Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 1 Government of India Ministry of Human Resource Development Department of School Education and Literacy ***** Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 22 nd May, 2014 Minutes of the 38th RMSA PAB Meeting (18 th Integrated RMSA PAB Meeting) held on the 20 th March, 2014, for approval of Annual Work Plan & Budget 2014-15 of Haryana under the Centrally Sponsored Scheme of the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) 1. The 38 th Meeting (18 th Integrated RMSA PAB) of the Project Approval Board of the RMSA to consider the Annual Work Plan & Budget 2014-15 for the State of Haryana under Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA, including the components of ICT@ Schools, Girls’ Hostels, Vocational Education and Inclusive Education for the Disabled at Secondary Stage (IEDSS) was held on the 20 th March, 2014, under the Chairmanship of Shri R. Bhattacharya, Secretary (School Education & Literacy). 2. The list of participants who attended the meeting is attached at Annexure-I. Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) 3. At the outset, Secretary (SE&L) welcomed all the participants. The Joint Secretary, Ms. Radha Chauhan, briefed PAB that at the beginning of the 12 th Five Year Plan (2012-13)RMSA had committed liabilities to the tune of Rs 8500 Crores, but since no new works were approved in 2012-13 and with limited approvals in the year 2013-14, the Committed liabilities have come down to the tune of Rs 4800 Crores. 4. However, the concern still remains since a number of States still have a huge backlog of Non-Recurring works which could not be started due to the fixed cost norms of the earlier approvals, and where the States have not been able to arrange for the gap-funding between the earlier approved norms and the State SoRs, and where the funds have been released to the States resulting in the situation where the States are sitting on a huge unspent balance. She informed the PAB that this has resulted in preventing the release of funds from the Ministry on one hand, which later on may lead to surrendering of funds under the scheme, while the Scheme itself suffers from lack of funds. In light of the situation the State is requested to utilize the funds sanctioned in order for further releases as well for new approvals being considered by the PAB.
77
Embed
Government of India Ministry of Human Resource ......Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 5 (vi) PAB also took note of huge backlog in recruitment and appointment of approved teachers. In view
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 1
Government of India
Ministry of Human Resource Development
Department of School Education and Literacy
*****
Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi
22nd
May, 2014
Minutes of the 38th RMSA PAB Meeting (18th
Integrated RMSA PAB Meeting) held on the 20th
March, 2014, for approval of Annual Work Plan & Budget 2014-15 of Haryana under the
Centrally Sponsored Scheme of the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA)
1. The 38th
Meeting (18th
Integrated RMSA PAB) of the Project Approval Board of the RMSA to
consider the Annual Work Plan & Budget 2014-15 for the State of Haryana under Rashtriya
Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA, including the components of ICT@ Schools, Girls’
Hostels, Vocational Education and Inclusive Education for the Disabled at Secondary Stage
(IEDSS) was held on the 20th
March, 2014, under the Chairmanship of Shri R. Bhattacharya,
Secretary (School Education & Literacy).
2. The list of participants who attended the meeting is attached at Annexure-I.
Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA)
3. At the outset, Secretary (SE&L) welcomed all the participants. The Joint Secretary, Ms.
Radha Chauhan, briefed PAB that at the beginning of the 12th
Five Year Plan (2012-13)RMSA
had committed liabilities to the tune of Rs 8500 Crores, but since no new works were approved in
2012-13 and with limited approvals in the year 2013-14, the Committed liabilities have come
down to the tune of Rs 4800 Crores.
4. However, the concern still remains since a number of States still have a huge backlog of
Non-Recurring works which could not be started due to the fixed cost norms of the earlier
approvals, and where the States have not been able to arrange for the gap-funding between the
earlier approved norms and the State SoRs, and where the funds have been released to the States
resulting in the situation where the States are sitting on a huge unspent balance. She informed the
PAB that this has resulted in preventing the release of funds from the Ministry on one hand, which
later on may lead to surrendering of funds under the scheme, while the Scheme itself suffers from
lack of funds. In light of the situation the State is requested to utilize the funds sanctioned in order
for further releases as well for new approvals being considered by the PAB.
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 2
5. She noted that there is a need for the State to shift the activities of the subsumed
components to the RMSA SPD. Since funds for all the subsumed components are now being
released to the RMSA Implementing Society (through the State) all correspondence and
communication will be with RMSA SPD and the Secretary including financial matters concerning
all its subsumed components. Therefore , the States would do well to streamline the activities
relating to ICT @ Schools, IEDSS, Vocationalization of Education and Girls’ Hostel functioning
into the RMSA Society and formally notify the RMSA SPD as the nodal person) anchoring all
these activities.
6. She also informed the Board that in order to facilitate efficient implementation and also
address issue relating to amount available to States under MMER, following provisions has been
made:
(i) Release of ad-hoc recurring grant to the tune of 25% of the expenditure incurred in the previous
FY by the States.
(ii) Facility of spill-over of funds relating to approvals of non-recurring grant that would provide
States with the flexibility to deploy funds regardless of year of its approval (but as per norms under
which they were approved).
(iii) MMER to be available as against the Annual Plan approval
7. General Issues highlighted for consideration and guidance of the PAB:
(i) Quality interventions: Adoption of project based approach: The PAB outlining the
overall shift that is needed with four years of activity based interventions under the
Quality head of RMSA, emphasized the need for the States to adopt a holistic project
based approach to interventions wherein selected activities are put together in a manner
that the outcomes and objectives that are envisaged through those interventions that are
clearly defined and are measurable over a period of time through basic indicators such
as enhancement in enrolment (CWSN, Girls SC..) retention, transition, performance or
reduction in drop out and so on. Each such intervention needs to be substantiated by its
performance outcome which should be taken up for evaluation by the State as part of its
MMER activities.
(ii) Quality of Inclusion in Secondary schools (CWSN under IEDSS): The issue of
deployment of special education teachers was highlighted that at present, there is no
deployment policy of special education teachers in any state and their (special
education teachers) role in secondary classes need to be clearly outlined. At present, in
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 3
most states, most of these teachers have not been deployed in the schools but rather at
the block headquarters with no defined role and responsibility.
PAB advised that States should ensure that all these special education teachers (for
whom the financial support is being made from IEDSS) should be deployed in the
school(s), and if they are serving more than one school in the vicinity then there formal
deployment should be with the school having larger number of CWSN children.
PAB also requested NCERT to guide the States by detailing the role of special
education teachers at the secondary level and if need be modify the curriculum to meet
the needs of CWSN children. Even though the IEDSS scheme has been subsumed
under the RMSA, the planning and implementation of this component is still being
carried out in an isolated manner, with some of the States/ UTs still implementing the
interventions under this component totally through NGOs which is adverse to the
overall objectives of scheme which envisages State as the prime implementing agency
and NGOs role being limited in aiding and supporting the State.
The PAB emphasized that Secondary Schools need to be made more inclusive for
CWSN, with adaptations to infrastructure to be planned under the RMSA non-recurring
/ civil works component, while the teacher training for improving inclusive practices
(targeted at CWSN) of Subject teachers should be within the RMSA teacher training
package.
(iii) UDISE: The issue with regard to UDISE data of the state was also raised. In the current
year, MHRD/ TSG has used UDISE data to verify the distance from the UPS to the
proposed secondary school and on the basis of distance shown in the UDISE data, the
current year proposal for establishing new school has been appraised. However, the
state claims some technical problem in that column no 19B of the UDISE DCF which
results in inconsistency where the distance from UPS to Secondary Schools is shown
as zero in many cases even if the actual distance is 6 or 15 Kms and due to this
discrepancy in the data, proposals for new school could not be found eligible for
upgradation.
NUEPA was requested to look into this and the State may pursue the matter of
correcting the UDISE data with NUEPA.
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 4
Though the timeline for sending the UDISE data ( elementary and Secondary ) to
NUEPA is in December every year, it is seen that that States have not been able to send
their UDISE data to NUEPA on time, which in turn affects and causes delay in the
appraisal of RMSA plans, since they are based on the UDISE data.
There are discrepancies in the UDISE data, which are reflected in the mismatch
between this years’ data ( 2013-14) and last year’s data ( 2012-13).
The coding /categorization (lowest class/ highest class) is being followed differently in
different states, resulting in various interpretations of the number of schools, for a same
set of schools. Thus, while in Kerala, a school is given a single UDISE code for the
Primary, Upper Primary, Secondary and Higher Secondary, in Andhra Pradesh,
Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Odisha, etc, the UDISE code for Primary
School is different from the code of the Secondary, from that of the Higher Secondary,
etc, resulting in these States showing a higher number of government schools.
PAB requested NUEPA to clarify this and this is especially critical since the UDISE
will be the official data from this year onwards.
(iv) Reference was made to the 3rd
RMSA JRM aide memoire which suggested tracking of
children who have passed out of Class VIII to ensure that they get enrolled in Class IX,
using simple techniques of identifying clusters/feeder schools to a Secondary school
(v) In view of the limited availability of funds under the programme and also the fact that
States have been unable to act on previous approvals relating to recruitment and
appointment of staff , PAB indicated that approvals regarding Lab Attendants,
Librarians and Multi task Support Staff previously committed but not yet acted upon be
revoked with immediate effect. Approval/Commitment for salary was for that particular
year and if not acted upon and not revalidated specifically, later on stands withdrawn.
Commitment of financial support towards this category of support personnel, which is
generally sourced on a contractual basis, will also be reviewed as part of the Annual
Plan and is subject to availability of funds after provisioning for core set of
commitments including teacher’s salary.
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 5
(vi) PAB also took note of huge backlog in recruitment and appointment of approved
teachers. In view of the limited fund availability under the scheme, it was noted that
provision of salary under the annual recurring grant shall be earmarked and committed
only for the particular year. Any subsequent appointment commitment of RMSA funds
will be subject to availability of funds in the current year.
8. Ms. Caralyn K. Deshmukh, Director (RMSA -1) gave a detailed overview of the status of
implementation, planning and monitoring of RMSA in the State of Haryana. In the presentation,
various aspects of implementation of the RMSA scheme in the State, including areas of concern,
major issues, decreasing Education Indicators (GER), progress of recurring and non-recurring
activities approved to the State under the RMSA were highlighted.
A copy of presentation is at Annexure II
9. Convergence of Schemes:
Out of the total schools in Haryana, till 2013-14, 3409 schools have been covered under
RMSA, 3217 under ICT @ Schools, 3195 under IEDSS, and 140 under VE.
The objective is to cover the schools completely in terms of available schemes- the whole
school approach where a school improvement plan makes use of the available schemes at
the state and centre to ensure the holistic development and improvement of the school.
Thus, a school is ensured adequate and good quality infrastructure-compatible with the
pedagogical needs of the different classes and subjects, teachers training, remedial,
libraries, laboratories, children with special needs, special educators, ICT facilities,
vocational education/options and linkage with girls hostels.
10. Special Focus Districts (SFDs)
Out of the 21 districts in Haryana, 04 districts are SFDs, (2 SC + 01 Minority and 1 SC &
Minority) namely Ambala, Sirsa, Fatehbad and Gurgaon. There are 36 educational blocks
(EBBS). This year, a total of 603 schools have been approved to be strengthened and 16 schools
brought under VE coverage in the 4 SFD districts of Haryana (115 in Gurgaon, 185 +5 (VE) in
Sirsa, 155 +5 (VE) in Ambala and 148+6(VE) in Fatehbad) .
11. Areas of Concern:
(i) There is no information on the dropout rate and retention rate for the year 2011-12,
2012-13 and 2013-14.
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 6
(ii) Girl’s participation in enrolment is less than the boys. The representation of boys and
girls in the total enrolment is 55.88% and 44.12% respectivel .
(iii) Some districts exhibit low transition rate viz. Mewat 65.92% and Sirsa 91.11%. And
having low GPI viz. Mewat 0.50 and Palwal 0.87.
(iv) The UDISE 2013-14 shows that the number of government schools shown is 3212, in
which 26 schools increased from last year’s number. The State could not give any
clarification to explain this increase.
(v) The state of Haryana has 36 Educationally Backward Blocks (EBBs). Girl’s hostels have
been approved in 18 EBBs only. Till date, only 2 girls’ hostels are functional.
(vi) Although GIS Mapping has been completed in the state except in 4 districts the
result/report of the mapping exercise has not yet been finalized
(vii) The state has not provided training calendar, name of the training institutions.
Information on training need assessment; need to identify the grey areas for the training
of Headmasters/Principals’; and expected outcomes (Best practices, innovation; and
impact on school administration.
(viii) Since the inception of RMSA, the MHRD, GOI has approved 28297 teachers for in-
service training but the state was able to provide training only to 8657 (30.60%)
teachers.
(ix) Internet and broadband connectivity is not available in all the schools covered so far
under ICT. State has also not provided the comprehensive progress report for year 2013-
14.
(x) PAB cancelled following previous approvals for Strengthening of existing schools
5 schools had been repeated for which the components detailed are to be cancelled
(3 Science Lab,2Computer room,4 Art & Culture Room 3 Library and 2 ACR) ,1
school is a private un-aided school for which the components approved (Drinking
Water: 1 Toilet: 1) will be cancelled.(the list of these schools are appended in
Annexure IV)
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 7
12. Areas of Strength
(i) 100% teachers of Government Secondary Schools are trained.
(ii) Separate cadre for teachers in the educationally backward district of Mewat (Minority).
(iii) ‘Mukhiya Mantri Shiksha Diksha’ programme for quality enhancement.
(iv) Evidence of school level planning. School improvement plans has been developed in the
state.
(v) SMDCs have been constituted in all High and Senior secondary schools.
(vi) The state has shared evidence of recruitment orders of 6786 teachers
13. PAB’s attention was invited to the terms and conditions specified in the appointment orders of
Staff, where it is linking the staff appointment to approval from GoI under the RMSA
programme. PAB expressed concern that this would mean that as and when the programme
support stops, schools opened under support from RMSA would be closed down and staff
appointed with support from the programme would be terminated which is not the case.
Clearly, teachers and staff are appointed by the State, based on the recruitment rules and
policies of the State and are the State’s responsibility which should not be undermined by such
misleading aversions in the appointment orders. It was also clarified that while the state may
take a view on recruitment of PGT under RMSA, however, the financial commitment under
RMSA will be projected on the basis of TGT and their pay scales.
14. State was requested to update and clarify the vacancy position, which was submitted as under:
Total posts in State - - 34,972
On 3:2 ratio between Elementary - 21,235
& Secondary - 13,737
RMSA posts sanctioned - 7,551
Total secondary cadre - 21,288 (13737+7551)
No. Of vacancies in secondary cadre - 6942
No. Of vacancies on RMSA Posts - 795 (7551-6756)
No. Of vacancies borne on State - 6147
(State says recruitment under process)
15. Progress under RMSA:
(i) Non-Recurring:
Out of 53 new schools approved to the State, only 41 schools have been made
functional by the State. Till 2013-14, strengthening of 1998 existing schools has been
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 8
approved to the State. Out of the total approved schools under strengthening the state
has taken-up 91.93% of the works till date, in which 63.36% are completed & 28.56%
are in progress. The rest is yet to be started.
Out of total approved outlay of Rs. 455.99 crore and Central Share of Rs. 341.99 crore,
Rs. 235.18 crore has been released .Rs. 106.18 crore remains as the committed liability.
The State has reported an estimated expenditure of Rs. 294.15 crore till 31st March,
2014 which is 85.39% of available funds of 344.70 crore
(ii) Recurring:
In the year 2013-14 Rs. 215.73 crore was approved for recurring activities with Central
Share of Rs. 161.80 crore. An amount of Rs. 62.00 crore was released to the State. The
State has reported an expenditure of Rs. 80.57 crore, as on 31st March 2014.
No progress is seen with regard to the components of SMDC training, book fair and
training of MRPs and teachers.
16. Annual Work Plan and Budget of 2014-15:
The proposal submitted by the State was discussed and the following decisions were taken.
Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA)
S.
No.
Activities
I NON RECURRING
1.
Up Gradation Of New Schools:
The proposal of the State for up gradation of 22 Government schools ( opening of new
schools ) was not approved by PAB as the proposed schools are not eligible as per distance
norms ( zero distance from the nearest Secondary Schools)
2. Strengthening of Existing Govt. Schools:
Haryana proposed for strengthening of 852 existing schools. PAB approved 321 schools
which are found eligible. (The list is attached- Annexure V) 528 Schools are not eligible
on the ground that :- 24 schools are new schools, land not available in one school, 38
schools’ details with regard to availability of Science Labs and Art & Craft rooms are not
available in UDISE , 465 schools already have Sci. lab/Art Craft /library room as per
UDISE 2012-13 data and 3 schools did not have any components as part of the proposal.
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 9
3. Major Repair Grant:
State has proposed major repair for 84 Class rooms in 19 schools. As per UDISE 2013-14,
major repair is required only in 5 class rooms in 2 schools (i.e. in GSSS Jakhal Mandi: 4,
GSSS Malvi: 1). However, the estimates for the above two schools submitted by the State
do not have the required technical and administrative sanction Hence, not approved.
II
RECURRING
1.
Financial assistance for salary of Staff for new schools sanctioned in previous year
(2009-2014)
In view of the limited fund availability under the scheme, it was noted that provision of
salary under the annual recurring grant shall be earmarked and committed only for
personnel formally in place. Any subsequent appointment commitment of RMSA funds
will be subject to availability of funds in the current year.
Status of approval of staff in previously PAB approved new schools :
Year of
Sanction
No. of
Sanctioned
Schools
Teaching Staff Non-Teaching Staff
Headmasters
Approved
Subject
Teachers
Approved
Total Subject
Teachers +
Headmasters
Lab
Attendant
Multitask
Support
Staff
2010-11 32 32 160 192 32 32
2011-12 5 5 25 30 5 5
21* 21 105 126 21 21
2013-14 16** 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-
Total 74 school
(74=58
RMSA
school +21
Kissan
Model
schools)
58 290 348 58 58
*21 Kisan Model Schools in which PAB approved teaching & Non-teaching Staff.
** Teachers not approved by PAB in the new schools approved in 2013-14.
(i) Salary of Headmasters and subject teachers for the schools upgraded under RMSA
till date : For the schools upgraded in the previous years, State proposed financial
assistance for the salary of 74 ( including Head Masters @ Rs. 45860 per month and
370 teachers @ Rs 36000 per month).
(ii) PAB approved financial support for salary of 16 headmasters (who are in place) out of
the PAB approved 58 Head teachers posts @ Rs 38300 per month and 63 teachers (who
are in place) out of the 290 teachers approved @ Rs 29690 per month (16 teachers in 9
KGBV+47 teachers in 28 schools) for 12 months for Maths, Science (Chem. Physics,
Bio), S.S.T., Geography, Pol Science, Eco & History), language (English & Hindi).
Haryana RMSA-2014-15 Page 10
(ii) Salary of Lab Attendants: The proposal for financial assistance for 74 Lab attendants
against the approved 58 Lab Attendants posts in the previously approved schools was not
approved by PAB as no recruitment has been done. PAB revoked the earlier approvals for
these posts.
(iii) Salary of Multi Task Support Staff in schools: The proposal for financial assistance for
74 MTSS against the 58 previously approved posts was not approved by PAB as no staff
are in position. PAB revoked the earlier approvals for these posts.
2. Additional Staff for existing schools sanctioned till 2013-14:
(i) (i) Subject Teacher: The proposal for financial support for salary of 7223 teachers was
approved for 5682 teachers @ Rs 29690 per month against teachers in position for 12
months for the subjects; Maths, Science(Chemistry, Physics, Bio), S.S.T (Geography, Pol.
0.00lakh, IEDSS-Rs 260.25 lakh ) with a GoI Committed Liability of Rs. 20421.34 lakh (RMSA –
Rs 10681.37 lakh, ICT – Rs. 8144.60 lakh. GH – Rs 1335.12lakh, IEDSS-Rs 260.25 lakh and VE
Rs.0.00 lakh)
The spill over from previous approvals (of Non-Recurring grants) and committed liabilities as
against it was noted with reference to further releases of non-recurring grants to the State.
22. The release of funds to different components against fresh approvals and against committed
previous approvals will be further guided by the following conditions:
(i) The State Administration shall give a written commitment for meeting its share of the
RMSA, ICT@ school, IEDSS, Girls Hostel & Vocational Education of the budget approved
according to prescribed sharing pattern of the components.
(ii) SMDCs or equivalent bodies should be constituted and accounts opened to incur expenditure
under school grant, minor repair, civil works, and other such expenditure, which have to be
incurred only through these bodies as per RMSA norms.
(iii) The State Government will maintain their level of investment in Secondary education as in
2009-10 and give the details of this to GOI before the release of second instalment.
(iv) The second instalment would only be released after (a) the proportionate instalment of State
share has been transferred to the State implementation Society, (b) at least 50% expenditure
against available funds has been incurred, (c) utilization certificate has been submitted for
funds released in the year 2013-14 and (d) Audit Reports have been submitted for the year
2012-13.
The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the Chair.
**********
Annexure-I
Participants of the 38th Meeting (the 18th composite meeting) of Project Approval Board (PAB)to consider integrated Annual Work Plan and Budget, 2014-15 for the State of Haryana ofRMSA, ICT, Girls’ Hostels, Vocational Education and IEDSS Schemes held on 20th March,2014 in Conference Room (Room No.112-C), Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.
List of participants
1. Shri R. Bhattacharya ChairpersonSecretary, SE&L, MHRD
Pass % of Total 52.1 49.52 59.39 49.4 58.31 58 59.52 55.4 44.76Pass % of SCs 30.38 29.05 38.1 25.9 31.53 36.65 39.18 34.63 28.88
52.149.52
59.39
49.4
58.31 58 59.52
55.4
44.76
30.38 29.05
38.1
25.9
31.53
36.6539.18
34.63
28.88
Glimpse of Civil Works Progress
New school ACR Science lab Computerroom
Library Art/craftroom
Toilet Block DW
53
11521087
1426
1547
1957
257
6011
730668
915981
1252
187
2315
322 338410
453
559
511
Approved Completed In progress16
5/29/2014
9
Progress of ICT @ School
1436
0
1436
37 45
82
Completed coverage of ICT in schools-Govt.
Completed coverage of ICT in schools-Govt. Aided
Completed coverage of ICT in schools-Total Schools
Yet to be covered under ICT- Govt.
Yet to be covered under ICT- Govt.Aided
Yet to be covered under ICT- TotalSchools
17
Progress of Girls Hostel
The State is having 36 EBBs & GirlsHostel only for 18 EBBs has beensanctioned. As far as the progress isconcerned the state has started theactual construction work of 13 girlshostels
18
5/29/2014
10
Areas of Strength• In the state 100% teachers of Government Secondary Schools are trained.
• Separate cadre for teachers in the special focus district of Mewat(Minority)
• ‘Mukhiya Mantri Shiksha Diksha’ programme launched for qualityenhancement
• Bottom up approach of planning School improvement plan has beendeveloped.
• SMDC are in place in all High and Senior secondary schools.
• The state has submitted hard copies of recruitment orders of 6786teachers and the appraisal team verified each and every recruitment orderand the same also discussed in the Pre-PABs
• 28 + 09 KGVBs schools are upgraded in 2010-11 and teachers arerecruited. Documentary evidences shows teachers are in place;
19
Areas of ConcernEducation Indicator:• Girl’s participation in enrolment is less than the boys. The
representation of boys and girls in the total enrolment is 55.88%and 44.12% respectively which is showing around 11% lessparticipation then the boys.
• State did not provide the dropout rate and retention rate for the year2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14.
• The transition rate (class VIII to IX) at state level is 96.31% in theyear 2013-14, which has increased from 94.40% in 2012-13 Thedistricts having low transition rate viz. Mewat 65.92%and Sirsa91.11% need special attention.
• In UDISE 2013-14, no. of Govt schools generated as 3212 , 26schools increased from last year. State has not given anynotification for increase in number, so appraisal team consideredlast year approved figure i.e. 3183 as school grant
20
5/29/2014
11
Areas of Concern (Contd.)Access & Participation:
• Although the Gross Access Ratio at the state level is 76.81 %, The District West Mewat(62.55%), and Palwal (64.94%) is having very low Gross access ratio, which is an area ofconcern.
• GIS mapping: - Although, GIS Mapping has been completed in the state except 4 districts,but the result of the mapping exercise has not yet been finalized
• As per perspective plan total 61 secondary schools were required by the state to cover allaccess less habitation. Considering the above facts, the state is required 45 schools in thecoming years. The list of these 45 schools is awaited from the state.
Civil Works:
• The overall cumulative progress of the Civil Works in the State since inception is91.93% of the works till date, in which 63.36% are completed & 28.56% are inprogress. The rest 8.07% is yet to be started.
• 5 schools found duplicate having component :Science Lab : 3, Computer room : 2,Art Culture Room : 4, Library : 3 ACR : 2 (proposed for cancellation),
• 1 school found as private un-aided having component: Water : 1,Toilet : 1 (proposedfor consideration)
• 108 schools found to be duplicate in ICT @ School Scheme (2 schools repeated in2005-2006, 98 schools repeated in 2005-2006, 4 schools repeated in 2007-2008, 3schools are middle schools & 1 school is private
21
IssuesIssues• Pending Annual Report 2012-13 (English & Hindi Version).• State has committed of Rs 50 Cr only for State Budget Provision
2014-15.• Discrepancies in the Audit Report 2012-13(e.g. expenditure reported
more than approval and expenditure incurred against componentswhich were not approved in 2012-13).
Recruitment of Lab Assistant:• Since 2010-11, the PABs have recommended financial support for
709 lab assistant but the financial progress reports (QPR, AuditReport and Costing Sheets of AWP&B) are not showing expenditureon 709 lab assistant;
• The state has provided documents against recruited 77 LabAssistant; but these documents neither have Official File Number northe date in the documents. In this case it is difficult for the appraisalteam to take positive decision for financial support for 77 LabAssistant;
Areas of Concern (Contd.)
5/29/2014
12
Areas of Concern (Contd.)
Teacher & Teacher Training :• State has reported sanctioned post of teachers in 2011-12 as 10212,
however in 2014-15 State has reported 18329 sanctioned teachers forSecondary level (difference of 8117 teachers in the sanctioned post).
• The state has not provided training calendar, name of the training institutionsfor headmasters training.
• Training Need Assessment; need to identify the grey areas for the trainingof Headmasters/Principals’; and Expected outcomes (Best practices,innovation; and Impact on school administration
• In service subject teachers’ training is inconsistent in the state. Since theinception of RMSA, the MHRD, GOI has approved 28297 teachers for in-service training but the state has provided training only to 8657 (30.60%)teachers
23
Proposal and RecommendationRMSA2014-15
24
5/29/2014
13
Sl.No. Activities Proposal for 2014-15 Recommendation for 2014-15
Phy Fin Phy FinA RMSA
Non recurring1 New Schools
1.01 1 section school1.02 2 section school 22 1805.98
58.01Flexible Pool for engaging resource persons includingteachers/skill trainers, Skill Knowledge Providers,Coordinators, guest faculty etc. 1450.00 14.5 50 725.00
58.02 Raw Materials, maintenance of tools and equipment’spurchase of books, software, e- learning material etc 280.00 50 140.00
58.03 Cost of providing hands on skill training to students inindustrial and commercial establishments 150.00 50 75.00
58.04Cost of Assessment and Certification @ Rs 600 for100 students of Class IXth and Class IXth and Rs. 800/-for 100 students of Class XIth and Class XIIth
60.00 60.00
58.05 Office Expenses/Contingencies (includingexpenditure on awareness & publicity, guidanceand counseling, transport, field visits,stationery, electricity, water office expensesetc.) 200.00 2
44
5/29/2014
23
58.06 Teacher training (In-servicetraining) 6.00 0.06 100 6.00Subtotal 2146.00 1206.00
59.01 Flexible Pool for EngagingResource persons includingteachers / skill trainers, SkillKnowledge Providers,Coordinators, guest facultyetc. 14.5 100 1450.00 14.5 50 725.00
59.02
Raw Materials, maintenance oftools and equip ment’s purchaseof books, software, e-learningmaterial etc
100 280.00 25 70.00 59.02
Raw Materials,maintenance oftools and equip-ment’s purchaseof books, software,e-learning materialetc
45
Sl.No. ActivitiesProposal for 2014-15 Recommendation
for 2014-15Phy Fin Phy Fin
59.03Cost of providing hands on skill training tostudents in industrial and commercialestablishments
100 150.00 25 37.50
59.04
Cost of Assessment and Certification @ Rs600 for Class IX and X and Rs 800 for ClassXI and XII. 30.00 30.00
46
5/29/2014
24
Sl.No. ActivitiesProposal for
2014-15Recommendation for
2014-15Phy Fin Phy Fin
59.05
Office Expenses/ Contingencies(including expenditure onawareness & publicity, guidance andcounseling, trans port, field visits,stationery, electricity, water officeexpenses etc.
100 200.00 50 100.00
59.06 Teacher Training (Induction) 100 22.00 100 22.00
Sub Total 2132.00 984.50
Total Recurring 3040.80 3099.30
VE-Total ( Non recurring +recurring) 6040.80 4876.06
47
Summary of Scheme wise Proposal & Recommendations2014-15 is as follows:
Scheme
Fresh Proposal for 2014-15 Fresh Recommendation for2014-15 Total