Government of Rajasthan Rural Development & Panchyat Raj Deparetment (Watershed Development & Soil Conservation) Name of Project : IWMP - 20 Effective Area of Project : 5071.5 Ha. Cost /ha. : 12000/- Cost of Project : 608.58 lacs Block : Uniara District : Tonk PIA- Assistant Engineer W.D. & S.C., P.S. Uniara Project Manager, WCDC W.D. & S.C., District - Tonk
88
Embed
Government of Rajasthanwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed... · CHAPTER – I INTROCUTION Location : IWMP 20 Project is located in Uniara Block, of TONK district.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Government of Rajasthan
Rural Development & Panchyat Raj Deparetment
(Watershed Development & Soil
Conservation)
Name of Project : IWMP - 20
Effective Area of Project : 5071.5 Ha.
Cost /ha. : 12000/-
Cost of Project : 608.58 lacs
Block : Uniara
District : Tonk
PIA- Assistant Engineer W.D. & S.C., P.S. Uniara
Project Manager, WCDC W.D. & S.C., District - Tonk
Detail of Project
1. Name of Project : IWMP 20
2 Sanction No. & date of Project : vkbZ-MCY;w-,e-ih-- 820(1-87)@fu-t-Hkw-l-
@ 5856&6030 fnukad 09-05-14
2. Macro & Micro Nos : 071206 090307 090308 090309
13 1,3,8,9 1,5,6,7 2,3,9,11,15,16
3. Deviation from Project Sanctioned :
Items As per Project Sanctioned
Project Area 5071.50 ha.
Effective Area 5071.50 ha.
Macro/ Micro
9/9,15
6/13 7/1
7/9 8/5,6
8/1,5 7/3 6/13 9/11
9/3, 9,11,15,16
8/5 9/2,3,11,16
No
Name of Gram
Mohammadpura Khatoli
Payaga Deoli Soap
Mandawara
Panchayats
Rahimnagar, Manoharpura
Khatoli, Gangli
Payga Chhan, Ibrahim nagar, Islamnagar, Anwarnagar
Deoli Govindpura,mohammadnagar
Soap
Alipura-bhagwanpura,
mahuwa Name of Villages
Geogrophical 307.20 1295.00 778.30
1086.00 355.00 1250.00
Area
Project Cost 608.58 lacs.
(Rs in Lakhs)
CERTIFICATE
Certified that the undersigned have proposed the appropriate and need based
activities required in the watershed project area with active participation of beneficiaries
along with consultation of Watershed Committees(WCs). Approval of watershed project
plan and DPR has been obtained from WC, Gram Sabha. The plan and DPR document
of IWMP 20 project, at P.S. Uniara District Tonk technically sound, viable and
appropriate for implementation during the period 2013 - 2018.
We recommend that this plan be sanctioned and put to implementation.
As discussed earlier . Horticulture/vegetables could be more economical to Small and
marginal farmers with irrigation source.
Setting of Vermi Compost Units :
Keeping in view the side effect of residues of chemicals and fertilizers on human health the
emphasis would be on cultivation of organic produce through motivating farmers and
providing assistance for production of organic input, vermi compost.
Production and distribution of quality seed :
There is need to ensure that good quality seed is available for cultivators for which
adequate seed production would be initiated in watershed areas with the assistance of
private sector and agriculture department technologies
Sprinklers :
Ffor efficient water management practices emphasis on demonstration of sprinklers with
adequate financial support and convergence/private partnership.
Innovative hitech/ export oriented activities :
innovative hi-tech/ export oriented projects like floriculture, etc which are in negligible
existence at present, can be implemented by individual farmers / private companies.
Drip irrigation :
Drip irrigation will be promoted in all horticulture plantations, vegetables, green houses and
in nurseries for rational use of irrigation water higher yields and quality produce.
Table 2.7 Livestock Status - animals/milk production / average yield
Yield(milk/ Dry matter
S. Description Population mutton/ Units
requirement per Total requirement
No. of animals in No. Wool) year (7Kg per in Tone.
(Lit / Day) animal.)
1 Cows 760 1.5-3 Lit 760 5320 1941.80
Indigenous 725 1.5-3 Lit. 725 5075 1852.37
Hybrid 35 4-5 Lit. 35 245 89.42
2 Buffaloes 518 3-7 Lit. 518 3626 1323.49
3 Goat 595 0.5-1 Lit. 595 - -
4 Sheep 1240 0.75 - 0.90 kg 1240 - -
5 Camel 0 0 0.00
6 Poultry 0 0 0.00
7 Piggery 0 0 0.00
Total 4058 27111 Kg. 9895.50
In spite of the large number of livestock, production is less hence increase in productivity across all
species, is a major challenge. To reduce production of unproductive cattle and improve the
productivity by improving the breeds by breeding management following activities will be taken up
Castration.
Artificial insemination
Distribution of superior Breeding bulls for use in Cattle and Buffalo.
Breeding distribution crossbred rams, Buck.
Animals health camps green fodder demonstration.
Besides breed improvement other animal husbandry practices like better health, hygiene
and feeding practices can increase productivity of livestock. Hence Activities like Animal
health camps demonstration of improved methods of conservation and utilization of Forage
crops are proposed.
Table 2.8 Existing area under fodder (ha)
S.No Item Unit Area/QuantityTone
1 Existing Cultivable area under Fodder Ha 0
2 Production of Green fodder 15
3 Production of Dry fodder 8600
4 Area under Pastures 912 ha
5 Production of fodder 200
6 Existing area under Fuel wood 20 ha
7 Supplementary feed 1 Kg/Day
8 Silage Pits NIL
9 Availability of fodder 8815 T
10 Deficiency of fodder 1080.50 T
The table above shows there is fodder deficiency (Requirement is 9895.50 T. and
availability 8815 T.)
To minimize the large and expanding gap between feed and fodder resource availability
and demand there is need for
Increase in area under fodder crops
Increase in productivity of fodder crops
Development of pastures
And reduction in large number of livestock production through replacement by few
but productive animals
Table 2.9 Agriculture implements
S. No Implements Nos.
1 2 3
1 Tractor 315
2 Sprayers-manual/ power 430
3 Cultivators/Harrows 240
4 Seed drill 225
5 Thresher 225
Farm mechanization and seed banks :
As discussed earlier 10.00% land holding belong to Large farmer, 90% land holdings
belong to small and marginal farmers who own only 19% of total cultivator so owning of big
farm implements by individual farmers is not economical so SHG would be promoted to buy
farm implements and rent to farmer
Table 2.10 NREGA Status - No. of Card Holder, activities taken so far, employment
status.
Sr. Name of GP/ Total No .of Employment Activity taken up so far no. village job cards Status
1 lksai 1104 582
1- Strengthening of Water Harvesting
Structure. 2
eksgEeniqjk 1239 918 2. Rural connecting work
3. Pasture development works
3 e.Mkojk 936 862
4 ik;xk
1255 1032
5 nsoyh
. 1060 . 626
6 1554 886
[kkrkasyh
Table 2.11 Migration Details
Distance of Income from
No. of No. of days
destination of Occupation
Major reason(s) for such Name of village persons per year of migration during
migrating occupation
migrating migration from the migration
(Rs. in lakh)
village (km)
Rahimnagar 6 720 Lack of Off Farm 160 to 510 km. Labour in cities 2.15
activities, Small &
Manoharpura
15 1800 -- -- 5.40
fragmented Holdings,
Sop 20 2400 Rainfed Ag., Large Family -- -- 7.20
size & Low Wages
Payaga
20 2400 -- -- 7.20
Chhan 10 1200 -- -- 3.60
Ibrahimnagar 0 0 -- -- 0.00
Anwarnagar 5 600 -- -- 1.80
Islamnagar 0 0 -- -- 0.00
Deoli 20 2800 -- -- 8.40
Mahmoodnagar 0 0 -- -- 0.00
Govindpura 0 0 0.00
Khatoli 20 2500 7.50
Gangli 8 1150 3.45
Mahua 10 1500 -- -- 4.50
Alipura-Bhagwanpura 0 0
0.00
;ksx 150 51.20
The migration can be check by creation of employment opportunities ,enhancing farm level economy , increases the income of the people engaged in animal husbandry by dairy, poultry and marketing and value addition. (as discussed earlier) and diversification in livelihoods . The existing livelihoods Village are given below
Table 2.12 (a) : Major activities (On Farm)
Name of activity No of House holds Average annual income from the Rs.
cultivators 985 25000
Dairying 134 7500
Poultry -- --
Piggery -- --
Landless Agri. Labourers 50 --
Table 2.12(b) : Major activities (Off Farm)
Name of activity Households/ individuals Average annual income from the Rs.
The efforts for increase in income through off farm activities will be made under livelihood component through assistance to SHG or individuals
Table 2.13( a ) Status of Existing SHG :
Monthly Fund Assistan
Source Trainin
Membe Activity of g
S. No Name of SHG income available ce Village rs involved assistanc receive Rs Rs available
e d
1 rstkth 10 50 Y Anwarnagar
2 Ckkck jkenso 11 20 Y Anwarnagar
3 ckykth 11 25 Y Anwarnagar
4 ekgknsoth 10 50 Y Anwarnagar
5 ckykth 11 50 Y Payaga
6 t; ekrk th 11 50 Y Payaga
7 nso ukjk;.k 12 50 Y Payaga
8 HkS:th 10 100 Y Payaga
9 xq: egkjkt 12 20 Y Soap
10 ctjax cyh 11 20 Y Soap
11 nsyoky th 13 20 Y Soap
12 lsfodk 11 20 Y Soap
13 t; ekrk th 10 20 Y Soap
14 guqeku th 10 20 Y Soap
15 fcfLeYyk 15 20 Y Soap
16 pk¡n 12 50 Y Soap
17 Ckkck jke jghe 10 20 Y Soap
18 Ekkrk th 13 20 Y Gangli
19 jkenso th 13 20 Y Gangli
20 egknso 13 20 Y Gangli
21 HkS: th 15 20 Y Gangli
22 guqeku th 10 20 Y Gangli
23 nso egkjkt 12 20 Y Gangli
24 eksgEen 11 20 Y Khatoli
25 vyh gqlSu 10 20 Y Khatoli
26 f'ko 'kadj 11 20 Y Khatoli
27 y{eh 11 20 Y Khatoli
28 ckyk th 12 20 Y Khatoli
29 x.ks’k th 13 20 Y Khatoli
30 ';ke ckck 11 20 Y Khatoli
31 jk/ks jk/ks 10 20 Y Khatoli
32 mtkyk 11 20 Y Khatoli
33 dqy nso 13 20 Y Khatoli
34 pkSFkekrk th 11
20
Y Alipura-Bhagwanpura
35 'kadj Hkxoku 10
20
Y Alipura-Bhagwanpura
36 ctjax cyh 11
20
Y Alipura-Bhagwanpura
37 x.ks’k th 11 20 Y Alipura-
Bhagwanpura
38 nsoukjk;.k 11
20
Y Alipura-Bhagwanpura
39 pkSFkekrk 12 20 Y Deoli
40 'kdj Hkxoku 11 20 Y Deoli
41 guqeku th 12 20 Y Deoli
The table indicates existence of number of groups in the area also these need to
be strengthened through trainings and financial assistance.
II. Technical Features :
Table 2.14 : Ground Water
Functional Area
Water S.No Source No. Dry irrigate
depth mtr. availability(days) d Ha.
i) Dug wells 390 16-18 450 Approx 180
ii) Shallow tube wells 42 70 25 Approx 230
iii) Pumping sets 195 0 -
iv) Deep Tube Wells 26 140 50 365 days
Total 653
Table 2.15 Availability of drinking
water
Present
No. of
Drinking availability
Name drinking No.
S. water of No.
of the water requires No. Desfunctional No
requirement drinking functional
Village/GP sources repairs
Ltrs/day water
available
Ltrs/ day
1 Mohammadpura 30000 18000 18 10 6 2
2 Sop 150000 110000 26 16 8 2
3 Payaga 120000 85000 20 14 5 1
4 Khatoli 60000 45000 16 10 3 3
4
5 Mandawra 50000 148
75000 2 4
80000
6 Deoli 110000 19 12 3 4
Table 2.16 : Water Use efficiency
Name of Area (Hectare)
through water saving through water
major Any other
devices(Drip/ conserving agronomic Total crop
(pl. specify) Sprinklers) practices
Mustard Nil 2500 2500
The tables above indicate need for judicious use of available Water. Encouraging optimum use of water through installation of sprinklers on every
operational wells
Table 2.17 : Slope details.
Slope of Watershed
S.No. Slope percentage Area in hectares
1 0 – 1% 2193.00
2 1- 3 % 2103.00
3 Above 3% 775.50
As most of the area has slope less than 3% construction of contour bunds can solve the
problem of water erosion in agriculture fields and protect washing of top soil and
manures/fertilisers.
Table 2.18 Water Budgeting
Good Catchment – Normally a funnel shaped catchment in hilly terrain with
less vegetation.
Average Catchment – Catchment in the plains where there is no dense growth
of vegetation.
Bad Catchment – Catchment with dense growth of vegetation & highly permeable top soil
& sub soil.
Total available runoff(cum) use Stranges table AV. Rain fall 550 mm
Type of Yield of runoff from
Area in ha. catchment per ha.(cum.) Total Runoff in cum Catchment
use Stranges table
Good 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average 5071.50 907.10 4600357.65
Bad 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 5071.50 4600357.65
Runoff trapped in existing structures
S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity (cum)
i) WHS(earthen) - -
ii) Khadin/Talab 3 150000
iii) Farm Ponds 6 8000
iv) Tanka/ Nadi 5 40000
v) Anicuts - -
Total 14 198000
Runoff to beTrapped in proposed structures:
S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity (cum)
i) WHS(earthen) 19 95000
ii) Khadin/Talab - -
iii) Farm Ponds 10 18500
iv) ECD 20 10000
v) Anicuts Medium 13 520000
Total 643500
Runoff trapped in existing & proposed structures = 198000+643500 =841500cum. % Runoff trapped = total runoff trapped x100/Total available runoff =18.29%
Height of all the structures proposed is between 0.80 metre to 1.50 metre. There is no structures whose water impounding height is more than 2 metre.
Table 2.19 Soil details
Soil Profile
S. Major Soil Classes
Area in hectares
No.
Clay loam 4245.00
Hilly/Sandy Laom 826.50
Soil Depth : 40-45cm
B Depth (Cms.) Area in hectares
1 30 540.50
2 35 1490.00
3 45 3041.00
C Soil fertility Status Kg/ha Recommended
N or O.C. 0.29% 0.5%
P 20/HA 23-56KG/HA
K 360/HA 144-336KG/HA
Micronutrients
Zn 0.36PPM 0.6PPM
Fe 1.99PPM 4.5PPM
The analysis of table shows need to improve and maintain soil fertility. Soil health card to
every farmer every crop season will be provided, which will include the recommendation for
Application micro nutrient and fertilizers
Table 2.20 Erosion details
Erosion status in project Area
Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha)
Water erosion
a Sheet 4637.50
b Rill 178.00
c Gully 256.00
Sub-Total
Wind erosion -
Total for project 5071.50
The need is:
To check land degradation To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of livestock To check cultivation on sloping lands without adequate precautions of soil and water
conservation measures To discourage cultivation along susceptible nallah beds To check Faulty agriculture techniques To check Uncontrolled grazing and developed cattle tracks To check Deforestation of steep slopes To check erosive velocity of runoff, store Runoff, to arrest silt carried by runoff and to
recharge Ground Water structures life Earthen check dams, gully plugs, Bank
Stabilisation, Loose stone check Dams, Gabions, Earthen embankment (Nadi) and
Anicuts would be taken up.
CHAPTER - III
Proposed Development Plan :
A) Preparatory phase activities Capacity Building Trainings and EPA
The IEC activities like Kalajathas, Group meetings, door to door campaign, slogans
and wall writings etc. were carried out in all the habitations of Watershed. A series of
meetings were conducted with GP members, community and discussed about the
implementation of IWMP programme. User groups were also formed.
Gramasabhas were conducted for approval of EPA (Village), for selecting the
watershed committee and approval of DPR.
S.no
Name of the Gram Panchayat
Date on which Gramasabha
approved EPA
1 Mohammadpura 04/05/2015
2 Payaga 06/05/2015
3 Sop 09/05/2015
4 Deoli 07/05/2015
5 Mandawara 05/05/2015
6 Khatoli 08/05/2015
S.
Names of Amount
Estimated Expenditure Expe- Actual
earmarked cost Rs. in incurred Rs. Balance cted outc-
No.
village
for EPA lacs in lacs
outcome ome
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
Mohammadpura
1.327
1.32
1.32 0.00
2 Payaga 4.692 1.05 1.05 3.642
3
Sop
1.534
1.84
0.00 1.84
4 Deoli 3.362 2.16 2.16 1.202
5
Madawar
a 5.40 4.02 4.02 1.38
6 Khatoli 5.594 3.68 3.68 1.914
The PRA exercise was carried out in all the villages on the dates shown below:
S.no Name of the village/Habitation Date on which PRA conducted
1 Mohammadpura 2.11.2017 to 25.11.2017
2 Payaga 2.11.2017 to 25.11.2017
3 Sop 2.11.2017 to 25.11.2017
4 Deoli
2.11.2017 to 25.11.2017
5 Mandawara 2.11.2017 to 25.11.2017
6 Khatoli 2.11.2017 to 25.11.2017
CAPACITY BUILDING
Table- List of approved Training Institutes@
for Capacity Building in the project area
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Full
S. Name of Name of Address Name &
Type of Area(s) of Accredi the
with Designatio
No Stakeholde contact n of the Institut speciali- ta-tion Training . rs no., Head of e
# zation
$ details
Institute website Institute & e-mail
State
All 1 PIAs IGPRS DG IGPRS Activities/
Govt. Ws
State
All
2 WDTs IGPRS
DG IGPRS Activities/
Govt.
Ws
3 UGs KVK Prog. Autono Research
Bansthali
Coordi. mous Institutes
4 SHGs KVK Prog.
Bansthali
Coordi.
Agri. Dy. State WS
5 WCs Trg.
Director Govt. Activities
Centre
6 GPs NGO/PIA
7 Community NGO/PIA
8 PM/SLNA
Name of Project :IWMP -20
P.S. UNIARA (TONK)
1. Trainning Plan at SLNA Level (0.045%):
Amount : 0.304 lacs
2. Training Plan at WCDC Level (1.17%)
S.No Training Plan No. of No. of
Amount Training Persons
1 Accountancy & Bookeeping 15 410 1.82
2 Common Guideline 10 270 1.15
3 DPR Prepration 1 30 0.13
4 Livilihood 15 420 1.85
5 Others 20 450 2.17
Total 61 1580 7.12
3. Training Plan at PIA Level (3.285%)
S.No Training Plan No. of No. of
Amount Training Persons
1 Accountancy & Bookeeping 15 450 2.02
2 Baseine Survey 6 180 0.81
3 Common Guideline 10 300 1.35
4 Watershed Management 13 390 1.75
5 Exposure Tourism 2 90 3.82
6 Livilihood 10 300 1.35
7 DPR Prepration 1 30 0.13
8 PRA Excerise 3 300 0.30
9 Others 40 1400 8.462
Total 100 3440 19.992
AT WCDC Level (1.30%)
Table- Capacity Building activities in the project (PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL) : IWMP–20 P.S. UNIARA (TONK)
1 2 3 5 6 7
T o t a l n o . o f p e r s o n s
No. of persons to be trained during No. of Training to be organized No. of person days to be trained Year year year year year
Total year year year year year
Total year year year year year
Total
S. Project project period during project period during project period
WAPCOS was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1
and LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database
depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to
watershed under different ownerships at village level
Various thematic layers provided by WAPCOS are :
Delineation of Macro/Micro watershed boundaries. Digitised Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area. Network of Drainage lines, existing water bodies, falling in the project area. Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements). Land Use / Land cover map. Contours at 1 meter interval, slope map
Based on GIS thematic layers, Field visits , PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as
discussed in chapter 2) final Treatment plan on revenue map for implementation has been
framed. Thus each intervention identified has been marked on revenue map (map enclosed
in DPR as annexure L).The GIS based intervention map, PRA based intervention map are
annexed as K.
B) Livelihood Action Plan (LAP):
An awareness programme has been undertaken at Gram Sabha for communication
& sensitization of the target beneficiaries. Livelihood Action Plan is a pre requisite for
availing the funds under the livelihood component. LAP has been prepared by the
PIA in consultation with WDT, WC & the members of SHG,SC/ST, women, landless/
assetless households. Details of funds available & their utilisation is as under :
(i) Total project cost Rs. 608.58 Lacs.
(ii) Funds available under livelihood component is 8.10% of total project cost=
Rs 49.295 Lacs.
(a) Seed money for SHGs as revolving fund = Rs.29.52 Lacs.
(minimum 60% of livelihood component) 118 No. Of SHG to be formed 1562 No of persons (members) in SHGs
(b) Seed money for enterprising individuals = Rs.5.00 Lacs
(minimum 10% of livelihood component)
-- No of persons identified as enterprising individuals 20 Nos.
List of persons & Proposed Activities.
S.No Watershed Committee Name of Person Activity Proposed
List Enclosed
(c) Funds for Enterprising SHG/Federations of SHG
(Maximum 30 % of livelihood activities)= Rs.14.775
Lacs
The funding for major livelihood activities will enable the enterprising SHGs/SHG federation to
avail a composite loan for undertaking major livelihood activities or to upscale activities as
recommended by the WC & approved by WCDC in consultation with line departments.
Details of enterprising SHG/federation is given below :
Grant in aid 50%
Name of SHG/ Project Project of project cost
S.No. Cost in or 2 lacs Bank loan SHG federation Name
lacs whichever is
less
List Enclosed
* Details of project activities can be prepared in coming years after formation of
SHG federation or as the case may be.
C) Production Plan: An awareness programme has been undertaken at Gram Sabha for communication
& sensitization of the target beneficiaries. Production System & micro enterprises
Action Plan is pre-requisite for availing the funds under the Production System &
micro enterprises component. Production plan has been prepared by the PIA in
consultation with WDT, WC & the members of Users Group. Details of funds
available & their utilisation is as under :
(iii) Total project cost Rs 608.58 Lacs.
(iv) Funds available under Production System & Micro enterprises component
Fortnightly Meetings with Livestock keeper to discuss and decide all breedable females to
be covered.
Creation Of Disease Free Zone: Livestock’s health coverage
Establishment of Pashudhan Seva Kendra (PSK) (Convergence with peer department)
Deworming to reduce worm load and enhance disease resistance. (Convergence with peer department)
Distribution of mineral mixture. (Convergence with peer department)
Free of Cost Vaccination in IWMP area Livestock for H.S., B.Q., F.M.D., PPR, ETV and Sheep Pox.
Ensure Hygenic measures to check Zonosis.(DAH/ IWMP)
Construction of Animal Sheds with Manger and Portable Manger With accessories
Provision of Cattle Water Troughs.
Transect walk were carried out involving the community for Social mapping, Resource
mapping. Detailed discussions and deliberations with all the primary stakeholders were
carried out.
Socio-economic survey was carried out during July to Nov. 2012. period covering all the
households and primary data on demography, Land holdings, Employment status,
Community activities etc. was collected as mentioned in chapter 2.
WAPCOS was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1
and LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database
depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to
watershed under different ownerships at village level
Various thematic layers provided by WAPCOS are :
Delineation of Macro/Micro watershed boundaries. Digitised Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area. Network of Drainage lines, existing water bodies, falling in the project area. Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements). Land Use / Land cover map. Contours at 1 meter interval, slope map
Based on GIS thematic layers, Field visits , PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as
discussed in chapter 2) final Treatment plan on revenue map for implementation has been
framed. Thus each intervention identified has been marked on revenue map .
IWMP – 20 Panchyat Uniara
Format-3
FINANCIAL TARGET
PIA Level Financial Target IWMP – 20 P.S. UNIARA
Amount (Rs. in Lakh)
No. Head Financial year
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 Administrative 6.086 6.086 14.606 15.823 12.172
2 Capacity building 6.086 15.215 3.043 3.043 -
3 Monitoring 0.609 0.609 1.217 1.826 1.217
4 Preparation Of DPR 5.477 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 EPA 21.909 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Evaluation 0.00 1.826 0.913 2.13 0.609
IWMP – 20 Panchyat Uniara
Format-4
FINANCIAL TARGET
WCDC Level Financial Target
Amount (Rs. in Lakh)
No. Head Financial year
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 Administrative - - - - -
2 Capacity building - 7.12 0.00 0.00 -
3 Monitoring - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Preparation Of DPR - - - - -
5 Any Other - - - - -
Format-5
Capacity building plan (PIA level) Name of Project : IWMP- 20 Block: UNIARA District : TONK
Amount (Rs. in Lakh) – 19.992 lcas
No. Head
Financial year
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 No of trainings planned - 15 58 27 -
2 No of persons to be trained - 600 2030 810 -
Format-6
Capacity building plan (WCDC Level )
Name of Project : IWMP- 20 Block: UNIARA District : TONK
Amount (Rs. in Lakh) – 7.12 lcas
No. Head Financial year
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 No of trainings planned - 12 40 9 -
2 No of persons to be trained - 340 960 280 -
Name of Project:- IWMP 20 P.S.:- Uniara
Area:- 5071.50 Ha. Cost:- 608.58 Lacs
CHAPTER III
Proposed Development Plan
(A) Preparatory phase activities 19.80%
Unit Unit
cost Quantity
Total
cost
Cost from
project
PMKSY
(IWMP)Fund
Cost from
Convergen
ce Fund
Benificiar
y
Contribut
ion
Admn. 12000/ha. 9% 5071.50 ha. 54.772 54.772 0 0
Monitoring 12000/ha. 0.90% 5071.50 ha. 5.477 5.477 0 0
Evaluation 12000/ha. 0.90% 5071.50 ha. 5.477 5.477 0 0
EPA 12000/ha. 3.60% 5071.50 ha. 21.909 21.909 0 0
I & CB 12000/ha. 4.50% 5071.50 ha. 27.386 27.386 0 0
DPR 12000/ha. 0.90% 5071.50 ha. 5.4772 5.477 0 0
Total (A) 12000/ha. 19.80% 5071.50 ha. 120.499 120.499 0 0
(B) Natural resource management 50.40%
Conservation measures for arable land (private land)
Earthen Bund/Field bund Rum 0.00072 93940 67.637 67.637 2.60 7.5
Tanka/ECD No 0.5 20 10.000 10.00 0.00 0.65
Khet talai/Farm pond No 1 10 10.000 10.00 0.00 0.00
Bank Stablisation/Peripheral Bund No 0 0 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Conservation measures for non arable land
Pasture Development ha 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
V-ditch No 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water Harvesting structure No 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
AfforstationDeepning/ No 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Drainage line treatment No 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
MMS No 10.2 13 132.6 132.60 14.50 0.00
LSCD pakka chakdam No 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
WHS No 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Percolation tank No 3 14 42 42.00 7.00 0.00
Mini Percolation tank No 2 5 10 10.00 0.00 0.00
Bank Stablisation/Peripheral Bund Rum 0.001 34487 34.487 34.487 1.40 0.00
Revolving Fund to enterprising individual (maximum 10 % amount) No 20.000 0.253 5.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 15.000 3.788 5.000 1.263 20.000 5.050
Grant in aid to enterprising SHG or Federation of SHG individual (maximum 30 % amount) No 59.000 0.250 14.750 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 45.000 11.250 14.000 3.500 59.000 14.750
Total (C) 104.072 0.000 0.000 67.648 36.425 104.072
Bank stabilisation/peripgeral bunds No 0 0 0.00 WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Conservation measures for non arable land(private land)
Pasture Development No WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V-ditch No WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Water harvesting structure No 0 0 0 WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
afforestation No WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Drainage line treatment
MMS No 2 7.25 14.5 WD&SC 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 6.5 2 14.5
LSCD No WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WHS No 0 0 0 WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PT No 2 3.5 7 WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.5 1 3.5 2 7
Bank stabilisation/peripgeral bunds No 1400 0.001 1.4 WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 840 0.84 560 0.56 1400 1.4
Total 25.50
0.
00 13.90 11.60 25.50
Production System
Production measures for arable land
Horticulture plantation No 0 0 0
WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sprinklers and drip irrigation No
0 0 0
WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Floriculture No
0 0 0
WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Vermi Compost No
0 0 0
WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Crop Demonstration No
0 0 0
WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Total
0.000
0.00
0.000 0.000
Livelihood System 8.1%
Revolving Fund to SHG ( minmun 60 % amt. ) No
0 0 0
WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Revolving Fund to enterprising individual (maximum 10 % amount) No
0 0 0
WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant in aid to enterprising SHG or Federation of SHG individual (maximum 30 % amount) No
0 0 0
WD&SC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Livlihood systrms 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 25.50
0.
00 13.90 11.60 0.00 25.50
CHAPTER – VI (IWMP-20) EXPECTED OUT COMES
S. No. Item Unit of Pre-project Expected Post-
Remarks measurement Status project Status
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level) Meters 20-25 13-15 Mtr
2 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated No. Nil 8
3 Quality of drinking water Floride Floridation Plant Convergence from PHED
4 Availability of drinking water Not Sufficient 25% increase
5 Change in irrigated Area Ha 840 1590
6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Agr+AH Agri+Horti+AH
7 Area under agricultural crop Ha
I Area under single crop Ha 3990.50 4245
Ii Area under double crop Ha 62 155
Iii Area under multiple crop Ha 19 36
8 Change in cultivated Area Ha
9 yield of Yield of Bajra q/ha 7.50/Ha 9/Ha
major crops Yield of Wheat q/ha 31.80/Ha 35/Ha
of area Yield of Gram q/ha 7.00/Ha 8.00/Ha
Yield of Mustard q/ha 13.50/Ha 15/Ha
10 Production of Bajra tons 255 T 360 T
production of
Production of Wheat tons 805.5 1010
major crops
Production of Gram tons 730.10 1050.00T of area
Production of Mustard tons 1465.20 1865.00
11 Area under vegetation Ha 20.50 45 Ha
12 Area under horticulture Ha 14.30 60Ha
13 Area under fuel Ha 150 300Ha
14 Area under Fodder Ha 20 80
15 Fodder production Q 88150 100000
16 Milk production Litres/day 2510 3050
17 SHGs Active No. 41 65
18 No. of livelihoods No. 79 115
19 Income Rs.in la 14100 18000
20 Migration No. 150 45
21 SHG Federations formed No. - 5
Critical Assumption
No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.
There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained
before irreversible damage is done. Adverse market conditions do not persist long.
Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely
distributed particularly in the rural areas. Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that
timely and appropriate technical advice and services are provided to farmers whenever
required. The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving
needs and feedback from participants. The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the
District and State level Implementing Agencies
Means of Verification of indicators
Baseline surveys like household income ,expenditure, health and nutrition etc at the
beginning, mid-term and end of the project period Annual participatory assessment by communities during project period. Regular project monitoring reports prepared by project monitoring teams/ agencies.
Membership and other Records, Minutes of Meetings maintained by the SHGs, WCs/
Individual beneficiaries/project-related village and local bodies/PRIs. External review missions
Data maintained by Government department (Revenue, Agriculture, Groundwater,
Irrigation, Animal Husbandry
CHAPTER VII
TECHNICAL DESIGNS AND ESTIMATES
Technical designs and estimates for proposed activities.
For Estimates GKN of the districts should be used. For Production System activities, rates
provided by the Department is to be used & if not vailable than rates of
Agriculture/Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry should be used.
For Livelihood activities, project norms provided by the Department is to be used & if not
available than cost norms of NABARD, NRLM etc can be used.
CHAPTER - VIII Enclosures – IWMP 20 P.S. Uniara
i. Location –District, block, village, watershed location map
j. Map of Uniara IWMP Project (Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral
& Topo Sheet)
k. PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing)
l. Treatment map (Indicate proposed works)
m. Cadastral Map on watershed boundary
n. Information on Soils, Soil fertility, Land capability, Soil chemical problems like
salinity, alkalinity
o. Land Use Land Cover map
p. Information on existing water harvesting structures & well inventory along
with GPS co-ordinates.
q. High resolution, latest Remote Sensing Satellite data
Documents of Agreements: Proceedings of gram sabha for EPA approval
Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution
Proceedings of gram sabha for DPR approval
Proceeding of Standing Committee of P.S. for DPR approval.
Proceeding of Standing Committee of Z.P. for DPR approval.