ACTIVITY IN CASE 2:12-CV-02997-MCE-DAD GRINOLS ET AL V. ELECTORAL COLLEGE ET AL MINUTE ORDER Inbox x [email protected]12:41 PM (1 hour ago) to CourtMail This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Eastern District of California – Live System Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 12/20/2012 at 12:40:04 PM PST and filed on 12/20/2012 Case Name: Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al Case Number: 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Filer: Document Number: 13 (No document attached) Docket Text: AMENDED MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Chief District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court’s own motion, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [12] is set for hearing on January 3, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. Oppositions are to be filed not later than December 26, 2012 and a reply, if any, by December 28, 2012. Plaintiffs’ counsel is ordered to give notice of this minute order to Defendants by 4:00 p.m., December 20, 2012. (Deutsch, S) Modified on 12/20/2012 (Deutsch, S). 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to: Orly Taitz [email protected], [email protected]2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: This is a re-generated NEF. Created on 12/20/2012 at 12:41 PM PST
Legal filings concerning a lawsuit against the Electoral College to stop confirmation of vote for Obama for President because of massive identity fraud crimes by Obama.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ACTIVITY IN CASE 2:12-CV-02997-MCE-DAD GRINOLS ET AL V. ELECTORAL COLLEGE ET AL MINUTE ORDER Inbox x
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access
fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
U.S. District Court
Eastern District of California – Live System
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 12/20/2012 at 12:40:04 PM PST and filed on 12/20/2012
Case Name: Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
Case Number: 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
Filer:
Document Number: 13 (No document attached)
Docket Text: AMENDED MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Chief District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court’s own motion, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [12] is set for hearing on January 3, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. Oppositions are to be filed not later than December 26, 2012 and a reply, if any, by December 28, 2012. Plaintiffs’ counsel is ordered to give notice of this minute order to Defendants by 4:00 p.m., December 20, 2012. (Deutsch, S) Modified on 12/20/2012 (Deutsch, S).
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to: The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
This is a re-generated NEF. Created on 12/20/2012 at 12:41 PM PST
c4 ?2(3/an answer to the complaint which is served on you with this summons, within . (Meuleman, A)SUMMONSISSUED as to days afterservice of this summons on you? exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment bydefault will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. Any answer that you serveon the parties to this action must be filed with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable periodof time after service.
VICTORIA C. MINORCLERK
/s/ A. Meuleman
ISSUED ON 2012-12-13 08:34:31.0, ClerkUSDC EDCA(By) DEPUTY CLERK
Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 12/18/12 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:L2_:_c:t-923{:$4gFeAD^ *D_oqryqept_L Fjted LZttBtI2 paoe 1, at 2UNITED STATES DTSTRICT COUFTT --EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES GRINOLS, ET AL. ,
V.
ELECTORAL COLLEGE, ET AL. ,
SUMMONS IN A CIVI CASE
CASE NO: 2:12-CV -02997-MCE-DAI)
service of this surnmons on you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment bydefault will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. Alry answer that you serveon the parties to this action must be filed with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable periodof time after service.
VICTORIA C. MINORCLERK
isl A. Meuleman
ISSUED ON 2012-12-13 08:34:31.0, ClerkUSDC EDCA
(By) DEPUTY CLERK
Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 12/18/12 Page 3 of 5
vqJL L.LL-VV-\JZ-;V r -tvl\/
RE,TURN OF SERVICEService of the Summons and complaint was made by m",r) IDA* l; I ii' I t-> 17-*o* o,
"r*uu* rr**rl c/ /u fr ,,
Check one box below to indicate appropriate method of seruice
Served personally upon the defendant. Place where served:
Left copies thereof at the defendant's dwelling house or usual place ofbode with a person of suitable age anddiscretion then residing therein.
Name of person with whom the summons and complaint were left:
Retumed unexecuted:
STATEMENT OF SER\TICE FEESrrevel lsgnvrcrs Tffiffivsn i
-I declare under penalty of pe{ury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information
Executed on/Lt['
Date
't'N 3? '5"P ' tI /':'i'{'};'-'''{?Aditresi ofServer
1 FedEx Standard 0vernightL I Nsnbusinsss ftmoon.*
Smday Ddtuv Nfr awilsue.
5 Paekaging .Dmhdwrmridso.
L/
l\.,,1'FedEx Envelope* | FedEx Pak* f l FedEx -
FedEx! Bo* u Tube
o"" /,1 /{- lo O- ',ii"Y"#!ilh", '
omc?co@IoO
UEoIoC,oaEoqxo)E'(D {r; f -T t{-
I A//on3To
Recipient'sName
6 SpecialHandlingandDeliverySignaturc0ptions
T-l SATIJRDAYDeliveruL---.1 iloT awilatle lor Fed& $dndad 0vemistt Fed& Day AM., or tudk kpress S6ver
- NoSignatureRequired,[-lr..tsignrtur. -N'J"t"?JflfljLXgL l Pacbsemryhlffiffiod l:l Sonsons€tccipisdsaddrc$ | laddresqmmeone*r
.mrnm, a sqmtu€Dr.€N.ry' mar son Dr.sru€ry ruPa #,11:*:li[ilfl]g:
Docs lhis shipment contain dangemus gmds?one hox must he checked.* / _-;;; --'--- _-,*[y'o tr3g]i;:psr***"" tr $[ft;,,",9;*,*" E Pfl"19,9u^,*u
Danlom$0oo&lincludimdryice)canndbeshippsdintukpacbsing ! CargoAirCraft0nltr placed in a ted& &prN Drcp Bu
7 P4ymem arzra;I
-
awane
#+$:l** il,*,T "'"E H,Tf -il,;; r
hdBAcdNo. EqHTMM, D6
TotalPackags ToblWeight TotslDeclaredValuet
lbs. $ .m
iou liabiliry is hmhed bUsslmunlesspudeclae a highervalue. See bsckhrdMils. ByudnghisAdillFuagrebhesMcecoddomonhebackdhsA6illandrnSecumfl todhSeMceGude.includingbmffd [mn our lhbility.
fieu D.t€ 1/12. Pad*16ru2.@012 F6d&. Pfl INTED lN U S A SBF
D€plfroorAufrqfrmm
H0tD WeekdayFedklocdon addreas
T--] BE0U|RED ilfr aEilshlo hru feduhduwrntarc
H0LD Saturdayhdk lmdnn rddlN
- RmuFm_Ml#oilLYtor
L-l todePidivowmhmsdkdkDrybsledhcdns";Y;Hr""""
,o*
Address
E
Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 12/18/12 Page 5 of 5
exclusively on the fact record contained herein; namely the Birth Certificate of
Barack Hussein Obama (Ex. 21) as posted on the White House website, and
expressly adopted by Obama.
Here is the official statement from the White House website:
In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet.
When any citizen born in Hawaii requests their birth certificate, they receive exactly what the President received. In fact, the document posted on the campaign website is what Hawaiians use to get a driver’s license from the state and the document recognized by the Federal Government and the courts for all legal purposes. That’s because it is the birth certificate. This is not and should not be an open question.
The President believed the distraction over his birth certificate wasn’t good for the country. It may have been good politics and good TV, but it was bad for the American people and distracting from the many challenges we face as a country. Therefore, the President directed his counsel to review the legal authority for seeking access to the long form certificate and to request on that basis that the Hawaii State Department of Health make an exception to release a copy of his long form birth certificate. They granted that exception in part because of the tremendous volume of requests they had been getting.
Here is the comment of Barack Hussein Obama concerning the release of
this Birth Certificate:
We've posted the certification that is given by the state of Hawaii on
the Internet for everybody to see. Transcript of President’s remarks
following the release of the long form Birth Certificate, The White House,
Office of the Press Secretary, April 27, 2011 at 9:48 a.m. PDT.
Federal Rules of Evidence, 804(3) provides for the admissibility of this
evidence, and plaintiff submits that judicial notice should be taken thereof:
(3) Statement Against Interest. A statement that:
(A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made, it was so contrary to the declarant’s proprietary or pecuniary interest or had so great a tendency to invalidate the declarant’s claim against someone else or to expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability; and
(B) is supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate its trustworthiness, if it is offered in a criminal case as one that tends to expose the declarant to criminal liability.
Because Plaintiffs have granted standing to bring this charge, and because
the issue is justiciable in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
California, (see Marbury v Madison, op. cit.), this court must therefore consider
the law regarding the precondition of facts as admitted by Barack Hussein Obama
and consider whether he is actually able to hold the office of the Presidency.
a. Standing
Article III standing means an injury in fact that is fairly traceable to the
challenged conduct and has some likelihood of redressability. Fleck and Assocs.,
Inc. v. City of Phoenix, 471 F.3d 1100, 1103-04 (9th Cir. 2006). Lujan v. Defenders
of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 556-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). The
Supreme Court has also recognized third-party standing in cases involving jury
composition. See, e.g., Campbell v. Louisiana, 523 U.S. 392, 397-400 (1998)
(allowing a litigant to raise a claim on behalf of third parties where (1) the litigant
has suffered an “injury in fact”; (2) he has a “close relationship” to the third
parties; and (3) there is some hindrance to the third parties asserting their own
rights); Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 410-15 (1991).
Plaintiffs have standing to raise this claim. Plaintiffs James Grinols and
Robert Odden are Presidential Electors who have been deprived of their ability to
cast a lawful vote for the Presidency, and Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory
MacLeran, and Keith Judd have been deprived of a lawful election for the office of
the Presidency. Their claims are distinct, and the remedy sought herein will
redress these claims by preventing the codification of an unlawful election.
b. Justiciability
The integrity of the election system in the state of California is not non-
justiciable or purely a political issue. The Governor of California and its Secretary
of State have a mandatory duty to discharge the office by supporting both the
United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of California.
“It is emphatically the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law
is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and
interpret the rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the Court must decide on the
operation of each.
If courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to
any ordinary act of the legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act,
must govern the case to which they both apply.” Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1
Cranch 137, 137 (1803).
Furthermore, it is the duty of the Governor and the Secretary of State of
California, and all members of the Legislature, all public officers (including
Electors) and employees, all executive, legislative, and judicial officers, to apply
constitutional regimen in the governance of a statewide election, pursuant to
their oath of office set forth here:
"I, ___________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm)
that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the
Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the
United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this
obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion;
and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am
about to enter.
"And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a
member of any party or organization, political or other- wise, that now
advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the
State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within
the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation)
I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or other-
wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United
States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful
means except as follows:
(If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions") and that during
such time as I hold the office of
_____________________________________________ I will not advocate
nor become (name of office) a member of any party or organization,
political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the Government of
the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other
unlawful means." Article 20, Section 3, Constitution of the State of
California.
Because the Governor of the State of California, the Secretary of State, and
the Electoral College have a duty to preserve the integrity of the election system
under the United States Constitution; because Obama is in criminal violation of
federal laws concerning his identity, and because he has failed to establish 1)
lawful citizenship; 2) a lawful name; 3) a lawful social security number
identification; 4) a lawful registration for the selective service system; 5) natural
born citizen status are required under Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the US
Constitution: plaintiffs have been deprived in 1) their ability to cast a lawful vote
for the Presidency (elector plaintiffs) and 2) their candidacies for President. This
can be redressed by this court when the court enjoins the Electoral College from
certifying its vote.
c. Mootness
The basic question in determining mootness is whether there is a present
controversy as to which effective relief can be granted. Feldman v. Bomar, 518
F.3d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 2008). In this case, this court is the last bulwark between
the life of the constitutional republic of the United States, and its demise. This
court can and should fashion relief, and because such an opportunity exists for
this court to enjoin the Electoral College from moving forward with the election of
a candidate for President who cannot lawfully hold the post, the issue before the
court is a present controversy and is not moot.
The cause of action is one which “arises under” the Federal Constitution.
This complaint alleges that the certification of an ineligible candidate to the office
of the Presidency deprives Plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws in
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Dismissal of the complaint upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the
subject matter would is not justified, because the case can only be dismissed if
the claim were “so attenuated and unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of
merit,” Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579, or “frivolous,”
Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 683. That the claim is unsubstantial must be “very
plain.” Hart v. Keith Vaudeville Exchange, 262 U.S. 271, 274, 369 U.S. 186.
Furthermore, this court has a duty to enjoin an unlawful election in any
manner it deems appropriate. Pursuant to 28 USC § 453, all members of the
federal judiciary are required to take the following oath:
“I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer
justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to
the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of
(Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of
the commander in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged
long form birth certificate, forged selective Service certificate and a stolen
Grinols et al v Electora I college et al Petition for TRo 33
Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and
fitness for office
4. President ofthe Senat€ from presenting the Certificates ofthe Electoral Vote to
the U.S. Congress due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the
citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka
Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and
position ofthe comrnander in-Chiell while using a forged short form birth
certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective Service certificate
and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number rco<-xx-4425 as a proofofhis
legitimacy and fitness for office
5. U.S. Congress from confirming the elections results due to lack of legitimacy for
office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obarna, aka
Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for
the U.S. Presidency and position ofthe commander in-Chief, while using a forged
short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective
Service certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxr-xx-4425
as a proof ofhis legitimacy and fitness for office
Grinols et alv Electo.al College et al Petition for TRo 34
6. Defendant Barack Hussein Obama from taking the oath ofoffice as a U.S.
President on the inauguration day due to his lack of legitimacy for office and fraud
committed by him, as tle citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack
(Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S.
Presidency and position ofthe Commander in-Chiei while using a forged short
form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged selective Service
certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a
proofofhis legitimacy and fitness for office.
Further adjudication on the merits will take place
on
So ordered and adjudged
Honorable Morison C. England
Chief Judge U.S. Disfiict Court Eastem District of Califomia
Dated
Grinols et alv Electoral College et al Petition forTRO 35
Affidavit of of Notice
I Orly Taitz, counsel on the case attest
l. complaint, summons and exhibits were served on the defendants by
sending aforementioned documents by ovemight Federal express on
12.18.2012
2. Motion for TRO and attached Check list forms were served on the
defendants by sending aforementioned documents by ovemight Federal
express on 12.19.2012
/s/ Dr Orly Taitz ESQ .//
t2.lg.2ol2 ) " n'JAFFIDAVIT OF IRREPARABLf, HARM
Plaintiffs herein are Presidential Candidates and Presidential Electors.
P residential elections are being certified within days.
Oath of office ofthe new President will be taken next month.
Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm ofa lost el€ction and hability to
exercise a right to vote by the Presidential electors-
,'a -
._.- / /.l . ,1,/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
counsel for Plaintifs
Grinols et alv Electoral Colleae etalP€tition for TRO 36
Grinols et alv ElectoralCollege et al Petition forTRO 31
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTEASITERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TEITPORARY RESTRANING ORDER(rRo)
CHECKLIST
NOTE: When filing a Motion for a TRO with the court, you must choose Motjon for TRO. you mustcomplete this document and attach is to your mo on as an attachment in CM/ECF. lf you havequ€stions, please calt th€ CiTECF Holp Desk at 1-866-884-5525 (Sacramento) or1 -866-884-5444 (Fresno).
(A) Check one. Filing party is represented by counsgl AFiting party is acling in pro se n
(B) Has there been acfual notice, or a sufficient showing of efforts to provide notice to the affected party?See Local Rule 61231 and FRCP 6S(b).
Did applicant discuss alternatives to a TRO hearing?
Did applicant ask opponent to stipulate to a TRO?
Opposing Party: U.S. anomcy .epre6en$ng Feablal detcndants, AG ropresentlng stato dofendents
Telephone No.: US Attomey 918-554-2700 AG of CA 9t6i22n360
(C) Has there been undue delay ln bringing a TRO?
Could lhis have been brought earlier?
Yes: E No: A
TRO Checklist - P€ge 2
(D) What is the irreparable injury?
lnabilily by th€ Pre3idontial Electors to vote and have their voL ceralfiod for a logftim.te candldai€, lossofa contest for U.S. prcsldent, dgprivation ofrlghls rolated to voting by the Preildonllal €leclors
Why the need for an expedited hearing?
immedlate Imp6nding u6urpation of lhe U.S. Presldency due to Dotendant Obame's use gf forg€d lDs andu3e of a CT Social Socurity numb.r xxx-rx.4425 which waa hever assigned lo hirh accordlng to E.vedtand ssNvs
(E) Documents to be itled and (unless impossible) sqved on affectd pafties/counsel:
A (\ complaint
@ (2) Motion for TRo
E (3) Brief on ail legal issued pres€nted by the motion
A @ Affidavit detailing notice, or efforts to effect notice, orshowjng why it should not be given
g (5) Affidavit in support of exigtence of irreparable harm
E (6) Proposed order wjlh provision for bond
A 0 Proposed order with blanks for fixing:
E lime and date of hearing for motion for preliminary injunction
! Dale for filing responsive papers
D Amount of bond, if any
C Date and hour of issuanc€
n (B) For TROS requested €xpart6, proposed order shall notify affected parties then canapply to the court for modification/dissolution on 2 days notic€ or such shorter notic€ asthe court may allow. See Local Rulo 61231 and FRCP 65(b)
r .{er€d a 6py d the empr.int o0 FgE) add e0,uc ( ro7 e,96) G
Nek to subDr mo (r.F dary astcn,rc ordei)
-vent lnd ssNvs, due ro.vden.e!r ro46ryf s
dlega|lvh'''lun@'dlh'taai$ne rea<dis (conprai'r and o'der by rldqe dFrrer spoftd or o yracEsa.@)
*purateGoEa)iorRoofcedf&to n bo h.rrd di the md ts by the q 6nd'nq ,!dqe& oot 3!pd.re(do d rcr*) b rno
2 42 PM (ro hrndes a9o)
d .me.r h!td.3(@cd leuc.cry
Notice of Electronic Filingon r 2/r4l20r? at 2:r2 B PSr .nd id 6 \21t.t20\2
"..-*,*, ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 121'14112DENYING Plaintiffs' [2] Request. lf the parties wish to proceed with theirrequest for a temporary restraining order, they are hereby ordered to filethe documents listed in this order by 12121112, (Manzer, C)
Grinols et alv ElectoralCollege et alPetitionforTRO 6
:e&, NIP ?:;:1.'7u{;'':,,,,"";r;
Express {.-l# r--iff :"liij Number 80aa lEEn e&714 ftpress Package Service *Tomdrodom
I{OTE: Sewice order has chansed. Please selod carelully
Packages up to 150 lbsht rehawowffilb.Mturcw
htu Epffi tuisHUS frfiiil
wfffir*q1wn FedEx2DavA.M.I I secondbusnedsmonrnq-
Saturday Delivery N0T available.
n FedEx2DavI I SecondOusnessatomoon.'Thu6davshipmenb
- wll he del ve.ed on Mondav unless SATUBDAY
Deliveryh selecbd-
n FedExExoressSaverI frndbusinedsdav'
Satudav Delivery N0T availab e
5fr4Your lnternal Billing RelerenceFl$ 24 chatac@rs will appear on invoice.
5 Packaging rDd'Ed€ru€ridsm.
I FedExEnvelope* fl f.of"euf fl FedEx ; ledEx l=l gt'er! Box L lube
ToRecipient'sName
6 Special Handling and Delivery Signature Options
r_] SAT|RDAYDeliverv' I iloT.vail.blclor'edu srindarc 0!enqht FedbAavA V o kdu &p'€ss savea
I-
No Sionature Reouired \-/Direct SignatureI Packdo;mavoe efrffiou \ ,f Soreol"atrecipiedsadd'ess! ohan;q.siarar-'e'o'de..ery v TavssnrcrdeNeryturyrra
Dopsttis shipmemcontain dangerous goods?
, J One box must be checked.*/
-Yes -YesVt'lo L l $;ffiliyo:Ti,o" L-_1 -s3;t6,'0"*u"*- L lDaro€r0ussoodslincludinq dryice) canndbe shipped ln Fede packagins
or placed in a FedAtuprcss Drop Bor
lndirect Siqnature
- lf no one h alailable d recipredsaddre$,someone il a neqhboring
- addr€ss mavsonlordelvery For
resLdemal deltuedes only tu ryPlta
H0LD Saturdaytodabcdnaddres
- R€0U|RD A€ibile oNUh
I tod&PnoryovemiqfrandFed&Dayb$ledlocatons
Drv lceDrylce,9,UN r&5
-
(- ks
I CargoAircraft0nly
Billto:
-
EfierFedExAcdl{o.orCreditcardl{o.below --
--
$"]jru**" !Fecipient !triroearty f CreditCard f Cash/Check
bs. S
-.S
l0,trlbdNsrmneotoUSImrn'€ssvo-de!lar€.h(lervaLeSeebasooeDhBvus{tisAdiltru*^". m # seru.ce conltons on me oih ol fE Atroi aro n tre c -rel ledb serc€ Cu d" nt lJdins brsm:d [mfr our ]iability.
V^:**,r,,*:yp,ytiisl$m,,*""; I r [4iH:i?lY6,,,;l,",jrr,iri"dri*ll.liJ""':J"iii^il"ijvii' i'iii'tillidrv 0"i""ry | d rm e iveed.on vmdavm 'hseeded. I u€rveryrsseecreo
FedExstandardOvernight | 1 FedExExpres,sSaverNef0u$nessafiernoon.' " I L,l frrdb-sine$daY-'SauroayDdNen \0- ava ldbre. I SatfdavDelveryNOI ava lab'e
6sr"n,mr#dffiztp / Z4 dC 5 Packaging 'Decrarcdvaruerinilsn
q
Your lnternal Billing RelerenceFd24 charac@rsffll appearon invobe
n FedExEnverope* @ t"ootuo. tl FB'.XE- tr l:i!^ [ ott.,
-vocN//6 D di*py,:u,","" L iiict;l3f"-*" L l 3,#,!l'9,n,*o -' -,sDans€rcusso9ds{includinsdryice)canndbeshipp€dhFed&Fckasins ! CargoAirCraft0nlyor obced ln a Fedk &prcss omp Box.
James Grinols, Robert Odden, in their capacity )Case #
as Presidential Electors ) Declaratory and lnjunctive
Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, ) Relief
Keith Judd in their capacity as )Petition for
candidates for the U.S. President ) Extraordinary Emergency Writ of
v Electoral College, President of the Senate, )Mandamus/ Stay of Certification
Governor of California, Secretary of State ) of votes for Presidential
of California, U.S. Congress, Barack Hussein ) Candidate Obama due to
Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka )elections fraud and his use of
Barack Obama Soebarkah, in his capacity as a I invalidfiorged/ fraudulently
Candidate for the U.S.President in 2012 )obtained lDs
(petition for permanent injunction is pending)
Grinolsetalvelectoralcollege2012,PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition for STAY 1
Petitioners are seeking certification as class representatives and class action
certification
PARTIES
Edward Noonan, Hereinafter "Noonan", winner of the California American
Independent Party Primary for the U.S. President. Edward Noonan's Certificate ofnomination as the American lndependent party candidate for the U.5. President is
attached as exhibit 1. Noonan resides at 1213 11th Ave, Olivehurst, CA 95961.
Keith Judd, Hereinafter "Judd" -Democratic Party candidate for the U.5. President,
a runner up in the Democratic party primary in West Virginia, received 40% of the
vote, more than any other Democratic party challenger to Obama, would be a
Democratic party nominee, if it is found that Obama was not eligible due to
elections fraud and use of forged lDs.
Thomas Gregory MacLeran, {Hereinafter "MacLeran") Candidate for the US
President, registered with the FEC, would be affected if it is found by the court
that obama as not a legitimate candidate for the U.5. President due to elections
fraud committed by him and due to his use offorged lDs. ln case a stay is issued
and a new election is scheduled, MacLeran's rights will be affected.
James Grinols is a Republican party elector who was deprived of his right toparticipate in the electoral college 2012, due to the fact that Democratic party
electors representing candidate Obama were seated based on fraud and use of
forged lDs by Obama. Grinols is seeking a certification as a representative of a
class of Republican party Electors and electors in general seeking to stop Electoral
college 2012 from certifying electoral votes obtained by fraud and forgery
Robert Odden is a Libertarian party elector, who was deprived of his right topa rticipate in the electoral college 2012, d ue to the fact that Democratic party
electors representing candidate Obama were seated based on fraud and use offorged lDs by Obama. Grinols is seeking a certification as a representative of a
class of Libertarian party Electors and electors in general seeking to stop Electoral
college 2012 from certifying electoral votes obtained by fraud and forgery
Grinols et alvelectoralcollege 2012, President ofthe senate et al Petition forSTAY
Electoral College 2012 - 20L2 Electoral College is sued as a governmental agency
that was elected as a result of 2012 general election and which convenes only
once, on Decembe r 17 ,2072 - Electoral college is sued to STAY certification of
electoral votes 2012 due to fraud and use of forged lDs by Candidate Obama.
ln case the court finds that it is not willing to adjudicate against the electoral
college as one governmental agency, Plaintiffs are seeking adjudication against 55
California electors, who are subject to the jurisdiction ofthis court and joining
258 remaining Democratic Party electors from 26 other states, who are pledged
to Candidate Obama, based on pendent party jurisdiction as the claim arose froma common nucleus of operative fact and under Exxon Mobil v Alapatah services
545 U.5. 546 and under 28 USC 1367.
President of the Senate - Joseph Biden, President of the Senate is sued in his
official ca pacity to Stay/enjoin presentment by the President of the senate to thejoined session of Congress the results of 2012 electoral college elections and in his
capacity as a representative of Congress enjoining Congress from certifying the
results of 2012 electoral college elections due to fraud and use of forged/fraudulently obtained lDs and fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security
numberxxx-xx-4425 by Candidate Barack Hussein Obama
U.S. Congress is sued as a governmental agency in it's capacity and ministerial
duty to vote and confirm the results of the electoral college election of the U.s.
President. Plaintiffs are seeking to enjoin the U.S. congress from voting forCandidate Obama due to fraud committed by Obama and his use of forged lDs as
a basis of his eligibility for the U.5. Presidency
Governor of California and Secretary of State of California are sued in their official
ministerialduty as state officials certifying results of 2012 elections and
presenting the certificate of ascertainment to the electoral college.
Barack Hussein Obama- candidate for the U.S. President
VENUE AND JURISDICTION
Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President of the Senate et al Petition for STAY 3
This court has Jurisdiction as the U.S. Federal agencies are defendants, and
controversy involves federal question 28 U.S.C. g 1331 (federal question)
Venue is proper as defendants Governor of California and secretary of state ofCalifornia are located in the Eastern District of California
LEGAL BASIS
The United States Electoral Coll€ge is the institution that oilicially elects the President and
Vice Presjdent of the United States every lour years. The President and Vice President arc flot
elected directlyby the voters. Instead, they are elected indircctly by "electors" who are elected by
populirl vote on a state by state basis. Eleclors are apportioned to each state and the District of
Columbia, but not to territorial possessions of the United States, sLrch as Puerto Rico and GLla$.
The number olelectors in each state is equal to the number of members of Congress to which the
state is entitled. The Twenty-third Amendment has always resulted in the District of Columbia
having three elcctors. There are 538 electo$, based on there being 435 representatives and 100
senators, plus the three electors from the District of Columbia. Electors chosen on Election Day
meet in their respective state capitals (or in the case of Washington, D.C., within the Distdct) on
the Monday after rhe second wednesday in December, at which time they cast their electoral
votes on separate ballots for President and Vice President.
The Electoral College never actually meets as one body. Although procedures in each state vary
slightly, the electors generally follow a similar series of steps, and the Congress has
constitutional authority to regulate the procedures the states tbllow. The meeting is opened by
the election ce ification official-often that state's secretary of state or equivalent-who reads
the CERTIFICATE OF ASCERTAINIIENT. This documcnt sets forth who was chosen to
Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President of the Senate et al Petition for STAY
cast the electoral votes. Each elector submits a w tten ballot with the name of a candidate for
President. The next step is the casting of the vote lbr Vice President, which follows a similar
Pattern.
Each state's electors must complete six CERTIFICATES OF VOTE. Each Certificate of Vote
must be signed by all of the electors and a CERTIFICATE OF ASCERTAINMENT must be
attached to each of the Certificates of Vote. Each Certificate of Vote must include the names of
those who received an electoral vote for either the office of President or of Vice President. The
electors certify the CERTIFICATES OF VOTE and copies of the Ceftificates are then sent in
the following fashion
One is sent by registered mail to the President of the Senate (who usually is the Vice President);
Two are sent by registered mailto the Archivist ofthe United States;
Two are sent to the state's Secretary ofState; and
One is sent to the chiefjudge ofthe United States district court where those eledors met.
A staff member of the PRESIDENT OF TIIE SENATE collects the Ceftificates of vote as
they ar.ive and prepares them for the joint session of the Congress. The Certificates are
arranged-unopened-in alphabetical order and placed in two special mahogany boxes.
Alabama tluough Missouri (including Washington, D.C.) are placed in one box altd Montana
through Wyoming are placed in the other box. The Twelfth Amendment mandates that the
CONGRESS assemble injoint session to count the electoral votes and declare the \{inners ofthe
election.l6l The session is ordinarily required to take place on January 6 in the calendar year
immediately following fte meetings of the presidential electors. Si[ce the Twentieth
Grinols et alv electoral college 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Petition for STAY
Amendment, the newly elected House declarcs the winner of thc election; all elections before
1936 were determined by the outgoing House instead.
The meeting is held at I:00 pm in the Chamber of the U.S. House of Reprcsentatives. Thc sitting
Vice President is expected to preside, but in several cases the President pro tempote of the
Senate has chaired the proceedings instead. Results of the electoral vote can be challenged by at
least one Reprcsentative and one senator.
REQT]EST FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND FOR
CERTIFICATION OF PLAINTIFFS AS REPRESENTATIVES OF A
CLASS
Plaintifls are seeking a class certification and a certification of a class
representativc herein.
Plaintif'f Grinols is seeking certification as a representative of a class of
Republican Party electors and electors in general.
Plaintiff Odden is seeking certification as a representative of a class of
Libertarian Party electors and electors in general.
Plaintiff Judd is seekng certification as a representative of a class of the
Democratic Party Presidential candidates and Presidential candidates in general
PlaintilT Macleran is seeKng certit'ication as a reprcsentative of Republican
party candidates and Presidenl.ial candidatcs in general
Grinolsetalvelectoralcollege2012,PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition for STAY 6
Plaintiff Noonan seeks certification of a representative of a class of minor
party Presidential candidates and Presidential candidates in general
This action can be maintained as a class action under FRCP Rule 23, which
states as follow:
(a) Prerequisites. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as
representative parties on behalf of all members only if:
(l )The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable;
(2)There are questions of law or fact cornmon to the class;
(3)The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the
claims or defenses of the class; and
(4) The representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests
of the call.
(b) Types of Class Actions. A class action may be maintained of Rule 23(a) is
satistied arrd if:
(l) Prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members
would create a risk of:
(A) Inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class
members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the
party opposing the class; or
Grinols et alv electo ra I college 2012, President ofthe Senate €t al Petition for STAY 7
(B) Adjudications with respect to individual class members that, as a
practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other
members not parties to the individual adjudications or would
substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests;
(2) The party opposing the class had acted or refirsed to act on grounds
that apply generally to the class, so that final injunctive relief or
corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate respecting the class as a
whole; or
(3) The court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class
members predominate over any questions affectin-a only individual
members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for
fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. The matters pertinent to
these findings include:
(A)The class members' interests in individually controlling the prosecution
or defense of separate actions;
(B)The extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy
already begun by or against class members;
(C)The desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the
claims in panicular lorum: and
(D) The likely diffrculties in managing a class action.
Grinols et al v electora I college 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Petition for5TAY
The members of the class are so numerous that it is impossible and impracticable
to bring all of them to this court as named plaintiffs.
Damage to Plaintifts is similar to damage of other class members.
Not certifying this legal action as a class action can lead to conllicting rulings and
judgments;
There are questions of law or fact common to the class;
The claims or defenses of the representative panies are typical of the claims or
defenses of the class; and
Plaintifti will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
R,EQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL
Due to the fact that high level officials are Defendants in this case, and due
to high probability of pressure on the presiding judge, 7th Amendment right to jury
trial is asserted and jury determination of all issues, facts and law is demanded in
the hearing.
1. Plaintiffs have uncovered one and a half million invalid voter registrations
in the state of California
Grinolsetalvelectoralcollege2012,PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition for STAY 9
2 Evidence shows that one of the leading candidates for the U.S. Presidency,
Barack Obama, is not qualified for office, as he is a citizen of lndonesia and is
using a forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a Social
Security number which was never assigned to him as a proof of his identity and
eligibility to the U.S. Presidency.
3. The issue of one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the voter
rolls of California represent an issue of great public importance.
According to California elections statute 2150 in order for a voter
registration to be valid, a perspective voter had to provide information in
some eight areas, such as name, address, birth date, state, where he was
born, evidence of prior voter registration and so on. PLAINTIFF'S
COU NSEL Taitz requested from the secretary of State Bowen an official
DVD of voter rolls. She forwarded this DVD to several computer analysts.
Plaintiffs are attaching as an exhibit verified affidavit of a Computer
engineer David Yun, who analyzed the voter rolls and found over one
and a half million invalid voter registrations in California, in violation of
elections statute 2150. Mr. Yun foun d 756,21.3 records without a birth
place, 685, 739 records where instead of a required na me of the state of
birth, U. S. or U.5.A was entered, 141,851 possibly duplicate records,
Grlnols et a I v electoral college 2012, Presidentofthe Senate et al Petition for STAY 10
130,019 records with birth date over 100, 757 records without a birth
date,898 records without a first name. (Exhibit 11,12)Additionally,
Exhibit 1.9 shows e-malls from orange county and Los Angeles County,
where employees of the Registrar's office admit to falsification of voter
data by entering date 1900, when there is no date or entering USA or Us
when the name of the state of birth is missing. Moreover, it was reported
that the number of registered voters in California went up by over a
million since the last Presidential election in 2008 and most ofthe
increase came from on line registration. The problem with this, is that
nobody checks voter lDs, when one registers on line, Secretary of State
Bowen issued directives, where attendants at precincts are not allowed
to check identifications at the precincts, can lead to even more voter
fraud, whereby the one and a half million invalid voter registrations
might be only a tip of the iceberg
4. An issue of legitimacy to the U.S. Presidency of Barack Obama, citizen of
lndonesia usurping the U.S. Presidency with the aid of forged lDs and a
stolen Social Security number, which was never assigned to him, is the
number one issue in the natlon in terms of its' importance.
Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, Preside nt of the senate et al PetitionforSTAY 11
5. According to Article 1, section 2 ofthe U.S. Constitution U.S. President is
supposed to be a natural born U.5. citizen
6. Millions of U.S. citizens wrote to their elected officials and Secretaries of
State seeking confirmation of Obama's eligibility.
On April 27,2011 just 4 days prior to scheduled hearing
in the gth Circuit Court of Appeals of a challenge Keves. Barnett et al v Obama 09-
56a27 and 10-55084. brought by under signed counsel, Obama released, what he
claimed a copy of his original birth certificate. Within hours there was a
mou nta in of evidence to show that the a lleged copy of the birth certificate was a
computer generated forgery, not a document created with a typewriter in 1961.
Evidence will be discussed later.
7. ln the last four years hundreds of desperate U.S. citizens filed legal
actions in state and federal courts challenging Obama's legitimacy for the
U.5. Presidency. As of now there was a systemic and egregious denial of
7th amendment right to a jury trial on this issue of paramount importance
to the nation. There was a systemic jury nullification. Judges presiding in
Obama's eligibility challenges routinely dismissed the cases based on
technicalities. As of today not one single judge in the nation of 314
Plaintiffi incorporate all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein
29. All of the above evidence showed Obama to be using forged
Identification papers and a Social Security number, which was never
assigned to him. Aforementioned document show Obama's citizenship to be
Indonesian. There are no valid identification papers to show Obama to be a
natural bom U.S. citizen.
30. Obama is running fbr the U.S. Presidency in 2012 election comrnitting
fraud, claiming to be a natural born U.S. citizen, and using forged and
lraudulently obtained IDs as a basis for his natural born U.S. citizen status
31. Based on the above presented evidence Plaintifs are seeKng
DECLARATORY RELIEF that candidate Obama lacks the constitutional
requirements to become the U.S. President due to the fact that Obama is not a
natural-bom citizen of United States and was placed on the ballot by virtue of
fiaud, and his use of lbrged and liaudulently obtained identification
documents-
32. Secretary of State of California and Govemor of Califomia are the state
officials, who have the ministerial duty of Presenting the Certificate of
Ascertainment to the members of the Electoral College
Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President ofthe Senate et al PetitionforSTAY 24
33. Members of the Electoral College 2012 are electors, who are required to
vote for their pledged candidates. absent a court order of STAY or
INJUNCTION the members of the electoral college will have to vote for
Obama in the jurisdictions, where he won the popular vote or they may be
subject to penalties even if they are lbrced to violate the law and violate their
oath of office to uphold the Constitution.
President of the Senate has a ministerial duty of presenting the Certificates of
Vote to the U.S. Congress.
U.S. Congress has a ministerial duty of voting to confirm or refuse to confirm
the rcsults of the Electoral College vote.
EQUITABLE RELIEF
EMERGENCY STA Y/MANDATE FOR STAY/PRELIMINARY
IN.TUNCTION
Plaintiffs incorporate all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein.
34. Equitable remedy is warranted as economic remedy is not sufflcient.
Plaintiffs who are candidates for the U.S. President and loss of election cannot
be cured wil.h economic damages. Plaintifts, who are electors, lost their right
to participate in 2012 Electoral College. Plaintiffs are stating that they are
Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Peiition for STAY 25
improperly prevented from competing in the general election. Additionally,
they are alleging that Candidate Obama is improperly allowed to compete in
the general election, even though he is a foreign national, he is using a last
name, which is not legally his and he is using forged/ fraudulently obtained
identification papers as a basis of his identity. Plaintiffs have suffered and
continue to suffer an undue hardship.
35. Secretary of State will not suffer any hardship if the Petition for a Writ of
Mandamus/ stay is granted.
36.In balancing the hardships, the hardship suffered by the Plaintiffs
outweighs the non-extant hardship to the defendant.
37. Granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus/ Stay is in Public Policy, as it will
ensure integrity of elections and will protect the public from the elections
fraud.
38. Precedent of McCarthy v Briscoe 429 US l3l7,97 S Ct 10; 50 L Ed 2d
49; 1976 U.S. Lexls 4129 states that a stay can be granted by a single justice
to either add or remove a candidate.
39. Rqcqnt precedelt gf Miller v Campbell 3:10-cv-252 RRB U.S. DistrictDrovlded srmrlar relrel1'Therefore, for the reasons articulat-ed above and byDefendants
Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President ofthe Senate et al Petition forSTAY 26
in thelr Motion Lo D.ismiss for Lack of Federal
Question JurisdicLlon or in the Alternative to Abstain
at Docket 17, which Plaintiff responded to at Docket
20, this matt.er is hereby STAYED so that the parties
may lrring this dispute before the appropriate State
tribunal . The court shal1 retain jurisdiction
pursuant to Puflman and will remain available to
review any constitutional issues that may exist once
the State remedies have been exhausted, In order to
ensure that these serious StaLe law issues are resolved
prlor to cert.ification of the election, the
Court hereby condilionally GR ANTS Plaintiff's motion
to enjoin certification of the eleccion. If an action
is filed in State Court on or before Novenber 22,
2010, the results of this election sha11 not be
certified unLil the 1ega1 issues raised therein have
been fuLly and finally resolwed. " jd
Additionally, allowing Mr. Obama to be certified would violate California
Election Code Section 1203, which states "Anyone who files or submits for
filing a nomination paper or declaration of candidacy that it or any part of it
has been made falsely is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand
Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, Presidentotthe Senate etal PetitionforSTAY Z7
dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the state for 16 months or two or
three years or by both line and imprisonment" and California Elections
Code Section 18500 that states, "Any person who commits f raud and
person who aids or abets fraud or attempts to aid or abet fraud, in
connection with any vote cast to be cast or attempted to be cast is guilty of
a felony, punishable by imprisonment for 16 months or two or years".
Since in his official School Registration #206 from Assisi School in Jakarta
lndonesia, Obama is listed is citizen of lndonesia, not U.S. citizen,
Delendants and this court might be subject to a charge of treason by
allowing a foreign national, citizen of lndonesia, Barack Obama, aka
Barack (Barry ) Soetoro aka Barack Obama Soebarkah to usurp the U.S.
presidency and the position of Commander in Chief by virtue ol fraud and
Barack Obama Soebarkah ineligible/illegitimate for the position of the
U.S. President due to the fact that he is not a Natural Born U.S.
citizen and that his eligibility lor office claims are based on forged and
f raudulently obtained identif ication papers.
Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, President of the Senate et al Petition forSTAY 2A
2. STAY ol Presentment of CERTIFICATE OF ASCERTAINMENT by
the Governor and the Secretary of State with votes for candidate
Obama pending resolution of the issue of his legitimacy for the U.S.
Presidency in light of his lndonesian citizenship, due to the fact that
according to his mother's passport records his last name is
Soebarkah and he is seeking to become a U.S. President under a
name that is not legally his and due to his use of forged lDs,
specifically a forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service
Certificate and a fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security
number as proof of his identity.
2. STAY of vote by the ELECTORAL COLLEGE for candidate Obama
pending resolution of the issue of his legitimacy for the U.S. Presidency in
light of his lndonesian citizenship, due to the fact that according to his
mother's passport records his last name is Soebarkah and he is seeking to
become a U.S. President under a name that is not legally his and due to his
use of forged lDs, specifically a forged birth certificate, forged Selective
Service Certificate and a fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security
number as proof ot his identity.
Grinolset alvelectoralcollege 2012, Presidentofthe Senateet al Petition forSTAY 29
3. STAY OF PRESENTMENT OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ELECTORAL
VOTE BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE for candidate Obama
pending resolution ol the issue of his legitimacy for the U.S. Presidency in
light of his lndonesian citizenship, due to the facl that according to his
mother's passpon records his last name is Soebarkah and he is seeking to
become a U.S. President under a name that is not legally his and due to his
use of forged lDs, specilically a forged birth certificate, forged Selective
Service Certificate and a f raudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security
number as proof of his identity.
4. STAY OF VOTE BY THE U.S. CONGRESS for candidate Obama
pending resolution of the issue of his legitimacy for the U.S. Presidency in
light of his Indonesian citizenship, due to the fact that according to his
mother's passport records his last name is Soebarkah and he is seeking to
become a U.S. President under a name that is not legally his and due to his
use of forged lDs, specifically a forged birth certificate, iorged Selective
Service Certificate and a lraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security
number as proof of his identity.
5. Costs, attorney's fees and any other reliel courl finds just and proper.
Grinols et alv electoralcollege 2012, PresidentoftheSenateetal Petition forSTAY 30
I hereby certify that foregoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and informed consent.
Respectf ully Submitted,
-{rz (art/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Counsel for Plaintiffs
12.10.2012
Grinols et al v electoral college 2012, President of the Senate et al Petltion for STAY 31
EXHIBIT 1
)"^- E*'r*-Debra BowenSecretary ot Slate
i'
'|
:
t:
I
\d
ilx{,l
''.
CERTIFICATE OF NOMINATION
I, Oebla Bolvon, Secretary of State ot th6 State ol Californira, hsreby cerliry:
That acaording io the final olfcial retums oI lhe Prirnary Eledion h€ld on the5th day of June, 2012, and the statement oI the .*ult lhereof on fle in myofiice,
Edward. C. Noonqnwas nominalod a6 lhe America lndependent Party's c€ndidat€ for the oflic€ of
Presldent
lN WTNESS WHEREOF. I h€reonlo set my hand andaffix lhe Great Seal of the Stst6 of CelifomiE, atSacrarnento, fris 10h day ol Jtttf,2012.
:=..=--_-=,.j{
EXHIBIT 2
STATE OF ARIZONACounty of Maricopa
AFFIDA\TTI, the undersigned, being first duiy srvorn, do hereby state under oath and underpenatty of perjury that the followiag facts are true:
1. I am ovet the age of 18 and am a resident of Arizona The inionnaiioncontained in this affidar'it is based upon rny ol'yn personal lool!'ledge and,
if cailed as a witness, I could testit' @mpetently thereto' I am a formersworn law enforcement officer and cdminal investitator. Since 2oo7 Ihave been duly appointed by the elected Sheriff of lttaricopa Countr',Arizona, Joseph Arpaio, as the chief investigator of his Cold Case Posse.
2. Under the Arizona Constitution and ArizoDa Revised Statutes, the Shedflhas the authoritl to request assistance from a volunteer posse ("the ColdCase Posse"), a speciai five member team of experienced in'estiSatorslocated in the cou[tJ', to assist him in the execution of his duties. Theindividuallr-selected tean deputized by the Sheriff includes former policedetectives and attorneys $'ho \^rork voluntarily and at virtually no el:pense
to the taxpa,yer u'henever the Sheriffauthodz€s an investigation to add'essaDy issue as the Sheriff deems appropriate.
3. In August 2011, a Sroup ol citizens ftom the Surpise Arizona Tea Partyorganization called upon the Sheriff in his office and preseoted a petitionsigned by approximately 25o residents of Maricopa CouDty, requesting theSheriffs Department to inr€stigate 1'!'hether a doclrment posted oD theofficial irebsite ofthe white House on 27 April 2011 and purpoting on itsface to be an electronic image of the "long-form" or original Har'r'aiian
4. If the image of the bidh certificate $'ere not genuine, the question mightarise u-hether Mr Obama had been born within the jurisdiction o{ theUnited states and thereby complied utth the requirement under Article ilof the U.S. Constitution tltat the President be a "natural-bor[ citizen".
S. The petitioners expressed theil concern that, until that point' no la$'enforcement agency had e\,€r gode on record as indicating that it had
i$'estigated or u'as willing to investigate whether President Obama was
eligiblt to hold his office. The petitioners said that lack of resources andjurisdictional challenges had inhibited any such in\-estigation elsewhere.
6. Sheriff Arpaio con,missioned the Cold Case Posse to undertake lheinvestigation tequested b]' the petiticjners The principai focus of theinl'estigatio[ is the electronic document on the White House website tl-latPreside.llt Obama had presented as the inage of his long-form birth
certificate to the American people and to citizens of Maricopa County at aWhite House press confereDce on April 27, zorr, u'hen he had said: "Weprovided additional information today atlout t}le site of my bifth. .., Yes, infact, I was borq in Hav/aii, August 4, 1961, in ]Gpi'olani Hospital."
7. For 17 ]€als {rom 1991 until the }.ear before the Presidential election of2oo8, the annually revised biography written by Mr Obama and circulatedby his litemry agents had contaiued tie uords "Barack Obama, the firstAfrican-American President of the Harvard Law Reuieru, was born inKenya and raised in Indonesia and Halraii,"
8. The official PolftcmentarA Debates of the Kenyan National Assembly for25 March 2o1o rccords tbat Mr Orengo, the Minister for l,ands, said: "IfAmerica ... did not see itself as a multiparB' state or nation, how could ayoung man borrl here iE Keuya, who is not even a natil€ Americarr,become tle President ofAmerica?"
9. The investigation has closely examined the procedures for registlation ofbirths at the Hawaii Department of Health and various statemelts madeby ofticials of the Hawaii govemment o!€r the last fii'e J€ars in connectionr.r'ith the authentici4' of Mr Obama's birth records. We have chronicled aseries ofinconsistent and misleading representations that urious officialsof tie government of Hawaii have made since 2oo7 or the question \^'hatoriginal birth records, if any, are held by the Ha\,\aii Department of Health.
1o.In February 2or2, I rcpofted to Sheriff Arpaio that there $?s probablecause to consider that the White House image of Mr Obama's birthcertificate w'as a forgery, and specifically that it $'as not a true and accdratephotographic image of a genuine birth record, I advised tlle Sheriff thatthe forgers had probably committed two crimes: first, frauclulentlycreating a forgery tiat the White House had charactetized, knowingly orunknowingly, as ao officially-produced tovernmental birth record; andsemndly, fraudu'lently presentint to the residents of Maricopa County andto the American public at large a forgery that the White House hadrepresented as "proof positire" of President Obama's authentic 1961Hawaiian long-form bidh cetificate,
11- These conclusions were reinforced by input flom numerous exlerts iD thefie1ds of typeu.ritingJ q?esettlng, computer-geDerated documentation,forensic document analysis and Adobe computer programs, as rvell ascomparisons with aumerous other tirth rccords and expert re!'iels ofHarvaii state law and of the regulations, policies and procedures o{ theHawaii Department of Health.
12. The investigation further determined that the Hawaii Department ofHealth has engaged in what the Sheriffs investigators believe is asystematic effort to hide from ia$. eDforcement and the public $&ate\.etoriginal 1961 birth records t}le Hawaii Department of Health may have inits possession. The Posse also accumulated evidence that tie Hawaiigorernment and its agencies had changed their policies and pracedures ina manner calculated to hinder our law-enforcement investigation.
13. ln furtherance of the in'estigatioo, uhich has norv contiDued for morethan a 1'ear, I have twic€ r'isited Ha&?ii within tbe last six montis. On thefiIst occasion, a Maricopa County Sheriffs Of6ce Detective and Ipresented our credentials to the ofnces of the Hawaii Department ofHealti and requested to speak to Mr Alvin Onaka, the chief registrar ofLrirths, a simulacrum of $'hose signature-stamp had appeared on theelectronic document on the White House website. We had hoped to ask MrOnaka if he rrould verifi the authenticity of tie White House releaseddocument and to reri8 th€ legitimacy of the registrar's stamp bearinS hissignature. Additionally we hoped to ask him to allol\, us, for laq'-enforcemeDt .easons, to inspect the original document and, in due course,to subject it to forensic examination.
14. Ho$€\'er, r.hen r'r'e presented our credentials at the front desk of theHa$aii Depaftment of Health, much to our amazemeDt we i{ere infortnedthat Mr Onaka does not speak to the public. we explained that \\e werethere on official busincss. Ne1'ertheless, $e $€re not permitted access tox{r Onal€.
15. At our insistence \\-e did hare an oppoftunir-v' to speak \'\,ith Depu!'Attornel' General ,Iill NagamiDe. During our meeting Ms. Nagaminereftised to veri$ the autheuticit' of the PDF file released b1- the WhiteHouse. As a natter of {act Ms. Nagamine rvou}d not provide us r^'ith anyconfimlation that the document was created b1,the Harvaii Department ofHealth.
16, Ms. Nagamine accused us of trjing to get a \,elificatioq of a birth record$ithont legal authoriB to do so, eren though the docrmeDt has beenoffeled lbr public vielr'r'ia the World Wide Web. She constantiJ evadedaDs\,\-ering e\€n question about the legitimaq'of the document bl hidingbehind State statutes.
17. we also visited the Kapi'olani Hospital, which the document on the WhiteHouse lvebsite identifies as the place o{ Mr Obarna's birth. We haddiscovered as a result of oru enquides that the hospital, at tlle rcler?nttime, had maintaiDed a separate record-keeping system b1.'r,r'hich all birthsat the hospilal \\€re recorded, This document is stored in the hospitalarchives. These archives are accessible to the public by hospital
permission. We asked to see the hospital's birth records for 1961 but wereless than politely rcfused. At no time did Kapi'olani Hospital e,i'er confirmthat Mr Obama was in fact born in the hospital. Nor did thet, confirm thatthey $€re in possession of his birth records,
18, Having regard to the elaborate non-cooperation we received from the Stateof Ha\!aii, and upon close examination of the evidenoe, it is myinvestigatioral opinion, shared by the Sherif, that forgery and fraud havebeen committed in key identig records, including President Obama'slong-form birth ceftificate; his computerized short-form birth abstract; hisSelective Service Registmtion card.
19. The Cold Case Posse has also noted that Mr Obama's first L{ecutive Order,issued on his first full day as Presidentr uras to seal all of his oun pastrecords fiom public scrutiny. Documentation that is not available for MrObama includes not only his odginal birth records but also his baptismrecords, his adoption records, his kindergarten records, his Punalouschool records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia UnivelsiBrecords, his Columbia Univemity thesis, his Harr,-ard Lau. School records,his Hanard Lan' Revier-r' articles, his scholarly articles from the Unh€rsityof Chicago, his passports, his medical records, his files from his years as anIllinois State Senator, and his Illinois State Bar Association records.
20. The then Republican Governor, Linda Lingle, stated during an inten,ie\^otr Nell YorK"s WABC radio il zoo8 that in an attempt to queU the BithCedificate issue she had the Birth Certificate inspected by the state'sdircctor of health, Chiyome Fukino.
21. Lingle is quoted "So I had ml health diredor, \!ho is a phpician bybackground, go personally viera' the birth certificate in the bifth records oftie Department of Hea.lti, and we issued a nervs release at that timesaving that the president I'as, in fact, born at lGpi'olani Hospital inHonolulu, Ha\a.aii. And that's just a fact and yet people cotrtinue to call upand e-mail and want lo make it an issue and I think it's again a horribledistmction for the countr_v by those people u'ho continue this."
22.On October 31, 2oo8, Dr. Chil,ome Fukino released the folio\\'ingstatement: "There have been uumerous requests for Sen. BaEck HusseinObama's official binh ceftificate. State law (Harai'i Revised Statutes€338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons rvhodo not have a tan8ible interest in tie f.ital record. Therefore, I as Directorof Health for the State of Hawai'i, along $ith the Regisbar of VitalStatistics, $'ho has statutory autho ty to oversee and maintain these tlpeof r'ital records, har,e personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i StateDepartmert of Healtl has Serl. Obama's original birth certificate oo record
in accordance with state policies and procedures. No state offlcial,including Governor l,inda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital recordbe handled in a manner different frorn any other Yital record in thepossession ofthe State of Hawai'i."
23.Months later, in,Iuly zoo9, she added another comment: "1, Dr. ChilomeFukino, Director of the Hawaii State Departrnent of Health, hare seen theoriginal r,ital records maintained on filebythe Hal'\aii State Department ofHealth veri!'ing Barack Hussein Obama was bom in Ha}aii and is anatural-bom American. I have nothing further to add to this statement ormy original statement issued in October 2ooS over eight montln ago."
Significantly, Fukino changes the wording from rieuing Sen. Obama's"original birth certificate" to having "seen the original rital recordsmaintained on file by the Ha\,r'aii State Department of Health, r'eriflingBarack Hussein Obama r,!as born in Hawaii and is a aatural-bomAmerican".
24.The Golemor of Han'aii, Mr Neil Abercrombie, has said tlnt he rtasprcsent rvhen Mr. Obama \a?s born. laler, however, he letmcted thatstatement and aci<aorviedged that he did not see Obama's parents withtheir new born son at ary hospital, although he said he remembers seeingobama as a child n'ith his parents at social events. There is no evidence tosuppod that claim. No doctor or nurse $'ho attended his birth has comefon ,iud to say so.
2s.Abercrcmbie told the Honoiulu Star Advertiser he lvas searching rvithinthe Ha\{,aii Department of Healt}r to find definitive vital records thatrvould prove Obama was born in Harvaii, because the continuing eligibilig'controvercy could hurt the prcsident's chances of re-election in 2otz.
26.Abercrombie said the bilth certificate issue uould hare "politicalimplications" for ille presidential election ''that *-e sirrply cannot have. "
2T.Abercrombie did not report to the ner^Bpaper tiat he or the HaraiiDepartment of Health had found Obama's long-form, hospital-generatedbirth certificate. The governor oDly suggested his investigations to datehad identified an r.tnspecified listing or notation of Obama's birth dratsomeone had made in the state archives-
2S.Abercrombie did not say to the newspaper that he or the IlauaiiDepartment of Health had found Obama's long-form, hospital-generatedbirth certificate. Nor did he say to the neuspaper he had personalll,seenany birth record for Obama. Tbe governor onll' suggested hisinvestigations to date had identified an tLnspecified listing or notation ofObama's birth that someooe had made in the state archives.
29.'lt was actually 1^'aitten, I arn told, this is what our iavestigation isshowing, it actually exists in the archives, wdtten dois\" Abercrombiesaid.
3o.Conceivably, the 1.et-undisclosed birth record in the state archives thatAbercrcmbie said had been discov-ered may hal€ come from theglandparents registering Obama's birth, an eveot that lvould automaticallyhave triggered both the newspaper birth aanouncements and availabilityof a Certification of Li\e Bifth, even if no long-form birth certificateexisted.
31. Our iN'estigation has revealed that in 196r, as Hawaiian 1a$, then stood,Obama's grandparents, Stanley and Madel,m Dunham, could lar.fully har'emade an in-person report of a Hawaiian birth even if the infant BaractObamaJr. had been foreign-born.
32.The ne\4'spaper announcements of Mr Obama's birth do not pro\€ he wasborn in Hau'aii, since they could have been triggered by tie grandparcutsregistering the bidh as Hawaiian. Thel might then have paid for theannouncement themselves.
33. However, we hal€ learned that it was not uncommon for local ner'r'spapersto publish birth announcement paid for by individuals reporting the birthin the local paper, e\€n if the child has bom elser,vhere. If so, theregistration of an out-of-countr-v birtb as Hawaiian would have beenreported in the same way as the registration of ar in-coutrt]' birth.Neither of the r**o advertisements states that Obama was born in aparticular hospital. Both give lery limited information.
34.To date the puryorted undisclosed birth record in the state archives thatAbercrombie has clairned to har.e discovered and has described as beiag"actually uritten" has never been nrade public. Being located in the statearchives, this document should be available for inspection by the gereralpublic &ithout restraidt.
35. Frcm Aber$ombie's admission, it is legitimate to infer that this record, ifit indeed exists, $as not iD the possession of the Ha\^aii Department ofHealth, $.hich may have had no record of the in-country birth of MrObama either in hard copy form, such as lont form birth certificate,presen'ed in its l?ult as described b;- Dr. Chilome Fukino. If such adocument had existed, Abererombie rvould have had it \^'itbin minutes ofhis lequest.
36.Mr Obama's long-form birth certificate $'ould have been preserved in ahard-covered bound volume along witb the other long form birthcertificates of that period. 'l his record would have been easily accessible tothe Depafimeni of H€alth upo! the Covernofs request, had it existed.
37. Dr. Chiyome Fukino also gave an intervie$ to CNN otr Aprii 26, 2011, inuhich she stated that she simply werlt i[to the vault and inspededObama's original Birth Ceftificate. Iuferentially, it should have been thateasy for Governor Abercmmbie to locate it as well.
38.This circumstance also suggests that the birth record of Mr Obama wastrot at that time recorded in ttle Department of Health's computerizeddatabase that has been in use since 2oo1.
39.1n March zorz, Sheriff Arpaio held a Press Conference durirg which heand I presented an outlire ofthose aspects of the inr€stigation tiat $ouldnot conpromise the safety of witnesses or the integrity and future couseof the investigation. At that time, we had concluded that there wasprobable cause that tbrgery and fraud had been committed in rcspect offour documents: the long-form or original birth certificate Jor Mr Obama,lr'hich contained multiple errors ald anonalies, many of them serious; theshort-form computer-genel.ated abstract of Mr Obama's btth record thatthe Democratic Party had published in zoo7, u'hich was p nted using aform of words not cunent at the relevant date; the selective-senicedocument for Mr Obama, which contained a tlvo-digit year-stamp conhar,to specifications Mitten by the Department gf Defence to the effect thatthe y'ear of issue should be expressed as four digits on tie stamp, andcontmrl to any other selective-seFice registmtion document that \^€ havebeen able to examine; and we are awEre that the social security number,rvhicb has a prefix tlrat at the date of issue was unique to connecticut eventhough Mr Obama has never rcsided in that State.
40.In an attempt to verify whether Mr Obama and his mother had arrir.ecl inthe United States at or around the aileged date of his birth, \'\€ contactedthe National Archives to obtain micrcfilms of the I-94 immigrationlandilg records for the I'ear 196r. All such records lvere and are arailabiefor the entile year 1961, except for those on iie alleged date of Mr Obama'sbirth (August 4), three dals before that date, and thrce dat's after thatdate. The Archivist and his staff did not tell us how the missing recordshad come to b€ lost, and offered no hope tiat they rvould ever come tolight.
41. After three months of further investigation, the Sheliff held a second prcssconference to announce, with nly support, tiat it was no longer a questionof probable cause: it uas no\{ certain that the document on the White
House website r.vas a forgery. The Sheriff also announced that theinvestigation would continue: and it has continued ever since.
42.The purpose of holding press conferences was and is to noti!' the publicthat ao investigation is in progress, with the aim of obtaining additionalinformation that might be helpful to the in€stigato$ in reaching thetruth. As a result of both press conferences, additional material of thiskind became arailable to us.
43.Our investigation concludes that P.esident Obama's long-form birthcertificate is a computer-generated document; that it was manufacturedpiecemeal and electronically; and tiat it did not originate as a cop,v of atrue paper record from a bound volume, as claimed by the white Houseand by the Governor of Halreii and by the director of tle IlealthDepartment, cited in a press release issued April 2Z 2orr, bythe Go1€morto coincide r{ith the publication of the document on the White Housewebsite.
44. Most importantl!, tie "registmr's stamp" iD the computer-generateddocument released by the white House and posted on the White House\'\'ebsite may have been imported from another unknour: sourcedocument. The fact that tie stamp cannot har€ beeu placed on thedocument pursuant to state and federal laws is one of many indicationsthat the document is a forgery and, therefore, tiat it cannot be relied uponas verification, legal or othelwise, of the date, piace or circumstances of MrObama's bifth.
45. The Registrar's date-stamp exhibited a similar grave anomaly, allowing itto be moved about electronically u'ithin the document - which wou'ld havebeen impossible ifthe document r'\"re tfle scanned ard certified cop,v thatofhcial statements profess it to be. The Registrais signature-stamp anddate-stamp vrer.e computer-generated inages tiat 1'r'ere imported into thedocurnent. Thel' l$ere not electronic images of actual rubber-stampimprints inked by hand or machine on to a papet documetrt, Accordingly,the document on the white House wetrsite is, at a minimum, misleading tothe public in that it ha.s no legal import and cannot be relied upon as alegal document carrying the full faith and credit of the State of Ha$?ii andveriling tie date, place and other circumstances of Mr Obama's birth. Aphotograph ofthe Registmr's date-stamp is exhibited and marked "M22".
46.These and numerous other e$ors and anomalies obsened after extensiveforensic scrutiny of the electrcnic irnage downloaded from the rt!'hite
House \,vebsite were inconsistent $'ith features to be erpected h-hen apape! document is placed on the glass plate of a scanner so that it can becaptured as an electro-photographic image, or whel it is scanned and then
8
processd either to enharce the clariry- of the image b]' optical chalacterrccognitiou or to reduce file-size by file-compression or oPtimization,
47. Furthering the investigation, I returned to Har ?ii for a second time. I metMr Duncar Sunahal?, t}le brother of Virginia Sunahara, an infant born inHa\ aii on August 4, 1961, the alleged date of Mr Obama's birth there. MsSunahara died the foilowing day, August 5, after breathing difiiculties.when I met Ml Sunahara he had recently applied to the Departmert ofHealth in Ha\a"ii for a copy of his deceased sister's bith certificate. Hetold me the Department had gone to $eat lengths to deny him a copy ofthe origiml long-form birth certificate that a close relative is entitled bylaw to request and the Department is obliged by lau' to supply. The ColdCase Posse is compelled to consider the question why this litde girl's 1961
long-form birth certificate \azs so disconcerting to the Hawaii Depatmentof Health that it did not wish to issue a copy to Mr Sunalam upon request
48.I obtained from Mr Sunahara a copl' of proceedings in the Circuit Court ofthe First Circuit, State of Haw?ii, iB which the Depuq Attornel' General,Ms Nagamine, appeared before Judge Rhonda Nishimura on March 8,2012, to argue that Mr Sunaham i\as Dot entided under Hau'aiian statutela\a'to see, still less obtain, a certified copy of his deceased sister's original1961 lory-form birth certifi cate.
49. During the prcceedings, the Attorney General implied that Mr Sroahara'srequest arose flom an underb'iDg interest in obtaining evidencc that mightassist iD determiring whether the document on the White House websiteis indeed a forgery- Ms Nagamine said Mr Sunahara ought to be satisfiedwith a short-form extmct of the birth record rather than a long-formprinted image of the original copy in the bound volume for 196r in the\,?ults ofthe Health Department.
so.Ms Nagamine also said that the entirc vohime of birth certificatesinferentially coDtaining not only Ms Sunahara's lon6-form original birthcertificate but also those of mins bom at about the same date had beenrcmoved to a special, secure location rdth very iimited access. I do Dotknow u'hat purpose the Depa.rtment of Health had in presening theserecords at all, unless it rl'as to sho$, them upon request to family membersand otherc - such as law enforcement - $ith a legitimate and statutor"vinterest in seeing the documents.
Er. Ms Nagamine said that accessing the original birth records nas difficuital1d expensive. Holrcver, in Dr. Chiyome Fukino's intervieg'with CNN shestated ttrat she simpl]' \a€nt into the vault and inspected Obama's originalBirth Ceftificate. I arn told by Mr Sunahara that he u'as tilling to pay anyreasonable fee to coi-el the cost. Our inr-estigation indicates that the
9
Health Department's fee is not great attorneys for Obama had paid grofor a certified copy and g4 for a second certified cop}. Inferentiallr,. suchsmall fees are an indication that the difficulty of consulting the aichiresand genemting certified copies is not great. And I hare come across fuftherevidence that the diiiculty of consulting the records is not very great: forthey are normally kept in bound volumes on specially-designed streh,esloown to librarians as "stacks", A picture of Mr Onala pr ling out a bookof birth records from 1972, just ni;e years after the year that is of interestto our investigation, sho$'s how small the difnculqv in consulting therecords is likely to be. 'l'he pbotograph is marked ,'MZr,,, annexed andsiSned as rclati\€ hereto.
52.The reason ufiy la.u.-enforcement investigators u,ish to examine theoriginal long-form birth cetificate of I{s Sunahara relates to the practiceof the Health Departmelt to number each birth certificate sequeatiallyu4th the last t\lo digits of the lear follo$ed by a five-digit numberincremented sequentially by a date-stamp that advanc€d the counter by 1after every stamping. At that time, approximately 48 births occurred even,day in Tlawaii. and were required to 6e registered. They \\.ere sequentjsllystamped in order ofdate ofbirth.
53, Photostat images of the long-form original birth certificates of hr.indaughterc bom to Eleanor Nordyke at Kapi'olani Hospital August 5, 1961,one day after the alleg€d bifth of Mr Obama at the same hospital, har-ebeen dm\a'n to the Cold Case posse's attention. They had been p;blished inthe Honolulu Advertiser, As a result of examiuing these images, the ColdCase Posse has reason to suspect that the sequential number on thecomputer-genented short-form abstract that the Health Departmentreleased to the family is lot the same as that rdich appears on ihe long-form original birth certificate that was issued for Ms Sunahara.
54. Examinatio[ of the birth ertificates issued to the parcnts of the Nordyketwins -show-s that their registration numbers,, 61/10637 ancl ro63g,preceded tlre number on Mr Obama's short-form and long-foimcertificates, q'hich is sholra as 6Llto64t, e\€n though he was bom a dayearlier than they r.rere. Ms Sunahara u"as born August 4, r96t, and het.certificate was stamped by the Hawaii registmr August 8, but her numberwas no8o. The table summadzes tfie position:
Name ofchild Date and time born Registered Certificate #Barack Obama
Virginia SunaharaSusan Nordl'ke
Gretchen Nordvte
AnZ 4 al T24 pmAug 4 at 9:16 pmAug 5 at 2:P pmAug S at 2:17 pm
Aug 8Aug 10
Aug 11
Aug 11
10641.
1108O
ro6371o638
l0
SS. Mr Obama's birdl cedificate was registered August 8, 1961. The Nordyketlvins' birth certificate was registered August 11, 1961. Even if thesequential nurnbedng had follor,"ed the date of redstration mther tJran thedate of bidh, IVlr Obama's cedificate should have been automaticallyassigned a number lower, not higher, than the numbers allocated to thecertificates of the Nordyke hvins. Ald the Dumber currently assigned toMs Sunahara is entirely out of scquence.
56.One possible explanation for the out-of-sequence serial numbers mighthave been that several serialized piles of birth certificates n€re registeredat different hospitais. Holr'rer'er, Ms Verna K. Lee, an ofiicial respolsiblefor the recording of bifths in Honolulu in 1961, $'hen inten iebed b)' arepoter for $ nd.com, said that this $?s not the case. Ms Lee rlas the localregistrar u'ho apparently signed the documeni on the White House \^'ebsite
{it is possible that the forgers lifted her sigr'lature from anotier bidhceRificate and inserted it electronically into the computerized compilationthat is nou'on the white House \ '€bsite).
57. Ms, l€e irEs surpdsed that the numbels \,\ere out of sequence. Ms. Leemade recorded statements to a wND reporter during a phone intenierv. Ihave persolally listened to those record.ings. On the recordedconversation Ms. l,ee said that all of lhe birth certificates received in a
month $er€ ordeled chl:nologically by date and time of birth andrumbered sequentially at the end of each month. The only exception - notrelevant in the present case - 14as that binh certificates received from theislands and tiom one local out-station iir Oahuu€re grouped separately, soas not to under-represenl births outside Honolulu or unattended birlhsoccuffing at home in the 50% statistical samples b1'u'hich only evet-numbered births w'erc reported to the Federal Gor€mment as mandatedb1 r he U.S. oflir e of \ iral Statistics.
SB. Ms Lee has said that birth ceftificates ftom the hospitals ir Oaht $.ete sentdirecily to the centrzrl office of the Depa ment of llealth in Honolulu. Thebi.th cedificates rvere all numbered at the end of each monih by oneperson. lvhen Ms Lee ras asked whether there might have been mistakesiil numbering Lhe birth certificates, she insisted that they were numbetedcouectly and in sequence. The long-form o ginal certificates $ereinspected trvice for accuacy by t\i/o difierent clerks and then signed by theregistrar. The]'\rere kept together secured in a certain room until theyrere all numbered at the end of the mooth. They were not allowed tobecome out of order and they $'ere not numbered incorrectly. (lt should benoted that the Nord]*e t\4'ins werc born minutes apart and their respectivecertificate numbering uas based not only on date but on tinte as *ell. Thisindicates the clerk scrutinized the documents pr-iot to placing them inchronological order for proper numbering.) Based on Ms l€e'srepresentation, I consider it highly unlikely that a birth certificate so far
l1
out of sequence as that \\,hich norv appears on Ms Sunahara's sholt-formbirth abstract could have been accepted at a registrur's of{ice managed byVema K l€e.
59.1t is also possible tlat i$,estigatorc are being misled into de!'otillgattentioD to the number on Ms Sunahara's odginal long-fom bidhcertificate, which may after all turn out to be different from that of MrObama and identical to that which appearc on her short-fom comput€rabstract. For that reason among otheE, inl€stigators would like to inspectand, in due course, forensicaily to examine the lolumes of long'formcertificates for' 1961, and specifically the long-form original birthceftificates for Mr Obama, for Ms Sunahara, and for the Nord)&e t$'ids.
60.A possibility that the investigators are constrained to bear in mind, giventhe lumercus other defects iE the document on tie White House website,is that the number on that document is Dot a genuine registation numberassigned to his birth certificate in 1961, but $as issued M'hen tie short-fonn document uas generated dur:ing the 2oo8 presidential campaign. ltis possible that the Health Department does not rlant the public to see theoriginal 196l birth r€cords because forensic examination might establisitthat the forgerc had made a mistake in assigning to the forged long-formdocument on the White House v-ebsite a number that \r'as out of sequenceand that may (or mal' not) be identical with the number on the long-formoriginal bidb certificate of Ms Sunahara. This is one reason $'hy thein!€stigatom have asked to see the original bound lolumes from thestaclG.
6r. I am additionalll concerned tlat tfie Ha$aii Department of Health has notoffered any testimotry that the modern computedzed data now used togenemte the short-form abstracts have been sa{eguarded from nurnericalor other data manipulation, Ail that the Attomey General of Hawaiioffered to the Maricopa Counq Sheriffs Office as proof that Mr Obamawas born in l{awaii uas a computer-generated list of birth rcgistutionsthat was contained in a ring-binder. Pages could easily be removed, added,or removed, altered and reinserted at .l .ill. There rvas no ler'rl of securityother than closing the rings ofthe binder holding the pages together,
62.The investigato$ have obtained an affidarit from an individual $'ho wentto the Department of Health h'hen some of the first questions r!€re b€ingraised about Mr Obama's birth certificate. That individual states that lr'heuhe first went to the main office of the Halvaii Department of Health inIlonolulu, Mr Obama's name did not appear in the computerizedregistmtion list irt the ring binder, but u,hel he went back approximatel]14 days later to re-examine tie same list he \1,as surprised to see that MrObaura's name now appeaed on it.
t2
63. Notwithstanding this afiidar,it, it is plausible that an original birth recordfor Mr Obama exists in Harvaii. Our investigation has discovered that atttrat time Haraiian law contained a specific provision that permitted aHawaiian parelt of a child born anlwhere in the wrcrld or any adultpurporting to represent that parent, the fight to register the child asHanaiian-born. It is for this reason that two e ries in the "Btths" coiumnof the local ne\{spape$ at the time do not constitute evidence that MrObama lvas born in Ha$'aii. 'l'hey are merely evidence suggesting that abirth certificate was issued for him in Harr.aii, and they tell us nothingabout whether or not he wa$ born there. In particular they do not - as theWhite House document purports to do identii/ the hospital of birth.
64.If Mr Obama had not in fact been bortr in l-Iawaii, the long-form originalbirth certificate rould not have stated that he had been born in apalticular hospital at a particular time, and would not have borne thesignatures of the attending physician and registrar. The ner,\spaper entrieslr.ould have been identical whether he had been born in Hawaii orelservhele iu the world; but the birth records rvould not have beenidentical-
65. The existence of this law permitting out-of-counhl births to be registeredas though they were Haraiian births is a further reason why the Sherifiu'ishes his forensic investgators to be gi\€n access to the original boundvolumes of birth certificates for 196r, and to be pemitted to carry outforensic scrutiny o{ the volumes and of certain individual certificates,including that of Mr Obama.
66.For these reasons, it is necessalv fol tie inl'estigators to bear in mind thepossibility that the intention of the Ha\aaii Department of Health inrefusing to allou' Mr Sunahan to have a certified copy of the originai bifihcertificate ofhis deceased sister is to conceal forgery and fraud tithin theDepadment itself.
67. The Cold Case Posse's lalv-enforcement inl'estigation into Mr Obama'sbirth certificate continueq taking account of the additional informationobtained both as a result ofthe Cold Case Posse's own enquiries and as aresult oI assistance from the public following the publication of some ofor.rr results by the Sheriff at the March and July:orz press conferences.
68.The law-enforcement inestigatioo by and on behalf o{ t}re Sheriff ofMaricopa County, Arizona, nould be greatly assisted, and could bebrought swi{lly, inexpensivd, and decisively to an end, ifthe Departhentof Health and the matragement of the Kapi'olani Hospital n€re willing toallo$' court-recognized forensic experts selected by the Shedff of MaricopaCounqy to inspect aIId forensically examine the volumes of long-form
l3
origind birth certificates for 196r and the birth records kept by theKapiolaui Hospital for that yea!. It should be noted tbat forensic erpertsare tEined il1 the malagement a.nd presewation of paper records, andwould cause lo damage to the records iB the course of their forensicexamination.
Executed ltris day of
irl Maricopa County, Arizona.
2012,
Swom to and subscribed before me
this
JAME$ C JACKSON
Comm. E4ift Jun 3 Z0t5
9,- a"y tf x.-l
t4
MZI
This is the photograph of Mr onaka wilhdEwirrg a bound volune of long'fofln original birh cenificaleslor 1972 riom the shcks at dre Depanment of ll€altb in Hasaii- rcfcned to in my
^tfida\it in Sndhata '.,Il.n'dr: The sourc€ ofthe photograph is an irteNiew ol Rasa Foumier with M. Onaka, enlilled (?.rird
the Reco t Straight, published at midweek.com. Novenbe. I 6. 20 I L
': i
t5
MZ2
t: .i
/./ -7 -.<
This is dle image, refered to tu my atidavit in Smar'la r ti.,an. ofthc "long-foln birth certificate' fortvlr Obama, witl the regismls signarure-stanrp and, separately. rh€ legislmr's dal€-stamp mov.d &omlheir o.iginal locaiions on the 'te.tificale", l+hich are indicaled by whire ghost imag€s towards the foot oftlte green recurity pap€r on io which the fabricared documenr had bccn elec!rcnically superimpos€d. Thatthe rcgist.ar's date stamp and tie r€gist ar's tcxthignatu.e stamp were both d€ated by links to extemalobjeds imponed inlo the Obama bi.ih cedifica(e ias aho confinned by tuming on the "Links' oplion inthe "Window" m€nu in ldobe llluslator.lhe ins€l inage at top right is $e ljsl ofiinks that appears whenthat oprion is activated. Evidence thar the rwo reg;stmr sramps ar€ cxrcmal obi€cls imported inlo tle Obama''binh documcnr" can b. se€n in rhat d!€ rcgisrar's date stamp and text^ignatur€ stamp can easiiy andsepamiely be electronically uoved. rorated a! *ill. turned sideways or even upsjde-down. and repositionedanywhere on rh€ document. None ofseveral hundred software suiGs designed for the automaled optical-chancter.ecognition. i'nage cnhanc€ment. file compression. or optimization olan electro-photographicim.g€ of& o.iginal paper docum.nr that $erc studicd ed tesred by expen consuliants to the invertigarivetead lts capable ol proccssing rhe electmnic data reprcsenting the image b such a maMer as to slore thedata representing either of the two stamps on a single "lay€f' so as lo allow lhe sramps to be moved aboutarwill.
16
Date
R[SELI-ER5OI:
YNDE FOBMAI SCANNEFTS
ciEaKScAi!.iEFs] EAS|DOOCIMENI LMACINC SOI IW^FE
TItEREPostroRYrMARcttrvE INDEX SYsrEMs, INC.
P.O.60xrtrll:t€:LLEVUE. WASHINGTON 93015
i42s) 643 1131t F Ax l24A) 38a 7297F.r resoonse lo thls lettei
wEB P,rCtSww.a.chiveindex com
ww whoiesalech€.kscanners com
May 10, 2()11
Affidavit
l, I)ouglas B. Vogt. anl oYer I 8 year s old, do not suller 6 om alry mcntal impairnrent, have personal
knowledge in the lollowjng and atlest undcr penally ofperjury that I have knowledge and expertisein documents, inraging, scarurers ard docunlent imaging progl?ms. Based on my kr]owledge andexpcrtise the 1bllowjng is 1r'ue arld conect
I have a unique backgrouud lor analyzing this doclrmenr. I o*,ned a l)?eseti;ng company tbr 11
years so I know typ€ and ionrr design vcry well. I cunently own Archive index Systems since 1993,
which sells all types of docunlerL scanDers worldivide and also devcloped document imagingsoliwarc (IheRepository). i know how the scanners work. I have also soid other document irnagingprogra[rs, such as Laser Fiche, Libe.!y ard Alchemy. I have sold and insialied document imagingsyslems ir1 cily and courlty govertunents! so I k[ow their plocedures with ir]1aging systelns and
cver)1hing aboui the design ol sucb pmgranrs. Tlris will be impodant in undcrstanding \,"hai has
happened $jrh Obama's Ceflificate ol LiYe Birlh.
Flgurc 1 Tiii image ol lhe Obama s Ceiliiicale ot LiveBlrih daled Algust 8, 1961, presented on TV 4/2712011
Whol I Dircovered obout OboroS Certificdte of Live Bidh dnd whv rt ito Forqery'
What the Obama administraiion released is a PDF inage that they a]e trying to Fass ofi as a
Certificate l-ivc Bilth Long F'olnl plinted on green security paper by the County llealth Depanment-
lh( lo|r' i. d crc"tea lorS, ry lor lhe fol'o$ing easons
l. Curved and no -curvcd type. lhe irlage rve are looking at *as scanncd in grayscalc and somepal1 in binar] which cannot be on the sarDe inrage. The reason I knolv this is becausc of iheshadorving along the guucr (left+and sidc). It also nearrs that the count],eFployees who did tireoiginal scanning of all thc lbnrls. did not take the individual pages out oI-die posi birdets. The
result is that alL the pages in that book display a pzrailax distorted image ol the lines alld t}.pe. Theycu&c and drop down to thc lei1. ii you look at Iirre 2 (Figure 3) on lhe fbmr that sals .9e1- you willnotice the lcttcrs drop do\{r one pixel but the typed word i,ldle does not. AIso notice the line justbclo'w rtLrle drops down 3 pixcjs.
The second incident ofthis parallax prnblcm is scen in line 6c Nonc of HosPilal at lllslitttliotl(figure 4)- 'Ih€ wotd
^irrn, drops do\an 2 pixels, but ihe typed hospitai name, Kupidani, does not
drop down a1 all. And again ihe linc Just below drops dorvn 2 pixels, but nol lhc name Lali.)Lrri
m-Tirmc of Horpltd
KaniolsntI
rual Etrl CNCC O:
$Gx
I{e'L
! igLrrc 4. Line 6c ai 5007o. fhe ty pewriier name of the hospital does not drop down 2 p ixels
The conclusion you musi come {o is thal the lyped in forn was superimposed over txislingoriginal Ccnificate of l-ive Birth form liorn the county. In facl, silce I lound some ol the form
hcaclings scanncd in as binary and gralscaie. $e fonn ilself is a conposite but &e person who
creareJit clid not flaltened the inage of the blatk lotm and save it as one file belore they started
piacing the typewilel text on the composile form. lhe individuaL(s) who Perpellaled fiis forgery
could not evidcnlly find a blank tbrm h ihe clcrks iinaging database, so they were lorccd to clcan up
exisling foms and overiay lhe typewriler type we see herc' The folger was also iooking force(ifi;es with the concct slattped dates and thal is why I lhink thcy used note than ol]e odginal
foml- At fi$1 I \.vondcled why the forger didn'l just lypesei thc enlire lorm lrom scratch and overlay
the type and no1 have to wotay about lhe parallax problem Then I rcmeffbered thal i!] tlle early
1960s there \ves no photo0,pcselling and this ibrm was set in hot nretal tiom a iirlol)pc nrachinc.Ihc tlpe tlesign is linrcs Rorran but they cou/d nercr repljlalc Lhe exac! dcsign.-ihcy \\,crc srrckhaving to use existing forns thal lvere scar)r)cd ;n usirrg binary and gtayscalc.
2.'l'here is a rvhite haloing around all thl' tl'pe on the form. Figure 5 is an examplc ofthis. lhiseflect should nol appear on a scanncd grayscal., ilnagc. Figurc 6 is a graysc^lc iillagc scanncd in a1
240 dpi. Yor \uill |otice tbat thcrc is qo haloing cllect arorilrd thc lyne and also the sccurity patlenris seen lhroudr the typc. Figure 7 is a color itlage \r4tcre you can clearly see the secu ty green colorlhrough lhe type ancl no haloing. Figurc 8 shows a Black and 'i/hile (binary) image ofrhc samc typc.lhc i]nfor1anl thing to renlelnbcr is that yotr can ol ha\'e gralscale and binarv on lhe sane scanLrnlcss 1he image is n conlpositc. llul nleuns that dill-crent colnponents ofthc \\,bolc imagc are nrrdcuo of srrl:rllcr par(s. Figurc 9 is tLn erlargcd version ol Figurc 6 sho*iDg what grayscale letlcrsshoukl look like conrpaled to birrary.
N!n. (TrF or prllr)
BA .ACK
lri! rtl e 5 Ohrma-s lbrni l:igurc 6. ( ir:r\'-scale
:- .li.l'i] ir: ''/,1;i:,. , ,', .- lr,-lilr]!:': -11 r. \/;. i:t'i llt i. : | .:iir jl_11, (:
|islre 7. ('ohr imagc.
!!gr!oi!9llgr:!!!!i!
SECURITY PACIIVentura & S€pulvel15165 Venlura Bc!Sherman Oirfts. Ca
-;. t i!.: Oi).ima acr iilicaig is ir,n.lcd iliiir bo{h binlry :l d grayscale icttcr. \ti,;.L is.iuii nrioli,ersnroking gur that lhis ibrm is a lcrrgcry. l( appears thc lincs and sone of thc boxcs \!crc scanncdLrsirg grar';calc, brl url)' sofie ol1ir. lorni hcadirgs *cle grayscule urrd sonreljn1cs il is olly sornc
lcllcrs- figure l0 and figure 4 gi\c one cxanlple. You \\ill roiicc that tire 1/and. .r/, in Hosp;141, lirrInstitulion. /11-and again the /, and 1Jn hospital werc gra)scale images, but lhe rcsr ofthe linc isbirury ]'hc lypewrilor line belolv \a'as scanncd nr as !l binarl inr0gc. I can.rlso tell yotr lor certaintythat the lbnn ryFc \\'as scann€d in al a lowcr'rcsolulion (:200 dpi). lhisisbccauseofrhcsizeofthcpixlls on the lcttcrs !\'ere such ll)at rhe opcnings on rhc.r arrd r on the l_irst linc a.c not visiDic and
tl lled in.
fiAFiiE-or tn-tion fif ;ot-In Eofftrnl-t
rlenl l{aternity & ftmecolrigure l0 showing tl Drixlurc ofgrayscalc and binary L),pe on thc sdme lir)c.
Anothcl example is lorurd in frtrm box la.gia)scalc iurage ard thc resr is hirrary (Irigutcand thc rest \vas nol Lnrtilit was added.
his nanre B,IRll(l^ For sonre reason the "R" is aI l). l hal nrearls the 'R" \\'as originally on lhc 1o!tl
I igure I i. Aaother eranrple ol gralscaic a d binar),olt the santc lille.
;\nolher cxample is lhe Ce iiicale Dunrber ilscll (Figure I2). Thc last "l'- on lhc lomr is agl'al'scalc inragc hut lhc resi oi thc rrnnbcrs irre nor. 'l his is.iusl rnolher cxamplc ol it cut and past
AFTIAENT OF HEALT6t to6*flIrigure 12. lhe lasl'l 'is gm)'scalo- but thc rest are binary.
.1. The Sequrntial Nunber is a fraud. I n'ould ]ike you ro lcfcr back to l'igLrrcs I and 2. You willDotice that Barack Obanra was slrpposed lo havc becn bor-n on Friday at 7j24 p.nr. August 4, l96land the local regislrar acceplcd it on lircsday Augusl 8, 196l and hal)d slanrped Lhe Celljficatcnumber "61 10641." Ih.n nolics that thc otiler Ccrriiicale of Susan E. Nordyke sas borlr on
Saturday nt 2:12 p.n1. AugUSl 5, 196l and anothcr rcgistr'ar dale slamped it on August t I, but her('erlificate nurnber is "6l 10617 " Keep in nrind drere $,ould bc only o c batcs slamp Ndchjnc in theolficc so ll1c nlrmbcrs \louid all b€ Lrrique. I here canDol bc any duplicales so cvery Ce ificale hds a
unique .ellnl nunher. OhaDa s Ceflific tc would have rnost likely beel nrailcd on thc follo*ing\1,,,.J.'i.il(:".r'r! r.rri,r.i i-,1 1i,JiiLiLl.(,dr)rlrclr'.SLr\d,)i',,,"11.c.C.,ti'i;attlo"Lslikcii\\as rnailed sonretimc carlier that rveek unrl nor Jcc(flc(i unlil the I llr'hut shc hils a (lerlilicalc 4nunrbc$ lcss than Obanra s- It is inrpossrblc to ha\,e Obrnra's Cer1ificrle numbcr to be ibur rumbcrshigber rha a Certilisate rhat can)c in 3 davs laler.
l'he lacts I havc shown 1'ou in #3 al1J ii lcll nrc sclelirl li)irgs aboLrl hou'Ibis fbrgery u'as
asscnblcd. l. Sorrc person(s) jn the Hcallh Depa(mcn!, who had access 1o Lhe docun)ent irr)3tsingprogram, search the database lbr' someonc close 10 lhe actual binh date ol Obama and foLrrrd
someone near the 4rr' ol- August. They nra) ha\,c crossed refercnced thc dcalh daldbase 1o findsomeore \!ho had died and had a bifth dale close to Obanra's. If you renlen1ber, lhe Federal
Covernnren! u,anted lhe Stales lo cross relerencc the biflh and dcath dalabascs so thc database wouldhu\.e iliai irformation.2. ihedalc stamps have lwo difi'erent colors and sizes (see #5 belos) whichindicates thal bolh dalcs came lionr differenl Cerlilicatcs. f. More Ihan onc pcrcon is involvcd in thc
llawaii Departnlent of l-lealth 10 assemble lhe clilfercnt componcnts that were used, do thc dalabase
searches 1() llnd the right Cerlilicalcs 10 crcallr Presidcnl Obaura-s liaudulent Ceiilicale of l,jveBi|th ancl firTalty sign thc haudulcDt certiilcale I bclieve that alicr all the con)poneols rverc
xssenbled they \lcrc thcn givcn lo a graphic ar'tist to aclually assenrbie lhe wlole rhllg and crearethc iinishcd li)rgcry. In short rhjs wls a conspilacy to dctiaud rhe Ljnilcd Slatcs.
5. T\io (lifirrent colors and {ont sizes in Forlh box 22 and 20 D te,4cccptcl hj Rcg. Ce ctut.what is'ery rcrcaling aboul rhi:i box ilnd date cDtry is therc rc l.no differcnt colors on both lines.Bolh lincs \!cre scaoncd using binary m,,rJe. trLrr I rec trro drltcrcrrr cL,lrrrs lFrgurc li). What I thinkrlis is shortirg us is lhat thc person who pLrL this iraud logethcr was looking ao'a fum.r that had tlrcright datc nanrcl) "August 8 i9 l." As ),ou can see thc only (hings ftar arc prinled in dark green(l{-.71. (i=92, B=7:l) ar! "Dare A'arrd "AL'C -8 6 "fhe rest ofti.tc type is in black. lIisrcilsnrelha1tIreli\r8ll\asrvor.Lingirrcolor.nxxlc'@+.
f o+Ee{-tf iln-+he-.*{d}q}*r,e+il++t+Fltil+k-is--H$f j*eB@bee" t rted bl rl1t{€i jt+,€tHeee5:a}rd si-€fl tlreloft1-:it-t€'i+i+iifle.
tur r! Ihat nrarr]rufe*lceriJe?q1"?a11fElre{l+1Mi'effrlinrpr-
29,.
iri{urc i I TNo diliercnl colors. darl grecn and black.
The same lhlng is lbLrnd in form bo\ 20 "I)ate Accepled by Local Reg." FigLr|e 14 again shou,srhal lhc drtc has 1wo ditlcrcn{ colors. I bc 'AtJ(; -tt I96 - is irr da,l{ grcen (R-.{t7, (;-l I i. I}=87) andllrc' l ' ir in blnck Yct a!ir!ir) another irrclirrabtc prool rh;sli nis a tbrgcrJ. t,olm box I7a clisplaysthc sanrc l1vo color inrage in thc rvori "None'-. thc "Non" is in ciark grcen.
lO, Ilrte Acccptcd by t+d Hcg,
Il:igulc I4. Ar;othcr cramplc ol t\!o colors on ilrc sanrc linc
6. Muitiple lsycr-s ilr the Pl)F filo tr,]m the White ltous€. I am no! thc fitst one to flnd this factan(l they deseNe thc c|cdit 1o| discovering it. What they discovcrcd is lhat whcn you of'en up thcPt)li liic in Adobc Iilustralor.rnd you luirr on lay.fs. you see a long list ol nine diliercnt tayers thatconespo d 1() diflL'reDr sccrn)ns l)1 rhc tb'nr, includine rhc signalurcs on thc fbnn. ldiscovered usingiusl ln)' Adobe Acrobxt 8 Siandarci thal I could also sco thc diJfercr)t componcnls disall)car lvhen I
cnlargcd lhc inlagc 11).iusl 40{)o1o and uscd Ihe "hand" k)ol to quicl:ly movc around *rFimali. WhtnI nrovcd thc irnngc l'asl, lhe !:rrious lypc (o rponL' rs \\ould Llisapncrr firrn rhe llmr but thc linessril}ed.jusl as I had concludcd.
A Rebutloltoine Di,<overy ofth€ Multi LoyeB Found n the PDF F&.'rhc only rcbutlal 10 lhc Dinc laycN discovcrcd in lhc PBF filc relcuscd by the White,li(nrse u'as a
Ll-tfl.rfl,1 ,ioI).r r'rn.r,lir' g',rpl-ir rrri.rs frorr. QL,cr'cr bllhr namc,'iJcaa4ldtidc lre,nblal orrApril 29. lt ryas rcporlcd b1, l:ox N$vs an on thcir web site ati
LIc trics b cxcuse ihc lnulli-laycrs as mcrcly an afiilact ol an OCR (Optical Chal?ctelIiecognition) enginc and lL1en sarcd ds a PDF. lhere arc 1wo ntajor reason Le is wrorg and I knowflonr his statenrent he kllows DolbinB about OCR engines and how thcy work aid thcir c shucture.Fircl oI ali lhc Oiranla l'l)l: cedilicate was supposed lo havc corte dllectly trc111 the HealiilDeparlnents otlicc. As stated belir!, llie records they havc \\,ould have absolutely no reason to beOCRcd ard il they were :rskecl to give the customei a PDf inragc ir would be lrom fieir cxisting'flFF irlage stored in Lheir docuncnt imaging plogl-anl on the serlrer. The program wor.rld havc doneno OCR processing at lhat t!nle-
N4y qualillcalions on OCR p.ogralns are considerable. Our own document imagrng pruglanl,'fheRel)ository, has an OCR option Aom Expervision thal is celled lypcRcader. Wc i le$ated'l'ypcReadcr into our program but ro do this we bad Io sign a non-d;sclosure statcnrent wilh lheln aDdthcn we goi lhcir Took Kit arrd APL When an OCR program saves a filc as a scarchablc PDl., thellle-corlains three lnain tilcs rvithin it. fhe first file is an image file, Lrsually a conrpressed Group4'lll.F. Thc sccond filc is a ASCII lext file aud the last filc is a malir file thet contains the X and Ycoordinates ol all lhc $,o|ds in the docunreDt. lhe Stalting pojnt 1br rhe image llle and the lnallix t'ilcis usually lhe upper righi left l1and comcr of rhe imagc tlteasured in pixels. 'l he tesl llle and m^trixllles worLlct ne\/er be scen as separate iryers and thctc is cettainly no oine laye6. The threc lileswould bc in a PD|'wrapper'- ard that's all. All OCR plog|ams r-vo|k on the same prjnciple.
Thc Celrificate o1'Live Bitlh Obanra ptesentod on television on Aril 27, 201 1 is a forgery.
l. \iu.L5.\\hcr,o r. n,1cr.o,- ni- lr.rrJ :,no .e, . _) -
t^rrrrc or ro,,.:24(1t{A :>. M€Bl^,Zbbe
r. -.4CXM.i 5-,-D!ad€a.ia6t - , a Norary Public of Kins County and thc State rl1'
Washinglon afbresaid, hereby ce(ify that Douglos B. VogL pcrsonally kno$'n 1lr me 1() be thc alliariin the loregoiDg alfidavil, personally appeared before ffe lhis day and having becn by nre dulys\iorn deposcs a d say that dle lact3 sei ibrth in lbc above affidavit a|e truc {rnd cLlirecl.
$'itncss mv hanrl and c'i'ficial seal this the 1OLr' diiy
My connission Expiru' $ tJ- no ll
@WkDouglas ll. Vogt
EXHIBIT 3
Presentation & Report by Paul lrey - Typography ancl Type Face Expert. Copy Courtesy of: protectourliberty.org
?-
I
The American TS4leurritenHow a Young Computer Graphics Person Could Not Understand How
to Use a Computer to tr'orge a Typewritten Document.It s been some 50 years since we have used tJrpe-
wdters to produce docrments. Computers have replaced the tJrpewdter slld €liven us gtes"t advaJ]-
ta€es in document prepsration. There is no need tounderst€rd the old tjrpew?iter. Except when youneed to lorge a tJapewritten docmoni.
A computer in the haDds of a youJulll€rson who
ca,D crea,t a modern forgery rs no match for the oldstyle quiikf mechanica,l tj|rEvudter. The forger whoproduced the Obaroa Hawajja,n Lon€| Iorm Hea,ltir
Depari rent Birth Ceriilicate may have tho!€htthat all tJrpesvriter tJ/peface styles wer€ alike. Toget his letters he should have asstumed tirat heneoded only to m€,tch tjrllewrilten lett€rs lomd inthe old illes of Hawaii brlth certiflcat€s to scai] ...copy a,r1d paste into his new docunent. Those o1d
fi les should be a.11 a,iike haurlg been used to producet'irth certilicat€s in i,h6 1 96 I era.
He must have und€rstood that he needed tocopy the old iype\,'dter styles a.[d would lindthem in the files_
But underst€,nding scanners -.- he also had tokrow that scanjring a letter "t" one time aind
using it a.ll over his docu'metlt wou.Id be co]al/ic-tion assured. Because sca.n lines enga€le alett€r differenuy every tille it's done. go hescanned a bunch of old bdrth cerEncates andused a diflerent "t" each time.
The mistake was that ma.Dy of the letters iDthe old fi1es were from differelt typewTiterstyles aDd that's something he did Dotrealize.-.resulti[g in maE-y type\,rfitten letters on hisforgery that did not match each other'.
I hope this helps to exptain what might havehappened with thjs documeDt.
Paul Ir€y
Pr$€nlation & Report by Peul lrey - lypography and Type Face Expert. Copy Courtesy ol: Protocoutl-lberly.org
CERTIFICAIt OF LIVE IIRTHit.:i,.., r5r
DCPAITAITNI O' II€AIIX61. 106t1
t,L'/rn.i\+. lrrF / l!, )
f{lljj!,1 r..Erir:-i:ii' , rr,.- ;- -' r
" r-. * r,ryl.,. s.
n"d.:.4 r-,". _r^t: I rn I r,c: I I'd_ p.*hi.rr! r rh. T.ir!.r lr(rr r4io.
0'rlt]';!J
- t+, !9ht i
I ehr
tlonol ul u, HeHali
!(a!icldnJ. !:et+rrlty A /jt'iac{logical L(,cpit6I tJ 4, .r'. J"&r.l JdHlY-B ih El
i ( ;.rl-fi-:;;i; !,llDli.r(N.rqrn(.Rll.ll{dlDt
Hcnol,$Iu
6085 lta]Fnianaole !igLH.y
f,-q" ,i i;h.; lir, F.,hrr,r ,,.,;;";;;.;;", 1.-
25 lieriYar Dest ,t-[tlce :
iii;.J5EIti 0010,t[ I'fric.-$
Alr''!l
Studeri UD-lver:s-ity
Carca sia3rt'JllBr1.l4rr r;,i7-il., r i.d;rr-.,:, - L J'd-:;;";;;rr.
Ia ' hric[ite HcDeI dr,h lhn |nr llr* d{dr.a.,h.rl!, r, rr!, hn ro.fdl.. r[! 1,, .f nr lide]na..
ln witness shereot he has he€to set his hand and s6al.
a Nota.y ft.t lic ol !h€ Cou,rty and Slal€ aforsald, hereby cenify $'al
-L$g!\+ -" +.L-,6 personally known to m€ ro b fte atfianr in t'le for€gohg atfidavil, peBonallv app€ar€d
betore ms this day ard havinq bsen ddy s1lom deposes a.td iiys the facls set torth h th€ above attrdavit are tle and correcL
wit'ess nry band and ofticial seal ftis .?lg
day ot ll4l4h . Zf) \2
Notary Publicb siEnalure:
W commission €xpi.€s;
liy 19' E014
EXHIBIT 5
rmdrvii
STATI, OF FLORIDA ))ss
COLI:\iTY OF DLn A1.l
I. lclicito Ps!'a arn ovcr l8 yclrs old and r*idcm of 7579 Walden Rctd- Jaclr.<onvillc.Fl- ll24a t|Jirb FL DI- 4P10S245.45-082 0. I do rIor suffgr frotrl liy Ecqtal impqirmenland can competcntly aRcst to &c folloqirg undcr thc pcratl-v of pdrjury:
L I am a profcssioaal *eb dcv.lopcr halin8 g.adu&tcd wi6 a bachclor's dcFG: inlI er l1-l Tcr:hnierl lcfitutc in lndirnapolis, N.
:. I halc ovcr len -'-aars of cxpcrierrcc o[ e,,cb dcsign-q rfld detelqpmes( snd ha\coften uscd softl 'ar. sucb as Adobc Photoshop add Adobc lltustator.
j I dor nlo:rdcd from the oifici8J $litehouse \rcbsrrc. rt::jt1'hj1s!gu$-ar, .\F:11
fr. '01 l. rhe nc* t'irth cerlificrtc rr_ Barai:k ()barna Il:l:f; t S:. lvhii+ouric.&q] lJ;!c.jle,r-aul|;l9s r$-:!+\,qrtrIl!r!tr-cq4,jc-a!i. j9,U-tilq; liJf
J. I obs6\e.l !h3t the bir& ccnifi€rc pdf fiic cou.ld bc o1^-ncd or'.b Adobe lll'r'-tr''rt,'t,nd lhc soft\sr. reveal.d thai lhis do,:un1cnt h&s many la)ers ofinapes o:': t.
This indicalcs ftrl the dilculnmr \ris not it trre copl of fic o.iSjnal binl:ccnlficatc, bul a rccr_ntll crcrt'd doculnLrrt usrng Adobe lllufi-itclr
-i. i f'.rtlrr: ,.bsc* eC that r$is docrunctll dccs no! havc an cmtels4d scll norrnril,.
efrlrel b tir il &'Sisttats to r'rcq :o ihc tdlctrticil.'- ot golcnuoanl iisuedJr'CUmcnLs,
A1ITH NO1.
jt\l ) S!'1OR\ T() t<forc me al. AF:l :t.:0ll
\() ;RI-IC
GooFF€Y C WllLls. J8.i.lorary PulrE. Stalr ol FbdoM; iorim. sx! Jrn.24,2fi4
ComFr. ilo 0C 955m
l{ar€ "-p;.\ .-
CERTI'TTTE Of
,".- :,i: ' ri; I E,
LIVI IIITHL'il.... l5r
dt^aft.axt o, ftr!:xGt 10611
:r,::) - "' ""*' c,.lt :! ,'- Atl, .r
I si:"r:'. j. e;rr :iir; li'rc.r.l, $J'-*I ;: fdntr, 5il:
l. F.licilo I'ipa, anr ?ver l8 years old and rcrident of7J79 Walden Road, Jacksonville, lrl 12244 *irh FI-DL 'rP 100-lr5-45.081-lr. I do n,,r suilir ftom :iry mcnlal irDpai.m.nt and I compcten(ly ltt€st to thcfollorving undcr lh. penaliy oltLrJUry:
L l a'n a profissional seb developer having g.aduared with a bachcloas dcgree in lT |rom I ITTshnicBl lftstirur. in lndranapolis.lN. I have overlen years of cxpe.ience of in web designs andJe!!lopm(iu and I havc o{ten uscd roriavar. such ns Adobe Pholoshop and Adobe Illustraror.
I On April lJ,2010. thc whitehoce wcbsire. www.whilehouse-qo!. releas€d rhe 2009 ro.rn lMoollncome l'a\ Rerurn ofPreidenr llarack rl. Obdna:hnp. //wrv elwh irclrousc.gov/sit({/de fault/fi los/pre5ident{bama-20 I O-co.np lete-Ietum pd f.
L I downloa&d rhis65-page pdffil€on my computer. I obs4rved thatall information about rhe
prBidcnt s and rhe fi.sr lady.' s soc'al tecuriry numbcn werc redacted. All blocks or spaces forso.ialsec liry numbcrs we.c brak. o. elir*our.'
a I sLibmir Erhibir A (auached herewifi, pagc 4l pan of2oo9 fom l04o) Form 709 tJ.S Cili TaxRebm of llres. aarack Obama. Thc sprce fo. his social security numbor is redacted or blank.
5. I submit top Exhib A (attach€d hercwilh, page 49 part of 2009 Form 1040) Fo.m 709 U.S. GiftT,r Retu.rloffirst Lady Michelle Ohafla The spsce for hcr social security number is r€daclcd or
6. Then throqgh Adobe lllusiralo. so{tware,1 opened ljxhibit A and A and found thal lhese two pdffiles havc qwo lale.s .eh. norjustone laye'. whdn fie rop layer i! n med oror dragged away,th( socral securr) numbe's olborh pcrsons are revcaled
1? lsubmilL*hibirAl(aftache'lherewirhjFormT09U-S.CiftTaxRctumofPres.BarackObamaw;th his sctial sccurity numbcr revoaled. The following informarion are reveai€d:
I
l. Barack Obamas SSN- 042{E-.14252] Michelle Obarna'$ SsN 3so-6o-2Jozl. An inirial MLo otr ftesideof rorm 709.lt L l .r rnch Jark souare wrth no!. ion on rr.ll Prepa(cr's SSI\ or PIN Plrtj5709?4
El\ i6-t700600Phond no. -l l21372.0440
70s Un(ed Slates Gift iand Generation-Skipplng Transler) Tax ffelurn
I r'e,r,l lr:rr".,r lhr. ,ci ,rtt ,tt\ ,,1 \l.Il.rr't) r I ;r( rrrl',r;. lttor. lh. ( ,'r'rrrlilt.('. ll\\.,r. .,rrtr \l.-rn. Srrl, t,'rIr' l . i orr \". i:rl \L'..r lIn lr1. I l,rrr{ Ltl
LNITED STTES DiSTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr Orl,v Taitz, Esquire, Pro Se,
Plaintif
Civil Action:
Barack Hussein Obama,Delendant
Aflidavit ofJohr N. SamPson
1 . My name is Johtl N. Sampson. I am over 18 years of age, am of sound mind and free ofany mefial disease or psychological impairment of any kind or condition
2. 1am a crtizen of the Uoited States of America, I am 58 years old, and was bom in
Jacksor lleights, Queens, New York and lajsed in the State ofNew Yotk
3. I am th€ ChiefExecutive Officer, Owner, and Opeatot ofCSI Consultiog and
lnvestigations LLC, a consultidg and prlvate investigative firm registeied ijth the Sectetary ofState oiColorado as a timited iiability Company pu.suant to the iaws oft.he State ofColorado
The company was formed in the Statdofcolondo on January 2' 2009 and is in good standing
with the 3ecietary of State ofColorado. Colorado does not lrale any licensing requiremeds or
provisions for privale iovestigators.
4. I have persolal lcrowledge of all of the facrs and circumstances described herein below
and trill testify in open court to all ofthe same.
5 On, or about, November 16, 2009, Orly Tai?- the attomey who is prosecuting the above
captioned matter, requested that I access LocatePlus, a commercial database that I subscribe to'
6. On, or about. Nolember 16, 2009, pu.suant 10 the aforementioned request by Orly Taitz,I requested from LocatePlus, any and all legall_v obtarnable inlormation relatine to SSN 0.12i8-4425.
7. As a result of this inquiry, I came to leam that Plaintiff Banack Hussein Obamq has usedthis Social Securitl number since at least Aom Jlne l, 1986 to plesent. A detailed repo.t wasgenerated showing family relationships, past residence history, real property owred by Mr.Obama, and other detailed information to include, but not limited to, ddver's license infomahon,telephone numbers associated with Mr. Obama, and people possibly related to Mr. Obama
8. This inforrnation was obtained pursuant to a legitimate and permissible search under theuser agreement I have with LocatePlus. This reciuest was made in connectior with a pendr'ngcivil action, which is one ofthe expressed permissible purposes 10 conduct such an inquirytkough LocatePlus, as well as a possible criminal violation ofunited Slates la% and possiblefraud.
9. As a result ofthis search and the results that we.e obtained, on or about November 17,2009, I accessed a public access database named "SSN Validator" athttp://\r,'\rlv.ssnvaijdator.cor"-/. The information this site provided me i{as that SSN 042-68-4425was issued by the Social Security Administration based upon aa applicafion filed for a SocialSecunty Number in the Stale of Comecticut betw€el the years 1976 ax.d 1977 .
I 0. Based upoa ioformation and beliel Plaintiff Baflack Hussein Obama has never had adrect conlection with th€ State of Couecticut and has never claimed residency in the State ofConnecticut.
11- I am a recently retired Sgnior Deportation O{trcer ofthe United States Departrnent ofHomeland Security, Immigation alrd Customs Enforcemeot (DHS ICE) having retired onAugust 30, 2008.
12. As a result ofmy formal tainirg as an immigation officer, conducted a1 the Fede.al LawEnforcement Traimng Center (FLETC), located in Brullswick, Georgia, a,r1d advanced trainingreceived at FLETC in Artesia, New Mexico and elsewh€re du.irg my 27 year career, as \aell as
my professional experience spannirg 27 years offederal law enfotcemen! it is my knowl€dgeard belief that Social Security Numbers can orly be applied for iri the State in which theapplicant habitually resides and has thei official residence.
13. During the penod betrveen January 1, 1976 and December 31, 1977 iaclusive, it is myL-nowledge and beliefthat Barrack Hussein Obama habitually resided solely withitr the State olHawaii aod was between the ag€s of 14 and 16 during the time period stated above. During thatperiod of time, based upon information and belief, Mr. Obama resided with his maternalgrardparenls, Madel),n and Stanley Dunham ir the Stale of Hawaii.
N'LA, u I 91r, requestrng that I contact hlm regarding m) account.
15. On or about Iebruary i, 2010, I telephoned N4r. Russo at 978-921 -212'l , extension 319
and inquired as to uh), he *rshed to discuss m] accolnt. At tiat time, Mr. Russo stated that
LocatePlus had notic€d I had conducted what he called a "celebrity political figure" inquiry and
wadled to knorv *ht I had done so and which permissible reason pursuant to the user agreement
t was under with LocatePlus pertained to my making my inquiry.
16. I told N{r. Russo that I lvas a private investigator in the State ofcolorado, that I had been
tasked by D.. Orly Taitz. an attomey ir California who was prosecutitrg a civil suit tnvolvirg MrObama and that I had emails and olher documentation that I could send him ved&ing lhat fact.
Mr. Russo staled that he rvor.id appreciate it if I u'ould send that idormalion to him which I did
on or about Feb.uary 3. 2010. He assured me a't that time that ifl i{ere to provide thisinforrnation to hm it er'ould rcsolve any "issues" LocatePlus may have regarding my inquiry inloa "political celeb.ify".
17 ln the email I sent to Mr. Russo, I olTered to have Dl. Taitz send him an ernail as wellconfirming the fact that I had been tasked by her to conduct this inquiry pursuant to a pending
civil suit in the United States Dlstnct Court for the Cerfral District ofcalifo.nia He stated that
he would iike to receive such an email.
18. On or about February 4, 2010, Dr. Otly Taitz, at my request, sent Mr' Russo an email
irdicatrng that she had requested me, in co lection with the pending civil suit in Califomiaagainst Mr. Obama, to corduct research through the somm€rcial databases I habitualll' use as a
private irvestigator, related to SSN 042-6811425.
19 Numerous emails have been erchanged between me atld Mi- Russo due to the fact that as
ofFebruary 2, 2010, my account with LocatePlus has been frozen and I can no longer access this
database despite the fact that I responded to their inquiries and have provided evidence to them
indicatiog that I had followed t}le user agreement lve have entered into. I have repeatedly ask€d
that my account be unlocked, unfrozen, and made avaiiable to me.
20. Despite all ofthis, as ofMatch 8, 2010, m.v accol:nt remains frozen and I aln unable toconduct legitimate, Iegal database searches in cotn€ction with my buslness As a resuit, I am
being finaloially harmed, unable to conduct legal, lar'ful, legitimale investigations pursuant to
law, and unable to p.ovids to my clients, the seryices they have contracted with me to provide,
tl,ereby sub.jecting me to possible civil litigatioo for failing to provide coni?cted seryices.
21. Based upon information and belief, misuse ofa SocEl Secunty number is a ditectviolation ofTitle 42 Uaited States Code, Seclion 408(aX?XB), which is a federal lelonypunishable under Title i8 United States Code by filre or imprisonment ofup to five yea.s, orboth.
z). r nare nor DeeD comp€osated lor making this affida\it.
Further, Affiant sayeth not.
Sigaed and execLrted ia Aurora, Colorado on this 8 day of March, 2010.
)-,#-r_John N Sampsoa
EXHIBIT 10
tts(, - s;\ !crrrrcalron Kesulls l'ase 101 I
ii' ' r'. \r:'\!i, I tll llli ir I .: i,...i. a:,1. ,.1 r. !i ,,,.
' {ilrr Social Security Number Verification SystemlssNVs)
SSN Verifi cation Results
1
'|
0
Tlre lollowmg rab e dlsplays yo!. submrned resllls The li6t corumn rndrca€s lhe submded .ecorcveifEd laied oremp€yee € dec€ased the i6l live d€its ol the SSN wllbe.nasked for [email protected] and re@rds eilh . vertielon reslns code ot 2 3 4 or 6
VerifY More 5_SNsWhat ro do il at9SILt4!!!qvslfoFreld Offrce Locator
faired ' oala d@s nor march sociarsecuitt AdmmEt.arons Gcords select WISI to do-rlan SSN Farls io Ve.rty ror mo€,nromamn
oeceased - Dala malches sooarsec!flly adnn'stonons €cords and our.ecor6 .drcale lhatlhe pe6on E d@ased For hore nlodalon please conlad our gener.l SsA nlornalon lrnear 1{0G772J 21 3 1TOD,'TaY 1 {0+3?fi77E ) or your r@l Soc6l seco.ny feld ofic€ 56€.1Freld Oifice Locator.to 0nd lhe o(ice ne.reslyou
Vs.i6od - OaIa marches SocrelSecrily Adnrnrslratons records
-tssn:*66urE J ssssessss I MMOOYYYY
SSN not n lile lneler rssued)
Have 6 quesnont Crll ! {00-7724270 Mon - Fi 7AM to 7PM Ea$em Tnre lo sp€at wdn Employer Cuslomer SeMce polson.el ForTDDTnY €l 1 .t 00-325{n 8
I I hrrc orer Ir) v!'ars di conrp.Jt.r iltlirr irti()n re.hn(,log) linaivlcdse_: I ilnr rLrn?nrlt r ron:purer Inromurion S\ n,jms rnal)sr.
' I pL4itrnr dxtxh:r<. rrl(l (ompur..r rLpJir scn rc'.:s.
-.1. i M\+ ri ciiu.rlronrl backs.ound ;n conrpulcr sci!'ncc I'ron De\^ L ni\e!."ir)a il,1tn(l Irulliplc indi!iduuls. sho rc 100 !curu old. lj0ruarsold,]00!carsold-\\hoffeduritirtl\
\oI;n! in !-i1.h xnii e\cn clc.licn.,\l()|n.\'Orl] Iaik. !rhi) rvasacandidale li'rrhc ti.S Scr latc in :{j I : prinlrr) conhcrcd I nc nnd
tr!!idqd \\ilh {hc l)\ l) ol th! CA loler r.gisiruri,nrt osl ing ro anal\'?-e rhc data.I p(rs{,nali} prrioE cJ thc ffirl} sir nl thc di]l.rb.ac pror ided lo nte b} rilomc\ Orh l !iz.I liruDd nruliinlc inrguinrki.i iD rlii'o.,1aincd darahas,].
I ti,und lhe liillo\\i,rg durics:\ iil)ll rctord,\ $;lhoul fl.sl namc
h r-S7 rccords \liftout binh d.1le
( . t5.r.ll r rc,ir)rds *irhoul pla':c ol birthl) i rccLrrds r ithuur an addrcss
1.. l1l.:{61 possible duplicarc records
l . I -r0.r)t 9.rcords !\ irh hinh datc oldcr than I lio )cal5.\ccordirg ti) 4,,\ !:lccrions cod.' :150 cver! ioter r!.!isrrlrtion is supposcd ro conuin a binh d{re ol'the\{llry- a5 \ell as otircr rniormtrt'on- such ,5 sou'rt4 oforisin- tir;t and last nrme- prior voter rcsiilraltun-addr.s:J. inlbmration disclosing whcther the pc pccti!e voler js u fclon or pflrolee. a drivers lic€'rsc. hstl;ur digiG ul!hc SociJ Securitt nlmber oran idcntilier nun1bcr.
ll&sed on mt personaldala aml)sis in onl! on. otS par.rmerers ofvcriiicalioll. binh datc, thcre ar*hLlndred\ otrhousands 0f r+ran!l) inralid !der rcgiskaliuns $hich nccd kr tri rern(^ed ll1nll lhcdlldbac and i io.ol't \{)tcr r€sisurions $ilh birth dale sho'^'in-q the {oier kr bc o\cr l0O 1c'rn ol<1.
\ hic,r ir rr suspi(ious \ olcr re{islrrtion- \!hich necd Io bc \crjlied.
6.
;8
]I
l{1.
I rrrrj lhar lrll ol thc inli)rmation heacin is trut and coffcct lo lhc Ltc$ ofmv kr1o$lc'de.e. l dcclarc this
un(lLr rhc pcnaltl ofncnur!-
NatrN l)avid Yun
,\Jllrc:rs j.l(ru $ l horrron !c. :\'!,hcin. CA 9ltl0+
Sr\om ro rnd sub{ribrd befirrc nc this
d ('f .:011.
Exhibit 12
AFFIDAVIT OF D{vid Yun
I. David Yun, arn over I8 ycars oJd, have persoDal knowledge ofde loregoing and can and attest 1o lhelolJorvirrg:
1. I have over l0 years ol compuier infbmration techoology kno\\'lcdgc.2. I am cuFenlly a Conrpuler Information Systems analysr.I I p<rfofm JulabJsc and complrter reparr sen,ices..i. i have a'l educaaional background in computer scicnce liom Devry University5. I lbund multiple irrcgula.irics in the obtaired database.
6. I lbund rnt tiple individuals. \r'ho hav€ listed rheir place ofbirrlr as US o. USA. A valid place ofbirth isrequired ir I4 srates as stated in PTF Appcndix C.pdf of Cali{bmia vorer regisrrarion guide.
7. Attomey Orly Taitz. who was a candidate fbr the U.S. Senate in 2012 pritr'Iar-v., contacted mc Andprovided a DVD ol the CA voter registrdlions asking to analyze the dula.
8. I personally perlormed the analysis olrhe daubase provided to lne by arlornet Orly 'taitz9 i found mulliple irrcgulariries in ftc obtaincd darabnsc,10. I found &e lollowing resllt/ cnlric(s):
A- 685739 Records w,here Place of tlirril is lisred as US or i-iSA_
I L According to CA Elecrions code 2150 every voter regisrrafioo is supposed to contain a bir$ dare of rlrcvoler, as rvell as other information, such as country oforigin, first and last name, prior voter regisaation,addrrss, information disclosing whether lhe peaspective voter is a fllon or parolee, a drivers license, lastfour digits of the Social Security aumbcr or an ;denrifier number.
12, Based on my personal data analysis in only onc of8 parurnelers ofvcrification, birth dat€. thcre arehundreds ofthousands oi fiagrantly invalid voier regisrEtions which need to b€ removcd from thedatabase, which is a suspicious voier registralion, which need to be verified.
i a(tes! thal all of lhe information hcrein is true and correct to the besr rfml knowledge. I declare rbisunder the p€nalty ofpeliur_v.
\lrneal /! /::^t.
Nanie-- "-DtvifYun :-
Addrcss 3400 W TI IOtu\TON AVE. ANAHlitvl- CA 92804
tacrsrutlot or clA4lF(xr€.20:,.1. tlE.l.!a of th. D{/t'll: narry Saatao
2. rl. plrc. ard d.ra 6f Hrth: tb.Elllu a-t-1961
r. af <lrir.nrhlo: tdomsJ.b. rh fq.la. d!5c.d&tr:c. fte .dnli 9ro!P:
a. r'l. r.lleldl: lstat. addr.cs ot rh. poptlr x.ft€llo orlu dor/ndrt6. F.6 illlch 3.t'ool (rtov.d f.Oi) rnd hher cl.rr: ???
r. r. Drl. .cc.9r.d: l-r-I'oa (J.ru:ry l. r96t)b. Grdc: I (Flrrt gll.h)
E. .. fta na of th. er.rrta x../xr,: L. sro€tro x ^
(tolo Soato.o)b. o.cLoIio./lob: (???? G.ooraolrv ????)(n.r. ol rhr .oth.r -eill onli ba !r.d if f.thr" i5 dR6.d)c. rdrfGs: x.nr.ig o.l.r a@l/nro!
c, rlF dre ol rhe ou.rdlrnr(?? rs fillcc up. ,? p.'.rnr ot thc Pupil rtr. tpt .v.ll$le, .lrt'ty ???7 ???b.(ru!. 5o!hc. thln9 )!. ocauoatlon/rob:(. fi. idd.a3s: r..l}teno orll. Roovrool
ro- Lerr rhl. r.lEl :a. ? B5 flnlth.d. ostrldc fra tlE cLrstb. ?? r..l.vrd ?? th. d:r.:c, ?? the rahool to:
11. otts iifaratid:
EXHIBITl4
CERTIFICATION DECLARATION OFChristopher-Earl: Strunk in esse
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, hereby declare and certif under penalty ofperjury with 28USC 1746, that:
I . I am the Plai iff in the case Stunk v US DOS USDC for the Dstrict of ColumbiaDocket 08-cv-2234 seeking the passport r€lated records of Stanley Am Dunham (a.k.aS. Ann Dunham Obam4 a.k.a. S. Ann Durham Soetoro) (deceased); aod
2. I am the Petitioner in the matter ofthe Freedom oflnformation Act Request for tiepassport related records of Stanley Ann Dunham et al. with cas€ coDtrol number:200807238.
3. On or about July 30,2010,I received a traosmittal of six individual records marked Plthrough P6 showing the ftont and back ofeach for a total pages of l2 plus tie two pagecover lener ofJuly 29, 2010, and
4. T"llot on htly 29,2010 all the recods marked Pl thrcugh P6 werc de€med all thoseavailable regarding the above referenc€d matter described in the cover letter by JonathanM. Robin, Dir€ctor for the Office ofLegal Affairs and Law Enforcement Liaison Bureauof Consu.lar Afairs Passpott Services (see the aftacbed).
5. Ofparticular interest is the "Amend to Include @xclude) Childreo" entry by Stanley AnnDuoham Soetoro who subscribed to on 13 August 1968 on page 2 ofthe Documentmark€d Pl showtr in her own hand*riting crossed out to mean to exclude "BardckHussein Obama (Soebarkrh)" ftorn her passport .enewal.
6. The attached documents plus cover l€lter oftwo pages for a total 14 pages received ftomthe U.S. Depaxtuent of State associated with my request for records of Stanley ArmDunham etc. with case conaol number: 200807238.
I do hereby declare and certiry thrt the rttNchcd records are a truo atrd rccurate copy ofthose rcceived by Declerrnt rtrd thrt I am .vril&ble to testify iD open court.s such.
Dated: Brooklyo New YorkItecember f7 .2oll7
593 Vandcrbilt Avetroe - 281BrooklyD, New York 11238Cell- 8,15-9015757 email: chris@strunkws
In reply refer to:C NPPf /L/LE - Case Control Number: 200807238
Christopher E. Strunk593 Vandcrbilt Avenue. #28 I
Brookiyn, NY I1238
Dear lr,1r. Strunk:
The following is in response to your request to the Department ofState, dated November 22, ?008, requesting the release of material under theprovisions ofthe Freedom of Inlormation Act (5 U.S.C. g 552).
We have compleied a search tbr recqrds responsive to your request.The search resulted in the refrieval ofsix documeDts that are responsive toyour re.quest. After carehrl review ofthese documents, we have det€rminedthat all six documents may be released in fiill.
We did not locate a 1965 passpon applicatiou referenced in anapplication for amendment ofpassport that is included in the rcleascddocuments. Many passport applications and other non-vital records {iomthat period were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidancefrom the Ceneral Seftices Admrnisrration.
Passpofi reaords twically coBsist ofapplications lcr United Statespasspons and supponing evidence of United Stat€s citizenship- Passponrecords do not include evidence oftrav€l such as enfance/exit stamps, visas,residencc pemrits. etc.- since this information is entered ioto the passportbook after issuance,
This completcs the processing ofyour request.
Office ofLegal Alfairs and Law Enforcement LiaisonBueau of Consular Affairs
Passport Services
Enclosures:As stated
Jonathan M. Rolbin, Director
?1
APPLICATTOX FORREflEWAL I A{ErlDr{€Nl --i EXJETTSION
OF
posr :.-i:Lr,,a) :r.ion-si,.-r FeFEiFEo ro oEe^FrMExr Foi a;r,6N= .:,r ',r--Ii:\: iENE"eo,srirheE r rI I aMENoeo as HEouEsrED
s :.oo FEE .ollEcrEo-No FEe co(EcrED
t.,., ro,A dc.o,rr eo RFvFRSF.J
d ciriz.n or tn6 Unirod 5rot5, J6 h..rgt.d dhoY.. {ll.d.ndr'..i
oarEoF Erirts irltdlr, d4, @JA/a. iq,//42 /|,/tt /= ,t f"t av n sal <
C' r,.(a "l' , J,,. l-rn"=,",uFrrEo 5r^r.r ltfiloeNcc tstpt eaeE.'l.hr. ..qtr, aaet d
!
zreiie
,wr e r.ve'. cr o; ^i' oprcc,oE"r ;oi'F- {t;-: i. r",rrrd;*q 'i-' iJZ;;-.it/ d t ,
I hay. uo. (?id io ns.r p.oon r.lu,red .n 16 !c ji.l!d.A in |h. ras$D o! Jocu.ni ion [!s). srn.r a.qunils Uiit.J S.r.s cni-:6rhi* b.<! oztqrlii.d rr ..iri:.n oi 3 lor!'6R ra.: ak.n r onh.! r.& d .ftnnRid or dhn f6mt d.d{.rio. of.I!.ie..td . lociln .sr.: <nrc.<d or savlii in
'h..,n.J f.tci3 or r roleie .rnc .cc.ar.d cr r. ;n.d rt,. dlrics or m, orti.., po.,, ;r.Fprorh.or ud6 t!. s.rc6hdr ot r ror.iF rrlc or roltrjcat rqbdilirio' rh.!.dri yoEi ii r ,.rni.ar .l.c(io, in . to..iF sr.r. or pr.d.irtr.djad.l.cijooorpl.6i3cn.!oJaltDii.(h.loe.r.irtryov.r{oi.i!.r.ri'ory:6.d.!to6!ti.nucirddcrd'..'lisanh.rid rt l:oir.d SEr.r { s.te. ! lirlomltr or dd,el{ ofii..r i)t ri. trrir.t<u..! i! r {oFia,rarq.r.r sqrnr or d.j@4 rb. b.n.-ln! ol llc.!riooaltt dl riy ro!.'s. srrr.i dr L..n coDricr.d hr. cor.o. cosr d,di3l of conF.i.driurisdic.ior ol coMirii6 riy rcr
o! p de!.y by lor*, 'n.
ananlHr u{ d. U.ncd sr.r<!,4r qr of '[. otpvens'is.d o4' 6. ondrhl' rd. 5..r o-tt F.a 6r e. @p+ k th. *.r,co-,, or b ny.rtr.. p.Eq in<r!d.c
- rA. FrrF! q doa,''ta'lat.lli?dtpnl hr tA. Net l. *o!rd !. [email protected]!de, '[k @r,.;ro..)
ttr}"'#LF..t A. ptn&'$Ae6 eAvtlEPPRCPOI€O TPAVE! PL !T: jr-/$n f*a{,rit .rrupFs.i nF rFrrft* /. .r\J ! U",- Lt P
:ri.lr:fr ,Ft Tc ga vL!r1 at
./*.*p*tg g :f "r.4I ttf 4E:a:t^: a+<>
o tr. i,Biv(,i.ri rq,re iakrr:
!,iFrilr!r,lrir'rtrlnrlun.;r,{!:4iiittr;:r.rr.rt,r'iirlrq,1)-qrde.firtr;,'r.jlxrali:.]tlri.i.,'. i, {li! rii.q'ri,,5, rL,r Lvr o rLr J!rr., !/i r.. ir itr4rird,1,i,iLJr rjt1r!1.
l. My name is Susan Elizabeth Daniels. I am over l8 years old, am of sound
mind and free ofany menlal disease or psychological impairment oiany kind or
condition.
2. Iant a citizen ofthe United States ofAmerica, I am 68 years old and I was
born and raised in the State ofohio.
3. I am licensed by the State of Ohio as a private investigator; I am president ofDaniels and Associates Investigations, Inc., incorporated in March 1995, license
number 65199565509.
4. I have penonal knowledge ofall the facts and circumstances described herein
below and will testiry in open court to all ofthe same.
5. I located a social security number for Barack Hussein Obama and found that itwas issued betwee n 1977-1979 inthe State ofConnecticut but as I investigated
firther, I found an additional eight social security numbers. One ofthe numbers had
@eceased) behind it. I was able to find the name ofthe person the SSN actuallybelonged to and printed it fiom the Social Security Administration death index.
6. I researched social securify numbers for Michelle Obama. When I ran hername, two different social security numbers appeared for her, includimg one thatdoes not belong io her but is listed for her at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington,D.C.
7. The true and correct copies I personally obtained are attached.
8. I solemnly swear under penalty ofpe{ury that all the facts stated andcircumstances described above are true and correct stalements.
9. I have not received any compensation for making this affidavit.
Further, Affiant saithSigned and executed inOctober, 2009-
^,/ .aLtt onthisll"dlyof
Elizabeth
NOTARY'S JURAT
Susan hlizabeth Daniels appeared belore mE in person on this /2 da> olOcrober, 100e. i" )/-',,'f . rciryl. 4Z ' C.-1 . r 7 aUctober, zUUy, ffr / /t4'.-&.! lclry L -fr.' 42.-z- . / / a(state), U < . ,4 (country) and having presented to me herdt{ver's license and
having been swom by me duly under oath and having been admonished that she did
so under penalty of perjury, she did then and there depose herselfand give the above-
listed statements in my presence in the form ofhis written affidavit.
Specifically but without limitation, Susan Elizabeth Daniels did in my presence
authenticate the documents attached here as a true and correct copy ofthe documents
she obtained and described in her af'fidavit.
Business Address of Notary: &4 q!01 n
My Seal Appears Above this line.
My prinred Name i s:j ! "'^E-5--L!j:lit92! ; my notarial commission or
license expires on: 2-t t!.E .ri,Li ]; r.SrLtEttbt
BHhH
HHEH
BHtsH
HHtsH
HHEH
EHftF
1600 PENNSYLVANIA A\,'E I'IWWASH|NGTON DC 20500-0003
hnpsJ/secure.accurinl.com/app/bps/mai
I All FullNam€ AgE/DoB A.lds€s +*
Date Phone lnfomalion
EI*
6*
E*
tt*
eldt*
R*
E*
E*
E*
EIt
Er =? r= r-l /MlcrlELLE oBAMA
A Es r{]F / c.no". r"*eI 35o5Grtr
MICHELLE OB,AMA
BHtsR/ MICHELLE OBAMA
MICHELLE OBAMA
MICHELLE O64MA
MICHEILE OBAMA
BHtsF
5046 S GREENWQOO AVE
, CHICAGO 116061t2806 A!qos-A€()7
1 OLD STATE CAPIIOL PLZ APISPRINGFIELD lL 62701-l 512 M.y 0€ - Sep 09
Jun 08 - Se? @
MICHELLE OBAMA 505 CATI.IARINE ST
Ft E5 B.l4l P'rILADE' PHIA PA re ! :loos As oZ( 6E !ii;i c-nds Femb
5o3o ouENlrN sT 303 365-5697 ' MDT
DENVER CO 80239-4312 Jul@'Aus@
123 W NORTH AVECAROL STREAM lL 60188-2001 M 09-A!S@
{V)<Verified) R.pon verificd rvith a family member or $Incore adidg on behalf of a fadily memb.r-(P)=(Pr@f) Death Certifi@tc Observed. (cerrhYou can nolv order the SS 5 Fom for dcca*d individlals directly from the Social Seclnly Adminisuationonlin.ar@
Dr. Khalwale: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I stand here to make a petition on behalf ofKiborowa squatten who are a group of squatters from Trans Nzoia District under anorganizalion called Kiborowa Squatters Alliance- The squatters reside in the rural andperi-urban slums within Trans Nzoia and like our forefathers, remain landless and livingunder deplorable conditions. Some of those squaners €lre temporary labouers on theformer colonial settler farms now popularly called Agricultural Development Corporation(ADC) farrns. Our girls and women are raped and forced into prostitution and earlyrnarriages, occasioning high instances of HIVIAIDS and gender biased violence. Thereare high poverty levels leading to early school dropouts and childhood labour. Despitethos€ squafters making several presentations to the Govemnent with assuances fromdistrict commissionerst permanent secretaries and Ministers for Land and Settlementsince Independence, our people have yet to see any positive action. We are, therefore,praying through this petitior for your humble intervention as a House, so that theGovemnent of the Republic of Kenya may immediately s€ttle all the squatters on thefollowing ADC farrns: Sabwani, Sekhendu and Olingatongo ADC farms. We are alsopraying that the Government rcstrains those Members of Parliament who are incitingmembers fiom non-squatter comnunities to invade those farms.
Mr. Speaker: Order, Dr. Khalwale! You caught my eye to present a petition, butI am in doubt as to whether or not you have, in fact, conplied with Standing OrderNo.204. At least,I have ro indication liom the Clerk ofthe National Assembly, which Inormally have as a matte! of practice, that you have complied with Standing OrderNo.204. Can yos satisry me that you bave done so?
Dr. Khalwale: Mr. Speaker, Sir, this petition was presented to the Offioe of theClerk. He went th(ough it and marked it to the Sp€aker of the National Assembly. TheOffice ofthe Speake. ofthe National Assembly marked it to Mr. Ndoobi wh6 is in thelegal arm of Parliament. Mr. Ndombi invited me to his office. We \ /ent through thispetition and I am glad to confirm that we have complied to the letter, to the requirementsofthat Staoding Order.
Mr. Speaker: Can you, please, let me have a look at the petition to b€ satisfiedthat those steps have been taken?
Dr. Khalwale: Mr. Speaker, Sir. after I conclude or before?
the way to look at devolution is about governance, lf at all we take this Con$itutionwithout lookilg at the elements ofdevolution properly, then I am afraid we have missed
the boa1, We should be very courageous and brave because in 1963, resources were going
to the regions. It was not by changing the Constitution that the regions went but bystarving the regions of funds and even the power to t.Lx the regions. That is how the
regions were kilLed. But uhen the regiors were working, even hon. Ngala was feelingbetter and safer as the president of the Coast region rather than being a Member ofParliament here.
The other thing that we are addressing through devolution is exclusion. What has
made us sufer as a lation is exclusioq. Once people feel excluded, even when you want
to employ a policeman or constable or you want to build a dispensary, it must come ftomthe centre. In the colonial days, these things were being done on the gound atrd they
could give bursaries and build roads- I corrunend devolution. Those who fear devolutionare living in the past. l hey arqleing guided by their etbnic consideration and objectives.
They are living in the past.llf America was living in a siluation where they feared
ethdcity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation how could a young man
bom here in Keny4 who is not even a native Americar! become the President ofAmerica? It is because they did away witb exclusiorl Wbat has killed us here isexclusion; that once Mr. Orengo b President, I know ofno other place than Ugenya. Thatis why we were fighting against these many Presidencies in the past. I hope that Kenyawill come ofage. This countty must come ofage. People want Aeedom and nations want
liberatior\ but countries want independence.I beg to suppofi.Prof. Kam.r: Thank you, Mr- Deputy Speaker, Sir, for giving me the opporturtty
to cortribute to this historic Motion- I would like to support it with amendments and Iwill be mentioning w'hich ones.
Mr. Depuy Speaker, Sir, allow me, first, to congratulate those who have
participated in the procass of Constitulion-naking in this country. I want to recognize the
vetemns - the Orengos and lmanyaras - past and present. I also }lant to remember 1o
rccognize the Bomas goup ofdelegates that gave us the lirst Draft (2004). I also want toremember the Comrittee of Experts (CoE) and our own Parliamentary SelectCofunittee. These people have done a cornmendable job. The Constitution makingprccess has been very long and tedious. Sometimes it has been acrimonious and tempers
have gone up and down. But all in all, the process has brought us this far and we must
thank God fo! that.Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is instruciive to note that while it has taken a very
long time, there axe some zre.is that have consistently rernained in all the &afts that we
have today. As we consider that, we are reminded of why Kenyans \r'anted to have a
Constitution, to begin witlr- In the preamble, there is a statement that says: "We, thepeople of Kenya adopt, enact and give to ourselves and our future generation thisConstitutiorL"
1\4r. D€puty Speaker, Sir, we must enstrle that Kenyans get a new Coostitution
that will serve them and the futule generalions- How do we ensule this? We must ensule
this by ensuring that the Proposed Constitution is good for all, fair to all and serves all.
This may require the spi.il of give and take, but it must all be inclusive and non
exclusive. The eyes ofthe nation are focused on this House. We must ris€ to the occasion
3t Thursday, 25'h March, 2010(P)
EXHIBIT 17
The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama s Literary Agent in l99l Booklet: 'Bom in Kenya and Ia... Page I of2l
KEI{YA AI{D RAISED IN II{D{IIIESIA AIII! IaHAWAII'
THE UETTING - EXCLUSIUE - OBAMA'S
Note ham Senbt Manogetudt:
A^&eu Brettbad w6 neuer a "Bi.7het,' dftd Bt itbarr Neas is a
'te thot h@ n@er aduocute.l the natotiDe oJ "Bittherism." In
fact, A"drew beLtlee4 u w .lo, thdt I't6idqt Batuck Otunaluos born in Honolulu. HauaiL ona sust4,1961-
vet AtuIrcLo also believed that the @mpliot noinsieatu media
hdd rcJted to exanine Praident Obdnb's ,leologicaL pdst, ot the
caetu s.ruJtqtpe@no he ond his aAvi9m had s'^sn aedfor
u EJor that @'on thot w lonthed Ihe vpttins,- oq onsohgR&tr in uhiJh ue aplorc the ,Jeolosical backgtdn l oJP6i.lent obono (and oth6 prcidential @tulanvs\-rct to eUtigdte 2oo8, but beeue i.lss dnl actioLs huue co%eqrencs.
It is also in that spiit thot ue [email protected], dd n@ prent, th.booklet daecribe<l belou-ote L\at inalud6 a turketing pitchfot a
forth@mins book b! o then louns, otheruie u\k'turJoflne.lresrzal o/rhe Handd ta{ R*i..w.
II isdiden@ flot ol the P6ident st'Nisn onsin, but detBatuck obamd s ptbli. pqsona has pqhaps been prcsqleddife@tu at difretuat nn6.
,,'.],.*.. @brm n Ker\% lod Rirnj rrLi.irr:d f'r t..rajj t'h. r,:lc( :t. rrr!4.,6 . d,or .!f,iJF:srorC r R.r+dr JiJBio: nunsr'rl
rJlr,rr:rJ U(i :f,rP;*r 4 a
i;]..!'.'li..IJl'9]vals
Bradi ob. ma, the li6t Atiics-Amdi@ proidcnr of the!l ard br R.\jerr, s as bom in Kcnr! and !!i{d inlndonesia and Hawaii. rhc son of an Ameri@ anthftpologistand a Le.ru fin ce Einist€., he .ttended colebiaUnn€rsily and wo.kd as a lnancial jou.nalist d.d editor forBu.ind InterMtion.l copomrion. nc sen€d as prejcct
.oordimtor in Harlem lor the Neh Yo.k Ptrblic Intcrest
R6cNh Croup, and was Exemii\e DiJecto. of the DeleloPi!8con muitics Prcject in chicaso s South Side. Hiscommitnent io social and racili isstrG sill be qideDt in his
The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in
serem1 times oer soeral days. He. cals aie *reened by dauloroted s6ice tbat reqtris @lleN to state thet nam€ ddconpdy, which we did. she nfler dreNd.
The d6ign of the h@tl€t $E uddtaten by Richard Eelse', whohas since closed his bulnss. Bellsey, reached by telelhore, could
not rec.ll the eBt details ofthc booklet. but told Breitbart Nehs
rhat it "sounds likc one of oujobs, Iike I did for [A.to! & D]stelltw€nt! lrtrs a8o o. morc.r'
I 99 I Booklet: 'Bom in Ketrya and ra--. Page 4 of 2 1
E trrard t. ata!aDyat l
The parade ofauthoF alongside obam in the booklet includcspoliticutrs, sub as form€i speaker of the Houle Tip ONeill; sporisl%ends, ssh as J@ MontaD and KarEeh AbdulJabbar; ddnumercLrs Holbryood celeb.ities.
'l he Brrse side ofth. pa$ that f@tuB BaEck Obama includeslomer CMn Party pqidentul andidate Rrlph Nader dd elrb -r99G "bo! bald DoD *Ntion N6 Kiils On lhe Bloclc
The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent h l99l Booklet: 'Bom m Kenya and ra... Page 5 of21
EBdDrtlirdd
atoh!uqrlly
tg.r fftl| Onttr. Bloot
I
,i
Acto4 sto spoke to BEitbort |tI.6 by t€l€phonc, confrmedpEile details ofdE boo[et anil said tbat it cost thc asency teB oftlrcusand! of dol€$ to Drcd!.€.
He indi@ted that wlil€ 'alhost nobody" emte his or h€r o$rbiognphy, t!. noMrfttc6 in the booklet, wboa'the a8€dts dslttl *lth on a datly brsis,'rerE 'prcbabb/ appoach€d to app.orr
Drstel did not rerpohd to nlreroE Equett! for colDmt virenail.nd t€lephorF- rcrrsisteittoH BEithart Nes tbrt DyEt l"do€s not aiawe. qugtlons about obam."
The €nant Ob€ma bi('glrphy in the Acton & Dlslcl boold,et desmt corhsdict the suth€rticity of Oboma's birth c€rtificate.MorcorE, scE rl contemtutueoa aeounlrahttp://ircni6uneltism.@m/2o12lor/u/obea-looo-intef,.ieww@-Eoirt+cMbaw-bennirit€d-meri@n of Obernatbakgrcund dsclibe obo@ eE b,viry beeD ho, n in rlas.iirbttP: //m-.NtiF6.@p/106/o2lo6lus/f rst,bl!ct+1..t€d-tc
The biogEphy doe8, bos€ver, fit a pattem in which Obama{! thep€ople repr..s*ing ,nd supportiDg hin-E nipulate hn! Fblic
Dsvid Mrl3nb6:s ftrticolnilg bialapby of Obana hgrepodedv lqlosedrhftp: //m.r2nitdair.bm/9oliti6/to12lo6lwmq beack-obamu-in-lde david-maeisl. ntr exampl€, tlat a [email protected]€s!'bed iD D&mton !r! adE {!s, in faat,.rmahu of €wersl sepdate indiaiduels.
In addition, Obai!.l a.d bls h{ileB haE a hi*ory of r€definitrthis i&ntity when €{Fnient. Ir [aa{h 2oo8, for €r.rmpl€, hefdou$y dlllalElahttp://1.|w.hufdnetonp6t.6o/2ooa/oilr8/obaM-rrce-sPeech-read-th n azott htnD: "I c.n @ E or€ dtuo,.?E FeNdiahWlidtl thrn r cln disord th€ black cffmunity. I can no hor€dbown hiE thad r ca.! ry white glandsodler.'
http:/ Mww.breitbad.com,/Big-Govemment40 I 2/05/1 7fh+Vetting-Barack-Obama-Litera -.- 8126nO12
EXHIBIT 18
State ofArizona
County of Maricopa
)
) ss.
)
AFFIDA\-IT
{, the undersigned. being first duly s\om. do hereby'stale Lrnder oath and underperraltr of per.1ur1 lhat lhe lact' are lrue:
i. I am o\-er the age of iE and am a resident ofArizona. The information containedin this alfidavit is based upon ny orvn personal kno*ledge and, if called as a
witness. could testily conpeteutly tlrereto. I am the duly elected Sheriff ofMaicopa Count). Arizona. and I hal e been a ia$ en lorcement officer and olficial,in bofi state and f'ederal sovemrrrent- lor 51 vears.
).
4.
2
3.
In August of iasr year. a group of citizens lrorl the Surprise Arizona Tea Pary"organization met \\ith me in my office and presented a petltion signed byapproxinaiely 250 residents of \Iaricopa County. asking if I lvould investigate thecontroversy sirrrounding President Barrack Obama's birth certiflcate authentjcityand his eligibility to sene as the Prcsid€rt ofthe United States.
This group expressed its concen that. up until tllat point, no law enforcemenlagency in the country had cver gone on record indicating that they i'lad eitherlooked into this or that they *ere lvilling to do so. citing lack of resources andju sdicrional challenges.
The Maricopa County Sherilfs Olfice is in a rather unique position. Under theArizona Constitution and Arizona Reviied Statutes. as the elected Sheriff ofNlaricopa County. I have the autilo.ity to request the aid of the volunteer posse,located in the colLntt, to assist me in the execution of my drLties. Har'ingorganized a !olunteer posse ofapproxinately 1,000 members, I. as the Sherilfofthe Maricopa County Sherifls Office. can auihorize an investigation go fonvard toanswer these questions at virtuail! no eripense to the ta\ payer.
The Cold Case posse agreed to underlake the inrestigation requested by the 250cilizens of N{aricopa Count),. This posse consists of lonner police officers andattomeys who have rvorked invcstigating the controvers)/ sudounding BarackObama-
-fhe investigation mainly locused on the electronic documenl thar was
I
presented as President Obanta s long tornt binh certificate to the American peopleand to citizens of \{alicopa Corurl b\ the \\'hite Holrsc on April 27. 20 i i.
6. Tl . i r r r e i r r :- . ' r r ' ' IcJ rn ,1 q19.g, c\rrrt IJltJIregistration ofbinhs ar rhe Hr\aii Departnentmade b1 11a*'aii go\emn'tenr ot'llcials regardin.sthe las( fi\e vears.
of the procedLrres regarding theof Health and various sntementsthe Obama birth controversv over
7. Lpon close exanrinrtion ofthe e\idence. it is nr) beliefthat folger)- and lrard waslikell' comrritted in ker idenrirr docLLIrlents inclLrding President Obanra s long-lornr birth ce11ificatc. his Selecrirc Ser|ice Registration card. and his SocillSecurit\, nunlhcr.
li.
9.
\lr investiuators and I belrerc tha! Presidenl Obanra-s long-lorm bifih ceniticaleis a co|nputer-generated docltnlent. \ai ntanLtl'actllred electroniaallj,. and diat itdid not originate in a paper tblnrat. ai clained b)- the \Vlrile House. Mostinrl)onantl\'. the regijtr-ar's stanlp in lhe coutpufer generated docLrment releasedbr" the \\'hire House and pojt.d on rhe \\'hile Houle \\ebsite. mav ha\e beeninlp()ned floln another unkno\n source docuntent. The eilect of the stamp notbeing placcd on the docunteu! plrrsuanr lo sttte and tederal lans nreans that thereis probahle cause that tlte documeni is a tbrger)-. and tltereibre. ir cannot be usedas a r erification. legal or olhetl\ iie- of the date. place or circuntstances of BarackObanra s birth.
Tire Cold Case Posse lau enforcement iu!esrigation iuto Berack Obana's bifihcenit-icate and his eliribilitl ro be plcsident rs on,going. The on-going narure ofrhe inrcstigaLion is duc lo additioltal inlbmtrtiolt that Ltas conra to light since lvelreld the press conlirerce in \larch. l0ll. -\s socrn as that inlbmlation has beenploperly rcrified br. the Cold Caie Poss.. I rill release thar inlonration to thepublrc-
E\ecLrted this iL da)'olJLrne.!laricopa Counr). Arizona-
\r orr r, ..d ..rb..r.b,d b<tur( r.r. ir .r\[l n ' or -.-JU4S_
]',.1'trq,.iu\,-\'rrL $',.\!Lt L,)
'j2l
Joseph \1. Arpaio. \laricopa County Sheriff
rbin' turac - 66 .aatsr..ri^flco$ cot wtY
EXHIBIT 19
- ----- Forwarded message -----F.om Public Records <oare Thu. Aug 30.2012 ar 4 50 PMSubjecti FW: Request Voter Regrstralion NumberTo:!F4Er{*