Top Banner
Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft Research
27

Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Zoe Monroe
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Geometry Clipmaps:Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids

Geometry Clipmaps:Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids

Frank LosassoStanford University

Frank LosassoStanford University

Hugues HoppeMicrosoft Research

Hugues HoppeMicrosoft Research

Page 2: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Terrain Rendering ChallengesTerrain Rendering Challenges

• Concise storage No paging hick-ups

• Real-Time frame rates 60 fps

• Visual continuity No temporal pops

• Concise storage No paging hick-ups

• Real-Time frame rates 60 fps

• Visual continuity No temporal pops

Mount Rainier

Olympic Mountains

Primary Dataset:United States at 30m spacing

20 Billion samples

Primary Dataset:United States at 30m spacing

20 Billion samples

Page 3: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Previous WorkPrevious Work

• Irregular Meshes (e.g. [Hoppe 98])

– Fewest polygons– Extremely CPU intensive

• Bin-trees (e.g. [Lindstrom et al 96])

– Simpler data structures / algorithms– Still CPU intensive

• Bin-tree Regions (e.g. [Cignoni et al 03])

– Precomputed regions Decreased CPU cost

– Temporal continuity difficult

• Irregular Meshes (e.g. [Hoppe 98])

– Fewest polygons– Extremely CPU intensive

• Bin-trees (e.g. [Lindstrom et al 96])

– Simpler data structures / algorithms– Still CPU intensive

• Bin-tree Regions (e.g. [Cignoni et al 03])

– Precomputed regions Decreased CPU cost

– Temporal continuity difficult

Page 4: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Previous WorkPrevious Work

• Texture Clipmaps [Tanner 1998]– ‘Infinitely’ large textures– Clipped mipmap hierarchy

• Modeling for the Plausible Emulation of Large Worlds [Dollins 2002]– Quadtree LOD around viewer– Terrain synthesis

• Texture Clipmaps [Tanner 1998]– ‘Infinitely’ large textures– Clipped mipmap hierarchy

• Modeling for the Plausible Emulation of Large Worlds [Dollins 2002]– Quadtree LOD around viewer– Terrain synthesis

Page 5: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Geometry ClipmapsGeometry Clipmaps

• Store data in uniform 2D grids

• Level-of-Detail from nesting of grids

• Refine based on distance

• Main Advantages– Simplicity – Compression– Synthesis

• Store data in uniform 2D grids

• Level-of-Detail from nesting of grids

• Refine based on distance

• Main Advantages– Simplicity – Compression– Synthesis

Page 6: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Terrain as a PyramidTerrain as a Pyramid

Coarsest Level

Finest Level

•Terrain as mipmap pyramid

•LOD using nested grids

•Terrain as mipmap pyramid

•LOD using nested grids

Page 7: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Puget SoundPuget Sound

Page 8: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Individual Clipmap LevelsIndividual Clipmap Levels

• Uniform 2D grid• Indexed triangle strip

– Efficient caching– 60 M triangles/second

• 255-by-255 grid

• Expected Soon:– Vertex Textures

• Uniform 2D grid• Indexed triangle strip

– Efficient caching– 60 M triangles/second

• 255-by-255 grid

• Expected Soon:– Vertex Textures

Page 9: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Inter-Level TransitionsInter-Level Transitions

• Between respective power-of-2 grids• Between respective power-of-2 grids

Page 10: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Inter-Level TransitionsInter-Level Transitions

No transitionNo transition Geometry transitionGeometry transition Geometry & texture transition

Geometry & texture transition

Gaps in geometryGaps in geometry Gaps in texturing/shadingGaps in texturing/shading

Page 11: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Inter-Level TransitionsInter-Level Transitions

• Vertex shader blend geometry

• Pixel shader blend textures– Both are inexpensive

• Vertex shader blend geometry

• Pixel shader blend textures– Both are inexpensive

Page 12: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Clipmap UpdateClipmap Update

• For each level– Calculate new clipmap region– Fill new L-shaped region– Use toroidal arrays for efficiency

• For each level– Calculate new clipmap region– Fill new L-shaped region– Use toroidal arrays for efficiency

Page 13: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Clipmap UpdateClipmap Update

• Update levels coarse-to-fine– Use limited update budget– Only render updated data

Fine levels may be cropped

Rendering load decreases as update load becomes to large for the budget

• Update levels coarse-to-fine– Use limited update budget– Only render updated data

Fine levels may be cropped

Rendering load decreases as update load becomes to large for the budget

Page 14: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

‘Filling’ New Regions‘Filling’ New Regions

• Two Sources:– Computed on-demand at 60 frames/second

• Two Sources:– Computed on-demand at 60 frames/second

Decompressed explicit terrain

Decompressed explicit terrain

Synthesized new terrain

Synthesized new terrain

Page 15: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Clipmap UpdateClipmap Update

• Fine level from coarse level

• U is a 16 point C1 smooth interpolant

• For synthesized terrain, X = Gaussian noise• For explicit terrain, X = compression residual

• Fine level from coarse level

• U is a 16 point C1 smooth interpolant

• For synthesized terrain, X = Gaussian noise• For explicit terrain, X = compression residual

Page 16: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Terrain SynthesisTerrain Synthesis

• Adds high frequency detail

• Upsample then add Gaussian noise

– Precomputed 50-by-50 noise texture– Per-octave amplitude from real terrain

• Adds high frequency detail

• Upsample then add Gaussian noise

– Precomputed 50-by-50 noise texture– Per-octave amplitude from real terrain

Page 17: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Texture SynthesisTexture Synthesis

Page 18: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Subdivision InterpolantSubdivision Interpolant

Bilinear Interpolant (C0)Bilinear Interpolant (C0) 16-point Interpolant (C1)16-point Interpolant (C1)

Page 19: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Terrain CompressionTerrain Compression

• Create mipmap fine-to-coarse

• D found from data such that:

• Create mipmap fine-to-coarse

• D found from data such that:

Page 20: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Terrain CompressionTerrain Compression

• Calculate residuals coarse-to-fine– Upsample and compute

inter-level residual

– Quantize and compress residual

– Replace approximation Prevent error accumulation

• Calculate residuals coarse-to-fine– Upsample and compute

inter-level residual

– Quantize and compress residual

– Replace approximation Prevent error accumulation

Page 21: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Compression ResultsCompression Results

• U.S height map– 30m horizontal spacing– 1m vertical resolution– 216,000-by-93,600 grid– 40GB uncompressed

– 350MB compressed factor of over 100– rms error 1.8m (6% of sample spacing)

• U.S height map– 30m horizontal spacing– 1m vertical resolution– 216,000-by-93,600 grid– 40GB uncompressed

– 350MB compressed factor of over 100– rms error 1.8m (6% of sample spacing)

Page 22: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Compression ResultsCompression Results

LOD schemeNumber of samples

Runtime space

Bytes per sample

Hoppe [98] 8 M 50 MB 6.0

Lindstrom [02] 256 M 5.0 GB 19.5

Cignoni et al [02] 64 M 115 MB 1.8

Geometry Clipmaps 20 G 375 MB 0.02

Page 23: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Level-of-detail ErrorLevel-of-detail Error

• Analyzed statistically See paper

• For U.S. terrain (640-by-480 resolution)– rms error = 0.15 pixels– max error = 12 pixels– 99.9th percentile = 0.90 pixels

• Analyzed statistically See paper

• For U.S. terrain (640-by-480 resolution)– rms error = 0.15 pixels– max error = 12 pixels– 99.9th percentile = 0.90 pixels

Page 24: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

United States of AmericaUnited States of America

Page 25: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

Graphics Hardware FriendlyGraphics Hardware Friendly

• Can be implemented in hardware– Clipmap levels as high-precision textures– Subdivision and normal calculation [Losasso et al 03]

– Morphing already done in hardware– Noise from Noise() or from texture

• Uploaded on-demand– Decompressed terrain

• Can be implemented in hardware– Clipmap levels as high-precision textures– Subdivision and normal calculation [Losasso et al 03]

– Morphing already done in hardware– Noise from Noise() or from texture

• Uploaded on-demand– Decompressed terrain

Page 26: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

LimitationsLimitations

• Statistical error analysis– Assumes bounded spectral density

• Unnecessarily many triangles– Assumes uniformly detailed terrain

but, allows for optimal rendering throughput

• Statistical error analysis– Assumes bounded spectral density

• Unnecessarily many triangles– Assumes uniformly detailed terrain

but, allows for optimal rendering throughput

Page 27: Geometry Clipmaps: Terrain Rendering Using Nested Regular Grids Frank Losasso Stanford University Frank Losasso Stanford University Hugues Hoppe Microsoft.

AdvantagesAdvantages

• Simplicity

• Optimal rendering throughput

• Visual continuity

• Steady rendering

• Graceful degradation

• Compression

• Synthesis

• Simplicity

• Optimal rendering throughput

• Visual continuity

• Steady rendering

• Graceful degradation

• Compression

• Synthesis