Top Banner

of 31

Geological Survey Professional Paper

Jul 05, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    1/31

    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized

    by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the

    information in books and make it universally accessible

    http://books.google.com

    https://books.google.co.id/books?id=a75UAAAAYAAJ

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    2/31

    Computer aidedEstimates

    ofConcentrating grade

    IronResources

    intheNegaunee

    Iron formation

    Marquette

    District,Michigan

    9

    GEOLOGICALSURVEYPROFESSIONALPAPER1045

    1

     

    mi

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    3/31

    COVER PHOTOGRAPHS

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    7

    6

    8

    9

    1 0

    1 1

    1 2

    1 3

    1 4

    1 .

    A s b e s t o s o r e

    2 .

    L e a d

    o r e .

    B a l m a t

    m in e . N .

    Y .

    3 . C h r o m i t e - c h r o m i u m o r e , W a s h i n g t o n

    4 .

    Z i n c o r e , F r i e d e n s v i t l e ,

    P a .

    5 . B a n d e d i r o n - f o r ma t i o n . P a l m e r ,

    M i c h .

    6 . R i b b o n a s b e s t o s o r e . Q u e b e c , C a n a d a

    7 . M a n g a n e s e o r e , b a n d e d

    r h o d o c h r o s i t e

    8 .

    Aluminum

    o r e , b a u x i t e , G e o r g i a

    9 .

    N a t i v e

    c o p p e r

    o r e ,

    Keweenawan

    P e n i n s u l a , M i c h .

    1 0 .

    P o r p h y r y

    molybdenum o r e ,

    C o l o r a d o

    1 1 . Z i n c

    o r e ,

    E d w a r d s ,

    N . Y .

    1 2 .

    M a n g a n e s e

    n o d u l e s ,

    o c e a n f l o o r

    1 3 . B o t r y o i d a l

    f l u o r i t e o r e ,

    P o n c h a S p r i n g s , C o l o .

    1 4 . T u n g s t e n o r e . N o r t h

    C a r o l i n a

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    4/31

    Computer aided

    Estimates

    of

    Concentrating gradeIronResources

    in

    the

    Negaunee

    Iron formation

    Marquette

    District,

    Michigan

    By W. F. CANNON, SANDRA L. POWERS, andNANCYA. WRIGHT

    GEOLOGICALSURVEYPROFESSIONALPAPER 1045

    An

    esti m ati o n of

    the

    magnitude

     

    quality, and economic potential

    o f

    subeconomic

    resources o f

    iron

    in

    an

    important

    active

    mining

    district

    UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON

    :

    1978

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    5/31

    UNITED

    STATESDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

    CECDL D. ANDRUS,

    Secretary

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

    W. A.

    Radlinski,

    Acting Director

    Library o f Congress Cataloging i n P u b l i c a t i o n Data

    Canno n,

    W F

    Computer-aided

    estimates o f concentrating-grade

    i r o n

    resources

    i n

    t h e

    N e g a u n e e

    Iron-formation,

    Marquette

    D i s t r i c t , Michigan.

    ( G e o l o g i c a l

    Survey professional paper

    ; 1045)

    Bibliography: p .

    Supt. o f Docs, n o . : I

    19.16:1045

    1 . Iron

    ores

    ichigan

    arquette

    C o .—a ta p r o c e s s i n g . I . Powers,

    Sandra

    L . , j o i n t

    author.

    I I . Wright,

    Na ncy A . , j o i n t a u t h o r . I I I . T i t l e .

    IV.

    S e r i e s : United S t a t e s . Geological Survey.

    Professional paper ; 1 0 4 5 .

    TN403.M5C36

    553'.4'0977496 77- 6 08 12 0

    Fo r

    s a l e b y

    the

    Superintendent of

    Documents,

    U.S.

    Government Printing Office

    W a sh in g to n , D .C. 2 0 4 0 2

    Stock

    Number

    024-001-03059-4

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    6/31

    CONTENTS

    P a g e

    Abstract

    1

    Introduction 1

    Acknowledgments 2

    N e g a u n e e

    Iron-formation

    2

    Mineralogy a n d texture 2

    Structural p o s i t i o n

    a n d

    thickness 3

    Resource

    data

    b a n k

    3

    Preparation of the

    data b a n k

    4

    Variables 5

    I d e n t i f i c a t i o n a n d l o c a t i o n 5

    Taconite

    characteristics

    P a g e

    Resource

    data

    b a n k

    ontinued

    Variables—ontinued

    Deposit

    characteristics 7

    R e l i a b i l i t y

    of

    data

    8

    Iron resources 9

    Resource

    c l a s s i f i c a t i o n 11

    Estimates of t o t a l recoverable iron 13

    Future

    of taconite

    m i n i n g i n

    the

    Marquette

    d i s t r i c t . _ 19

    Effect of technol ogi c

    advances on

    i r o n resources

    20

    Conclusions

    20

    References

    c i t e d 2 '

    ILLUSTRATIONS

    P a g e

    Figure

    1 .

    Generalized

    geologic

    map

    of

    the

    Marquette

    d i s t r i c t 2

    2 Hypothetical cross s e c t i o n o f data block showing method

    b y

    which variables are measured a nd assigned

    t o

    blocks 6

    3 . Cumulative

    curve showing

    relationship

    b etween

    long

    tons

    of

    Neg a u n e e

    Iron-formation

    a n d d e pth b e n e ath the surface 9

    4

    Graph

    showing long

    tons

    of iron-formation i n categories described

    i n

    the text 10

    5 . Hi sto g ra m sho w i ng long tons o f the po ssib ly tre ata bl e i r o n -

    formation within 1 ,000 feet of the surface r e l a t i v e t o volume

    of consolidated waste rock overly ing i t 1 1

    6 . Hi sto g ra m sho w i ng long tons of

    the

    possi bly tre ata ble i r o n -

    formation within 1,000 f e e t o f the surface with various r a t i o s

    of volume of iron-formation

    t o

    volume o f interlayered waste

    rock

    1 1

    7 .

    Resource

    c l a s s i f i c a t i o n chart 12

    8. Histo gra ms sho w i n g r e s u l t s of three types o f metallurgical t e s t s 14

    9

    Geologic

    map

    of the

    Marquette

    d i s t r i c t

    showing

    the d i s t r i b u t i o n

    o f

    vario us mineralogical

    c l a s s e s

    of iron-formatio n within

    the

    Neg a u n e e

    Iron-formation 16

    1 0 . Regression

    l i n e s showing the negative correlation b etween co n

    centrate-iron

    percentage a n d concentrate-silica

    percentage

    fo r

    three types of metallurgical t e s t s 18

    1 1 .

    Curves

    showing maximum short tons of i ron pote nti a ll y

    available

    within

    1,000 f e e t

    o f

    the surface

    fo r

    tw o metallurgical c l a s s e s

    of iron-formation at various c u t o f f grades 18

    1 2 .

    Graph showing

    projected production

    trends

    fo r

    the Marquette

    d i s t r i c t

    from

    operating m in es a nd a nn ou nce d expansion a n d

    d evelopment plans 19

    TABLES

    P a g e

    T a b l e 1 . Percentage of variation b etween original calculations a n d r e c a l

    culated values of four variables

    fo r

    \ i -m \ 2 ( 0 .6 5 -km ) v e r t i c a l

    columns

    through the iron-formation

    8

    2

    Metallurgical d a ta u se d i n simulation

    m o d e l

    13

    i n

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    7/31

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    8/31

    COMPUTER-AIDED ESTIMATES

    OF

    CONCENTRATING-GRADE IRON

    RESOURCES INTHE

    NEGAUNEEIRON-FORMATION,

    MARQUETTEDISTRICT, MICHIGAN

    By

    W.

    F. Cannon,

    Sandra

    L.

    Powers, and

    Nancy A. Wright

    ABSTRACT

    The Ne ga u ne e

    Iron-formation of

    Precambrian

    a ge i s

    the

    principal i ro n -b e ari n g u n it i n the

    Marquette

    i r o n

    range,

    Michigan.

    Th e Negaunee,

    a lo n g w i th other sedimentary a n d

    igneous r o c k s , i s folded

    i n t o

    a complex synclinal structure,

    the

    Marquette

    trough, a n d r e l a t e d

    smaller s t r u c t u r e s .

    The N e g a u n e e contains a b ou t 2 05 b i l l i o n long tons of rock

    a n d

    averages 32 percent i r o n . By

    u si ng a

    computerized

    data

    bank,

    we have

    analyzed

    the resource

    potential

    of

    the

    Negau

    n e e ,

    a n d

    b y

    using

    a

    s t a t i s t i c a l si m ul ati o n m o de l ,

    we have

    estimated

    the

    maximum

    a m o u n t

    o f

    iron

    recoverable

    u n d er

    present or

    moderately

    improved economic

    a n d technologic

    c o n d i t i o n s .

    Within the d i s t r i c t

    i s a bout

    9 1 . 6 b i l l i o n long tons

    of f i n e

    grained

    hematitic a n d g o e t h i t i c

    iron-formation. Ab o ut

    2 8 . 4

    b i l l i o n long

    tons

    i s within 1 , 0 0 0 f e e t ( 3 0 4 . 8 m) of the

    sur

    face; t h i s material could y i e l d a maximum o f a bout 7 b i l

    l i o n sho rt to ns o f iron i n concentrates that co ntai n 60-65

    weight-percent i r o n . Th e concentrates cou ld be pro d uce d b y

    s e l e c t i v e

    f l o c c u l a t i o n a n d f l o t a t i o n , or some

    modification

    o f

    that

    p r o c e s s , such

    that recovery of i r o n i s at

    l e a s t 2 0 w e i ght-

    percent

    of

    the crude

    o r e .

    Magnetic iron-formation constitutes a bout 48 b i l l i o n long

    t o n s . Ab o ut

    1 0 . 5

    b i l l i o n long tons i s within 1,000 f e e t ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m) of the

    surface a n d

    could

    y i e l d a maximum

    of a bout 3

    b i l l i o n

    short

    tons

    of

    iron i n concentrates produced

    b y

    mag

    n e t i c

    separation.

    The

    recovery

    of iron

    i s

    at

    l e a s t

    20 weight-

    percent of the crude

    o r e .

    I n

    a d d i t i o n ,

    a bout 2 7 . 1 b i l l i o n long tons o f iron-formation

    contains coarse-grained hematite. Ab o ut 4 . 8 b i l li o n long tons

    i s within

    1,000

    f e e t

    (304.8

    m) of

    the surface

    a n d

    could

    y i e l d a maximum

    of

    ab o ut 0 . 7

    b i l l i o n

    short tons

    of iron

    i n

    concentrates produced

    b y froth f l o t a t i o n ; the

    iron recovered

    i s at

    l e a s t 20

    weight-percent of the crude o r e .

    S i l i c a t e iron-formation constitutes a bout 3 7 . 6 b i l l i o n long

    t o n s , a bout 5 . 6 b i l li o n long tons of which i s within 1,000

    feet ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m) o f the su rfa ce .

    However, the

    s i l i c a t e

    i r o n -

    formation

    i s not

    a m e n a b l e t o concentration

    b y

    present tech

    nology.

    INTRODUCTION

    The

    Marquette

    iron

    range

    was

    the

    f i r s t

    o f

    th e

    g r e a t Lake Superior iron- ore districts to be discov

    ered. The iron resources o f the district a re in th e Ne

    gaunee Iro n -f o rm ati o n, a sedimentary accumulation

    o f iron minerals. Shortly after th e d i sco v er y o f the

    Negaunee in 1 8 4 4 , iron production began,

    and

    since

    that time,

    the district has

    been

    one

    o f the principal

    sources o f iro n o re fo r the United States. Most o re

    mined b efo re the 1 9 5 0 ' s was from high-grade de

    posits that formed a s secondary concentrations

    in

    the Negaunee Iro n -f o rm ati o n . I n the

    19 50's, when

    reserves o f

    high-grade

    o re

    were being

    depleted rap

    idly, the technology fo r

    processing

    lower grade

    o re

    was

    d e v e l op e d,

    and

    since

    that

    time production from

    th e Marquette range

    has

    come increasingly

    from

    concentrating-grade

    ore, commonly ca l l e d t ac on i te .

    The technology fo r

    producing

    a merchantable

    iron- ore product from taconite i s complex a n d , in

    g e n er a l, i n vo l ve s o p e n -p i t mining, multistage crush

    i n g and g ri n di ng , a process fo r separating iron

    min

    erals from gangue minerals, and an

    agglomerating

    process (most commonly, pelletizing) fo r the iron-

    mineral

    concentrate.

    The

    economic availability

    o f

    iron

    from

    a

    taconite

    deposit i s

    determined

    by many

    factors,

    o n l y some o f which

    a re geologic.

    Hence, by

    usi n g o n l y g e o l o g ic d at a a s

    i s done in

    this study, we

    a re n o t

    a b l e

    to

    estimate

    reserves'

    o f

    taconite.

    Rather, in

    this paper,

    we i nt e n d to

    present

    esti

    mates for

    the Marquette District

    o f

    th e maximum

    amount

    o f iro n

    that

    i s geologically known a s w e l l

    a s the amount that

    i s

    potentially recoverable. The

    e sti m a te s a re d e ri ve d

    by usi n g data from a d etailed

    data

    bank

    developed

    fo r tha t p u rp o se .

    I n

    this paper,

    iron

    r e so u r ce s a r e classified

    accord

    i n g

    to th e

    degree to which they approach the g e o l o g

    i c

    characteristics of presently

    economic

    deposits and

    the degree o f

    certainty

    with which the

    deposit i s

    known.

    Mathematical

    sim u l ati o n models

    a re used

    to

    derive maximum

    estimates

    o f

    recoverable

    iron

    1 A r e s e r v e i s c o n s i d e r e d t o b e m a t e r i a

    f r o m

    w h i c h i r o n c a n b e

    e c o

    n o m i c a l l y a n d

    l e g a l l y

    e x t r a c t e d

    a t

    t h e p r e s e n t t i m e . T h i s s t u d y i s c o n

    c e r n e d

    w i t h

    r e s o u r c e s ,

    w h i c h a r e

    c o n s i d e r e d t o b e m a t e r i a l f r o m w hi ch

    e x t r a c t i o n

    o f i r o n

    i s c ur r en t l y o r p o t e n t i a l l y f e a s i b l e .

    R e s o u r c e s t h e r e

    f o re i n cl ud e r e s e r v e s , b u t a l s o i n c l u d e much more

    m a t e r i a l

    w h o s e

    r e c o v e r y

    may

    o r

    ma y

    n ot b e

    e c o n o m i c a l l y f e a s i b l e .

    1

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    9/31

    2

    IRON-FORMATION, MICHIGAN

    STIMATES

    OF

    NEGAUNEE

    from m at eri a l that i s geologically most similar to

    presently economic d e po sits. F i n a l ly ,

    th e

    degree

    to

    which future

    technologic

    advances in

    several

    fields

    would

    affect the

    resource base o f

    the

    district

    i s dis

    cussed.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The

    d at a

    that

    have

    made

    this

    report

    possible

    were

    collected during many years o f f i e l d

    and

    l a b o r atory

    work by

    U . S. Ge o l o g i ca l Survey personnel.

    We wish

    to

    thank J . E.

    Gair,

    W.

    P.

    Puffett, G.

    C. Simmons,

    L. D.

    Clark,

    and

    J .

    S. K l as n er, who, along with the

    se n io r a u th or, have participated in studies

    of

    the

    Marquette district,

    and

    who

    have made av a i l a b l e to

    u s much

    original information

    and material.

    We

    a re

    also greatly

    i n d e bt e d

    to the mining

    companies

    in

    the

    area who, fo r many years, have

    been very

    co

    operative in

    supplying information from diamond

    drilling and mining operations. This information

    has i n c l u d e d subsurface data that

    have

    permitted

    an

    accurate

    thre e - d i m e nsi o n a l

    an alysis

    o f

    the

    district.

    Lawrence J .

    Drew

    o f th e

    U .S. Ge o l o gi ca l

    Survey

    designed and wrote

    a computer program

    used

    fo r

    Monte

    C arl o

    si m u l ati o n

    o f i ro n

    resources.

    NEGAUNEE IRON-FORMATION

    The Negaunee Iro n -f o rm ati o n, the principal i

    resource o f

    the Marquette r a n g e ,

    i s a stra ti g ra p

    u n it in the complexly f o l d e d and faulted Marque

    trough and a d j a ce n t sm a l l e r structures

    he Palm

    basin, Republic

    trough,

    and Mitchigan River tro

    (see f i g . 1). Al l the str uct ures a re synclines comp

    cated

    by

    faulting. The

    iron-formation

    i s

    part

    o f

    Marquette

    Range Supergroup,

    a

    thick

    accumulat

    o f

    sedimentary and vo lc a n ic

    m at eri a l about

    2

    bil

    y e a r s

    old.

    The mineralogy,

    texture, and

    structura l p osit

    o f

    the

    Negaunee vary greatly

    within

    the district

    have been mapped and d escri b e d by

    Simmo

    ( 1 9 7 4 ) ,

    Puffett ( 1 9 7 4 ) , Cannon ( 1 9 7 4 ) ,

    G

    ( 1 9 7 5 ) , Clark, Cannon,

    and

    Klasner ( 1 9 7 5 ) , C

    non ( 1 9 7 5 ) , Cannon and Klasner ( 1 9 7 4 , 1 9 7 5 a ,

    and Klasner and Cannon ( 1 9 7 5 a , b ) . The g e n er

    ized description that f o l l o w s i s based on

    those

    mo

    d etailed d escriptio ns.

    MINERALOGY AND

    TEXTURE

    The sediments o f the Negaunee Iron-format

    were deposited a s very fine grained chemical preci

    i -

    » »

    v

    v , ■— —

    , s , \

    i

    *   i > -

     

    -   I «

    R 3 1 W

    R 3 0 W

    R 2 9

    W

    C R Y S T A L L I N E ROCK

    ( P R E C A M B R I A N

    W) — M o s t l y g r a n i t i c g n e i s s

    0

    1 2 3

    4

    5

    M I E S

    : :

    :

    0

    1

    2 3 4 5 6 7 8 K I L O M E T E R S

    Figure 1 .—eneralized geologic map of the Marquette d i s t r i c t showing the

    distribution

    o f the N e g a u n e e Iron-format

    a n d the l o ca t i o n o f metamorphic isograds (modified

    from

    James,

    1955).

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    10/31

    RESOURCE DATA BANK

    tates in which siderite, iron-silicate minerals,

    and

    iron o x i d e s and hydroxides accumulated to form

    iron-rich layers, commonly

    i n t e r b e d d e d with

    s i l i c e

    ous

    (cherty) layers. The mineralogy differed from

    place

    to

    place, probably a s a result o f varying physi

    cal and chemical environments during o r shortly a f

    te r deposition

    (James,

    1 9 5 4 ) . The mineralogy

    was

    further

    affected

    by

    diagenesis,

    regional

    metamorph-

    ism, and weathering.

    Metamorphism has had a very profound effect on

    the mineralogy

    o f

    the Negaunee,

    commonly

    resulting

    in n e a r l y total change in th e

    original

    m i n er a l o g ica l

    makeup. Metamorphic isograds mapped by James

    ( 1 9 5 5 ) and slightly m o d if i e d by subsequent

    work

    a re

    shown in

    figure

    1 .

    I n the

    east

    end o f

    th e

    Marquette

    district, the

    Negaunee

    i s least metamorphosed, and

    iro n - b e ari n g

    minerals

    a re chiefly siderite, minneso-

    taite, st i l p n o m e l a n e ,

    m a g n e ti te , h em a ti te ,

    and

    g o e -

    thite. Grain size i s

    very

    small, g e n e r a l l y

    less than

    0 .0 02 i nch

    ( 0 . 0 5

    mm). As

    metamorphic

    grade in

    creased,

    siderite

    and

    minnesotaite

    were

    converted

    to

    other minerals, chiefly grunerite, within the biotite

    z o n e, and grain size became progressively larger. At

    metamorphic

    grades

    higher

    than

    those

    in th e biotite

    z o n e , no significant mineralogic changes occurred.

    Grunerite, m a g n etit e, and hematite remained stable

    and are the principal iro n - b e ari n g minerals in

    rocks

    o f the highest grade attained (sillimanite z o n e ) .

    Chert gra i n size

    i s

    a s

    large

    a s 0 .0 2 inch

    (0.5

    mm)

    in rocks o f the highest metamorphic grades, and

    some iron minerals

    a re

    several times larger. I n gen

    eral,

    th e

    banded cherty nature o f th e rock i s pre

    served to th e highest metamorphic gra d e s. I n the

    area shown in figure 1 , west o f the garnet isograd,

    the

    relatively

    c oa r se g ra i n size has

    inhibited

    second

    ary oxidation, and o x i d a t i v e weathering has n o t

    been an important mineral-forming

    process

    ; e ast o f

    the

    garnet

    isograd much o f th e iron-formation has

    been d e ep l y weathered, and a l l

    the

    goethite and part

    o f

    the hematite

    were formed by postmetamorphic

    weathering o f siderite, minnesotaite, and m a g n etit e.

    STRUCTURAL

    POSITION AND THICKNESS

    The

    Negaunee

    Iron-formation i s f o l d e d into a

    doubly plunging synclinorium in the Marquette

    trough (see f i g . 1 ). The iro n -f o rm ati o n attains i t s

    g re a te st t hi ck n e ss ( 3 , 3 0 0 - 3 , 9 0 0 ft; -1,000-1,200

    m)

    near

    the

    west-plunging

    keel

    o f

    th e

    synclinorium

    a few m i l e s so u th o f

    the

    towns o f Negaunee and Ish-

    peming. Because o f l im ite d erosion o f the

    syncline

    and the relatively

    gentle

    plunge (20°-30°) and g r e a t

    stratigraphic thickness of the

    f o l d e d

    unit, a very

    large area i s u n d e r l a i n by the iron-formation. The

    synclinorium g e n e r a l l y maintains a westward plunge

    from i t s e astern end to

    the

    vicinity o f

    Humboldt,

    where the d e e p est parts o f the formation

    a re

    be

    lieved

    to

    be about 8,200

    feet

    (2,5 0 0 m) below

    th e

    surface

    (Klasner and Cannon,

    1 9 7 4 ) .

    The

    formation

    thins abruptly

    away from the

    exposed

    keel,

    also thins

    along the buried

    keel,

    and commonly has a thick

    ness

    o f

    250-500

    feet

    (~80-160

    m)

    where

    exposed

    a l o n g th e ste e p ly dipping limbs. I n

    much

    o f western

    Marquette district,

    the

    Negaunee i s absent a s a re

    sult

    o f truncation along an ov e r l y i n g unconformity.

    The westernmost occurrence o f th e Negaunee i s

    along

    th e

    north limb o f th e synclinorium near

    the

    community

    o f

    Three

    Lakes.

    I n the Palmer b as i n (see

    f i g . 1 ) ,

    the

    Negaunee

    i s

    about

    1 , 1 0 0

    feet

    (—350

    m)

    thick

    and

    i s f o l d e d into

    a

    ha l f sy n cl i ne co n si sti n g o f a

    south

    limb and keel ;

    the

    north

    limb

    has

    been e l i m i n at e d by faulting. The

    structure i s a s much a s

    2, 5 0 0 f e et

    (—750 m) deep.

    The

    Mitchigan River trough i s likewise a

    half

    syn

    cline

    because

    th e

    west

    limb has been

    e l i m i n a t e d

    by

    faulting.

    The

    Negaunee

    there

    can be

    a s

    much

    a s

    1 , 0 0 0

    feet (—300

    m)

    thick, and the

    trough

    i s about

    6 , 5 0 0 feet (-2,000

    m)

    deep

    The Republic trough i s a

    syncline

    that plunges

    about

    4 5 °

    NW.

    a t

    the exposed keel but i s b e l i ev e d to

    decrease in plunge toward the northwest. I n this

    trough,

    the Negaunee i s g e n e r a l l y thin, in several

    a r e a s i s absent, and o n l y

    near

    the exposed keel

    re aches a significant thickness o f a s much a s 1 ,0 00

    feet (-300 m).

    RESOURCE DATA BANK

    Between

    1957

    and

    1 97 4, the

    U.S. Geological

    Sur

    vey

    mapped the

    Marquette district, i n cl u di n g the

    Negaunee

    Iro n -f o rm ati o n,

    in

    detail.

    During

    that

    work,

    a

    vast amount o f

    petrologic and

    structural

    information was accumulated, a n d , with the cooper

    a ti on o f

    th e mining

    companies

    active

    in the a re a, a

    f i l e

    o f d i a m o n d - d r i l l i n g

    records

    was

    co mp i l e d .

    I n

    1 9 7 5 , we

    began a pro j ect

    to

    organize that informa

    tion

    into

    a computerized data f i l e on i ro n re so u rc e s.

    The basic element of

    the

    d at a system co n si sts o f

    blocks measuring VnXV-i m i l e (0.8x0.8 km) hori

    z ontally and 500 o r 1 , 0 0 0 feet

    ( 1 5 2 . 4

    o r 3 0 4 . 8 m)

    vertically. Thus, the area o f the

    district

    u n d e r l a i n by

    iro n -f o rm ati o n was

    d i v i d e d into '/i-mi-

    ( 0 . 6 5 -k m 2 )

    a r e a s and d i v i d e d

    into horizontal

    slabs from the su r

    face

    to

    —500

    feet

    (—152.4 m)   —500 fe et to —1,000

    feet (—152.4 m

    to

    —304.8 m) and then into deeper

    1,000-fo ot-

    ( 3 0 4 . 8 - m - )

    thi c k sl a b s to the base o f the

    iron-formation. For each thre e - d i m e nsi o n a l b l ock

    thus defined, about 45 variables were measured,

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    11/31

    4

    ESTIMATES

    OF NEGAUNEE IRON-FORMATION,

    MICHIGAN

    calculated, o r estimated. Al l variables

    were e nt ere d

    into a

    computerized

    f i l e ; by means o f th e Ge o l o g ic

    Retrieval

    and

    Synopsis

    Program,

    GRASP

    (Bowen

    and

    B ot b o l, 1 9 7 5 ) , the

    data can

    be classified and re

    called by

    any

    o f the

    vari a b l es

    o r

    any

    combination o f

    variables.

    The

    data

    bank ca n be

    us e d

    a s

    an information

    system

    that

    will answer

    any

    question that

    can

    be

    phrased in terms o f listed variables, a s l o n g a s the

    q u esti o n er c o n si d e r s t he limitations imposed by th e

    manner in which va l u es were determined and stored.

    PREPARATION OF THE DATA

    BANK

    For

    this

    resource ev a l u at i o n,

    we

    needed

    to

    pre

    pare,

    a s quickly

    a s

    possible,

    a computer f i l e

    o f

    infor

    mation

    about

    the b l ocks within the

    Marquette

    dis

    t r i c t .

    I n order to determine what variables would

    b e

    i n c l u d e d

    in th e f i l e and hence, how th e d at a-i np ut

    form would be d e s i g n e d, we

    needed

    to co nsi d er f i r s t

    what questions would be asked o f the final data

    system.

    Once

    this

    was established,

    a

    simple

    i np ut

    form was designed to re co rd the d ata a s efficiently

    and easily a s possible.

    The next task was

    to

    make the data machine-

    re a d a b l e . The co nv e nti o n a l method i s

    to u se

    punch

    cards, but

    because

    o f the

    large

    volume of data

    in

    vo lv e d

    in

    this

    project,

    cassette

    tapes were used

    to

    record the data. The

    tapes

    a re small, ho ld a

    relative

    ly large amount o f data, and

    a re

    re us a b l e once the

    data contained on them

    have

    been transmitted to

    the computer.

    A problem in making th e data machine-readable

    i s th e introduction o f errors. Each time data a re

    translated from one

    medium

    to a n o t he r , e r ro r s may

    be introduced.

    For

    this project, a

    programmable

    d at a- e ntry station was used,

    not o n l y

    because i t

    g e n er at es cassette tapes,

    but

    also because i t can do a

    l i m it e d amount o f data editing. The d at a- e ntry sta

    tion i s much like a keypunch machine in concept. As

    d ata a re typed a t a keyboard, they appear on a CRT

    (cathode ray

    tu b e )

    screen. After a certain amount

    o f data accumulates on

    the screen,

    i t can be edited,

    corrected

    i f necessary,

    and then transferred elec

    tronically from the scr e en to the cassette tape, thus

    clearing

    the

    screen for more data. For e a s e o f entry

    and

    editing,

    a preprogrammed  form appears on

    the sc re e n ;

    the  form nas a format

    similar to the

    sheet

    on

    which

    d a ta a re

    originally

    recorded.

    Cer

    tain errors a r e a u to m a ti ca l l y detected. For instance,

    a nonnumeric character cannot be entered in a

    numeric-only f i e l d , and vice-versa. I f a mistake i s

    made, an alarm sounds, and

    the

    operator must make

    the

    correct

    e n try b e fo re th e machine will continue.

    I n

    addition,

    the d at a- e ntry station i s

    programmab

    to the e xt e nt that i t ca n generate new

    numbers fo

    g i v e n

    record on th e b a sis o f numbers already

    tered. Using av a i l a b l e

    arithmetic

    operators,

    i t

    possible to generate ratios, sums, products, and

    on,

    in vari o us combinations and to incorporate

    t

    resultant number a s

    part

    o f

    the

    record.

    For

    t

    discussion,

    a

    record

    i s

    one

    b l ock

    in

    the

    Marquet

    district

    and

    a l l

    the

    d at a associated with th at b l o

    Each record i s written

    on

    the cassette tape in f i

    format, meaning that i n each record, i t e m s alwa

    appear in th e same position

    and have

    th e same

    nu

    b e r

    o f

    characters.

    After the data a re in machine-readable form, th

    a re transmitted to the computer f o r p ro c e ssi n g . T

    d at a- e ntry station i s used fo r

    this j o b also.

    Becau

    the d at a- e ntry station i s programmable i t can

    made to appear to the ho st computer a s a telet

    t erm i n a l . The data can then be transmitted to t

    computer through the u se o f a v o i ce - g ra d e t e l e ph

    connected to the terminal through an acous

    coupler.

    Because the final d at a f i l e

    needs to

    b e

    accessi

    in an interactive mode, th e host computer has to

    a timesharing computer. The computer o f a pri v

    company

    whose function i s to s e l l computer ti

    was deemed

    th e most

    appropriate, both in cost a

    in

    speed

    o f processing.

    The software system chosen

    to manage

    the d

    i s known a s

    the

    Ge o l o g ic Retrieval and

    Synops

    Program  GRASP) (Bowen and

    B ot b o l,

    1 9 7

    GRASP

    i s

    a

    se t

    o f

    Fortran

    IV su bro uti n es and

    main

    driver

    that provi d es

    interactive

    access

    to

    g

    logic data. Because GRASP

    i s

    a machine-indep

    dent

    interactive

    system,

    i t

    was av a i l a b l e

    on

    chosen computer.

    The Marquette district

    GRASP f i l e actually c

    sists

    o f four

    f i l e s

    : mask f i l e , definitions f i l e , dict

    ary f i l e , and numeric

    master

    f i l e . The mask

    f i l e

    c

    tains a sho rt

    acronym

    fo r each o f the 45

    variab

    abundant iron mineral o r

    formation name,

    the ma

    f i l e t e l l s

    the GRASP system whether

    a

    particu

    field

    will

    co nt a i n

    a real

    ( d e c i m a l )

    number, an

    i

    ger (whole) number,

    o r

    character-string (alpha

    m eric).

    For

    character-string

    items,

    such a s m

    abundant iron mineral o r formation name

    the

    ma

    f i l e

    also

    has a numeric pointer to th e f i r s t e ntry

    the d i cti o n a ry

    f i l e

    associated

    with

    that

    item. T

    dictionary f i l e i s a l i s t o f a l l the possible

    charact

    string

    it e ms

    that

    c ou l d appear

    i n

    the GRASP

    At present i t

    has

    73 entries. Al l the i te m s

    fo r

    e

    field are grouped together in the d i cti o na ry

    which co nt a i ns a count of how many it e ms there

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    12/31

    RESOURCE

    DATA BANK 5

    for each f i e l d . The definition f i l e ' s main

    purpose

    i s

    to provide a full breakdown o f the 45 vari a b l es into

    various

    categories

    o f

    information

    in the GRASP f i l e

    (such as,

    taconite

    characteristics,

    deposit

    character

    istics), a s w e l l a s

    to

    provide a

    description

    o f each

    acronym. The

    numeric

    master

    f i l e i s the

    actual data

    f i l e , but

    i t i s

    fa r d ifferent in

    appearance from

    the

    raw

    data

    a s

    they

    initially appear

    on

    the

    time-sharing

    computer.

    Each o f the alphanumeric

    entries

    has

    been replaced

    by a

    number

    indicating

    that

    entry's

    relative position in

    the

    dictionary f i l e . An important

    po i nt i s that

    th e

    u se o f this method o f storing dic

    ti o n ary pointers rather than the l o n g character-

    string e n try sa ve s a

    co nsi d era b l e

    amount o f space

    in

    the

    computer. For

    instance,

    instead

    o f having

    the

    full county name  Marquette appear

    in

    every re c

    ord

    in that

    county,

    th e

    word

    i s

    replaced

    by

    a

    number

    indicating

    i t s position

    in

    th e dictionary. Decimal

    number and i n t e g e r

    d at a fields

    a re sto re d a s they

    were entered.

    For a

    given r e co rd , se v e ra l

    fields may

    have

    been

    left

    blank on

    th e

    original

    input

    sheet,

    meaning that the data

    for a

    particular item a re un

    av a i l a bl e .

    The GRASP software will

    compress

    the

    data

    so that the

    numeric

    master

    f i l e i s

    a s

    sm a l l

    a s

    possible.

    AFortran IV program, BUILD1, changes th e raw

    i n pu t re co rd into the compressed unformatted bi

    nary

    numeric master f i l e . The

    BUILD1 program

    r e a d s in

    each

    transmitted record, checks

    for

    blank

    numeric fields to ensure that they do not

    g e t sto re d

    a s zero, compares each alphanumeric entry in each

    raw-data record with the co n te n ts o f th e appropri

    a te part o f th e dictionary f i l e in order to determine

    that

    entry's

    numeric

    position

    in

    the

    dictionary,

    and

    finally writ es

    th e

    transformed record into

    the

    nu

    meric master f i l e . The

    program i s

    run once fo r each

    cassette f i l e that

    i s

    transmitted to

    the

    timesharing

    computer.

    BUILD

    has been designed so that re c

    ords that are already a

    part

    o f the

    numeric

    master

    f i l e

    may

    be updated easily.

    The update part o f th e

    program

    a p pl i e s t o numeric fields

    o nly .

    The resultant

    new numeric

    master

    f i l e

    will then

    co nt a i n the

    o ld

    numeric master

    f i l e

    and any

    updates that have

    been

    made, a s w el l a s

    the

    most recently transmitted ca s

    sette f i l e . I n a d di ti on to

    the

    electronic e d it i ng per

    formed during th e

    initial

    data e ntry and the e d it i ng

    functions

    o f th e programs, th e

    entire

    data se t was

    e d it e d

    manually

    by

    comparing

    printouts

    o f

    th e

    data

    with

    the original

    data sheets.

    At this po i nt the f i l e can

    be

    interrogated by th e

    GRASP system. Among the

    things

    GRASP can

    be

    used fo r i s th e creation o f

    subfiles.

    Through use

    o f

    condition,

    logic, and

    search

    commands,

    the se su b-

    f i l e s

    can

    be generated

    according

    to user-specified cri

    teria. The f ol l ow i n g a re examples o f subfiles : ( 1 ) a l l

    th e blocks whose most

    abundant iron

    mineral i s

    magnetite and which

    co nta i n 1 5 m i l l i o n to 30 m i l l i o n

    tons

    o f i ro n

    ore,

    and (2) a l l th e b l o cks tha t

    have

    a

    grain size o f less than 0 . 0 2

    inch

    (0.5

    mm)

    or a

    maximum Pleistocene

    thickness o f

    no

    more than 120

    feet

    ( 3 7

    m).

    Simple

    statistical

    o p erati o ns

    can be

    performed

    on

    the master f i l e o r

    any

    subfiles.

    By

    use

    o f th e

    function

    command, th e

    user can

    o bt a i n

    the

    maximum, minimum,

    mean, variance,

    and standard-

    d e v i a t i o n v a l u e s fo r any o f

    the

    variables. Not

    o n l y

    are they important numbers in themselves, but the

    maximum andminimum v a l u e s a re quite v a l u a b l e a s

    secondary e d it i ng numbers. Extremely high o r low

    numbers will show up a s e rro rs and can be f l a g g e d

    and

    changed.

    The program will a l so ca l cu la te the

    slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient fo r a

    least-squares regression line

    between

    any two nu

    meric variables.

    The

    final

    data

    f i l e

    contains

    1,860

    records

    which

    a re a l l

    accessible and

    updatable by

    th e

    GRASP soft

    ware

    system.

    On the basis o f

    any

    given

    se t

    o f c on d i

    tions and associated

    logic,

    i t takes

    about 45

    seconds

    to search

    th e

    entire f i l e and to select the

    appropriate

    records

    to be

    stored in a

    subfile.

    The

    total

    cost

    o f

    this o p erati o n averages about $2.7 5

    fo r each

    com

    puter run.

    VARIABLES

    Each o f 1 ,86 0 blocks containing iron-formation i s

    characterized by a se t o f va ri ab l es d e scri b e d b e lo w .

    A

    hypothetical cross

    section

    and data b l ock

    a re

    shown in

    figure

    2

    to

    illustrate the manner in

    which

    ce rta i n v ari a b le s were

    measured

    and assigned to

    blocks.

    IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION

    These v ar i a b l e s provide information on the identi

    fication and geographic and spatial location o f ind i

    v i d u a l blocks.

    Unique

    identification number.—

    he district

    was

    d i v i d e d

    on

    a half-mile (0.8-km)

    grid by

    north-south

    and

    east-west

    lines, and

    each Vi-mi2 ( 0 . 6 5 -km2) area

    was assig n e d a unique i d e n t i f y i n g number, ID1,

    that

    corresponds to

    a

    number assigned to that b l ock

    on

    an index map o f th e district. The district was fur

    ther

    d i v i d e d

    into

    horizontal

    slabs,

    either

    500

    feet

    ( 1 5 2 . 4

    m)

    thick

    (for the two

    slabs n e ar est

    the

    sur

    face) o r 1 , 0 0 0

    feet

    ( 3 0 4 . 8 m) thick. The depth be

    low

    the

    surface

    i s indicated by

    I D 3 ,

    the

    depth

    to

    th e

    bottom o f the slab. These

    two

    a re separated by ID 2,

    an

    alpha character coded to indicate the formation

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    13/31

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    14/31

    RESOURCE DATA BANK

    7

    TACONITE CHARACTERISTICS

    Seventeen variables are

    i n c l u d e d

    that give infor

    mation

    on the nature and

    magnitude

    o f iron-forma

    tion

    within

    a block.

    Grade.

    ive

    variables

    give

    the percentage

    o f

    iron,

    s i l i c a ,

    phosphorous,

    manganese,

    and

    alumina

    in the

    i r o n - f or m at i o n . Values

    were obtained mostly

    from

    assays

    o f

    drill

    core

    provided

    by mining

    com

    p a n i e s

    but also

    from

    a n a l y s es by the U.S. Geological

    Survey

    o f drill core and

    samples from

    outcrops. Be

    ca us e much o f

    th e

    drilling was done

    in e xp l o rati o n

    for

    high-grade ore, many cores are partly in materi

    al that

    has

    undergone secondary

    enrichment,

    and

    thus, th e

    cores a re not r e pr e se n ta t i ve o f

    most

    o f the

    i r o n - f or m at i o n .

    To

    a v o i d b i a s i n g our v a l u e s

    by

    these

    higher grade cores,

    any

    a n a l y s e s

    o f

    gre at er

    than 40

    percent iron were excluded from our

    d ata.

    Volume o f iro n -f o rm ati o n .—he volume o f iron-

    formation in m i l l i o ns o f cu b ic feet c o n t a i n e d in each

    slab i s calculated from cross secti o ns drawn

    a t

    Va-mi

    ( 0 . 8-km )

    intervals

    approximately

    perpendicular

    to

    the strike

    o f th e iron-formation. Where the shape

    o f the iron-formation

    between

    cross sections i s to o

    irregular to approximate by co n si d e ri n g o n ly

    end

    areas, the volume i s estimated by approximating the

    shape

    by means o f combinations

    o f po l y he d ra l

    forms

    whose

    volume

    can

    be calculated from simple

    f orm u l as.

    Density

    of i r o n - f or m at i o n .

    he

    density o f iron-

    formation i s

    recorded in short tons per cubic foot.

    I t

    i s

    determined i n di vi d ua l ly fo r

    each slab from a

    graph

    relating density to iron

    percentage.

    M i l l i o ns o f sho rt to ns o f i r o n - f or m at i o n .

    he

    amount o f iron-formation

    in

    m i l l i o ns o f sho rt tons

    i s

    determined

    by

    multiplying

    density

    by

    th e

    volume

    o f iron-formation

    in th e block.

    Millions o f

    short

    tons o f iron.—

    he

    amount o f

    iron in m i ll i on s o f short tons i s

    determined

    by m u lti

    p l y i n g m i ll i on s o f short

    tons

    o f iron-formation in the

    b l ock

    by the iron

    percentage.

    Grain s i z e .

    he grain-size variable

    indicates

    th e

    size, in m i ll i m ete rs, o f chert grains. The v a l u e i s

    determined either by direct measurement in thin

    sections o r i s d eriv e d from the

    location o f

    the

    b l ock

    with

    respect to metamorphic isograds by using ob

    served relationships

    between

    metamorphic grade

    and

    gra i n

    size.

    Most

    abundant

    i ro n m i ne ra l .

    he

    most

    abundant

    iro n - b e ari n g mineral within th e entire slab

    i s

    de

    term i n e d . It may represent an average determined

    from two o r more lithologic types o f i r o n- f o rm a ti o n .

    Mineralogic co nt e nt i s

    determined

    from drill

    re c

    ords, thin sections, and field observations.

    Other i ro n m in era ls.

    hree

    variables

    indicate

    other abundant (more than 1 0

    percent) iron miner

    als

    contained in the slab.

    Accessory minerals.

    he three most common a c

    cessory minerals (less than 1 0 pe rce n t) , excluding

    quartz, a re

    listed

    a s s e pa r a te variables.

    DEPOSIT

    CHARACTERISTICS

    The

    remaining v ari a b le s d e scri b e mostly

    geo

    metric

    and g e o l o g i c

    r e la t io n shi p s o f

    the deposit and

    can

    be used

    to judge

    i t s m i n a b i l it y .

    Formation

    name.—he stratigraphic

    name o f

    the

    formation or member i s

    i n c l u d e d here

    and i s

    an

    alternative

    means

    o f

    storing

    and retrieving th e in

    formation

    given

    by

    ID2, but

    here i s listed in full in

    alpha

    characters rather

    than

    in coded

    form.

    Formation

    thickness.

    he total

    stratigraphic

    thickn ess of th e iron-formation o f which

    the

    materi

    al i n c l u d e d

    in

    th e b l ock i s a part ( I

    in

    f i g . 2)

    i s

    ind icated.

    Iron-formation

    thickness.

    he

    maximum

    verti

    ca l thickness o f iron-formation within the b lo ck ( j

    and k in f i g . 2 ) i s defi n e d.

    I nt erl a y er e d waste thickness.—he

    thickness o f

    waste

    rock, determined l arg e l y

    from

    drill d ata,

    i s

    listed.

    Iron-formation/waste.—ron-formation/waste i s

    calculated a s the ratio o f thickn ess of iron-formation

    to thickn ess of waste rock.

    Dip.

    he average d i p o f bedding o f the

    iron-

    formation estimated

    to the

    n e ar est 5 °

    i s

    listed here.

    Thickness o f

    Pleistocene

    overburden.

    —he thick

    ness o f

    Pleistocene

    cover

    i s

    measured

    in feet and in

    clu d es

    separate

    v ar i a b l e s

    fo r

    maximum,

    minimum,

    and average thickness.

    Values

    a re

    determined from

    d i a m o n d - d r i l l i n g and

    w a t e r - w e l l

    records.

    Stripping required to

    uncover iro n -f o rm ati o n .—

    Separate

    v a l u e s a re given fo r consolidated (c and d

    in

    f i g .

    2)

    and u nco nso l i d at e d ( a and b

    in

    f i g . 2)

    strip

    ping. Unconsolidated stripping

    i s calculated by using

    the average Pleistocene thickness.

    Consolidated

    stripping

    i s

    calculated from the same cross

    sections

    used

    to calculate

    iron-formation volume.

    Only ma

    terial

    within th e b l ock i s

    considered,

    so that figures

    do not reflect

    the

    total

    amount

    o f rock that might

    have

    to bemoved

    to

    actually mine th e iron-formation

    because

    mining might

    also

    require

    moving

    rock

    in

    adjacent blocks.

    I nt erl a y er e d

    waste-rock

    type.—wo

    vari a b l es

    identify

    th e

    two most common types

    o f rock inter

    l a y e r e d with th e

    iro n -f o rm ati o n .

    They are

    deter

    mined

    l arg e l y

    from drill records.

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    15/31

    1 0

    IRON-FORMATION,

    MICHIGAN

    STIMATES

    OF

    NEGAUNEE

    1 0 0 p

    9 0

    8 0

    7 0

    W

    g o

    o

    O 5 0

    o

    m 4 0

    3 0

    2 0 h

    1 0

    o

    SB

    ?

     °

    c c

    l u —

    z

    <

    c c

    a

    z

    o

    <

    2

    c c

    O

    L L

    z

    o

    c c

    u

    H

    Z

    C 3

    <

    C O C O

    L ? O

    I H

    is

    H

    L U C C

    L O

    -

    C C

    <

    O

    u

    L U ( J

    b z

    C O C O

    g

    <

    C C

    O

    O

    c c

    <

    U J C 3

    b z

    C O C O

    Figure 4 —raph showing b i l l i o n s of long tons of N e g a u n e e

    Iron-formation

    i n categories described i n the t e x t . Shaded

    part of bars i s

    iron-formation

    within

    1,000 f e e t ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m)

    o f the

    surface.

    Smaller bars

    indicate

    a m o u n t of

    each c l a s s

    that contains more than 10 percent s i d e r i t e .

    m at eri a l i s within 1 , 0 0 0 feet ( 3 0 4 . 8 m) o f the su

    face. Next in importance i s iron-formation c ont a i

    i n g

    magnetite a s

    the

    most abundant m i n e r a l . Abou

    48

    billion

    l on g to ns

    o f this

    type

    i s present,

    of

    whi

    about 10.5 billion l o n g to n s i s within 1 ,0 00 fe

    ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m) o f the surface. Coarse-grained he m atit

    i r o n - f or m at i o n ,

    co nce ntrat a b l e by froth flotation,

    th e

    least

    abundant

    type, totalling

    about

    27.1

    billi

    l o n g

    tons, o f which

    o n l y about

    4.8

    billion

    l o n g to

    i s

    within

    1 , 0 0 0

    feet

    ( 3 0 4 . 8 m)

    o f

    th e surface. Silica

    iron-formation, not amenable to concentration

    means o f present technology, totals about

    3 7 . 6

    b i

    lion l o n g tons, about 5 .6 billion l o n g to ns o f which

    within 1,0 0 0 feet ( 3 0 4 . 8 m) o f th e surface. Abou

    92.5 billion l o n g to ns o f

    th e

    iron-formation

    i s al

    siderite-bearing.

    Locally, siderite

    i s

    the

    predomina

    iron mineral in the i r o n - f or m at i o n ,

    but

    we ha

    identified no blocks in which i t i s the most abunda

    mineral within an entire i/i-mi2 ( 0 . 6 5 -km2) are

    Thus, this large tonnage d o es n ot re pre se nt

    a d d

    tional iron-formation

    over tha t o f th e first f o

    classes, but

    i s

    a repetition o f th e

    tonnage indicat

    f o r h e ma t iti c , magnetic, and silicate

    iron-formati

    that also co nt a i ns

    siderite a s

    an

    abundant ( >

    1 0

    pe

    cent)

    m i n e r a l . The amount

    o f each

    class that co

    tains

    siderite in

    quantities

    gre at er than 1 0

    p erce

    i s

    also shown in

    figure 4 .

    These figures

    indicate t ha t th e Negaunee

    co nt a i

    a maximum o f about 167

    billion

    l o n g to n s o f iro

    formation that

    might

    be

    treatable

    by existing

    co

    centrating

    pro ce sse s o r m o d if ica ti o n s o f

    them.

    Abou

    44 billion

    tons o f this

    m at eri a l i s

    a t depths

    o f le

    than

    1 , 0 0 0

    feet ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m) beneath

    the

    surface

    a

    might

    be

    accessible

    to o p e n -p it

    mining. Certainl

    some

    percentage

    o f tha t

    amount

    will

    never be

    e c

    nomically

    av a i l a b l e from open pits. However,

    t

    error

    i ntro d uce d

    by

    i n c l u d i n g economically u n a v a i

    a b l e

    iro n -f o rm ati o n

    in

    this assessment

    i s

    a t

    lea

    partly offset

    because we excluded

    iron-formation

    depths gre at er than 1 , 0 0 0

    feet

    ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m),

    some

    which will

    probably be

    mined a t presently operati

    open

    pits. Future

    pits

    might

    also be

    deeper

    th

    1 , 0 0 0

    feet ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m).

    We

    emphasize

    that

    these f

    ures

    can in

    no way be

    construed

    to repres e nt

    e c

    nomically reco v era b l e ore. They simply i n d i ca te t

    maximum amount o f m at eri a l that meets minimu

    requirements to be co nsi d ere d a s potential co nce

    trating-grade

    ore.

    Many

    other

    variables

    must

    be

    d

    fined

    in order to make a

    more certain assessment

    the economic potential

    o f the m ate ri a l.

    Many

    the se va ri ab le s are not g e o l o g i c and

    cannot

    treated by means

    o f our

    data

    b ase. Of

    the g eo l og

    variables, many require d etailed information

    fa r

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    16/31

    IRON RESOURCES

    1 1

    excess o f our data base and cannot be estimated. A

    few a d d it i o n a l

    g e ol o gi c v ari a b le s

    that we can

    esti

    mate

    are co nsi d ere d

    b e l o w .

    Two

    important v ar i a b l e s

    in

    determining th e feasi

    bility

    o f open-pit mining

    a re the

    amount o f over

    l y i n g waste rock that

    must

    be stripped

    and

    the

    amount o f

    interlayered waste rock that

    must

    b e

    moved

    along

    with

    ore.

    Figures

    5

    and

    6

    show

    maxi

    mum

    tonnages o f possible

    treatable

    iron-formation

    within

    1,0 0 0 feet

    ( 3 0 4 . 8 m)

    o f th e su rf a ce that can

    be

    mined relative to th e

    amount

    o f waste rock

    that

    would be moved. No generalizations can be made fo r

    the amount o f waste that can

    be

    moved e c o n o m i c a l l y .

    The economics o f i n d i v i d u a l

    mining

    pl an s a re gov

    erned by a complex se t o f factors, and there i s ,

    3 5

    2

    3 0

    C O

    O

    H

    P U

    < z

    D C - 1

    O

    u .

    Z

    o

    D C

    1 1

    -

    - _

    J

    -

    1 0 1 0 0

    1 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0

    CONSOLIDATED

    STRIPPING,

    I N M IL L ION

    CUBIC

    F EET PER '/.-SQUARE-MILE BLOCK

    Figure 5 .—i sto g ra m sh ow i n g b i l l i o n s of long tons of the

    possibly treatable N e g a u n e e Iron-formatio n within 1,000

    f e e t

    ( 3 0 4 . 8 m) o f the

    surface r e l a t i v e t o volume

    of co n

    s o l i d a t e d

    waste rock

    overlying i t .

    Vo l u m e of waste i s c a l

    cu la te d o nl y

    within

    v e r t i c a l

    boundaries

    of

    each

    V i - m i 5

    b l o c k , n ot w ithi n

    inward

    sloping boundaries as w o u l d

    probably be

    required

    for d evelopment

    o f

    an ope n p i t .

    3 0

    1 0 0 0

    VOLUME IRON-FORMATION/VOLUME WASTE

    Figure

    6—

    i sto g ra m sho w i n g b i l l i o n s

    o f

    long tons of

    the

    possibly treatable N e g a u n e e

    Iron-formation

    within 1,000

    f e e t ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m) o f the

    surface with various r a t i o s

    o f

    volume

    o f

    iron-formation t o volume

    of

    interlayered waste

    r o c k .

    therefore,

    a wide

    range in

    tolerance

    fo r waste rock.

    No attempt i s made in this report to estimate

    amounts o f iron-formation that

    c ou l d

    be mined

    e co

    nomically relative to amounts o f a sso ci a te d waste

    rock that would need to b e moved.

    Figure 5

    shows,

    however, that development

    o f

    a

    major

    part o f

    the resource may not be hindered

    seriously

    by

    large

    amounts

    o f

    o v e rl y i n g w a s te .

    Near

    ly three-quarters o f the m at eri a l within 1,0 0 0 feet

    ( 3 0 4 . 8 m) o f th e su rf a ce

    requires

    stripping o f less

    than

    1 m i l l i o n

    f t 3

    ( 2 8 , 3 2 1 m3) o f consolidated ma

    terial

    fo r

    each

    Vi-mi- ( 0 . 6 5 -k m 2 ) area

    to

    uncover th e

    i r o n - f or m at i o n . These figures

    fo r o v erl y i n g consoli

    d a t e d

    waste must be co nsi d ere d

    approximate mini

    ma for two reasons.

    First, we

    have

    d ef i n e d o v erl y i n g

    stripping a s

    being

    restricted mostly to

    quartzite and

    conglomerate stratigraphically above th e Negaunee,

    whereas an i n d iv i d u a l

    mine

    may

    be in

    a

    stratigraph

    ically medial position in th e

    Negaunee

    and

    have

    a

    metadiabase

    s i l l , i n c l u d e d

    in

    our figures a s inter

    l a y e r e d

    waste,

    a s

    o v erl y i n g

    rock.

    When

    i n d i v i d u a l

    mines are

    considered,

    therefore,

    there may

    in fact

    be m at eri a l to b e

    stripped,

    such a s metadiabase, that

    in our figures i s

    i n c l u d e d

    a s i n te rl a y e re d waste rath

    e r

    than

    a s o ve rl yi ng w a ste . Se co nd , in

    calculating

    volumes o f stri pp in g , we have calculated o n l y ma

    terial directly above the iro n -f o rm ati o n o f interest,

    which, in effect, assumes

    vertical

    pi t w a l l s i f our

    figures are applied

    to

    an

    i n d iv i d u a l

    mine.

    Because

    vertical

    pits a re

    g e n e r a l l y

    n o t feasible in actual

    min

    i n g

    practice, o v e r l y i n g

    and adjoining waste volumes

    fo r an i n d iv i d u a l

    mine would often be somewhat

    gre at er

    than our figures indicate.

    Figure 6 indicates that more than 90 p erce nt o f

    th e 44 billion to ns o f

    possibly

    treatable iron-forma

    tion within 1 , 0 0 0 feet

    ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m) o f the

    surface has

    iro n -f o rm ati o n : waste ratios gre at er than 1 : 1 and

    that

    nearly

    16 billion tons has a

    ratio

    o f better than

    1 0 : 1 .

    Thus,

    excessive volumes o f interlayered waste

    rock do not

    seem

    a major hindrance

    to

    development

    o f a large percentage o f th e

    resources.

    Much o f the

    waste i s interlayered

    metadiabase

    s i l l s ,

    which a re

    g e n e ra l l y l a rg e discrete b o d i e s

    (see

    f i g . 1 ). I n min

    ing,

    much

    o f

    the

    s i l l s c ou l d be left i n pl a ce , e ff e cti ve

    ly improving th e iron-formation : waste ratios o f th e

    m at eri a l actually mined. However, in places, th e

    presence o f the

    metadiabase

    s i l l s

    would

    cause min

    i n g

    o f

    some

    underlying iron-formation

    to

    be

    e co

    nomically unattractive.

    RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION

    A

    classification system f o r r e so u r ce s based on de

    gree o f economic feasibility o f mining and process

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    17/31

    12

    IRON-FORMATION, MICHIGAN

    STIMATES OF NEGAUNEE

    i ng the

    o re and on degree o f

    g e o l o g i c

    assurance with

    which

    th e deposit i s

    known was proposed by McKel-

    vey  1973 and has been adopted

    by

    the U .S. Geo

    logical Survey

    and

    the

    U.S.

    Bureau

    o f

    M i n es. A

    m o d i f i e d ve rsi on o f tha t classification i s used here.

    Our classif ication d if fers from McKelvey's in two

    ways. First, we do n o t i n c l u d e

    c ate g o ri e s f or

    u n d i s

    covered

    resources.

    We

    co nsi d er

    that

    the

    Marquette

    district i s so thoroughly e xp l o re d that a l l the ma

    terial indicated by our figures i s known with ade

    quate degree o f assurance to be co nsi d ere d an identi

    fied resource.

    The possibility

    that

    substantial a d d i

    tional

    deposits

    o f

    iro n -f o rm ati o n

    exist in the

    district

    i s negligible in light o f the

    g r e a t

    amount o f g e o l o g ic

    and geophysical data on th e area. Seco n d , we do not

    subdivide re se rve s a s

    suggested

    by

    McKelvey.

    We

    co n si d e r tha t the

    definition

    o f economic availability

    o f iro n

    o re i s dependent

    on

    many

    factors

    that can

    not be estimated

    without

    very d e ta i le d stu d ie s and

    that reserves

    a re

    restricted

    to thoroughly tested

    ma

    terial

    a t existing

    mines

    o r

    in

    a r e a s

    where

    d e v e l o p

    ment i s known

    to

    be feasib le in the immediate

    future.

    I n figure 7 , th e tonnage that we assign to each o f

    seven resource

    categories

    i s shown. Under

    economic

    deposits,

    we

    include

    estimates o f e co n om i ca l ly re

    c ov e ra b l e m a te r i a l a t

    three existing

    taconite mines

    plus

    one deposit a t which development in th e near

    E C O N O M I C

    MEASURED, I N D I C A T E D , AND INFERRED

    2-3

    P A R A M A R G I N A L

    MEASURED

    INDICATED

    INFERRED

    S U E C O N O M I C

    2 6 . 1

    7.9

    7 . 3

    S U M R G I N L

    7.6

    20.9

    133.1

    —DECREASING

    GEOLOGIC ASSURANCE

    -*

    [ A l l f i g u r e s i n b i l l i o n long t o n s ]

    Figure 7 .—

    esource

    c l a s s i f i c a t i o n chart showing b i l l i o n s o f

    long tons of Neg a u n e e Iron-f ormatio n assig ned

    t o

    cate

    gories based

    o n

    varying degrees

    t o

    which material a p

    proaches the characteristics

    of presently

    economic

    deposits

    a n d the

    degree of

    a ssu ra n ce w i th which the d epo si t

    i s

    known.

    future has been announced.

    These

    estimates a

    based

    on annual production

    capacity

    of co nce ntra

    i n g plants and

    presumed

    minimum l i f e span of th

    mi n es, a s w el l a s on pu b l ishe d reserve figures.

    Under subeconomic resources, we

    have

    d i v i d

    m at eri a l into two

    categories—

    aramarginal r

    sources and submarginal resources—n th e

    basis

    mineralogy

    and

    depth

    below

    the

    surface. Parama

    g i n a l

    resources include

    m at eri a l that has m a g n etit

    hematite, o r

    goethite

    a s the

    most

    abundant

    iron

    mi

    eral

    and that i s within

    1 , 0 0 0 feet

    ( 3 0 4 . 8 m) o f th

    surface.

    Thus, paramarginal

    resources include ma

    terial

    that

    i s potentially

    accessible

    to

    open-pit

    min

    ing, and

    that

    has

    m i n er a l o g ica l similarities to ma

    terial presently

    being

    processed commercially. A

    though

    large

    amounts o f this m at eri a l may not b

    processible by techn iq u es currently used, we consi

    e r i t likely that new processes o r m o d i f i c at i o n s o

    current ones c ou l d successfully beneficiate much o

    i t . Al l the m a te ri a l has one feature in common—

    a l a rge

    percentage

    o f

    the

    contained

    iron

    i s

    presen

    in a mineralogic form ( ox id e o r hydrous o x i d e min

    erals), fo r which

    b eneficiatio n requires

    o n l y

    th

    physical separation o f iron

    minerals

    from gangu

    minerals.

    Submarginal resources include m at eri a l

    a t depth

    gre at er than

    1 , 0 0 0

    feet

    ( 3 0 4 . 8

    m) and

    a l l m at eri a l

    r e ga r d l e ss o f d e pth ,

    that

    co nt a i ns iron-silicate a s th

    most abundant m i n e r a l . Submarginal resources

    therefore, include (1 ) m at eri a l that to

    become

    e co

    nomically reco v era b l e would require a

    substantia

    improvement in mining o r p ro c e ssi n g technology o

    a substantial increase in price o f i ro n co n ce n tra te s

    o r b o th; and (2) m at eri a l fo r which the concentra

    tion

    o f

    much

    o f

    th e

    contained

    iron

    requires

    a

    chemi

    ca l a s w el l a s a phy si ca l process.

    We have rather a r bi tr a ri l y d e f in e d limits

    on

    de

    gree o f g e o l o g i c assurance a s five o r more data point

    (outcrops plus drillholes) per mi2 ( 0.65 km2) fo

    measured resources, and one to four data points pe

    Vi m i 2 ( 0 . 6 5

    km2)

    f o r i n d ica te d resources. Materia

    not known directly but whose presence

    i s predicte

    by projection o f data for relatively

    short

    distance

    i s co nsi d ere d an inferred resource.

    Figure 7 shows that fo r paramarginal

    resource

    about 34 billion l o n g tons, o r more than 80 percen

    o f the ca te g ory , i s known

    from

    a t

    least one

    dat

    p oi nt

    per

    Vi

    m i 2

    ( 0 . 6 5

    km2) and

    more

    than 60

    per

    cent i s known from five o r

    more data

    points. Thi

    high

    degree

    o f g e o l o g ic assurance reflects the de

    tailed surface mapping o f th e district a s w e l l a s th

    gre at number o f

    drillholes

    that pe n e tra te the firs

    1 , 0 0 0

    feet

    beneath

    the

    surface.

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    18/31

    IRON RESOURCES

    1 3

    For submarginal

    r e so u rce s th e situation i s

    re

    versed.

    Only

    about

    7 .6 billion

    l o n g tons,

    o r

    about 5

    percent o f the category

    i s

    known from more than

    five data

    points per V4 m*2 (0.65 km-),

    whereas

    gre at er than 80 percent o r 1 3 3 . 1 billion l o n g tons

    i s

    inferred

    by

    projection o f d ata. Because i n f e rr e d su b -

    marginal resources account fo r about 65 p erce nt of

    th e

    total

    resource,

    we

    would like

    to

    co nsi d er

    briefly

    th e

    degree

    o f assurance with which the m a te ri a l i s

    inferred. We a re d e a l i n g with a stratigraphic unit,

    th e Negaunee Iro n -f o rm ati o n, that i s known from

    surface and n e ar-surf ace data to vary g r a d u a l l y

    along

    stri ke i n a manner in which th e most impor

    tant

    variables such a s

    thickness and

    mineralogy

    can

    g e n er a l l y be

    predicted

    rather w e l l between

    data

    points 1 mile (1.6 km) apart. Our data bank i s n o t

    co nstructe d so a s to i d en ti fy re a d i ly the n e a re st d a ta

    point to a block, but we believe, from

    our

    e xp eri e nce

    in

    analyzing

    the data, that seldom i s a b l ock more

    than 1

    m i l e from

    a data point.

    Therefore,

    although

    by

    projecting

    data

    we

    i ntro d uce

    some

    u ncerta i nt y

    into our figures f o r i n f e rr e d resources,

    wefeel,

    from

    the

    degree and scale o f

    variation se e n

    a t

    the surface,

    that

    in projecting

    our data

    relatively

    short distances,

    we have notintroduced

    any

    gross errors.

    ESTIMATES OF TOTAL RECOVERABLE

    IRON

    Ultimately the most important va l u es

    for

    iron re

    sources

    are estimates o f the amount o f m e ta l l ic iron

    that can b e produced from av a i l a b l e

    i r o n - f or m at i o n .

    As wehave indicated previously, we do not

    attempt

    to d ef in e

    amounts o f

    economically

    reco v era b l e iron.

    We have,

    however,

    estimated the maximum amount

    o f iro n that

    might

    be produced from known iron-

    f orm ati o n,

    given

    economic

    c o nd i ti o n s th a t

    a l l o w

    i t s

    profitable mining

    and

    processing.

    These

    f i gu re s i n di

    cate

    the maximum g e o l o g i c availability

    o f i ro n

    under

    existing o r somewhat improved technologic and e co

    nomic conditions

    and

    can

    be

    co nsi d ere d an

    upper

    limit

    for

    iro n r eserves.

    To d efine

    the

    amount o f

    recoverable iron,

    we

    must

    answer

    two b a s i c

    questions.

    First, what percentage

    o f th e

    iron-formation i s

    amenable to processing

    to

    make a concentrate that meets quality

    standards

    fo r

    co nt a i n e d iron and silica? Seco n d , o f

    the

    amount o f

    iro n -f o rm ati o n

    that

    meets

    minimum

    quality stand

    ards, what

    percentage o f

    th e

    iron can be recovered

    ?

    To answer these questions requires data on the

    metallurgical response o f iro n -f o rm ati o n to vari o us

    concentrating processes. Comprehensive tests fo r

    th e

    Negaunee

    a s a whole

    have

    never been made;

    rather,

    a few areas, which for a variety o f reasons

    have received concentrated study,

    have

    been rather

    thoroughly tested, and we are l arg e l y without

    data

    fo r

    the

    remainder o f

    th e

    district. Precise

    estimates

    based

    directly on

    e mp irica l measurements

    cannot

    be

    made, but

    the

    av a i l a b l e metallurgical data can be

    us e d

    to predict

    the maximum amount o f i ro n recov

    e r a b l e from untested m at eri a l . To do this, a Monte

    Carlo sim u l ati o n model was d e s i g n e d, based on

    the

    assumption

    that

    th e

    m at eri a l

    fo r

    which

    test

    results

    are

    known

    i s

    th e

    same

    a s

    m at eri a l

    to

    which

    the

    data

    a re

    being projected.

    The

    results provided

    by

    the

    model a re no more o r less valid than that assump

    tion. P oss i b l e e rrors o f o v e r e st i m a ti o n i n t ro d u c e d by

    this assumption a re discussed in more detail

    b e l o w .

    The e mp irica l base fo r th e

    model

    was d e r i v e d from

    metallurgical tests by

    the

    U.S. Bureau o f Mines

    (Heising and Frommer, 1 9 6 7 ) and

    from

    data pro

    v i d e d by

    mining

    companies. I n

    a l l ,

    more than 3 6 , 0 0 0

    feet

    ( 1 0 , 9 7 3 m) o f

    drill core

    i s i n c l u d e d

    in

    th e tests;

    an i n d iv i d u a l test i s g e n e r a l l y

    on 5-20

    f ee t ( 1 .5 -6 .1

    m) o f core.

    Metallurgical data a re

    av a i l a b l e

    fo r

    4 1

    sample

    blocks.

    They

    a re

    d i v i d e d

    into

    three

    types

    o f

    tests

    and a re

    shown in

    figure

    8 and

    table

    2 . Ten sample

    Table 2 —

    etallurgical

    d a ta u se d

    i n

    simulation m o d e

    [ E a c h l i n e

    r e p r e s e n t s a v e r a g e

    r e s u l t s

    f o r o n e

    d a t a b l o c k I

    I r o n -

    C on ce n t r a t e C on ce n t r at e R e c o v e r a b l e

    f o r m a t i o n

    Fe

    S i O = F e i n b l o c k L e n g t h o f

    ( i n w t . ( i n w t . ( i n w t .

    ( m i l l i o n

    d r i l l c o r e

    p e r c e n t )

    p e r c e n t ) p e r c e n t )

    l o n g t o n s )

    t e s t e d ( f e e t )

    Magnetic s e p a r a t i o n

    6 0 . 8

    1 2 8

    3 8 . 2

    2 9 6 . 9

    3 , 3 2 0

    6 7 . 2

    5 . 9

    2 5 . 2 1 7 9 . 9 1 5 3

    6 3 . 4

    1 0 . 7

    2 4 . 7 2 4 9 . 3

    4 , 8 4 2

    6 3 . 6

    9 . 4

    2 1 . 0

    1 4 2 . 9 1 , 2 4 1

    6 6 . 0

    9 . 8 2 8 . 6

    3 3 2 . 9 1 , 6 2 1

    6 4 . 7

    8 . 8

    2 5 . 8

    3 0 9 . 3 1 , 7 0 6

    6 7 . 2

    1 7 . 6

    3 4 . 2

    6 9 . 2 6 9 7

    5 5 . 6

    1 9 . 1 3 1 . 1 8 4 . 7

    2 , 3 8 8

    6 4 . 1

    9 . 1

    1 7 . 3 2 4 . 9

    2 3 4

    6 3 . 6

    9 . 3

    2 5 . 7

    5 2 . 3

    9 1 1

    6 0 . 6

    a . s

    2 7 . 0

    5 2 . 4

    6

    6 5 . 7 6 . 4 2 7 . 2

    3 9 . 2

    5

    6 2 . 7

    8 . 0

    4 9 . 5

    1 3 . 3 1 5

    6 6 . 6 7 . 2

    1 9 . 0 2 8 . 8

    1 0

    6 7 . 1

    7 . 2

    4 3 . 8

    8 . 9

    1 0

    6 5 . 7 2 0 . 3

    2 9 . 4

    4 7 . 0

    5

    5 8 . 0

    1 5 . 7

    5 0 . 2

    3 9 . 2

    6 0

    5 5 . 9 2 2 . 4

    4 4 . 2 2 7 . 4

    4 6 7

    5 7 . 6

    1 6 . 3

    4 8 . 2 9 . 6

    1 8 7

    S e l e ct i v e f l o c cu l at i o n

    6 0 . 2

    1 8 . 4 3 6 0

    1 2 7 . 4

    7 1 5

    6 6 . 3

    4 . 0

    2 0 . 6 3 4 5 . 8

    T r e n c h

    s a m p l e s

    6 4 . 1 5 . 8

    2 9 . 6 1 4 5 . 8 D o .

    6 6 . 4

    5 . 3

    2 8 . 7

    1 5 3 . 8

    D o .

    6 6 . 7 4 . 4

    2 5 . 5

    2 0 5 . 9

    D o .

    5 1 . 1 1 9 . 0

    I S .

    7

    1 4 2 . 2

    D o .

    6 1 . 6

    1 1 . 8

    3 3 . 9 2 0 4 . 5

    3 , 9 7 4

    5 7 . 5

    1 6 . 0

    3 0 . 1 1 8 2 . 8

    6 5 4

    6 0 . 5

    1 3 . 1

    3 3 . 7

    2 8 7 . 3 3 , 9 2 9

    6 2 . 3

    1 0 . 6 3 4 . 8 7 6 9

    7 , 9 4 8

    Froth

    f l o t a t i o n

    6 4 . 9 4 . 0

    2 4 . 7 1 2 . 4

    1 7 2

    6 3 .

    8 . 1

    2 7 . 8 2 0 . 6

    1 0

    6 4 . 1

    4 . 3

    3 8 . 7

    1 9 . 3

    5

    5 9 . 5

    6 . 8 3 0 . 2

    1 5 . 5

    5

    6 7 . 9

    8 . 1

    3 9 . 3

    2 8 . 8 1 0

    6 7 . 0

    2 . 1

    3 5 . 5

    3 3 . 1 3 0

    6 6 . S 4 . 0

    3 6 . 4 2 7 . 4

    6

    6 5 . S

    5 . 8

    4 1 . 7

    8 . 4

    1 0

    5 8 . 8 1 3 . 4 3 7 . 0

    3 9 . 2

    2 0 7

    5 2 . 2

    9 . 8

    2 3 . 9

    2 7 . 4

    T

    6 5 . 5

    8 . 2 1 9 . 8

    1 3 5 . 7

    2 94

    6 1 . 7

    8 . 8 2 5 . 2

    7 9 . 0

    3 3 5

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    19/31

    1 4

    ESTIMATES OF NEGAUNEE IRON-FORMATION, MICHIGAN

    L U

    t c

    <

    — I

    1 1

    C O

    O

    t r d

    u j 5

    c o

    D

    5

    4

    -

    3 -

    2

    1 -

    0

    r r T T I

    5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5 7 0

    PERCENT

    CONCENTRATE

    F e

    DAVIS MAGNETIC TUBE TESTS

    [Average r e s ul t s f o r each %- s q u a r e - m i l e b l o c k ]

    u

    1

    2

    1

    0

    n _i _

    n

    4 - i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

    1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1

    m

    0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0

    PERCENT CONCENTRATE

    S i 0 2

    2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5

    PERCENT RECOVERABLE

    F e

    T 1

    5 5

    C C

    <

    _ l

    u _ C D

    O m

    c c =

    u j

    5

    C O

    5

    z >

    z

    5 -

    4

    3

    2 -

    1 —

    0

    L

      I I I Mill 1 i 1 '

    5 0

    5 5

    6 0 6 5 7 0

    PERCENT

    CONCENTRATE

    F e

    SELECTIVE

    FLOCCULATION TESTS

    (Average

    r e su lt s f o r

    each %-square-mile b l o c k ]

    u

    3

    2

    i i i

    0

    5

    1 0 1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    PERCENT CONCENTRATE

    S i 0 2

    | i t M |   1 i i i i i | i i i |

    2 5

    3 0

    3 5

    4 0 4 5

    5 0

    PERCENT

    RECOVERABLE

    F e

    U J

    D C

    <

    eg

    - J

    L L 0 3

    c o

    D

    6

    4

    3 -

    2 -

    1

    0

    1

    I 1 1 | 1 1 i i |

    i i

    i

    5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5 7 0

    PERCENT

    CONCENTRATE

    F e

    FROTH FLOTATION TESTS

    [Average r e s ul t s f o r each V i - s q u a r e - m i l e b l o c k ]

    5

    4

    3

    -

    2 -

    1

    0

    - rnrn

    [ i I I | I I | i i i n ]

    0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5

    PERCENT

    CONCENTRATE

    S i 0 2

    5

    4 -

    3 -

    2 -

    1

    0

    1 M   1 1

    I I

    i i 1 i i 1

    1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0

    PERCENT

    RECOVERABLE

    F e

    5 0

    U J

    c c

    <

    _ i

    u _ C D

    o

    m

    a : =

    u j 5

    m

    Z

    6

    5

    4 -

    3 -

    p.

      I   1  

    COMBINED

    FROTH FLOTATION,

    DAVIS

    TUBE,

    AND

    SELECTIVE

    FLOCCULATION TESTS

    [Average r e s ul t s f o r each V 4 - s q u a r e - m i l e b l o c k ]

    n

    5 0

    5 5 6 0

    6 5

    7 0

    PERCENT CONCENTRATE

    F e

    1

    I I I

    1 i 1

    0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    PERCENT

    CONCENTRATE

    S i 0 2

    2 5

    3 0 3 5

    4 0 4 5

    PERCENT RECOVERABLE

    F e

    5 0

    5 5

    Figure

    8—

    istograms

    showing r e s u l t s of

    three types

    of metallurgical t e s t s . Se e t a b l e 2

    for tabulated r e s u l t s .  Perce

    concentrate

    Fe i s

    percentage

    b y

    weight

    of

    F e i n

    f i n a l concentrate;  percent

    concentrate

    Si O

     

    i s

    percentage

    b y w e ig

    of Si02 i n f i n a l concentrate;  percent recoverable Fe i s

    percentage

    of crude ore

    recovered

    as

    F e

    i n

    f i n a l concentra

    (weight Fe i n concentrate/weight crude o r e ) .

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    20/31

    IRON

    RESOURCES 1 5

    blocks represent f i n e - g ra i n e d hematitic iron-forma

    tion, 1 9 b lo cks represent magnetic i r o n - f or m at i o n ,

    and 1 2 blocks re pre se n t co a rse - gra i n ed he m a ti ti c

    iro n -f o rm ati o n .

    Each v a l u e on

    th e

    histograms and

    in th e table represents an average for one o f our

    blocks.

    Each

    average i s d eriv e d from one to more

    than 100

    i n d i v i d u a l tests.

    The model i s designed to test

    o n l y

    paramarginal

    resources, because metallurgical d ata a re av a i l a b l e

    o n l y fo r m at eri a l in

    which

    o x i d e s and hydroxides

    a re the most abundant iron minerals and that

    can

    b e concentrated by means o f current technology.

    Thus, large

    qu an ti ti es o f i ro n c o n t a i n e d

    in

    silicate

    and carbonate minerals

    are a ut o m atica l l y excluded

    because

    no technology exists

    to concentrate iron

    con

    tai n e d

    in th ese m i n era l s. Also,

    iron

    co nt a i n e d

    in

    iron-formation

    a t

    gre at er

    than 1,0 0 0-foot ( 3 0 4 . 8 - m )

    depths

    i s excluded

    because we have l i m it e d our esti

    mates to m at eri a l within 1,0 0 0

    feet ( 3 0 4 . 8 m) of

    the

    surface.

    Paramarginal resources were

    d i v i d e d

    into

    three

    categories

    according

    to

    mineralogy and

    gra i n

    size

    fo r

    testing a g a in st the

    most

    appropriate

    metallurgical data. Fine-grained hematitic and g o e -

    thitic iro n -f o rm ati o n was

    tested a g a i n st

    d at a

    fo r

    selective

    flocculation

    tests. Coarse-grained

    hematitic

    iro n -f o rm ati o n

    was

    tested a g a i n s t

    froth-flotation

    d ata,

    and magnetitic

    iro n -f o rm ati o n

    was tested

    a g a i nst

    Davis magnetic tube d ata.

    The distribution

    o f these

    th re e ty pe s o f iron-formation in the Mar

    quette

    district

    i s shown in figure 9 .

    When

    the si m u l a ti o n experiment

    was

    performed,

    the

    quality

    criteria used

    fo r

    an

    acceptable concen

    trate were iron in excess o f 60 percent and silica less

    than

    1 0

    percent.

    These

    v a l u e s

    a re

    a

    few

    percentage

    points short o f currently a c ce p ta b l e s ta n d a r d s, but

    were

    chosen for

    two

    reasons. First,

    metallurgical

    tests are likely to y ie ld re su lts a few percentage

    points

    poorer than

    results that

    can

    be achieved

    through a

    concentrating process

    appropriately ad

    justed and

      fine-tuned to

    a

    particular

    o re b o dy .

    Seco n d ,

    i f

    a cutoff

    closer to present

    standards

    were

    used

    o r instance,

    65 percent iron

    and 6-8

    percent

    silica

    —he

    calculated

    va l u es

    would exclude much

    m at eri a l that we feel should be i ncl ud ed a s a para

    marginal

    resource. The data

    in

    tab le

    2 ,

    for

    example,

    indicate that o n l y about one quarter o f

    the

    m at eri a l

    tested meets current

    standards. Yet

    m a te ri a l tha t

    fails to

    meet those

    standards

    by o n l y 5 p erce nt o r

    less

    requires o n l y a slight improvement in

    process

    ing. Even

    though

    those improvements

    may

    be tech

    nically difficult to make, we b e l i ev e tha t a high po

    tential

    for

    such improvements exists

    and

    that

    m at eri a l

    meeting

    our cutoff

    criteria

    i s clearly

    a

    paramarginal resource.

    We used

    the

    Monte Carlo sim u l at i o n, a

    computer

    ized statistical

    sampling

    procedure, to

    test each

    b l o ck

    r ep e at e d l y a g a i nst known l a b o r atory

    tests. I n

    our

    m o d e l ,

    the sampling

    began

    by

    selecting

    an

    i n d iv i d u a l

    b l ock

    from the

    array

    o f b lo cks containing paramar

    g i n a l resources.

    A

    v a l u e

    f o r c o n ce n tr a te - i ro n

    per

    centage was chosen a t random from an

    empirical

    cumulative distribution curve

    d eriv e d from

    the

    con

    centrate-iron

    data in table

    2 . The

    random

    selections

    were performed in a manner whereby the results o f

    a large number

    of selections,

    i f plotted a s a

    cumula

    tive frequency

    diagram,

    would approximate th e

    shape

    o f the

    empirical

    cumulative distribution. If

    the

    concentrate-iron percentage

    va l u e

    chosen fo r th e

    f i r s t

    b l ock

    was

    less

    than 6 0 percent ( n ot

    acceptable

    quality), 0.0 tons

    o f

    reco v era b l e

    iron was

    assig n e d

    to that block.

    The

    sampling procedure continued by

    again se l ecti n g a t random a v a l u e

    fo r

    concentrate

    iro n fo r

    a

    second

    b lo ck. I f

    the

    selected

    v a l u e

    this

    time

    was

    greater

    than

    60

    p erce nt

    concentrate iron

    (acceptable

    quality), the

    percentage

    o f

    concentrate

    silica was

    tested.

    Figure

    1 0

    shows that

    concentrate

    iron and concentrate silica a re n ot independent vari

    a b l es

    ;

    rather,

    a s e x pe cte d , a strong n e g ativ e correla

    ti o n e x ists

    between

    the

    two

    because

    iron and

    silica

    a re the o nl y important co n sti tu e n ts o f

    th e rock.

    Thus, concentrate-silica

    percentage cannot

    be

    sam

    pled

    from the

    empirical distribution

    a s

    an

    independ

    e n t

    variab le. It

    was

    d eriv e d instead

    from th e

    regres

    sion relationship: SiO, =A0+A (co ne. Fe)±

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    21/31

    ESTIMATES OF NEGAUNEE IRON-FORMATION, MICHIGAN

    R 3 1 W 8 8 ° 1 0

    R

    3 0

    W

    WOO'

    R 2 9 W

    4 6 ° 3 5

    T .

    4 8

    N .

    T 4 7 N

    T . 4 6

    N

    4 6 ° 2 0

    T .

    4 5

    N

      v

    -

    r

    2 3

    M

    ~ 1

    I

    3 4

    K I L O M

    B a s e m o d i f i e d

    f r o m

    t h e C l e v e l a n d -

    C l i f f s I r o n C o m p a n y , 1 9 5 0

  • 8/16/2019 Geological Survey Professional Paper

    22/31

    IRON

    RESOURCES

    1 7

    R . 2 8 W

    4 6 ° 3 5

    T . 4 8

    N .

    4 6 ° 3 0

    T 4 7 N .

    DESCRIPTION

    OF MAP UNITS

    DIABASE AND METAMORPHOSED DIABASE

    MARQUETTE RANGE SUPERGROUP—I n

    c l u d i n g

    Negaunee

    I r o n - f o r m a t i o n ( X n )

    CRYSTALLINE

    ROCKS

    (PRECAMBRIAN

    W)

    M o s t l y

    g r a n i t i c

    g n e i s s

    Contact—Approximately l o c a t e d ; dashed under

    w a t e r

    Fault—

    Approximately l o c a t e d ;

    dashed

    under

    w a t e r

    MINERALOGICAL CLASSES OF

    NEGAUNEE

    IRON-FORMATION ( X n )

    Magnetic i r o n - f o r m a t i o n—o m m o n l y i n c l u d e s

    i r o n - c a r b o n a t e

    a nd

    i r o n - s i l i c a t e

    m i