1 Global Environmental Governance and Politics of Ecotourism: Case Study of Cambodia Baromey Neth, Sam Ol Rith & Béatrice Knerr Department of Development Economics, Migration and Agricultural Policy, Faculty 11, University of Kassel, Germany 12 th EADI General Conference Global Governance for Sustainable Development: The Need for Policy Coherence and New Partnerships
19
Embed
Global Environmental Governance and Politics of Ecotourism: Case Study of Cambodia
Presentation by Baromey Neth, Sam Ol Rith & Béatrice Knerr on the EADI Environment and Development Working Group session during the EADI General Conference. Geneva, 25 June 2008
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Global Environmental Governance and Politics of Ecotourism:Case Study of Cambodia
Baromey Neth, Sam Ol Rith & Béatrice Knerr
Department of Development Economics, Migration and Agricultural Policy, Faculty 11,University of Kassel, Germany
12th EADI General Conference Global Governance for Sustainable Development: The Need for Policy Coherence and New Partnerships
2
What is This Research about?
Examine actors (state and non-state) that influence decision-making for planning and policies of ecotourism in Cambodia, and hence to whom the outcomes of the projects are targeted.
… approached theoretically from diverse perspectives of political ecologists, which interpret events with reference to the behaviors or attitudes of actors in pursuit of their political agendas.
Neoliberalism & its relation with tourism, Global environmental governance (GEG) Politics of ecotourism
“… formal institutions and regimes empowered to enforce compliance, as well as the informal arrangements that people or institutions have agreed or perceived to be in their interest.” (Commission on Global Governance, 1995, p.4)
Philosophy Differences
Decentralization and power sharing (Hardt and Negri, 2000)
Extension of the power of states in the global system despite
the proliferation of non-state actors (Duffy, 2006)
26 protected areas, accounted for 18% of Cambodia’s total land areas
A participant of the GEG regime multi-stakeholder environmental governance
Economic growth & strengthened nexus of government-business sector decline in communities’ ownership rights over natural resources social tensions / conflicts and evictions
Annual growth rate (21.3%) one of the fastest growing destinations in SE Asia
Received 2,015,128 international tourists in 2007
Contributing USD 1.4 billions (10%) to GDP as the second largest sector following garment sector (USD 2.9 billions)
Ecotourism is managed by the Ministry of Environment
Ecotourism in protected areas as part of CBNRM strategies initiated by non-state actors.
Source: Neth Baromey (2007)
12
Definitions of Ecotourism and CBET in Cambodian Context
CBET: “… a form of tourism that is run by the
community and for community. It promotes conservation of nature and culture. CBET also strives to improve the local likelihood as well as promoting meaningful interaction between community and visitors.” (CCBEN, 2002)
Ecotourism: “… a tool which is developed and managed sustainably in partnership with local communities and other stakeholders to ensure community involvement and equitable benefit sharing without negatively affecting the ecological integrity of the area or the social and cultural integrity of adjacent communities.” (TSCP, 2006)
Global Environmental Governance and Politics of Ecotourism in Cambodia (cont.)
Ecotourism has been integrated into national and (cross) regional development policies
The transmission of preservationist philosophy (preservation narrative coexists with neoliberal discourse) & post cold war views about governance
Ecotourism / CBET is promoted to satisfy multiple audiences:
Nature conservation Economic development initiatives Poverty reduction
Environmental education Community empowerment and participation Decentralized approaches Mutual benefit distribution / sharing
15
Ecotourism Politics of State and Non-State Institutions in Cambodia
International DevelopmentAgencies and Donors
(ADB, UNDP, GEF, IFC-WB, CI, FFI, SNV, WWF, etc.)
Government Institutions(Ministry of Tourism,
Ministry of Environment, etc.)
International & National(Local) Environmental
Organizations
Community-level Development and Conservation Programs
in Protected Areas / Biosphere Reserves / Ramsar Sites
(via Ecotourism incorporated into Integrated NRM)
Joint Venture
Foreign Consultants/ Advisors
- Integration of NR plans- Resource conservation & management- Protected area operations and maintenance- Community development- Community empowerment & involvement- Decentralization & deconcentration- Recreation programs- Research & monitoring
Economic Growth-Oriented
Conservation-Oriented
Main Benefit Receivers: Executing agency (MoE) and its responsible staffs
Government via taxes
Main Benefit Receivers: Selected members
of local communities
Neoliberal Actors
Populist/Neo-Populist Actors
16
Constraints of Ecotourism Politics in Cambodia
Constraints Descriptions Actors
Theoretical Conversion of ideology into “classical approach” to conservation State & non-state
Legal Different interpretations and lack of supportive document; unclear mandate; more economic opportunity focused; poor law enforcement strategies; unspecified key provisions of laws; political instability and frequent change of laws; etc.
State
Institutional low capacity; political pressure; corruption; bureaucracy and centralized management plans; nepotism; economic monopoly; lack of community’s awareness and support; overlapped responsibilities; etc.
State
Structural Client-patron relationship; top-down management; etc. State & non-state
Implementation Participation & benefits are hard to measure; insecure land ownership & resource accessibility; people’s limited legitimacy & access to livelihood resources; problem of identifying & selecting community members; disparities in economic generation & distribution; etc.
Non-state
Lack of community involvement; lack of institutional collaboration/partnership; trend towards mass ecotourism; etc.
State
Limited capacities of local communities and executing agencies’ staffs State & Non-state
17
Conclusion
Cambodia’s ecotourism is highly political and strongly interrelated with structures of neoliberalism and GEG.
Dependency on external resources for ecotourism/CBET development brings in strong influence of external power and loss of local power and control.
None of the policies of the state and non-state actors prioritizes the well-being and secure livelihoods of the communities.
Ecotourism controlled by the state actors would lead to “mass ecotourism, while the current CBET would trigger people’s conflicts of interest, out-migration and expulsion. Source: SNV
(2007)
18
Implications for Policy
Set up & implement adaptive co-management strategies
Invest in human and social capital construction
Maximize the use of traditional wisdom and practices
Improve the education and training of relevant personnel
Promote best practices of CBNRM and create appropriate CBET mechanisms that ensure long-term development objectives (through partnership building, sound policy or legislation formulation, institutional reform, communication networks, participatory research linkages …)
Increase ecotourism product development, marketing strategies and risk management
Provide more support to social and public services and local SMEs development with appropriate technology
Strengthen local empowerment and participation and ownership right