Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan Axions G. Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Mü Motivation, Cosmological Role and Experimental Searches Axions IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo
54
Embed
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan Axions Georg G. Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
AxionsAxionsGeorg G. Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, MünchenGeorg G. Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München
AxionsAxionsIPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, TokyoIPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Axion Physics in a Nut Shell
CP conservation in QCD byPeccei-Quinn mechanism
For fa ≫ f axions are “invisible”
and very light
Axions a ~ 0
mf mafa
a
Particle-Physics Motivation
Axions thermally produced in stars, e.g. by Primakoff production
• Limits from avoiding excessive energy drain• Solar axion searches (CAST, Sumico)
a
Solar and Stellar Axions
In spite of small mass, axions are bornIn spite of small mass, axions are born non-relativisticallynon-relativistically (non-thermal relics)(non-thermal relics)
Cold dark matterCold dark matter candidate candidate
mmaa ~ ~ eV or even smallereV or even smaller
CosmologyCosmology Search for Axion Dark Matter
S
Na
Bext
Microwave resonator (1 GHz = 4 eV)
Primakoffconversion
ADMX (Livermore) New CARRACK (Kyoto)
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
CP Violation in Particle Physics
Discrete symmetries in particle physics
C - Charge conjugation, transforms particles to antiparticles violated by weak interactions
P - Parity, changes left-handedness to right-handedness violated by weak interactions
T - Time reversal, changes direction of motion (forward to backward)
CPT - exactly conserved in quantum field theories
CP – conserved by all gauge interactions violated by three-flavor quark mixing matrix
M. KobayashiM. KobayashiT. MaskawaT. Maskawa
Physics Nobel Prize 2008
All known CP-violating effects derive froma single phase in the quark mass matrix(Kobayashi-Maskawa phase), i.e. from complex Yukawa couplings
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) Matrix
.c.hWV dLCKMuL2g
Quark interaction with W boson(charged-current electroweak interaction)
Unitary Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrixrelates mass eigenstatesto weak interaction eigenstates
t,c,uu )b,s,d(d
tbtstd
cbcscd
ubusud
CKMVVV
VVV
VVV
V
VCKM depends on three mixing angles and one phase ,explaining all observed CP-violation
Precision tests use “unitarity triangles” consisting of products of measuredcomponents of VCKM, for example:
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Measurements of CKM Unitarity Triangle
CKMfitter Grouphttp://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr
UTfit Collaborationhttp://www.utfit.org
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Kobayashi and Maskawa
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Experimental limits: Why so small?
The CP Problem of Strong Interactions
aas
aa41
qi
qq
qQCD G~G8
GGemiDL q
aas
aa41
qi
qq
qQCD G~G8
GGemiDL q
Realquarkmass
Phase fromYukawa coupling
CP-oddquantity ~EB
Angularvariable
//
G~G8
)Mdetarg(GG)miD(L sq4
1qq
qqQCD
G~G
8)Mdetarg(GG)miD(L s
q41
qqq
qQCD
Remove phase of mass term by chiral phase transformation of quark fields
q2i
qq5e
q2i
qq5e
• can be traded between quark phases and term• Induces a large neutron electric dipole moment (a T-violating quantity)
1010 1010
//
G~G
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Neutron Electric Dipole Moment
Violates time reversal (T) andspace reflection (P) symmetries
Experimental limit
|d| < 0.63 10 e cm
Natural scale
e/2mN = 1.06 10 e cm
Limit on coefficient
11mm
10N
q 11mm
10N
q ≲≲
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Supernova 1987A Energy-Loss Argument
NeutrinoNeutrinospheresphere
Neutrino diffusion
Late-time signal most sensitive observableLate-time signal most sensitive observable
Emission of very weakly interactingEmission of very weakly interactingparticles would “steal” energy from theparticles would “steal” energy from theneutrino burst and shorten it.neutrino burst and shorten it.(Early neutrino burst powered by accretion,(Early neutrino burst powered by accretion, not sensitive to volume energy loss.)not sensitive to volume energy loss.)
Volume emissionVolume emission of novel particlesof novel particles
SN 1987A neutrino signal
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
• New U(1) symmetry, spontaneously broken at a large scale fa
• Axion is “phase” of new Higgs field: angular variable a(x)/fa
• By construction couples to GG term with strength s/8 e.g. triangle loop with new heavy quark (KSVZ model)
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Creation of Cosmological Axions
T ~ fa (very early universe)• UPQ(1) spontaneously broken
• Higgs field settles in “Mexican hat”• Axion field sits fixed at
a1 = 1 fa
a
V(a)
a
V(a)
=0_
T ~ 1 GeV (H ~ 109 eV)• Axion mass turns on quickly by thermal instanton gas• Field starts oscillating when
ma ≳ 3H
• Classical field oscillations (axions at rest)• Axion number density in comoving volume conserved
• Axion mass density today:
2a
21
311
31
211a
3a fRH3~Ra)T(mRn 2
a21
311
31
211a
3a fRH3~Ra)T(mRn
a
2221
a
2a
2a2
12aa
21aaa m
fmm
fmfmnm
a
2221
a
2a
2a2
12aa
21aaa m
fmm
fmfmnm
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Axion Cosmology in PLB 120 (1983)
Page 127
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Axion Cosmology in PLB 120 (1983)
Page 133
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Axion Cosmology in PLB 120 (1983)
Page 137
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Killing Two Birds with One Stone
Peccei-Quinn mechanismPeccei-Quinn mechanism• Solves strong CP problemSolves strong CP problem• May provide dark matterMay provide dark matter in the form of axionsin the form of axions
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Cosmic Axion Density
184.1
a
2i
184.1
12a2
i2
a meV10
105.0GeV10
f195.0h
184.1
a
2i
184.1
12a2
i2
a meV10
105.0GeV10
f195.0h
Modern values for QCD parameters and temperature-dependent axion massimply (Bae, Huh & Kim, arXiv:0806.0497)
If axions provide the cold dark matter: ah2 0.11
592.0a
592.0
a
12
i eV10m
0.1f
GeV1075.0
592.0a
592.0
a
12
i eV10m
0.1f
GeV1075.0
• i ~ 1 implies fa ~ 1012 GeV and ma ~ 10 eV
(“classic window”)
• fa ~ 1016 GeV (GUT scale) or larger (string inspired) requires i ≲ 0.003
(“anthropic window”)
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Lee-Weinberg Curve for Neutrinos and Axions
log(a)
log(ma)
M
10 eV 10 eV
CDM
HDM
Axions Thermal RelicsNon-Thermal
Relics
log()
log(m)
M
10 eV
CDM
HDM
10 GeV
Neutrinos& WIMPs
Thermal Relics
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Axion Hot Dark Matter Limits from Precision Data
ma < 1.0 eV (95% CL)
ma < 0.4 eV (95% CL)
WMAP-5, LSS, BAO, SNIa
WMAP-3, small-scale CMB,HST, BBN, LSS, Ly-
Hannestad, Mirizzi, Raffelt& Wong [arXiv:0803.1585]
Melchiorri, Mena & Slosar[arXiv:0705.2695]
Marginalizing over unknown neutrino hot dark matter component
Credible regions for neutrino plus axion hotdark matter (WMAP-5, LSS, BAO, SNIa)Hannestad, Mirizzi, Raffelt & Wong[arXiv:0803.1585]
95%68%
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Cold Axion Populations
Case 2:Reheating restores PQ symmetry
• Cosmic strings of broken UPQ(1) form by Kibble mechanism• Radiate long-wavelength axions
• a independent of initial conditions
• N = 1 or else domain wall problem
Inhomogeneities of axion field large,self-couplings lead to formation of mini-clustersTypical properties• Mass ~ 1012 Msun
• Radius ~ 1010 cm• Mass fraction up to several 10%
Case 1:Inflation after PQ symmetry breaking
Homogeneous mode oscillates after T ≲ QCD
Dependence on initial misalignmentangle 2
ia 2ia
• Isocurvature fluctuations from large quantum fluctuations of massless axion field created during inflation• Strong CMB bounds on isocurvature fluctuations• Scale of inflation required to be small
Dark matter density a cosmic randomnumber (“environmental parameter”)
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Strings form by Kibble mechanism after break-down of UPQ(1)
Small loops form by self-intersection
Axions from Cosmic Strings
Paul Shellard
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Inflation, Axions, and Anthropic Selection
If PQ symmetry is not restored after inflation
• Axion density determined by initial random number < i <
• Different in different patches of the universe• Our visible universe, after inflation, from a single patch• Axion/photon ratio a cosmic random number, chosen by spontaneous symmetry breaking process
Allows for small i ≲ 0.003 and thus for fa at GUT or string scale
• Is this “unlikely” or “unnatural” or “fine tuning”?• Should one design experiments for very small-mass axion dark matter?
Difficult to form baryonic structures if baryon/dark matter density too low,
posterior probability for small i not necessarily small
• Linde, “Inflation and axion cosmology,” PLB 201:437, 1988• Tegmark, Aguirre, Rees & Wilczek, “Dimensionless constants, cosmology and other dark matters,” PRD 73:023505, 2006 [astro-ph/0511774]
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Posterior Dark Matter Probability Distribution
Tegmark, Aguirre, Rees & Wilczek,“Dimensionless constants, cosmology and other dark matters,”
PRD 73:023505, 2006 [astro-ph/0511774]
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Creation of Adiabatic vs. Isocurvature Perturbations
Inflaton field: Axion field:
Slow roll
Reheating
De Sitter expansion imprintsscale invariant fluctuations
Inflaton decay matter & radiationFluctuations in both (adiabatic)
De Sitterexpansionimprintsscale invariantfluctuations
Inflaton decay radiationAxion field oscillates late matterFluctuations of matter relative toradiation: Entropy fluctuations
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Amplitudes of Adiabatic and Isocurvature Perturbations
2
22
)k(S
2
22
)k(S
1n
02Pl
22
ad
kk
M
H~)k(R
I
1n
02Pl
22
ad
kk
M
H~)k(R
I
1n
022a
2
222
iso
ikk
f
H~~)k(S
I1n
022a
2
222
iso
ikk
f
H~~)k(S
I
Entropy fluctuations induced by de Sitter expansion on axion field
Isocurvature power spectrum, assuming Gaussian fluctuations
(niso = 1 2, slow-roll parameter )
Usual curvature power spectrum
Total power spectrumuncorrelated sum
22 )k(S)k(R)k(P 22 )k(S)k(R)k(P
Isocurvature fraction
at pivot scale k0 0.002 Mpc22
a2
S
2
kk
22
2
i0
fA
H~
)k(S)k(R
)k(S
I22
a2
S
2
kk
22
2
i0
fA
H~
)k(S)k(R
)k(S
I
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Sky map of CMBR temperaturefluctuations
T
T,T,
TT,T
,
Power Spectrum of CMB Temperature Fluctuations
Multipole expansion
,Ya, m
0 mm
,Ya, m
0 mm
Angular power spectrum
mmmmm aa
121
aaC
mmmmm aa
121
aaC
Acoustic Peaks
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Axion correlations Karl van BibberKarl van Bibberat IDM 2008 at IDM 2008
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Fine Structure in Axion Spectrum
• Axion distribution on a 3-dim sheet in 6-dim phase space• Is “folded up” by galaxy formation• Velocity distribution shows narrow peaks that can be resolved• More detectable information than local dark matter density
P.Sikivie& collaborators
Georg Raffelt, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany IPMU Colloquium, 10 June 2009, Tokyo, Japan
Summary
Peccei-Quinn dynamical CP symmetry restorationis better motivated than ever
Provides well-motivated cold dark matter candidatein the form of axions
Realistic full-scale search in “classic window” (ma ~ 1100 eV)
is finally beginning (ADMX and New CARRACK)
Isocurvature fluctuations could still show up (Planck, future CVL probe)
Experimental approach in “anthropic window” (ma ≲ neV)