8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
1/55
Prepared by:
Ayman Naalweh
Mustafa Mayyaleh
Nidal Turkoman
An-Najah National University
Faculty of Engineering
Civil Engineering Department
Graduation Project:
3D Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction Design For Al-Manar Building
Supervised By
Dr: Imad AL-Qasem
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
2/55
3Ds For Al-Manar Building
GRADUATION PROJECT
December 2010
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
3/55
SUBJECTS TO BE COVERED
Abstract
Chapter One : Introduction Chapter Two : Slab
Chapter Three : Beams
Chapter Four : Columns
Chapter Five : Footing Chapter Six : Checks
Chapter Seven : Dynamic Analysis
Chapter Eight : Soil Structure Interaction
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
4/55
Abstract
AL-Manar building composed of seven stories office
building. Each floor is composed of equal surface area
of 1925 m2with 3.5 meter height and long spans.
The building analyzed under static loads using SAP
2000v12.
After that the building was analyzed dynamically.
Finally it was designed based on Soil Structure
Interaction (SSI).
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
5/55
INTRODUCTION
About the project:
(AL-Manar) building in Ramallah, is an office buildingconsists of seven floors having the same area and height,
the first floor will be used as a garage.
Philosophy of analysis & design:
SAP2000 V12 is used for analysis and ultimate design
method is used for design of slab, the slab are carried over
drop beams.
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
6/55
INTRODUCTION
Materials of construction:
Reinforced concrete:() = 2.4 ton/m3 ,
The required compressive strength after 28 days is
fc = 250 kg/cm2,
For footings fc =280 kg/cm2
For columns fc = 500 kg/cm2
Fy =4200 kg/cm2
Soil capacity = 3.5 kg/cm
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
7/55
INTRODUCTION
loads:
Live load: LL=0.4 ton/m2
Dead load: DL=(Calculated By SAP) , SID= 0.3 ton/m2
Earthquake load: its represents the lateral load that comes
from an earthquake.
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
8/55
INTRODUCTION
Combinations:
Ultimate load= 1.2D+1.6L
Codes Used:
American Concrete Institute Code (ACI 318-05)
Uniform Building Code 1997 (UBC97)
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
9/55
SLAB
One way solid slab is used :
Thickness of slab: t = Ln/24 =12.9 cm use15 cm ,d=12 cm Slab consists of two strips (strip 1 & 2)
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
10/55
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
11/55
SLAB
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR SLAB :
STRIP 1 :
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
12/55
SLAB
M+ve.= 1.28 ton.m
= 0.0024
As bottom= * b* d = 2.8 cm2
Ast = shrinkage * b*h = 0.0018*100*15= 2.7 cm2
Use 1 12 mm /30 cm
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
13/55
SLAB
M ve= 1.75 ton.m
= 0.0028
Ast top= 3.66 cm2
Use 1 12 mm/ 25cm
Shrinkage steel = 1 12 mm / 30 cm
Check shear :Vu= 2.95 ton at distance d from face of column.
Vc = (.53)(10) (b) (d) =0.75*0.53**10*1.0*0.12= 7.54 ton > 2.95 ton. Ok
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
14/55
BEAMS
BEAMS SYSTEM:
Beams will be designed using reaction method(Loads from
slab reactions) in this project, all the beams are dropped,
multi spans and large space beams.
Beam 1
(0.8*0.3)
Beam 2
(0.8*0.4)
Girder 1
(0.9*0.3)
Girder 2
(0.9*0.6)
Ast TOP 15.01 cm2 43.7 cm2 39.7 cm2 97.68 cm2
# of bars 4 22 mm 12 22 mm 9 25 mm 20 25 mm
Ast BOTTOM 14.40 cm2 41.32 cm2 32.6 cm2 78.5 cm2
# of bars 4 22 mm 11 22 mm 9 22 mm 21 22mm
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
15/55
BEAMS
DESIGN OF BEAM 1:
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
16/55
BEAMS
DESIGN OF BEAM 1:
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
17/55
BEAMS
DESIGN OF BEAM 1:
Positive moment on beam 1:
M+ve = 38.44 ton.m
=0. 00624
As bottom= * b*d = 14.4 cm2
As min = 0.0033*b*d=0.0033.*30*76=7.54 cm2 < 14.4 cm2
Use 4 22 mm
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
18/55
BEAMS
DESIGN OF BEAM 1:
Negative moment on beam 1:
M -ve= 40.34 ton.m
= 0.0066
Astop= 15.01 cm2
Use 4 22 mm
Min. beam width = ndb +(n-1)S+2ds+2* cover
b min = 4(2.2)+ 3(2.5)+2(2.5) +2(1)
=23.3 cm < 30 cm ok
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
19/55
COLUMNS
Columns System :
Columns are used primarily to support axial compressive
loads, that coming from beams that stand over them.
24 columns in this project are classified into 2 groups
depending on the ultimate axial load and the shape.
The ultimate axial load on each column is calculated from
3D SAP, and the reaction of beams as shown in next table :
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
20/55
3D (SAP)
(ton)
Hand
calculation
(ton)
3D (SAP)
(ton)
Hand
calculation
(ton)
C1 451.1 284.1 C13 858.3 759.8
C2 901.8 711.4 C14 1425.5 1859.3
C3 852 711.4 C15 1425.7 1859.3C4 462.6 284.1 C16 857 759.8
C5 852.4 869.1 C17 852.6 869.1
C6 1796 2126.2 C18 1786.9 2126.2
C7 1723.4 2126.2 C19 1786.5 2126.2C8 863.1 869.1 C20 851.9 869.1
C9 858.6 759.8 C21 453.1 284.1
C10 1425.4 1859.3 C22 895.9 711.4
C11 1425.7 1859.3 C23 895.1 711.4
C12 856.2 759.8 C24 451.8 284.1
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
21/55
COLUMNS
Design of columns:
the capacity of column:
Pn max = {0.85'c (Ag - Ast) + y Ast}
Ast= 0.01 Ag (Assumed)
All columns are considered as short columns .
Column type Tied column Spiral column
0.65 0.7
0.8 0.85
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
22/55
COLUMNS
Group (1) Group (2)C1 C13 C6
C2 C16 C7
C3 C17 C10
C4 C20 C11
C5 C21 C14C8 C22 C15
C9 C23 C18
C12 C24 C19
Columns Groups :
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
23/55
Let
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
24/55
COLUMNS
Design columns in group (1):
Pu = 980 ton
Check buckling:
The column is short
K: The effective length coefficient (=1 braced frame )
Lu: unbraced length of the columnr: radius of gyration of the column cross section
Let = 1 , = 16.67 < 22 ok short column.
Pn max = {0.85'c (Ag - Ast) + y Ast}
Let
b
b
M
M
2
1
= 1
Let
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
25/55
COLUMNS
Design columns in group (1):
Ag = 4073 cm2
Use 70*70 Ag = 4900 cm2
Ast = 0.01 4900 = 49 cm2 (use 20 18)
:Spacing between stirrupsSpacing between stirrups shall not exceed the least of the following:
1) At least dimension of the column = 70cm
2) 16db= 16*1.8 = 28.8 cm
3) 48ds= 48*1.0 = 48 cm
use Ties (1 10 mm/25 cm c/c)
Let
= 1
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
26/55
COLUMNS :
Summary:
Group 1 Group 2Ultimate load
(ton)
980 1900
dimensions (cm) 70*70 Dia. = 95
Reinforcement 20 18 28 18
Stirrups / Spiral 10 mm 10 mm
Spacing (cm) 25 5
cover (cm) 2.5 cm 2.5 cm
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
27/55
FOOTING :
FOOTING SYSTEM:
All footings were designed as isolated footings. The design depends on the total axial load carried by
each column.
Groups of footings :
FootingGroups
F1, F4,F21,F24Group 1F2, F3,F5,F8,F9,F12,F13,F16,F17,F20,
F22, F23Group 2F6,F7,F10,F11,F14,F15,F18,F19Group 3
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
28/55
FOOTING :
Summary :
Group 3Group 2Group 16.5*6.54.7*4.73.4*3.4Dimensions (m)
13011070Thickness (cm)37.623.1217.62Steel in x direction (cm2/m)37.623.1217.62Steel in y direction (cm2/m)
555Cover (cm)
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
29/55
FOOTING :
Group 2 using sap :
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
30/55
FOOTING :
Group 2 using sap :
Moment per meter in x& y =395.66/4.7= 84.18 ton.m/m
Compare it with hand calculation Mu= 88.73 ton.m
% of error = 88.73-84.18/84.14 = 5.4 %
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
31/55
FOOTING :
Tie Beam Design:
Tie beams are beams used to connect between columns
necks, its work to provide resistance moments applied on
the columns and to resist earthquakes load to provide
limitation of footings movement.
Tie beam was designed based on minimum requirements
with dimensions of 30 cm width and 50 cm depth. Use minimum area of steel , with cover = 4 cm.
Ast Top bars Bottom bars stirrups
4.46cm2 4 12 mm 4 12 mm 1 10 / 20cm
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
32/55
CHECKS
Check Compatibility:This requires that the structure behave as one unit, so the
computerized model should achieve compatibility, to be moreapproach to reality.
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
33/55
CHECKS
Check of equilibrium:
Dead load:
Columns :
Type of
column
Number of
columns dimensions (m)
Weigh per
unitvolume
weight (ton)
Tied 112 3.5 0.7 0.7 2.4 3.5*0.7*0.7*2.4*112 = 460.99
Spiral 56 3.5 D= 0.95 2.4 (/4 *0.952 )*3.5*2.4*56= 333.42
Total 794.41
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
34/55
CHECKS
Slab :
Area of slab =1846.2m
Weight of slab = 1846.2*2.4*0.15*7 = 4652.42 ton
Beams :
Type of beamNumber of
beams
dimensions
(m)
Total
length
Weigh per
unit volumeweight (ton)
Ground
beams 112 0.3 0.5 404.4 2.4 0.3*0.5*2.4*404.4 = 145.58
Beam 1 42 0.3 0.8 77 2.4 0.3*0.8*2.4*77*7 = 310.46
Beam 2 98 0.4 0.8 516 2.4 0.4*0.8*2.4*516*7 = 2774.14
Girder 1 112 0.3 0.9 102 2.4 0.3*0.9*2.4*102*7 = 462.71
Girder 2 112 0.6 0.95 102 2.4 0.6*0.9*2.4*102*7 = 946.75Total 4359.18
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
35/55
CHECKS
Super imposed dead load:
Super imposed dead load = area of slab* Super imposed on slab
= 1846.2*0.3*7 = 3877.02 ton
Total dead load = columns +slabs +beams +super imposed
= 794.41+4652.42+3877.02+4359.18= 13683.03 ton
Results from SAP: Dead load = 13947.82ton
Error in dead load:
% of error = (13947.82-13683.03)/ 13683.03 = 1.9% < 5% ok
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
36/55
CHECKS
Live load:
Live load = area of slab* live load
= 1846.2*0.4*7 = 5169.36ton
Results from SAP:
Live load = 5169.36
Error in live load:
% of error =(5169.36 -5169.36)/5169.36 = 0% < 5% ok
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
37/55
CHECKS
Check stress strain relationship:
Taking beam 1 as example:
StressStrain relationship is more difficult check compared with
others, because of the large difference between values of 1D and
3D model, which usually appears during check .
Max M+Ext. (Ton.m) Max M-Int. (Ton.m)
1D 3D % of error 1D 3D % of error
38.44 43.18 12.3 40.34 35.4 13.9
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
38/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Period of structure :
Fundamental period of structure depends on the nature of
building, in terms of mass and stiffness distribution in the
building .
(Define area mass for building)
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
39/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
40/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Check the modal response period from Sap by Rayleigh
method
Approximate method calculation:
Rayleigh law: period = 2 , Where:
M = mass of floor
= displacement in direction of force (m)
F: force on the slab (ton)
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
41/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Level mass force delta mass*delta2 force*delta period
(sec)
7 196.6 1846.2 1.97 762.9849 3637.014
6 196.6 1846.2 1.88 694.863 3470.856
5 196.6 1846.2 1.74 595.2262 3212.388
4 196.6 1846.2 1.54 466.2566 2843.148
3 196.6 1846.2 1.27 317.0961 2344.674
2 196.6 1846.2 0.94 173.7158 1735.428
1 196.6 1846.2 0.52 53.16064 960.024
sum 3063.303 18203.53 2.58
Rayleiph method calculation for 7 stories in x- direction :
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
42/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Response spectrum :
Analysis input:
IE: seismic factor (importance factor) = 1.0
R: response modification factor (Ordinary frame) = 3
PGA: peak ground acceleration = 0.2 g
According to seismic map for Palestine (Ramallah city)
Soil type: SB (Rock)
Ca: seismic coefficient for acceleration = 0.2
Cv: seismic coefficient for velocity = 0.2
Scale factor = = 3.27
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
43/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Definition of response spectrum function :
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
44/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Define of earthquake load case in x-direction :
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
45/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Base reaction for Response Spectrum :
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
46/55
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Summary:
Displacment
(cm)
Base Reaction of
Qauke (ton)
Modal period
(sec)
Direction
5.28321.72.63X-direction ( U1 )
4.64393.32.15Y- direction ( U2 )
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
47/55
SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
The process in which the response of the soil influences the
motion of the structure and the motion of the structure influences
the response of the soil is termed as soil-structure interaction
(SSI).
Neglecting SSI is reasonable for light structures in relatively stiff
soil such as low rise buildings, however, The effect of SSI
becomes prominent for heavy structures resting on relatively soft
soils .
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
48/55
SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
Soil structure model from SAP
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
49/55
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
50/55
SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
M+ ext.= 32.73 ton.m
= 0.0053
As bottom= * bw* d = 12.0 cm2
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
51/55
SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
SUMMARY:
Max M-Ext. Max M+Ext. Max M-Int. Max M+Int.
BEAM Normal
1D
SSI
3D
Normal
1D
SSI
3D
Normal
1D
SSI
3D
Normal
1D
SSI
3D
BEAM1 0 -58.21 38.44 32.73 -40.34 -35.86 0.32 17.37
BEAM2 0 -109.32 96.69 57.93 -101.64 -40.35 2.06 18.02
Girder1 0 -72.2 87.87 41.91 -103.58 -76.12 53.87 40.56
Girder2 0 -155.28 220.14 100.7 -258.58 180.4 90.21 94.56
Astcm2 Astcm
2 Astcm2 Astcm
2
BEAM1 0 22.4 14.23 11.05 14.99 13.33 0.1 6.2
BEAM2 0 48.3 41.32 23.08 43.9 15.64 0.8 6.7
Girder1 0 25.86 31.1 14.4 39.68 27.7 17.93 13.38
Girder2 0 52.01 78.49 32.68 93.9 62.8 28.84 31.12
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
52/55
SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
SUMMARY:Max S-Ext. Max S+Ext. Max S-Int. Max S+Int.
BEAM Normal1D
SSI3D
Normal1D
SSI3D
Normal1D
SSI3D
Normal1D
SSI3D
BEAM1 -13.85 -24.35 19.82 21.5 -14.34 -15.83 -13.85 14.34
BEAM2 -36.8 -48.14 51.23 42.25 -37.07 -29.74 37.07 29.69
Girder1 -26.95 -34.91 47.26 35.13 -39.16 -34.72 34.59 34.23
Girder2 -66.83 -86.87 117.53 88.4 -98.42 -85.91 85.49 87.1Spacing(10)
(cm)
Spacing(10)
(cm)
Spacing(10)
(cm)
Spacing(10)
(cm)
BEAM1 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
BEAM2 25 13 13 13 25 25 25 25
Girder1 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
53/55
SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR SLAB:
STRIP 2:
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
54/55
SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
M+ ve=1.18 ton.m
b=100 cm, d=12 cm
= 0.00221
As bottom= * b* d = 2.6 cm2
Asmin.=2.7cm2
Use 1 12 mm /30 cm
8/12/2019 graduation_project_ps_1.ppt
55/55
SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI)
SUMMARY: