Glucose-1-Phosphate Transport into Protoplasts and ... · Glucose-1-Phosphate Transport into Protoplasts and Chloroplasts from Leaves of Arabidopsis1 Joerg Fettke*, Irina Malinova,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Glucose-1-Phosphate Transport into Protoplasts andChloroplasts from Leaves of Arabidopsis1
Joerg Fettke*, Irina Malinova, Tanja Albrecht, Mahdi Hejazi, and Martin Steup
Mass Spectrometry of Biopolymers (J.F.) and Department of Plant Physiology (J.F., I.M., T.A., M.H., M.S.),University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Almost all glucosyl transfer reactions rely on glucose-1-phosphate (Glc-1-P) that either immediately acts as glucosyl donor oras substrate for the synthesis of the more widely used Glc dinucleotides, ADPglucose or UDPglucose. In this communication,we have analyzed two Glc-1-P-related processes: the carbon flux from externally supplied Glc-1-P to starch by either mesophyllprotoplasts or intact chloroplasts from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). When intact protoplasts or chloroplasts are incubatedwith [U-14C]Glc-1-P, starch is rapidly labeled. Incorporation into starch is unaffected by the addition of unlabeled Glc-6-P orGlc, indicating a selective flux from Glc-1-P to starch. However, illuminated protoplasts incorporate less 14C into starch whenunlabeled bicarbonate is supplied in addition to the 14C-labeled Glc-1-P. Mesophyll protoplasts incubated with [U-14C]Glc-1-Pincorporate 14C into the plastidial pool of adenosine diphosphoglucose. Protoplasts prepared from leaves of mutants ofArabidopsis that lack either the plastidial phosphorylase or the phosphoglucomutase isozyme incorporate 14C derived fromexternal Glc-1-P into starch, but incorporation into starch is insignificant when protoplasts from a mutant possessing a highlyreduced ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activity are studied. Thus, the path of assimilatory starch biosynthesis initiated byextraplastidial Glc-1-P leads to the plastidial pool of adenosine diphosphoglucose, and at this intermediate it is fused with theCalvin cycle-driven route. Mutants lacking the plastidial phosphoglucomutase contain a small yet significant amount oftransitory starch.
The entire metabolism of eukaryotic cells consists ofdistinct reaction sequences within a given compart-ment and the action of metabolite transporters thatfunctionally interconnect the various compartments.Similarly, transporters located at the interface betweenthe cells and the apoplastic space (i.e. in the cellmembrane) permit an intercellular transport of me-tabolites and thereby integrate metabolic processesthat take place in various cells. Both metabolite-relatedenzymes and transporters can exert a second function,as they also are capable of integrating signaling pathsand thereby transferring information on the metabolicstatus of the cellular compartments or the entire cell(Smeekens, 1998; Rolland et al., 2002).A large group of metabolite transporters are func-
tionally related to the metabolism of sugars or sugarderivatives, and some of them act within pathways thateither synthesize or degrade polysaccharides. Amongthe plant polysaccharides, quantitatively most impor-tant are the plastidial starch and the apoplastic cell wall.Cell wall-related sugar transporters are mainly locatedin the endoplasmic reticulum and transport mostlynucleotide sugars (Seifert, 2004). Starch-related trans-
porters reside in the inner envelope membrane ofplastids. A Glc transporter of the envelope membranehas functionally been characterized (Weber et al., 2000).However, the quantitatively dominant product of theplastidial transitory starch degradation is maltose,which is exported into the cytosol by the recentlyidentified maltose transporter designated as MEX (formaltose excess; Niittyla et al., 2004; Weise et al., 2004).Like the other transporters listed below, this trans-porter is located in the inner chloroplast envelopemembrane. As MEX-deficient mutants from Arabi-dopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) contain exceptionally highmaltose levels and exhibit a massive starch excessphenotype as well as a strong retardation in growth,MEX appears to exert an indispensable functionwithin the starch-Suc conversion (Niittyla et al., 2004).
Other metabolite transporters of the chloroplastenvelope membranes are functionally more closelyrelated to the reductive pentose phosphate cycle.Phosphate translocators mediate a strict counterex-change of phosphorylated sugars (or of 3-phospho-glycerate) and orthophosphate. The triose phosphate/phosphate translocator exports triose phosphate (and,to some extent, 3-phosphoglycerate) from the chloro-plast into the cytosol, mainly during the light period(Schneider et al., 2002). The xylulose-5-phosphate/phosphate translocator has been proposed to providethe plastidial pentose phosphate pathwaywith reducedcarbon compounds or reducing equivalents (Eicks et al.,2002; Weber, 2004). Depending on concentration gradi-ents, the phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate transloca-tors (strongly expressed in photosynthesis-competent
1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-schaft (Teilprojekt no. B2 to J.F. and M.S.).
* Corresponding author; e-mail [email protected] author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the
findings presented in this article in accordance with the policydescribed in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is:Joerg Fettke ([email protected]).
Plant Physiology�, April 2011, Vol. 155, pp. 1723–1734, www.plantphysiol.org � 2010 American Society of Plant Biologists 1723 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 20, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
cells of C4 plants) as well as the Glc-6-P/phosphatetranslocators (prominent in heterotrophic cells) mediatethe transport of the respective phosphorylated metab-olite between the plastid and the cytosol. For each ofthe two translocators, two genes have been identifiedthat are differentially expressed in various Arabidopsisorgans (Weber, 2004). Recently, evidence has beenpresented for the occurrence of an evolutionarily con-served plastidial ADPglucose exporter (Colleoni et al.,2010). However, current knowledge of the metabolitetransporters is far from complete, as analysis of thegenome of Arabidopsis revealed that approximately140 putative metabolite transporters exist, all of whichare predicted to be located in the inner plastid envelopemembrane (Ferro et al., 2002; Schwacke et al., 2003).
None of the translocators described above is ableto transport another important metabolite, Glc-1-P(Kammerer et al., 1998; Eicks et al., 2002). This Glc esteris a key intermediate in several major carbon fluxes,such as starch, Suc, and cellulose biosynthesis. In thecurrent model of the photosynthesis-driven starch bio-synthesis, the plastidial phosphoglucomutase (pPGM)mediates the formation of Glc-1-P from Glc-6-P, whichis directly derived from a Calvin cycle intermediate,Fru-6-P. By the action of ADPglucose pyrophosphory-lase, Glc-1-P is then converted to ADPglucose, which isthe general glucosyl donor for a variety of starchsynthases. The dominance of the ADPglucose-depen-dent path of starch biosynthesis concurs with the factthat mutants from Arabidopsis lacking the plastidiala-glucan phosphorylase isozyme (PHS1) possess es-sentially the same starch content as wild-type plantswhen grown under normal conditions (Zeeman et al.,2004). However, transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum)plants underexpressing both the plastidial and thecytosolic phosphoglucomutase unexpectedly possesstransitory starch levels similar to those of the wild-typecontrols. These phenotypic features are considered tobe inconsistent with this model (Fernie et al., 2002);therefore, the carbon fluxes toward starch appear to bemore complex than are often assumed.
Recently, we have shown that in heterotrophic tis-sues, such as potato tuber discs, Glc-1-P is selectivelytaken up and, subsequently, enters two paths. It ismetabolized via the cytosolic phosphorylase by trans-ferring the glucosyl residue to starch-related hetero-glycans (Fettke et al., 2008). Another portion of theimported Glc-1-P directly enters the amyloplasts andis converted to starch. Under normal conditions, thisconversion, which is mainly mediated by the plastidialphosphorylase isozyme, is not the dominant pathwayof reserve starch biosynthesis (Fettke et al., 2010).However, it offers an explanation of some features ofstarch metabolism as observed in various mutants (seeabove), because this route apparently relies neither onthe cytosolic nor the plastidial Glc-6-P/Glc-1-P inter-conversion.
The question remains whether or not this processoperates also in autotrophic tissues, as any evidence forthe transport of Glc-1-P into bothmesophyll protoplasts
and chloroplasts is lacking. In this communication, wehave studied the transport of Glc-1-P into autotrophiccells as well as possible implications of this process forthe entire transitory starch metabolism.
RESULTS
Uptake and Utilization of External Glc-1-P by Mesophyll
Protoplasts from Arabidopsis
To study the uptake of Glc-1-P by intact mesophyllprotoplasts, short-term experiments were performedusing varying concentrations of [U-14C]Glc-1-P. Fol-lowing an incubation of 30 s, the protoplasts werewashed and the total 14C content of the protoplastswas determined (Fig. 1, A and B). Uptake of the 14C-labeled Glc-1-P was clearly detectable at submicromo-lar concentrations, and saturation was achieved atapproximately 1 mM Glc-1-P. The apparent Km wasestimated to be 413 mM.
In another series of short-term uptake experiments,the protoplasts were incubated with either 200 or 400mM [U-14C]Glc-1-P and an equal concentration of un-labeled Glc and Glc-6-P, respectively. As a control, theunlabeled compound was omitted (Fig. 1C). Neitherthe presence of Glc nor that of Glc-6-P affected theuptake of Glc-1-P. Thus, the putative Glc-1-P trans-porter is selective for both the phosphorylated Glc (asit does not react with Glc) and the anomeric position ofthe phosphate ester (as it does not act on Glc-6-P).
In order to determine whether or not the importedGlc-1-P is converted to starch (as is the case in heter-otrophic potato tuber cells; Fettke et al., 2010), meso-phyll protoplasts from Arabidopsis leaves wereincubated for 20 min with equimolar concentrations(20 mM each) of [U-14C]Glc-1-P or [U-14C]Glc. Duringincubation, the protoplasts were either illuminated ordarkened. Following incubation, starch was isolatedand the 14C content was quantified. Incubation withGlc-1-P results in a more than 10-fold higher incorpo-ration as compared with Glc (Fig. 2A). Thus, thesuperior efficiency of the Glc-1-P-dependent labelingof starch is not unique to heterotrophic cells (comparewith Fettke et al., 2010). Light stimulates the flux fromboth external Glc-1-P and Glc to starch, but even indarkened protoplasts, the Glc-1-P-dependent labelingof starch is higher than that of Glc in illuminatedprotoplasts. When comparing the incorporation intostarch in illuminated and darkened protoplasts, itshould be noted that in the dark starch biosynthesisvia the ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase is inhibited(Hendriks et al., 2003) and, in addition, net starchdegradation is initiated. The onset of starch mobiliza-tion, as observed under the conditions used, wasanalyzed by 14C labeling of protoplasts in the light,transfer into the dark, and determination of 14C label ofstarch during the dark phase (data not shown). There-fore, in darkened protoplasts, the 14C labeling of starchequals the total incorporation minus the release oflabel due to starch degradation.
Fettke et al.
1724 Plant Physiol. Vol. 155, 2011 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 20, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
For a more detailed analysis of the Glc-1-P-depen-dent incorporation into starch, Arabidopsis mesophyllprotoplasts were incubated for 5 or 10 min with one ofthree mixtures each of which contained [U-14C]Glc-1-P
(20 mM each) and, in addition, one of three unlabeledcompounds (orthophosphate, Glc, or Glc-6-P; 10 mM
each). As a control, an aliquot of the protoplast sus-pension was incubated with [U-14C]Glc-1-P (20 mM)without adding any unlabeled compound. Protoplastswere illuminated during incubation. The addition ofany of the three unlabeled compounds increases the Glc-1-P-dependent incorporation into starch, but quantita-tively the enhancement differs depending upon theunlabeled compound. Glc-6-P ismore effective thanGlc,but orthophosphate is by far most efficient: It increasesthe labeling of starch approximately 20-fold as com-pared with the control (Fig. 2B). The stimulatory effectof orthophosphate clearly excludes the possibility thatthe Glc-1-P-dependent labeling of starch is due to adirect glucosyl transfer to the starch granules that iscatalyzed by a phosphorylase and takes place outsidethe intact protoplasts. In principle, any unnoticedbreakage of protoplasts could release both nativestarch granules and phosphorylase activity. However,the phosphorylase-mediated glucosyl transfer to starchgranules that occurs outside the protoplasts would beinhibited by orthophosphate. As a control, protoplastswere mechanically broken, and the conversion of Glc-1-P to starch within 10 min was monitored to be lessthan 1% as compared with that of the intact proto-plasts (data not shown). Furthermore, this type ofstarch labeling is not expected to be stimulated by light(Fig. 2B; see Fig. 3A below).
During incubation, the Glc-1-P-dependent carbonflux to starch is far from being constant, as most of the14C is incorporated into starch during the first 5 min ofincubation and the extension to 10min results in only avery small increment of the labeling (Fig. 2B). At themolecular level, this result is difficult to explain, as theentire flux is based on a series of reactions and in-cludes a variety of components, several of which couldbe limiting factors or steps but are difficult to estimate.Of special relevance appears to be a possible limitationexerted by the first step (i.e. the Glc-1-P import) by thecytosolic orthophosphate level. If so, the simultaneousaddition of orthophosphate and Glc-1-P would leadto a higher cytosolic orthophosphate concentration,which then would stimulate the import of the Glcphosphate.
In order to analyze a possible interdependenceof the transport of orthophosphate and of Glc-1-Pmore directly, two additional labeling experiments wereperformed. It should be noted that in these experi-ments, either the total label inside the protoplasts (Fig.2C) or the label released from the protoplasts into themedium (Fig. 2D) was monitored. In the first experi-ment, protoplasts were incubated in mixtures containing10 mM [33P]orthophosphate and, in addition, eitherunlabeled Glc-1-P or unlabeled Glc (20 mM each). Asa control, the incubation medium contained only[33P]orthophosphate. Following the incubation for 5 minin the light, the protoplasts were carefully washedto remove external 33P label and the amount of 33Pinside the protoplasts was monitored (Fig. 2C). The
Figure 1. Uptake of external Glc-1-P by Arabidopsis mesophyll pro-toplasts. A and B, Short-term uptake using varying concentrations ofGlc-1-P. Protoplasts were incubated for 30 s with [U-14C]Glc-1-P(concentrations as indicated) and washed, and the 14C label inside theprotoplasts was determined. The Michaelis-Menten (A) and the Line-weaver-Burk (B) plots are given. The mean of two independentlyperformed experiments (two replicas each) and the SD (n = 4) are given.C, Selectivity of Glc-1-P uptake by protoplasts. After 30 s of incubationof the protoplasts with 200 or 400 mM [U-14C]Glc-1-P, [U-14C]Glc-1-P,and equal concentrations of Glc or Glc-6-P, the protoplasts werewashed and the total 14C content of the protoplasts was determined.The mean of three independent experiments and SD are given.
Glc-1-P Transport
Plant Physiol. Vol. 155, 2011 1725 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 20, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
addition of unlabeled Glc-1-P decreased the 33P labelinside the protoplasts as compared with the control.By contrast, equimolar external Glc did not affect the33P content of the protoplasts. This result is consistentwith the assumption that external Glc-1-P is importedinto the cell via a Glc-1-P/orthophosphate exchangethat takes place at the plasmalemma and therebydiminishes the orthophosphate-dependent prelabel-ing of the protoplasts.
In the second experiment, protoplasts were prela-beled by incubation with [33P]orthophosphate for 10min in the light. Subsequently, the residual externalorthophosphate was carefully removed by repeatedwashing steps and then the protoplast suspension wasdivided into two equal parts that were incubated for5 min in the light either in the presence or in theabsence (control) of 20 mM Glc-1-P. Finally, the proto-plasts were pelleted by centrifugation, and the 33Pcontent in the supernatant was monitored (Fig. 2D).External Glc-1-P increased the release of orthophos-phate into the medium more than 2-fold as comparedwith the control.
In summary, both labeling experiments clearly indi-cate that the mesophyll protoplasts import externalGlc-1-P by an antiport mechanism that utilizes ortho-phosphate as counter-ion.
Utilization of External Glc-1-P by Isolated
Arabidopsis Chloroplasts
The results shown in Figure 1 imply that Glc-1-P istaken up by the cells and is converted to starch. Thisraises the question whether or not Glc-1-P directlyenters the chloroplasts where the starch synthesistakes place. Until now, Glc-1-P has not been reportedto be imported into chloroplasts, but indirect evidencefor an uptake by nongreen plastids has been published(for potato tubers, Kosegarten and Mengel, 1994;Naeem et al., 1997; for wheat [Triticum aestivum],Tetlow et al., 1996; for soybean [Glycine max], Coatesand ap Rees, 1994). To answer the question mentionedabove, chloroplasts isolated from Arabidopsis leaveswere incubated with [U-14C]Glc-1-P. As a control, analiquot of the same chloroplast preparation was me-chanically broken by using a potter and, subsequently,the homogenate was treated identically. Isolated chlo-
Figure 2. Utilization of external Glc-1-P by mesophyll protoplasts fromArabidopsis. A, Glc- or Glc-1-P-dependent incorporation into starch.Protoplasts were incubated for 20 min with either [U-14C]Glc-1-P(G1P; 20 mM) or [U-14C]Glc (Glc; 20 mM) in the light or in the dark.Subsequently, starch was isolated and the [14C]glucosyl incorporationwas monitored. The mean of two independently performed experi-ments (three replicas each) and the SD are given. B, Glc-1-P uptake andutilization by mesophyll protoplasts. Protoplasts were incubated with[U-14C]Glc-1-P (G1P; 20 mM), [U-14C]Glc-1-P (20 mM) plus unlabeledGlc (10 mM; G1P/Glc), [U-14C]Glc-1-P (20 mM) plus unlabeled Glc-6-P(10 mM; G1P/G6P), or [U-14C]Glc-1-P (20 mM) plus unlabeled ortho-phosphate (10 mM; G1P/Pi) for 5 or 10 min in the light. Subsequently,starch was isolated and the [14C]glucosyl incorporation was deter-mined. Themean of three independently performed experiments and SD
are given. C and D, Counterexchange of Glc-1-P and orthophosphate.C, Protoplasts were incubated for 5 min in the light with [33P]ortho-phosphate (10 mM; Pi), [33P]orthophosphate (10 mM) and unlabeledGlc-1-P (20 mM; Pi/G1P), or [33P]orthophosphate (10 mM) and unla-
beled Glc (20 mM; Pi/Glc). The protoplasts were then washed until no33P label could be detected in the washing solution. The 33P contentof the protoplasts was monitored. The mean of two independentlyperformed experiments (two replicas each) and the SD (n = 4) aregiven. D, Protoplasts were incubated for 10 min in the light with[33P]orthophosphate (10mM). Following removal of the residual external33P label by washing, the protoplast suspension was separated into twoequal parts. To one part, unlabeled Glc-1-P (20 mM) was added (+G1P).In the other part (control), Glc-1-P was omitted (2G1P). After 5 min ofillumination, the protoplasts of both aliquots were pelleted and the 33Pcontent in the supernatant was determined. Results from a typicalexperiment out of two independently performed experiments (threereplicas each) and SD are given.
Fettke et al.
1726 Plant Physiol. Vol. 155, 2011 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 20, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
roplasts are able to take up Glc-1-P and to convert it intostarch at a relatively high rate. This process requires,however, the intactness of the organelles (Fig. 3A).Thus, both the uptake of Glc-1-P and the flux towardstarch are functional in isolated intact chloroplasts.In an additional experiment, chloroplasts were in-
cubated with a mixture of [U-14C]Glc-1-P and (unla-beled) orthophosphate or with [U-14C]Glc-6-P. As acontrol, chloroplasts were incubated only with [U-14C]Glc-1-P. For the three incubation mixtures, the incor-poration of 14C into starch was monitored (Fig. 3B). Inthe presence of both [U-14C]Glc-1-P and orthophos-phate, incorporation into starch is decreased (but stillexceeds that observed with Glc-6-P), suggesting a Glc-1-P/orthophosphate antiport that is functional at theenvelope membranes of the chloroplasts. These dataare further supported by the fact that simultaneousincubation of chloroplasts with 33P-labeled orthophos-phate and unlabeled Glc-1-P results in a decreaseduptake of orthophosphate as comparedwith incubationonly with 33P-labeled orthophosphate (data not shown).This result is expected if the external Glc-1-P is im-ported via an exchange with internal orthophosphate.As the incubation of isolated chloroplast with equimo-lar [U-14C]Glc-6-P results in a minor labeling of starch(Fig. 3B), import and plastidial metabolism of the twoexternally supplied Glc phosphate esters differ.In another series of experiments, isolated chloro-
plasts were incubated with either [U-14C]Glc-1-P onlyor together with unlabeled Glc-6-P or Glc (16.67 mM
each). 14C incorporation into starch was monitoredafter 10 or 20 min of incubation. Neither unlabeledGlc-6-P nor free Glc significantly affected the incorpo-ration of 14C into starch, indicating a selective importof the anomeric Glc ester into the chloroplast (Fig. 3C).In summary, all the data shown in Figure 3 indicate
that mesophyll cells from leaves are capable of im-porting Glc-1-P from the cytosol into the chloroplaststroma.
Contribution of the Plastidial AtPHS1 to the Conversion
of Glc-1-P to Starch
Following the uptake into chloroplasts, Glc-1-Pcould be further metabolized by two distinct starch-synthesizing pathways. First, in a single reaction (me-diated by the plastidial AtPHS1), glucosyl residuescould be transferred directly to acceptor sites at thesurface of native starch granules. Alternatively, itcould undergo a more complex sequence: first, theconversion of Glc-1-P to ADPglucose via ADPglu-cose pyrophosphorylase (Lin et al., 1988), and sub-sequently, the glucosyl transfer from ADPglucose toglucans of the starch granule that is catalyzed by atleast five ADPglucose-dependent starch synthase iso-zymes.In order to test the existence and/or relevance of the
PHS1-dependent path, Arabidopsis insertion mutantswere used that are deficient in the plastidial phos-phorylase isozyme (AtPHS1; Zeeman et al., 2004). The
phosphorylase pattern from Arabidopsis wild-typeleaves consists of four bands of activity, all whichstrictly depend on Glc-1-P (Fig. 4A). On a glycogen-containing separation gel, the two slowly movingbands represent the cytosolic phosphorylase isoform(AtPHS2) that exists in two states differing in theapparent affinity toward the immobilized polyglucan(Fettke et al., 2005). Similarly, the plastidial phosphor-ylase isoform (AtPHS1) occurs in two distinct butfaster moving bands (Fig. 4A). In knockout mutantslacking the plastidial phosphorylase, these two bandsare undetectable, suggesting that they are products ofthe same gene. The structural and functional implica-tions of the heterogeneity of AtPHS1 and AtPHS2 areunknown.
As compared with the wild-type control, mesophyllprotoplasts from AtPHS1-deficient lines did not differin the Glc-1-P-dependent incorporation into starch(Fig. 4B). Therefore, in mesophyll cells, the directglucosyl transfer to starch, as mediated by AtPHS1,appears to be of no or minor relevance. By contrast, inpotato tuber discs, the conversion of Glc-1-P intostarch did reflect the level of the plastidial phosphor-ylase activity (Fettke et al., 2010).
ADPglucose-Dependent 14C Incorporation into Starch
As the plastidial Glc-1-P pool is not noticeablyused for any AtPHS1-mediated 14C labeling of starch(Fig. 4B), we tested whether or not the conversion ofGlc-1-P to starch does include both the action ofADPglucose pyrophosphorylase and the incorpora-tion into the plastidial ADPglucose pool. If so, theactivity of the Calvin cycle that also feeds into thisstarch-forming path is expected to affect the conversionof the externally supplied Glc-1-P toward starch. Inorder to test this possibility, we incubated protoplastswith 10 mM [U-14C]Glc-1-P in either the presence orabsence of 5 mM unlabeled HCO3
2. 14C labeling ofstarch is significantly reduced by the addition ofunlabeled hydrogen carbonate (Table I). These resultsstrongly suggest that the imported Glc-1-P and inter-mediates of the Calvin cycle enter the plastidialADPglucose pool and, subsequently, utilize the samereactions that transfer glucosyl residues to starch.
If so, incubation of protoplasts with [U-14C]Glc-1-Pshould result in a 14C labeling of ADPglucose. To testthis prediction, we incubated protoplasts derived fromwild-type leaves with [U-14C]Glc-1-P for 10 or 20 minin the dark or in the light. At intervals, aliquots of theincubation mixture were withdrawn and metabolicprocesses were terminated by the addition of ethanol(final concentration of 50% [v/v]) followed by heating.By this treatment, proteins were denatured and me-tabolites were extracted. Subsequently, the extractswere lyophilized, dissolved in water, and then reactedwith a mixture of native potato tuber starch andrecombinant starch synthase III (AtSSIII) derivedfrom Arabidopsis. Following careful washing, the 14Cincorporation into native starch granules was moni-
Glc-1-P Transport
Plant Physiol. Vol. 155, 2011 1727 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 20, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
tored (Table II). Due to the selectivity of the recom-binant starch synthase, this method permits the quan-tification of the 14C content of ADPglucose even in thepresence of a large excess of [U-14C]Glc-1-P. In addi-tion, aliquots of the protoplast suspension were usedto monitor the incorporation into starch by the intactprotoplasts during incubation with [U-14C]Glc-1-P(Table II).
During illumination of protoplasts, import of[U-14C]Glc-1-P results in 14C incorporation into bothstarch and ADPglucose. Both processes require intact-ness of the protoplasts. In the dark, almost no starchis labeled and, in addition, less 14C-ADPglucose isformed (Table II). This result is not unexpected, as thesynthesis of ADPglucose via ADPglucose pyrophos-phorylase has been reported to be light dependent(Hendriks et al., 2003).
Starch Synthesis in the Arabidopsis pgm1 Mutant
The Arabidopsis mutant that lacks a functionalpPGM (i.e. the pgm1 mutant) is incapable of perform-ing Calvin cycle-driven biosynthesis of assimilatorystarch (Caspar et al., 1985). For a long time, this mutanthas been considered to lack any leaf starch. However,some recently published data indicate that it doesindeed contain starch, although in very small quantities(Niittyla et al., 2004; Munoz et al., 2005). This impliesthat, although to a far lower extent, assimilatory starchcan be formed by an additional, yet unknown, paththat does not include the plastidial conversion of theCalvin cycle-derived Glc-6-P to Glc-1-P. The import ofGlc-1-P into the chloroplast, as analyzed in this study,could be an essential step in this path.
To test this assumption, we prepared mesophyllprotoplasts from the pgm1 mutant and incubated theprotoplasts with [U-14C]Glc-1-P during illumination.For comparison, protoplasts were isolated from leavesof two types of Arabidopsis plants that had beengrown under essentially the same conditions and hadbeen treated identically: wild-type plants and a mu-tant having a strongly reduced level of the ADPglu-cose pyrophosphorylase activity (adg1; Lin et al., 1988).At intervals, aliquots of the three protoplast prepara-tions were withdrawn, and following the extraction ofstarch, the 14C content was monitored. In the pgm1mutant, 14C label was clearly detectable in the starchfraction and the 14C incorporation proceeded withtime (Fig. 5A). Thus, 14C derived from the externallysupplied Glc-1-P was taken up by the protoplasts,
Figure 3. Glc-1-P-dependent incorporation into starch by chloroplastsfrom Arabidopsis. A, Chloroplasts isolated from wild-type plants wereincubated with [U-14C]Glc-1-P (16.67 mM) in the light. As a control,chloroplasts were broken using a potter and were otherwise treatedidentically. After incubation, the starch was extracted and the 14Ccontent was monitored. The mean of two independently performedexperiments (two replicas each) and the SD (n = 4) are given. Intactindicates intact chloroplasts, and broken indicates mechanically dis-integrated chloroplasts were incubated. B, Selectivity of the Glc-1-P-dependent incorporation into starch. Illuminated chloroplasts wereincubatedwith [U-14C]Glc-1-P (16.67 mM each) or [U-14C]Glc-1-P plusunlabeled orthophosphate (6.67 mM) or [U-14C]Glc-6-P (16.67 mM
each). After isolation of the starch, the [14C]glucosyl incorporation wasdetermined. The mean of two independently performed experiments(two replicas each) and the SD (n = 4) are given. G1P, Incubation with[U-14C]Glc-1-P; G1P/Pi, incubation with [U-14C]Glc-1-P and unla-
beled orthophosphate; G6P, incubation with [U-14C]Glc-6-P. C, TheGlc-1-P-dependent incorporation into starch is unaffected by theaddition of unlabeled Glc-6-P or Glc. Illuminated chloroplasts wereincubated with [U-14C]Glc-1-P (16.67 mM each) only (G1P), with[U-14C]Glc-1-P plus unlabeled Glc-6-P (16.67 mM each; G1P/G6P), orwith [U-14C]Glc-1-P plus unlabeled Glc (16.67 mM each; G1P/Glc).Following 10 or 20 min of incubation, starch was isolated and the con-tent of 14C was quantified. The mean of two independently performedexperiments (two replicas each) and the SD (n = 4) are given.
Fettke et al.
1728 Plant Physiol. Vol. 155, 2011 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 20, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
imported into the chloroplast, and then incorporatedinto starch even in the absence of a functional pPGM.However, labeling of starch was lower as comparedwith the wild-type control. By contrast, the mutantfrom Arabidopsis having a lower ADPglucose phos-phorylase activity incorporated very little 14C intostarch, and labeling was essentially unchanged duringthe 5- to 20-min incubation (Fig. 5A). Thus, the resid-ual ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activity of thismutant is insufficient to sustain the carbon flux fromexternally supplied Glc-1-P toward starch.Regarding the pgm1 mutant, the in vivo flux from
Glc-1-P into the plastids is minor and, therefore, un-able to permit normal starch accumulation. At the endof the light period, we monitored the leaf starchcontent to be 0.09 6 0.006 mg Glc g21 fresh weight,whereas the ecotype Columbia wild-type plants,grown under the same conditions, contained 6.843 60.427 mg Glc g21 fresh weight (n = 4). Despite the lowstarch content of the pgm1 mutant, we were able toisolate native leaf starch granules (Fig. 5C). Based onscanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination, themorphology of the mutant-derived starch particles issimilar to that obtained fromwild-type leaves (Fig. 5B;Streb et al., 2009).For several reasons, the relatively small contribution
of the Glc-6-P-independent flux to the total starchbiosynthesis is not surprising: First, in the cytosol, Glc-1-P is used in various (and, possibly, competing)reactions, among which the formation of UDPglucoseis most prominent. Subsequently, UDPglucose is usedfor the biosynthesis of Suc and cell wall polysaccha-
rides. Second, the total cellular content of Glc-1-P isvery low and undergoes only moderate changesthroughout the light/dark cycle (Schneider et al.,2002). Finally, provided an appropriate gradient isgiven, an efficient Glc-1-P/phosphate antiporter lo-cated in the chloroplast envelope membrane(s) willeven lower the plastidial Glc-1-P pool if mediatingbidirectional transport. Thereby, the transporter willdiminish the contribution of the Calvin cycle-indepen-dent path of starch biosynthesis.
DISCUSSION
In this communication, we provide evidence that pho-tosynthesis-competent mesophyll cells from leaves ofArabidopsis are capable of utilizing extracellularGlc-1-P. Following uptake, Glc-1-P passes the plastidialenvelopemembranes and, finally, the hexosyl residue isconverted to starch.
Figure 4. Impact of the plastidial phosphorylase isozyme on the incorporation into starch during Glc-1-P incubation. A,Phosphorylase pattern as revealed by native PAGE. Leaves were harvested during the light period. Buffer-soluble proteins wereextracted from Arabidopsis wild-type or AtPHS1 knockout plants. To each lane, 20 mg of protein was applied. The separation gelcontained 0.4% (w/v) glycogen. Following electrophoresis, the separation gel was equilibrated, incubated, and stained. I, Slowlymigrating cytosolic phosphorylase (AtPHS2); II, fast migrating cytosolic phosphorylase (AtPHS2); III, slowly migrating plastidialphosphorylase (AtPHS1); IV, fast migrating plastidial phosphorylase (AtPHS1). B, Impact of the plastidial phosphorylase (AtPHS1)on the Glc-1-P-dependent labeling of starch in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. Protoplasts from wild-type (wt) or plastidialphosphorylase knockout plants (lines Atphs1-1 and Atphs1-2) were incubatedwith [U-14C]Glc-1-P (20mM). At intervals, aliquotsof the protoplast suspension were withdrawn, and the incorporation of [U-14C]glucosyl residues into starch was monitored. Themean of two independently performed experiments (two replicas each) and the SD (n = 4) are given.
Table I. 14C incorporation into starch using Glc-1-P in the presenceof unlabeled hydrogen carbonate
Protoplasts were incubated in the presence or absence of 5 mM
HCO32 for 30 and 60 min, respectively. Protoplasts were illuminated
throughout the incubation. The starch was isolated, and 14C incorpo-ration was monitored. Values are given as nmol Glc mL21 (n = 3;6SD).
Incubation Time 5 mM HCO32 No HCO3
2 Added
30 min 1.05 6 0.04 1.72 6 0.0260 min 4.42 6 0.07 6.17 6 0.10
Glc-1-P Transport
Plant Physiol. Vol. 155, 2011 1729 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 20, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Most of the experiments described here have beenperformed by using isolated mesophyll protoplaststhat, to some extent, are a nonphysiological systempossessing altered carbon fluxes such as the resyn-thesis of cell wall materials that may be favored overother biosynthetic paths. However, for this study, bothisolation and treatment of protoplasts had been care-fully optimized. Under the conditions used, more than85% of the protoplasts remained functional over aperiod of 24 h (data not shown). Nevertheless, controlexperiments were included ensuring that the biochem-ical processes studied are restricted to intact protoplasts.When using these precautions, functional protoplastsoffer some unique advantages, as, in short-term exper-iments, they permit a quantitative analysis of the uptakeof metabolites. For putative transporters, apparent Kmand Vmax values can be determined, which is impossibleif more physiological systems, such as leaf tissues, areapplied. As an example, due to both the geometry ofleaf discs and the structural complexity of the apo-plastic space, the uptake of a given metabolite into acell is unavoidably superimposed (and largely af-fected) by the diffusion of that compound to thevicinity of the respective cell; therefore, neither effec-tive extracellular concentrations of the metabolite noruptake rates can be determined.
Based on the experiments described above, wepropose the scheme of transitory starch biosynthesisoutlined in Figure 6.
The transfer of glucosyl residues to nonreducingends of native starch granules is mediated by variousisoforms of starch synthase (EC 2.4.1.21) that all utilizeADPglucose as donor. The glucosyl donor is formedby the action of the ADPglucose pyrophosphorylaseaccording to the following equation: ATP + Glc-1-P4ADPglucose + PPi.
However, two distinct routes lead to the plastidialpool of Glc-1-P. One is well established and driven by
the Calvin cycle intermediate, Fru-6-P, which, in a two-step reaction, is converted to Glc-6-P (mediated by theplastidial hexose phosphate isomerase) and, subse-quently, to Glc-1-P (mediated by the pPGM). InArabidopsis, this route is by far dominant; therefore,mutants lacking either functional plastidial hexosephosphate isomerase or pPGM are largely (but notcompletely) impaired in the biosynthesis of assimila-tory starch. A second path consists of the direct importof Glc-1-P into the chloroplast, where it joins the poolof the hexosyl phosphate used by ADPglucose pyro-phosphorylase. However, the import of Glc-1-P can-not compensate the biosynthetic route derived fromFru-6-P; therefore, the amount of native starch granulesthat is found in pPGM-deficient plants accounts foronly slightly more than 1% as compared with the wildtype (see above).
To some extent, the data reported here concur withthe metabolism of Glc-1-P as described for heterotro-phic tissues, such as potato tubers (Fettke et al., 2008,2010). Tuber parenchyma cells are capable of import-ing Glc-1-P and incorporating the glucosyl residuesinto starch. Evidence has been presented that thisprocess includes the action of two transporters locatedat the plasmalemma and the amyloplast envelope
Table II. Incorporation of [14C]ADPglucose formed by ADPglucosepyrophosphorylase into starch via AtSSIII
Protoplasts were incubated with 1 mM [U-14C]Glc-1-P in the light ordark. After 30 and 60 min of incubation, the metabolites wereextracted, and the incorporation of formed [14C]ADPglucose intostarch via AtSSIII was monitored. As controls, the AtSSIII was omitted(Minus SSIII), or 14C-labeled ADPglucose was added to the reactionmixture (Plus ADPglucose). In addition, from the protoplasts, the starchwas isolated, and the 14C incorporation during [U-14C]Glc-1-P incu-bation was monitored. Results from one experiment of two are shown(n = 3; 6SD).
Figure 5. Starch synthesis in pgm1 mutants. A, Protoplasts were iso-lated from leaves of wild-type plants (wt), a mutant lacking the pPGMactivity (pgm1), or a mutant having reduced activity of ADPglucosepyrophosphorylase (adg1) and were incubated with [U-14C]Glc-1-P(20 mM) in the light. Subsequently, starch was extracted and the [14C]glucosyl incorporation into starch was determined. The data representmeans of three incubations 6 SD. B and C, Native starch granules iso-lated from leaves of wild-type plants (B) and the pgm1 mutant (C) asanalyzed by SEM. Bars = 20 mm.
Fettke et al.
1730 Plant Physiol. Vol. 155, 2011 www.plantphysiol.orgon May 20, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
membranes, respectively (Fettke et al., 2010). In addi-tion, the imported Glc-1-P has been shown to be incor-porated, via the cytosolic phosphorylase isozyme, intocytosolic heteroglycans (Fettke et al., 2008). However,this reaction seems to be of minor relevance for thecarbon flux directed to starch, as a reduced activityof the cytosolic phosphorylase did not affect the [U-14C]Glc-1-P-dependent labeling of starch. Nevertheless, thispathway could be involved in buffering the cytosolicGlc-1-P pool.Following the import of Glc-1-P into the amylo-
plasts, the subsequent incorporation into starch ismainly mediated by the plastidial phosphorylase iso-zyme (Pho1; Fettke et al., 2010). By contrast, in meso-phyll cells, Glc-1-P imported into the chloroplast leadsto the formation of ADPglucose, which then acts as aglucosyl donor for starch synthases (Table II). Theseresults are in agreement with the conclusion that inArabidopsis, the plastidial phosphorylase is not es-sential for starch metabolism under normal growthconditions (Zeeman et al., 2004).In potato tubers, the Pho1-dependent path seems to
be of minor relevance under normal in vivo condi-tions. Potato plants having a reduced pPGM activityaccumulate by far less reserve starch as comparedwithwild-type controls (Tauberger et al., 2000).Similarly, Arabidopsis plants (and potato leaves as
well) lacking a functional pPGM (Caspar et al., 1985)contain less starch than wild-type leaves. These mu-tants are capable of forming small amounts of leafstarch by a pathway that is not directly linked to thefunctional Calvin cycle (Fig. 6; Streb et al., 2009).However, potato lines possessing an antisense repres-sion of both the cytosolic PGM and the pPGM unex-pectedly exhibit a phenotype similar to the wild type(Fernie et al., 2002). Similarly, the sta5-1 mutant fromChlamydomonas reinhardtii, which is reported to lack thepPGM, accumulates 4% to 12% of the normal starchamounts (Van den Koornhuyse et al., 1996). In all these
cases, an import of Glc-1-P into the plastid can, at leastpartially, compensate the blocked Glc-6-P/Glc-1-Pconversion inside the plastid and, therefore, explainsthe described phenotypes.
For several reasons, it is not unexpected that the fluxoutlined above often permits only a partial restorationof starch biosynthesis. However, the quantification ofthe two Glc esters in several tissues indicates that theGlc-6-P levels exceed those of Glc-1-P (Tarnowsky et al.,1964; Alpers, 1968; Tetlow et al., 1998). Thus, the importof Glc-1-P into the plastids appears to be limited by thecytosolic concentration of the substrate. Interestingly, inmutants lacking a functional phosphoglucomutase, theGlc-6-P content is increased 10-fold but that of Glc-1-Pis only slightly higher as compared with the wild-typecontrols (Kofler et al., 2000). Furthermore, recentlypublished data strongly indicate that the expression ofmetabolite transporters located at the chloroplast enve-lope is affected by alterations in central carbon metab-olism. In pPGM-lacking mutants of Arabidopsis, theplastidial transport activity for both Glc-6-P and phos-phoglycerate is significantly increased (Kunz et al.,2010). Possibly, the flux from the plastidial Glc-6-Ppool into the cytosol is enhanced, which results in afaster formation of Glc-1-P by the cytosolic phospho-glucomutase activity. Furthermore, alterations in thecentral carbonmetabolism affect the expression of othertransporters of the chloroplast envelope as well. Inwild-type leaves, expression of the Glc-6-P transporteris weak (Niewiadomski et al., 2005). However, forthe plastidial Glc-6-P/phosphate translocator mutants,both a strongly increased expression of a second iso-form of this transporter and an enhanced transport ratehave been reported (Kunz et al., 2010).
In order to analyze the flexibility of the primarymetabolism, two double mutants from Arabidopsishave been generated in our laboratory that lack boththe plastidial phosphorylase (PHS1) and the ADPglu-cose pyrophosphorylase or AtPHS1 plus pPGM. Phe-notypic analyses of these mutants are in progress.
The uptake of Glc-1-P by isolated chloroplasts fromleaves of Arabidopsis, as shown in this study, appearsto contradict a previous study performed with spinach(Spinacia oleracea) chloroplasts. In that study (Quicket al., 1995), the conclusion was reached that externallysupplied Glc-1-P does not permit any significant starchbiosynthesis. However, in that study, chloroplasts wereisolated from spinach leaves that had been fed forseveral days with Glc. It remains to be clarifiedwhetheror not the long-term feeding of the spinach leaves withGlc affects the uptake and/or intrachloroplastidialmetabolism of Glc-1-P. In our experiments, the Glc-1-P-dependent incorporation into starch occurs at arelatively high rate that exceeds the rate of photosyn-thesis-dependent starch synthesis (data not shown).
The Glc-1-P-dependent starch labeling in mesophyllprotoplasts is much higher than that observed duringincubation with Glc (Fig. 2). Surprisingly, simulta-neous incubation of the protoplasts with [U-14C]Glc-1-P and orthophosphate results in a strongly increased
labeling of starch. This enhancement suggests an effi-cient limitation of Glc-1-P import by the cytosolicorthophosphate level. However, the simultaneous in-cubation with [U-14C]Glc-1-P and Glc or Glc-6-P alsoresults in an enhanced labeling of starch. Currently,this effect is difficult to explain. However, it should betaken into consideration that metabolic paths are oftensuperimposed by sugar-mediated signaling effectsthat alter carbon fluxes (see above).
Our results clearly demonstrate that Glc-1-P is takenup and, subsequently, is very efficiently metabolizedby mesophyll protoplasts from Arabidopsis. The directinterconnection between the cytosolic and plastidialGlc-1-P pools suggests so far unnoticed intracellularcarbon fluxes toward the plastidial starch that in-crease the flexibility of the plant primary metabolism.In planta under normal conditions, these pathwaysseem to be of minor relevance, but under someconditions (such as lower temperatures; Satoh et al.,2008) or distinct mutations, they enable the plant tobalance those particular situations. It remains to beclarified whether or not extracellular Glc-1-P and itsfast uptake by autotrophic cells will also constitute anefficient intercellular carbon flux.