Top Banner
Geriatric Comanagement . Armin Shahrokni, MD, MPH [email protected] Oct 2021 Of Older Patients with Cancer, MSKCC Experience
36

Geriatric Comanagement

Nov 18, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Geriatric Comanagement

Geriatric Comanagement

.

Armin Shahrokni, MD, MPH

[email protected]

Oct 2021

Of Older Patients with Cancer, MSKCC Experience

Page 2: Geriatric Comanagement

Disclosure• I have nothing to disclose.

Page 3: Geriatric Comanagement

About Me

• Joined MSKCC in 2013 after completing a geriatric oncology fellowship

at UCLA.

• Have both oncology and geriatric clinics.

• Attend both disease management team and geriatrics service

meetings.

• In the geriatric clinic, mainly perform preoperative evaluation on

patients aged 75+.

• Currently our Geriatric Service has 5MDs, 3NPs, 4RNs, pharmacist,

social worker, nutritionist.

Page 4: Geriatric Comanagement

Outline

✓ My MSKCC Problem

✓ My (our) 7-year Journey to Solve the Problem

Page 5: Geriatric Comanagement

Fascination with Age

Page 6: Geriatric Comanagement
Page 7: Geriatric Comanagement

Limitations of focusing on just AGE

Page 8: Geriatric Comanagement
Page 9: Geriatric Comanagement
Page 10: Geriatric Comanagement

Differentiating between these Octogenarians

Page 11: Geriatric Comanagement

The Gray Zone

Page 12: Geriatric Comanagement

A Very Simple Formula

Negative Cancer/Tx Outcome Frail Body Stress of X

Where X could be Cancer Cancer surgeryOther cancer treatment Or other stressors

Page 13: Geriatric Comanagement

The Concept of Frailty

Page 14: Geriatric Comanagement

When frailty differs among patients, same level of stress produces different outcomes.

Page 15: Geriatric Comanagement

Our MSKCC Problem

• Geriatric Assessment was mainly performed on paper and the data

was mostly wasted.

• We were UNABLE TO

➢ compare one patient’s fitness with the other patient easily

➢ retrieve or collect the data easily.

➢ communicate with other colleagues in a data-driven environment.

➢ explain/show the importance of our work.

• Every medical personnel had its own interpretation of frailty, making it

very difficult to understand what they mean by frailty.

Page 16: Geriatric Comanagement

Solution: Electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment

A web-based Geriatric Assessment

Missions

To allow physicians to have a more comprehensive overview of fitness of

older patients with cancer

To be patient-centered.

To have the capability of capturing data in a way that is useful for practice

and valuable for research at the same time.

To be supportive of patient care and not disruptive.

Page 17: Geriatric Comanagement

Electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment

• Validated questionnaires for each geriatric

assessment domain

Patients/caregivers able to complete the eRFA

• At home (if they have email access)

• In the clinic waiting area using a tablet or laptop

• In the exam room using a desktop

Page 18: Geriatric Comanagement

Functional Status

Cognition

Social Support

Social Activity

Interference

Nutrition status

Polypharmacy

Sensory Deficit

Emotional status

KPS ADL IADL TUG Falls history Use of assistive

devices

Mini-Cog

4-item MOS-SSS

MOS-SAS

VisionHearing

DT GDS- 4 item

eRFA Domains and Items

Page 19: Geriatric Comanagement

How is eRFA administered?

Database For future analysis Final reportFor healthcare providers

Geriatric RNs perform the Mini-Cog and the Timed Get Up & Go test and enter the result

into eRFA

Page 20: Geriatric Comanagement

eRFA Final Report: Quantifying Frailty

Page 21: Geriatric Comanagement

eRFA: Feasible

Page 22: Geriatric Comanagement

eRFA Score and Postoperative Mortality

Page 23: Geriatric Comanagement

Each additional impairment adds 14% to the risk of dying

within 6 months after surgery

Page 24: Geriatric Comanagement

Development of

MSK-Frailty Index (MSK-FI)

eRFA and Perioperative Care Process

Page 25: Geriatric Comanagement

Preoperative Distress: 72%

Poor Social Support: 56%

likelihood of receipt of

postoperative mental health care

services

Page 26: Geriatric Comanagement
Page 27: Geriatric Comanagement
Page 28: Geriatric Comanagement

The Geriatric Comanagement

Preoperative Care

Perform Geriatric Assessment and do the necessary interventions to optimize the status

Educate patients and caregivers

Use of incentive spirometry in the postoperative period

Importance of exercise before surgery

Postoperative delirium and preventive measures

Importance of proper pain management in the perioperative period.

Page 29: Geriatric Comanagement

Inpatient Postoperative Care

Implement delirium risk reduction interventions

Assist with the pain management

Reinforce the use of incentive spirometry

Assist with functional recovery

Educate patient and family about the importance of early mobility

Request physical therapy consultation

Assist the surgical team with safe hospital discharge planning

The Geriatric Comanagement

Page 30: Geriatric Comanagement

Shahrokni @MSK_GeriOnc

Aims of the Study

Primary aim:

To assess the association between Geriatric Comanagement

and 90 day postoperative mortality

Secondary aims:

To assess the association between Geriatric Comanagement

and Inpatient Supportive Care Utilization.

Page 31: Geriatric Comanagement

Patient Population

- Age 75 or older

- Seen by a surgery service as a new visit from 2015-18.

- Proceeded with surgery within the first two months of that

visit.

- Hospital Length of Stay of ≥1 day.

- Cohort is divided into Geriatric Comanagement and Surgery

cohorts

Page 32: Geriatric Comanagement
Page 33: Geriatric Comanagement
Page 34: Geriatric Comanagement
Page 35: Geriatric Comanagement

Conclusion

➢ Every Cancer Center is facing or will face the Memorial

Problem; The Ever-Growing Problem of Frailty.

➢ The solution would be a mixture of data, geriatric

expertise, and multidisciplinary collaboration.

➢ It requires adequate human resource, constant education

and training to promote the value of geriatric oncology,

collecting data, presenting the data in various local and

non-local venues, and building teams and partnering with

other services.

Page 36: Geriatric Comanagement

Thanks to the Members of the Team