Top Banner
Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics
42

Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Geopolitical perspectiveson war and peace (3):

Critical GeopoliticsCounter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq

GEOG 220 – Geopolitics

Page 2: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Why did a majority of Americansinitially supported the war in Iraq?

Page 3: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Framing ‘Iraq’

Page 4: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Framing

=> Selective representation

• Policy framing: selected words, images, descriptions => limited policy options

• Mass media framing: biased depictions => limited public debate

Page 5: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Geopolitical framingObjective: using the trauma of 9/11 to justify Iraq invasion and consolidate ‘US security and credibility’

Iraq as terror threat

Iraq as theatre of war

Iraq as liberated population

Page 6: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Iraq as terror threat => American determination

Page 7: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

IRAQ = ‘SADDAM’ + WEAPONS + TERRORISTS

Page 8: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.
Page 9: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Gaining ‘consent’ for war

Jan-03 31% immediate invasion

Feb-03 40% Convinced by Bush’s speech

Mar-03 47% Invasion without UNSC approval

Apr-03 62% In support of the war

Jan-03 Feb-03 Mar-03 Apr-030%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Page 10: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Iraq as theatre of war => American firepower

Page 11: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.
Page 12: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Iraq as liberated population => American heroism

Page 13: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Pew Research Center, poll 1500 adults in UShttp://pewresearch.org/pubs/770/iraq-war-five-year-anniversary

Page 14: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Iraq as terror threat

=> US Government deception

“Top US officials…made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq…[as] part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretences.”

Center for Public Integrity, 2008 report.

Page 15: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Iraq as a theatre of war=> US military limitations

Page 16: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Iraq as liberated population=> US government exactions

Documented civilian deaths from violence 110,205 – 120,395

Page 17: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Main points:– Geopolitical framing of ‘Iraq’ allowed for initial

consent by US public– Framing proved biased and shortsighted– Resulted in counter-framing of ‘US’ as deceiving,

declining and dangerous => greater distrust

– Need to resist such ‘framings’…

Page 18: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Re-interpreting the geopolitical frame: Saddam’s rifle

• Subaltern geopolitics – Libya in Western perspectives

Page 19: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

IRAQ = ‘SADDAM’ + WEAPONS + TERRORISTS

Page 20: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Why is Saddam Hussein firing an ‘old rifle’ at a public meeting in Bagdad?

Page 21: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.
Page 22: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.
Page 23: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

- Ottoman Empire/Turkey mocked - acquiring remnants of its empire become Allies war aim

Page 24: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Today the European states have attacked the Islamic countries from every corner. Italy has attacked Tripoli in North Africa, Russian troops have occupied northern Iran, and English troops have entered southern Iran. This will inevitably result in the disappearance of Islam. Therefore all Muslims, Arab and non Arab, must prepare themselves to repel unbelief (kufr) from ‑the two Islamic countries. They must not hold themselves back or spare any expense to bring about the means to expel Italian troops from Tripoli, and Russian and English troops from northern and southern Iran. This is one of the most important Islamic duties, in order that the Ottoman and Iranian empires remain protected and safe from Christian attacks, with Allah's help. 5 Dhu ‘l Hijjah‑Muhammad Kazim al Tabataba'i.‑

Page 25: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.
Page 26: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

The Iraqis are going towards Baghdad to demand their rights, and it is necessary for you and for all the Muslims to join their brothers on this noble principle. Beware of disturbing the peace and disagreeing and quarrelling amongst yourselves. I advise you to protect the lives, possessions and honour of all religious communities and sects in your country, and never to harm any one of them.

Mirza Shhazi, religious leader, April 1920

Page 27: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.
Page 28: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.
Page 29: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Enfield rifle seized from British colonial troops in 1920 pro-independence uprising by Iraqis

• Symbol of Iraqi nationalism as British came to rule former Ottoman provinces following WWI

• Up to 9,000 Iraqi killed by British troops to quell the May 1920 Revolution, incl. through air bombardments

• British install Faysal ibn Husayn as King of Iraq in 1921 to give the appearance of independence (indirect rule)

• Iraq remains de facto colony until 1958 coup, with nationalization of oil assets between 1961-1972

Page 30: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Othering

• The ‘Othered’ Iraq and the ‘other Iraq’– ‘Othered Iraq’: the Iraq within conventional

geopolitical perspective, where even understandings of ‘everyday life’ brings a sense of distance and ‘Otherness’

– The ‘other Iraq’: the Iraq outside conventional geopolitical perspective, where understandings of ‘everyday life’ brings a sense of common humanity (commonality)

Page 31: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

The ‘Other’ or ‘constitutive Other’

• Through selective (and biased) perceptions of differences between yourself and someone else, or between your country and another, you come to define yourself or your country

• More than a comparative perspective … it is a constitutive one (i.e. constitutes two supposed ‘realities’)

Þ Other or ‘constitute Other’Þ See, Edward Said (1979) Orientalism

Page 32: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

• Performative attributes (repetition of appearance)

Page 33: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Performative attributesin ‘everyday banal geopolitics’

Page 34: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Othering 102

• Prejudice and assumptions

Page 35: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Racialized geopoliticsApartheid South Africa’s Bantustans

Page 36: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Othering 103

• Inclusion by virtue of Othering

Page 37: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Inclusion in the geopolitics of migration

Page 38: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Geopolitics, Othering and Imperialism

• Othering: “act of emphasizing the perceived weaknesses of marginalized groups as a way of stressing the alleged strength of those in positions of power”

• The way in which you define ‘Others’ defines your ‘Self’ => self-legitimization of conduct

Page 39: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

‘Iraq Market’

The other Iraq The Othered Iraq

Page 40: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

‘Iraq School’

The other Iraq The Othered Iraq

Page 41: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

Conclusion

• Geopolitical frames are culturally and historically relative

• Critical geopolitics gives attention to diversity of interpretations of ‘history’

• Anti- or counter-geopolitics requires to be attentive to processes of ‘Othering’ and to bring out counter-narratives

Page 42: Geopolitical perspectives on war and peace (3): Critical Geopolitics Counter-framing and ‘Othering’ Iraq GEOG 220 – Geopolitics.

At home …

• See this brief video:• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cAeTkA_1fk

• What was the US government trying to (literally) get ‘out of the frame’ of the cameras at the UN?

• What counter-narrative did the tapestry evoke?• What is the role of art in geopolitics?• Was this communication maneuver by the US

government successful?