Georgia: LG Monitoring and Project Impact Evaluation Washington DC, 23 March, 2015 David Labadze – LG Monitoring Expert David Egiashvili – LGAF Country Coordinator Denys Nizalov – Land Monitoring Coordinator, Kyiv School of Economics Kateryna Chmelova – Data Analyst 1
35
Embed
Georgia: LG Monitoring and Project Impact Evaluation Washington DC, 23 March, 2015 David Labadze – LG Monitoring Expert David Egiashvili – LGAF Country.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Georgia: LG Monitoring andProject Impact
Evaluation
Washington DC, 23 March, 2015
David Labadze – LG Monitoring Expert
David Egiashvili – LGAF Country Coordinator
Denys Nizalov – Land Monitoring Coordinator, Kyiv School of Economics
Kateryna Chmelova – Data Analyst
2
Background for Land Governance Monitoring
• LGAF – 2011;
• LGAF Update 2012;
• Pilot implementation of Land Governance Monitoring System – 2013;
• Retrospective monitoring of Land Governance – 2011-2014;
• Land Governance Monitoring System – 2013;
3
Monitoring Indicators
A. Number (and prices where possible) of registered transactions of different types – (2011-2014);
B. Receipts of land tax revenue – (2011-2014);C. Share of communal, private, and state land mapped – (2013);D. Cases of expropriation and privatization – (2013);E. Number of land-related conflicts in the courts – (2011-2014);F. Share of agricultural/residential land registered and mapped in
women’s/men’s name or in joint ownership – (2011-2014);
Note: Pilot Implementation (2013); Retrospective update (2011-2014)
4
Data Sources
Note: Pilot Implementation (2013); Retrospective update (2011-2014)
National Agency of Public RegistryLand Inventory (2006)Land Cadaster (31.12.2014)Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property (2011- 2014)
Court (from District Level) (2011-2014);Neighbor disputesImmovable property ownershipLease, agricultural land leaseMortgageInheritance-related disputes, etc.
Revenue Service (2011- 2014) Land and real estate tax revenues by municipalities
Road Department (Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Development) (2013);
5
Group A. Number and prices of registered transactions
6
* 2012 is adjusted for number of transactions of ownership registration of agricultural land connected with the reform of 2012 (472,446 transactions )
Indicator A.Number of Land and Real Estate Transactions
Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property (2011- 2014)
Group F. Share of agricultural/residential land registered and mapped in women’s and men’s name and in joint propertyIn progress:
• NAPR has linked the Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property and CRA DB’s and imported the gender information.
Indicator F.
29
Agricultural Land Parcels by Owners
2011 2012 2013 20140
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
female male organizations
Indicator F.
30
Residential Land Parcels by Owners
2011 2012 2013 20140
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
female male org
Indicator F.
32
Stakeholders Workshops
TbilisiWorld Bank Regional Office
33
A. Number (and prices where possible) of registered transactions of different types;
B. Receipts of land tax revenue;C. Share of communal, private, and state land mapped;D. Cases of expropriation and privatization;E. Number of land-related conflicts in the courts;F. Share of agricultural/residential land registered and mapped in
women’s/men’s name or in joint ownership;
Monitoring Indicators for Sakrebulo Level
34
Project Impact Evaluation
• Retrospective monitoring of pilot sakrebulos;• Retrospective monitoring of neighbor sakrebulos (raions);• Quarterly monitoring sakrebulos during and after project
implementation;
• Comparative analysis for project impact evaluation;
35
Next Steps
• Better engagement of Stakeholders and providers of information;• Involving decision makers;• Start Project Impact Evaluation;• Development of analytical and dissemination of results;• Short and long term development of monitoring system;