Top Banner
Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London
26

Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

Dec 28, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

Gravitational lensing of the CMB

Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz

University of Alabama in HuntsvilleTom Kibble

Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London

Page 2: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.
Page 3: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

+ve curvature Flat -ve curvature

Page 4: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

0

E

E

0

E

E

E

dD

Positive curvature: parallel rays converge, sourcesappear `larger’. Source distance (or angular size distance D) is `smaller’

Zero curvature: parallel rays stay parallel, sourceshave `same’ size Angular size distance has Euclidean value

Negative curvature: parallel rays diverge, sourcesappear `smaller’. Angular size distance D is `larger’

% Angular magnification

Page 5: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

EXAMPLES TO ILLUSTRATE THE BEHAVIOR OF PROPAGATING LIGHT

The general equation is DzGDzHd

Ddmm

55202

2

)1(4)1(2

3

Non-expanding empty Universe

Parallel rays stay parallel

1,00,02

2

0 d

dt

d

DdH m

tcttcdtD eobs

t

t

e

obs

)(

Expanding empty Universe

where )1( zd

dt

Parallel rays diverge; 0 orDD E

Dord

Ddm 00

2

2

0 orDD E

Page 6: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

Non-expanding Universe with some matter

DGd

DdH m

40

2

2

0

Parallel rays diverge; 0 orDD E

Expanding Universe with matter and energy at critical density

DzHd

Ddm

5202

2

)1(2

31

Parallel rays stay parallel; 0 orDD E

The general equation is DzGDzHd

Ddmm

55202

2

)1(4)1(2

3

where )1( z

d

dt

Page 7: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

PROPAGATION THROUGH THE REAL UNIVERSE

We know the real universe is clumped. There are three possibilities

Smooth medium all along, with 1 m

WMAP papers assumed thisscenario

At low z smooth medium has 1

CLUMPS are small and rareHardly visited by light rays

Page 8: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

CMB lensing by primordial matter

Page 9: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

2dF/WMAP1 matter spectrum (Cole et al 2005)

Page 10: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.
Page 11: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.
Page 12: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.
Page 13: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.
Page 14: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.
Page 15: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.
Page 16: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

PROPAGATION THROUGH THE REAL UNIVERSE

We know the real universe is clumped. There are three possibilities

Smooth medium all along, with 1 m

WMAP papers assumed thisscenario

Smooth medium has 1

CLUMPS are small and rareHardly visited by light rays

Page 17: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

If a small bundle of rays misses all the clumps, it will map back to a demagnified regionLet us suppose that all the matter in is clumped i.e. the voids are matter freeszz

Dord

Dd0

2

2

The percentage increase in D is given by

)20

9

2

11(

822

0022

0

smssms

s

s

s DHDHDHD

DD

where c=1 and & are the Euclidean angular size and angular size distance of the source

This is known as the Dyer-Roeder empty beam

s sD

z=zs z=0

Page 18: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

What happens if the bundle encounters a gravitational lens

E

E

db

db

Dz

DDD

sL

LLs )()1(2

)(

where the meanings of the D’s is

assuming Euclidean distances since mean density is ~ critical. Also the deflection angle effectis

b

drbr

rrGbb

22

)(44)(')(

We can use this to calculate the average

Page 19: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

Consider a tube of non-evolving randomly placed lenses

ndV

LL bdbdDzn 20 )1(2.

sD

M

bs

s drbr

rrbdbdD

D

DDDzGn

0 0220

)(4)()1(4

)20

9

2

11(

822

0022

0 smssm DHDHDH

Thus

The magnification by the lenses and demagnification at the voids exactly compensate each other.

The average beam is Euclidean if the mean density is critical.

Page 20: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

How does gravitational lensing conserve surface brightness?Unlike ordinary magnifying glass, gravitational lens magnifies a central pixel and tangentially shear an outside pixel.

Only rays passing through the gravitational lens are magnified

• The rest of the rays are deflected outwards to make room for the central magnification (tangential shearing)

Before Lensing After Lensing

When lens is "inside"source is magnified

When lens is "outside" the source is distorted but not magnified

Gravitational lensing of

a large source

Page 21: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

If there is a Poisson distribution of foreground clumps extending from the observer's neighborhood

to a furthest distance D

δ θ ≈ π² GM √nD o

Source sizeFluctuation Mass of

One clump

Number densityof clumps

In the limit of infrequent lensing,this is >> magnification fluctuation

due to the deflection of boundary rayby boundary clumps, viz.

δ θ ≈ 2π² n GMRDo

Radius of lens

Page 22: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

Returning to the three possibilities

Homogeneous1 m Source Size

Source Size

Source Size

1 m

1 m

Inhomogeneous atlow z

Clumps are missedby most rays

Page 23: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

WHY THE PRIMORDIAL P(k) SPECTRUM DOES NOT ACCOUNT FORLENSING BY NON-LINEAR GROWTHS AT Z < 1

Homogeneous Universe

Mass Compensation(swiss cheese)

Poisson Limit

Page 24: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

While the percentage angular magnification has an average of

Its variance is given by

For a large source (like CMB cold spots), this means the average angular sizecan fluctuate by the amount

ndV

2

0222

22022 )(4

5

3

2

31

3

8)(

bs

f

s

f drbr

rrbdb

D

D

D

DGnndV

N

where lensofarea

sourceofareaN

Page 25: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.

Cluster CMB lensing parameters

Page 26: Gravitational lensing of the CMB Richard Lieu Jonathan Mittaz University of Alabama in Huntsville Tom Kibble Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London.