Top Banner

of 55

graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

Jun 03, 2018

Download

Documents

Hugo Rodriguez
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    1/55

    Prepared by:

    Ayman Naalweh

    Mustafa Mayyaleh

    Nidal Turkoman

    An-Najah National University

    Faculty of Engineering

    Civil Engineering Department

    Graduation Project:

    3D Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction Design For Al-Manar Building

    Supervised By

    Dr: Imad AL-Qasem

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    2/55

    3Ds For Al-Manar Building

    GRADUATION PROJECT

    December 2010

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    3/55

    SUBJECTS TO BE COVERED

    Abstract

    Chapter One : Introduction Chapter Two : Slab

    Chapter Three : Beams

    Chapter Four : Columns

    Chapter Five : Footing Chapter Six : Checks

    Chapter Seven : Dynamic Analysis

    Chapter Eight : Soil Structure Interaction

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    4/55

    Abstract

    AL-Manar building composed of seven stories office

    building. Each floor is composed of equal surface area

    of 1925 m2with 3.5 meter height and long spans.

    The building analyzed under static loads using SAP

    2000v12.

    After that the building was analyzed dynamically.

    Finally it was designed based on Soil Structure

    Interaction (SSI).

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    5/55

    INTRODUCTION

    About the project:

    (AL-Manar) building in Ramallah, is an office buildingconsists of seven floors having the same area and height,

    the first floor will be used as a garage.

    Philosophy of analysis & design:

    SAP2000 V12 is used for analysis and ultimate design

    method is used for design of slab, the slab are carried over

    drop beams.

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    6/55

    INTRODUCTION

    Materials of construction:

    Reinforced concrete:() = 2.4 ton/m3 ,

    The required compressive strength after 28 days is

    fc = 250 kg/cm2,

    For footings fc =280 kg/cm2

    For columns fc = 500 kg/cm2

    Fy =4200 kg/cm2

    Soil capacity = 3.5 kg/cm

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    7/55

    INTRODUCTION

    loads:

    Live load: LL=0.4 ton/m2

    Dead load: DL=(Calculated By SAP) , SID= 0.3 ton/m2

    Earthquake load: its represents the lateral load that comes

    from an earthquake.

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    8/55

    INTRODUCTION

    Combinations:

    Ultimate load= 1.2D+1.6L

    Codes Used:

    American Concrete Institute Code (ACI 318-05)

    Uniform Building Code 1997 (UBC97)

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    9/55

    SLAB

    One way solid slab is used :

    Thickness of slab: t = Ln/24 =12.9 cm use15 cm ,d=12 cm Slab consists of two strips (strip 1 & 2)

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    10/55

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    11/55

    SLAB

    ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR SLAB :

    STRIP 1 :

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    12/55

    SLAB

    M+ve.= 1.28 ton.m

    = 0.0024

    As bottom= * b* d = 2.8 cm2

    Ast = shrinkage * b*h = 0.0018*100*15= 2.7 cm2

    Use 1 12 mm /30 cm

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    13/55

    SLAB

    M ve= 1.75 ton.m

    = 0.0028

    Ast top= 3.66 cm2

    Use 1 12 mm/ 25cm

    Shrinkage steel = 1 12 mm / 30 cm

    Check shear :Vu= 2.95 ton at distance d from face of column.

    Vc = (.53)(10) (b) (d) =0.75*0.53**10*1.0*0.12= 7.54 ton > 2.95 ton. Ok

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    14/55

    BEAMS

    BEAMS SYSTEM:

    Beams will be designed using reaction method(Loads from

    slab reactions) in this project, all the beams are dropped,

    multi spans and large space beams.

    Beam 1

    (0.8*0.3)

    Beam 2

    (0.8*0.4)

    Girder 1

    (0.9*0.3)

    Girder 2

    (0.9*0.6)

    Ast TOP 15.01 cm2 43.7 cm2 39.7 cm2 97.68 cm2

    # of bars 4 22 mm 12 22 mm 9 25 mm 20 25 mm

    Ast BOTTOM 14.40 cm2 41.32 cm2 32.6 cm2 78.5 cm2

    # of bars 4 22 mm 11 22 mm 9 22 mm 21 22mm

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    15/55

    BEAMS

    DESIGN OF BEAM 1:

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    16/55

    BEAMS

    DESIGN OF BEAM 1:

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    17/55

    BEAMS

    DESIGN OF BEAM 1:

    Positive moment on beam 1:

    M+ve = 38.44 ton.m

    =0. 00624

    As bottom= * b*d = 14.4 cm2

    As min = 0.0033*b*d=0.0033.*30*76=7.54 cm2 < 14.4 cm2

    Use 4 22 mm

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    18/55

    BEAMS

    DESIGN OF BEAM 1:

    Negative moment on beam 1:

    M -ve= 40.34 ton.m

    = 0.0066

    Astop= 15.01 cm2

    Use 4 22 mm

    Min. beam width = ndb +(n-1)S+2ds+2* cover

    b min = 4(2.2)+ 3(2.5)+2(2.5) +2(1)

    =23.3 cm < 30 cm ok

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    19/55

    COLUMNS

    Columns System :

    Columns are used primarily to support axial compressive

    loads, that coming from beams that stand over them.

    24 columns in this project are classified into 2 groups

    depending on the ultimate axial load and the shape.

    The ultimate axial load on each column is calculated from

    3D SAP, and the reaction of beams as shown in next table :

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    20/55

    3D (SAP)

    (ton)

    Hand

    calculation

    (ton)

    3D (SAP)

    (ton)

    Hand

    calculation

    (ton)

    C1 451.1 284.1 C13 858.3 759.8

    C2 901.8 711.4 C14 1425.5 1859.3

    C3 852 711.4 C15 1425.7 1859.3C4 462.6 284.1 C16 857 759.8

    C5 852.4 869.1 C17 852.6 869.1

    C6 1796 2126.2 C18 1786.9 2126.2

    C7 1723.4 2126.2 C19 1786.5 2126.2C8 863.1 869.1 C20 851.9 869.1

    C9 858.6 759.8 C21 453.1 284.1

    C10 1425.4 1859.3 C22 895.9 711.4

    C11 1425.7 1859.3 C23 895.1 711.4

    C12 856.2 759.8 C24 451.8 284.1

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    21/55

    COLUMNS

    Design of columns:

    the capacity of column:

    Pn max = {0.85'c (Ag - Ast) + y Ast}

    Ast= 0.01 Ag (Assumed)

    All columns are considered as short columns .

    Column type Tied column Spiral column

    0.65 0.7

    0.8 0.85

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    22/55

    COLUMNS

    Group (1) Group (2)C1 C13 C6

    C2 C16 C7

    C3 C17 C10

    C4 C20 C11

    C5 C21 C14C8 C22 C15

    C9 C23 C18

    C12 C24 C19

    Columns Groups :

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    23/55

    Let

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    24/55

    COLUMNS

    Design columns in group (1):

    Pu = 980 ton

    Check buckling:

    The column is short

    K: The effective length coefficient (=1 braced frame )

    Lu: unbraced length of the columnr: radius of gyration of the column cross section

    Let = 1 , = 16.67 < 22 ok short column.

    Pn max = {0.85'c (Ag - Ast) + y Ast}

    Let

    b

    b

    M

    M

    2

    1

    = 1

    Let

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    25/55

    COLUMNS

    Design columns in group (1):

    Ag = 4073 cm2

    Use 70*70 Ag = 4900 cm2

    Ast = 0.01 4900 = 49 cm2 (use 20 18)

    :Spacing between stirrupsSpacing between stirrups shall not exceed the least of the following:

    1) At least dimension of the column = 70cm

    2) 16db= 16*1.8 = 28.8 cm

    3) 48ds= 48*1.0 = 48 cm

    use Ties (1 10 mm/25 cm c/c)

    Let

    = 1

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    26/55

    COLUMNS :

    Summary:

    Group 1 Group 2Ultimate load

    (ton)

    980 1900

    dimensions (cm) 70*70 Dia. = 95

    Reinforcement 20 18 28 18

    Stirrups / Spiral 10 mm 10 mm

    Spacing (cm) 25 5

    cover (cm) 2.5 cm 2.5 cm

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    27/55

    FOOTING :

    FOOTING SYSTEM:

    All footings were designed as isolated footings. The design depends on the total axial load carried by

    each column.

    Groups of footings :

    FootingGroups

    F1, F4,F21,F24Group 1F2, F3,F5,F8,F9,F12,F13,F16,F17,F20,

    F22, F23Group 2F6,F7,F10,F11,F14,F15,F18,F19Group 3

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    28/55

    FOOTING :

    Summary :

    Group 3Group 2Group 16.5*6.54.7*4.73.4*3.4Dimensions (m)

    13011070Thickness (cm)37.623.1217.62Steel in x direction (cm2/m)37.623.1217.62Steel in y direction (cm2/m)

    555Cover (cm)

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    29/55

    FOOTING :

    Group 2 using sap :

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    30/55

    FOOTING :

    Group 2 using sap :

    Moment per meter in x& y =395.66/4.7= 84.18 ton.m/m

    Compare it with hand calculation Mu= 88.73 ton.m

    % of error = 88.73-84.18/84.14 = 5.4 %

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    31/55

    FOOTING :

    Tie Beam Design:

    Tie beams are beams used to connect between columns

    necks, its work to provide resistance moments applied on

    the columns and to resist earthquakes load to provide

    limitation of footings movement.

    Tie beam was designed based on minimum requirements

    with dimensions of 30 cm width and 50 cm depth. Use minimum area of steel , with cover = 4 cm.

    Ast Top bars Bottom bars stirrups

    4.46cm2 4 12 mm 4 12 mm 1 10 / 20cm

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    32/55

    CHECKS

    Check Compatibility:This requires that the structure behave as one unit, so the

    computerized model should achieve compatibility, to be moreapproach to reality.

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    33/55

    CHECKS

    Check of equilibrium:

    Dead load:

    Columns :

    Type of

    column

    Number of

    columns dimensions (m)

    Weigh per

    unitvolume

    weight (ton)

    Tied 112 3.5 0.7 0.7 2.4 3.5*0.7*0.7*2.4*112 = 460.99

    Spiral 56 3.5 D= 0.95 2.4 (/4 *0.952 )*3.5*2.4*56= 333.42

    Total 794.41

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    34/55

    CHECKS

    Slab :

    Area of slab =1846.2m

    Weight of slab = 1846.2*2.4*0.15*7 = 4652.42 ton

    Beams :

    Type of beamNumber of

    beams

    dimensions

    (m)

    Total

    length

    Weigh per

    unit volumeweight (ton)

    Ground

    beams 112 0.3 0.5 404.4 2.4 0.3*0.5*2.4*404.4 = 145.58

    Beam 1 42 0.3 0.8 77 2.4 0.3*0.8*2.4*77*7 = 310.46

    Beam 2 98 0.4 0.8 516 2.4 0.4*0.8*2.4*516*7 = 2774.14

    Girder 1 112 0.3 0.9 102 2.4 0.3*0.9*2.4*102*7 = 462.71

    Girder 2 112 0.6 0.95 102 2.4 0.6*0.9*2.4*102*7 = 946.75Total 4359.18

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    35/55

    CHECKS

    Super imposed dead load:

    Super imposed dead load = area of slab* Super imposed on slab

    = 1846.2*0.3*7 = 3877.02 ton

    Total dead load = columns +slabs +beams +super imposed

    = 794.41+4652.42+3877.02+4359.18= 13683.03 ton

    Results from SAP: Dead load = 13947.82ton

    Error in dead load:

    % of error = (13947.82-13683.03)/ 13683.03 = 1.9% < 5% ok

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    36/55

    CHECKS

    Live load:

    Live load = area of slab* live load

    = 1846.2*0.4*7 = 5169.36ton

    Results from SAP:

    Live load = 5169.36

    Error in live load:

    % of error =(5169.36 -5169.36)/5169.36 = 0% < 5% ok

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    37/55

    CHECKS

    Check stress strain relationship:

    Taking beam 1 as example:

    StressStrain relationship is more difficult check compared with

    others, because of the large difference between values of 1D and

    3D model, which usually appears during check .

    Max M+Ext. (Ton.m) Max M-Int. (Ton.m)

    1D 3D % of error 1D 3D % of error

    38.44 43.18 12.3 40.34 35.4 13.9

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    38/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Period of structure :

    Fundamental period of structure depends on the nature of

    building, in terms of mass and stiffness distribution in the

    building .

    (Define area mass for building)

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    39/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    40/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Check the modal response period from Sap by Rayleigh

    method

    Approximate method calculation:

    Rayleigh law: period = 2 , Where:

    M = mass of floor

    = displacement in direction of force (m)

    F: force on the slab (ton)

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    41/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Level mass force delta mass*delta2 force*delta period

    (sec)

    7 196.6 1846.2 1.97 762.9849 3637.014

    6 196.6 1846.2 1.88 694.863 3470.856

    5 196.6 1846.2 1.74 595.2262 3212.388

    4 196.6 1846.2 1.54 466.2566 2843.148

    3 196.6 1846.2 1.27 317.0961 2344.674

    2 196.6 1846.2 0.94 173.7158 1735.428

    1 196.6 1846.2 0.52 53.16064 960.024

    sum 3063.303 18203.53 2.58

    Rayleiph method calculation for 7 stories in x- direction :

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    42/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Response spectrum :

    Analysis input:

    IE: seismic factor (importance factor) = 1.0

    R: response modification factor (Ordinary frame) = 3

    PGA: peak ground acceleration = 0.2 g

    According to seismic map for Palestine (Ramallah city)

    Soil type: SB (Rock)

    Ca: seismic coefficient for acceleration = 0.2

    Cv: seismic coefficient for velocity = 0.2

    Scale factor = = 3.27

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    43/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Definition of response spectrum function :

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    44/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Define of earthquake load case in x-direction :

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    45/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Base reaction for Response Spectrum :

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    46/55

    DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Summary:

    Displacment

    (cm)

    Base Reaction of

    Qauke (ton)

    Modal period

    (sec)

    Direction

    5.28321.72.63X-direction ( U1 )

    4.64393.32.15Y- direction ( U2 )

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    47/55

    SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)

    The process in which the response of the soil influences the

    motion of the structure and the motion of the structure influences

    the response of the soil is termed as soil-structure interaction

    (SSI).

    Neglecting SSI is reasonable for light structures in relatively stiff

    soil such as low rise buildings, however, The effect of SSI

    becomes prominent for heavy structures resting on relatively soft

    soils .

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    48/55

    SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)

    Soil structure model from SAP

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    49/55

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    50/55

    SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)

    M+ ext.= 32.73 ton.m

    = 0.0053

    As bottom= * bw* d = 12.0 cm2

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    51/55

    SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)

    SUMMARY:

    Max M-Ext. Max M+Ext. Max M-Int. Max M+Int.

    BEAM Normal

    1D

    SSI

    3D

    Normal

    1D

    SSI

    3D

    Normal

    1D

    SSI

    3D

    Normal

    1D

    SSI

    3D

    BEAM1 0 -58.21 38.44 32.73 -40.34 -35.86 0.32 17.37

    BEAM2 0 -109.32 96.69 57.93 -101.64 -40.35 2.06 18.02

    Girder1 0 -72.2 87.87 41.91 -103.58 -76.12 53.87 40.56

    Girder2 0 -155.28 220.14 100.7 -258.58 180.4 90.21 94.56

    Astcm2 Astcm

    2 Astcm2 Astcm

    2

    BEAM1 0 22.4 14.23 11.05 14.99 13.33 0.1 6.2

    BEAM2 0 48.3 41.32 23.08 43.9 15.64 0.8 6.7

    Girder1 0 25.86 31.1 14.4 39.68 27.7 17.93 13.38

    Girder2 0 52.01 78.49 32.68 93.9 62.8 28.84 31.12

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    52/55

    SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)

    SUMMARY:Max S-Ext. Max S+Ext. Max S-Int. Max S+Int.

    BEAM Normal1D

    SSI3D

    Normal1D

    SSI3D

    Normal1D

    SSI3D

    Normal1D

    SSI3D

    BEAM1 -13.85 -24.35 19.82 21.5 -14.34 -15.83 -13.85 14.34

    BEAM2 -36.8 -48.14 51.23 42.25 -37.07 -29.74 37.07 29.69

    Girder1 -26.95 -34.91 47.26 35.13 -39.16 -34.72 34.59 34.23

    Girder2 -66.83 -86.87 117.53 88.4 -98.42 -85.91 85.49 87.1Spacing(10)

    (cm)

    Spacing(10)

    (cm)

    Spacing(10)

    (cm)

    Spacing(10)

    (cm)

    BEAM1 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35

    BEAM2 25 13 13 13 25 25 25 25

    Girder1 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    53/55

    SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)

    ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR SLAB:

    STRIP 2:

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    54/55

    SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)

    M+ ve=1.18 ton.m

    b=100 cm, d=12 cm

    = 0.00221

    As bottom= * b* d = 2.6 cm2

    Asmin.=2.7cm2

    Use 1 12 mm /30 cm

  • 8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt

    55/55

    SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)

    SUMMARY: