The Central City Church building was recently damaged by a fire that occurred overnight. The insurance company will not pay on a claim if it is determined that a fire was started deliberately. Since nobody was in the Central City Church building at the time the fire swept through the structure, the insurance company will most certainly reimburse the church for the damage caused by the fire. Which of the following is an assumption that is required to reach the conclusion above? A recent su rvey cond ucted in the New Homesmagazine indicated that more than 70% of its readers are planning to purchase or build a new home over the next two years. Based on the results of the survey, the editor of the magazine concluded that over the next two years, the real estate industry is likely to experience rapid growth driven by the high market demand for new homes. Which of the following statements, if true, would be the most damaging to the conclusion of the magazine’s editor?There is only one major road, Freeway Z, that links County X and County Y. The border of the two counties is primarily defined by a mountain range, over which the construction of new roads is severely restricted by environmental laws. A cost-effective solution to the problem of traffic congestion on Freeway Z is to build a commuter train tunnel through the mountain range. The successful implementation of this plan would cost far less than expanding the existing freeway and would also reduce the number of cars clogging the roads in both counties. Which of the following, if true, could proponents of the plan above most appropriately cite as a piece of evidence for the soundness of their plan? Fire damages are generally the most expensive type of loss that insurance companies cover. There was no one in the building at the time the fire swept through the structure. No individual would fraudulently profit by setting a fire in the church building. The insurance company typically pays claims for s imilar situations in other non-residential structures, such as office buildings and restaurants. The fire was not deliberately started by someone who then left the building before the fire grew The survey included over 50,000 respondents representing all major age categories. The survey was mailed to all the subscribers of the magazine and included prepaid postage to facilitat e returning the questionnaire. Readers of theNew Ho mes magazine are much more likely to be interested in buying or purchasing a home than the rest of the public. The number of the magazine's readers has more than doubled over the past 2 years. All survey respondents received one free issue of the magazine as a token of appreciation for filling out the survey.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
The Central City Church building was recently damaged by a fire that occurred overnight. The
insurance company will not pay on a claim if it is determined that a fire was started deliberately.
Since nobody was in the Central City Church building at the time the fire swept through the structure,
the insurance company will most certainly reimburse the church for the damage caused by the fire.
Which of the following is an assumption that is required to reach the conclusion above?
A recent survey conducted in the New Homes magazine indicated that more than 70% of its readers
are planning to purchase or build a new home over the next two years. Based on the results of the
survey, the editor of the magazine concluded that over the next two years, the real estate industry is
likely to experience rapid growth driven by the high market demand for new homes.
Which of the following statements, if true, would be the most damaging to the conclusion of the
magazine’s editor?
There is only one major road, Freeway Z, that links County X and County Y. The border of the two
counties is primarily defined by a mountain range, over which the construction of new roads is
severely restricted by environmental laws. A cost-effective solution to the problem of trafficcongestion on Freeway Z is to build a commuter train tunnel through the mountain range. The
successful implementation of this plan would cost far less than expanding the existing freeway and
would also reduce the number of cars clogging the roads in both counties.
Which of the following, if true, could proponents of the plan above most appropriately cite as a piece
of evidence for the soundness of their plan?
Fire damages are generally the most expensive type of loss that insurance companies cover.
There was no one in the building at the time the fire swept through the structure.
No individual would fraudulently profit by setting a fire in the church building.
The insurance company typically pays claims for similar situations in other non-residential structures,
such as office buildings and restaurants.
The fire was not deliberately started by someone who then left the building before the fire grew
The survey included over 50,000 respondents representing all major age categories.
The survey was mailed to all the subscribers of the magazine and included prepaid postage to facilitatereturning the questionnaire.
Readers of the New Homes magazine are much more likely to be interested in buying or purchasing a
home than the rest of the public.
The number of the magazine's readers has more than doubled over the past 2 years.
All survey respondents received one free issue of the magazine as a token of appreciation for filling outthe survey.
to their final destinations within the cell. When the smooth transfer of proteins
from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus is interrupted, the cell
dies.
With this in mind, researchers conducted a genetic screen in yeast cells
in order to identify any gene that works to reverse the toxic levels of alpha-
synuclein in the cell. Researchers discovered that such a gene does in fact exist,
and have located the genetic counterpart in mammalian nerve cells, or neurons.
This discovery has led to new hopes that drug therapy could potentially activate
this gene, thereby suppressing the toxicity of alpha-synuclein in dopamine-
producing neurons.
While drug therapy to suppress alpha-synuclein has been examined in
yeast, fruitflies, roundworms, and cultures of rat neurons, researchers are
hesitant to conclude that such therapies will prove successful on human
patients. Alpha-synuclein toxicity seems to be one cause for the death of
dopamine-producing neurons in Parkinson’s patients, but other causes mayexist. Most scientists involved with Parkinson’s research do agree, however, that
such promising early results provide a basis for further testing.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
Which of the following statements regarding a high level of alpha-synuclein is supported by thepassage?
According to the passage, which of the following represents the chronology of a typical protein life ina healthy yeast cell?
compare and contrast current treatments for Parkinson’s Disease
discuss new scientific findings and the implications of these findings for treating Parkinson’s Disease
explain the role of proteins in dopamine-producing neurons
introduce new research that supports an already existing treatment method for Parkinson’s Disease
question the scientific evidence used to support current treatments for Parkinson’s Disease
It is not a cause for the death of neurons in Parkinson’s patients, though it has led to other research that
may prove fruitful.
Its effect on human neurons cannot be tested.
It is one possible cause for the death of neurons in Parkinson’s patients, but not the only one.
Its detrimental effect on human neurons can be prevented through drug therapy.
It is the only possible cause for the death of neurons in Parkinson’s patients.
Protein is made in the endoplasmic reticulum, sent to the Golgi apparatus, processed and altered in the
Golgi apparatus, and then delivered to other parts of the cell.
The Bunsen burner, named after the German scientist who improved its design and efficiency, was
invented in 1885 not by Bunsen himself but by fellow scientist Michael Faraday.
Named for the capital of Belgium, Brussels sprouts, which at its fullest growth scarcely exceeds a
large walnut in size, are immature buds shaped like tiny cabbages.
Protein is created in the Golgi apparatus, modified and delivered to other parts of the cell, then
decomposed by alpha-synuclein.
Protein is produced in the endoplasmic reticulum, sent to the Golgi apparatus, and then decomposed by
alpha-synuclein.
Protein is produced in the Golgi apparatus, modified by the Golgi apparatus, distributed to the neuron,
and then sent to the endoplasmic reticulum.
Protein is produced by alpha-synuclein, transferred to the endoplasmic reticulum, sent to the Golgi
apparatus for modification, and then distributed to the rest of the cell.
named after the German scientist who improved its design and efficiency, was invented in 1885 not by
Bunsen himself but by fellow scientist Michael Faraday
which was named for the German scientist who improved its design and efficiency, was not invented
in 1885 by Bunsen himself but, rather, by Michael Faraday, his fellow scientist
which is named for the German scientist improving its design and efficiency, was invented not by
Bunsen himself but, rather, by Michael Faraday, a fellow scientist in 1885
named for the German scientist improving its design and efficiency, was not invented by Bunsen
himself but by Michael Faraday, a fellow scientist, in 1885
naming after the German scientist who had improved its design and efficiency, was invented not byBunsen himself, but, rather, by fellow scientist Michael Faraday in 1885
its fullest growth scarcely exceeds a large walnut in
its fullest growth scarcely exceed a large walnut in
their fullest growth scarcely exceeds a large walnut in
their fullest growth scarcely exceed a walnut's large
their fullest growth scarcely exceed a large walnut in
Ecologist: The incidence of alligator attacks on humans in the vicinity of the Blue Lagoon has
increased in recent years. Relocating at least half of the Blue Lagoon’s alligator population
would help decrease the incidence of alligator attacks on humans.
The ecologist’s claim relies on which of the following assumptions?
There is a correlation between the size of the alligator population and the incidence of
alligator attacks on humans.
In recent years, there has been no significant change in the size of the alligator population in
the Blue Lagoon.
Not all alligator attacks on humans are reported to authorities.
Relocating half of the lagoon’s alligator population would not be prohibitively expensive.
Martin Luther King Jr. won the Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and
was the most famous leader of the American civil rights movement.
Martin Luther King Jr. won the Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and
was the most famous leader of the American civil rights movement.
Martin Luther King Jr., the most famous leader of the American civil rights movement, won
the Nobel Peace Prize and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Martin Luther King Jr., the most famous leader of the American civil rights movement, wonthe Nobel Peace Prize and he won the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Martin Luther King Jr. was the most famous leader of the American civil rights movement,the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, and he won the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Martin Luther King Jr., the most famous leader of the American civil rights movement, won
the Nobel Peace Prize as well as the Presidential Medal of Freedom, too.
Although amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS, typically causes death within 3 to 5 years of
the onset of symptoms, on average, the famous physicist Stephen Hawking has defied the
odds, in contrast, by living more than 40 years after his initial diagnosis.
typically causes death within 3 to 5 years of the onset of symptoms, on average, the famous
physicist Stephen Hawking has defied the odds, in contrast,
causes death within 3 to 5 years of the onset of symptoms, on average, the famous physicist
Stephen Hawking has defied the odds, in contrast,
typically causes death within 3 to 5 years of the onset of symptoms, the famous physicistStephen Hawking has defied the odds
causes death within 3 to 5 years of the average onset of symptoms, the famous physicist
Stephen Hawking has defied the odds, by contrast,
typically causes death within 3 to 5 years of the average onset of symptoms, the famous
physicist Stephen Hawking has defied the odds
The golden toad of Costa Rica, whose beauty and rarity inspired anunusual degree of human interest from a public generally unconcernedabout amphibians, may nevertheless have been driven to extinction byhuman activity. In the United States, a public relations campaign raisedmoney to protect the toad’s habitat in Costa Rica, establishing theMonteverde Cloud Forest Preserve in 1972. However, setting aside habitatwas not enough to save the species. The toad's demise in the late 1980s
was a harbinger of further species extinction in Costa Rica. Since thattime, another twenty of the fifty species of frogs and toads known to once
inhabit a 30 square kilometer area near Monteverde have disappeared.Between one third and one half of the world’s amphibian species—
including frogs, toads, and salamanders—have declined or disappeared.
Scientists hypothesize that the more subtle effects of human activities onthe world's ecosystems, such as the accretion of pollutants, the decreasein atmospheric ozone, and changing weather patterns due to globalwarming, are beginning to take their toll. Perhaps amphibians - whosepermeable skin makes them unusually sensitive to environmental changes- are the biological harbingers of the natural world, giving humans early
notification of the deterioration, if not destruction, of our ecosystem.In the second paragraph, the author notes that amphibians have permeable skin in order to
argue that the golden toad is not the only endangered amphibian
explain why amphibians might be affected earlier than other animals by an adverse
environmentillustrate that preserving the golden toad’s habitat was not enough to save the species
demonstrate that the accretion of pollutants poses a greater threat to amphibian species than
do changes to the atmosphere or climate
suggest that threats to amphibians need not be a cause for human concern
Which of the following best describes the overall organization of the passage?
The first paragraph speculates on the causes of a global phenomenon; the second paragraph
describes one specific example of this phenomenon.
The first paragraph explains one environmental consequence of human activity; the second
paragraph discusses solutions which might mitigate further environmental damage.
The first paragraph details one instance of an ecological change; the second paragraph
discusses the import and global extent of this change.
The first paragraph discusses efforts to protect the habitat of a particular species; the second
paragraph advocates for additional habitat protection.
The first paragraph describes the unexplained worldwide disappearance of toads; the secondparagraph adds that salamanders and frogs are also disappearing.
According to the passage, all of the following are true EXCEPT:
Humans are at least partially responsible for changing weather patterns.
Toads, like frogs, have permeable skin.
A species may become extinct even if its habitat is preserved.
Costa Rica’s Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve was not paid for solely by the Costa Rican
government.
More frog and toad species than salamander species have disappeared in Costa Rica sincethe late 1980s.
Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as a reason for the initial interest of theNetherlands in the Banda Islands?
Venetian merchants. Seeking a monopoly over this valuable spice, theDutch attacked the Banda Islands, subjugating the native people in a
mostly successful attempt to control the trade.However, one island in the Banda chain remained in the hands of
the British and was the object of much conflict between the Netherlands
and England. After many battles, the British offered to cede control of theisland in exchange for New Amsterdam, a Dutch outpost on the east coastof North America. Inveterate traders, the Dutch were more interested inthe spice trade than in the small outpost of New Amsterdam. In 1667, theTreaty of Breda gave the Dutch complete control of the Banda Islands,and thus of the nutmeg trade, and gave the British New Amsterdam,
which they promptly renamed New York. Today, nutmeg trees can befound in many countries and no one company or country has a monopoly
on the trade.
Th
eauthor mentionsthatnutmegbec
ame a luxury item in the European market in order to
discuss the role of the Dutch in the history of the trade of luxury items
explain why the Dutch wanted to control the market for nutmeg
establish that the Dutch obtained a monopoly on the importation of nutmeg into Europe
demonstrate the importance of spices in Europe
explain why the British wanted to control the market for nutmeg
In the passage, the author is primarily interested in
tracing the history of a major city
discussing the role of commonplace items in world development
offering a specific example to support a general claim
arguing for continued research into political history
presenting an innovative view of a commonplace item
Increased economic competition with Britain
Subjugation of the native people
An opportunity to expand to a new geographical market
Which of the following best completes the passage below?
In an exit poll of voters who had recently voted for governor, four-fifths said they would vote for a
gubernatorial candidate who uses a wheelchair. However, the poll may have overestimated theproportion of voters who would vote for such a candidate, because ______________.
At any given time, approximately fifteen percent of all homes in Florida are on the market. In Texas,
however, only seven percent of all homes are on the market at any given time. Therefore, one will
have a wider selection of homes to choose from if one looks for a home in Florida rather than in
Texas.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously strengthen the argument above?
The desire to restrict access to a commodity
Some voters who would not vote for a candidate who uses a wheelchair might have claimed to the
pollster that they would.
Some voters who would vote for a candidate who uses a wheelchair may not have accurately answered
the pollster’s questions.
Some voters who said they would not vote for a candidate who uses a wheelchair also would not votefor candidates who express certain types of beliefs.
Some people who are not registered voters also would probably not vote for a candidate who uses awheelchair.
Some voters who claim they would not vote for a candidate who uses a wheelchair might vote for a
candidate who uses a wheelchair if that candidate shared their beliefs.
Homes in Florida tend to be less expensive than those in Texas.
Mortgages are easier to obtain for homes in Florida than for homes in Texas.
The construction industry in Texas has reported significant growth over the past year.
The cost of constructing new homes in Texas is higher than in Florida.
The total number of homes in Florida is three times greater than the total number in Texas.
Kleine-Levin syndrome, a rare neurological disorder primarily affecting adolescents, is
characterized by cyclical episodes of extreme lethargy, heightened irritability, and appearing
Albinism is a rare genetic condition that inhibits the production of melanin, or pigmentation, in theskin and hair. People born with albinism are unusually susceptible to sunburn, melanoma, and a
range of other health issues that are generally connected to excessive exposure to the sun.
The statements above, if true, provide the most support for which of the following conclusions?
apparent confusion
had been confused
Studies show thatrepeated exposure toan allergen cantrigger anaphylaxis.This condition, inwhich an allergicperson becomesoverly sensitized tothe allergen inquestion, can provokea life-threatening
reaction via evenminimal exposure.
Because minor earthquakes can weaken the existing infrastructure in an area, a
series of minor earthquakes sometimes causes much more extensive damage thanmight otherwise be expected.
Peanut allergy sufferers do not need to ingest peanut products in order toexperience an allergic episode; a reaction can also be triggered by touching peanuts
or peanut oils.
Scientists theorize that global warming, a gradual increase in the average
worldwide temperature, is the primary cause of the increasing occurrence of extreme weather patterns in the last two decades.
People born with albinism develop other biological protections against melanoma and other sun-related
health issues.
Humans with a high production of melanin can easily ignore health issues related to exposure to the
sun.
When a non-albino person gets sunburn, the amount of melanin produced by that person decreases.
In humans, melanin plays a role in protecting the skin from developing sunburn and other sun-related
ailments.
It is not possible for a person born with albinism to adopt other artificial protective measures against
Parents are concerned not only with finding good schools for their children, but they have to know
what makes one better than another.
but they have to know what makes one better than another
but they must decide which school is better than the other
and knowing what school is best of them all
and they have to know what makes one school better than another
but also with knowing what makes one school better than another
The movement for women’s rights traces its origin to the first half of
the nineteenth century. The Seneca Falls Convention, held in Seneca Falls,New York in July of 1848, is commonly regarded as the beginning of the
women's rights movement in the United States. This conference waspreceded by a series of ground-breaking events that made possible thisseminal milestone in the history of American women.
The idea for the convention emerged during the 1840 World Anti-Slavery Convention in London, a conference that precluded its femaledelegates from participation in discussions. Lucretia Mott, a famouswomen’s rights activist, wrote in her diary that calling the 1840convention a “world” convention "was a mere poetical license." She hadaccompanied her husband to London but had to sit behind a partition withother women activists, including Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who laterbecame one of the main forces behind the Seneca Falls Convention.
During the early 1840s, Elizabeth Cady Stanton composed theDeclaration of Sentiments, a document modeled after the Declaration of
Independence, declaring the rights of women. At the time of itscomposition, the Declaration of Sentiments was so bold that when
Elizabeth Stanton showed the draft to her husband, he stated that if sheread it at the Seneca Falls Convention, he would have to leave town. TheDeclaration contained several new resolutions. It proclaimed that all menand women are born equal and stated that no man could withhold awoman's rights, take her property, or preclude her from the right to vote.
This Declaration also became the foundation for the Seneca Falls
Convention.On July 19-20, 1848, the Seneca Falls Convention brought together240 delegates between ages 22 and 60, including forty men, who spent
the two days at the conference debating, refining and voting on theDeclaration of Sentiments. Most of the declaration’s resolutions received
unanimous support and were officially endorsed. Later in 1848, theSeneca Falls convention was followed by an even larger meeting in
Rochester, New York. Thereafter, national women's conventions were held
The author of the passage mentions Stanton's husband's intention to leave town most likely in order to emphasize which of the following?
According to the passage, the articles of the Declaration of Sentiments precluded each of thefollowing, EXCEPT:
annually, contributing to the growing momentum in the movement forwomen's rights.Which of the following best describes the main purpose of the passage above?
To compare the origin of the women’s rights movement with the current-day situation.
To support further expansion of women’s rights in the United States.
To criticize the nineteenth-century restrictions on women’s rights.
To explain the reasons for the opposition to the Seneca Falls Convention.
To discuss the origin of the women’s rights movement.
The personal relationship between Stanton and her husband was rapidly deteriorating.
Stanton's husband needed to attend another convention that was held out of town.
Stanton's husband was prone to spontaneous and emotional decisions.
The Declaration of Sentiments contained bold proclamations for its time.
The abusive language in the Declaration of Sentiments could reflect negatively on the reputation of
Stanton’s husband.
Restraining women from participating in military expeditions.
Denying women the right to vote.
Taking women’s property.
Claiming that men and women are not born equal.
Withholding women’s rights.
Congress has passed a law that scales back the tax credits offered to purchasers of hybrid
cars. Because of this, the number of hybrid cars sold each year, which has approximately
doubled in each of the last five years, is likely to flatten in the next few years.
Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens the conclusion that the number of
hybrid cars sold annually is likely to flatten in the next few years?
Most people buy hybrid cars for reasons other than to save money in the long run.
healthcare providers would have to decrease the billing level in order to offset the change.
(3) State the Goal
On inference questions, we’re looking for the answer that must be true according to the
information given in the passage. The most tempting wrong answers are often items that
might be true but don’t have to be true.
(4) Work from Wrong to Right
(A) CORRECT. The passage states that, if the percentage is changed, healthcare providers
will adjust the amount of the bill so that the dollar amount does not change. In particular, if the
legal percentage is decreased, healthcare providers must bill increased amounts to
accomplish this objective. Since private patients are responsible for the full amount billed,
they will be responsible for the new, higher amount.
(B) There is nothing in the passage to suggest that the amount paid by insurance companies
could not change for reasons unrelated to the law. For example, nothing in the passageprevents the healthcare providers from changing their prices, and a change in prices without
a change in the percentage paid would result in a change in the dollar amount paid by the
insurance companies.
(C) This statement might be true, but there is nothing in the passage to indicate that it must
be true. The passage describes what healthcare providers will do only in the event of a
change in the law; it does not describe what they will do in other situations, such as the one
described in this answer choice.
(D) The passage provides no information about what determines the legally set percentage.
(E) This statement may be true for some patients but does not have to be true for all, e.g., for
those who use healthcare services very infrequently. For such patients – even if they pay
greater bills when they do use healthcare services – the difference may not make up for the
cost of insurance premiums, especially if those premiums are high.
(2) The original makes a comparison between car sales in 2004 and this January. However, the
comparison is of prepositional phrases, which must be compared using "as," not "like," which
is used to compare nouns. ("Like" would be correctly used to compare one year to another,
for example, "Like 2004, 2005 was a good year.") Also, this sentence has an idiomatic
error. The idiom ―as often as‖ must be written out and cannot be contracted to ―as
often.‖ Finally, the phrasing "car sales to first-time buyers as often as to return customers" is
awkward and should be recast.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(3) (B) This choice incorrectly uses the comparison term "Like." Also, the idiom ―as often‖ is
(4) (C) This sentence uses the correct idiom, "as often as." However, the pronoun ―it‖ does not
have an antecedent, as ―sales‖ (as well as "buyers") is plural. Finally, "and it" weakens the
syntax and meaning of the first part of the sentence.
(5) (D) CORRECT. This choice clearly compares sales in the two years. The idiom ―as often as‖
is correctly written and is placed in a comparison of actions (i.e., "first-time buyers bought
cars") rather than in a comparison of prepositional phrases, which is more awkward.
(6) (E) The idiom ―as often‖ is incorrect; it should be ―as often as.‖
(7) This is a general question that can be answered by considering the general structure of the
passage.
(A) This passage does not compare and contrast current treatments. The first paragraph
does mention current treatments, but these treatments are grouped together as treatments
that all work to replenish dopamine levels in the brain.
(B) CORRECT. The topic sentence of the second paragraph discusses new scientific
findings and their implications: ―recent research provides insight into the inner workings of
dopamine-producing neurons, and may lead to a new drug treatment that would proactively
protect the neurons from decay.‖
(C) While the protein alpha-synuclein is discussed in the second paragraph, the role of this
protein is not the main focus of the passage.
(D) The new research method does not support an ―already existing‖ treatment method, but
rather a new, potential treatment method.
(E) The scientific evidence discussed in this passage supports a new treatment method; it
does not call into question currently existing treatment methods. (8) In the fourth paragraph, it is stated that ―alpha-synuclein toxicity seems to be one cause for
the death of dopamine-producing neurons in Parkinson’s patients, but other causes may
exist.‖
(A) This statement contradicts the information given in the fourth paragraph. The fourth
paragraph states that alpha-synuclein toxicity, or high levels of alpha-synuclein, seems to be
one cause for the death of neurons.
(B) The fourth paragraph states ―that such promising early results provide a basis for further
testing,‖ implying that further testing on the cause of neuron death, and the related drug
treatment, can and will be conducted.
(C) CORRECT. This statement agrees with the information given in paragraph four: ―alpha-
synuclein toxicity seems to be one cause for the death of dopamine-producing neurons in
Parkinson’s patients, but other causes may exist.‖
(D) While paragraph four states that drug therapy to prevent alpha-synuclein toxicity has
been tested in yeast, fruitflies, roundworms, and cultures of rat neurons, there is no evidence
to suggest that drug therapy will prove effective in human neurons.
(E) This statement contradicts the information given in the fourth paragraph. The fourth
paragraph states that alpha-synuclein toxicity, or high levels of alpha-synuclein, seems to be
one cause for the death of neurons, but not the only one. (9) The second paragraph states that ―high levels of alpha-synuclein disrupt the flow of proteins
from the endoplasmic reticulum, the site of protein production in the cell, to the Golgi
apparatus, the component of the cell that modifies and sorts the proteins before sending
them to their final destinations within the cell.‖ This implies that proteins in healthy cells are
produced in the endoplasmic reticulum, sent to the Golgi apparatus where they are modified,
and then shipped to the rest of the cell.
(A) CORRECT. This chronology is supported by the information given in the secondparagraph.
(B) Proteins are created in the endoplasmic reticulum, not the Golgi apparatus. Further, there
is no evidence to show that proteins in healthy cells are decomposed by alpha-synuclein.
(C) There is no evidence to show that proteins in healthy cells are decomposed by alpha-
synuclein.
(D) Proteins are created in the endoplasmic reticulum, not the Golgi apparatus.
(E) Proteins are created in the endoplasmic reticulum, not by alpha-synuclein.
(10) The original sentence is correct. The contrast set off by the parallel structures "not … but"
should only contrast Bunsen and Faraday; the reference to the year 1885 should not be
included in that parallel structure, since the year in which the burner was invented is not part
of the indicated contrast. The modifier "in 1885" should be attached as directly as possible to
the action "was invented".
The idioms "named for" and "named after" are both correct, so there can be no eliminations
based on those idioms.
The past tense "improved" is the most logical tense for that verb, since the action in question
is a simple historical action.
(A) The original sentence is correct as written.
(B) The past tense "was named" is inappropriate because it suggests that the burner is no
longer named after Bunsen. In addition, "not invented in 1885" wrongly suggests that the
burner was invented in a different year. Finally, the constructions following "not" and "but"
are not parallel.
(C) The present participle "improving" is inappropriate. This type of participle adopts the
population is actually related to the incidence of attacks on humans. The correct answer will
state this assumption.
(A) The alligators’ preference has no bearing on whether the number of alligators in the
lagoon actually affects the frequency of attacks on humans. Therefore, the conclusion is not
dependent on this assumption.
(B) CORRECT. This choice explicitly states that there is a relationship between the size of
the alligator population and the frequency of attacks on humans.
(C) The conclusion is not dependent on this assumption. In fact, this assumption would most
likely lead to a different conclusion altogether. If the size of the alligator population has
remained constant while the incidence of attacks has increased, it would be logical to
conclude that the size of the population does not affect the incidence of attacks.
(D) This assumption, true or not true, does not address the relationship between the alligator
population and the incidence of attacks. Therefore, the conclusion is not dependent on thisstatement.
(E) The expense associated with relocating the alligators has no bearing on the relationship
between the alligator population and the incidence of attacks. Therefore, the conclusion is
not dependent on this statement. (18) The items in a list require parallelism. In this sentence, "Martin Luther King Jr. won"
applies to each item in the list, which works for the first two items but does not work for the
third, "was the most famous leader..."
(19) (A) This answer choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(20) (B) CORRECT. "The most famous leader of the American civil rights movement" is
no longer placed in a list with the two prizes won; instead, it is correctly used as a clause
modifying "Martin Luther King Jr." The two prizes ("Nobel Peace Prize" and "Presidential
Medal of Freedom") are in correct parallel format.
(21) (C) This sentence corrects the original parallelism error but introduces a new error.
"The most famous leader of the American civil rights movement" is no longer placed in a list
with the two prizes won; instead, it is correctly used as a clause modifying "Martin Luther King Jr." However, "won the Nobel Peace Prize and he won the Presidential Medal of
Freedom" is unnecessarily wordy; because the two are both prizes, they should be more
(30) In the second paragraph, the author mentions that frog, toad, and salamander populations
have declined, possibly due to environmental effects. The author then indicates that
amphibians have ―permeable skin [that] makes them unusually sensitive to environmental
changes‖ and suggests that amphibians are ―the biological harbingers of the natural world,
giving humans early notification‖ of environmental changes.‖ The word ―harbinger‖ means to
foreshadow or provide early notice of something that is going to happen.
(A) Permeable skin is introduced not to argue that other amphibians are endangered, but to
explain why amphibians in general are especially sensitive to changes to the environment.
(B) CORRECT. The author does suggest that amphibians’ special sensitivity—due at least in
part to their permeable skin—means that they are affected by adverse environments earlier
than are other animals.
(C) The first paragraph does say that saving the golden toad’s habitat was not enough to
save the species, but this does not explain why the author discusses the permeability of
amphibian skin in the second paragraph.
(D) The passage does suggest that permeable skin leaves amphibians especially
susceptible to their environment, but draws no distinction among various causes or types of
adverse environments.
(E) The relevant sentence indicates that amphibians may give ―humans early notification of
the deterioration of our ecosystem.‖ This does not suggest that humans can ignore threats to
amphibians; if anything, it suggests the opposite. (31) The first paragraph focuses predominately on the disappearance of a specific amphibian: the
golden toad of Costa Rica. The second paragraph explains that the demise of the golden
toad is one example of a global disappearance of amphibians, notes potential causes, andsuggests that the global phenomenon may be important to non-amphibian species.
(A) The first paragraph focuses on the disappearance of species in a particular area of the
world, while the second paragraph discusses potential causes and the significance of a
global phenomenon.
(B) No solutions that might mitigate further environmental damage are discussed in the
second paragraph of the passage.
(C) CORRECT. The first paragraph focuses primarily on Costa Rica’s golden toad, one
example of the widespread decline of amphibious populations in recent decades. Thesecond paragraph discusses possible causes for this decline as well as its possible
significance.
(D) The first paragraph does mention efforts to protect the habitat of the golden toad. In the
second paragraph, however, the passage does not advocate any action, or even discuss
(E) The first paragraph focuses primarily on one particular toad in Costa Rica and never
mentions the ―worldwide disappearance‖ of toads. The second paragraph does mention that
salamanders and frogs are also disappearing, but this is not the focus of the paragraph. (32) ―Except‖ questions are negatively-worded questions. Typically, four of the answers will fall
into a certain category or be ―true‖ in some way, while the fifth choice will be the ―odd one
out.‖ The correct answer on EXCEPT questions will be the odd one out. Keep track of your eliminations on your scrap paper. Because it is often easier to find the four ―true‖ answer
choices, focus on eliminating wrong answers rather than trying to find the one right answer.
(A) True. The second sentence of the second paragraph characterizes ―global warming‖ as a
side-effect of human activities.
(B) True. The first sentence of the second paragraph classifies both toads and frogs as
amphibians. Later in the second paragraph, the passage explains that amphibians have
permeable skin.
(C) True. The third sentence of the first paragraph states, ―setting aside habitat was notenough to save the species.‖ The golden toad in fact became extinct after M onteverde was
established.
(D) True. The second sentence of the first paragraph states that money was raised in the
United States to establish the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve.
(E) CORRECT. Unknown. The passage offers no information about the number of
salamander species in Costa Rica that have disappeared since the late 1980s. We cannot
assume that this omission indicates a lesser number than either toad or frog species. (33) The phrase ―recent global boom‖ describes something that began in the past and is
continuing into the present; hence, the present perfect tense ―has led‖ is more appropriatethan the simple present tense ―leads.‖ In addition, ―such as‖ is preferred to ―like‖ when
introducing examples.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) The singular subject ―boom‖ does not agree with the plural verb ―have led.‖
(C) The meaning of the sentence has changed because this choice states that the number of
―thieves‖ has increased rather than the number of ―thefts.‖ In addition, ―such as‖ is preferred
to ―like‖ when introducing examples.
(D) CORRECT. This choice correctly uses the present perfect tense ―has led‖ to indicate that
the boom began in the past and is continuing into the present, and also to properly indicate
that the boom started before the rise in theft. In addition, ―such as‖ is preferred to ―like‖ when
introducing examples.
(E) The present perfect tense ―has led‖ is more appropriate than the present progressive
tense ―is leading‖ because although the pr esent progressive indicates an action or state that
is continuing, it does not properly indicate the relative time sequence of the boom and the
subsequent rise in the theft of metal objects. (34) (A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) The modifying phrase ―Discouraged by new data that show increases in toxic emissions
from domestic factories‖ is meant to modify the noun ―shareholders.‖ Therefore,―shareholders‖ should be placed directly after ―factories.‖ Instead, it seems that the
―searches‖ are ―Discouraged by new data,‖ which is not logical. Also, the passive
construction ―are being conducted by‖ is unnecessarily wordy. Finally, the placement of ―who
are looking for alternative investment opportunities‖ after ―companies‖ makes it seem that the
―companies‖ are ―searching for alternative investment opportunities.‖ According to the
original sentence, the ―shareholders‖ are looking for these ―opportunities,‖ not the
―companies.‖
(C) While the misplaced modifier issue is corrected by placing ―shareholders‖ adjacent to the
modifying phrase, the past perfect form of the verb, ―had begun,’’ is used unnecessarily. In
fact, the use of ―had begun‖ implies that the ―shareholders‖ had begun searching for newinvestment opportunities before the discouraging data were released. This is not the
intended meaning of the sentence. Also, ―investment opportunities outside of the
manufacturing industry‖ is wordy when compared with ―alternative investment opportunities.‖
(D) The placement of ―the nation’s leading manufacturing companies‖ adjacent to the
modifying phrase makes it seem that these companies are ―Discouraged by new data,‖
which changes the meaning of the sentence. The original meaning is further compromised
by ―companies are searching.‖ The ―shareholders‖ are searching for new opportunities, not
the companies.
(E) CORRECT. The misplaced modifier issue is corrected by placing ―shareholders‖ adjacentto the modifying phrase. It is clear that the ―shareholders‖ are ―searching,‖ and not the
companies. The active voice "are searching" replaces the wordy passive construction
"searches. . . are being conducted by." Finally, the phrase ―alternative investment
opportunities‖ is clear and concise. (35) First, the subject of the sentence is "capital gains tax," which is singular. The verb,
however, is "have been being", which is plural. So we need to find a choice that contains a
singular verb. Second, we do not need "being" to indicate that the tax became the subject of
debate at some point in the recent past and has continued to be the subject of debate up to
the present time.
(36)
(37) (A) This choice is the same as the original sentence.
(38)
(39) (B) "Have been" is plural.
(40)
(41) (C) "Were" is plural.
(42)
(43) (D) "Has been being" is singular, though "being" is unnecessary.
(45) (E) CORRECT. "Has been" is singular and in the proper tense.The question asks us to determine why the author mentions that nutmeg became a luxury item in the
European market. In the first paragraph, after establishing the ―luxury item‖ info, the author writes
―seeking a monopoly over this valuable spice, the Dutch attacked the Banda Islands.‖
(A) The passage does not discuss the trade of luxury items in general; it mentions only one luxury
item, nutmeg.
(B) CORRECT. The Dutch sought ―a monopoly‖ over the market for ―this valuable spice.‖ ―Seeking a
monopoly‖ is a way to indicate that the Dutch wanted to control the market for nutmeg.
(C) The fact that nutmeg became a luxury item is the reason the Dutch wanted to monopolize the
market. It does not establish that the Dutch actuallysucceeded in establishing a monopoly.
(D) The author mentions only that nutmeg became a luxury item in the European market; there is no
mention made of other spices or their importance.
(E) There is no mention made in the passage of any desire on the part of the British to control the
nutmeg trade. No reason is given for their possession of one of the Banda Islands.
The correct answer to a ―main idea‖ question should reflect the overall message, or point, of the
passage. At the beginning of the first paragraph, the author makes the claim that "items that seem
unremarkable today might once have altered the course of history." In the next sentence, the author
offers nutmeg as an example of that opening claim. The rest of the passage then elaborates on that
example.
(A) The passage is not primarily about the history of a major city, as it only mentions New
Amsterdam/New York in passing.
(B) The passage provides only one example of the impact a commonplace item had on world
history; it does not discuss the role of multiple ―commonplace items.‖
(C) CORRECT. Nutmeg is used as a specific example of the author's general claim that ―items that
seem unremarkable today might once have altered the course of history.‖
(D) The author does not argue for continued research into history, political or otherwise.
(E) While the main claim of the passage (that seemingly unremarkable items might have altered the
course of history) might reasonably be called innovative, this answer choice applies the ―innovative‖
label specifically to the nutmeg example. But the passage does not present an ―innovative view of‖
nutmeg (the commonplace item); the information about nutmeg is historical and fact-based in nature
The first paragraph says ―Seeking a monopoly over this valuable spice, the Dutch attacked the
Banda Islands.‖ The correct answer choice should paraphrase this in some way.
(A) The passage does not mention increased competition with Britain as a reason for the initial
who would vote for a candidate who uses wheelchair has been undercounted, not
overcounted. Incorrect.
The conclusion is that "one will have a wider selection of homes to choose from if one looks for a
home in Florida rather than in Texas." Why? Because 15% of all homes in Florida are on the market
whereas only 7% of all homes in Texas are on the market. This argument confuses percentages with
specific numbers. It is possible that 15% of the number of homes in Florida is actually smaller than
7% of the number of homes in Texas. If the number of homes in both states were the same, or if the
number of homes in Florida were greater than the number in Texas, the argument would be
stronger.
(A) The argument focuses on the number of homes, not their cost.
(B) Again, the argument focuses on the number of homes, not their affordability.
(C) If the construction industry in Texas is growing, the gap between the number of homes in Floridaand the number of homes in Texas might shrink, thus weakening the argument rather than
strengthening it.
(D) The argument does not focus on the cost of homes.
(E) CORRECT. This choice tells us that the absolute number of homes in Florida is greater than in
Texas. Therefore, 15% of the homes in Florida must represent a larger number of homes than does
7% of the homes in Texas, thus strengthening the argument.The symptoms of Kleine-Levin syndrome are presented in a list. The modified nouns ―extreme
lethargy‖ and ―heightened irritability‖ are parallel with each other, but ―appearing confused‖ must be
changed to ―apparent confusion‖ to make the third symptom parallel to the first two.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) The phrase ―they appear confused‖ is not parallel with the modified nouns ―extreme lethargy‖ and
―heightened irritability.‖ In addition, the plural pronoun ―they‖ has no clear antecedent; it could refer
to either ―adolescents‖ or ―episodes.‖
(C) The phrase ―may be confused‖ is not parallel with the modified nouns ―extreme lethargy‖ and
―heightened irritability.‖ In addition, the clause ―may be confused‖ has no clear subject, thus could
incorrectly suggest that the syndrome itself may be confused.
(D) CORRECT. The modified noun ―apparent confusion‖ is parallel with the other listed symptoms,
―extreme lethargy‖ and ―heightened irritability.‖
(E) The phrase ―had been confused‖ is not parallel with the modified nouns ―extreme lethargy‖ and
―heightened irritability.‖ In addition, the clause ―had been confused‖ has no clear subject, thus could
incorrectly suggest that the syndrome itself had been confused.
A person's immune system becomes hypersensitive to an allergen via repeated exposure. We need
to find an example in which a series of minor events (repeated exposure to an allergen) can
ultimately provoke a typically unexpected, extreme response (a life-threatening reaction due to only
minimal exposure to the allergen).
(A) In this situation, a behavior (diet) over time leads one to become more susceptible to other chronic conditions (diabetes and high blood pressure). This does not mimic the idea of a series of
minor events causing an unexpected and extreme reaction; rather, the process described is
reasonably to be expected.
(B) CORRECT. A series of minor earthquakes (minor events) weaken the existing infrastructure.
The weakened infrastructure then allows a minor earthquake to do much greater damage than
expected (unusual and extreme).
(C) This choice is tempting because it addresses an allergy health issue, but we want to mimic the
structure of the argument, not merely the topic. This choice says that someone with an allergy can
have a reaction by touching the substance to which he or she is allergic; this is to be expected andcannot reasonably be considered unexpected. Further, this choice does not discuss any sudden
onset of extreme susceptibility to the allergen.
(D) In this situation, a gradual occurrence (warming weather) leads to severe weather conditions.
We are not given information as to whether the increase in temperature is "minor," nor do we have
reason to know whether the response (severe weather) should be considered unexpected.
(E) It is reasonable to expect that the more someone speeds, the more likely she or he is to get
caught; this situation cannot reasonably be considered unexpected, nor is the result (getting caught)
extreme.
This argument provides that albinos, or people whose bodies do not produce melanin, are unusually
susceptible to solar exposure. This suggests a connection between the production of melanin in
humans and protection from sunburn and other sun-related ailments; we should look for a
conclusion that draws this connection.
(A) The argument does not indicate that people born with albinism somehow develop other natural
defenses against sun-related health issues.
(B) This conclusion is too extreme to be supported by the argument; nothing in the argument
suggests that humans whose bodies produce high levels of melanin can "easily ignore" sunburn or
other sun-related health issues.
(C) There is no indication in the argument that sunburn reduces melanin production.
(D) CORRECT. The argument does strongly suggest that melanin plays some role in protecting the
skin from developing sunburn and other sun-related ailments, since albinos do not produce melanin
and are unusually susceptible to sun-related ailments.
This sentence has three mistakes. First, the idiom ―not only X but also Y‖ is not properly used here.
Second, the two parts compared should be parallel to each other; i.e., ―finding good schools‖ and
―knowing what makes …." should be used. Finally, the pronoun ―one‖ does not have a clear
antecedent: it could refer to either schools or children.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) This choice does not correct the improperly used idiom ―not only X but also Y.‖ In addition, it
does not use parallel structure for ―X‖ ("finding") and ―Y" ("must decide").
(C) This choice does not correct the improperly used idiom ―not only X but also Y.‖ It also changes
the meaning of the sentence by using the phrase ―decide which school is best of them all.‖
(D) This choice does not correct the improperly used idiom ―not only X but also Y.‖ In addition, it
does not use parallel structure for ―X‖ ("finding") and ―Y" ("have to know").
(E) CORRECT. This choice corrects all three errors in the original sentence. First, it uses the idiom―not only X but also Y‖ correctly. Second, it uses parallel structure in the phrase ―not only with finding
… but also with knowing …. ‖ Finally, the phrase ―one school‖ makes it clear that ―one‖ refers to
―school.‖
On questions asking about the main idea of the passage, it is useful to refer to the opening
paragraph, which usually provides a broad overview of the passage. Also, be sure to avoid extreme
answer choices and those answers that refer to a part of the passage rather than the whole text.
(A) While the passage discusses the origin of the women’s rights movement, the text does not
attempt to compare it to the contemporary state of affairs. Nothing in the passage is mentioned
about the current-day situation.
(B) While the passage discusses the development of the women’s rights movement, it does not
suggest further expansion of women’s rights.
(C) The passage mentions only a few restrictions on women’s rights and does so in a cursory way.
Furthermore, the text merely describes rather than criticizes these restrictions.
(D) The passage provides no information regarding the specific reasons for the opposition to
women’s rights movement.
(E) CORRECT. The entire passage is devoted to the discussion of the early days in the women’s
rights movement and the events leading up to the Seneca Falls Convention, which, according to the
passage, "is commonly regarded as the beginning of the women's rights movement in the United
States." Note that this idea is mimicked in the first sentence of the opening paragraph: ―The
movement for women’s rights traces its origin to the first half of the nineteenth century.‖
On questions that ask about the purpose of including a certain piece of information in the passage,
make sure to evaluate the context in which this evidence is presented. Therefore, it is useful to re-
read not only the sentence that provides the information at issue, but also one or two sentences
The conclusion of the passage is that the number of hybrid cars sold annually is likely to flatten over
the next few years. This conclusion is supported by the premise that Congress has decreased tax
incentives for buyers of hybrid cars. The necessary assumption linking this premise to the conclusion
is that buyers are motivated to buy hybrid cars primarily because they can save money in the long
run. The answer choice that undermines this assumption will most weaken the conclusion of the
passage.
(A) CORRECT. This answer choice weakens the conclusion by undermining the assumption upon
which it is based.
(B) This answer choice provides an additional reason for buyers motivated by cost savings not to
purchase hybrid cars, and therefore helps to strengthen the conclusion rather than weaken it.
(C) One of the attractions of hybrid cars is their fuel efficiency. As the price of gasoline increases, so
does the cost-savings per mile driven of hybrid cars compared to traditional gasoline-powered cars.
The fact that gasoline prices are forecast to fall over the next few years means that hybrid cars offer
less of a benefit than they would in an environment with rising gasoline prices. Hence, this doesmore to strengthen the conclusion rather than to weaken it.
(D) This choice is irrelevant to the tax-based argument about hybrid sales. However, it does give an
additional reason for buyers to avoid purchasing a hybrid car and, if anything, slightly supports the
prediction that hybrid sales will flatten.
(E) This choice is irrelevant to the tax-based argument about hybrid sales. In addition, perhaps the
costs of this advertising campaign will be passed on to consumers, making hybrid cars even more
expensive.
The modifying phrase ―hoping to alleviate some of the financial burdens…‖ begins this sentence and
should be followed immediately by the noun the modifier refers to, ―the county government.‖
However, the original sentence illogically suggests that ―property taxes‖ were hoping to alleviate the
financial burdens. Additionally, the phrase ―raised by an eleven percent increase‖ contains a
redundancy; either ―raised by eleven percent‖ or ―increased by eleven percent‖ would be more
concise and correct. Finally, the passive construction ―property taxes…were raised…by the county
government‖ is wordier than the preferred active construction ―the county
government…raised…property taxes.‖
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) The modifying phrase ―hoping to alleviate…‖ should be followed immediately by the noun the
modifier refers to, ―the county government.‖ However, this choice illogically suggests that ―property
taxes‖ were hoping to alleviate the financial burdens. Also, the passive construction ―property
taxes…were raised…by the county government‖ is wordier than the preferred active construction
―the county government…raised…property taxes.‖
(C) The phrase ―raised…by an eleven percent increase‖ contains a redundancy; either ―raised by
eleven percent‖ or ―increased by eleven percent‖ would be more concise and correct.
(D) The phrase ―last year raised by eleven percent property taxes‖ is awkward, since ―property
taxes,‖ the object, do not immediately follow the verb ―raised.‖ The meaning would be clearer if it
were phrased ―raised property taxes by eleven percent last year.‖
(E) CORRECT. This choice is the most concise and correct. ―The county government‖ correctly
follows the modifying phrase ―hoping to alleviate…‖ The concise phrase ―raised…by eleven percent‖is used. Finally, the active construction ―the county government…raised…property taxes‖ replaces
the wordier passive construction ―property taxes…were raised…by the county government.‖
First, the subject of the main clause is "the increase in unemployment rates," which is singular. Yet,
the verb in the main clause is "are forcing," which is plural. Second, "significantly increased retail
prices as well as energy costs" is both awkward and unclear. The logical inference is that the energy
costs have increased as well, but this is not clear from the grammar that "significantly increased"
modifies "energy costs" in addition to "retail prices." This phrase could also be more elegantly
expressed.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) The subject of the main clause here is "the increase in rates of unemployment," which is singular,
but the verb is "have been forcing," which is plural. However, the replacement of "as well as" with
"and" is an improvement over the original sentence because it more clearly links "significant
increases" and "energy costs."
(C) CORRECT. The subject of the main clause is "the increase in unemployment rates" and the
corresponding verb is "is forcing," which are both singular. The phrase "coupled with significant
increases in both retail prices and energy costs" is elegant and clearly links "significant increases" to
"energy costs" through the use of "both."
(D) The subject of the main clause is "the increase in unemployment rates" and the corresponding
verb is "is forcing," which are both singular. However, the phrase "coupled with significantly
increased retail prices as well as energy costs" is still awkward and unclear.
(E) The subject of the main clause is "the increase in unemployment rates" and the corresponding
verb is "had been forcing," which are both singular. However, "had been forcing" is in the past
perfect tense, which requires two past actions, one of which must occur earlier than than the other.
This is not the case here. Moreover, the correct idiom is "both X and Y" and not "both X as well as
Y."
We are given a list of problematic events, each one leading to the next, and we are asked to find a
way to break the cycle of events. In order to do so, we need to find a way to alter one of these
events in such a way that it will change the overall cycle so that small community hospitals are no
longer losing money (at least, for these particular reasons).
(A) The reimbursement rates for specialty care are not a part of the problematic cycle; rather, the
relatively low volume of specialty care at community hospitals is the problem. If the hospital is doing
very little or no specialty care work in the first place, then charging more for specialty care won't help
much.
(B) Even if the hospital successfully advertises its specialty care services and attracts a lot of new
customers, it will not be able to serve these customers because it does not have the necessary
specialists in place to provide the specialty care. This choice does not "follow through" the entire
cycle.
(C) CORRECT. Since the local residents choose to patronize the nearby affluent hospitals due to the
presence of specialists, they will also begin to patronize the community hospital, which is using
these same specialists. The amount of high-margin specialty care will increase and the hospital will
make more money, thus enabling it to continue using specialists.
(D) The mere act of educating the public about the relatively low reimbursement rates of governmenthealth plans does not directly impact the hospital or break the cycle. In order for this to work, the
hospital would have to find some way to increase reimbursement rates for routine care from the
government plans or convert people from government plans to private insurers that reimburse at
better rates.
(E) Most of the community hospital's patients are either on government-funded plans or lack
insurance altogether. Receiving more money from private insurers, therefore, is unlikely to generate
enough revenue to break the cycle.
The argument provides seemingly conflicting evidence. On the one hand, the class size remained
constant. On the other hand, the college received a greater number of applications and a greater
proportion of applicants received offers of admission from the college. We need to select an answer
that would reconcile this contradiction.
(A) While this statement explains the increase in applications to College X, it provides no information
about why the size of the entering class remained the same despite an increase in both the number
of applications and the acceptance rate.
(B) While this answer choice explains one of the reasons for the increase in the applications to
College X, it provides no information about why a greater proportion of applicants received an offer
from the college.
(C) CORRECT. This statement explains how the size of the entering class at College X could remain
the same despite the rise in applications and increased acceptance rate. Since a substantially
greater proportion of accepted applicants decided to attend other colleges, College X had to extend
more offers to fill the same class. As a result, the admission rate increased despite the increase in
applications and no changes in the class size.
(D) The relative comparison of College X to other academic institutions is beyond the scope of the