Global rangelands and their role in food security Temuulen “Teki” Sankey Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ
Global rangelands and their role in food security
Temuulen “Teki” SankeyNorthern Arizona University
Flagstaff, AZ
Background
• I am a plant ecologist/dendrochronologist/RS
• I study rangeland use/land cover changes:– Intermountain USA: grassland-forest ecotones,
aspen and pinyon-juniper woodlands– Great Basin: sagebrush shrublands– Sonoran Desert: desert invasive forbs– Central Asia: grassland steppe
Western US Rangelands• Climate change and land
management-induced changes– Fire – Woody encroachment
Post-fire recovery in sagebrush• 16 fires since 1937• SPOT image
Sankey et al. 2008. Post-fire recovery of sagebrush communities: Assessment using SPOT5 and Very Large Scale Aerial Imagery. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61: 598-604
Post-fire recovery in sagebrush
Mountain big sagebrushMean cover = 38%
Time = 27 years
Sankey et al. 2008. Post-fire recovery of sagebrush communities: Assessment using SPOT5 and Very Large Scale Aerial Imagery. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61: 598-604
Sagebrush characterization - Lidar
• Classify sagebrush communities
• Shrub height
Sankey, T. and P. Bond. 2010. Lidar-based classification of sagebrush community types. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64: 92-98
Sagebrush Height - Lidar
Field-based maximum shrub height (cm)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
LiD
AR
-der
ived
max
imu
m s
hru
b h
eigh
t (c
m)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
y= -24.52 +0.94XAdj. R2 = 0.77SB = 9%NU = 3%LC = 84%
Sankey, T. and P. Bond. 2010. Lidar-based classification of sagebrush community types. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64: 92-98
Sagebrush Height - Lidar
Vegetation classes
Herb ARAR ARTR PUTR Other
Veg
etat
ion
heig
ht (
cm)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lidar measurementField measurement
a b
c
d
a
Sankey, T. and P. Bond. 2010. Lidar-based classification of sagebrush community types. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64: 92-98
Western Rangelands: Juniper encroachment• Juniper cover increase: 30-600%• Encroachment leads to:– Understory vegetation loss– Soil erosion– Habitat loss– Fire hazard
• Control treatment– Prescribed fire– Cutting– Shredding
Juniper encroachment• Quantify encroachment rates and patterns• Identify priority areas for control treatment
Juniper encroachment
Sankey et al. 2010. Characterizing western juniper expansion via a fusion of Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper and lidar data. Rangeland Ecology and Management 63: 514-523
-
A
C
B
0 100 M
Legend
Juniper absenceJuniper presence
! Juniper trees
Landsat
Fusion
Lidar
Vegetation associations
ARTRV/PUTR
ARTRV/SYOR
ARTRV/PSSP
ARAR/PSSP
ARAR/FEID
Juni
per
cano
py c
over
(%
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
ab
cd
e
Sankey et al. 2010. Characterizing western juniper expansion via a fusion of Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper and lidar data. Rangeland Ecology and Management 63: 514-523
Juniper encroachment
Juniper encroachment
Shrubland Grassland
Juni
per
incr
ease
(%
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
Grazed Ungrazed
Sankey, T. and M. Germino. 2008. Assessment of juniper encroachment with the use of satellite imagery and geospatial data. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61: 412-418
Decades
1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
Rel
ativ
e di
stri
buti
on o
f tr
ee a
ge (
%)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
N=228
Juniper encroachment
Sankey et al. 2013. Lidar-derived carbon estimates in woody encroachment. Journal of Geophysical Research (In Press)
Field-measured tree height (m)
0 4 8 12 16
Lid
ar-d
eriv
ed tr
ee h
eigh
t (m
)
0
4
8
12
16
y = -0.14 + 0.82XR2 = 0.84p < 0.001RMSE = 4.9
Juniper encroachment
Sankey et al. 2013. Lidar-derived carbon estimates in woody encroachment. Journal of Geophysical Research (In Press)
Field-measured tree canopy cover
0 20 40 60 80 100
Lid
ar-d
eriv
ed tr
ee c
anop
y co
ver
0
20
40
60
80
100
y = 6.72 + 1.44XR2 = 0.82p = 0.04
Juniper encroachment
Sankey et al. 2013. Lidar-derived carbon estimates in woody encroachment. Journal of Geophysical Research (In Press)
Field-measured juniper tree density
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Lid
ar-d
eriv
ed j
un
iper
tre
e d
ensi
ty
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
R2=0.79y=8.38+0.59*X
Juniper encroachment
Sankey et al. 2013. Lidar-derived carbon estimates in woody encroachment. Journal of Geophysical Research (In Press)
Juniper encroachment
0 2 4 6 80
2
4
6
8
Ground-predicted biomass (ln(kg))
Lid
ar-p
red
icte
d b
iom
ass
(ln
(kg)
)Y= 0.85 + 0.77*XR2 =0.77p <0.001RMSE = 0.5
Sankey et al. 2013. Lidar-derived carbon estimates in woody encroachment. Journal of Geophysical Research (In Press)
Central Asian Rangelands• Mongolia’s political
changes• Changes in herding
practices• Livestock numbers
tripled
Effects on rangelands• Landsat 5 TM• 6 years: 1986,
1989,1990,…...shift… 2001, 2002, 2007
• Collective vs post-collective
• Significant decrease
Rangelands vs Croplands• Many abandoned fields in former socialist
countries• Abandoned fields were used as rangelands• New shift now