Top Banner
Ghost Condensation and Horizon Entropy Ref. arXiv: 1602.06511 w/ S.Jazayeri, R.Saitou and Y.Watanabe Shinji Mukohyama (YITP, Kyoto) Based also on other works with N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, P. Creminelli, T. Furukawa, K. Ichiki, K. Izumi, M. Luty, N. Sugiyama, J. Thaler, T. Wiseman, M. Zaldarriaga
33

Ghost Condensation and Horizon Entropycosmo/SW_2016/PPT/Mukohyama_GC.pdfArkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and Mukohyama, JHEP 0405:074,2004 42 2 1 2 00 2 L L M h K eff EH 2 M D SS ...

Feb 08, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Ghost Condensation

    and

    Horizon Entropy

    Ref. arXiv: 1602.06511 w/ S.Jazayeri, R.Saitou and Y.Watanabe

    Shinji Mukohyama

    (YITP, Kyoto)

    Based also on other works with

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, P. Creminelli, T. Furukawa, K. Ichiki, K.

    Izumi, M. Luty, N. Sugiyama, J. Thaler, T. Wiseman, M. Zaldarriaga

  • Can we change gravity in IR?

    Change Theory?Massive gravity Fierz-Pauli 1939DGP model Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati 2000

    Change State?Higgs phase of gravityThe simplest: Ghost condensationArkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and Mukohyama, JHEP 0405:074,2004.

  • Ghost condensation

    Suppose

    2)( LSMgrav LLL L

    gravity

    SMEnergy

    Vacuum

    Any coupling instability

    Arkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and

    Mukohyama, JHEP 0405:074,2004

  • In analogy with Higgs potential, can this be stabilized?

    424 )()( ML ?Clearly are higher dim ops. Really we

    should consider

    4)(

    ()(~)( 22 QPPL )

    Naively no sensible EFT.

    NOT THE CASE.

    There is a sensible EFT + derivative expansion.

    (Shift symmetry is assumed.)

  • For simplicity

    2)( PL

    Eq of motion

    0 PClearly any constant is a solution!

    Suppose constant + timelike.

    Go to frame where

    ctc i 0,

    Solution for any c!

    P

    in flat background.

  • Look at small fluctuations

    ct

    2222224 )()()(2)( cPcPccPxdS

    So for 0)(2)( 222 cPccP

    0)( 2 cP

    NORMAL sign kinetic terms.

    STABLE stable stable

  • In this language, we can have a good EFT because

    the background sits at some value c.

    doesn’t sample entire function .

    Taylor expansion of around

    makes perfect sense.

    2)( P

    Small fluctuations controlled by small # of

    parameters at low energies.

    2)( P 22)( c

  • So far, possible backgrounds are labeled by

    continuous parameter c.

    Situation changes in presence of gravity, in

    expanding universe.2 2 2 2

    4

    ( )

    ( )

    ds dt a t dx

    S d x gP g

    T

    ~ PPg

    E.O.M.

    0][ 3 Pat 0P as a

    0 or 0)( 2 P(unstable ghost

    background)

  • P

    2M

    Gravity (Hubble friction)

    drives you here!

    In this language, we can have a good EFT because

    the background sits at the special value.

    doesn’t sample entire function .

    Taylor expansion of around

    makes perfect sense.

    2)( P

    Small fluctuations controlled by small # of

    parameters at low energies.

    2)( P 42)( M

    Attractor

  • Look at small perturbations

    2424444 ))(()()( MPMPMMPxd

    No spatial kinetic term for !

    Other terms ()(~ 2 QP )do contain spatial kinetic terms but at least

    22 )(

    22

    2

    24 )(2

    1

    MxdS

    Low

    energy

    22

    2

    23 )(2

    1

    MxdPositive definite Hamiltonian

    STABLE!

    2

    42

    M

    k

    tM 2

  • Of course there are higher terms in

    effective theory.

    2

    2224 )(

    2

    1

    MxdS

    Because of k4, spatial fluctuations are less

    suppressed than we are used to…

    To analyze low-energy theory, we must do

    proper analysis of scaling dimensions of

    operators!

    2

    2

    ~)(

    M

  • 2

    2223 )(

    2

    1

    Mxdtd

    4/1

    2/1

    1

    r

    dxrdx

    dtrdt

    rEE

    Make

    invariant

    Leading operator in infrared

    2

    23

    ~)(

    Mxdtd

    scaling dimension 1/4. (Barely) irrelevant

    Good low-E effective theory.

    HEALTHY SECTOR IN ABSENCE

    OF GRAVITY

  • What makes the ghost condensate special is that,

    unlike other cosmological fluid, IT DOES NOT

    DILUTE AS UNIVERSE EXPANDS.

    Normally:

    In deep future, flat or dS (maximal symmetry)

    EMPTY OF FLUID

    NOTE: Background breaks Lorentz invariance

    spontaneously – prefered frame where is spatially

    isotropic. No different from CMBR or any

    cosmological fluid.

  • NOT HERE!2M even as universe expands.

    )()(44 MPgMPT

    Exactly that of c.c. !)( 4MP

    dS solution!

    0 0

    Flat!

    Present acceleration can be due to ghost condensate

    even with =0 (in the symmetric phase). w=p/r=-1

    exactly. BUT NOT A C.C.

    PHYSICAL FLUID WITH PHYSICAL

    EXCITATIONS.

    P P

  • and timelike

    Background metric is maximally

    symmetric, either Minkowski or dS.

    Systematic construction of

    Low-energy effective theory

    Backgrounds characterized by

    0

    Arkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and Mukohyama, JHEP 0405:074,2004

    224 21

    00 22eff EHL L M h K

    M

    22ij i j

    ij i jK KM

  • Gauge choice: .),( txt

    (Unitary gauge)

    Residual symmetry: ),( xtxx

    Write down most general action invariant under

    this residual symmetry.

    ( Action for : undo unitary gauge!)

    Start with flat background hg

    h

    Under residuali

    ijjiijii hhh ,,0 0000

    0

  • Action invariant under i

    2

    00h

    2

    0ih2 , ij ijK K K

    0 0 01

    2ij ij j i i jK h h h

    OK

    OK

    24 21 2

    00 2 2

    ij

    eff EH ijL L M h K K KM M

    Action for

    ij ij i jK K 00 00 02h h 0

    224 21

    00 22eff EHL L M h K

    M

    22ij i j

    ij i jK KM

    Beginning at quadratic order,

    since we are assuming flat

    space is good background.

  • 2 23 2

    2

    1 ( )

    2dtd x

    M

    4/1

    2/1

    1

    r

    dxrdx

    dtrdt

    rEE

    Make

    invariant

    Leading nonlinear operator in infrared

    2

    23

    ~)(

    Mxdtd

    has scaling dimension 1/4. (Barely) irrelevant

    Good low-E effective theory

    Robust prediction

  • Higgs mechanism Ghost condensate

    Order

    parameter

    Instability Tachyon Ghost

    Condensate V’=0, V’’>0 P’=0, P’’>0

    Broken

    symmetry

    Gauge symmetry Time translational

    symmetry

    Force to be

    modified

    Gauge force Gravity

    New force

    law

    Yukawa type Newton+Oscillation

    2 2 2

    2( )P

    (| |)V

    Arkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and Mukohyama 2004

  • Bounds on symmetry breaking scale M

    M

    Jeans Instability

    (sun)

    100GeV 1TeV

    Supernova time-delay

    ruled out

    ruled out

    ruled out

    0

    allowed

    Twinkling from Lensing

    (CMB)

    So far, there is no conflict with experiments

    and observations if M < 100GeV.

    Arkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and Mukohyama and Wiseman, JHEP 0701:036,2007

  • Ghost condensation• Ghost condensation is the simplest Higgs

    phase of gravity.

    • The low-E EFT is determined by the symmetry breaking pattern. No ghost in the EFT.

    • Gravity is modified in IR.

    • Consistent with experiments and observations if M < 100GeV.

  • Holography and GSL• Do holographic dual descriptions always exist?

    PROBABLY NO. e.g.) A de Sitter space is only meta-

    stable and a unitary holographic dual is not known.

    • How about ghost condensate?

    • Let’s look for violation of GSL in ghost condensate,

    since violation of GSL would indicate absence of

    holographic dual. (GSL is expected to be dual to

    ordinary 2nd law.)

    • Three proposals: (i) semi-classical heat flow; (ii)

    analogue of Penrose process; (iii) negative energy.

    • The generalized 2nd law holds in the presence of

    ghost condensate. (Mukohyama 2009, 2010)

  • Ghost inflation and de Sitter

    entropy bound

    • Black holes & cosmology in gravity theories are

    as important as Hydrogen atoms & blackbody

    radiation in quantum mechanics

    • Provide non-trivial tests for theories of gravity

    e.g. black-hole entropy in string theory

    • Does the theory of ghost condensation pass

    those tests?

    • Ghost condensation is known to be consistent

    with BH thermodynamics (Mukohyama 2009, 2010)

    • How about de Sitter thermodynamics?

    S.Jazayeri, S.Mukohyama, R.Saitou, Y.Watanabe 2016

  • de Sitter thermodynamics

    • de Sitter (dS) spacetime is one of the three

    spacetimes with maximal symmetry

    • dS horizon has temperature TH = H/(2)

    • In quantum gravity, a dS space is probably

    unstable (e.g. KKLT, Susskind, …). So, let’s

    consider a dS space as a part of inflation

    • Friedmann equation

    1st law with entropy S = A/(4GN) = /(GNH2)

    (This is in contrast with analogue gravity systems.)

  • de Sitter entropy bound

    • Slow roll inflation (non-eternal)

    Arkani-Hamed, et.al. 2007

    for non-eternal inflation

  • de Sitter entropy bound

    • Eternal inflation

    • Fluctuation generated during eternal epoch

    would collapse to form BH unobservable!

    • This bound holds for a large class of models

    of inflation

    • Does ghost inflation satisfy the bound?

    Arkani-Hamed, et.al. 2007

  • !0

    NOT SLOW ROLL

    Scale-invariant perturbationscf. tilted ghost inflation, Senatore (2004)

    r

    r

    H~ 4/1)/( MHM ~

    4/5

    M

    H~

    ~ 2M

    scaling dim of

    [compare ]Pl

    H

    M

    Similar to

    hybrid inflation but

    Arkani-Hamed, Creminelli, Mukohyama and Zaldarriaga, JHEP 0404:001,2004

    Ghost inflation

    V

  • Prediction of Large non-Gauss.

    Leading non-linear interaction

    non-G of ~H

    M

    1/4 scaling dim of op.

    1/5

    r

    r

    ~

    2

    2

    ( )

    M

    2 23 2

    2

    1 ( )

    2dtd x

    M

    [Really “0.1” ~ 10-2. VISIBLE.

    In usual inflation, non-G ~ ~ 10-5 too small.]

    5/1/ rr rr /

    fNL ~ 82 -4/5, equilateral type

    Planck 2015 constraint (equilateral type)

    fNL = -4±43 (68% CL statistical) 4/50.6 0.5

  • de Sitter entropy bound

    • Eternal inflation

    • Fluctuation generated during eternal epoch

    would collapse to form BH unobservable!

    • This bound holds for a large class of models

    of inflation

    • Does ghost inflation satisfy the bound?

    The answer appears to be “no” since Ntot can

    be arbitrarily large. Swampland?

    Arkani-Hamed, et.al. 2007

  • Lower bound on ?

    • Tiny prevents earlier inflationary modes

    from being observed.

    • Nobs ~ ln(kmax/kmin) S = /(GNH2)

    • In our universe, W=O(1) and thus the

    bound is well satisfied.

    with

    S.Jazayeri, S.Mukohyama, R.Saitou, Y.Watanabe 2016

  • Summary• Ghost condensation is the simplest Higgs

    phase of gravity.

    • The low-E EFT is determined by the symmetry breaking pattern. No ghost in the EFT.

    • Gravity is modified in IR.

    • Consistent with experiments and observations if M < 100GeV.

    • It appears easy but is actually difficult to violate

    the generalized 2nd law by ghost condensate. (Mukohyama 2009, 2010)

    • Ghost inflation predicts large non-Gaussianitythat can be tested.

    • de Sitter entropy bound appears to be violated but is actually satisfied by ghost inflation.

  • Higgs mechanism Ghost condensate

    Order

    parameter

    Instability Tachyon Ghost

    Condensate V’=0, V’’>0 P’=0, P’’>0

    Broken

    symmetry

    Gauge symmetry Time translational

    symmetry

    Force to be

    modified

    Gauge force Gravity

    New force

    law

    Yukawa type Newton+Oscillation

    2 2 2

    2( )P

    (| |)V

    Thank you

    very much!

    Arkani-Hamed, Cheng, Luty and Mukohyama 2004

  • Cosmological Page time

    • Hawking rad from BH Srad = Sent increases

    but SBH (≧ Sent) decreases semi-classical description should break down @ Page time,

    when SBH ~ half of SBH,init

    • After inflation, we expect to see O(1) deviation

    from semi-classical description @ Page time,

    when Nobs ~ Send

    • For example, if decays at a=adecay then

    S.Jazayeri, S.Mukohyama, R.Saitou, Y.Watanabe 2016