Global Climate Change Consequences for Cerrado Tree Species Marinez Ferreira de Siqueira Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental - CRIA
Jan 18, 2018
Global Climate Change Consequences for Cerrado Tree Species
Marinez Ferreira de Siqueira
Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental - CRIA
Biodiversity Consequences of Global Climate Change
In this study we applied a technique that can be called ecological niche modeling to generate predictive models of species’ potential future geographic distributions.
Climate Change and Biodiversity
• Climate change involve a complex combination of warming, augmented climatic variability, extreme event, etc.
• Biodiversity consequences are unknown, although are thought to be potentially serious involving drastic reductions and extinctions for many species.
Methodology• HadCM2 General Circulation Model – two scenarios
used– HHGSDX50 - 0.5%/yr CO2, sulphate aerosol forcing – HHGGAX50 - 1%/yr CO2, no sulfate aerosols forcing
• 0.5 x 0.5 degree resolution• Nine base environmental coverages• 162 species – all trees with >30 points (Projeto de
Cooperação Técnica Conservação e Manejo da Biodiversidade do Bioma Cerrado – EMBRAPA Cerrados – UnB – Ibama/DFID e RBGE/Reino Unido database)
Ecological Niche Modeling and Predicting Geographic Distributions
Geo
grap
hy
E
colo
gy
Distributional points
GARP
Precipitation
Tem
pera
ture
Ecological niche model
Distributional prediction
Changed climate projection
Projectclimate change
Methodology• Build ecological models for each species using
GARP based on present-day coverages• Predict and characterize present-day geographic
distribution of each species• Adjust geographic coverages according to
projections of large-scale models of global climate change
• Project distributions of each species onto adjusted geographic coverages
• Compare and contrast present-day and projected distributions across the entire suite of species
Present Temperature Regime
Projected Changes in Temperature
Present Precipitation Regime
Projected Precipitation Changes
Atlapetes virenticeps Distributional Points
Atlapetes virenticeps:Rule set for prediction
0 r 0.50 0.99 28.55 0.35 0.504IF - Elev*0.26 r + Precip*0.19 r - Temp*0.10 rTHEN Taxon=BACKGROUND
4 r 0.53 0.86 23.58 0.51 0.314IF + Elev*0.32 r - Precip*0.19 r - Temp*0.10 rTHEN Taxon=PRESENT
1 r 0.49 0.91 26.32 0.39 0.122IF - Elev*0.02 r + Precip*0.28 r - Temp*0.30 rTHEN Taxon=BACKGROUND
3 m 0.49 0.85 23.73 0.44 0.028IF Elev=[1482,3360]r AND Precip=[ 1, 4]r AND Temp=[ 2, 4]rTHEN Taxon=PRESENT
6 d 0.49 0.86 20.90 0.33 0.019IF Elev=[1937,3241]rTHEN Taxon=PRESENT
2 d 0.49 0.85 23.78 0.44 0.013IF Elev=[ 0,2727]r AND Precip=[ 4, 9]rTHEN Taxon=BACKGROUND
5 d 0.48 0.83 22.11 0.41 0.000IF Elev=[1640,2866]r AND Precip=[ 1, 4]r AND Temp=[ 2, 5]rTHEN Taxon=PRESENT
Atlapetes virenticeps Predicted Geographic Distribution
Atlapetes virenticeps:Rule set for prediction
0 r 0.50 0.99 28.55 0.35 0.504IF - Elev*0.26 r + Precip*0.19 r - Temp*0.10 rTHEN Taxon=BACKGROUND
4 r 0.53 0.86 23.58 0.51 0.314IF + Elev*0.32 r - Precip*0.19 r - Temp*0.10 rTHEN Taxon=PRESENT
1 r 0.49 0.91 26.32 0.39 0.122IF - Elev*0.02 r + Precip*0.28 r - Temp*0.30 rTHEN Taxon=BACKGROUND
3 m 0.49 0.85 23.73 0.44 0.028IF Elev=[1482,3360]r AND Precip=[ 1, 4]r AND Temp=[ 2, 4]rTHEN Taxon=PRESENT
6 d 0.49 0.86 20.90 0.33 0.019IF Elev=[1937,3241]rTHEN Taxon=PRESENT
2 d 0.49 0.85 23.78 0.44 0.013IF Elev=[ 0,2727]r AND Precip=[ 4, 9]rTHEN Taxon=BACKGROUND
5 d 0.48 0.83 22.11 0.41 0.000IF Elev=[1640,2866]r AND Precip=[ 1, 4]r AND Temp=[ 2, 5]rTHEN Taxon=PRESENT
Atlapetes virenticeps Model Projected on Adjusted Coverages
Atlapetes virenticeps Before vs. After
Examples of predictions of present (1961-1990) and future (2055) distributions of Acosmium subelegans
Area projected to remain habitable in 2055 (AX scenario)
Area projected to remain habitable in 2055 (DX scenario)
Examples of predictions of present (1961-1990) and future (2055) distributions of cerrado tree species
Qualea parvifolia
Rapanea guianensis
Patterns of predicted species richness among the 162 species of cerrado trees analyzed in the core
distributional area of cerrado at the present (1961-1990)
HHGSDX50 climate change scenario = 144 species
HHGGAX50 climate change scenario = 106 species
Patterns of predicted species richness in a climate change scenario
Consequences for the 162 tree species analysed
• DX Scenario:– 18 species were predicted to end up without
habitable areas (extinction in cerrado).– 91 species were predicted to decline by >90% in
potential distributional area in the cerrado region.• AX Scenario:
– 56 were predicted to end up without habitable areas in the cerrado region (extinction in cerrado).
– 123 species were predicted to decline by >90% in potential distributional area in the cerrado region.
0
25
50
75
100
0 25 50 75 100
Percent of distributional area (DX scenario)
Per
cent
of d
istri
butio
nal a
rea
(AX
sce
nario
)
Relationship of severity of prediction of climate change consequences in the HHGSDX50 and HHGGAX50 scenarios.
No dispersal
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
HHGSDX50
HH
GG
AX50
Mexican Birds, Mammals, Butterflies
Canada Butterflies – Current Species Richness
Compare Maximum Species Richness:
Present with HSDX 2020
Present
2020
Steller’s Jay before
Mountains vs Flatlands
Steller’s Jay afterPygmy Nuthatch beforePygmy Nuthatch after
Baird’s Sparrow before
Mountains vs Flatlands
Baird’s Sparrow afterLesser Prairie-Chicken beforeLesser Prairie-Chicken after
Mountains vs Flatlands
Percent Change - No Dispersal
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Percent change
Freq
uenc
y
Centroid Distance - No Dispersal
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Distance (km)Fr
eque
ncy
Climate Change and Biodiversity• Species respond in manners that are quite
individual to climate change ... General tendencies are not absolute
• Seriousness of effects varies drastically among regions
• Effects appear to be in general worse in flatlands regions, and not as serious in montane regions
• Conservation implications remain almost completely unexplored ...
Hotspot of Predicted Species Richness among Cerrado Tree Species at Present
Prioritization of areas for conservation in the face of changing climates, based on DX scenario of
global climate change
87 species38 species
7 species
6 species
3 species
Prioritization of areas for conservation in the face of changing climates, based on AX scenario of
global climate change
63 species 32 species
8 species
Hotspot of Predicted Species Richness among Cerrado Tree Species at Present
HHGSDX50 climate change scenario = 145 species
HHGGAX50 climate change scenario = 108 species
Patterns of predicted species richness in a climate change scenario
São Paulo Museum of Cerrado Tree Diversity????
Lightest red = 81-120 sepcies
Light red = 121 – 140 species
Red = > 140 species
Black = patches of the cerrado vegetation type
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to the team of researchers involved in the Projeto de Cooperação Técnica Conservação e Manejo da Biodiversidade do Bioma Cerrado – EMBRAPA Cerrados – UnB – Ibama/DFID e RBGE/Reino Unido for their generosity in making occurrence data available to us.
Prof. Dr. A. Townsend Peterson - Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, The University of Kansas, to help with modelling.