Top Banner
44

Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Dec 18, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study
Page 2: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Pre-Proposal MeetingMarch 22, 2018

Page 3: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

• Welcome and Introductions• NOACA• Hyperloop Transportation Technologies (HTT)

• RFP Overview• Scope of Work• Evaluation Criteria• Schedule/Important Dates• Q & A

AGENDA

Page 4: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

• Grace Gallucci• NOACA Executive Director

• Kathy Sarli• NOACA Planning Director/Project Manager

• Randy Lane• NOACA Programming Director

• Susanna Merlone• Director of Administrative Services

• Chuck Michael• HTT Project Manager

INTRODUCTIONS

Page 5: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

NOACA is the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for northeast OhioConducts multi-modal transportation & environmental planning for a five-county regionDetermines how federal transportation dollars are spentConducts transportation-related air quality planning and public education activitiesFunctions as the “areawide” water quality planning agency for the region

WHAT IS NOACA … AND WHAT DOES IT DO?

Page 6: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

HYPERLOOP TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES

Page 7: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

How it works

Operational costs minimized through alternative energy and systems automation

Electromagnetic propulsion enables emission-free transport

Levitated capsule reduces friction, increases efficiency

Fully enclosed environmentprotected from weather and

traffic crossing

Page 8: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

30 M LENGTH | 20 TONS WEIGHT2.7 M DIAMETER

1,223KM/H MAX / LEVITATION AT 40 KM/H

28-40PASSENGER

CAPACITY

160,000+PASSENGERS

DAILY

4,000+CARGO

SHIPMENTS DAILY

PASSIVE MAGNETIC LEVITATION ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION

Design credit: PriestmanGoode

Capsule

Page 9: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

30 M WIDE

4 M DIAMETER

ELEVATED ON PYLONSHEIGHT DEPENDING ON TERRAIN

LOW PRESSURE ENVIRONMENT< 100 PA

POWERED BY ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES

SEISMIC ISOLATIONTECHNOLOGY

Design credit: MAD Architects

System

Page 10: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

INTEGRATED OR NEWLYBUILT STATIONS

ADAPTIVE 40 SECOND DEPARTURE RATE

SIZE MIN TURN RADIUS ACCELERATION

Station

Page 11: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

430 KM/H

925 KM/H

1,223 KM/H

2,170 KM/H

High speed rail

Airplane

Hyperloop™

Concorde

Speed

Page 12: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Solar Regenerat ivebraking Geothermal Wind

Page 13: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Energy Balance

Energy consumed:Acceleration

Capsule Systems

Vacuum

Energy generated:Solar Panels

Regenerative Braking

Page 14: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Intrinsic Safety features

Immune to weather conditions

Protected separated tube

No grade crossings with traffic

Quiet and clean electric propulsion

Passive magnetic levitation

Smart sensors in capsules and tubes

Proven insurable by Munich Re

Page 15: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Built on proven technologies

Page 16: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

L O S A N G E L E S

B R AT I S L AV A

D U B A IA B U D H A B I

B A R C E L O N A

O F F I C E S

C O L L A B O R AT O R S C I T Y8 0 0 + P R O F E S S I O N A L S F R O M 4 0 + C O U N T R I E S

T O U L O U S E

Crowd-powered ecosystem

Page 17: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study
Page 18: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Route Studies

Page 19: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

network Studies

Page 20: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

network Studies

Page 21: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

network Studies

Page 22: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

network Studies

Page 23: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

www.hyperloop.global

G R E A T L A K E S

www.greatlakeshyperloop.com

Page 24: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Dirk AhlbornCo-founder and CEO

Bibop G. GrestaCo-founder and Chairman

Andres de LeonChief Operating Officer

Andrea La MendolaChief Global Operations Officer

Bernd StephanChief Financial Officer

Robert MillerChief Marketing Officer

Page 25: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Passenger capsuleA composites leader in the aerospace, automotive and infrastructure markets

EngineeringOne of the world’s most respected design, engineering, and project management consultancies

VacuumInventor of the vacuum pump, with over 165 years in vacuum technology

ReinsuranceOne of the world's leading reinsurers on global & local risk solutions

Augmented RealityAward-winning software platform providing solutions for Augmented Reality

Magnetic levitationExclusive license for Inductrack™ passive magnetic levitation technology

DesignDesign consultancy that delivers exceptional brand experiences for leading international companies

TechnologyInvented the GPU, redefined modern computer graphics and parallel computing; GPU deep learning ignited modern AI

Ranked most successful firm in the U.S. from American Lawyer’s A-list

Legal expertise

Integrated partners & sponsors

Page 26: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Abu Dhabi, UAE Toulouse, France

Great Lakes, United StatesBratislava, Slovakia

Brno, Czech Republic Jakarta, Indonesia

Seoul, South Korea

First comprehensive Feasibility Study completedRoyal strategic partnershipPlan to build a passenger prototype

Pre-feasibility Study completedExplore building a local Hyperloop system, with the vision of creating future routes

Feasibility Study agreementExploration for a Hyperloop system connecting Brno and Bratislava, Slovakia

Co-development agreement R&D collaboration to start in 2018

Feasibility Study agreementFirst agreement in Southeast AsiaInitial focus on Jakarta

Andhra Pradesh, India

Public-Private Partnership agreement with broad industry consortiumMulti-state Feasibility Study

Feasibility Study agreementPublic-Private Partnership modelInitial focus on Andhra Pradesh, start 2018

Opened first R&D facility for developing and testing Hyperloop related technologiesBuilding of full-scale prototype

Global agreements

Page 27: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

BLANK SLIDE

www.hyperloop.global

Page 28: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

• A new mode of transport, the Hyperloop, will revolutionize travel by connecting people and goods safely and efficiently

• Feasibility study to be developed in cooperation with HTT to evaluate the first commercial Hyperloop transport system in Ohio

• DBE Goal of 10%

RFP OVERVIEW

Page 29: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

• Phase 1 - Project Objectives and Organization• Phase 2 - Site Reconnaissance and Preliminary Route

Analysis• Phase 3 - Technical and Financial Feasibility• Phase 4 - Project Development Cost, Schedule,

Implementation Strategies and Final Report

SCOPE

Page 30: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Phase 1 - Project Objectives and Organization• Objectives• Project Execution Plan• Communication/Stakeholder Engagement PlanConsultant Deliverables• Project Execution Plan• Communications/ Stakeholder Engagement Plan

SCOPE

Page 31: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Phase 2 - Site Reconnaissance and Preliminary Route Analysis• Site Reconnaissance• Corridor Route Analysis• Preliminary Network AnalysisConsultant Deliverables• Technical Memorandum No. 1 addressing Site

Reconnaissance, Corridor Route Analysis, and Preliminary Network Analysis

SCOPE

Page 32: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Phase 3 - Technical and Financial Feasibility• Environmental and Regulatory• Conceptual Engineering• Right-of-Way• Technology Assessment• Passenger/Freight Forecasts/Travel Demand• Conceptual Operating Plan

• Station Locations/Operating Timetables• Testing/Deployment

SCOPE

Page 33: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Phase 3 - Technical and Financial FeasibilityConsultant Deliverables• Draft and Summary Environmental and Regulatory Findings • Technical Memorandum No. 2

• Alignment Constraints• Location of Major Structures• Operations/Maintenance and Layover Requirements• Interfaces with Other Transportation Infrastructure• Right of Way

• Technical Memorandum, No. 3 addressing Passenger and Freight Forecasts and Travel Demand

SCOPE

Page 34: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Phase 4 - Project Development Cost, Schedule, Implementation Strategies and Final Report• Cost Methodology

• Technology Cost Methodology (HTT)• Infrastructure Cost Methodology

• Conceptual Cost Estimate• Technology Cost Estimate (HTT)• Infrastructure Cost Estimate

• Design/Build Readiness Assessment• Analysis and Recommendations• Project Schedule• Project Implementation Strategies

• Summary Report

SCOPE

Page 35: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Phase 4 - Project Development Cost, Schedule, Implementation Strategies and Final ReportConsultant Deliverables • Infrastructure Cost Methodology • Infrastructure Cost Estimate • Design/Build Readiness Assessment

• Project Delivery Analysis• Workforce/Labor Assessment

• Project Schedule (with NOACA and HTT) • Project Implementation Strategies (with NOACA and HTT) • Final Summary Report

SCOPE

Page 36: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

PROJECT FINAL SYNTHESISConsultant Deliverable• Final report that synthesizes all deliverables and

related components into a final report that is comprehensive and logically organized

SCOPE

Page 37: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

SCHEDULE/TIMELINE

A minimum of a two-week review cycle by NOACA is built in to the Project Timeline, anticipated at the end of each phase.

Page 38: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

Project Approach: Exhibit 1, Note 1 35

Project Management: Exhibit 1, Note 2 15

Qualifications of Firm/Staff- Exhibit 1, Note 3 25

Experience of Assigned Staff including Subconsultants: Exhibit 1, Note 4 25

Total 100

EVALUATION CRITERIACriteria Weight %

Page 39: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

March 22, 2018 – Pre-proposal MeetingApril 24, 2018; 12:00 Noon – Deadline for SubmissionsApril 26 & 27, 2018 – Interviews with Selected CandidatesJune 2018 – Approval of Contract by NOACA Board of Directors

IMPORTANT DATES

Page 40: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

QUESTIONS

All verbal comments, questions and responses are non-bindingOfficial responses will be made in writing and posted to the websiteCopies of this presentation will be posted on the website http://www.noaca.org

Page 41: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

www.noaca.org

Page 42: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study

NOACA will STRENGTHEN regional cohesion, PRESERVE existing infrastructure, and BUILD a sustainable multimodal transportation system to SUPPORT economic development and ENHANCE quality of life in Northeast Ohio.

Page 43: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study
Page 44: Great Lakes Hyperloop Feasibility Study