Top Banner
Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator algebras Hamiltonian G-spaces References Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ritt Lectures, Columbia, December 13–14 2007
93

Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Jun 24, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Geometry and representations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Department of MathematicsMassachusetts Institute of Technology

Ritt Lectures, Columbia, December 13–14 2007

Page 2: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Outline

Introduction

Commuting algebras

Differential operator algebras

Hamiltonian G-spaces

References

Page 3: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Abstract harmonic analysis

Say Lie group G acts on manifold M. Can ask aboutI topology of MI solutions of G-invariant differential equationsI special functions on M (automorphic forms, etc.)

Method step 1: LINEARIZE. Replace M by Hilbertspace L2(M). Now G acts by unitary operators.Method step 2: DIAGONALIZE. Decompose L2(M)into minimal G-invariant subspaces.Method step 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY. Studyminimal pieces: irreducible unitary repns of G.Difficult questions: how does DIAGONALIZE work,and what kind of minimal pieces do you get?

Page 4: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Abstract harmonic analysis

Say Lie group G acts on manifold M. Can ask aboutI topology of MI solutions of G-invariant differential equationsI special functions on M (automorphic forms, etc.)

Method step 1: LINEARIZE. Replace M by Hilbertspace L2(M). Now G acts by unitary operators.Method step 2: DIAGONALIZE. Decompose L2(M)into minimal G-invariant subspaces.Method step 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY. Studyminimal pieces: irreducible unitary repns of G.Difficult questions: how does DIAGONALIZE work,and what kind of minimal pieces do you get?

Page 5: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Abstract harmonic analysis

Say Lie group G acts on manifold M. Can ask aboutI topology of MI solutions of G-invariant differential equationsI special functions on M (automorphic forms, etc.)

Method step 1: LINEARIZE. Replace M by Hilbertspace L2(M). Now G acts by unitary operators.Method step 2: DIAGONALIZE. Decompose L2(M)into minimal G-invariant subspaces.Method step 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY. Studyminimal pieces: irreducible unitary repns of G.Difficult questions: how does DIAGONALIZE work,and what kind of minimal pieces do you get?

Page 6: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Abstract harmonic analysis

Say Lie group G acts on manifold M. Can ask aboutI topology of MI solutions of G-invariant differential equationsI special functions on M (automorphic forms, etc.)

Method step 1: LINEARIZE. Replace M by Hilbertspace L2(M). Now G acts by unitary operators.Method step 2: DIAGONALIZE. Decompose L2(M)into minimal G-invariant subspaces.Method step 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY. Studyminimal pieces: irreducible unitary repns of G.Difficult questions: how does DIAGONALIZE work,and what kind of minimal pieces do you get?

Page 7: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Abstract harmonic analysis

Say Lie group G acts on manifold M. Can ask aboutI topology of MI solutions of G-invariant differential equationsI special functions on M (automorphic forms, etc.)

Method step 1: LINEARIZE. Replace M by Hilbertspace L2(M). Now G acts by unitary operators.Method step 2: DIAGONALIZE. Decompose L2(M)into minimal G-invariant subspaces.Method step 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY. Studyminimal pieces: irreducible unitary repns of G.Difficult questions: how does DIAGONALIZE work,and what kind of minimal pieces do you get?

Page 8: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Abstract harmonic analysis

Say Lie group G acts on manifold M. Can ask aboutI topology of MI solutions of G-invariant differential equationsI special functions on M (automorphic forms, etc.)

Method step 1: LINEARIZE. Replace M by Hilbertspace L2(M). Now G acts by unitary operators.Method step 2: DIAGONALIZE. Decompose L2(M)into minimal G-invariant subspaces.Method step 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY. Studyminimal pieces: irreducible unitary repns of G.Difficult questions: how does DIAGONALIZE work,and what kind of minimal pieces do you get?

Page 9: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Abstract harmonic analysis

Say Lie group G acts on manifold M. Can ask aboutI topology of MI solutions of G-invariant differential equationsI special functions on M (automorphic forms, etc.)

Method step 1: LINEARIZE. Replace M by Hilbertspace L2(M). Now G acts by unitary operators.Method step 2: DIAGONALIZE. Decompose L2(M)into minimal G-invariant subspaces.Method step 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY. Studyminimal pieces: irreducible unitary repns of G.Difficult questions: how does DIAGONALIZE work,and what kind of minimal pieces do you get?

Page 10: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Abstract harmonic analysis

Say Lie group G acts on manifold M. Can ask aboutI topology of MI solutions of G-invariant differential equationsI special functions on M (automorphic forms, etc.)

Method step 1: LINEARIZE. Replace M by Hilbertspace L2(M). Now G acts by unitary operators.Method step 2: DIAGONALIZE. Decompose L2(M)into minimal G-invariant subspaces.Method step 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY. Studyminimal pieces: irreducible unitary repns of G.Difficult questions: how does DIAGONALIZE work,and what kind of minimal pieces do you get?

Page 11: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Plan of talks

I Outline strategy for decomposing L2(M), by analogywith “double centralizers” in finite-dimensionalalgebra.

I Strategy Kirillov-Kostant philosophy:irreducible unitary representationsof Lie group G

m(nearly) symplectic manifolds with (nearly)transitive Hamiltonian action of G

I “Strategy” and “philosophy” have a lot of wishfulthinking. Describe theorems supporting m.

Page 12: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Plan of talks

I Outline strategy for decomposing L2(M), by analogywith “double centralizers” in finite-dimensionalalgebra.

I Strategy Kirillov-Kostant philosophy:irreducible unitary representationsof Lie group G

m(nearly) symplectic manifolds with (nearly)transitive Hamiltonian action of G

I “Strategy” and “philosophy” have a lot of wishfulthinking. Describe theorems supporting m.

Page 13: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Plan of talks

I Outline strategy for decomposing L2(M), by analogywith “double centralizers” in finite-dimensionalalgebra.

I Strategy Kirillov-Kostant philosophy:irreducible unitary representationsof Lie group G

m(nearly) symplectic manifolds with (nearly)transitive Hamiltonian action of G

I “Strategy” and “philosophy” have a lot of wishfulthinking. Describe theorems supporting m.

Page 14: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Plan of talks

I Outline strategy for decomposing L2(M), by analogywith “double centralizers” in finite-dimensionalalgebra.

I Strategy Kirillov-Kostant philosophy:irreducible unitary representationsof Lie group G

m(nearly) symplectic manifolds with (nearly)transitive Hamiltonian action of G

I “Strategy” and “philosophy” have a lot of wishfulthinking. Describe theorems supporting m.

Page 15: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Plan of talks

I Outline strategy for decomposing L2(M), by analogywith “double centralizers” in finite-dimensionalalgebra.

I Strategy Kirillov-Kostant philosophy:irreducible unitary representationsof Lie group G

m(nearly) symplectic manifolds with (nearly)transitive Hamiltonian action of G

I “Strategy” and “philosophy” have a lot of wishfulthinking. Describe theorems supporting m.

Page 16: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Decomposing a representation

Given ops on Hilbert space H, want to decompose Hin operator-invt way. Fin-diml theory:V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Classical structure theorem:

W1, . . . , Wr all simple A-modules; then

A ' End(W1)× · · · × End(Wr ).

V ' m1W1 + · · ·+ mr Wr .

Positive integer mi is multiplicity of Wi in V .

Slicker version: define multiplicity spaceMi = HomA(Wi , V ); then mi = dim Mi , and

V ' M1 ⊗W1 + · · ·+ Mr ⊗Wr .

Slickest version: COMMUTING ALGEBRAS. . .

Page 17: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Decomposing a representation

Given ops on Hilbert space H, want to decompose Hin operator-invt way. Fin-diml theory:V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Classical structure theorem:

W1, . . . , Wr all simple A-modules; then

A ' End(W1)× · · · × End(Wr ).

V ' m1W1 + · · ·+ mr Wr .

Positive integer mi is multiplicity of Wi in V .

Slicker version: define multiplicity spaceMi = HomA(Wi , V ); then mi = dim Mi , and

V ' M1 ⊗W1 + · · ·+ Mr ⊗Wr .

Slickest version: COMMUTING ALGEBRAS. . .

Page 18: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Decomposing a representation

Given ops on Hilbert space H, want to decompose Hin operator-invt way. Fin-diml theory:V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Classical structure theorem:

W1, . . . , Wr all simple A-modules; then

A ' End(W1)× · · · × End(Wr ).

V ' m1W1 + · · ·+ mr Wr .

Positive integer mi is multiplicity of Wi in V .

Slicker version: define multiplicity spaceMi = HomA(Wi , V ); then mi = dim Mi , and

V ' M1 ⊗W1 + · · ·+ Mr ⊗Wr .

Slickest version: COMMUTING ALGEBRAS. . .

Page 19: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Decomposing a representation

Given ops on Hilbert space H, want to decompose Hin operator-invt way. Fin-diml theory:V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Classical structure theorem:

W1, . . . , Wr all simple A-modules; then

A ' End(W1)× · · · × End(Wr ).

V ' m1W1 + · · ·+ mr Wr .

Positive integer mi is multiplicity of Wi in V .

Slicker version: define multiplicity spaceMi = HomA(Wi , V ); then mi = dim Mi , and

V ' M1 ⊗W1 + · · ·+ Mr ⊗Wr .

Slickest version: COMMUTING ALGEBRAS. . .

Page 20: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Decomposing a representation

Given ops on Hilbert space H, want to decompose Hin operator-invt way. Fin-diml theory:V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Classical structure theorem:

W1, . . . , Wr all simple A-modules; then

A ' End(W1)× · · · × End(Wr ).

V ' m1W1 + · · ·+ mr Wr .

Positive integer mi is multiplicity of Wi in V .

Slicker version: define multiplicity spaceMi = HomA(Wi , V ); then mi = dim Mi , and

V ' M1 ⊗W1 + · · ·+ Mr ⊗Wr .

Slickest version: COMMUTING ALGEBRAS. . .

Page 21: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Decomposing a representation

Given ops on Hilbert space H, want to decompose Hin operator-invt way. Fin-diml theory:V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Classical structure theorem:

W1, . . . , Wr all simple A-modules; then

A ' End(W1)× · · · × End(Wr ).

V ' m1W1 + · · ·+ mr Wr .

Positive integer mi is multiplicity of Wi in V .

Slicker version: define multiplicity spaceMi = HomA(Wi , V ); then mi = dim Mi , and

V ' M1 ⊗W1 + · · ·+ Mr ⊗Wr .

Slickest version: COMMUTING ALGEBRAS. . .

Page 22: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Decomposing a representation

Given ops on Hilbert space H, want to decompose Hin operator-invt way. Fin-diml theory:V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Classical structure theorem:

W1, . . . , Wr all simple A-modules; then

A ' End(W1)× · · · × End(Wr ).

V ' m1W1 + · · ·+ mr Wr .

Positive integer mi is multiplicity of Wi in V .

Slicker version: define multiplicity spaceMi = HomA(Wi , V ); then mi = dim Mi , and

V ' M1 ⊗W1 + · · ·+ Mr ⊗Wr .

Slickest version: COMMUTING ALGEBRAS. . .

Page 23: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Commuting algebras and all that

V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Define

Z = Cent End(V )(A),

a new semisimple algebra of operators on V .

TheoremSay A and Z are complex semisimple algebras ofoperators on V as above.

1. A = Cent End(V )(Z).2. There is a natural bijection between irr modules Wi

for A and irr modules Mi for Z, given by

Mi ' HomA(Wi , V ), Wi ' HomZ(Mi , V ).

3. V '∑

i Mi ⊗Wi as a module for A×Z.

Page 24: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Commuting algebras and all that

V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Define

Z = Cent End(V )(A),

a new semisimple algebra of operators on V .

TheoremSay A and Z are complex semisimple algebras ofoperators on V as above.

1. A = Cent End(V )(Z).2. There is a natural bijection between irr modules Wi

for A and irr modules Mi for Z, given by

Mi ' HomA(Wi , V ), Wi ' HomZ(Mi , V ).

3. V '∑

i Mi ⊗Wi as a module for A×Z.

Page 25: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Commuting algebras and all that

V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Define

Z = Cent End(V )(A),

a new semisimple algebra of operators on V .

TheoremSay A and Z are complex semisimple algebras ofoperators on V as above.

1. A = Cent End(V )(Z).2. There is a natural bijection between irr modules Wi

for A and irr modules Mi for Z, given by

Mi ' HomA(Wi , V ), Wi ' HomZ(Mi , V ).

3. V '∑

i Mi ⊗Wi as a module for A×Z.

Page 26: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Commuting algebras and all that

V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Define

Z = Cent End(V )(A),

a new semisimple algebra of operators on V .

TheoremSay A and Z are complex semisimple algebras ofoperators on V as above.

1. A = Cent End(V )(Z).2. There is a natural bijection between irr modules Wi

for A and irr modules Mi for Z, given by

Mi ' HomA(Wi , V ), Wi ' HomZ(Mi , V ).

3. V '∑

i Mi ⊗Wi as a module for A×Z.

Page 27: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Commuting algebras and all that

V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Define

Z = Cent End(V )(A),

a new semisimple algebra of operators on V .

TheoremSay A and Z are complex semisimple algebras ofoperators on V as above.

1. A = Cent End(V )(Z).2. There is a natural bijection between irr modules Wi

for A and irr modules Mi for Z, given by

Mi ' HomA(Wi , V ), Wi ' HomZ(Mi , V ).

3. V '∑

i Mi ⊗Wi as a module for A×Z.

Page 28: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Commuting algebras and all that

V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Define

Z = Cent End(V )(A),

a new semisimple algebra of operators on V .

TheoremSay A and Z are complex semisimple algebras ofoperators on V as above.

1. A = Cent End(V )(Z).2. There is a natural bijection between irr modules Wi

for A and irr modules Mi for Z, given by

Mi ' HomA(Wi , V ), Wi ' HomZ(Mi , V ).

3. V '∑

i Mi ⊗Wi as a module for A×Z.

Page 29: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Commuting algebras and all that

V/C fin-diml, A ⊂ End(V ) cplx semisimple alg of ops.Define

Z = Cent End(V )(A),

a new semisimple algebra of operators on V .

TheoremSay A and Z are complex semisimple algebras ofoperators on V as above.

1. A = Cent End(V )(Z).2. There is a natural bijection between irr modules Wi

for A and irr modules Mi for Z, given by

Mi ' HomA(Wi , V ), Wi ' HomZ(Mi , V ).

3. V '∑

i Mi ⊗Wi as a module for A×Z.

Page 30: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Example of commuting algebras

G finite group, V = L2(G).

A = alg gen by left translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

A is the group algebra of G.

Z = alg gen by right translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

Z is also the group algebra of G.Set of simple A-modules is

{Wi} = all irr reps of G.

Set of simple Z-modules is

{Mi} = all irr reps of G, Mi = W ∗i .

Decomposition of L2(G) is Peter-Weyl theorem:

L2(G) =∑

Wi irr of G

Wi ⊗W ∗i .

Page 31: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Example of commuting algebras

G finite group, V = L2(G).

A = alg gen by left translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

A is the group algebra of G.

Z = alg gen by right translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

Z is also the group algebra of G.Set of simple A-modules is

{Wi} = all irr reps of G.

Set of simple Z-modules is

{Mi} = all irr reps of G, Mi = W ∗i .

Decomposition of L2(G) is Peter-Weyl theorem:

L2(G) =∑

Wi irr of G

Wi ⊗W ∗i .

Page 32: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Example of commuting algebras

G finite group, V = L2(G).

A = alg gen by left translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

A is the group algebra of G.

Z = alg gen by right translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

Z is also the group algebra of G.Set of simple A-modules is

{Wi} = all irr reps of G.

Set of simple Z-modules is

{Mi} = all irr reps of G, Mi = W ∗i .

Decomposition of L2(G) is Peter-Weyl theorem:

L2(G) =∑

Wi irr of G

Wi ⊗W ∗i .

Page 33: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Example of commuting algebras

G finite group, V = L2(G).

A = alg gen by left translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

A is the group algebra of G.

Z = alg gen by right translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

Z is also the group algebra of G.Set of simple A-modules is

{Wi} = all irr reps of G.

Set of simple Z-modules is

{Mi} = all irr reps of G, Mi = W ∗i .

Decomposition of L2(G) is Peter-Weyl theorem:

L2(G) =∑

Wi irr of G

Wi ⊗W ∗i .

Page 34: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Example of commuting algebras

G finite group, V = L2(G).

A = alg gen by left translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

A is the group algebra of G.

Z = alg gen by right translations in G ⊂ End(V ).

Z is also the group algebra of G.Set of simple A-modules is

{Wi} = all irr reps of G.

Set of simple Z-modules is

{Mi} = all irr reps of G, Mi = W ∗i .

Decomposition of L2(G) is Peter-Weyl theorem:

L2(G) =∑

Wi irr of G

Wi ⊗W ∗i .

Page 35: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Another example of commuting algebras

GL(V ) acts on nth tensor power T n(V ): defineA = ends of T n(V ) gen by GL(V ).

Quotient of group alg of GL(V );

simple A-mods {Wi} = irr reps of GL(V ) on T n(V ).

Symmetric group Sn also acts on T n(V ): defineZ = ends of T n(V ) gen by symm group Sn.

Quotient of group alg of Sn;simple Z-mods {Mi} = irr reps of Sn on T n(V ).

Theorem (Schur-Weyl duality)Algebras A and Z acting on T n(V ) as mutual centralizers:

T n(V ) =∑

Mi ⊗Wi .

Summands! partitions of n into at most dim V parts.

Page 36: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Another example of commuting algebras

GL(V ) acts on nth tensor power T n(V ): defineA = ends of T n(V ) gen by GL(V ).

Quotient of group alg of GL(V );

simple A-mods {Wi} = irr reps of GL(V ) on T n(V ).

Symmetric group Sn also acts on T n(V ): defineZ = ends of T n(V ) gen by symm group Sn.

Quotient of group alg of Sn;simple Z-mods {Mi} = irr reps of Sn on T n(V ).

Theorem (Schur-Weyl duality)Algebras A and Z acting on T n(V ) as mutual centralizers:

T n(V ) =∑

Mi ⊗Wi .

Summands! partitions of n into at most dim V parts.

Page 37: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Another example of commuting algebras

GL(V ) acts on nth tensor power T n(V ): defineA = ends of T n(V ) gen by GL(V ).

Quotient of group alg of GL(V );

simple A-mods {Wi} = irr reps of GL(V ) on T n(V ).

Symmetric group Sn also acts on T n(V ): defineZ = ends of T n(V ) gen by symm group Sn.

Quotient of group alg of Sn;simple Z-mods {Mi} = irr reps of Sn on T n(V ).

Theorem (Schur-Weyl duality)Algebras A and Z acting on T n(V ) as mutual centralizers:

T n(V ) =∑

Mi ⊗Wi .

Summands! partitions of n into at most dim V parts.

Page 38: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Another example of commuting algebras

GL(V ) acts on nth tensor power T n(V ): defineA = ends of T n(V ) gen by GL(V ).

Quotient of group alg of GL(V );

simple A-mods {Wi} = irr reps of GL(V ) on T n(V ).

Symmetric group Sn also acts on T n(V ): defineZ = ends of T n(V ) gen by symm group Sn.

Quotient of group alg of Sn;simple Z-mods {Mi} = irr reps of Sn on T n(V ).

Theorem (Schur-Weyl duality)Algebras A and Z acting on T n(V ) as mutual centralizers:

T n(V ) =∑

Mi ⊗Wi .

Summands! partitions of n into at most dim V parts.

Page 39: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Another example of commuting algebras

GL(V ) acts on nth tensor power T n(V ): defineA = ends of T n(V ) gen by GL(V ).

Quotient of group alg of GL(V );

simple A-mods {Wi} = irr reps of GL(V ) on T n(V ).

Symmetric group Sn also acts on T n(V ): defineZ = ends of T n(V ) gen by symm group Sn.

Quotient of group alg of Sn;simple Z-mods {Mi} = irr reps of Sn on T n(V ).

Theorem (Schur-Weyl duality)Algebras A and Z acting on T n(V ) as mutual centralizers:

T n(V ) =∑

Mi ⊗Wi .

Summands! partitions of n into at most dim V parts.

Page 40: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Another example of commuting algebras

GL(V ) acts on nth tensor power T n(V ): define

A = ends of T n(V ) gen by GL(V ).

Quotient of group alg of GL(V );

simple A-mods {Wi} = irr reps of GL(V ) on T n(V ).

Symmetric group Sn also acts on T n(V ): define

Z = ends of T n(V ) gen by symm group Sn.

Quotient of group alg of Sn;

simple Z-mods {Mi} = irr reps of Sn on T n(V ).

Theorem (Schur-Weyl duality)Algebras A and Z acting on T n(V ) as mutual centralizers:

T n(V ) =∑

Mi ⊗Wi .

Summands! partitions of n into at most dim V parts.

Page 41: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 42: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 43: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 44: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 45: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 46: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 47: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 48: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 49: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Infinite-dimensional representations

Need framework to study ops on inf-diml V .

Finite-diml ↔ infinite-diml dictionaryfinite-diml V ↔ C∞(M)

repn of G on V ↔ action of G on MEnd(V ) ↔ Diff(M)

A = im(C[G]) ⊂ End(V ) ↔ A = im(U(g)) ⊂ Diff(M)

Z = CentEnd(V )(A) ↔ Z = diff ops comm with G

Which differential operators commute with G?

Answer generalizations of dictionary. . .

Page 50: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Differential operators and symbols

Diffn(M) = diff operators of order ≤ n.

Increasing filtration, (Diffp)(Diffq) ⊂ Diffp+q .

Theorem (Symbol calculus)1. There is an isomorphism of graded algebras

σ : gr Diff(M) → Poly(T ∗(M))

to fns on T ∗(M) that are polynomial in fibers.2.

σn : Diffn(M)/ Diffn−1(M) → Polyn(T ∗(M)).

3. Commutator of diff ops Poisson bracket {, } onT ∗(M): for D ∈ Diffp(M), D′ ∈ Diffq(M),

σp+q−1([D, D′]) = {σp(D), σq(D′)}.

Diff ops comm with G! symbols Poisson-comm with g.

Page 51: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Differential operators and symbols

Diffn(M) = diff operators of order ≤ n.

Increasing filtration, (Diffp)(Diffq) ⊂ Diffp+q .

Theorem (Symbol calculus)1. There is an isomorphism of graded algebras

σ : gr Diff(M) → Poly(T ∗(M))

to fns on T ∗(M) that are polynomial in fibers.2.

σn : Diffn(M)/ Diffn−1(M) → Polyn(T ∗(M)).

3. Commutator of diff ops Poisson bracket {, } onT ∗(M): for D ∈ Diffp(M), D′ ∈ Diffq(M),

σp+q−1([D, D′]) = {σp(D), σq(D′)}.

Diff ops comm with G! symbols Poisson-comm with g.

Page 52: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Differential operators and symbols

Diffn(M) = diff operators of order ≤ n.

Increasing filtration, (Diffp)(Diffq) ⊂ Diffp+q .

Theorem (Symbol calculus)1. There is an isomorphism of graded algebras

σ : gr Diff(M) → Poly(T ∗(M))

to fns on T ∗(M) that are polynomial in fibers.2.

σn : Diffn(M)/ Diffn−1(M) → Polyn(T ∗(M)).

3. Commutator of diff ops Poisson bracket {, } onT ∗(M): for D ∈ Diffp(M), D′ ∈ Diffq(M),

σp+q−1([D, D′]) = {σp(D), σq(D′)}.

Diff ops comm with G! symbols Poisson-comm with g.

Page 53: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Differential operators and symbols

Diffn(M) = diff operators of order ≤ n.

Increasing filtration, (Diffp)(Diffq) ⊂ Diffp+q .

Theorem (Symbol calculus)1. There is an isomorphism of graded algebras

σ : gr Diff(M) → Poly(T ∗(M))

to fns on T ∗(M) that are polynomial in fibers.2.

σn : Diffn(M)/ Diffn−1(M) → Polyn(T ∗(M)).

3. Commutator of diff ops Poisson bracket {, } onT ∗(M): for D ∈ Diffp(M), D′ ∈ Diffq(M),

σp+q−1([D, D′]) = {σp(D), σq(D′)}.

Diff ops comm with G! symbols Poisson-comm with g.

Page 54: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Differential operators and symbols

Diffn(M) = diff operators of order ≤ n.

Increasing filtration, (Diffp)(Diffq) ⊂ Diffp+q .

Theorem (Symbol calculus)1. There is an isomorphism of graded algebras

σ : gr Diff(M) → Poly(T ∗(M))

to fns on T ∗(M) that are polynomial in fibers.2.

σn : Diffn(M)/ Diffn−1(M) → Polyn(T ∗(M)).

3. Commutator of diff ops Poisson bracket {, } onT ∗(M): for D ∈ Diffp(M), D′ ∈ Diffq(M),

σp+q−1([D, D′]) = {σp(D), σq(D′)}.

Diff ops comm with G! symbols Poisson-comm with g.

Page 55: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Differential operators and symbols

Diffn(M) = diff operators of order ≤ n.

Increasing filtration, (Diffp)(Diffq) ⊂ Diffp+q .

Theorem (Symbol calculus)1. There is an isomorphism of graded algebras

σ : gr Diff(M) → Poly(T ∗(M))

to fns on T ∗(M) that are polynomial in fibers.2.

σn : Diffn(M)/ Diffn−1(M) → Polyn(T ∗(M)).

3. Commutator of diff ops Poisson bracket {, } onT ∗(M): for D ∈ Diffp(M), D′ ∈ Diffq(M),

σp+q−1([D, D′]) = {σp(D), σq(D′)}.

Diff ops comm with G! symbols Poisson-comm with g.

Page 56: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Differential operators and symbols

Diffn(M) = diff operators of order ≤ n.

Increasing filtration, (Diffp)(Diffq) ⊂ Diffp+q .

Theorem (Symbol calculus)1. There is an isomorphism of graded algebras

σ : gr Diff(M) → Poly(T ∗(M))

to fns on T ∗(M) that are polynomial in fibers.2.

σn : Diffn(M)/ Diffn−1(M) → Polyn(T ∗(M)).

3. Commutator of diff ops Poisson bracket {, } onT ∗(M): for D ∈ Diffp(M), D′ ∈ Diffq(M),

σp+q−1([D, D′]) = {σp(D), σq(D′)}.

Diff ops comm with G! symbols Poisson-comm with g.

Page 57: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Differential operators and symbols

Diffn(M) = diff operators of order ≤ n.

Increasing filtration, (Diffp)(Diffq) ⊂ Diffp+q .

Theorem (Symbol calculus)1. There is an isomorphism of graded algebras

σ : gr Diff(M) → Poly(T ∗(M))

to fns on T ∗(M) that are polynomial in fibers.2.

σn : Diffn(M)/ Diffn−1(M) → Polyn(T ∗(M)).

3. Commutator of diff ops Poisson bracket {, } onT ∗(M): for D ∈ Diffp(M), D′ ∈ Diffq(M),

σp+q−1([D, D′]) = {σp(D), σq(D′)}.

Diff ops comm with G! symbols Poisson-comm with g.

Page 58: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson structure and Lie group actions

X mfld w. Poisson {, } on fns (e.g. T ∗(M)).Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect(X ): ξf (g) = {f , g}.Vector fields ξf called Hamiltonian; flows preserve{, }. Map f 7→ ξf is Lie alg homomomorphism.Lie group action on X Lie alg homom Y 7→ ξYfrom Lie(G) to Vect(X ).Call X Hamiltonian G-space if given Lie alg homomY 7→ fY from Lie(G) to C∞(X ) with ξY = ξfY .G acts on M T ∗(M) is Hamiltonian G-space: Liealg elt Y vec fld ξM

Y on M function fY on T ∗(M):

fY (m, λ) = λ(ξMY (m)) (m ∈ M, λ ∈ T ∗

m(M)).

f on X with {f , g} = 0! f constant on G orbits.

Page 59: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson structure and Lie group actions

X mfld w. Poisson {, } on fns (e.g. T ∗(M)).Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect(X ): ξf (g) = {f , g}.Vector fields ξf called Hamiltonian; flows preserve{, }. Map f 7→ ξf is Lie alg homomomorphism.Lie group action on X Lie alg homom Y 7→ ξYfrom Lie(G) to Vect(X ).Call X Hamiltonian G-space if given Lie alg homomY 7→ fY from Lie(G) to C∞(X ) with ξY = ξfY .G acts on M T ∗(M) is Hamiltonian G-space: Liealg elt Y vec fld ξM

Y on M function fY on T ∗(M):

fY (m, λ) = λ(ξMY (m)) (m ∈ M, λ ∈ T ∗

m(M)).

f on X with {f , g} = 0! f constant on G orbits.

Page 60: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson structure and Lie group actions

X mfld w. Poisson {, } on fns (e.g. T ∗(M)).Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect(X ): ξf (g) = {f , g}.Vector fields ξf called Hamiltonian; flows preserve{, }. Map f 7→ ξf is Lie alg homomomorphism.Lie group action on X Lie alg homom Y 7→ ξYfrom Lie(G) to Vect(X ).Call X Hamiltonian G-space if given Lie alg homomY 7→ fY from Lie(G) to C∞(X ) with ξY = ξfY .G acts on M T ∗(M) is Hamiltonian G-space: Liealg elt Y vec fld ξM

Y on M function fY on T ∗(M):

fY (m, λ) = λ(ξMY (m)) (m ∈ M, λ ∈ T ∗

m(M)).

f on X with {f , g} = 0! f constant on G orbits.

Page 61: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson structure and Lie group actions

X mfld w. Poisson {, } on fns (e.g. T ∗(M)).Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect(X ): ξf (g) = {f , g}.Vector fields ξf called Hamiltonian; flows preserve{, }. Map f 7→ ξf is Lie alg homomomorphism.Lie group action on X Lie alg homom Y 7→ ξYfrom Lie(G) to Vect(X ).Call X Hamiltonian G-space if given Lie alg homomY 7→ fY from Lie(G) to C∞(X ) with ξY = ξfY .G acts on M T ∗(M) is Hamiltonian G-space: Liealg elt Y vec fld ξM

Y on M function fY on T ∗(M):

fY (m, λ) = λ(ξMY (m)) (m ∈ M, λ ∈ T ∗

m(M)).

f on X with {f , g} = 0! f constant on G orbits.

Page 62: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson structure and Lie group actions

X mfld w. Poisson {, } on fns (e.g. T ∗(M)).Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect(X ): ξf (g) = {f , g}.Vector fields ξf called Hamiltonian; flows preserve{, }. Map f 7→ ξf is Lie alg homomomorphism.Lie group action on X Lie alg homom Y 7→ ξYfrom Lie(G) to Vect(X ).Call X Hamiltonian G-space if given Lie alg homomY 7→ fY from Lie(G) to C∞(X ) with ξY = ξfY .G acts on M T ∗(M) is Hamiltonian G-space: Liealg elt Y vec fld ξM

Y on M function fY on T ∗(M):

fY (m, λ) = λ(ξMY (m)) (m ∈ M, λ ∈ T ∗

m(M)).

f on X with {f , g} = 0! f constant on G orbits.

Page 63: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson structure and Lie group actions

X mfld w. Poisson {, } on fns (e.g. T ∗(M)).Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect(X ): ξf (g) = {f , g}.Vector fields ξf called Hamiltonian; flows preserve{, }. Map f 7→ ξf is Lie alg homomomorphism.Lie group action on X Lie alg homom Y 7→ ξYfrom Lie(G) to Vect(X ).Call X Hamiltonian G-space if given Lie alg homomY 7→ fY from Lie(G) to C∞(X ) with ξY = ξfY .G acts on M T ∗(M) is Hamiltonian G-space: Liealg elt Y vec fld ξM

Y on M function fY on T ∗(M):

fY (m, λ) = λ(ξMY (m)) (m ∈ M, λ ∈ T ∗

m(M)).

f on X with {f , g} = 0! f constant on G orbits.

Page 64: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson structure and Lie group actions

X mfld w. Poisson {, } on fns (e.g. T ∗(M)).Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect(X ): ξf (g) = {f , g}.Vector fields ξf called Hamiltonian; flows preserve{, }. Map f 7→ ξf is Lie alg homomomorphism.Lie group action on X Lie alg homom Y 7→ ξYfrom Lie(G) to Vect(X ).Call X Hamiltonian G-space if given Lie alg homomY 7→ fY from Lie(G) to C∞(X ) with ξY = ξfY .G acts on M T ∗(M) is Hamiltonian G-space: Liealg elt Y vec fld ξM

Y on M function fY on T ∗(M):

fY (m, λ) = λ(ξMY (m)) (m ∈ M, λ ∈ T ∗

m(M)).

f on X with {f , g} = 0! f constant on G orbits.

Page 65: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 66: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 67: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 68: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 69: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 70: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 71: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 72: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 73: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 74: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Our story so far. . .

G acts on M ! T ∗(M) Hamiltonian G-space.G-decomp of C∞(M)! (Diff M)G-modules.

(Diff M)G σ! C∞(T ∗(M))G ! C∞((T ∗(M))//G).

Hope C∞(M) irr ⇔ G has dense orbit on T ∗(M).

Suggests generalization. . .

Hamiltonian G-cone X graded alg Poly(X ).Seek filtered alg D, symbol calc grD σ→Poly(X )carrying [, ] on D to {, } on Poly(X ).Seek to lift G action on Poly(X ) to G action on D viaLie alg hom g → D1.Seek simple D-module W (analogue of C∞(M)).Hope W irr for G ⇔ G has dense orbit on X .

Page 75: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 76: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 77: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 78: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 79: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 80: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 81: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 82: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 83: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Poisson manifolds

Poisson mfld X : brkt {, } on fns with Lie alg axioms(skew, bilin, Jacobi) AND {f , gh} = {f , g}h + g{f , h}.Bracket with f ξf ∈ Vect X , Hamiltonian vector fld;Jacobi [ξf , ξg] = ξ{f ,g}.Vals of Hamiltonian vec flds integrable distn S foliation of X by embedded submflds.Symp form on Sx : ωx(ξf (x), ξg(x)) = {f , g}(x).

I Embedded submflds are symplectic.I Hamiltonian flows preserve embedded submflds.I Ham G-space! Lie alg map g → C∞(X )!

(Poisson) moment map map µ : X → g∗

I X Ham G-space G-orbits ⊂ embedded submflds.I Kostant: Homog Ham G-space = cover of orbit on g∗.

Page 84: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 85: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 86: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 87: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 88: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 89: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 90: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 91: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 92: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

Method of coadjoint orbits

Kostant’s thm worth stating twice: homogeneousHamiltonian G-space = covering of G-orbit on g∗.Includes classification of symp homog spaces for G.(Riem homog spaces hopelessly complicated.)

Kirillov-Kostant philosophy of coadjt orbits suggests{irr unitary reps of G} = G! g∗/G. (?)

Bij (?) true for G simply conn nilp (Kirillov).

Other G: restr rt side to “admissible” orbits (integralitycond). Expect “almost all” of G: enough for interestingharmonic analysis.

Duflo: (?) for algebraic G reduces to reductive G.Two ways to do repn theory:

1. start with coadjt orbit, look for repn. Hard.2. start with repn, look for coadjt orbit. Easy.

Page 93: Geometry and representations of reductive groupsdav/rittC.pdf · Geometry and representations of reductive groups David Vogan Introduction Commuting algebras Differential operator

Geometry andrepresentations ofreductive groups

David Vogan

Introduction

Commutingalgebras

Differentialoperator algebras

HamiltonianG-spaces

References

References

W. Graham and D. Vogan, “Geometric quantization fornilpotent coadjoint orbits,” in Geometry andRepresentation Theory of real and p-adic groups.Birkhauser, Boston-Basel-Berlin, 1998 .

D. Vogan, “The method of coadjoint orbits for realreductive groups,” in Representation Theory of LieGroups. IAS/Park City Mathematics Series 8 (1999),179–238.