GOLD STANDARD LOCAL STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT 10.1 MW YÜCE HEPP CONTENTS A. Project Description 1. Project eligibility under Gold Standard 2. Current project status B. Design of Stakeholder Consultation Process 1. Description of physical meeting(s) i. Agenda ii. Non-technical summary iii. Invitation tracking table iv. Text of individual invitations v. Text of public invitations 2. Description of other consultation methods used C. Consultation Process 1. Participants‟ in physical meeting(s) i. List ii. Evaluation forms 2. Pictures from physical meeting(s) 3. Outcome of consultation process i. Minutes of physical meeting(s) ii. Minutes of other consultations iii. Assessment of all comments iv. Revisit sustainable development assessment v. Summary of changes to project design based on comments D. Sustainable Development Assessment 1. Own sustainable development assessment i. „Do no harm‟ assessment ii. Sustainable development matrix 2. Stakeholders blind sustainable development matrix 3. Consolidated sustainable development matrix E. Discussion on Sustainability Monitoring Plan F. Description of Stakeholder Feedback Round Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
68
Embed
GOLD STANDARD LOCAL STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION …documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/979931468318868429/pdf/E20650v420…GOLD STANDARD LOCAL STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT 10.1 MW YÜCE
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
GOLD STANDARD LOCAL STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT
10.1 MW YÜCE HEPP
CONTENTS
A. Project Description
1. Project eligibility under Gold Standard
2. Current project status
B. Design of Stakeholder Consultation Process
1. Description of physical meeting(s)
i. Agenda
ii. Non-technical summary
iii. Invitation tracking table
iv. Text of individual invitations
v. Text of public invitations
2. Description of other consultation methods used
C. Consultation Process
1. Participants‟ in physical meeting(s)
i. List
ii. Evaluation forms
2. Pictures from physical meeting(s)
3. Outcome of consultation process
i. Minutes of physical meeting(s)
ii. Minutes of other consultations
iii. Assessment of all comments
iv. Revisit sustainable development assessment
v. Summary of changes to project design based on comments
D. Sustainable Development Assessment
1. Own sustainable development assessment
i. „Do no harm‟ assessment
ii. Sustainable development matrix
2. Stakeholders blind sustainable development matrix
3. Consolidated sustainable development matrix
E. Discussion on Sustainability Monitoring Plan
F. Description of Stakeholder Feedback Round
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
wb20439
Typewritten Text
E2065 v42
Annex 1. Original participants list
Annex 2. Original feedback forms
Annex 3. Special Guidance for Run-off River Type HEPP Projects
Annex 4. Contributions of the project owner to minimize disturbance to the locals
Annex 5. Example of an official record kept whilst the work outfit is distributed to workers
Annex 6. Permit that specifies where to deposit the excavation waste
SECTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. 1. Project eligibility under the Gold Standard
The Yüce hydroelectric power plant (HEPP) project is a run-off-river type project which has been
designed in order to utilize the water potential of Yüce and Gürül watercourses for energy
generation.Yüce HEPP Project is planned to be implemented by Menerji Elektrik Uretim Dağıtım
Pazarlama Sanayi ve Tic. Ltd. Şti within the boundaries of Dereli District of Giresun Province and
on Yüce and Gürül watercourses which are the lateral branches of Aksu watercourse.
The Project Plant will include two regulators, conveyance tunnel, conveyance canal, forebay,
penstock and power house. Regulator 1 will be installed on the Yüce watercourse on 870 m
thalweg level. The water which is derived by Regulator 1 will be derived to the left coast of Güdül
watercourse by the transmission tunnel after being floated in the sediment pool.
Regulator 2 will be constructed on the 868,40m thalweg level on Güdül Watercourse. The water
which is taken by Regulator 2 and the water which is derived from the Regulator 1 will be
transmitted to the forebay through the conveyance canal with 1750 m length. The water
accumulated in the forebay will be transmitted to the plant building through the penstock which is
going to be constructed with 2740 m length. The water then goes through the turbines of the 2 unit
plant building with 10,134 MW installed capacity and will be again discharged to the Yüce
watercourse. Expected generation is estimated as 30.751 GWh. According to calculations based
on electricity generation estimates, Yüce HEPP project will result in a CO2 reduction of 17,282
tonnes per year due to use of renewable resources.
A. 2. Current project status
The construction started on 02/10/2009. As of 26/10/2010, 45% of the construction has finished.
SECTION B. DESIGN OF STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS
B. 1. Design of physical meeting(s)
i. Agenda
The Stakeholder Feedback Round for retroactive YUCE HEPP was held on 26/10/2010 in Güdül
Village.
The agenda of the meeting covered the aspects of the GS Toolkit as recommended.
Agenda
14:30-14:40 Climate change and energy, Global Tan Energy
14:40-14:50 Introduction of the project, Menerji El. Ür. Dağ. A.Ş.
14:50- 15:30 Question and Answers
15:30-16:00 Blind SD Exercise and discussion on monitoring
Ülkemizde elektrik enerjisi ihtiyacı, sanayileşme, ekonomik gelişme ve nüfus artışı gibi
nedenlerden dolayı hızla artmaktadır. Elektrik enerjisi üretebilmesi için gerekli kaynakların
(doğalgaz, petrol, vb) yetersizliği nedeniyle, Türkiye enerjide dışa bağımlı bir ülke konumundadır.
Hidroelektrik santralleri, yerli kaynakların kullanımına imkân vererek ithal yakıt bağımlılığını
azaltması, ekonomik olması ve sera gazı salımına neden olmaması nedeniyle hızla artan elektrik
enerjisi ihtiyacının karşılanmasında fosil yakıtlarla çalışan termik santrallere göre birçok fayda
sağlamaktadır.
Yüce Hidroelektrik Santralı Projesi, Menerji Elektrik Üretim Dağ. Paz. San. Ve Tic. Ldt. Şti. tarafından, Giresun İli, Dereli İlçesi sınırları içerisinde, Yüce ve Gürül Dereleri üzerinde inşa
edilmektedir.
Resim 1. YÜCE HES Proje Sahası
Proje kapsamında yapılması planlanan tesisler şunlardır; 2 adet regülatör, iletim kanalı ve tüneli, su
alma yapısı ve çökeltim havuzu, cebri boru ve santral binasıdır. Regülatör 1, Yüce Deresi üzerinde
talvegden 870 m kotunda yapılacak, buradan iletim kanalı ile alınacak su Güdül Deresi‟ne
yönlendirilecektir. Regülatör 2 ise talvegden 868.40 m kotunda Güdül Deresi üzerinde yer alacaktır.
Bu iki regülatörden alınan sular 1750 m uzunluğundaki iletim kanalı ile yükleme havuzuna, oradan da
2740 m‟lik cebri borular ile santral binasına iletilecektir. Yüce HES‟in kurulu güç kapasitesi 10.134
MW olup, elde edilecek elektrik enerjisi yıllık 30.75 GWh saat olarak hesaplanmıştır.
Suyun enerjsinden faydalanılarak üretilecek olan bu temiz enerji ile iklim değişikliğine yol açan
17,282 ton karbondioksitin yıllık olarak salınımı engellenmiş olacaktır.
Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurulu (EPDK) tarafından 20 Mart 2009 tarihinde üretim lisansı
verilmiştir. Proje nehir tipi olarak planlanmış ve tesislerde su depolaması yapılmamakta olup,
elektrik üretiminde kullanılan su, aynı miktarda geri verilecektir.
Projenin çevreye etkisinin belirlenmesi amacıyla, ilgili kanun ve düzenlemeler kapsamında
hazırlanmış olan ve Projenin bölgedeki canlılara, ekonomik ve sosyal yaşama etkilerini
değerlendiren proje tanıtım dosyasının incelenmesi sonrasında T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı
tarafından söz konusu projenin çevreye olumsuz bir etkisi olmadığına ve daha detaylı bir çevresel
etki raporunun hazırlanmasına gerek olmadığına karar verilmiştir.
Proje kapsamında yapılması düşünülen tesislerin inşaat işlerine 2009 yılı Kasım ayında başlanmış
olup, 2011 yılı ortalarında işletmeye alınması öngörülmektedir. İnşaat süresince yaklaşık 100 kişinin
istihdam edileceği öngörülmektedir. Tesisin işletmeye alındığı zaman ise, yaklaşık 10 kişiye
doğrudan ve sürekli iş imkânı sağlanacak olup, yerel halka istihdam esnasında öncelik verilecektir.
YÜCE HEPP PROJECT SITE
iii. Invitation tracking table
Category
code
Organisation
(if relevant)
Name of
invitee
Way of
invitation
Date of
invitation
Confirmation
received? Y/N
A Local people
from Yüce
Village
Orally via
Head of
Village and
Project
Manager
14/10/2010 Y
A Head of Yüce
Village
Orally via
Project
Manager
14/10/2010 Y
A Local people
from Güdül
Village
Orally via
Head of
Village and
Project
Manager
14/10/2010 Y
A Head of Güdül
Village
Orally via
Project
Manager
14/10/2010 Y
A Local People
from Çamlık
Village
Orally via
Head of
Village and
Project
Manager
14/10/2010 Y
A Head of Çamlık
Village
Orally via
Project
Manager
14/10/2010 Y
C Ministry of
Environment-
DG
Environmental
Management
Fulya
Somunkıra
noglu
Facsimile 14/10/2010 Y
C Ministry of
Energy- DG
Electrical
Power
Resources
Survey and
Development
Mustafa
Kemal
Büyükmıhç
ı
Facsimile 14/10/2010 Y
C Ministry of
Energy- DG
Electricity
Works
Budak Dilli Facsimile 14/10/2010 Y
Mayor of
Giresun
Kerim
Aksu
Facsimile 14/10/2010
B District
Governor of
Dereli
Murat
Özdemir
Facsimile 14/10/2010 Y
B State Hydraulic
Works (DSI)
Mehmet
Recep Çıtır
Facsimile,
follow-up via
14/10/2010
Regional
Dierctorate
telephone
B Dereli
Municipality
Zeki
Şenlikoğlu
Facsimile 14/10/2010 Y
B Province
Agricultural
Department
Muhammed
Hakyemez
Facsimile,
follow-up via
telephone
14/10/2010 Y
B District Police
Department
Mustafa
Kıyak
Facsimile 14/10/2010 Y
B District
Gendarmerie
Jan. Yüz.
Ahmet
Hakan
Karaaslan
Facsimile 14/10/2010 Y
B District Forestry
Department
Özkan
Şahin
Facsimile,
follow-up via
telephone
14/10/2010 Y
E Gold Standard Nahla
Sabet
Mail 14/10/2010 Y
E Gold Standard Heba Rabie Mail 14/10/2010 Y
E Gold Standard Bahar Ubay Mail 14/10/2010
F WWF Turkey Ceren Ayas Mail 14/10/2010 Y
F Greenpeace Mail 14/10/2010 Y
F Mercy Corps Mail 14/10/2010 Y
F Helio
International
Mail 14/10/2010 Y
F Renewable
Energy and
Energy
Efficiency
Partnership
Mail 14/10/2010 Y
D City
Representative,
TEMA-
Association to
Combat Erosion
Özcan
Öztürk
Mail 14/10/2010 Y
F Regional
Environmenatl
Centre- Turkey
Gülçin
Özsoy
Mail 14/10/2010 Y
Stakeholders have been identified according to GS Toolkit.
Since there exist no assigned DNA in Turkey, Ministry of Environment and Forestry have been
invited as relevant Government Authority and UNFCCC Focal Point. Two Directorate of Ministry
of Energy and Natural Resources have also been included as relevant Government Authorities.
When possible, participation of the invitees was confirmed in order to make necessary
arrangements for the meeting. GS supporting NGOs and local representative of GS have been
invited through e-mail message sent on 14/10/2010. Local and national government institutions,
local representatives of GS supporter NGOs and other identified stakeholders have been informed
through invitation letters in Turkish along with non-technical summary sent by registered mail and
facsimile messages. The meeting invitation was also published in a local newspaper.
Locals have been identified considering settlements impacted by the project. Village heads of all
neighbouring settlements have been contacted initially by the project manager.
The project owners provided shuttle service from/to the villages.
iv. Text of individual invitations and delivery confirmations
Example of Invitations (Invitation to the District Governor)
14/10/2009
Sn. Kerim Aksu
Giresun Belediye Başkanı
Subject: YÜCE HEPP Stakeholder Engagement and Feedback Meeting
The procedures to certify the GHGs emission reductions from YÜCE HEPP, located in Dereli
Province, Giresun, have been initiated between Menerji El. Ür. Dağ. Paz. San. Tic. LTD ŞTİ
and Global Tan Energy. In this respect, we would like to invite you to share your views on the
Project during the stakeholder engagement and feedback meeting.
The meeting will take place in Gudul Village, construction foodcourt on 26/10/2010 at 14:30.
Please, kindly find the non-technical summary of the Project and the agenda enclosed.
We would like to reiterate that your participation is of utmost importance to us and would like to
see you in our meeting.
Regards,
Menerji El. Ür. Dağ. Paz. San. Tic. LTD ŞTİ
Email invitation to Gold Standard, local and international civil society representatives Text
of public invitations
Public invitation at the Local “İleri” Newpaper
B. 2. Description of other consultation methods used
The turnover and the quality of participation were satisfactory. Hence, no other methods were
used.
SECTION C. CONSULTATION PROCESS
C. 1. Participants‟ in physical meeting(s)
i. List of participants
Category
Code
Name Male/ Female Organisation (if
relevant)/
Position
Village1
A Mustafa Kaya M Cooperative
President
Güdül
A Halit Torun M Yüce
A Ömer Sarıkaya M Küçük Ahmet
A Levent Akıl M Küçük Ahmet
A Adem Akılş M
A Nedim Kaya M
A Aşkın Atar M Guard,
MENERJİ
Güdül
A Şükrü Halal M Driver,
MENERJİ
Yüce
A İskender Bayrak M Guard,
MENERJİ
Güdül
A Coşkun Karakaya M Yüce
A Ali Adar M Head of
Village
Güdül
A Hüseyin Esen M Head of
Village
Çarıh Köyü
A Faik Can Aksu M Officer Dereli
B Metin Öztürk M Member of
Munipical
Parliament
Dereli
A Mustafa Yönden M Çamlıköyü
Dereli
A Ali Okusal M Driver,
MENERJİ
Güdül
A Şenol Atar M Weldor,
MENERJİ
Güdül
D Yusuf Kılıçoğlu M Weldor,
MENERJİ
Güdül
A Mehmet Bayrak M Yüce
A Ali Yaylı M Yüce
A İzzet Töngcelçi M Yüce
1 The telephone numbers can be found in the original participation list ANNEX
A Mustafa Topal M Güdül
A Hasan Kaya M Güdül
A Mustafa Kök M Yüce
A Hakkı Kök M Head of
Village
Yüce
A Mehmet Kılıçoğlu M Güdül
A Yusuf Kaya M Yüce
A Mürsel Konak M Güdül
A Halil Kılıçoğlu M Güdül
A Cevat Kılıçoğlu M Güdül
A Coşukn Atar M Güdül
A Ahmet Bsyrak M Yüce
A Yılmaz Ali M Yüce
A Ali Topal M Member of
Village Council
Güdül
A Ali Baş M Güdül
A Faruk Kaya M Güdül
A Ferut Kaya M Güdül
A Bayram Töngelci M Yüce
A Şevket ? M Güdül
B Yunus Cinal M Provincal
Administration
Dereli
B Okan Şahin M Province Forest
Director
Dereli
Sinan Yazgan M Project
Manager
Essentium-
MENERJİ
ii. Evaluation forms
Name What is your
impression of
the meeting?
What do you
like about the
project?
What do you
not like about
the project?
Signature
Ahmet Bayrak-
Yüce Village
After the flood,
they fixed the
bridges and
roads.
Staff works
under heavy
conditions for 12
hrs with
minimum wage.
Excavation
waste is dumped
by the road
causing mud.
Air pollution.
Our drinking
water is cut.
Fishes
disappeared.
Aşkın Atar No security
measures.
Mustafa Kök Very beneficial
meeting. Thank
you.
Project provided
employment
opportunities.
Riverbed is
adversely
impacted.
Mustafa Toprak The meeting
should have been
held long ago. It
was informative
and beneficial.
Contribution in
national
economy is
positive.
The project
affects the daily
life in our
village. Roads
are damaged,
dust, noise and
pollution are
disturbing.
Between Tunnel
CT2 and Gudu
Bridge, no
animals use the
water.
Ömer Sarıkaya The meeting was
not very
effective, nor
useful. It could
have been more
updated.
Employment
should be
realized in a far
way among all
villages. Unequal
waging should
be fixed.
You harm the
environment as
you dump the
excavation waste
and you do not
take any
precautions. You
do it as it comes
easy.
Faik Can Aksu
Our problems are
listened. Senior
company
representatives
should have been
participated.
Contributes in
lessening
Turkey‟s
dependency on
foreign sources.
In terms of
environment, its
impact is huge.
Ali Topal
Awareness
raising for the
locals.
Beneficial
project in terms
of bringing in the
potential of
hydro power.
Employment
If the
environment is
rearranged once
the construction
is over, I do not
think that the
villagers will be
reactive
anymore.
Mustafa Kaya-
Güdül Village
Informative
Beneficial for
the national
economy.
Employment
opportunities for
locals.
Disturbance to
the environment
should be
minimized,
especially in
terms of water
resources and
excavation
waste.
Mehmet Atar
We saw the
shortages of the
project.
Personally, there
are many of
shortages.
Of course, the
project brought
some
opportunities. It
would not be fair
if we say no.
But, the benefits
are minimum.
More
employment and
better wages.
Our roads are
damaged. Water
is cut. We
understand that
some negativities
might occur, but,
those should be
minimized.
Aşkın Atar
Mr. Tolga has
very positive
intentions. But,
managers do not
take human
aspect into
account. Thank
you Mr. Tolga.
Faruk Kaya-
Güdül Village
The meeting
should have been
held before the
project started. It
is too late. If the
project had
started today, the
villagers would
have rejected it.
The head of
village is
considering what
goes in his
pocket.
Yes, it has some
benefits but they
should not work
for individuals
own interest. Al
village should
benefit from the
opportunities
equally.
Noise, pollution,
disturbance.
Şenol Atar
Too late to hold
the meeting.
I think the
project has many
benefits to the
households. I
thank you to
Tolga Bey and
his colleagues.
Of course, there
are some
negative aspects.
However, it
would not be
possible to
realize the
project with no
disturbances at
all. I am sure all
will be
compansated.
Yusuf Kılıçoğlu
It was beneficial
to get
information. But,
it should have
been earlier.
Everybody
benefits from the
project, but,
everybody also
calculated how
much money he
can get out of it.
Our water spring
abolished.
Ali Okusal
Very good.
Should happen in
every two
months.
I am supportive
of the project.
Thank you.
Due to the
tunnel, our water
resource is
abolished. Wage
is not fair. No
working
equipment such
as boots or
outfit.
Hasan Kaya
Timing is late. I
hope it will be
beneficial.
Economic
contributions. I
hope you can
produce clean
energy.
Coşkun
Karakaya
Distrubances of
the locals should
be resolved.
Contribution to
national
economy. But,
human and
environmental
aspects should be
respected.
It was said that
all 3 villages
would benefit
from the project
equally.
However, this
promise was not
kept. We hope
they will.
C. 2. Pictures from physical meeting(s)
C. 3. Outcome of consultation process
i. Minutes of physical meeting(s)
After Zeren Erik‟s (Global Tan Energy) short introduction speech on energy and climate, Sinan
Yazgan from Essentium- MENERJİ briefed the participants about the project‟s current status.
The meeting lasted around 3 hours and the locals provided us with many comments which also
helped us to elaborate on the items under the sustainability blind test directly and indirectly. Same
comments are stressed by different participants several times, thus, the minutes below reflect
compilation of those comments.
Local: Why is the name of the project is Yüce? We would like our village to be named after as
well.
Sinan Yazgan: The name of the project is determined by the authorities. We do not have say on
that unfortunately.
Coşkun Karakaya (Yüce Village): During the construction works, issues such as maintaining
the landscaping has been neglected and the surrounding has become a mess. Our village suffers
from dust and mud along the road. The waste from tunnel work has been disposed in the riverbeds
which constitutes high risk of flood at time of heavy precipitation. Will you clean these? You
should pay attention to those points. Moreover, you pay minimum wage to the workers which is
not fair. We would like to have better wages.
Sinan Yazgan: First of all, we use most of the excavation waste for road works. For the rest, we
use the areas determined by DSI. We cannot use any other places than that without permission. To
overcome the dust problem, we water the roads as much as possible. As per the flood, as you
know, this area, as a characteristic feature, has always been experiencing flood, before the project.
After the flood last month, we repaired the roads; we placed culverts where necessary and cleaned
up the accumulated material. As per the wages, we recruit about 250 staff, much more than we
need. Out of those 250, 150 are from your villages. We actually do not need that much workforce;
however, in order to improve the economic conditions of locals, we bear the cost of excess
employment.
Locals: We are aware that during construction of such projects there might be problems, of
course. And, we have to bear with those. However, we would like those to be minimized.
Sinan Yazgan: I would like to ask you if you benefit from this project or not?
Locals: There are benefits in terms of employment, but, we would like our problems to be solved
and damages to be minimized.
Aşkın Atar: It is true that before the project riverbed was blocked at some points. I would like to
mention something else. I am the dynamite guard of the project. I would like to highlight the
accident I had yesterday. A piece of rock dropped on the container I was in and I could have been
badly damaged or died. The security measures are not enough.
Sinan Yazgan: We are taking the precautionary measures to minimize the risks all along the
project site. However, as you would also agree, there is always part of risk that is embedded in the
construction work. We expropriated the land where such issues could state a problem.
Locals: The promises given before have not been realised such as pebbling of the village roads.
There were also trout breeding, they do not exist anymore. We could not even benefit from the
tunnel waste.
Sinan Yazgan: The promise about pebbling was given by the “Province Administration” and it is
actually their duty. However, as MENERJİ we laid pebbles along the roads from the excavation
waste, as you know. In order to reduce your disturbance, we maintain the roads as frequently as
possible and we again use this waste. Very little of the excavation waste is disposed.
Mustafa Kaya: Our drinking water is cut and will be cut in future.
Mehmet Karaca (Bugato Construction): We will maintain the system and you will have your
drinking water without problems.
(GTE note: By drinking water, the locals mean the springs leaking from the mountain. During the
construction of the tunnel, the water sinks in the tunnel, thus, changes the direction.)
Ali Okusal: We would like our problems to be solved such as the rehabilitation of roads.
Sinan Yazgan: We are doing our best to finish the construction as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, because the land in the region is very scarce our proximity to your village is also
very close. Thus, we kindly ask for your patience during the construction. Once it is over, most of
your problems will disappear and we will start rehabilitating the roads and other rearrangements.
We just need time.
Local: Will you evacuate the waste disposal area?
Sinan Yazgan: We dispose our excavation waste only at places obliged by the authorities. Thus,
we cannot replace them. As I mentioned earlier, we use most of the excavation waste.
Locals: How is the expropriation took place?
Sinan Yazgan: Once we obtain the license for the project, we apply to EPDK (Electricity Market
Regulating Authority) for expropriation. As these projects fall under the category of
“common/national benefit”, EPDK expropriates the necessary land immediately. The value of
land is determined by a group of authorities and local representatives. The company is not
involved in the process. We receive the amount and the address to pay and we pay.
Hüseyin Esen (Head of Çamlık Village): What kind of extras will be for us with regards to the
project?
Sinan Yazgan: We employ 150 people from your villages. And, during the operation we will
prioritize locals for recruitment. We will carry out landscaping work and compensate any damage
we caused. For extras, I should reiterate that our first priority is to finish the construction as soon
as possible. Because, most of your disturbance will be over. Please, give us time and we will do
our best to meet your demands if they are feasible.
Zeren Erik: Also, please try to distinguish between private interests and the problems you face
regarding the project or common benefits. The priority should be minimizing or abolishing the
disturbances you face vis-a-vis the project.
Officer at the municipality: You do not have an EIA report. You prepare EIA reports yourself.
We can stop this project if we would like as locals.
Zeren Erik: Every project under 50 MW has to prepare a Project Introduction File in line with
the EIA regulations. This file is also called the pre-IEA report. For this project, it is prepared by a
consultancy company. The file is assessed by Local Administration and they decide if this project
needs EIA report or not. If they decide that the project needs to go through EIA procedure, then
the company has to develop a much more detailed report. Within the judicial system or via
organizing local movements, individuals can pursue their issues. And, in any case, you should
always monitor these projects as citizens.
Locals: On the Aksu River, there will be seven regulators. We are worried that we will lose our
river.
Sinan Yazgan: Please, note that these projects have the government‟s support to meet the
increasing energy need of Turkey. Turkey‟s energy supply has to grow around 6% each year and
to government to meet sustain development has to make investments. But, because the
investments are huge, it invites the private sector to increase the generation capacity. We are
making this investment for the welfare of the nation and we will return it back to the state after 49
years.
Locals: Will the climate change?
Zeren Erik: Large dam projects with significant reservoirs affect the surrounding climate.
However, this is a run-of-river project with no storage capacity, thus the climate would not be
affected.
Özkan Şahin: I think because the level of water will reduce, our climate will change and our
agricultural activities will be impacted. How much life water will be released? Is it going to be
enough? How many days the project will generate electricity?
Zeren Erik: Talking about climatic change needs years of observation and as the lifewater is
provided, there should not be a significant impact. The permits for these projects are given by the
state authorities based on hydrological and meteorological measures collected for decades. DSI
determined the minimum flow as 10% to be released. This amount is for the maintenance of the
ecosystem and the company should increase the released water depending on the needs of the
users. Usually, this extra amount is agreed between the villagers and the company.
Sinan Yazgan. The average generation hour/year is expected to be 3500. However, depending on
the water, we might produce less or more. We will not produce when the water level is below our
design flow rate anyways, especially during summer. And, we will release all the water at those
times.
Locals: We cannot sleep at night due to dynamiting? We would like you to regulate your work
hours accordingly.
Sinan Yazgan: Our working hours during night is the same as the day. We carry out dynamiting
within the permitted levels.
Local: I have land of 40 ha. Due to rocks dropped on my land, I had difficulties with harvesting. I
would like those to be cleaned.
Sinan Yazgan: We will return your lands as they were. Please, come to our office later and we
will identify these together. Mehmet Bey is aware of that and working towards finding a solution.
Yunus Bey: I am against this project. The traffic is just flowing in front of my house. I am
disturbed by the traffic, dust and mud. My 85-year-old mum cannot sleep at night because of the
truck traffic and dynamiting. I lost my peace. I will make official complain about this project and I
am against it. I am also disturbed by the odour of waste water you charge in the riverbed.
Sinan Yazgan: Please, give us some time. During the construction, such disturbances are
inevitable, but, we will maintain the environment once the construction work is over. Please, bear
with us.
Minutes of other consultations
N/A
ii. Assessment of all comments
As there were several complaints regarding the project noted during the meeting, we asked the
project owner to prepare a short report with relevant supporting evidence such as photos,
permits...etc. The explanation below includes statements from this report in addition to the
comments provided at the meeting.
Stakeholder comment Was comment taken
into account (Yes/ No)?
Explanation (Why? How?)
Salaries are not fair vis-a-vis
working hours
N/A Currently, this project is over-
employed to improve the economic
conditions of the locals as much as
possible. We have employed around
240 people, out of which around
150 are from the villages around.
Wages, starting from the minimum
defined by law, range according to
the qualification of the staff. Both
morning and night shifts work for
10 hours, including 1 hour of lunch
break. Essentium has three projects
going on at the moment, however, it
is difficult to make salary
comparison among them as the
workers are paid by the sub-
contractors.
-Employment should be
equally provided from each
village.
-The benefits from the project
should not be for individuals,
but, rather for the general
benefit of the villages.
Yes As the main construction site is in
Güdül Village, it is the mostly-
impacted one among all the villages.
To be able to minimize the
disturbance, we eventually have to
pay special attention to Güdül
Village.
Having said that, contributions
indicated below have been realised
in the surrounding villages:
- Maintenance of the
electricity lines.
- Maintenance and
refurbishment of the water
system
- Supply of construction
materials to many locals to
be used for construction
houses.
- Rehabilitation of roads after
the flooding.
- Food and animals supplied
to the locals.
- Maintenance and
refurbishment of the
mosques and schools.
- Construction of new roads
to isolated locations and of
passes.
- Supply of machinery and
equipment for several needs
-Excavation waste is disposed
along the road which causes
mud problem.
-Excavation waste is disposed
carelessly and damage the
nature.
-Excavation waste disposed
along the riverbed increases
the risk of flood.
N/A We obtain the necessary permits
from DSI to dispose our waste at the
selected points.2 We do not and
cannot store the waste anywhere we
would like. It is important to
highlight that most of the excavation
waste is utilized to maintain roads
and for other construction purposes.
It is difficult to avoid mud totally.
To reduce the disturbance, we
maintain the roads frequently.
Our drinking water is cut. Yes We built new water depots for the
Güdül Village.3 However, as the
houses are apart from each other,
not every household can benefit
from them. We maintain the system
case by case for individual
complaints.
-The traffic causes problems
such as dust, noise and air
pollution.
-Our roads are damaged. We
would like rehabilitation of
our roads.
- During the construction,
landscaping is ignored and
Yes As space is very scarce in the area,
our main construction site is in
Gudul Village. We are aware of
your complaints and we try to
minimize that. During the dry
season, our vehicles water the roads
frequently.4 We maintain the roads
to avoid mud and for our own
2 Please, see the permits obtained in Annex 6 of the SFR Report in Turkish
3 Please see, the Figure 7 in Annex 4 of the SRF Report..
4 Please see, Figure1 to Figure 5 in Annex 4 of the SRF Report.
villages became messy. purposes. As a result of our work,
we actually improved the quality of
roads.5
Once the construction is over, we
will also carry out landscaping work
including planting trees.
To deal with the noise and air
quality problems, we use new
vehicles.
The fish disappeared
Yes There is no significant fish
population in the river. However, it
might be possible to carry out field
studies to monitor the population
once the construction over.
Security measures should be
strengthened (related to rocks
posing risks).
Yes
We take precautionary measures to
minimize/ abolish the safety risks. A
permanent “Health and Safety
Expert” and “Site Doctor” are
employed at site. Also, the workers
are trained according to their
qualifications and job descriptions.
However, especially, during the
dynamiting, to avoid such incidents,
we do not let human and vehicle
traffic at certain points. Dynamiting
guards manage the human and
vehicle traffic and keep them out of
the risky areas. After the incident,
those guards were equipped with
walkie talkies and road blockings
have been practiced more actively.
Moreover, rocks and earth posing
risks are being cleared from the
slopes.
Incident: The incident took place
during the night (dynamiting) shift
on the headpool way. A rock fell
down and hit the guard container.
There is neither working outfit
nor boots distributed to
workers.
N/A We provide our workers with the
necessary outfit and safety
equipment together with an “official
declaration of lending” signed by
each employee.6
The dynamiting during the Yes Tunnel works, hence, dynamiting
5 Please see, Figure1 to Figure 5 in Annex 4 of the SRF Report.
6 For an example of the official record, please see Annex 5 of the SFR Report.
night causes disturbance by
the villagers
has been carried out only at night
shifts between 19:00 and 06:00 in
line with the memorandum on
“Remarks to Apply on Dynamiting
at Night”.7 To reduce the level of
disturbance, gel dynamites are
deployed.
We will have a measurement study
carried out by experts and under the
light of that study reduction
measures will be identified and
applied. The explosives are very
expensive and it is of benefit to the
sub-contractor to use optimum
amount to reduce costs.
How is the expropriation
carried out?
Yes Once we obtain the license for the
project, we apply to EPDK
(Electricity Market Regulating
Authority) for expropriation. As
these projects fall under the
category of “common/national
benefit”, EPDK expropriates the
necessary land immediately. The
value of land is determined by a
group of authorities and local
representatives. The company is not
involved in the process. We receive
the amount and the address to pay
and we pay.
Do you have EIA report? N/A As this project is under 50 MW,
according to the regulation, we have
to prepare an pre-EIA report which
goes under scrutiny by the local
authorities. The projects have to
prepare an EIA report if the
authorities oblige it after assessing
the pre-EIA report. Our project
received “EIA Exemption” at this
stage.
On the Aksu River, there are 7
HEPP projects. We are
worried about losing our
water.
Yes All projects obtain the necessary
permits from DSI based on the
hydrological and meteorological
observations obtained for decades of
monitoring. As long as the life water
is supplied within the regulated
amount, there should not be a
problem. We will supply the life-
water continuously foreseen in the
regulations.
-Will the climate change? Yes -This project is a run-of-river
7 Provided to the DOE with these documents.
-How much water will be
released?
-How many hours will the
facility work?
project which does not have a
significant storage capacity. Thus,
climate change is not an issue as it
is for large hydro projects with large
reservoirs.
-We will release the necessary
amount to maintain the ecosystem
as it is defined by the regulations.
-The facility is expected to work
around 3500 hours/year according
to the optimization studies.
However, depending on water, we
might produce less or more. Please,
note that we will not generate
electricity during the dry season and
release all the water.
There are rocks and stones
accumulated on my land. Will
you clean these?
Yes We will clean the land and return it
as they were. Please, come to our
office to identify which lands are
affected. In fact, those lands are
expropriated, but, still, we let the
villagers to utilize them including
collecting the harvest.
We are disturbed by the odour
from waste water discharged
to the river.
N/A We do not discharge our waste to
the riverbed. We have installed
chemical treatment facility for the
waste from concrete production and
biological treatment facility for
domestic waste water which are
very rare for such projects in
Turkey.8
iii. Revisit sustainability assessment
Are you going to revisit the sustainable development assessment?
Please note that this is necessary when there are indicators scored
„negative‟ or if there are stakeholder comments that can‟t be mitigated
Yes No
The project owner has a positive attitude towards minimizing or abolishing the problems faced by
the locals. Some complaints are marked as “not applicable” which indicate either:
- the complaint does not have a base and the company has already taken measures regarding
it (i.e.; waste water discharged into the river after going through biological treatment,
work outfits are distributed to staff), or,
- it is not within the jurisdiction of the company to change it (i.e.; where the excavation
waste should be stored).
8 Please see, Figure 6 for the photos of the Biological and Chemical Treatment Plants.
The complaints which are taken into consideration will be integrated into the sustainability
monitoring plan as elaborated below.
iv. Summary of alterations based on comments
- Acoustic measurements will be carried out to identify the noise levels from the
construction and dynamiting according to which mitigation measures will be identified.
- Fish population might be monitored during the first years of the power plant in operation
by experts.
- During the dynamiting, human and vehicle traffic have been more actively managed and
the communication between the staff has been improved with walkie talkies. Also, rocks
and earth posing threat will be removed at risky points.
- Stones and rocks accumulated on lands will be cleared.
- Water has been supplied to households where water is cut due to tunnel works.
SECTION D. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT
D. 1. Own sustainable development assessment
i. „Do no harm‟ assessment
Safeguarding principles
Description of
relevance to my
project
Assessment of my
project risks
breaching it
(low/medium/high)
Mitigation
measure
Human Rights
1 The Project respects
internationally proclaimed
human rights including
dignity, cultural property and
uniqueness of indigenous
people. The Project is not
complicity in Human Rights
abuses.
Not Relevant.
Project activities
are not expected
to cause any
human rights
abuse. Turkey has
ratified European
Convention on
Human Right in
10/03/19549.
None No mitigation
measure is
required for this
indicator.
2 The Project does not
involve and is not complicit
in involuntary resettlement.
Not Relevant.
Project does not
involve any
resettlement.
None No mitigation
measure is
required for this
indicator.
3 The Project does not
involve and is not complicity
in the alteration, damage or
removal of any critical
cultural heritage.
Not Relevant.
No cultural
heritage has been
identified in the
project site.
None No mitigation
measure is
required for this
indicator.
Labour Standards
4 The Project respects the
employees‟ freedom of
association and their right to
collective bargaining and is
not complicit in restrictions of
these freedoms and rights
Not Relevant.
Turkey has
ratified ILO 87
and 98
conventions .All
staff recruited are
employed
according to the
national
legislations.10
None No mitigation
measure is
required for this
indicator
5 The Project does not
involve and is not complicit
in any form of forced or
Not Relevant.
Turkey has
ratified ILO
None No mitigation
measure is
9 http://www.istanbul.gov.tr/?pid=9218 (Accessed on 15/03/2010)