers 408 of which 91 are female and 317 are male. The student population
totals 341, 77 female and 264 male, aging from 18 to 30-years-old. Civil Engineering diploma
students total 181, of which 38 are female and 143 are male students. There are 111 Electrical
Engineering students pursuing a diploma, 24 female and 88 male. Additionally, students enrolled in a
Mechanical Engineering diploma program total 49, 16 female and 33 male students. JNP employs 41
lecturers, 4 female and 37 male, from 24 to 57-years-old. To note, 7 male lecturers are pursuing
studies. There are 26 administrators from 22 to 40-years-old, 10 female and 16 male, of which 3 are
away on studies. Together, JNP and PCE RT members:
● Gathered thirteen sets of data involving 38 respondents, 11 female and 27 male.
● Two class observations with male lecturers,
● Four focus groups with lecturers and students, and
● Six key informant interviews with students, lecturers, and administrators.
● One additional set was gathered from the notes with 1 male respondent.
On April 23, 26, and 30, 2012, PCE research team visited RIHS in Thimphu. Those research
team members, who did not previously have a chance to travel far to visit other colleges, alternated
the data collection process at said college. Total population at RIHS numbers 395 of which 201 are
female and 194 are male. The student body totals 335, of which 169 are female and 166 are male
students. There are 23 students seeking a degree at RIHS, 17 female and 6 male students, while 152
are enrolled in a diploma program, of which 74 are female and 78 are male. Students seeking a
certificate total 160, with 78 female and 82 male students. RIHS employs 32 lecturers, of which 18
are female and 14 are male, whose ages range from 26 to 60-years-old, as well as 28 administrators,
14 female and 14 male, from 24 to 50-years-old. Together, RIHS and PCE RT members:
● Gathered seventeen sets of data that engaged 60 respondents, 29 female ad 31 male.
● Five class observations, and
● Five focus groups and
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
45
● Seven key informant interviews.
To note, all focus group and key informant interview participants were pre-selected.
On their next visit to Thimphu, on May 07, 2012, PCE RT members went to NITM. Total
population at NITM numbers 88 of which 35 are female and 53 are male. The student body at NITM
numbers 60 students enrolled full time, 23 female and 37 male, from 20 to 29-years-old. Students
seeking Doctor’s degree, Drungthso, amount to a total of 31, with 9 female and 22 male students,
while those enrolled in a diploma program total 29, of which 14 are female and 15 are male. The
Institute employs 11 lecturers, 3 female and 8 male, 24 to 58-years-old and also 17 administrators, 9
female and 8 male, from 23 to 44-years-old. Together, NITM and PCE RT members:
● Gathered six data sets that involved 33 participants, 13 female and 20 male.
● Two classroom observations, with 2 male lecturers,
● Three focus groups with students and lecturers, and
● One key informant interview with 1 male administrator.
Total population at PCE numbers 1008 of which 427 are female and 581 are male. The
student population totals 943, including 409 are female and 534 are male between 19 to 39-years-old.
Currently, there are 62 lecturers appointed at PCE, 17 female and 45 male, whose ages range between
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
46
26 to 53-years-old. Additionally, there are 3 administrators including support staff, of which 1 are
female and 2 are male, and their ages range from 30 and 53- years-old. PCE RT gathered 47 data sets
that involved 110 respondents, including actively participating research team members. Together,
During the pretest week PCE RT members:
● Gathered sixteen data sets engaging 57 respondents, 24 female and 33 male.
● Seven focus groups with 21 female and 21 male students, 2 female and 4 male lecturers.
● Two class observations with 2 male lecturers, and
● Seven key informant interviews with 1 female and 2 male students, 3 male lecturers, and 1
male administrator.
During the Baseline round, the PCE team gathered 31 data sets that involved 53 respondents,
including 14 participating research team members. PCE RT collected data through class observations
that included couching group observations, thereby collecting:
● Fifteen data sets, with 6 female and 9 male lecturers.
● Team also participated in two focus groups with 3 female and 2 male students, 2 female and 4
male lecturers and
● Six key informant interviews with 1 female lecturer and 2 male lecturers, 1 male
administrator, and 2 students, 1 female and 1 male.
● An additional eight sets, gathered through use of field notes, meeting notes, and research team
diary entries, involved 8 respondents, 3 female and 5 male.
● Furthermore, PCE RT visited 3 local schools and gathered an additional 8 data sets, involving
18 participants. The school data was not used in the report.
Data collection methods
Qualitative methods of data collection are ways of gathering information yielding results that
can’t easily be measured by, or translated into, numbers. They are often used when you need the
subtleties behind the numbers, such as the feelings, small actions, or pieces of community history
affecting the current situation. The methods acknowledge the fact that experience is subjective and it
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
47
is filtered through the perceptions and personal views of the people undergoing the research.
Qualitative researchers believe it’s important to understand those perceptions and personal views.
Qualitative data collection methods connect directly with the population under study. In assessment,
the best sources of information are those closest to what’s being assessed. In this study the lecturers,
students, and administrators, experience the situation more than anyone else. The qualitative methods
used were directed to the lecturers, students, and administrators at all ten RUB colleges. The topic
guide questions developed, used more complex questions than quantitative methods would have
allowed. The qualitative methods selected enabled the revelation of certain underlying realities of the
situation that quantitative methods would not have been able to uncover, such as perceptions about the
education at RUB and in general the educational system of Bhutan. The questions allowed the
researchers to follow promising directions by the responsive use of probing questions such as:
1.1 What does a RUB education mean? Probes
• When people find out that a person has graduated from RUB, what is the first thought that you would want to come to them?
• What symbolism do you want associated with someone who has graduated from RUB? • What is unique about RUB from other colleges? • How does RUB prepare young people to contribute to Bhutan, in a GNH way?
o How does RUB prepare young people to be good neighbours? Good parents? Good friends? Protectors of the environment? Engage in culture? Righteous leaders?
This type of question and response led to the discovery of important information that
quantitative results would not have revealed to the team. The methods chosen allowed for the human
factor. While the information obtained through qualitative methods may have been subjective, it was
identified as such, and was analyzed accordingly. The data collection methods used for this study
included focus group discussions, key informant interviews, observations, research diaries, meeting
notes and plenary sessions. Focus group discussions in this study refered to a session about 1-1½
hours in length, conducted by a facilitator which was the PI and/or research team member (RUB
faculty) along with a note taker, which was also the PI and/or research team member (RUB faculty).
The focus group discussion was conducted with a relatively homogeneous group of 6-12 participants,
done in a comfortable setting where there were relatively few interruptions, during which one, or
more, participatory exercises were used with the group to link the probing questions and discussions.
These sessions generated various kinds of verbal and visual products, plus field notes, that were then
subjected to a combined and comparative analysis.
For this study, a key informant interview referred to open-ended sessions conducted by the PI
and/or research team member as interviewer/facilitator, and a note taker again the PI and/or research
team member. The interview was conducted with individuals that have special knowledge about the
key issues under investigation. Interviews often lasted about 1 hour, used a relatively limited set of
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
48
open-ended topic guide questions as a reference and at times combined probing questions with
participatory tools to enhance participation and reflection.
Observations in this study referred to direct observations in RUB classrooms during the
spring 2012 semester conducted by the PI and/or research team member as the observer. The
observation lasted one class period, approximately 50 minutes, and included written detailed notes of
classroom practices and interactions. The observations were about pedagogy and classroom practices
rather than content. Observations continued as an on-going weekly activity within each RUB College
during the spring 2012 semester.
A research diary was a record of the researcher’s involvement in the project. While the
contents of the diary were sometimes used as data, they were different from the information of the
observations, interviews, discussions or other data that were collected because the diary contained
information about the researcher: what the researcher did during the research process and their
development of research skills and knowledge throughout the baseline round. The research diary
complements the data yielded by the other forms of data collection.
The main reasons for keeping a research diary were to:
• Generate a history of the project, as well as the researcher’s thinking and the research process
• Provide material for reflection
• Offer data on the research process
• Record the development of the researcher’s research skills
Keeping a diary was, therefore, a useful means to:
• Explore individual researcher practices
• Get practice and gain confidence in recording research and writing
• Empower oneself as researcher through sharing experience with peers
• Engage in supportive but critical interaction between peers and participants
What went in the research diary?
• Summary of what happened each day the researcher worked on the project
• Stories of conversations, discussion, interviews, planning sessions, etc.
• Questions and topics for further study or investigation
• Guesses, hunches, and ideas
• Diagrams, drawings, and mind-maps
• Observations
• Reflections on observations
• Plans for future action or research
The research diaries were written up in field notes, progress reports, and/or other documents. There
were no rules about style, language, or spelling. Research diaries, from research team members, were
collected twice through the baseline round, spring semester 2012. Documenting the process of
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
49
research team members was important to inform the cyclical process of PAR and the interventions
developed.
For qualitative fieldwork, taking good notes and keeping them well-organized were critical
skills for successful data collection. Meeting notes were important as they drew on many opinions and
knowledge at one time, and uncovered disagreements or differences that were discussed. These
disagreements were not always evident during focus group discussions or key informant interviews.
The field research team met several times daily during data collection to talk about situations that
were unclear and to troubleshoot any problems. We also made use of a variety of peer-debriefing
techniques.
Plenary discussions were large group feedback sessions held on the last day of the fieldwork
in each college, with the exception of CST which held its plenary during morning hour the following
week after data collection. This was due to a visit by the Ministry of Health on the college campus
during our last day of research analysis. The plenaries focused on the analysis of the data sets by the
research team and included interactive, participatory exercises with lecturers from the college. All
lecturers, and at times students, were invited. The plenary sessions were led by the individual research
team from that college, as well as the travel PCE research team members, and recorded by a note
taker, typically the research associate. In addition, at times notes were taken on flip charts and idea
cards, which were then recorded as data at a later date.
Jumpstart
The Jumpstart workshop was a two-week workshop held at PCE at the onset of the research,
February 15-29, 2012, so all research team members could develop the OPM and research skills
together. In addition, foundations of critical pedagogy and contemplative education were presented
and practiced. During the Jumpstart workshop research team members learned, practiced and
developed their skills in how to: (a) ask strategic and probing questions; (b) hold focus groups
discussions, key informant interviews and direct obbservations; (c) note take; (d) coding data; (e)
analyze data; (f) write up findings and summaries; (g) and make recommendations to develop GNH
classroom practices and pedagogies. The majority of research team members stated that note taking
was considerably more difficult than anticipated and developing probing questions was a skill they
needed to practice. The research team members continued to develop their skills and expand their
knowledge in data collection and analysis throughout the entire baseline round.
During the sessions where foundations of holistic education were introduced through
contemplative education and critical pedagogy, research team members and other PCE lecturers and
RUB staff and administrators identified and prioritized GNH values and principles, clarified the
challenges and questions about the research, and completed the design and organization of the
upcoming data collection process. Most of the ten colleges sent research team leaders to the entire
Jumpstart workshop. There were two colleges that joined after the first 4-6 days. Subsequently,
missing the foundational preparation and team building aspects of the workshop led to extra work and
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
50
confusion in the data collection process when visiting those colleges. The recommendations
emanating from the research team leaders strongly suggested that directors of the colleges should also
have attended the workshop along with all research team members from the colleges, not just research
team leaders or representatives. According to feedback over 80% of participants who attended the
entire workshop stated they were convinced of the importance, design, and implementation of the
study and methodology; however, they were also very concerned with the possible inability to relay
and convince other lecturers back at their home colleges. Almost all research team leaders expressed
this as a potential limitation of the effectiveness of the study. The largest contributing factors to this
concern was the fear that lecturers would believe there was not sufficient time to carry out such a
research study, it was too much work, and the lecturers would not voluntarily participate because the
benefits were not immediate nor the outcome clearly defined. In a PAR study the outcomes emerge
rather than being defined at the onset of the study. The Vice Chancellor attended throughout the entire
Jumpstart as did the RUB’s Dean of Research Dr. Dorji Thinley. Their response was positive and
their leadership model and guidance to lecturers exceptional, supportive, and quite uncommon for
people in their positions.
Pretest
After the conclusion of the Jumpstart workshop, the topic guide questions were administered
during a pretest in Paro by the PCE research team both at PCE and at several school sites in Paro.
Pre-test data at PCE and in Paro schools provided insight to research team members as to topic guide
question adjustments, and where additional training was needed to move forward with PAR. For
instance, during the focus group discussions research team members recognized their challenges to
hold focus group discussions, the importance of asking probing questions, the value of having
informal conversations, and the consequence of talking too much and leading the group in contrast to
listening and letting the respondents offer information. Skills in developing probing questions,
pausing during conversation, and note taking were identified and further practiced. During the pre-
test, a variety of checklists were also developed to ensure clear organization and collect accurate
documentation of data; including specifying sources of information and data collection methods.
Methods to clearly identify the respondents by gender, degree/diploma, as well as the composition of
each college’s research team, locations for data collection, development of a specific sampling plan,
and a form to capture pedagogical issues which were to emerge during the data collection process. As
the research team moved forward with the study, the OPM containing the protocols, topic guide
questions, and the glossary for the study remained a living, content-malleable guide to which research
team members continued to contribute by adding culturally appropriate terms and relevant guiding
questions. There were fourteen major adjustments, i.e. drafts over the baseline study period from
February 2012 – April 2012.
Onsite data collection
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
51
March 12, 2012 the research team started their visit to RUB’s ten colleges. The respondent
population for the GNH PAR study included students, lecturers, administrators, and staff from RUB
colleges and schools in the surrounding areas. Dispersed across Bhutan, RUB’s colleges included:
Paro College of Education (PCE) in Paro, College of Natural Resources (CNR) in Lobesa, College of
Science and Technology (CST) in Rinchending, Gaeddu College of Business Studies (GCBS) in
Gedu, Chukha, Institute of Language and Culture Studies (ILCS) in Trongsa, Jigme Namgyel
Polytechnic (JNP) in Dewathang, National Institute of Traditional Medicine (NITM) in Kawajangsa,
Thimphu, Royal Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Thimphu, Samtse College of Education (SCE),
Samtse, and Sherubtse College (SC) in Kanglung, Tashigang. Since RUB is also responsible for the
instructing teachers in Bhutan, a small secondary sample of schoolteachers, students, and
administrators in several of the communities where the colleges reside were also part of the
respondent population.
The original schedule for visits was changed after visits to the first two colleges. During the
visit to ILCS, the PCE traveling research team members received messages from home-based PCE
research team members of the challenges they were encountering. To address these challenges, the
PCE traveling research team thought it best to return to PCE and work with the home-based PCE
research team members supporting their development in data collection and analysis skills. Due to this
need the time scheduled for visits to other colleges shifted as well as the overall timeline for the
baseline round and first two cycles of interventions. Originally the baseline round and first cycles of
interventions were to take place during the spring semester 2012. The adjusted time line moved the
first cycle of interventions to the month of May and the second cycle of interventions to the fall
semester of 2012 where the PCE research team will lead the interventions with support from the PI
via email. The PI left Bhutan at the beginning of June to return to her teaching at Naropa University
in Boulder, CO, USA. In addition, the original PCE research team leaders who were appointed
resigned and two other research team members volunteered to resume the leadership position. One of
the second group of leaders left RUB, and hence the research team, at the end of the spring semester
and the other is still the current research team leader, Jambay Lhamo. It is interesting to note that the
appointed leaders resigned and the volunteer leader is still in the position of research team leader.
The research team stated that the time commitments, roles, duties, and expectations of the
research leader were not clear during the baseline round and they were not given sufficient time to
give to the research to ensure the stated and hoped for quality commitment. For the first research team
leader, the limits on time to put into the research was mainly due to the assigned 20-hour teaching
load he was given for the spring 2012 semester. For the second research team leader, the limits on
time were mainly due to the 8-hour teaching load and home commitments. During the study review
meeting on May 25, all attending agreed to reduce the teaching load of Jambay Lhamo during the fall
2012 semester and other semesters she will lead the research in, to support the success and quality of
the research; hoping to be given no more than an 8 hour teaching load.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
52
Collection process
Note taking was the priority method of recording data; some video and audio recordings were
also used. The research members grouped into pairs when collecting data. One person asked the
questions and facilitated discussion, while the other person wrote the notes attempting to catch the
conversation verbatim. The note taker did enter the conversation at times supporting the facilitator.
The initial notes taken during the conversation were referred to as short notes. Immediately following
a focus group discussion, key informant interview, observation, or meeting, the research team pair sat
together and reviewed their short notes. Through their review, the short notes were expanded into
long notes by adding pieces of information they remembered but did not have time to record.
Clarification of the researchers’ interpretation of responses was also deliberated. In addition,
comments from the thoughts and opinions of the research team members were integrated into the
notes and were annotated in brackets.
During the collection of data at each of the ten colleges, which took between three and seven
days, the research team members from PCE and the home college analyzed the data by: (a) coding the
data into patterns; (b) identifying patterns that would define and align to a holistic GNH classroom
practice and pedagogy; (c) identifying gaps between current practice and that of a holistic GNH
classroom and pedagogy; (d) proposing recommendations for the development of GNH classroom
practices and pedagogies; and (e) conducting a plenary for final feedback from respondents. All
evaluation steps were completed in a participatory manner. During the plenary session, the findings
and recommendations from the data collected at the colleges were shared and one last round of
feedback from respondents was collected to deepen clarification. Ultimately, an agreement on the
analysis of the data was obtained. Lastly, the agreed upon analysis and recommendations were used to
plan, design, and recommend interventions for future rounds of the research.
Data analysis methods
Intro: What is data analysis?
Data analysis is the most crucial aspect of qualitative research. Analysis is a process of
breaking up, separating, and disassembling research data and materials into pieces, parts, elements,
and/or units. With evidences broken down into manageable pieces, the research team then sorted and
sifted through the data sets, searching for patterns, sequences, processes, and aggregates. The aim of
the analysis process was to assemble or reconstruct the data in a meaningful or comprehensible
systematic manner. Coding was the primary step taken during the analysis to organize, categorize,
and make sense of the data. The research team members found the analysis process quite arduous.
Coding was not a mechanical or technical exercise, rather it was a dynamic, intuitive, and creative
process using inductive reasoning, thinking and theorizing. As the research members gained
experience through the process of coding, a deeper understanding of what they have been studying
developed; simultaneously, the research team members continued to refine their abilities and their
interpretations. The PCE research team members that traveled to other colleges continuously reported
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
53
on the increase of the development of their skills and knowledge in determining the categories,
relationships, and assumptions underlying the respondents’ answers. This growth and development in
research knowledge and skills is inherent in the process of PAR, providing capacity building within
RUB (Taylor & Bogdan, 1998). Through the experiential approach of PAR, research knowledge and
skills for the core PCE research team continued to emerge.
Parts of data analysis
Coding was the fundamental means of developing the analysis. Coding was the process of
categorizing the data into patterns, themes, or ideas and marking similar passages of text with a code
or label. The label typically had a symbol, or color, in order for the patterns to be easily retrieved for
comparison and analysis. Coding made it easier to search through the data and make comparisons, as
well as identify patterns that required further investigation. The coding process allowed the research
team members to notice phenomena through the analysis process by identifying commonalities and
differences. The codes were attached to groups of words, sentences, or paragraphs, within the data.
The research team used codes to pull together and categorize a series of discrete statements and
observations, which initially emerged from the data. At first the data appeared to be a mass of
accounts, but by studying and coding the data sets the research team began to create order and
developed patterns which were eventually categorized into themes.
Coding was a step of analysis that continued through the life of the research. Coding was based
in grounded theory (Charmaz, 2003). In fact, grounded theory is often referred to in the literature as a
constant comparative method of analysis and one of the most common procedures (Strauss, & Corbin,
1990). Constant comparison was used and referred to the process where every time a passage of text
has been selected and coded, it was compared with the other passages that have already been coded.
This ensured that coding was consistent and allowed the research team members to consider the
possibility that some of the passages coded may not fit as well as originally thought and thus, may
need to be coded differently.
The process
As the research analysis began, the research team members carefully read a sample of the data
sets to develop substantive and general topic codes. The research team then went through all the
original transcripts, marked each appropriate line or section with a code in the margin, while re-
checking to see if the meaning first applied still held true in relation to the other statements used with
the same label. The research teams read and re-read the data sets, thinking intensively about the
patterns and their significance. At the end of data collection at each college the research team
members laid out all the data sets on a table so they could look at them all at once. Then they marked
different parts in different ways to find the patterns between the data sets. The research team inserted
different colored marks and words of so they could see the multiple connections across the data sets.
Eventually, the threads revealed patterns among the patterns. The discoveries depended on how the
data sets were coded. The research team did not reduce their analysis to the codes, nor did they derive
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
54
the patterns by simply inspecting collections of data sets. Through the combination of: (a) focused
attention, (b) intensive analysis of a small part of the data, (c) collaborative analysis of the all data sets
together, and 3) the ability to see the how the patterns of the data came together, the research team
members were able to make the discoveries and interpretations necessary for discussion and
recommendations.
The research team used the process of coding to develop patterns and to organized the
patterns into themes. The coding process started as a heuristic process evolving into a reanalysis of
data by researchers who typically were not involved in the original data collection or analysis. Codes
were initially developed through an inductive approach. Through inductive reasoning, the research
team members took a series of specific statements and tried to categorize them into a more general
pattern to reduce the number of patterns. At the end of the process over 180 patterns were identified
and organized into 22 themes. Deductive reasoning, which came later, involved using the patterns
generated and moved towards a more finite list of themes.
A group of code words were devised to help the research team collect the patterns noted in a
systematic way so that they could be subjected to further analysis. Heuristic coding facilitated the
discovery of patterns, and helped the research team to open up the data to further intensive analysis
and inspection. The burdens placed on heuristic codes were much less than those placed on objective
codes. At first, the research team had no assurance that the patterns coded always had the same
meaning, or that every possible pattern in the data set was captured. Therefore, it was the
responsibility of the research team to refine and further develop coding schemes within the analysis of
the data. We looked for counter examples and confirming examples in the data. The heuristic coding
process was the beginning of a process of analysis that required the research team to work deeper and
deeper into the data. Further, heuristic code words changed and evolved as the analysis developed.
Finally, heuristic code words changed and transformed the researcher who, in turn, changed and
transformed the code words as the analytical process proceeded. Again, this demonstrates part of the
experiential learning of PAR. To paraphrase Shakespeare: the answers we look for are not in the
codes, but in ourselves and our meaning. The meaning the research team gave to the codes developed
through the individual and group process of critical analysis, dialectical discussion, and cyclical
review of the data set.
The baseline round analysis started out using grounded theory, letting codes emerge from the
data as part of the noticing process. The codes or pattern labels we gave acted as markers, or a pointer,
to interpret and rationalize what it is research team members thought was happening. In addition,
research team members used codes as transparent representations, and eventually as collection points
for future data sets. In this way codes enabled research team members to continue to make discoveries
about deeper realities in the data referenced by the codes. The codes of the patterns were given names
related to the purpose of the study. When patterns appeared that had not been previously identified,
new labels were created. As the research progressed our number of patterns grew. This allowed for
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
55
the research team members to better address all patterns that emerged within the interventions for
future rounds of the study.
The process of developing patterns and categorization produced conversation between the
researchers about the data, informed the research process, offered descriptive reports, and built
possibilities for interventions for the next round. Patterns were not created in isolation from other
patterns. The patterns that arose, due as a result of conversation within the research team and among
respondents, enabled decisions to be made on how to organize the patterns in ways, which were useful
for continued analysis. The development of patterns helped the research team to ask questions, to
change or drop existing questions from the topic guide, and to compare data across the colleges. From
this process the topic guide went through several adaptations.
The process itself had several steps of analysis. The research pair that executed the interview
and note taking first coded the passages of text in the data set. Once this step was completed, different
research team members reviewed the text to see if the codes had similar meaning or interpretation for
them, as did with the first pair. The research team members proceeded through the analysis ending by
writing the findings, summaries, and making suggestions along the way. This process extended the
conversation among the research team to another level of analysis, by PCE research team members a
few weeks after the initial data set was taken and initially analyzed further adjusting the pattern
distribution.
Some of the questions the research team used to help identify the patterns and themes were:
“What is going on?” “ What are people doing?” “What is the person saying?” “What are the
assumptions behind the statements?” Some of the coding guides used to identify and describe patterns
were:
1. Behaviors and specific acts identified among the lecturers and students. For example, the topics
of the silence of the students in class and lecturing being the most common style of teaching
were frequently described during FG and KI across all colleges.
2. Strategies and practices described by lecturers and students. For example, the patterns within
teaching strategies were identified through frequent mention of the limited teaching strategies
used by lecturers. The majority of the teaching strategies identified by students and lecturers
were lecture, group discussion, and group presentations.
3. States of shared conditions experienced by people within the college community. For example,
the students and lecturers reported exam qualifications determined which college students
attended; lecturers reported their position was determined through examinations and other
external regulations rather than a desire for teaching. One lecturer told the story of how he
wanted to be a doctor, however due to the examination scores he could only become a lecturer
and not even in his field of interest. The lecturers mentioned this would start to change since
the college is now autonomous.
4. Meanings of phenomena. Meanings and interpretations were important aspects of what directs
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
56
respondent actions. This area of coding included concepts respondents use to understand
their world, norms, values and rules that guide their actions as well as the symbols or
language respondents use to construe events or describe objects, roles or persons. For
example, students, lecturers, and administrators, described the relationship between student
and teacher in relation to the silence young people have in front of older people being part of
the culture in Bhutan. Respect was correlated with the use of a quiet voice and the student
being silent during the class time. Moving to a more student-centered, democratic, and
integrated holistic classroom setting, the relationship between student and teacher will need to
shift. This does not mean that respect is lost; instead, respect will need to be defined in terms
of respectful dialectical dialogue rather than student silence.
5. Participation or involvement in the classroom and outside the classroom in the college setting.
For example, students do not seem to be a part of decision-making at the college level in
terms of curriculum or overall college journey.
6. Descriptions and experiences in relationships and interactions between student and student,
student and lecturer, student and administrator, administrator and lecturer, and so on. For
example, the need for more friendly teachers was reported across the colleges repeatedly
during student interviews and student focus group discussions.
7. Conditions and/or constraints for developing pedagogy and classroom practices that align with
GNH were identified. For example, lecturers across the colleges reported the lack of
management support for fulfilling duties in a quality manner. The constraint of time being
one of the strongest. This was heard not only by respondent lecturers but also by research
team members feeling they did not have the time necessary to commit to the research to
maintain quality and continue working with their “heavy load” of teaching and duties required
from the college.
8. Consequences. Many times, students and lecturers related experiences are based upon
consequences. For example, presently the consequence of group learning is that some
students do most of the work, while others do very little. In a holistic GNH classroom the
sorts of classroom practices and pedagogies that would reduce these consequences include:
learning how to do collaborative work where students are interdependent upon each other.
This would include not only learning the subject content but also learning metacognition, how
to learn. Holistic GNH education expands how to learn from the individual to the collective
realm.
9. Structures and settings of the context including the college rooms, work place, housing, canteen
and so forth. In addition, structures include program structure such as the length of time of a
class, typically 50 minutes.
• Reflective researcher’s role in the process of analysis. For example, the ways in which research
team members participated in their growth and development of research skills and knowledge.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
57
This in turn shifted the way the processes of the PAR study moved forward.
• Word repetitions. Research team members looked for commonly used words, and other words,
whose close repetition indicated emotions.
• Local or regional categories. The terms used by respondents with a particular meaning and
significance in their setting.
• Key-words-in-context. Research team members looked for the range of uses of key terms in the
phrases and sentences in which they occurred.
• Compare and contrast. This was essentially the grounded theory idea of constant comparison. Ask:
“What is this about?” and “How does it differ from the preceding or following statements?”
• Social science inquiries. Used social experiences to explain the conditions, actions, interaction and
consequences of phenomena. For example, the descriptions of the students experience in a
class.
• Searching for missing information. When information seems incomplete or confusing, research
team members essentially tried to get an idea of what was not being done or talked about.
• Metaphors and analogies. People often used metaphors to indicate something about their key
central beliefs and these may have indicated the way they felt about issues.
• Transitions and power dynamics. One of the discursive elements in speech, which included turn-
taking in conversation, offered information on cultural norms and meanings.
• Connectors. The research team members constantly negotiated the connections and interpretation
of terms used by the respondents. For example, the term ‘make’ as in we ‘make the student
learn’ was interpreted in the context of our data to imply ‘to try,’ ‘The research team members
tried to give opportunity for our students to learn.’
• Unmarked text. An examination of the text that had not been coded as a pattern. The research team
members in the second round of analysis, while rereading data sets, attended to reviewing the
parts of the data set with no codes.
• Overview. The research team spread out all coded data sets to view as a whole. Eyeballing or
scanning the text searching for circled words, underlined statements, colored highlighted
places, drew lines and arrows down the margins to indicate different meanings and coding,
and identified patterns that appeared visually. Once this was completed the research team
members discussed significances. The research team did this both individually and in small
groups. Research team members collaborated to label and pull together patterns that appeared
throughout the data, eventually organizing the patterns into themes.
While marking the raw data and field notes, the research team kept a list of the patterns that
were constructed and a short definition for explanation. When the first round of analysis and summary
writing was completed, the core research team again reviewed the raw data to ensure the patterns that
emerged were used consistent, checking with the originally developed definitions to be sure the code
given fit with the meaning of the raw data.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
58
This critical micro-level work required repeatedly looking at the passages, doing a dialectic
dance between an idea about how text is organized and comparing it with other examples from other
data sets, figuring out what the research team members were looking at, how to look at it, and why
they gave it the meaning they did. That critical analysis came out of the numerous cycles through the
massive amounts of thinking about the raw data, and the intuition and serendipity of the research team
members.
As the research team members moved forward in the data collection process and patterns
repeated, the research team members began to identify common patterns and started to develop a list
for future analysis moving the coding process from a heuristic process to an objective process. As the
researchers read through the data sets the number of codes or patterns evolved and grew. Eventually
over 180 patterns emerged.
The core research team believed it was necessary to sort them into further groups to reduce
the number of associations with which we were working. The research team members did this by
grouping interrelated patterns organizing them into 22 themes. The research team members then
sorted the themes using a hierarchy system based upon strength or the number of times the patterns
that made up the theme, appeared in the raw data. This is what Strauss and Cobin (1990) refer to as
dimensionalising. Dimensionalising and categorizing raised questions about the relationship between
codes. In this way, the development of reorganizing patterns into themes formed the basis for further
key analysis of the data.
At the end of the analysis process, the research team went through a reanalysis process where
different research team members, different lecturers (not part of the research team), and two other
research assistants (not part of the data collection process), reanalyzed the data sets.
Data analysis in summary
The analysis of the data made it possible for PAR research teams to uncover, expose, and
consider the complexities within their colleges. During the baseline round, categories and headings
were generated from the data informing future rounds of the study. The research team members
recorded and transcribed short notes taken during the discussion, interview, or observation, into long
notes on the computer within 24 hours after the interview, meeting, or observation. The researchers
then sorted through the raw data coding, and developing categories and patterns either previously
identified or those that were emerging. Both the interviewer and note-taker read all notes. At the end
of the day, the analysis and summary were shared with the entire research team. At this time the
research team members took all the data sets of the day and collated the coded patterns. At the end of
the week, the research team members combined all data sets taken at the college and combined the
themes ranking them by the amount of times the theme was discussed. Conversations about
challenges, successes, doubts, and other concerns that emerged during the week, were discussed and
then addressed. After each college visit and data collection process, the research team members held
discussions to adjust and make minor modifications to the categories.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
59
Lastly, a plenary was held at all c the colleges. Plenary discussions are large group discussions
during the feedback sessions on the last day of fieldwork in a given college. These were focused on
the themes that emerged using and including interactive participatory exercises led by the research
team members and recorded by the research associate. Flip charts and idea cards were produced, as
well as feedback forms. All these components were added as part of the data. There were many
different ways we established validity and reliability including: triangulation of the data, member
check, interviewer collaboration, peer debriefing, negative and positive deviance analysis,
confirmability, and bracketing. Most of these methods were coined, or at least extensively described,
by Lincoln and Guba (1985).
Findings
This is the essence of the report! As far as the research team possibly could, the findings
section is exhaustive in reporting the data. Obviously due to time and number of pages some decisions
were made about what to put in and what to leave out. The research team used verbatim quotes from
the raw data to support your findings. The longer quotes provided are to preserve the context as well
as the meaning of the respondents’ intent. Short quotes typically can be taken out of context and offer
support with little elaboration of an idea.
The findings from any research project are always the result of attempts to interpret and make
sense of a complex reality. With the GNH PAR research study at RUB’s ten colleges, we as
researchers were seeking to understand the implications of directing the organization, development
and management of classroom practices and pedagogies. Moreover, we sought to reveal some of the
contributing factors as to how the colleges can more align with GNH and holistic education as called
for by the GNH national framework. Providing this kind of analysis is important at a time when
colleges are being urged to take more responsibility to innovate with classroom practices and
pedagogies.
The findings we report by no means provide a definitive explanation of classroom change.
The purpose of the findings section is to illustrate the opinions of lectures, students, and
administrators on contributing factors, which emerged during the baseline data collection round. The
discussion section that follows is to provide a discussion of the findings with recommendations that
were developed by the core research team at PCE. The findings and discussions are organized into 22
major key themes: 1) Quality of education, 2) Teaching strategies, 3) GNH definition, 4) Critical
pedagogy, 5) Mindfulness practices in the classroom, 6) Assessment, 7) Relationships, 8) Cultural
preservation, 9) Motivation of lecturers, students, and administrators, 10) Responsibility and
discipline, 11) Modernization, 12) Environmental preservation and sustainability, 13) Community
based, student-centered – that will help them. At moment, most activities are lecture.
Sometimes group work, presentations within group. Most lessons, it’s listening and not much
involvement” (BL_CNR_KISADM).
• “From learning point of view, classrooms are always packed with large number of students,
facilities always insufficient, central curriculum mandated from the top. With a local
curriculum, learning may be better” (BL_CNR_KISADM).
• “Don’t have adequate materials at a local level? Kids are learning about yaks in the south, but
no yaks there and the kids have never seen them. Today, poem about some bird that even
faculty didn’t see. Would need to plan, need to think about philosophy of education that
relates to local. Prioritize different subjects, but integrate subjects” (BL_CNR_KISADM).
• “When Indian curriculum was in place, the content was more. I feel there were many topics. It
was elaborated. When we taught that way, children had mastery of the subject. In the present
curriculum, this is not happening. Cannot finish the entire syllabus. Tougher questions are left
out for the kids. When students go to higher grades, they become weaker” (BL_CNR_KIST).
Teaching Strategies
A concern over the implementation of teaching strategies was the second most common theme
uncovered by the research. The data collected from the respondents reveals several gaps between the
strategies currently implemented by lecturers and the more varied participatory methods desired by
students. Not only was there a pronounced call for lecturers to review and reinforce lessons previously
learned, but also a focus on the practical implementation of relevant knowledge through experiential
learning opportunities. Furthermore, a significant number of students stated they would like to see a
departure from the recitation lecture style of teaching in favour of engaging Socratic discussion style
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
78
classes, more opportunity to do practical application, and a more friend teacher and student interaction
alongside the use of more varied styles of visual aids that go beyond a mere PowerPoint presentation.
Teaching strategies need to place greater emphasis on relevant knowledge and affective skills
which typically cannot be easily assessed by tests. The analysis of the data suggests that lecturers need
to provide more space for teaching to emphasize the application of knowledge through the analysis,
synthesis and assessment process. This type of learning requires a variety of teaching strategies
beyond recall and simple understanding. The teaching strategies chosen should open up opportunities
for activities and learning experiences where students develop personal and social skills, attitudes as
they interact by learning together, participating in dialectic discussion, and acting responsibly. With
freedom from the constraints of high-stake qualifying examinations, lecturers can further explore the
use of trans-curricular, problem-posing, thematic study, and experiential learning. Using a variety of
participatory teaching strategies aims to lead the students and lecturers to more interesting, enjoyable
and meaningful teaching and learning experiences.
Interactive Strategies
Student – Student and Student – Lecturer, Participatory strategies Classes, in which flow of the lecture is interrupted at times to engage students in activities that
would facilitate and create a connection between the student and material, student and student, and
between student and lecturer, according to most respondents, would be a welcome, but a challenging
departure from a lecture-based class. Students very adamantly described their partiality to active
engagement in class, as it fostered a sense of collective learning amongst their peers. During research,
it was observed that in classes, in which more interactive participatory strategies were used, students
seemed to express a more joyful liking for the class and subject studied. One of the administrators
alluded to the curriculum change and its potential benefits that would allow students to take
responsibility for their learning as well as enable lecturers to call upon a medley of techniques.
• “If it is interesting lecture, students will move forward, but if boring they stay in the back.
The front students are involved in the learning, the rest talk at the back” (BL_JNP_FGS).
• “Had each group exchange with another group and share their answers-see and analyze. After
they get to ask, but first they go over themselves and then bring in the other group for
questions and answers” (BL_PCE_OBS).
• “[In group work], they learn to share with each other, work as a team, as a team, there is
quality in the learning, encouragement given to each other, there is equal participation”
(BL_PCE_KIPSADM).
• “Lecturer asks for a volunteer for the next activity – nobody comes forward at first. Then, one
F student comes up front. Lecturer gives instructions and asks if they are clear. Students are
laughing and chatting among themselves. Lecturer is getting the materials ready (I cannot see
from the back, I can hear ripping the masking tape). Lecturer puts a piece of paper on the
student’s back on which the word “books” is written. The student must ask the class 10
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
79
questions to guess the word. Lecturer mentions that student is asking a lot of closed ended
questions suggesting her to instead ask a variety of questions that would bring students to the
right answer. Finally, student guesses the word and everyone laughs and starts clapping. As a
reward, lecturer says, you can take the book” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “Lecturer was posing questions in the middle of the lesson to the class in general but he didn’t
try to get gather and answers from the students” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “I would let the students do things in a more cooperative way, groups discussions, interactive
forms of teaching, cooperation” (BL_JNP_FGS).
• “The students seem to work together --- asking questions to each other and talking with each
other. They smile and giggle a bit while working” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “[The best class one could attend involves] Interaction between teachers and students, teacher
gives time more to students than giving lectures, encourage group discussion and when
sometimes we get board – create joke or gain our concentration” (BL_SHER_FGS).
• “Yes, if curriculum changed whereby different strategies/ideas/values incorporated, activity-
based, student-centered – that will help them. At the moment most activities are lecture.
Sometimes group work, and some presentations within group. Most lessons it is listening and
not much involvement. If give projects to students, students do interviews, students make
presentations, etc. – better for students. If students are really practically involved, they will
more actively participate. During lectures students are very silent, no interaction, sometimes
students even fall asleep” (BL_CNR_KISADM).
• “Lecturers interact, make students think critically, there are other programs with
entertainment, interactions among students – pre service and in service, and mindfulness. We
are not only learning from the books but from other components, there are cultural programs.
I think this needs to be sustained because these activities improve individuals as a whole. We
gain confidence in public speaking; these things expose us to many opportunities. Now we
can speak and we are learning new practices. This will be useful for future” (BL_RIHS_KIS).
• “Distinction made – is lecture only about speaking and speaking? Getting students’ input,
inductive and deductive, how to introduce the topic, getting info from students. I use group
work, debate (to focus on pronunciation), I give them a lot of 2 minute mini presentations to
give every student a chance to speak” (BL_SHER_KIL).
Variety
From the data collected, in addition to lecturing, techniques used in class to intellectually engage
students in their own learning mostly included a some kind of visual aid, such as projector or a chalk
board, lecturer – directed group work, recollection of the previously learned material, humour, story
telling, group discussion, and brainstorming. There was a variety of opinion on the kind of visual aid
preferred; some students preferred well organized, aesthetically pleasing PowerPoint presentations,
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
80
while others favoured a more traditional chalk board, as the pace of the lecturer’s writing on the board
was more controlled and easier to follow than a PowerPoint presentation. Most students are aware of
the kind of teaching they are receiving, as some respondents are able to clearly quantify a small
number of the teaching strategies their lecturers utilize. In addition to student interaction and group
discussions, students showed a wide interest in use of strategic questioning and relevant examples in
class.
• “Some teachers use a projector, some simply sit and they talk or sit and give us work and then
we discuss. By using a projector, we don’t understand that much. Teacher should talk and
explain the point. Many of us prefer the white board. “ Another student went on to say: “We
would like it if teachers could come in and talk with us, entertain us.” Another student stated:
“To not go off topic, but do it in a way, so we don’t notice time passing. Also, by giving us
examples that are relevant to topic and our lives. Entertainment should be related to topics;
we don’t like lecture delivered for the entire time.” (BL_GCBS_FGS).
• “I am not biased but some tutors are very hardworking that are bringing great change and
doing good but I feel that there are some tutors that are incompetent. In the past learned about
4 kinds of teaching strategies. I am seeing that some tutors are not aware of this. Emotion and
time has not been shown here and there are some tutors that are trying hard and making us a
better human being” (BL_RIHS_FGS).
• “Now, we have a group learning environment – we guided them and divide them in groups
(gender and abilities mixed), we need to have more kinds of teaching strategies to use”
(BL_CNR_FGL).
• When asked about what strategies and skills can be used to make the learning effective, one
of the respondents replied: “Teacher should have a sound knowledge; he or she should have
effective strategies like questioning, giving plenty of relevant examples and role modeling.
Reviewing the previously learnt lesson is also equally important, giving chance for the
student to speak and finally, group discussion is very vital” (BL_ILCS_KIL).
• “New lecturers lack teaching strategies in the class. They are unable to deliver.” Another
respondent added, “That hamper having no confidence in them.” A third respondent
remarked, “We feel they lack confidence and less faith” (BL_SHER_FGS).
• “The groups are allowed to go out and have a waste walk-relaxation and brain storming, come
back and then have group discussion” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
More group discussions
• “I would like you to discuss in a pair. Discuss with your partner. You can write on a piece of
paper. Write down the points, why do we need special education in Bhutan? Please write on
the piece of paper because I will collect the piece of paper” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
81
• “Work in pairs and find as many mistakes as possible in the given sentence. I will give you 1
minute” (BL_RIHS_OBSL).
• “Group work, brainstorm a particular topic – certain topic they have to discuss and tell the
outcome” (BL_JNP_FGL).
• “You say you form a group and discuss for 10 minutes. Lecturer explains how to form groups
– etc. [Lecturers says] come up with as many ideas a possible” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “We have open discussions, open interaction, and we take care of our own resources”
(BL_RIHS_KIL).
• “Free discussions in the class. Not only confined to the textbooks, that was very catchy and
interesting, but asking questions, sharing experiences – when teachers open”
(BL_SHER_FGS).
• “We could have more presentations from the students’ side and also more group work”
(BL_RIHS_FGS).
• In reference to what an effective lecturer looks like: “First day he entered the class, he
[lecturer] says, “Make mistakes as much as you can.” He involves the students. He makes
every student participate. He is never frustrated or get angry. Lots of video clips make class
interesting. He also explains. Asks questions on the topic taught such as “Never Give Up In
Life.” So, students come up with their viewpoints and explain from their viewpoint. He
conducts mock interviews and role –plays, which make us understand really well. He gives us
freedom of speech. He never denies any requests. He gives a lot of wisdom”
(BL_GCBS_FGS).
Visual aid: media, TV, doc, music, poetry, and art.
• “I try to make the attractive PowerPoint presentations. Then, I ask questions and make my
presentation attractive and lively. It should not be always serious. If I find that my students
are lost or feeling sleepy, I make it lively” (BL_RIHS_FGL).
• “Lecturer asks: “Is it visible from the back [projection]?” Lecturer starts adjusting the picture
to make it larger. There is a piece of white cloth taped on the chalkboard on which LCD is
projecting” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “Lecturer continues to explain and writes on the board to facilitate the process”
(BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “Lecturer used slides, photos to give visual representation of the instruments he was talking
about” (BL_ILCS_OBSL).
Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning (VAK)
• “[Lecturer] takes student’s hands and arms and repositions so student has easier time and
explains why this position is recommended” (BL_RIHS_OBSL).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
82
• “She had everyone stand up and stretch out their bodies. On the count of three she had
everyone sit down turn to their partner and begin to talk! Everyone talk” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “Lecturer and students are singing an “addition song,” clapping, (“ok, 1,2,3, and 4:” everyone
sings again – learning numbers)” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “Right after attendance lecturer started drawing a world map on the board.” Observer noted:
“I was wondering how that two visually impaired could know what is being drawn on the
board because teacher explained nothing on it.” Two visually impaired students seem to be
listening passionately” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “Although the kinds of questions L is asking are quite probing, “What is your opinion
regarding…”and lecturer is using visual (writing on the board) and auditory (speaking) means
of knowledge transmission, lecturer is mainly lecturing” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
Scaffolding knowledge
• “[Lecturer] nods her head – and then asks about dissolving the solution and let’s the student
know it changes --- asks increases or decreases” (BL_RIHS_OBSL).
Fun and Games
• “Beyond my classes I engage in fun and games also where they enjoy and also refreshes the
mind too” (BL_JNP_KIL).
• Fun and games: “Teaching they come across – through games. For me it is one way of
practicing GNH in the classroom --- teaching the concept through a game. My students learn
more, they will have fun and it is practicing GNH in the class” (Pretest_PCE_FGS).
• “[Lecturer] talks about making class environment lively for the children, especially making
math interesting for the students Lecturer takes out a pair of dice – says, “You can make your
own dice –paper, wood. Lecturer gives instructions to students how to play the game and
walks over to each desk to distribute dice (dice are big, about 1,” and made out of wood).
Students are playing within their group – the room is filled with sound and laughter as
everyone rolls the dice. Lecturer is walking over to each group” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “[Lecturer] starts with a fun brain teaser exercise. Students participate by offering answers
freely” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
Humour
• “Mood differs from time to time. Minute to minute it is different, but I crack a joke and then
start a class” (BL_JNP_FGL).
• “They [teachers] come to us and we talk friendly, they share their experiences and views, so
become more free. They entertain us.” A respondent added, “Some teachers used to crack
jokes to relax us.” Another respondent said, “ To make us pay attention.” The second
respondent continued, “Students will feel very drowsy, so jokes help keep us awake”
(BL_RIHS_FGS).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
83
Individual attention
• “Lecturer is helping another group draw the diagram. A student from the back of the class
calls the lecturer ”Sir!” to get his attention. Lecturer nods from across the room and says will
be there. After finishing helping one group, lecturer walks over to the students who needed
him and walks the group through the process of diagraming” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
PowerPoint enhancement
• “PowerPoint, sometimes some teachers are better with chalk board. The speed of PowerPoint
is too fast. I have notices the same teachers with chalkboard, they teach better”
(BL_SCE_KIS).
Engage students in their learning
• “So far we are discussing the basis of curriculum. We also looked at social present, past and
future, and human development. As I told you in the previous lesson in the class we will
discuss on learning theories” (BL_SCE_OBS).
• “How are you feeling now? Are you in a better mood? Let’s reflect on what we did last time.
Do you remember what we did?” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “I make time to revise previous topics (5-10min). I ask questions and we talk about it. At the
end of the week, we revise the whole week’s topics” (BL_SHER_KIL).
• “[Lecturer] Distributes the assignment paper of the previous session. Lecturer: “We will
recapitulate of what we have learned the other day” (BL_RIHS_OBSL).
Learning theory (shy, temperaments)
• “I pinpoint them [shy students] asking question those students only. 70% of students come to
me if they have any doubts; it is always in a group. Also, in the class, we group shy with
talkative ones together.” Another respondent stated, “In my case, I never give attention to that
particular, shy student. When we are outside I ask, if you have problems, come and talk to
me” (BL_JNP_FGL).
• “If I have a set of shy students, then I call the roll numbers, they stand up and give me
answers. Active classes, I can see those less willing to participate and I pinpoint them”
(BL_SHER_KIL).
• “When I was in class 11 and 12, I was a shy person. At that time, I had a Commerce teacher.
He always encouraged me to be confident and slowly by slowly, I have improved my
confidence after reaching college” (BL_GCBS_FGS).
Story telling
• When asked to describe a favorite teacher, student responded, “I had a teacher who before
reading the story, would tell the story. Sometimes he used to say in Dzongkha so that we
understand better” (BL_SCE_FGS)
Hands-on activities
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
84
• “They do civil construction, building roads, doing project work.” Another respondent adds,
“To fulfill their diploma we have projects, so those projects we try to use. Example, a shed”
(BL_JNP_FGL).
Creating intentional classroom culture
• “One of the male students walked over to another student and the lecturer sat down in a desk
joining the students.” (BL_ILCS_OBSL).
• “When the teacher used to enter the class then, there used to be fear. I don’t want my students
to have fear. I want to make my students open up and learn. So I smile as I enter the class.
So, that I make myself as approachable” (BL_RIHS_FGL).
• “It is my responsibility. I have to smile even if I am not happy. I never show my temper to my
students. Teachers mood and manner affects students’ learning” (BL_PCE_KIL).
• “Class should start with a smile, joke, and a pleasing manner – to get a good response –
symbiotic relationship in the class. All classes – hi, how are you doing, asking helping in
every problem. Students will respond to those classes” (BL_SHER_FGS).
• “The tutor took his seat in front of his class and started working on his laptop which
continued till the end of class” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “If somebody sees a tiger, run away. If teacher comes in angry, students will be scared they
will beat us. Cannot share our doubts. If I am angry pouring my anger on teaching, we’ll see
on the teachers reaction not lecture.” Another respondent added, “Same if their temper is
poured out. As students, they would not show it, but will be burning on the inside. How
effective teacher is effective will not matter because of his/her mood. No peace of mind.” The
first respondent continued, “If we start hating our teacher, we will start hating the subject too
and will start performing badly, effect performance and style” (BL_RIHS_KIS).
Experiences, practical implementation needed
• “Practicals, we do it with our hands. Students prefer hands-on classes and learn more that the
lecture based classes. In practical classes, we apply theory. It is more interesting, it applies
what we have learned” (BL_SHER_FGS).
Hand-outs (ineffective)
• “Written notes are provided by the tutors. They are not giving us many opportunities to
explore on our own. There is not enough time to explore also. We get so many handouts and
if we want to go for further studies then it would be important to have time to explore”
(BL_RIHS_FGS).
• “We just enter in the class and expecting to take notes and then we hear we do not have to
take notes. They use a projector and there is teaching and they go with their syllabus and
covering the class. At last we do not get much knowledge or much facilitating, in terms of
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
85
the course. What I can say at the beginning there should be made to take notes and not given
the notes” (BL-SHER_KIS).
Language: power, mindful speech, word selection
• “Language determines character, if you know how to speak that language well, you can
express anger in a soft way. For example, if I am angry, and I talk in a polite way, the other
person will be helpful. But, if I do not know that language well, I might be aggressive”
(BL_SCE_FGS).
• “During my high school, I ad a teacher who was a gold medalist. He did not teach properly,
he could not express properly, so I did not understand properly. We went to principal and
asked for change, but principal said, “He is a medalist. If he cannot teach properly, who can
teach?” Some teachers use language properly and we understand properly.” Another
respondent added, “If the language is not used properly, we cannot understand what he is
teaching” (BL_SCE_FGS).
• “The new lecturers lack so many qualifications in language.” Respondent continued, “With
language one can play. Speak whatever they feel; harsh words demotivate us”
(BL_SHER_FGS).
Brainstorming
• “Now how we actually do the process of brainstorming. Process – we need to identify or we
need to look for brainstorming or not. Then we form a group. It can be on any ideas ---
[lecturer] continues to explain – identify theme of using the brainstorming. Lecturer writes on
board and continues to explain concept with PowerPoint. Let new ideas or brain storm”
(BL_SHER_OBSL).
Field study sites
• “Here we get chance to learn through practical and field work. They [practical learning
experiences] are very empowering. We can learn by ourselves through experience”
(BL_CNR_FGS).
• “Through field study and hot spring learners will talk about hot spring to those who are at the
sight. Thus that will lead to GNH. On mountains we talk about herbal medicine”
(BL_NITM_KIADM).
• “One lecturer tries to share whatever he learned and he goes 15-20 minutes beyond syllabus –
example, hanging bridge. That is very useful, focus on our real talent of an engineer. We also
do site visits. They take us to construction site. That is new. They tell us that information is
also available on this page then we go to the library so we can look it up” (BL_JNP_FGS).
Repetition: call and response, drills
• “They [students] answer or repeat after lecturer” (BL_ILCS_OBSL).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
86
• “Lecturer used a lot of repetition. He asked questions and had students repeat after him”
(BL_ILCS_OBSL).
• “Tutor answers his own questions most of the time” (BL_CST_OBSL).
Strategic questioning
• “I learnt so much about asking questions collecting data from other lecturers and the students.
I did not realize how hard it is to ask probing questions. This will help me a lot in my classes
with students. I usually ask yes/no questions. Now I feel I can ask probing questions”
(BL_PCE_KI)
• “I though I new what a probing question was, but until I tried, I did not really know”
(BL_SCE_KI).
• “It is so much harder to teach using strategic questions or critical thinking questions. It is a
lot easier to have students respond yes or no or have a right answer. I am not sure I can teach
like this. I do not know if the students are able” (BL_SHER_FGL).
• “We like when the tutor asks us questions and we can tell our opinion. It has more meaning. I
do not want to just memorize” (BL_SCE_FGS).
• “How we develop a holistic education system, specifically in the tertiary level at RUB is the
focus of the GNH PAR study. To give our students a holistic education using different
classroom pedagogies, making opportunities in the class where students can think and act
critically, question and themselves, self reflect, and relate what they have learned in the
classrooms to real life situations is really important. Few classrooms in Bhutan utilize holistic
education practices” (BL_PCE_meeting notes).
Service learning
• “Since it is 2 years diploma program which was shorten, it might be difficult for Institute to
adjust [infusing service learning into curriculum] as a part of curriculum otherwise it is good
idea being normal courses” (BL_JNP_KIADM).
Independent learning
• [Students’ self- learning activities] Besides class, library. A lot of problems with library.
Librarians left. We are discussing what to do. Can learn at home. Time not there in school, as
all time is occupied” (BL_CNR_KISADM).
GNH Definition
GNH definition was the third strongest theme that emerged from data across ten colleges. The
data collected depicted a wide variety of attitudes and opinions in relation to GNH. Some respondents
stated GNH is about feeling happy and being content. Other respondents stated they believe GNH is a
byproduct of living a healthy and successful life, with successful having a variety of meanings.
Successful was defined as monetarily successful, successful in relationships, and success in balancing
the complexity of life and feeling internal peace. A few respondents stated that GNH was a life
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
87
manifestation of Buddhist principles, such as the non-attachment to desire or denial and thereby
suffering. The vast majority of the respondents’ definitions and parameters of GNH was a vague,
understanding of the national framework. Therefore one of the strongest recommendations from the
research team members was to develop a working definition. A working definition was developed
during the Cycle I intervention round and can be found in Appendix D.
Vague
• “[GNH means} peace in mind.” Another respondent says, “Happiness within ourselves.” A
respondent answers, “Happiness of all.” Another respondent states, “Being content with what
you have.” Another respondent points, “Equality and justice for all.” Another respondent
further adds, “ Harmony” (BL_RIHS_FGS).
• “You have heard about GNH, can you think of some values and principles practiced in your
classroom? They [respondents] kept silent. “Not sure of what this is” (BL_JNP_FGS).
• “I don’t have much idea about GNH values and principles. I think it is about the four pillars. I
am sorry to say that” (BL_PCE_KISST).
• “We promote many [GNH values in the classroom] but without realizing it”
(BL_RIHS_FGL).
• “GNH is very subjective. How can you measure a person’s happiness, civic sense ---
complimentary not concrete. Not measurable” (BL_JNP_KIADM).
• “Indirectly or directly we are doing it, preserving culture and environment and teachers are
teaching about GNH values. Cleaning campaign, GNH is being implemented. The philosophy
is vague.” Another respondent states, “GNH has depth. Gross national happiness goes beyond
4 pillars.” The first respondent continues, “GNH is confusing. We are happy only with the
material, so how will we be happy if, according to GNH, we cannot pursue wealth?” The
second respondent adds, “GNH is an abstract idea.” “The first respondent says, “GNH says be
happy with what you have. Paradoxically, GNH will not give you happiness.” The second
respondent posits, “GNH, happiness is the state of mind.” The first respondent says, “Many
countries are eager and crazy about GNH; we don’t find this philosophy good”
(BL_JNP_FGS).
• “There have been a lot of people and writers talking about GNH. If you ask a group of
students what GNH really is, the students would not be able to explain it well. People have
not said what it is. It is not that people were not willing to tell [about] it, but the idea itself is
weak. Some way could explain in a simpler form people could understand somehow
understand better. If I know what GNH is then, I could practice and that would bring
happiness. It is difficult to explain, as it is vague especially to uneducated people. Educate
them more and make it more clear so they could really practice” (Pretest_PCE_KIS).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
88
• “I am not sure of how GNH being taught in classroom. I don’t know how GNH is measured
in the classroom. I don’t know how to relate the GNH with technical knowledge”
(BL_CST_KIL).
• “Not sure how to relate the course to GNH. We have to focus on the syllabus to be covered.
And also connect to the technical how to relate to GNH. Our own attitude – when the
students ask us question and have a positive – other than that we cannot relate to the subject”
(BL_SHER_FGL).
• “Classroom is not related to GNH because the syllabus is technical.” (BL_CST_FGS).
• “At first, interacting with teacher it has nothing to do with GNH. Whenever we laugh in the
class, he says that is GNH. I don’t know how related that was to GNH, but that was the only
thing I heard about GNH in the class” (BL_CST_FGS).
• “I do not see any room for me to talk about values of GNH in physics” (BL_SHER_FGL).
• “Students are very happy with their teachers. If the tutors do not come to the classes, the
students are happier and I see GNH there. When we scold them, it seems they are not happy”
(BL_PCE_KIL).
• “Broad topics happiness is wanted from every individual. I think it differs for everyone.
People with less desires will be less unhappy, people who expect high, they will unhappy”
(BL_RIHS_KIS).
• “Everyone knows about GNH, but only surface. Four pillars, nine domains. Infusing GNH:
don’t do. Talk about GNH and its importance in curriculum, but that’s all. If we infuse it (in
education), understanding of four pillars improves. “ After being asked about whether GNH
should be infused in the curriculum or taught as a subject, the same respondent answered,
“Everybody is talking about GNH, but a lot of confusion. Some fed up with word GNH. What
is real GNH? Difficult concept. Important ingredients not clear – that is what people think.
Difficult to infuse – no time, coverage fast (refers to syllabus material). Compulsion to
somehow infuse, but unclear what is or how to infuse” (BL_CNR_KISADM).
Theory / Implementation concrete
• “GNH is improving, but my question is that does this GNH really exist? It is not about an
individual, but about the gross. 70% of people are farmers and 30% are employed elsewhere.
We see farmers suffering, if 70% of people are farmers and not happy – how is the goal
completed? My question is, is GNH something that our government has acquired or is it just a
hot topic?” (BL_ILCS_KIS).
• “The four pillars of GNH shape or help them to lead better life and be better future citizens.
Education helps children to find out the importance of environment, to take good care of the
environment” (BL_PCE_KIPSADM).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
89
• “I’ve been a supporter of GNH, but talking of GNH and practicing it different. E.g. Eating
meat and the teachings of Buddhism. It is contradicting. It is difficult for livestock people. To
increase production for the farmers, animals need to be killed. The principles of GNH are
good. But I don’t know how we Bhutanese follow/practice them. Like the Buddhism and
compassion. It is not essential for materialistic possession” (BL_CNR_KIL).
• “12 credits per module – students are supposed to go through 16 credits – 300 for the 3-year
program. 420 for 4 years. One option as to offer GNH as a module” (BL_SHER_FGL).
• “I think our institute is also taking care of culture – started having diklam namja, kabney,
respecting traditions, and being mindful. Health for example, we need to be mindful because
we are taking care of patient, be careful how we talk to them, drugs you give them”
(BL_RIHS_KIL).
• “GNH pedagogy is felt as vague idea and some staff members felt it is somehow being
implemented which are also taught in school and other learning institution. Through this
training, it has been clearer for many. Teaching strategy though based on content, the concern
in how far it is being delivered is being looked into. Morning speeches have been happening
before GNH became popular” (BL_JNP_KIADM).
• “It depends on the subject matter you are teaching. You cannot sometimes twist your topic to
bring it to GNH values. I tend to use transparency, accountability, and efficiency. It is
required in the topic I teach, about health administration. EAT.” Another respondent remarks,
“I teach them to be healthy, and to have right attitude. Whatever theory you learn you have to
practice them with empathy, right attitude, and sympathy. Whatever they do, they should do it
with a purpose. For example, washing your hands, you don’t just wash for the sake of
washing but you do it with a purpose” (BL_RIHS_FGL)”
• “If I talk about GNH in the school, make the students comfortable. Safe and green
environment. Teaching should be embedded with GNH. Being open to the students, let the
students feel free to share” (BL_PCE_KIAPSADM).
• “GNH is indigenous. The concept developed in our country. It has a high vision, which
includes animals as well. Happiness is the ultimate aim. Where is happiness, in the materials
or spiritualism? GNH has a long - term goal and was also adopted as a millennium goal. So I
think we should respect it.” Respondent added, “Achievement will be possible if we
implement well. One can be through bringing the GNH values to the
classroom”(Pretest_PCE_FGS).
Curriculum
Data show that one’s individual happiness impacts teaching and the way one incorporates GNH
into classroom. As it is restricted to the lecturer’s role in the classroom, there is no mention of the
students’ contribution to a shared positive learning relationship.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
90
• “My own view on GNH is simple it means everyone to be happy. GNH in teaching means
the teacher and thought should be happy and as teacher we have to give our best teaching.
Judge them [students] and make sure they have learned and implemented. We need to put
efforts to monitor the student that’s how we fulfill GNH” (BL_JNP_FGL).
• “One thing I would like to do is bring change in the curriculum by incorporating GNH values
and making teachers teach happily. The idea of role modeling must go into the students’
learning. Students should realize that we have to live happily; happy teachers produce happy
students” (Pretest_PCE_KIL).
• “Whatever the content is, we ask ourselves, are GNH values in it? When you deliver content,
define the values that relate to day –to- day life. That way, upon graduation, students will
have all of the values and will live happily. If I teach division, take for example apples.
Mother brought 5 apples, sharing values. When you divide, you share. “ Another respondent
shared, ”I teach economics. GNH is there because we teach about resources, population. In
resources, in the process of teaching, we bring GNH values and principles. Knowing the facts
that resources are limited. We explain the efficient use of resources.” Another respondent
added, “I teach Dzongkha. GNH has come from the Buddhist texts, when I teach about the
cause and effect, we should always desire for the good. Students should manage 9 virtues.
Now the prostration, chanting mantras and giving a good thought” (BL_SCE_FGSTS).
• “For people, to be able to understand GNH, curriculum should change – integrated part.
Modern curriculum is totally subject-based, there is so much to be covered, and focus is on
exams. Therefore, GNH is difficult to infuse. With in-depth learning would serve best
purpose. At moment, only talking more about people needing to be happy, etc.”
(BL_CNR_KISADM).
• “Basically, when you talk about quality, I don’t see GNH as a separate subject – it is a
holistic way. People mistakenly believe that quality is reading, writing, passing exams and
having unrelated information in your life. I don’t think that is the way. Our education system
has come from the West. Experts, consultant brought their own cultural views. Now, our
government, in the late 80s, realized that we had followed Indian curriculum –it was a legacy
of India and we had no choice, we had no manpower, doctors were trained in India and they
also brought their own values. Government, now, with GNH is actually preserving cultural
heritage, spiritual and national identity, environment and how to be in the world, that although
we are a small country, we can make a contribution. Bhutan acts in a holistic way and it will
not deteriorate. Our education will improve and become people centered, need centered. That
would be my perception integrated GNH” (BL_SCE_FGL).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
91
• “We talk about equality, even in math when we talk about subtraction: Karma had 5 apples,
his friend Dorji stole 2 apples. That is stealing, which is a negative value. Instead, we say:
Karma shared 2 apples with his friend. Rephrase instead” (BL_CNR_FGSTS).
• “In the problem given, Karma has 5 cows, His brother snatched away 3 cows. How many
cows does he have? Nowadays, our lecturer gives the problem as: Karma has 5 cows. He
shares 3 cows with his sister. How many cows does he have?” (Pretest_PCE_FGS).
• “Physical education – very important – the content should have value related parts for GNH”
(Pretest_PCE_FGS).
• “Our minister of education to implement GNH education in schools. In upcoming years, I
think every subject we have to keep in mind, but our main philosophy must be GNH – we
must interlink this concept with the subjects we teach. I will try to do so”
(Pretest_PCE_FGS).
• “Dramatic Arts Ideas/projects: Write scripts; use art of script writing as a powerful way to
make change. Use drama as a tool to talk about GNH values. Interactive, holistic. Language
and actions-pair share, story telling. Vocal warm ups” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “For example in a mathematics lesson, I have five cows, 3 died. How many cows were left
with me? This can be put into a different way, I had five cows, and three were taken to the
higher mountains. How many are left with me? Children are happy when we use the second
example. So we always try to put GNH in our daily lessons” (BL_PCE_KIPSADM).
• “GNH, why doesn’t the minister of education come up with GNH in the curriculum? Why
don’t they bring GNH into the curriculum?” (BL_RIHS_KIS).
Alignment with Buddhist philosophy
• “GNH initiative – I personally take it as a noble endeavor – new pedagogies will be created –
it is Buddhist philosophy (regarding every sentient being as your mother and father –
interrelated). Today, if you look at your parents, we have so much gratitude for them. If we
are grateful to them, how grateful are we to our past parents. This is just the philosophy I am
talking about it. So, the initiative brings everyone opportunities to be happy and have all of
the qualities to develop as good human beings. GNH pedagogy is an initiative and a noble
goal – by 2014 GNH could be practiced not only here but the world too. The world is never
perfect. We are not perfect. Initiative of GNH is to make us perfect, but samsara is endless.
But, the fact is that this conscience is here. Maximum number of students here is satisfied,
staff employ pedagogies that make students feel comfortable and with desire to learn more. I
would like to see this place that students want to come here because of the human touch not
only academics. There is enjoyment and fun; that would be my vision”(BL_ILCS_KIADM).
• “I think GNH happiness is about being free from suffering. Al sentient beings are being
divided by suffering. How to get rid of suffering? As we get the ultimate truth that is called
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
92
Denba, when we get rid of the cause of suffering, then you will attain the ultimate bliss of
happiness. “ “ We all have a Buddha nature and one day, all beings will achieve GNH by
being enlightened. So, it is achievable” (BL_ILCS_FGL).
• “GNH is not in the solid measurable form. It is about our perception – Rinpoche said opening
your heart. You keep opening your heart and that way you can feel the love. Remember how
your grandparents loved you and how you felt when they loved you. Even with your parents,
we want to make others feel like that. You try to love others so they can enjoy the same
feeling you felt. If we are able to approach people by quality of education and making others
understand, quality of education will improve so will GNH too. We are a small country that
can easily achieve GNH. Enlightenment, happiness is to understand self and others”
(BL_ILCS_KIS).
Fulfillment of desires, materialistic
• “GNH is a jargon and also our guiding principle. If a farmer is happy producing what he
requires, that is ok. Farmers can earn more with services. But they will be greedy and want
more. For example, with the roads now, even farmers think of getting a second car. Then they
think of Hilux and they go further to get Prado. They feel that their social status is high they
need to improve themselves. I say this is Anti-GNH” (BL_CNR_FGL).
• “GNH means contentment in the whole people or population not only for the high status
people. As far as I know GNH does not exist in the rural areas. The concept of GNH is
wrong. For example, like [name of the college staff member] in our college, he is suffering.
He should be paid more to survive and keep him happy” (BL_PCE_KIL).
• “We can clearly understand [that there is no GNH in rural areas] and I have seen that people
in the remote areas work from as early as 5am in the morning till 8-9 pm in the evening. Their
lives start from dawn to dusk. Those rich do not have to do that. They travel in luxury cars, go
where ever they want and it’s in their hands whether to work or not. The boss will give the
work to people under him and they hardly work. For example, if we take two lecturers, one
very sincere and the other not, but at the end of the day, both are equally paid”
(BL_PCE_KIL).
• “If it is GNH country, there should be enough resources” (BL_PCE_KIL).
• “Well, talking about GNH, I don’t know much, but for me, it means happiness. It is a
prevailing factor in our country. It is being engrossed by our monarchy and it deals with
pillars and our country is doing great things supporting pillars. If people are happy there is
GNH, though pillars are being promoted, people are, and I don’t think are happy. GNH is a
difficult task. I don’t feel people are happy.” Respondent continued, “Happy if provided
necessary means. Government has not done that yet. Western parts of Bhutan have more
resources, others people are not much happy” (BL_SHER_FGS).+
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
93
• “GNH philosophy is really great. If we practice GNH, happiness is good. Happiness is more
important, but who doesn’t love money. GNH philosophy is good, but if not practiced, it is
useless” (BL_SCE_FGS).
Interdependence
• “How certain practices can lead to unhealthy life. Such life styles can finally lead to
happiness or unhappiness. Mind, body and action how one should react. Ultimately how it
leads to happiness” (BL_NITM_KIADM).
• “Life Skills help. It helps us take our life in the right way. If we do a favour for a friend. She
becomes happy, I in turn become happy. What term is that called? Inter-personal skills”
(Pretest_PCE_FGS).
• “My opinion it [mindfulness and GNH] is absolutely related. GNH is mainly to do with the
people’s happiness and their solution. Mindfulness practice makes us think twice before we
act. It makes us do whatever we do calmer. GNH aim is the people’s happiness and if we are
happy then everyone’s happiness comes. I don’t know how to put it into words”
(BL_PCE_KIS).
Awareness, being awake
• “Now, GNH – it is a very complex term. Many people make further conclusions. When you
use this national word, you are talking about nation, society. When GNH is propagated by the
state, then it is hard to connect it to the individual level. Facilities, structures, social
arrangement but, on an individual is happiness – the word is captured. The term is loosely
used in different context. GNH is used as a synonym for happiness. People think it as parallel
to happiness. From a state: preservation is one pillar – from an individual perspective, GNH is
more about disciplining the mind. Mind is the determining factor. In the personal perspective,
GNH is all about happiness which is connected to the function of the mind, how you establish
yourself in the society, how you deal with people and how are you cause of someone else’s
happiness, taking a leading role in the conducive environment and others are happy through
your initiative. If you are mindful, you are in control. If you are angry, you can be aware that
you should not be acting furiously – being mindful creates space to reflect on that. When the
anger is gone, you feel awkward – if you yelled at people. Mindful is basically guiding your
personality.” (BL_ILCS_KIADM).
Individual / collective
• ”Very important, I think it reduces the gap between the rich and the poor. It focuses on the
happiness of the whole nation, not only on the individual. In developing countries, some
people may be rich but there are beggars on the street – but we stand on our feet.”
(BL_CST_FGS).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
94
• ”Happiness is for the community not for the individual. Happiness is GNH. Community
vitality is important. As a whole, if it is happy, individual then comes” (BL_JNP_FGS).
• “I firstly heard in economics, grade 9 and about GNP in other countries. Than I did not know
about it, but now I think GNH may become GGH, gross global happiness. It is not something
that can be bought – it should come from inside. We should be happy spiritually and
materially. We may blame others for our health, mood, and other factors should be good too.
GNH includes the whole country and for the whole country to be happy it should be close to
perfect. When everything is fairly distributed than only GNH will be applicable”
(BL_SHER_FGS).
• “I am not generalizing; GNH is one of the best philosophies I have heard of. We have to
thank our 4th king, our best philosopher we have. GNH helps others. We are Buddhists. Main
thing is about being happy, we can see all of the elements in it. All elements of other religions
can fit in that too. Even though it has been edited to the millennium goal, we can promote it
because we know that money can provide comfort, but not happiness. GNH can be accepted
globally” (BL_SHER_FGS).
• “GNH for me personally, is whatever you do in a day; if you are happy at the end of the day
that is GNH. If one is happy, community is happy, if [community is] happy then nation is
happy” (BL_SHER_FGS).
• “I think GNH is not for individual but happiness in society. Till now I could not grasp the
concept of GNH properly but that is what I feel” (BL_RIHS_KIADM).
Rhetorical jargon, negative attitude
• “Happiness as a whole – how far is it true, we don’t know. It has some pillars…(names them).
As individual, it does not prevail. Social violence, party night, there are fights. One of the
pillars, promote culture – who is promoting it? Everyone dresses in a western style. No
preservation of environment” (BL_RIHS_KIS).
• “Need to sent them for exposure, may be out of Bhutan in order to learn from other good, so
that some values can be implemented in the classroom providing more opportunities for
student learning. I am totally against GNH and I don’t see it in Bhutan” (BL_PCE_KIL).
• When asked, “What would be an ideal college work situation for you,” one of the respondents
replied, “Money.” Another respondent added, “We hear about GNH, blah blah. At the end of
the day I wish we had money, we do calculations” (BL_JNP_FGL).
• Scientists find it difficult to understand such philosophy, unlike social scientists do. How can
happiness be measured? Foreigners seem to understand principles of GNH. Bhutanese
students do not appreciate GNH” (BL_CNR_KISADM).
GNH standards and indicators
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
95
• “GNH has certain indicators, I am aware of the measuring tools. That is on government level.
For me, individual level, collective, every child has access to education; families are not
dying because they don’t have meal, no frustration with the corruption, system. We live in the
country and we are blessed to be Bhutanese” (BL_SHER_KIL).
Too restrictive
• “To me, unless you are running a special GNH module, it would be very challenging to
incorporate GNH in the content. But, you can use GNH values and principles in the delivery
in the existing content.” When asked to provide examples, respondent replied: “You take the
core of engineering math, what values and principles can you infuse? (Respondent asks a
note-taker, “Can you help me, which ones are there?”) Shall we put all pillars in the content? I
think.. What are the GNH values and principles? You are happy, someone around you is
happy, society is happy, the world is happy; it is gross national happiness. Happiness is a state
on a real state of time basis. Putting in content, engineering core subjects, I don’t see it being
very realistic, but you can teach the values and principles. For example, simply as you are
teaching how to estimate costing, teach students what if you used a wrong proportion, what is
the effect? When you are doing measurements, what is the implication, if that money was
saved, then you can bring a lot of examples in the teaching learning. But, putting the core
values…somehow I think it may be difficult. Of course, teaching, you can bring in GNH
values and principles in how you as engineers can stop corruption, can influence others not to
be corrupt, and how you will benefit yourself. I am sure people will be willing to accept.
Quality is another thing you can bring in“ (BL_CST_KIADM).
Fulfillment of needs
• “My sister really understands our family problems because we are in the middle class. She
has taken her examination and has qualified. There is GNH. My parents are really happy
about that. Even a single family member can contribute to it” (BL_ILCS_KIS).
GNH tools for assessment
• “We need to have constant follow up of the GNH input. For example, this GNH interview is
first of its kind. People should constantly check and balance on GNH”
(BL_PCE_KIPSADM).
Sustainability
• “I cannot answer, the gaps are widening and there is textured difference. Few manufacturing
companies are coming up in Bhutan. There are less executive holding posts. CEO kinds of
posts are very rare. There are limited numbers of doctors and engineers, and managing
directors. NGOS and UN – charities. Human index – we have laws to do that. In most
remote areas, people have no lights. Gave a lot of index. So many NGO’s and charities even
from the UN. CPI: rose from 5 to 5.7. Press freedom 38. WK – 131. Bhutan economy as the
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
96
World Bank states is 64. Looking at all this forces the coming up of huge projects, global
climate change, global catastrophe, how long can GNH hold up” (BL_JNP_KIADM).
Relationships, social gatherings
• “Camping, picnics with our teachers. [That is GNH]” (Pretest_PCE_FGS).
Rubrics / Affective domain
• “It started with a small concept, GNP that was measured. Our 4th king deliberately said that he
is after not GDP, but GNH. Those little words became now a debatable topic. For me, it
confuses me at times because happiness is hard to measure. What I found out through my own
experience, there is unquenchable desire. It does not matter how much we have; we want
more. Then, coming to this, we have 4 pillars. I like spiritual and cultural conservation. I had
a friend from the west, I asked him why he came to Bhutan – you know, you are spiritually
rich. The rest of the world has lost its spirituality. GNH can in a way measure the science of
mind, the feeling and emotions are very accountable for happiness“ (BL_CST_FGS).
• “Our views should be respected and I should respect others. If I stand and say the answer and
might be wrong but my tutor always supports me with their answers and it makes it and me
more confident makes me do more writings. Respecting each other’s views and beliefs is
GNH” (BL_PCE_KIS).
Critical Pedagogy/ Banking
Contemplative critical pedagogy utilizing a variety of participatory teaching strategies,
especially co-operative learning, is described, as the heart of the colleges’ needed changes. Data
compiled by researchers clearly demonstrated an absence of pedagogical development beyond the
banking knowledge style of teaching employed through an adherence to the lecture style of instruction
and test and quiz assessment. The ideas of critical pedagogy put forth by Freire (1970) in response to
traditional formal models of education where the “teacher” is the authority and stands at the front and
“imparts” information to the “students” that are passive recipients. Freire referred to this type of
schooling as the “banking” method of teaching.
Critical pedagogy recognizes the problems of society as more than simply isolated events of
individuals of deficiencies in the social structure. These problems form part of the interactive context
between individual and society. The individual, a social actor, both creates and is created by the social
universe of which s/he is a part. The two are inextricably interwoven. For the critical educator, there
are many sides to a problem. Knowledge (truth) is socially constructed, culturally mediated and
historically situated and students need the opportunity to engage in praxis (informed action) that is
guided by phronesis, the disposition to act truly and rightly, (Darder, 2009). Teaching and learning
then become a process of inquiry, of critique and of constructing knowledge building a social
imagination that works within a language of possibilities. Knowledge is relevant when it begins with
the experiences students bring with them from the surrounding culture; it is critical when these
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
97
experiences are shown to raise contradictions and it is transformative when students begin to use the
knowledge to help reduce suffering and empower self and others to live a just and righteous life.
Dewey (1916, 1998) saw the necessity for cooperation and community support for the
individual. He directed attention to the ‘social medium’ in which the individual growth occurred and
to the mutuality of significant collective concerns. He was aware that the principles and assumptions
that gave rise to public schools curricula were taken for granted, fundamentally unquestionable,
therefore a method of social inquiry had to be developed to develop rational insight and dialogue
increasing the ability to understand and live with compassion reducing inequities that foster suffering.
Emerson (1983) sought to rouse his listeners to create their own meanings, to think for
themselves. Thoreau (1849) wanted students to reject their own self-exploitation, to refuse what we
would now call false consciousness and artificial needs. He was intent to naming his lived world, the
idea of freedom solved little; students and teachers had to take action to achieve their freedom with
responsibility in which they saw as the fundamental power to think, choose, and act for the good of
the whole.
The observations completed by the research team members observed a few classes using more
dialectic approaches in the classroom, applying relevant information to the students’ lives, and make
use of strategic questions to support the discovery of knowledge, however, these cases were few to
find. Most classes seldom advanced beyond yes/no questioning leaving students little opportunity to
critically analyze or reflect upon the lesson and its relevance to their lives. The research shows that
respondents see a need for the continuing professional development of lecturers in varied pedagogical
methods, teaching strategies, foundational principles and skills of contemplative critical pedagogy,
and in the development of infusing relevant examples in the classroom. This requires the lecturer to
bring in current social, cultural, environmental, political, and economic issues to critical think and act
within the subject matter under study. In this way, the student cognitive, ethical, and societal decisions
that are made after college will be based in a process that is more likely to be a conscious process of
analysis and reflective inquiry.
Lecture style
Data show that lecture style presentation is the most dominant method of instruction. Some
respondents claim that lack of infrastructure and urgency to cover syllabus in time are the main
reasons why they resort to lecture style of teaching.
• Respondent claims to engage in lecture style: “Mostly through oral teaching”
(BL_ILCS_KIL).
• “80/20 learning technique: 20% in the classroom and 80% from hard work. From my
opinion, it is the opposite here. We are only spoon-fed“ (BL_SHER_FGS).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
98
• “Lecturer was still talking and the students were listening they were quiet and looking at the
lecturer. Only a few times students were taking notes and there was not talking amongst the
students” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “Lecturer wrote on the blackboard and continued to lecture and explain”
(BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “Lecturer is still only lecturing (11:40am to 12:15pm) and still standing in the same place,
sideways” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “[At 12pm, Lecturer] Explained the biography of the playwright through slide presentation
and lecture (Observer noted: deposit of knowledge). Students merely listened to the lecture
and did nothing else. Note -taking was not evident. 12.15pm, the lecturer still continued with
the slides, explanation and lecture. “Criminals need to be punished-they need to be reformed.”
(Observer noted: How do you discuss this at deeper level and bring personal stories and
experiences?). 12.20 Lecturer lectured. (Observer noted: absence of students’ interaction).
“Who can heal Africa’s wounds?”(Observer noted: This could have been deliberated at length
as it had potential for internalization)
• 12.30 lecture still and his laptop. “Sex is a difficult topic to talk about here.” (Observer
noted: How? Do you discuss further and create opportunity to find out the truth yourself?
What do students have to say?)” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “2nd PowerPoint slide, [lecturer] reads the slide and expands, 3rd PowerPoint slide,
[lecturer] reads the slide and expands, 4th PowerPoint slide, [lecturer] reads and expands, 5th
PowerPoint slide, [lecturer] reads and expands, 6th the same, and so on” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “Talks and describes experiment: Included the steps and what to expect in his description”
(BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “For me, it depends on the topic which I am teaching. If I am teaching about diseases, I use
case study and scenario method. I give the scenario and students study and discuss. But if I
am teaching some theories, I go for presentation and lecture. Sometimes because of the
infrastructure, too many students, small room, and syllabus to cover, most of the time we end
up doing the lecture.” Another respondent shares, “I do the same. We also follow the lecturer
method as well as other methods. It depends on the topic. So do case study method, group
presentation and lecture” (BL_RIHS_FGL).
• “I use the scenarios from the text. Then I adapt it to the scenario in Bhutan. And sometimes it
somewhat seems like a challenge. When I ask students what methods they like, they respond
that they want to go with the lecture. I never got a concrete answer [why]” (BL_RIHS_FGL).
• “During our time, no technology, no lcd, we were using overhead projector, transferences,
there was not much role modeling, demonstrating, or to bring audio visual. Teacher would be
coming to class and keep on continuously teaching, not concerned whether students were
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
99
interested. We too, did not feel interested, during exam, we were worried. The best part was if
teacher did not come. Now, curricular activities with students with talents” (BL_RIHS_FGS).
• “Teacher holds the book and explains the chapter by holding the book. Reads from the text
by looking at the book” (BL_NITM_OBSL).
• “They [lecturers] are tired and hectic.” Another respondent adds, “The lecturer just uses a
lecture. If it is 3 - hour class, the one hour is a lecture and the 2 hours is practical for what
they had been thought.” A different respondent states,” Lecturers just use a power point and
talk.” “[There are] very few group discussions. Mostly lecture style” (BL_JNP_FGS).
• “New lecturer from India – for that we are not getting so familiar with him and whenever we
ask question he is not around. He is not coming with anything to class. He just dictates –
[even] if we are not getting the point. If we can ask for the last semester’s --- the lecturer”
(BL_SCE_KIS).
• “The first 50 minutes is a lecture, then we have 10 minutes of questions. They usually …
they ask to solve numerical problems as the homework. They can learn better in this way
(BL_JNP_FGS).
• “Lecturer was expressive in his body language (students laughed and seemed very relaxed),
using visual aid, and was taking time for students’ questions. However, lecturer was still
mainly depositing knowledge” (BL_ILCS_OBSL).
Relevant examples
When delivering material, lecturers can ask students about creative solutions to relevant problems
in Bhutan.
• “I give them the theory and always base it on real life examples. When I use examples from
real life, students enjoy. Students don’t have experience. So when we share with them
examples, success stories and challenge stories, they learn more. We must always link their
new learning to real experience, go back and forth.” Respondent continues, “I teach them to-
be health workers, so I talk about the health workers and how they work and their
experiences. I, not only give them the theoretical knowledge but I make sure to always relate
it to distinct scenarios which helps them understand better” (BL_RIHS_FGL).
• “Lecturer goes again to explain the importance of singing to children – “Rhyme can be
created but it needs to be relevant to your teaching” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “Lecturer is using waste management in their town as an example to help students relate to
the concept” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “The application in research areas – chemistry. When she teaches theory she relates in day to
day life. We are studying about environmental pollution, areas in the country and do some
service to help to the nation. This is very interesting - -which involves application and
research areas” (BL_SHER_FGS).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
100
• “Whenever they relate to example – data – sort of example – also if the topic relevance to the
teaching and to the students. Some simply come and teach the topic – it is nonsense”
(BL_SHER_KIS).
• “[Bringing cultural values into classroom] It is powerful because it makes us realize and the
students also realize through play that there are values we are learning. Not just only playing
lama but also when we look at the whole play and family roles – values like responsibilities
and respect – we are trying to act out. Through play there are certain things we can learn.
Bringing this to content enriches the lesson” (Pretest_PCE_KIL).
• “[Lecturer] continues to explain problems and creative solution making – using Thomas
Edison – more than 2000 experiments” (BL_SHER_OBSL).
Critical Analysis
• “Sometimes, we make intentional questions – so students could make mistakes”
(BL_JNP_FGL).
• [I used a wrong formula in the class because] I just wanted to check the progress of students’
learning. I did not realize it was such a powerful tool” (BL_CST_KIADM).
• “[Lecturer asks the class] What did you see at the river side? Naming: Pollution, Action:
Picked up trash. Who is poisoning the river? We are, human beings! Asking questions is
mindfulness. I see this trash, what do I do? We can make a difference!! And it begins with
ourselves in order to make a difference elsewhere. [Lecturer] told a story, I just made a
difference to the crab in the sea. What do we do as mindful beings of this planet? Humans are
not separate from Earth” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “Not so many conversations about the social, political and economic… Sometimes we are so
focused on what the students really must know to do a job. These things are important to
know, not maybe in the classroom setting. Really to know – must know – these things are
missed out. The larger picture is missed out. The contradictions are not so discussed. These
are good things and important to bring into the classroom” (BL_RIHS_KIADM).
• “For me, I think the quality has not improved but the people’s expectations have. Although
we don’t educate in the school system – the things that are taught are not up to expectations.
They need to be open to the good information around. People should have good reading
habits, newspapers, try and watch different kind of programs” (Pretest_PCE_FGS).
Yes / No style of questions
Perceived as one of the common ways to engage and assess students’ learning, “yes / no” type
questions offer no reciprocity or exchange of thought between students and lecturer.
• “Can theories of learning enhance the understanding of learning and teaching? As a class,
they respond “yes” (BL_SCE_OBSL).
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
101
• “After reading the list she asked if there were any questions: NO! And did not discuss the list
again” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “Is this clear to you? All students respond yes sir as a chorus” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “What is poetry? Do you know? Chorus answer given by the students: Yes sir”
(BL_SHER_OBSL).
• “Lecturer asks the class yes/no questions and students answer in unison: Yes, sir!”
Probing questions
• “When students said their list out loud [lecturer] asked them why they believed that”
(BL_PCE_OBS).
• “[Lecturer] Invited everyone to come and sit on the sides. He wondered how everyone
communicated and if it was fun for them and why? Demonstration is important in teaching
children.” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “Why do we need education? Please write specific things” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
Co-creation of knowledge
Students seem to want to have more input into their classrooms, which would make them active
partners in co-learning and co-creating new knowledge.
• When asked, “What as an individual how have you added happiness to the community, a
respondent replied, “Students would arrange the seating arrangement before lecturer comes to
make a better learning environment. Table and chairs” (BL_JNP_FGS).
• “Lecturer played with all teams. Made huddles to have everyone discuss what they liked
about the game and how they could work better together as a team” (BL_PCE_OBSL).
• “Ground Rules for the Class: Punctual, space to speak without judgment, one at a time,
imagery has allowed us to verify that mindfulness practice can literally change our brains and improve
ability of learning and our roles as student and teacher by enhancing our capacity for learning,
integrating, and acting. Mindfulness practice in education focuses on teaching students how to pay
attention rather that telling the student to pay attention. As noted by many stories during the data
collection, telling the student happened far more often that showing students how to pay attention.
Mindfulness practice relates to a GNH education as mindfulness can encourage and increase
pro-social behaviors of kindness and compassion to improve the quality of life. Kindness and
compassion are both GNH values. Mindfulness practice would require lecturers to slow down a bit
and take the time in class to cultivate an appreciation of how the student is in relationship with
oneself, have the student pay attention to how one is learning, and give time for students to learn how
one is in relationship to other students, nature, and the greater community.
Mindfulness practice in classrooms can decrease the ever-increasing pressures and demands
of the technological digital driven society. The practice in our classrooms can help students and
lecturers intentionally bring awareness that being human and how to recognize and address the social
differences and inequities in a loving and compassionate action filled way.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
177
As per the data collected during the baseline round mindfulness practice is not a consistent or
regular practice among most of the lecturers in the classroom. There were reports of a few lecturers
who use mindfulness practice in their classrooms on a regular basis, however these were a very small
percentage. The students and lecturers who reported mindfulness in the classroom stated the level of
focus and attention students are able to undertake increased and classroom learning went more
smoothly.
Several of the contributing factors from the lecturers for not using mindfulness practice in the
classroom included: (a) not able to lead classroom mindfulness practices effectively due to a lack of
experience and knowledge (b) the lecturers do not believe that mindfulness practice is of benefit in the
classroom, (c) little training has been available for lecturers on mindfulness practice (d) lecturers do
not have their own personal mindfulness practice (e) lecturers perceived that the students would not
want mindfulness practice in their classroom and (f) mindfulness practice is associated with religious
practice and should not be in schools. There were two lecturer respondents who reported that if
mindfulness practice was required in the classroom they would leave the college.
The student respondents reported they thought (a) mindfulness practice was useful (b) they
had experienced mindfulness practice in the classroom during their secondary schooling and wanted
to continue (c) students wanted to have more consistent practices at the College (d) students wanted
more lecturers to use mindfulness practice in the classroom (e) students would like to develop their
own practice and have a time and place on college to practice as once they go home students reported
not having a quiet place and time to practce. Student respondents from several colleges reported that
they did have their own mindfulness practice and used it prior to starting homework in the evening.
The majority of student respondents stated the purpose of mindfulness practice was to enhance
concentration for their schooling.
During the jumpstart the group of lecturers and administrators stated that for mindfulness
practice to become integrated into the classroom there needed to be a comprehensible difference
between classroom practice and religious practice. The concern that lecturers would be hesitant to
bring mindfulness practice into their classrooms was noted due to the religious connotations. In
addition, the lecturers stated they needed more evidence as to the benefits of student learning before
mindfulness practice should be required by the college as a pedagogical practice. The tendency
reported by lecturers and students in the colleges was that mindfulness is used for concentration and
focus development of students.
The research team believes that mindfulness practice should be come something each and
every class practices and supports throughout RUB. The following is a list of activities the research
team thought would be beneficial to enlist in RUB as a way of infusing mindfulness practice and its
benefits into RUB college classrooms. The activity is followed by a recommended time frame to
introduce during the research study. In addition to the benefits to student learning and human values
education, the RUB administration could also infuse into their management practices providing RUB
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
178
the opportunity to become a model and a leading educational institution in holistic pedagogies and
traditions.
1. Mindfulness practices become a part of the curriculum for modules and is written in the
lesson plans and semester plans. (Phase II)
2. A mindfulness practice manual is developed by lecturers at PCE and the PI for lecturers
throughout RUB to use as a tool and guide. (Cycle I and Cycle II intervention).
3. Practice not only in the class but also encourage students and lecturers to have personal
practices, therefore have a place or room central in the college where lecturers and students
can go and practice during the day in their free time, (Phase II).
4. Introduce yoga morning, evening, (Cycle III and Cycle IV) for all
5. Introduce yoga and other eastern traditional arts as an elective module for all students (Phase
III)
6. On-going follow up coaching and training for lecturer personal practice and development of
practice in the classroom to raise confidence (Phase II and Phase III).
7. Invitation of Monastic leaders to the college four or five times a semester to help develop the
personal mindfulness practice of lecturers and students.
8. Within each semester a two-day retreat is available for students and lecturers to participate in.
(Phase II)
a. Eventually this may be offered two or three times during the semester.
Assessment
Nothing we do to, or for our students is more important than our assessment of their work and
the feedback we give them on it. The results of our assessment influence students for the rest
of their lives... (Race et al., 2005)
The most widely use form of assessments at RUB are testing and quizzes, this is followed by
group presentations, however very few lecturers use rubrics with their student to clearly identify
student learning outcomes and expectations. Should tests determine ones future? Why would Bhutan
want someone to take a test to keep students out of a college they want to enter? How does a multiple
choice or short answer question tests encourage students to look at current issues from the
perspective of GNH values and principles? At present the students learning is evaluated based on
exam marks alone, so respondents felt there is a need to change the motive for learning and go beyond
marks (BL_CNR_12-03-12). To achieve gains in student knowledge and skills, RUB lecturers must
give students a rich curriculum with varied opportunities to use their learning and skills in real world
issues and opportunities. Overwhelmingly students at RUB believed that the tests at level 10 and level
12 should not determine the success and future of a student. Students tend to internalize the judgments
of test scores as legitimate. Many times the scores on the tests become a brand of shame in which
students carry long after the test. Tests tend to oversimplify what is taught in the classroom and to
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
179
severely constrict what is taught to only those items most likely to appear on the upcoming test. How
can a test really capture what a student learnt in the last one – eight years of schooling? How will in-
depth courses be taught if testing for memorization is required? How will RUB lecturers be able to
innovate new curriculum and pedagogies if assessments are based upon test scores? Taking a test is
not the way to amend education. The money and time invested in tests could be given to lecturer
professional development workshops, school supplies, or perhaps cultural arts programs. Raising
student awareness is about getting an education that is meaningful, deep, and personalized. Testing
does not support this.
A few concerns that were revealed through the data were:
• My peers do not do the same amount of work as me and I end up doing everything.
(BL_PCE_FGS)
• It's just easier if the teacher lectures and gives PowerPoint slides in a handout that I can study
for the exam. Examinations are how it is decided where we go after school.
(BL_SHER_FGS)
• Tests do not teach us anything but they do tell us if we are smart enough to make it or not and
we can be denied based up our scores. (BL_CST_FGS)
• “I wanted to be a doctor, I could only come here and teach because I did not qualify. I
sometimes think about being a doctor, but I could not” (BL_CNR_KIL).
There is an important relationship between assessment and student learning of module
objectives. Most often the assessment and the objectives on the content of the module make up the
entire course. Typically a first step in module development is to create student-learning objectives.
Based on these learning objectives lecturers can then design what types of teaching strategies and
assessments will measure students' learning of the stated learning objectives. There should be a match
between student-learning objectives, assessment tools, and teaching strategies.
For a holistic GNH classroom, the student learning objectives for each and every module
must go beyond content if GNH values and principles are to be achieved. The GNH values and
principles will need to be embedded into the semester plan beginning with the module student-
learning objectives followed by teaching strategies utilized, strategic questions for thought, and lastly
the assessment tools selected. Lecturers should be able to align their choice of assessment tools to the
both student content objectives and GNH values and principle objectives. Once the student learning
objectives and assessment tools are in place a semester plan for learning can be developed creating the
learning opportunities that will best support the students in reaching the student-learning objectives.
Critical reflection on the learning objectives should lead instructors to awareness about appropriate,
relevant assessments and authentic assessments. Assessment has many benefits beside the obvious
one of providing a measure of students' learning or memorization of content. Assessment can be a
way to engage students with their learning. Ideally lecturers’ assessment is to support active learning
rather than assessment of student learning to ensure that the assessment process is an integral part of
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
180
students' education.
Assessments for learning focuses on the opportunities to develop students’ ability to self-
reflect and evaluate themselves, to develop judgments and evidence to support those judgments about
their own and other students’ performance and learning, and to improve. Authentic assessment
methods offer lots of opportunities for students to develop their skills through formative assessment
using small amounts of summative assessment.
One challenge for instructors in higher education today as well as in the lower grades is
instilling in students a sense of responsibility for their own learning. Throughout the world we are
witnessing a rise in active learning and learner-centered instruction and assessment in higher
education. This rise does not come without some resistance from the students as the new strategies are
breaking what is familiar patterns and putting more responsibility on the student to learn.
Weimer (2002) suggests that students “must accept the responsibility for learning. This
involves developing the intellectual maturity, learning skills, and awareness necessary to function as
autonomous learners" (p. 95). With the rise of PowerPoint and the use of online learning management
systems students become more dependent on the teacher to supply all necessary information for the
good grade that will lead them to high qualifying score and a good career. To align higher education
with GNH values and principles a paradigm shift is needed so that students are happily engaged in the
learning and assessment processes; participating in classrooms through interactions with their peers
and lecturers; and for learning to be academically, socially, emotionally, and spiritually rewarding
contributing to personal and social well-being.
Holistic education utilizing critical pedagogy and contemplative education proposes one way
to encourage students to take responsibility for their learning, is to give the student some power in the
decision-making about their module and assessment tools (Weimer, 2002). When students are
integrated in the options, students better understand the reading selection, assignment design,
assessments and in-class activities. Often times, students are not even given a simple rationale for the
instructor's decision on readings and assessment tools. The students then become passive followers,
something that is quite opposite of what holistic GNH classroom pedagogy calls for.
Peer and self-assessment, for instance, can foster a number of skills, such as reflection,
critical thinking and self-awareness, collaboration, and collective learning raising civic vitality, self-
discipline, responsibility and interdependence. For PCE and SCE peer and self-assessment gives pre-
service students insight into the assessment process and how their future teaching can be enhanced.
Discussing the whys and the ways lecturers assess with students can help ensure the aims and goals of
lecturer chosen assessments are clear. Utilizing assessment that makes use of technology, such as the
use of online discussion forums or electronic submission of work, can teach students needed
technological skills and reduce plagiarism informing students how to gather and report information
(Cowan, 2005).
For the lecturers at RUB to utilize assessment as a form of measurement and a form of
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
181
learning workshops and follow-up coaching will need to be provided over a 2-3 year period. In
addition, revision of semester plans, and student information systems will need to be adjusted to
accept newly identified ways of assessment. During the workshop lecturers will learn how to integrate
multiple streams of assessment data to inform them on the reality of how well their students are
learning the content, skills, and GNH values and principles being targeted by the specific module’s
learning objectives. Assessment workshops will include, but not be limited to, summative, formative,
peer feedback and student self-assessment rubrics design and reducing the reliance and pressure of
tests. This intervention is planned for Cycle III intervention round during the winter session of RUB
(January – February 2012) for the PCE research team members and lecturers who have been identified
by the director or voluntarily commit to the intensive assessment workshop.
The research team believes that changes in assessment are essential for RUB to develop a
GNH pedagogy and classroom practice. The following is a list of activities the research team
recommends to RUB as a way to assess of student learning moving away from tests and exams. The
activity is followed by a recommended time frame to introduce during the research study.
1. Inculcate critical thinking and action into every module as part of the assessment
process. This can be started by developing strategic questions for each class lesson
into the semester plans by creating an additional column to the semester plans and
lecturers working tougher to come up with a series of strategic questions that align
with the module topic. (Cycle II)
2. To develop objectives and indicators of student learning for GNH value and
principles that can be assessed. (Cycle III)
3. Development of authentic assessment tools by lecturers through professional
learning communities, coaching groups. (On-going through Cycle II, Cycle IV,
Cycle V).
4. Development of peer assessment and self-assessment tools to be used in modules
for student learning and development. (Cycle III)
5. Workshops with lecturers to learn and develop authentic assessment tools matching
student outcomes and indicators for GNH values and principles as well as content
material. (Cycle III)
Relationships
Building relationships between lecturer and student was significantly stronger among the
students than the lecturers. Students wanted a more friendly atmosphere in the classroom as well as
during office hours. Students reported that in general they were hesitant to see lecturers during office
hours unless they had a specific question or doubt about an assignment. Only five students reported
going to see the lecturer about expanding the class content or topics not specifically related to the
class. Few lecturers could give specifics about what their students thought about learning expectations
and goals of the module.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
182
Students are coming from a primary and secondary educational background where in most
cases the student was not given many choices about their learning. Seeing lecturers continue this
process is common. In fact, oftentimes, what is rare is when lecturers do share their power and give
students more choice and voice in the classroom. The data supports the pattern that instructional
choices that exert control over students are informed by lecturer beliefs and assumptions about
students' (lack of) capacity for learning and decision-making. Students are not seen as academically
experienced enough to make good decisions about learning; students lack academic skills for learning;
students come to get good, pass qualifying exams, and get a civic job.
The research team recommends that lecturers begin on the first day of class to develop a more
personal relationship with the students and share decision-making power. For example, on the first
day of class lecturers can survey the students about their learning expectations and goals for the
course. Discover what content about the topic understudy is most meaningful and relevant to them
(given their majors, career goals, other module, etc.). The lecturer and students can democratically
make decisions about cell phone and computer use in the classroom, food and drink in the classroom,
attendance and punctuality, use of online learning management systems, side conversations, chair
arrangements, and other ground rules to create an intentional learning culture of respect and shared
responsibility. Lecturers and student work together early in the semester to establish an intentional
culture of the classroom, one that is collaborative and open to questions, exploration of the subject
matter, and relevant to students’ lives. Guidelines should include ways to deal with opposing views
when they arise, ensure that everyone contributes, and how to address dominant and silent students
Lecturers could provide a sample of assignments for students to either choose from or modify.
There are several ways that student can have input on assignments. For instance students are told
what point value would earn them an A, B, and so forth. The student could then choose from a
selection of assignments to total equal to or more than what they needed to receive an A in the class.
This would mean the lecturer would need to have enough choices so students could opt out of 1 or 2
assignments of their choosing. Another option is for the lecturer to select the assignments they want
the students to do because the lecturer firmly believes the selected assignments will be the best
measure of meaningful student learning in the module - i.e., the selected assignments are non-
negotiable. Then, the lecturer can explore with the students ideas on how best to complete them. If it
is a writing assignment will students give the lecturers multiple drafts before grading? Will the
students have choice of submission formats such as paper, video, performance art, presentation, can
the students choose to work individually or in groups?
An additional option is to let students contribute to the assessment decisions. What
assessments make the most sense given the learning objectives you all have agreed upon for the
module course? How best will students and lecturers know that students have learned and are able to
apply the new knowledge and/or skill? Can students include a self-assessment or peer assessment on
particular assignments? Brainstorm with the students about their learning preferences. Ask questions
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
183
on how to arrange the classroom in rows, in small groups around a table, in a semi-circle or a full
circle including the lecturer. How will lecturers and student contribute to the module content?
There are many ways to create and develop more friendly relationships sharing the
responsibility of teaching and learning. The research team recommends that coaching groups,
professional learning communities of lecturers at each college, use their observations and discussions
with each other to develop other ways of integrating relationship development into their pedagogy.
Cultural preservation
The baseline data shows that all RUB colleges recognize the importance of preserving the
culture of Bhutan through informed and integrated curriculum and classroom practices. ILCS ranked
the highest amongst all the colleges in expressing the critical role of culture preservation in achieving
GNH goals. According to the respondents (BL_ILCS_FGL), preserving our national language
Dzongkha is one of the ways of preserving the unique national identity and it is crucial to have more
subjects taught in Dzongkha, not only at ILCS but also other colleges. Students at other colleges
confirmed this stance. However, the data also showed that a deeper understanding of cultural values
and their connection with environment is required for students to think critically and to internalize
their interdependence of both culture and Bhutan’s natural environment. One of the most important
goals of the RUB is to develop graduates with a greater sense of appreciation for the country’s unique
culture in the rapid era of modernization and appreciate and identify themselves with their own unique
cultural heritage (Tertiary Education Policy of the Kingdom of Bhutan, 2010).
The research team recommends that modules integrate historical cultural aspects of Bhutan
within the subject content. Workshops should be held within each college where lecturers work
together infusing historical cultural traditions such as story telling, farming, and yak herding. This
workshop should happen during faculty development time or during the winter or summer session
where lecturers can then receive education credits for attending. In addition, the research team
recommends an experiential component for RUB students by staying with the natured based
populations throughout Bhutan for a one-week time frame during the first year second semester. In
this way RUB students can first hand understand the contributions and benefits of this lifestyle. This
deeper understanding will bring about a more active support for the preservation of historical cultures
of Bhutan.
Motivation
A high level of employee motivation is derived from effective management practices. To
develop motivated employees, a manager must treat people as individuals, empower workers by
providing freedom of expression and listening to their voices, provide an effective reward system,
encourage freedom with responsibility, involve all the members in decision making and above all be a
dynamic and far sighted leader, one with a vision to carry others through challenges. Thus, managers
who are at the greatest risk of derailment are those who are unable to build, direct, and motivate their
team, or are unable to teach and develop their team (Centre for Leadership Development, 2010;
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
184
Nohria, Groysberg, & Lee, 2008). Motivation is considered to be a central achievement of human
resources management practices with a fundamental aim to increase job involvement and job
satisfaction of a lecturer and acquiring high level of work motivation (Jerris, 1999).
Components for higher motivation include career development, which has been shown to
ensure teacher motivation, which in turn enhances lecturer performance and thus impacts learning
outcomes positively. Several of the lecturers throughout RUB believe that being geographically away
from their families is a sacrifice that impacts the quality of teaching and motivation to teach. Surveys
in NWFP and Punjab have shown that teacher discipline and motivation is better when teachers are
placed within their area of residence (World Bank, “Management
Study”, 2005; World Bank, “Reform Study”, 2005).
The research team recommends a plan to be developed and include an exploration of various
issues of motivation for the lecturers at RUB, an elaboration of problems which are being faced by
lecturers regarding factors specifically to RUB, and recommendations supported by an action plan
needs to be developed. In addition, a recognition plan for lecturer achievement and lecturer
contributions to the university be developed so that the lecturers feel more satisfied in their job, which
is directly related to classroom pedagogy and practices. The courage and dedication for developing
high performance and GNH value infused work systems can only be achieved if lecturers are willing
to give their best. Compensation hence must have to give attention to the non-monetary factors such
as recognition, feed back and opportunities for career development to retain a high quality lecturer
alongside financial incentives. Several of the lecturers throughout RUB believe that being
geographically away from their families is a sacrifice that impacts the quality of teaching and
motivation to teach. Surveys in NWFP and Punjab have shown that teacher discipline and motivation
is better when teachers are placed within their area of residence (World Bank, “Management Study”,
2005; World Bank, “Reform Study”, 2005).
The research team believes that intrinsic and extrinsic motivation result in different outcomes.
Scores of studies have shown that the more people are rewarded for doing something, the more they
are apt to lose interest in whatever they had to do to get the reward. Researchers keep finding that
offering people positive reinforcement for being helpful and generous ends up undermining those very
qualities, and encourage lecturers and students to improve grades results however become less
interested in learning, (Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999; Kohn, 1999).
Responsibility and Self Discipline
The analysis of the data shows that there is no common definition of responsibility and self-
discipline among lecturers or students. For educators who invoke the need to teach students self-
discipline, an exploration of the philosophical foundation of that concept is essential. Some
respondents believed that obedience to authority is what produces self-discipline, and self-discipline,
in turn, is required for achievement (Block, 2002, pp. 195-96). Actions are chosen because one
‘should’ do them, or because not doing so might engender anxiety, guilt, or loss of esteem. Other
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
185
respondents believe that responsibility and self-discipline is more of an internalization process that
can take place more authentically, so the actions are experienced as volitional or self-determined. In
this way responsibility and self-discipline are seen as being fully integrated into one’s value structure
and feels chosen. Research demonstrates that the latter kind of internalization leads to better outcomes
than the former. The research team member’s analysis of the data suggests that in order to teach GNH
values and principles, practice should begin from oneself. In order to develop happiness,
responsibility and discipline opportunities need to be given to students and lecturers to become self-
disciplined and act righteous, not wait to be told to do so.
The research team members believe it is essential for teachers to promote the more positive
version by minimizing “externally imposed evaluations, goals, rewards, and pressures” as well as
proactively supporting students’ sense of autonomy,” (Ryan & Stiller, 1991, p. 143). Having
responsibility and self-discipline to be internal is not sufficient. If students or lecturers feel
controlled, even from within, they’re likely to be more conflicted, unhappy, and perhaps less likely to
succeed with their tasks of teaching and learning. A holistic college education provides opportunity
for the student to discover who they are and how they want to be in the world. Lecturers, students and
administrators at RUB needs to ask if the RUB college journey consists of collecting credentials for
whatever comes next or does the RUB college experience provide gratification, in itself. RUB
students may learn to be skilled test-takers, take hold of grades and be able to delay gratification,
however is this the mixed the blessing of self-discipline that GNH is striving for?
Some lecturers ask: How can they get students to raise their hands and wait to be called on
rather than blurting out the answer? Some lecturers will ask: Why does the lecturer ask most of the
questions and unilaterally decide who gets to speak, and when? Some students ask: What is the best
way for me to learn self-discipline so I will do my work? Some students ask: Are these assignments,
which feel like work really worth doing? A holistic GNH education makes a distinction of
responsibility and self-discipline beyond creating control for a work force, developing a workaholic
mentality. The cultivation of awareness so that students understand the benefits of study and the
student wants to follow through even if it’s not always pleasurable is more important that if the
students knows what their supposed to study and may feel bad about themself if they do not study
(Ryan, Rigby, & King, 1993,).
What aspect of life is important for a GNH education, this question asks is it important to
train children to make meaningful decisions, become part of a democratic society, and learn to think
critically or put one’s nose to the grind on doing what the prescribed lessons are and doing whatever
one is told. To develop the capacity to choose whether and when to persevere, to control oneself, to
follow the rules is more important than the tendency to do these things in every situation needs to be
reviewed. Secure, healthy students and lecturers can be flexible and open to new experiences and self-
discovery, deriving satisfaction from the process of learning and teaching rather than being focused on
the end product. A self-disciplined student may be understood as a student who is reading or
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
186
problem-solving purely as a means to the end of a good test score or a high grade, or paying attention
in class, making comments in a discussion, and filling in answers on a worksheet. A self-disciplined
student may also be understood as a student who is intrinsically motivated, wanting to do something
for its own sake, to read just because it’s exciting to captivate oneself in a story. The research team
suggests that further conversation about how to promote deep thinking and excitement about learning,
rather than the memorization of facts and practicing skills by rote needs be organized. A critical
dialogue of self-discipline in the field of education and throughout the Bhutanese culture is needed
Environmental preservation
This study has revealed that a lack of on-going environmental awareness and education is
apparent at most of the colleges. There are a diversity of ways that lecturers can address
environmental education in their classrooms. Furthermore, RUB can require a program for all RUB
students to take part in during their overall four year journey. For instance, environmental education
could become a compulsory area of the curriculum in higher education using a range of different
approaches, the most common being that it is embedded in all subject areas. Similar to the
recommendations for cultural preservation in the first year, the students in their second year second
semester could be required to camp in the wilderness and learn environmental awareness such as the
program Leave No Trace or National Outdoor Leadership School offers. The links are provided for
further investigation. The research team has contacts and connections for both the groups if RUB is
interested in pursuing further development.
It is interesting to note that in addition to broad areas of knowledge in relation to
environmental education, the importance of values, ethics, attitudes and behaviors in the classroom
and pedagogy of teaching and learning emerges, thus giving the teaching of environmental education
a perspective not always found in the classroom or pedagogy of the lecturer. This approach suggests
that general concerns about the environment and sustainability are being taken seriously striving to
inculcate attitudes and values will result in environmentally responsible behavior by young citizens of
Bhutan. Enhancement of inner perceptual and/or spiritual life can be experienced through outdoor
nature based activities such as nature study, aesthetic contemplation, meditation, painting,
photography, and archeological or historical research, among others. These activities also support
physical well-being.
The following recommendations are intended to encourage responsible attitude and
responsibility throughout the campus community.
• Encourage and facilitate the dissemination of curriculum-related information across RUB
colleges. This may be carried out by traditional means such as publications, via the world-
wide web and/or the setting up of a RUB wide professional development for all lecturers in
environmental education.
• The notion of a “Green Award” for College across Bhutan could provide incentives for
schools and their pupils to become more environment-friendly. Awards could be providing
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
187
the campus with 50 trees, or receptacles to increase recycling on campus, or perhaps a week-
long training for students and lecturers on environmental awareness and education. In doing
so, this should encourage more environmentally aware behavior by young people.
• To develop indicators and criteria for RUB so that colleges have a systemic and transparent
way to reach and attain environmental preservation and awareness on campus. These
indicators will coincide with the indicators that are developed for GNH values and principles
i.e. attitude as well as knowledge and behavior. This implies a monitoring and evaluation
system would also need to be developed for assessment, perhaps self-assessment purposes.
• Encourage adequate lecturer training, initial, in-service, and on-going each semester to ensure
that lecturers are knowledgeable and able to provide content in environmental education
across the different areas in the curriculum.
• For RUB to require all students throughout RUB during their second year, second semester to
attend a one week long environmental experiential outdoor learning trip. This trip could be
offered in many forms such as trekking in near-by wilderness areas, camping in national
parks, river rafting, or mountaineering or canoeing. Following is an example of what this one
week experience could offer. This one-week is part of the 15 week semester. Lecturers too
would be required to participate in the outdoor experience. The week should not be an
optional one week adventure, in that being one of the pillars of GNH, a strong stance is
required to model and uphold the importance of environmental preservation.
Leave No Trace is a set of ethics that help guide people when they spend time in natural
unpopulated areas. Leave No Trace was originally developed in the 1970s when people started to
take an interest and go outside for recreation. People did not know how to take care of and properly
treat the outdoors. Soon places that people were frequently traveled to in the outdoors were becoming
loved to death. Campers and hikers destroyed local vegetation and they left trash and other traces of
their visit. The impacts that people were having on the environments they were visiting were
destroying the ecology of the environment and decreasing the beauty and landscape for other people
to visit and enjoy. Soon the four land management agencies of the United Stated employed National
Outdoor Leadership School to develop a code of ethics that they could spread to people so that the
outdoors would cared for.
Leave No Trace has developed seven different principles that can help guide peoples’
endeavors and activities in the outdoors and help them leave these places in a beautiful and pristine
nature. These seven principles are guiding ethics and not laws to obey. They should be considered
and contemplated within each and every different ecosystem and place; each place and ecosystem is
different and therefore people need to learn not only basic principles but also specific balances that
exist within each specific area.
The seven principles from Leave No Trace are:
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
188
Plan Ahead and Prepare
• Know the regulations and special concerns for the area you'll visit.
• Prepare for extreme weather, hazards, and emergencies.
• Schedule your trip to avoid times of high use.
• Visit in small groups when possible. Consider splitting larger groups into smaller groups.
• Repackage food to minimize waste.
• Use a map and compass to eliminate the use of marking paint, rock cairns or flagging.
Travel and Camp on Durable Surfaces
ñ Durable surfaces include established trails and campsites, rock, gravel, dry grasses or snow.
ñ Protect riparian areas by camping at least 200 feet from lakes and streams.
ñ Good campsites are found, not made. Altering a site is not necessary.
ñ In popular areas:
ñ Concentrate use on existing trails and campsites.
ñ Walk single file in the middle of the trail, even when wet or muddy.
ñ Keep campsites small. Focus activity in areas where vegetation is absent.
ñ In pristine areas:
ñ Disperse use to prevent the creation of campsites and trails.
ñ Avoid places where impacts are just beginning.
Dispose of Waste Properly
ñ Pack it in, pack it out. Inspect your campsite and rest areas for trash or spilled foods. Pack out
all trash, leftover food, and litter.
ñ Deposit solid human waste in catholes dug 6 to 8 inches deep at least 200 feet from water,
camp, and trails. Cover and disguise the cathole when finished.
ñ Pack out toilet paper and hygiene products.
ñ To wash yourself or your dishes, carry water 200 feet away from streams or lakes and use
small amounts of biodegradable soap. Scatter strained dishwater.
Leave What You Find
ñ Preserve the past: examine, but do not touch, cultural or historic structures and artifacts.
ñ Leave rocks, plants and other natural objects as you find them.
ñ Avoid introducing or transporting non-native species.
ñ Do not build structures, furniture, or dig trenches.
Minimize Campfire Impacts
ñ Campfires can cause lasting impacts to the backcountry. Use a lightweight stove for cooking
and enjoy a candle lantern for light.
ñ Where fires are permitted, use established fire rings, fire pans, or mound fires.
ñ Keep fires small. Only use sticks from the ground that can be broken by hand.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
189
ñ Burn all wood and coals to ash, put out campfires completely, then scatter cool ashes.
Respect Wildlife
ñ Observe wildlife from a distance. Do not follow or approach them.
ñ Never feed animals. Feeding wildlife damages their health, alters natural behaviors, and
exposes them to predators and other dangers.
ñ Protect wildlife and your food by storing rations and trash securely.
ñ Control pets at all times, or leave them at home.
ñ Avoid wildlife during sensitive times: mating, nesting, raising young, or winter.
Be Considerate of Other Visitors
ñ Respect other visitors and protect the quality of their experience.
ñ Be courteous. Yield to other users on the trail.
ñ Step to the downhill side of the trail when encountering pack stock.
ñ Take breaks and camp away from trails and other visitors.
ñ Let nature's sounds prevail. Avoid loud voices and noises.
Retrieved May 16, 2012 from www.LNT.org
Community partnership
The analysis of the baseline data from most of the colleges; CNR, JNP, SCE, ILCS, RITM,
NITM, and GCBS; affirmed the importance of building community partnerships. The data showed
that increasing community involvement in and out-of-college programs can yield significant benefits
to programs and the students that they serve. The teacher respondents have expressed that providing
youth with opportunities to participate in their community is a powerful engagement strategy that can
also teach social responsibility. Some of these community practices already carried out by school
students are road maintenance, cleaning and gardening. However these types of activities are not on-
going and usually not part of the module curriculum, rather they are extra or co-curricular activities.
Students noted that one of the most interesting features of the community partnership the college can
have is the invitation of a guest speaker by the college from the local community to impart their
knowledge to students, teacher and administrators of the college (BL_CNR_FGS_13-03-12).
The community partnership benefits both the college and the community. When colleges and
communities work together both are strengthened in synergistic ways and make gains that outpace
what either entity could accomplish on its own: families access community resources more easily;
seniors contribute wisdom and gain a greater sense of purpose; and ultimately, students serve and
learn beyond their school involvement increasing the development of many GNH values and
principles, and the RUB college takes a leadership position within the local and national community. The students contribute to the development of the community vitality with their service and helps
community to sustain itself into the future. One of the goals of RUB should include how to develop a
strong community partnership that aligns with the GNH framework. The research team recommends a
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
190
pilot program between PCE and the REC Seed Schools in Paro and Thimphu. Students from PCE
will be matched with a teacher from one of the Seed Schools. This teacher will provide opportunities
and learning for the PCE student while the PCE student provides service to the teacher in the
classroom. The service is part of the learning process integrated within the modules, required of the
student, and is part of the assessment plan for the module. Lecturers periodically check in during the
semester with the Seed School teacher to ensure a quality partnership. The teacher from the Seed
School will be required to write an evaluation of the student’s performance at the end of each
semester. The same teacher and student works tougher over a three to four year period deepening the
learning and relationship between the school and college and the teacher and student. In this way, the
knowledge and skill the students learn increases. In culmination, the students at PCE can accumulate
more than 200 hours of classroom experience prior to their practicum during their third year. This
allows the student to be a better qualified teacher during their practicum, learn form the teachers
leading Bhutan in transformative education practices, and upon graduation be fully prepared with best
practices and experience to lead their own classroom. The students will not have to return to learn best
practices in follow up workshops, which is currently the situation. The lecturers at PCE can then
assess the student not only in their knowledge accumulation but their applied skill throughout the
entire students academic journey. Service learning opportunities should start in the first year first
semester and be part of each and every module throughout the entire time at RUB. Community partnerships can invite the community members to the college to share their
experiences as well as build a relationship that opens doors to opportunities for growth and learning
outside the college. Studies show that school and community relationships have positive results on
students (Mapp, 2007). Mapp noted that many educators are still surprised to learn that family
engagement in the home is vital for optimal learning. When education changes from a classroom
based sense to a more parent inclusive type of engagement strategy, education then starts to think
about how to support families and community, the greater society. When family engagement and
community involvement is linked to learning, we see improvement in learning and trust building
(Mapp, 2007).
The GNH values and principles framework calls for interconnectedness. If schools are
separate from their communities than learning the importance of interconnectedness as a value is
limited. Community partnerships weave together core components of the GNH holistic education
model. Community partnerships can have various levels starting with service learning and developing
into internships as part of RUB requirements for graduation. Community partnerships can include
developing relationships with individual people, local businesses, and other associations. RUB should
start slowly to establish pilot partnerships putting sustainability at the forefront, also one of the core
GNH pillars. RUB firstly, needs to make formal arrangements to provide a program, service and the
curriculum adjustments necessary to support student learning and achievement.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
191
The community partnership for the GNH educational model is really limited by what lecturers
and administrators can imagine; for instance RUB can partner with a start up recycling plant and help
develop and plan what is needed to make a secure plan. This can involve reaching out to the
community and providing education about recycling. The college and community residence can
address community safety issues and join together to organize an action plan. Programs can be offered
to the community depending of which college and what programs are offered within the college.
Reciprocal process is the upmost importance and community partnerships need to weave intricately
with the students learning content and assessment.
These partnerships raise the visibility of the college as well as local issues and programs. By
developing community partnerships it helps students practice mindfulness in having an intentional
purpose by being aware of other peoples time, commitments and resources. In addition the students
benefit by gaining experience to procure more meaningful employment in Bhutan’s growing
economy.
Democracy
As per the baseline data collected from all the colleges under Royal University of Bhutan
(RUB), the need of democracy in the college appears to be one of lower ranking themes in the
analysis pattern. This concern was not seen in all the colleges. This could be due to several
contributing factors, one of which is the research team members did not go in depth in their
questioning when democracy and related topics were mentioned, another could be due to the newness
of democracy in the country, and lastly, democratic principles have not been part of the schooling
culture to date. The data from five of the ten colleges indicated the need to move toward a democratic
way of doing things. Some of the issues that appeared in the data were the lack of freedom of
expression, freedom comes with internal responsibility, shared decision making, good governance,
and the importance of the collective good. The baseline data from College of Science and Technology
(CST) indicated that from 11.1% of the data sets, students and faculty affirmed the need to have
democracy in terms of freedom of expression and speech in the classroom. Some of the respondents
said they would like to live in an environment where there is freedom, fairness and justice, so that no
one is judging you and respect amongst each other is cultivated (BL_CST_FGS). Some of the
respondents related that politicking was present on the campus whereby some people gained freedom
with different sets of rules and regulations than other people had to follow. (BL_CST_KIS). Another
response that was echoed at a few of the colleges from two different focus groups discussions and a
key informant interview with lectures and an administrator stated that they did not want to do
anything without being told, and they did not want to do anything if they were told (BL_SCE_FGL
and BL_PCE_FGL). Hopefully every individual will take up their responsibility without someone
having to push from behind (BL_CNR_KIADM).
According to data collected from College of Natural Resources (CNR), 5.5% of data set
affirmed the need of freedom of expression, 5.5% of data set asserted the need of shared decision-
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
192
making and another 5.5% of data set indicated the need of good governance, which was related to
democracy. A similar pattern was seen in Jigme Namgyal Polytechnic (JNP) with 8.3% of data set
indicating that freedom should come with responsibility, 8.3% of data set talked about the the need of
the collective good to be part of the curriculum, and at Samtse College of Education (SCE) 10% of
data affirmed the need of the freedom of speech within the classroom and throughout the college.
Some of the respondents from JNP confirmed the view that if the tasks were assigned in a more
democratic way, the opportunity for students and lecturers to take this freedom with responsibility for
the collective goodness of the college as whole would be better provided. According to some
respondents from SCE, supporting staffs assume that they are not given equal opportunities like
teaching faculty at the RUB. In addition, staff do not voice their opinions because they feel their
voices are not heard so most of the time they simply follow the instructions from their seniors
(BL_SCE_FGADM).
The research team members suggest that democracy in the classroom be discussed further and
intervention plans be made in conjunction with lecturers representative of each college. A model for
democracy in the classroom and at the management level be developed along with an assessment plan
to ensure the model is implemented effectively.
Management and Leadership
It is the belief of the research team is that there is a strong connection between democracy and
good management. That for any system to function efficiently there must be democratization of a
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
207
Operations Manual GNH PAR Gap Analysis
History and purpose of this GNH PAR study – brief summary This national study on GNH in the classroom, pedagogy, and curriculum was conceived in response to the consultancy in the spring of 2011 around critical pedagogy and contemplative education at the Royal University of Bhutan (RUB). This knowledge is desired for informing decision-makers, lecturers, teachers and administrators in schools from pre-school through higher education. This study will facilitate RUB’s review of current classroom practices, pedagogy and curriculum concerns in the short, medium and long term and identify gaps to move towards a GNH pedagogy and classroom practice. The study begins in February 2012 and will include field research in ten of RUB. It is expected that the findings will be disseminated in August 2012. (Completed in September 2012). Phase I – Spring 2012
Objective: Increase the capacity in holistic education knowledge and classroom practices among the faculty at RUB.
Means: A jumpstart workshop consisting of 10 days, 8 hours a day module on critical pedagogy and contemplative education pedagogy and participatory action research. Completed March 2012
Objective: To further develop post-graduate higher education MA, PhD program On-going to be completed December 2014.
Means: Continued meetings and development on the syllabus infusing GNH classroom practices, pedagogy, and literature. On-going through Cycle I, II, III, IV, and V interventions to be completed spring semester 2014.
Objective: Increase the availability of data on historic and current Bhutanese educational practice to inform the development of a national holistic educational system and holistic educational classroom practices. Means: A participatory action research (PAR) study executed by the faculty at RUB and primary Investigator, Dr.Young. On-going to be completed spring semester 2014. (baseline round completed May 2012, Cycle I interventions completed June 15, 2012).
Phase II – Spring 2013 Objective: Increase the capacity of RUB faculty, participating pre-service teachers, in-
service teachers and administrators. Means: Undertake teacher/administer training throughout Bhutan with the faculty at RUB and consultants. Objective: To continue with the PAR study gathering data on the implementation of the pedagogy techniques that were developed from the PAR 2012 phase 1.
Phase III – Spring 2014 Objective: Develop graduate level programs (MA and PhD) in education and teacher/administrator professional development courses to offer students from in Bhutan as well as from around the world opportunity to study the philosophical foundations of a GNH classroom.
Background to the study Historical Context and Background
In the 1960’s, the 4th King of Bhutan developed an approach to modernization, the objective of which he called “Gross National Happiness” (GNH). This framework, based upon the premise that the happiness of the people should be a guiding principle in the development of this formerly closed
Snapshot This section gives an overview of the study up to the present. It also includes some materials from the design workshop related to study colleges and desired information to obtain in the field.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
208
society, acknowledges that the spiritual and emotional development of the people is as important to the country as the promotion and development of material accumulation and modern comfort. The pursuit of GNH currently guides all economic and social policies in Bhutan. In 2009, the King of Bhutan asked the government and the people to address the need to reform the educational system. His goal was to transform the current British-Indian based school structure into a more holistic educational system in line with the principles of GNH. Holistic education, based upon the premise that each person finds identity, meaning, and purpose in life through connections to the community, the natural world, and humanitarian values such as compassion, interdependence, and trust, aligns well with basic Bhutanese GNH principles.
Although the vast majority of the population currently has access to the Bhutanese public education system, there still exists an emphasis on an Anglo-Indian curriculum that focuses on individual achievement, competitiveness, and technical mastery of numeracy and literacy. To cultivate GNH, it is essential that holistic education be integrated at all levels of the educational system and embedded in the daily classroom practice and curriculum.
This project will inform the development of the first national-scale school system based upon Holistic Education principles. While there are currently individual schools that take a holistic approach, to date, no country has attempted to use holistic education as the underlying paradigm for the nation’s entire education system. The small nation of Bhutan is attempting to create something the world has never seen before.
The project will also provide a unique example to inform other parts of the world about holistic education and will provide a model for the development of MA and PhD graduate programs in holistic education for pre-service teachers within Bhutan as well as from the world. This program will be developed using the findings from this study.
The purpose of education is to meet the social, the economic, and the human resource needs of the society while increasing the quality of life contributing to GNH. Teacher education colleges are looked upon as the main contributors to the quality of teachers, shaping classroom practice to become more learner/student centred and holistic, aligning with GNH. There is no doubt that the country faces a number of problems in the area of education when aligning with GNH. The quality of education in Bhutan is a major concern at all levels of formal and non-formal education. To date there have been several critiques and recommendations to support educational transitions at the college level as well as the pre-primary through XII level of public schooling. This study will contribute adding to those recommendations. Here are examples of concerns that the Bhutanese educational system is currently facing.
Ø Lecturers: (training – out of country) a. There exists preliminary research recommending more engagement in the classrooms
and expanding pedagogy beyond lecture and what is referred to as the banking model of education that was coined by Paulo Freire, (1970). It is imperative to apply the recommendations at the RUB. VanBalkom &Sherman (2010) noted that the colleges in Bhutan primarily use the lecture method as the predominant teaching pedagogy even with content about the use of different teaching methods. The study asserts that students’ state “Lecturers should practice what they teach” and recommends for teachers to model different teaching strategies when teaching the pre-service teachers.
b. A school system that is cultivated from the GNH framework would include values education in textbooks, teacher preparation and classroom management. Dasho Karma Ura notes that value education; also known as character education, civic education, and moral education; has been overshadowed by the emphasis on individualism with a de-emphasis on social responsibility, community consciousness, and altruism in western education systems.
c. There is a lack of qualified faculty to staff all of the needs for the RUB colleges. To accomplish the development of the tertiary education in Bhutan, a goal to increase the professional development of existing lecturers as well as increasing the capacity of the Bhutanese educational college system is necessary.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
209
d. Many teacher candidates enter teaching not out of “genuine interest but rather because they were not accepted into higher studies in areas of greater interest, or had better job options” (VanBalkom & Sherman, 2010, p. 54). Therefore, there is a high probability that Bhutan may be producing teachers working solely for their salary, and not quality teachers who contribute to the goodness and quality of the learners.
Ø Students:
a. While progress is being made in revamping programme content, students identified a number of concerns about course offerings and teacher pedagogy. Students have offered a number of examples that suggested a general disconnect between theory and classroom practice of the RUB faculty.
b. MacInerney & MacInerney (1994) talk about how students learn best and say that concrete demonstrations of key concepts facilitate effective learning (p. 568) and the engagement of students in the learning process is necessary. Many concrete demonstrations are lacking in the classroom construction of knowledge.
c. The pre-primary class through the Class 10 is available to every citizen in Bhutan. The official age of entry to the pre-primary class is six years old. Access to Class 11 and 12 is based on the student’s performance on national examinations at the end of Class 10 based on merit. Those students who qualify for higher education may then choose from several areas depending on their scores. Those who do not qualify for higher secondary education on RGOB scholarship may seek admission to vocational training institutes, self finance their studies, or may choose to repeat Class 12 to improve their test scores. The choice of teaching typically resides in the filtration system based on scores from exams.
Ø Modernization: a. Historically, Bhutan has been a monarchy that governs as a closed system with
respect to the global community. Consequently, Bhutan has had limited access to information, technology, and other resources from the developed world.
b. Bhutan is currently undergoing significant social transformation, moving out of a closed society into the global community. Inherent in the process is the ever-expanding impact of the consumer economy infiltrating the boundaries of the country. To guide this impact it is necessary for students and teachers to broaden their cultural critique to include an analysis of the problems a consumer society imposes on a harmonious ecological system.
c. Many times people living in a Monarchy have not had abundant experiences innovating and guiding change. Limited experiences with innovation among teachers and administrators seem to develop a more compliant and dutiful means of working.
d. It is important to lay the foundational essence of holistic education throughout the country such that the children, growing up during the decentralization of the monarchic power base will be versed and grounded in Bhutanese foundations to develop the national happiness they are seeking
e. Oral transmission and values education need to be integrated into the Paro education pedagogy (Dorji Penjore, 2005). They have functioned historically as a medium of moral, civic, and intellectual education in non-literate societies. The oral traditions are the expressions of the identity, the purpose, the functions, the customs, and the generational continuity of the culture.
The RUB has a number of challenges at hand. With a scanty database and policy gaps, it is difficult for the responsible ministries and supporting organisations and agencies to respond adequately to the government’s educational priorities. In order to move toward a better understanding of GNH values and principles in the classroom and to contribute to policy dialogue and sustainable programme development to address classroom practices and pedagogy it is proposed that a comprehensive study, analysis and recommendations of these issues is conducted. Therefore the first phase of this PAR
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
210
study will be implemented in the spring 2012. The intended outcome of this study is a coherent analysis, based on a highly participatory study process, which will provide an information base and transformative practices for participating lecturers. This study helps to inform further policy development and strategic programming for GNH PEDAGOGY by the Principal Investigator (PI), RUB lecturers alongside other key partners and stakeholders.
Objectives of the study Overall objective - To contribute to broadening and deepening of understanding on the scope, scale, trends and implications of GNH in classroom practices, pedagogy, and curriculum in schools preschool through higher education, by identifying the gap between current pedagogy and pedagogy that aligns with GNH principles and analysing the most critical factors/causes that contribute to their situation as a basis for planning programmatic interventions. Specific objectives for the field phase of the study:
• Begin with a two-week jumpstart training that will provide foundational information on critical pedagogy, contemplative education, and PAR research design and tools. Completed March 2012.
• Carry out a four month long (First Phase) field-based operational research gap analysis study with three cycles of data collection. Completed one cycle in all 10 colleges, baseline data of current classroom practices spring semester 2012.
o The first is with the participation of lecturers, teachers, students, administrators, and families on how and why classroom practices, pedagogy, and curriculum are affecting various groups of students, teachers, and the overall community in terms of the GNH framework of Bhutan. The research team will identify the population that is affected by current educational practices for in-depth assessment and analysis, including current classroom practices and lecturer and student perceptions about their problems. Focus groups discussion, key informant interviews and observations will be conducted in 8 geographical areas throughout Bhutan.
o The second cycle includes training of teachers and staff visited in the first cycle of data collection. A follow-up visit by the research team will collect data from observations, daily journals, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions.
o The third cycle includes training of teachers and staff visited in the first cycle of data collection. A follow-up visit by the research team will collect data from observations, daily journals, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. A document including guidelines for GNH pedagogy training and implementation will be written as the summary of the study and sent to OVC. The OVC will then distribute to other institutions such as REC, MOE, and make available on their website.
Prioritised information for this study In summary, the prioritised topics from the jumpstart workshop are as follows:
General Topic 1: Contemplative education Topic 2: Critical pedagogy Topic 3: Community perceptions about the purpose of schooling and education Topic 4: Perceptions about current classroom practices Topic 5: Perceptions of GNH values and principles Topic 6: Strategies for transformational learning and teaching Topic 7: Mindfulness practices: personal and classroom practices Topic 8: Participatory action research toolkit Topic 9: Variety of classroom participatory teaching practices Topic 10: Resources: Human, structural, political, symbolic (Boleman and Deal) Topic 11: Professional development mindfulness training
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
211
Topic 12: Research knowledge and skill development – adjust and develop research design for GNH PAR study Topic 13: Practice skills for research design and data collection.
Region specific Topic 14: Specific needs in the geographical area Topic 15: Teacher/Staff/Administration availability Topic 16: Resource availability Topic 17: Student attendance Topic 18: Support of current educational system
Methodology for the qualitative field- phase
Field methodology – overview The study will be conducted by a team of lecturers and staff from RUB under the leadership of an International researcher (PI) in a highly participatory manner with a strong emphasis on participation and interaction with the development of GNH PEDAGOGY. Up to this point, the study has already been implementing the following or has plans for the spring of 2012:
• Desk review – based on existing documents and secondary data sets in Bhutan, internet searching, and selected interviews with some key informants (KI - both adults and young people) at RUB. Note –more national level interviews to be conducted in coming weeks.
• Design workshop - a participatory design workshop will be held with RUB lecturers, staff representatives to refine the information needs of the study, select study Colleges, review sampling strategies and make suggestions about field tools. (February 15 – 29 at Paro College).
• Training for data collectors – before and during the jumpstart workshop, many additional specific plans and tools will be as separate handouts and study sessions will take place during the first training of data collectors and team leaders. (February 15 – 29 at Paro College).
The current phase of the study will be:
• Qualitative field study – primary data gathering, using various participatory tools in direct observations (obs), research diaries (RD), focus group (FG) discussions and key informant (KI) interviews with selected students, youth and adults, teachers and administrators in the target colleges. Direct information from people in communities, institutions and organisations, including individuals to the extent that this is possible during informal and formal meetings; this data is referred to as meeting notes (MN). This step will also include a pre-test in the Paro college, which will be a full scale data collection of substantive and usable data, and then an expansion phase to other colleges (for a total of 10 study colleges).
Operational definitions • ‘Focus Group’ in this context refers to a session of 1-1½ hours in length, conducted by a
facilitator which is the PI or research team member (RUB faculty or staff) and a note taker, with a relatively homogeneous group of 6-12 participants, done in a comfortable setting where there are relatively few interruptions (if possible), during which one or more participatory exercises are carried out with the group and linked to discussions and probing questions; these sessions will be generating various kinds of verbal and visual products, plus field notes, that can be subjected to later combined and comparative analysis.
Snapshot This section updates content on methodology
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
212
• ‘Key Informant Interviews’ in this context refer to open-ended sessions conducted by the PI and/or research team member as interviewer/facilitator, and a note taker, with individuals having special knowledge about the key issues being investigated. Interviews often last about 1 hour, using a relatively limited set of topics/open-ended questions combined with probing questions; sometimes participatory tools are also included.
• Observations in this context refer to direct observations in RUB classrooms during the spring 2012 semester conducted by the PI and/or research team member as observer. The observation lasts one class period, approximately 50 minutes and includes detailed notes of classroom practices and interactions. The observations are about pedagogy rather than content. Observations occur as an on-going weekly activity within each RUB College. Lecturers are divided into groups of 3,4,or 5 and observer two other lecturers in their group each week. In addition, observations are held by the PI and research team members during the week of primary qualitative field work.
• Meetings refer to informal and formal meetings with people working at RUB. The notes are taken by the research associate.
• Research Dairies are expected to be kept by all research team members and shared during the 2012 academic year.
Sampling plans– field phase Expected data Phase Expected data per geographical area Comments Primary qualitative fieldwork
• Target is likely to be 7-10 ‘focus groups’ (FGs), 8-12 ‘key informant interviews’ (KIs), and 3-6 observations per college (x10) over a three/four day period
• Gives a total of about 70-100 FGs, 80-120 KIs, and 30-60 observations which is a substantive data set.
• In addition meeting notes and research diaries will be included.
This represents about 280 as the absolute maximum total potentially achievable data sets under the very best of conditions with the most capable and committed persons as data collectors and respondents (participants), based on teams of 6 persons active in data gathering. Data sets are completed by the PI and research team members.
Participants who will be contributing primary data The details of which kinds of lecturers, administrators, students will be developed in a participatory way through the results of the desk review, study sessions, and consultative meetings with the research committee (RC) during the design jumpstart February 15 – 29. The participant categories include:
• RUB lecturers (primary study group) • Students in higher education at various colleges (primary study group) • Administrators and staff at RUB Colleges (primary study group) • Students in primary school (secondary study group – Only by PCE and SCE research team) • Students in secondary school (secondary study group – Only by PCE and SCE research team) • In-service teachers and staff (secondary study group – Only by PCE and SCE research team)
Feasibility - Numbers of sessions feasible based on: • Interviews - we calculate one KI interview at 45 minutes average, though they can run up to 90
minutes or longer for very informed, analytical and interested persons. Time to arrange the interview, or trace a suitable person is at least equal, and sometimes several times more than the duration of the actual interview. We prefer two persons present at these interviews, one functioning mostly as an interviewer/discussion facilitator and the other as a note taker
• Focus groups – we calculate an average of 1½ hours of contact time for a focus group. The amount of time to mobilize and convene people is again at least equal as a minimum, and
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
213
frequently double or triple the amount of contact time, longer when specific categories of persons are being convened, not just general residents of a community. Again, two persons are needed – facilitator and note taker.
• Interviews and Focus Groups will be held at the same time in the community during data collection.
• Observations – we calculate that one observation will be 50 minutes on average. Time to arrange the observation is about 10 minutes. One lecturers or PI will be present at each observation. Observations will take place during the primary baseline, cycle I, and cycle II periods as well as on - going in each College.
• Meetings are on an as needed basis determined by the research team as well as administrators throughout RUB.
Representativeness - Numbers desired linked to anticipated categories of respondents: • Lecturers at RUB: by gender, mixed grouping, or subject area • Administrators/staff at RUB – by gender, mixed grouping or role • Students at RUB – by gender, mixed grouping or subject area • Local teachers and administrators/staff of various schools– by gender, by roles, by age group
taught, or mixed grouping • Students from various schools (or informal learning locations when no schools exist) in both
primary and secondary levels
Representativeness – Numbers desired linked to anticipated geographical coverage: Need to be as representative as possible in study colleges. At a minimum, this may include: • Rural and urban settings In addition, one can anticipate several other factors that will influence the scale possible: • Numbers feasible also based on experience with feasible duration of work in a college within a
multi-college study, and anticipated difficulties in the field [plus budget]
Sampling and geographic coverage Sampling for field data collection – This will be done through a mix of random sampling incorporating probability and stratified random sampling as well as purposive and convenience sampling. The details to be worked out in consultation with the RUB research team of each college. The participatory consultative process in developing the study is designed to help identify the gatekeepers who can facilitate contacts with all kinds of potential respondents and smooth the recruitment of participants.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
214
Fieldwork – some general advice For many researchers, the heart of any study is in the fieldwork. That is where all of his or her data starts to appear and hypotheses are validated or fresh ideas generated. However, in the rush to get to the field, the researcher may overlook some common problems that can be prevented with a bit of anticipation. Over-enthusiasm to jump into the study and lack of attention to these potential difficulties can result in lowering the quality of the data collected and may even defeat the purpose of the study. In this short paper we will discuss a few of these hazards and ways to minimize their potential effects.
Personnel Most research projects employ one or more people to assist with the fieldwork. Bickering, conflict and disruption of the fieldwork can occur if the whole group of researchers, research team leader, and assistants are not well prepared to act as a coordinated team. Avoiding such a problem starts with careful interviewing of candidates for the positions of assistants and, if needed, research team leader. Applicants should be mature, responsible, able to speak the vernacular language of the proposed study area, and be physically capable of carrying out any required tasks. Next, the researcher needs to recognize that people have different, personal reasons for wishing to participate in a fieldwork exercise. As such, they will come to the study with a variety of personal expectations, which the study may or may not be capable of meeting. To avoid disputes in the field about payment and amount of work, all candidates should be informed before committing themselves to the study about the conditions of work. Thus, they should know about terms of payment, accommodations, conditions of fieldwork, hours of work expected each day, and physical labour, including extensive walking. After research teams are formed and before going to the field, there should be a formal period of training for all the assistants and research team leaders (February 15–29, 2012 Paro College). The training is important for two reasons: building a cohesive, cooperative research team and imparting the specific skills necessary to carry the particular research at hand. Emphasizing collaboration during the training period can help to minimize disagreements about sharing of subsequent work in the field. Unfamiliarity by team members about the process of the research can result in sub-standard or non-uniform data collection. Important process issues for training include sampling and interviewing methods, definitions and preferred translations, measurement and sampling collection techniques, how to make any observations, and field editing of data collected. The training should include both discussion and practical experiences for all tasks that are expected of the field workers.
Community/College Many well-designed research studies have been jeopardized by lack of researcher sensitivity to the concerns of the study community/college. Several common perceptions about research projects that can occur among local authorities and community members include: Some leaders use the presence of the research team to show that they are active. In so doing, even with the best of intentions, they may misinform the residents about the purpose of the study. College community members may reject the approach of researchers who are misinterpreted and believe to be inspecting the college, lecturers and students. Of late, there has been an activation of field research in Bhutan. As a result it is becoming more and more likely that any given study will end up in a community where other research has also occurred in the recent past. In such an area the new researcher may meet with residual attitudes left over from the previous study. Sometimes these feelings include resentment, most often because the last group never
Snapshot This section is a quick look at some of the main problems and solutions for a successful field study.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
215
got back to the community with any feedback about their research. Other times the community may feel that the questions being asked are similar to a previous study and object to answering them all over again. Making a pre-visit to the field sites by the RUB College Research team leader before beginning the actual fieldwork starts can minimize most misunderstandings. Both during the pre-visit and at the time of the study sufficient attention needs to be given to introductions and explanations as well as time for discussion about the study. It is important to clearly identify the purpose of the study and what exactly will be done with the results. As much as possible, the researcher should also try to get background information about other on-going and/or recent research studies in the same community. After the study we believe that it is virtually mandatory that the researcher communicate back to the college leader and through them to the college community under study. The message should include a courteous appreciation for assistance given as well as a short, simplified version of the final report. These actions will benefit both the community under study and any future researchers working in the same area.
Resources The third big source of potential headaches in the field is finding that one hasn't got enough resources to do the work. Trying to minimize expenses back in Paro (place of origination), researcher may go to the field without a sufficient cushion for any contingencies. It can be very expensive in time and money to send someone back to town to get more Topic Guide forms printed up after miscounting before heading to some rural community. Lack of a first aid kit with simple medicines for stomach upsets may mean lost days of work. Planning a study during the snow and wet seasons without checking on the roads and the capability of any vehicle to be used is almost asking for disaster. Minimizing these hazards can be done by a combination approach. First, talk with local RUB representatives and ask their opinions about your plans. Secondly, research team leaders make a pre-visit and pay attention to all the potential hardships of doing research in the proposed area, including accommodations, food, roads, communications, etc. Thirdly, pre-test everything that will be done during the actual study (Paro during March 5-10). Do a sufficient number of interviews, focus groups, and observations to spot where the possible problems are. Then plan how to avoid the problems or decrease them by redesigning/adjusting the work or emphasizing the difficult parts during the on-site review training at each College.
Summary While misfortune can strike at any time, problems in the field can usually be avoided by adequate preparation. Build a cooperative team that can adapt to strain with a sense of humour. Be sure everyone has been trained in the skills needed to carry out the work properly. Carry on a meaningful dialogue with the community about the research before, during and after the fieldwork. Thoroughly pre-test all of the steps of the research, allocate resources wisely, and then... We hope you will have fun in the field.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
216
Strategies for data gathering, including ethics
Strategies for data gathering
Approaches to data gathering – guiding principles There are three main guiding principles to this study – participatory, capacity building and ethical. Participatory – the most knowledgeable persons about the conditions of current classroom pedagogy and GNH pedagogy are generally the lecturers/teachers, students, and staff themselves, plus the family/parents in the secondary study group. This study has developed specific tools and techniques to engage students, lecturers, administrators and staff in discussions and participatory activities to identify and review issues on classroom practices and pedagogy. Capacity building - Experiential training will be conducted with various categories of people who are recruited to help implement this study, including personnel from the study colleges (site visits) and RUB lectures as data collectors (February 15–29, 2012, Paro College). It is hoped this capacity building strategy will have a multiplier effect – i.e. that those persons who participate in undertaking the study will subsequently apply the skills gained in their respective places of work/practices. Ethical study – the research team is very aware of the potential difficulties of exploring the issues likely to arise in a study of GNH PEDAGOGY. The research team will take considerable effort to maintain confidentiality as well as creating discussion and interview environments where participants can talk freely. [see guideline on “coping with difficult situations”]. Most of the questions in the tools (see section on ‘tools’) will seek information by using “third person questions” in discussion and interview situations. [see also materials below and in the guidelines section on ethics and confidentiality]
Methods for primary data collection1 Types of methods to be used in the field include: Focus group discussions – working with groups of 6-12 persons, using a topic guide and facilitator
(RT member) with a note taker; and usually involving some form of participatory task, e.g., mapping, developing flow analysis of a problem, ranking certain conditions or issues that emerge, going on a guided walk, etc.
Key informant interviews – working with 1-3 persons, again, using a topic guide and both a RT member and note taker, often mostly discussion, sometimes including review of some documents held by the key informant, sometimes including a participatory task, such as creating a diagram or chart of a situation.
Plenary discussions – there will be large group discussions at the time of the feedback sessions on the last day of fieldwork in a given college. These will be focused by using the analysis from the RT and will include interactive, participatory exercises, be led by a RT member, and recorded by a note taker – in addition to whatever flip charts and idea cards are produced. [see tools section]
Meeting notes – notes taken during meetings at RUB colleges. Research Diaries – each research team member has been asked to keep a research diary and share
elements to better understand the challenges in change and study implementation. Observations – Observations of lecturers at RUB for primary study group and teachers and in local
schools for the secondary study group. All observations as held in classrooms by the PI or a research team members.
1 For additional handout and technical materials see PAR dropbox provided to all research team leaders
Snapshot This section describes the main techniques for data gathering and ethical procedures, including respect for college, community and school visit protocol.
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
217
Very important notes on confidentiality2
Objectives of the GNH PEDAGOGY Study This is a national study on current classroom practices and pedagogy and the development of classroom practices and pedagogy that align more fully with the national GNH framework contracted to RUB lecturers and a principal investigator from outside the country by RUB. Primary data collection will be carried out in ten RUB colleges. It is anticipated that the results will be very useful to RUB policy makers, lecturers, staff, and students by informing them about holistic education and potential interventions that could support a schooling environment more closely aligned with the national GNH framework. Please include this background information as you brief the people you contact for mobilisation.
Confidentiality The Research Team is grateful for the time and dedication you have committed to organise and arrange for the GNH PEDAGOGY study so that data collectors will be able to meet with many different and relevant respondents in various areas of your college. One very important aspect of this study that we want to emphasize is the issue of confidentiality. In a study of this kind, confidentiality begins right from the point of mobilisation, through data collection, report writing and dissemination of results. It is very challenging and needs considerable care throughout the study to maintain a high ethical standard of good confidentiality for the protection of the respondents, whatever their age and backgrounds. The purpose of this note is to urge your caution about this aspect while you mobilise or communicate to the people that will be involved in the GNH PEDAGOGY study. We sincerely request that everyone participating in this study be responsibly confidential, such that any information provided by respondents should be kept anonymous. Nobody’s name should be revealed or implicated in findings of the study if they do not want to as expressed by the respondent or group of respondents. Data collectors and research team leaders will carefully explain about confidentiality to respondents, and obtain their consent before proceeding with any study related questions. When the analysis and report are prepared, sources will not be revealed or recognisably quoted if there is any potential for harm. In this way, there will be no possibility for any reader/user of the results to identify any of the respondents as individuals. The sample size within a college will help in allowing aggregation of information such that it will not be possible for readers to identify specific information sources. In support of this arrangement, the RT asserts very strongly that the names of specific respondents are neither to be publicised nor shared with any other parties, regardless of their status or circumstances. Any pressure to reveal sources should be directed to the research team leader.
Coping with expectations It will be very important to inform potential respondents that there will be no monetary rewards for participating in the study. As you are already aware from the consultative meeting, this is an important study, and moving into topics and issues where better information is badly needed. As such, the only reward for participants is knowing that they are contributing to this significant effort. Ethics – reminder sheet for all team members
General permission • See protocol plan • Courtesy call to RUB college leader and school directors by RTL 2 For all study team members
Participatory Action Research GNH RUB Gap Analysis Report, Baseline Round 2012.
218
Personal permission • Build rapport - Greetings before anything and politeness. • Introductions – Self-introductions of data collector(s), including both note taker and PI/RT
members, local people – if they want to introduce themselves and DO NOT immediately write the name down, especially if this is likely to be a confidential interview. DO NOT ask for all personal names in focus groups, tell people they can use whatever name they want, whether true or not.
• Objectives of the study – describe in the vernacular, and be sure they are clearly understood. • Benefits - Clearly state that there will be no monetary gains or specific projects coming because
of the study. The only benefits are contribution to the needed information for policy makers, organisations, agencies, donors and interested individuals and groups who may be involved in education and GNH.
• Risks – there are no direct risks from the study – no procedures will be done, and all information received is confidential. The interview or discussion will take a little bit of their time, but not long (key informant interviews are usually about 45 minutes; focus groups are usually about 60-90 minutes)
• Confidentiality – all information that comes from anyone in the study will not be identified with that individual person in any communications with persons outside of the study or in any reports. Very confidential information will not be shared with anyone except the direct research team leader, the data collector or the college RTL – who is part of the study. Give constant re-assurance of confidentiality. See also the confidentiality sheet.
• Right to not respond or to end the session – let all respondents/participants know that they have the right to ask questions at any time, the right to think about their answers, and the right to refuse to answer for any question. They also have the right to end/leave the interview/discussion at any time without prejudice or harm to come to them.
• Verbal consent - Seek consent of respondents whether they are willing to take part in the discussion/interview with you.
• Acceptability of setting - Seek agreement about the venue and ensure safety for discussion/interview
• In difficult situations, consult your guidelines on “handling difficult and sensitive situations”