Top Banner
GLOBAL WARMING GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS ENGINEERING FACULTY OF CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING
29

GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Dec 25, 2015

Download

Documents

James Fletcher
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

GLOBAL WARMINGGLOBAL WARMING

PROS AND CONS

Dr. Bajnóczy GáborTonkó Csilla

BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS

DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS ENGINEERING

FACULTY OF CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING

Page 2: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

The pictures and drawings of The pictures and drawings of this presentation can be this presentation can be used only for education !used only for education !

Any commercial use is Any commercial use is prohibited !prohibited !

Page 3: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Global warming: fact, no doubtGlobal warming: fact, no doubt

August ,1984

Mt. Hood Oregon

end of summer 2002

Page 4: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

THE FACT OF GLOBAL WARMING CAN NOT BE THE FACT OF GLOBAL WARMING CAN NOT BE QUESTIONEDQUESTIONED

1941 2004

Bruce Molnia,Glacier Bay National Park, 2004, U.S. Geological Survey USA

Page 5: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

What is the reason?

BECAUSE OF THE PEOLE (LET’S SHAME US)!

UNCONTROLLABLE PROCESS?

GLOBAL WARMING: FACT, NO DOUBTGLOBAL WARMING: FACT, NO DOUBT

Page 6: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Global warming, greenhouse Global warming, greenhouse eeffectffect

CO2

C O2

Energia elnyelés

láthatófény

heat

visible light

energy dissipation

Page 7: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Drastic increase in carbon dioxide Drastic increase in carbon dioxide concentration since the industrial concentration since the industrial

revolutionrevolution

Page 8: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Greenhouse gases: not only carbon Greenhouse gases: not only carbon dioxidedioxide

Methane organic matter decomposition (paddy field, landfill)

Nitrous oxide (N2O) biomass burning, fluidized boiler,

catalytic cars, nitrogen fertilizer

Chlor-fluor-carbon gases refrigerators, solvents, blowing

Page 9: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

GREENHOUSE EFFECT ALWAYS WAS AND ALWAYS WILL BE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT ALWAYS WAS AND ALWAYS WILL BE; CAUSE: WATER VAPORCAUSE: WATER VAPOR

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/TableOfCont.htmlThey do not beleve in the role of carbon-dioxide.

Page 10: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Water vapor and greenhouse Water vapor and greenhouse effecteffect

Earth’s average temperature

increseas

Evaporation increases, Greenhouse Effect

intensifies

Evaporation increases, amount of cloud increases, irradiation decreases, Earth’

average temperaturedecreases

Page 11: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

PERIODICALLY CHANGING CLIMATEPERIODICALLY CHANGING CLIMATE

? ?

GLOBAL WARMINGGLOBAL WARMING

Everything is based on something!

Yes, this may cause the warming

This is true, but don’t cause such a rapid

warming

Page 12: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

POSSIBLE CAUSES OF PERIODICALLY CLIMATE CHANGEPOSSIBLE CAUSES OF PERIODICALLY CLIMATE CHANGE

1. Periodically change of solar flares (period of time: 11 and 206 years)

2. Change of Earth’s elliptical orbit around the Sun (period of time: 100 000 years) irradiation change - about 0,2%

Page 13: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

POSSIBLE CAUSES OF PERIODICALLY CLIMATE CHANGEPOSSIBLE CAUSES OF PERIODICALLY CLIMATE CHANGE

3. Angle of Earth’s Axis change (period of time: 41 000 years)

4. Change of day and night equal date (period of time: 22 00 years) irradiation change – about 15%

During an equinox, the Earth is not tilted toward or away from the Sun and the length of the day is the same at all points on the Earth's surface.

Page 14: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Air pollutant: heating and cooling Air pollutant: heating and cooling effecteffect

Particle pollution

↓global

cooling?

25% of atmospheric particle are anthropogenic

Page 15: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

There were warmer There were warmer periods!periods!

Page 16: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

COCO22 average temperatureaverage temperature

Page 17: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Better safe than sorry !

Page 18: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Can we do something against Can we do something against global warming?global warming?

European Union is committed

USA: no commercial interest

Developing countries(China, India, etc.):It’s not the biggest

problem

Page 19: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Renewable energy against the global Renewable energy against the global warmingwarming

NO CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONNO CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION

Water energy Solar energy Wind energy Geothermal energy Biomass Tidal energy (Lunar energy) Wave energy

Let‘s see the possibilities in Hungary ?

Page 20: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Water energyWater energy

It is a real hydroelectric plant

Page 21: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Hydroelectric plants in Hydroelectric plants in HungaryHungary

Tiszalök 11,4 MW Kisköre 28 MW

Electric power plants in Hungary ~ 9400 MW

No level differences on flat area !

Page 22: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Solar energySolar energyIT IS SAID, IT IS FREE, LET US USE IT.

Low energy density: 1kW/m2

What is the situation in Hungary?

Incoming: july 5 kWh/m2day jan. 1,5 kWh/m2day

Available: july 2,8 kWh/m2day jan. 1,1 kWh/m2day

DOMESTIC HOT WATER SUPPLY (FAMILY HOUSE)200 dm3 60°C water/day claims: 14 kWh/dayCollector surface: ≈ 12 – 15 m2

Domestic hot water: YES Heating: Not enough

DOMESTIC HEATING (100 m2 FAMILY HOUSE)Average heat output (6 winter moth): 1,4 kWh/m2. It' average is far from the peak !!claims: 1400 m2 Collector surface: ≈ 140 - 180 m2

Page 23: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Solar power plantSolar power plant

464 000 m2 collector area 80 MW

Page 24: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Wind energyWind energy

Well known from ancient time

Page 25: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Wind energyWind energy

1 MW wind turbine: height : 45 meter, rotor diameter : 55 meter

Europe’s wind turbine output: ≈ 40 000 MW

Problem: the storage of electric energy. If there is no wind, a conventional fast response power plant capacity must be available.

Wind farms on land and off shore

Page 26: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Geothermal energyGeothermal energy

Page 27: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Geothermal energyGeothermal energy Hungary’s potential in geothermal energy is quite remarkable

Problem: thermal waste

The currently used methods for the discharge of utilized thermal water involves: direct discharge into sub-surface water sources (reinjection), discharge into periodical water courses and discharge into receiving waters directly or indirectly (through drainage).

Only about 20 are injection wells, although recent legislation prohibits new geothermal systems from being established without injection; only waters used for balneotherapy are allowed to be discharged at the surface.

Page 28: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Energy from biomassEnergy from biomassRealistic in Hungary ?

Different sources

WoodUsed for hundreds of years.Forest area is not too much in Hungary.

pellet

chipsforest

Page 29: GLOBAL WARMING PROS AND CONS Dr. Bajnóczy Gábor Tonkó Csilla BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.

Energy from biomassEnergy from biomassenergy plants instead of wood

Szarvas - energy grass

Energy willow

Energy poplar1 and 3 years old

35 km2 1 MW

whole area of Hungary 2657 MW