Getting Started with User-Centered Taxonomy Design Joseph A. Busch, Senior Principal
Dec 16, 2015
Getting Started with User-Centered Taxonomy Design
Joseph A. Busch, Senior Principal
Project Performance Corporation
1,300-person (325 in US) multi-
disciplinary team of scientific and
technical experts Taxonomy and metadata design experts. Systems engineers and architects. Policy and regulatory specialists. Project management professionals. Certified information technology experts. Security professionals. Behavioral change and knowledge transfer
specialists.
Commercial and non-governmental clients
3
Government clients
Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration
Who we are: Joseph Busch
• Over 25 years in the business of organized information.– Senior Principal, PPC– Founder, Taxonomy Strategies– Director, Solutions Architecture, Interwoven– VP, Infoware, Metacode Technologies – Program Manager, Getty Foundation– Manager, Pricewaterhouse
• Metadata and taxonomies community leadership.– President, American Society for Information Science & Technology– Director, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative– Founder, Networked Knowledge Organization Systems/Services
What we do
What we do
Organize Stuff
Who are you?
• Your Role– Content Manager – Editor– Information Architect– Usability Expert– Librarian– Records Manager– Knowledge Engineer– Ontologist– Chief Information Officer– Communications– Administration
• Sector– Education– Government– Research– Other
What sectors do you work in?
How do you organize your sock drawer?
Or, like this?
Like this?
Today’s agenda
9:00-9:30 30 min Introduction
9:30-9:45 15 min Roles, sectors & interests exercise
9:45-10:30 45 min Defining taxonomy
10:30-10:45 15 min Coffee Break
10:45-11:00 15 min Noun sorting exercise
11:00-12:00 60 min Justification for business taxonomy
12:00-1:00 60 min Lunch
1:00-1:15 15 min Governance exercise
1:15-2:15 60 min Planning a taxonomy project
2:15-2:45 30 min Coffee break
2:45-3:45 60 min How to get started
4:45-4:45 60 min Case study exercise
4:45-5:00 15 min Q&A, Closing
Agenda
• Defining business taxonomy• Justification for a business taxonomy• Planning a taxonomy project• How to get started• Case study• Closing
Taxonomy and metadata definitions
• Primary tools to provide structure to unstructured information.
• Depending on system design and use, may be front-end or back-end functionality.
• Taxonomy (categorization) is often actualized by applying metadata to documents.
• Enable findability.Se
arch
Brow
se
Metadata
Taxonomy and metadata definitions
• Metadata– Data about data.
• Taxonomy– The classification of organisms in an ordered system that indicates
natural relationships. – The science, laws, or principles of classification; systematics. – Division into ordered groups, categories, or hierarchies.
Examples of taxonomy used to populate metadata fields
Metadata
Title
Author
Department
Audience
Topic
Topics
Employee Services Compensation Retirement Insurance Further Education
Finance & Budget
Products & Services
Support Services Infrastructure Supplies
Metadata Values (As Taxonomy)
Audience
Internal Executives Managers
External Suppliers Customers Partners
Explaining traditional taxonomies
• Biological/Medical/Library Science Taxonomies– An overall organizational
system with many branches or sub-branches that organizes their world of information.
– Extremely rigid approach• Purely subject-oriented.• Consistent and methodical.• Every item has one and
only one correct categorization.
• “Instantive” Categorization Approach– Defined by “is a”
relationships— each child category is an instance of the parent category.
– “Pure” taxonomic approach.
Kingdom Animalia
Phylum Chordata
Class Reptilia
Order Squamata
Family Colubridae
Genus Pituophis
Species Catenifer
Defining the business taxonomy
• Categorization structure designed by and for business users– Business users as primary taggers/content contributors– Business users (or their constituents) as primary consumers
• Used for both (or either) primary or secondary categorization:– Primary: Navigation, Management– Secondary: Search, Tagging
“ When we talk about a taxonomy, we are not only talking about a website navigation scheme. Websites change frequently, we are looking at a more durable way to deal with content so that different navigation schemes can be used over time.”
– R. Daniel “Taxonomy FAQs”
Characteristics of business taxonomies
• Tend to be less rigid and constrained.
• Influenced by usability concerns– Minimize number of “clicks”
• Often content-driven– Ensure balanced content
distribution.• Allow flexibility, redundancy
– Items may be organized into multiple categories.
– May support multiple taxonomies for disparate audiences.
• May use one or more different categorization approaches.
Traditional v. business taxonomy: Side-by-side comparison
Traditional Taxonomy
• Back-end Visibility• Integration & Classification• Absolute Granularity• Ultimate Classification
Business Taxonomy
• Front-end Visibility/Navigation Structure
• Navigation & Integration/Classification
• Increased Usability• Simplicity
Example of business taxonomy
Business taxonomy problem: How to pick from > 5,000 faucets?
Refine search by:• Category• Price• Brand• Color/Finish• # Handles• Series Name• Water Filter?• Faucet Spray• Handle Shape• Soap Dispenser?
How business taxonomy translates into front-end interface
Metadata Field: Size
Taxonomy Values:4.55.566.578…
Metadata Field: Color
Taxonomy Values:BlackBlueBrownGreenGreyIvory…
Metadata Field: Type
Taxonomy Values:Athletic InspiredBootsLoafers and Slip-onsOxfords and MoreSandals
Metadata Field: Brand
Taxonomy Values:Antonio MauriziBacco BucciBen ShermanBruno Magli…
How business taxonomy translates into front-end interface…for YOUR ORGANIZATION
Metadata Field: Topic
Taxonomy Values:ManufacturingBenefitsInfrastructureQualitySafety…
Metadata Field: Locale
Taxonomy Values:North AmericaEuropeAsiaSouth America…
Metadata Field: Document Type
Taxonomy Values:FormsPoliciesProceduresReportsNews…
Metadata Field: Department
Taxonomy Values:HRSales and MarketingCommunicationsShipping…
?
Noun exercise: Most popular flickr tags
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/
Noun exercise: Facet grouping
Sort flickr categories into 5 or fewer groups. Then label each group.
Agenda
• Defining business taxonomy• Justification for a business taxonomy• Planning a taxonomy project• How to get started• Case study• Closing
Justification for business taxonomy
• Easier information management.• Flexibility to respond to changing needs.• Foundation for findability and usability.
Effectiveness of business taxonomies
• Categorize in multiple, independent, categories.
• Allow combinations of categories to narrow the choice of items.
• 4 independent categories of 10 nodes each have the same discriminatory power as one hierarchy of 10,000 nodes (104)– Easier to maintain– Easier to reusue existing
material– Can be easier to navigate, if
software supports it
42 values to maintain (10+6+11+15)
9900 combinations (10x6x11x15)
Main Ingredients
Cooking Methods
Meal Type Cuisines
• Chocolate• Dairy• Fruits• Grains• Meat &
Seafood• Nuts• Olives• Pasta• Spices &
Seasonings• Vegetables
• Breakfast• Brunch• Lunch• Supper• Dinner• Snack
• African• American• Asian• Caribbean• Continental• Eclectic/
Fusion/ International
• Jewish• Latin American• Mediterranean• Middle Eastern• Vegetarian
• Advanced• Bake• Broil• Fry• Grill• Marinade• Microwave• No Cooking• Poach• Quick• Roast• Sauté• Slow
Cooking• Steam• Stir-fry
Easier management – Greater consistency:Overall enterprise taxonomy goals for the EPA
• Provide a single methodology for categorizing information across offices, programs, and regions.
• Reduce the time it takes to successfully target and find cross-Program/Region information– Enable and enforce content linking across the agency
• Build common agency-wide terminology resources– Eliminate multiple, ambiguous taxonomies – Eliminate multiple glossaries, abbreviations and acronyms
• Group things differently depending on the context– e.g., ground water with drinking water, or ground water with water
quality• Get the right content to the right people in the right format at
the right time.
Flexibility to respond to changing needs
• Respond to innovation– New product or service launch
• Respond to disruption– The boss wants something done now
• Target / personalize content– RSS feeds– Tailored portals
• Assemble new site quickly– Unfunded mandates
Michael
Steve
Foundation for findability and usability
• For a product catalog, e.g., HomeDepot.com– Conversion rate increases
• 20% increase. Petersen– Lift in average order size.
• 20% increase. Petersen
• For knowledge workers, e.g., call center support staff– Time saved
• 36% faster than search. Chen & Dumais.
• For knowledge workers, e.g., analysts– Increase in productivity
• 25% productivity increase from not re-creating content . Taylor.• Estimated productivity loss exceeded $10M per year—about $500 per
employee per year. Nielsen.
Common categorization schemes – Strive for topical taxonomy
Hard
est E
asie
st
Method Definition Examples
Facet-based Information categorized into multiple taxonomies or “stackonomies” based on unique but pervasive characteristics including topic, function, etc.
Wines by region
France > Alsace
Wines by type
White > Chardonnay
Wines by price
Subject-oriented
Information categorized by subject or topic. Instantive - each child category is an instance of the parent category Partitive - each child category is a part of the parent category
water pollution, soil
pollution,
air pollution…
Functional Information categorized by the process to which it relates
employment, staffing, training
Organization-al
Information categorized by corporate departments or business entities.
Human Resources, Marketing, Accounting, Research…
Document Type
Information categorized by the type of document
presentations, expense reports, press releases …
Taxonomy governance self-assessment
Basic1. Is there a process in place to examine search
query logs? Yes No2. Is there an organization-wide metadata
standard, such as the “Dublin Core”, for use by search tools? Yes No
Intermediate1. Is there an ongoing data cleansing procedure
to look for any redundant, obsolete or trivial content (ROT)? Yes NoIf there is a process, describe it briefly.
2. Does the search engine index more than 4 repositories around the organization?
3. Are system features and metadata fields added based on cost/benefit analysis, or because they are easy to do with the current applications and tools? Cost/Benefit Easy
4. Are applications and tools acquired after requirements have been analyzed, or are major purchases sometimes made to use up year-end money? Requirements Year-End
5. Are there hiring and training practices for metadata and taxonomy positions? Yes NoIf there is training, describe it briefly.
Advanced1. Are there established qualitative and
quantitative measures of metadata quality? Yes NoIf there are measures, describe them briefly.
2. Can the CEO explain the return on investment (ROI) for content management, search and metadata? Yes No
Agenda
• Defining business taxonomy• Justification for a business taxonomy• Planning a taxonomy project• How to get started• Case study• Closing
Top down v. bottom up approach – We’re focusing on top down
Top down approach• Keep it broad and shallow
– 6-12 top-level categories.– 2-3 levels deep.
• Focus mainly on the primary, top-level concepts– Keep it simple (elegant)
• Be inspired by schemes that already exist and are being used– Industry standards.– Local practices.
• When appropriate, use universally applicable divisions– Business activities.
• Focus on the names of people, places, organizations and things—Save the true topics for last.
Bottom up approach• Essentially boiling the ocean.• Identify frequently occurring noun
phrases in text—thousands and thousands of them.
• Identify every possible category, and then try to sort them into meaningful groups.
• Obsess over the naming of each taxonomy node.
Primary risks and challenges
• Lack of understanding• Complexity• Compliance• Resistance to change• Delay and avoidance
Lack of understanding
• Why are we building this taxonomy– What is the business problem that we are trying to solve
• Who are the end users– Are they being involved in building the taxonomy– Observe what end users do and how they are do it
• Review query logs and web analytics• Sales conversion and order size statistics
• Business not consumer (or end user) perspective– Org chart thinking– Combining apples with oranges
• Confusing Document types and Department names with Topics
Complexity
• Perception that complexity validates your worth (knowledge)• The tendency is to make the taxonomy more complex than it
needs to be– Every possible category is described instead of just the ones needed
today.– Adding categories, but not removing any.– Focus on categories that relate to what the most important content is
about, or the most common user tasks.
Compliance
• Compliance is a key driver for taxonomy projects– eDiscovery – records management.– SOX / FDIC – transparency in corporate decision-making.– HIPPA – medical records security (and communication)
• Avoiding penalties for breaching regulations– EPA-regulated industries.– FDA-regulated products (food and drugs)– USDA-approved labels.– CMS quality improvements.
• Following required procedures.– Insurance claims.– Telecommunication service rates.– Customer support and complaints.
Resistance to change
AwarenessAwareness
DesireDesire
KnowledgeKnowledgeAbilityAbility
Reinforce-ment
Reinforce-ment
Lack of:Lack of:
Delay and avoidance
! Not invented here – We’ve been working on our taxonomy for the past 5 years.
\ Inertia – We’ve always done it this way.$ Unfunded mandate – We don’t have the resources to do this.X Insubordination – I don’t want to do this.
What do you need to get started?
• Understand your Audience.• Understand your Publishers/
Content Managers.• Understand your Technology
platform.• Understand your Content.
– How much content.– How it is tagged.
• Understand the Scope of the project.
Taxonomy design projects seldom do (and never should) exist in a vacuum. Unless the project managers and designers recognize and adapt to the project constraints, the project is doomed to failure or obscurity.
Understand your audience
• End users drive the language and complexity of the structure.– Who are they?– Who is the lowest common denominator?– Define the “spectrum of experience:
New Employee Tenured Employee
Technophobe
Young Old
Native Speaker Foreign Language
Technophile
Understand your publishers
• Publisher determine the reasonable complexity of a taxonomy/metadata strategy:– Acceptable amount of time per document– Number of metadata fields– Complexity of taxonomy
Business Users Information Professional
Part-time (Volunteer) Dedicated Position
Few Publishers Many Publishers
Diverse Publisher Homogenous Publishers
Understand your platform: CM, DM, RM, Portal, Enterprise
• Taxonomy design seldom works outside the context of a business mission, typically tied to a technology:
Web Content ManagementPortal Document Management
Records Management
Looser TighterLess Complex More Complex
Understand your content: How much?
• More content typically equals more time to re-tag with new taxonomy and metadata design
• Explore iterative approaches to re-tagging• Take advantage of effort to clean out old or obsolete content• Consider alternatives:
– Auto-categorization tools– Tagging services
Understand your content: How is it tagged?
• Typically, content does not have “salvageable” metadata– Metadata mappings often don’t work.– But working with existing metadata can provide quick wins.
• Be willing to reduce fields to improve quality.• Use business rules to automate content tagging.
– Tag top-level content first• Tag landing pages for major sections• Lower-level pages inherit tags from top-level pages
– If content originated in this department, then tag it with pre-defined values.
Understand your limitations
• Many, if not most taxonomy project fit within the context of a large project and are driven by artificial limitations: – Schedule– Budget– Personnel
Relax: you’re not alone. Few taxonomy design project are perfectly resources and funded. The most important thing is to START the process. Recognize you can make due with given resources as long as you begin the process correctly and build from there.
Define your use cases
• Understand how/why you will be using taxonomy and metadata.• Define who your content managers are in order to understand
their capabilities:– Willingness to manually enter fields.– Ability to properly tag content.
• Define your audience to understand their needs:– Sorting needs.
• Communicate benefits to all users
Key components to a successful taxonomy project: Project best practices
• Incremental, extensible process that identifies and enables users, and engages stakeholders.
• Keep your audience in mind.• Strive for subject-based categorization.• Be consistent.• Control depth and breadth.• Make a long-term investment.• A means to an end, and not the end in itself .• Not perfect, but it does the job it is supposed to do—such as
improving search and navigation. • Improved over time, and maintained.
Common roles and responsibilities: Committees
• Governance Board – Review overall strategy of taxonomy and define the type of appropriate content.
• Taxonomy Team – Approve requests for new folders and ensure the value of content placement and metadata.
• Content Managers – Approve and edit content.• Content Owners – Publish content and apply metadata.
GroupPublish Content
Edit/Move Content
Approve Content
Request Content or
FoldersCreate/Edit
Folders
Taxonomy Team ● ●
Content Managers ● ● ● ●
Content Owners ● ●
Iterative design plan
Identify business
case
Identify business
case
PlanningPlanning
DiscoveryDiscovery
Form taxonomy
team
Form taxonomy
team
Form focus group
Form focus group
Build taxonomy
Build taxonomy
Maintain & evolve
Maintain & evolve
Testing & review
Testing & review
Tag content
Tag content
Communications, education and marketing
• Give users the ability to learn about the taxonomy by a range of means:– One-on-one meetings– Live presentations/ Workshops– Documentation– Animated Tutorials– Context Sensitive Help– White Papers
• Create two-way communications and prove it means something – Document decisions and archive all input.– Make all feedback available to end users.– Provide means of communication via the system.
• Market the value of the taxonomy and effective metadata use – mandates will not be sufficient.
Define governance
• Apply the core governance principles to your taxonomy and metadata strategy:– Roles and Responsibilities –
• Managers• Reviewers
– Policies – • For naming• Required Fields
– Procedures – • For reviewing and approving metadata placement• For acting on poor metadata application
End user focus
• Recognize that users may think about and look for information in different ways
• Understand your business practices and use the most appropriate categorization method(s)
• Consider multiple taxonomies for disparate audiences• Use familiar vocabulary and organizational schemas to ensure a
logical browsing experience.
Leverage existing metrics: Passive and active
• Active (Survey/Interviews)– Perform online and in-person interviews– Provide feedback mechanisms on every screen– Conduct pre- and post-rollout surveys
• Passive (Usage Monitoring)– Identify components that are not being used in order to address
improvements– Alert administrators to empty folders, too many documents, or a
proliferation of other components– Identify most popular components in order to learn from them– Identify the terms users are searching for and the folders in which they
are browsing to provide similar content– Identify inactive users to address their issues
Agenda
• Defining business taxonomy• Justification for a business taxonomy• Planning a taxonomy project• How to get started• Case study• Closing
The workshop concept
• A working session that includes – Problem-solving, and– Hands-on activities
To involve participants in a accomplishing practical task.
Recommended workshop configuration: FDA Taxonomy Committee Selection Criteria
• Represent internal business functional areas – IT (CIO, Web Operations, Systems Administration, Application Development,
etc.) – Communications and Public Affairs.– Administration (HR, Financial Management, etc.)
• Represent program areas– Biologics, Devices, Radiological Health, Drugs, Food Safety, Nutrition,
Veterinary Medicine and Toxicology.– Regional offices, Regulatory Affairs and Office of the Commissioner.
• Have information management responsibility related to any or many phases of the content lifecycle– Planning Creation Management Publication Archiving.
• Be of a manageable size – a minimum of 6 and maximum of 12 members.
Primary goals
• Surface business value of taxonomy.• Involve taxonomy stakeholders and end users.• Discover high-level taxonomy that can be modified and extended
over time.
Sample agenda
9:00-10:00 Introductions and project overview.
10:00-11:15 Exercise 1: Information seeking use case exercise and discussion.
11:15-11:30 Break
11:30-12:45 Exercise 2: Identify and agree on intranet audiences.
12:45-1:30 Lunch
1:30-2:45 Exercise 3: identify and group tasks (what you do and what other people want to do on the intranet)
2:45-3:00 Break
3:45-4:30 Exercise 4: Identify and group topics.
4:30-5:00 Summarize and discuss next steps.
Exercise 1: Define value statementEPA Success measures – Usage metrics
• Reduce FOIA requests/costs.• Expand use to include different types of people (new audiences)• Improve customer satisfaction survey results
– Score higher on American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) government-wide survey.
• Improve OMB Performance and Accountability Reports (PARS) – Show cause and effect especially between regulation & measured
outcome, e.g, arsenic removed from water and health.– Provide more visibility for research pages.
• Reduce cost per unique user (UU) – Increase Webstats (page hits)
• Increase number of successful website searches.
Exercise 2: Define audience types anddifferentiators
• “I should get the official stance of the organization on an issue … not a bunch of items dated from around the same time.”
• Our 1.3 million realtor members are not technically savvy.
• [On current website, it's] “hard for the user to really get a grasp of what's going on.”– e.g., Joe Realtor trying to
find information about diversity.
• Aggregation (2d level pages) mostly reflect the org chart.
Audiences
Association ExecutivesPolicy MakersConsumersLawyers & Legal CounselMediaNAR MembersNAR StaffNAR Leadership
Geographic Areas
Property Types
Business Activities
Differentiators
Exercise 2: Define audience types anddifferentiators
Differentiators• Audience Situation: Audience
situation(s) to whom the conference is relevant.
• Perspective: Overall tone of the content – emotional, clinical or practical.
• Clinical Characteristics: Specific cancer type(s) or other clinical characteristics discussed during the conference, or relevant to the conference.
Audiences
Multiple AudiencesPatientsFamily & FriendsPress & PublicClinicians & ProvidersWorried Well
Situation
Perspective
Differentiators
Clinical Characteristics
Exercise 3: Define verbs – What people want to do – NASA Taxonomy use case domains
• Project Manager– “I’d like to see all documents at a certain level in the WBS.” E.g., All planning
docs relating to project management.• Scientist
– “I’d like to see what types of data were returned on earlier missions using a particular instrument to help with the Science Definition Goals of my new proposal.”
• Cognizant Engineer– “I’d like to see all problem failure reports on a sub-system I designed and flew
5 years ago so I can incorporate the lessons learned into my current mission.”• Project Information Management Engineer
– “I’d like to see the status of all Phase B documents that I need to prep for an upcoming CDR gate review so I know we’re ready.”
• Operations Engineer– “The space craft is experiencing some behavior anomalies. I’d like to look at all
quality control records and test results relating to the specific sub-system that’s producing errors, so we can figure out how to fix the system and continue the mission.”
Exercise 4: Define nouns/topics
Absolute Auctions • ADA • Advocacy • Agency Disclosure • Americans with Disabilities Act • Appraisal • Auctions • Benefits • Benefits • Blackberry • Branding • Brokerage Management • Brownfields • Business Activity • Business Issues • Business Lifecycle • Buying • Closing • Commercial Finance • Commercial Green Buildings • Commercial Real estate • Commercial Research • Compliance • Computer Software • Computers • Consumer Surveys • Conventional Residential Lending • Customer Follow-Up • Development Impact Fees • Digital Cameras • Digital Photography • Diversity • Downzoning • Economic Forecasts • Economic Indicators • Environment • Environmental Issues • Errors & Omissions Insurance • Ethics • Fair Housing • Farm Land • Governance • Government Affairs • Green Roofs • Ground Leases • Ground Leases • Growth Management • Health • Hiring • History • Hotel / Motel Properties • Housing Statistics • Human Resources • Human Resources • Inclusionary Zoning • Industry Surveys • Insurance • Insurance Availability • International Real Estate • International Research • Issues • Keeping Customers • Land • Lead-Based Paint • Leadership • Legal • Legislative Affairs • Liability • License Laws • Listing • Lobbying • Low-Income Housing Tax Credits • Luxury Homes • Marketing a Brokerage • Membership • Military Base Closings • Minimum Bid Auctions • Mold & Health Issues • Multi-Family Properties • NAR Membership • Negotiating • Networking Computers • New Homes • Office Properties • Offices • Online Auctions • PDA • Personal Marketing • Property Marketing • Property Types • Property Values • Prospecting • Real Estate Transfer Taxes • Recruitment • Remote Access • Representation • Research & Analysis • Reserve Auctions • Residential Real Estate • Resorts • Retail Properties • Retaining Customers • Retaining Top Personnel • Retention • Risk Management • Sales Meetings • Second Homes • Selling • Smart Growth • Smart Growth • Stigmatized Homes • Tax Issues • Taxes • Technology • Underground Storage Tanks • Water Rights • Website Development • Wireless Access • Workplace Trends • Zoning • Zoning Laws • Zoning Ordinances
Find commonalities
• Advocacy & Lobby– Business Issues • Commercial Finance • Conventional Residential Lending • Diversity • Environmental
Issues • Fair Housing • License Laws • Smart Growth • Tax Issues• Brokerage Management
– Human Resources & Benefits • Leadership • Marketing a Brokerage • Offices & Facilities • Recruitment & Hiring • Retaining Top Personnel • Risk Management • Sales Meetings • Workplace Trends
• Business Activity & Lifecycle– Appraisal & Property Values • Auctions • Buying • Representation • Selling
• Legal & Liability Topics– Agency Disclosure • Compliance • Health & Environment • Insurance • Taxes • Zoning & Land
• NAR & Membership– Branding • Ethics • Governance • History • Membership
• Property Types– Commercial • International • Land • Residential • Resorts & Second Homes
• Research & Analysis– Commercial Research • Consumer Surveys • Economic Indicators & Forecasts • Housing Statistics •
Industry Surveys • International Research• Technology
– Website Development • Computer & Networking Hardware • Computer Software • Cameras & Photography • Wireless & Remote Access
Identify non-topical terms for additional metadata fields
• Content types– Listserv • Magazine • News Service Report • Newsletter • Research
Publication • Statistics
• Organizations– Affiliates • Association Executives • Board • Business Specialties • Committees
• Communications Division • Executive Offices • Government Affairs Division • Legal Affairs Division • Marketing & Business Development Division • Research Division
• Geographic Areas– Countries • NAR Regions • SMSAs • States
• Audiences– Association Executives • Policy Makers • Consumers • Lawyers & Legal Staff •
Media • NAR Members • NAR Staff • NAR Leaders
Agenda
• Defining business taxonomy• Justification for a business taxonomy• Planning a taxonomy project• How to get started• Case study• Closing
Overall project objectives
• Establish and review high-level requirements for SAMHSA clearinghouses product tagging, web presentation and search.
• Define appropriate metadata structure and controlled vocabularies to: – Provide unified access to NCADI and NMHIC product catalogs.– Consider application to other SAMHSA web content .– Align scheme with other relevant HHS and private resources.
• Develop taxonomy editorial rules, usage guide and change management recommendations.
• Prepare task-based scripts for testing usability of the taxonomy to effectively search for and navigate unified product catalog.
SAMHSA Health Information Network home page (http://www.samhsa.gov/shin/moreaboutshin.aspx)
National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information - NCADI Home Page
(http://ncadi.samhsa.gov/)
National Mental Health Information Center – NMHIC Home Page
(http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/)
National Institute of Mental Health – NIMH: Mental Health Disorders
(http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/the-numbers-count-mental-disorders-in-america.shtml)
ICD 10 Chapter V (http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/)
• Mental and behavioural disorders (F00-F99 )F00-F09 Organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders F10-F19 Mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use F20-F29 Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders F30-F39 Mood (affective) disorders F40-F48 Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders F50-F59 Behavioural syndromes associated with physiological disturbances and
physical factors F60-F69 Disorders of adult personality and behaviour F70-F79 Mental retardation F80-F89 Disorders of psychological development F90-F98 Behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in
childhood and adolescence F99 Unspecified mental disorder
High-level taxonomy: Facets & query log terms
Sort terms from the SAMHSA query
logs into buckets, and then label
them.
High-level taxonomy: User groups, questions and tasks
User Groups Questions or Tasks
Based on the SAMHSA Program Review and Needs Sensing reports executive summaries, list 5 user groups who are likely to use the SAMHSA clearinghouses. Then list the questions they are likely to want to answer, or tasks that they want to accomplish.
Agenda
• Defining business taxonomy• Justification for a business taxonomy• Planning a taxonomy project• How to get started• Case study• Closing
Rinse and repeat
The taxonomy should be built in an iterative fashion, with more content and broader review for each iteration.
Review of total methodology
• Know the ROI case – what is the benefit you want and what can you afford in the way of tagging, software, and other expenses.
• Know the content to be categorized and the people who will use it. Have an idea of the UI they will use to access the content.
• Get the team together.• Go through the process, in an iterative manner.
The 9 steps to successful taxonomy design
Identify business
case
Identify business
case
PlanningPlanning
DiscoveryDiscovery
Form taxonomy
team
Form taxonomy
team
Form focus group
Form focus group
Build taxonomy
Build taxonomy
Maintain & evolve
Maintain & evolve
Testing & review
Testing & review
Tag content
Tag content